1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:10,559 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the 2 00:00:10,600 --> 00:00:14,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am 3 00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg 4 00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 1: Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, 5 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:23,080 Speaker 1: or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:24,120 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 2: Going back to the markets, the Dow not doing anything, 7 00:00:26,920 --> 00:00:29,319 Speaker 2: the SMP not doing anything, but within the Dow, the 8 00:00:29,320 --> 00:00:32,559 Speaker 2: best performers Amazon up almost fifteen percent. The worst performer 9 00:00:32,680 --> 00:00:35,960 Speaker 2: is Apple, down about nine point three percent following yesterday's 10 00:00:36,120 --> 00:00:40,200 Speaker 2: quarterly results and the outlook. Gene Munster is the authority 11 00:00:40,360 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 2: on Apple. He is managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, 12 00:00:43,680 --> 00:00:45,559 Speaker 2: and of course years before that he was a sell 13 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:48,040 Speaker 2: side analyst on Apple, one of the most well known. 14 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:51,760 Speaker 2: Gene good to speak with you. Partially, I'm guessing that 15 00:00:51,800 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 2: Apple's declined today outside declient has a lot to do 16 00:00:54,520 --> 00:00:56,440 Speaker 2: with the fact that it was an now performer in 17 00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:59,400 Speaker 2: the lead up to these results. What did we really 18 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:02,840 Speaker 2: learn from Apple that can be attributed to what decisions 19 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:06,120 Speaker 2: it made versus things are beyond its control, like really 20 00:01:06,160 --> 00:01:07,320 Speaker 2: high memoryship prices. 21 00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:10,959 Speaker 3: Well, this is less about the high memory prices and 22 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:13,840 Speaker 3: more just similar numbers about where the guidance is going. 23 00:01:14,280 --> 00:01:16,240 Speaker 3: So Scott, just to take a step back, they guided 24 00:01:16,280 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 3: the twelve or the shoes at twelve percent revenue grows 25 00:01:18,760 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 3: through September. They guided to nine to eleven. Now, when 26 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:25,800 Speaker 3: you find this subtraction key with a company, a stock 27 00:01:25,840 --> 00:01:27,840 Speaker 3: that's been up twenty two percent over the past month 28 00:01:27,920 --> 00:01:31,200 Speaker 3: versus the NASZAK up one percent, when analysts go to 29 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:34,039 Speaker 3: that subtraction key, that is negative for the stock. There's 30 00:01:34,120 --> 00:01:37,960 Speaker 3: just no explanation that can get investors comfortable. And I 31 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:40,520 Speaker 3: think that's kind of where the conversation ended. But I 32 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:42,280 Speaker 3: want to go through that a little bit and answer 33 00:01:42,319 --> 00:01:44,520 Speaker 3: your question about like what what's the substance of what's 34 00:01:44,560 --> 00:01:47,720 Speaker 3: going on? Is it's about memory costs. The answer is 35 00:01:47,800 --> 00:01:49,920 Speaker 3: a little bit about memory costs. Maybe if you think 36 00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:53,000 Speaker 3: about the ten percent decline, probably one or two percent 37 00:01:53,120 --> 00:01:55,080 Speaker 3: is about this higher memory costs. It's going to have 38 00:01:55,520 --> 00:01:58,160 Speaker 3: a fifty BIPs negative impact on their margins in the 39 00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:02,160 Speaker 3: September quarter. The picture is on revenue and effectively what 40 00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:04,480 Speaker 3: happened this is a pretty unique dynamic, but it makes 41 00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:07,000 Speaker 3: a ton of sense is that the iPhone has been 42 00:02:07,080 --> 00:02:09,000 Speaker 3: on fire. It was up twenty two percent in the 43 00:02:09,080 --> 00:02:11,160 Speaker 3: June quarter. If you look at over the past year, 44 00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:13,880 Speaker 3: it's been up twenty two percent. That compares to over 45 00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:16,560 Speaker 3: the past five years it's up three percent on average. 46 00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:20,320 Speaker 3: So we've got this huge surge and iPhone demand and separately, 47 00:02:20,360 --> 00:02:23,120 Speaker 3: the MAC up almost thirty percent. Typically it's up a 48 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:25,720 Speaker 3: few percent. And what that means is that they have 49 00:02:25,880 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 3: essentially been pulling through inventory. Remember how tight inventory is 50 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 3: in part because of these pricing deals that they have 51 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:34,120 Speaker 3: to try to keep costs low. They're limited to the 52 00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:37,320 Speaker 3: amount of capacity that they've had, so they pulled inventory 53 00:02:37,800 --> 00:02:40,680 Speaker 3: essentially from September into the June quarter, and that means 54 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:42,839 Speaker 3: they just simply don't have as much. And the way 55 00:02:42,880 --> 00:02:45,000 Speaker 3: that I'm going to back test this and be pretty 56 00:02:45,000 --> 00:02:47,280 Speaker 3: easy for your listeners to do this is just look 57 00:02:47,280 --> 00:02:50,200 Speaker 3: at what the lead times on the products are right now. 58 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:53,000 Speaker 3: They're running a few weeks now that typically would be 59 00:02:53,160 --> 00:02:55,960 Speaker 3: same day on many of their products. That's the indication 60 00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 3: that they are in fact constrained and so effectively, what 61 00:02:58,840 --> 00:03:02,600 Speaker 3: happened is they stole demand from the September quarter and 62 00:03:02,680 --> 00:03:05,280 Speaker 3: pulled it into the June quarter. There's still a ton 63 00:03:05,320 --> 00:03:07,840 Speaker 3: of demand out there stole supply excuse me, and pulled 64 00:03:07,840 --> 00:03:10,400 Speaker 3: it into the June quarter. There's still ample demand and 65 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:12,200 Speaker 3: I think all the end of the day, just to 66 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 3: put it in the most basic term, Street was at 67 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:16,840 Speaker 3: twelve percent revenue growth for September. If they would have 68 00:03:17,000 --> 00:03:20,680 Speaker 3: kind of had currency constant and supply constant, I bet 69 00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:23,200 Speaker 3: they would have guided to better than fifteen percent growth 70 00:03:23,200 --> 00:03:24,160 Speaker 3: for the September quarter. 71 00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:27,400 Speaker 4: So, Gene, you were busy this week, as a lot 72 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 4: of tech investors were, with all the earnings. 73 00:03:29,080 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 5: But I got to. 74 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 4: Ask you about this story Wall Street Journal story about 75 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:36,760 Speaker 4: Tesla spinning out its China business maybe paved the way 76 00:03:36,800 --> 00:03:40,760 Speaker 4: for a SpaceX merger. Is that does that seem reasonable 77 00:03:40,760 --> 00:03:40,960 Speaker 4: to you? 78 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:42,560 Speaker 6: Yeah? 79 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:46,960 Speaker 3: I would say it's reasonable, and it is going to 80 00:03:47,160 --> 00:03:49,640 Speaker 3: increase the probability that I have put on this happening 81 00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:52,520 Speaker 3: in the next few years from ninety to probably ninety 82 00:03:52,520 --> 00:03:55,000 Speaker 3: two percent. About a week ago I had it at 83 00:03:55,040 --> 00:03:58,400 Speaker 3: eighty percent. And then the Tesla earnings call, they led 84 00:03:58,440 --> 00:04:01,880 Speaker 3: a question in about the two companies coming together, which 85 00:04:01,920 --> 00:04:04,920 Speaker 3: surprised me. Elon started to answer the question, and then 86 00:04:05,160 --> 00:04:07,560 Speaker 3: Legal took over and said, really, we can't say much, 87 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:10,200 Speaker 3: and then Elon grabbed the mic back and started to 88 00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:13,120 Speaker 3: kind of pontificate about the benefits of these two companies 89 00:04:13,120 --> 00:04:15,520 Speaker 3: being together. That took me from eighty to ninety. Now 90 00:04:15,520 --> 00:04:17,840 Speaker 3: I'm at ninety two, and the answer is it just 91 00:04:17,880 --> 00:04:20,039 Speaker 3: makes a ton of sense. Like this China piece, I 92 00:04:20,080 --> 00:04:25,719 Speaker 3: think is grossly underappreciated about the tensions tech from the 93 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:29,560 Speaker 3: technology companies geopolitically, as I've been meeting with many companies 94 00:04:29,640 --> 00:04:32,800 Speaker 3: that have ties and these leading private companies that have 95 00:04:32,839 --> 00:04:35,600 Speaker 3: ties to China, it's pretty clear that they want as 96 00:04:35,680 --> 00:04:38,640 Speaker 3: much separation as possible, and so my view is that 97 00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:41,480 Speaker 3: we're probably a couple of years away. Elon's always been 98 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:45,160 Speaker 3: has always structured the China business to be easily separated 99 00:04:45,200 --> 00:04:48,480 Speaker 3: from the US business for a lot of reasons. In 100 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:51,200 Speaker 3: one of them is his master plan. Just don't it's 101 00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:53,320 Speaker 3: very simple. He's going to just keep growing up his 102 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:57,080 Speaker 3: businesses into a master company. And so to answer your question, Paul, 103 00:04:57,160 --> 00:04:59,640 Speaker 3: is I think that this makes a ton of sense, 104 00:05:00,320 --> 00:05:02,240 Speaker 3: even though they're saying that it's not going on. I 105 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:03,839 Speaker 3: think it very much is in the cards. 106 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:06,919 Speaker 2: Sounds like it'd be good for Elon Musk from the 107 00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 2: way he operates and runs his company. Would it be 108 00:05:09,600 --> 00:05:10,920 Speaker 2: good for investors? 109 00:05:12,920 --> 00:05:15,960 Speaker 3: Now, that's the key question, and I think the answer 110 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:18,919 Speaker 3: is that the simple answers yes from two levels. And 111 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:22,000 Speaker 3: an operational piece, which is most important is that when 112 00:05:22,000 --> 00:05:27,039 Speaker 3: you bring things together, you reduce redundancies. And there's this 113 00:05:27,160 --> 00:05:30,839 Speaker 3: long standing view and within tech companies that are highly 114 00:05:30,839 --> 00:05:34,200 Speaker 3: innovative that smaller teams are more effective, and so when 115 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:36,960 Speaker 3: you have smaller, tighter teams and effectively you can do that. 116 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:39,800 Speaker 3: I think that's one piece of bringing all these together. 117 00:05:39,920 --> 00:05:42,720 Speaker 3: I think their visions are very similar obviously around being 118 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:48,359 Speaker 3: AI first, space AI with SpaceX, physical AI, trustrial with Tesla. 119 00:05:48,440 --> 00:05:49,479 Speaker 5: All that makes sense. 120 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:52,200 Speaker 3: The other reason why I think investors would be rewarded 121 00:05:52,279 --> 00:05:55,760 Speaker 3: is that the dynamic around Tesla and SpaceX to a 122 00:05:55,800 --> 00:05:58,720 Speaker 3: lesser extent right now is really about and less investor 123 00:05:58,839 --> 00:06:02,240 Speaker 3: confidence are on the long term retail investor confidence, and 124 00:06:02,320 --> 00:06:05,680 Speaker 3: I think that that unwavering confidence would only increase if 125 00:06:05,680 --> 00:06:08,080 Speaker 3: they brought some of these together. And that has really 126 00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:11,280 Speaker 3: explained how Tesla can still be a one point two 127 00:06:11,279 --> 00:06:14,239 Speaker 3: trillion dollar company despite having many of its targets pushed 128 00:06:14,240 --> 00:06:16,640 Speaker 3: back for years. And so I think you put these 129 00:06:16,680 --> 00:06:20,240 Speaker 3: two together, it would undoubtedly be the biggest company. I 130 00:06:20,240 --> 00:06:23,240 Speaker 3: think you put them together your I think the path 131 00:06:23,279 --> 00:06:25,760 Speaker 3: to a tend jillion dollar company is as well laid 132 00:06:25,800 --> 00:06:26,640 Speaker 3: at that point. 133 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:27,480 Speaker 6: Stay with us. 134 00:06:27,560 --> 00:06:29,760 Speaker 5: More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this. 135 00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:37,600 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live 136 00:06:37,680 --> 00:06:41,080 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto 137 00:06:41,160 --> 00:06:44,240 Speaker 1: with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you 138 00:06:44,279 --> 00:06:47,680 Speaker 1: get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 139 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:53,120 Speaker 4: Erni's coming out of the energy patch here, excellent mobile, Chevron, 140 00:06:53,240 --> 00:06:55,480 Speaker 4: some of the big boys reporting here. Let's get in 141 00:06:55,760 --> 00:06:57,480 Speaker 4: touch with an expert on this stuff. 142 00:06:57,680 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 5: Vincent Piazza. 143 00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:00,240 Speaker 4: He's the senior research channel, so he covers all the 144 00:07:00,279 --> 00:07:02,280 Speaker 4: oil and gas companies for Bloomberg Intelligence. 145 00:07:02,680 --> 00:07:03,920 Speaker 5: No idea where he is. 146 00:07:04,640 --> 00:07:05,280 Speaker 6: It could be. 147 00:07:05,279 --> 00:07:06,880 Speaker 4: Philly, Princeton, Wilmington. 148 00:07:07,120 --> 00:07:08,280 Speaker 6: You never know where this guy is. 149 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:11,040 Speaker 4: Bence, what's going on in your world of big oil? 150 00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:15,360 Speaker 6: And Good morning from Wilmington, Delaware. 151 00:07:16,400 --> 00:07:21,160 Speaker 7: But it's always sunny in Philadelphia, remember there you go. Yeah, 152 00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:24,520 Speaker 7: So look, if you think about coming into the quarter, 153 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:30,080 Speaker 7: Exon and Chevron, significant optimism coming into the quarter, just 154 00:07:30,680 --> 00:07:34,720 Speaker 7: considering where we are on wt I and Brent. But 155 00:07:35,480 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 7: you know, Chevron posted a much much cleaner quarter operationally, 156 00:07:41,000 --> 00:07:46,560 Speaker 7: significant free cash flow, buybacks and dividends were up. The 157 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:50,920 Speaker 7: debt side, you know, Chevron bought back roughly eight billion 158 00:07:50,960 --> 00:07:56,720 Speaker 7: dollars of debt. So look strong quarter operationally for Chevron, 159 00:07:57,120 --> 00:08:00,400 Speaker 7: a little more optimism coming into the quarter. For Exxon 160 00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:04,400 Speaker 7: it's down roughly two percent, little softer on the downstream side. 161 00:08:04,840 --> 00:08:10,680 Speaker 7: But Paul combined thirty two billion of free cash flow. 162 00:08:10,520 --> 00:08:11,160 Speaker 6: In the quarter. 163 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:15,520 Speaker 7: For both companies, you're getting that back in dividends. You're 164 00:08:15,520 --> 00:08:19,880 Speaker 7: getting that back in buybacks as well. But for Exon, 165 00:08:20,000 --> 00:08:23,240 Speaker 7: Paul a little bit more of an impact from Hormuz 166 00:08:23,400 --> 00:08:27,920 Speaker 7: in three Q, so some thorny issues that they have 167 00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:28,640 Speaker 7: to deal with. 168 00:08:28,760 --> 00:08:31,080 Speaker 6: But for Chevron, much much cleaner quarter. 169 00:08:32,559 --> 00:08:35,520 Speaker 2: So does this windfall help them do anything that they 170 00:08:35,640 --> 00:08:38,080 Speaker 2: wouldn't be able to do otherwise? You talked about how 171 00:08:38,200 --> 00:08:40,880 Speaker 2: Chevron is going to reduce debt and increased share buybacks, 172 00:08:40,880 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 2: but operationally, can it think bigger than that? 173 00:08:43,720 --> 00:08:48,880 Speaker 7: Yeah, So if you think about Venezuela for Chevron, Chevron's 174 00:08:48,920 --> 00:08:53,040 Speaker 7: output in Venezuela will likely grow through twenty twenty eight. Again, 175 00:08:53,720 --> 00:08:59,160 Speaker 7: put the geopolitics aside. Definitely an operational ambition for them, 176 00:08:59,760 --> 00:09:04,079 Speaker 7: but one that we'll see production grow from roughly two 177 00:09:04,200 --> 00:09:07,319 Speaker 7: hundred and eighty thousand barrels to four hundred thousand. 178 00:09:07,400 --> 00:09:09,560 Speaker 6: Not a big mover right now. 179 00:09:09,480 --> 00:09:11,480 Speaker 7: But think about over the next couple of years what 180 00:09:11,520 --> 00:09:16,200 Speaker 7: could happen there with a more sanguine political backdrop in 181 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:16,760 Speaker 7: the country. 182 00:09:17,040 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 4: Hey, Vince, what are your companies saying about the strait 183 00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:22,480 Speaker 4: of horror moves. I'm kind of the opinion that this 184 00:09:22,559 --> 00:09:24,880 Speaker 4: thing's never going to be really open again because it 185 00:09:24,960 --> 00:09:28,599 Speaker 4: just takes the threat of an attack to kind of 186 00:09:28,600 --> 00:09:30,599 Speaker 4: shut things down. What are your companies saying. 187 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:35,280 Speaker 7: Well, I can tell you what they've met, and consider 188 00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:39,520 Speaker 7: that most of my coverage universe is US and domestic. 189 00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:43,480 Speaker 6: But what we see the industry doing is. 190 00:09:43,520 --> 00:09:50,960 Speaker 7: Recasting those capital flows, rejiggering, reordering seaborn maritime logistics to 191 00:09:51,000 --> 00:09:51,719 Speaker 7: dilute the. 192 00:09:51,720 --> 00:09:54,480 Speaker 6: Impact of the region. And what does that mean. 193 00:09:54,920 --> 00:09:59,360 Speaker 7: Well, it means extending transit times by up to two 194 00:09:59,520 --> 00:10:05,280 Speaker 7: three weeks and moving barrels away from geopolitical and conflict zones. 195 00:10:06,559 --> 00:10:07,800 Speaker 6: What does that mean in general? 196 00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:08,120 Speaker 5: Though? 197 00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:11,920 Speaker 7: It means a higher floor price, and it also means 198 00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:17,880 Speaker 7: a logistics environment that provides for greater redundancy, whether it's 199 00:10:18,360 --> 00:10:23,960 Speaker 7: floating storage, whether it's more land storage as well. But 200 00:10:24,160 --> 00:10:27,320 Speaker 7: it does suggest that over time, you know, we do 201 00:10:27,400 --> 00:10:30,800 Speaker 7: see that part of the world being diluted so that 202 00:10:30,840 --> 00:10:33,400 Speaker 7: you get away from those conflict zones. It means more 203 00:10:33,440 --> 00:10:38,120 Speaker 7: capital coming to North America, whether it's capital invested in 204 00:10:38,240 --> 00:10:42,160 Speaker 7: the US or Canada to get those molecules out in 205 00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 7: the export market. It means more dollars heading down to 206 00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:50,200 Speaker 7: South America too, whether it's Venezuela, whether it's Argentina, and 207 00:10:50,240 --> 00:10:53,720 Speaker 7: even Brazil as well. So you could see over the 208 00:10:53,760 --> 00:10:58,679 Speaker 7: next several years, greater capital flowing to the Western hemisphere, 209 00:10:59,520 --> 00:11:03,800 Speaker 7: more barrels in floating storage, more barrels and land storage 210 00:11:03,800 --> 00:11:07,040 Speaker 7: to dilute the impact of subsequent geopolitical events. 211 00:11:07,559 --> 00:11:10,480 Speaker 2: Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this. 212 00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:18,480 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live 213 00:11:18,559 --> 00:11:21,679 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android 214 00:11:21,679 --> 00:11:25,000 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever 215 00:11:25,040 --> 00:11:28,600 Speaker 1: you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 216 00:11:29,400 --> 00:11:30,200 Speaker 5: Let's get right to it. 217 00:11:30,480 --> 00:11:34,680 Speaker 4: FIFA has plans to privatize some of its commercial business. 218 00:11:34,679 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 4: I think I've got that right, Okay, that's the global 219 00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:40,600 Speaker 4: FIFA UEFA. They're the European dudes. They're not happy with it. 220 00:11:40,960 --> 00:11:43,120 Speaker 4: And look at this just across the tape. I think 221 00:11:43,160 --> 00:11:47,559 Speaker 4: this is ap senior FIFA official resigns over Infantino's World 222 00:11:47,559 --> 00:11:52,480 Speaker 4: Cup selloff plan. Second says it deceived staff. Wow, random 223 00:11:52,480 --> 00:11:54,840 Speaker 4: Waims Joints. Is here you a sports This is a 224 00:11:54,840 --> 00:11:58,120 Speaker 4: big story, randal. This is global soccer. We just finished 225 00:11:58,120 --> 00:12:01,160 Speaker 4: with the World Cup. People have a great appreciation for football, 226 00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:04,040 Speaker 4: maybe now than they had before the World Cup. What's 227 00:12:04,080 --> 00:12:04,720 Speaker 4: going on here? 228 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:07,600 Speaker 8: Listen, FIFA is trying to make as much money as 229 00:12:07,600 --> 00:12:09,920 Speaker 8: they possibly can. And you know, for me personally, I 230 00:12:09,920 --> 00:12:11,440 Speaker 8: thought the World Cup was going to come to a 231 00:12:11,480 --> 00:12:13,200 Speaker 8: cloth I would be able to take a deep breath. 232 00:12:13,280 --> 00:12:15,640 Speaker 5: But obviously we're witnessing a global fight right now. 233 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:18,079 Speaker 8: We have FIFA who is over the World Cup, which 234 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:20,840 Speaker 8: is the biggest, largest tournament and the most famous tournament. 235 00:12:20,840 --> 00:12:22,079 Speaker 5: It's the one of the players love the most. 236 00:12:22,120 --> 00:12:26,760 Speaker 8: It's one that the teams participating they have a deep 237 00:12:26,800 --> 00:12:27,760 Speaker 8: desire to win it. 238 00:12:28,000 --> 00:12:30,120 Speaker 5: But now they're saying, you know, we can. 239 00:12:30,120 --> 00:12:33,079 Speaker 8: Raise up to four point two billion dollars from Joshua 240 00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:36,440 Speaker 8: Kushners strive capital, and of course he is the son 241 00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:39,720 Speaker 8: in law of President Trump, who you BEFA catered to 242 00:12:39,840 --> 00:12:41,240 Speaker 8: brother in law, brother of. 243 00:12:41,200 --> 00:12:41,719 Speaker 5: The son in law. 244 00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:44,920 Speaker 8: Thank you for correcting that. You know, FIFA catd to 245 00:12:44,960 --> 00:12:47,400 Speaker 8: President Trump all while he was here. And you have UEFA, 246 00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:51,520 Speaker 8: who's over many of the countries who were participants, France, England, Spain, 247 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:54,559 Speaker 8: so many who are just like, hold on, enough is enough. 248 00:12:55,000 --> 00:12:58,520 Speaker 2: Enough is enough. So UEFA is now talking about boycotting 249 00:12:58,520 --> 00:13:00,600 Speaker 2: the World Cup that's not for another four years. So 250 00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:02,360 Speaker 2: is this kind of an empty threat because there's a 251 00:13:02,440 --> 00:13:04,160 Speaker 2: lot of time between now and the next World Cup. 252 00:13:04,360 --> 00:13:05,679 Speaker 5: I don't think it's an empty threat. 253 00:13:05,760 --> 00:13:08,080 Speaker 8: I think that they're very very serious about this because 254 00:13:08,120 --> 00:13:10,640 Speaker 8: Conka Calf, who is over in North America, Central America 255 00:13:10,679 --> 00:13:12,480 Speaker 8: and the Caribbean, is also in and we have yet 256 00:13:12,520 --> 00:13:14,079 Speaker 8: to see what South America has to. 257 00:13:14,040 --> 00:13:14,960 Speaker 5: Say as well. 258 00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:17,440 Speaker 8: And so if everyone raises their hand and says we're 259 00:13:17,480 --> 00:13:20,600 Speaker 8: done with this, then of course these are membership organizations. 260 00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:23,720 Speaker 8: These aren't the members themselves. But of course to be 261 00:13:23,760 --> 00:13:25,240 Speaker 8: a part of UEFA you have to be a member, 262 00:13:25,280 --> 00:13:29,640 Speaker 8: and I think FIFA as well. So if England, France, Mexico, 263 00:13:29,760 --> 00:13:32,120 Speaker 8: the US, all of these organizations are saying, no, who 264 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:34,680 Speaker 8: is going to be participating in this World Cup? And 265 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:37,120 Speaker 8: it's not just the twenty thirty one, it's next year's 266 00:13:37,160 --> 00:13:39,360 Speaker 8: Women's World Cup, and of course it's top of. 267 00:13:39,320 --> 00:13:41,560 Speaker 5: Mind as well. 268 00:13:41,760 --> 00:13:46,080 Speaker 4: One of the surprising aspects to me is JP Morgan 269 00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:50,240 Speaker 4: is advising FIFA here. I'm surprised JP Morgan's would get 270 00:13:50,240 --> 00:13:52,320 Speaker 4: within a million miles of this. 271 00:13:52,679 --> 00:13:54,560 Speaker 5: Well, Jason a lot. 272 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:58,319 Speaker 4: Of money and the potential political falloup distinctly. 273 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:01,600 Speaker 5: Yep, it's true. That's true. How JP Morgan tried to 274 00:14:01,600 --> 00:14:03,400 Speaker 5: do the Super League years ago that. 275 00:14:03,760 --> 00:14:07,719 Speaker 8: Fell apart as well, and then outside of that, the 276 00:14:07,840 --> 00:14:12,080 Speaker 8: upside is tremendous. You know, FIFA's talking about expanding the 277 00:14:12,120 --> 00:14:14,160 Speaker 8: World Cup to sixty four teams. I believe there was 278 00:14:14,200 --> 00:14:16,880 Speaker 8: a report from the Times of London that just dropped 279 00:14:16,880 --> 00:14:18,920 Speaker 8: a couple hours or maybe minutes ago that said that 280 00:14:18,960 --> 00:14:21,520 Speaker 8: they're trying to do this by August and the vote 281 00:14:21,760 --> 00:14:24,600 Speaker 8: for this four point two billion dollars would be in September. 282 00:14:24,800 --> 00:14:26,960 Speaker 8: So who stands the profit between now and then if 283 00:14:27,000 --> 00:14:29,960 Speaker 8: you expanded before this investment goes in, of course the 284 00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:31,760 Speaker 8: investors immediately make a. 285 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 5: Ton of money. 286 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:35,880 Speaker 2: Your colleague Jobs Turner in London wrote a really interesting 287 00:14:35,920 --> 00:14:39,760 Speaker 2: newsletter where he said FIFA's mistake was to value its 288 00:14:39,800 --> 00:14:42,040 Speaker 2: spin off at twenty billion dollars. What it should have 289 00:14:42,080 --> 00:14:45,240 Speaker 2: done is value it at five times that amount and 290 00:14:45,280 --> 00:14:47,800 Speaker 2: make it so that the members each country would get 291 00:14:47,800 --> 00:14:50,680 Speaker 2: even more of a payout, so that it'd be uneconomical 292 00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:51,880 Speaker 2: for them to say, no. 293 00:14:52,720 --> 00:14:54,960 Speaker 8: We were talking about this before, you know, we went live. 294 00:14:55,000 --> 00:14:57,000 Speaker 8: And if you are France, if you are England, if 295 00:14:57,040 --> 00:14:59,000 Speaker 8: you are Spain, if your Portugal, if your co issue, 296 00:14:59,000 --> 00:15:01,720 Speaker 8: twenty million dollars isn' but a good portion of these 297 00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,560 Speaker 8: soccer federations can make that money in their sleep, and 298 00:15:06,600 --> 00:15:09,760 Speaker 8: one hundred million dollars goes a long way. You know, 299 00:15:09,840 --> 00:15:11,640 Speaker 8: might be able to build a training facility, you might 300 00:15:11,680 --> 00:15:14,840 Speaker 8: be able to hire coaches that can better develop talent, 301 00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:17,400 Speaker 8: all of those things, whereas twenty million, I'm not so sure. 302 00:15:17,480 --> 00:15:19,440 Speaker 2: It's harder to say soccer's off for sale if you 303 00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:20,800 Speaker 2: get a one hundred million exactly. 304 00:15:20,840 --> 00:15:23,360 Speaker 8: And of course you have to remember that some of 305 00:15:23,400 --> 00:15:26,760 Speaker 8: the issues that exist in global football outside of Europe 306 00:15:26,760 --> 00:15:30,360 Speaker 8: are often the money distribution. So after you send this check, 307 00:15:30,400 --> 00:15:32,880 Speaker 8: who's going to be distributing the money. Is that person 308 00:15:32,960 --> 00:15:34,440 Speaker 8: going to be like, oh, we got twenty million dollars, 309 00:15:34,480 --> 00:15:35,480 Speaker 8: I'm going to take five of it. 310 00:15:35,560 --> 00:15:37,600 Speaker 5: Oh, no, one's looking. I'm going to take another two 311 00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:39,160 Speaker 5: and a half. And now you know you. 312 00:15:39,120 --> 00:15:41,360 Speaker 8: Have twelve and a half left to distribute amongst the players, 313 00:15:41,360 --> 00:15:43,440 Speaker 8: amongst other officials and everyone else like that. 314 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:45,240 Speaker 5: There's no governance over that. 315 00:15:45,360 --> 00:15:47,920 Speaker 8: It would just be a blank check to these federations 316 00:15:47,920 --> 00:15:49,160 Speaker 8: and then they would have to deal with it. 317 00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:51,960 Speaker 5: So it's on life support. 318 00:15:52,000 --> 00:15:55,080 Speaker 4: I would say, is Yuweifa and the other critics of 319 00:15:55,120 --> 00:15:57,560 Speaker 4: the FIFA's plan. Are they critical of the fact that 320 00:15:57,600 --> 00:16:01,720 Speaker 4: they're selling a piece of FIFA in general or is 321 00:16:01,760 --> 00:16:02,840 Speaker 4: it to whom they are? 322 00:16:02,880 --> 00:16:04,960 Speaker 5: So I think it's both. I think it's both. 323 00:16:05,440 --> 00:16:07,160 Speaker 8: Number one of this is that if you were going 324 00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:08,840 Speaker 8: to sell a part of this, then you would want 325 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:09,640 Speaker 8: to consult them. 326 00:16:09,520 --> 00:16:10,080 Speaker 5: To begin with. 327 00:16:10,480 --> 00:16:12,160 Speaker 8: You'd want to consult you atha, you would want to 328 00:16:12,200 --> 00:16:15,000 Speaker 8: consult concocasts, say hey, we're thinking about doing this. Then 329 00:16:15,040 --> 00:16:17,360 Speaker 8: you could say that you could get some preliminary thoughts 330 00:16:17,400 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 8: on it. 331 00:16:17,960 --> 00:16:20,360 Speaker 5: Everyone was shocked, you know, a week. 332 00:16:20,200 --> 00:16:22,720 Speaker 8: Ago or earlier this week when they dropped this and 333 00:16:22,760 --> 00:16:25,120 Speaker 8: said you know what we're going to be raising this money. 334 00:16:25,320 --> 00:16:27,560 Speaker 2: But your reporting has shown that these discussions have been 335 00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 2: going on for a while. 336 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:30,160 Speaker 5: It's not like it was last week exactly. 337 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:32,200 Speaker 8: So now that makes you think you go back all 338 00:16:32,200 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 8: the way to December of last year, President Trump gets 339 00:16:34,280 --> 00:16:36,960 Speaker 8: a Peace Prize and then we have, you know, these different. 340 00:16:36,720 --> 00:16:37,400 Speaker 5: Wars that go on. 341 00:16:37,440 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 8: But also how long has FIFA been considering this, knowing 342 00:16:40,720 --> 00:16:42,760 Speaker 8: that this was going to be the most successful World 343 00:16:42,800 --> 00:16:45,440 Speaker 8: Cup of all time? And why did FIFA not have 344 00:16:45,520 --> 00:16:47,760 Speaker 8: conversations with other private equity firms. 345 00:16:47,760 --> 00:16:50,040 Speaker 5: Such as CVC, such as A sixth Street. 346 00:16:50,080 --> 00:16:51,960 Speaker 8: I think there's a bunch of them who might be 347 00:16:52,040 --> 00:16:55,480 Speaker 8: interested in doing this, but those conversations probably did not happen. 348 00:16:55,560 --> 00:16:57,920 Speaker 4: It's called running a process. Why did they not run 349 00:16:57,920 --> 00:17:00,800 Speaker 4: a process? And the process is, here's a pitch book, 350 00:17:00,800 --> 00:17:03,240 Speaker 4: We're gonna sit out touncover yourself, right, yeah, and do 351 00:17:03,320 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 4: it and then you create competition, you drive up to 352 00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:07,320 Speaker 4: value all that kind of stuff. 353 00:17:07,320 --> 00:17:09,680 Speaker 5: And you brought up JP Morgan really quickly. What about 354 00:17:09,720 --> 00:17:10,320 Speaker 5: the other banks? 355 00:17:10,560 --> 00:17:10,760 Speaker 7: Why? 356 00:17:11,320 --> 00:17:12,160 Speaker 5: I'm not saying. 357 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:13,920 Speaker 8: There's anything wrong with JP Morgan, but I imagine that 358 00:17:13,960 --> 00:17:16,440 Speaker 8: there are other banks who might globally who might want 359 00:17:16,480 --> 00:17:17,960 Speaker 8: to be in understand. 360 00:17:17,600 --> 00:17:17,960 Speaker 5: And they're not. 361 00:17:18,840 --> 00:17:23,520 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, 362 00:17:23,720 --> 00:17:27,680 Speaker 1: and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday, 363 00:17:27,880 --> 00:17:31,159 Speaker 1: ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the 364 00:17:31,240 --> 00:17:35,119 Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You 365 00:17:35,160 --> 00:17:38,439 Speaker 1: can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and 366 00:17:38,640 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 1: always on the Bloomberg terminal