WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Nvidia Earnings, UK Special Election, Modi Israel Visit

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look at the

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 2>top stories in the coming week from our Daybreak anchors

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 2>all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program, we

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 2>look ahead to the Last of the mag seven earnings

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>with Chip Giant and video reporting. I'm Nathan Hager in Washington.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm callin Heppoon, London, where we're delving into the special

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 3>election that could redefine the UK's political future.

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm Doug Prisner, looking ahead to Indian Prime Minister in

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 4>Narungramodi's visit to Israel in the coming week.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>eleven three zero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London,

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Syria XM one twenty one, and around the world on

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Nathan Hager. We begin today's

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 2>program with earnings from AI Chip Giant Invidia, the last

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 2>of the Magnificent Seven, reports its end of year results

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 2>after the close of training on Wednesday, for more. We're

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 2>joined by Kun John Sabhani, senior semiconductor analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Great to have you with us on the program, Kun John.

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Of course, in Vidia has been at the center of

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the AI spending story for so long, so where do

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 2>you see the bar when it comes to Invidia's results

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:32.279
<v Speaker 2>this time around?

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 5>As usual, the expectations will run high. You know, folks

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 5>are expecting the usual or if not better than the

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 5>mid single digit beaten race that we have gotten used

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 5>to with them, which I think is quite possible given

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 5>multiple drivers that have gotten better since their last quarterly earnings.

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, we have heard from the largest customers of Nvidia,

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 5>and most of them have increased their CAPEX projection significantly,

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 5>some of them forty to fifty percent in case of

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 5>Google and Amazon for twenty twenty six, so that really helps.

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 5>We have heard of deals being made since last quarter

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 5>with these hyperscalers and other customers adopting millions of units

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 5>of in Nvidia, which should drive further upside to that

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 5>five hundred billion number that Jensen had provided end of

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 5>last year regarding the Blackwell and Rubin backlog through twenty

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.080
<v Speaker 5>twenty six. So estimates are running higher than that, and

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.119
<v Speaker 5>we expect them to give indications that it is going

0:02:38.160 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 5>to run higher than that. And finally, the third key

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 5>point will be visibility on resuming the H too or

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 5>I should say starting the H two hundred shipments to

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 5>China because that continues. Will be a key upside driver

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 5>if that happens soon. And we did see AMD start

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 5>to ship some of its prior to generation chipmates to

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 5>China in this quarter when there is a reported results.

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's take some of those points in turn. John, you

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 2>mentioned the millions of units deployed. I think that was

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>an allusion to the announcement we heard just a few

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 2>days ago from Meta Platforms. Does that sort of raise

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the bar when it comes to the outlook that we're

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>expecting to hear from Jensen in the call this week.

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 5>It does raise the bar for the full year. I

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 5>don't know if it raises the bar for the next quarter.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 5>Outlook that deal with Meta, you know, it's a long

0:03:32.840 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 5>term deal and the lead times will be longer than

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 5>to get the revenue in this quarter, so does raise

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 5>the bar for the full earth.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to the pipeline for future chips,

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 2>we heard Jensen talk about the Ruben semiconductor being on

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 2>track for the second half of this year at the

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>recent conference that Nvidia held. Are we expecting any more

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 2>clarity when it comes to some of those next generation

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 2>chips video.

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure we will hear some commentary that evaluations are

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 5>going well, etc. Remember, this was a very unique time.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 5>Usually at CES, Nvidia in the past has not talked

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 5>about their next generation products, which are released at the

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 5>end of the year. Usually they saved that for the GtC,

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 5>which will be their marquee event happening in March. Them

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 5>talking about this this early in the year gives gave

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 5>investors confidence that there would be sort of no hiccups

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 5>with the Rubin ramp as they're aware with Blackwells, So

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 5>that's a good news. We'll definitely hear some update, but

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 5>I think most of the big news will be saved

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 5>for him to talk about at GtC next month.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>And when it comes to the re entry of the

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 2>H two hundred ship that you mentioned in China, we've

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>heard jenst in the past talk about, you know, even

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 2>keeping China revenue off the table, they're still going to

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>put out pretty significant numbers. How important is it though,

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 2>for Nvidia to get back into the Chinese market to

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 2>keep its momentum going.

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 5>I think it is definitely important. Look, most of the

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 5>other areas they are dominating, so investors are very aware.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 5>So this is a market which if it does open

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 5>up significantly for them, they can go and grab another

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 5>significant share, a dominant share. Before the shipment sanctions had

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 5>come in and Vidia was a dominant share of that market,

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 5>So definitely very important. Could easily, you know, if the

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 5>gates get open, you can easily think about adding somewhere

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 5>between seven to twelve thirteen billion dollars back, which is

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 5>a substantial amount. Yes, we'll not move. I mean if

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 5>the company is going to about to be making one

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 5>hundred and fifty two hundred billion dollars, you can argue

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 5>five to twelve billion is small, but still a significant upside.

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Of course, there's been so much discussion within the market

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 2>about you know, whether there's too much spending in AI,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 2>whether it's circular spending, and even this AI disruption trade.

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 2>How do you expect in Nvidia's results to color some

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 2>of that debate on Wall Street?

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:08.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think. I mean, if anything, a better results

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 5>from in media could keep these arguments going forward. I

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 5>don't think better results will will help with diminishing these arguments.

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 5>In fact, a week result could slow down this argument,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 5>giving people the more validity that these concents are real.

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 5>We don't think these concents are real at this point,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 5>and as long as Nvidia keeps doing better and better,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 5>I don't think these arguments will go away anywhere.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Appreciate this, Kun John. Ahead of those earnings from Nvidia,

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 2>much appreciated, that is, Kun John Sabhani, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Semiconductor Analyst. Let's take a look now at some stocks

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 2>making news in the week ahead. I'm Nathan Hager, joined

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>by Bloomberg Markets Live Managing Editor Christine Akino. I thought

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.720
<v Speaker 2>we were almost done with earnings, Christine, but it looks

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 2>like we got some pretty big names reporting this week,

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 2>including Home Depot. On Tuesday was the holiday quarter, a

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 2>time people were thinking about home improvement.

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 6>Oh well, Nathan, I think from what we've heard from

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 6>Home Depot, things are not looking great. They have implemented

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 6>a lot of cost custing cutting measures over the last

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:14.360
<v Speaker 6>couple of months. So this month, for example, the company

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 6>said it's making the requirements for bonus payouts to managers

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 6>more strict if they're telling eligible employees that they now

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 6>have a higher threshold for sales performance metrics to be

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 6>able to receive this bonus. And then in January they

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 6>also said that they're going to be cutting jobs across

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 6>several teams and also requiring corporate staff to return to

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 6>the office, and so it really seems like home Depot

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 6>is really bracing for a challenging quarter that's probably going

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 6>to be reflected in the earnings results that we're going

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 6>to be seeing. And so it's just a question of whether,

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 6>you know, once investors see them, are they going to

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 6>see enough of a silver aligning in those results? You know,

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 6>whether it's the cost cutting measures that Home Deep implemented

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 6>or anything else that they're doing that would give them

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 6>a steadier footing moving forward. That's probably going to be

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 6>what's in focus for investors next week.

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting though, I mean, we're still off the

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>high from September for home Depot, but the stock has

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 2>been kind of on a bit of a bounce here

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 2>over the last couple of months. So does that mean

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the bar is kind of higher for home Depot when

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the earnings.

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I suppose you could say that just because you know,

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 6>it has weathered a lot of storms over the last

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 6>few months. They have been warning for quite some time

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 6>now about slow down in housing, which is very much

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 6>affecting their bottom line. But at the same time, we

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.160
<v Speaker 6>have seen, as you mentioned, a resilience in the shares,

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 6>and so perhaps there is some of that optimism baked

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:42.559
<v Speaker 6>in already that the company will be able to keep afloat.

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 6>It's it's you know, it's it's earnings outlook, it's revenue outlook,

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 6>and so you know, if there is some disappointment there,

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 6>we'll probably see that in the aftermath of the reaction

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 6>to the earnings.

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 2>Coming Moving from Home Depot, another stock that starts with

0:08:58.200 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>H reports on Tuesday.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 5>HP.

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Where are they when it comes to the AI tech story?

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean very interesting when it comes to HP.

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 6>Of course, it did get a bit of a boost

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 6>when it comes to the AI story, right. It was

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 6>very much involved in that trade back in the latter

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 6>part of twenty twenty five when it was all about

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 6>the expansion of the AI trade to the various companies

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 6>involved in implementing the data center build out, and HP

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 6>is a part of that supply chain. But you know,

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 6>our Analyti Bloomber intelligence really focusing in on margins for

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 6>HP here. They are big in the PC space, a

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 6>lot of pressure there when it comes to margins, and

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 6>and so that's a big question whether they're going to

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 6>be able to.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 5>Keep that up.

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 6>Also question about you know, their their memory supply. Is

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 6>that supply chain again going to be resilient and moving forward,

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 6>And you know, it's a big Q question whether they're

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 6>going to be able to maintain pricing power given that

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 6>the environment at the moment for anything air related is

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more challenging as we've seen in recent

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 6>price action.

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 2>Is that what we're seeing and reflected in terms of

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 2>the kind of steady decline that we've been seeing in

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>hpiece chart over the last few months.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, absolutely, Nathan, I mean, I think it is one

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 6>of these socks very interesting. You know, it's just kind

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:28.000
<v Speaker 6>of right in the middle of kind of institutional air demand,

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 6>right given that it is part of the buildout story.

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.400
<v Speaker 6>But then at the same time, a lot of fluctuations

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 6>due to its spot when it comes to the consumer space, right,

0:10:39.480 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 6>Like it's PC offering still very much subject to the

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.559
<v Speaker 6>whims of the consumer, and as we've been hearing from

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 6>a lot of other companies, that is quite a challenge environment.

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 6>It's not that consumers are fully scaling back on their purchases,

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 6>they're just being more strategic about it. And that may

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 6>be where HP's vulnerabilities really maybe.

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 2>And on Thursday we hear from one of HP's competitors.

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Is it going to be a similar story when it

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:06.959
<v Speaker 2>comes to Dell Computer?

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? I mean for Dell, it really has been a

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:11.920
<v Speaker 6>rough start to twenty twenty six. Right, We've seen their

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 6>shares down more than seven percent. They very much did

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 6>get wrapped up in the early twenty twenty six declines

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 6>for US equities in general, given all these fears about

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 6>AI disruption, and you know, for Bloomer Intelligence, their outlook

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 6>really focusing in on the AI server demand that Dell

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 6>is enjoying, and so that is a positive for them

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.839
<v Speaker 6>and as allow them to have a more broad consumer base.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 6>And you know, our analysts are very much optimistic in

0:11:43.679 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 6>terms of their ability to sustain that momentum through twenty thirty.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 6>So high expectations potentially for this earnings result possibly a

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 6>high potential for disappointment as well.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, another busy earnings week on tap. Thanks for this, Christine,

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 2>good having your Christina Keino, Managing editor for Bloomberg Markets Live.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we'll look at

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>the special election that could redefine the UK's political future.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Nathan Hager

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 2>in Washington. Up later in our program we'll look ahead

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Israel. But

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>first in the coming days, a special election in the

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>UK could highlight the fractured state of British politics. Bookmakers

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 2>are predicting a three horse race between Labor and the

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 2>insurgents on the right hand left. Gambling odds compiled by

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 2>odds Checker suggests the Green Party will edge out Reform,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 2>with the incumbent Labor Party third. For more, let's go

0:12:57.080 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 2>to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe banker Caroline Nathan.

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 3>In an unassuming and often neglected Manchester suburb, a three

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 3>way fight is hotting up between challenger parties Reform UK

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 3>and the Green Party, who are vying to pry the

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 3>area's parliamentary seat away from the incumbent governing Labor Party,

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 3>with a special by election looming in Gordon and Denton

0:13:21.120 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 3>on the twenty sixth of February. The battle is highlighting

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 3>the sinking popularity of Prime Minister Kirs Stamer's Labor administration

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 3>and the rising fortunes of populist competitors on both the

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 3>right and the left. It's an uncertain situation that could

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 3>have implications for the UK's politics and economic prospects. Three

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Gutchukovin Dan is senior research economists at UK Asset Manager Aberdeen.

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 3>She says the instability could prove costly what we're seeing.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's been a good week for bomb markets

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 7>in the UK and elsewhere, but there is a lot

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 7>of premium already in the guilt market.

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:03.599
<v Speaker 3>But I've say a lot of rates investors are cautious.

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 7>And I think these key events like the by election

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 7>in ten days time, the local elections in May, there

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 7>is the acceptance that there could there is likely to

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 7>be a leadership change later this year. So obviously we

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 7>had a bit of a flash point. Two weeks ago

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 7>and Kilts really sold off quite aggressively and that is

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 7>an issue for the government. High interest rates are an

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 7>issue for the government, so whoever leads the UK later

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 7>this year will have to keep that in mind.

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 3>So perhaps a challenge to the Prime Minister Kirs Starmer

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Sui Kutchu Govin Dan seeing a research economist at UK

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 3>Asset Manager Aberdeen speak to me and Stephen Cowell on

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Radio. So will the coming local contest between the

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 3>government and all its challengers leave Starmer vulnerable or vindicated?

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 3>Joining me now to discuss is our Bloomberg UK Economy

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 3>reporter Arena and Angel and our UK Politics reporter Lucy

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 3>White come to both of you. Thank you for being

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 3>with us. Lucy. Should we start with a bit of

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 3>the politics. Set the scene. Why is this by election

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 3>so crucial for Keir Starmer?

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 8>So there's not very often in between general elections that

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 8>we get a sort of national vote like this, because

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 8>this isn't you know, your kind of usual local politics

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 8>kind of election. This is a by election for a

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 8>seat in Westminster. So it's the first real test that

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 8>we're going to have for an area where they are

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 8>electing a new person to Westminster, and this is all

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 8>because Andrew gyn has resigned on health grounds, but he

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 8>was also caught up in a bit of a scandal.

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 8>He's the labor incumbents at the moment around leaked WhatsApp messages,

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 8>and this is going to be the first real test

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 8>we have of who these people in Gorson and Denton

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.560
<v Speaker 8>want as their representative. And as you were saying just then,

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 8>you know, there's a real flashpoint at the moment as

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 8>to Obviously there's some kind of idiosyncratic reasons why people

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 8>are not a fan of laboring in that area, but

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 8>there's also this kind of real challenge, real tussle going

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 8>on between Reform and the Greens at the moment. And

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 8>if this goes badly in for labor in Manchester or

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 8>in this particular suburb of Manchester where labor have really

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 8>had a sort of strongholder for several years, the implications

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 8>for this nationally are are pretty stark.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 3>We really have polling at the moment, but how much

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>ground might labor have lost in this region. Who are

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the front runners, So it's.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 8>Really a three way tie at the moment. We've got

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 8>Labor as the incumbents, and then we've got the Green

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 8>Party who are really hoping to make gains on the

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 8>sort of populist left of politics, and Reform who are

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 8>at the polar opposite end of that sort of making

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 8>looking to make headway on the populist right. And they're

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 8>you know, kind of involved in this three way battle.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 8>It's hard to tell who is doing particularly well at

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 8>the moment because there's no sort of you know, kind

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 8>of there is. There is polling at a local level,

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 8>but none of it, you know, kind of particularly reliable.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 8>The sample sizes just aren't as big. From myself and

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 8>Arena when we were on the ground last week in

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.399
<v Speaker 8>the area, there's a huge amount of visibility for the

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 8>Green Party. This post is everywhere, there's a lot of

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 8>campaigners on the ground. For Reform, there's very little visibility,

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 8>but you know, kind of local polling does seem to

0:17:21.240 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 8>see them doing quite well. As for Labor, you know,

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot of people who are kind of well,

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 8>I've I've voted labors all my life, so I probably will.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 8>But there's an equal number i'd say that we spoke

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 8>to of people that we spoke to there who say

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 8>whether it's due to the Andrew growing what's up scandal

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 8>or whether it's due to Kirstarma just saying I will

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 8>never vote labor again in my life.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.199
<v Speaker 3>Arena take us through the economics, then we know that

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 3>for a long time, UK wages and incomes really haven't

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>risen very much. The economy isn't growing very quickly. How

0:17:56.480 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 3>has that manifested in Manchester and how do resident and

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 3>there I feel about it?

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 9>When Lucy and I went up there, I would say

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 9>that the top issue that came up in Gordon and

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 9>Denton was at the rising cost of living and you

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 9>know you have that, you also have the rise in

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 9>the cost of doing business.

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 10>There's also you know, other issues related.

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 9>To flight tipping, decaying states, drug dealing, and you know,

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 9>underneath this you could sense that there is one big issue,

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 9>and that issue is that the community is decaying.

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 10>But things didn't used to be like this, you know.

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 9>So the people of Gordon and Dent and they seem

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 9>to be people who take pride and where they come

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 9>from and pride and who they are, and there's a

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 9>sense that that's now been taken away from them. And

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 9>who do they blame for this? They blame the government

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 9>and you know labor came in with big promises. There

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 9>was real hope that things will change quickly, but they

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.959
<v Speaker 9>haven't for you know, many reasons. You know, perhaps some

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 9>of the are default of policy. Others are you know,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 9>are just the result of like structural factors which you

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 9>know could never be turned around very quickly. And you know,

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 9>and the local people also blame their previous MP and Gwynn.

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 9>You know, some told us they wrote to him to

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 9>complain but they never heard back. So they feel like

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 9>things are not getting better and also that they're getting neglected.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that's really interesting. So then what do we

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 3>know about the economic profile of those who perhaps are

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 3>likely to support the challenge of parties, parties like Reform

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and the Greens. If you say that, underneath it there's

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 3>what sounds like quite a lot of anger, maybe some hopelessness.

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:33.880
<v Speaker 9>Exactly, and Reforming Green voters are actually very similar in a.

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 10>Key way they feel.

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 9>And this is at the national level, not just in

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 9>Gordon and Denton. But it was really interesting to see

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 9>it sort of play out there. But these people feel

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 9>somehow cheated on by the sort of by the political

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 9>economy of the country.

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 10>So look thrill from more in common put this very well.

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 9>You know he told me that, you know, you ask

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 9>people is the system working? And the answer tends to

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 9>be no, Then you ask them, okay, can we change

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 9>the system them from within to make it work or

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 9>do we just burn it all down? And the burn

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 9>it all down theres These are the people who either

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 9>go to reform or the.

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.840
<v Speaker 10>Greens, you know which one. It depends on who they blame.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 9>For the Greens, that tends to be capitalism and big

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.719
<v Speaker 9>corporates capturing the economic gains from themselves and leaving everyone

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 9>else worse off.

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 10>So you have, you know, young university.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:25.360
<v Speaker 9>Educated people who are a big demographic for them, and

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 9>for reform, it's really blaming immigration and migrants putting a

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:30.959
<v Speaker 9>strain on public services.

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure that Labor are putting up a good fight

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 3>and trying to make their case for why perhaps they

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 3>need more time or the progress that they've made so far,

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 3>Lucy in terms of kissed Arma, how much damage could

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 3>it do potentially if Labor were to fail to retain

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 3>this parliamentary seat.

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 8>I think it will be embarrassing for them. But at

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 8>the same time, I'm not sure that people within Labor

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 8>have a huge amount of hope for it going particularly

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 8>well at the moment, I think, you know, it's important

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.919
<v Speaker 8>to realize that this is just one area and that

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, I daresay if I were to be Devil's

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 8>advocate for labor, they would say that there are, you know,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.399
<v Speaker 8>some very idiosyncratic issues in this area, for example, the

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 8>WhatsApp scandal that Andrew Grimm was involved in. But at

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 8>the same time, you know, it is going to be

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 8>hugely embarrassing for them if they lose in a seat

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 8>where as recently as twenty twenty four they won fifty

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 8>point eight percent of the vote, and even more, it's

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 8>kind of hard to compare because the boundaries were slightly

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 8>different than the general election before that in twenty nineteen,

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 8>but it would have been even higher back then. So

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 8>I think if Labor are to you know, go from

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 8>that level to totally losing the seat, it is a

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 8>kind of really worrying sign for them, because you know,

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 8>if we're to have you know, this pattern repeated across

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 8>the country in areas where labor isn't was never this

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 8>this good, then you know, they're really looking at a

0:21:56.160 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 8>kind of potential wipeout at the next election, which is

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 8>due to be held by the next general election, which

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 8>is due to be held by twenty twenty nine.

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 3>So in terms of what's going on with the demographics

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 3>in the constituency, I think that's also quite interesting and

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 3>there's been quite a lot of focus on that in

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 3>terms of the economic challenges, worries, complaints or hopes that

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 3>people have for that tell us about the demographics arena.

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.680
<v Speaker 9>So the Gorton and Denton has been called the Frankenstein

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 9>constituency because it's made up of very different parts. You know,

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 9>you have Gorton and crucially this is where two thirds

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 9>of the population lives, and Gordon is very ethnically diverse.

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 9>Forty percent of residents identify as Muslim.

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 11>You know.

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 9>One of the main places we visited there is the

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 9>Alongside Market, this big open air market reminiscent of Istanbul bazaars,

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 9>and it also has a Gorton has a large share

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 9>of students and university graduates and a larger share of these.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 10>People than Denton.

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 9>So Gordon is fertile ground you know for labor and

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.920
<v Speaker 9>the Greens both have their headquarters there and as Lucy said,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 9>you know, we saw lots of Green posters, but not

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 9>that many Labor, I would say when we visited last week.

0:23:06.840 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 9>And then you know, then there's Denton and as soon

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 9>as you cross into Dent and you can almost tell

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 9>the difference because the houses are bigger somehow, and you know,

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 9>Reform has set up it's HQ there and it's in

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 9>a large, sort of sleek warehouse. And you know, regardless

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.719
<v Speaker 9>whether you're from Gorton or Dent. And I think all

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 9>voters seem to agree on one thing. You know, they

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 9>won't vote Labor again. But not many people have made

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 9>up their mind about whether they go to the Greens

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 9>or Reforms. So you know, Reform seems to be alienating

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 9>voters and the ethnically diverse Gorton with its anti immigration message,

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 9>and you know, some residents said they won't vote for

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 9>them because they're racist. However, you know, the Greens similarly

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 9>are putting off other voters. For example, there was this

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 9>this resident we spoke to who said, you know, I

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 9>don't like Labor. I will vote for Reform even though

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 9>I don't with their stands on immigration. But I won't

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 9>vote for the Greenes because I don't like their stands

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 9>on prebritty blockers. So it's really really up in the

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 9>air sort of who will win?

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, thank you to both of you for your reporting

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 3>on the ground and for being with me here today.

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 3>My thanks to Bloomberg's economics reporter Arena Angel and to

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 3>our politics reporter Lucy White.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 10>Thank you.

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Now I want to read out a full list of

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 3>the candidates, of course, who are running for this by

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 3>election in Gordon and Denton. Nick Buckley Advanced UK, Charlotte

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Cadden Conservative Party, Dan Clark Libertarian Party, Matt Goodwin Reform UK,

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Sebastian Moore Social Democratic Party, Joseph o'meecher Rejoin EU Party,

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Jackie Pearcy Liberal Democrats, Hannah Spencer, Green Party, Angeliki Soogia

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Labor Party, Sir einke Loot the Official Monster Raving Looney Party,

0:24:56.960 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Hugo Wills Communist League.

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 10>I'm Carol, yep.

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Get here in London. You can catch us every weekday

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 3>morning here for Bloomberg Daybreak. You are beginning at six

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 3>am in London. That's at one am on woll Street. Nathan.

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Caroline, and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 2>India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set for a two

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>day visit to Israel. We'll look at what to expect next.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hagar, and this is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>day Break Weekend, our global look ahead at the top

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>stories for investors in the coming week. I'm Nathan Hagar

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 2>and Washington. Indian Prime Minister Narendromodi is set for a

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 2>two day visit to Israel in the week ahead. For

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 2>a preview, let's get to Doug Krisner, hosted the Bloomberg

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Daybreak Asia podcast.

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 4>Thanks Nathan. This will be Mody's second visit to Israel

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 4>in eight years. Back in July twenty seventeen, he became

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.399
<v Speaker 4>the first Indian Prime minister to travel to Israel with

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 4>a goal of elevating tide. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Knyahu

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 4>has said there is a tremendous alliance between these two countries.

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 4>For a closer look, I'm joined by Bloomberg's Rosalind Matheson.

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 4>She is Chief Asia correspondent. Roz joins from our studio

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 4>in Singapore. Thank you for being here. From what I've read,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 4>NATANYAHUU and Modi are expected to discuss various forms of cooperation.

0:26:23.720 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 4>Do you have a sense of which areas might be prioritized.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:32.159
<v Speaker 12>Two key areas really probably with their conversation. One is

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 12>momentum towards a free trade agreement. I mean, India tends

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 12>to move very slowly on trade deals over many years,

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 12>but they're suddenly in this environment of diversify or die

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 12>around the world on trade, They're rushing to get trade

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 12>deals done. I mean they just did significant trade deals

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 12>with the EU and also with the US, So there

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 12>is movement here on the Israeli front, and their significant

0:26:57.200 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 12>trade relationship already between the two countries. I mean, Israel's

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 12>a significant buyer of refined petroleum products from India, diamonds

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 12>as well. India is Israel's second biggest trading partner in Asia.

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 12>I think bilateral trade last year was around five billion dollars.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.439
<v Speaker 12>So there's a lot to talk about on the trade front,

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 12>and there's a lot to talk about on the defense front,

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 12>because India is obviously also moving away from Russia in

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 12>terms of weapons that it buys. It's still its biggest market,

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 12>but it is moving to buy more weapons from the US,

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 12>from France and from Israel, and so there'll be a

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 12>lot of discussion around the potential there around defense, but

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 12>also as part of that technology sharing when it comes

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 12>to defense, and so can they produce stuff together, but

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 12>can they share that technology when they do so.

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 4>So, India, as I understand, is also engaged in more

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.439
<v Speaker 4>outreach to the Arab world. Last month, India hosted the

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 4>second India Arab Foreign Ministers Meeting. And I'm wondering whether

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 4>that necessity fairly complicates in some way Modi's mission.

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 10>Well, yes and no.

0:28:04.200 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 12>I mean India has been a strong supporter of Israel.

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 12>There's a clear relationship between Urendromod and Benjamin Netanyahu. I

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 12>mean they speak on the phone every couple of months,

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 12>if not each month. And India has supplied Israel with

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 12>drones and been quite a supporter when it comes to

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 12>their actions in Gaza. But also they don't recognize Jerusalem

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 12>as Israel's capital. There are some underlying issues that because

0:28:31.520 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 12>India above all is trying to maintain this idea still

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 12>a strategic autonomy which they've always tried to walk a

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 12>line on which is to have a balance of relationships.

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 12>And so that does mean do they look to have

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 12>outreach relationships with the Arab world as well? And is

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 12>Iran potentially a factor in all of this because obviously

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 12>there are serious tensions between Israel and Iran. There's the

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 12>specter potentially of US and Israeli intervention again in Ira.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 12>So what's going to be Mody's message to be be

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 12>about that?

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 4>What about Modi's aim to try to bring in some

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 4>capital from Israel into various sectors of the Indian economy.

0:29:11.000 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Are there any industries that come to mind.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 12>Well, certainly there is further opportunity for India around stuff

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 12>like diamonds are already exporting a lot of that to Israel,

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 12>and refined petroleum products that don't sell raw crude to Israel,

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 12>but obviously there's a significant relationship there. So those will

0:29:31.200 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 12>be the two key things. But obviously they just also

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 12>want to set the table a bit around the parameters

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 12>of this FTA. Doesn't involve services, for example, I mean,

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 12>that's always a thorny issue for India in trade deals

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 12>is services. But it's really going to be probably at

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 12>a higher level around broader understandings when it comes to

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 12>trade and defense.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 4>Modi is expected to address the Israeli Parliament, the Knesset.

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Do we have a sense of the issues that Modi

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 4>may speak two.

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 12>At this stage, we do not, but we're expecting him

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 12>to talk broadly about fundamental ties and to do so

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 12>with again with some affection, particularly towards Benjamin Netanyahu. I mean,

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 12>BB says that Modi is popular in Israel. They talk

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 12>again on the phone quite often, so there'll be an

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 12>overarching sense of the relationship in that address. If it

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 12>happens to the Kanesset, to the Israeli Parliament. Modi will

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.680
<v Speaker 12>probably want to steer clear of talking about things like

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 12>the West Bank. For example. India's tried not to get

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 12>involved in the issues regarding the West Bank and Israel's

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 12>policies there, so he'll probably steer away from that one.

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 12>He might talk more broadly around the prospects for a

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 12>longer term peace in Gaza and his desire to see

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 12>that happen. Of course, there's a ceasefar in Gaza, but

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 12>there's big questions about how you go from that to

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 12>a more fundamental, long term peace in Gaza and what

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 12>it means in terms of the disarmament of Hamas. For example,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.560
<v Speaker 12>probably walk a pretty clear line there about not going

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 12>into particularly tricky issues around the West Bank.

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 4>What about the relationship that both India and Israel have

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:13.400
<v Speaker 4>with the United States and particularly President Trump.

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 12>Well, it's one of those things. We're in this period

0:31:15.720 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 12>where again, relationships are shifting pretty quickly. Power balances around

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 12>the world are shifting pretty quickly, and again we're seeing

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 12>that in things like trade deals getting done that were

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 12>you know, on hiatus essentially for many years. This idea

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 12>that you have to have a diversification of your relationships,

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 12>and some of that is spurred by the administration of

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump. Certainly there have been tensions between the US

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 12>and India. We saw that, really the trade deal went

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 12>into the freezer for some months as a result, you know,

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 12>Donald Trump really pushing India over its purchases of Russian

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 12>energy and singling India out in that and that was really,

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 12>you know, something that Modi couldn't publicly tolerate for his

0:31:58.080 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 12>prestige at home. That said, the US and India will

0:32:02.040 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 12>always have a relationship. Modi's just simply about having you know,

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 12>that diversification strategy going. And obviously, you know, Israel and

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 12>the US, BB and Trump have generally a strong relationship.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 12>The occasional tussle over certain aspects of the Middle East

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:20.840
<v Speaker 12>but it's a strong relationship, so you can imagine that,

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:24.600
<v Speaker 12>you know, BB and Modi will talk quite generally in

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 12>warm terms about the US during this trip.

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 4>What do we know about Modi's popularity in Israel? Is

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 4>he a widely popular politician?

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Well?

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 12>Yes, according to BB, the Israeli leader, I mean, Mody

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 12>was the first India Prime minister to visit Israel back

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 12>in twenty seventeen. I think he had a flower named

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 12>after him as a chrysanthemum at the time. So there

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 12>is this kind of strong history of cooperation. They've had

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 12>full diplomatic ties between the countries for some decades, and

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 12>Mody is quite popular in Israel as a result, and

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 12>seen as someone who you know, hasn't been overtly critical

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 12>of Israel over its actions in Gaza, the conflict in Gaza.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 12>He can expect to have a very warm welcome, including

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:10.479
<v Speaker 12>by the Parliament.

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm wondering whether China will come up as a part

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 4>of these discussions as well.

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, certainly. Again, China is like China, the US other

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 12>great powers are always in the backdrop in these conversations

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 12>at the moment in terms of how you're balancing your

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 12>relationships and India again trying for this idea of strategic autonomy.

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 12>I mean, relationships between India and China go up and

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 12>they go can go down quite a bit, but they've

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 12>been on a warmer track in the past year or so,

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 12>driven in part by the tensions that India's had separately

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 12>with the US. So there's a pragmatism that comes into

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 12>all these relationships, including with China, and the sense of

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 12>what's China going to be doing around the Middle East,

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 12>developing its own business and trade ties, including with Arab nations,

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 12>and what does that lead to. So certainly it's in

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 12>the atmosphere these conversations, but there is a sense from

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 12>both Israel and a India in a way that these

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 12>things need to be done in a very pragmatic fashion.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.640
<v Speaker 4>What about the area of agriculture. Is there much in

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 4>the way of trade exchange between these two countries where

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 4>agricultural products are involved?

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.400
<v Speaker 12>Not a ton, And agriculture is just a very thorny

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 12>issue for India again, like other countries, You've got in

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 12>a way this kind of mythical image of the India farmer,

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 12>and they are a very powerful voting block in India,

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 12>and you can see that Modi being very cautious about

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 12>moving away from subsidies for farm products in India or

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 12>trade deals that might disadvantage the farmers of his country,

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 12>and he's very achuned to that and his own popularity.

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 12>So they've tended to be quite protective, i would say,

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 12>of the India agricultural market, so very cautious about doing

0:34:54.480 --> 0:34:55.400
<v Speaker 12>deals as a result.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 4>So from what I understand, Riz and Israeli delegation will

0:34:59.239 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 4>be leaving for New Delhi on Monday of next week

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 4>for a first round of kind of trade agreement talks.

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 4>So it seems like both sides are working at trying

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 4>to achieve something. Is there, in your mind a timeline

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 4>here as to when something needs to be kind of

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 4>agreed upon or is this going to be a kind

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 4>of a protracted, longer term project.

0:35:23.640 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 12>Well, there is a sense that things are picking up.

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:30.239
<v Speaker 12>You had ministerial delegations going back and forth last year,

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 12>as you say this, an Israeli delegation due and New

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 12>Delhi in the coming week that's supposed to be sort

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 12>of technical talks, and it's the first round of those

0:35:39.360 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 12>technical talks. There was a framework agreement that was signed

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:45.359
<v Speaker 12>last November, but it's a framework and there's a lot

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 12>of work to be done here as a result, but

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 12>you really do get the sense of momentum on both sides,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 12>and some of the officials are saying that they're aiming

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 12>for a deal potentially at some point this year.

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 4>ROS will leave it there. Thank you so much for

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 4>helping us preview Prime Minister Modi's visit to Israel. That

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.320
<v Speaker 4>is Bloomberg's Rasal and Matheson, our chief Asia correspondent, joining

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 4>us from Singapore. In the last week, India hosted an

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence summit. It was there that Prime Minister Modi

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 4>said the event offered further proof that India is progressing

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 4>rapidly in the fields of science and technology. At the summit,

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:25.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg spoke with Arthur Mensch of the French firm mistral Ai,

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 4>and he addressed the Indian market for artificial intelligence.

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.959
<v Speaker 11>So what we see is that on the infrastructure side,

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 11>India has taken a strong stance on the sovereignty and

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 11>so that's a place where we can play an important

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.399
<v Speaker 11>role because the platform we bring is something that every

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 11>state we work with can actually customize. So in that aspect,

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 11>I believe there are a lot of synergies in between

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.879
<v Speaker 11>what we can provide and what India already has. They

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:56.479
<v Speaker 11>have taken some step in training models themselves as well. Again,

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 11>this is a place where the open source media that

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 11>we can provide can play because they can be used

0:37:02.080 --> 0:37:04.760
<v Speaker 11>as a basis to make models better at certain languages.

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 11>This is something that we actively do with certain states,

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 11>that we've done with Singapore, that we are doing with Morocco.

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 11>We've released a model last year called miss Calsaba which

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.520
<v Speaker 11>is specifically good at Indian languages in texts, and so

0:37:16.560 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 11>that's something that we can improve through partnerships with Indian

0:37:20.239 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 11>companies that have access to more data. The audio models

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.920
<v Speaker 11>that we've released, Vauxcral in particular, is very strong at

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 11>Indian language. We see audio as a big way in

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 11>which the consumer market in India engage with technology, and

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 11>so again that's a place where partnerships can actually take

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 11>us much further because we can provide the technology and

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 11>the training stack and the GPUs and the people that

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 11>know how to train models. But what we could benefit

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 11>from and what we could partner on is access to data,

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 11>access to the consumer market so that we can make

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 11>that technology better and give it put it in the

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 11>hands of, for instance, the Indian government.

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 4>That was Arthur Mensch from the French firm mistral Ai,

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 4>speaking to Bloomberg at the inn AI Impact Summit in

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:04.760
<v Speaker 4>New Delhi. I'm Doug Prisner. You can catch us weekdays

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 4>for the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available wherever you get

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 4>your podcast.

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Nathan, Thanks Doug, and that does it for this edition

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 2>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning

0:38:15.320 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 2>at five am Wall Street Time for the latest on

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 2>markets overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Nathan Hager.

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.