WEBVTT - 5 Surprising Things About the European ETF Market

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Well carew brilliance. I'm Joel Weber and I'm Eric Belchiernis.

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I was in London recently, Eric, and one thing I've

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>learned about being in London is that you're kind of

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a superman in the ETF space, but you have sidekicks.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of them has been on the show a

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>couple of times. Tom Sarah Vegas. He's relocated to London recently. Yeah,

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>he's like, he's like a Miniu but over there. Yeah,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.279
<v Speaker 1>effectively Robin to your batman, I guess. So you know,

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Tom is his own man. He's much more

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of an expert in smart beta and multi factor research

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>than I am. For sure, he's our smart beta expert.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>But the reason he went to London. He was here

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>for a full year, and we kept getting the same

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 1>reply from clients, I love this data set on the library,

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>or I love this note, but can you do it

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for Europe? But can you do it for Europe? But

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>can you do it for Europe? And we got this

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>so many times that we thought, Okay, we should just

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>do it for Europe. And Tom is being sent there

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it for Europe. So I went to the

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.919
<v Speaker 1>pub with him bottom a pint. We have an incredible office,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this little pub around the corner. We took him there

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and started kicking some stuff around with him, and we

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just started talking about e t F s in Europe,

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and I thought this would actually be a really good episode.

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And he happens to be back in New York now

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>on like a spring break, I guess, And we said,

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>why don't why don't we talk to him about what

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>he's learned in the little baptism he's had in Europe. Yeah,

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good to think global sometimes. The t

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>F they trade and I think last time I checked

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy exchanges around the world. Europe is the second biggest

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>area after the United States. But it is different, and

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>the culture is different, the regulations are different, and kind

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of it was a it's a good excuse to get

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>some perspective on how investors in another country do it

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and some similarities and differences. The US is somewhat spoiled

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's just the US over there. There's all these

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>different countries, They've got different currencies. We sometimes referred to

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it as the Wild West in terms of trying to

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>tame that beast, which is all these different uh like legacy. Uh,

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>situations that make it hard to just do certain things

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.839
<v Speaker 1>that are easy in the US, and so Tom has

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>his work cut out for him. Okay, So joining us

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.679
<v Speaker 1>on this episode of Trillions, Tom Saraphagus, an analyst with

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. This WEEKND Trillions, five surprising things about the

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>European et F markets. Tom, Welcome back to Trilliance. Can

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you say your first name again? Last name Sara Hagus? Okay,

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's I have a much easier time in Europe getting

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>by with that name. He's our version of the Greek freak.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just a basketball player for those who don't know

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>from the other Bucks with a crazy Greek leame. So, Tom,

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>how do you like London so far? It's great. Yeah,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going great. I've always uh, you know, I've

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>been to London before, so you know, before I decided

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to go, I had to make sure I like the city.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of just like a cleaner version of

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>New York, a little bit of a slower pace. But

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so far, so good. And talk to me about what

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you've learned since you've been there. So I think Eric's

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like alluded to it in the intro with

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the t F market, I meant life like it's much

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>slower paced. Uh, And they take their holidays very seriously

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're called holidays. Yeah, they are called holidays, And

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>apartments are called flats. The elevators to lift, so you

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of have to get used to it. You know.

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like English technology. So that is actually a perfect

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>transition into E T S. Right, So what's it like

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>over there? So I would say overall, it's the same

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but different, right, and so can we end the podcast

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>there is that it? So overall, Um, you know, they

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>do want to be like the US, but um, some

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>things that are kind of alluded to, they're just they're

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>not there yet there, you know. I think the biggest

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>thing is we call it Europe, right, but when you

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>think about it, it's all these regional markets all put together.

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They're all very different, to have different mentalities, they have

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>different investor bases. There's a lot of fragmentation in Europe.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think as they move sort of trying to

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>be more centralized, the market is going to grow faster.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>But um, they really want to grow. I think they

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of why we even decided to put an

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>analyst age because they asked for for content. They're like,

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we really want more help into helping figure out this market. Um,

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>which is why we're in the position that we're in.

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So UM, I think it's gonna keep continuing to grow,

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>not to say it doesn't have its own hurdles, but okay,

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so you brought with you something like five mind blowing facts.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Are they gonna blow my mind and Eric's mind or

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>just mine? I'm gonna pretend my mind is blow. I

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>probably know these, but I when I first saw them,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>my mind was blown. So I'll go back to that

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>feeling of not knowing. I think some Eric might know,

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but definitely some Eric might know. Um, I think any

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>of the et F nerds listening are going to be

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>blown away. But there's some other ones that I think

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Eric didn't know about. Drop your hammer. So let's start

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with the first one. Um, there are actually way more

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.280
<v Speaker 1>e t F s in Europe than there are in

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the U. S is about almost three thousand in Europe.

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>There's only about in the US. But asset wise, we're

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>at three point six trillion here less than a trillion

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, right, so way more products, much fewer assets.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And that goes back to the the thing I was talking

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>about fragmentation, right, So if you are so, what you

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>end up finding here is we have three smpts, but

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in Europe you have like fifty stock six et s, right,

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>because of all that fragmentation. So if you are an

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>issue er launching a product in the UK, you're going

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to launch a similar product in France and Germany xcess.

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You end up having a lot of these copycat products,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and because of that, you end up having a lot

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>more products out there, but the assets so when you

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of look at assets per product, it's much less

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. So literally it will be the same et

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>F but listed on different exchanges yep, and like different exchanges.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>And also the thing that we are not used to

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>here in the US their share classes there, right, So

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>if you buy an e t F to paysitive, then

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you're getting that dividend and Europe you get to pick

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that I want the dividend do I want the dividend

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>being reinvested. So there's all these nuances that you don't

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>um sort of appreciate being a US invest So that's

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I think there's a little behavioral economics in there,

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>which is when you have too much choice. Maybe it's

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. And when you talk about all those

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>different products, are we talking about if you are are

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>you are they cross list thing on all these different

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>exchanges or do they actually go to that country domicile

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 1>and come out with a fresh new product in that country. No,

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So what it will be is um. There's also issuers

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in all different countries. Right, So there's DWS right, which

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>is German, There's I Shares, there's the French issues, so

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them. What they do is okay, So

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:41.239
<v Speaker 1>like French clients are gonna buy from the French issues,

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>So the French companies are going to launch the you know,

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the the broad bench mark e TS DWUS is gonna

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>launch this broad market et F, I Shares, Vanguard, etcetera.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So you end up having a lot of the same

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>products just launched them the different respective markets. Um. And

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>then on the cross listings. That's one thing too. But

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 1>there's also different share classes which we don't have here

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in the U. S. That's a that's a very new

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 1>thing for anyone who's sort of been trained in the

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 1>US and going over to Europe. Uh. And they also

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>have different currencies. Again, I think we don't really have

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to deal with here. So there's a lot more decisions

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that go into buying an et F there do I

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>want this? Do I want the dividends? And what currency

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I want? A currency hedge? And then what currency the frank,

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the Euro, the pound. Right, So there's all these decisions

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that go into buying an ETF that we don't that

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not necessarily used to here. Okay, so related what

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>are people investing in if they're not investing in ETFs

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>active mutual funds? So like here again, the whole the

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>big battle there is sort of active active mutual funds

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>versus et s UM And then a new piece of

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of of regulation went into effect last year which is

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>MYFED two, and that was really trying to shine the

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>light on the cost of active. Right, active funds are

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>much more expensive. Research plays a big part in that

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it does, and the unbeldoding of research and ETFs just

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>naturally are going to be the beneficiary of that. Right

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>as there's more scrutiny on costs and that comes the light, uh,

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's sort of trying to get away from the

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>commission based models which have been really big in Europe.

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Et f are just naturally gonna do we just pause there?

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is major to me. This is the biggest catalyst

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for et F growth in the U S, which is

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the shift away from the commission model. So all these

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>wealth managers and advisors were getting paid by the mutual fund.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like a kickback, and that's what determined

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>whether you were in this fund or that fund. That

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's dying and the new form is fee based, which

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially just means the advisor gets a percent of the

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>client's assets. And once they're getting a percentage of that pie,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of course they're motivated to pick cheap stuff because now

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it's coming out of their money too. If if in

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the US we are saying, I don't know in the

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>sixth inning of that move, some people may debate that,

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>but let's just say we're in the sixth inning. Where

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are we in Europe from the broker the commission broker

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>model to the fee based model. Sure, I would say

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we're probably late first inning because if it just went

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>into effect last year, right, so it's just all of

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>now bringing on that, shedding that light on it. And

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>when these things passed, it's never perfect right from the

0:08:57.960 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>get go. It's like Okay, we're gonna pass this regulation

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be perfect. They're still sort of

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the industry still started, still trying to figure it out.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.839
<v Speaker 1>So it's still very early innings in Europe on sort

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:11.599
<v Speaker 1>of that transition over there. And culturally are people a

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>little less okay, paying more in Europe? Because in the

0:09:16.640 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 1>in the US, whether it's Amazon or E t F

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 1>or Vanguard, whatever, people are pretty We're like professional consumers.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We are a consumer culture and we're very sensitive to cost.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 1>We will go to the to me. Yeah, So are

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they that intense over there when it comes to that culturally,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say no. And it's even this goes back

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to the distribution. The way it's handled in Europe is

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you go to your bank, right in your bank handles everything.

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So I have my mortgage in my savings account on

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>my investment account at my bank, and I had that

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>because my dad had that. So when my dad passed

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to the account to me, I'm not moving it because

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:52.959
<v Speaker 1>it's convenient. It's there already, know the advisor. They're charging

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>me whatever they're charging me, and they're putting me in

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>their active funds. So yeah, there is this huge uh,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>the cost obsession isn't as big in Europe, and we

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.839
<v Speaker 1>actually see it in the flows. And I've studied this

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>um here. Right. If et F cuts its feed by

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 1>basis point, everyone sort of shifts over in Europe. It's

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just not that obsessive on costs. Yeah. I think as

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>more education comes and there's more more the regulation gets

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>put to the to the forefront, it'll the obsession I

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 1>think will start to because like the land before time,

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like twenty years ago, we'll get there.

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, My mind is not blown, but you know

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got you've impressed me. There you go, uh fact

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>to a number two Okay, I think this one is

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>an interesting one, and it's on Vanguard, right, So they

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.839
<v Speaker 1>you cannot talk about the the industry here and not

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>bring a vanguard. They are such a big powerhouse here,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>they're sucking up all the floats, they're changing the advisor

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>model everything. Here in Europe they don't have that same

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of No one really knows who Vanguard is, right,

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:02.839
<v Speaker 1>So the number two issue where here they're like number

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>six in Europe. They have markets here only four percent

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. So what I think is really interesting is

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:11.319
<v Speaker 1>that here Vangard doesn't really have to do anything, like

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows their Vanger. They're cheap and all the money's

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>flowing to them. In Europe, they sort of have to

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 1>go out and promote themselves like, hey, we're Vanguard, this

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is what we're doing. Uh, you know, we do each

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of a big deal. We're from Pennsylvania. So

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really interesting that you sort of see

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>them not in the top tier firm. They're sort of

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like in the second tier and they actually have to

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>like hustle and work and like sort of do all

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the work that the other firms have to compete with

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>them here in the US. So they've that role sort

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>of reversed in Europe for them if they're six, right,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh black Rock is where what are they? Black Rock

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>is one? So so it's not like a U S thing.

0:11:48.280 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>It's just they were late going there. Maybe they were late,

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and but they are sort of what we've seen here

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>with like JP Morgan being really aggressive. I see that

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>with Vanguard over there, like they're opening the opening up

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>new offices, they're really building out their sales teams, so

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they're really sort of in ramp up mode. When I

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>feel like here the sort of just sitting back and

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of just collecting all the money. The fisher jumping

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in the boat here. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, they've taken like

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a little over a billion a day here. How quickly

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>have they risen in the ranks? Though, they're rising very quickly.

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think every issuer has their eye on them because

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 1>they've seen the success they've had here. Um, And it's interesting.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>They're not the cheapest ones out there in Europe. There

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>are other firms that are cheaper than they are, but

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>all the E t f s are there. You can

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>quind of see them like starting to warm up, like

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>they sort of like the picture of the bullpen, like

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to warm up and everyone's starting to watch

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>them because they have seen what they've done here. Um,

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're you know, they're they've been really aggressive with hirings.

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 1>So what's the football? Mon the four? It's like he's

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>got the the like the kicker starts like exactly into

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the net thing. By the way, have you picked a

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>team yet? A club? Sorry? So I've always liked the

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Hot Spurs from a long time ago. Now they're good

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:56.839
<v Speaker 1>and everyone accusing me that I like them now, But

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking is the soccer because not the San Antonio Alright,

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So I'm actually startled that Vanguard is that sort of

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, up and coming over in Europe? Blow my

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>mind with another fact, okay, um, retail investors, right, they

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>have been really the ones that have been behind a

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the growth here in the US. So if

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you sort of look between retail and institutional, it's about

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>a fifty fifty split here, it's very small in Europe.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>It's only about in Europe it's really small. Um. And

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>again that comes back to the the commission model, right,

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>because everything is at your bank. Your bank's handling everything.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>They're on the commission model, so they're putting you in

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.199
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds. I'm gonna put out a theory. Is this

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:45.199
<v Speaker 1>because everyone's taxed at a higher rate in Europe and

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>therefore they don't have as much disposable income to just

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>do their own investing. On the side, I think it

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the that could be it, but also

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the convenience factor, Like it's just the mentality is very

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>different there. So here, you start a job, what's the

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>first thing you do? You felt your four O one

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.199
<v Speaker 1>K form, right, and you're sort of like have you

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on I RA. In Europe it's different. They don't sort

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of have this do it yourself like investing culture as

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>much as we do here. So retail just hasn't really adopted.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It is fast, but you know they don't. And by

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, by retail, we mean advisors and do it

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself retail correct That is stunning. In the US, I

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>think that number is probably more like and it's eleven

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>percent there. I mean retails were the majority of the

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>flows come and advisors institutions use them, but more to

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 1>trade and adjust their portfolio. It's more like for liquidity.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>That is stunning, And I think it does speak to

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that incentive. If the middleman is incentivized to get the

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>kick back from the mutual fund and they get paid

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>more that way, why on earth would they move to

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>an e t F for something that doesn't pay them.

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>And this is part of what happened here. But now

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I think people actually look for the fee base model,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>which some people are will use fiduciary. That's the big

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>word that's used here for that mode, which is acting

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in your client's best interests. So it sounds like fiduciary

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>is not a big deal over there, so I don't

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear. And this goes back when we

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>say Europe, right, so some countries have moved away from

0:15:11.160 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that commission model, so like the UK, like the Netherlands

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have sort of banned that, but other countries haven't. Right

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>this this goes back to the nuance and the fragmentation

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. So yeah, you might see UK might have

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a bigger chunk of retail and advisors than they do

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in other in other countries too. So I think as

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it gets more centralized and more that models adapted across

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Europe will eventually see it. But for now it's really

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly institutional, like it's for for tactical moves or or

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>like positions a big portfolio. I was over there and

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I met with initial I won't say who, but I was.

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, naive, I guess, and they pointed

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>out they said, they said, here's what people are paying

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>for for everything, their advisor fee. I'll add it up.

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It came to like six to eight percent. You know,

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the fund fee, which is like two percent, then

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the advisor fee and then the the loads. You start

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>adding it up, it was like six um here, you know,

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you might pay one percent for your advisor and then

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty basis points for your funds. So this is dead's

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>a large difference, and I think this is probably what

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the U S issuers. As this market

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>here gets so competitive on price, they're seeing opportunity there

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's why you see not just Vanguard, but other

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>US companies go over there to try to sort of

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>be first. As that model moves, they'll be there with

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the products totally. Can probably squeeze a little bit more

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in Europe yet before all that, because we're starting to

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>see really cheap products start to launch now. But they're

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just launching now right, so I think there's still a

0:16:42.080 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit of room for them to be able to

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 1>make make a little bit of money there. And all

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>that you actual said, all the U S shuares are

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>over there now either they started up their own teams

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>there or they bought someone to already have some of

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure in place. Okay, I want you to turn

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>out the volume. Give me something big. I think this

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>one's big, and it's not specifically for et s, but

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to bring it full circle. And

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like this this policing on closet indexing. Right.

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So what that means is there are funds out there

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that that charge a lot more than say a cheap

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:14.959
<v Speaker 1>etf but they don't look any different than the benchmark. Right.

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So in the UK they got really strict on this

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and they basically went in and said, Okay, we're gonna

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>look at all the funds and if you are just

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a closet indexer, we are going to flag you and

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to make you pay back some of the

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>fees to investors. Right. So last year thirty four million

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>dollars and fees actually went back to investors. This is

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>actually a big deal. This is people are looking at

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>portfolios and being like, you're actually not doing what you're

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>saying you're doing exactly. So they basically looked at um

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of things, basically are you giving the value

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that you're saying that you're doing. So it's basically a

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>mix of qualitative data that they did balso like quantitative.

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:50.919
<v Speaker 1>So they went in and said, okay, let's see your

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>marketing materials. How are you marketing this fund? Right? Are

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you marketing is sort of like this active fund and

0:17:55.760 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>making all this Yes, exactly. In Europe, they're much more

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>aggressive about sort of honing in on these closet indexers here,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I feel like incess sort of no. They'll look and

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they say, hey, this is the closet nex I'm gonna

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>move my my funds there. There's a lot of scrutiny.

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And what's eventually going to happen is you have ETFs

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:14.160
<v Speaker 1>on one side, you have the closet indexers in the middle.

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Then you're sort of like the high active sture active.

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 1>They're basically coming in the middle and splitting it right there,

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna so naturally that split is gonna put a lot

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>of money back into ETFs in Europe. So this is fascinating.

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I called the closet indexing police. Whenever I post this

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, everybody usually has a negative reaction. They're like,

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>don't you know you can't police this stuff? Um, but

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I see what Europe is doing. In the US, I

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of this happens naturally. People have gone,

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 1>like we call the trend going from closet indexing to

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>actual indexing. That's why if you look at the Fidelity

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Magellan where a lot of these big old traditional active

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>equity funds, the holdings look a lot like the SMP fire,

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people are those are the funds

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>they're leaving. Why pay one percent for that when you

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>get just about the same thing for five basis points um.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Again in Europe, maybe people aren't doing it is naturally

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in the in the regular to trying to just push

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this little Here's the issue though, and I've come to

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>feel a little sorry for the closet indexers because if

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you if you take a lot of active bets and

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of active share, you will not sell as

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>much as the fund because it's the middlemen who don't

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>want anything to look that crazy on the statement. So

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>they actually it's because of advisors having career risk that

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't want actual true active They may say they do,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but they actually want it close to the SNP. That way,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't in a bad year, it doesn't return much

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>worse than the SMP, and the client goes, oh my god,

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 1>why am I down? That's what I'm saying. So it's

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the demand from the advisors that has the active mutual

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>funds here hugging the benchmark a little because they don't

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>want to get lose assets. This is what Peter Krauss

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was saying. In our in our podcast with him a

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.880
<v Speaker 1>couple months ago, he he hates this too. He thinks

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this is just protecting your assets. Again, the advisors demand

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is behind a lot of this, and they don't The

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 1>focus is always on the active mutual fund. But the

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>advisors are really the one asking for it because they

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:11.560
<v Speaker 1>they may not want to buy to Vanguard funds in

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>call today because the client may go, why am I

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>paying you? So they want something that has like different

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to it, but might have returns that are close to

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the S and P so they don't look bad or

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>get fired. So in a way, closet indexing is by

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, by design and by demand. It's if you

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>went to high active share, you would be more active

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and you be truly active, but the client would have

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to weather a bunch of down years and some real

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>steep drawouns because over you know, that's how true active goes.

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't win every year doing a real true active strategy.

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So I find this issue to be very complicated and

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>not as simple as like, oh, these active mutual funds

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>are really not doing their job. Um, it's all about

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>incentives and and keeping your job and keeping the assets.

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's just the system that has created

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>all this. It up. Give me number five. Okay, so

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>this one is a little bit nerdy, but it's sort

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of sometimes in Europe. I noticed some things that they're

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>much more advanced and other things in certain things and

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>much behind other things in the US. But here, and

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this has come up a lot, especially for

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>small issuers. It's about payments to market makers, right, and

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens in the U s. If you're a small

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:22.239
<v Speaker 1>issue or with a new product that doesn't trade a lot,

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you're at a disadvantage, right, no one's really buying your product.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Someone goes to buy it. They noticed spreads are tight

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in Europe. You can actually incentivize the market maker to

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>come in and provide liquidity for that product. It's banned

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but in Europe allows it, They do it,

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>They let you do that. Um I think it's interesting

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that they do that because sort of a lot of

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>issuers here have been petitioning to have it done. Europe

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>has already been okay with that. Um So, I think

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a huge difference in Europe. And what I think

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately might do is a lot of the smaller

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>issuers are going to have sort of a better shot

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>at being able to raise some assets than in the US,

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's really competitive being a small issuer going up

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>against some of the larger firms. Here um and oh,

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>here's the most important question. How do you pronounce s

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>M A R T hyphen b E T A. Well,

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to pronounce it smart beta. Over there, you

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 1>have to pronounce it smart beta. Okay, that's when he

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>comes back, starts saying smart beta. He's coming right back.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's see how you're if he's still American? Ready,

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can you say aluminum? Aluminum? Okay, not aluminium? Right, that's

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>next level. I mean that's like it's like then you

0:22:33.920 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's too late to ask him back. Yeah, Tom, thanks

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for joining us in trillions, Thanks for having me, Thanks

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening to trillions. Until next time. You can find

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>us in the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify,

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and whatever else he likes to us. We'd love to

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hear from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Baltunes, and you can find Tom Sara

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>fagus at Tee Sarah Fagas. Good Luck's bulling that Trillions

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>is produced by Magnus Hendrickson. Francesca Levy is the head

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg podcast Bible