WEBVTT - How the Hedge Fund Magnetar Is Financing the AI Boom

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Joe, AI is so hot right now, in the immortal

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 2>words of Mugatu, AI is so hot.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it is really hot. You know, you hear something.

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 3>There's a little bit of slowing down in some of

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 3>the progress on the models, but the recent in video

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.880
<v Speaker 3>results speak for themselves. There is nothing that I've seen

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 3>yet that would suggest that this macro trend, at least

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>as an investment trend, and I'm not talking about stocks

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 3>per se, is anywhere close to quote slowing down.

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And the interesting thing is we seem to be

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>more and more players, some new types of players that

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 2>are getting into the space. So, you know, we have

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>AI funds kind of launching left and right. And one

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 2>of the newest players is a hedge fund called Magnetar

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and I know them like primarily for credit stuff. I

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.759
<v Speaker 2>think they were big in redcap trades for a while. Yeah,

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and now they're launching an AI fund, a VC fund,

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:24.839
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of unusual for this type of hedge

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 2>fund to.

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 3>Do totally, I mean I've heard of magnetar for a

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>long time, obviously, going back to the early twenty tens

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 3>at least, And look, I'm not surprised that various investors

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>are looking for what is their distinct way into this space?

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 3>And of course, look, we've done interviews with vcs of

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:48.280
<v Speaker 3>various nature and positions in the past, and so I

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 3>guess you know, there's sort of two questions to my

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>mind anytime we're gonna be talking to someone investing in

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 3>early stage or any stage of AI, which is obviously

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 3>what is the thesis is what's going to win out

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>where we'll value a crew. But then from an investor perspective,

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 3>given so many entrants into this space, specifically whether on

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the public equity side, whether on the private side, whether

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>on the VC side or early stage, late stage, what

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 3>do they, as a fund or an investor bring to

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 3>the table or will be able to see that the

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 3>other billions of dollars competing for AI profits do not see.

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 2>I have a slightly different question, which is for these

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 2>types of investors, like how much is it about how

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>good the technology is that they're investing in versus how

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 2>much is it about getting in the right position in

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 2>the capital stack.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 3>So that's a great question.

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to be really interesting to talk

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 2>to someone who's coming from this perspective. And without further ado,

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 2>we have the perfect guest we're going to be speaking with,

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Jim Prosco. He is a partner and senior portfolio manager

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 2>on Magnetar's Alternative credit and fixed income team. Jim, Welcome

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:57.959
<v Speaker 2>to the show.

0:02:58.400 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, great to be here.

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So how does someone on a hedge funds fixed income

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 2>team get into AI.

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have a long history of investments in private companies,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 4>really dating back to an increased focus after the Financial

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Crisis when spreads and yields got tighter and the private

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 4>markets seem more interesting. And we've often partnered with platforms

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 4>where we thought we could grow the platform and generate

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 4>an interesting asset, either a pool of cash flowing assets,

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 4>or help grow the company and participate in that growth

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 4>and support them through financing and other things like we

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 4>can support them through helping them with hiring or accounting

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>or other systems they need, and just to help them

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 4>grow generally. And so you know, I've been doing that

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 4>a long time and we've been a number of areas

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 4>like auto lending in Ireland, and then we've moved into

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 4>various fintech companies. We were one of the first institutional

0:03:55.520 --> 0:04:00.040
<v Speaker 4>investors in open Door before they went public. We're supporting

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 4>and investing in a very interesting fintech that is financing

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 4>restaurants right now, and so we felt we had experience

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>in that space, and then that sort of overlapped with

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 4>our relationship and our investment in core Weave, where we

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.080
<v Speaker 4>were the first institutional investor in core Weave in twenty

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty one. So we're very early in the trend of

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 4>putting capital into the AI infrastructure space and that's just

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 4>sort of grown as this whole market has grown to

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 4>encompass literally everything. Now, you know, we continue to look

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 4>for smart ways to invest, and you know, one of

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 4>those ways we felt was what can we provide that's

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 4>a value And one of the things we can provide

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 4>besides the general help we can give a growth stage

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 4>company is compute because that is the scarce resource right now,

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 4>and that's where all the capital is going to the

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 4>various parts of the value chain to deliver compute, and

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 4>so there's a competition to get compute, and if you're

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 4>a smaller company with limited capital or limited access to capital,

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 4>it can be difficult to get that, and so that

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 4>was sort of the value proposition we thought we could

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 4>bring to bear.

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I have this vision in my head of vcs,

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 2>like going into startups bearing baskets full of chips.

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Ah yeah, instead of just saying.

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 2>That, like our pitch is the relationship and the coaching as.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 3>We have access to the chips or the energy plus chips.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 3>Just for point of clarification, listeners should know we've talked

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 3>to Core. We've at least twice on the show, and

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 3>it feels like in the AI space specifically, this is

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 3>one of those names that's a very big deal, but

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 3>not many people don't know it the way they know

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 3>sayan in Nvidia at the very back end or Chatgypt

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 3>at the very front end, but they build a lot

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 3>of the data centers that are filled with Nvidia chips.

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 3>I want to get more into the business model there

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 3>because I have a lot of questions in the business

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>of selling compute, etc. But talk a little bit more

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 3>about you said your experience in the private side is

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 3>like this expertise with platforms per se. And when I

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>think of platforms, I think of companies that can acquire

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 3>lots of other companies or a lot can be built

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 3>onto them. Talk to us about how the platform specific

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 3>expertise informs you're thinking with a core weave or any

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 3>other AI investment that you're making now.

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 4>So we've tried to put capital into companies that are

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 4>trying to build their business in a particular space, and

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 4>oftentimes that could be a space where they generate a

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 4>cash flowing asset, like in the auto loan example, in

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 4>the open door example, they were acquiring real estate, which

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 4>was a hard asset. In that restaurant fintech example, they're

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 4>acquiring restaurant credit. And so we've tried to support businesses

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 4>that had some kind of asset or flow and work

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 4>with them on a number of ways that we can

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 4>add value. I think first and foremost is all these

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 4>growth stage companies need financing, and I think we have

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 4>great expertise from debt to equity, private to public, and

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 4>we can be innovative in trying to bring you the best,

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>most appropriate, lowest cost capital to these growth stage companies.

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 4>And like I said, as well as.

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 3>So just to be clear, just to understand in this context,

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:30.239
<v Speaker 3>what makes AI distinct, say from other waves of tech

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 3>or what makes it distinct for say a magnetar is

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.560
<v Speaker 3>in part this distinct capital demand that was not perhaps

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 3>as big of a deal during the SaaS wave of

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the twenty tens.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so not not only a general capital demand, but

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 4>in many cases, for many of these companies, a very

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 4>specific demand to have capital to deploy with compute, and

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 4>because they need this very specific scarce resource, helping to

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 4>deliver that resource, and in particular helping to deliver that

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 4>resource in a high quality way. Where you have a

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 4>partner like core Weave that has I think there's a

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 4>lot of evidence that they have the highest performing AI

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 4>training cluster, and so that is really valuable to these

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 4>companies that might otherwise struggle to get enough compute to

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 4>further their business model.

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of Core We've I'm really curious how that conversation

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 2>actually started because this was a new and novel thing.

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't think we had chip based loans before to

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.319
<v Speaker 2>my knowledge, and I keep hearing that asset based financing

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 2>is going to be like this next big thing in

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 2>private credit or it's the last real frontier in private credit.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 2>How did you come up with this idea this deal?

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, acid based financing is really a classic private credit

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 4>tool and there's a number of examples. Just if you

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 4>think about my example with the Irish auto lender. If

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 4>you buy a loan for a car, so the Irish

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 4>auto lenders generating car loans and those go and you

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:10.119
<v Speaker 4>buy them in a vehicle, you have primarily the security

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 4>of the people paying on those loans, and so you

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 4>get paid back by the cash flow of the borrowers

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.760
<v Speaker 4>paying their car loans back, but there's credit risk to

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 4>that they could potentially stop paying, and in the case

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:26.239
<v Speaker 4>where they stop paying, then you have the cars collateral.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 4>And really that metaphor applies almost directly to GPUs, where

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 4>if you're a company delivering high performance compute like Core

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 4>we've has, you're contractually selling that compute to some counterparty

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 4>that's going to use it in their case. You know,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 4>that's often a very large, very credit worthy hyperscaler, but

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 4>not always. There could be smaller startups that have riskier

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:58.079
<v Speaker 4>business models, and in that case, primarily by funding the GPU,

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>you're getting paid back with those controls actual cash flows

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.439
<v Speaker 4>on the use of the GPU. But in the case

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 4>that company fails, then as backup you have the GPU itself. Now,

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 4>the GPU isn't really like the car where you'll probably

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 4>go out and sell it, but you get the time

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 4>back on the GPU, which you can then resell to

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 4>somebody else, and being a scarce asset, you can think

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 4>about what value that would have in a future time.

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 3>One difference that I could imagine with the GPU versus

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 3>other forms of assets, say whether it's a car or

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 3>say whether it's a house, is a certain here in

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.319
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, still unpredictability about many things in the future.

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 3>Will in video always be the gold standard so to speak?

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 3>In AI chips maybe it looks like it, yes, but

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't seem guaranteed. How fast will the current generation

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 3>of chips that are deployed degrade in value? I imagine

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 3>there are fairly predictable sort of depreciation curves for cars

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 3>that perhaps are more uncertain for chips. And then also

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>the uncertainty of actual deployment given permitting and challenges with

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 3>energy and the other operational things that have to do

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 3>with a new company building a data center. Talk to

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 3>us about modeling or at least thinking through some of

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.079
<v Speaker 3>the uncertainties with chips specifically, Well, depending.

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 4>What stage you get involved, you have the breadth of

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 4>all those different risks potentially. So if you're investing in

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 4>high performance compute but it's a greenfield data center, then

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 4>you have to think about all those things. You have

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.560
<v Speaker 4>to think about the delivering of the power. You have

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 4>to think about the timing on all the components to

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 4>get to the data center. If you're making what we've

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 4>been talking about, which is sort of a GPU based loan,

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 4>then usually that loan is based upon a running GPU

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 4>and an existing high performance compute data center, so you

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 4>don't really have to think about some of the earlier

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 4>stage issues. You more have to think about how long

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 4>is my contract, how good is my contract, What do

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.719
<v Speaker 4>I think the value of renting that chip out will

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 4>be at the end of that contract. How much rent

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 4>on that chip could I get if I had to

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 4>re rent that in the middle of the contract. So

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 4>it's more near term things on actually having a functioning

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 4>GPU in the data center, But all those other things

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 4>have to be financed too, and there's going to be

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 4>innovative and large amounts of capital dedicated to financing those things.

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Setting aside the financing for a second, how hard has

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 2>it been just to find physical space in data centers, well, it's.

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 4>Been extremely scarce, and a lot of that is driven

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 4>by the search for power. The data centers required for

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 4>the new AI chips are much different than the old

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 4>data center. So it isn't really cost efficient in most

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 4>cases to go and take an old data center and

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 4>try to retrofit it because the amount of power just

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 4>a loan that has to go there is you know,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 4>transcending an order of magnitude more per rack of GPUs now,

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 4>and so that's just you just can't really retrofit that efficiently.

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 4>It's better to build your own building. And so it's

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 4>really come down to things like permitting availability of power

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 4>and time to get all your components, and you know,

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 4>all these things have their own lead time. So it

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.479
<v Speaker 4>had an interesting back and forth to Brian on curing transformers.

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 4>You know, all these little you know, nuances come into

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 4>play when you have to build a data center. And

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 4>so because power is really the limiting factor most of all,

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 4>you're seeing a lot of moves towards where the power is.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 4>And it was recently an article on Bloomberg. I think

0:13:50.640 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>about a company in Texas that owns a bunch of

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 4>land that's now worth forty billion dollars, right, And that's

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 4>because they're near all this renewable power. But that isn't

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 4>the only thing. It's incredibly complex to operate this high

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 4>performance compute. So then you have to think about if

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 4>I try to build my data center out there where

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 4>the power is. Can I get everything out there, including

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 4>operational expertise?

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Can I staff my data center with the kind of

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 4>experts I need to run this kind of highly technical,

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 4>high performance compute. And each generation is just getting more complicated.

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 4>We're going to have liquid cooling on the next generation

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 4>of Nvidia chips, probably immersion cooling right after that. It's

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 4>very complicated, very expensive, and very difficult to scale. Much

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 4>harder to do in a large size than it is

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 4>to do in.

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 5>A small size.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Magnetar can finance a small modular nuclear reactor. No, seriously,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>because if you're financing the compute and securing that on

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 2>behalf of companies that you want to invest in, you

0:14:51.960 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 2>could go one layer down finance the energy.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 4>And we're certainly interested in that, and we have a

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 4>history in investing in energy. We have investment right now

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 4>and a developer of utility scale solar power in the

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 4>US who has least some of that solar power to

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 4>various hyperscalers. So that is certainly a space we're interested in.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 4>I was just in Miami meeting with a company that

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.880
<v Speaker 4>has a novel heat sink battery technology that they want

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 4>to deploy to data centers that they're talking to a

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 4>bunch of data center type companies about launching that product there.

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 4>So there's a ton of interesting things, and just like

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 4>every other part of this ecosystem, it's going to require

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 4>an immense amount of capital.

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess, just since we're sidetracked on the energy component

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 3>for now while we're here novel battery technologies, there's a

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of them out there. There's a lot of startups

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 3>that have something novel and energy, and often one of

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 3>the things that they talk about is this chicken and

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 3>egg problem where they need capital, They need sort of

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 3>financing of some sort or another to build this stuff,

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 3>but the lenders don't really want to give it until

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 3>there's demand, and no one's just going to promise to

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 3>buy it until it's shown that it can work. Can

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>you talk a little bit, I mean again, I know

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 3>there's a little bit off track from GPUs themselves. But

0:16:10.840 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 3>since you were talking about similar yeah, talk about the batteries.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Can you talk a little bit about that dynamic as

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 3>it affects solving the energy side of the equation?

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, for sure.

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:22.760
<v Speaker 4>And it has some overlap with the way you look

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 4>at an AI company too. You know, if you think

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 4>about the core things that we really want to look at,

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 4>it's technology team and traction. So does their technology really work?

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 4>That's first and foremost. You know, what is this product?

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Does it have some kind of advantage? And then traction

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 4>like time to market.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 5>That's super important.

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I was just talking to isokon pool side and like

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 4>to him, like those are the two most important things.

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 4>Speed to product, speed to market, because it's a race,

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 4>and even if you have the greatest technology, if you

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 4>take too long, someone's going to be using something else.

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 4>And that's certainly true in the energy space where energy

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 4>is of critical importance. So I think that for these

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 4>startups on the traction side, they really need some strategic

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 4>partnerships because their cost of capital is very high.

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.919
<v Speaker 3>Strategic partnership is kind of like an existing company that

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 3>has a demand. It also has a lot of cash

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.080
<v Speaker 3>and could theoretically be a buyer of their.

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:29.679
<v Speaker 4>Solution, yes, and really on the other side too, So

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 4>for example, because their cost of capital is so high,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 4>there's certain things that it's hard for him to do.

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 4>And one of the things that it's really hard for

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.199
<v Speaker 4>all these startups to do, and this was true and

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 4>the recycling industry and other industries, is build a plant.

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 4>Like very expensive, time consuming to build a plant. You

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 4>don't really want to raise bc capital to build a plant,

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 4>and so it's important to have a partnership on the

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing side too. And that was really like the first

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 4>thing this battery startup that I just visited talked about

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 4>is like getting that because you've got to be able

0:18:04.000 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 4>to deliver your product and you have to deliver it

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 4>on scale, and ideally you don't want to be wasting

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 4>time building your own plant on that and then like

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 4>you said, on the other end, you want to have

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 4>a partnership with the users of the energy, which is

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 4>all the people that either have data centers or use

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 4>data centers or customers of data centers, and you want

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 4>them to ideally put together an attract a financing relationship

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 4>where you know, in some form or fashion they're front

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 4>loading their payments to use so that you can use

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.120
<v Speaker 4>that capital to actually build a product that they meet.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 2>So Joe and I went to San Francisco a little

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 2>while ago and we saw some cool things. I had

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 2>my first ride in a way Moo, and we saw

0:19:04.000 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 2>some cool battery related technology. We also saw a lot

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>of vcs. Everyone very excited about AI. Obviously, they were

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 2>also talking about the difficulty of chasing deals right now,

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 2>how do you compete with those traditional vcs or are

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 2>you just not competing with them directly because you're taking

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the slightly different GPU backed approach.

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, I think it's both.

0:19:27.840 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 4>I think you're competing with them and to an extent,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 4>partnering with them. And that's the thing we had to

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 4>ask ourselves before launching the fund, is what are we

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 4>bringing to the bear that's value added? And in this case,

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 4>we're bringing to bear the compute. And so often these startups,

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 4>even if they're backed by a strong VC, can have

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a chicken and egg problem, which is

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 4>they need compute to develop their product, and they need

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 4>capital to buy that compute. But if they don't have

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 4>the compute lined up and the price locked in, then

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 4>the capital might be hesitant to go in because they'd

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 4>be like, we could put our capital into you, and

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:07.159
<v Speaker 4>then it could take you an extra six months to

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 4>get your compute, and by that time some competitors passed

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 4>you by or the technology has changed. And on the

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 4>other hand, because they're a startup, they don't really have

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 4>the credit worthiness to just contract the compute. They most

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 4>likely have to pay up front, and so we bridge

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 4>that gap. And so if we go into a fundraising

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 4>round where there's a bunch of vcs putting cash in,

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 4>if they know that we're putting compute in alongside them

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 4>and that the second the round closes that compute will

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 4>be available to the company, that makes it easier to

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 4>raise the cash part of it. So we are competing

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 4>and we need that value added to be part of

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 4>the equation. But also I think it helps them to

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 4>raise from traditional vcs because we take that one risk

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:52.520
<v Speaker 4>off the table.

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 3>How big is the market of companies that need compute,

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 3>because there are plenty of AI companies that just build

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>on top of an existing model like GPT or anthropics model,

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. How many companies are actually out there and

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 3>who like not who are they specifically, but what are

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 3>the types of companies for whom actual access to compute

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 3>is an important part of their business.

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, well, you know it starts, of course with the

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 4>LM companies. You're using massive, huge, huge amounts of compute.

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 5>But then if you look.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 4>At the rest of sort of the AI stack, there's

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 4>a couple areas where you're going to need compute, and

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 4>one is all the small model custom model companies, and

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 4>small commute a lot of different things. So you can

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 4>have some very small companies that are using a very

0:21:49.040 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 4>targeted model, like say in a vertical stack, you might

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 4>have a robotics company that is specifically training a model

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 4>to run a robot in a particular situation, and that

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 4>could be anything from a warehouse to doing surgery, right,

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 4>and they need compute to train that model or another

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 4>one which is huge and dominated by an existing big

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 4>players autonomous driving, but there are other autonomous driving companies

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 4>that are trying to be deployed at other automakers that

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 4>need compute to train those models.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 5>Or weather models.

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 4>There's some really good companies that we've talked to doing

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.879
<v Speaker 4>weather models. They need compute to train their model, and

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 4>so that whole model layer, and then even on the

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 4>app layer, they might be custom elements of small models

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.480
<v Speaker 4>that they have that sit on top of the big

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 4>lms that they need some amount of compute for.

0:22:45.560 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 5>So there's quite a range.

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 4>You know, it's not everyone, you know, it's more in

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 4>that model application layer, and you know, less in the

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure layer that need compute.

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 2>So this is one thing I always wonder about AI investment,

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:00.400
<v Speaker 2>which is you have a lot of companies that are

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 2>building on top of existing models, as Joe mentioned, And

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>to some extent that makes sense because they can save

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 2>a lot of money by doing it, and realistically, are

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 2>you going to compete with Google or Microsoft? Probably not.

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 2>But on the other hand, I always wonder if you're

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 2>building on top of an existing model, how do you

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 2>ring fence that business? Because my assumption is if AI

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 2>gets better, maybe at some point the AI can replicate

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 2>any AI model basically.

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 4>So this is the first thing we always worry about

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 4>is does some giant company already have this product in

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 4>a closet with like twenty PhDs working on this and

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 4>somebody I was just at this conference and somebody coined

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 4>the phrase incumbent maximalist, And that's the man. You think

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 4>the incumbents are going to do everything and no one

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 4>else will ever succeed. And I think there's a few

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:58.479
<v Speaker 4>use cases. There's things where it's a very specific task

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 4>that is hard to do well with a giant general

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 4>model and probably isn't worth doing well. Like if you're

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 4>focused on growing tens to hundreds of billions of dollars

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 4>of revenue, you can't be distracted by trying to do

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 4>every little thing. And we've seen this in previous tech

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 4>revolutions as well, and so it can be something that's

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 4>very focused on a space. We've seen legal accounting, sales.

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 4>There's some great companies that have virtual employees that they're

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 4>doing things that are very task specific. There's some companies

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 4>doing text of language and language to text and other

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 4>things for very specific applications. So you know that's one way.

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 4>The other way is data. The greatest ring fence is

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 4>to any AI company or business is data. Because you've

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 4>seen as the performance of some of the lms has

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 4>supposedly flattened out, a lot of that is because they've

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 4>just used all the data, like they've trained on the

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 4>whole Internet, there's nothing left and so now you have

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 4>to have other ways to train or novel sources of data.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 4>So proprietary data is super valuable. And then there just

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 4>could be areas where they're conflicted. They don't want to

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 4>compete with their customers right now, although you know, competing

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 4>with your customers is a great tradition in the tech space,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.919
<v Speaker 4>but there could be situations where it's not worth it

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 4>to them yet to compete with their customers. And so

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 4>I think there's those different use cases where you know

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 4>you're going to see a small number of companies succeed.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I have a very stupid question, and actually I shouldn't

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.440
<v Speaker 3>even be asking you. I should have asked it the

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 3>last time we talked to core Weave, but since you're here,

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna take them all again, or on the question

0:25:42.440 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 3>I didn't ask them. I know that Nvidia is an

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 3>investor in core Weave, but even setting aside that specific relationship,

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 3>the actual purchasing of chips, how does the pricing work

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 3>and how much is it a de facto auction? Where

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.000
<v Speaker 3>As demand for chips boomed, in Vidia can expand its

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 3>margin versus in Vidia aims for a stable margin over time,

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 3>And I imagine this enters into your calculation to somewhat

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 3>thinking about a core Weaves future capital requirements. How does

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 3>that market for chips work?

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, I can't comment on the internal workings of Nvidia

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 4>setting their prices.

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 3>But is an investor in a buyer whatever you I'm

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a buyer of chips, how do I want to buy

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 3>some chips?

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>And now imagine it's like the container industry where you

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 2>have to have a specific relationship and there's a shipping

0:26:35.000 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 2>manager called Lars somewhere in northern Europe who holds the

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 2>keys to the chips.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, for any company using a resource, and it's certainly

0:26:43.840 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 4>true of companies using compute right, it's always a cost

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 4>benefit example. So there's great benefits to running your AI

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 4>training on an Nvidia ecosystem on a network like Core

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 4>weaves that's very fast and very reliable because you know,

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 4>when you train a model, you stop every fifteen or

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 4>thirty minutes to save your work, and if there's a

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 4>failure in there, you have to go back to the

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 4>last time you save your work and there's a huge

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 4>loss on that. So there's benefits to using the best technology,

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 4>but those are quantifiable, and if you're a particular kind

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 4>of technology becomes too expensive, you'll see people diversify out right.

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there was just news the last two days

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:35.880
<v Speaker 4>about Anthropic and AWS and aws's new chips, So there's

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 4>always some form of competition. I mean, in Vida is

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 4>sitting in a unique place where they've really had a

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 4>de facto monopoly on this, and I think their pricing

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 4>is being set in a way to grow the market,

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 4>right Like, they want to grow the market. I can't

0:27:51.320 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 4>speak for them, but you wouldn't want to set the

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 4>price of your product so high that you stifle the

0:27:57.440 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 4>market's growth, right Like, growth is more than making an

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 4>extra dollar on every widget, And so I think that's

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 4>got to be a calculation, and certainly to date it's

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:10.919
<v Speaker 4>been fruitful in that this market has taken off like

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 4>almost no market ever.

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to the capital question, and

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>most venture capital comes in the form of equity. You're

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 2>doing something slightly different in my understanding. You're primarily going

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 2>down the debt and sort of fixed income route. That

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 2>seems so different because in my mind, when I think

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 2>about bond investing, and we've said this a number of

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 2>times on the show, it's all about avoiding losers, right Like,

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 2>there's limited upside, but you don't want a bankruptcy that

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>wipes out your investment, whereas equity the upside is basically uncapped.

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 2>So it's about finding that one stellar out performer or

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 2>that one lottery ticket. How do you square I guess

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the risk averseness of some of this debt financing with

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 2>getting the huge upside that is potentially there from AI.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, the amount of financing required for this whole AI buildout,

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 4>which is on some immense scale of you know, people

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 4>have talked about the Manhattan Project, the building of the Interstates.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 4>It's going to require capital in many forms for many things,

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 4>and I think there's a lot of thinking going on,

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 4>and you know, certainly we're part of that in deploying

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 4>the most efficient capital to the different layers of this buildout.

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 4>And so we've talked about a couple different things here.

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 4>We've talked about financing GPUs. So if you're financing GPUs

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 4>with debt, then you can really think through your downside protection,

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 4>just like in the audio metaphor.

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, you have the collateral.

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 4>You have the collateral, you have the contract. You can

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 4>analyze the credit worthiness of the contract. You can look

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 4>at how the leasing curves of prior chip generations have decayed.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 4>You have some real information there, you have a real asset,

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 4>you have real contracted cash flows. Now in the VC fund,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 4>that's a lot different. In this case, this is true

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 4>venture equity, and it's just that it's being deployed in

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 4>a unique way where instead of cash, the compute has

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 4>been contractually secured and it's just being exchanged for the

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 4>equity directly, as I talked about before, saving that step

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 4>and de risking the process of acquiring compute for these

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 4>grow stage companies.

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 2>So you are doing equity through the VC fund.

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 5>The VC fund is equity.

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 4>Yes, it would be part of typically but not always

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 4>a part of a round that a growth stage company

0:30:59.040 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 4>might be doing.

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Doing convertibles.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 4>So we can do virtually anything across the debt equity

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 4>private public spectrum, and have in many cases in the

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 4>AI fund itself. Most of the companies being gross stage

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 4>are not really in a position to do debt, so

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 4>I think for the most part, I would expect that

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 4>those would all be venture equity investments.

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I gotta chuckle when you're like, oh, we've been in

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:29.880
<v Speaker 3>this space, it's way back, and then you said twenty

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, But it does really sort of.

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 5>Speak to hell.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 2>It feels like a long time.

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well, you know, I mean ched GBT, I think

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 3>came out at the very end of twenty twenty two

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 3>or maybe early twenty twenty three, and that was the

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 3>big light bulb moment for a lot of people. So

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 3>even being that active in a lot of this stuff

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 3>a year earlier truly is early. That being said, things

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.720
<v Speaker 3>like core weave, things like data centers. The need for

0:31:52.800 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 3>compute is very well understood right now in a way

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that perhaps in three years ago many people in the

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 3>credit and financing space weren't thinking of is that a

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 3>margin compressor for you? The fact that other entities, probably

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 3>many with much more capital than Magnetar has everyone has

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 3>now woken up to this opportunity of yes, there's going

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.959
<v Speaker 3>to be a lot of financing needs in AI. And

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 3>do you see change in competition or spreads or anything

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think it really depends on what you're financing.

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 4>So there's a lot of capital that's gone into all

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 4>these spaces, and certainly all across the stack.

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 5>Of financing compute.

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.000
<v Speaker 4>You've seen a huge amount of capital come in, and

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 4>you've seen all the giant investment companies providers of capital.

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Get involved and so.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of capital in there, but there's also

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 4>like a huge need for capital, and it's very complex

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 4>thinking about the structuring and getting the right capital and

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.080
<v Speaker 4>the right space. And so I think there's room to

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 4>be innovative. And I've spent the last twenty years at

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 4>Magnetar thinking about unique ways to source investments and deploy capital,

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think that really comes to bear on this.

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:16.360
<v Speaker 4>And because this whole market, like you said, is so new,

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 4>and we've only had chat GPT for a couple of years,

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, you're seeing companies with all different ways of working.

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, we I talked to a company in the

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 4>text of voice space at a conference last week and

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 4>they actually were buying their own DGX servers themselves and

0:33:34.120 --> 0:33:38.000
<v Speaker 4>just running on themselves in their own on premp site.

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 4>And We're like, sure, like that's something we can finance.

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 4>That's like a hard asset.

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 5>But no one's really looking at that yet.

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 4>Because most of the capital is so big, it has

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 4>to go to the biggest thing. So you have your

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollar investment firm, which was a couple you're not

0:33:55.920 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 4>going to want to deploy twenty to fifty million dollars

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 4>in a one off thing. You're going to want to

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 4>deploy tens of billions of dollars in the biggest thing,

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 4>whether that's power, physical data centers, or GPUs.

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 2>What's the pitch to your investors, to Magnetars investors, Because again,

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 2>this is something I know you said you've been in

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 2>the tech space for a while, but it's still something

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 2>that feels fairly new. And when I think about AI,

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>there's been so much excitement over it. Some people have

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 2>been talking about whether or not it's in a bubble,

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think about a hedge fund, and that's all

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 2>about uncorrelated returns and investing profitably through the cycle. I

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 2>get that you might be promising very large upside to investors,

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 2>but what is the hedge aspect of this.

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:47.919
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 4>As a firm, we've done many different products and many

0:34:51.080 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 4>different strategies for many different investors over the years, and

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 4>we've really been flexible in trying to deploy capital in

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 4>the most most interesting areas that are going to have

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 4>the best risk adjusted returns. And many of our investors

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 4>have been with us through the whole life of the

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 4>firm since two thousand and five and appreciate that. And

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 4>so we've done both diversified investment strategies where we just

0:35:17.320 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 4>thought the general pipeline of deploying structured capital has been great,

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 4>and then we've also done things targeted at a particular

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 4>asset when we thought that opportunity was great. And so

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 4>in the case of the VC fund, the value proposition

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:37.080
<v Speaker 4>really is for the investor what it is for the company,

0:35:37.120 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 4>which is, we're bringing something unique to these gross stage

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 4>AI companies which will get us access to making investments

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 4>and what we hope will be the best best of

0:35:49.600 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 4>those companies with the best business models and the best teams.

0:35:53.920 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 4>And so we're going to use the unique compute that

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 4>we have and the way that we're going to exchange

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 4>that for equity and deliver that to these companies as

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 4>a way of getting access to investments in what's a

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 4>very as you mentioned, very competitive environment where there's a

0:36:09.440 --> 0:36:12.640
<v Speaker 4>lot of capital going into the space. And so I

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 4>think for investors that want to participate in that kind

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 4>of investment, in getting capital deployed into growth stage AI companies,

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, this is a very unique opportunity, and so

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 4>we saw a lot of traction with that.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 3>When you come in as a VC investor in some

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 3>of these startups, do you have to supply dollars or

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:38.279
<v Speaker 3>in some cases or all cases, is your ability to

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 3>promise compute from day one enough for equity?

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 4>It really varies, and there's investments we've made both inside

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 4>and outside the fund, and it just depends on the situation.

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 4>So there can be companies that we find super interesting

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 4>but don't need compute, and in that case we could

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 4>invest in those companies directly outside of the fund. For

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 4>the fund itself, the proposition is equity for compute, and

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 4>so the fund itself is focused on companies that really

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 4>do need equity and are interested in equity. And I

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 4>really do need compute and are interested in compute on

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:18.759
<v Speaker 4>corewaves network, and so that's the kind of companies that

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.919
<v Speaker 4>will invest in from the fund. But as Magnetar as

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 4>a whole, we've been focused, like we talked about, on

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 4>everything from energy, through infrastructure, through other AI companies that

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 4>just don't happen to me compute right now.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Then, just to this point, your ability to promise or

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 3>give AI startups compute, this access to compute emerged via

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 3>that initial relationship as a financier.

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 2>This is what I was going to ask, which is

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 2>how worried. Are you about competitors doing the same thing

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.839
<v Speaker 2>and providing GPU back debt or is it the case

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 2>that because of your first mover advantage with core Weave,

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 2>you can hold onto that advantage for a while.

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>So for the fund itself, it was the unique relationship

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 4>we had with coreweve where we felt they were the

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 4>best provider of AI training compute and we were able

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 4>to work with them to contract some of the very

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 4>scarce resource of that and then have that available to

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 4>deliver to these AI growth companies. And so that was

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:32.280
<v Speaker 4>really where we were able to put together something unique because.

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Day one that was understood to be part of the

0:38:34.600 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 3>payoff of being a financing partner to Corewave.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 5>I wouldn't say from day one.

0:38:40.719 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 4>I would just say it's part of the natural growth

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 4>in their business and our growth in investing in the

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 4>AI market and in being a partner with them. Everyone

0:38:53.200 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 4>is both a partner and a competitor in this space,

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:59.160
<v Speaker 4>and you know, Nvidia has multiple ways that they invest

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 4>in their customers, as do all the hyper scalers for example,

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 4>And so it's really about are you providing something unique,

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 4>something that's different, And you know, right now this moment

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 4>in time. We feel like the size of the compute

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:18.600
<v Speaker 4>we're providing and the network we're providing it on and

0:39:18.680 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 4>the way that we can provide it in real time

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:25.439
<v Speaker 4>is unique and is valuable to many companies. Now, look,

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 4>there could be some companies that are getting their compute

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 4>from somewhere else and it's just not a fit that's

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 4>certainly going to happen. But I think there's many, many

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.439
<v Speaker 4>AI growth companies where this is very valuable to them

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 4>to get the compute on Quorwy's network, and that's going

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 4>to lead to a relationship with them.

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 3>When Amazon makes a VC investment, it's in large part

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 3>understood that it's the same sort of premise that they're

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 3>going to invest in some software company and the money

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 3>comes right back in because that company has AWS needs

0:39:55.640 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and so it comes back. Obviously, we know that the

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:03.120
<v Speaker 3>not only to the large legacy hyper scalers. Not only

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.280
<v Speaker 3>they're building their own models, many of them they're building

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 3>their own silicon and Facebook has its own chips and

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 3>talked about Amazon and Google has I forget what their

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 3>whole thing is called. How do you think about them

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 3>as competitors to core weave in these sort of pure

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 3>chips and data center side. I know their partners, I

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 3>know their customers, et cetera. But they are also pure

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.439
<v Speaker 3>competitors both to say a core weave and to say

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 3>an n video.

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Again, everyone's a partner and a competitor, you know. I

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:33.800
<v Speaker 4>think the difference.

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Google's as TPUs is their thing. Anyway, Sorry, keep going,

0:40:36.040 --> 0:40:36.600
<v Speaker 3>I just couldn't.

0:40:36.920 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the difference, as Brian talked about, is

0:40:39.840 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 4>the core Weave network was built for the ground up

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 4>to be hyper efficient at running AI solutions, and so

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.600
<v Speaker 4>I think it's unique in that way, and I think

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 4>that's why it's grown so fast. But certainly everyone else

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 4>is trying to build their own out and there will

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 4>be other people that will have in Vida GPU chips

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:05.440
<v Speaker 4>and that will include the hyperscalers. But you know, one

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 4>of the things we've.

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Seen is that.

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 4>This is very hard technology. So it's particularly hard to

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 4>deploy at scale because you run into like real physics issues,

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, surface area to volume type issues of getting

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 4>this much power to IRAQ with like how much cable

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:31.279
<v Speaker 4>does that take? How much cooling does that take? How

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 4>do you run the software layer, like the software layer

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 4>to control you know, a node of eight GPUs is

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 4>going to be a lot different than if you're trying

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 4>to run one hundred and twenty eight thousand GPUs. And

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 4>so this problem gets more and more difficult, and you

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:51.359
<v Speaker 4>need better technology and you need highly skilled people, and

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 4>so the bar is always moving. You know, there's always

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:59.400
<v Speaker 4>a next generation chips that's going to be super complicated. Certainly,

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:05.279
<v Speaker 4>the Blackwell deployments and the incremental new Blackwell generations are

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:08.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be ever more complicated and trigger to deploy.

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 4>And you've seen issues already, right, You've seen hyperscalers and

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:17.919
<v Speaker 4>other competitors in the space have reliability problems or be

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:22.359
<v Speaker 4>behind schedule. Like it's not easy. It's a very complicated technology.

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 4>You're not plugging your GPU into the wall and it's

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 4>ready to run an AI model, and so like, I

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 4>think there's going to be value accrewing to skill an

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 4>efficiency and execution in the space, and you know that's

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:37.760
<v Speaker 4>going to last for a while.

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 2>So some people draw an analogy between the current enthusiastic

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 2>cycle for AI and the early two thousands period where

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.360
<v Speaker 2>we had a lot of enthusiasm for internet companies and

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 2>telecoms and things like that. Do you see evidence of

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:57.040
<v Speaker 2>froth out there, or is it the case that because

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 2>of the huge amount of initial capital invents that's needed,

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:04.960
<v Speaker 2>it's difficult to get I guess enough new entrance that

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 2>this would become a bubble.

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, everything can become a bubble eventually in almost any

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 4>industry that's highly capital intensive. Usually if there's excess returns,

0:43:17.480 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 4>you'll see capital go into it until those returns aren't

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:22.920
<v Speaker 4>good anymore, and a lot of capital will go in

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 4>before you figure out.

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 5>That last part.

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 4>But this is extremely early. Like if you look at

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 4>the capital that went into the Internet and then how

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:37.640
<v Speaker 4>that value accrued to both the big tech companies and

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 4>the startups. People have looked at numbers like three trillion

0:43:41.680 --> 0:43:46.239
<v Speaker 4>dollars of equity value created with the large incumbents, but

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:50.239
<v Speaker 4>there was another five hundred billion created for the new startups.

0:43:50.239 --> 0:43:53.800
<v Speaker 4>And we're just getting going here, right. We're just building

0:43:53.880 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 4>out the kind of data centers, the kind of energy infrastructure.

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.839
<v Speaker 5>We're just starting to deploy products. If you talked to.

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:07.439
<v Speaker 4>Enterprises, they're just starting to implement the most obvious use

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 4>cases for AI. So I think we're much too early

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.480
<v Speaker 4>to worry about a bubble. I talked to somebody at

0:44:14.480 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 4>a hyperscaler and they were like, the last thing we're

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 4>worried about right now is having too much compute.

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Last question for me, you say, we're early. There's still

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 3>no signs of too much compute. Earlier in the conversation,

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 3>you're like, this is a Manhattan project, scale project. Give

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 3>us some flashy number. How much has been deployed in

0:44:35.760 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 3>this area, and you know over the next ten years

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 3>how much capital is going to be demanded for this

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:43.200
<v Speaker 3>space and how much will be needed.

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:46.920
<v Speaker 4>So one one number I saw was that in twenty

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty three, thirty seven billion dollars was deployed into AI infrastructure,

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 4>and in two thousand and thirty three that number is

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.680
<v Speaker 4>going to be like four hundred and thirty billion in

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:04.800
<v Speaker 4>that year. So this is trillion dollar scale investment.

0:45:05.880 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Cool, You're cool, all right, Jim Presco, Thank you so

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 2>much for coming on all thoughts. That was great.

0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for having me.

0:45:13.080 --> 0:45:13.759
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much.

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:26.919
<v Speaker 4>Joe.

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 2>There's two things that I hear consistently about AI, and

0:45:30.880 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 2>one is it's going to need a lot of capital, yeah,

0:45:33.560 --> 0:45:35.640
<v Speaker 2>which Jim spoke to. And then the other thing I

0:45:35.680 --> 0:45:38.719
<v Speaker 2>always hear is well, at some point AI companies have

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 2>to actually produce revenue, and I guess the question is, like,

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:46.440
<v Speaker 2>are they going to start producing revenue in time to

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 2>pay back that massive capital need.

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 3>Yes, it's very interesting because, look, I believe that there

0:45:53.800 --> 0:45:58.880
<v Speaker 3>are companies that are getting productive value out of AI models.

0:45:58.719 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Like I believe that exists.

0:46:00.440 --> 0:46:02.960
<v Speaker 3>But you know, you talk about hundreds of billions over

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 3>the coming years and financing in the end that is

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:10.120
<v Speaker 3>going to have to come from profitable deployment to customers,

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 3>and so like this to me is like, you know,

0:46:12.840 --> 0:46:15.960
<v Speaker 3>still a bit uncertain. I do think the financing that

0:46:16.000 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 3>we talked about is extremely interesting just in the context

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 3>of this conversation.

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, the GPU backed loans, Yeah.

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, both the GPU backed loans and the opportunity that

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 3>that affords company like Magnetar to make GPU capacity in

0:46:33.400 --> 0:46:37.360
<v Speaker 3>lieu of cash for equity investments is extremely interesting. And

0:46:37.480 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 3>so and then you get this second order effect. So A,

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 3>you're providing something that other vcs can't because you are

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 3>giving them access to compute on day one. And then

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 3>b other vcs want to enter that deal because they

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 3>know that they're going to be investing in a company

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:54.840
<v Speaker 3>that is not going to be have to scrambling for

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 3>compute once they get that VC cash.

0:46:57.280 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a very sort of middle way approach because I

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 2>think so far the way we've seen AI investment unfold

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.480
<v Speaker 2>is either it's the sort of picks and shovels approach

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 2>where you invest in the chip companies themselves and the

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:13.440
<v Speaker 2>data centers, or it's you invest in the AI companies

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:15.839
<v Speaker 2>that are doing cool things. But this is kind of both.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 3>It is exactly both, and it sort of sounds like

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 3>some combination of foresightful planning and also stumbling into a

0:47:23.440 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 3>very good situation by which the firm's relationship with core Weave,

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 3>dating all the way back to twenty twenty one, does

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:36.160
<v Speaker 3>now give them this a certain edge in the VCR.

0:47:36.320 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 3>It's just a really it's this is a fascinating sort

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 3>of open frontier in many respects.

0:47:41.440 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I still want to know who came up with the

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 2>idea for chip based financing. Jim kind of evaded that

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:48.440
<v Speaker 2>part of the question, but I want to know what

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 2>those initial conversations were Like.

0:47:50.320 --> 0:47:52.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's also just interesting to think about that on

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 3>some level, the analogies are like an Irish car lender, right,

0:47:57.040 --> 0:47:59.640
<v Speaker 3>So it's like, on some level this is a very

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 3>none and with technology that is highly uncertain. And then

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, if you're invested in a Carlo

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 3>and Company, you could sort of get it.

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, shall we leave it there.

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:11.319
<v Speaker 5>Let's leave it there.

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Oudlots podcast. I'm

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:23.640
<v Speaker 3>Follow our producers Kerman Rodriguez at Kerman armand dash Ol

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Bennett at Dashbot and kill Brooks at Kilbrooks. Thank you

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.960
<v Speaker 3>to our producer Moses Onam. From our Oddlots content, go

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:32.799
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we have transcripts,

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.399
<v Speaker 3>a blog, and a daily newsletter and you can chet

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 3>about all of these topics, including AI twenty four seven

0:48:38.920 --> 0:48:41.720
<v Speaker 3>in our discord. Go there and check it out Discord

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 3>dot gg.

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Slash odlocks And if you enjoy ad Blots, if you

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 2>like it when we dig into the capital structure of

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 2>AI investments, then please leave us a positive review on

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 2>your favorite podcast platform. And remember, if you are a

0:48:56.120 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to all of our episodes absolutely.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 2>The ad free. All you need to do is find

0:49:02.200 --> 0:49:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts and follow the instructions there.

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.