WEBVTT - Top 20 Draft Day ADP Deals (Ep. 941)

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Fantasy Pros MLB. This is the

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Baseball Podcast. It is me, Joey p Joep Zapia

0:00:12.000 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>with me is the Welsh, and today we're gonna have

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:16.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. I know we've talked to a

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of big stars and big players with very high ADPs,

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.480
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna talk about the opposite today. That's right.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>These are the hidden gems, the sleepers, if you will,

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the guys that are going way too far

0:00:27.960 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>at ADP that we think are real gems that you

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>should be looking for drafting. And remember, if these picks

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>don't work out, you can always cut them for somebody else.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 1>But every single year, Welsh, we know this, We've been

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 1>doing this forever. You draft some guys late, they end

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>up winning you leagues, being huge contributors, or even just

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>being contributors for a while where they can help you

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>out while somebody's recovering from injury or some other issues

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>going on. And that is a huge difference maker in

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball life. So I think it's really important

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this might be the most important show you all year

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to identify some of these guys going outside of the

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one seventies all the way to eight hundred. That's right,

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got put somebody eight hundred ADP. I think it's

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>going to change over the weeks ahead, but right now

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where the kids ends ADP is on this one

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>guy Welsh, How important are these hidden gems that we're

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>going to discuss today for everybody's Fantasy Baseball livelihood?

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you mentioned it. These are these can

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 2>be league winners. This is these are the guys that

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 2>attribute to that adage of like you don't win your

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>draft in the first round or the second round, it's

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 2>because you're finding great deals of guys that are going

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>to completely completely have big returns off of where you've

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:39.759
<v Speaker 2>gotten them. And I mean, at the end of the day,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 2>we can't have every single player have positive returns, but

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>you want to have as many as possible, and sometimes

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>do you just look and you're just like, why is

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>this guy still down there? One of the things we

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 2>do do here is we're using an aggregate ADP here

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 2>in Fantasy pros, which is using multiple sites different average

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 2>draft position, so you know, sometimes it could be one

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 2>site that drags a player down, but you know, we'll

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 2>also be honest a lot of people are going to

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>look at ADP's here, but there are tons of instance

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.639
<v Speaker 2>as well, instances where you're looking and you're like, well,

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>this guy's average ADP on Fantasy Pros is this, and

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 2>it's even worse onto of the big major sites that

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.679
<v Speaker 2>you look at. So it's super important to be able

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to identify to fill out your roster by finding some

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>of these gems on these ADP deals.

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And speaking at gems. Well, we've got a bunch of

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.919
<v Speaker 1>great people here at Fantasy Pros and we're gonna be

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>using them all for the Fantasy Fest this coming Wednesday,

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that's right in March twelfth, three pm Eastern. Be there

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>or B Square Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball Fest, a four

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>hour live stream of friendship, fun and baseball. We got

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>bold predictions, we've got breakouts, we got bus we've got everything.

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got the Welsh, We've got the Worm, We've got Mayor,

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got me, Joey p and Joel Rico more than

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>one Joe that's probably necessary for every Fantasy Fest. We've

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>got guests to Frank Stanfeld, Chris Towers, Eric Crosscott Pianowski,

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and many more. So you can tune in live right

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>here in the YouTube channel. Subscribe to the YouTube channel

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to twenty five thousand subscribers before opening day.

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Fingers crossed, we can get there, and of course we

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>always promise we'll do stupid things when we hit every milestone,

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but subscribe to the YouTube channel, watch Fantasy Fest live

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or just watch it back. But the best way to

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>remember is to subscribe to the YouTube channel and ring

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the belts that goes ding for notification so you can

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.519
<v Speaker 1>join us and we'll be taking your questions as well

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.639
<v Speaker 1>as going through all of the pitfalls and pleasantries of

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>fantasy Baseball. And if you like free stuff, we've got

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>an amazing giveaway John Smoltz. That's right, Hall of Famer

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>John Smoltz assigned braves jersey of John Smoltz can be

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>yours thanks to our good friends at Pristine Auction dot com.

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>All you have to do to enter is subscribe to

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Pros YouTube channel for MLB. That's Fantasy Pros MLB.

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe right now, drop a comment below on this video

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or any video, and that's it. We'll be announcing the

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>lucky winner right here on the channel, so make sure

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you turn on those notifications like I told you before,

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>so you know when new videos are up and can

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>claim your prize. Now, all my guys are post three

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred ADP on these gems list today. Welsh started in

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the one seventies and worked his way to the two hundreds,

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the three hundreds, and then the four hundreds. So Welsh

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>wanted to kick things off with a pitcher at one

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>seventy one.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is the only guy that's inside the

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>top two hundred. I didn't set a barrier to go,

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 2>you know, only outside the three hundred. I was just

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 2>kind of peruising there's quite a few two hundreds, but

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:27.719
<v Speaker 2>this is my highest of the players and kind of

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 2>talked about him a decent amount so far. So just

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 2>going to throw back out here. The highest of these

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>on the ADP deals at one seventy one is Christopher

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Sanchez with the Phillies, and we've talked. I've talked about

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the added cutter in getting the K percentage up. We've

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>also seen that he's had Velo increases and that's huge

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 2>having those Villa increases on the fastball. Adding a cutter

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>in to get the K percentages up. The K percentage

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>is kind of the biggest thing that's holding him back.

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 2>I think on fantasy value, he had some significant innings

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 2>last year. He's on a really good team, but it

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.720
<v Speaker 2>was around like a twenty percent k percentage lower than

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Brian Wu. So if he pushes that up into the

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percentile range, and you could foresee that with

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, this uptick in velocity and this added new pitch,

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 2>he is gonna blow past this. But even if he

0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't blow past this, I think he's still coming out

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>of value. I think it's still probably at least twenty picks.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I've seen him go inside the top one fifty and

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of drafts right now, so I think around

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.000
<v Speaker 2>the one seventies this is a good way to start this.

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 2>This is a higher ish name, but he's still not

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 2>even in the one fifty of your draft ranks. Here

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>that as far as ADP goes, I think Chris Sanchez

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 2>is a smoking deal.

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Still, all right. I'm an overachiever, So I started in

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the three hundreds. That's where I started today for my list,

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>And the first one I want to draft is Bubba Chandler,

0:05:48.200 --> 0:05:52.799
<v Speaker 1>big time pitching prospect of the Pittsburgh Pirates. And the

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Pirates back of the rotations Andrew Heeney and Bailey Falter.

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Right now, if you go back and look at Bubba

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Chandler and his minorgue track record here in Double A

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>last year and twenty twenty four, he made sixteen starts

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>nineteen games at a four ERA, okay, but the strikeout

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>rate is incredible over ten and a half k per nine.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>He moved up seven starts in Triple A and things

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>actually got better for him at Triple A, which was fantastic,

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:18.919
<v Speaker 1>a one to eight nine ERA over his first seven starts.

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>My guest Welsh is he'll make ten to twelve starts

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>at Triple A and then he's going to get the call.

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>So this is one of these guys you want to

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>draft in stash if you're in some sort of league

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>where you're in let's say multiple keepers, right and you're

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in a salary cap league, get drafted him for maybe

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.559
<v Speaker 1>a buck or two. By the time he comes up there,

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say Midsummer, maybe there's a chance he can

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>really make I would say ten or so impactful starts

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe next year look as something he could

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>be useful too. But also the hype around these prospects

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 1>is real and sometimes they can become even great trade

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>chips as well. So Bubba Chandler, a guy that's got

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>an incredible fastball, another one of these just big time

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>pitching prospects from the Pittsburgh organization. And if they only

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>had some hit prospects, maybe things will get better instead

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 1>of a bunch of old farts like Andrew mccutchet and

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Tommy fam in the lineup. But I digress. At the

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, Pittsburgh, what the hell you doing?

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to another guy here, number two fifteen.

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>If you like steels, well you'll like this next guy.

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Victor Roebliss. He's been on some of you. Chris

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Sanchez Victor Robliss both been on a few of my

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 2>different videos that we've talked about. And frankly, if you

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 2>don't want to attack stolen bases early, you want to

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 2>find them later. How about post two hundred thirty to

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 2>forty plus stolen bases. If you've gotten stolen bases early on,

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 2>then you need to pivot to power. You don't want

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 2>to forget about the position and you want to be

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 2>able to come back again. Victor Robliss a prime position

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 2>for that. He's going to be hitting at the top

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 2>of this Mariners lineup, had a really great run with them.

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 2>There's a potential for ten forty this season, and the

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:53.360
<v Speaker 2>stolen bases are going to go through the roof. The

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 2>spring hasn't been anything to write home about. It's kind

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of like, you know, two hundred, I think some of

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 2>the strike so there he's not running, but you don't

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>want him to run in spring. Once he gets going

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 2>into the season, they've got a manufacture runs. I think

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 2>this team knows this too. They weren't hyper I mean,

0:08:08.800 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Justin Turner was out there, you know, publicly calling them

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 2>out like, hey, if I'm the biggest thing that you've done,

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>you've messed up. And I think part of that is

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>this team being comfortable with what they have and knowing

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to have to be a much more

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 2>hyper aggressive team on the base pads. I mean, and

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 2>they already relatively are with a lot of pieces they have,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 2>and Victor Roblos is the table setter for that. So

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.520
<v Speaker 2>post two hundred, a forty plus stolen base guy that

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>can hit for average score runs, Yeah, maybe he's going

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 2>to be a little devoid in RBI. Maybe a little

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 2>bit in the homers, but you're going to get three

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 2>ish high category. If he's hitting two eighty plus and

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 2>he's scoring eighty plus runs and he steals forty plus,

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's your close to three high end categories.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a smashing deal. And I've seen him

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 2>go as high as one point fifty as well, so

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>sixty seventy spots higher. I think he is a prime

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 2>pick that you got to go. I'm surprised he hasn't

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>pushed up. There's a couple of those stolen base guys.

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we saw Luis Garcia with the Nationals get

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>pushed up. We just haven't seen it with Victor Robless

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 2>enough yet. And I really think he could warrant being

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:13.079
<v Speaker 2>drafted almost one hundred picks higher, So huge, huge eighty

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 2>p deal in Victor Robless.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Well, Stolen bases are easier to combine now with the

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>rules changes, But if you're in a draft and steels

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are getting away from you, a great late pick here

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>for Robless without a doubt, just kind of fill that

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>void a little bit and make up some ground. Next

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>on my list at three zero five currently Luis Severino

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of now the Athletics the Sacramento Athletics. Are we even

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 1>calling them the Sacramento Athletics, I don't know.

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 2>I think like the Athletics, you see they're gonna wear

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 2>a Las Vegas patch on their Why the Sacramento they're

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna wear a Las Vegas patch on their jersey?

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Is it a nicotine patch or just like, yeah it

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>is lot after going.

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>To Vegas, it does seem like it should be.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Louis Severino last year had a really solid season. The

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty one year old found himself again in New York,

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but not for the Yankees, for the Mets. He threw

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and eighty two innings plus postseason. It looked

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>prett now. The strikeout rate wasn't prolific, but still strong enough.

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>He just walked sixty guys struck out one hundred and

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty one was around three to ninety one. But again,

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a guy that went out there made thirty one starts

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:15.559
<v Speaker 1>last year, and durability is important. I think this athletics

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>team is going to be much better than people realize.

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that division is a little softer than people

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 1>might realize. Also, and it would not surprise me if

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the Athletics somehow backdoored their way into the playoffs. I'm

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>just telling you all right now, it's not out of

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the realm of possibilities. And they went out there and

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>were aggressive. I know they had to spend money. I

0:10:33.880 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>get all that, but if you're looking for a guy

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>as a fifth starter or a bench starter on your team,

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>why not look at a guy like Severino coming off

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a very good season, a very competitive season. When I

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>like most about Severino last year when I watched him

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>pitch was he found his competitiveness again and that was

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the thing that was really lacking. I know health was

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 1>an issue for him with the Yankees, but also that

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>competitive fire that came back in a big way. And

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I love this offense for the Athletics. I think they're

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>going to surprise some people this year. Back to your list, Welsh,

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go to another one at two eighteen. If you're

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>looking for another bat, who is it.

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're gonna go to a middle of the order

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 2>bat that's post two hundred. It is on the team

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 2>that I like with the Arizona Diamondbacks, it's Lordus Guriel

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 2>and you know, having the ability to hit three on

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 2>one of the highest and most aggressive scoring teams in

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 2>baseball is a plus. We have to give him that

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 2>extra advantage. The Diamondback you're gonna have lordis majority of

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 2>the time probably hitting between like a three and a four.

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 2>You know, pinning the side of the plate, you can

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 2>have opportunities where they might you know, have a left

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>hand or hitting three. But if you're hitting between three

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 2>and four in the Diamondbacks line, if you've got kateel

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Marte and you've got Corbyn Carroll both on base in

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 2>front of you, Corvin Carroll's scoring at the highest rate

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 2>went on base in baseball, katel Marte having an absolute

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 2>breakthrough season, and Lords being a legitimate high batting average

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 2>two sixty to two eighty twenty five homer end guy. There,

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 2>there's always the possibility that he could pull the guy

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be either hitting in front or behind him.

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 2>A Josh Naylor in put up one hundred RBI season. Hell,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 2>if you have a Naylor hitting three and Lord is

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.599
<v Speaker 2>hitting four, there's just more guys that are going to

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 2>be on base with that potential, and he's free. He's

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 2>an outfielder, he's free. Dan Back's have talked about potentially

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe playing him a tiny bit less. I think that's

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 2>in the field, and I think what that would provide

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 2>is maybe having him DH But he's always going to

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 2>be in a prime RBI spot. I think he's legitimately

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 2>year after year underrated in that offense, and post two hundred,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be able to provide you an easy

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 2>pop of like one fifty value. And I think I

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 2>touched with Ario Cohen. He thinks Lordis was one of

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 2>the top players that popped out is a deal off

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>of his ATC projection. So getting a middle of the

0:12:45.960 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 2>order lineup in one of the highest run heavy teams

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 2>is a plus. And it is post two hundred right now,

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So he's an ADP deal.

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Deeper leagues, you're looking for some help in the middle infield,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe things get away from you. Tario Estrada of the

0:12:58.559 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 1>now Colorado Rockies.

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 2>I I almost put him on this list, by the way.

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>For Estrada and look injuries, bad metrics, everything was bad

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for him. But he's still just twenty nine years old,

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>still in his quote unquote prime if you dial back

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to twenty twenty two to twenty twenty three, is a

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>guy hitting fourteen home runs every year, hitting somewhere around

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>two sixty five two seventy, and now you're taking him

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.079
<v Speaker 1>out as a right handed batter of San Francisco and

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>dropping him in Colorado. Welsh to me, this is a

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>no brainer when you're trying to find some depth in

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 1>the middle infield, qualify the second base, and I think

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not a guy that I'm looking to start

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>in that second base as a fantasy manager this year,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>but as a middle infield guy, I think you might

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be able to do a little worse than him. And

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>I think right now, you look at the ADP, he's

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>practically a free player. And let's not forget he had

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>two straight years of twenty plus stolen bases too. I

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 1>know nothing worked out for this player last year. He's

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>also in a one year show me deal. There is

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>an option next year for Estrata. But Welsh to me,

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>whenever players like Estrada are playing for money and playing

0:13:56.800 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in a good hitter environment, I'm paying attention, and Estrata

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>takes both of those boxes. Let's go back to another

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>guy on your list here coming in at two twenty six,

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy who got traded this offseason. Let's talk about

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan India in his new digs.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think kind of with your astrata thing

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>as well. Any player that's going to put up those

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>potential twenty twenty seasons, you've got to pay attention to

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 2>on value, and that's why Estrada pops out. That's also

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 2>why a guy like Jonathan India pops out. You know,

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>he hasn't gotten to that twenty twenty marker over the

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 2>last couple of years. But it's also some of it

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 2>has been playing time seventeen fourteen to two forty eight

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 2>average fifteen thirteen. This is homers, stolen bases, and a

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 2>two forty eight average last season. He's now going to

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>be put in a situation where he probably more often

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 2>than not, is going to be leading off for the

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City Royals. This is coming off of a career

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>high walk percentage twelve percent, which was like top three

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 2>percent out of the league under twenty percent K percentage.

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 2>So even if the hitting profile hasn't boosted and created

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 2>into this big monster, he expected average was two sixty

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 2>six after hitting two forty eight. That's the best of

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 2>his career K percentage, lowest of his career walk percentage,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 2>highest of his career now you're going to go on

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 2>a playoff potential Royals team. We're leading off and hitting

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 2>behind Bobby Witt, Salvador Perez, Vini pas Quentino. As long

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 2>as he can stay healthy, I legitimately think Jonathan India

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 2>has got an opportunity to put up a twenty twenty season,

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 2>and if not, I think you're looking at probably like

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>somewhere between an eighteen and eighteen high runs. Maybe the

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 2>RBIs even tick up a little bit. And I know

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 2>it's funny because he's coming from a very hitter friendly environment.

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 2>I think the team context is way better. And it's

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of interjecting with the time period for Jonathan India

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 2>that I think he's just a smoking deal. At two

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty six right now, that is his average ADP across

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 2>multiple sites, and essentially what that is also telling you

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>is he's post two hundred in most of these as well.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 2>So if you're looking for a player that can probably

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 2>aggressively beat this, I think Jonathan India is one of

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>those guys.

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I would agree I like a lot this year too.

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a team that I think is going to continue

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to get better over the next couple of years ahead

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to be very competitive this year. Again.

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Next on my list at three thirty four, it's a pitcher.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And no, it's not because I spent a lot of

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>time with Joe Rico. I wrote all the pictures up

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>for the Black Book, and I was already on David

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Festa anyway, because when you break down David Festa, even

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't make the rotation, and if he doesn't

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>make the rotation out of spring training, he's going to

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be even cheaper. Probably you'll be free. You just kind

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>of pluck him off with your last pick. But if

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you go back and look at last season, the first

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>two starts were Festo before absolutely dreadful. Two starts, ten innings,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve earned runs, an ERA over ten after that a

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 1>three eight one ERA. Over his final eleven starts fifty

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>four innings, struck out sixty nine guys. So he's got

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>big time strikeout ability eleven k per nine. There. The

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>whip was at one point twenty five over those same starts.

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>He had a three eight one ERA. As I said before,

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>so Festa figured it out, and to me, it's a

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. At some point he is going to be

0:16:58.000 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>back in that rotation for the Twins if he does

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>not break camp with them in the rotation. So either way,

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got to start thinking about and some of my

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>picks for more long term remember baseball six months long.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather have some of these guys on your

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>roster if you have enough bench to keep them as

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 1>opposed to wasting free agent budget on players. And you know,

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if a guy like Festa gets called up, it's gonna

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>cost you a lot because people are gonna get excited

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 1>about it. So if you can early on make some

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>space on your bench for a guy like Festa, because

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>either way, I think he's gonna probably make at least

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>fifteen stars for the Twins this year, if not more.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Welsh back to your list here, and the next player

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about is one of the favorites of

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pollock. If you missed out on either of the

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Ultimate Pitching Guys with Enosius or Nick Pollock, watch them

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>here on the YouTube channel, Go click on them. They're fantastic.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But William's another player that Nick was very much in

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 1>on again late ADP. If it doesn't work out, you

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>can cut him, but he could be a big piece

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this year for that Cleveland rotation.

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a lot about Like what this is is

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 2>like having these low ADP for high potential. So if

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you want a confirmation on everything you might have heard

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 2>on some of the pitching ones, well here you go

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 2>two forty four average ADP and that is rising because

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.200
<v Speaker 2>not only all off of all the positive words you

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 2>would have got out of the pitching guides, but he's

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 2>also had a phenomenal spring training. Through eight innings pitch

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>so far in spring training that's over three games, he

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 2>has a sixteen to two strike to walk ratio. He

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.120
<v Speaker 2>has struck out sixteen, so double the amount of innings

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 2>he's pitched, and he's only walked too. In that period

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>of time, we've seen the whiffs go up. I think

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>the VLO has been up, looks very consistent, extension looks good.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 2>And health. That's a big thing with Gavin Williams is

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 2>just staying out there, being healthy and locking in that

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 2>rotation spot, which all of those things seem to be

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 2>clicking right now. So a big key kind of like

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 2>as you said, Joe, with any of these players, is

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 2>finding the right upside versus what you can just show away,

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, back to the very top. Like the reason

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 2>why my Bubba Chandler is worth taking a shot on

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 2>is because you can take a shot on him at

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the end of drafts and then you can hear what

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 2>the word is. I mean, every day I will say

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 2>we're getting like this guy's with some of the weelvy Martes,

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, sent down to Triple A. He's not making

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>the team, so we are getting some confirmations. But when

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't have those, you can go and take a

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 2>guy at the end of your draft that can be

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 2>replaceable based on that. But then you might get a timeline.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>And if that timeline on a guy like Bubba Chandler

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.159
<v Speaker 2>is hey, by the end of April, we're going to

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 2>let him start four or five and back hold and

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 2>now you don't have to worry about waiver the capitol

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 2>if it is you know, probably sometime this summer. Okay,

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 2>you took your shot. Maybe you don't want to hold

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 2>on anymore. You want a streaming spot, Let him go

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and put a marker on it. That's what's so valuable

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 2>about that. The same thing, just to a smaller or

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 2>different degree, applies for a guy like Gavin Williams. Where

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Gavin Williams, you know he's going to be in the

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 2>rotation and if it works out, it's super beneficial and

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 2>you're happy. And if it doesn't, then you cut him

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 2>and you can move on to some other type of streaming.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, give him some time to see if it

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>works out, but if it doesn't, you can go and stream.

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 2>That's why these deals become even bigger is because of

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the shots that you can take. And Gavin Williams actually

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>might be a player that makes it more palatable to

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>take a shot on abubb a Chandler because I do

0:20:12.800 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 2>think there's more staying power with a guy like Gavin Williams.

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 2>And this Spring has been phenomenal, but these are the

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 2>type of guys hitting on these might enable you to

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.200
<v Speaker 2>hold on to even abubb a Chandler. So just a

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit more again, he is the Spring sensation. He

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 2>is moving way up though, so pay attention to the

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 2>costs because they are rising like crazy on Gavin Williams.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm going to jump ahead to a name

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on my list who's going further in ADP than some

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.679
<v Speaker 1>other guys are going to talk about next. But he

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>is the subject of our Microsoft Chasing Challengers, brought to

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you by Microsoft. Just like the athletes who push boundaries

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and redefine what's possible in business. Business decision makers today

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>are turning challenges into opportunities, and Microsoft meets you where

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you are with tools and guidance to help you make

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>an impact with safe, secure AI solutions. Whatever challenge you're facing,

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft empowers you with the expertise to say, bring it on.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 1>In this segment, we're gonna bring on Max Meyer of

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Marlins. Now, Meyer is a guy a couple

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, I know Welsh was very high on.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>My good friend Craig Mish kept telling me, man, this

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>kid's electric. He is going to be a big time

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:19.560
<v Speaker 1>pitcher in the major leagues. Then injuries and then mismanagement.

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>It's been incredibly challenging to watch Max Meyer get bumped

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>back and forth last year between the major leagues and

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the minor leagues, and all for the sake of what

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>saving his innings, his innings for what the playoffs that

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins were never going to make. I don't understand this,

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to basically write off all of last

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>year for him because I want to hug him like

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in goodwill hunting and say it's not your fault Max Meyer.

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just not It was a terrible situation they put

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.159
<v Speaker 1>him in, and then they were limiting him in the

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues with how many pitches he was gonna throw

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>in certain things. Just let him have a regular season

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and cut him off at one hundred innings, and that's

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 1>what you wanted to do. But pitchers are creatures of habit,

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's the big challenge when you have a young pitcher.

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to develop confidence. They're trying to get themselves

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in a good spot here where they feel like they're

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>ready for the major leagues. And when you're not giving

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 1>him enough exposure to fail, you're basically putting them in

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a failure position to begin with. So I know the

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Marlins aren't going to be a good team, but Max

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Meyer so far has had a very good spring. The

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>velocity looks really strong. I don't see a situation where

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not in the rotation this time around, after all

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the nonsense and containment last year. So the challenge for

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins will be again when do they cap him

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of innings? And for fantasy managers, how big

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>of an investment do you make? Luckily, right now, the

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>adp is at three seventy two, so Welsh, you don't

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>have to make a very big investment on him to

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>find out if he's any good and the strikeout potential

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is there for him. So even if the latter part

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of the season doesn't look good, the first half could

0:22:46.520 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be very good. But the challenge will be what does

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>he look like after the All Star break? How much

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>can he give you in a second half. That's the

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>challenge the Marlins will face this year with Meyer. And remember,

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's AI solutions empower you to take bold steps and

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>new ideas to help drive your business forward. With Microsoft

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>as your trusted partner, you can navigate your journey with confidence,

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>finding innovative solutions and reaching new possibilities. Visit microsoft dot

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>com Slash challengers to learn more. Welsh, let's get back

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to your list here, and this is my favorite guy

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on your list at two fifty nine. I've been drafting

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:22.159
<v Speaker 1>this guy everywhere. He is hitting third, I believe in

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>the lineup this year, hitting in between Williadomas and hitting

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>after an in front of Matt Chapman. It's a great

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>spot in the lineup. He's got batting average, he's got

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a little speed, a little pop last year didn't work

0:23:32.920 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>for jung Houley, but I am buying back in big

0:23:35.400 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>time on the cheap this year. And it looks like

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you are too.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you nailed it outside the top two point fifty.

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.720
<v Speaker 2>The hitting three is huge. I think that's a huge

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 2>placement in this But I don't want to say it's everything,

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>because that can also change. He might just hit on

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 2>strong side. He might be hitting three. Sometimes they might

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>move him up. We also know that just where you

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.679
<v Speaker 2>are in the lineup isn't like a guarantee for the

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 2>entirety of seasons. Guys are going to move around. But

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 2>what it opens up for a guy like jung Ulee

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>is he already he had the It's not quite the

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Luisa rise or anything like that, but maybe Jacob wilsony

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>with a little bit more speed potential. But you have

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 2>this like, oh, this might be a points league's guy

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 2>where you know he doesn't strike out, he gets on base,

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>but he doesn't really contribute a whole lot in the

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 2>counting stats market. If you are hitting three, you really

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 2>got a potential to play a bigger role in that.

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 2>We're also seeing a little bit of that power. I

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 2>mean so far this spring, we've already seen three extra

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>base hits, which is positive. He's hitting three forty three,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 2>he's walking more than he's striking out so far this spring,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>and he's just got to stay healthy. So you know,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 2>this could end up being like he hits ten homers

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 2>steals twelve bases, but maybe he has eighty run and

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 2>ADRBI or maybe the runs go up higher if he

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 2>moves around in the lineup. At the end of the day,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 2>he's just hit. The ADP is super low for a

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 2>guy that's going to be incredibly high in the lineup.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 2>He is a massively patient player. He doesn't strike out,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 2>which should keep him at the time of the lineup

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 2>as long as he keeps getting on base, which he

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 2>walks a decent amount. So there's a lot positive for

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Jung Houlee four twenty five OBP so far this spring

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 2>as well. That middle of the owner. It's kind of

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 2>like Lord of Skuriel. But to be frank, there might

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>be more upside with Jung Hooley as far as where

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 2>his batting average can go, and this applies also for

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 2>points leagues. He moves way up there, but Junghulee's ADP

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 2>feeling like it might be criminally low.

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say it is, and I because I play

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of points leagues, I have a lot

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of Junghu Lee interests this year. And I will tell

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you this as well, I love the spot in the lineup.

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>So this ceiling is limited for him, Like, he's not

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's gonna, you know, be winning MVPs or

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>anything close to that. Now, A floor is very strong

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>in five categories, especially where he's hitting in that batting

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>order specifically. That's what I really like. You know, he's

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna get runs and RBIs and he's going to have

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 1>soul and bases and some batting average like and it

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like a really likable guy too. It's just everybody

0:25:57.280 --> 0:25:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in the clubhouse likes him too, and he's just like

0:25:59.840 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>a a guy you want to root for, which is nice.

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And Jung Hu Lee again, criminally low, I think that

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>might be the best way to put it. Also criminally low.

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>How about a fourth starter on the Atlanta Braves Grant

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Holmes at three thirty five. I don't quite understand why

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this is so low. I'm trying to wrap my mind

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>around it. Now. I know in the minor leagues he

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>struggled with Walks a little bit. You saw that, you know,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>walk pernin somewhere on the three and a half ish range,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>give or take, last year was lower than two. So

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that was a big jump. So was that the evolution

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>of Grant Holmes and finding something new with the major

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 1>league group there or maybe this was just a bit

0:26:35.400 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of luck. So even if there is regression, Welsh, I

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like Grant Holmes, when you look at what he

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>did last year, is a player that you could certainly

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 1>buy in on in this ADP. Two start weeks on

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>a good team, Eventually you get a Kunya back. Eventually,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, this rotation gets Strider back. But I don't

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 1>think he gets bumped from this rotation necessarily either. I

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think Holmes defined himself last year in the rotation looked

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>very solid, was very consistent. You look at the x F,

0:27:00.520 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the XCRA, all the deeper stats, they're all right in

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>line with the era. So I'm buying in on Grant

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Holmes on the cheap, and I don't know why this

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>ADP is struggling to find ground personally. Back to your list.

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Here another guy who's getting converted from the bullpen to

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the rotation. Another one of my favorite targets. Welsh took

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>another one from me. It's Clay Holmes of the New

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>York Mets. We mentioned about Sevarino in the turnaround for

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>him and I the turnaround for him. So far, so

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>good for Clay Holmes. I keep calling him Derek Lowe

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>with more strikeouts. That to me is what Clay Holmes

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>can be. And they're gonna need him too in this rotation.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>So what's appealing to you about this ADP When it

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to Clay.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 2>HOLMESY are second straight homes. That's right, it's very Michael

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 2>king Ish to me. I mean, this is this is

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 2>theoretically this would be the Michael King of this season,

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 2>a reliever who is going to be making that starter transition.

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 2>So I mean the first question is going to be

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 2>about what the innings can be. But I think Michael

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 2>King is another good barrier. This is also a veteran

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 2>pitcher making this move. He's had multiple sixty plus inning seasons,

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 2>so is it outlandish that he could push to one fifty?

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. The arsenal will be really interesting

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to watch. You've got sinker, primary sinker, which is part

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 2>of the low part. You were talking about the two

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 2>sliders that he throws. He throws it's kind of it

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 2>looks like bullety slider that's got just that lower trajectory,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:24.919
<v Speaker 2>and then he throws this sweeper, and the sweeper is

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 2>the thing that really opens up the possibility of this

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.040
<v Speaker 2>being like a Michael King transition. Even though his case

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 2>went down year over year twenty seven to twenty five percent,

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the sweeper and slider both had a thirty eight percent

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 2>or higher with percentage. They're big strikeout pitches and he's

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 2>going to be stretching this out over the season. And

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 2>we've also seen really great results so far this spring

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 2>pulling this up. As far as his spring stats go,

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 2>he has had nine point two innings so far, pitched,

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 2>giving up zero earned runs. He struck out thirteen, walked four,

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 2>had a point six to two whip. He's also not

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 2>giving up any hits. That's not going to carry completely

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 2>into the season. But you know, if that sweeper does

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 2>what Michael Kings was doing out there, you might start

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 2>looking at like a real strikeout guy. And if you

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 2>get five percent walk rates, six percent walk rates, let's

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 2>say last year he had eight percent. So even if

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 2>you go into sevens, but he get that twenty five

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 2>to twenty seven percent K percentage over a full season. Listen,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 2>it's not going to be Michael King, but I think

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 2>that could be top thirty five, top forty overall sp

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 2>for a guy.

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Michael Walka, and he's going outside a useful and.

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 2>He's going outside the top two fifty. And guess what,

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the Mets desperately need his innings with their injuries, and

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 2>they can push that. So Clay Holmes is kind of

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 2>a must draft guide, especially to see if early on

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 2>this transition works out. But I'd also point out remember

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 2>how rough it was for Michael King at the beginning

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 2>of the season. He did face the Dodgers last year,

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 2>so maybe you want to hold on a little bit.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 2>But Clay Holmes is like a Muss draft guy.

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a little rough start to the year for King,

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>but after that, I think we can all agree it

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:06.719
<v Speaker 1>worked out pretty well. Louis Angelecunya at three forty four

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is my next pick here. Acunya last year a solid

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>year when he came up with the Mets. They only

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>played fourteen games there, but one hundred and thirty one

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 1>games of Triple A seven homers, forty steals, he only

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>had two sixty, So he'd like to see a little

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>bit more contact, a little bit more on bass skills.

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But in the Arizona Fall League he tore the cover

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>off the ball three thirty seven batting average. He had

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>nine to fourteen ops in the AFL. Now the downside

0:30:31.680 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>right now with Acunya is he's not having a good

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>spring so far. He kind of needs to turn things

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on here if he's going to force any Mets hands. However,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Jeff McNeil is always hurt to me. Jeff McNeil is

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a bench player at this station in his career. He

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>is not an everyday player. I don't think he offers

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you enough. Acunya has some pop, has definitely some speed.

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a better defender, he's a more athletic player, younger player,

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Mets are continuing to look like they're trying

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to get younger and younger, and I think Acunia might

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be part of that. Now watch carefully because Brett Baty

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>played some second base the other day too, So who

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>knows what things are moving around there and what could

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>be happening somebody else besides Jeff McNeil is gonna play

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 1>more games at second base than Jeff McNeil this year.

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you it's gonna happen. It's gonna come to fruition. So,

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Akunya, whether it's Beaty in a transition there,

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>who knows. Maybe Ronnie Maurisio could be somebody. But right

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>now Akunya is still at the top of my list.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what he does in the next weeks ahead

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in spring training before he gets sent down. But regardless,

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>long term, somebody else is taking that job. I think

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five. Next on the list of the Welsh,

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a pitcher who's coming over from Japan for the

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore Orioles. Now this guy's going outside the top three hundred,

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of unknowns and a guy who had some

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't say down years, but seemed like he was

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>leveling off in Japan. Then last year had a terrific season.

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Can that carry over for him in twenty twenty five

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about Sigano.

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tomo Yuki Sigano is feels like the last big pitch.

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm I mean, they got what Eflyn and Sagano, it

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 2>feels like right now, because Grayson Rodriguez is dealing with

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 2>some inflammation and maybe they'll get some positive news. But

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about a pitcher that a team is going

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 2>to have to ride the innings on all season. But

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>you're also pushing with this guy that has had an

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 2>absolutely phenomenal spring. He's coming off of a start where

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 2>he just pitched three innings, gave up no hits, no walks,

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 2>struck out five, and through all nineteen pitches for nineteen

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:31.959
<v Speaker 2>strikes as well. This spring, he's put up just some

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 2>monster numbers. This is before that last start, so I

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 2>believe he's now over no this was his last start.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>He's got seven innings, seven strikeouts, two walks, four hits

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>so far this spring, and all we're looking for his opportunities.

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 2>This is a veteran who can push a bunch of innings.

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 2>He's had some really good strikeouts success early on. He's

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 2>not getting hit early on. We're looking for any type

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 2>of translation, and the Orioles need him absolutely desperately with

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 2>the deal Grayson Rodriguez, so maybe this strikeout potential is

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 2>going to carry over into the regular season. This is

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 2>my first guy outside the top three hundred. I'm not sure,

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:12.479
<v Speaker 2>there's a ton of Post, a ton of Post three

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 2>hundred pitchers that are gonna pitch from day one that

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 2>you were gonna get like one hundred and fifty probably

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 2>easy innings with this strikeout potential. Again, if it carries over,

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 2>it's free. It's absolutely free. With Sigano, I'm trying to

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>take him everywhere I can. I think he's also pushing

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit, as you know, Grayson coming down,

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna push him in the lineup and maybe gonna get

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 2>more starts. But I really love the strikeout potential. I

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 2>love the spring start, and I'm gonna bank a little

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 2>bit on this spring carrying over into the season for Sagana.

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>There's another guy who's got not high end strikeout ability,

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna have a rotation spot. No, probably not

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of path to wins, but I think Ryan

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Weathers of the Marlins at three to sixty can at

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>least be a body in your rotation at the very least. Now,

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>last year, eighty six innings for the Big Club, he

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>had a three six three R. Now, the XCRA was

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a little higher, the FIP was more in the four range.

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.280
<v Speaker 1>But even so, if he lands somewhere in the low fours.

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I think in mixed leagues, it's still a guy that

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 1>you can have as a streamer. You play the matchups,

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you played the two start weeks, and there's upside for more.

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Weathers is a pitcher that they have high expectations for,

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and at some point I think this year Sandal Contra

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to get dealt to a contender. I don't

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to wait on that much longer, so

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>rotation spot for him is going to be safe. So

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I've given you not one, but two guys on the Marlins,

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and I know the Marlins. You know it's gonna be

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a tricky season for them. It's not a great lineup.

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:38.399
<v Speaker 1>It's not at the Revy bullpen. But when you're looking

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.359
<v Speaker 1>for bodies to make some starts, we've had some big

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>pictures already dealing with injuries, Kirby. You mentioned Rodriguez. We're

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about Garrett Cole at the end of the

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>show because we you know, we've we've got to talk

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>about it because it's a big, big piece. But you're

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna need as many starter as you could possibly find,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:55.439
<v Speaker 1>just like every other major league team. So take some shots,

0:34:55.480 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and some guys that have rotation spots, both homes guys

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we'm talking about Ryan Weathers, Max Meyer, guys that are

0:35:01.640 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>going to have opportunities to take the ball over fifth

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>day that is at least a start, and hopefully they

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>can give you some quality starts in those situations. A

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>couple more guys left here on the list. This next

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>one at three thirty nine, Jock Peterson. That is a

0:35:15.840 --> 0:35:17.520
<v Speaker 1>player of the Welsh Picked and that's a guy that

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I keep looking at late in drafts for pop. He

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>plays in a good Texas Rangers lineup. I don't get

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>why this ADP is quite so low on him. Welch,

0:35:26.000 --> 0:35:27.080
<v Speaker 1>do you well.

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I think part of it is platoon. Part of it

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:31.919
<v Speaker 2>is he's util lonely. I think that holds him back

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. But I've been saying this since we've

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 2>started doing videos. I think Jock Peterson is criminally underrated.

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 2>On the strong side. Last year he hit two eighty

0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 2>one with twenty two homers with the Arizona Diamondbacks and

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.440
<v Speaker 2>that was in like three hundred and thirty something at bats,

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 2>So there's kind of an argument to be like, well,

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, he kind of does stink versus lefties. If

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.000
<v Speaker 2>he gets more opportunity, which has been talked about with Texas,

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:58.680
<v Speaker 2>that could lower some of the potential. Yeah, but you're

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 2>also just looking for as many as as possible that

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 2>I just think even if he is a strong side

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 2>platoon guy, at the end of the day, he's still massively,

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 2>massively more valuable than where he's going right now. You

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 2>can get mid twenty home run potential with high batting average.

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 2>That's the other thing is he's not like a two

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 2>forty batting average. He's sticking this in two eighty one

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 2>on the strong side is what he put up this

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 2>past year. Good hard hit numbers. He's not striking out

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:29.799
<v Speaker 2>to an aggressive degree. He's walking, he's getting on base.

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, it's Texas, it's a really hit

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 2>or friendly environment, and they're gonna put him at three,

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>probably on the strong side, three or four. If they

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.799
<v Speaker 2>put him at three, you've got Seeger and Simeon in front.

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 2>If they put him at four, just therow Langford in there.

0:36:44.040 --> 0:36:45.879
<v Speaker 2>All three of those guys getting on base, and they're

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>on base potential for Jock Peterson RBI opportunities through the

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 2>roof and then hitting behind him, about Adolius Garcia Jake Berger.

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 2>There there's plenty of run opportunities, and if they do

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 2>play him in the field in any capacity, that could

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.879
<v Speaker 2>open up a few other opportunities. End of the day,

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 2>he's absolutely free three point thirty nine. You can take

0:37:04.239 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 2>him at the end of every draft. I know he

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't provide you position flexibility, but I would guess he

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 2>is probably going to be the best util you can

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 2>put out there unless you had invested obviously in like

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Otani or Ozuna or something like that. But Jack Peterson,

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 2>when I don't get Brent Rooker and Ozuna and Otani,

0:37:22.040 --> 0:37:24.560
<v Speaker 2>I have to have it at the end of every draft,

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 2>or if I play in a multi util type of league,

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 2>even more, Jack Peterson hard to find that twenty five

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.600
<v Speaker 2>plus pop at the very end of drafts, and it's

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 2>really you know, for daily leagues, I think it's even

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 2>more valuable when you can kind of move him in

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>and out. But the Rangers might put us in a

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 2>situation where even weekly lineup leagues, Jack Peterson is going

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to be a play every single week.

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Next guy on my list is one of my favorite values,

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think it's just prospect fatigue. I think

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is. This is a fork in the

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>road season. But he's only twenty four years old. At

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 1>three sixty three, Kyle Manzardo, who's going to be hitting

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>three and starting at first base down of the jhel

0:38:00.480 --> 0:38:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Or is gone, and he's hitting right behind Jose Ramirez

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>so far this spring, I just want to point this out.

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So far, he's had twenty two at bats, two homers,

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>five rby he's hitting four to nine with a twelve

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:14.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty one ops. Now, it's just spring, but spring matters

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>for guys that it matters for, and it matters for

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Manzaro because he hasn't lived up to his potential.

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.839
<v Speaker 1>He's bounced around now more than an organization. So this

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 1>is his opportunity to lay claim to the starting first

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 1>base job. Run away with it. Be the guy. You

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:30.759
<v Speaker 1>can't be in a better spot in the lineup than

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hitting behind Jose Ramirez. Right, You're in a great spot there,

0:38:34.080 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>except maybe hitting in front of Jose Ramrez. That's the

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.320
<v Speaker 1>only thing you might want more. But to me Manzardo again,

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe just a little bit more patience is what we

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:43.720
<v Speaker 1>need for him. I know this is a player Welsh

0:38:43.760 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>from the prospect world that you've been in on for

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>a while. But it feels like everybody's forgotten about him

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>because the ADP is telling me, I love buying back in.

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>If it's a startup dynasty, what a great value you're

0:38:54.160 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>going to be getting on him. But even in a

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>redraft league, if you're looking for some help at the corners,

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Manzardo can be that guy. And I think it's insane.

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 1>With the spring he's having that the ADP hasn't risen

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>quite yet. If he stays this hot, it's going to change.

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>But either way, he is an incredible value in twenty

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. One more name on each of our lists. Welsh,

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you've gone to the four hundreds. You're in the four

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred section. You're up there with Bob Yucker trying to

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 1>see the game. Let's talk about it. Who is the

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 1>guy here at four point fifty two that you've chosen?

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, this is my deepest play here. It is one

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 2>more diamondback and it is just a representative of my

0:39:32.640 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 2>maybe my lack of avoiding or my I want to

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 2>say love, but I guess I'm just gonna say it's

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of my love for really high side platoon players.

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I think Kerry Carpenter's in play, Jack Peterson's in play,

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 2>and Peven Smith is in play. And I've talked a

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.880
<v Speaker 2>lot about him. Peven is going to be the Diamondbacks

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Jack Peterson this year. He is going to be their

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 2>strong side platoon for dh He also can play in

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the outfield. He can play first base as a replacement there.

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 2>He provides a lot and he and I've cited it

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 2>a million times, but you're looking at like high contact.

0:40:06.239 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 2>It was like eighty five percent contact rate with one

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 2>hundred one hundred fifty ev which is your top fifty

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 2>evs were over one hundred. It was like eight players

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 2>in the league that marked that last season with one

0:40:20.000 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 2>hundred and fifty plate appearances are above and Pevin was

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 2>one of those, and actually uh Randall Gritchick was the

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 2>other one. With just monster players, All that is to

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:33.439
<v Speaker 2>say is that Peven Smith is very representative of what

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.239
<v Speaker 2>Jock was as a platoon player, and it's why they

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 2>didn't need to go and get some lefty platoon guy.

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 2>And they're going to give him a lot of regular

0:40:41.719 --> 0:40:44.600
<v Speaker 2>bats and his position flexibility puts him in a little

0:40:44.640 --> 0:40:47.279
<v Speaker 2>bit of a better spot than what was going on

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 2>with Jock Peterson, and I think he can hit lefties

0:40:49.640 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 2>a little bit better.

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>He is free.

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 2>If he does what Jock Peterson did, he will be

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a top two to two fifty overall player. Maybe some

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 2>of those opportunities will get taken, but I really think

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:04.360
<v Speaker 2>he's a guy worth monitoring or in deeper leagues. He

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 2>is a deal because he is in that Jock Peterson

0:41:07.239 --> 0:41:09.880
<v Speaker 2>spot and his skill set as far as contact rates

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 2>hard to hit rates go mirrored Jock. And again that

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 2>is why they did not bring Jock back, and they

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.400
<v Speaker 2>weren't worried about not having a Jock like lefty platoon.

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Gritchick will play the against left hander dh Or in

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the outfield and Peven will be that for the strong

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:28.680
<v Speaker 2>side platoons. So Pevin Smith is my final of the

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:30.480
<v Speaker 2>ADP deals.

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, my last one. The ADP is eight hundred,

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 1>that's right, eight hundred and ten. Why because he's not

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>being drafted yet, and I want to emphasize yet here.

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I have to say the spring, I have fallen in

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 1>love with a prospect and his name is Cam Smith,

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and he is tearing the cover off of the base

0:41:49.120 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 1>ball and that might be an understatement Welsh. So far

0:41:52.680 --> 0:41:55.800
<v Speaker 1>thirteen at bats, two homers, seven rbi. He's at in

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>six fifteen A, seven to twenty two ovp A twelve

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one slugging, and we're already making that transition of

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Altuve to the outfield. That seems like that's earmarked to happen.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You sign Eesack Paradise. Why because he can play second

0:42:07.760 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and he can play third, but camp Smith should be

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>playing third base. I don't want to hear about Brennan Rodgers,

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:17.319
<v Speaker 1>non Reisler invite tee. I don't care. I've watched camp

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Smith now and I know he went fourteenth overall. He

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:23.680
<v Speaker 1>came over that Kyle Tucker trade. I think the Astros

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>might have saved themselves here in an enormous way. Not

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 1>only do you move on from Alex Bregman, you move

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on from Tucker, but well, this organization didn't have a

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of first round picks because of the scandal, Right,

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>so how do you reinvent yourselves by making an incredible

0:42:38.400 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>trade of your best player for a camp miss guy.

0:42:41.920 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching cam Smith and he reminds me of a

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>bigger version of Adrian Beltray. He hits the ball so hard,

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so hard at his explosiveness with his hands. He attacks

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the baseball and there's very few guys like that. When

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>when you see them hit the baseball, it just feels

0:42:56.920 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like they're hitting the baseball harder. I haven't looked at

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>all the exit vlos, watching with my eyeballs, and my god,

0:43:03.200 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy is exciting. I think it's only a matter

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of time. I think your last pick in every draft

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>should be this kid. I don't know if he's gonna

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>start the year at the big club because despite the

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that he did play some minor league baseball last year,

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>only thirty two games. You know, he had five of

0:43:16.239 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>those games at Double A. The combined slash was three thirteen,

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>three ninety six six oh nine with one thousand ops.

0:43:23.000 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>He's probably gonna get some playing time in Double A,

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.520
<v Speaker 1>probably a little season thing at Triple A. But Welsh,

0:43:28.640 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I am telling you this kid is coming fast to

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the major leagues and I want him on my rosters

0:43:32.680 --> 0:43:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five. You're the prospect guru. Talk about

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Cam Smith for all the people out there.

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think he's a guy. If he didn't make

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 2>the roster, we'll be talking about in April in May,

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 2>we'll be talking about like he's got to come out.

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 2>An interesting take too, if the Astros really want to

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.200
<v Speaker 2>take it to the value of you know what they're

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.040
<v Speaker 2>getting back from the Kyle Tucker is, let Cam Smith

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 2>break with the team and if he were to win

0:43:55.680 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 2>Rookie of the Year, they would acquire a first round

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 2>pick under that. I think it's the program. So if

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:04.439
<v Speaker 2>you have a prospect they have to like essentially break

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:06.319
<v Speaker 2>camp or play within the first like you know, ten

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 2>days or whatever. They'd be advantageous to do it, especially

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 2>because of what they've done with the roster. They didn't

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 2>go and re sign Bregmann, they didn't bring somebody else

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 2>in Pradies can go and play second and al Tuves

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.480
<v Speaker 2>looks to be a left fielder now. So it feels

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 2>like they've done everything they can to make it work

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.920
<v Speaker 2>for Cam Smith, not a non roster inviting in Brandon Rodd.

0:44:26.760 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 1>There's clearing the path. I agree. And you know what

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>else is interesting too, You can't even bet him right

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:33.040
<v Speaker 1>now for Rookie the Year. He wasn't even on the

0:44:33.040 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>board this weekend, which I think that's going to change

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. But to your point, like, what are we

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>doing here, if we're the Astros, if you could drop

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this guy in this order, and it reminds me of

0:44:43.400 --> 0:44:45.320
<v Speaker 1>whenever the Longoria kind of made that jump and it

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of shocked everybody, but he proved that he just

0:44:47.760 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>belonged right away, like every Longoria was ready. That's the

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>last time in recent memory of you know, and that

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>was a long time ago. That was that fifteen years ago.

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where we're at, but that's kind of

0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like where we're at with this, where some

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>guys are just ready. Cam Smith's probably not going to

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>break with the club, but if he does, it wouldn't

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:05.480
<v Speaker 1>shock me at all. Dude.

0:45:05.800 --> 0:45:08.799
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think the biggest thing probably holding him

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 2>back has been strikeout issues which he had in college

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.000
<v Speaker 2>and stuff like that. But I mean, I would say,

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 2>if they feel that they've got that covered, this is

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:20.360
<v Speaker 2>a college bat who moved up some levels. If I know,

0:45:20.400 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 2>it's the Angels and we laugh, But if the Angels

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:26.200
<v Speaker 2>are going to consider a guy like Christian Moore coming

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:28.880
<v Speaker 2>up and breaking camp with the team, I think I

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 2>think more teams have to consider this with guys like

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.880
<v Speaker 2>cam Smith, just simply because of the return, the potential

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 2>returns that you can have on it, and if it

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work out early on, you send him down and

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 2>you can still control. There's still some contract control you

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:44.400
<v Speaker 2>can have if you don't bring him back up if

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:46.840
<v Speaker 2>he shows he's super not ready. But that's the battle.

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 2>You have the Jackson Holidays who proved to be kind

0:45:50.080 --> 0:45:52.319
<v Speaker 2>of epic disasters, and then you have the guys at

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 2>work from day one. I'd love to see it, but

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 2>if not, like what we said earlier, Winter, take Cam

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Smith at the end of your draft. Then if he

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:02.399
<v Speaker 2>gets sent back down, then just put him on your

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 2>watch list for when he gets pushed up to Triple A,

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:05.919
<v Speaker 2>because he'll be up this year.

0:46:06.360 --> 0:46:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, last note here before we get out of town today.

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunate to use for the Yankees. They will be without

0:46:12.120 --> 0:46:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Cole for the year. He's having Tommy John surgery. Now,

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>wel I'm leading off last year. I might have gone

0:46:17.800 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 1>on the record once or twice saying that this was

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 1>going to end poorly for Garrett Cole. Everybody told me

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I was crazy. I was crazy, and then look he

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>did finish the year they went to the World Series,

0:46:27.480 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. He never looked comfortable to me. He

0:46:29.840 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>never looked like vintage Garrett Cole. I don't think anybody shocked.

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think this is probably why they pushed for that

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Max freed and overpaid, so they knew they had somebody else.

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 1>So on the weekend before this news officially broke, I

0:46:40.360 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>already bet the Boston Red Sox to win that division,

0:46:43.640 --> 0:46:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and I feel pretty good about the plus three sixty.

0:46:45.760 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I think I got ed or three fifty. It was

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:52.319
<v Speaker 1>pretty good spot there. That's moved obviously since then. But look,

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:53.839
<v Speaker 1>this is a huge blow of the Yankees. You lose

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Juan Soto, you lose Garrett Cole in keeper leagues is

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>crushing news. I think it really forces the Yankees' hand

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to go out there and make a move for another

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>starter sooner than later, because Marcus Stroman and the answer

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>he just not. So how do you recover from this?

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>If you're the Yankees? Here are you? Are you dangerously

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 1>close to losing the window of the prime Garrett Cole

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Judge. Has that just been shut? Was the

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:18.560
<v Speaker 1>high point last year's World Series?

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 2>One thing I want to clean up? Has it been

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:22.480
<v Speaker 2>because he's going for a second opinion? Has that second

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 2>opinion been conferred? I just wanted to point that out.

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 2>He's gonna have Tommy John. The first thing has been

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:31.279
<v Speaker 2>Tommy John. There's a second report out that's saying that

0:47:31.320 --> 0:47:34.239
<v Speaker 2>he just wants a confirmation and then if that is

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:36.319
<v Speaker 2>most likely, he is going to be out for the year.

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Also to mention Gean, Carlos Stanton is a disaster and

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 2>looks like he's out for the year and they've lost

0:47:42.600 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 2>Louis Heel. Louise Heel is going to be out. I

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.280
<v Speaker 2>don't believe you can throw for six to eight weeks

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 2>and then he'll start a throwing program. So that's been

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:52.560
<v Speaker 2>a disaster. So yeah, back to your question.

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, the first opinion to answer yours was Jim Bowden

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>saying that they already got news that he was recommended

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 1>the first opinion for Tommy John. So second opinions. Has

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 1>there ever been a second opinion where they didn't get it? No? No,

0:48:04.400 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>what's coming here?

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.360
<v Speaker 2>When you're going for second opinion on Tommy John? It

0:48:07.400 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 2>never ends. Well, we just wanted to clean that up

0:48:09.239 --> 0:48:12.839
<v Speaker 2>just a tiny bit. But yeah, I think you look

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 2>at like three key players out of this lineup. Are

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.239
<v Speaker 2>you hurting? This isn't the Angels with Prime Judge and

0:48:20.280 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 2>Prime trout like, they're not squandering it. They're just it's

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 2>getting messed up.

0:48:24.800 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.399
<v Speaker 2>They couldn't bring Sodo back, and their star pitcher ends

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.680
<v Speaker 2>up having Tommy John their big young rookie of the

0:48:30.719 --> 0:48:33.080
<v Speaker 2>year stud he's injured. So it's just it is. It's

0:48:33.200 --> 0:48:35.920
<v Speaker 2>unfortunate luck. I'm not one hundred percent sure they're squandering it.

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Where it'll feel squandering is when they don't make any trades.

0:48:41.040 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 2>Ever thing well, when they when they look at guys

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.560
<v Speaker 2>like you know, Spencer Jones and they don't take any

0:48:46.560 --> 0:48:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of those assets and go and make a move, you know,

0:48:48.640 --> 0:48:50.200
<v Speaker 2>and go and try to trade for a Dylan c

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:52.719
<v Speaker 2>So they don't do anything like that, that'll feel where

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like squandered. I think the best that they're going

0:48:56.080 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to do is they there's a rumor that they reached

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 2>out to JD. Martinez about the Stanton stuff, but they

0:49:02.040 --> 0:49:05.080
<v Speaker 2>couldn't come to terms. There's a few guys still left

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 2>out there. Kyle Gibson is still out on the market.

0:49:07.440 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 2>I think they're just going to put band aids on

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 2>a broken bone, and it's pretty miss.

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Good news community. He's going to lock in that rotation

0:49:14.440 --> 0:49:16.440
<v Speaker 1>for a while now, for sure, with all these injuries.

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:19.080
<v Speaker 1>But this is a tough situation here for the Yankees,

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of expectations. But again, this was inevitable.

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I told you it was coming. I hate sometimes I

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:28.560
<v Speaker 1>don't like being right, but this was already do But

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I do, but I don't like what I'm right about

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>people being hurt. I'm just trying to do public service

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for the fantasy community saying it's not going to end well,

0:49:37.200 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 1>and unfortunately it did not end well. But what is

0:49:40.360 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be great Fantasy Fest. See that transition Wednesday

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 1>right here on the channel. Make sure you join us

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 1>here for Fantasy Fest. Make sure you subscribe to the channel.

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Drop your comments below three pm Eastern ring the belt

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:54.399
<v Speaker 1>to that goes Dag and remember when you comment below,

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 1>give us your favorite late ADP Steel and you might

0:49:57.600 --> 0:50:00.959
<v Speaker 1>win yourself a John Smaltz autographed jersey. That's right, Good

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 1>time's happening, lots of baseball still to play. Hopefully we

0:50:04.719 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>all stay healthy this year and that'll do it for us.

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on for the Welsh.

0:50:08.440 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:50:14.880 --> 0:50:17.280
<v Speaker 3>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:20.200
<v Speaker 3>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:50:20.320 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 3>or Spotify, follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:50:27.000 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 3>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB