1 00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:10,559 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the 2 00:00:10,600 --> 00:00:14,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am 3 00:00:14,600 --> 00:00:17,840 Speaker 1: Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg 4 00:00:17,920 --> 00:00:21,040 Speaker 1: Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, 5 00:00:21,360 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:24,360 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 2: Within the farmer space, Novo Nordisk the eight rs American 7 00:00:27,440 --> 00:00:30,639 Speaker 2: depository seats down by double digits, in fact lower for 8 00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:33,680 Speaker 2: fifth day, losing about sixteen percent today, and this is 9 00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 2: after its next generation obesity shot Cagri Semma delivered less 10 00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:41,760 Speaker 2: weight loss than Eli Lilly's rival treatment. Let's bring in 11 00:00:41,800 --> 00:00:43,920 Speaker 2: Sam Fazzelli. He is our director of research for Global 12 00:00:43,960 --> 00:00:48,280 Speaker 2: Industries and senior pharmaceutils analysts on what's happening here, and Sam, 13 00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:50,680 Speaker 2: I mean, we've been keeping a close eye on Noah 14 00:00:50,720 --> 00:00:52,880 Speaker 2: Nordous because it was a pioneer and weight loss drugs, 15 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:55,840 Speaker 2: but it appears that it has really fallen behind Eli 16 00:00:55,880 --> 00:00:59,000 Speaker 2: Lilly and continues to fall behind even with this next 17 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:02,680 Speaker 2: gen obesity shot. The data shows a twenty point two 18 00:01:02,720 --> 00:01:06,040 Speaker 2: percent weight loss after eighty four weeks compared with Eli 19 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:09,240 Speaker 2: Lilly's twenty three point six percent weight loss. I mean 20 00:01:09,480 --> 00:01:12,280 Speaker 2: that sounds like, it's pretty small differences. Is that an 21 00:01:12,400 --> 00:01:13,679 Speaker 2: unqualified failure? 22 00:01:15,319 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 3: Well, the trial was set up Scarlett to test one 23 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:22,760 Speaker 3: drug against the other and it failed, right, So that's you. 24 00:01:22,760 --> 00:01:26,119 Speaker 3: You know, when they start these trials, I have hypothesis, 25 00:01:26,400 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 3: we think our drug is as good as this one, 26 00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 3: and they set the hypothesis up. They do the right 27 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:34,600 Speaker 3: number of patients to prove that agorisma is as good 28 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:37,960 Speaker 3: as tears appetite. It didn't prove that. What it does 29 00:01:38,319 --> 00:01:40,480 Speaker 3: I mean, I don't really care about this. Twenty three percent, 30 00:01:40,560 --> 00:01:43,720 Speaker 3: twenty five percent. A lot of people are happy with 31 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,039 Speaker 3: the weight loss they get and they maintain the weight loss. 32 00:01:46,040 --> 00:01:48,760 Speaker 3: That's what they care about. This rapid weight loss of 33 00:01:48,920 --> 00:01:52,440 Speaker 3: very large weight loss may matter for much more Obeis 34 00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:56,360 Speaker 3: patients potentially, But the reality is this is handed the 35 00:01:56,400 --> 00:01:59,720 Speaker 3: gift to Eli Lilly. Now, once the date is published, 36 00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 3: they can go out there and say, well, look we've 37 00:02:02,760 --> 00:02:06,280 Speaker 3: beaten b GOV, We've beaten the next generation drug. They've 38 00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:09,720 Speaker 3: got at least unweight loss on the surface. What happens 39 00:02:09,720 --> 00:02:11,680 Speaker 3: to muscle laws and all that sort of stuff will 40 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:14,919 Speaker 3: come out, Oh for a fat versus visceral fat, et cetera. 41 00:02:15,600 --> 00:02:18,200 Speaker 3: We've beaten them is the drug to take and they 42 00:02:18,400 --> 00:02:20,400 Speaker 3: should be able to sell as much as they can 43 00:02:20,440 --> 00:02:23,560 Speaker 3: make so, which is kind of what's been going on already. 44 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:26,120 Speaker 2: All Right, thank you for explaining that it's the relative 45 00:02:26,160 --> 00:02:29,440 Speaker 2: effectiveness and in this case giving Eilily an easy win. 46 00:02:30,400 --> 00:02:32,919 Speaker 2: Why is it that Nova Noordisk has lost so much 47 00:02:32,960 --> 00:02:35,480 Speaker 2: ground and its edge to Eli Lilly. Does it come 48 00:02:35,520 --> 00:02:37,600 Speaker 2: down to the science of it or is there something 49 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:41,440 Speaker 2: culturally at the company that's led to this underperformance. 50 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:44,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, I can't speak to the culture, to be honest 51 00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:46,960 Speaker 3: with you. I mean, this has been a phenomenal story 52 00:02:47,080 --> 00:02:51,720 Speaker 3: for years. Right, They were the pioneers in obesity, they 53 00:02:52,520 --> 00:02:55,919 Speaker 3: in diabetes. With this class of drugs they brought for obesity. 54 00:02:56,480 --> 00:02:59,960 Speaker 3: They have a lot to applaud for them. For the point, 55 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 3: which is all these companies take calculated risks. Back in 56 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:07,920 Speaker 3: twenty fifteen sixteen, really took a calculated risk by this 57 00:03:08,120 --> 00:03:12,080 Speaker 3: new molecule, a GLP one attached to it, a GOP. 58 00:03:12,240 --> 00:03:13,919 Speaker 3: Let's forget what they are, but they are two different 59 00:03:13,960 --> 00:03:17,600 Speaker 3: ways of modulating the system. And nobody thought that GOP 60 00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 3: would do what it did. So they were lucky. They 61 00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:23,760 Speaker 3: threw the dice and they got the right answer, or 62 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:26,400 Speaker 3: they just had a very clever biology person said I 63 00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:28,320 Speaker 3: disagree with the rest the world, GP will do this. 64 00:03:28,560 --> 00:03:31,520 Speaker 3: So they ended up with a supercharge product. And then 65 00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:34,360 Speaker 3: of course no one never went down that road. Even 66 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:36,560 Speaker 3: since twenty eighteen when we all saw the first data 67 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:39,400 Speaker 3: went wow, there's a whole bunch of other companies who 68 00:03:39,400 --> 00:03:43,040 Speaker 3: did this. We have a list that we keep, not Novoe. 69 00:03:43,200 --> 00:03:45,560 Speaker 3: They put their dice or they put their money on 70 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 3: this combination amulin. A lot of people have too, but 71 00:03:49,440 --> 00:03:51,560 Speaker 3: so it hasn't worked out. It's just the way that 72 00:03:51,640 --> 00:03:54,640 Speaker 3: drug development goes. In six years time, you might find 73 00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:58,800 Speaker 3: that some mechanism they've got starts to beat what Lily has, 74 00:03:58,920 --> 00:04:00,440 Speaker 3: but we don't see that at the minute, and we 75 00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:02,960 Speaker 3: haven't got any site on those things. 76 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:05,600 Speaker 4: Karen from the Jersey Shore Rights in and says she's 77 00:04:05,680 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 4: a huge fan of weg be worked just great, Yo, Sam, 78 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:13,760 Speaker 4: Here we go merk splitting its main pharmaceutical unit in 79 00:04:13,800 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 4: two as it prepares for the approaching patent experty of 80 00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:18,520 Speaker 4: its best selling drug. 81 00:04:18,680 --> 00:04:19,479 Speaker 5: What's going on here? 82 00:04:20,600 --> 00:04:22,840 Speaker 3: Yes, so there's one other company that does this since 83 00:04:22,960 --> 00:04:24,800 Speaker 3: been one of the you know, you plot the share 84 00:04:24,880 --> 00:04:27,240 Speaker 3: charts and you go, Wow, that's pretty cool. And that's 85 00:04:27,240 --> 00:04:32,320 Speaker 3: ask Seneca as has for a long time had a 86 00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:36,800 Speaker 3: division a personally responsible for oncology business and responsible for 87 00:04:36,839 --> 00:04:40,520 Speaker 3: oncology drug development. That's always been there. I think they 88 00:04:40,560 --> 00:04:43,920 Speaker 3: recognized they had assets and that on coology drug development 89 00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 3: is quite different to every other area. Here's Mark now 90 00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:51,080 Speaker 3: doing the same thing. Is it suggesting that they, because 91 00:04:51,120 --> 00:04:53,560 Speaker 3: of the number of drugs that they've got coming some 92 00:04:53,720 --> 00:04:56,040 Speaker 3: in on college or someone elsewhere, it's better to have 93 00:04:56,080 --> 00:04:58,520 Speaker 3: two units that look after these two things, especially in 94 00:04:58,560 --> 00:05:00,880 Speaker 3: the R and D side. I think doing the right thing. 95 00:05:01,400 --> 00:05:04,279 Speaker 3: I don't think it tells us much about separating the 96 00:05:04,360 --> 00:05:06,560 Speaker 3: reporting lines and all that sort of stuff, or the 97 00:05:07,040 --> 00:05:10,000 Speaker 3: P and L look of things. I think it's much 98 00:05:10,040 --> 00:05:12,520 Speaker 3: more to do with making sure that they're going to 99 00:05:12,520 --> 00:05:15,880 Speaker 3: get the best chance in the specialty farmer as they 100 00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:18,440 Speaker 3: call and oncology, and I think that's the right call 101 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:20,000 Speaker 3: to make by them. 102 00:05:20,240 --> 00:05:22,960 Speaker 2: Does it lead to a formal spinoff where you might 103 00:05:23,000 --> 00:05:25,200 Speaker 2: have two publicly traded companies or is this more like 104 00:05:25,240 --> 00:05:27,159 Speaker 2: an internal division within the company. 105 00:05:27,360 --> 00:05:30,360 Speaker 3: Yeah, I doubt this is about a spin off. I mean, 106 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:33,680 Speaker 3: who knows. I'm not in the board of listening to 107 00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:36,279 Speaker 3: the or even a fly on the wall. And the 108 00:05:36,360 --> 00:05:38,360 Speaker 3: thing is, I don't think you need to go that far. 109 00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:41,280 Speaker 3: I think this just reckly reorganizing the business in a 110 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:43,800 Speaker 3: way that works best for the pipeline. And I think 111 00:05:43,800 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 3: that's the right thing to do, especially if my colleague 112 00:05:46,720 --> 00:05:50,400 Speaker 3: or Guessbacker and Vene Hamilton are right that actually the 113 00:05:50,480 --> 00:05:52,800 Speaker 3: key truder that people think is going to expire in 114 00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:55,479 Speaker 3: terms of their patents in twenty twenty nine has another 115 00:05:55,520 --> 00:05:57,479 Speaker 3: extra three years of cash flow or four years of 116 00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:00,200 Speaker 3: cash flow to twenty thirty three. Remember it's the bigest 117 00:06:00,279 --> 00:06:03,520 Speaker 3: drug in the world. If they're right in their patent analysis, 118 00:06:04,160 --> 00:06:06,520 Speaker 3: you know, this really puts that on collegey business in 119 00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:07,559 Speaker 3: super charge mode. 120 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:09,720 Speaker 5: Yeah, Sam, thanks so much for joining us. Appreciate it. 121 00:06:09,760 --> 00:06:12,400 Speaker 4: Sam Pazzelli, Director Research for Global Industries and senior Pharma 122 00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 4: analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's based on London, where it's 123 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:15,839 Speaker 4: not snowing. 124 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:19,599 Speaker 5: Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this. 125 00:06:23,480 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live 126 00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:29,960 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am. He's done on Apple, Corplay and 127 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:33,240 Speaker 1: Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand 128 00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:36,839 Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts or watch us live on YouTube. 129 00:06:37,560 --> 00:06:38,279 Speaker 5: One of the big. 130 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:41,200 Speaker 2: Gainers in today's trade, or maybe Vegas an overstatement, but 131 00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:44,919 Speaker 2: given that we're seeing sizable losses in the equity indexes, 132 00:06:45,640 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 2: I'd say two point four percent move higher is kind 133 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:49,560 Speaker 2: of game, kind of. 134 00:06:49,520 --> 00:06:50,000 Speaker 3: Big, right. 135 00:06:50,200 --> 00:06:53,840 Speaker 2: Domino's Pizza DPZ is the ticker moving higher today. The 136 00:06:53,880 --> 00:06:57,039 Speaker 2: company reported a bigger than expected rise in comparable sales. 137 00:06:57,320 --> 00:06:59,960 Speaker 2: So let's bring in Michael Helen. He is our senior 138 00:07:00,120 --> 00:07:05,000 Speaker 2: restaurant and food service analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence, and Michael, 139 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:08,000 Speaker 2: Domino's provides a lot of value to people. You see 140 00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:12,000 Speaker 2: those ads for buy one, get one free, and they've 141 00:07:12,040 --> 00:07:15,880 Speaker 2: added stuffed pizza crust to their repertoire. So people are 142 00:07:15,880 --> 00:07:19,920 Speaker 2: getting value and they're getting something I guess in terms 143 00:07:19,960 --> 00:07:23,240 Speaker 2: of food value as well. Talk to us about Domino's 144 00:07:23,240 --> 00:07:24,560 Speaker 2: Pizza and the strategy here. 145 00:07:27,200 --> 00:07:29,920 Speaker 6: Yeah, so you know, to your point, they are out 146 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:31,960 Speaker 6: performing the market pretty handily. 147 00:07:32,080 --> 00:07:32,360 Speaker 3: Today. 148 00:07:32,400 --> 00:07:37,240 Speaker 6: It was a pretty solid report. Saam store sales topped expectations. 149 00:07:37,360 --> 00:07:40,400 Speaker 6: You know, they're doing it with a few different things. Yes, 150 00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:44,400 Speaker 6: the food innovation stuff crust isn't groundbreaking, but it's something 151 00:07:44,400 --> 00:07:47,240 Speaker 6: that their national competitors had already offered, right, and so 152 00:07:47,240 --> 00:07:49,880 Speaker 6: they're trying to take a piece of that market here 153 00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:53,160 Speaker 6: in the US value to your point, right, they're number 154 00:07:53,200 --> 00:07:55,680 Speaker 6: one pizza player here in the United States. They have 155 00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 6: more stores than anyone else, and they have that scale, 156 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 6: so they are able to offer price points that their 157 00:08:01,360 --> 00:08:05,680 Speaker 6: competitors really can't match and and keep it profitable for 158 00:08:05,760 --> 00:08:07,640 Speaker 6: the franchisees. 159 00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:08,120 Speaker 5: You know. 160 00:08:08,240 --> 00:08:10,280 Speaker 6: And then another big part of the strategy here has 161 00:08:10,320 --> 00:08:14,880 Speaker 6: been the door Dash and Uber Eats expansion, right, So 162 00:08:14,920 --> 00:08:18,120 Speaker 6: they're still delivering the food themselves, but they're posting their 163 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:23,320 Speaker 6: their food on the third party aggregator sites and that's 164 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:26,840 Speaker 6: been been a big boost to their business as well. 165 00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:30,000 Speaker 4: What's the difference in economics might using one of their 166 00:08:30,040 --> 00:08:32,120 Speaker 4: own drivers versus a third. 167 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:37,000 Speaker 5: Party like a door Dash. Yeah, it's a big difference, Paul. 168 00:08:37,040 --> 00:08:41,640 Speaker 6: It's it probably costs a big player like Dominoes, it 169 00:08:41,640 --> 00:08:44,280 Speaker 6: would probably you know, for them to deliver it themselves. 170 00:08:44,360 --> 00:08:45,439 Speaker 5: It probably costs them. 171 00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:49,800 Speaker 6: Half of what it would cost, maybe even less than 172 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 6: half of what it would call. So it makes a 173 00:08:51,720 --> 00:08:55,880 Speaker 6: huge difference on the delivery economics, you know. So for 174 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:59,480 Speaker 6: the chains that already have a delivery network like Dominoes. 175 00:08:59,480 --> 00:09:00,560 Speaker 5: It's really a no brainer. 176 00:09:01,640 --> 00:09:04,480 Speaker 2: One thing that Dominoes did over the last quarter was 177 00:09:04,520 --> 00:09:06,640 Speaker 2: make more money by selling more food to its stores, 178 00:09:06,720 --> 00:09:10,720 Speaker 2: charging higher prices for ingredients, collecting more fees from the 179 00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:14,120 Speaker 2: franchise operators for advertising and royalties. That's good for the 180 00:09:14,120 --> 00:09:19,120 Speaker 2: bottom line, But does it sour relationships with franchise operators? 181 00:09:19,400 --> 00:09:21,600 Speaker 2: I mean, how does that? How does Dominoes manage that 182 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:22,280 Speaker 2: going forward? 183 00:09:23,720 --> 00:09:25,760 Speaker 5: Yeah, that's that's a good question, Scarlett. 184 00:09:25,880 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 6: You know, franchise ze relationships is crucial in this business 185 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:31,679 Speaker 6: because they're going to be the ones, you know, forking 186 00:09:31,760 --> 00:09:34,760 Speaker 6: up the capital to build new stores, right, So you 187 00:09:34,800 --> 00:09:37,319 Speaker 6: want to keep them happy with strong same source sales, 188 00:09:37,360 --> 00:09:39,760 Speaker 6: you know, at three percent plus almost four percent. Game 189 00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:44,200 Speaker 6: keeps them happy, you know, in terms of the supply chain, 190 00:09:44,320 --> 00:09:47,080 Speaker 6: so you know, Domino's owns the supply chain. They want 191 00:09:47,080 --> 00:09:51,480 Speaker 6: to make sure that their franchisees aren't skimping on quality, right, 192 00:09:51,559 --> 00:09:54,560 Speaker 6: and so what they do to make this palatable for 193 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:58,920 Speaker 6: their franchisees is they actually split the revenues on a 194 00:09:58,960 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 6: monthly basis via checks with their franchisees, right. And so, yes, 195 00:10:02,840 --> 00:10:05,520 Speaker 6: prices are going up expected to go up low single 196 00:10:05,520 --> 00:10:10,439 Speaker 6: digits this year for commodities and in the supply chain. Right, 197 00:10:10,440 --> 00:10:13,679 Speaker 6: but they give back half of that half of their 198 00:10:13,720 --> 00:10:16,680 Speaker 6: profit increase back to their franchises and a sharing agreement. 199 00:10:17,400 --> 00:10:19,200 Speaker 4: All right, Mike, thanks so much for joining us as 200 00:10:19,200 --> 00:10:21,640 Speaker 4: always our go to voice on all things in the 201 00:10:21,640 --> 00:10:25,120 Speaker 4: restaurant business. Mike Kaitlin covers the restaurants for Bloomberg Intelligence. 202 00:10:26,040 --> 00:10:29,199 Speaker 5: Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this. 203 00:10:33,080 --> 00:10:36,800 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live 204 00:10:36,880 --> 00:10:39,920 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android 205 00:10:39,960 --> 00:10:43,280 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever 206 00:10:43,320 --> 00:10:46,440 Speaker 1: you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 207 00:10:47,200 --> 00:10:51,880 Speaker 4: A pair of retailers, retailers, they win some tailor relief, 208 00:10:52,480 --> 00:10:54,199 Speaker 4: teriff relief on Supreme Court ruling. 209 00:10:54,240 --> 00:10:54,760 Speaker 5: So how about that? 210 00:10:54,800 --> 00:10:56,400 Speaker 4: So maybe some of these are pair of retailers that 211 00:10:56,440 --> 00:10:58,120 Speaker 4: get a little bit of a break here as they've 212 00:10:58,160 --> 00:11:00,240 Speaker 4: been bearing some of the brunt of the terror here. 213 00:11:00,240 --> 00:11:02,680 Speaker 4: Mary Ross Gilbert joins his senior equity analysts. 214 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:03,360 Speaker 5: She covers the. 215 00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:05,880 Speaker 4: Retail space for Bloomberg Intelligence. She's out there in La 216 00:11:05,960 --> 00:11:09,600 Speaker 4: where it is not snowing. I can tell you that Mary, 217 00:11:09,600 --> 00:11:12,600 Speaker 4: thanks so much for joining us here. Supreme Court ruling 218 00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:15,560 Speaker 4: striking down some of those I reciprocal tariffs. What's it 219 00:11:15,600 --> 00:11:17,760 Speaker 4: mean for the retailers that you cover? 220 00:11:19,240 --> 00:11:22,400 Speaker 7: Yes, so, Paul, what this means is that we're going 221 00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:26,120 Speaker 7: to get some relief. We're not getting complete relief from tariffs. 222 00:11:26,120 --> 00:11:28,960 Speaker 7: So when you think about it, just before Trump over 223 00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:32,120 Speaker 7: the weekend on Saturday, I mean, first, on Friday, he 224 00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:37,560 Speaker 7: said he was going to exercise his ability to enforce 225 00:11:37,679 --> 00:11:40,240 Speaker 7: Section one point twenty two of the nineteen seventy four 226 00:11:40,320 --> 00:11:44,240 Speaker 7: Tariff Code, and you can go up to about fifteen percent. 227 00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:47,760 Speaker 7: So on Friday he announced ten percent immediately or actually 228 00:11:47,800 --> 00:11:50,319 Speaker 7: it was in three days, and then Saturday said immediately 229 00:11:50,360 --> 00:11:53,360 Speaker 7: fifteen percent. So really, what that means is you're going 230 00:11:53,400 --> 00:11:57,600 Speaker 7: to get about a twenty five percent savings from the 231 00:11:57,679 --> 00:12:02,440 Speaker 7: tariff rates that these apparel retailers were paying just prior 232 00:12:02,520 --> 00:12:05,400 Speaker 7: to this news that came out on Saturday. And so 233 00:12:05,480 --> 00:12:08,520 Speaker 7: we estimate that the savings could be anywhere from twenty 234 00:12:08,520 --> 00:12:11,240 Speaker 7: to fifty basis points, maybe a little more than that. 235 00:12:11,880 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 7: And many of these apparel companies have been putting in 236 00:12:14,840 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 7: mitigation measures, and of course the number one being well 237 00:12:18,280 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 7: first of all diversifying away from China so they have 238 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:26,360 Speaker 7: a lot less exposure there, and then also their suppliers 239 00:12:26,440 --> 00:12:30,679 Speaker 7: absorbing let's say, about half of the tariff impact, and 240 00:12:30,760 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 7: then of course price increases and that's being passed on 241 00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:37,440 Speaker 7: to the consumer, and it's done very selectively, and so 242 00:12:37,760 --> 00:12:41,000 Speaker 7: that's why the savings, the net savings is going to 243 00:12:41,040 --> 00:12:43,640 Speaker 7: be somewhere around twenty to fifty basis points. And just 244 00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:46,680 Speaker 7: to give you an example, what companies have disclosed is 245 00:12:46,679 --> 00:12:49,959 Speaker 7: on an annual basis, they were looking for a net 246 00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:53,800 Speaker 7: tariff impact again net of these mitigation measures to be 247 00:12:53,960 --> 00:12:56,400 Speaker 7: somewhere in that sort of one hundred to two hundred 248 00:12:56,440 --> 00:12:59,120 Speaker 7: basis points in that range. 249 00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:02,920 Speaker 4: So I guess it's interesting here because some of these 250 00:13:02,960 --> 00:13:05,360 Speaker 4: retailers have in fact been right kind of in the 251 00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:09,120 Speaker 4: crosshairs of the tariff debate. Have any of the companies 252 00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:11,480 Speaker 4: that you covered they talked about whether they would even 253 00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:16,800 Speaker 4: think about getting tear rebates if that's a possibility, Paul, that's. 254 00:13:16,679 --> 00:13:22,080 Speaker 7: A really good question. It's I can't imagine that a 255 00:13:22,200 --> 00:13:26,320 Speaker 7: rebate process could actually go into effect. It would be 256 00:13:27,040 --> 00:13:30,560 Speaker 7: a nightmare to try to go back and recover these funds. 257 00:13:31,400 --> 00:13:35,840 Speaker 7: It just seems I don't know, I think it's too complex. 258 00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:39,600 Speaker 7: I think we just have to let whatever tariffs were 259 00:13:39,840 --> 00:13:44,559 Speaker 7: already enforced and the funds received. I certainly hope that 260 00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:46,880 Speaker 7: doesn't happen because that could turn out to be a 261 00:13:47,040 --> 00:13:50,960 Speaker 7: very expensive nightmare trying to recover those funds, and then 262 00:13:51,160 --> 00:13:53,200 Speaker 7: the idea would be, well, should it go back to 263 00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:56,600 Speaker 7: the consumer once, you know, if companies were to recover it. 264 00:13:56,679 --> 00:14:00,559 Speaker 4: So, yeah, it's very cool. So given that, I mean 265 00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,280 Speaker 4: we've had, you know, roughly a year of these tariffs. 266 00:14:03,760 --> 00:14:06,200 Speaker 4: Is there a kind of a ballpark that you've arrived at, 267 00:14:06,280 --> 00:14:08,760 Speaker 4: or the companies have disclosed about how much they took 268 00:14:08,800 --> 00:14:12,360 Speaker 4: into their margin versus maybe how much the importer took 269 00:14:12,440 --> 00:14:15,880 Speaker 4: into its margin the consumer took into its margin. 270 00:14:15,960 --> 00:14:16,160 Speaker 3: There. 271 00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:22,520 Speaker 7: Yeah, it's very it's complex to say specifically, but I 272 00:14:22,560 --> 00:14:25,520 Speaker 7: think what we were trying to allude to earlier, that 273 00:14:25,560 --> 00:14:28,560 Speaker 7: one hundred to two hundred basis points is what these 274 00:14:28,680 --> 00:14:32,760 Speaker 7: companies are effectively taking in on an annual basis based 275 00:14:32,800 --> 00:14:36,280 Speaker 7: on commentary from the third quarter earnings call. So they 276 00:14:36,360 --> 00:14:42,280 Speaker 7: might have gotten hit more or less depending on the 277 00:14:42,320 --> 00:14:46,040 Speaker 7: retailer that we're talking about and goods that were sourced 278 00:14:46,120 --> 00:14:48,800 Speaker 7: during various times, right, because if you had some retailers 279 00:14:49,080 --> 00:14:52,560 Speaker 7: that sourced fall and winter during that time when China 280 00:14:53,120 --> 00:14:55,600 Speaker 7: had a tariff that was well over one hundred percent, 281 00:14:56,240 --> 00:15:00,400 Speaker 7: then that merchandise and their margin was affected very much 282 00:15:00,440 --> 00:15:03,160 Speaker 7: so because they had already taken delivery of that product. 283 00:15:03,560 --> 00:15:06,960 Speaker 7: So really it depends on the retailer. And then you 284 00:15:06,960 --> 00:15:10,920 Speaker 7: have a couple of retailers, for example, Aritzia and Ralph Lauren. 285 00:15:12,120 --> 00:15:15,520 Speaker 7: Both of those companies have been posting margin increases all 286 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:19,240 Speaker 7: year and so they've been able to benefit from strong sales. 287 00:15:19,560 --> 00:15:22,000 Speaker 7: What that means is that they're able to leverage fixed 288 00:15:22,040 --> 00:15:25,320 Speaker 7: costs and get incremental benefits there and also pass on 289 00:15:25,440 --> 00:15:29,560 Speaker 7: price increases. And so even though they've been negatively impacted 290 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:33,040 Speaker 7: by tariffs, you're not seeing that net effect, whereas most 291 00:15:33,040 --> 00:15:36,320 Speaker 7: of the other retailers you have seen margins dented, and 292 00:15:36,360 --> 00:15:40,000 Speaker 7: they've disclosed every quarter what the tariff impact has been 293 00:15:40,520 --> 00:15:45,400 Speaker 7: net mitigation measures, and also they'll provide sort of the 294 00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:48,400 Speaker 7: gross impact. So like I said, I would say the 295 00:15:48,840 --> 00:15:51,360 Speaker 7: net one hundred to or two hundred basis points. Think 296 00:15:51,400 --> 00:15:55,000 Speaker 7: about gap Abercrombie gaps at the lower level, they set 297 00:15:55,040 --> 00:15:57,040 Speaker 7: annual impact about one hundred to one hundred and ten 298 00:15:57,080 --> 00:16:02,160 Speaker 7: basis points, Abercrombie and Fitch about one seven, and American 299 00:16:02,200 --> 00:16:04,520 Speaker 7: Eagle they were sort of harder two hundred to two 300 00:16:04,600 --> 00:16:06,000 Speaker 7: hundred and twenty five basis points. 301 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:08,200 Speaker 4: All right, very good, Mary Ross Gilbert, thank you so 302 00:16:08,280 --> 00:16:08,880 Speaker 4: much for joining us. 303 00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:09,560 Speaker 5: Mary ros Gilbert. 304 00:16:09,600 --> 00:16:11,760 Speaker 4: She's a senior ecodanaly she covers the retail space for 305 00:16:11,760 --> 00:16:16,800 Speaker 4: Bloomberg Intelligence, and she's located out there in La California office. 306 00:16:18,520 --> 00:16:20,920 Speaker 5: Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up. 307 00:16:21,080 --> 00:16:21,560 Speaker 7: Fire for this. 308 00:16:24,640 --> 00:16:28,360 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live 309 00:16:28,440 --> 00:16:31,520 Speaker 1: weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android 310 00:16:31,520 --> 00:16:34,840 Speaker 1: Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever 311 00:16:34,920 --> 00:16:38,000 Speaker 1: you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 312 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 4: Friday, we had the Supreme Court strike down some of 313 00:16:41,400 --> 00:16:45,040 Speaker 4: President Trump's reciprocal tires. We've got some new ones. They're 314 00:16:45,040 --> 00:16:48,240 Speaker 4: back ten no, fifteen percent coming back. 315 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:50,800 Speaker 5: Are these things going to be litigated? I have no idea. 316 00:16:50,840 --> 00:16:55,560 Speaker 4: Holly from she's a Bloomberg Intelligence litigation analyst. Holly, thanks 317 00:16:55,640 --> 00:16:57,440 Speaker 4: much for joining us here. We had the Supreme Court 318 00:16:57,520 --> 00:17:01,160 Speaker 4: ruling here, what's left to be gated? If any because 319 00:17:01,160 --> 00:17:03,960 Speaker 4: there's still lots and lots and lots of tariffs out there. 320 00:17:06,200 --> 00:17:10,000 Speaker 8: So what's left to be litigated probably is what happens 321 00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:12,879 Speaker 8: with all the tariffs that have been collected, Like, do 322 00:17:12,880 --> 00:17:17,119 Speaker 8: do the importers have to go who want refunds have 323 00:17:17,200 --> 00:17:20,359 Speaker 8: to go to the Court of International Trade to see refunds? 324 00:17:20,400 --> 00:17:22,359 Speaker 8: Do they have to file lawsuits or can they just 325 00:17:22,440 --> 00:17:24,960 Speaker 8: file some kind of application with the Customs with Worder 326 00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:27,960 Speaker 8: Protection Agency. So that's a question that's still outstanding. It 327 00:17:28,040 --> 00:17:32,440 Speaker 8: doesn't affect the tariffs that Trump imposed via Section two 328 00:17:32,480 --> 00:17:37,639 Speaker 8: thirty two, which work on things like aluminium, steel and 329 00:17:37,680 --> 00:17:40,200 Speaker 8: auto and autoparts, and it doesn't affect through one tariffs 330 00:17:40,240 --> 00:17:42,159 Speaker 8: that were imposed in twenty eighteen. 331 00:17:43,640 --> 00:17:46,560 Speaker 2: Okay, So that's that's where it stands. Well on the 332 00:17:46,560 --> 00:17:50,280 Speaker 2: main tariffs. What about the deminimous exemption. Explain to us 333 00:17:50,359 --> 00:17:53,320 Speaker 2: how that works and whether that's affected by the Supreme 334 00:17:53,359 --> 00:17:53,920 Speaker 2: Courts ruling. 335 00:17:55,119 --> 00:17:58,880 Speaker 8: So the dominimus exemption is not necessarily affected. It's an exemption. 336 00:17:58,960 --> 00:18:01,800 Speaker 8: It's not a terriff, so it's an exemption to a terriff. 337 00:18:01,840 --> 00:18:06,360 Speaker 8: So we don't know if this if the ruling means 338 00:18:06,440 --> 00:18:11,200 Speaker 8: that the that the Court that he cannot remove an 339 00:18:11,880 --> 00:18:15,080 Speaker 8: a terror he cannot remove an exemption to a teriff. 340 00:18:15,480 --> 00:18:17,919 Speaker 8: So it's not necessarily the case that that So the 341 00:18:17,920 --> 00:18:20,399 Speaker 8: Supreme Court didn't answer that question. In other words, that 342 00:18:20,480 --> 00:18:23,840 Speaker 8: ruling doesn't answer the question. But I think there's a 343 00:18:23,880 --> 00:18:27,560 Speaker 8: case that's playing out now UH at the International Trade Court. 344 00:18:27,560 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 8: That ruling was that that case case was stay pending 345 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:34,920 Speaker 8: appeal of the of the Supreme Court ruling. And so 346 00:18:35,280 --> 00:18:38,160 Speaker 8: what I think happens is I think that the court 347 00:18:38,240 --> 00:18:42,480 Speaker 8: will say that he probably can't remove that exemption via 348 00:18:42,520 --> 00:18:45,959 Speaker 8: executive order. It probably has to be some kind of regulation. 349 00:18:46,320 --> 00:18:49,359 Speaker 8: And it's not even clear that that that his his 350 00:18:49,440 --> 00:18:53,159 Speaker 8: Trade secretary can promulgates. And it's not even clear that 351 00:18:53,200 --> 00:18:56,399 Speaker 8: he can remove it at all, because there's some question 352 00:18:56,400 --> 00:18:59,119 Speaker 8: as to whether that exemption is mandatory based on the 353 00:18:59,160 --> 00:19:00,000 Speaker 8: language of the statue. 354 00:19:00,080 --> 00:19:04,040 Speaker 4: You if I want to get a refund to some 355 00:19:05,160 --> 00:19:07,720 Speaker 4: terroriffts that I've paid, how do I do that? 356 00:19:09,520 --> 00:19:13,640 Speaker 8: So normally what you do is what happens is the 357 00:19:13,680 --> 00:19:16,679 Speaker 8: goods come in you, you ask to me what you 358 00:19:16,720 --> 00:19:20,600 Speaker 8: think you owe. The Customs Order Protection Agency decides whether 359 00:19:20,880 --> 00:19:24,680 Speaker 8: that's correct. That's called liquidation. If that amount is finalized 360 00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:27,080 Speaker 8: and it liquidates, you have one hundred and eighty days 361 00:19:27,080 --> 00:19:30,880 Speaker 8: to protest what the Customs Agency says you owe. So 362 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:34,160 Speaker 8: that's normally how you get a refund. You file a protest, 363 00:19:34,560 --> 00:19:36,679 Speaker 8: and they think that that might be the procedure used here, 364 00:19:36,760 --> 00:19:39,360 Speaker 8: but nobody really knows because this has never happened before. 365 00:19:40,640 --> 00:19:43,040 Speaker 4: Well, if I'm if I'm Nike or something like that, 366 00:19:43,800 --> 00:19:47,000 Speaker 4: I mean, do I say you owe me hundreds of 367 00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:49,160 Speaker 4: millions of dollars or something like that? Is that how 368 00:19:49,200 --> 00:19:49,919 Speaker 4: we think it's going to go? 369 00:19:50,000 --> 00:19:51,800 Speaker 5: Or are they are? They actually are people? 370 00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:54,719 Speaker 4: Actually our companies actually go through that the work of 371 00:19:54,800 --> 00:19:55,320 Speaker 4: doing this. 372 00:19:56,600 --> 00:19:59,600 Speaker 8: Well, you know, it probably depends on the amount that 373 00:19:59,720 --> 00:20:04,119 Speaker 8: they think that they're overpaid, and there are also you know, 374 00:20:04,240 --> 00:20:08,080 Speaker 8: other issues that they may take into account. So you know, 375 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:11,399 Speaker 8: it's not clear whether all companies will see refunds. There 376 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:14,240 Speaker 8: are probably some companies that say it's not worth it 377 00:20:14,280 --> 00:20:16,239 Speaker 8: for them to try, so they're going to weigh their 378 00:20:16,320 --> 00:20:19,120 Speaker 8: right to do that. Some of them may be time 379 00:20:19,119 --> 00:20:21,960 Speaker 8: barred from doing that by virtue of the deadline super protest. 380 00:20:22,720 --> 00:20:24,960 Speaker 8: So we don't expect the full amount that's been collected 381 00:20:24,960 --> 00:20:25,760 Speaker 8: to be refunded. 382 00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:29,680 Speaker 2: Holly what will you be watching for and listening for 383 00:20:29,760 --> 00:20:31,840 Speaker 2: when the President speaks in his State of the Union 384 00:20:31,880 --> 00:20:34,080 Speaker 2: tomorrow When it comes to tariffs, I mean, he's going 385 00:20:34,160 --> 00:20:36,040 Speaker 2: to say a lot of things, and we know that 386 00:20:36,160 --> 00:20:38,680 Speaker 2: a lot of what he says he doesn't necessarily it's 387 00:20:38,720 --> 00:20:41,520 Speaker 2: more in the spirit of what he wants. But specifically 388 00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:45,040 Speaker 2: when it comes to the legality of some of this stuff, 389 00:20:45,040 --> 00:20:48,000 Speaker 2: what will you be listening for, Well, we. 390 00:20:47,920 --> 00:20:49,520 Speaker 8: Want to see what he like what you said, We 391 00:20:49,560 --> 00:20:51,560 Speaker 8: want to see what he says because what he wants 392 00:20:51,600 --> 00:20:54,920 Speaker 8: has to be justified by some kind of legal authority, 393 00:20:55,280 --> 00:20:57,840 Speaker 8: and so we want to see, you know, what he's 394 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:00,640 Speaker 8: aiming to do, and then we'll try to figure out 395 00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:02,399 Speaker 8: how he's going to do that. And so there are 396 00:21:02,480 --> 00:21:05,400 Speaker 8: various tariffing tools that he has, and he's already imposed 397 00:21:05,680 --> 00:21:09,280 Speaker 8: terrorist via Section one twenty two, but those are time 398 00:21:09,359 --> 00:21:12,000 Speaker 8: limited for one hundred and fifty days, so we'll probably 399 00:21:12,600 --> 00:21:15,879 Speaker 8: he'll probably use other authorities. And so that's something where 400 00:21:15,560 --> 00:21:17,800 Speaker 8: we're going to look at, is you know, what is 401 00:21:17,800 --> 00:21:20,040 Speaker 8: he trying to do? Can he use the other authorities 402 00:21:20,040 --> 00:21:20,439 Speaker 8: to do that? 403 00:21:21,680 --> 00:21:23,920 Speaker 4: Holly, was there anything or I guess what was most 404 00:21:24,080 --> 00:21:28,360 Speaker 4: notable to you from the Supreme Court ruling on Friday. 405 00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:31,520 Speaker 8: I think that was what was really striking was that 406 00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:35,000 Speaker 8: that they said that this statue doesn't allow terriffs at all. 407 00:21:35,760 --> 00:21:39,440 Speaker 8: So any tariff that he is imposed via this statute 408 00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:43,359 Speaker 8: are probably going to be struck. So teriffs on India 409 00:21:43,359 --> 00:21:45,600 Speaker 8: and Brazil are going to be struck. And what they 410 00:21:45,640 --> 00:21:48,439 Speaker 8: said was a tariff is a tax, and so only 411 00:21:48,480 --> 00:21:51,239 Speaker 8: Congress has the power to tax, and if they are 412 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:53,400 Speaker 8: going to delegate that power, they have to be very 413 00:21:53,480 --> 00:21:56,720 Speaker 8: very clear when they do that, and you know, using 414 00:21:56,720 --> 00:21:59,840 Speaker 8: this vague language and the statue you know, wasn't enough. 415 00:22:00,080 --> 00:22:04,080 Speaker 8: And so that I think that was very interesting. And 416 00:22:04,160 --> 00:22:07,520 Speaker 8: the other thing to note is that you know, they 417 00:22:07,680 --> 00:22:12,800 Speaker 8: did talk about other tariffing powers he has, so it 418 00:22:13,119 --> 00:22:16,040 Speaker 8: may be the case that you know, and we think 419 00:22:16,119 --> 00:22:19,199 Speaker 8: that those tariffing powers rest on you know, better legal footing. 420 00:22:19,320 --> 00:22:22,680 Speaker 8: So the challenges will be harder to the new terriffs 421 00:22:22,720 --> 00:22:26,920 Speaker 8: the imposes if he's going to use you know, well 422 00:22:26,920 --> 00:22:29,360 Speaker 8: settled authorities like Section two thirty two or the Trade 423 00:22:29,359 --> 00:22:32,160 Speaker 8: Expansion Acts or Section three oh one or the Trade Act, 424 00:22:32,160 --> 00:22:35,160 Speaker 8: which both of which he's used before, so challenges will 425 00:22:35,160 --> 00:22:36,560 Speaker 8: probably be harder. 426 00:22:36,880 --> 00:22:38,960 Speaker 2: All right, good stuff. Holly from Thank You So Much, 427 00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:44,080 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Intelligence litigation analysts on how President Trump's fifteen percent 428 00:22:44,160 --> 00:22:48,919 Speaker 2: tariff will likely stick, but if it doesn't, he is 429 00:22:49,000 --> 00:22:52,520 Speaker 2: going to have several options. Holly mentioned section two thirty two. 430 00:22:52,600 --> 00:22:54,800 Speaker 2: There's section two h one. There's section three h one. 431 00:22:54,840 --> 00:22:57,400 Speaker 2: There's Section one twenty two, there's section three thirty eight. 432 00:22:57,400 --> 00:22:59,639 Speaker 2: All of these things take time, so they can't be 433 00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:03,480 Speaker 2: imposed instantly. They require investigation. And in the case of 434 00:23:03,640 --> 00:23:07,520 Speaker 2: Section two thirty two, I believe, oh no, section one 435 00:23:07,640 --> 00:23:10,760 Speaker 2: twenty two, there's like a you know, a time span, 436 00:23:10,880 --> 00:23:13,920 Speaker 2: a time limit of only fifteen months, which seems like 437 00:23:13,960 --> 00:23:16,480 Speaker 2: a lot of work to get a temporary terror Yeah. 438 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:18,520 Speaker 4: And I guess my question I asking a lot of folks, 439 00:23:18,520 --> 00:23:21,879 Speaker 4: particularly on the political side, like Henrietta Trees. Clearly, this 440 00:23:22,000 --> 00:23:27,919 Speaker 4: is pulling tariffs in general, is pulling very poorly. Affordability 441 00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:31,480 Speaker 4: broadly defined, is polling as a very key issue. It's 442 00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:34,960 Speaker 4: almost mind bogging that the president continues to double down 443 00:23:34,960 --> 00:23:37,119 Speaker 4: and triple down on this whole terrorf issue. But it 444 00:23:37,200 --> 00:23:39,480 Speaker 4: is certainly key to his trade policy, to parts of 445 00:23:39,520 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 4: his economic policy. 446 00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:42,560 Speaker 2: His geopolitical policy. 447 00:23:42,680 --> 00:23:42,840 Speaker 3: Yep. 448 00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:45,439 Speaker 5: But I would just if I were his advisor. 449 00:23:45,440 --> 00:23:48,000 Speaker 4: I'm saying, but it's coming at a big cost, mister President, 450 00:23:48,040 --> 00:23:50,159 Speaker 4: in terms of and we've got the midterm elections coming up, 451 00:23:50,200 --> 00:23:52,920 Speaker 4: and we've got some people that are nervous. But I'm 452 00:23:52,920 --> 00:23:54,400 Speaker 4: sure those discussions are being had. 453 00:23:54,440 --> 00:23:56,680 Speaker 2: But well, he's the second term president, so maybe it's 454 00:23:56,680 --> 00:23:58,920 Speaker 2: their problem, someone else's problem, not his problem. 455 00:23:58,840 --> 00:23:59,440 Speaker 5: Exactly right. 456 00:24:00,640 --> 00:24:05,359 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify, 457 00:24:05,520 --> 00:24:09,520 Speaker 1: and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday, 458 00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:13,000 Speaker 1: ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the 459 00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:16,959 Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You 460 00:24:16,960 --> 00:24:20,280 Speaker 1: can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and 461 00:24:20,480 --> 00:24:22,440 Speaker 1: always on the Bloomberg terminal