WEBVTT - Project 2029: How We Protect Reproductive Rights Against MAGA 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi, We're on vacation, but we have an amazing special

0:00:03.800 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>episode for you. In the last year, we set out

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to ask some questions to the smartest people in their

0:00:09.680 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>fields about what Democrats should do when they regain power.

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>We hope you'll enjoy this special episode of Project twenty

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine, a Reimagining. Hello and welcome to Part three

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of our new docu series, Project twenty twenty nine of Reimagining.

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Molly john Fast, a columnist, podcaster, are and person

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>you occasionally see on Gable News. In this series, we're

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to start a conversation about where the Democratic Party

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:38.919
<v Speaker 1>goes when it regains power. The hope is that there

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>will be an agenda that puts people first and creates

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>incentives for many of the voters Democrats have lost to

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>come back to the party. In this episode, we're going

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to discuss reproductive rights and how when Democrats regain power,

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we can work to make sure those rights are codified.

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We've assembled some of the smartest people we know to

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>explain to us how we can begin to protect, to codify,

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and help change our legislation so we never have to

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>fight for these rights again. But first, it's easy to

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>forget just all the ways these rights are being attacked.

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's walk through where we are at this very

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>moment in America today. First, we'll hear from Mary Ziegler

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>about the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 2>Probably the most significant thing that's happened in recent years

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 2>is that the Supreme Court overturned Rob Wade, which opened

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the door to a bunch of other legal changes that

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 2>are really unprecedented. Right, So, we've seen criminal abortion laws

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 2>that are much more stringent than anything that was on

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 2>the books in the nineteenth century. We've seen those laws

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>interpreted in ways that preclude physicians from intervening in miscarriages

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>and stillbirths, not just in situations where people are seeking abortions.

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 2>And we've seen that those laws can have unintended consequences

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.279
<v Speaker 2>for people at the end end of life too, people

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 2>who whose advanced directives don't address pregnancy, or who don't

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 2>have an advanced directives at all. So I think one

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 2>of the things we've seen is that what seems to

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>be changes just about abortion, which are significant enough in

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>their own right, are spilling over into lots of areas

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 2>involving people's lives, whether that's birth control or IVF on

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 2>the one hand, or certainly people with wanted pregnancies having

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 2>pregnancy complications on the other.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll hear from Nancy north Up about Texas's impact

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on abortion laws.

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 3>So you both have the flat out criminal laws that

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 3>make abortion of crime, aiding a betting abortion of crime.

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, Texas has been the innovator on this, for

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>lack of a better word, that allows these bounty hunting

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 3>lawsuits where or dary individuals can sue someone because they

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 3>have provided an abortion aided and bed providing an abortion.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 3>They've just passed a law about going after the manufacturers

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>and the shippers of medication abortion, which has been a

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 3>lifeline in post row America. So it's everything from the

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 3>state prosecuting to giving individuals the power to become sort

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.800
<v Speaker 3>of their own vigilante attorneys general to go after people

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>who again might be a friend helping someone go out

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>of state. I mean, we have represented individuals in the

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>state of Texas where an abusive boyfriend has sued the

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 3>friends and family of a woman in one case who

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 3>left the state of Texas to have an abortion another

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>state that's perfectly legal to do, but he brought this

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit against them. We represent another woman. She found out

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 3>when she was driving around that a million dollar lawsuit

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 3>had been followed against her for allegedly helping a friend

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 3>secure medication abortion in the state of Texas.

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And all of this madness started with SB eight. Mary

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Ziegler will explain what SB eight was designed to do.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 2>So SBA was passed in twenty twenty one, and at

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 2>the time, it was mostly designed to circumvent row. So

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 2>the idea was that instead of the government enforcing criminal

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 2>abortion laws, that enforcement would be outsourced to private citizens

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>who could sue anyone who performed an abortion for at

0:04:13.040 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 2>least ten thousand dollars, regardless of whether that person had

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 2>any connection to the abortion. So this was designed to

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 2>scare abortion providers to stop offering services. It was designed

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 2>to kind of incentivize a group of bounty hunters to

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>go after them, and it legally meant that some of

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the constitutional roadblocks that could be in place if the

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 2>government was enforcing these laws would go away. And of

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 2>course SBA stopped mattering as much when Roe came down

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 2>because Texas could enforce lots of other criminal bands, but

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 2>it still mattered in lots of other ways, because we've

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 2>seen that sometimes politicians hesitate to enforce the most stringent

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 2>bands because they know that doing so will be politically unpopular.

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Here's Nancy northup on how medication abortion could be banned.

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 3>Medication abortion, which is a two pill regime that has

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 3>been on the market, approved by the FDA for twenty

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 3>five years as safe and effective determinative pregnancy in the

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 3>early period of pregnancy. This has been the case is

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.480
<v Speaker 3>ten thousand women are getting abortion pills in states where

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 3>there's a ban. So of course it's in the sight

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 3>line of those who want to ban abortion entirely, and

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 3>they're different ways that they're going about this. Texas just

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>passed a law that goes into effect December fourth, h

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 3>House Bill seven, which says that vigilantes can come and

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:38.680
<v Speaker 3>sue manufacturers people who are mailing medication abortion to try

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 3>to stop it. Second, you know, the Trump administration has

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 3>asked the FDA to take another look at the approval

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 3>of medication abortion. Now, this is something that should be

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 3>a determination on the science, on the facts, as it

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 3>has been for twenty five years, but they are seeking

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 3>to get a reversal from the Agency of the approval

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 3>of medication abode because then it would not only cut

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 3>off medication abortion states where it's band, but it would

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 3>cut off medication abortion. It stays where it's legal across

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the United States.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>And this, of course means every woman, whether seeking an

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>abortion or not, can feel the implications of these overreaching laws.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Badden explains how this puts women at risk.

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 4>What this means is that every woman's pregnancy is suspect

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 4>and every woman's reproductive health is at risk. We are

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 4>seeing that with people who are pregnant and want to

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 4>continue their pregnancies but face a healthcare issue or healthcare crisis,

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 4>who can't get the care that they need. We've seen

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 4>that in Texas and Florida and Georgia. We've unfortunately seen

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 4>the tragic deaths of several women, some of whom were

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.320
<v Speaker 4>not seeking abortion care. They were seeking help with their

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 4>pregnancies that they wanted. And I think that is the

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 4>unfortunate reality of abortion bands, is that doctors and hospital

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 4>systems feel scared to provide necessary care because the state

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.239
<v Speaker 4>law could essentially criminalize them for doing so. It puts

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 4>every woman in every person's health at risk.

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Jessica Vlendi, who writes the definitive sub stack

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>on women's health abortion every day. She has tirelessly chronicled

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>these attacks on women's health.

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 5>Women are dying, women are going septic, The maternal mortality

0:07:30.320 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 5>rate is going up, the infant mortality rate is going up,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 5>the sepsis rate is going up. Right, like all of

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 5>these things that we could sort of expect. Then there

0:07:38.600 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 5>are the ripple effects of bands where you have obgins

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 5>leaving anti abortion states. As a result of that, maternity

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 5>wards are shuttering. As a result of maternity wards shuttering,

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 5>there are these huge maternal health deserts across the country, right,

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 5>and so there's sort of like the medical piece that's happening.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 5>What is pos I will say, and this is the

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 5>thing that they're trying to attack the most. It should

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 5>go without saying, But it doesn't that there isn't a

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 5>fetal heartbeat when these bands are our limiting abortion, right,

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 5>when Republicans pass a heartbeat law, it's generally at around

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 5>six weeks of pregnancy. There is no heartbeat then, because

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 5>there is no heart formed yet. And so this it

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 5>really is just again a fake science thing to try

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 5>to ban abortion as early as possible. Most people are

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 5>not going to know that they're pregnant at six weeks.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 5>And I think it's part of this broader effort by

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 5>Republicans to seem medically credible, to seem scientifically credible, because

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 5>they can't just say, oh, we just don't want you

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 5>having a but right, or this is religious or this

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 5>is ideological, because they know how incredibly incredibly unpopular it is.

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 5>That's the same reason they're doing We're just concerned about

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 5>women's health, We're just concerned about coercion, we're just concerned

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 5>about clean water. They can't say they actually want because

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 5>no one agrees with them, and I mean no one,

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 5>not even in red states, even in the reddest states

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 5>and the states that are considered the most anti abortion,

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 5>people still don't want these laws, right like they still

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 5>want to repeal abortion bands. Republicans still want to repeal

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 5>abortion bands. There's no overseating how unpopular these laws are.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 5>I think they may be the most unpopular laws on

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 5>the books in America. And again, this is part of

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 5>why I do the newsletter too, because there is this

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 5>real issue with a lot of lefty mail pundits and

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 5>you know, experts who want to say that we need

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 5>to compromise on abortion, and that's how we're going to

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.520
<v Speaker 5>win red states, and that's where we're gonna, you know,

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 5>meet in the middle somehow. And it's so far removed

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 5>from the reality of this issue that I'm just I'm

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 5>desperate to be like constantly reiterated this so that people

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 5>understand how popular this issue is for Democrats. I think

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 5>one of the best examples of that is the rise

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 5>of what conservatives call equal protection bills, which basically claim

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 5>they're a fetal personhood push, basically claim that fetus' embryos,

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 5>fertilized eggs have equal protection rights under the fourteenth Amendment

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 5>of the Constitution. And we've seen over a dozen states

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 5>introduced bills that would state that and would make having

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 5>an abortion would punish the abortion patient as a murderer,

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 5>and in a lot of these states that could mean

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 5>the death penalty. A couple of years ago, Republicans would say,

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, the legislators said, oh, these are just a

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 5>couple of outliers, These are a couple of extremists. No

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 5>one is taking these bills seriously. Guess what we're seeing

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 5>more of the bills introduced. We're seeing the bills get

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 5>more co sponsors. Just a couple of weeks ago, South

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 5>Carolina had multiple hearings on one of these bills. This

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 5>is a real thing, and it really concerns me that

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 5>the mainstream media in particular, because they know that these

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 5>bills are not going to pass right now, they sort

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 5>of tend to ignore them, right or they treat them

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 5>as if, well, you know, again, these are extreme, this

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 5>is radical, This is not going to go anywhere. That's

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 5>not true. We see it increasing. I think it was

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 5>a few months ago after Kentucky introduced one of these bills,

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 5>the Courier Journal in Kentucky, like the largest most circulated

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 5>newspaper in Kentucky, ran an op ed by one of

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 5>these guys who pushes equal protection bills. They call themselves

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 5>abortion abolitionists. They ran an op ed by him where

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 5>he's defending this, and it's like, how is it possible

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 5>that we've gotten to the point where a state's you know,

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 5>paper of record is seriously talking about whether or not

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 5>to give them in the death penalty for abortion. The

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 5>other thing, in addition to the equal protection is the

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 5>attacks on travel right we've seen multiple states, and attacks

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 5>on speech. We've seen multiple states like Idaho and Tennessee

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.160
<v Speaker 5>pass what they call anti trafficking anti abortion trafficking laws

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 5>that they claim are to help miners who might being abused.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 5>It says you can't take a minor out of state

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 5>without a parental permission for an abortion, which on its

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 5>face sounds like okay, like that sounds reasonable. The laws

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 5>are written, and they, I should say, they are in

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 5>court in some sections of this have been blocked. But

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 5>the way that they're written, it basically says helping a

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 5>teenager get an abortion in any way, not just helping

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 5>them leave the state, driving them to the post office

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 5>to pick up abortion pills, texting them the URL to

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 5>a clinic could be a felony, right, And then you

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 5>have I forget how many counties it is, but it's

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 5>like over a dozen counties in Texas that have passed

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 5>anti trafficking ordinances not just directed at miners, but of

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 5>women of all ages, so that it's illegal to help

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 5>someone leave the state in these counties. And so you're

0:12:54.280 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 5>talking about literally restricting adult women's right to travel. We're

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 5>not hearing about it, right, Like if there were dozens

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 5>of counties doing this, dementsing men can't leave the state,

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 5>or you can be sued if you help a woman

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 5>leave the state. You would hear about it every day.

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And while many anti choice activists believe that you can

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ban abortion and still protect pregnant women from the downstream

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.559
<v Speaker 1>effects of banning abortion, we know that in reality that

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. Nancy Northope points out the difficulty in having

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>exceptions when it comes to abortion bands.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 3>What people aren't seeing because although it gets coverage to

0:13:37.760 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 3>some extent in the press, it doesn't get covered a lot.

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Is how impossible it is to craft exceptions to abortion

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 3>bands for health risks. It is impossible. You cannot list

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 3>the conditions, and part of it's impossible because the way

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 3>healthcare is normally practice, you make a decision for yourself

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 3>about benefits and risks.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Mary Ziegler discusses the unintended consequences of criminalizing abortions.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think that one of the things we've

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 2>seen since Rose overturned is that movements to criminalize abortion

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 2>are having a lot of unintended consequences. So we've seen

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 2>that doctors and hospitals and lawmakers don't know what abortion means, right.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>So if you have someone coming in suffering from pre eclemsia,

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>or someone who's had a miscarriage, and there may still

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 2>be fetal cardiac activity, but a pregnancy is fundamentally ended.

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 2>We've seen doctors saying, sorry, you know, your wife may die,

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>but we can't intervene yet because if we intervene, that'll

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 2>be an abortion, and that will be committing a felony

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 2>and we'll go to jail for a decade or more.

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 2>And so we've seen a lot of people who are

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 2>not a worshion seekers right, people who are just have

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 2>wanted pregnancies, who are having medical emergencies be turned away.

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>We've seen hospitals, sometimes the Associated Press reporting that some

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>emergency rooms don't want to treat pregnant patients at all

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 2>because they're afraid of the legal complications. We've seen patients

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 2>and end of life scenarios who are diagnosed with essentially

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>brain death have their families be unable to decide whether

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 2>they should remain on life support during a pregnancy because

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 2>doctors and lawmakers interpret the law to say that that

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 2>would be an abortion. And we've seen IVF families, some

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of whom view their own embryos as their children, be

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>told that as an unintended consequence of some of these changes,

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 2>they no longer have access to IVF.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not just that the right refuses to carve out

0:15:37.520 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>protections for pregnant women. It's more than that they have

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>declared war on birth control. And this war on birth

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 1>control has spilled out into one of the greatest technological

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.239
<v Speaker 1>achievements for having more children IVF.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 2>IVF wasn't a culture were issue until recently, if you

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>think about it, and it's become one. I think because

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 2>of the overruling of Row. That was pretty obvious in

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 2>February twenty twenty four when the Alabama Supreme Court held

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>that the state's wrongful death law, which allows you to

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 2>bring certain lawsuits, applied to IVF embryos, and that had

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>the effect of basically entirely stopping IVF in the state

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 2>until lawmakers passed a statute essentially not denying that IVF

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 2>embryos were people, but allowing IVF to go forward. But

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 2>that wasn't the end of it. We've seen people in

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 2>the anti abortion movement continuing to push to limit IVF

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 2>and promoting what they call a more effective alternative to IVF.

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>They call restorative reproductive medicine. So we've started to see

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 2>states in the South promoting this idea as an alternative

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 2>to IVF. And what restorative reproductive medicine is, just for context,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 2>is essentially a lot of the treatments that you would

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 2>get for infertility that stopped short of IVF. They focus

0:16:55.040 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 2>almost entirely on female infertility, and they often end up

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 2>being ineffective for people who would need IVF, for people

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 2>dealing with male factor infertility, and they can be used

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 2>by people whose clock is running out as far as

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 2>the efficacy of IVF is concerned. So we're seeing an

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 2>ongoing effort to restrict IVF and also to fund and

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 2>promote an alternative that may not work as well for

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 2>people experiencing infertility.

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 1>And what you see over and over again is these

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>laws sweep up people who aren't even having abortions. This

0:17:32.520 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>case is a prime example. Jessica Valenti explains how the

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 1>right wants to control women's pregnancies and how they're failing

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>at it.

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 5>Should a miscarriage and like most people, do you put

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.159
<v Speaker 5>your miscarriage remains in the trash? What else are you

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 5>supposed to do with them? And so she was arrested

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 5>for that. There was a woman in Texas who spent

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 5>five months in jail after she miscarried in a public

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 5>bathroom because they didn't like that she flushed it. I

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 5>have taken, like internally to calling them like ick laws,

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 5>because all of these it's like the ick factor. All

0:18:04.800 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 5>of these mostly male cops and prosecutors have no idea

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 5>what pregnancy laws really looks like. They get icked out

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 5>when they see blood, right, and they're desperate to punish people,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 5>and so it really is this like loophole. It's this

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 5>way around the prohibition on arresting abortion patients. They figure

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 5>out different seemingly unrelated charges to bring against women.

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And crisis pregnancy centers are the right answer to much

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of this, and we all know those do nothing but

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>fail women's health needs.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 5>That like crisis pregnancy centers really are central to Republicans

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 5>plan for all of this. That you know, CPCs are

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 5>their enforcement arm. They are trying to sort of give

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:56.480
<v Speaker 5>CPCs this super immunity from state regulation, so that trying

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 5>to regulate them at all, trying to say hey, you

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 5>can't lide away, you can't put out this nonsense is

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 5>considered a First Amendment violation and so they're really it's

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 5>not just that they're using these groups to funnel, you know,

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 5>millions of taxpayer dollars into into religious organizations, but they

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 5>are emboldening and empowering these organizations, which they say are

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 5>good to replace all the planned parenthood clinics that their

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 5>policies are shuddering, right, So they are saying, yeah, they're

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 5>they're the they're the opposite, and they don't they're not

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 5>real healthcare clinics. Like that's how little they think about

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.639
<v Speaker 5>our health. They're saying, we're going to give million dollars,

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 5>like millions and millions of dollars to these groups that

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 5>don't have doctors on staff for the most part. Sometimes

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 5>they have like a medical director that'll come in once

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 5>or twice a month, and usually they're like a retired urologist.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 5>It's just absurd. They're not real. But they're trying to

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 5>paint this picture of CPCs as a reasonable replacement for

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 5>planned parenthood clinics. And one of the primary reasons they're

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 5>doing that is to enact in informal ban on birth

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 5>control right. They don't want to come out and say

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 5>birth control is illegal. They don't want to. They don't

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 5>want that heat. They don't want that backlash. But if

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 5>they can get rid of every single credible reproductive health

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 5>clinic in a state and replace it with a crisis

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 5>pregnancy center that one can't prescribe birth control because there's

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 5>no doctors there, and two won't and the only way

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 5>that they'll talk about it is to say that it'll

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 5>give you cancer or it'll kill you. There, you have

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 5>like a ban on birth control without ever having to

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 5>write it in the books.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And what is very striking is that the abortion rate

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>has actually not gone down despite all the obstacles and

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>work the right wing has put into trying to make

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it harder to get an abortion.

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 5>So what is positive is that the abortion rate hasn't

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 5>gone down. Right, These laws have been shockingly ineffective at

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 5>reducing the abortion rate. The only thing that they have

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 5>done is increased suffering, increased death. Right Like, they're not

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 5>reducing the abortion rate, and that's in large part because

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 5>of abortion medication and telehealth. Right now, I think it's

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 5>about one and four. The last study showed one in

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 5>four abortions in America are provided via telehealth. And so

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 5>you have all of these women in red states getting

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 5>abortion pills shipped to them from doctors and shield states.

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 5>Anti abortion people are really really pissed about that, and

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 5>so the vast majority of attacks that we're seeing right now,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 5>the attacks that we're seeing this year especially are on

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 5>abortion pills. That is what they are most desperate to

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 5>do away with with telehealth specifically, and some.

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Blue states have already enacted shield laws. Let's hear from

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Badden about what these shield laws do.

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 4>Abortion shield laws are policies that states enact that aim

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 4>to in some way protect abortion providers in that state

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 4>from being able to provide care to those who live

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 4>in other states. So essentially protecting an abortion provider in

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 4>your state from any charges from a state that bands

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 4>abortion and might want to go after you. About twenty

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 4>two states have some kind of shield law on the

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 4>books in some way, but eight states have a really

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 4>important component, which is this extension of the shield law

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 4>protections to telehealth provision. So that's what really allows a

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 4>provider in a protective state to treat a patient in

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 4>another state via telehealth and get them the medication that

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 4>they need to have the abortion care that they need.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 4>So incredibly important, huge innovation lots for states to continue

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 4>enacting them and also continue strengthening them, because the legal

0:22:46.880 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 4>developments on these change almost every week, week to week,

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 4>month to month, and so it's really important for states

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 4>to know that none of these laws are one and done.

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 4>You can't just pass one shield law or pass the

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 4>right to abortion and call it a day. You have

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 4>to keep abreast of what the attacks are and keep

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 4>finding ways in your state to respond to them and

0:23:07.480 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 4>to protect abortion in provision.

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>But the goal here is to protect women's reproductive rights

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 1>so that there isn't a cycle of losing and gaining right.

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>Mary Ziegler points out that voters don't want things like

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>fetal personhood.

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 2>The kind of endgame for the anti abortion movement is

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>fetal personhood, the idea that you know from the moment

0:23:28.600 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 2>of fertilization their constitutional rights, and they think that would

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 2>be a path to a national abortion band through the

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 2>judiciary that would also apply to things like IVF. It

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 2>turns out, unsurprisingly that strong majorities of voters don't want this,

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>and that they could put some effective pressure on state

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>judges and even federal judges and Republican politicians not to

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.720
<v Speaker 2>embrace this. But normal people don't know that that's what

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 2>this is.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.639
<v Speaker 2>It's like the life begins at conception thing. If you

0:23:54.680 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 2>say to an average voter, when do you think life begins?

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 2>Some of them who are not opposed to may well

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 2>say conception, right. I mean it doesn't follow. All this

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 2>other stuff doesn't follow from that. So I think if

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 2>people want to make a difference sun reproductive rights, in

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 2>addition to voting, in addition to campaigning, in addition to

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 2>donating to organizations that are either litigating this or helping

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 2>people access services, there's also just telling your neighbors what

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 2>this actually is and is not right to say to people.

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 2>The issue here is not that when you see an

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 2>ultrasound from your friend who's excited to be pregnant, that

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 2>you think that's a baby. The issue is do you

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 2>want people who do these things to go to jail?

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Because that's what we're talking about. It's not about do

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 2>you value life or do you not value life? Or

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>do you value this life more than the pregnant person's life.

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 2>It's essentially putting women and pregnant people back in the

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 2>picture and seeing what we're doing is criminalizing some of

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 2>these people. We're not actually helping anyone by doing that,

0:24:50.280 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 2>we're just creating a bigger carcial state.

0:24:55.400 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Northup emphasizes the importance of passing comprehensive legislation when

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to reproductive rights.

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>When there is a majority in the Congress that supports

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 3>abortion rights and a president who will sign that legislation,

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 3>that Congress needs to pass comprehensive legislation to protect access

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.199
<v Speaker 3>to abortion. And it cannot be about going back to,

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, the shreds that were left a row. It

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>has to be comprehensive. It has to be stronger. And

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 3>here's the thing, because of Roe versus Way, for many years,

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 3>people did not understand that Congress has the power to

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 3>do this. But they do. And let me just say

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>about this, the American public is already way ahead of

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Congress on this. In every state where they've been given

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity, a majority has voted for access to abortion.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 3>So we think about people have to realize this is

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 3>within grasp of being able to have, you know, Congress

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>address the national nightmare of the criminalization of abortion. Congress

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 3>can do it. The movement has been working on some

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 3>very strong legislation that when there is a majority supporting

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 3>abortion rights, I would fully expect to be introduced. It

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 3>would be legislation that covers the two big proms, which is,

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 3>you know, the legal right to access abortion care, and

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 3>the second would be the addressing the financial issues, the

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:29.880
<v Speaker 3>insurance issues that I just talked about, you know, as

0:26:29.880 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 3>well as issues of you know, not excluding immigrants from healthcare.

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:38.159
<v Speaker 1>And here's Mary Ziegeler on repealing outdated laws.

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:40.639
<v Speaker 2>One thing I think a kind of bare minimum idea

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Democrats would explore would probably be repealing bad old laws

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 2>like the Comstock Act, which is sort of hanging fires

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of possibility for a Republican administration to use to mail

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 2>van the mailing of any item related to abortion, which

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 2>could be a backdoor national ban on abortion. So I

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 2>think a first step for Democrats would be to take

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.919
<v Speaker 2>that off the table. Democrats have also been focusing on

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.760
<v Speaker 2>some kind of federal guarantee for access to reproductive rights.

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 2>The model that was receiving the most attention the Biden

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 2>years was the Women's Health Protection Act, and we may

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 2>see a kind of updated, you know, Women's Health Protection

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Act two point zero that will recognize some of the

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 2>changes we've seen since that bill was drafted. Because that

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>bill was drafted of course, you know in an era

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 2>where a lot of the kinds of state laws were

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 2>seeing from conservatives just weren't on the books. So and

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 2>the reason that's important is because Republicans are not very

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 2>likely to pass a sweeping bill criminalizing abortion, an IVF,

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 2>and contraception, because then they're going to have to have

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 2>that be on their voting record. The danger about something

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 2>like the Comstock Act is that Republicans can say, hey,

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not me, it's just existing federal law. I'm just

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.640
<v Speaker 2>enforcing existing federal law. So removing the Comstock Act would

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 2>mean essentially that to get to the same results, Republicans

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 2>would actually have to be accountable for what they were

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>voting for, and I think that would be a much

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 2>much heavier lift for people opposed to abortion.

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Badden explains that Roe was not the end all,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>be all of reproductive rights and what we can do

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to approve on it. I know Roe v.

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 4>WAD was the floor, not the ceiling, and I think

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 4>that's an important reminder for what we think about now

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 4>when we think about, Okay, Roe is gone, we have

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 4>to build back something better and stronger and something that

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 4>really allows for true reproductive health care access. For all

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 4>and not the limitations that we had even under the

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 4>ROW framework that.

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 5>There's no one fixed.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 4>This is an effort that needs to happen at every

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 4>level of government, the state legislature's, the courts, Congress, and

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 4>federal administration. Nothing short of an all out national right

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 4>to abortion for anyone at any time, without barriers is

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 4>acceptable from a values judgment, right, from a values point

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 4>of view, from our human rights point of view. But

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 4>what that means practice is we have to be responding

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 4>to all of the attacks that we are seeing. There

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 4>are city councils who are passing laws saying you can't

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 4>use the roads in that city or county to leave

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 4>to go get an abortion. There are states that are

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 4>trying to ban people from helping someone leave the state

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 4>to get abortion care that is legal in another state. Right, like,

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 4>they are really finding any lever they can to criminalize

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 4>patients and providers and really limit your ability as a

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 4>human being to move around the country with ease, which

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 4>is your constitutional right to travel. And so I say

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 4>that because we can't just say, hey, there's one silver

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 4>bullet here. It's not ballot measures. That's part of the toolbox, right,

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 4>that's one tool in the toolbox. The wins that we've

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 4>had in state ballot measures are an incredible display of

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 4>clear articulation that the public wants to see abortion rights

0:29:56.240 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 4>protected even in what we would consider kind of traditionally

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 4>hostile or red so called bread states. Right, that's not

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 4>universally true, but it's by and large true, And I

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 4>think that I would start with a state by state strategy,

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 4>leave no state untested. When you can win in Missouri,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 4>when you can win in Kansas, it means you can

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 4>win in other places. To build the ground game, build

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 4>the state policy muscle, to remove abortion bands, to overturn

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 4>abortion bands, and to start focusing on access right, not

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 4>just legality, but access, and then use that momentum at

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the federal level to enact in a national right to abortion,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 4>and to do things like protecting your ability to travel

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 4>across state lines for healthcare of any kind, protecting your

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 4>ability to access a full range of information about how

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 4>to use mifipristone, or how to use medicaids in abortion,

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 4>to enact levers, and create abortion funds that are publicly funded.

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 4>Make sure Medicaid and other public insurance programs cover abortion care.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Make sure there are not limitations for private insurance. We

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 4>know that the High Amendment has been a horrific policy

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 4>for also nearly fifty years that even while Roe stood,

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.880
<v Speaker 4>really stopped people from getting the care that they need

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 4>that they otherwise would have gotten.

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>We need to think big. This new era of politics

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be about Democrats taking half measures the way they

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>might have in previous administrations. Jessica Valenti doesn't think the

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>government should be involved in women's pregnancies at all.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 5>The ideal scenario is national protections for abortion by just

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 5>saying the government has no place intervening in pregnancy. Ever,

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:45.760
<v Speaker 5>pregnancy is too complicated to legislate at any point, and

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 5>we are like, I don't want to hear about like

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 5>row or storing row. I don't want to hear about

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 5>twenty four weeks. I don't want to hear about viability,

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 5>which is a made up term that's not a medical term.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 5>Just there is no place for the government in pregnancy.

0:32:00.640 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Another thing we must do is protect women from frivolous

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits filed to strip away their reproductive rights.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.480
<v Speaker 5>From civil suits. Right, Like, That's the other thing that

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 5>we're seeing. Texas, which is always leading the way in

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 5>these sort of like nightmare bills. They passed a law

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 5>that just went into effect this month that allows people

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 5>to sue pretty much anyone who touches abortion pills on

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 5>their way to a woman in Texas for one hundred

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 5>thousand dollars. And so again it's a way to get

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 5>around this idea that like there's a prohibition on actually

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 5>criminalizing or actually suing the pregnant person who's had an abortion.

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 5>Instead of doing that will ruin everyone's life around you, Right,

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 5>We'll make it so you have no support system. We'll

0:32:46.760 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 5>make it so that your friends and family are too

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 5>afraid to help you get abortion pills, too afraid to

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 5>lend you money to get out of town, too afraid

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 5>to give you advice. They want to create isolation and

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 5>fear and this chilling effect.

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Lastly, Mary Ziegler thinks Democrats need to take better action

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to protect reproductive rights.

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think there's definitely a question of Democrats getting

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 2>their stuff together about it, because we've had plenty of

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 2>scenarios where Democrats had majorities that could pass federal protections

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>for reproductive rights, and they've literally never done it. They

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't do it in the nineties, they didn't do it

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 2>in the oughts, and so I think an important thing

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 2>to happen if Democrats are able to do this again

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 2>is to finally say this time it's a priority.

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 2>There was always this sort of either Democrats worrying with

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 2>one another about how progressive or practical to be to

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 2>the point where they didn't do anything, or it was

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 2>Democrats saying, well, we can deal with reproductive rights later

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 2>because we have bigger problems. And I think if Democrats

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 2>get into power again, there would have to be a

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 2>moment where they say, you know, the time is really now,

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 2>this is a priority. It's this is going to take

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 2>back seat again to whatever other issue of the day

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 2>happens to be there. And I'm not that pessimistic about that,

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 2>because I think we've seen since Roe was overturned that

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 2>this is an issue on which democrats principles and kind

0:34:12.320 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 2>of selfish priorities dovetail. Right, A lot of democrats political

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:22.760
<v Speaker 2>self interest aligns with their ability to enact their principles.

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 2>This isn't a situation where Democrats are out on a

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 2>limb doing something that's likely to cost them electorally. When

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 2>they're acting on their principles, because one of the lessons

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 2>we've seen since the overruling of Dobbs is that reproductive

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 2>rights are not a democratic issue. They're an issue everybody,

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 2>not everybody, but that a majority of Americans agree on.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a winning issue in deep red states like Missouri,

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.240
<v Speaker 2>it's a winning issue in purple states like Arizona and Michigan.

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Polling in places like Louisiana suggests that a majority of

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.400
<v Speaker 2>voters there think their abortion laws are too harsh. So

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the ballot an issue of campaign's been a really powerful

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 2>way to take advantage of that, where it's possible to

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.320
<v Speaker 2>say essentially that where the Republican Party is on this

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 2>is not where the American people are on this anywhere,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.320
<v Speaker 2>including in some of the red estates in America.

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for watching this episode. We made

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>this series to get the conversation going about what happens

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:17.360
<v Speaker 1>after trump Ism. Democrats need to be more than just

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump, and part of this includes a bold vision

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild after Trump's disastrous agenda reshapes America. We'd love

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>to create as much of a conversation around this as possible.

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Solea you share it with a friend and click like

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on this video and comment, so it spreads to more

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>people on YouTube