WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema: Head

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Hello, and welcome to Weird House Cinema. My name is

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 2>Joe McCormick. My regular co host, Robert Lamb is not

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 2>with me today, so I am being joined by a

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:28.159
<v Speaker 2>guest someone who will be familiar to longtime listeners of

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 2>the show, our former producer and friend, Seth Nicholas Johnson.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>How are you doing, Seth?

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Hello? Everyone, I'm doing great. Happy to be back again,

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 3>and I'm glad to still be a part of the

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, Stuff to Blow your Mind family.

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's really great to have you back, man. Yeah.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.160
<v Speaker 2>So the movie we're going to be talking about today

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>is a movie you suggested, Seth, one that I had

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 2>never seen before, and I am thrilled to discuss it

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>today because it is so strange and so interesting. Today's

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 2>film is the nineteen sixty eight psychedelic musical comedy Head,

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 2>starring the TV musical act The Monkeys, and people may

0:01:08.800 --> 0:01:11.759
<v Speaker 2>say they monkey around, but the important thing to understand

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>is that being a monkey is a pact with Satan,

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>cursing you to a dreadful existence of meaninglessness and unfreedom.

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:21.919
<v Speaker 2>But also it's all for a laugh.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 3>You know, they monkey around a lot in this movie.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:30.759
<v Speaker 3>Like if a reviewer simply wrote that after they saw

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.279
<v Speaker 3>the film, you know these boys, they really monkey around,

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 3>they'd be correct. That is what's happening throughout the entire

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 3>eighty six minutes of this film.

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>But what's not true is that they're too busy singing

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 2>to put anybody down. This movie sort of does put

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people in things down, including the monkeys

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>and the creators of the monkeys, true, and everything that

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 2>enabled the monkeys to happen, and the fans of the monkeys,

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and war and consumerism and the broader culture and basically everything.

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a shocking indictment of humankind.

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 3>It's very true.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.919
<v Speaker 2>So I first of all had no idea this movie

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>was going to have such dark threads running through it,

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 2>or that it would be as funny as it was.

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 2>But I previously actually didn't know much about the Monkeys.

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I didn't like grow up watching the show or anything

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I knew, you know, so the songs that would play

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 2>on the radio and stuff. So before we get into

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 2>discussing the film itself, Sethlake, what is your pre existing

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>relationship with the Monkeys and did that have anything to

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 2>do with you suggesting this movie for today.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, I grew up on the TV show. Well obviously

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.519
<v Speaker 3>on the reruns. I wasn't around for the first round.

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>But if folks don't know, around the mid to late eighties,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>MTV started replaying old episodes of The Monkeys simp believe

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>it was like the thirtieth anniversary, twentieth anniversary, something like that,

0:02:54.280 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 3>And when that happened, yeah, I guess would have been

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the twentieth anniversary sixties, seventies, eighties, correct anniversary on MTV.

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 3>They had a bunch of reunions and they played the

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>TV Show and there was like a second wave of

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Monkey Mania, and this was kind of a big bolster,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 3>not only to their record sales, some of their albums

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 3>like re entered the charts and stuff like that, but

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>in addition to that, they started doing reunion tours like

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 3>the Monkeys came back in the mid to late eighties,

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 3>and I guess I was influenced by that as a

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 3>as a small child, because I watched those reruns and

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 3>fell in love with it and just like the humor

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 3>and the silliness, and honestly also the quality of the

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>music really won me over as a child and it

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>stuck with me for a long time. And eventually, when

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 3>I did become old enough to start like you know,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 3>buying my own albums and like caring about music, I

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>was like, you know, some of these Monkeys albums are great.

0:03:48.560 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 3>So then I went like through the effort of actually

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>like learning the history of them and when they took

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>over and started, you know, being in control of their

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 3>own music compared with when they just had a bunch

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 3>of like you know, studio heads telling them what they

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>had to do, and what the difference between that sound was. Like,

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I really did a deep dive and just to just

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 3>to you know, educate myself. And yeah, I would call

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 3>myself a big Monkeys fan. I have seen my personal

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 3>favorite Monkey, Mike Nesmyth, in concert multiple times, and you

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 3>know what, that's what I'll definitely say. I'm an enormous

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 3>Mike Nesmyth fan, and Mike Nesmyth used to be in

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 3>the Monkeys, That's what I'll say.

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 2>It is surprising when you go back and listen how

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.919
<v Speaker 2>good a lot of these songs are, like well written

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 2>pop tunes. Yeah, And I honestly Seth thought you might

0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 2>say that you're on Ramp to the Monkeys was the

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 2>smash Mouth cover in the Shrek soundtrack. I'm a believer.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't think I'm quite young enough for that. I'm

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 3>sure the generation below us would definitely say that. But

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 3>now I was brought on board with the reruns on

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>a MTV back in the late eighties.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, was that song. By the way, this would be

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>a good segue to the fact that actually a lot

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.239
<v Speaker 2>of the great Monkeys tunes that we know were written

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>by people who would go on to become great, you know, musicians,

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>well known stars and songwriters in their own right. I

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 2>think I'm a believer who was written by Neil Diamond,

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 2>wasn't it.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 3>I believe there is some truth to that. I can't

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 3>remember if it was originally intended to be a Neil

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Diamond song originally, but yeah, there was a bunch of

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 3>that kind of like flip flopping back and forth back then.

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>But he was definitely involved, that's for sure.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But other songs of the Monkeys were written by

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 2>like Carol King and collaborators. So, like, there are several

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Carol King songs that pop up in this movie, and

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>they're fantastic. Probably one of the best songs in the movie.

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 2>The Porpoise song is a Carol King and I forget

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the collaborator to his name will come up later.

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 3>Harry Nielsen too. They had some really good Harry Nielsen

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 3>collaborations in the future. And not to you know, harp

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>too much on my favorite monkey, Michael Nesmith. But Michael

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Nesmyth definitely wrote all of the best Monkeys songs. Well,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.679
<v Speaker 3>we'll hear at least one in this movie, a Circle Sky.

0:06:06.880 --> 0:06:11.040
<v Speaker 3>But when you hear that that Texas twang out of

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 3>Mike Nesmyth's mouth, you know, you know it's a Nesmuth original.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>And man, he writes a damn fine song. If folks

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 3>don't know he was, well, well, we'll get to this later.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 3>But he was already a famous songwriter before he joined

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the Monkeys, like, for example, he wrote Linda Ronstadt's Different Drum.

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 3>You know that song that's a Mesmith original? Yes, yeah,

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 3>uh yeah.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:35.359
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So we'll have to talk about the different elements

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 2>as we go along, But maybe before we go into

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 2>the history of the Monkeys and what the monkeys mean,

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>we should just give a brief description of what is head,

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 2>What is this movie? It is hard to describe, but

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.720
<v Speaker 2>I think the way I would put it is that

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 2>it is a nonlinear mad cap comedy starring the mid

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 2>sixties made for TV band the Monkeys as themselves or

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>as the slightly fictionalized versions of themselves that were that

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>were the Monkeys, or actually you might say as like

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 2>a second order character, like a a second order fictionalized

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 2>version of the Monkeys that appears in this movie to

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>sort of comment on the characters that they played in

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the show. Does that make any sense?

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 3>It absolutely does. And you know, I was just thinking

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 3>to myself, what other structures around this time were happening,

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:31.000
<v Speaker 3>And here's something that I don't believe this can be

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 3>connected because the timelines are too similar. I think it

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 3>was probably just like the vibe going through the air was.

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Did you ever used to watch Rowan and Martin's laugh.

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 2>In I think I've seen like one episode of it.

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 3>I had pointing out how old I am, But I

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely used to watch reruns of Rowan and Martin's Laughing

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 3>back in the day, and it has that same highly gosh,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 3>how to even put it, because there's a combination of psychedelia,

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>corny old jokes, rapid succession from like shot to shot,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 3>very little from thing to thing, and that show came

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 3>out in nineteen sixty eight, the same year as this movie.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 3>So okay, I'm not claiming that there's any connection there,

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 3>but I do think there must have been something in

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the water that made people feel that this was like

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>where the pendulum was swinging, that this was the kind

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 3>of structure that was needed in the world.

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>Or something in the kool aid yea, the electric kool

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:28.040
<v Speaker 2>aid exactly there, I think it would be. In fact,

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say it would be hard to

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>deny the drug influences on this movie, but in fact

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't. Even Like the creators have explicitly said this

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 2>movie was fueled by psychedelic drugs. Like Bob Rayfelson, who

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>will talk about in a bit, has given interviews extensively

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about how much the use of drugs like marijuana

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>and LSD played into the creative process that led to

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 2>this film. I don't know how much for the monkeys themselves,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 2>but for the writers and the director certainly this is

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 2>a very psychedelic forward comedy comedy film. But also so yeah,

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you get that very like only loosely logically connected or

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>sometimes totally logically unconnected sequence of images and scenes. But

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 2>also I just wanted to run down like a list

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 2>of things that this movie does. What these these comedic

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 2>episodes in the movie do so, they satirize American media,

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>especially like movies and TV with traditional square storytelling genres

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 2>like westerns and war movies. But also they they satirize

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 2>American advertising and just the general landscape of the media,

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 2>news report reports and stuff like that. But also these

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 2>there are several points in the movie that quite viscerally

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 2>critique the morality of US involvement in the Vietnam War

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 2>with like truly shocking imagery. But then the movie also

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 2>experiments with psychedelic music and imagery styles. I think if

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I was going to offer some critiques of this film,

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 2>one of them would be that I think they got

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>a little too excited about the solarization effect. I don't

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 2>know if that's quite as cool as they thought it was.

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Right for sure, I felt the same thing. Eventually, it

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.319
<v Speaker 3>was just a one throwoff moment, so I doubt we'll

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.599
<v Speaker 3>be referencing it directly. There was a scene with a

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 3>bunch of mylar balloons floating around, and I think they

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.319
<v Speaker 3>thought it would blow our minds, and I was like, nah,

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 3>we know what my lar balloons are. It's fine.

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 2>But then along with all that we get traditional song

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>and dance numbers. There's even like a Broadway show tune

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 2>kind of number in it. That's fantastic that there are

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>just like constant detours into corny non sequitor jokes. Like

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 2>the jokes are not all you know, like dark, incisive comedy.

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 2>A lot of it is just really the bottom of

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>the barrel kind of just the silliest puns and stuff.

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>And like you said too, the non sequitur nonsensical nature.

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Some of the humor is some of my favorites too.

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 3>One of my favorites I'll mention later. It's early in

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 3>the movie, so I'll bring it up later. But a

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.120
<v Speaker 3>lot of it is just good timing and good editing

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 3>with just like odd creative choices, especially captions. They use

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 3>a lot of odd text on screen captions and editing

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:29.959
<v Speaker 3>choices that are fascinating.

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh like when the guy says to Mickey Dolan's.

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, that yeah, that happens early in the movie.

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll mention that scene soon, but that that genuinely made

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 3>me laugh out loud. That's that we'll mention soon, Okay.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.520
<v Speaker 2>But another big thing this movie does is it meditates on,

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I would say, from the movie's perspective, the genuinely quite terrifying,

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 2>implied psychic undercurrents of Beatlemania and monkey mania. The movie

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 2>almost suggest there is something like threatening and fascist about

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the adulation of bands like this. And then also it

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 2>meditates on the meaninglessness of the Monkeys as a concept,

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 2>and on the meaninglessness of life, and on illusions of freedom.

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>But also it's funny.

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 3>It's very true. It's it's genuinely a funny film. And

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 3>it's amazing how they balance all of these pieces, that

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 3>it can be this dark, this unconnected, but also this

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 3>watchable and this funny. It's it's actually quite masterful in

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 3>many ways. Yeah.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 2>So in otherwise though, I mean, it's it's a movie

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 2>clearly made in the sixties, and like the sixties are

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 2>just wafting through it. So it is very dated in

0:12:48.200 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of ways. But in other ways it stands

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 2>out as surprisingly fresh and good and even shockingly, as

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 2>I said earlier, sharp with its satire. Sometimes it's hard

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 2>for me to think of another movie be quite like this. Agreed,

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we should hear some trailer audio.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 4>Not since the Ten Commandments.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 5>If you liked Covered Wagon Beyond from Here to Eternity.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 5>They can't be the Marx Brothers.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 4>They're too young. Columbia Pictures presents the Monkeys Mickey, Davey,

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 4>Mike Peter in Head. That's right, Head, what's it all about?

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Only Victor Mature's hair dresser knows for sure. Head is

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 4>the most extraordinary adventure, western comedy, love story, this greed, drama, musical, documentary,

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 4>satire ever filmed.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 2>All Right, So this is the part of the episode

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 2>we usually call connections where we talk about some people involved.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 2>There were a lot of people involved in this movie.

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 2>It has a ton of cameos that we can't possibly

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>name them all, but we'll try to talk through some

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 2>of the main figures and then maybe we'll hit on

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 2>some other things as we go through the plot a

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 2>little bit. The plot quote, It doesn't have a plot,

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>but as we talk about what happens on screen. The

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 2>director and writer of this film as a guy named

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Bob Rafelson who lived in nineteen thirty three through twenty

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty two. He was an American director, writer, and producer.

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.479
<v Speaker 2>Head was his first feature film, though he had previously

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 2>worked on TV as one of the creators of The

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Monkeys TV series for NBC in nineteen sixty five sixty six.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe he created it in sixty five and

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 2>it debuted in sixty six, I believe. But he would

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 2>later go on to be best known as a director

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of films like Five Ez Pieces in nineteen seventy, which

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 2>he directed and co wrote with Carol Eastman and which

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 2>starred Jack Nicholson and Karen Black. He also directed the

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighty one adaptation of The Postman Always Rings Twice.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>This is a story that was made had multiple movie

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 2>versions over the years, this version starring again Jack Nicholson

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>and Jessica Long, and then he also did The King

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 2>of Marvin Gardens in nineteen seventy two. Stay Hungry in

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventy six, a film starring Jeff Bridges and Sally Field,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 2>but also Arnold Schwarzenegger in a straight dramatic role. This

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 2>was I think his first movie after he appeared as

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Arnold's strong in that Hercules film.

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen that, and I'm actually kind of curious too.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:07.359
<v Speaker 3>That sounds pretty fascinating.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's like it's not an action movie at all.

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 2>Arnold Schwarzenegger plays like a guy who either owns or

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 2>manages a gym and a gym I think somewhere in Alabama.

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 2>And Jeff Bridges is like a shady real estate developer

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 2>who's trying to like scam him into selling the gem

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 2>property for some reason.

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating And I bet this would have been technically the

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 3>first time his voice was on film, because wasn't he

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 3>dubbed in that Hercules movie? Oh?

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 2>I bet he was. Yeah, that's sounds familiar. Yeah.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Rafelson also directed Black Widow in eighty seven, which is

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 2>a sort of neo noir movie. I think that has

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a Deborah Winger in it. Andy did the nineteen ninety

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 2>biographical film Mountains of the Moon, about the journeys of Richard,

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Francis Burton and John Hanning. Speak Rafelson along with his

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 2>partner Bert Schneider. They also provided funding for the production

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of Easy Rider in nineteen sixty nine, which was huge.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of hard to overstate the impact Easy Rider

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 2>on the film industry. It was hugely influential independent film

0:17:14.720 --> 0:17:17.119
<v Speaker 2>and a kind of frozen in time snapshot of the

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 2>feeling of an era, that era being the late sixties counterculture,

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 2>and together with another producer named Steve Blouner, Rafelson and

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Schneider would found a company called BBS Productions, which from

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 2>what I understand, they entered into an agreement with Columbia

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Pictures to finance films without allowing creative interference by the studios.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is seen by some as like

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 2>an important component in the evolution of the new Hollywood

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.400
<v Speaker 2>of the nineteen seventies, which was more it was sort

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 2>of less focused on creative control by the studio and

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 2>more focused on creative control by the directors and filmmakers.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 2>But before all that, Rafelson made The Monkeys. When I

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 2>as a kid and I was aware of, you know,

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the Monkeys, that I knew their songs from the radio

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and stuff, I actually did not realize that they were

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 2>a band created for television. And I don't know if

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>this qualifies them as a quote fictional band, because I

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>was talking about this with my wife Rachel. We watched

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the movie together and we were talking about, like, what

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 2>does it mean for a band to be fictional? At

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>least what you can say about the Monkeys is they

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 2>are not a band that formed by musicians on their

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 2>own right. They were formed for a project that was

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.359
<v Speaker 2>organized by someone else, and originally not all members of

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 2>the band played their instruments and wrote songs, though they

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 2>would kind of grow into different roles. But because of

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 2>that like growth and coming more into musicianship over time,

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>I guess you might say that they could in some

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 2>sense be considered a quote real band, whatever that means.

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>But at least at the beginning, Yeah, they did not

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 2>all write songs or play instruments the way I understand it,

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 2>and Seeth you can correct me if I'm wrong. I

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.680
<v Speaker 2>think Mike Nesmith and Peter Tork played instruments, and Nesmith

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>alone had written songs, but the others were kind of

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>new to music in this way.

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Kind Of one way that Mickey Dolans would often kind

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 3>of make an analogy for the situation was that they

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 3>hired Leonard Nimoy to play a vulcan, and eventually they

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:26.160
<v Speaker 3>had to actually become a vulcan. That was their job.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 3>And so let's see here, Davy Jones was a Broadway

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 3>guy like he was. He got really popular because he

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 3>was the artful dodger in Oliver that was like his

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 3>like claimed defect fits. Yeah, exactly, your salesman. Yeah, very

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 3>very like soft shoe. That's his thing, and that's kind

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 3>of the role that he kind of kept throughout the movie.

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 3>In fact, Zappa Frank Zappa makes a great cameo later

0:19:53.840 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 3>and makes reference to that in the film, which we'll

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 3>we'll get there. But so, yeah, that was his background.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 3>He could he could do like Broadway type singing, but

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't really a musician. And when you see him

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 3>on the Monkeys, he's usually playing like the tambourine or

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 3>the moroccas or something like that. But he's sort of

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 3>the lead singer exactly, although technically, if you go by

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 3>the numbers, Mickey Dolan's sang more than anyone. But but anyway, anyway, anyway,

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 3>so then we had Mike Nesmith, who was the full

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>blown real musician. He was making a living as a musician,

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 3>that was his job. And then Peter Tork definitely hung

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 3>out with hippies. In fact, the only reason he came

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 3>to the Monkeys was that his friend Stephen Stills had

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 3>auditioned been rejected, and then Stephen Stills said to Peter Tork, hey, man,

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 3>I think you're actually what they're looking for you should

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 3>go you should go check this out. And that's how

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 3>that happened.

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I heard that. Yeah, the way I heard it put

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>was that he was like a younger, cuter version of

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Still.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 3>Yes, exactly. He's like, they weren't into this, but you might,

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 3>you might get it. Go ahead, Yeah, And then yes,

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 3>mick Key Dolan's was a child actor. So he was

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the star of a television show called Circus Boy, I believe,

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 3>and so he was already like deep inside like the

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood scene, and he had some experience I believe playing guitar,

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.320
<v Speaker 3>but nothing else. And then as a default, when the

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 3>band kind of got together, they were like, someone has

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 3>to sit behind the drums. Mickey, that's you. And he's like,

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how to play the drums. He's like, well,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 3>you don't know how to play anything, You'll figure it out.

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 3>So Mickey by default had to learn how to be

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the drummer. Okay, yeah, so yeah, yeah, they all had

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 3>some experience, but Nesmuth was the only real musician there.

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 3>But so they were.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 2>The Monkeys were created by Rafelson and Schneider to pitch

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 2>as a show for NBC that would be like a

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>sitcom about a struggling folk rock band in California. But

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 2>it was, from what I understand, very much based on

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Beatlemania and the success of the Beatles, maybe the Beatles

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 2>movies at that point.

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, let's go. Let's go a little bit into

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 3>the history here. And in fact, when he first pitched

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 3>this series, Rafelson, he pitched with the band The Love

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 3>and Spoonful. He said, this will be the band that

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 3>we will focus on, and that fell apart for who

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 3>knows how many reasons, and rumor has it? Who knows,

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 3>you know, I mean, what's the saying there are many

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 3>fathers to a creative idea or something like that, you know,

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 3>whatever that phrase.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Is, success has a million fathers or something.

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Something like that. Who knows the absolute truth behind all

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>of this. But Rafelson said that he did have the

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 3>idea for the Monkeys actually long before Beatlemania, but then

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.880
<v Speaker 3>he had the clout to start pitching at it around

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 3>after the Beatles nineteen sixty four film A Hard Day's

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Night hit the theaters and was a big success. It's

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 3>a very simple film. It basically just shows the Beatles

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 3>preparing for a concert and then they have some wacky

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 3>adventures along the way to their oncerts, with many little

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 3>musical interludes peppered throughout, but probably because it happened in

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 3>the height of Beatlemania, and also because it actually is

0:23:08.520 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 3>a genuinely good movie. Have you ever seen Hard Day's

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Night before, Joe?

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 2>No. Strangely enough, the only one of the Beatles films

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 2>I've seen is Yellow Submarine, so I haven't seen. Yeah,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I have not seen Hard Day's Night, or I think

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the other one from just a year later, which was.

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Help, Help, is also quite good. And then also there's

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.440
<v Speaker 3>one more which was more or less a concert film,

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 3>which was the Magical Mystery Tour. That one also exists.

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 3>But Harday's Night is actually quite good. If anyone the

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 3>audience hasn't seen it, I recommend it's actually a Criterion pick,

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 3>I believe. And so that was a big commercial and

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.240
<v Speaker 3>critical success, and so based on that success, Bob Rafelson,

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 3>are you pronouncing it? Rayfulson? Is that? Is that what

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 3>we're going with?

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I like that, That's what I'm saying. Yeah, that's what

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.120
<v Speaker 2>That's what I heard Jack Nicholson say in an interview.

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So I assume he's right because they were friends.

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 3>Exactly let's go with Rafelson. So Bob Rafelson then, based

0:24:02.600 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 3>on this success, was able to go around to the

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 3>studios and be like, hey, you saw that success, we

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 3>want to do that for TV. Let's do that. So

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Bob Rafelson and as you mentioned earlier, Bert Schneider, they

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 3>were able to sell this concept to television, and the

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 3>concept was four charming musicians lived together and they have

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 3>wacky adventures just like just like a hard day's night.

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 3>And so this come is going to be called The Monkeys,

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 3>and basically it would a premiere September twelfth, nineteen sixty six.

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 3>They had a open cast and call, and they basically

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 3>had auditions with hundreds and hundreds of musicians which they

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 3>filmed actually, and they actually include some of that footage

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 3>in the TV show The Monkeys, which is actually very

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 3>charming and very entertaining. And they wound up hiring the

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 3>four that we've mentioned, Mickey Dolan's, Peter Tork, Michael Nosmith,

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Davey Jones. Now, all four actors had some experience, like

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 3>we mentioned, but the only one amongst them that was like, no,

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm a musician and I care about music was Mike Nesmyth.

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 3>These four, they were hired to be actors pretending to

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 3>be musicians. They were not hired to be musicians. All

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the music from the show was going to be written

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.440
<v Speaker 3>and recorded by quote unquote real musicians behind the scenes,

0:25:15.880 --> 0:25:19.320
<v Speaker 3>and these four actors were going to provide the singing voices,

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and that's it. They were not. The creators had no

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.719
<v Speaker 3>interest in this. I can go to much deeper detail

0:25:26.720 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 3>about the fights they had with like the original music

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 3>producers and all this other stuff, but another time, another time.

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 3>But basically, the first two albums that they recorded that

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 3>would have been nineteen sixty six Is the Monkeys and

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 3>nineteen sixty seven's More of the Monkeys. These functioned as

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 3>like the soundtrack for season one of the TV show,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 3>And eventually it just kind of came out that this

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 3>was all phony, this scripted TV show wasn't real. This

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 3>was how dark there so the audience they felt deceived.

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 3>They felt that like they had been sold a bill

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:08.720
<v Speaker 3>of goods that was not genuine, and so then they

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 3>had to kind of like there was a backlash against

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 3>them now in defense of the Monkeys themselves. Nesmuth actually

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 3>complained about this pretty early on. For example, on the

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 3>first record the Monkeys. If you look at it, it

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 3>looks like just a genuine record from a band. There's

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.360
<v Speaker 3>no like liner notes showing which musicians played on it

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 3>and who wrote and blah blah blah blah blah. It

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 3>looks like the Monkeys made this record. And he complained

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 3>about that. He said, you're fooling these people. He's like,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 3>you're making them think that we're a real band by design,

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.160
<v Speaker 3>and that's not going to work out in the long term.

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:49.920
<v Speaker 2>I can see that, Okay. So I would have thought

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 2>it would be silly to be mad at this TV

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 2>band for not being what is portrayed as because it's

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.000
<v Speaker 2>obviously a fictional show and all that. But I guess

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 2>I would feel differently if yeah, I can unders saying like,

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 2>if you put out a record in the liner notes,

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 2>don't give credit to the people who actually played on

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 2>the songs and all that, that would feel more like

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a true deception exactly.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 3>And so that's what happened on the first two albums,

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and the Monkeys basically put their foot down. This is

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.159
<v Speaker 3>in between seasons one and two, and they were like,

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>we want more creative control, especially over the music, but

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 3>in general, you know, if we are the Monkeys and

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 3>this is a hit, and it was a hit. Then

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 3>we want, you know, to feel like we are getting

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 3>our voice put through here and not feel like frauds,

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 3>not feel like hacks, you know. So that's what happened,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 3>and they were able to start making their own music

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and really focus on everything themselves, and that started with

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 3>their third album, Headquarters. And you know, based on whatever,

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 3>a different situation you want to say, after that season

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 3>where they took control, the series was canceled. So I

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 3>don't think we can fully blame that on the Monkeys,

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.880
<v Speaker 3>but hey, that is something that definitely happened. And then

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the next step after their TV show was canceled, Hey

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 3>let's make a feature length film. And that's the movie

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 3>that we're talking about today. And so after the commercial

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 3>and critical failure of head the movie we're talking about today,

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 3>the Monkeys then started a long series of breaking up

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and getting back together and having a reunion and hey,

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 3>this time the Monkeys are just two people, and hey,

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 3>this time the Monkeys are three people. And basically every

0:28:24.560 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 3>combination you could imagine of those four either being together

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 3>or a part it happened at one point or another.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, there was this great joke made at

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 3>some point. This would have been in the early seventies,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 3>where so Peter Tork was the first Monkey to quit.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 3>This was after the movie came out. Then Nesmuth quit

0:28:43.600 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 3>soon after that, and so each Monkey's album for a

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 3>while there just had one fewer member. There was one

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 3>with just three, then there was one with two. And

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:56.240
<v Speaker 3>then when a reviewer reviewed the album that just had

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Mickey Dolan's and Davy Jones on and he's like, I'm

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 3>pretty sure the next album is just to be called

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 3>the Monkey and I was like, that's pretty good, that's

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty funny. So so this happened on again, off again

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 3>for years and years. They had different like moments of

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 3>nostalgic popularity again. They even got back together to record

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 3>new albums at different points throughout their career. Some of

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.000
<v Speaker 3>those are actually quite good, some of them not so much.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 3>And this all kind of ended for sure for sure

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 3>in their final farewell tour that was just Nesmuth and

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Dolan's and that tour ended in twenty twenty one, and

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.640
<v Speaker 3>then the third of the Monkeys, Mike Nesmyth, he died.

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 3>So I believe Davy Jones was first. Peter Tork was second,

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Mike Nesmyth was third, and Dolan's is our last living

0:29:41.800 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 3>monkey at this current date on twenty twenty four.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, now, I did want to come back and emphasize

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 2>though there's one. Even though we're talking about how the

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, the there was this frustration with the fact

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 2>that the creative direction of the music was mostly given

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 2>from the studio, originally from the television studio, and not

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>from the Monkeys themselves. I don't think we should undersell

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the importance of the Monkeys, like the individual guys in

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 2>the band, as as as like what made the show popular,

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 2>because Rayfelson talks about how when they first put together

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>the pilot episode, they had only the scripted elements in it,

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 2>and the executives and test audiences whoever, everybody who looked

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 2>at it hated it. They were like terrible, awful. And

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 2>then he made a change. And the only change he

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 2>made was he inserted what you were talking about, some

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 2>of the interviews that were totally unscripted, just conversations, interviews

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 2>with the guys in the band when they were like

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 2>auditioning for the roles, and that completely changed the reaction.

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Everybody loved it, and so it was like the original

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 2>personal charm of these four actors slash musicians, which was

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>what made the show initially as successful as it.

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Was for sure. And yeah, I mean, if you ever

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 3>get a chance, I'm sure you could find them on

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 3>YouTube or just watch the TV show The Monkeys. I

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 3>think it's quite good. But yeah, like very funny Beatles

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 3>esque quips, like I remember in a Davy Jones's audition,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 3>He's in there and the interviewer is just like, oh, so, like, well,

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 3>what kind of a sound do you make? And he's like,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 3>what do you mean? I don't get that. He's like, no,

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 3>what kind of sound? Like a like a rock sound

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 3>or a folk sound. It's like, I make a terrible sound.

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 3>It's funny, very nice.

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay. So another thing that will be important going into

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 2>talking about the movie is that I think I think

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>you could say that each monkey in the band has

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 2>a has a bit. They've each got sort of an

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 2>archetype they fit and seth. You can tell me if

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm wrong about these, but this is the way I

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 2>understood it. I don't know the Monkeys as well as you,

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 2>but the way I read it is that Davy Jones

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 2>is the singer and he's the cute one. Mike Nesmith

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 2>is on guitar and he's like the serious one or

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the brooding artist. Peter Tork is on bass and he

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 2>is the simple one, sort of the California stoner, the

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 2>surfer type. And then Mickey Dolan's is on drums and he's.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 3>The cut up, the goofball. I think that's pretty accurate

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 3>for sure. I would quibble on very small things, like

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I would say Peter Tork instead of being simple, he

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>was more naive, like he was the one that was

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 3>gonna believe you. He was the hippie. But I think

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 3>what you said was close enough. And then I would

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 3>like I mentioned before too, Mickey Dolan's, by the numbers,

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 3>is perhaps the actual lead singer of the Monkeys, just

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 3>because he sang on the most tracks. Many people consider

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Mickey's voice to be the actual voice of the Monkeys,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 3>but part of that might be just too that he

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 3>stuck with at the longest. He is the last surviving monkey,

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 3>so his voice is the voice of the Monkeys.

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, I guess I'm thinking more about the way I've

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>seen them arranged on stage when forming that they have

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 2>they would have Davy Jones out front, and.

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 3>I've seen that talked about before too, where like I said,

0:33:09.080 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 3>none of them were drummers. One of them just had

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 3>to become the drummer. And they at first were thinking

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 3>about Davy and they're like, he's too short, we won't

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 3>see him. We need a bigger monkey back there. And

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 3>that's why Mickey became the drummer. And here's the interesting

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 3>thing too. Here's an interesting thing too, is that, like

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I said, obviously they were trying to duplicate the Beatles

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 3>and the Beatles' success. So if you look at it,

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the manufactured personality types are actually kind of one to

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 3>one to the Beatles. Davy Jones, the cute one was

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 3>Paul McCartney, The cute one Mike Nesmith. The serious artist

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.959
<v Speaker 3>was John Lennon. The serious artist Peter Torque, the quiet

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 3>one was George Harrison, the quiet one. And then Mickey

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Dolan's kind of the goof was Ringo Star kind of

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the goof. I don't think it quite matches up because

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 3>they're real personalities of the monkeys actually kind of like

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 3>further develop, but it is interesting how close they are

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 3>one to one.

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Mickey Dolans's goofiness is different than Ringo's goofy noess,

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Like Mickey is not an octopus's garden kind of goof

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 2>He's a he's he's a different He's got a sharper

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of goofiness.

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 3>He's a ham for sure. He definitely like he's putting

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 3>on a he's putting on a show. He he he

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 3>mugs to the camera. He's he's he's a he's a

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Hollywood actor, That's what he is.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 2>But actually the like it, I mean, he's good in there.

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 2>In some of his comedic scenes in Head, he's legitimately hilarious,

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 2>like the scene where he's fighting the coke machine is

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:44.879
<v Speaker 2>I was laughing out loud, definitely. But briefly, to come

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 2>back to dray Felson for just a moment, I wanted

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 2>to mention a quote of his I found where he

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 2>said he said, quote, of course, Head is an utterly

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 2>and totally fragmented film. Among other reasons for making it

0:34:57.960 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 2>was that I thought I would never get to make

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.400
<v Speaker 2>an other movie, so I might as well make fifty

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 2>to start out with and put them all in the

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 2>same feature. And when I read that, I was like,

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly that's what this movie feels like. So he

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.240
<v Speaker 2>did go on to become a big deal in Hollywood

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 2>in the seventies. He made a lot of other successful films,

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 2>but at this point that hadn't happened yet. He didn't

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 2>know that was going to happen. So it's like he

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 2>just tried to put everything he had on screen in

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 2>one go, and it's surprising how well it works.

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like he was constructing his own like directors

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:35.360
<v Speaker 3>reel that he could show off later.

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Look, I did a more film, Look at my range.

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 3>I did a deserts I did a party, I did

0:35:42.120 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 3>a concert, I did all these things. I've actually heard

0:35:44.560 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 3>something similar from Jordan Peel, where when he started directing

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:52.359
<v Speaker 3>stuff for Key and Peel, he went all out and

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 3>really dedicated himself to these big set pieces with lots

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 3>of production value, because in the future he knew that

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 3>if you wanted to say I'm a film director now,

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:02.520
<v Speaker 3>he would be able to go back and show them

0:36:02.560 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 3>these examples of Oh, look at these zombies. I did zombies. Hey,

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 3>look at this. You know I did sports.

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 2>That would why the makeup effects on Key and Peel

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 2>were so good. Yeah, exactly, he was.

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:17.800
<v Speaker 3>He was constructing a future directors reel much like Rafelson.

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 2>Okay, next person I want to talk about here with

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 2>head is the other writer of the film, Jack Nicholson

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 2>born nineteen thirty seven. Have we talked about Jack Nicholson

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 2>on the show before? A little known actor mostly famous

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 2>for playing the possibly playing the giant crab in Roger

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Corman's Attack of the Crab Monsters. Speaking of this movie

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 2>in an interview many years later, Nicholson said, at this

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 2>point in his career he was actually thinking that he

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 2>probably wanted to be a writer director instead of an actor.

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 2>And at this point his acting career was mostly like

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 2>B movies. I mean, he'd actually done stuff with the

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.919
<v Speaker 2>Roger Corman crew. You know, he'd been in Little Chop

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 2>of Horrors, I guess, and you know Corman type stuff.

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 2>He was in what was it called The Terror? Have

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:13.080
<v Speaker 2>you ever seen that? It's a Corman movie from sixty three,

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.919
<v Speaker 2>starring Boris Karloff and Jack Nicholson. So like actors I love,

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you'd think it'd be riveting, But I think I've tried

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 2>to watch it and like literally never made it more

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 2>than ten minutes. I think it's a snooze fest from

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 2>what I can recall, but I don't know. Maybe if

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 2>I went back and revisited, I would think differently. It's

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 2>been a long time, but yeah, so he mostly had

0:37:34.719 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 2>like B movies under his belt at this point.

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.759
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing. Can I tell you a couple of fun

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 3>things about Jack Nicholson directly tied into this movie?

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Please?

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Here are a couple of fun facts about Jack Nicholson,

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 3>specifically when he was working on this film. One is

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 3>that if you listen to the soundtrack album of this movie,

0:37:54.719 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 3>it's actually highly respected. It's one of the Monkeys' most

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 3>beloved albums only from the fans, but also from the

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 3>Monkeys themselves. They think it's one of the best. Jack

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 3>Nicholson completely compiled and arranged that soundtrack because it's got

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 3>all kinds of little like clips and soundbits from the

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:15.280
<v Speaker 3>movie itself and blah blah blah. It's really a beautiful

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:18.280
<v Speaker 3>noise collage of an album. It's fantastic. And the reason

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 3>that happened was that one day Jack Nicholson saw Mike

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Nesmuth working on It's like in the studio and he

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 3>was like, oh, I'd love to help out with that

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 3>if he need If he needs some you know, need

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 3>to need an extra hand, and Nesmuth was like, I

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 3>just want to go home. You do it. So Jack

0:38:34.160 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 3>stepped in and just did it himself. And then because

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 3>this was, you know, at the time just probably the

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:44.759
<v Speaker 3>biggest thing that Jack Nicholson ever had ever been associated with.

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 3>The Monkeys were all stars. This is amazing. He got

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.520
<v Speaker 3>to write a monkey's movie. This is his big break.

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 3>You know. He took a very active hand in the

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:54.839
<v Speaker 3>promotion of this film, doing all kinds of like you know,

0:38:54.960 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 3>like street team like stickering campaigns and stuff like that,

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 3>going to like all the different premieres, and he eventually said, quote,

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I saw it like one hundred and fifty eight million times. Man,

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 3>I loved it.

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if this is true, but I read

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 2>a supposed fact that Jack Nicholson was at one point

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 2>arrested for putting a sticker to promote the film on

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 2>a cops helmet in New York.

0:39:20.280 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 3>That matches with everything I've heard, so I think we

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:23.879
<v Speaker 3>can call that in fact.

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, so he was. So this is interesting that

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 2>he eventually got so deep into this movie and was

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:36.440
<v Speaker 2>so dedicated to promoting it, because that sort of clashes

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:39.360
<v Speaker 2>with his initial reaction to the pitch. So this was

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 2>when he wanted to be a writer director instead of

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 2>an actor. This would be you know, the mid late sixties.

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 2>And the way he was explaining it in this interview

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>is he went to pitch himself as a writer to

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 2>Bob Rafelson, who he knew, and he was, you know,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 2>trying to sell himself on that. He's like, yeah, put

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 2>me to work. Bobby said, Bob, I can write a

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 2>movie about anything, anything, And Rafelson said, okay, can you

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 2>write me a movie for the monkeys? And Nicholson replied

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 2>with evident disgust the monkeys. You gotta be kidding me.

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 2>And I think this this indicates the interesting place this

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 2>movie came from. You were talking about this this earlier

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 2>assessed with the Monkey's backlash after the first couple of

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 2>seasons of the show, where they came to be perceived

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 2>as like brutally uncool by the by the the hip

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.280
<v Speaker 2>out there taste makers, you know, sort of the acid

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 2>ronan like like Jack Nicholson and probably even Rafelson himself

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:38.839
<v Speaker 2>like that. They were looking on this as oh, this

0:40:38.880 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 2>is very uncool now. And I think you could say

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 2>this is also indicative of a kind of there's a

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:49.000
<v Speaker 2>thing like this that pops up, not just with respect

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>to the artists themselves, but I've often noticed like there's

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 2>like there's like a revulsion a lot of like dudes

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 2>have to to acts that are very popular vicially with

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 2>teenage girls. You know that there's like a kind of

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 2>sexist backlash to that too, And I bet that was

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 2>part of it as well.

0:41:07.480 --> 0:41:10.839
<v Speaker 3>What makes comparison to like the late nineties early two

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 3>thousands of boy bands assembled in the same way, there's

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 3>some you know, corporate overlord behind the scenes who puts

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 3>a cast and call out and just assembles the cute

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 3>ones and gives them each like a personality type, and

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 3>then they're presented to the public with music that they

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 3>didn't write and didn't perform. It was one hundred percent

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 3>like the original templates that became the boy band template

0:41:32.920 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 3>in the future, and that wasn't well respected when it

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 3>first happened. I think over time, you know, very similarly.

0:41:39.040 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure boy bands, you know, take more control over

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 3>their creative output and et cetera, et cetera, and all

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 3>that stuff. But I can see why someone like Jack

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Nicholson would be like you want me to make an

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.280
<v Speaker 3>in Sync movie. No, I'm not interested.

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't know what the equivalent in the nineties

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 2>would be, like, who is the Jack Nicholson of the

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 2>time being asked to make an n Sync movie?

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:03.839
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know what, here's here's an example. This would

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 3>have been much later, though, But do you remember when

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 3>it was first announced that the next David Fincher movie

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 3>was going to be the Facebook movie? And everyone thought, what, what? Why? Why? Why?

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Of all the things David Fincher can do. He's the

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:19.879
<v Speaker 3>seven guy, He's the game, you know, he's a What's

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 3>what's a great one? The fight Club? He's the fight

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 3>club guy? Why is he making a movie about Facebook?

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 3>And then the social network came out? And it's a

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 3>great movie because great, great artists can make great art

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 3>out of anything.

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and people didn't realize how dark the take would

0:42:33.440 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 2>be in the mid right, yes, but oh yeah. Anyway,

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 2>So coming back to like, so Nicholson's initial reaction is like,

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 2>you want me to make a movie for the monkeys?

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>I can't, You can't be serious. But then Rayfelson replies, like,

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:50.399
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute, you just said you could write about

0:42:50.440 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 2>anything where you know, were you lying to me. So

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:56.359
<v Speaker 2>Nicholson says, okay, I'll do it. And so the next

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 2>day Nicholson has to go in and pitch his Monkey

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 2>script to Rafaelson's partner, Bert Schneider, and Nicholson goes in

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 2>meets him. He tells him, Okay, I've got two movie

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.239
<v Speaker 2>ideas for you, Bert. One of them I can guarantee

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 2>with one hundred percent certainty will be as big a

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:17.279
<v Speaker 2>hit as A hard Day's Night, and the other one

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I can guarantee you with equal certainty won't make a dime.

0:43:21.560 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 2>And then, without hearing another word, Schneider says, I want

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 2>the second one. Well, and you know, well, here we

0:43:28.960 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 2>are with.

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:33.720
<v Speaker 3>This is actually gonna be something that is full blown

0:43:33.800 --> 0:43:36.799
<v Speaker 3>rumor mill. But some people believe this, including some of

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 3>the monkeys. There's a rumor that Jack Nicholson and then

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Bert and Jack wait, wait, hold on, there's too many Jacks, right,

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:50.279
<v Speaker 3>What's what's raf Bob Bob Bob Rafelson, Jack Nicholson and

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 3>Bert Schneider that the three of them intentionally tanked this

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 3>movie because they wanted to be done with the Monkeys,

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 3>in particular, that Bob Rafelson wanted to move on from

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 3>this into bigger and better things, and the only way

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 3>he was going to get that was if the monkeys

0:44:10.480 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 3>failed and went away. Now I think this is perhaps

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 3>complete fabrication, but many people believe it so much, to

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the point that if you watch there's a biopic about

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:23.759
<v Speaker 3>the monkeys. I believe it's called Daydream Believer, but it's

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 3>one of those made for TV, very low budget things.

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:31.279
<v Speaker 3>There is a scene where they are filming the Dandriff scene,

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 3>which we will get to later of the film head

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:37.040
<v Speaker 3>in the artificial made for TV biopic of the Monkeys.

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:40.439
<v Speaker 3>I know this is getting like inception layers, but in

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:42.759
<v Speaker 3>that scene, someone walks onto the set and it's like,

0:44:43.000 --> 0:44:46.240
<v Speaker 3>what are you doing? This is garbage. No one's gonna

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:49.959
<v Speaker 3>like this. And you see Jack Nicholson, the actor playing

0:44:50.040 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 3>Jack Nicholson, and the actor playing Bob Rafelson look at

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 3>each other and give each other a knowing look. Then

0:44:56.280 --> 0:45:03.000
<v Speaker 3>they continue filming. I don't think there's any confirmed truth

0:45:03.080 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 3>behind this, but that is something that many people believed,

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:07.520
<v Speaker 3>including some of the monkeys.

0:45:07.920 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's interesting. I could see that being possible.

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:14.439
<v Speaker 2>I will say that while I would regard that with skepticism,

0:45:14.480 --> 0:45:17.360
<v Speaker 2>I also regard with skepticism. A lot of the first

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 2>hand accounts of people like Rafaelson and Jack Nicholson about

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.880
<v Speaker 2>their time working on these projects because like, I don't know,

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 2>some of them are kind of like contain self contradictory details,

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:31.880
<v Speaker 2>like and also it's just like you know, it's Hollywood storytelling.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 2>There's it's just notorious for people kind of like telling

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 2>tall tales about how projects came to be, maybe not

0:45:38.080 --> 0:45:42.759
<v Speaker 2>even remembering totally and just making it into a good story.

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 2>So who knows really, And as.

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned, there were definitely drugs involved.

0:45:48.000 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 2>They were, Yeah, that's established. Rafelson said in an interview

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of this movie was written under the

0:45:55.480 --> 0:46:00.319
<v Speaker 2>influence of psychedelics in Harry Dean Stanton's basement amazing, So

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:04.799
<v Speaker 2>that's Harry Dean Stanton's basement is its own sort of

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.360
<v Speaker 2>in theagen. I guess this was.

0:46:07.360 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Also depicted in the biopic, and it's them sitting around

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 3>in a haze of pot smoke with a tape recorder

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:18.560
<v Speaker 3>just saying all of the wildest ideas that can possibly think.

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 3>And it's a fascinating biopick if anyone wants to learn

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:23.240
<v Speaker 3>more about the monkeys.

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, when it comes to the cast of this movie.

0:46:27.440 --> 0:46:30.439
<v Speaker 2>Most of the cast, apart from the monkeys, I think

0:46:31.000 --> 0:46:34.479
<v Speaker 2>could best be classified as cameos. They are not really

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.359
<v Speaker 2>very substantial roles in the film, but more like people

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 2>who pop in and out for strange little scenes or

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:42.719
<v Speaker 2>recurring gags.

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh and audience, don't feel bad if you don't notice

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 3>these cameos when you watch this film, because I've seen

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:52.399
<v Speaker 3>this movie many many times and I recognize like none

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 3>of them, even from actors and personalities I know, like

0:46:56.280 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Terry Garr and a net Funicello. I cannot tell you

0:47:00.080 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 3>where Terry gar is in this movie, and I cannot

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 3>tell you where a net Foodedicello is in this movie.

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 3>I can blame part of that in my face blindness,

0:47:07.320 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 3>but I think the other part too, is that these

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 3>are just blips. These are just passing things in the nights.

0:47:13.320 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Most of these cameos have very little substance to them.

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 2>And Rafelson has said in interviews that when finding when

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:24.640
<v Speaker 2>finding people to do all of these cameos, he claims

0:47:24.680 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 2>he was specifically looking for people who were recognizable to

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the public but who had in some way been like

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:36.880
<v Speaker 2>used up, mistreated, rejected, or sort of grown passed so

0:47:36.920 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 2>he wanted this like large cameo chorus of has beens, weirdos,

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:46.439
<v Speaker 2>outcasts and who's thats And I don't know if that's

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 2>exactly what he successfully summoned here, but if that's indeed

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 2>what he was going for, I can kind of see it.

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:58.360
<v Speaker 2>The movie is frantic, and the lines that characters deliver

0:47:59.239 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 2>are not characteristic of the characters as they appear, if

0:48:03.520 --> 0:48:08.240
<v Speaker 2>that makes any sense. So it's almost like it's almost

0:48:08.320 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 2>like people like cameo people show up to do a cameo,

0:48:11.560 --> 0:48:15.080
<v Speaker 2>but the lines they say could have been randomly reassigned

0:48:15.120 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 2>to any of the other people, you know what I.

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Mean, Yes, for sure. And the lines don't feel like

0:48:21.239 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 3>they're developing anything. Many of them are just non sequitur poetry.

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:31.399
<v Speaker 3>In many ways, a lot of them don't actually mean

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 3>anything other than conveying a feeling or like maybe perhaps

0:48:34.880 --> 0:48:36.600
<v Speaker 3>just kind of setting the mood for the scene that

0:48:36.920 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 3>is to follow.

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 2>So there is no way I can mention all the

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 2>cameos in this movie, but I'm gonna just mention some

0:48:42.840 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 2>of the top ones who get some of the some

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:48.280
<v Speaker 2>of the most screen time. So you already mentioned Seth

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:52.799
<v Speaker 2>that there is Annette Funicello who live nineteen forty two

0:48:52.840 --> 0:48:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to twenty thirteen. She was an American actress who started

0:48:56.160 --> 0:48:58.439
<v Speaker 2>out as a child performer on The Mickey Mouse Club.

0:48:58.520 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 2>She was a mousekutier, and she would later become a

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 2>pop singer. In the sixties, she had success with movies

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 2>in the beach party subgenre. And I just love how

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:11.800
<v Speaker 2>a popular genre of movies.

0:49:11.480 --> 0:49:13.799
<v Speaker 3>Used to be the beach Yes.

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Sort of a Ken genre, you know, and it makes

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:21.120
<v Speaker 2>me think, like, so the other you know her? Her

0:49:21.160 --> 0:49:23.920
<v Speaker 2>partner in these movies was often Frankie Avalon. So was

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:25.360
<v Speaker 2>he sort of the original Ken?

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? One hundred percent. Absolutely.

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 2>We also get Terry Garr who you mentioned born nineteen

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 2>forty four, American actress and comedian. Acted in lots of

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:41.120
<v Speaker 2>TV and movies. She's famously very funny. She was a

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 2>dancer too. I think before she was an actress and comedian,

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:48.400
<v Speaker 2>she was in movies as different as Francis Ford Coppola

0:49:48.400 --> 0:49:52.720
<v Speaker 2>as The Conversation and Young Frankenstein the Milbrooks movie.

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:56.400
<v Speaker 3>Two questions for you, just real quick, I started to interrupt. One.

0:49:56.920 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 3>So was Terry Garr a known entity when she filmed this?

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 3>I guess we can't answer it. To me, I don't

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 3>you know we weren't alive at the time, because like

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 3>to me and I only have you know, hindsight to

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 3>look at this. To me, I picture like the birth

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 3>of Terry garr As being young Frankenstein. But that's just

0:50:15.760 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 3>because that's what I know her best from. So my

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:22.960
<v Speaker 3>perception is definitely skewed. I wonder if someone in nineteen

0:50:22.960 --> 0:50:25.960
<v Speaker 3>sixty eight knew who she was and actually real quick

0:50:26.120 --> 0:50:28.919
<v Speaker 3>a net Funacello, where is she in this movie? I've

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:32.399
<v Speaker 3>never once been able to, like pinpoint review in.

0:50:32.440 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 2>The I think she's in the scene where Davy Jones

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:38.520
<v Speaker 2>wants to be a boxer, like he could have been

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:42.839
<v Speaker 2>a contender. He's boxing with Actually, so he's boxing with

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Sonny Liston. Okay, another cameo in the movie. So Sonny Liston,

0:50:46.960 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 2>who lived nineteen thirty to nineteen seventy American pro boxer.

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 2>He became a world heavyweight champion in nineteen sixty two

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:58.239
<v Speaker 2>after knocking out Floyd Patterson, and then in nineteen sixty four,

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Sunny Liston was feeded by Muhammad Ali, who is then

0:51:02.000 --> 0:51:04.960
<v Speaker 2>known as Cassius Clay. So by the time this movie

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 2>was made, Liston had already lost his world heavyweight title,

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and here he's in the scene where he's boxing Davy Jones,

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and I think Annette Funicello is like Davy Jones' wife

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 2>who's sitting in the audience watching him. And then I

0:51:19.600 --> 0:51:21.880
<v Speaker 2>think he's supposed to take a dive. And then they

0:51:21.920 --> 0:51:26.319
<v Speaker 2>have this emotional scene where she's shown crying asking him.

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't even remember what she's asking him to do,

0:51:29.040 --> 0:51:31.879
<v Speaker 2>and you see like a hand reach in from from

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 2>off screen to like wipe her tears away. It's not

0:51:35.040 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 2>her hand.

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm learning. This is great.

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:43.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure that's her. But so yeah, that's Sunny Liston.

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 2>That's another one of them. Timothy Carey is in this.

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.120
<v Speaker 2>He's sort of he's recognizable. He lived twenty nine through

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:52.040
<v Speaker 2>ninety four. He was an American actor known for playing

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 2>like weird, crazy characters. He was in several Stanley Kubrick movies.

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 2>He was in The Killing Who's in Paths of Glory,

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 2>and he was also in films as varied as the

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:07.279
<v Speaker 2>Marlon Brando western One Eyed Jackson nineteen sixty one and

0:52:07.360 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen sixty five beach party movie Beach Blanket Bingo

0:52:11.160 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 2>starring guess who, Frankie Avalon and Annette Funicello. And then finally,

0:52:17.200 --> 0:52:20.640
<v Speaker 2>sort of, if this film has a villain, the villain

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 2>might be us the audience, but also the film's villain

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:29.400
<v Speaker 2>might be Victor Mature who lived nineteen thirteen to nineteen

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:35.000
<v Speaker 2>ninety nine. He kind of plays Satan like this, Okay,

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 2>So Victor Mature, the actor was an American actor. He

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 2>was known as like a suave leading man in movies

0:52:41.160 --> 0:52:43.920
<v Speaker 2>in the forties and fifties. He was like in the

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Cecil b de mil biblical epics Samson and Delilah. And

0:52:48.360 --> 0:52:52.160
<v Speaker 2>in this movie he plays a cosmic trickster who sometimes

0:52:52.160 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 2>appears out of the sky, and he seems to want

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 2>to entrap the monkeys in a world of illusions that

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:01.160
<v Speaker 2>will cause them to forget their true nature. So he's

0:53:01.160 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of like like an old Hollywood gnostic demi urge.

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 3>I saw this movie at a young age originally, so

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 3>I always considered him to be the jolly green giant

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:14.920
<v Speaker 3>of this film. Doesn't quite make sense, but that's still

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:17.600
<v Speaker 3>a part of his character in my head whenever I

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:17.960
<v Speaker 3>see it.

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there are tons of other cameos who I

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 2>guess we should go ahead and say Frank Zappa's in

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.600
<v Speaker 2>this for like half a second. He pops in to

0:53:25.640 --> 0:53:28.160
<v Speaker 2>say a line and then a cow talks after him

0:53:28.320 --> 0:53:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and his I would say Frank Zappa's vibe in this

0:53:31.239 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 2>movie is halfway between Alan Watts and Bertram Gilfoyle.

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 3>And it's fun too because Frank Zappa was definitely a

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 3>friend of the monkeys, and he makes an appearance in

0:53:43.320 --> 0:53:46.319
<v Speaker 3>the TV show as well, and the scene that he

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:50.200
<v Speaker 3>played in the TV show, Frank Zappa plays Mike Nesmith

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:53.640
<v Speaker 3>and Mike Nesmith plays Frank Zappa, and I've seen their clip.

0:53:53.960 --> 0:53:55.120
<v Speaker 3>It's very entertaining.

0:53:55.920 --> 0:53:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I've seen this clip. I think they're like they they

0:53:58.400 --> 0:54:02.000
<v Speaker 2>interview each other as each other, and doesn't Mike Nesmith

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:05.040
<v Speaker 2>like try to grill Frank and Zappa as Mike Nesmith

0:54:05.120 --> 0:54:07.839
<v Speaker 2>on like why their music is so hollow and commercial?

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:13.560
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, it's great, it's great, and yeah, yeah, I

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 3>believe Frank's main thing here. So uh, it's right after

0:54:18.280 --> 0:54:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Davey has just performed like a soft shoe song and dance,

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:24.080
<v Speaker 3>he comes out and Frank Zappa goes, man, that's really white,

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 3>and then Davy Jones goes, yes, so am I very strange,

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 3>very strange.

0:54:30.040 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 2>And then a cow talks. What does the cow say.

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh I cuckoo chew or something, you know, gabba gabba hay,

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:40.560
<v Speaker 3>something nonsensical. A lot of my favorite quotes in this

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:41.960
<v Speaker 3>movie are complete nonsense.

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So here's the part where we would normally do

0:54:52.760 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 2>a full plot breakdown. This movie doesn't really have a plot,

0:54:56.400 --> 0:54:58.279
<v Speaker 2>so we can't do that, but we will instead try

0:54:58.320 --> 0:55:02.400
<v Speaker 2>to describe some things that happen. And in the movie. Yeah,

0:55:02.719 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 2>it opens with a scene that's like a ribbon cutting

0:55:05.719 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 2>ceremony where there are all these police gathered around marines

0:55:09.760 --> 0:55:13.200
<v Speaker 2>and silver helmets, and then we see a politician get

0:55:13.200 --> 0:55:17.080
<v Speaker 2>out of a limo. This character is credited as mayor Feedback,

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and he comes up to a ribbon. Somebody like hands

0:55:20.640 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 2>them a huge pair of scissors and he walks up

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to a ribbon and this is for the opening of

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:29.719
<v Speaker 2>a new arch bridge in the Los Angeles area. This

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:31.880
<v Speaker 2>this is apparently, I guess, supposed to be a real location,

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 2>like a bridge in Long Beach, California. But the mayor

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:40.280
<v Speaker 2>like can't speak into the microphone without creating an infinite

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:43.680
<v Speaker 2>echo of feedback, and we just see this like loop

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:47.359
<v Speaker 2>of the cop keeps hammering on the microphone and then

0:55:47.440 --> 0:55:50.000
<v Speaker 2>handing it back to the mayor like it's fine, but

0:55:50.080 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 2>it's still creating all this feedback. So it's like, even

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 2>this moment seemed kind of thematically significant to me, Like

0:55:56.920 --> 0:56:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the person who's supposed to speak here knows that it

0:56:00.920 --> 0:56:03.680
<v Speaker 2>is not going to sound right, but he just keeps

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:06.040
<v Speaker 2>getting the mic handed back to him like, yeah, go ahead.

0:56:06.520 --> 0:56:10.840
<v Speaker 3>It's an amazing bit of timing from I'm sure the

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:14.239
<v Speaker 3>director but as well as the editor to have the

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 3>confidence to start this, you know what. I'm sure would

0:56:18.120 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 3>have been viewed as a children's film in nineteen sixty

0:56:20.680 --> 0:56:22.600
<v Speaker 3>eight before anyone saw it. I'm sure a lot of

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:25.080
<v Speaker 3>fans of the TV show showed up waiting for the

0:56:25.080 --> 0:56:29.080
<v Speaker 3>TV show in feature length, and this is how they start.

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Because it's not even a quick moment. It's what probably

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:38.279
<v Speaker 3>like four minutes perhaps of yeah, of this slow pondering

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:41.759
<v Speaker 3>view of a mayor trying to talk into a microphone

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 3>and getting in It's just it's not something that someone

0:56:46.000 --> 0:56:49.080
<v Speaker 3>would do, by the book, it's a very deliberate decision.

0:56:49.680 --> 0:56:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then so before the mayor can cut the ribbon. Oh,

0:56:53.760 --> 0:56:56.920
<v Speaker 2>here come the monkeys. So there's the introduction, except there

0:56:56.960 --> 0:57:00.279
<v Speaker 2>is no introduction. They just run through the frame. They

0:57:00.320 --> 0:57:02.880
<v Speaker 2>run through like tearing through the ribbon, like the finish

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:06.839
<v Speaker 2>line of a race, signifying a kind of finality here

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:09.920
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning. And then they keep running, with Mickey

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Dolan's running ahead of the other guys while these loud

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 2>sirens wail all around them as if they are being pursued.

0:57:16.560 --> 0:57:20.479
<v Speaker 2>It suggests a feeling of persecution, but also like, ooh,

0:57:20.520 --> 0:57:23.840
<v Speaker 2>these boys are bad, but we never see anybody in

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 2>pursuit at this point at least. But then the monkeys

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 2>come to the edge of the bridge, and then Mickey

0:57:30.040 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Dolan's jumps off the side of the bridge, and this

0:57:32.680 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 2>is like not a low bridge, it's like really high up.

0:57:35.560 --> 0:57:38.200
<v Speaker 2>He just jumps off. That's a way to start a movie.

0:57:38.480 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 3>And audience remember this scene for later, because I definitely

0:57:41.920 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 3>want to talk about it at the end again and

0:57:43.880 --> 0:57:45.680
<v Speaker 3>where it will have a completely different context.

0:57:46.000 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, this does come back. So we see Mickey's

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 2>body tumble through the air in slow motion, occasionally cutting

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:54.480
<v Speaker 2>to long shots of an obvious dummy, but when it's

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 2>close up, I think it looks like it actually is

0:57:57.040 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Mickey and he's jumping on a trampoline, but he plunges

0:58:01.320 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 2>into the water below. And then we get our first

0:58:03.520 --> 0:58:07.760
<v Speaker 2>musical number. And this is a strange choice for an

0:58:07.880 --> 0:58:11.800
<v Speaker 2>opening musical number because it number one. I think this

0:58:11.920 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 2>song is great. It's one of the best songs in

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:17.000
<v Speaker 2>the movie, and I love it, but it's not really

0:58:17.040 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 2>the vibe you would expect for the first song in

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 2>A Monkey's Movie, which you'd think would be a more,

0:58:21.920 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, upbeat, tuneful pop number. Instead, this is

0:58:26.480 --> 0:58:30.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of a slower tempo psychedelic sound with a big

0:58:30.880 --> 0:58:36.240
<v Speaker 2>instrumental section with like guitars, cello and other strings, woodwinds, organ,

0:58:36.440 --> 0:58:38.560
<v Speaker 2>ringing bells. So it's almost like a day in the

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:41.880
<v Speaker 2>life that has all this crazy orchestra in it, just

0:58:41.920 --> 0:58:47.480
<v Speaker 2>like pounding on the beat while this languid melody plays.

0:58:47.520 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 2>And the song is called the Porpoise Song. And seth,

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you want to talk about your

0:58:52.960 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 2>thoughts about the song before we discuss the lyrics.

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh, sure, sure, I love this song. I think it

0:58:57.680 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 3>is amongst the Monkey's best tracks. And I grew everything

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 3>you just said. I love the deliberate choice that the

0:59:03.400 --> 0:59:07.120
<v Speaker 3>director and the writer and everyone honestly is making at

0:59:07.120 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 3>this point to tell the audience get out of here.

0:59:10.360 --> 0:59:13.000
<v Speaker 3>You know this movie you came to see, We're not

0:59:13.160 --> 0:59:14.720
<v Speaker 3>going to give it to you. We're going to give

0:59:14.720 --> 0:59:19.240
<v Speaker 3>you something very strange. Get out of this theater. And

0:59:19.280 --> 0:59:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I think that's great, And there's actually a really great

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 3>future use of this song. If anyone's ever seen the

0:59:26.080 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Cameron Crow film Vanilla Sky, this song is very intentionally,

0:59:31.040 --> 0:59:35.000
<v Speaker 3>very prominently and in multiple locations used in Vanilla Sky.

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:38.000
<v Speaker 3>So if you've seen that film, you've heard this song.

0:59:38.320 --> 0:59:40.240
<v Speaker 2>I have seen that movie, but it was long ago,

0:59:40.280 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 2>and I don't remember the use of this. Do you

0:59:42.880 --> 0:59:44.120
<v Speaker 2>what part of the movie is it?

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I guess I don't want to give anything away, but

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I will say never mind, but I'll give a very

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 3>vague illusion. It matches in many ways Mickey's Leap from

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:54.880
<v Speaker 3>the Bridge.

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:59.680
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So this song was written by Jerry Goffin and

0:59:59.760 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 2>car Old King. Carol King co wrote a couple of

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the best songs in the soundtrack, and the lyrics seem

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 2>very much to be a commentary on the creative frustrations

1:00:11.000 --> 1:00:14.360
<v Speaker 2>of the monkeys who wanted to be musicians on their

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>own terms, but were controlled by a corporate marketing apparatus.

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:21.479
<v Speaker 2>So like there's a verse that so the first verse

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 2>is my mi. The clock in the sky is pounding away.

1:00:24.400 --> 1:00:27.480
<v Speaker 2>There's so much to say. A face, a voice, an

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>overdub has no choice, an image cannot rejoice, And so

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:37.360
<v Speaker 2>the lyrics end up sort of holding up this idea

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:40.600
<v Speaker 2>of like whatever the singer's position is as kind of

1:00:40.640 --> 1:00:46.520
<v Speaker 2>like an image or an insubstantial reflection opposite the idea

1:00:46.560 --> 1:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>of the porpoise. The porpoise, it says, is laughing goodbye, goodbye, goodbye.

1:00:51.920 --> 1:00:54.120
<v Speaker 2>The porpoise is kind of the image of freedom in

1:00:54.160 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the song. It's like a wild animal that can swim

1:00:56.360 --> 1:00:59.120
<v Speaker 2>away in the ocean. And we hear the sounds of

1:00:59.160 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>the porpoise literally like sampled at the end of the song. Uh,

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:06.560
<v Speaker 2>and it's just repeatedly. It's like the sounds become mocking

1:01:06.680 --> 1:01:09.439
<v Speaker 2>because it is clear that the singer will never have

1:01:09.560 --> 1:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>freedom like the porpoise does. The singer instead summarizes their

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:20.320
<v Speaker 2>situation in the verse that says, clicks clacks, writing on

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the backs of giraffes for laughs is all right for

1:01:23.400 --> 1:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>a while the ego sings of castles and kings and

1:01:27.040 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 2>things that go with a life of style, wanting to feel,

1:01:30.640 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>to know what is real. Living is a lie. The

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:35.960
<v Speaker 2>porpoise is waiting goodbye, goodbye.

1:01:36.040 --> 1:01:39.480
<v Speaker 3>See and Sink would never do that. These boys far

1:01:39.560 --> 1:01:40.360
<v Speaker 3>beyond it and sync.

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I think, you know, a lot of psychedelic songs have

1:01:44.680 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>lyrics that, like, they kind of sound cool. They're more

1:01:48.040 --> 1:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>for sonic effect than they are for meaning. But I

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:54.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know, I think these are good, meaningful lyrics. It's

1:01:55.240 --> 1:01:58.640
<v Speaker 2>really clever. The line about clicks and clacks, you know,

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:02.920
<v Speaker 2>clicks being the idea of like the clicks that control

1:02:03.040 --> 1:02:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the band, the clicks of producers and so forth. The

1:02:05.960 --> 1:02:09.920
<v Speaker 2>claques being clacked meaning like a paid audience members.

1:02:09.880 --> 1:02:13.320
<v Speaker 3>And phonetically too, like just just just the automnopic sound

1:02:13.360 --> 1:02:15.600
<v Speaker 3>of both those things works on that level as well.

1:02:15.920 --> 1:02:19.240
<v Speaker 3>It's it's deep, it's meaningful, and it sounds good. It's

1:02:19.320 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 3>it's excellent songwriting.

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:26.440
<v Speaker 2>But also it's an incredible downer of an opener, good Bye, Goodbye, Goodbye.

1:02:26.560 --> 1:02:28.960
<v Speaker 2>The point of this song is that we will never

1:02:29.200 --> 1:02:32.800
<v Speaker 2>have creative freedom, and we are living a life of

1:02:34.280 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>falsity and illusion.

1:02:36.080 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Get out of the theater, kids, this isn't for you.

1:02:39.960 --> 1:02:42.520
<v Speaker 2>So in the water here Dolan's like synks to the

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:45.240
<v Speaker 2>bottom and he's like surrounded by coral and here we

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>get extensive use of that. I apologize if this is

1:02:49.080 --> 1:02:52.160
<v Speaker 2>not exactly the correct way to describe this, but it's

1:02:52.320 --> 1:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I think what would be called a solarization effect. It's

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 2>where like the colors are all weirdly inverted. It's like

1:02:58.880 --> 1:03:03.200
<v Speaker 2>sort of saturated and has opposite kinds of contrast intensities

1:03:03.240 --> 1:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of what the original image would be. I think I

1:03:06.360 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 2>read that the part of this was done because like

1:03:08.960 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 2>they shot some underwater scenes somewhere out actually in the ocean,

1:03:13.960 --> 1:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>but there had just been a hurricane and so the

1:03:16.240 --> 1:03:20.200
<v Speaker 2>water was really cloudy and so it didn't look right,

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 2>and so then they ended up having to reshoot things

1:03:22.360 --> 1:03:25.680
<v Speaker 2>in a swimming pool, and then they used this solarization

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:29.280
<v Speaker 2>technique to kind of cover that up. And it clearly

1:03:29.680 --> 1:03:31.560
<v Speaker 2>at the time they must have thought, yeah, this looks

1:03:31.560 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>so psychedelicly cool, but it kind of it wears at

1:03:34.600 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 2>it's welcome pretty quick. But anyway down there in the water,

1:03:37.520 --> 1:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>like Mickey, he sinks down and then mermaids come to

1:03:40.840 --> 1:03:42.680
<v Speaker 2>his rescue apparently.

1:03:42.640 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, rescue or doom, because you know, depending upon the

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:48.760
<v Speaker 3>mythology that we're talking about here. Okay, think about the

1:03:48.760 --> 1:03:53.960
<v Speaker 3>movie Hook. You know those mermaids they rescued Peter Pan. However,

1:03:54.000 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 3>you think about the other kinds of mermaids where they're

1:03:56.040 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 3>luring you deeper and deeper into the water so ultimately,

1:04:00.320 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, make you drown and then consume your flesh.

1:04:03.320 --> 1:04:06.760
<v Speaker 3>So it could be either it could be either one.

1:04:07.400 --> 1:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we see one of the mermaids. It appears

1:04:10.960 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 2>to be resuscitating Mickey with mouth to mouth.

1:04:13.920 --> 1:04:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Hook style, Peter Pan.

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:18.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. But then the solarization departs and we can see

1:04:18.720 --> 1:04:21.880
<v Speaker 2>them clearly again, and the water in the foreground is

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>revealed to be not real water or not water that

1:04:25.040 --> 1:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>they're in, but only a fish tank in front of

1:04:27.600 --> 1:04:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the camera with the mermaid and Mickey behind. And in fact,

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the mermaid is no longer a mermaid. It's just a

1:04:33.400 --> 1:04:36.560
<v Speaker 2>regular woman with legs and everything. And she's kissing Mickey

1:04:36.560 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>on the mouth. Then she walks away from him, revealing

1:04:39.680 --> 1:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>they're in some kind of weird apartment. This might have

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:45.840
<v Speaker 2>been correct me if I'm wrong here, Seth, this apartment

1:04:45.920 --> 1:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>might have been like a standard part of the Monkey's

1:04:48.400 --> 1:04:49.360
<v Speaker 2>TV set.

1:04:49.840 --> 1:04:52.360
<v Speaker 3>That's what it looks like. It's clearly not the exact

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:56.280
<v Speaker 3>same setup, but I think they're at least trying to

1:04:57.520 --> 1:05:00.480
<v Speaker 3>either reuse the sets or make us feel, hey, we're

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>back at the TV show for a moment. But yeah, yeah,

1:05:03.080 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that was intentional.

1:05:04.760 --> 1:05:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so it's kind of like that. It's like an

1:05:06.920 --> 1:05:09.280
<v Speaker 2>apartment that's like the Monkey set, except it has like

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 2>barbering equipment. There are people in these swiveling barber chairs

1:05:13.080 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, and the rest of the monkeys are

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>there too, And then the lady she kisses all of

1:05:18.120 --> 1:05:21.720
<v Speaker 2>them in sequence. She kisses Mickey, then Michael Nesmith, then

1:05:21.760 --> 1:05:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Peter tork Uh, then Davy Jones, and Davy Jones is last.

1:05:26.120 --> 1:05:28.840
<v Speaker 2>He's in front of this big orange stained glass window

1:05:28.920 --> 1:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>with seagulls screaming outside. And after this, she goes to

1:05:32.600 --> 1:05:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the door, looking kind of bored and unimpressed, and she's

1:05:35.720 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna leave the leave the apartment, but they ask her

1:05:38.400 --> 1:05:41.200
<v Speaker 2>for a verdict. First. I guess this was like a

1:05:41.280 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>kissing competition, and she's like, eh, even none of you

1:05:47.200 --> 1:05:49.520
<v Speaker 2>is better than the other yep.

1:05:51.360 --> 1:05:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

1:05:51.640 --> 1:05:53.840
<v Speaker 2>And then things start getting really wild.

1:05:54.400 --> 1:05:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Uh.

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:58.720
<v Speaker 2>There's another musical number that is credited as Diddy Diego

1:05:59.000 --> 1:06:01.880
<v Speaker 2>or the War Chance, and this is sung by the

1:06:01.880 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Monkeys to the rhythm of the I don't know what

1:06:04.560 --> 1:06:08.080
<v Speaker 2>this is originally called, but the Hello Operator song. The

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:12.840
<v Speaker 2>like the children's children's you know school yard rhyme dah

1:06:12.920 --> 1:06:16.600
<v Speaker 2>da da da di duh, and so I'm not going

1:06:16.680 --> 1:06:18.720
<v Speaker 2>to read all the lyrics, but some of the salient ones.

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:21.120
<v Speaker 2>It starts with, Hey, hey, we are the monkeys. You know,

1:06:21.160 --> 1:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>we love to please, a manufactured image with no philosophies,

1:06:25.760 --> 1:06:28.120
<v Speaker 2>and then later in the song it says, you say

1:06:28.160 --> 1:06:31.040
<v Speaker 2>we're manufactured to that we all agree, so make your

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>choice and will rejoice in never being free. Hey hey,

1:06:33.920 --> 1:06:36.160
<v Speaker 2>we are the monkeys. We've said it all before. The

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:38.240
<v Speaker 2>money's in. We're made of tin, We're here to give

1:06:38.240 --> 1:06:44.320
<v Speaker 2>you more. And as they're singing this, the screen you're

1:06:44.400 --> 1:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>watching is filling up with miniature TV screens that I

1:06:49.120 --> 1:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>think are showing you different scenes of the movie you're

1:06:52.520 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 2>about to watch. So they're all cutting in TV screens,

1:06:55.240 --> 1:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>showing you stuff that hasn't happened in the movie yet

1:06:58.080 --> 1:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>but will. Most of this stuff is silly in nature

1:07:02.920 --> 1:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>until the last screen pops up, which happens to show

1:07:07.400 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the execution of Nuin Van Limb, which was this important

1:07:12.520 --> 1:07:15.680
<v Speaker 2>event in the history of the Vietnam War. It was

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 2>like the summary execution of a Vietcong officer in Saigon

1:07:20.000 --> 1:07:23.080
<v Speaker 2>in February nineteen sixty eight in a photo that was

1:07:23.120 --> 1:07:26.959
<v Speaker 2>captured by the Associated Press photographer Eddie Adams, but also

1:07:27.040 --> 1:07:31.360
<v Speaker 2>was captured by a film TV camera and became like

1:07:31.400 --> 1:07:35.640
<v Speaker 2>this really important image in the American anti war movement. Obviously,

1:07:35.720 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 2>this is unbelievably tonally jarring on purpose, and then the

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:45.160
<v Speaker 2>film gives way to this overwhelming montage of war and

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 2>violence imagery, just like bombs exploding and weaponry and war photography,

1:07:52.280 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and the monkeys do like a cheerleading chant of give

1:07:56.320 --> 1:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>me a W, give me an A, give me an

1:07:58.200 --> 1:08:03.800
<v Speaker 2>R to spell war. So it's like, clearly, this incredibly

1:08:04.480 --> 1:08:09.360
<v Speaker 2>sharp critique of the Vietnam War, making it look clearly

1:08:09.400 --> 1:08:13.120
<v Speaker 2>intended to make it look barbarous and immoral, and then

1:08:13.160 --> 1:08:16.479
<v Speaker 2>it cuts straight from that to a goofy trench warfare skit.

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 2>I don't know how to explain, like I can't think

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:22.680
<v Speaker 2>of anything else like this it's so.

1:08:22.439 --> 1:08:26.599
<v Speaker 3>Strange, incredibly strange, and I mean there is humor to it,

1:08:26.960 --> 1:08:30.920
<v Speaker 3>but almost the humor is the existence of humor in

1:08:30.960 --> 1:08:33.760
<v Speaker 3>such a dire situation like that, like like they are

1:08:33.800 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 3>making genuine jokes, but I think the joke ultimately is

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:40.840
<v Speaker 3>that they are joking in this war scene when it

1:08:40.880 --> 1:08:42.880
<v Speaker 3>is not something that should be joked about, which is

1:08:43.240 --> 1:08:44.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of double layer fascinating.

1:08:45.439 --> 1:08:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So the trench warfare scene is like a parody

1:08:48.960 --> 1:08:52.439
<v Speaker 2>of a World War two movie, and this will come

1:08:52.520 --> 1:08:54.439
<v Speaker 2>up again and again. Like I said, there's like there

1:08:54.479 --> 1:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>are all these scenes in the movie that are parodies

1:08:58.240 --> 1:09:03.840
<v Speaker 2>of sort of square movie and TV genres. They're parodies

1:09:03.880 --> 1:09:09.639
<v Speaker 2>of westerns, parodies of war movies, parodies of sports movies.

1:09:10.479 --> 1:09:14.280
<v Speaker 2>And so the World War two movie scene has like

1:09:14.680 --> 1:09:17.760
<v Speaker 2>these gags about helmets, like Mickey doesn't want to wear

1:09:17.800 --> 1:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>his helmet, which actually seems kind of thematically significant given

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:26.880
<v Speaker 2>the opening. And then Peter, I think, or at least

1:09:26.840 --> 1:09:29.639
<v Speaker 2>there may be multiple of the other monkeys like run

1:09:29.680 --> 1:09:34.559
<v Speaker 2>out across the disputed zone between the trenches to retrieve

1:09:34.640 --> 1:09:37.720
<v Speaker 2>a different helmet for Mickey to wear, and eventually that

1:09:37.840 --> 1:09:41.040
<v Speaker 2>ends with them like fighting a football player who keeps

1:09:41.080 --> 1:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>tackling them, but they steal his football helmet and come

1:09:44.080 --> 1:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>back and give it to Mickey.

1:09:45.600 --> 1:09:48.639
<v Speaker 3>It's beautiful in many ways. In many ways, it's making

1:09:48.720 --> 1:09:54.320
<v Speaker 3>these connections between warfare and sports and the violence and

1:09:54.360 --> 1:09:57.200
<v Speaker 3>the one upsmanship and this like push and pull and

1:09:57.640 --> 1:10:01.280
<v Speaker 3>conflict between us and them, and it's it's fascinating and

1:10:01.320 --> 1:10:05.680
<v Speaker 3>beautiful and also very nonsensical and silly. It's it's odd.

1:10:06.600 --> 1:10:09.400
<v Speaker 2>And then it transitions straight from that to a concert

1:10:09.479 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 2>scene where this is just like a It starts off

1:10:12.040 --> 1:10:13.960
<v Speaker 2>just kind of like a straight concert scene with the

1:10:14.000 --> 1:10:16.719
<v Speaker 2>band playing on stage. They're playing their instruments and singing

1:10:17.280 --> 1:10:21.599
<v Speaker 2>in front of a crowd, and the song in this

1:10:21.680 --> 1:10:25.360
<v Speaker 2>scene is the Mike Nesmith song Circle Sky, written and

1:10:25.520 --> 1:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>sung by Mike Nesmith. The whole band is playing on

1:10:29.320 --> 1:10:32.439
<v Speaker 2>stage in front of an audience of screaming young fans.

1:10:32.640 --> 1:10:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Fans shown shrieking and applauding with such intensity it looks

1:10:38.320 --> 1:10:41.760
<v Speaker 2>almost more like pain and fear than happiness.

1:10:42.080 --> 1:10:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's throw in one bit of context here, which

1:10:45.720 --> 1:10:48.839
<v Speaker 3>I'm please correct me if I'm not getting this completely correct,

1:10:48.880 --> 1:10:51.800
<v Speaker 3>But this is kind of like the the series of

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>images that I remember. So the four monkeys. They are

1:10:55.240 --> 1:10:59.680
<v Speaker 3>trying to like breach this like cave or whatever, you know,

1:10:59.720 --> 1:11:01.720
<v Speaker 3>in the war scene. Still, so we're still we're still

1:11:01.760 --> 1:11:04.479
<v Speaker 3>picturing war. And when they get up there, you know,

1:11:04.479 --> 1:11:07.040
<v Speaker 3>they're doing things. They throw a grenade in, they charge

1:11:07.080 --> 1:11:09.360
<v Speaker 3>in as if they're about to attack, and that's the

1:11:09.520 --> 1:11:12.760
<v Speaker 3>direct transition into the scene you just mentioned of them

1:11:12.800 --> 1:11:17.000
<v Speaker 3>at their concert, right, So do they have this antagonistic

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>feeling towards their live shows? Do they see their concerts

1:11:20.040 --> 1:11:22.799
<v Speaker 3>as a battle and their audience as like an enemy

1:11:22.840 --> 1:11:25.479
<v Speaker 3>that must be bested that that this is this is

1:11:25.520 --> 1:11:28.800
<v Speaker 3>this is conflict, This is war between them and this

1:11:28.920 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 3>screaming horde that is their fan base.

1:11:31.640 --> 1:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>It's odd that would make sense given what happens at

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:36.599
<v Speaker 2>the end of this thing, because well, first of all,

1:11:36.880 --> 1:11:38.800
<v Speaker 2>let's talk about Circle Skide the song, and then when

1:11:38.800 --> 1:11:41.639
<v Speaker 2>we talk about how the scene finishes. This is a

1:11:41.800 --> 1:11:44.479
<v Speaker 2>very weird and interesting song. I'd say it's another one

1:11:44.520 --> 1:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>of my favorites in the soundtrack. Rhythmically, it's built around

1:11:49.320 --> 1:11:51.559
<v Speaker 2>a Bo Diddley beat, you know, bump a dump a dump,

1:11:51.600 --> 1:11:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a dump bump, but it also has this strange descending

1:11:55.520 --> 1:11:58.880
<v Speaker 2>chromatic scale part after the verses that kind of reminds

1:11:58.960 --> 1:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>me of the riff in Pink Floyd's Interstellar Overdrive. And

1:12:04.439 --> 1:12:09.639
<v Speaker 2>it's a weird sounding song. It's a lot more rock

1:12:10.080 --> 1:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>than most of the other Monkey songs I can think of,

1:12:13.320 --> 1:12:14.160
<v Speaker 2>if that makes sense.

1:12:14.640 --> 1:12:16.599
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, I mean, this is a this is a Nesmuth

1:12:16.800 --> 1:12:21.240
<v Speaker 3>and one thing that Nesmuth is credited as inventing. And

1:12:21.280 --> 1:12:24.599
<v Speaker 3>once again, no one invented anything. We're all building off

1:12:24.600 --> 1:12:27.200
<v Speaker 3>each other's influences, et cetera, et cetera. But one things

1:12:27.240 --> 1:12:31.519
<v Speaker 3>people give Nesmuth credit for is inventing the rock country genre,

1:12:31.720 --> 1:12:33.720
<v Speaker 3>that melding, you know, something that we would see later

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:40.639
<v Speaker 3>with like the Birds and Wilco exactly exactly. He's given

1:12:40.680 --> 1:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>credit for that, which these early Monkeys songs definitely kind

1:12:45.040 --> 1:12:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of hint towards, and then he gets really into it later.

1:12:48.120 --> 1:12:51.879
<v Speaker 3>This is just a quick bonus recommendation. There's a series

1:12:51.920 --> 1:12:55.479
<v Speaker 3>of three solo albums from Mike Nesmyth that I think

1:12:55.520 --> 1:12:57.720
<v Speaker 3>you would love, Joe, but I think everyone would love

1:12:58.120 --> 1:13:02.400
<v Speaker 3>nineteen seventy Magnetic southeteen seventy Loose Salute, nineteen seventy one

1:13:02.439 --> 1:13:06.519
<v Speaker 3>Nevada Fighter. All three are this Vibe and so if

1:13:06.560 --> 1:13:08.960
<v Speaker 3>anyone likes this song and the way this is going

1:13:09.120 --> 1:13:12.240
<v Speaker 3>that this is like a little hint at where Nesmuth

1:13:12.280 --> 1:13:14.360
<v Speaker 3>is headed next. And he put out three albums in

1:13:14.400 --> 1:13:17.200
<v Speaker 3>a row that are all this vibe and are all incredible.

1:13:17.840 --> 1:13:20.559
<v Speaker 2>I would say, yeah, and even this may be a

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:23.280
<v Speaker 2>very strange comparison, but I would say, if you loosen

1:13:23.439 --> 1:13:26.640
<v Speaker 2>all of the bolts on this type of music significantly,

1:13:27.120 --> 1:13:29.160
<v Speaker 2>you end up with the meat puppets.

1:13:29.200 --> 1:13:33.559
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely no, it's it's it's

1:13:33.760 --> 1:13:38.479
<v Speaker 3>incredible song making. It's Mike Nesmith. I'm a huge fan

1:13:38.520 --> 1:13:40.640
<v Speaker 3>of his. I really really love what he does, and

1:13:40.680 --> 1:13:43.080
<v Speaker 3>this is a great example of it. And this whole

1:13:43.120 --> 1:13:46.040
<v Speaker 3>scene is just filmed beautifully as well. This whole like

1:13:47.000 --> 1:13:50.000
<v Speaker 3>war into concert and then are you ready to go

1:13:50.040 --> 1:13:51.360
<v Speaker 3>into what it goes into next?

1:13:51.600 --> 1:13:53.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, So they sing this song and it's a

1:13:53.640 --> 1:13:55.840
<v Speaker 2>great musical number. But at the end of the song,

1:13:56.000 --> 1:14:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the audience, which again is mostly teenage girls, they assault

1:14:00.320 --> 1:14:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the stage, attack the band, and apparently kill them, except

1:14:05.240 --> 1:14:08.599
<v Speaker 2>it reveals that the band are not flesh and blood like.

1:14:08.640 --> 1:14:12.000
<v Speaker 2>They are ripped to pieces by the audience, revealing that

1:14:12.040 --> 1:14:14.440
<v Speaker 2>they are actually just puppets. And mannequins.

1:14:15.120 --> 1:14:16.960
<v Speaker 3>They were phony the whole time.

1:14:19.640 --> 1:14:21.240
<v Speaker 2>But I do want to dwell for a second on

1:14:21.280 --> 1:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>how like it's interesting the way the movie really focuses

1:14:25.439 --> 1:14:30.080
<v Speaker 2>on the intensity of the feeling and the audience for

1:14:30.160 --> 1:14:32.519
<v Speaker 2>the band. And I don't know how exactly this was filmed,

1:14:32.560 --> 1:14:35.800
<v Speaker 2>like if they filmed a real a real audience for

1:14:36.120 --> 1:14:38.439
<v Speaker 2>a Monkey's concert, or if these were just actors, you know,

1:14:38.520 --> 1:14:42.000
<v Speaker 2>asked to portray screaming. I really don't know what they

1:14:42.080 --> 1:14:45.840
<v Speaker 2>did here, but you can compare it certainly to live

1:14:45.880 --> 1:14:48.559
<v Speaker 2>footage of real audiences reacting to the Beatles or any

1:14:48.680 --> 1:14:52.000
<v Speaker 2>very popular band. And it just reminds me that I

1:14:52.080 --> 1:14:55.200
<v Speaker 2>love music. But however much I love music now, there

1:14:55.280 --> 1:14:58.519
<v Speaker 2>really is no way for me to access the kind

1:14:58.560 --> 1:15:02.519
<v Speaker 2>of excruciating passion I had for my favorite bands when

1:15:02.600 --> 1:15:05.880
<v Speaker 2>I was a teenager. There's like a teenage relationship with

1:15:06.040 --> 1:15:09.679
<v Speaker 2>music that that doesn't come back no matter how hard

1:15:09.720 --> 1:15:12.439
<v Speaker 2>you try, you know, like the way that you would

1:15:12.479 --> 1:15:15.600
<v Speaker 2>just scream for a band at that age.

1:15:15.760 --> 1:15:19.719
<v Speaker 3>And like the physical output, like especially if like again

1:15:19.760 --> 1:15:22.200
<v Speaker 3>you're in your young teenage years, you're going to a

1:15:22.240 --> 1:15:26.600
<v Speaker 3>metal show, a punk show, hardcore show, and that physical

1:15:26.920 --> 1:15:30.280
<v Speaker 3>feeling you get of being amongst your peers jostling and

1:15:30.320 --> 1:15:32.719
<v Speaker 3>being in a pit and all that stuff. I can't

1:15:32.760 --> 1:15:37.040
<v Speaker 3>imagine doing that anymore, Like, not for a second. You know,

1:15:37.120 --> 1:15:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm middle aged. There's not a chance.

1:15:39.720 --> 1:15:42.519
<v Speaker 2>But at least in my memory, I strongly identified with

1:15:42.640 --> 1:15:44.880
<v Speaker 2>the audience in the scene. Is like, I remember that

1:15:45.000 --> 1:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>feeling of like caring about a band, even a band

1:15:48.080 --> 1:15:50.519
<v Speaker 2>that maybe years later I would think was silly. Caring

1:15:50.640 --> 1:15:53.479
<v Speaker 2>this much, that is just overwhelming passion.

1:15:54.040 --> 1:15:57.320
<v Speaker 3>It's wonderful. I'm glad music has that ability. And yeah,

1:15:57.320 --> 1:15:59.680
<v Speaker 3>you're right, though I think teenagers connect to it in

1:15:59.720 --> 1:16:07.439
<v Speaker 3>a perfectly teenage way.

1:16:10.640 --> 1:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh but from here it goes on to all kinds

1:16:12.400 --> 1:16:14.599
<v Speaker 2>of other weird stuff. We get like a channel surfing

1:16:14.720 --> 1:16:17.960
<v Speaker 2>montage where we see like a disembodied hand clicking a

1:16:18.000 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 2>remote control. I don't think I even realized there were

1:16:21.080 --> 1:16:25.519
<v Speaker 2>remote controls at this point, but clicking a remote and

1:16:25.520 --> 1:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>we see on the TV screen like cuts between commercials

1:16:28.400 --> 1:16:32.400
<v Speaker 2>that highlight American consumerism. We get bits of Bible movies

1:16:32.439 --> 1:16:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and stuff. There's one moment where it's a Bela Lagosi movie.

1:16:35.840 --> 1:16:37.479
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what movie this is from. I didn't

1:16:37.479 --> 1:16:40.880
<v Speaker 2>look it up. But it's where Bella Lagosi is talking

1:16:40.920 --> 1:16:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to some guy and the other guy says, sounds like

1:16:42.840 --> 1:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of supernatural boloney to me, and Bello replies, supernatural,

1:16:47.560 --> 1:16:50.240
<v Speaker 2>perhaps bloney, perhaps not.

1:16:51.080 --> 1:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>This moment has a very prominent place on the album soundtrack,

1:16:54.560 --> 1:16:58.040
<v Speaker 3>this spell Lagosi quote, and I love it every time.

1:16:59.320 --> 1:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>But then we go to another very memorable scene. It's

1:17:02.880 --> 1:17:06.479
<v Speaker 2>the Mickey in the Desert scene where we get Mickey

1:17:06.520 --> 1:17:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Dollins lost in the desert, wandering around shirtless, thirsty. He

1:17:11.000 --> 1:17:13.679
<v Speaker 2>comes across a coke machine in the middle of the desert,

1:17:13.720 --> 1:17:16.640
<v Speaker 2>but it malfunctions and won't give him his coke. I

1:17:16.680 --> 1:17:20.799
<v Speaker 2>found this scene very funny. Yes, he's like fighting the machine.

1:17:21.080 --> 1:17:23.799
<v Speaker 2>And then later in the scene it becomes a parody

1:17:23.800 --> 1:17:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of Lawrence of Arabia with like an Arabian horseman riding

1:17:28.040 --> 1:17:30.960
<v Speaker 2>over the sand dunes, and then seth, did you want

1:17:31.000 --> 1:17:31.840
<v Speaker 2>to describe this part?

1:17:32.360 --> 1:17:35.439
<v Speaker 3>Sure? This is a moment we referenced earlier that genuinely

1:17:35.439 --> 1:17:38.519
<v Speaker 3>made me laugh out loud just yesterday watching this. When

1:17:39.160 --> 1:17:41.400
<v Speaker 3>the horseman rides up over the dunes, comes all the

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:44.880
<v Speaker 3>way up to Mickey, Mickey is confused, perhaps a little apprehensious,

1:17:44.880 --> 1:17:47.280
<v Speaker 3>a little little worried, and he goes and he's like

1:17:47.280 --> 1:17:49.559
<v Speaker 3>what and then he gets real close, he goes past,

1:17:49.960 --> 1:17:52.200
<v Speaker 3>and then there's a big caption on the screen that

1:17:52.280 --> 1:17:57.479
<v Speaker 3>just saysst some title. Yes, and then he just rides

1:17:57.520 --> 1:18:00.320
<v Speaker 3>off and that's it. That's the end. I believe.

1:18:00.400 --> 1:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Mickey once again goes what Yeah. But then there so

1:18:05.400 --> 1:18:09.080
<v Speaker 2>after that, there's a part where an Italian tank drives

1:18:09.160 --> 1:18:12.439
<v Speaker 2>up right. The driver gets out of the tank, goes

1:18:12.520 --> 1:18:15.320
<v Speaker 2>up to Mickey and confirms he is American. He only

1:18:15.360 --> 1:18:19.559
<v Speaker 2>speaks Italian, I think, but Americano, and Mickey confirms, and

1:18:19.600 --> 1:18:23.559
<v Speaker 2>then the tank driver gleefully surrenders to Mickey, and then

1:18:23.600 --> 1:18:26.840
<v Speaker 2>we basically get to watch this huge train of soldiers

1:18:26.920 --> 1:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>that are like all of the axis powers lining up

1:18:29.760 --> 1:18:31.280
<v Speaker 2>to surrender to the monkeys.

1:18:31.840 --> 1:18:32.680
<v Speaker 3>It's so what.

1:18:35.600 --> 1:18:35.720
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

1:18:36.000 --> 1:18:39.040
<v Speaker 2>And then oh, then finally Mickey gets in the tank

1:18:39.080 --> 1:18:41.439
<v Speaker 2>and uses it to shell the coke machine, which I

1:18:41.520 --> 1:18:42.479
<v Speaker 2>laughed out loud at.

1:18:43.120 --> 1:18:45.679
<v Speaker 3>You know who wasn't laughing was Coca Cola. They got

1:18:45.680 --> 1:18:48.120
<v Speaker 3>mad and actually requested that this be taken out of

1:18:48.120 --> 1:18:52.799
<v Speaker 3>the film. But not too long afterwards, Coca Cola actually

1:18:52.840 --> 1:18:56.680
<v Speaker 3>bought the production company in the studio that made this film,

1:18:56.800 --> 1:18:58.120
<v Speaker 3>so then they didn't mind so much.

1:18:59.080 --> 1:19:04.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's see after this, let's what happened. Oh, it

1:19:04.520 --> 1:19:07.679
<v Speaker 2>segues into another musical number and not so great scene

1:19:07.720 --> 1:19:10.439
<v Speaker 2>where the monkeys are like hanging out dressed in Arabic

1:19:10.520 --> 1:19:13.720
<v Speaker 2>clothing and surrounded by belly dancers. And this is to

1:19:13.920 --> 1:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>a company the Peter Torque song can You Dig It,

1:19:17.400 --> 1:19:19.639
<v Speaker 2>which is set to I don't know what you call

1:19:19.720 --> 1:19:23.320
<v Speaker 2>this genre, but it was like American psychedelic rock music

1:19:23.360 --> 1:19:25.960
<v Speaker 2>of the sixties that was supposed to be inflected with

1:19:26.160 --> 1:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I think like an Eastern sound, I.

1:19:28.680 --> 1:19:32.599
<v Speaker 3>Believe, right right, Yeah, when all of the white rock

1:19:32.600 --> 1:19:35.240
<v Speaker 3>and roll musicians bought a sitar and didn't know how

1:19:35.240 --> 1:19:37.720
<v Speaker 3>to play it, it was that era. Yeah. No, no

1:19:37.760 --> 1:19:39.720
<v Speaker 3>offense to George Harrison. I'm sure he was doing it

1:19:39.760 --> 1:19:40.519
<v Speaker 3>better than most.

1:19:40.880 --> 1:19:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, But but this one feels I

1:19:43.960 --> 1:19:45.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know, this is not I think one of the

1:19:45.400 --> 1:19:47.040
<v Speaker 2>better musical numbers in the movie.

1:19:47.640 --> 1:19:50.360
<v Speaker 3>It feels like a little music video interlude, but one

1:19:50.439 --> 1:19:54.240
<v Speaker 3>without as much meaning as the previous two Circle Sky

1:19:54.320 --> 1:19:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and Porpoise song.

1:19:55.520 --> 1:19:58.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. No offense to the belly dancers, though they do

1:19:58.600 --> 1:20:00.680
<v Speaker 2>great and we get for sure, no belly cam and

1:20:00.720 --> 1:20:04.920
<v Speaker 2>all that. But then we transition to another genre parody,

1:20:05.000 --> 1:20:08.639
<v Speaker 2>this time a Western featuring Terry Garr In this scene

1:20:08.720 --> 1:20:12.439
<v Speaker 2>where in the middle of the scene here Mickey gets

1:20:12.439 --> 1:20:15.240
<v Speaker 2>fed up and walks off set, literally tearing a hole

1:20:15.280 --> 1:20:17.960
<v Speaker 2>in the painted backdrop. And this is the first of

1:20:18.040 --> 1:20:20.200
<v Speaker 2>many scenes in the movie where the fourth wall not

1:20:20.240 --> 1:20:23.759
<v Speaker 2>only breaks, but the monkeys like argue with the director

1:20:23.880 --> 1:20:28.200
<v Speaker 2>and with the script and express dissatisfaction with the creative

1:20:28.240 --> 1:20:32.760
<v Speaker 2>direction of the movie. And I think this thing. I

1:20:32.840 --> 1:20:36.120
<v Speaker 2>don't know if it's happened already in other movies before this,

1:20:36.520 --> 1:20:39.160
<v Speaker 2>but I feel like this will be a sort of

1:20:39.240 --> 1:20:43.200
<v Speaker 2>copied in comedy movies that follow, like movies where people

1:20:43.240 --> 1:20:45.799
<v Speaker 2>break the fourth wall and start arguing with the director.

1:20:46.320 --> 1:20:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if it comes from this.

1:20:48.720 --> 1:20:50.519
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, great point. I mean this is pretty early on

1:20:50.640 --> 1:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>nineteen sixty eight is pretty early in the history of

1:20:52.720 --> 1:20:56.200
<v Speaker 3>cinema for things to still be established, like, for example,

1:20:56.240 --> 1:21:00.479
<v Speaker 3>this is a complete tangent. But something I learned recently, Joe,

1:21:00.520 --> 1:21:04.080
<v Speaker 3>do you know where the very first fart in American

1:21:04.160 --> 1:21:05.080
<v Speaker 3>cinema was?

1:21:05.880 --> 1:21:06.639
<v Speaker 2>I do not know.

1:21:07.080 --> 1:21:11.760
<v Speaker 3>Blazing saddles. Ah, that's how long it took to get

1:21:11.760 --> 1:21:13.959
<v Speaker 3>a fart in American cinema.

1:21:14.560 --> 1:21:18.360
<v Speaker 2>That's really funny. Well, so long, what year was Blazing Saddles,

1:21:18.360 --> 1:21:19.479
<v Speaker 2>by the way, you know, let's.

1:21:19.320 --> 1:21:21.559
<v Speaker 3>Look it up. These are just dumb facts in my head.

1:21:21.680 --> 1:21:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's find out because I was thinking.

1:21:24.080 --> 1:21:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Of Blazing Saddles. As doesn't Blazing Saddles have a scene

1:21:27.040 --> 1:21:29.559
<v Speaker 2>where the actors start arguing with the director?

1:21:29.960 --> 1:21:32.759
<v Speaker 3>They do, and that was nineteen seventy four. So perhaps

1:21:32.800 --> 1:21:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Blazing Saddles was at least in part influenced by, if

1:21:36.120 --> 1:21:38.799
<v Speaker 3>not this film, other things that were happening around this film.

1:21:38.880 --> 1:21:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Or maybe it's just something that's commonly in

1:21:42.080 --> 1:21:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the air in the sixties and seventies, and it is changing, yeah,

1:21:44.960 --> 1:21:48.600
<v Speaker 2>changing views about the role of the artist and understanding

1:21:48.640 --> 1:21:52.920
<v Speaker 2>film as a medium to be critiqued from a step back.

1:21:52.960 --> 1:21:53.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't know.

1:21:53.760 --> 1:21:55.679
<v Speaker 3>It must have been fun though, that at that time

1:21:55.720 --> 1:21:58.320
<v Speaker 3>you still could do things that were first that things

1:21:58.360 --> 1:22:01.479
<v Speaker 3>oh felt still unexplored, like it was the wild West.

1:22:01.600 --> 1:22:04.680
<v Speaker 3>No pun intended that you could just kind of do

1:22:04.840 --> 1:22:06.720
<v Speaker 3>something and have it be the first time it ever

1:22:06.720 --> 1:22:07.599
<v Speaker 3>happened on screen.

1:22:08.000 --> 1:22:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, And I wanted to mention so there are

1:22:10.120 --> 1:22:12.200
<v Speaker 2>these scenes where they argue with the director, and in

1:22:12.240 --> 1:22:15.479
<v Speaker 2>one of these scenes later you see Bob Raefelson and

1:22:15.680 --> 1:22:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Jack Nicholson as themselves like walk on screen and start

1:22:19.280 --> 1:22:20.880
<v Speaker 2>arguing with Peter Torrik and stuff.

1:22:21.200 --> 1:22:24.760
<v Speaker 3>It's amazing because you immediately recognize Jack Nicholson like it's

1:22:24.880 --> 1:22:28.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, Jack Nicholson is iconic, of course, and no

1:22:28.120 --> 1:22:31.519
<v Speaker 3>one looks like Jack Nicholson except Jack Nicholson. Like he is.

1:22:32.200 --> 1:22:35.479
<v Speaker 3>He's a legend, He's an icon from what I've heard.

1:22:36.040 --> 1:22:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Dennis Hopper is also in this scene, but I have

1:22:39.439 --> 1:22:41.200
<v Speaker 3>never been able to spot him, But then again, I

1:22:41.200 --> 1:22:43.960
<v Speaker 3>also couldn't spot a net Funicello, so that's not saying much.

1:22:44.920 --> 1:22:47.639
<v Speaker 2>I did not spot Dennis Hopper either, so I don't

1:22:47.640 --> 1:22:48.519
<v Speaker 2>know where he is in there.

1:22:48.600 --> 1:22:50.720
<v Speaker 3>But there's I do go in this scene though. It's

1:22:50.760 --> 1:22:54.400
<v Speaker 3>so it's so beautiful, like and just everything that's happening

1:22:54.439 --> 1:22:56.559
<v Speaker 3>in this scene. This is this is the diner scene, correct,

1:22:57.080 --> 1:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>the later scene where they're they're arguing with the with

1:22:59.840 --> 1:23:02.400
<v Speaker 3>the the director. Yeah, yes, yes, yes, yes.

1:23:02.720 --> 1:23:04.639
<v Speaker 2>But let's see other things in the movie. We've already

1:23:04.640 --> 1:23:07.759
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that the Davy Jones boxing with Sonny Liston scene.

1:23:09.240 --> 1:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>There is there's the you're the dummy theme. This is

1:23:13.200 --> 1:23:16.320
<v Speaker 2>a recurring thing in the movie where the monkeys kind

1:23:16.320 --> 1:23:18.280
<v Speaker 2>of have a dispute about which one of them is

1:23:18.320 --> 1:23:21.599
<v Speaker 2>the dummy, and they decide Peter is the dummy. He's

1:23:21.640 --> 1:23:24.320
<v Speaker 2>always the dummy, but in fact Peter in the end

1:23:24.360 --> 1:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>is revealed to be the one with wisdom right, and

1:23:28.320 --> 1:23:31.639
<v Speaker 2>this gives it goes into another one of the musical numbers,

1:23:31.840 --> 1:23:34.160
<v Speaker 2>a song called as We Go Along, written by Carol

1:23:34.240 --> 1:23:37.519
<v Speaker 2>King and Tony Stern. I don't know who's singing this one.

1:23:37.560 --> 1:23:39.960
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like a female voice, so it could be

1:23:40.040 --> 1:23:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Carol King singing, but I don't know for sure. This

1:23:43.479 --> 1:23:47.920
<v Speaker 2>one's kind of a hopeful sounding hippie ballad almost kind

1:23:47.920 --> 1:23:51.639
<v Speaker 2>of reminds me of the vibe of like Both Sides Now.

1:23:53.160 --> 1:23:58.320
<v Speaker 2>And we see Peter Tork wandering through landscapes of snow flowers, forests,

1:23:58.439 --> 1:24:02.320
<v Speaker 2>rocky beaches. It's like a land escape video. But then

1:24:02.360 --> 1:24:06.439
<v Speaker 2>this transitions straight into a montage of advertising billboards, and

1:24:06.479 --> 1:24:09.439
<v Speaker 2>then we go into the factory scene where the monkeys

1:24:09.439 --> 1:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>are touring a factory. What does this factory make? I

1:24:12.320 --> 1:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>think it makes shapes, that's what we see. Yeah, and

1:24:16.280 --> 1:24:18.400
<v Speaker 2>something that looks like v eight juice that we see

1:24:18.439 --> 1:24:20.679
<v Speaker 2>guys like coming. It's coming out of spouts and guys

1:24:20.680 --> 1:24:24.200
<v Speaker 2>are drinking it, and the foreman giving them the factory

1:24:24.240 --> 1:24:27.760
<v Speaker 2>tour explains that soon everything will be automated and then

1:24:27.880 --> 1:24:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the only work left to humanity will be figuring out

1:24:30.880 --> 1:24:34.400
<v Speaker 2>how to amuse itself, and he ominously comments that we

1:24:34.439 --> 1:24:36.000
<v Speaker 2>should be careful what we wish for.

1:24:37.040 --> 1:24:38.679
<v Speaker 3>We're getting closer to that every day.

1:24:38.960 --> 1:24:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and then the monkeys they like somehow from the

1:24:43.920 --> 1:24:46.960
<v Speaker 2>factory they get they walk into a giant tu pay

1:24:47.680 --> 1:24:50.040
<v Speaker 2>and they are like being I think they're being ordered

1:24:50.080 --> 1:24:52.559
<v Speaker 2>to film a commercial for something having to do with

1:24:52.600 --> 1:24:55.639
<v Speaker 2>the two pay. Like this is the Dandriff scene? Can

1:24:55.680 --> 1:24:58.000
<v Speaker 2>you explain this seth, what's going on?

1:24:58.320 --> 1:25:01.599
<v Speaker 3>I mean, first of all, how transition from the factory

1:25:01.640 --> 1:25:04.479
<v Speaker 3>to the dan Driff happens. I'm not entirely sure. There's

1:25:04.520 --> 1:25:06.439
<v Speaker 3>a few really great transitions where you can kind of

1:25:06.479 --> 1:25:08.639
<v Speaker 3>like see the A to the B. I'm not sure

1:25:08.640 --> 1:25:10.840
<v Speaker 3>if I can connect to this one. But so we

1:25:10.920 --> 1:25:15.280
<v Speaker 3>have a giant and I mean enormous pile of fake

1:25:15.840 --> 1:25:20.320
<v Speaker 3>large scale hair and the four monkeys dressed all in white,

1:25:20.560 --> 1:25:23.320
<v Speaker 3>and the director is yelling at them and commanding them, no,

1:25:23.560 --> 1:25:25.519
<v Speaker 3>roll around, roll on, wrap yourself up in there. You're

1:25:25.600 --> 1:25:26.400
<v Speaker 3>dan drff, you're dander.

1:25:26.520 --> 1:25:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Get in there, get in the hair.

1:25:30.080 --> 1:25:34.720
<v Speaker 3>And then I think, once again, we see another example

1:25:34.840 --> 1:25:38.640
<v Speaker 3>of your my puppets. Just do the stupid thing so

1:25:38.680 --> 1:25:40.160
<v Speaker 3>I can hurry up and film it, we can move

1:25:40.200 --> 1:25:42.519
<v Speaker 3>on with our lives. I need you to just do

1:25:42.560 --> 1:25:44.600
<v Speaker 3>what I'm saying. You don't need to understand it, you

1:25:44.600 --> 1:25:47.519
<v Speaker 3>don't need to have any commentary. Just roll around in there,

1:25:47.600 --> 1:25:48.160
<v Speaker 3>get in there.

1:25:50.360 --> 1:25:53.559
<v Speaker 2>And then we get a like zoom out where the

1:25:53.640 --> 1:25:57.360
<v Speaker 2>hair is revealed to be the hair of Victor Mature,

1:25:57.600 --> 1:26:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the Hollywood actor and the like Hollywood leading man, who's

1:26:01.280 --> 1:26:06.200
<v Speaker 2>got very nice looking hair, very well coaffed, and his

1:26:06.320 --> 1:26:11.879
<v Speaker 2>hair is being vacuumed. Was this a common hair grooming

1:26:11.920 --> 1:26:14.599
<v Speaker 2>procedure in the sixties to vacuum your hair?

1:26:15.920 --> 1:26:17.559
<v Speaker 3>To me, have you ever heard of it?

1:26:17.600 --> 1:26:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But okay, so his hair is being vacuumed, and then

1:26:19.960 --> 1:26:23.679
<v Speaker 2>the monkeys get sucked up into the vacuum, and then

1:26:23.720 --> 1:26:27.599
<v Speaker 2>somehow in this whole sequence, Davy gets separated, and then

1:26:27.760 --> 1:26:30.439
<v Speaker 2>we get another musical number. It's completely different from anything

1:26:30.479 --> 1:26:34.120
<v Speaker 2>that's come before, but I think is really good. Davy

1:26:34.200 --> 1:26:37.559
<v Speaker 2>finds himself alone on a sound stage and begins a

1:26:37.600 --> 1:26:41.720
<v Speaker 2>wonderful musical number that is visually dazzling by relying on

1:26:41.880 --> 1:26:46.519
<v Speaker 2>such a simple visual effect, which is editing between two

1:26:46.720 --> 1:26:51.120
<v Speaker 2>takes that each have completely inverted colors. So in one

1:26:51.160 --> 1:26:54.080
<v Speaker 2>take it's a white set with Davy Jones wearing a

1:26:54.080 --> 1:26:57.080
<v Speaker 2>black suit and a white shirt, and in the other

1:26:57.400 --> 1:27:00.200
<v Speaker 2>all the colors are the opposite, and they cut back

1:27:00.240 --> 1:27:03.360
<v Speaker 2>and forth between these two and the effect is fantastic. Also,

1:27:03.479 --> 1:27:06.559
<v Speaker 2>Davies dancing is really good, and he's got a dancing

1:27:06.600 --> 1:27:08.479
<v Speaker 2>partner and she's really good too. I was trying to

1:27:08.479 --> 1:27:11.040
<v Speaker 2>find out who his dancing partner was here, but I'm

1:27:11.040 --> 1:27:11.880
<v Speaker 2>not sure who it was.

1:27:12.560 --> 1:27:15.719
<v Speaker 3>I can say this in many situations throughout this film,

1:27:15.840 --> 1:27:20.160
<v Speaker 3>if you look into who the female cast member is,

1:27:20.600 --> 1:27:23.559
<v Speaker 3>it's quite often someone's wife or girlfriend that that happened

1:27:23.880 --> 1:27:26.519
<v Speaker 3>many times, like Jack Nicholson's girlfriend at the time was

1:27:26.520 --> 1:27:29.959
<v Speaker 3>in this. I believe a couple of the Monkeys' wives

1:27:30.000 --> 1:27:33.439
<v Speaker 3>were in this. Like that was a common thread throughout

1:27:33.439 --> 1:27:35.640
<v Speaker 3>this film was Friends of the Monkeys.

1:27:36.080 --> 1:27:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, okay, But then coming to the song itself, this

1:27:39.880 --> 1:27:43.639
<v Speaker 2>is the one written by Harry Nilson called Daddy's Song,

1:27:43.760 --> 1:27:47.439
<v Speaker 2>which the song sounds kind of cheerful, it sounds like

1:27:47.560 --> 1:27:51.320
<v Speaker 2>it's like a classic classic Broadway show tune, but actually

1:27:51.400 --> 1:27:54.200
<v Speaker 2>it is quite sad. It's a sad narrative about a

1:27:54.240 --> 1:27:57.640
<v Speaker 2>young boy who remembers looking up to his father, but

1:27:57.680 --> 1:28:01.400
<v Speaker 2>then his father abandons his family, and he tells about

1:28:01.439 --> 1:28:03.640
<v Speaker 2>how his mother didn't know how to explain it to

1:28:03.720 --> 1:28:06.639
<v Speaker 2>her son, and then he reflects on how he thinks

1:28:06.680 --> 1:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>he might never tell his own children. It is a

1:28:11.160 --> 1:28:14.519
<v Speaker 2>once again, just like a very strange and much darker

1:28:14.560 --> 1:28:17.559
<v Speaker 2>and more thoughtful song then you would guess from the

1:28:17.600 --> 1:28:20.320
<v Speaker 2>sound of it or from its context in the film.

1:28:20.640 --> 1:28:24.360
<v Speaker 3>And Nielsen actually did this multiple times for them. Another

1:28:24.520 --> 1:28:28.400
<v Speaker 3>really great one is a song called Cuddly Toy, another

1:28:28.439 --> 1:28:31.480
<v Speaker 3>one that has this kind of like soft shoe Broadway

1:28:31.760 --> 1:28:35.080
<v Speaker 3>vibe to it. It's from their album Piss's Aquarius Capricorn

1:28:35.080 --> 1:28:38.120
<v Speaker 3>and Jones Limited, and once again it's got Davy Jones

1:28:38.200 --> 1:28:41.439
<v Speaker 3>up front being this kind of like corny dude with

1:28:41.479 --> 1:28:46.360
<v Speaker 3>like a sad undertone. Like it's that they really had

1:28:46.400 --> 1:28:49.240
<v Speaker 3>a good thing going at this point. And do you

1:28:49.439 --> 1:28:52.920
<v Speaker 3>think that there was a deliberate metaphor here of separating

1:28:53.600 --> 1:28:56.680
<v Speaker 3>the the one monkey that did stand out that was

1:28:56.880 --> 1:28:59.479
<v Speaker 3>different from the others. He's one British monkey compared to

1:28:59.479 --> 1:29:01.920
<v Speaker 3>the three am and monkeys. Ah, yes, he's the song

1:29:01.960 --> 1:29:05.439
<v Speaker 3>and dance man. They're all hippies, Like, like, hmmm. I

1:29:05.479 --> 1:29:09.120
<v Speaker 3>wonder if there was this kind of intentional division, or

1:29:09.160 --> 1:29:12.160
<v Speaker 3>if perhaps it's as simple as like Davy Jones being like, hey,

1:29:12.200 --> 1:29:15.000
<v Speaker 3>I want I want a song, you know, give me

1:29:15.040 --> 1:29:16.880
<v Speaker 3>a chance to get up there and do my thing too.

1:29:17.400 --> 1:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>That's a good point. I hadn't thought of that, but

1:29:19.960 --> 1:29:22.759
<v Speaker 2>it actually does connect to something that I was talking

1:29:22.760 --> 1:29:25.360
<v Speaker 2>about with Rachel. So she actually she had more knowledge

1:29:25.400 --> 1:29:28.200
<v Speaker 2>of the monkeys growing up than I did, so going

1:29:28.280 --> 1:29:30.479
<v Speaker 2>into this movie she knew more about the monkeys than me.

1:29:31.040 --> 1:29:34.000
<v Speaker 2>And she pointed out how the movie kind of messes

1:29:34.080 --> 1:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>with the character of each monkey. So like Davy the

1:29:37.760 --> 1:29:40.080
<v Speaker 2>cute one is the fighter in the movie. He's the

1:29:40.120 --> 1:29:42.679
<v Speaker 2>guy who's boxing and we constantly see him actually doing

1:29:42.760 --> 1:29:46.680
<v Speaker 2>like doing karate and trying to fight people. Peter the

1:29:46.720 --> 1:29:49.719
<v Speaker 2>supposed dummy or the kind of like the naive one

1:29:50.320 --> 1:29:54.360
<v Speaker 2>is the wise enlightened one in this movie. Mickey the

1:29:54.439 --> 1:29:57.840
<v Speaker 2>funny one is shown having very like dark moods and

1:29:57.920 --> 1:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>is placed in a very dark context. And then the

1:30:01.400 --> 1:30:03.080
<v Speaker 2>odd one out here is kind of Mike. I'm not

1:30:03.080 --> 1:30:05.519
<v Speaker 2>sure how Mike fits this, like playing with the character.

1:30:05.520 --> 1:30:07.600
<v Speaker 2>He does still seem pretty serious in the movie. I

1:30:07.640 --> 1:30:10.360
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you have thoughts on that, but that

1:30:10.439 --> 1:30:12.880
<v Speaker 2>seemed interesting to me that the movie takes time to

1:30:12.920 --> 1:30:16.679
<v Speaker 2>single each one out at various points and then kind

1:30:16.720 --> 1:30:18.639
<v Speaker 2>of invert them for sure.

1:30:18.720 --> 1:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>And yeah, you know, I think you're completely right that

1:30:20.320 --> 1:30:23.240
<v Speaker 3>Mike Nesbeth doesn't quite get the subversion. I don't think

1:30:23.240 --> 1:30:26.240
<v Speaker 3>anything really happens to him. Maybe it's the fact that

1:30:26.400 --> 1:30:29.959
<v Speaker 3>in general he's seen as like the leader of the monkeys,

1:30:30.160 --> 1:30:32.680
<v Speaker 3>and in this film he doesn't really lead them at

1:30:32.680 --> 1:30:35.559
<v Speaker 3>any point, like he is in many ways just kind

1:30:35.560 --> 1:30:38.519
<v Speaker 3>of a passive character. But that's a stretch that's me

1:30:38.600 --> 1:30:47.960
<v Speaker 3>really reaching for it. Now.

1:30:47.960 --> 1:30:49.840
<v Speaker 2>There are a bunch of other sequences in the movie.

1:30:49.880 --> 1:30:52.639
<v Speaker 2>There's the horror movie sequence with like an eye behind

1:30:52.640 --> 1:30:55.920
<v Speaker 2>a mirror. That's great stuff. Yeah, like Davy season eye

1:30:55.920 --> 1:30:58.000
<v Speaker 2>behind a mirror in the bathroom and then he tries

1:30:58.040 --> 1:30:59.760
<v Speaker 2>to show it to other people but they can't see it.

1:31:00.960 --> 1:31:03.679
<v Speaker 2>There's that leads into a kind of go go dancer

1:31:03.760 --> 1:31:06.439
<v Speaker 2>freak out scene set to a song called do I

1:31:06.520 --> 1:31:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Have to Do This all over again? That title's kind

1:31:09.320 --> 1:31:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of on the nose from the themes. There's also this

1:31:14.240 --> 1:31:17.760
<v Speaker 2>whole thing with like the monkeys searching for quote the answer,

1:31:17.880 --> 1:31:20.680
<v Speaker 2>and there is a scene where like a guru inspires

1:31:20.720 --> 1:31:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Peter to reflect on how we cannot tell reality from illusion.

1:31:24.760 --> 1:31:28.599
<v Speaker 2>And then when we get to the ending, we actually

1:31:28.640 --> 1:31:31.120
<v Speaker 2>return to the beginning. Seth, I know you wanted to

1:31:31.160 --> 1:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>talk about the ending. Do you do you want to

1:31:32.600 --> 1:31:33.160
<v Speaker 2>take this here?

1:31:33.640 --> 1:31:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Sure? So at the end, we actually at first aren't

1:31:37.040 --> 1:31:40.599
<v Speaker 3>even sure that we're re entering the beginning again, because

1:31:41.120 --> 1:31:43.840
<v Speaker 3>it starts with basically all the characters from all the

1:31:43.880 --> 1:31:46.680
<v Speaker 3>scenes we've seen all the way up until now pursuing

1:31:46.880 --> 1:31:50.440
<v Speaker 3>the four monkeys. They're chasing them. Some of the characters

1:31:50.520 --> 1:31:53.800
<v Speaker 3>are feeling quite you know, antagonistic towards them chasing them around,

1:31:53.800 --> 1:31:56.600
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, et cetera, And eventually we do start to

1:31:56.600 --> 1:31:58.639
<v Speaker 3>put it together that oh, they're back on the bridge again,

1:31:59.200 --> 1:32:01.679
<v Speaker 3>and we're basically seeing the same scene from the beginning,

1:32:01.960 --> 1:32:04.920
<v Speaker 3>except that we just have context. Now we see who

1:32:04.960 --> 1:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>the chaser is, the camera is letting us see this

1:32:07.920 --> 1:32:10.760
<v Speaker 3>mob behind them. So in the beginning, if you're just

1:32:10.760 --> 1:32:14.799
<v Speaker 3>watching it without context, it feels like the monkeys committed

1:32:14.840 --> 1:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>suicide on their own, that they felt the need, that

1:32:17.920 --> 1:32:20.280
<v Speaker 3>they were like, the monkeys are over, let's go, and

1:32:20.320 --> 1:32:23.160
<v Speaker 3>they just jump off the bridge. Now with this extra context,

1:32:23.160 --> 1:32:25.800
<v Speaker 3>we can see that they were being pursued, that they

1:32:25.800 --> 1:32:28.400
<v Speaker 3>were being forced to do this, that in many ways, we,

1:32:28.760 --> 1:32:32.679
<v Speaker 3>the audience or perhaps society at large, forced them to jump.

1:32:32.800 --> 1:32:36.360
<v Speaker 3>That we ended the monkeys, not the monkeys. The monkeys

1:32:36.720 --> 1:32:38.519
<v Speaker 3>they were just they were just dealing with what we

1:32:38.720 --> 1:32:43.400
<v Speaker 3>gave them, that they were reacting to our pursuits and

1:32:43.600 --> 1:32:47.719
<v Speaker 3>anger and whatever. Maybe even our need for the monkeys

1:32:48.200 --> 1:32:51.000
<v Speaker 3>caused the monkeys to have to end. But yeah, it's

1:32:51.040 --> 1:32:54.000
<v Speaker 3>it's that it's our fault. We ended the monkeys, not

1:32:54.120 --> 1:32:54.679
<v Speaker 3>the monkeys.

1:32:55.080 --> 1:32:58.040
<v Speaker 2>It's our fault. And it's the creators of the monkey's

1:32:58.040 --> 1:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>fault because it's like the filmmaking apparatus is also chasing them,

1:33:01.360 --> 1:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>all of the actors and everything.

1:33:03.479 --> 1:33:07.880
<v Speaker 3>It's everyone's fault except the monkeys. Yeah.

1:33:08.040 --> 1:33:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And so like they jump off, and but we

1:33:10.640 --> 1:33:14.040
<v Speaker 2>get a return of the porpoise song. So there is

1:33:14.120 --> 1:33:16.519
<v Speaker 2>this this idea of the freedom of the porpoise, and

1:33:16.560 --> 1:33:18.439
<v Speaker 2>you wonder if maybe it's going to be a happy

1:33:18.520 --> 1:33:21.920
<v Speaker 2>ending where they actually do become like the porpoise, and they,

1:33:22.120 --> 1:33:24.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, when they hit the water, maybe they swim

1:33:24.320 --> 1:33:27.840
<v Speaker 2>out to sea and become free on their own. But instead,

1:33:28.080 --> 1:33:30.360
<v Speaker 2>when we last see them in the water, and then

1:33:30.520 --> 1:33:33.519
<v Speaker 2>it is you're teased with this idea of them becoming

1:33:33.560 --> 1:33:36.840
<v Speaker 2>like wild animals, you know, marine mammals with freedom, but

1:33:36.920 --> 1:33:39.840
<v Speaker 2>instead we realize that they are in fact in a

1:33:39.920 --> 1:33:43.360
<v Speaker 2>fish tank on the back of a truck being lorded

1:33:43.400 --> 1:33:47.400
<v Speaker 2>over by Victor Mature. This like this devilish demi urge

1:33:47.400 --> 1:33:50.559
<v Speaker 2>figure who's like sitting there in a director's chair, smoking

1:33:50.560 --> 1:33:53.479
<v Speaker 2>a pipe and grinning wickedly as they are as they

1:33:53.479 --> 1:33:57.200
<v Speaker 2>are carried away on a trailer presumably to be I

1:33:57.240 --> 1:34:00.639
<v Speaker 2>don't know, like shelved and archived or something, or maybe.

1:34:00.520 --> 1:34:03.280
<v Speaker 3>Put in a zoos. People can can continue to stare

1:34:03.320 --> 1:34:05.800
<v Speaker 3>at the monkeys, you know, you know, it would be

1:34:05.840 --> 1:34:08.799
<v Speaker 3>a fun art project that would actually be relatively easy.

1:34:09.600 --> 1:34:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Think of this as like a museum art installation where

1:34:12.120 --> 1:34:13.920
<v Speaker 3>you walk through and you see like those little like

1:34:14.000 --> 1:34:16.639
<v Speaker 3>side screening rooms where they're showing like an art film,

1:34:16.680 --> 1:34:18.040
<v Speaker 3>you can sit down and watch for a minute and

1:34:18.040 --> 1:34:20.599
<v Speaker 3>then get up and walk out. You could easily turn

1:34:20.720 --> 1:34:23.880
<v Speaker 3>this movie into an infinite loop that they are pursued

1:34:24.040 --> 1:34:26.559
<v Speaker 3>and then when they jump, you just seamlessly edited that

1:34:26.680 --> 1:34:29.280
<v Speaker 3>back into the original jumping off of the bridge, and

1:34:29.320 --> 1:34:32.120
<v Speaker 3>it just goes again and again and again. This could

1:34:32.520 --> 1:34:35.840
<v Speaker 3>very easily be an infinite loop of a movie, and

1:34:36.240 --> 1:34:37.880
<v Speaker 3>I'd love to see that. I wonder how many times

1:34:37.920 --> 1:34:38.679
<v Speaker 3>they can make it through.

1:34:39.720 --> 1:34:43.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a great idea. Yeah, organize it, Seth. You put

1:34:43.200 --> 1:34:44.280
<v Speaker 2>it together, get the rights.

1:34:44.960 --> 1:34:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll set aside some gallery space and yeah.

1:34:50.560 --> 1:34:52.479
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, I think that is all I have

1:34:52.560 --> 1:34:55.479
<v Speaker 2>to say about head Seth. Do you have anything else

1:34:55.640 --> 1:34:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you want to talk about before we wrap up here?

1:34:58.040 --> 1:35:00.439
<v Speaker 3>No, but I will say if anyone if this is

1:35:00.479 --> 1:35:03.160
<v Speaker 3>their first introduction to the Monkeys, I'm sure there are

1:35:03.160 --> 1:35:04.960
<v Speaker 3>people in the audience who are very familiar with the

1:35:04.960 --> 1:35:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Monkeys and some that have never seen anything from them.

1:35:08.840 --> 1:35:13.600
<v Speaker 3>I genuinely do recommend several Monkeys albums. But here's like

1:35:13.640 --> 1:35:17.000
<v Speaker 3>the big thing to keep in mind. The Monkeys actually

1:35:17.000 --> 1:35:20.880
<v Speaker 3>barely existed like the in like the Grand Timeline of life.

1:35:20.920 --> 1:35:24.680
<v Speaker 3>When they were having like a successful artistic output. It

1:35:24.720 --> 1:35:27.800
<v Speaker 3>was such a small window. The first album they put

1:35:27.880 --> 1:35:30.760
<v Speaker 3>out was in nineteen sixty six. This album is in

1:35:30.840 --> 1:35:34.920
<v Speaker 3>nineteen sixty eight, and in that window they released one, two, three, four,

1:35:35.080 --> 1:35:39.200
<v Speaker 3>five six albums and they had to already go through

1:35:39.640 --> 1:35:42.720
<v Speaker 3>an entire upheaval of people thinking that they're frauds and

1:35:42.760 --> 1:35:46.960
<v Speaker 3>fighting back for creative control. That whole window of sixty

1:35:46.960 --> 1:35:50.160
<v Speaker 3>six to sixty eight is just two years, and yet

1:35:50.200 --> 1:35:55.480
<v Speaker 3>it encompasses this whole enormous situation that just do It's

1:35:55.680 --> 1:35:58.519
<v Speaker 3>it's it's similar to when you look at the Beatles

1:35:58.520 --> 1:36:00.519
<v Speaker 3>and you see how much they accomplished and they short

1:36:00.520 --> 1:36:02.800
<v Speaker 3>time as a band because they're releasing more than one

1:36:02.840 --> 1:36:05.320
<v Speaker 3>album a year. In sixty seven, they released three albums.

1:36:05.360 --> 1:36:07.559
<v Speaker 3>In sixty eight they released two. Oh I'm talking about

1:36:07.560 --> 1:36:10.680
<v Speaker 3>the Monkeys again, by the way. So I do think

1:36:10.720 --> 1:36:14.120
<v Speaker 3>it's important to look into them as just a musical act.

1:36:14.400 --> 1:36:17.400
<v Speaker 3>And I will say, personally, my three favorite albums of

1:36:17.439 --> 1:36:21.320
<v Speaker 3>theirs are I mentioned it briefly. Pisce's Aquarius, Capricorn and

1:36:21.400 --> 1:36:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Jones Limited from nineteen sixty seven, The Birds, the Bees

1:36:24.800 --> 1:36:27.479
<v Speaker 3>and the Monkeys from nineteen sixty eight. That one's kind

1:36:27.479 --> 1:36:30.280
<v Speaker 3>of their wide album because they all had their own

1:36:30.479 --> 1:36:33.479
<v Speaker 3>very independent ideas of what they wanted their next album

1:36:33.520 --> 1:36:35.719
<v Speaker 3>to be, so they all kind of split off, produced

1:36:35.760 --> 1:36:37.920
<v Speaker 3>their own things, and then cobbled it back together like

1:36:37.960 --> 1:36:41.799
<v Speaker 3>a quilt, which is pretty fun. Then, oh, of course,

1:36:41.960 --> 1:36:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of course. And then in nineteen sixty eight Head of Course.

1:36:45.960 --> 1:36:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I think that's also a wonderful album, which there are

1:36:49.120 --> 1:36:51.880
<v Speaker 3>two versions of. Both are good, but the original version,

1:36:51.880 --> 1:36:55.000
<v Speaker 3>the one Jack Nicholson Babe's, that's the preferred version.

1:36:55.800 --> 1:36:57.800
<v Speaker 2>And hey, folks, if you would like to hear Seth

1:36:57.840 --> 1:37:00.160
<v Speaker 2>talk about music like this all the time, you can

1:37:00.200 --> 1:37:04.559
<v Speaker 2>subscribe to his other podcast, Rusty Needles Record Club. Seth,

1:37:04.600 --> 1:37:06.960
<v Speaker 2>do you want to pitch the show? What's the deal

1:37:07.080 --> 1:37:08.559
<v Speaker 2>with Rusty Needles Record Club?

1:37:08.840 --> 1:37:12.720
<v Speaker 3>I love to It's an old style podcast, back in

1:37:12.760 --> 1:37:18.080
<v Speaker 3>the days, pre advertising, pre gosh, what else do podcasts

1:37:18.080 --> 1:37:22.400
<v Speaker 3>have now? Pre celebrities, pre true crime, none of that stuff.

1:37:22.560 --> 1:37:24.879
<v Speaker 3>It's the old style. We just sit around in chitchat

1:37:24.920 --> 1:37:27.880
<v Speaker 3>for a while and then it's over and much like

1:37:27.920 --> 1:37:30.280
<v Speaker 3>this show, which I really appreciate. There's a big difference

1:37:30.280 --> 1:37:33.759
<v Speaker 3>between old style podcast and new style podcast. And anyway,

1:37:33.760 --> 1:37:36.400
<v Speaker 3>that's a whole nother thing. Rusty Needles Record Club is

1:37:36.439 --> 1:37:39.080
<v Speaker 3>a show where it's like a book club, but for music.

1:37:39.200 --> 1:37:41.639
<v Speaker 3>Each episode is a different album me and my co host.

1:37:41.920 --> 1:37:43.880
<v Speaker 3>We listen to it, we talk about it, we break

1:37:43.880 --> 1:37:46.400
<v Speaker 3>it down based on facts, based on our feelings, and

1:37:46.400 --> 1:37:49.040
<v Speaker 3>then we give the album a review. But ultimately it's

1:37:49.080 --> 1:37:51.400
<v Speaker 3>just a place for people who love music to kind

1:37:51.439 --> 1:37:54.200
<v Speaker 3>of get some music conversation in their ears, to have

1:37:54.240 --> 1:37:57.439
<v Speaker 3>like a nice relaxed parasocial relationship with some other people.

1:37:57.600 --> 1:38:00.920
<v Speaker 3>If you don't happen to have other friends around you

1:38:01.000 --> 1:38:02.800
<v Speaker 3>that you can talk about things like what your favorite

1:38:02.840 --> 1:38:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Monkeys album is, I'll do that for you.

1:38:05.120 --> 1:38:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, chipchat, the show is Rusty Needles Record Club. And

1:38:09.000 --> 1:38:12.559
<v Speaker 2>there's an apostrophe before the s on Needles right exactly.

1:38:12.640 --> 1:38:16.160
<v Speaker 3>This is Rusty Needle. He owns the record club.

1:38:16.520 --> 1:38:20.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, there you go wherever podcasts are found. Yep, yep,

1:38:20.760 --> 1:38:23.400
<v Speaker 2>look it up. Well, thank you so much for joining

1:38:23.400 --> 1:38:26.720
<v Speaker 2>me today, Seth. It has been a real pleasure to

1:38:27.120 --> 1:38:29.760
<v Speaker 2>have you back on the show again. And let's do

1:38:29.760 --> 1:38:30.240
<v Speaker 2>it again in the.

1:38:30.280 --> 1:38:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Future absolutely anytime.

1:38:32.520 --> 1:38:34.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, that does it for today. Huge thanks again

1:38:35.000 --> 1:38:39.720
<v Speaker 2>to Seth Nicholas Johnson for joining us. If you are

1:38:39.800 --> 1:38:41.800
<v Speaker 2>new to the show and would like to check us out,

1:38:41.840 --> 1:38:44.400
<v Speaker 2>why not subscribe to Stuff to Blow your Mind wherever

1:38:44.439 --> 1:38:47.200
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts. We offer a variety of different

1:38:47.240 --> 1:38:50.680
<v Speaker 2>things on each day of the week. Our core episodes

1:38:50.800 --> 1:38:53.479
<v Speaker 2>usually about science or science and culture in some way

1:38:53.560 --> 1:38:57.200
<v Speaker 2>or on Tuesdays and Thursdays. On Mondays we read listener mail.

1:38:57.360 --> 1:39:00.360
<v Speaker 2>On Wednesdays we do a short form scripted series is

1:39:00.360 --> 1:39:03.800
<v Speaker 2>called The Artifact or the Monster Fact or even new

1:39:03.840 --> 1:39:07.280
<v Speaker 2>forms of the short scripted show or Emerging. On Fridays,

1:39:07.320 --> 1:39:10.680
<v Speaker 2>we do this show Weird House Cinema, where we just

1:39:10.840 --> 1:39:14.800
<v Speaker 2>talk about a weird film, good or bad, well known

1:39:14.960 --> 1:39:17.000
<v Speaker 2>or obscure. We do them all as long as they

1:39:17.000 --> 1:39:19.920
<v Speaker 2>are strange in some way. And then on Saturdays we

1:39:20.000 --> 1:39:22.559
<v Speaker 2>run an episode from the Vault, an older episode of

1:39:22.560 --> 1:39:26.960
<v Speaker 2>the show Let's See Huge. Thanks as always to our

1:39:27.000 --> 1:39:30.400
<v Speaker 2>excellent audio producer JJ Posway. If you would like to

1:39:30.439 --> 1:39:32.719
<v Speaker 2>get in touch with us with feedback on this episode

1:39:32.800 --> 1:39:35.000
<v Speaker 2>or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

1:39:35.320 --> 1:39:37.519
<v Speaker 2>or just to say hello, you can email us at

1:39:37.600 --> 1:39:46.760
<v Speaker 2>contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:39:46.920 --> 1:39:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:39:49.920 --> 1:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:39:52.880 --> 1:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.