WEBVTT - Can a Chatbot Treat Depression?

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.836
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Nick Jacobson wanted to help people with mental illness,

0:00:22.996 --> 0:00:25.196
<v Speaker 1>so he went to grad school to get his PhD

0:00:25.276 --> 0:00:29.676
<v Speaker 1>in clinical psychology, but pretty quickly he realized there just

0:00:29.836 --> 0:00:32.956
<v Speaker 1>were nowhere near enough therapists to help all the people

0:00:32.996 --> 0:00:34.076
<v Speaker 1>who needed therapy.

0:00:34.676 --> 0:00:37.116
<v Speaker 2>If you go to pretty much any clinic, there's a

0:00:37.156 --> 0:00:39.596
<v Speaker 2>really long wait list, it's hard to get in, and

0:00:40.396 --> 0:00:42.436
<v Speaker 2>a lot of that is organic, and that there's just

0:00:42.756 --> 0:00:45.836
<v Speaker 2>a huge volume of need and not enough people to

0:00:45.876 --> 0:00:46.476
<v Speaker 2>go around.

0:00:46.956 --> 0:00:49.156
<v Speaker 1>Since he was a kid, Nick had been writing code

0:00:49.156 --> 0:00:52.116
<v Speaker 1>for fun, so in a sort of a side project

0:00:52.196 --> 0:00:54.996
<v Speaker 1>in grad school, he coded up a simple mobile app

0:00:55.076 --> 0:00:58.436
<v Speaker 1>called Mood Triggers. The app would prompt you to enter

0:00:58.516 --> 0:01:00.756
<v Speaker 1>how you were feeling, so it could measure your levels

0:01:00.756 --> 0:01:04.396
<v Speaker 1>of anxiety and depression, and it would track basic things

0:01:04.476 --> 0:01:06.876
<v Speaker 1>like how you slept, how much you went out, how

0:01:06.876 --> 0:01:10.796
<v Speaker 1>many steps you took. And then twenty fifteen Nick put

0:01:10.796 --> 0:01:13.276
<v Speaker 1>that app out into the world and people liked it.

0:01:13.956 --> 0:01:15.916
<v Speaker 2>A lot of folks just said that they learned a

0:01:15.916 --> 0:01:18.116
<v Speaker 2>lot about themselves and it was really helpful and actually

0:01:18.236 --> 0:01:20.916
<v Speaker 2>changing and managing their symptoms. So I think it was

0:01:20.956 --> 0:01:25.596
<v Speaker 2>beneficial for them to learn. Hey, maybe actually it's on

0:01:25.636 --> 0:01:27.916
<v Speaker 2>these days that I'm withdrawing and not spending any time

0:01:27.916 --> 0:01:30.956
<v Speaker 2>with people, that it might be good for me to

0:01:31.036 --> 0:01:34.596
<v Speaker 2>go and actually get out about that kind of thing.

0:01:35.116 --> 0:01:39.196
<v Speaker 2>And I had a lot of people that installed that application,

0:01:39.396 --> 0:01:43.676
<v Speaker 2>So about fifty thousand people installed it from all over

0:01:43.716 --> 0:01:48.396
<v Speaker 2>the world, over one hundred countries. In that one year,

0:01:49.716 --> 0:01:53.476
<v Speaker 2>I provided an intervention for more than what I could

0:01:53.476 --> 0:01:57.756
<v Speaker 2>have done over an entire career as a psychologist. I

0:01:57.796 --> 0:02:00.756
<v Speaker 2>was a graduate student at the time that like this

0:02:00.956 --> 0:02:04.276
<v Speaker 2>is like, you know, something that was just amazing to me,

0:02:04.396 --> 0:02:08.636
<v Speaker 2>the scale of technology and its ability to reach folks,

0:02:09.596 --> 0:02:11.956
<v Speaker 2>And so that made me really interested in trying to

0:02:11.996 --> 0:02:15.516
<v Speaker 2>do things that could essentially have that kind of impact.

0:02:21.796 --> 0:02:23.996
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jacob Goldstein and this is What's Your Problem, the

0:02:24.036 --> 0:02:25.836
<v Speaker 1>show where I talk to people who are trying to

0:02:25.876 --> 0:02:30.676
<v Speaker 1>make technological progress. My guest today is Nick Jacobson. Nick

0:02:30.716 --> 0:02:33.836
<v Speaker 1>finished his PhD in clinical psychology, but today he doesn't

0:02:33.876 --> 0:02:37.716
<v Speaker 1>see patients. He's a professor at Dartmouth Medical School and

0:02:37.716 --> 0:02:41.356
<v Speaker 1>he's part of a team that recently developed something called Therabot.

0:02:41.916 --> 0:02:46.356
<v Speaker 1>Therabot is a generative AI therapist. Nick's problem is this,

0:02:47.116 --> 0:02:50.516
<v Speaker 1>how do you use technology to help lots and lots

0:02:50.556 --> 0:02:54.316
<v Speaker 1>and lots of people with mental health problems, and how

0:02:54.356 --> 0:02:56.076
<v Speaker 1>do you do it in a way that is safe

0:02:56.276 --> 0:03:00.676
<v Speaker 1>and based on clear evidence. As you'll hear, Nick and

0:03:00.716 --> 0:03:03.876
<v Speaker 1>his colleagues recently tested therapod in a clinical trial with

0:03:03.996 --> 0:03:07.276
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of patients and the results were promising. But those

0:03:07.316 --> 0:03:10.596
<v Speaker 1>results only came after years of failures and over one

0:03:10.716 --> 0:03:15.036
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand hours of work by team Therapbot. Nick told

0:03:15.076 --> 0:03:18.116
<v Speaker 1>me he started thinking about building a therapy chatbot based

0:03:18.156 --> 0:03:21.796
<v Speaker 1>on a large language model back in twenty nineteen. That

0:03:21.956 --> 0:03:25.276
<v Speaker 1>was years before chat GPT brought large language models to

0:03:25.316 --> 0:03:28.156
<v Speaker 1>the masses, and Nick knew from the start that he

0:03:28.196 --> 0:03:31.316
<v Speaker 1>couldn't just use a general purpose model. He knew he

0:03:31.316 --> 0:03:34.116
<v Speaker 1>would need additional data to fine tune the model to

0:03:34.196 --> 0:03:36.516
<v Speaker 1>turn it into a therapist chatbot.

0:03:37.236 --> 0:03:40.836
<v Speaker 2>And so the first iteration of this was thinking about, Okay,

0:03:40.876 --> 0:03:45.156
<v Speaker 2>what where is there widely accessible data and that would

0:03:45.316 --> 0:03:48.436
<v Speaker 2>potentially have an evidence base that this could work. And

0:03:48.476 --> 0:03:51.996
<v Speaker 2>so we started with peer to peer forums, so folks

0:03:52.076 --> 0:03:56.516
<v Speaker 2>interacting with folks surrounding their mental health. So we trained

0:03:56.596 --> 0:04:01.476
<v Speaker 2>this model on hundreds of thousands of conversations that were

0:04:01.476 --> 0:04:02.596
<v Speaker 2>happening on the Internet.

0:04:02.676 --> 0:04:05.516
<v Speaker 1>So you have this model, you train it up, you

0:04:05.556 --> 0:04:08.956
<v Speaker 1>sit down in front of the computer. What do you

0:04:09.196 --> 0:04:10.476
<v Speaker 1>what do you say to the chat pot?

0:04:11.676 --> 0:04:13.236
<v Speaker 2>I'm feeling depressed? What should I do?

0:04:13.996 --> 0:04:15.916
<v Speaker 1>Okay? And then what is the what does the model

0:04:15.956 --> 0:04:16.596
<v Speaker 1>say back to you?

0:04:16.756 --> 0:04:21.156
<v Speaker 2>I'm paraphrasing here, but it was just like this, I'm

0:04:21.556 --> 0:04:25.596
<v Speaker 2>I feel so depressed every day I have. It's such

0:04:25.636 --> 0:04:28.156
<v Speaker 2>a hard time getting out of bed. I just want

0:04:28.156 --> 0:04:28.956
<v Speaker 2>my life to be over.

0:04:29.196 --> 0:04:34.116
<v Speaker 1>So literally therapist is saying they're going to kill themselves.

0:04:33.636 --> 0:04:37.196
<v Speaker 2>Right, So it's escalating talking about kind of really thoughts

0:04:37.196 --> 0:04:42.156
<v Speaker 2>about about death. And it's clearly like the profound mismatch

0:04:42.196 --> 0:04:44.796
<v Speaker 2>between what we were thinking about and what we were

0:04:44.796 --> 0:04:45.716
<v Speaker 2>going for is.

0:04:45.676 --> 0:04:47.596
<v Speaker 1>What what did you think when you read that?

0:04:48.196 --> 0:04:52.356
<v Speaker 2>So I thought this is a such a non starter.

0:04:52.676 --> 0:04:54.756
<v Speaker 2>But it was. I think one of the things that

0:04:54.836 --> 0:04:56.476
<v Speaker 2>I think was clear was it was picking up on

0:04:56.596 --> 0:04:58.676
<v Speaker 2>patterns in the data, but were the wrong data.

0:04:59.196 --> 0:05:02.276
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean one one option then is give up.

0:05:02.796 --> 0:05:06.196
<v Speaker 2>It would have been absolutely like, literally, the worst therapist

0:05:06.276 --> 0:05:09.556
<v Speaker 2>ever is what you have built? I mean it, I

0:05:09.556 --> 0:05:12.956
<v Speaker 2>couldn't imagine a worse Yeah, a worse thing to actually

0:05:12.996 --> 0:05:15.556
<v Speaker 2>try to implement in a real setting. So this went

0:05:15.636 --> 0:05:19.156
<v Speaker 2>nowhere on in and of itself. But we had a

0:05:19.156 --> 0:05:21.316
<v Speaker 2>good reason to start there actually, So it wasn't just

0:05:21.356 --> 0:05:24.036
<v Speaker 2>that there's widely available data these peer networks actually do.

0:05:24.276 --> 0:05:27.356
<v Speaker 2>There is literature to support that having exposure to these

0:05:27.396 --> 0:05:30.236
<v Speaker 2>peer networks actually improves mental health outcomes. It's a big

0:05:30.276 --> 0:05:33.516
<v Speaker 2>literature and the cancer Survivor network, for example, where folks

0:05:33.556 --> 0:05:35.676
<v Speaker 2>that are struggling with cancer and hearing from other folks

0:05:35.716 --> 0:05:38.476
<v Speaker 2>that have gone through it can really build this resilience

0:05:38.556 --> 0:05:40.556
<v Speaker 2>and it promotes a lot of mental health outcomes that

0:05:40.596 --> 0:05:42.796
<v Speaker 2>are positive. So we had a good reason to start,

0:05:42.836 --> 0:05:47.196
<v Speaker 2>but gosh, did it not go well? So, okay, the

0:05:47.236 --> 0:05:51.596
<v Speaker 2>next thing we do is switch gears the exact opposite direction. Okay,

0:05:51.636 --> 0:05:54.516
<v Speaker 2>we started with very lay persons trying to interact with

0:05:54.636 --> 0:05:57.476
<v Speaker 2>other lay persons surrounding their mental health. Let's go to

0:05:57.516 --> 0:06:01.516
<v Speaker 2>what providers would do. And so we we got access

0:06:01.596 --> 0:06:05.516
<v Speaker 2>to thousands of psychotherapy training videos and these are interesting.

0:06:05.796 --> 0:06:08.956
<v Speaker 2>These are these are how psychologists are often like exposed

0:06:08.956 --> 0:06:11.836
<v Speaker 2>to the field on what they would what they would

0:06:12.116 --> 0:06:14.676
<v Speaker 2>like really learn how therapy is supposed to work and

0:06:14.716 --> 0:06:17.116
<v Speaker 2>how it's supposed to be delivered. And in these these

0:06:17.116 --> 0:06:21.716
<v Speaker 2>are like dialogues between sometimes actual patients that are consenting

0:06:21.756 --> 0:06:24.596
<v Speaker 2>to be part of this and sometimes simulated patients where

0:06:24.596 --> 0:06:28.396
<v Speaker 2>it's an actor that's that's trying to mimic this, and

0:06:29.796 --> 0:06:32.516
<v Speaker 2>there's a psychologist or a mental health provider that is

0:06:32.596 --> 0:06:36.316
<v Speaker 2>like really having a real session with this, And so

0:06:36.356 --> 0:06:40.436
<v Speaker 2>we train our second model on on that. On that data,

0:06:40.396 --> 0:06:43.876
<v Speaker 2>it seems more promising. You would think you'd say, I'm

0:06:43.876 --> 0:06:46.956
<v Speaker 2>feeling depressed. What should I do? As like the initial

0:06:47.196 --> 0:06:51.676
<v Speaker 2>way that we would test this, the model says mm hmm,

0:06:53.996 --> 0:06:56.396
<v Speaker 2>like literally mm hmm.

0:06:56.756 --> 0:07:00.956
<v Speaker 1>And like like it writes out m m space hmm.

0:07:00.996 --> 0:07:01.516
<v Speaker 2>You've got it.

0:07:01.796 --> 0:07:04.956
<v Speaker 1>And so what did you think when you saw that?

0:07:05.276 --> 0:07:07.076
<v Speaker 2>And so I was like, oh gosh, it's picking up

0:07:07.076 --> 0:07:09.596
<v Speaker 2>on patterns in the data, and so the yeah, but

0:07:10.516 --> 0:07:13.876
<v Speaker 2>you continue these interactions and then the next responses go

0:07:14.036 --> 0:07:18.476
<v Speaker 2>on from the therapist, So like within about five or

0:07:18.516 --> 0:07:22.316
<v Speaker 2>so turns, we would often get the model that would

0:07:22.316 --> 0:07:25.836
<v Speaker 2>respond about their interpretations of their problems stemming from their

0:07:25.916 --> 0:07:29.076
<v Speaker 2>their mother or their parents more generally. So like it's

0:07:29.156 --> 0:07:30.596
<v Speaker 2>kind of like, if you were to try to think

0:07:30.636 --> 0:07:33.396
<v Speaker 2>about it, what a psychologist is. This is like every

0:07:33.636 --> 0:07:36.036
<v Speaker 2>trope of what a like in your mind if you

0:07:36.076 --> 0:07:37.236
<v Speaker 2>were going to like think.

0:07:37.116 --> 0:07:40.876
<v Speaker 1>Of the stereotypical on the couch and a guy's wearing

0:07:40.916 --> 0:07:42.836
<v Speaker 1>a tweet jacket sitting in a chair.

0:07:42.756 --> 0:07:47.676
<v Speaker 2>And hardly says anything of that could be potentially helpful,

0:07:47.716 --> 0:07:50.036
<v Speaker 2>but is reflecting things back to me and.

0:07:50.036 --> 0:07:52.636
<v Speaker 1>So then telling me it goes back to my parents. Yeah,

0:07:52.756 --> 0:07:54.876
<v Speaker 1>well this is so let's just pause here for a moment, because,

0:07:54.876 --> 0:07:59.316
<v Speaker 1>as you say, this is like the stereotype of the therapist,

0:07:59.716 --> 0:08:02.916
<v Speaker 1>but you trained it on real data, so maybe it's

0:08:02.916 --> 0:08:04.316
<v Speaker 1>the stereotype for a reason.

0:08:04.436 --> 0:08:08.956
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think what to me was really clear was

0:08:09.396 --> 0:08:13.796
<v Speaker 2>that we were we had data that the models were

0:08:13.876 --> 0:08:16.676
<v Speaker 2>emulating patterns they were seeing in the data. So the

0:08:16.716 --> 0:08:20.036
<v Speaker 2>models weren't the problem. The problem was the data were

0:08:20.036 --> 0:08:21.116
<v Speaker 2>the wrong data.

0:08:21.276 --> 0:08:23.436
<v Speaker 1>But the data is the data that is used to

0:08:23.476 --> 0:08:26.116
<v Speaker 1>trade real therapists. Like, it's confusing that this is the

0:08:26.156 --> 0:08:26.716
<v Speaker 1>wrong data.

0:08:26.876 --> 0:08:28.276
<v Speaker 2>It is it is.

0:08:28.476 --> 0:08:31.156
<v Speaker 1>Why why is it the wrong data? This should be

0:08:31.196 --> 0:08:32.356
<v Speaker 1>exactly the data you want.

0:08:32.436 --> 0:08:34.836
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's it's the wrong data for this format. And

0:08:34.916 --> 0:08:40.116
<v Speaker 2>our conversation when you might say something me nodding along

0:08:40.356 --> 0:08:43.636
<v Speaker 2>or saying mm hmm or go on, my contextually be

0:08:43.916 --> 0:08:48.916
<v Speaker 2>like completely appropriate. So tactically in a conversational dialogue that

0:08:48.956 --> 0:08:52.356
<v Speaker 2>would happen via chat. This is not like a medium

0:08:52.356 --> 0:08:54.676
<v Speaker 2>that works very well like this kind of thing.

0:08:54.836 --> 0:08:58.516
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's almost like a translation, right. It doesn't translate

0:08:58.556 --> 0:09:00.996
<v Speaker 1>from a human face to face interaction to a chat

0:09:00.996 --> 0:09:02.236
<v Speaker 1>window on the computer.

0:09:01.996 --> 0:09:03.236
<v Speaker 2>And not the right setting.

0:09:03.396 --> 0:09:05.116
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that I mean that goes to the like

0:09:05.396 --> 0:09:10.236
<v Speaker 1>nonverbal subtler aspects of therapy, right, like presumer when the

0:09:10.236 --> 0:09:14.596
<v Speaker 1>therapist is saying m hm, there is there is body language,

0:09:14.636 --> 0:09:17.756
<v Speaker 1>there's everything that's happening in the room, which is a

0:09:17.796 --> 0:09:21.356
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of information or emotional information, right, and that

0:09:21.476 --> 0:09:24.236
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that is lost, yes, no doubt in

0:09:24.316 --> 0:09:28.356
<v Speaker 1>this medium and and maybe speaks to a broader question

0:09:28.636 --> 0:09:31.156
<v Speaker 1>about the translatability of therapy.

0:09:31.316 --> 0:09:35.556
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely so I think to me, like the it

0:09:35.636 --> 0:09:39.316
<v Speaker 2>was at that moment that I kind of knew that

0:09:39.356 --> 0:09:42.436
<v Speaker 2>we we needed to do something radically different. Neither of

0:09:42.476 --> 0:09:45.956
<v Speaker 2>these was working well. About one in ten of the

0:09:46.076 --> 0:09:51.316
<v Speaker 2>responses from that from that chatbot, based on the clinicians,

0:09:51.556 --> 0:09:53.916
<v Speaker 2>would be something that we would be happy with. So

0:09:54.116 --> 0:09:57.756
<v Speaker 2>something that is both personalized, clinically appropriate and dynamic.

0:09:58.356 --> 0:10:00.796
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying you've got it right ten percent of exactly.

0:10:00.916 --> 0:10:04.116
<v Speaker 2>So really, no, that's that's not a good like no,

0:10:04.156 --> 0:10:06.076
<v Speaker 2>it's not a good not a good therapy. No, we

0:10:06.076 --> 0:10:09.036
<v Speaker 2>would we would never think about implement like actually trying

0:10:09.196 --> 0:10:13.556
<v Speaker 2>employ that. So then what we started at that point

0:10:13.876 --> 0:10:17.916
<v Speaker 2>was building our own creating our own data set from scratch,

0:10:18.316 --> 0:10:22.636
<v Speaker 2>in which we how how the models would learn would

0:10:22.636 --> 0:10:25.876
<v Speaker 2>be exactly what we want it to say.

0:10:25.916 --> 0:10:28.716
<v Speaker 1>That seems that seems wild, I mean, how do you

0:10:28.796 --> 0:10:30.596
<v Speaker 1>do that? How do you how do you generate that

0:10:30.676 --> 0:10:31.236
<v Speaker 1>much data.

0:10:31.356 --> 0:10:33.436
<v Speaker 2>We've had a team of one hundred people that have

0:10:33.516 --> 0:10:35.716
<v Speaker 2>worked on this project over the last five and a

0:10:35.756 --> 0:10:38.796
<v Speaker 2>half years at this point, and they've spent over one

0:10:38.836 --> 0:10:41.916
<v Speaker 2>hundred thousand human hours kind of really trying to build this.

0:10:42.116 --> 0:10:44.596
<v Speaker 1>Just specifically, what how do you build a data set

0:10:44.636 --> 0:10:47.876
<v Speaker 1>from scratch? Because like, the data set is the huge problem.

0:10:48.076 --> 0:10:54.236
<v Speaker 2>Yes, absolutely so. Psychotherapy, when you would test it is

0:10:54.316 --> 0:10:57.316
<v Speaker 2>based on something that is written down in a manual.

0:10:57.756 --> 0:11:01.076
<v Speaker 2>So when you're a psychologist when they're in a randomized

0:11:01.076 --> 0:11:03.636
<v Speaker 2>controlled trial trying to test whether something works or not.

0:11:04.596 --> 0:11:07.356
<v Speaker 2>To be able to test it, it has to be replicable,

0:11:07.516 --> 0:11:11.356
<v Speaker 2>meaning it's like repeated across different therapists. So there are

0:11:11.436 --> 0:11:14.836
<v Speaker 2>manuals that are developed. In this session you work on

0:11:14.836 --> 0:11:17.556
<v Speaker 2>on psycho education. On this session we're going to be

0:11:17.556 --> 0:11:21.596
<v Speaker 2>working on behavioral activation, So which are different techniques that

0:11:21.636 --> 0:11:24.876
<v Speaker 2>are really a focus at a given time, and these

0:11:24.916 --> 0:11:27.676
<v Speaker 2>are broken down to try to make it translational so

0:11:27.676 --> 0:11:30.116
<v Speaker 2>that you can actually move it. So the team would

0:11:30.196 --> 0:11:34.236
<v Speaker 2>read these empirically supported treatment manuals, so the ones that

0:11:34.316 --> 0:11:37.876
<v Speaker 2>had been tested in randomized control trials, and then what

0:11:37.916 --> 0:11:41.276
<v Speaker 2>we would do is we would take that content chapter

0:11:41.316 --> 0:11:44.476
<v Speaker 2>by chapter, because this is like session by session, take

0:11:44.516 --> 0:11:47.116
<v Speaker 2>the techniques that would work well via chat, of which

0:11:47.236 --> 0:11:51.436
<v Speaker 2>most things in cognitive behavioral therapy would, and then we

0:11:51.476 --> 0:11:57.156
<v Speaker 2>would create an artificial dialogue between would act as like

0:11:57.236 --> 0:12:00.116
<v Speaker 2>what is the patient's presenting problem, what they're bringing on,

0:12:00.196 --> 0:12:03.436
<v Speaker 2>what the personality is like, and we're kind of constructing this,

0:12:03.636 --> 0:12:07.596
<v Speaker 2>and then what is what we would want our system

0:12:07.636 --> 0:12:10.756
<v Speaker 2>to be the gold standard response for every kind of

0:12:10.796 --> 0:12:14.396
<v Speaker 2>input and output that we'd have. So we're writing both

0:12:14.476 --> 0:12:17.076
<v Speaker 2>the patient end and the therapist end.

0:12:17.796 --> 0:12:19.716
<v Speaker 1>It's like you're writing a screenplay.

0:12:19.436 --> 0:12:21.916
<v Speaker 2>Basically, it really is. It's a lot like that, but

0:12:22.036 --> 0:12:25.996
<v Speaker 2>instead of a screenplay that might be written like in general,

0:12:26.076 --> 0:12:29.036
<v Speaker 2>it's like not like not just something general, but like,

0:12:29.196 --> 0:12:32.596
<v Speaker 2>where is something that's really evidence based based on content

0:12:32.676 --> 0:12:35.956
<v Speaker 2>that we know works in this setting?

0:12:36.036 --> 0:12:39.516
<v Speaker 1>And so what you write the equivalent of what thousands

0:12:39.556 --> 0:12:40.956
<v Speaker 1>of hours of sessions?

0:12:41.036 --> 0:12:44.596
<v Speaker 2>Hundreds of thousands. There was post docs, grad students and

0:12:44.716 --> 0:12:47.556
<v Speaker 2>undergraduates within my group that we're all part of this

0:12:47.636 --> 0:12:49.196
<v Speaker 2>team that are creating.

0:12:49.156 --> 0:12:51.156
<v Speaker 1>Just doing the work, just writing the dialogue.

0:12:51.236 --> 0:12:54.436
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. And not only did we write them, but

0:12:54.916 --> 0:12:58.436
<v Speaker 2>every dialogue before it would go into something that our

0:12:58.436 --> 0:13:01.796
<v Speaker 2>models are trained would be reviewed by another member of

0:13:01.836 --> 0:13:06.836
<v Speaker 2>the team. So it's all not only crafted by hand,

0:13:06.916 --> 0:13:09.716
<v Speaker 2>but we would review it, give each other feed on it,

0:13:09.796 --> 0:13:12.236
<v Speaker 2>and then like make sure that it is the highest

0:13:12.316 --> 0:13:17.996
<v Speaker 2>quality data. And that's when we started seeing dramatic improvements

0:13:18.036 --> 0:13:22.036
<v Speaker 2>in the model performance. So we continued with us for years.

0:13:23.196 --> 0:13:29.476
<v Speaker 2>Six months before chat TPT was launched, we had a

0:13:29.596 --> 0:13:33.916
<v Speaker 2>model that in today's standards would be so tiny, that

0:13:34.116 --> 0:13:38.516
<v Speaker 2>was delivering about ninety percent of the responses that were

0:13:38.556 --> 0:13:42.276
<v Speaker 2>output We were evaluating as exactly what we'd want. It's

0:13:42.316 --> 0:13:47.276
<v Speaker 2>this gold standard evidence based treatment, so that was fantastic.

0:13:47.396 --> 0:13:49.916
<v Speaker 2>We were really excited about it. So we've got like

0:13:49.956 --> 0:13:53.556
<v Speaker 2>the we've got the benefit side down of the equation.

0:13:54.316 --> 0:13:58.196
<v Speaker 2>The next two years we focus on the risk, the

0:13:58.316 --> 0:14:00.516
<v Speaker 2>risk side of it well, because there's a huge risk.

0:14:00.356 --> 0:14:02.676
<v Speaker 1>Here, right The people who are using it are by

0:14:02.756 --> 0:14:07.596
<v Speaker 1>design quite vulnerable, by design putting a tremendous amount of

0:14:07.716 --> 0:14:11.996
<v Speaker 1>trust into this bot and making themselves vulnerable to it,

0:14:12.276 --> 0:14:16.196
<v Speaker 1>like it's a it's quite a risky proposition. And so

0:14:16.196 --> 0:14:18.116
<v Speaker 1>so tell me specifically, what are you doing.

0:14:18.236 --> 0:14:21.516
<v Speaker 2>So we're trying to get it to endorse elements that

0:14:21.556 --> 0:14:24.796
<v Speaker 2>would make mental health worse. So a lot of our

0:14:24.876 --> 0:14:29.436
<v Speaker 2>conversations or surrounding trying to get it to For example,

0:14:29.836 --> 0:14:33.436
<v Speaker 2>I'll give you an example of one that nearly almost

0:14:33.836 --> 0:14:37.356
<v Speaker 2>almost any model will struggle with that's not tailored towards

0:14:37.396 --> 0:14:40.676
<v Speaker 2>the safety end. What is it is if you tell

0:14:40.756 --> 0:14:43.076
<v Speaker 2>a model that you want to lose weight, it will

0:14:43.236 --> 0:14:46.196
<v Speaker 2>generally try to help you do that. And if you

0:14:46.276 --> 0:14:48.076
<v Speaker 2>want to if you want to work in an area

0:14:48.116 --> 0:14:52.236
<v Speaker 2>related to mental health, trying to promote weight loss without

0:14:52.276 --> 0:14:54.076
<v Speaker 2>context is so not safe.

0:14:54.476 --> 0:14:56.636
<v Speaker 1>You saying it might be a user within eating disorder

0:14:56.676 --> 0:15:00.196
<v Speaker 1>absolutely unhealthily thin, who wants to be even thinner.

0:14:59.836 --> 0:15:03.116
<v Speaker 2>And the model will help them to often actually get

0:15:03.156 --> 0:15:06.356
<v Speaker 2>into a lower weight than they already are. So this

0:15:06.516 --> 0:15:09.716
<v Speaker 2>is like not something that we would ever want to promote,

0:15:09.796 --> 0:15:12.956
<v Speaker 2>but this is something that we certainly at earlier stages

0:15:13.036 --> 0:15:15.716
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing these types of characteristics within the model.

0:15:15.956 --> 0:15:18.236
<v Speaker 1>What are other like, that's an interesting one and it

0:15:18.316 --> 0:15:20.116
<v Speaker 1>makes perfect sense when you say it, I would not

0:15:20.196 --> 0:15:22.036
<v Speaker 1>have thought of it. Or what's another one?

0:15:22.196 --> 0:15:24.396
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it would be like we talk about

0:15:24.436 --> 0:15:27.556
<v Speaker 2>the ethics of suicide. For example, somebody who is who thinks,

0:15:27.636 --> 0:15:30.796
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're in a midst of suffering and you

0:15:30.836 --> 0:15:33.156
<v Speaker 2>know it's like that they could should be able to

0:15:33.236 --> 0:15:35.036
<v Speaker 2>end of their life or they're thinking about this.

0:15:35.356 --> 0:15:39.316
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and what do you want the model? What what?

0:15:39.316 --> 0:15:41.196
<v Speaker 1>What does the model say that it shouldn't say in

0:15:41.236 --> 0:15:41.716
<v Speaker 1>that setting?

0:15:41.796 --> 0:15:44.476
<v Speaker 2>So for you, in these settings, we want to make

0:15:44.516 --> 0:15:47.636
<v Speaker 2>sure that they don't and the model does not promote

0:15:47.716 --> 0:15:52.316
<v Speaker 2>or endorse elements that would promote someone's a worsening of

0:15:52.356 --> 0:15:55.636
<v Speaker 2>suicidal intent. We want to make sure we're providing not

0:15:55.676 --> 0:15:59.116
<v Speaker 2>only not the absence of that, actually some benefit in

0:15:59.156 --> 0:16:00.276
<v Speaker 2>these types of scenarios.

0:16:00.556 --> 0:16:03.116
<v Speaker 1>That's the ultimate nightmare for you. Yeah, right, Like this

0:16:03.316 --> 0:16:06.276
<v Speaker 1>be super clear. The very worst thing that could happen

0:16:06.516 --> 0:16:09.796
<v Speaker 1>is you build this thing and it contributes to someone. Absolutely,

0:16:09.796 --> 0:16:13.316
<v Speaker 1>that's a plausible outcome and a disastrous night.

0:16:13.436 --> 0:16:16.436
<v Speaker 2>It's everything that I worry about in this area is

0:16:16.556 --> 0:16:19.796
<v Speaker 2>exactly this kind of thing. And so we essentially every

0:16:19.836 --> 0:16:23.276
<v Speaker 2>time we find an area where they're not implementing things perfectly,

0:16:24.156 --> 0:16:28.756
<v Speaker 2>some optimal response, adding new training data, and that's that's

0:16:28.796 --> 0:16:31.316
<v Speaker 2>when things continue to get better until we do this

0:16:31.436 --> 0:16:34.116
<v Speaker 2>and we don't find these holes anymore. That's when we

0:16:34.196 --> 0:16:37.276
<v Speaker 2>finally we're ready for the randomized control trial.

0:16:38.076 --> 0:16:43.476
<v Speaker 1>Right, So you decide after after what four years five years?

0:16:43.516 --> 0:16:46.596
<v Speaker 2>This is about four and a half years.

0:16:46.916 --> 0:16:50.196
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that that you're ready to to have people.

0:16:50.036 --> 0:16:51.476
<v Speaker 2>Use use the model.

0:16:51.676 --> 0:16:54.276
<v Speaker 1>I'll be it in a kind of Yeah, you're going

0:16:54.356 --> 0:16:56.476
<v Speaker 1>to be the human in the loop. Right, So, so

0:16:56.596 --> 0:16:59.316
<v Speaker 1>you decide to do this study. You recruit people on

0:16:59.756 --> 0:17:01.276
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Instagram.

0:17:00.876 --> 0:17:04.476
<v Speaker 2>Basically ye exactly, yep, and what.

0:17:04.476 --> 0:17:06.236
<v Speaker 1>So what are they signing up for? What's the what's

0:17:06.276 --> 0:17:07.116
<v Speaker 1>the big study you do?

0:17:07.236 --> 0:17:10.236
<v Speaker 2>So it's a it's a it's a randomized control trial.

0:17:11.556 --> 0:17:15.036
<v Speaker 2>The trial design is essentially that folks would come in,

0:17:15.476 --> 0:17:19.116
<v Speaker 2>they would fill out information about their mental health across

0:17:19.116 --> 0:17:24.236
<v Speaker 2>a variety of areas, so depression, anxiety, and eating disorders,

0:17:24.276 --> 0:17:28.876
<v Speaker 2>for folks that screen positive for having clinical levels of

0:17:28.916 --> 0:17:32.916
<v Speaker 2>depression or anxiety, they would be in our Folks that

0:17:32.956 --> 0:17:35.596
<v Speaker 2>were at risk for eating disorders would be included in

0:17:35.636 --> 0:17:39.276
<v Speaker 2>the trial. We tried to have at least seventy people

0:17:39.316 --> 0:17:41.636
<v Speaker 2>in each group, so we had two hundred and ten

0:17:41.676 --> 0:17:45.036
<v Speaker 2>people that we were planning on and rolling within the trial,

0:17:45.556 --> 0:17:48.756
<v Speaker 2>and then half of them were randomized to receive their

0:17:48.756 --> 0:17:50.996
<v Speaker 2>ABOUT and half of them were on a wait list

0:17:51.116 --> 0:17:53.756
<v Speaker 2>in which they would receive their ABOUT after the trial

0:17:53.796 --> 0:17:57.156
<v Speaker 2>had ended. The trial design was to try to ask

0:17:57.196 --> 0:18:00.316
<v Speaker 2>folks to use their ABOUT for four weeks. They retained

0:18:00.396 --> 0:18:02.916
<v Speaker 2>access to therabot and could use their ABOUT for the

0:18:02.956 --> 0:18:06.716
<v Speaker 2>next four weeks thereafter, so eight weeks total, but we

0:18:06.756 --> 0:18:08.996
<v Speaker 2>asked them to try to actually use it during that

0:18:09.196 --> 0:18:12.796
<v Speaker 2>first four weeks and that was that was essentially the

0:18:12.836 --> 0:18:13.436
<v Speaker 2>trial design.

0:18:13.596 --> 0:18:17.436
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so people signed up, they start like, what's

0:18:17.556 --> 0:18:20.636
<v Speaker 1>what's actually happening? Are they just like chatting with the

0:18:20.676 --> 0:18:22.036
<v Speaker 1>bought every day? Is it?

0:18:22.076 --> 0:18:26.196
<v Speaker 2>So they install a smartphone application that's that they're about at.

0:18:27.156 --> 0:18:31.036
<v Speaker 2>They are prompted once a day to try to have

0:18:31.076 --> 0:18:33.956
<v Speaker 2>a conversation starter with the with the bot and then

0:18:34.196 --> 0:18:37.436
<v Speaker 2>the bot. From there they could talk about it when

0:18:37.596 --> 0:18:40.276
<v Speaker 2>and wherever they would want. They can ignore those notifications

0:18:40.276 --> 0:18:42.636
<v Speaker 2>and kind of engage with it at any time that

0:18:42.636 --> 0:18:47.076
<v Speaker 2>they'd want. But that was the gist of the trial design,

0:18:47.156 --> 0:18:49.556
<v Speaker 2>and so folks in terms of how people used it,

0:18:50.036 --> 0:18:53.196
<v Speaker 2>they interacted with it throughout the day, throughout the night.

0:18:54.196 --> 0:18:58.676
<v Speaker 2>So for example, folks that would have trouble sleeping, that

0:18:58.796 --> 0:19:00.716
<v Speaker 2>was like a way that folks during the middle of

0:19:00.756 --> 0:19:05.516
<v Speaker 2>the night would engage with it fairly often. They in

0:19:05.596 --> 0:19:09.036
<v Speaker 2>terms of the types of the topics that they described,

0:19:10.476 --> 0:19:13.116
<v Speaker 2>it was really the entire range of something that you

0:19:13.116 --> 0:19:15.796
<v Speaker 2>would see in psychotherapy. We had folks that were dealing

0:19:15.836 --> 0:19:18.996
<v Speaker 2>with and discussing their different symptoms that they were talking about.

0:19:19.036 --> 0:19:21.236
<v Speaker 2>So the depression, their anxiety that they were struggling with,

0:19:21.276 --> 0:19:24.796
<v Speaker 2>their their eating, and their body image concerns. Those types

0:19:24.796 --> 0:19:27.076
<v Speaker 2>of things are common because of the groups that we

0:19:27.076 --> 0:19:33.156
<v Speaker 2>were recruiting. But relationship difficulties, problems like folks, some folks

0:19:33.156 --> 0:19:37.596
<v Speaker 2>were really like I had ruptures in there, you know,

0:19:37.796 --> 0:19:40.076
<v Speaker 2>somebody was going through a divorce. Other folks were like

0:19:40.196 --> 0:19:44.516
<v Speaker 2>going through breakups, problems at work. Some folks were unemployed

0:19:45.556 --> 0:19:48.676
<v Speaker 2>and during this time, So like the range of kind

0:19:48.716 --> 0:19:52.396
<v Speaker 2>of personal dilemmas and difficulties that folks were experiencing. Was

0:19:52.476 --> 0:19:54.276
<v Speaker 2>a lot of what we would see in like a

0:19:54.356 --> 0:19:58.316
<v Speaker 2>real setting where it's like kind of a whole host

0:19:58.436 --> 0:20:02.156
<v Speaker 2>of different things that folks were describing and experiencing.

0:20:02.076 --> 0:20:04.676
<v Speaker 1>And presumably had they agreed as part of enrolling in

0:20:04.756 --> 0:20:07.796
<v Speaker 1>the trial to let you read the transcript Oh?

0:20:07.836 --> 0:20:11.236
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, yeah, very very clear when we did an informed

0:20:11.236 --> 0:20:14.916
<v Speaker 2>consent process where folks would know that we were reading

0:20:15.396 --> 0:20:16.516
<v Speaker 2>reading these transcripts.

0:20:16.916 --> 0:20:19.236
<v Speaker 1>And are you personally, like, what was it like for

0:20:19.276 --> 0:20:21.596
<v Speaker 1>you seeing them come in? Are you reading them every day?

0:20:21.676 --> 0:20:22.556
<v Speaker 1>I mean more than that.

0:20:23.156 --> 0:20:27.156
<v Speaker 2>So, I mean this is something that is so ill.

0:20:27.396 --> 0:20:29.596
<v Speaker 2>You alluded to that that this is one of these

0:20:29.636 --> 0:20:33.036
<v Speaker 2>concerns that anybody would have. Is like a nightmare scenario

0:20:33.516 --> 0:20:37.196
<v Speaker 2>where something is the bad happens and somebody actually outs right,

0:20:37.436 --> 0:20:39.516
<v Speaker 2>So this is like I think of this in a

0:20:39.556 --> 0:20:40.756
<v Speaker 2>way that I take So this is not.

0:20:40.756 --> 0:20:43.916
<v Speaker 1>A happy moment for you. This is like you're terrified

0:20:43.916 --> 0:20:44.916
<v Speaker 1>that it might go wrong.

0:20:45.076 --> 0:20:48.156
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's it's certainly like I see it going right,

0:20:48.236 --> 0:20:50.556
<v Speaker 2>but I have every concern that it could go wrong.

0:20:50.796 --> 0:20:54.716
<v Speaker 2>Right like that, And so for the first half of

0:20:54.756 --> 0:21:00.636
<v Speaker 2>the trial, I am monitoring every single interaction sent to

0:21:00.796 --> 0:21:03.436
<v Speaker 2>or from the bot. Other people are also doing this

0:21:03.516 --> 0:21:05.836
<v Speaker 2>on the team, so I'm not the only one. But

0:21:05.916 --> 0:21:07.396
<v Speaker 2>I did not get a lot of sleep in the

0:21:07.396 --> 0:21:10.156
<v Speaker 2>first half of this trial, in part because I was

0:21:10.196 --> 0:21:12.156
<v Speaker 2>really trying to do this in near real time. So

0:21:12.316 --> 0:21:15.276
<v Speaker 2>usually for nearly every message I was, I was getting

0:21:15.396 --> 0:21:18.356
<v Speaker 2>to it within about an hour. So yeah, it was

0:21:18.676 --> 0:21:21.956
<v Speaker 2>it was a barrage of NonStop kind of communication that

0:21:22.036 --> 0:21:22.476
<v Speaker 2>was happening.

0:21:22.556 --> 0:21:24.996
<v Speaker 1>So were there were there any slip ups? Did you

0:21:24.996 --> 0:21:27.436
<v Speaker 1>ever have to intervene as a human in the loop.

0:21:27.316 --> 0:21:30.356
<v Speaker 2>That we did? And the thing that that was something

0:21:30.396 --> 0:21:34.236
<v Speaker 2>that we as a team did not anticipate. What we

0:21:34.356 --> 0:21:37.796
<v Speaker 2>found was really unintended behavior was a lot of folks

0:21:38.156 --> 0:21:42.436
<v Speaker 2>interacted with they're abot, and in doing that, there was

0:21:42.476 --> 0:21:46.116
<v Speaker 2>a significant number of people that would interact with it

0:21:46.156 --> 0:21:48.876
<v Speaker 2>and talk about their medical symptoms. So, for example, there

0:21:48.916 --> 0:21:51.356
<v Speaker 2>was a number of folks that were experiencing symptoms of

0:21:51.396 --> 0:21:55.116
<v Speaker 2>a sexually transmitted disease and they would described that in

0:21:55.156 --> 0:21:58.236
<v Speaker 2>great detail and ask it, you know what, how how

0:21:58.316 --> 0:22:01.716
<v Speaker 2>they should medically treat that? And instead of they're they're

0:22:01.716 --> 0:22:05.436
<v Speaker 2>about saying, hey, go see a provider for this this

0:22:05.476 --> 0:22:08.636
<v Speaker 2>is not my realm of expertise, it responds as if,

0:22:09.756 --> 0:22:12.756
<v Speaker 2>and so this that all of the advice that it

0:22:12.796 --> 0:22:17.356
<v Speaker 2>gave was really fairly reasonable, both in the assessment and

0:22:17.396 --> 0:22:20.396
<v Speaker 2>treatment protocols, but we would not have wanted to act

0:22:20.476 --> 0:22:24.436
<v Speaker 2>that way, So we contacted all of those folks to

0:22:24.596 --> 0:22:29.476
<v Speaker 2>recommend that they actually contact a physician about that. Folks

0:22:29.476 --> 0:22:33.636
<v Speaker 2>did interact with it related to crisis situations. So we

0:22:33.716 --> 0:22:39.076
<v Speaker 2>had also had there about in these moments provided appropriate

0:22:39.116 --> 0:22:42.516
<v Speaker 2>contextual crisis support, but we reached out to those folks

0:22:43.076 --> 0:22:45.876
<v Speaker 2>to further escalate and make sure that they had further

0:22:45.916 --> 0:22:49.876
<v Speaker 2>support available and that and those types of times too.

0:22:50.156 --> 0:22:53.956
<v Speaker 2>So there there were things that, you know, we're certainly

0:22:54.036 --> 0:22:58.836
<v Speaker 2>areas of concern that that happened, but nothing nothing that

0:22:58.996 --> 0:23:02.556
<v Speaker 2>was concerning from the major areas that we had intended

0:23:02.756 --> 0:23:05.196
<v Speaker 2>all kind of really went went pretty well.

0:23:08.636 --> 0:23:11.156
<v Speaker 1>Still, Tom on the show the results of the study

0:23:11.356 --> 0:23:23.036
<v Speaker 1>and what's next for therapot. What were the results of

0:23:23.036 --> 0:23:23.516
<v Speaker 1>the study.

0:23:23.996 --> 0:23:26.356
<v Speaker 2>So this is one of the things that was just

0:23:27.116 --> 0:23:31.396
<v Speaker 2>really fantastic to see was that we had we looked

0:23:31.436 --> 0:23:33.876
<v Speaker 2>at our main outcomes for what we were trying to

0:23:33.916 --> 0:23:39.076
<v Speaker 2>look at, where the degree to folks reduced their depression symptoms,

0:23:39.396 --> 0:23:44.196
<v Speaker 2>their anxiety symptoms, and their eating disorder symptoms among the

0:23:44.276 --> 0:23:47.796
<v Speaker 2>intervention group relative to the control group. So based on

0:23:47.836 --> 0:23:51.276
<v Speaker 2>the change and self reported symptoms in the treatment group

0:23:51.356 --> 0:23:55.756
<v Speaker 2>versus the control group, and we saw these really large

0:23:56.356 --> 0:24:01.716
<v Speaker 2>differential reductions, meaning a lot more reductions and changes that happened,

0:24:01.756 --> 0:24:04.756
<v Speaker 2>and that non depressive symptoms, the anxiety symptoms, and the

0:24:04.756 --> 0:24:07.876
<v Speaker 2>eating disorder symptoms, and the THERAPOT group relative of the

0:24:07.916 --> 0:24:11.476
<v Speaker 2>witless control group, and the degree of change is about

0:24:11.516 --> 0:24:14.716
<v Speaker 2>as strong as you'd ever see. And are randomized control

0:24:14.796 --> 0:24:19.876
<v Speaker 2>trials of outpatient psychotherapy that would be delivered within cognitive

0:24:19.876 --> 0:24:23.396
<v Speaker 2>behavioral therapy with a human, a real human delivering this

0:24:23.556 --> 0:24:26.556
<v Speaker 2>an expert. You didn't test it against against therapy, No,

0:24:26.636 --> 0:24:30.476
<v Speaker 2>we didn't. What you're saying, results results of other studies

0:24:30.876 --> 0:24:35.236
<v Speaker 2>using real human therapists show comparable magnitudes of benefit. That's

0:24:35.276 --> 0:24:35.956
<v Speaker 2>exactly right.

0:24:36.156 --> 0:24:38.316
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you've gotta do a head to head. I mean,

0:24:38.356 --> 0:24:41.436
<v Speaker 1>that's the obvious question, like why not randomize people to

0:24:41.516 --> 0:24:42.636
<v Speaker 1>therapy or THERAPI bought?

0:24:42.756 --> 0:24:46.596
<v Speaker 2>So the main thing when we're thinking about the first

0:24:46.716 --> 0:24:49.276
<v Speaker 2>origins point is we want to have some kind of

0:24:49.396 --> 0:24:52.916
<v Speaker 2>effect of how this works relative to the absence of anything.

0:24:52.556 --> 0:24:56.156
<v Speaker 1>Relative to nothing, well, because I mean, presumably the easiest

0:24:56.196 --> 0:24:58.476
<v Speaker 1>case to make for it is not it's better than

0:24:58.516 --> 0:25:01.356
<v Speaker 1>a therapist. It's a huge number of people who need

0:25:01.356 --> 0:25:04.636
<v Speaker 1>a therapist don't have one exactly, and that's the unfortunate reality.

0:25:05.156 --> 0:25:07.276
<v Speaker 1>BOT is better than nothing. It doesn't have to be

0:25:07.276 --> 0:25:09.436
<v Speaker 1>better than a human therapist. It just has to better,

0:25:09.516 --> 0:25:09.916
<v Speaker 1>that's right.

0:25:10.316 --> 0:25:14.196
<v Speaker 2>But so yes, the we are planning ahead to head

0:25:14.236 --> 0:25:17.596
<v Speaker 2>trial against therapist as the next trial that we run,

0:25:18.916 --> 0:25:21.996
<v Speaker 2>in large part because I already think we are not inferior.

0:25:22.516 --> 0:25:24.796
<v Speaker 2>So it will it'll be interesting to see if that

0:25:24.876 --> 0:25:28.156
<v Speaker 2>actually comes out. But that is that is something that

0:25:28.676 --> 0:25:33.636
<v Speaker 2>we have outstanding funding proposals to try to actually do that.

0:25:34.236 --> 0:25:36.276
<v Speaker 2>So one of the other things that I haven't gotten

0:25:36.316 --> 0:25:37.916
<v Speaker 2>to with in the trial outcomes that I think is

0:25:38.036 --> 0:25:43.996
<v Speaker 2>really important on that end actually is to two things.

0:25:44.276 --> 0:25:49.076
<v Speaker 2>One is the degree that folks formed a relationship with

0:25:49.916 --> 0:25:54.476
<v Speaker 2>therapaud and so in psychotherapy, one of the most well

0:25:54.516 --> 0:25:58.036
<v Speaker 2>studied constructs is the ability that you and your therapist

0:25:58.476 --> 0:26:01.556
<v Speaker 2>can get together and work together on common goals and

0:26:01.596 --> 0:26:05.596
<v Speaker 2>trust each other that you as a it's a relationship,

0:26:04.596 --> 0:26:09.076
<v Speaker 2>it's a human relationship. And so this in the literature

0:26:09.276 --> 0:26:12.236
<v Speaker 2>is called the working alliance, and so it's this ability

0:26:12.276 --> 0:26:17.636
<v Speaker 2>to form this bond. We measured this working alliance using

0:26:17.676 --> 0:26:21.476
<v Speaker 2>the same measure that folks would use with outpatient providers

0:26:21.516 --> 0:26:24.276
<v Speaker 2>about how they they felt about their therapist, but instead

0:26:24.276 --> 0:26:28.156
<v Speaker 2>of the therapist that now we're talking about therabot, and

0:26:28.916 --> 0:26:32.476
<v Speaker 2>and folks rated it nearly identically to the norms that

0:26:32.916 --> 0:26:36.196
<v Speaker 2>you would see on the outpatient literature. So we asked folks,

0:26:36.276 --> 0:26:39.156
<v Speaker 2>we give folks the same measure, and that it's essentially

0:26:39.196 --> 0:26:42.836
<v Speaker 2>equivalent to how folks are reading human providers in these ways.

0:26:43.196 --> 0:26:46.756
<v Speaker 1>This is consistent with other where we're seeing people having

0:26:46.836 --> 0:26:50.996
<v Speaker 1>relationship with chatbots and other domains. Yes, I'm old enough

0:26:51.036 --> 0:26:54.356
<v Speaker 1>that it seems weird to me. I don't know, seem

0:26:54.476 --> 0:26:54.956
<v Speaker 1>weird to you.

0:26:55.276 --> 0:26:58.356
<v Speaker 2>I that part I this is more of a surprise

0:26:58.396 --> 0:27:00.516
<v Speaker 2>to me that it was as the bonds were as

0:27:00.556 --> 0:27:02.676
<v Speaker 2>high as they were, that they would actually be about

0:27:02.716 --> 0:27:05.356
<v Speaker 2>what humans would be. And I will say, like one

0:27:05.396 --> 0:27:08.516
<v Speaker 2>of the other surprises within the interactions was the number

0:27:08.516 --> 0:27:12.956
<v Speaker 2>of people that would like respond kind of check in

0:27:12.996 --> 0:27:16.276
<v Speaker 2>with therabot with and just say hey, just checking in

0:27:16.796 --> 0:27:18.996
<v Speaker 2>as if like Therabot is like a I don't know.

0:27:19.076 --> 0:27:22.676
<v Speaker 2>I would I would only like have anticipated folks would

0:27:22.716 --> 0:27:25.556
<v Speaker 2>use this as a tool, so like not like they

0:27:25.596 --> 0:27:28.396
<v Speaker 2>went to hang out with like almost that way. It's

0:27:28.436 --> 0:27:32.556
<v Speaker 2>like our initiating a conversation that isn't I guess doesn't

0:27:32.556 --> 0:27:33.836
<v Speaker 2>have an intention in mind.

0:27:34.076 --> 0:27:39.036
<v Speaker 1>I say please, I'm thank you, I can't help my

0:27:39.436 --> 0:27:41.356
<v Speaker 1>Is it because I think they're going to take over

0:27:41.636 --> 0:27:43.516
<v Speaker 1>or is it a habit or what? I don't know,

0:27:43.556 --> 0:27:44.636
<v Speaker 1>but I do, I do.

0:27:44.716 --> 0:27:47.196
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wouldn't. I would say that this was more

0:27:47.236 --> 0:27:50.476
<v Speaker 2>surprising the degree to that folks established this this level

0:27:50.516 --> 0:27:52.796
<v Speaker 2>of a bond with it. I think it's actually really

0:27:52.836 --> 0:27:57.556
<v Speaker 2>good and in really important that they do, in large

0:27:57.596 --> 0:27:59.036
<v Speaker 2>part because that's one of the ways that we know

0:27:59.076 --> 0:28:02.996
<v Speaker 2>psychotherapy works, is that that that folks can come together

0:28:03.036 --> 0:28:06.076
<v Speaker 2>and trust this and develop this working relationship. So I

0:28:06.076 --> 0:28:08.676
<v Speaker 2>think it's actually a necessary ingredient for this to work.

0:28:08.716 --> 0:28:11.396
<v Speaker 1>To some I get it makes sense to me intellectually

0:28:11.476 --> 0:28:13.716
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying. Does it give you any pause or

0:28:13.756 --> 0:28:14.916
<v Speaker 1>do you just think it's great?

0:28:15.156 --> 0:28:19.876
<v Speaker 2>It it gives me pause. If we weren't delivering evidence

0:28:19.916 --> 0:28:23.756
<v Speaker 2>based treatment, Well, this is a good moment. Let's talk

0:28:23.756 --> 0:28:26.436
<v Speaker 2>about the let's talk about the industry more generally. Yeah,

0:28:26.676 --> 0:28:28.916
<v Speaker 2>this is not a you're not making a company, this

0:28:28.956 --> 0:28:31.116
<v Speaker 2>is not a product, right, you don't have any money

0:28:31.116 --> 0:28:34.876
<v Speaker 2>at stake. But there is a something of a therapy

0:28:34.956 --> 0:28:35.836
<v Speaker 2>bought industry.

0:28:35.996 --> 0:28:38.476
<v Speaker 1>There is a private sector. Like, tell me what is

0:28:38.516 --> 0:28:39.876
<v Speaker 1>the broader landscape here?

0:28:39.996 --> 0:28:42.916
<v Speaker 2>Like, so there's a lot of folks that are have

0:28:43.076 --> 0:28:48.236
<v Speaker 2>jumped in predominantly sense the loans of shot GPT, and

0:28:48.516 --> 0:28:51.556
<v Speaker 2>a lot of folks that have learned that you can

0:28:52.076 --> 0:28:54.196
<v Speaker 2>call a foundation model fairly easily.

0:28:54.436 --> 0:28:56.076
<v Speaker 1>When you say call you mean just sort of like

0:28:56.596 --> 0:29:00.236
<v Speaker 1>you sort of take a foundation model like GBT, and

0:29:00.276 --> 0:29:02.316
<v Speaker 1>then you kind of put a wrapper around exactly and

0:29:02.356 --> 0:29:05.516
<v Speaker 1>the rapper it's like it's basically GPT with a therapist wrapper.

0:29:05.636 --> 0:29:08.436
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So it's a lot of folks within this industry

0:29:08.836 --> 0:29:13.876
<v Speaker 2>are saying, hey, you act like a therapist and then

0:29:13.956 --> 0:29:16.116
<v Speaker 2>kind of off to the races. It's it's otherwise not

0:29:16.676 --> 0:29:19.236
<v Speaker 2>changed in any way, shape or form. It's it's like

0:29:19.316 --> 0:29:22.596
<v Speaker 2>a literally like a system prompt. So if you were

0:29:22.876 --> 0:29:25.436
<v Speaker 2>interacting with chat GBT, it would be something along the

0:29:25.476 --> 0:29:28.716
<v Speaker 2>lines of, hey, act as a therapist and here's what

0:29:29.276 --> 0:29:31.116
<v Speaker 2>we go on to do. They may have more directions

0:29:31.116 --> 0:29:34.036
<v Speaker 2>than this. But that's this is kind of the light

0:29:34.116 --> 0:29:38.276
<v Speaker 2>touch nature, so super different from what we're doing. Actually, yes,

0:29:38.716 --> 0:29:42.836
<v Speaker 2>so we conducted the first randomized control trial of any

0:29:42.996 --> 0:29:47.356
<v Speaker 2>generative AI for any type of clinical mental health problem.

0:29:48.116 --> 0:29:51.596
<v Speaker 2>And so I know that these folks don't have evidence

0:29:52.556 --> 0:29:54.036
<v Speaker 2>that this kind of thing works.

0:29:54.396 --> 0:29:57.756
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are non generative AI bots that people

0:29:57.836 --> 0:30:01.156
<v Speaker 1>did randomize control trials of, right, just to be clear.

0:30:01.276 --> 0:30:05.036
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there are non generative absolutely that have have evidence

0:30:05.116 --> 0:30:10.076
<v Speaker 2>behind them. The generative side is very new, and so

0:30:10.876 --> 0:30:13.116
<v Speaker 2>and there's a lot of folks in the generative space

0:30:13.156 --> 0:30:16.556
<v Speaker 2>that have jumped in. Yeah, and so a lot of

0:30:16.596 --> 0:30:22.316
<v Speaker 2>these folks are not psychologists and not psychiatrists, and and

0:30:22.556 --> 0:30:26.436
<v Speaker 2>Silicon Valley, there's a saying move fast and break things.

0:30:27.116 --> 0:30:29.756
<v Speaker 2>This is not the setting to do that. Like move

0:30:29.796 --> 0:30:32.036
<v Speaker 2>fast and break people is what you're talking about here.

0:30:32.116 --> 0:30:35.916
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's like the and the amount of times

0:30:35.916 --> 0:30:40.276
<v Speaker 2>that these foundation models act in profoundly unsafe ways would

0:30:40.276 --> 0:30:43.596
<v Speaker 2>be unacceptable to the field. So like that, we tested

0:30:43.636 --> 0:30:45.996
<v Speaker 2>a lot of these models alongside when we were developing

0:30:46.036 --> 0:30:48.556
<v Speaker 2>all of this. So it's like, I know that they

0:30:48.636 --> 0:30:51.156
<v Speaker 2>don't they don't work in this kind of way in

0:30:51.196 --> 0:30:55.676
<v Speaker 2>a real safe environment. So because of that, I'm I'm

0:30:55.716 --> 0:30:59.516
<v Speaker 2>really hugely concerned with kind of the field at large

0:30:59.556 --> 0:31:02.396
<v Speaker 2>that is moving fast and doesn't really have this level

0:31:02.476 --> 0:31:06.116
<v Speaker 2>of dedication to trying to do it right. And I

0:31:06.116 --> 0:31:09.636
<v Speaker 2>think one of the things that's really kind of canning

0:31:09.876 --> 0:31:12.676
<v Speaker 2>within this is it always looks polished, so it's harder

0:31:12.716 --> 0:31:16.036
<v Speaker 2>to see when you're getting exposed to things that are dangerous.

0:31:16.316 --> 0:31:18.236
<v Speaker 2>But the field, I think is in a spot where

0:31:18.756 --> 0:31:20.436
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of folks that are out there that

0:31:20.476 --> 0:31:23.716
<v Speaker 2>are acting and implementing things that are untested, and I

0:31:23.756 --> 0:31:26.396
<v Speaker 2>suspect a lot of them are really dangerous.

0:31:26.916 --> 0:31:30.116
<v Speaker 1>How do you how do you imagine theahbut getting from

0:31:30.156 --> 0:31:32.796
<v Speaker 1>the experimental phase into the widespread use phase.

0:31:32.956 --> 0:31:35.836
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we want to essentially have one at least

0:31:35.876 --> 0:31:38.276
<v Speaker 2>one larger trial before we do this. You know, we

0:31:38.316 --> 0:31:42.196
<v Speaker 2>have it's pretty a pretty decent sized first trial for

0:31:42.396 --> 0:31:45.716
<v Speaker 2>being a first trial, but it's not something that I

0:31:45.716 --> 0:31:48.356
<v Speaker 2>would want to see out in the open just yet.

0:31:48.516 --> 0:31:50.876
<v Speaker 2>We want to have continue to oversight it, make sure

0:31:50.916 --> 0:31:54.476
<v Speaker 2>it's safe and effective. But if it continues to demonstrate

0:31:54.516 --> 0:31:57.236
<v Speaker 2>safety and effectiveness, this is one of those things that

0:31:57.756 --> 0:32:00.516
<v Speaker 2>why I got into this is to really have an

0:32:00.516 --> 0:32:03.996
<v Speaker 2>impact on folks lives, and this is one of those

0:32:04.036 --> 0:32:08.756
<v Speaker 2>things that could scale really effective personalized cares in real ways. So, yeah,

0:32:08.796 --> 0:32:12.036
<v Speaker 2>we we intend to if evidence continues to show that

0:32:12.076 --> 0:32:14.676
<v Speaker 2>it's safe and effective, to make this out into the

0:32:15.076 --> 0:32:17.956
<v Speaker 2>open market. In terms of the thing that I care

0:32:17.996 --> 0:32:19.996
<v Speaker 2>about in terms of the ways that we could do

0:32:20.076 --> 0:32:23.076
<v Speaker 2>this is trying to do this in some ways that

0:32:23.076 --> 0:32:25.876
<v Speaker 2>would be scalable, so that we're considering a bunch of

0:32:25.876 --> 0:32:29.356
<v Speaker 2>different pathways. Some of those would be delivered by philanthropy

0:32:29.876 --> 0:32:34.716
<v Speaker 2>or nonprofit models. We are considering also like just a

0:32:34.716 --> 0:32:37.556
<v Speaker 2>strategy that would just not for me to make money,

0:32:37.836 --> 0:32:39.916
<v Speaker 2>but just to scale this under some kind of for

0:32:40.076 --> 0:32:43.436
<v Speaker 2>profit structure as well, but really just to try to

0:32:43.596 --> 0:32:46.316
<v Speaker 2>get this out into the open so that folks could

0:32:46.356 --> 0:32:49.876
<v Speaker 2>actually use it, because ultimately we'll need some kind of

0:32:49.956 --> 0:32:54.276
<v Speaker 2>revenue in some ways to be part of this that

0:32:54.316 --> 0:32:57.716
<v Speaker 2>would essentially enable the servers to stay on and to

0:32:57.756 --> 0:32:58.276
<v Speaker 2>scale it.

0:32:58.556 --> 0:33:00.876
<v Speaker 1>And presumably you have to pay some amount of people

0:33:00.916 --> 0:33:03.796
<v Speaker 1>to do some amount of supervision absolutely forever.

0:33:04.036 --> 0:33:07.836
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So we in the real deployment setting, we hope

0:33:07.836 --> 0:33:12.796
<v Speaker 2>to have essentially the decreasing levels of oversight relative to

0:33:12.836 --> 0:33:16.316
<v Speaker 2>these trials, but not an absence of oversight. So exactly

0:33:16.596 --> 0:33:18.516
<v Speaker 2>you're not going to stay up all night reading every

0:33:18.556 --> 0:33:22.196
<v Speaker 2>message exactly, that won't be sustainable for the future, but

0:33:22.276 --> 0:33:24.636
<v Speaker 2>we will have like flags for things that should be

0:33:25.276 --> 0:33:26.996
<v Speaker 2>seen by humans and intervened upon.

0:33:27.756 --> 0:33:32.876
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about this other domain you've worked in in

0:33:32.956 --> 0:33:36.036
<v Speaker 1>terms of technology and mental health, right, and so in

0:33:36.076 --> 0:33:38.796
<v Speaker 1>addition to your work on thera bot, you've done a

0:33:38.836 --> 0:33:43.956
<v Speaker 1>lot of work on it seems like basically diagnosis monitoring people,

0:33:44.356 --> 0:33:49.436
<v Speaker 1>essentially using mobile devices and wearables to track people's mental

0:33:49.436 --> 0:33:52.396
<v Speaker 1>health to predict outcomes like tell me about your work

0:33:52.436 --> 0:33:53.476
<v Speaker 1>there and the field there.

0:33:54.036 --> 0:33:58.676
<v Speaker 2>So essentially it's trying to trying to monitor folks within

0:33:58.716 --> 0:34:03.356
<v Speaker 2>their freestanding conditions, so like in their real real life,

0:34:04.076 --> 0:34:08.636
<v Speaker 2>through using technology so in ways that are not don't

0:34:08.676 --> 0:34:09.596
<v Speaker 2>require burden.

0:34:09.916 --> 0:34:12.876
<v Speaker 1>The starting point is like your phone is collecting data

0:34:12.916 --> 0:34:15.796
<v Speaker 1>about you all the time. What if that data could

0:34:15.796 --> 0:34:16.836
<v Speaker 1>make you less depressed?

0:34:17.236 --> 0:34:19.476
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly, what if we could use that data to

0:34:19.516 --> 0:34:22.956
<v Speaker 2>know something about you so that we could actually intervene

0:34:23.116 --> 0:34:27.196
<v Speaker 2>and so, like thinking about a lot of mental health symptoms.

0:34:27.276 --> 0:34:31.276
<v Speaker 2>I think one of the challenges of them is they

0:34:31.356 --> 0:34:34.676
<v Speaker 2>are not like all or nothing the field. Actually, I

0:34:34.676 --> 0:34:38.156
<v Speaker 2>think it's this really wrong. And when you would talk

0:34:38.196 --> 0:34:41.356
<v Speaker 2>to anybody who has a experience as a clinical problem,

0:34:41.636 --> 0:34:44.916
<v Speaker 2>they have changes that happen pretty rapidly within their daily life.

0:34:44.956 --> 0:34:48.516
<v Speaker 2>So they like will have better moments and worse moments

0:34:48.516 --> 0:34:51.716
<v Speaker 2>within a day, They'll have better and worse days. And

0:34:51.756 --> 0:34:54.436
<v Speaker 2>it's not like it's all this like it's always depressed

0:34:54.676 --> 0:34:58.916
<v Speaker 2>or not depressed. It's like these these fluctuating states of it.

0:34:59.196 --> 0:35:02.556
<v Speaker 2>And I think one of the things that's really important

0:35:02.556 --> 0:35:05.076
<v Speaker 2>about these types of things is if we can monitor

0:35:05.116 --> 0:35:08.316
<v Speaker 2>and predict those rapid changes, which I think we can.

0:35:08.676 --> 0:35:11.836
<v Speaker 2>We have a that we can is that we can

0:35:11.876 --> 0:35:16.076
<v Speaker 2>then intervene upon the symptoms before they happen in real time,

0:35:16.436 --> 0:35:18.436
<v Speaker 2>so like trying to predict the ebbs and the flows

0:35:18.436 --> 0:35:21.716
<v Speaker 2>of the symptoms, not to like say, I want somebody

0:35:21.756 --> 0:35:24.556
<v Speaker 2>to never be able to be stressed within their life,

0:35:24.596 --> 0:35:26.636
<v Speaker 2>but so that they can actually be more resilient and

0:35:26.676 --> 0:35:27.276
<v Speaker 2>cope with it.

0:35:28.476 --> 0:35:32.436
<v Speaker 1>And so what's the state of that art, Like, is

0:35:32.476 --> 0:35:35.076
<v Speaker 1>there somebody who's can you do that? Can somebody do that?

0:35:35.236 --> 0:35:36.116
<v Speaker 1>Is there an app for that?

0:35:36.236 --> 0:35:38.516
<v Speaker 2>As we used to say, Yeah, I mean we have

0:35:39.396 --> 0:35:44.516
<v Speaker 2>the science surrounding. This is about ten years old. We've

0:35:44.556 --> 0:35:47.796
<v Speaker 2>done about forty studies in this area across a broad

0:35:47.876 --> 0:35:53.676
<v Speaker 2>range of symptoms, so anxiety, depression, post traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia,

0:35:54.956 --> 0:35:59.676
<v Speaker 2>bipolar disorder, eating disorders, so a lodge are different types

0:35:59.676 --> 0:36:02.116
<v Speaker 2>of clinical phenomenon and we can predict a lot of

0:36:02.116 --> 0:36:07.076
<v Speaker 2>different things in ways that I think are really important.

0:36:07.076 --> 0:36:10.156
<v Speaker 2>But I think, like to really move the needle on

0:36:10.196 --> 0:36:14.636
<v Speaker 2>something that would make it into population wide ability to

0:36:14.716 --> 0:36:17.796
<v Speaker 2>do this, I think the real thing that would be

0:36:18.036 --> 0:36:22.236
<v Speaker 2>needed for like the ability to do this is to

0:36:22.316 --> 0:36:28.036
<v Speaker 2>pair this with intervention that's dynamic. So something that's actually ability,

0:36:28.276 --> 0:36:31.956
<v Speaker 2>has an ability to change and has like a boundless

0:36:31.996 --> 0:36:35.476
<v Speaker 2>context of intervention. So I'm going to actually loop you.

0:36:35.436 --> 0:36:36.516
<v Speaker 1>Back like the Abot.

0:36:36.716 --> 0:36:39.276
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. So these two things that have been

0:36:39.316 --> 0:36:43.716
<v Speaker 2>distinct arms of my work are like so natural compliments

0:36:43.756 --> 0:36:46.156
<v Speaker 2>to one another. Now think about Okay, let's come back

0:36:46.156 --> 0:36:48.116
<v Speaker 2>to therabot in this kind of setting.

0:36:48.396 --> 0:36:49.396
<v Speaker 1>So give me the dream.

0:36:49.556 --> 0:36:53.556
<v Speaker 2>So this is the dream. So you have Therabot, but

0:36:53.716 --> 0:36:57.476
<v Speaker 2>instead of like a psychologist that's completely unaware of what happens,

0:36:57.556 --> 0:37:00.636
<v Speaker 2>is reliant on the patient to tell them everything that's

0:37:00.676 --> 0:37:03.236
<v Speaker 2>going on. In their life. Yeah, all of a sudden,

0:37:03.276 --> 0:37:06.676
<v Speaker 2>there butt knows them knows hey, oh this they're not

0:37:06.756 --> 0:37:10.996
<v Speaker 2>sleeping very well for the past couple days. They haven't

0:37:11.196 --> 0:37:14.796
<v Speaker 2>left their home this week, and this is a big

0:37:14.836 --> 0:37:18.156
<v Speaker 2>deviation from them and how they normally would live life

0:37:18.516 --> 0:37:22.076
<v Speaker 2>Like this can be targets of intervention that don't wait

0:37:22.436 --> 0:37:25.476
<v Speaker 2>for this to be some sustained pattern in their life

0:37:25.636 --> 0:37:29.316
<v Speaker 2>that becomes entrenched and hard to change. Like, no, let's

0:37:29.316 --> 0:37:31.916
<v Speaker 2>actually have that as part of the conversation, where we

0:37:31.956 --> 0:37:33.916
<v Speaker 2>don't have to wait for someone to tell us that

0:37:34.156 --> 0:37:35.916
<v Speaker 2>that they didn't get out of bed. We kind of

0:37:35.956 --> 0:37:39.196
<v Speaker 2>know that they haven't left their house, and we can

0:37:39.236 --> 0:37:42.116
<v Speaker 2>actually make that a content of the intervention. So that's like,

0:37:42.236 --> 0:37:46.356
<v Speaker 2>I think these these ability to like intervene proactively in

0:37:46.396 --> 0:37:49.876
<v Speaker 2>these risk moments and not wait for folks to come

0:37:49.916 --> 0:37:53.116
<v Speaker 2>to us and tell us every aspect of their life

0:37:53.116 --> 0:37:55.596
<v Speaker 2>that they may not know and so like because of this,

0:37:55.876 --> 0:38:00.796
<v Speaker 2>it's that's that's where I think there's a really powerful

0:38:01.076 --> 0:38:01.956
<v Speaker 2>pairing of these two.

0:38:02.276 --> 0:38:05.276
<v Speaker 1>I can see why that combination would be incredibly powerful

0:38:05.316 --> 0:38:09.156
<v Speaker 1>and helpful. Do you worry at all about having that

0:38:09.276 --> 0:38:12.956
<v Speaker 1>much information and that much sort of personal information on

0:38:13.036 --> 0:38:16.756
<v Speaker 1>so many dimensions about people who are by definition vulnerable.

0:38:16.996 --> 0:38:19.876
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, in some ways, I think it's the

0:38:19.996 --> 0:38:22.596
<v Speaker 2>real ways that folks are already collecting a lot of

0:38:22.596 --> 0:38:26.036
<v Speaker 2>this type of data already on these same populations, and

0:38:26.076 --> 0:38:27.996
<v Speaker 2>now that we could put it to good use. Do

0:38:28.076 --> 0:38:32.156
<v Speaker 2>I worry about kind of yet falling into the wrong hands. Absolutely.

0:38:32.236 --> 0:38:35.476
<v Speaker 2>I mean we have like really big tight data security

0:38:35.876 --> 0:38:37.996
<v Speaker 2>kind of protocols surrounding all of this to try to

0:38:38.036 --> 0:38:41.196
<v Speaker 2>make sure that only folks that are established members of

0:38:41.236 --> 0:38:44.676
<v Speaker 2>the team have any access to this data. And so yeah,

0:38:44.676 --> 0:38:47.516
<v Speaker 2>we are really concerned about it. But yeah, no, if

0:38:47.516 --> 0:38:49.756
<v Speaker 2>there was a breach or something like that that could

0:38:49.796 --> 0:38:57.636
<v Speaker 2>be hugely impactful, something that would be greatly worry.

0:38:56.436 --> 0:39:09.236
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a minute with the lightning round. Hey,

0:39:09.316 --> 0:39:11.356
<v Speaker 1>let's finish with the lightning round.

0:39:11.756 --> 0:39:12.116
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:39:14.796 --> 0:39:18.956
<v Speaker 1>On net, have smartphones made us happier or less happy?

0:39:19.836 --> 0:39:20.436
<v Speaker 2>Less happy?

0:39:21.196 --> 0:39:23.036
<v Speaker 1>You think that you think you could change that, You

0:39:23.076 --> 0:39:25.156
<v Speaker 1>think you could make the net flip back the other way.

0:39:25.316 --> 0:39:28.156
<v Speaker 2>I think that we need to meet people where they are,

0:39:28.956 --> 0:39:32.436
<v Speaker 2>and and so this is we're not like trying to

0:39:32.476 --> 0:39:34.796
<v Speaker 2>keep folks on their phones, right, like, we're trying to

0:39:34.796 --> 0:39:38.396
<v Speaker 2>actually start with where they are and intervene there, but

0:39:38.516 --> 0:39:41.236
<v Speaker 2>like push them to go and experience life in a

0:39:41.236 --> 0:39:42.276
<v Speaker 2>lot of ways.

0:39:42.676 --> 0:39:47.276
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Freud overrated or underrated?

0:39:48.156 --> 0:39:48.756
<v Speaker 2>Overrated?

0:39:49.916 --> 0:39:55.516
<v Speaker 1>Still okay, who's the most underrated thinker in the history

0:39:55.556 --> 0:39:56.596
<v Speaker 1>of psychology? Oh?

0:39:56.636 --> 0:40:05.556
<v Speaker 2>My, I I mean to some degree, Skinner was like

0:40:06.316 --> 0:40:10.676
<v Speaker 2>really operant conditioning is like at the heart of most

0:40:11.276 --> 0:40:15.596
<v Speaker 2>clinical phenomenon that deal with emotions, and I think it's

0:40:15.596 --> 0:40:18.876
<v Speaker 2>probably one of the most impactful. Like it's so simple

0:40:18.956 --> 0:40:23.476
<v Speaker 2>in some ways that behavior is shaped by both positive

0:40:23.836 --> 0:40:29.876
<v Speaker 2>essentially benefits and like drawbacks, so rewards and punishments and

0:40:29.956 --> 0:40:33.316
<v Speaker 2>these these types of things are the simplicity of it

0:40:33.356 --> 0:40:36.676
<v Speaker 2>is is so simple, but like the how meaningful it

0:40:36.716 --> 0:40:38.996
<v Speaker 2>is and daily life is so profound, we.

0:40:39.036 --> 0:40:41.796
<v Speaker 1>Still underrate it. I mean when I the little bit

0:40:41.836 --> 0:40:43.996
<v Speaker 1>I know about Skinner, I think of the black box, right,

0:40:44.036 --> 0:40:46.636
<v Speaker 1>the like, don't worry about what's going on in somebody's mind,

0:40:46.796 --> 0:40:48.676
<v Speaker 1>just look at what's going on on the outdoit. Yeah.

0:40:48.716 --> 0:40:49.556
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And with.

0:40:49.636 --> 0:40:52.036
<v Speaker 1>Behavior, I mean in a way it sort of maps

0:40:52.076 --> 0:40:57.436
<v Speaker 1>to your wearable's mobile devices thing, right, like just look,

0:40:57.516 --> 0:40:59.716
<v Speaker 1>if you don't go outside, you get sad, and so

0:40:59.836 --> 0:41:00.716
<v Speaker 1>go outside.

0:41:00.916 --> 0:41:04.716
<v Speaker 2>Sure exactly. I am a behaviorist at heart, So this

0:41:04.876 --> 0:41:07.036
<v Speaker 2>is part of part of what however you way.

0:41:07.076 --> 0:41:10.356
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I was actually think briefly before we talked

0:41:10.356 --> 0:41:11.916
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't gonna bring it up, But since you brought

0:41:11.956 --> 0:41:14.676
<v Speaker 1>it up, it's interesting to think. Like the famous thing

0:41:14.676 --> 0:41:16.956
<v Speaker 1>people say about Skinner is like the mind is a

0:41:16.956 --> 0:41:18.596
<v Speaker 1>black box, right, we don't know what's going on on

0:41:18.636 --> 0:41:19.636
<v Speaker 1>the inside and don't worry about it.

0:41:19.756 --> 0:41:19.996
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:41:20.036 --> 0:41:23.476
<v Speaker 1>It makes me think of the way large language models

0:41:23.876 --> 0:41:25.956
<v Speaker 1>on black boxes, and even the people who build them

0:41:25.996 --> 0:41:27.116
<v Speaker 1>don't understand how they work.

0:41:27.196 --> 0:41:30.756
<v Speaker 2>Right. Yeah, absolutely, I think psychologists in some ways are

0:41:30.916 --> 0:41:34.796
<v Speaker 2>best suited to understand the behavior of large language models,

0:41:34.836 --> 0:41:38.476
<v Speaker 2>because it's actually the science of behavior absence the ability

0:41:38.516 --> 0:41:43.276
<v Speaker 2>to like potentially understand what's going on inside, Like neuroscience

0:41:43.356 --> 0:41:45.636
<v Speaker 2>is a natural compliment, but in some ways a different

0:41:46.036 --> 0:41:48.196
<v Speaker 2>different lens in which you view the world. So like

0:41:48.276 --> 0:41:51.636
<v Speaker 2>trying to develop a predictable system that is shaped. I

0:41:51.636 --> 0:41:54.796
<v Speaker 2>actually think we're not so bad in terms of folks

0:41:54.796 --> 0:41:55.916
<v Speaker 2>to be able to take this on.

0:41:59.236 --> 0:42:00.756
<v Speaker 1>What's your go to karaoke song?

0:42:01.436 --> 0:42:04.396
<v Speaker 2>Oh, don't stop believing. I'm a big karaoke person too.

0:42:04.636 --> 0:42:09.756
<v Speaker 1>Somebody just sent me that just the vocal from stop believing.

0:42:09.796 --> 0:42:13.436
<v Speaker 2>Ah, yeah, no, it's it's it's like a meme.

0:42:13.716 --> 0:42:14.676
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing, it is.

0:42:15.396 --> 0:42:15.516
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:42:17.516 --> 0:42:20.396
<v Speaker 1>What's one thing you've learned about yourself from a wearable device?

0:42:21.036 --> 0:42:24.356
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm. One of the things that I would say,

0:42:24.396 --> 0:42:28.796
<v Speaker 2>like my ability to understand recognize when I've actually had

0:42:29.036 --> 0:42:31.956
<v Speaker 2>a poor night's sleep or a good night's sleep has

0:42:31.956 --> 0:42:35.796
<v Speaker 2>gotten much better over time. Like I think, as humans

0:42:35.796 --> 0:42:38.116
<v Speaker 2>were not very well calibrated to it. But as you

0:42:38.836 --> 0:42:43.116
<v Speaker 2>actually start to wear them and get understand you can

0:42:43.236 --> 0:42:45.316
<v Speaker 2>you are you become a better self reporter.

0:42:45.436 --> 0:42:49.116
<v Speaker 1>Actually I sleep badly. I assume it's because I'm middle aged.

0:42:50.356 --> 0:42:52.236
<v Speaker 1>I do most of the things you're supposed to do.

0:42:52.276 --> 0:42:54.996
<v Speaker 1>But give me one tip for sleeping. Well, I get

0:42:54.996 --> 0:42:56.396
<v Speaker 1>to sleep, but then I wake up in the middle

0:42:56.436 --> 0:42:56.756
<v Speaker 1>of the night.

0:42:57.036 --> 0:42:59.516
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. That. I think. One of the things that a

0:42:59.556 --> 0:43:04.396
<v Speaker 2>lot of people will do is they'll worry, particularly in bed,

0:43:04.516 --> 0:43:07.516
<v Speaker 2>or use this as a time for thinking, so a

0:43:07.516 --> 0:43:10.596
<v Speaker 2>lot of a lot of the effective surrounding that, or

0:43:10.636 --> 0:43:14.956
<v Speaker 2>to try to actually give yourself that same time that

0:43:14.996 --> 0:43:17.596
<v Speaker 2>would be that unstructured time that you would be dedicated

0:43:17.996 --> 0:43:19.636
<v Speaker 2>that you might experience in bed.

0:43:19.836 --> 0:43:22.196
<v Speaker 1>You tell me I should worry it ten at night

0:43:22.236 --> 0:43:24.156
<v Speaker 1>instead of three in the morning. If I worry, if

0:43:24.236 --> 0:43:26.476
<v Speaker 1>I say it ten at night, okay, worry now, then

0:43:26.476 --> 0:43:27.396
<v Speaker 1>I'll sleep through the night.

0:43:27.596 --> 0:43:31.036
<v Speaker 2>There there's literally evidence surrounding scheduling your worries out and

0:43:31.036 --> 0:43:33.876
<v Speaker 2>I love during the day and it does work. So yeah,

0:43:33.916 --> 0:43:35.716
<v Speaker 2>that's okay. If it's got some.

0:43:35.676 --> 0:43:38.796
<v Speaker 1>Worries, I'm gonna worry it ten tonight, I'll let you

0:43:38.836 --> 0:43:39.556
<v Speaker 1>know tomorrow morning.

0:43:39.556 --> 0:43:45.676
<v Speaker 2>If it were just don't do it in bed. Yeah, okay, okay.

0:43:45.796 --> 0:43:48.036
<v Speaker 1>If you had to build a chatbot based on one

0:43:48.076 --> 0:43:54.796
<v Speaker 1>of the following fictional therapists or psychiatrists, which fictional therapist

0:43:54.916 --> 0:44:00.316
<v Speaker 1>or psychiatrist would it be? A Jennifer Milthy from The Sopranos,

0:44:00.636 --> 0:44:05.836
<v Speaker 1>B Doctor Krokowski from The Magic Mountain, see Fraser from Fraser,

0:44:06.396 --> 0:44:08.196
<v Speaker 1>or d Hannibal Lecter.

0:44:08.516 --> 0:44:12.636
<v Speaker 2>Oh god, okay, I would probably go with Frasier, a

0:44:12.756 --> 0:44:15.636
<v Speaker 2>very different style of therapy than but I think his

0:44:15.916 --> 0:44:20.516
<v Speaker 2>demeanor is at least generally decent, So yeah, mostly appropriate

0:44:20.556 --> 0:44:22.396
<v Speaker 2>with most of his clients from what I remember in

0:44:22.436 --> 0:44:22.756
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:44:22.956 --> 0:44:26.276
<v Speaker 1>Okay, it's a very thoughtful response to an absurd question.

0:44:28.876 --> 0:44:30.356
<v Speaker 1>Anything else we should talk about?

0:44:30.676 --> 0:44:34.436
<v Speaker 2>You've asked wonderful questions one thing I will say, maybe

0:44:34.476 --> 0:44:37.676
<v Speaker 2>for folks that might be listening, is a lot of

0:44:37.676 --> 0:44:42.156
<v Speaker 2>folks are already using generator AI for their mental health treatment,

0:44:43.076 --> 0:44:47.236
<v Speaker 2>and so I will I'll give a recommendation if folks

0:44:47.276 --> 0:44:51.036
<v Speaker 2>are doing this already, that they just treat it with

0:44:51.116 --> 0:44:53.916
<v Speaker 2>the same level of concern they would have the Internet.

0:44:54.756 --> 0:44:58.156
<v Speaker 2>They there may be benefits they can get out of it. Awesome, great,

0:44:59.116 --> 0:45:02.556
<v Speaker 2>but just don't work on changing something within your daily

0:45:02.596 --> 0:45:07.196
<v Speaker 2>life surrounding particularly your behavior, based on what these models

0:45:07.196 --> 0:45:10.276
<v Speaker 2>are doing, without some real thought on making sure that

0:45:10.276 --> 0:45:12.996
<v Speaker 2>that is actually going to be a safe thing for

0:45:13.036 --> 0:45:13.476
<v Speaker 2>you to do.

0:45:20.356 --> 0:45:23.116
<v Speaker 1>Nick Jacobsen is an assistant professor at the Center for

0:45:23.196 --> 0:45:26.996
<v Speaker 1>Technology and Behavioral Health at the Geissel School of Medicine

0:45:27.156 --> 0:45:30.956
<v Speaker 1>at Dartmouth. Today's show was produced by Gabriel Hunter Chang.

0:45:31.276 --> 0:45:34.596
<v Speaker 1>It was edited by Lydia Jean Kott and engineered by

0:45:34.636 --> 0:45:38.236
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Brugier. You can email us at problem at Pushkin

0:45:38.316 --> 0:45:41.516
<v Speaker 1>dot FM. I'm Jacob Boldstein, and we'll be back next

0:45:41.556 --> 0:45:42.316
<v Speaker 1>week with another

0:45:42.356 --> 0:45:51.476
<v Speaker 2>Episode of What's Your Problem.