1 00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:03,440 Speaker 1: Cable news is ripping us apart, dividing the nation, making 2 00:00:03,440 --> 00:00:05,880 Speaker 1: it impossible to function as a society and to know 3 00:00:05,920 --> 00:00:08,680 Speaker 1: what is true and what is false. The good news 4 00:00:08,760 --> 00:00:10,800 Speaker 1: is that they're failing and they know it. That is 5 00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:14,840 Speaker 1: why we're building something new. Be part of creating a new, better, healthier, 6 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:17,920 Speaker 1: and more trustworthy mainstream by becoming a Breaking Points Premium 7 00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:21,520 Speaker 1: member today at breakingpoints dot com. Your hard earned money 8 00:00:21,560 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: is going to help us build for the midterms and 9 00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:27,320 Speaker 1: the upcoming presidential election so we can provide unparalleled coverage 10 00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:28,560 Speaker 1: of what is sure to be one of the most 11 00:00:28,600 --> 00:00:32,280 Speaker 1: pivotal moments in American history. So what are you waiting for? 12 00:00:32,479 --> 00:00:36,479 Speaker 1: Go to Breakingpoints dot com to help us out. Andrew 13 00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 1: Yang floating and interesting name for a potential president of 14 00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:42,280 Speaker 1: the United States in twenty twenty four, Go ahead and 15 00:00:42,280 --> 00:00:44,000 Speaker 1: throw this tear sheet up on the screen. This was 16 00:00:44,040 --> 00:00:47,720 Speaker 1: in his podcast which is called Forward, and he was 17 00:00:47,960 --> 00:00:51,840 Speaker 1: talking to comedian Shane Gillis. Remember Gillis was the one 18 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:54,600 Speaker 1: who actually was supposed to be on CNN on SNL 19 00:00:54,760 --> 00:00:57,400 Speaker 1: rather and he got canceled because he is I love 20 00:00:57,440 --> 00:00:59,880 Speaker 1: it like slurred some I don't even remember exactly what 21 00:00:59,920 --> 00:01:02,240 Speaker 1: he said, but Andrew Yang was one of the people 22 00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 1: that he like racially slurred, and then Yang came out 23 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:07,160 Speaker 1: and was like, don't make this guy looking. I don't care. 24 00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:09,320 Speaker 1: So anyway, they had this whole sit down conversation. I 25 00:01:09,319 --> 00:01:11,400 Speaker 1: actually did listen to the whole thing yesterday. But the 26 00:01:11,440 --> 00:01:14,120 Speaker 1: part that's making headlines here is Andrew Yang trying to 27 00:01:14,200 --> 00:01:17,760 Speaker 1: draft Matthew McConaughey, one of your faiths sager, for president, 28 00:01:18,080 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 1: saying we need him to get us out of this mess. 29 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:23,480 Speaker 1: Let me read you the transcript of what he says here. 30 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:26,360 Speaker 1: His analysis of the Democratic and the Republican Party says, 31 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 1: you have the Democratic Party establishment who are like, hey, 32 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:30,640 Speaker 1: you got to play by these rules, like we're going 33 00:01:30,680 --> 00:01:32,600 Speaker 1: to act a certain way. We're buttoned up, and we 34 00:01:32,640 --> 00:01:34,280 Speaker 1: have a certain way of presenting by the way I 35 00:01:34,360 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 1: ran for president and this career, Yang said, then you 36 00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:39,080 Speaker 1: have the Republican Party under Trump that's become this anti 37 00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:43,160 Speaker 1: institutional if everything burn it down kind of energy. He continued, 38 00:01:43,160 --> 00:01:46,360 Speaker 1: there's a Republican establishment within that that fought Trump and lost. 39 00:01:46,520 --> 00:01:48,680 Speaker 1: Now everyone's going along with it. You know, there has 40 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:51,639 Speaker 1: to be a kind of this positive ex institutional energy 41 00:01:51,640 --> 00:01:53,640 Speaker 1: that comes up and ends up being a third force 42 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:56,440 Speaker 1: in American politics. He lays out his plan for his 43 00:01:56,520 --> 00:01:59,800 Speaker 1: perfect ex institutional candidate. I'm not really sure what that means, 44 00:01:59,840 --> 00:02:02,400 Speaker 1: but anyway, my paragon example of this is someone like 45 00:02:02,680 --> 00:02:06,600 Speaker 1: Matthew McConaughey. Like, so, McConaughey is from outside institutions, but 46 00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:09,400 Speaker 1: he's not an asshole in the same way Donald Trump is. 47 00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:11,360 Speaker 1: So I look at someone like that and think, God, like, 48 00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:13,400 Speaker 1: that's the kind of figure we need to get us 49 00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:15,720 Speaker 1: out of this mess. Gillis chimes in and says, I 50 00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:18,120 Speaker 1: can't believe that's where we're at. Imagine as the country 51 00:02:18,160 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 1: ten years ago. Hopefully Matthew McConaughey can get us out 52 00:02:21,200 --> 00:02:24,079 Speaker 1: of this mess. Yang goes on to say, so you 53 00:02:24,120 --> 00:02:26,680 Speaker 1: can fill in figures for Matthew McConaughey, Mark Cubans in 54 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:29,360 Speaker 1: this category, the rocks in this category, some would say 55 00:02:29,440 --> 00:02:33,160 Speaker 1: Oprah Winfrey, and then it goes on from there. But 56 00:02:33,639 --> 00:02:36,160 Speaker 1: what do you think of this? Since you've been a McConaughey, 57 00:02:36,639 --> 00:02:39,920 Speaker 1: you've had your McConaughey flirtations here. Yeah, I like Matthew McConaughey. 58 00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:42,359 Speaker 1: I just don't think Look, I think that what happened 59 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:44,280 Speaker 1: with the gun thing actually shows that he can be 60 00:02:44,320 --> 00:02:47,040 Speaker 1: politically effective if he wants. But also he doesn't have 61 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:50,359 Speaker 1: necessarily the best instincts because he effectively aligned himself with 62 00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:52,320 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, which I think is fine, I mean, 63 00:02:52,360 --> 00:02:54,200 Speaker 1: because that's ultimately what he cared about, what he wanted 64 00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:57,400 Speaker 1: to do. But Andrew's not wrong. But at the same time, 65 00:02:57,520 --> 00:02:59,960 Speaker 1: I just look a lot of the third party move 66 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:03,000 Speaker 1: movement era and efforts that we would have right now 67 00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 1: just don't seem to be working. Right now really is 68 00:03:06,200 --> 00:03:09,720 Speaker 1: just a time of like deep partisan political division, and 69 00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:11,720 Speaker 1: from what I've seen, you know, the guys who I've 70 00:03:11,720 --> 00:03:13,080 Speaker 1: looked to, like the Rock you know, is a good 71 00:03:13,120 --> 00:03:15,079 Speaker 1: example I pointed to I thought he would be in Ax, 72 00:03:15,400 --> 00:03:17,160 Speaker 1: was like, oh, this guy's unificering. I mean, he denounces 73 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:21,400 Speaker 1: Rogan because of pressures from online wokes and you know, 74 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:24,160 Speaker 1: during the whole N word thing. So it's like all 75 00:03:24,200 --> 00:03:27,240 Speaker 1: of them ultimately just have pressures on them which make 76 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:29,640 Speaker 1: them unable to actually rise above what they need to. 77 00:03:30,040 --> 00:03:32,480 Speaker 1: Mark Cuban actually is not a bad example as somebody 78 00:03:32,480 --> 00:03:35,080 Speaker 1: who actually probably could do it of anybody and has 79 00:03:35,120 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 1: a decent story, but even then challenging the existing political 80 00:03:38,760 --> 00:03:41,720 Speaker 1: infrastructures is so difficult that I'm not sure it would work. 81 00:03:41,760 --> 00:03:43,800 Speaker 1: I think maybe in the future, maybe five six years 82 00:03:43,800 --> 00:03:46,200 Speaker 1: from now, when people are absolutely more disillusioned well with 83 00:03:46,240 --> 00:03:49,360 Speaker 1: the political system. The other part, it's not just the disillusionment, 84 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:52,960 Speaker 1: like there's plenty. I think the level of disillusionment is sufficient. 85 00:03:53,160 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: It's just the actual structure of that's the exactly problem. 86 00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 1: And so I think the efforts that Yang is pursuing 87 00:03:59,760 --> 00:04:03,920 Speaker 1: on things like rank choice voting and trying to reform 88 00:04:04,040 --> 00:04:07,240 Speaker 1: the electoral system so that there is a chance for 89 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:10,080 Speaker 1: third parties to have a real shot or at least 90 00:04:10,120 --> 00:04:12,760 Speaker 1: have more of an impact on American politics. I support 91 00:04:12,760 --> 00:04:14,600 Speaker 1: that one hundred percent. I think that would be an 92 00:04:14,600 --> 00:04:17,599 Speaker 1: incredible improvement. I think the fact that we're facing down 93 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,560 Speaker 1: this election where it's like Joe Biden versus Donald Trump, 94 00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:24,080 Speaker 1: two people that everyone's like not this again, please anything 95 00:04:24,120 --> 00:04:26,719 Speaker 1: but this, and there's almost like no way out of 96 00:04:26,760 --> 00:04:29,120 Speaker 1: it because of the way that our system is structured. 97 00:04:29,360 --> 00:04:32,440 Speaker 1: I think dealing with that problem is actually really important. 98 00:04:32,839 --> 00:04:36,040 Speaker 1: But we haven't dealt with that problem yet, and so 99 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:40,000 Speaker 1: at this point, the idea of any third party candidate 100 00:04:40,160 --> 00:04:43,520 Speaker 1: actually having a shot at being fully successful outside of 101 00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:46,280 Speaker 1: the two major parties. It's just fanciful. I mean, the 102 00:04:46,839 --> 00:04:50,720 Speaker 1: model is to come in from the outside and take 103 00:04:50,760 --> 00:04:53,360 Speaker 1: over one of the mainstream parties. That's what we've seen 104 00:04:53,400 --> 00:04:55,400 Speaker 1: work in the past, and in a way, the Reagan 105 00:04:55,480 --> 00:04:59,320 Speaker 1: Revolution was was that in the Republican Party, where you know, 106 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:02,880 Speaker 1: prior to that, Republicans had been more or less in 107 00:05:02,920 --> 00:05:06,560 Speaker 1: acquiescence with major provisions of the New Deal. And then 108 00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:09,320 Speaker 1: Reagan comes in, he takes over the party apparatus that 109 00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:12,640 Speaker 1: had started with the Goldwater Revolution. He takes that and 110 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:16,520 Speaker 1: he completely transforms and takes over the party. You see 111 00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:19,600 Speaker 1: that with Bill Clinton and the DLC in the Democratic 112 00:05:19,640 --> 00:05:22,159 Speaker 1: Party in the nineties. You see it sort of with 113 00:05:22,279 --> 00:05:25,360 Speaker 1: Trump and the Republican Party in recent years, even though 114 00:05:25,400 --> 00:05:29,080 Speaker 1: he ends up really governing more like a traditional Reagan 115 00:05:29,160 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 1: you know, Republican than he had sort of presented himself 116 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:36,560 Speaker 1: in the campaign in twenty sixteen. But you know, I mean, 117 00:05:37,120 --> 00:05:39,359 Speaker 1: I obviously have issues with all of these people that 118 00:05:39,400 --> 00:05:41,240 Speaker 1: he floats. They're all these sort of like you know, 119 00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:44,760 Speaker 1: enlightened centrist types that it's not even really clear what 120 00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:49,480 Speaker 1: they actually believe or stand for, would fight for, which 121 00:05:49,520 --> 00:05:51,799 Speaker 1: means that you're going to be buffeted by the wins 122 00:05:51,839 --> 00:05:54,880 Speaker 1: of like you know, this one says they're offended at that, 123 00:05:55,160 --> 00:05:57,760 Speaker 1: or that one says they're that you should be going 124 00:05:57,760 --> 00:06:00,640 Speaker 1: in this direction. To me, it's really important you have 125 00:06:00,680 --> 00:06:03,200 Speaker 1: candidates who are very clear on where they stand, what 126 00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 1: they're going to fight for, and what their program and 127 00:06:04,960 --> 00:06:08,680 Speaker 1: agenda is. But yeah, so led politics are hard. Reagan 128 00:06:08,839 --> 00:06:10,440 Speaker 1: was an example actually of that because they had a 129 00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:13,520 Speaker 1: legitimate ideological agenda and he was former government in California, 130 00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: so he was able to translate his like showman, his 131 00:06:16,800 --> 00:06:20,920 Speaker 1: showmanship with an actual like governing in practice. He had 132 00:06:20,920 --> 00:06:25,360 Speaker 1: a deep ideological, like right philosophy, thought out philosophy. Yeah, 133 00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:26,960 Speaker 1: it's very interesting actually to kind of see it. So 134 00:06:26,960 --> 00:06:28,320 Speaker 1: I think if anybody was going to do it, they 135 00:06:28,360 --> 00:06:29,920 Speaker 1: have to do it in the way that Reagan did, 136 00:06:30,000 --> 00:06:32,160 Speaker 1: or even Trump. I mean, to his credit, Trump effectively 137 00:06:32,160 --> 00:06:34,080 Speaker 1: believed the same thing for like thirty five years for 138 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:38,000 Speaker 1: the care of his campaign getting ripped off China, same 139 00:06:38,040 --> 00:06:39,480 Speaker 1: thing over. I mean, you could go back and watch 140 00:06:39,480 --> 00:06:41,039 Speaker 1: a clip of him for I think he was on 141 00:06:41,080 --> 00:06:43,840 Speaker 1: Oprah in like nineteen seventy nine and he was saying 142 00:06:43,880 --> 00:06:46,680 Speaker 1: the exact same thing. It was shocking really actually to 143 00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:48,640 Speaker 1: go ahead and watch. So it has to be somebody 144 00:06:48,960 --> 00:06:50,719 Speaker 1: like that. It's a very unique set of skills that 145 00:06:50,720 --> 00:06:52,480 Speaker 1: could get you there. Again, to be clear, I think 146 00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:54,880 Speaker 1: McConaughey could do it if he wanted to, but he 147 00:06:54,920 --> 00:06:57,200 Speaker 1: has to make different choices than the ones he's currently making. 148 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:02,480 Speaker 1: Something we have been tracking very closely here is how 149 00:07:02,520 --> 00:07:06,480 Speaker 1: the housing market will respond to the FED raising interest rates. 150 00:07:06,560 --> 00:07:09,120 Speaker 1: And we already have brought to you how just these 151 00:07:09,160 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 1: small moves the FED has made so far have had 152 00:07:12,320 --> 00:07:15,360 Speaker 1: massive implications in terms of the cost of borrowing and 153 00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:19,040 Speaker 1: the mortgage interest rates, and that has a huge effect 154 00:07:19,160 --> 00:07:22,000 Speaker 1: on people's ability to ultimately purchase a home. We're now 155 00:07:22,080 --> 00:07:25,360 Speaker 1: starting to see the data that in the housing market, 156 00:07:25,400 --> 00:07:27,360 Speaker 1: I mean, there really is kind of an imminent collapse 157 00:07:27,360 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 1: coming and we're seeing the early warning sides. Go ahead 158 00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:32,040 Speaker 1: and put this up on the screen. So home sale 159 00:07:32,440 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 1: cancelations jumped in June as buyers backed away. Sixty thousand 160 00:07:37,880 --> 00:07:41,760 Speaker 1: deals fell through, equal to fifteen percent of homes that 161 00:07:41,960 --> 00:07:45,480 Speaker 1: entered into contract. This is by far the highest number 162 00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:48,240 Speaker 1: that we have seen since the beginning of the pandemic, 163 00:07:48,360 --> 00:07:52,240 Speaker 1: when the entire economy collapsed and was shut down, and 164 00:07:52,280 --> 00:07:54,559 Speaker 1: at that point people said, who wo wo, I can't 165 00:07:54,560 --> 00:07:56,160 Speaker 1: go through with this because I'm not sure I'm going 166 00:07:56,240 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 1: to have a job. We are now back to approaching 167 00:07:59,520 --> 00:08:02,840 Speaker 1: those LEFS levels in terms of home sale cancelation. So again, 168 00:08:03,200 --> 00:08:07,920 Speaker 1: nearly eight about fifteen percent of homes that buyers you know, 169 00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 1: are planning to buy, they enter into a contract, are 170 00:08:10,640 --> 00:08:14,840 Speaker 1: being canceled, and they're backing away from and directly directly 171 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:16,920 Speaker 1: tied to the actions that the FED is taking here 172 00:08:16,920 --> 00:08:18,840 Speaker 1: cancel rate. Like I said, it hasn't been this high 173 00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:21,840 Speaker 1: basically since twenty twenty, like right after that, and it's 174 00:08:21,880 --> 00:08:24,120 Speaker 1: continuing to rise to precipitous rate. It's just going to 175 00:08:24,120 --> 00:08:26,080 Speaker 1: continue to rise, and if it gets to the twenty 176 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:28,040 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five percent, it's just going to make the 177 00:08:28,040 --> 00:08:30,920 Speaker 1: housing market even more of a chaos. And something I've 178 00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:33,720 Speaker 1: been trying to point to is when high priced buyers 179 00:08:33,760 --> 00:08:36,200 Speaker 1: are pushed out of the home market. Let's be honest, 180 00:08:36,200 --> 00:08:38,040 Speaker 1: the home market is mostly for upper middle class people 181 00:08:38,080 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 1: at this point, just given what the poessionally, I mean, 182 00:08:39,840 --> 00:08:42,640 Speaker 1: the media, housing prices half a million dollars in sanity, 183 00:08:42,679 --> 00:08:44,000 Speaker 1: So you have the upper middle class just to be 184 00:08:44,040 --> 00:08:46,680 Speaker 1: able to get into it. Well, whenever the interest rates 185 00:08:46,679 --> 00:08:48,280 Speaker 1: get it so that not even the upper class can 186 00:08:48,320 --> 00:08:50,680 Speaker 1: only the basically the upper class can be the people 187 00:08:50,679 --> 00:08:52,440 Speaker 1: who afford it. Then the upper middle class are going 188 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:53,840 Speaker 1: to turn to the renting market and they are going 189 00:08:53,880 --> 00:08:56,959 Speaker 1: to rent luxury property and squeeze everybody down the value chain, 190 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:58,640 Speaker 1: which is going to increase the price of the rent. 191 00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:01,680 Speaker 1: We're seeing this all ready in how doest housing markets 192 00:09:01,840 --> 00:09:04,520 Speaker 1: across the country, which was a response to rising rates. 193 00:09:04,559 --> 00:09:06,760 Speaker 1: So where the rates are where they are right now, 194 00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:09,960 Speaker 1: it's a total disaster because it pushes people into a 195 00:09:10,000 --> 00:09:13,360 Speaker 1: place where they have to be able to choose between 196 00:09:13,440 --> 00:09:15,320 Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know why anyone would basically choose 197 00:09:15,320 --> 00:09:17,320 Speaker 1: to have a six percent mortgage rate. Is what I 198 00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:19,280 Speaker 1: was also looking at. And another thing that makes this 199 00:09:19,320 --> 00:09:22,280 Speaker 1: more dangerous, I didn't realize this. When rates go up 200 00:09:22,280 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 1: to like six percent, it no longer is necessarily to 201 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:28,280 Speaker 1: your benefit to take the fixed rate mortgage, which creates 202 00:09:28,280 --> 00:09:30,720 Speaker 1: all Again I'm not a mortgage expert, but there are 203 00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:33,560 Speaker 1: all other kinds of like wonky adjustable rate type mortgages 204 00:09:33,559 --> 00:09:34,960 Speaker 1: that you can go for where you might be able 205 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:37,200 Speaker 1: to pay less at least in the long term. But 206 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:39,400 Speaker 1: those are much more subject to market conditions that are 207 00:09:39,400 --> 00:09:41,600 Speaker 1: not as locked in and friendly as the consumer more 208 00:09:41,640 --> 00:09:44,080 Speaker 1: subject to financialization. So what I was reading is that 209 00:09:44,480 --> 00:09:47,120 Speaker 1: by increasing their mortgage rate and going away from the 210 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:50,360 Speaker 1: low fixed rate mortgages typical of the last ten to 211 00:09:50,400 --> 00:09:52,800 Speaker 1: fifteen years, or yeah, I guess the last ten years 212 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:55,360 Speaker 1: of low interest rates from the FED, it changes the 213 00:09:55,360 --> 00:09:57,960 Speaker 1: whole dynamics of all of us housing, which is just 214 00:09:57,960 --> 00:10:01,360 Speaker 1: not good. Yes, interesting, Well, the dustible rate mortgages were 215 00:10:01,440 --> 00:10:04,720 Speaker 1: part of the story in terms of the housing collapse, 216 00:10:05,200 --> 00:10:07,760 Speaker 1: because you remember they had the ballooning payments that consumers 217 00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:10,080 Speaker 1: didn't understand what they were getting into at the beginning, 218 00:10:10,400 --> 00:10:13,160 Speaker 1: and then their payment jumps and escalates to a point 219 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:16,520 Speaker 1: where immediately they can't afford it, and they're being pushed down, 220 00:10:16,600 --> 00:10:19,319 Speaker 1: essentially because they were tricked into signing onto something that 221 00:10:19,920 --> 00:10:23,480 Speaker 1: was well outside of what their actual means were. I mean, 222 00:10:23,520 --> 00:10:26,160 Speaker 1: this is what we're saying, Like, I think it's really 223 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:29,360 Speaker 1: important that you understand. This is the goal of our 224 00:10:29,400 --> 00:10:33,120 Speaker 1: policymakers is to make it impossible for you to buy 225 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:37,160 Speaker 1: a house. To tank the housing market with follow on effects, 226 00:10:37,160 --> 00:10:39,800 Speaker 1: as you're pointing out in the rental market as well. 227 00:10:40,040 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 1: This is their goal because they are unable because of 228 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:47,080 Speaker 1: political gridlock and lack of political imagination to deal with 229 00:10:47,160 --> 00:10:50,880 Speaker 1: the supply side issues that are fueling inflation. So the 230 00:10:50,920 --> 00:10:53,280 Speaker 1: only thing they can do is like take a hammer 231 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:56,240 Speaker 1: to the American consumer, and the housing market is the 232 00:10:56,280 --> 00:11:01,319 Speaker 1: area that is most sensitive typically to these FED rate increases. 233 00:11:01,480 --> 00:11:04,040 Speaker 1: The other thing that you pointed to before, which is 234 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:07,320 Speaker 1: a part of this picture, Americans have never paid higher 235 00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:11,640 Speaker 1: interest rates to finance car purchases, so also in terms 236 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:14,080 Speaker 1: of being able to afford a vehicle to be able 237 00:11:14,080 --> 00:11:17,200 Speaker 1: to get to and from work, consumers are already being 238 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:21,280 Speaker 1: hit really, really hard, and we are just at the 239 00:11:21,320 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 1: beginning of what the FED is ultimately planning to do. 240 00:11:26,240 --> 00:11:30,120 Speaker 1: So you know, it's a real warning sign that this 241 00:11:30,240 --> 00:11:32,920 Speaker 1: early on you're seeing these kind of dire numbers in 242 00:11:33,000 --> 00:11:35,360 Speaker 1: terms of home sale cancelations. People who thought they were 243 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:37,400 Speaker 1: going to be able to, you know, to purchase a 244 00:11:37,440 --> 00:11:40,400 Speaker 1: home maybe for the first time, you know, maybe be 245 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:43,280 Speaker 1: able to move somewhere that was better for them for 246 00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 1: their family, and they're having to say, I just can't 247 00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:48,000 Speaker 1: do it right now for these rates yeah. I mean, 248 00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:49,839 Speaker 1: you could delay it for ten years. Who knows whenever 249 00:11:49,840 --> 00:11:51,120 Speaker 1: these things are going to come back, and then you're 250 00:11:51,120 --> 00:11:53,600 Speaker 1: going to be what like forty five fifty in your 251 00:11:53,600 --> 00:11:57,480 Speaker 1: own house. Yeah, not good. Not good. Nina Jankowitz is 252 00:11:57,559 --> 00:12:01,240 Speaker 1: the person who just simply will not disappears the gift 253 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:03,360 Speaker 1: gifts she keeps on giving, at least to us. She's 254 00:12:03,400 --> 00:12:06,880 Speaker 1: been recently appeared on the Brian Stelter program over at 255 00:12:06,960 --> 00:12:11,079 Speaker 1: CNN to deny that she ever herself spread disinformation while 256 00:12:11,160 --> 00:12:13,760 Speaker 1: she was the head of the Disinformation Governance Board. Let's 257 00:12:13,760 --> 00:12:16,840 Speaker 1: take a listen. I, you know, did not post disinformation. 258 00:12:16,960 --> 00:12:19,920 Speaker 1: The folks that are honing in on tweets that I 259 00:12:20,080 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 1: sent in twenty sixteen when I had fewer than a 260 00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:26,720 Speaker 1: thousand Twitter followers that you know, I was just sharing 261 00:12:26,760 --> 00:12:29,600 Speaker 1: information about a presidential election as it was happening, as 262 00:12:29,640 --> 00:12:32,160 Speaker 1: millions of other Americans were doing, using their right to 263 00:12:32,200 --> 00:12:35,080 Speaker 1: freedom of speech. That wasn't disinformation, right, it was just 264 00:12:35,120 --> 00:12:38,680 Speaker 1: sharing news. Other people honed in on tweets that were 265 00:12:38,760 --> 00:12:41,440 Speaker 1: they completely stripped of context. The one that the conservatives 266 00:12:41,440 --> 00:12:44,559 Speaker 1: loved to really amplify was a tweet that they claimed 267 00:12:45,280 --> 00:12:48,679 Speaker 1: that that made me seem like I was calling the 268 00:12:48,760 --> 00:12:51,520 Speaker 1: Hunter Biden laptop disinformation, when in fact I was just 269 00:12:51,640 --> 00:12:55,000 Speaker 1: live tweeting a debate, you know, saying the exact words 270 00:12:55,040 --> 00:12:58,000 Speaker 1: that then candidate Biden and President Trump were saying during 271 00:12:58,000 --> 00:13:00,960 Speaker 1: a debate, totally stripped of context. So you still think 272 00:13:01,800 --> 00:13:06,280 Speaker 1: further into the context, so you still think you were right. Absolutely, 273 00:13:06,320 --> 00:13:07,960 Speaker 1: I was the right. Hire Also that's not true what 274 00:13:08,000 --> 00:13:10,000 Speaker 1: she was saying. She was live tweeting it, and also 275 00:13:10,040 --> 00:13:12,920 Speaker 1: trying to add the context about how the laptop which 276 00:13:12,960 --> 00:13:15,720 Speaker 1: she was calling disinformation, she's spreading a little bit of 277 00:13:15,920 --> 00:13:18,880 Speaker 1: just spreading disinformation. Disinformation there about what you go on 278 00:13:19,000 --> 00:13:21,600 Speaker 1: forever at the number of things that this lady said 279 00:13:21,640 --> 00:13:24,320 Speaker 1: which were straight up false. She was promoting the Hunter 280 00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:27,559 Speaker 1: Biden conspiracy that it was some Russian plant. I mean, 281 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:31,960 Speaker 1: she was even an election truther twenty sixteen with Hillary, 282 00:13:32,120 --> 00:13:35,600 Speaker 1: I mean, on COVID, was spreading all kinds of insanity. 283 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:39,600 Speaker 1: She literally tweeted please lock us down in like March 284 00:13:39,600 --> 00:13:42,360 Speaker 1: of twenty twenty. So listen, it's very clear that she 285 00:13:42,440 --> 00:13:44,679 Speaker 1: was not the right person of any authority to be 286 00:13:44,760 --> 00:13:46,640 Speaker 1: the arbiter or not. I also think it is a 287 00:13:46,679 --> 00:13:49,920 Speaker 1: ludicrous interview because he didn't even push back, He didn't 288 00:13:49,920 --> 00:13:51,520 Speaker 1: ask her about any of the specifics, and he's just 289 00:13:51,640 --> 00:13:53,360 Speaker 1: let her be like, yeah, I was the right person. No, 290 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:57,120 Speaker 1: I didn't spread any any untruths or misinformation. What is that? Also, 291 00:13:57,160 --> 00:13:59,400 Speaker 1: why don't you here's the other thing? If his show 292 00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 1: is called Really Sources, So you're talking to a former 293 00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:04,280 Speaker 1: government official who was trying to decide what's true and 294 00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:08,080 Speaker 1: what's not and was actively pushing meetings with social media 295 00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:10,480 Speaker 1: companies like Twitter, including the person who actually sends her 296 00:14:10,480 --> 00:14:12,839 Speaker 1: the Hunter Byden laptop story over Twitter. Why don't you 297 00:14:12,840 --> 00:14:16,600 Speaker 1: ask her about that's open source information that's available right now. Yeah, 298 00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:19,360 Speaker 1: I know why they are incapable of doing this. Even 299 00:14:19,360 --> 00:14:23,160 Speaker 1: some of his colleagues at CNN were uncomfortable with and 300 00:14:23,400 --> 00:14:29,480 Speaker 1: asked hard questions, Remember about dash was exactly Yeah, difficult 301 00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:33,080 Speaker 1: questions of the DHS secretary about what exactly this board 302 00:14:33,200 --> 00:14:36,280 Speaker 1: is and what exactly this board does, which you know, 303 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:39,880 Speaker 1: I mean as cringe as Nina Jankowitz is. That's really 304 00:14:39,920 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 1: the bigger problem is that it would not be better, 305 00:14:43,280 --> 00:14:45,880 Speaker 1: it would not be a good outcome if they put 306 00:14:45,920 --> 00:14:48,400 Speaker 1: a less cringe person as the head of this board. 307 00:14:48,480 --> 00:14:50,840 Speaker 1: This board just should not exist. That's really the bottom 308 00:14:50,840 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 1: line here. Ultimately, Now, in a way, they kind of 309 00:14:54,040 --> 00:14:56,080 Speaker 1: did us a favor by picking someone who was so 310 00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:59,160 Speaker 1: clearly not a neutral actor, who had, you know, herself's 311 00:14:59,400 --> 00:15:04,520 Speaker 1: spreading great questionable and outright false information, because it made 312 00:15:04,560 --> 00:15:06,760 Speaker 1: it much easier for people to be able to sort 313 00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:09,200 Speaker 1: of go on the offense and say this idea is 314 00:15:09,280 --> 00:15:11,560 Speaker 1: ludicrous and this is really not something that the government 315 00:15:11,560 --> 00:15:14,000 Speaker 1: should be doing whatsoever. And we literally never got a 316 00:15:14,000 --> 00:15:16,520 Speaker 1: straight answer about what this board was meant to do. 317 00:15:17,000 --> 00:15:20,400 Speaker 1: They would, on one hand, be like, stop warrant, like 318 00:15:20,440 --> 00:15:22,600 Speaker 1: this is no big deal. This board is barely a thing, 319 00:15:22,800 --> 00:15:24,840 Speaker 1: like it barely is going to do anything. And on 320 00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 1: the other hand, they'd be like, this is an attack 321 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 1: on our ability to deal with misinformation, and this is 322 00:15:30,320 --> 00:15:33,800 Speaker 1: so super important that you let us have our truth 323 00:15:33,840 --> 00:15:40,160 Speaker 1: board here at at the DHS. So anyway, it's interesting 324 00:15:40,200 --> 00:15:42,200 Speaker 1: all around. I wonder how long Brian Stelter is going 325 00:15:42,240 --> 00:15:44,120 Speaker 1: to continue to have a show. I would love that, listen. 326 00:15:44,360 --> 00:15:46,120 Speaker 1: I would love a lot of rumors that he might 327 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:48,280 Speaker 1: be on the shopping block is part of the new 328 00:15:48,360 --> 00:15:52,040 Speaker 1: regime at CNN, So we'll see totally, absolutely all right 329 00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:57,120 Speaker 1: more for you. Ell lator, Hey everyone, this is Ken Clippenstein, 330 00:15:57,120 --> 00:16:00,520 Speaker 1: investigative reporter with the intercept. I'm doing Breaking Points Intersect edition. 331 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:05,320 Speaker 1: Joined with me here is Jonathan Geyer, senior foreign policy 332 00:16:05,960 --> 00:16:08,960 Speaker 1: writer for Vox. Thanks for having me. Ken, good to 333 00:16:09,000 --> 00:16:10,840 Speaker 1: talk to you. We'll be talking to you about a 334 00:16:10,880 --> 00:16:14,400 Speaker 1: story that he had about Saudi Arabia in which I 335 00:16:14,400 --> 00:16:17,840 Speaker 1: think the title very succinctly captures what exactly is going 336 00:16:17,840 --> 00:16:20,480 Speaker 1: on here, which is Biden distanced himself from Sauda Arabia 337 00:16:20,560 --> 00:16:24,800 Speaker 1: until gas prices got bad, and so I think one 338 00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:26,720 Speaker 1: of the most important parts of this story is how 339 00:16:27,640 --> 00:16:29,880 Speaker 1: you are able to get at the tension between what 340 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:32,520 Speaker 1: Biden said was going to be a human rights centered 341 00:16:32,560 --> 00:16:36,120 Speaker 1: foreign policy and a foreign policy for the middle class, 342 00:16:36,520 --> 00:16:38,680 Speaker 1: that is, one in which he holds the Saudi Crown 343 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:42,240 Speaker 1: Prince Mohammed Bencelman or MBS as he's called accountable for, 344 00:16:42,400 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 1: you know, his murder, of his role in the murder 345 00:16:45,320 --> 00:16:50,720 Speaker 1: of Jamal Kashogi, Washington Post journalist, and the fact that 346 00:16:51,120 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 1: gas prices are you know, soaring, and that that's something 347 00:16:53,680 --> 00:16:59,200 Speaker 1: that's you know, hurting, is political approval rating. So could 348 00:16:59,200 --> 00:17:01,280 Speaker 1: you explain that a little bit. Yeah. So I would 349 00:17:01,280 --> 00:17:04,000 Speaker 1: say there are kind of two bumper stickers of Biden's 350 00:17:04,040 --> 00:17:08,200 Speaker 1: foreign policy. One is, as you say, centering human rights. Obviously, 351 00:17:08,240 --> 00:17:11,920 Speaker 1: he called Saudi Arabia Paria on the campaign trail. There 352 00:17:11,920 --> 00:17:15,040 Speaker 1: seem to be real hope from human rights defenders that 353 00:17:15,320 --> 00:17:17,880 Speaker 1: there would be a different US policy towards Saudi Arabia. 354 00:17:18,000 --> 00:17:19,919 Speaker 1: But you have the other bumper sticker, which is a 355 00:17:19,960 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 1: foreign policy for the middle class. And I think as 356 00:17:23,080 --> 00:17:25,720 Speaker 1: inflation is soaring, as the economy is in a tight 357 00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:29,160 Speaker 1: spot right now, that really means dealing with gas prices 358 00:17:29,320 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 1: in Saudi Arabia, big energy producer. Now, the experts I 359 00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:36,320 Speaker 1: spoke to think the changes, as you probably know well, 360 00:17:36,359 --> 00:17:39,159 Speaker 1: will be pretty marginal in terms of more gas on 361 00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:42,560 Speaker 1: the market and lower prices. But I think the president 362 00:17:42,600 --> 00:17:45,160 Speaker 1: wants to look like he's doing everything he can possibly 363 00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:48,040 Speaker 1: do and lead up to the midterms. But this means 364 00:17:48,280 --> 00:17:51,879 Speaker 1: these two bumper stickers are kind of in a collision, 365 00:17:52,440 --> 00:17:56,200 Speaker 1: and it looks really awkward, very awkward. And for example, 366 00:17:56,359 --> 00:17:58,520 Speaker 1: Biden actually penned an op ed in the Washington Post, 367 00:17:58,560 --> 00:18:01,159 Speaker 1: which again that was the paper that Jamal Kashogi wrote for, 368 00:18:01,520 --> 00:18:03,760 Speaker 1: in which he just addresses the public and says why 369 00:18:03,800 --> 00:18:07,560 Speaker 1: I'm going to Saudi Arabia because recall, during the presidential primary, 370 00:18:07,760 --> 00:18:10,480 Speaker 1: he vowed to make sat Arabia and nbsa quote pariah, 371 00:18:10,640 --> 00:18:13,639 Speaker 1: and that's language that there doesn't leave much room for interpretation. 372 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:16,120 Speaker 1: You know, it's pretty plain spoken language, and now he's 373 00:18:16,160 --> 00:18:19,520 Speaker 1: you know, abrogating that because of I just wish that. 374 00:18:19,600 --> 00:18:22,439 Speaker 1: I mean, if you read that op ed that the 375 00:18:22,480 --> 00:18:25,159 Speaker 1: president wrote, it's kind of interesting itself. I search for 376 00:18:25,200 --> 00:18:27,680 Speaker 1: the word oil, you know, which is your piece suggests 377 00:18:27,720 --> 00:18:30,800 Speaker 1: is clearly a big factor in what's going on here. 378 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:32,960 Speaker 1: That word appears one time in the entire op ed. 379 00:18:33,280 --> 00:18:35,240 Speaker 1: On the other hand, it seems like the trip started 380 00:18:35,280 --> 00:18:38,560 Speaker 1: being about oil, right, and now it's kind of about security. 381 00:18:38,680 --> 00:18:40,840 Speaker 1: It's about all these other things. So that's what's interesting. 382 00:18:40,880 --> 00:18:42,800 Speaker 1: You search that that piece that he wrote, the word 383 00:18:42,880 --> 00:18:46,000 Speaker 1: Israel comes up like a dozen times, and exactly to 384 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:48,600 Speaker 1: some extent, he's sort of hiding behind this. Oh you know, 385 00:18:48,720 --> 00:18:50,679 Speaker 1: we're going to have this normalization. This is what you 386 00:18:50,760 --> 00:18:53,639 Speaker 1: like the israelis, right, guys. So don't worry about, you know, 387 00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:56,040 Speaker 1: what I said about making Saturabia pariah, because I've got 388 00:18:56,080 --> 00:18:58,160 Speaker 1: this other thing that you care about that we're doing, 389 00:18:59,240 --> 00:19:01,040 Speaker 1: and so I mean, and that's I think that's sort 390 00:19:01,040 --> 00:19:02,520 Speaker 1: of going to be the messaging going forward. I think 391 00:19:02,560 --> 00:19:05,160 Speaker 1: there's an open question as to, as you say, whether 392 00:19:05,359 --> 00:19:08,080 Speaker 1: the middle class is going to be getting anything out 393 00:19:08,119 --> 00:19:12,440 Speaker 1: of that. Well, come on, Jamal Hashoji was a Virginia resident. 394 00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:15,520 Speaker 1: He was writing for the local paper of Washington d C. 395 00:19:16,080 --> 00:19:18,320 Speaker 1: I mean, maybe a foreign policy for the middle class 396 00:19:18,359 --> 00:19:22,680 Speaker 1: would address, you know, the heinous assassination and dismemberment of 397 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:25,879 Speaker 1: one of our own a columnist, a journalist. And I 398 00:19:25,920 --> 00:19:29,000 Speaker 1: spoke with a human rights defender from Saudi Arabia this morning, 399 00:19:29,040 --> 00:19:31,119 Speaker 1: and you know what she told me is, this is 400 00:19:31,160 --> 00:19:34,400 Speaker 1: a police state. There's all these superficial changes that MBS, 401 00:19:34,480 --> 00:19:37,760 Speaker 1: the Saudi crum prince has put forward. You have movie theaters, 402 00:19:38,080 --> 00:19:40,720 Speaker 1: you have some women driving, you have concerts that there 403 00:19:40,720 --> 00:19:44,760 Speaker 1: has been opening up on some level culturally. But there's 404 00:19:44,800 --> 00:19:47,960 Speaker 1: been a huge backsliding on his own promises. There's been 405 00:19:49,000 --> 00:19:53,960 Speaker 1: capital punishment of miners in Saudi Arabia, there's you know, 406 00:19:54,200 --> 00:19:56,520 Speaker 1: continued to be a crackdown on free speech. There is 407 00:19:56,520 --> 00:19:58,400 Speaker 1: no free speech. Then they jailed some of the women 408 00:19:58,440 --> 00:20:01,560 Speaker 1: that were demonstrating for women in women's rights, women's driving. 409 00:20:02,040 --> 00:20:05,320 Speaker 1: So there's huge contradictions, just a bundle of contradictions with 410 00:20:05,359 --> 00:20:08,520 Speaker 1: all this this kind of picture of him kind of 411 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:11,679 Speaker 1: modernizing the society, which you know, there there's there's something 412 00:20:11,680 --> 00:20:14,160 Speaker 1: to that. I'm not saying there's nothing, but but yeah, 413 00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:16,320 Speaker 1: as as as you point out, there's all sorts of 414 00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:19,159 Speaker 1: ways that he's backsled. I just think that there's a 415 00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:23,360 Speaker 1: lack of candor in this town for a variety of reasons, 416 00:20:23,760 --> 00:20:25,800 Speaker 1: and and from the president. I wish the President would 417 00:20:25,800 --> 00:20:28,520 Speaker 1: just come out and talk about the you know, economic 418 00:20:28,560 --> 00:20:31,119 Speaker 1: consequences of this. The American people are adults. They can 419 00:20:31,200 --> 00:20:34,560 Speaker 1: understand the situation we're in in which not not just 420 00:20:34,640 --> 00:20:39,320 Speaker 1: our economy internally, but then the Russians are enjoying a 421 00:20:39,359 --> 00:20:42,119 Speaker 1: bonanza of profits in their war of aggression against the 422 00:20:42,240 --> 00:20:46,080 Speaker 1: Ukrainians because they're working with Russia. The two these are 423 00:20:46,080 --> 00:20:50,080 Speaker 1: the two biggest oil producers in Opek and keeping production low, 424 00:20:50,119 --> 00:20:53,280 Speaker 1: which has the effect of driving prices up and and 425 00:20:53,440 --> 00:20:58,800 Speaker 1: financing this government that's doing this UH horrible invasion uh 426 00:20:59,080 --> 00:21:01,760 Speaker 1: and and undercutting the sanctions that we're putting on them 427 00:21:01,760 --> 00:21:04,640 Speaker 1: to try to prevent them from proceeding with all this. 428 00:21:05,359 --> 00:21:07,639 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm very worried about the optics of this 429 00:21:07,720 --> 00:21:11,159 Speaker 1: trip because you know, President Biden is going to be 430 00:21:11,240 --> 00:21:15,000 Speaker 1: shaking hands or in a meeting with MBS. Now what 431 00:21:15,119 --> 00:21:18,439 Speaker 1: messages that send who's the superpower here. It's a major 432 00:21:18,520 --> 00:21:21,479 Speaker 1: about face and climb down for Biden. And you know 433 00:21:21,520 --> 00:21:23,679 Speaker 1: Biden has said for the past eighteen months, I'm not 434 00:21:23,720 --> 00:21:26,480 Speaker 1: going to meet with MBS. My technical counterpart is the king, 435 00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:30,240 Speaker 1: So I'm just going to interact with NBS's father. Everyone 436 00:21:30,320 --> 00:21:33,719 Speaker 1: knows NBS is effectively, you know, the CEO of the country. 437 00:21:33,760 --> 00:21:37,240 Speaker 1: He's running everything. But maybe this was a bad policy 438 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:40,560 Speaker 1: because now this incredible u turn. Maybe it would have 439 00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:44,240 Speaker 1: been better to deliver that intelligence report about Hashoji's killing, 440 00:21:44,600 --> 00:21:46,720 Speaker 1: you know, from the President to MBS in that first 441 00:21:46,760 --> 00:21:49,560 Speaker 1: meeting eighteen months ago, and say, look, this has got 442 00:21:49,560 --> 00:21:54,120 Speaker 1: to change. We need some accountability here. The relationship has 443 00:21:54,160 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 1: just totally gone off the rails. Saudi Arabia was always 444 00:21:57,320 --> 00:22:00,679 Speaker 1: a conservative kingdom, but it was a consultative king The 445 00:22:00,760 --> 00:22:03,720 Speaker 1: royal family had a role, it was it was governed 446 00:22:03,720 --> 00:22:07,160 Speaker 1: by consensus. Now you have this guy who many many 447 00:22:07,200 --> 00:22:10,920 Speaker 1: experts have compared to Saddam Hussein, who's in his thirties. 448 00:22:10,960 --> 00:22:14,000 Speaker 1: He could be running the country for another half century, 449 00:22:14,480 --> 00:22:17,119 Speaker 1: and he started this brutal war in Yemen that is 450 00:22:17,160 --> 00:22:20,080 Speaker 1: just probably you know, the biggest human rights disaster in 451 00:22:20,080 --> 00:22:23,400 Speaker 1: the world right now. And thankfully there is a ceasefire 452 00:22:23,520 --> 00:22:27,200 Speaker 1: right now in Yemen. But you know, that's small pittance 453 00:22:27,240 --> 00:22:30,359 Speaker 1: for just total recklessness. Yeah, I want to go back 454 00:22:30,359 --> 00:22:32,800 Speaker 1: to something you said. You talked about what message is 455 00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:34,399 Speaker 1: going to send, and that's really important. This is not 456 00:22:34,480 --> 00:22:39,720 Speaker 1: just abstract human rights concerns. For example, a prominent Saudi 457 00:22:39,760 --> 00:22:42,640 Speaker 1: dissident and Lebanon was killed recently. We don't know details about, 458 00:22:42,680 --> 00:22:44,359 Speaker 1: you know, who is behind it, what happened, but you know, 459 00:22:44,400 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 1: you can guess. And then in addition to that, there 460 00:22:47,840 --> 00:22:49,960 Speaker 1: was a case of a Saudi national in the United 461 00:22:49,960 --> 00:22:54,040 Speaker 1: States being harassed for her and threatened for just you know, 462 00:22:54,119 --> 00:22:57,400 Speaker 1: voicing concerns about her government. And so when you talk 463 00:22:57,440 --> 00:23:00,440 Speaker 1: to the Saudi diaspora community, in particularly Saudi dissident community, 464 00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:02,160 Speaker 1: as I have for a lot of stories that I've 465 00:23:02,200 --> 00:23:06,000 Speaker 1: done recently, they say that they have very concrete fears 466 00:23:06,320 --> 00:23:09,200 Speaker 1: that this is telling MBS that he has a green 467 00:23:09,280 --> 00:23:11,520 Speaker 1: light or maybe a yellow light to go ahead and 468 00:23:11,920 --> 00:23:13,840 Speaker 1: continue to do some of those things. Because the president's 469 00:23:13,840 --> 00:23:15,280 Speaker 1: going to normalize with you. What does he have to 470 00:23:15,280 --> 00:23:19,160 Speaker 1: lose if the primary sort of sanction that we placed 471 00:23:19,160 --> 00:23:21,200 Speaker 1: on him, since we didn't put you know, little economic 472 00:23:21,280 --> 00:23:24,040 Speaker 1: sanctions or really suspend much in the way of weapons, 473 00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:26,760 Speaker 1: was the president not meeting with him and dignifying, which 474 00:23:26,760 --> 00:23:28,639 Speaker 1: I do think matters if you're in a kingdom and 475 00:23:28,680 --> 00:23:31,800 Speaker 1: you're jockeying for power, you want the legitimacy of the 476 00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:33,960 Speaker 1: you know, president of the most powerful country meeting with you. 477 00:23:34,000 --> 00:23:36,439 Speaker 1: That doesn't matter to him. If you withdraw that, remove that, 478 00:23:36,520 --> 00:23:38,240 Speaker 1: What message is MBS going to take from that? In 479 00:23:38,320 --> 00:23:41,359 Speaker 1: terms of the transnational repression that he is engaged in. 480 00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:44,720 Speaker 1: That that perhaps is most you know, vividly captured by 481 00:23:44,800 --> 00:23:47,840 Speaker 1: MBS's assassination, but takes the form of all kinds of 482 00:23:49,080 --> 00:23:53,080 Speaker 1: bullying and you know, just other dissidents have been killed. 483 00:23:54,040 --> 00:23:56,119 Speaker 1: To give you another example of Saudi spies were working 484 00:23:56,119 --> 00:24:00,919 Speaker 1: in Twitter Justice Department alleges in passing and onto the 485 00:24:01,280 --> 00:24:03,960 Speaker 1: Saudi regime about dissidence in the United States. So this 486 00:24:04,040 --> 00:24:06,800 Speaker 1: is a very concrete threat to US residence and continues 487 00:24:06,840 --> 00:24:08,919 Speaker 1: to be. I don't think the koshogi thing is is 488 00:24:08,920 --> 00:24:11,959 Speaker 1: a historical artifact in any sense, right. I mean you 489 00:24:12,000 --> 00:24:14,320 Speaker 1: start to see a lot of parallels between how President 490 00:24:14,320 --> 00:24:17,120 Speaker 1: Trump dealt with Saudi Arabia and Biden. I mean, Biden's 491 00:24:17,160 --> 00:24:19,520 Speaker 1: rhetoric has the word human rights in it, but that 492 00:24:19,560 --> 00:24:22,000 Speaker 1: doesn't mean human rights are at its center. I mean, 493 00:24:22,200 --> 00:24:25,639 Speaker 1: you've done incredible reporting on Jared Kushner, Trump's brother in law, 494 00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:29,840 Speaker 1: kind of really profiting off, you know, getting major billions 495 00:24:30,320 --> 00:24:33,280 Speaker 1: off of his relationship with with Saudi and through his 496 00:24:33,560 --> 00:24:37,160 Speaker 1: investment fund. That is, you know, that's a different kind 497 00:24:37,160 --> 00:24:38,879 Speaker 1: of corruption. But I think what we're talking about here 498 00:24:38,960 --> 00:24:41,560 Speaker 1: is a moral corruption where you have a leader like 499 00:24:41,640 --> 00:24:46,120 Speaker 1: NBS who intelligence agencies determined killed a US resident. Yeah, 500 00:24:47,400 --> 00:24:49,320 Speaker 1: you know, is there going to be a meeting of 501 00:24:49,359 --> 00:24:52,520 Speaker 1: President Biden with Arab journalists on this trip? I would 502 00:24:52,520 --> 00:24:56,119 Speaker 1: really like to see that. Yeah, yeah, Okay, We're going 503 00:24:56,200 --> 00:24:58,440 Speaker 1: to leave it there. Once again, that's Jonathan Geyer. Where 504 00:24:58,480 --> 00:25:00,760 Speaker 1: can people find your work? Voxt dot com. Thanks for 505 00:25:00,800 --> 00:25:02,600 Speaker 1: having me, Ken, thank you for joining me. There is 506 00:25:02,640 --> 00:25:04,760 Speaker 1: another edition of Breaking Points Intercept