1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,759 Speaker 1: It's risk gone right now joining us to discuss black Rocks, 2 00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:05,640 Speaker 1: Kate more Bank for Americas Wooded, Kate, Are there any 3 00:00:05,640 --> 00:00:06,200 Speaker 1: bears left? 4 00:00:07,320 --> 00:00:09,760 Speaker 2: There are still a few holdouts, I think, John, I 5 00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 2: think there are a number of people who looked at 6 00:00:12,600 --> 00:00:15,560 Speaker 2: the phenomenal move in the equity markets last week and 7 00:00:15,680 --> 00:00:19,079 Speaker 2: risk assets kind of broadly and said this is not sustainable. 8 00:00:19,239 --> 00:00:20,919 Speaker 2: But no one wants to stand in front of his 9 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 2: train going into your end. I think we'll see a 10 00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:26,600 Speaker 2: lot of adjustment of positioning in January, however, and some 11 00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 2: of those bears will be a little bit bolder, especially 12 00:00:28,840 --> 00:00:30,600 Speaker 2: if we rally over the next two weeks. 13 00:00:30,680 --> 00:00:32,640 Speaker 1: The best is sound in bullish this morning, Mike Wilson 14 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,600 Speaker 1: and Molkan Stanley a bullish outcome for stocks off the 15 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:38,120 Speaker 1: back of what we heard from Chairman Powell, Jared Wooded, 16 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:40,520 Speaker 1: Are we setting go south up for disappointment? How high 17 00:00:40,600 --> 00:00:42,680 Speaker 1: is the bar now gone into twenty twenty four? 18 00:00:44,159 --> 00:00:46,199 Speaker 3: Yeah, I think it's fair to say, John, that the 19 00:00:46,240 --> 00:00:49,879 Speaker 3: gains from this pivot by the Fed are fully reflected 20 00:00:49,880 --> 00:00:51,880 Speaker 3: in the market. I mean, never mind the Santa Claus rally, 21 00:00:51,920 --> 00:00:55,000 Speaker 3: this market, bonds and stocks alike have trimmed the tree, 22 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:57,560 Speaker 3: they popped the champagne court for New Year's they booked 23 00:00:57,560 --> 00:01:00,200 Speaker 3: a ticket for summer vacation. They're so far ahead of 24 00:01:00,240 --> 00:01:03,840 Speaker 3: what the economic fundamentals would suggest. If anything, this is 25 00:01:03,840 --> 00:01:06,320 Speaker 3: a great point to start taking profits and look for 26 00:01:06,440 --> 00:01:07,920 Speaker 3: alternative positioning for next year. 27 00:01:08,120 --> 00:01:09,920 Speaker 1: Joe, as you'd pull back, why would you pull back? 28 00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:15,200 Speaker 3: Well, I take gains in you know, unprofitable tech. That's 29 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:17,200 Speaker 3: been one of the things that's rallied the most in 30 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:19,840 Speaker 3: this short covering rally, and the most shorted stocks have 31 00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:22,759 Speaker 3: been huge beneficiaries, as Kate menhe as bears pull back. 32 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:25,119 Speaker 4: But when you have low quality rallying. 33 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:27,880 Speaker 3: And when you have fundamentals that haven't really improved, you know, 34 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:30,160 Speaker 3: sharply in the last several weeks. If anything, we think 35 00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 3: the risk of inflation in the second half of next 36 00:01:32,680 --> 00:01:35,520 Speaker 3: year is still a big concern. So investing in things 37 00:01:35,520 --> 00:01:37,160 Speaker 3: that are going to be robust to inflation and to 38 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:39,360 Speaker 3: things that are higher up in quality seemed like a 39 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:41,759 Speaker 3: great way to position for next year at a time 40 00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:43,600 Speaker 3: when everyone else is just scrambling for any kind of 41 00:01:43,680 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 3: junk they can find. 42 00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:44,600 Speaker 5: It. 43 00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 1: Truly has been an everthing rally. Breadth has improved, Okay, 44 00:01:48,120 --> 00:01:49,920 Speaker 1: I just wanted from your perspective, is that's the real 45 00:01:49,960 --> 00:01:51,520 Speaker 1: deal or whether that's a head fake. 46 00:01:52,440 --> 00:01:52,680 Speaker 5: Yeah. 47 00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:54,559 Speaker 2: Look, I think there's a little bit of real deal 48 00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 2: and a little bit of headfeach actually mixed in here. 49 00:01:56,760 --> 00:01:58,880 Speaker 2: Don And on the one hand, you have seen a 50 00:01:58,920 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 2: lot of people reposition and kind of invest in the laggards, rotate, 51 00:02:02,800 --> 00:02:05,680 Speaker 2: try and neutralize some of their underweights. And on the 52 00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:09,120 Speaker 2: other hand, there's this acknowledgment that, let's say, particularly in 53 00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:12,720 Speaker 2: the small cap space that had been under tremendous amount 54 00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 2: of pressure as rates continued to rise, that if the 55 00:02:15,440 --> 00:02:18,359 Speaker 2: worst is behind us in terms of policy tightening, there 56 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:21,600 Speaker 2: is potential for some of these companies to perform Okay, 57 00:02:21,639 --> 00:02:23,919 Speaker 2: I'm not going to say phenomenal, but okay in twenty 58 00:02:23,960 --> 00:02:26,760 Speaker 2: twenty four, so the earning story has a little bit 59 00:02:26,800 --> 00:02:29,480 Speaker 2: less downward pressure, I would say in the small cap space. 60 00:02:29,840 --> 00:02:32,400 Speaker 2: So there's both the repositioning, I think, and an acknowledgment 61 00:02:32,440 --> 00:02:33,800 Speaker 2: the fundamentals could improve. 62 00:02:33,919 --> 00:02:35,760 Speaker 1: Okay, talk to me about a sect that you do like, 63 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:38,280 Speaker 1: tech and discretion rate are the winner is of this year? 64 00:02:38,320 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 1: The win is the next year? 65 00:02:40,320 --> 00:02:42,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, we like t tech discretionary, but we're looking for 66 00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:46,160 Speaker 2: opportunities down across all sectors. At this point, I might 67 00:02:46,480 --> 00:02:48,480 Speaker 2: take a little bit more of a bullish look and 68 00:02:48,520 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 2: a little bit more constructive than Derek right now and say, yes, 69 00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:54,359 Speaker 2: it's true that we've started to price in a lot 70 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:56,880 Speaker 2: of the best news from the monetary policy front, but 71 00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,920 Speaker 2: there's a lot of good fundamental stories across all of 72 00:03:00,120 --> 00:03:02,840 Speaker 2: sectors at this point. Companies have done the work in 73 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:06,280 Speaker 2: terms of reducing their expenses, they continue to manage to 74 00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:08,640 Speaker 2: the bottom line, and I think they're going to deliver 75 00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:15,200 Speaker 2: actually solid earnings across consumer, across technology, technology enablers, in 76 00:03:15,320 --> 00:03:17,839 Speaker 2: even some cyclical parts in twenty twenty four. 77 00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:19,280 Speaker 1: Charge would you agree with that? 78 00:03:20,720 --> 00:03:20,960 Speaker 4: Yeah? 79 00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 3: Look, when I mentioned going into higher quality, I'm thinking 80 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:26,639 Speaker 3: of companies and sectors where you have strong free cash 81 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 3: flow with solid balance sheets that have already endured a 82 00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:30,560 Speaker 3: lot of pain over the past decade. 83 00:03:30,680 --> 00:03:32,680 Speaker 4: To me, that's financials, that's energy. 84 00:03:32,880 --> 00:03:36,080 Speaker 3: We think about Asia equities in particular Korea, Japan, India, 85 00:03:36,160 --> 00:03:39,440 Speaker 3: even where you've got decent or even compelling valuation, lots 86 00:03:39,440 --> 00:03:42,720 Speaker 3: of corporate reform, a positive macro environment, and if the 87 00:03:42,840 --> 00:03:45,200 Speaker 3: consensus view is right that you have a weaker dollar 88 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:48,040 Speaker 3: next year, a friendly fed those Asian stocks really poised 89 00:03:48,080 --> 00:03:49,640 Speaker 3: to benefit from a weeker dollar as well. 90 00:03:49,880 --> 00:03:51,800 Speaker 1: Jorge, you mentioned the banks. Let's talk about them. On 91 00:03:51,880 --> 00:03:53,760 Speaker 1: the S and P five hundred. They are higher by 92 00:03:54,080 --> 00:03:57,000 Speaker 1: twenty six percent, not yet today, but since the end 93 00:03:57,000 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 1: of October. It's not just off the back of the 94 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:01,600 Speaker 1: bond market move. Something sustainable in your mind that we're 95 00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:02,040 Speaker 1: all missing. 96 00:04:03,760 --> 00:04:04,920 Speaker 4: Well, I think it's a few things. 97 00:04:04,920 --> 00:04:07,440 Speaker 3: There's a taking out of some of the risk around 98 00:04:08,320 --> 00:04:10,360 Speaker 3: real estate and some of those tail rist scenarios that 99 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 3: have dogged the market this year. There's understanding that a 100 00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:16,440 Speaker 3: friendlier fed, friendlier you know, cost of capital is going 101 00:04:16,480 --> 00:04:19,480 Speaker 3: to boost multiple lines of businesses across banks. 102 00:04:19,800 --> 00:04:21,640 Speaker 4: And positioning here matters too. 103 00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:25,160 Speaker 3: When people have been so bearish on especially larger cat 104 00:04:25,200 --> 00:04:27,559 Speaker 3: banks all year, when you have a rally of this type, 105 00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:28,920 Speaker 3: you expected. 106 00:04:28,480 --> 00:04:30,679 Speaker 4: Some of those most short of names to get an uplift. 107 00:04:30,760 --> 00:04:32,800 Speaker 1: Okay, what is it to like about the financials from 108 00:04:32,839 --> 00:04:33,520 Speaker 1: your perspective? 109 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:36,839 Speaker 2: I got to be honest, John, I'm not overly excited 110 00:04:36,880 --> 00:04:38,960 Speaker 2: about the financials at this point. I'd be putting my 111 00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:42,440 Speaker 2: incremental risk in maybe some different places. You know, I 112 00:04:42,480 --> 00:04:45,960 Speaker 2: mentioned discretionary before. We've had you know, a constructive view 113 00:04:46,000 --> 00:04:48,160 Speaker 2: on the sector. But I could see a broadening out 114 00:04:48,200 --> 00:04:50,880 Speaker 2: in terms of retail in particular, if we continue to 115 00:04:50,960 --> 00:04:54,480 Speaker 2: have what we've seen, which is like strong wage growth 116 00:04:55,000 --> 00:04:59,480 Speaker 2: but not so strong, inflation continuing to cool. But I'm 117 00:04:59,520 --> 00:05:04,880 Speaker 2: not talking that outrate, aggressive deplation, stable monetary policy and 118 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:07,599 Speaker 2: sentiment settling. You know, you can see a broadening out 119 00:05:07,960 --> 00:05:11,039 Speaker 2: in the discretionary space and across retail. And so that's 120 00:05:11,040 --> 00:05:12,440 Speaker 2: a place I'm doing a little bit of work and 121 00:05:12,480 --> 00:05:16,039 Speaker 2: getting more excited about the banks. I just don't see 122 00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:19,960 Speaker 2: a huge outperformance catalyst in twenty twenty four. 123 00:05:19,960 --> 00:05:22,120 Speaker 1: John, what are we missing? I last night twice, what 124 00:05:22,160 --> 00:05:22,719 Speaker 1: are we missing? 125 00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:24,839 Speaker 4: Well? 126 00:05:24,920 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 3: I think the most important thing for investors think about 127 00:05:27,040 --> 00:05:30,039 Speaker 3: right now is what's priced. Then, what's reflected in the 128 00:05:30,040 --> 00:05:33,720 Speaker 3: market today, and the consensus view on a perfect landing, 129 00:05:34,520 --> 00:05:38,360 Speaker 3: slower growth, friendly and disinflation and a FED that's very 130 00:05:38,360 --> 00:05:41,040 Speaker 3: happy to cut is I think fully reflected in the market. 131 00:05:41,080 --> 00:05:43,880 Speaker 3: So my point earlier about being tactically a bit cautious 132 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 3: reflects the fact that the market's already well ahead of 133 00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 3: the FED. That's why you have folks coming out in 134 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:50,880 Speaker 3: the days after saying maybe people who need to reconsider. 135 00:05:50,960 --> 00:05:53,760 Speaker 3: That's why my colleagues at Bank America just have the 136 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,239 Speaker 3: rate forecast four cuts next year, but which is still 137 00:05:56,480 --> 00:05:59,279 Speaker 3: much less established than the market as a whole. If 138 00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:02,520 Speaker 3: you're an investment are approaching the market from a neutral 139 00:06:02,520 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 3: standing point today, I think you have to have a 140 00:06:04,080 --> 00:06:06,719 Speaker 3: vire belt of things that are tactically a little bit 141 00:06:06,760 --> 00:06:09,599 Speaker 3: more cautious, but with looking for cyclical value opportunities. For 142 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:11,960 Speaker 3: the second half of this year, structural inflation, we think 143 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:13,680 Speaker 3: is a really big theme. That means you need to 144 00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:15,159 Speaker 3: be in equities, You need to be in commodities and 145 00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:19,279 Speaker 3: assets that can benefit from a structurally higher stagflationary or 146 00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:21,640 Speaker 3: inflationary environment. That doesn't mean you need to load up 147 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:23,560 Speaker 3: the vote at this moment, but it does mean that 148 00:06:23,600 --> 00:06:26,080 Speaker 3: the asset mix that most investors have in benchmarks and 149 00:06:26,120 --> 00:06:28,479 Speaker 3: model portfolios is ill suited to the world as we 150 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:29,039 Speaker 3: see it today. 151 00:06:29,160 --> 00:06:31,400 Speaker 1: Jad you can't say stagflation then walk away. We've got 152 00:06:31,440 --> 00:06:33,960 Speaker 1: to come back to it. Stagflation. Can you build on 153 00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:35,200 Speaker 1: that a little bit more? Is that the kind of 154 00:06:35,240 --> 00:06:36,640 Speaker 1: environment you're looking for next year. 155 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:38,480 Speaker 3: I think in the second half of next year there's 156 00:06:38,520 --> 00:06:41,440 Speaker 3: a very meaningful risk that you see a rebound in inflation. 157 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:44,040 Speaker 3: And my colleagues and economics and across the firm, I think, 158 00:06:44,120 --> 00:06:45,599 Speaker 3: have written about this as well as one of their 159 00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:48,160 Speaker 3: risk scenarios. Because when you look at all the whole 160 00:06:48,160 --> 00:06:51,159 Speaker 3: economy doesn't matter. Households, corporates, or government, all the major 161 00:06:51,200 --> 00:06:56,400 Speaker 3: sectors are in an environment in which their sensitivity to 162 00:06:56,480 --> 00:06:59,479 Speaker 3: rate hikes is extremely low. There's still, you know, lots 163 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:01,520 Speaker 3: of risk high inflation, and many of the metrics that 164 00:07:01,560 --> 00:07:04,680 Speaker 3: we watch are still one or two standard deviations above 165 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:07,080 Speaker 3: the long term norm. I'll give you a couple quick examples. 166 00:07:07,400 --> 00:07:11,040 Speaker 3: The US federal budget deficit five percent of GDP. Unprecedented 167 00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:14,320 Speaker 3: to be spending this much money with unemployment your record lows, 168 00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:17,320 Speaker 3: and that's completely improvirious for the Fed. People will tell you, John, oh, 169 00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:19,320 Speaker 3: don't worry, Congress is going to pull back on spending 170 00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:19,840 Speaker 3: next year. 171 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:21,040 Speaker 4: We think that's irrelevant. 172 00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:24,440 Speaker 3: Our analysts have told me that something like seventy seven 173 00:07:24,520 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 3: percent of the fiscal stimulus that's already been authorized by 174 00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:29,880 Speaker 3: Congress in the last several years hasn't even been spent yet. 175 00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:32,400 Speaker 3: That's going to still come through households and corporates. It's 176 00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:35,160 Speaker 3: the same story. Households are sitting on excess saving still 177 00:07:35,200 --> 00:07:38,239 Speaker 3: around nine hundred and fifty billion dollars. People very happy 178 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:42,360 Speaker 3: to buy houses at any price. Corporates are facing private 179 00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:45,000 Speaker 3: credit dry powder to the tune of five hundred billion dollars, 180 00:07:45,320 --> 00:07:47,480 Speaker 3: very happy to step in and plug any gaps and 181 00:07:47,600 --> 00:07:49,880 Speaker 3: lending that might come about. And it's worth noting too 182 00:07:49,960 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 3: that high oield issuers still sitting on big cash piles. 183 00:07:52,720 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 3: The interest coverage ratio for high oield bond issuers is 184 00:07:55,560 --> 00:07:58,640 Speaker 3: still one standard deviation above the long term average. This 185 00:07:58,680 --> 00:08:01,480 Speaker 3: is something you see very early cycle, not end of cycle, 186 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:03,240 Speaker 3: and it's the kind of thing that if the FED 187 00:08:03,320 --> 00:08:06,800 Speaker 3: does cut aggressively, you could see a rebound inflation. Given 188 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:08,440 Speaker 3: wage growth and all the other parts of the economy, 189 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:09,680 Speaker 3: they're still looking pretty hot. 190 00:08:09,960 --> 00:08:11,560 Speaker 1: Okay, what happens if Jarvis right? 191 00:08:12,920 --> 00:08:15,160 Speaker 2: I mean, if if inflation word of rebound, which I 192 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:17,520 Speaker 2: would say we put as a pretty low probability event 193 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:19,800 Speaker 2: in the second half of next year, because we do 194 00:08:19,840 --> 00:08:22,520 Speaker 2: think we're going to see a steady deceleration in overall 195 00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:25,480 Speaker 2: economic activity, perhaps not a big recession. 196 00:08:25,520 --> 00:08:28,040 Speaker 5: I think we're kind of a glide path here. 197 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:30,120 Speaker 2: But if we were to see a rebound in inflation, 198 00:08:30,560 --> 00:08:33,800 Speaker 2: that certainly would be a big hit for risk appetite. 199 00:08:33,920 --> 00:08:37,199 Speaker 2: If the FED had to talk about normalizing policy further, 200 00:08:37,559 --> 00:08:40,480 Speaker 2: that would be a big risk for the equity market. 201 00:08:41,000 --> 00:08:43,040 Speaker 2: But I do want to make a point here about 202 00:08:43,080 --> 00:08:44,920 Speaker 2: one of the risks for the second half of twenty 203 00:08:44,960 --> 00:08:47,480 Speaker 2: twenty four that we need to talk about, which is 204 00:08:47,679 --> 00:08:49,280 Speaker 2: twenty twenty four is an election year. 205 00:08:49,640 --> 00:08:52,720 Speaker 5: And during election years, especially if there's a chance. 206 00:08:52,520 --> 00:08:55,800 Speaker 2: Of a significant change in administration and policy. You know, 207 00:08:55,880 --> 00:08:59,120 Speaker 2: sometimes companies sit back a little bit and don't engage 208 00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:02,760 Speaker 2: in capital expendite are outside of necessary and maintenance capbex. 209 00:09:02,960 --> 00:09:04,559 Speaker 5: Right, they just sort of say. 210 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:07,040 Speaker 2: We'll do what's necessary, but let's see if there's a 211 00:09:07,120 --> 00:09:09,320 Speaker 2: change in the tax regime or a change in regulation 212 00:09:09,440 --> 00:09:11,920 Speaker 2: that's going to impact my ability to do business. So 213 00:09:12,040 --> 00:09:14,800 Speaker 2: sometimes in the kind of the fourth year represidential cycle 214 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:18,200 Speaker 2: are doing a big contested election, you will see a 215 00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:22,079 Speaker 2: change in spending so that I'm watching, which may lead 216 00:09:22,120 --> 00:09:24,800 Speaker 2: to some dampness in the economy. I'm not it's not 217 00:09:24,880 --> 00:09:27,560 Speaker 2: keeping me up at night, but it's something that's definitely 218 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:28,000 Speaker 2: a risk. 219 00:09:28,160 --> 00:09:30,520 Speaker 1: Find a word with Kate Moore Police. Okay, let's go 220 00:09:30,559 --> 00:09:33,320 Speaker 1: there the Federer serve, who do I listen to? The 221 00:09:33,400 --> 00:09:35,920 Speaker 1: chairman pal that I heard from with the start December, 222 00:09:36,000 --> 00:09:38,200 Speaker 1: the one I heard from on Wednesday, the people I've 223 00:09:38,240 --> 00:09:40,200 Speaker 1: heard from subsequently, who do I listen to? 224 00:09:41,200 --> 00:09:42,920 Speaker 2: I think we listened to them all. Don That's not 225 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 2: a cop out answer. I mean, I think Powell was 226 00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:49,200 Speaker 2: right in indicating that we can start discussing the possibility 227 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:54,200 Speaker 2: of rate cuts if the growth, inflation and employment data 228 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:57,200 Speaker 2: suggests that's the right and appropriate move. But I think 229 00:09:57,320 --> 00:09:59,080 Speaker 2: you know, the other FED speakers who come out and 230 00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 2: basically said, hey, we're not promising rate cuts in the 231 00:10:02,200 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 2: near term, that there's a lot of uncertainty in the 232 00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:06,680 Speaker 2: macro data, that we're still coming out of a very 233 00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:10,000 Speaker 2: unusual cycle from the pandemic, and like we have to 234 00:10:10,040 --> 00:10:10,640 Speaker 2: wait and see. 235 00:10:11,040 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 5: It's also worth paying attention to. 236 00:10:13,400 --> 00:10:15,560 Speaker 2: I mean, I think the message for markets is like, 237 00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:18,160 Speaker 2: don't get ahead of yourself and expecting a huge number 238 00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:20,600 Speaker 2: of rate cuts in the first half of twenty twenty four. 239 00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:23,560 Speaker 5: We still think growth is going to look quite good. 240 00:10:24,120 --> 00:10:27,040 Speaker 2: Some of the disinflationary pressures with the speed of disinflation 241 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:27,840 Speaker 2: may ease. 242 00:10:27,600 --> 00:10:29,920 Speaker 5: A little bit in the first part of twenty twenty four. 243 00:10:30,280 --> 00:10:32,120 Speaker 5: But that doesn't mean, and I'm going to make another 244 00:10:32,120 --> 00:10:33,280 Speaker 5: pitch for this, that it's like. 245 00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:36,680 Speaker 2: Game over for equities. I still think there's a risk 246 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:37,439 Speaker 2: on move to. 247 00:10:37,400 --> 00:10:39,760 Speaker 5: Be had John going into twenty twenty four. 248 00:10:39,840 --> 00:10:41,839 Speaker 1: Are there's some basic come to long assumptions you making 249 00:10:41,920 --> 00:10:45,520 Speaker 1: on the bond market though, Okay, to make that cool, Yeah. 250 00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:45,840 Speaker 5: That's right. 251 00:10:45,880 --> 00:10:48,840 Speaker 2: I mean, to Iyer's point, I would expect stability in 252 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:52,120 Speaker 2: yields if we had a huge amount of bond of volatility. 253 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:55,480 Speaker 5: If we ended up seeing let's say, sustainable. 254 00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:59,720 Speaker 2: Rise above four four ten and there was upward pressure, 255 00:11:00,360 --> 00:11:02,920 Speaker 2: there would be a little bit tougher case for equities. 256 00:11:03,080 --> 00:11:04,400 Speaker 2: But I do think we're going to be able to 257 00:11:04,440 --> 00:11:07,480 Speaker 2: move past the obsession with monetary policy and the obsession 258 00:11:07,480 --> 00:11:11,400 Speaker 2: with FED speed and focus a little bit more on fundamentals, 259 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:13,960 Speaker 2: which I think are going to improve. And by fundamentals, 260 00:11:14,000 --> 00:11:15,840 Speaker 2: I mean specifically earnings next year. 261 00:11:16,200 --> 00:11:18,280 Speaker 1: Okay, I hope that is not just the dream that 262 00:11:18,360 --> 00:11:21,559 Speaker 1: is actually a cool materialize. You know. I think we're 263 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:23,320 Speaker 1: all on the same page. We all want to stop 264 00:11:23,360 --> 00:11:25,920 Speaker 1: talking about this, Kay, Thank you always fantastic The Cats 265 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:28,320 Speaker 1: Shop with the brilliant came more of Black Rock alongside 266 00:11:28,360 --> 00:11:29,920 Speaker 1: Jared Wood of Bank for America