WEBVTT - Semifinal Edition

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.240 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys leagues dot Com. Here's your host, Paul.

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>It is a semi final edition of Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>We are here to get you to the championship. I

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>am Paul Giargie. At my coast today are Scott Fish

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson. Hello, gentlemen. I love the energy. You

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>stud my name that time, I don't I don't know.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Last week was like Scot Fish shot Fish. Yeah, it sounds,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it rolls off the tongue. Um. So exciting week. There's

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.639
<v Speaker 1>so many moving parts. I need to be upfront about this.

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Normally we record late Friday. Because of the holiday, we're

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>recording late Thursday, and there's a million things that are

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>changing by the minute. Well, what about those that celebrate Festivus.

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bitter about this, honestly care less about

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Christmas Eve. I want to celebrate festivals. I'm with you.

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I would do this on Christmas Eve if I needed to,

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.119
<v Speaker 1>But we are this is this is the hand we've

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>been dealt so bear in mind we're going with the

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>best information, most current information we've got as of Thursday.

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully most of this is still salient relevant. But nothing

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>will change nothing nothing, what if anything does. You can

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>just go to guarante leagues dot com and check out

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.679
<v Speaker 1>charges ranks. That's right, I am updating the rankings constantly.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>This is for two weeks. It's my whole job. He does,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just updating rankings all day. Man, we will have earned

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of this season. I'll tell you that much

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:43.839
<v Speaker 1>fun to get you over the course of the show,

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>will still give you to take a chance on me, guys.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And now maybe more important than ever, with these all

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of the starters going down with COVID, we'll give you

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>nine guys you can pivot to three tough questions remain

0:01:57.320 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in play, including some playoffs specific fake questions coming your way,

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and we'll break down all the matchups, beginning with what

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>feels like a defensive struggle Scott between Buffalo and the

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>New England Patriots. Obviously, last game was the Arctic wind Bowl.

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>You can glean very much from that game. I can,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>if if that can be a four teen to tend

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>score in that weather, I gotta expect at least double

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>in this indecent weather. On the Bill side, I have

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen with a B grade, not not quite his

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>usual A that he gets on this show. He's had

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdowns in five of his last six, and if

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking back, that one was a really really windy game.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>So uh, three straight really good rushing days for him

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>as well. Why the B The Pats have held three

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of the last five quarterbacks they faced under a hundred yards.

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not yeah, and crazy under a hundred passing for

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>three of their last five, six straight quarterbacks under a

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred seventy five. They've really shut down the pass game,

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and only one of those was a windy games, so

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no excuse. I will say Josh Allen was one

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of the better games of that with like a hundred

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and fifty yards, but in the wind, Yeah, in the wind.

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>B grade for Josh Allen. I gotta be grade on

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Stefan Diggs. I don't love it because I feel like

0:03:11.680 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the guy Bill Belichick is going to try to

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>take away. But even his bad games aren't bad. He

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>has sixty nine plus and or a score in every

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>game that wasn't that Monday night game. Every single one

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine and or score. You're you're you're getting you know,

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>seven plus points out of him. No matter what he's

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>he's got a C level floor. I can't give him

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 1>any though, just because of the tough Pats matchup. They've

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fewest receptions and second fewest yards to watch receivers.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I am given a C grade on Davis. I know

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Manuel Sanders is back, but Cole Beasley is out. I

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>feel like that open maybe out. You don't think that,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't think isn't that he's yeah? Uh. Gabriel Davis

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>has the most red zon red zone targets on the

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>team in the last three weeks, with eight every time

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>for two years. Last year seven touchdowns when John Brown

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>was out. Last week was Sanders was out, he had

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>two more. When someone's out and he comes in, he

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>steps up. I don't know how he doesn't get more

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>playing time. We've been big on him on this show

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>for two years now. Uh, Dawson Knox C grade. To

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>my concern here is Davis keeps stealing his red zone looks.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what was great for him earlier in the season.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>He has gained five plus targets almost every single game,

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and he does also have six red zone targets in

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the last three games. He gets those still, it's just

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>not as many as Davis. Not a huge yardage guy,

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>but maybe a touchdown in Knox had I think four

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 1>completions in the first quarter of last week's game, and

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, Dawson and then he didn't catch another

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>past No, But C grade on him, A C grade

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>on Devin's Singletary. He completely took over that backfield last

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>week tw plus touches. He's a good pass catcher. The

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>team indicated this week that they want him to be

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the lead role. They think he's got the lead role.

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been before by this Buffalo backfield, though, so I'm

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>keeping him in a C grade and the Pats. Uh.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>The Pats are likely to shut down Allen and Diggs.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>That's probably what they'll try to shut down, So maybe

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Singletary can get some pass Kennet chin work. UH. Ten

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>running backs have topped a hundred total yards in the

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>last twelve games against the Pats, with which that's a

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>little surprising. You can't pass on the path exactly. You

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can't pass on them. So that's why I get. I

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>give a starting grade to Devon Singletary, who I don't

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think has had a starting grade this season probably not

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>not often, Yeah, not often. On the other side, I

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>got Mac Jones on the bench. He's a decent real

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>life quarterback. He's just not a great fantasy quarterback. Uh.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And against this Bills d that they've only given up

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>one good passing day this entire year, and that was

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the Tom Brady they they they've been They've struggled a

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit less a little bit with tevious white out,

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>one good game, one bad game, and then the Wind game.

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see. But I don't trust Jones and this

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:02.239
<v Speaker 1>this likely tough matchup. Jacob be Myers C grade. Kendrick

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Born on the COVID list, not sure if he'll be back,

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but if he's not, it just substantiates that C grade

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>even more. Twelve targets last week, thirty in his last

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>five full games for Jacoby Myers, If you start anyone

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game, it's got to be him, just

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 1>because he's probably gonna get that C grade on volume.

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>He keeps getting six, seven, ten targets. Uh. This is

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a top ranked pasty though they don't have Tradavious White.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>They held down the Panthers. There's a lot to be concerned.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 1>I was very close to benching him, but once Born

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 1>landed on COVID, I thought, all right, you might get

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the volume in the one last passing game. Oh my gosh,

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this is such a matchup between players. No but no

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>playoff teams should have most mimr Henry you might have.

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>He scored like ten nine in ten games. He scored

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>nine touchdowns nine times in ten games. He usually doesn't

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.719
<v Speaker 1>top forty yards, but he's scoring consistently. The Bills have

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>only allowed three tight end touchdowns this year, but he

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>did score in that other in the last one. So

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a C grade on him just because he

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>can get touchdowns. Uh, Stevenson and Harris. Harris is back,

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he's practicing, he's healthy. You can't run very well on

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bills. Actually, I'm both on the bench. If Harris

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>does go, if Harris doesn't go, I'm giving Stevenson the

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>SEA grade. I think that that makes complete sense. Unfortunately,

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll split up enough work against a good defense that

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>probably neutralizes both. Brian Jacksonville taking on the Jets. This

0:07:25.360 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one should be a much shorter, easier one, and it

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>has to be Robinson might be a semi final winner

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>right here. Yeah, why don't you go ahead and hit

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that fantasy Fonzi button please? James snapshare last week with

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.679
<v Speaker 1>urban Meyer back on the bar stool, the song remains

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the same. The Jets suck against running backs, allowing one

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>combo yards and nearly two touchdowns per game. Easy a

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Fonzie a for James Robinson or of the wide receivers

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones. Despite getting out targeted by Laviska Chennault and

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the Quan Treadwell last week, Jones is still the one

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville wide receiver I would play, But you know what,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to. They're on the bench. The Jets

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>are too easy to run on. But you know he

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>was not on the bench. Dan Arnold's back. The Jets

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>are allowing more than five catches and sixty two yards

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>per game to tight end. So if you're in desperate

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be tight end, dan Arnold is your guy.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence is not your guy at quarterback. He's on

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the bench. That's pretty easy. Let me just let me

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just mention this about Trevor Lawrence. I tweeted this earlier

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>this week. He started the season with a three touchdown

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>game and then he went one touchdown one touchdown. That's

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns in his first three games. He has four

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns the rest of the year and one touchdown in

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the last two months. Trevor Lawrence the first player taken.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>The only reason this is not a gigantic's story of

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>how the first overall player has taken has been this

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bad it is because he's in Jacksonville, right, But I mean, like,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>is Houston a great spot? No, Davis Mills is doing okay?

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Are the Bears a great spot? No? Justin Fields is

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>doing all right? Yeah, Trevor Lawrence shaping up to be

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a bust. But we won't. We won't write them off

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>just yet. But anyway, we're writing him off for this week.

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Over to the Jets. A lot more to write off here,

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 1>including Michael Carter. He's on the bench. Just saw of

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the snaps last week. Jags can't be anybody to start here,

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>is there. I'm just gonna say, James, let's cut to

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the chase. Thank you, James and Crowder. I'll give him

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to see the Jaguars are allowing fourteen catches one seventy

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>yards and one touchdown per game to wide receiver units. Uh,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>he's the one I would start, even though it is

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a Keeling Cole revenge game. But I can't go there. Uh.

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Braxton Barrios, Keeling Cole, denzil Million Mims combined for two

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>catches last week. Mims had the most targets with three,

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but the least catches with zero from those guys. So yeah,

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 1>crowd is your only storable Jet this week. Let me

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 1>mention this just briefly on the Jets for those especially

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in Dynasty or Empire leagues where you you drafted Zack Wilson.

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>He's clearly played much better in these past whatever three

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>games since he came back from injury. Zack Wilson has

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>dramatically improved. If you wrote him off in the first

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>two months, but you know, and then he got hurt.

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you he's played far better later. I did

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>contemplate him as might take a chance on the quarter.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll give him that that much. But he's on the bench,

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>all right. I'm with you on that. Baltimore Ravens take

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>on the Cincinnati Bengals. I'm not rooting for injury here,

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but I am rooting that they rest Lamar Jackson for

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:41.640
<v Speaker 1>another week on Thursday. Correct And if he because you know,

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>with him on a foot injury, if you don't have

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the mobility, then what you've got on average out of

0:10:46.720 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson is two hundred sixty passing out to its.

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He's bad and about a touch a little over a

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game, which isn't great. So I just think

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have a fully healthy Tyler Huntley, not just

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>for Huntley saying, but for all the receiver's sake as well,

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>because he's proven himself to be pretty good. Get this.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>In his three full games, Tyler Hunt's hunt Huntley has

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>completed seventy of his passes. That's Drew Breeze level completion levels.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's remarkable for Huntley and his running ability

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>can spark a high end fantasy game, just like last

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>week when he was the highest scoring quarterback in fantasy football.

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>He's earning a paycheck next year, Well you know, yeah,

0:11:30.200 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>he isn't, right, I mean, what will be fascinating And

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 1>again not to get a hold ahead of ourselves here,

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson is going to insist on getting paid this offseason.

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>As he heads into his fifth year of his rookie deal,

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>He's going to insist on getting paid. He's gonna want

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>top five money. Ravens may look at all of you know,

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>may decide we don't want to give top five money

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to Lamar Jackson, which would be a reasonable conclusion to

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>draw either side of it could be reasonable. Then you

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>gotta you work out a deal with Tyler Huntley, who

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.079
<v Speaker 1>will be pennies on the dollar compared to what it

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>would cost to get Lamar Jackson. Then Jackson goes straight

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to Pittsburgh. It probably he probably does. It could work

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out that way anyway. Um, I've got to be grade

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>on Tyler Huntley, a C grade on Lamar Jackson if

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>he goes. Let's talk about the receivers. Mark Andrews has

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>just turned into an obvious. Ay, I don't even think

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I need to elaborate on it other than to say

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>no drop off whatsoever with Tyler Huntley, and so no,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about that at all. Let's go

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to Marquis Brown. He's got ten. He's got ten receptions

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>from Huntley last week, which is great, but his scoreless

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>streak now sits at six straight games for Hollywood. Brown.

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>He's faced the Bengals four times in his career. He

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>has scored in all four games, which is good news.

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 1>And he's gonna probably see a fair amount of Trey

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Waynes on the outside. Wayne has barely played in his

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>two years since going to Cincinnati, and he's giving up

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating of one D forty three in his coverage.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got to be great on Marquis Brown. Rashade Bateman

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sparked to life last week. He roasted since for eighty

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>yards on the only three catches in their prior meeting.

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, maybe he doesn't need a ton of volume here.

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he could, you know, be all right on just

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>three or four catches again here. Um, also on the

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>outside see some of the same Trey Waynes, which would

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 1>be helpful. Um. I've got a C grade on Bateman

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>if you need to go that direction. The running backs

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>devote Freeman and Lottavius Murray. Guys, we had to. If

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you didn't pay attention to last week's game. We have

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a full blown time share going on in Baltimore. If

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:32.959
<v Speaker 1>last week is any indication, both guys. Now, I believe

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>impossible to start unless you think last week was an

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>aberration with Ottavius Murray getting more touches. The only angles

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I can really offer you here is that the Bengals

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>give up a lot of receptions and receiving yards to

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>opposing running backs, and Freeman is the better pass catcher,

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so I give the preferred Neither gets a C grade,

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to pick one of the other,

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I would pick him onto Freeman. All right, let's go

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>over to the Cincinnati side, where really the biggest storyline

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is the Raven defense, which in Thursday's practice had a

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>total of thirteen available players. That's it, oh man. So

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>there you have to watch all of the COVID and

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>injuries that have stricken the Baltimore defense. And I've got

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I had strong grades on especially the passing game anyway,

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but you can ratchet everybody up a letter grade if

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that this level of injury and COVID

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>continues to strike Baltimore. The NBA is bringing back a

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>bunch of relics because of COVID. I think Ed Reid

0:14:34.920 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>could maybe suit up for the Raven. They might want

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>to go that way. Let's talk about the receivers. Tee

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Higgins gets an A. Prior to last week's flop, Higgins

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>had a run of three straight one yard games and

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>he chipped in two scores over that span. And Baltimore

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>secondary has surrendered five receiver scores in their last three games,

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>probably missing multiple starters here, So Tee Higgins gets an A.

0:14:55.480 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>You can't advance him too higher than in A if

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of Baltimore players are out, but you could

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>with Jamaar Chase, who's got a B grade right now.

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Horrific game last week. I believe it was one catch,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>three yards for Chase last week. I believe that's correct.

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Only one game with a touchdown in his last month,

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and over that month, here's Jamar Chase's average game three

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half catches, forty two yards. That's it, But

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>he put up two hundred yards on the Ravens in

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the last matchup between these teams, So remains startable with

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a B. And again, if it turns out that all

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the starters are missing from the Baltimore secondary, go ahead

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.560
<v Speaker 1>and bump them up to an A. Tyler Boyd startable

0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>here as well. He's seen at least five targets in

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>three straight games, turning those looks into nearly five catches

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>per game for an average of seventy nine yards. As

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it stands, it looks like lightly used journeyman Kevin Seymour

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>will man the slot for the Ravens. That would be

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a major plus matchup for Tyler Boyd, who comes in

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 1>with a B as well. Then if I like all

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>those receivers, obviously I love Joe Burrow in this game.

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It is a get right up ortunity for Burrow. Even

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>when the Baltimore defense was at full strength, Burrow would

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>have been a strong start here. But as it stands,

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he is an obvious A grade and I believe I

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>have him ranked number two or three at the quarterback

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>position this week. Lastly, Joe Mixon. This one's trickier because

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:21.520
<v Speaker 1>he has really hit a wall with injuries and time share.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Over the last three games. He's averaging fifty seven rushing

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>yards I'm three yards per carry and has one touchdown

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in the last three games. And the Ravens have been

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a great run defense, allowing the fifth newest rushing yards

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. And he's got the ankle injury,

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which is always dangerous on a running back. I don't

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, so I've got him as a B grade

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>here depending on whether or not the Baltimore defense his

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>how many people are out, But you could lower him

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to a streak C grade, which is where where I

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>originally had Joe Mixon, Like last week, a lot of

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>if then statements in all of these matchups. If this

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>happens this great, if this happens that great. Yeah, we're

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>doing our best, folks, and so are you. I know

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>this is very challenging fantasy managers. You're earning your championships

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this year like no other season. When we come back,

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:18.959
<v Speaker 1>nine players upon whom you can take a chance we'll

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>give you or take a chance of me players in moments,

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>chance a chance, take a chance on me. Nine players

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>not normally in your starting lineup. You need it this

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>week more than most, Matt. It is uh. We're done

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>surviving for starters, and we begin at the quarterback position.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish your take a chance of the quarterback before

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we start? Can I like that song? But can we

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>petition to get the chipmunks back? I love the chipmunks.

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I wish we could. I want the chipmunks, like, if

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>they're up to me, would be chipmunks every week all right,

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be chipmunks every week. Take a chance on me, quarterback.

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I have Matt Ryan. I know it sounds gross. He

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>has like three touchdown passes in the last six games.

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it, I get it, but he's playing against

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the Lions. Whoever. The last four games have allowed yards

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and two scores per game to opposing quarterbacks, and it's

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>actually a pretty decent spot for him. I have Matt

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Ryan C grade. People like to hear that, Ryan, you

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>take a chance for me quarterback. Used them last week

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and he used them again to a toungoola at the Saints.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 1>This week you will get Jalen waddle Back. That's a

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>big boon for two. Over the last three weeks, the

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Saints only highest opponent passing play percentage attent and during

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that same stretch, and Lean says you the most past

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>attempts per game at forty three plus. Saints very tough

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>to run on. I just think to airs it out

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>on Monday Night against New Orleans for once. We can't

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>use Jimmy Garoppolo because he's Thursday night, so you know

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we can't do that. Well, I'm gonna go to a

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>more desperation play than either of yours. Drew Lock going

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>up against the Raiders. I don't know what scenario exists

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to start Drew Lock. Maybe you were you

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>were counting on Taysom Hill or something. But here's your

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>quasi plausible scenario you'd like to go there. Uh Locks.

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Everything that Teddy Bridgewater isn't. He's strong armed and mistake prone.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>He is a boom or bus fantasy producer with some

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>boom opportunity this week because last year he started against

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. He put up three hundred thirty nine yards

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and two scores against the Raiders Drew Lock did earlier

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this year, Teddy posted his best game of the season

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders three thirty four and three. So this

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>team knows how to beat the Raiders. Vegas is a

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 1>slumping secondary. Over the past five weeks, they've allowed the

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>most passing touchdowns and the third most passing yards. Drew Lock,

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't actually kind of makes sense. Let's go to

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the running back position. You take a chance of me

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>runner Scott. I am going with Jordan Howard, And as

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>the week rolls on here that might be even more

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>more and more like a good spot. Uh. Just listeners

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.040
<v Speaker 1>love this I have a C grade on They like

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to they like to know the actual grade. He has

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>ten plus touches in five consecutive games he's played and

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.120
<v Speaker 1>has put Scott and Gainwell on the bench. Miles Sanders

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>is dinged up with the quad injury. He had fifty

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>seven or more yards in all five. He's got seventeen

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>red zone touches in those last five games. And this

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the game against the Giants that they

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.120
<v Speaker 1>might pound the clock late and a lot of Howards.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>So Jordan Howard, if you're Kenneth Gainwell, that's gotta hurt him.

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Undead corpse of Jordan Howard getting repso right, Uh, Brian,

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you gonna take a chance of your running back? Yeah?

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Fish just said take home players usually get a C.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I'm going with se Rex birkehead Rex Rare.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't. We don't have this down for a t REX,

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>but um, I'll work on that. Well, we'll get it.

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll go on later for C Rex. He's at home

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>against the close enough. Yeah, at home against the Chargers. Uh.

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Last week, that was like the fourth Jurassic Park they

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>had up. Those movies get worse by the the installments.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, Burkehead led Houston with nineteen opportunities last week. Uh,

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>those are targets and carries, by the way, opportunities. David

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Johnson Royce Freeman combined for just ten. The Chargers are

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>allowing me fourth most rushing yards fifteen per game and

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the third most touchdowns one point three per game to

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>opposing running back. So se Rex Rare Leonard Bernatt's not

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna play, do you? Bernard's on injury reserve. Ronaldo is

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a lot of work against Carolina in relief.

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Last week, he averaged eight yards per carry, and on

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the season he's been good for almost five yards per carried,

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>just like he was last year. Ronald Jones doesn't stink.

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>They don't like him. Apparently he's always in the doghouse

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, but he's They gotta start him. They don't

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have a choice. He's not gonna come close to for

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>nets receiving numbers, but we'll get almost all the carries

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>against a team giving up one hundred rushing yards per

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:25.280
<v Speaker 1>game over the last five weeks. They've also allowed five

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns over the past five games. Ronald Jones could

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>hit one hundred yards in a touchdown. If all of

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>those trends hold, let's go to the receivers. Scott, who's

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a chance for me? Receiver? So I'm in

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>this sleeper bowl one with A J. Dillon. I don't

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:43.359
<v Speaker 1>know if I mentioned about your good friend. I've number

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>one seed that I'm playing against JJ Dillon, and he

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:51.159
<v Speaker 1>sneakily picked up Allen Lazard to play against me. I

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>think he's got some inside knowledge in this matchup. So

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you should pick up Allen Lazard. By the way, mvs

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>on the COVID list, Marquez vald sconce on the COVID list,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So Lezard will see that number two work and probably

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like the out too, So you'll take a chance of

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>me runner Brian receiver. And I'm not playing against this

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not playing against this guy in any fantasy league,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but I might use him on Sunday. And that Zach

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Pascal of the Colts at Arizona. On the season, the

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals have allowed the third most touchdowns to wide receivers

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>six wide receiver touchdowns allowed over their last three games alone.

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.439
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals just put starting corner Robert Alfred on i

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>R last week, and lastly slot receivers have done very

0:23:35.080 --> 0:23:38.360
<v Speaker 1>well against Arizona lately. Over the last three weeks, Jachem

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 1>Grant five catches sixty two yards in a touchdown, Cooper

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Cup thirteen catches three yards in a touchdown, and last

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>week Fisher's boy I'm on ros st Brown eight catches

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety yards in a touchdown. Zach Pascal is next, Pascal Man.

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>If you hit that, I'll be very impressed. I've got

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Van Jefferson going up against the Vikings. He runs from

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>all over the field, left, right, and from the slot

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and has positive matchups and all three spots against Patrick Peterson,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Mackenzie Alexander, and Cameron Danceler. Mackenzie Alexander slumped all the

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>way to the very bottom of pro football focuses UH

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>cornerback rankings, and the Vikings have allowed the most yards

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers one per game, and over the last

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>five weeks that one ninety one balloons up to two

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred eight yards per game to wide receivers. They've allowed

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the second most touchdowns to wideouts. And we've seen a

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ton of depth guys tear up the Vikings just recently.

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Demere Bird, James Washington, Josh Reynolds, Juwan Jennings, Marquez, Valdes, Scantling,

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>why not Vane ever since? Probably better than all those gids,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, why not him? Uh Scott? Remember Jeremy Hill

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Bengals running back from a few years ago. I don't

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like talking about him. Yes, I don't know why. I

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>had a a toward toward love affair. Okay, so he had.

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember at one point people cracked the code on

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>his personal fantasy league and they found where he was

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>running his league on ESPN, And you know, they're all

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>quasi public. You can't change Jeremy Hill's team, but you

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>could see his team, and so people would figure out

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>who And he had all these Bengals on his team

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because he was a Bengal, and so people figure out

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:16.360
<v Speaker 1>who was in and out based on who Jeremy starting

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>on his fantasy So adding legitimately legitimacy, I think it

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>could be uh Detroit Lions taking on the Atlanta Falcons.

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Scott for the Lions. Jared Goff looks like there's a

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>good chance he won't go, and I don't. I don't

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>really like any part of this this offense without him.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>You don't trust him, boyle I can't gonna trust the

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>last after the last time. No, I have both quarterbacks

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. Actually I I don't. Course I hope

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>so Jared Goff was not playing well enough to uh

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to deserve a start anyway in the passing game, though.

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>If golf goes, I like calman Row again. If Boil goes,

0:25:54.119 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I kind of want to bench everybody in the passing game.

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But if golf goes, I have a C grade on

0:25:58.680 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Alman Raw. He's just clicking all the boxes right now.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Hundred seventy eight targets in the last three games. I'm

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure that's accurate. Hundred seventy eight sounds right. Um,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>charges not paid attention to you. You can tell hundred

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and seventy eight targets. Um, they constantly feed him eight

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:18.639
<v Speaker 1>plus catches, seventy plus yards and all three. Uh So

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a C grade on him just because he

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gets crazy volume if he if golf does go, everyone

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.879
<v Speaker 1>else is on the bench in the passing game, but

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift I'm going to give an a grade to.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 1>If he comes back, which it sounds like he's going

0:26:32.080 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>to be back. We're putting Netflix Craig Reynolds back on

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the bench uh DeAndre Swift. He had a hundred thirty

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>six total yards in his score the last time Boyle

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>started because he got all the work. They just kept

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>feeding him. And my worry is, you know, with his

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>long layoff, is he ready to get all the work

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>immediately when he comes back? And what if if Jamal

0:26:54.119 --> 0:26:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Williams is also off the COVID list, which looks like

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it looks like So that's my worry on Swift. Yeah,

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not like an art Vark type A. It's

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a low end A, but it's an A for Swift

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>just because I think he'll get a ton art Park.

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how that works. On the Atlanta side,

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan was na take a chance on me quarterback? Naturally.

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I like his past catchers just a little bit at least.

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I have a B grade on Gauge. Are people even

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.399
<v Speaker 1>watching how good Gauge is? Like he most two guys

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>last week, He's playing out of his mind right now,

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>sixty plus and or a score and six of his

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>last seven ninety plus in two of the last three.

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>With Pits taking so much attention, Ryan's turning to Gauge

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's making it happen. B grade on gauge,

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>B grade on pits. I have to. Despite all that attention,

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>he still gets targets sixty plus yards and six of

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>his last nine this matchup man twelve different tight ends,

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>twelve have top fifty and or scored four of them

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>in the last three games alone. Um. He might, however,

0:27:54.760 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>see some coverage from mamani are are ruy ru war. Sorry,

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>who's been stillar lately, And I think if he goes

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on anyone it might be Pitts. But I still have

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it be grade there corderrel Patterson. I'm gonna keep doing

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>it every week that I'm on this show. I pretty

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>much give Patterson a grade because you can't. I'm sorry,

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>jigs up on Patterson's That is my concern. After last

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks we talked about this concern. Yes, but the Lions

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are just such a nice matchup for running backs. They're

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst in the league. They're like third worst,

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>their bottom ten in almost every single category. Uh Andy's

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>game script proof. If they fall behind, they'll pass to him.

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>If they don't pass to him, He's not even running

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>routes anymore. Man. That's the problem. The lines have allowed

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty two running back touchdowns this year, nine backs over

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred yards. Right. I want to believe it's true too,

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but the reality is San Francisco was a tough, tough

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>defense last week, way tougher, unquestionably. But the thing, it's

0:28:55.080 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not a new trends five games having virtually no impact

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on the passage we've talked about, and he's a timeshare

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>running back. That's that's why I can't be I'm not

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on board with this. A grade on Errol Patterson. Um,

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break when we come back and Indianapolis

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Colts take on the Arizona Cardinals. Obviously, Jonathan Taylor, you

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.000
<v Speaker 1>know what to do, but what about elements of the

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Beyond Zach Pascal, who is all but a

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 1>lock for a massive game? Here is Carson Wentz, somebody

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go to war with. What about Michael Pittman

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 1>who got one catch before getting ejected last week? What

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>do you do with those guys? We'll talk through Colts

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and Cardinals when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:29:57.120 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Pulp Church and Scott Fish

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and Brian Johnson with you guillotine leagues, dot Com. All

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>my player rankings updated there. We've been very forthright about

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>today's show and that we are recording on Thursday due

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to the holiday, and that means that we're working with

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a little less information you might be when you hear this,

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.239
<v Speaker 1>So we're doing our best with what we know at

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. We encourage you to apply some breaking news

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>judgment as needed. Indianapolis takes on the Arizona Cardinals. Brian

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:30.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously um Jonathan Taylor goes without saying is an obvious A.

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But the passing game, to me is much more intriguing.

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Carson Wentz, Michael Pittman and

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>some of the other bubble guys that people might be

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking about. Well, we know why. I like Zach Pascal.

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>He was my take a chance on me wide receiver.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That's because the Cardinals have allowed the third most touchdowns

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers, six to the position over the last

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>three games alone. For that reason I gave Michael Pittmann

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is see, I'm not gonna give t Y Hilton a

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>starting grade though, I just can't do it. T Y,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. And as far as the tight ends go,

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>if but Wiley Cox and Jack they were one person

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>starting grade, but they are not. But for as far

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>as it goes for Carson Wentz, I still got him

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. There's the very real fear that Jonathan

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Taylor takes this game over and the Cardinals are allowing

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>just two four yards and one and a half passing

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game. Wentz is a sure fire starting two

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback leagues, but I don't see him cracking top twelve,

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen territory at quarterback, so he's on the bench

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 1>for me. You hit on the key problem. It's so

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to run on the Cards. A giant game potentially

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>coming from Taylor, and that might eat into a Carson Wentz.

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten starting linebackers, i'd say, as Simmons and Marcus

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Golden for Arizona are both banged up questionable to play.

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Bodes well for Taylor, but he's an obvious say over

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to the Cardinals side. James Conner has been an obvious

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 1>start in recent weeks, but I got him on the bench.

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Now that Chase Edmonds is back and he's still not

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a pent from the heel and injury they suffered two

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. He's not a hundo and uh he's in

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that time share and it's a tough matchup. The Coults

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are ranked fifth ends the run by Pro Football Focus. Uh.

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>They just held New England to thirty nine rushing yards

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>last week, so I got Connor and Edmonds on the bench.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I almost benched Christian Kirk, but uh, I did not.

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give him a c. Over the last five games,

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>no receiver has tallied more than fifty two yards against Indianapolis,

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and during that same span, the Colts have allowed these

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>second fewest yards two wide receivers and have given up

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.479
<v Speaker 1>just two touchdowns of the position. Both went to Stefan Diggs.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Christian Kirk is not Stefan Diggs. AJ Green used to

0:32:32.040 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be Stefon Diggs. He certainly not anymore. He is on

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the bench, but zach Ertz is not. If he plays.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>He's got a hamstring, he should. He should played through

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>it last week and they still targeted him I think

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 1>eleven times, so apparently it's not that bad. He should

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>be good to go, So I'm gonna give him the b.

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Last week, the Colts were picked apart by New England

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, mainly Hunter Henry not John new Smith. Sorry

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to say, charged for eighty yards and two touchdowns. Indias

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>also allowed the most yards to the tight end position

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:03.600
<v Speaker 1>on the season. So a safe B for Earth's but

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>just monitor that, Hammy, but he should be fine. And

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>not a very safe B for Kyler Murray. But I

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>mean give him a B here. The Colts have surrendered

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>just three passing touchdowns over the last three games, and

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that includes limiting Tom Brady to just two six yards

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and one touchdown in Week twelve. And I kind of

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>gets worse for Murray, who he did have a good

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>rushing game against the Bears. They ran him a lot

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:28.959
<v Speaker 1>in that game, but on the season he hasn't been

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>running a ton. But Indie has not allowed a quarterback

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdown all season, and they faced the likes of

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Tannehill, who has seven rushing touchdowns by the way,

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that's like fourth among running backs for Ryan Tannehill and

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson held all those guys out

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the end zone. So not not a smash spot

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for Murray at all, but I will still give him

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a B. And that's it for the Cards. Rams take

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Vikings. Matthew Stafford and Cooper Cupper obvious, a's

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>against a struggling secondary that just Jettison to starting cornerback

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>one week ago, and the team that'll I was the

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 1>most passing yards over the last five weeks and the

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.800
<v Speaker 1>most yards to wide receivers specifically, So Cup and Stafford

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>are obviously, but that also means I like Odell Beckham

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Not only have the Vikings given up the

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>most yardage to wide receivers, they're giving up They've given

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>up at least eighties six yards to a receiver in

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>six the last seven games. Beckham is the most likely

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>guy to get that. Over the last five games, Viking

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>secondaries also allowed seven touchdowns to the position, so obviously

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.399
<v Speaker 1>over one per game. Beckham lines up on the left

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>side of the field most often. That puts him on

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings best cornerback Patrick Peterson Van Jefferson's on the right.

0:34:36.000 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>He was might take a chance on me wide receiver.

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.959
<v Speaker 1>He also has a B grade in this game. Let's

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>go to the running backs Sony Walkman and Darryl Henderson.

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>They are not locked in an unfortunate committee. Sony had

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the upper hand last week, out touching Henderson by almost

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>three to one, but Henderson should be healthier now. The

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Vikings key run defenders are healthy and over the past

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.000
<v Speaker 1>three weeks they're giving up just three point nine yards

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 1>per carry. But even on that, they've managed to give

0:35:05.800 --> 0:35:08.399
<v Speaker 1>up decent games and Nagi Harrison David Montgomery the past

0:35:08.440 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. My guess is either Sony or Darryll end

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>up with good games, but good a good game. But

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they both do. And I don't love

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:23.239
<v Speaker 1>either once, no way, but it's nice that he's been activated.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to I bet they give him some work

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in week eighteen, just to get his legs back a

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 1>little bit right, knock the rust off, and then see

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>what he can do in the playoffs. Let's go to

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the Viking side where there's a little more intrigue here.

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.719
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook, as you already know, is out. Let's talk

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>about Alexander Madison, who averages a whopping twenty four touches

0:35:40.920 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>in games that Cook misses, and they don't. They barely

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>give anybody else any carries. They really trust Madison in

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this role. The Rams allow the third fewest yards per carry,

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>just three point nine on the season, and since ending

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>they're losing skid. Three weeks ago no back has topped

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>forty one rushing yards against them. That is not good

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>news for her. That is not good news for Alexander Madison,

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the last running back to hit one hundred yards against

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. Week four, James Conner posted ninety four receiving

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>yards against Los Angeles, but Madison doesn't catch much, and

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that means much. I've got to be

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>grade just on sheer volume for Alexander Madison, but I

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>don't love the matchup. Let's talk through the passing game,

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>beginning with Justin Jefferson. Hopefully the Vikings will overcorrect for

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>last week's egregious under utilization of Justin Jefferson. Jefferson should

0:36:34.000 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>let up a Ram secondary that has allowed the fifth

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>most yards to receivers over the past four games. Jalen

0:36:39.840 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey remains an elite cornerback you know, probably shadow Jefferson

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of the game, but maybe not all

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the game. Sometimes he does and sometimes he doesn't do that.

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it necessarily matters if Feeland tries

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to play or not. I think Jefferson would be his

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>focus here. No receiver has scored in three weeks against

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the Rams, and bigger stats usually come from non number

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>one receivers, like we've seen A. J. Green and Christian

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Kirk and THEA. Kwan Treadwell and Randall Cobb do better

0:37:04.440 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams the number one receivers. And that's why

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't have an A grade on Justin Jefferson. I've

0:37:09.080 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>just got the B grade on Justin Jefferson for this one.

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So then what about Adam Theland if he plays trying

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to come back on the early side of of a

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>high ankle sprain, So again, I don't think he's gonna

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of Jalen Ramsey. I believe that will

0:37:25.080 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>be mostly Justin Jefferson, and that gives him far easier

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:32.480
<v Speaker 1>matchups against Deontay Dayton and David Long. Rams secondaries allowed

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the fifth most yards seventy eight per game and six

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>most receptions to receivers over the last four games. And

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>those numbers aren't going through Jalen Ramsey. They're going through

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>the other guys like Dayton and Long. So there's a

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>scenario here where Theeland has a decent game, but you

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.399
<v Speaker 1>worry about the ankle and a setback at this high

0:37:49.440 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>ankle sprains reinjure all the time. There is real concern

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 1>here about the efficacy and aggravation possibilities for Theeland in

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>this game. I've got a C grade on the land

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>see grade on the quarterback, Kirk Cousins. Man, it's hard

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>to be enthused about cousins chances of success coming off

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a game when his offensive line delivered its worst performance

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year and Mike Zimmer only through the ball

0:38:12.520 --> 0:38:16.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty four times despite a practice squad. Secondary right guard

0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Mason Cole got destroyed by a Keem Hicks last week,

0:38:20.000 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and here comes Aaron Donald. So I'm I'm I'm really

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>nervous about this game for Cousins. Now, he has scored

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in thirty straight games, and he's thrown multiple touchdowns in

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:35.120
<v Speaker 1>seven straight games. The floor is still high for Cousins,

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't see the upside in this one. And

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I've only got the C grade on Cousins. Last guy

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll mentioned, Tyler Conklin's on the bench. Rams are middle

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to pack tight end defense, decent tight ends, generally fair, Okay.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.879
<v Speaker 1>The problem is Conklin's volume isn't good enough. He's seen

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>three or fewer targets in four of the past five games.

0:38:55.160 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Scott let's talk Brown's Packers. It looks like gonna get

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a fairly heavy dose of Nick Chubb in this game. Yes,

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt's gonna be out again. Passing game could be

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>in shambles. What do you think about Nick Chubb against

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the Packers? I have a B grade on Chubb and

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I could be convinced you could convince me into an

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>A which I think you're going to try to do,

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.400
<v Speaker 1>just based on based on the look on your setup,

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sensing your face say he should be in A grade. Uh.

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>The Packers held the last three backs they faced under

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>total a hundred total yards and only one score if

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you ignore Dalvin in eleven. In week eleven, that streak

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.920
<v Speaker 1>goes all the way back to Week six, holding running

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:40.920
<v Speaker 1>backs under a hundred Comba yards the starting running back. So,

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 1>but they don't typically see the amount of volume that

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb is gonna get. They usually see fifteen sixteen carrybacks.

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb's a twenty plus touch guy, especially with Kareem

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Hunt out. So with Chubb's volume, I have a B

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>grade on him. I don't like the passing game. I

0:39:57.600 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. I think it runs through Chubb. I

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>don't like the passing game. I have a bench grade

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>on every guy in the Browns passing game. The pack

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>has now allowed twelve quarterback touchdowns in the last three weeks,

0:40:08.600 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 1>which sounds great. And Baker mass missed last week. He's

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be back because the ten days will be

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>up on Saturday, right before the game, so he'll be

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He'll be back, but he's been struggling to get over

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:20.719
<v Speaker 1>two hundred fifty yards and he rarely has multiple scored games.

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You're just talking about cousins with a ton of them.

0:40:22.960 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Baker has three multiple scoring games on the season. That's

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>not helping you in FT. I like the way he

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 1>looked in the last game. He played um coming off

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the bye week and healthier, but the up the fantasy

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>upside just isn't there. Yeah, Jarvis Landry a couple of

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>good games, like right before the bye right as you're

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioning a couple of good games there before that, though

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 1>he had three games in a row under twenty six

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>total yards. He's only scored once on the season. He

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't score because Baker is not throwing a lot of touchdowns.

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>I have him on the bench. Donovan people Jones, he

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>looks like he should be better than his stats. Ever

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>show that's always disappointing. You watch him play, You're like,

0:41:00.840 --> 0:41:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he seems like he should be good. He seems like

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 1>he should get deep shots. But he's been sub fifty

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 1>yards in three the last four and the Packers pasty

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>against watch receivers is just too good to handle it.

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Donovan every day people's Jones as he's like an everyday person. Yeah,

0:41:15.880 --> 0:41:19.799
<v Speaker 1>I like it. Screw you guys. Austin Hooper coming back

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>neutralizes Najoku and Hooper, so unfortunately, yeah, yeah, on the others,

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>no more Hooper Scoopers. On the other side, Aaron Rodgers

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>got an A grade on him. The Browns d has

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>kept the score low in a lot of games recently.

0:41:35.000 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Only one time in the last nine weeks has it

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.000
<v Speaker 1>has an opponent topped twenty two points against the Browns.

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>They're keeping the score down. That said earlier in the season, Cardinals, Chargers, Chiefs,

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the good teams actually scored a lot

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of points on them. So I put the Packers more

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 1>with those good teams that they've played, Uh not like

0:41:54.280 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas or um. You know. The Tim Boyle lead

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Detroit Lions teams like that. A grade on Rogers. He's

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 1>got multiple touchdowns in thirteen of his last fourteen. Davante

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Adams isn't obviously he's got a hundred plus and or

0:42:07.880 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>score in fourth straight. You aren't benched him, Alan Lazard,

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>buddy with my buddy A J. Dillon. He's taking take

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me player Randall Cobb. This will be

0:42:20.760 --> 0:42:23.479
<v Speaker 1>his third game being on injured reserve, so he's he's

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely out MVS. Tested positive on Tuesday. He's likely out.

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Um So Lazard like, get him in there and the

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>running game. Aaron Jones and A J. Dillon. This is

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>just fun. It's like Javonte Williams and Melvin Gordon. It's

0:42:37.880 --> 0:42:40.759
<v Speaker 1>just fun every week trying to figure this out. I

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have a B grade this week on Aaron Jones. I

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:45.760
<v Speaker 1>have a C grade on A. J. Dillon. The Browns

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>held down Jacobson Freeman. Um, yes, Davante Freeman twice actually

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks last because they played him twice

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in a row with a buy in the middle. But

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>before that they gave up huge games to Swift and

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:01.959
<v Speaker 1>and Stevenson and Mixing and Harrison and the Melvin Javonte Duo.

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Both were startable against them, and I think that's the

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>good comparable. The pass catcher did a little bit better work,

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Jones is more of the past catcher than Dylan.

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I will mention Dylan gets way more red zone work

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out touching Jones to seven in the red zone the

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.719
<v Speaker 1>last five games that they played together. That's a lot

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of red zone. That's a big differential. That's a huge differential.

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Jones gets the receiving work. I think that's something you

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>can bank on a little better. So I have the

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:32.240
<v Speaker 1>B grade on Aaron Jones. The snaps have been pretty similar,

0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>touches pretty similar, so Beyon Jones Dylan. Yeah, that all

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that all makes sense. It's a very very tricky semifinals week.

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>You're looking for help for COVID players, injured players. Hopefully

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the show can help you. But if you want to

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>get any of the latest breaking player rankings that takes

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>into account all the changing, shifting sands of this week

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>number sixteen of the NFL season, we encourage you to

0:43:57.680 --> 0:43:59.959
<v Speaker 1>go to Guillotine leagues dot com. All my player ranking

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is available for free at Guillotine leagues dot com. When

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.440
<v Speaker 1>we come back three tough questions you can try to

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>knock heads with our panel of experts. They're going to

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:10.680
<v Speaker 1>try to go three and oh, including some playoff oriented

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:14.880
<v Speaker 1>questions specifically for commissioners. We'll talk about that when we

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:45.280
<v Speaker 1>come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:49.399
<v Speaker 1>our number two of this semi finals edition. We will

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:53.680
<v Speaker 1>have one more week of our regular Fantasy Football Weekly

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>next week. Then after that we go into off season

0:44:57.120 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>mode of Fantasy Football Weekly. We continue to bring you

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.360
<v Speaker 1>fan to see Football Weekly every week of the off season,

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:07.440
<v Speaker 1>but it's podcast only and it's a shorter edition, so

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:10.239
<v Speaker 1>we encourage you if you have not already subscribed to

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast Fantasy Football Weekly, we encourage you to do that.

0:45:13.280 --> 0:45:17.320
<v Speaker 1>And a special botus when you're listening, Charge does those

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:20.439
<v Speaker 1>from home, and he's in the studio for these. He's

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:23.080
<v Speaker 1>generally not wearing pants, and I feel like you could, Yeah,

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes over the air, it really you can tell.

0:45:25.960 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>You can tell that I'm pants less, and that's one

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:30.759
<v Speaker 1>of the that's one of the reasons I hate coming

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in the studio. They're all tight about their pants. Pants.

0:45:34.840 --> 0:45:38.880
<v Speaker 1>That's the reason I hate going to your house wearing

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 1>pants and it's really awkward, but it's not for me.

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:45.359
<v Speaker 1>It's just butting it all comfortable everywhere. What the how

0:45:45.400 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>did letting it all hang out? It wasn't castanza. Was

0:45:51.960 --> 0:45:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it all hang out there? And you do the pood bear?

0:45:56.320 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>At least we have the shirt on. Yeah, just the shirt. Yeah,

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the pooh bear. Very nice. Tough question number one. For

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the season, Antonio Brown will be a

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one, wide receiver too, flex or bench grade player.

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.680
<v Speaker 1>We begin with Scott Fish. I'm going with wide receiver two.

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Notice how I'm answering your question right away this time

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so very much. Uh. He was wide receiver six overall

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy points per game before he went he went

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>out on his injury. Uh, sounds like he's back. They

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.399
<v Speaker 1>say he's as healthy as he's been. Those extra three

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>weeks while being suspended helped Godwin and Evans. Won't be

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>taking the top coverage though anymore. I'm going wide receiver

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:38.920
<v Speaker 1>too on how much he'll get peppered with targets, but

0:46:38.960 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>they may not be the same quality targets that they

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>were at the beginning of the season. Okay, Brian, Antonio Brown.

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the year will be a wide receiver one,

0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:49.319
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, do flex or bench. So Brown's got the

0:46:49.320 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Panthers this week, the Jets next week, and then the

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Panthers again in week eighteen. And those are the Panthers

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>not a great matchup, but Stephan Gilmar and stuff. Those

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are bad offenses. The Tampa Bay is going up again,

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so I don't see a positive game script for Brown.

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>If they were, you know, shootout matchups, I would say

0:47:08.160 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one because Mike Evans is banged up. We

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 1>all know Chris Godwin's out for the year. Leonard Fournette

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>probably done for the regular season. But just based on

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the house, the opponents are too soft f Antonio Brown,

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm moving with Fish and going wide receiver to

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Brown is fresh and healthy. As you noted, he in

0:47:24.120 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 1>all probability. This passing offense is going to go through

0:47:26.400 --> 0:47:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Brown h and a little too Gronk. We've seen it before,

0:47:29.400 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in December of last year at the

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>end of the year, weeks fifteen through seventeen, he averaged

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 1>nine targets per game eight yards, and he scored in

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>every game weeks fifteen through seventeen last year. So the

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:49.360
<v Speaker 1>schedule is a little bit tricky, and that it's Carolina twice.

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Gilmore is totally legit. This secondary is great and

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that worries me enough. I in my mind before it

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:58.319
<v Speaker 1>looked at the schedule, I was like wide receiver one.

0:47:58.600 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And I got to the schedule and I an't do it. Um. Granted,

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you're not playing in Week eighteen against Carolina, but

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>some of you are. And the rest of the way,

0:48:05.280 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this this was phrased was rest of

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the season part two. It could happen, but we three

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>years removed from that. Uh, the correct answer is wide receiver.

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:23.360
<v Speaker 1>To tough. Question number two, what is the ideal playoff tiebreaker?

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So to be clear, what I'm talking about is two

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>teams that both scored eighty seven point six points. How

0:48:30.520 --> 0:48:33.239
<v Speaker 1>do you break that tie? And by the way, the

0:48:33.239 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>most important thing is that you have a rule in place.

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Any rule in place, you do not want to have

0:48:38.440 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out after they're already as a tie.

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 1>So what is the ideal playoff tiebreaker? Brian? Some people go,

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 1>how did you fair head to head against your opponent

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.280
<v Speaker 1>in the regular season, But in most cases you've played

0:48:51.320 --> 0:48:54.840
<v Speaker 1>them twice at most maybe just once. That's too small

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>of a sample for me. Some people go with the

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 1>your highest scoring bench player. That's a two small of

0:49:00.760 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a sample for me too. So I just go overall

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 1>points on the season. You measure who had the best

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.239
<v Speaker 1>season in terms of total points. So you just go

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 1>back to the regular season home field advantage pretty much.

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So total points for the regular season is my tiebreaker. Okay,

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott that scenario, I just go top seed. I feel

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like they've are in the top seed, they can be it.

0:49:19.360 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I I don't their home field advantage. I don't have

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a problem with the points. Um. I I actually hate

0:49:25.960 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>bench scoring stuff like that. I hate I don't like

0:49:29.440 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>how many touchdowns did your starter score because that is

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>completely dependent on how that person wanted to design their team.

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a PPR league where they had Hunter Renfro

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't score a lot, and he's I don't. I

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 1>don't like that you're dictating that I just have top seed.

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You can't use anything involving the bench. By the way,

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>do decimals to two places people, Yeah, you can do

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of place if you want to. You can't use

0:49:52.080 --> 0:49:54.720
<v Speaker 1>anything involving the bench. Wins should not be a playoff

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:56.920
<v Speaker 1>wins should not be decided by the injuries or COVID

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:00.480
<v Speaker 1>status of yours or your opponents bench. You know you're

0:50:00.480 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>playing to get the best possible starting lineup you could have,

0:50:03.560 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 1>so that's out. UM. You should not use any previous

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:09.960
<v Speaker 1>results to Brian's point earlier, um, small sample size. And

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Brian and I played each other in week six and

0:50:12.480 --> 0:50:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I had four guys different thing and he didn't. Yeh right,

0:50:16.120 --> 0:50:18.239
<v Speaker 1>so who knows. That's not good. It's got to be

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:23.600
<v Speaker 1>something that happened from this week. Total yards of all

0:50:23.640 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of your starters, not including kickers in defense gives me

0:50:26.480 --> 0:50:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty damn accurate estimation as to whose players had

0:50:30.200 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the best week. And you won't get a tie. And

0:50:32.640 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it's less flukey than the touch totally flukey than the touchdowns.

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And to tie, you can tie touchdowns too. You could

0:50:38.080 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 1>have five and I can have five. Now you're gonna

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 1>tie again. You're never gonna tie in total yards technically

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you could, though, sure I've got eight hundred ninety two

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna have eight ninety two total yards. Not

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. I that is the correct answer. Tough question

0:50:56.640 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 1>number three. You're on the clock for pick four of

0:51:01.960 --> 0:51:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the first round of next year's draft. So we're advancing

0:51:05.280 --> 0:51:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the clock to next August. Off the board or Jonathan Taylor,

0:51:10.400 --> 0:51:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Javante Williams because Melvin Gordon signed somewhere else, and Cooper

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>cup are off the board. Who are you taking? Pick four?

0:51:20.760 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You're on the clock, Scott. I thought for a moment,

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>just to be sneaky and weird, I thought about taking

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews because I love Mark Andrews. But I did

0:51:31.239 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not go that route. I went and played it safe

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 1>with a guy who has eighty plus yards and or

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a score in every game but one. He's had like

0:51:40.120 --> 0:51:43.479
<v Speaker 1>thirty or twelve plus Fantasy points in every game but one.

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:47.040
<v Speaker 1>He is as consistent as they come this year and

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:50.359
<v Speaker 1>next year. It might even be better the the other

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>guy on the other side of the field. You know,

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he's declined a little bit. They need to make a

0:51:54.200 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>move to talk. I'm setting it up. It is the

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:05.880
<v Speaker 1>best wide receiver in the NFL. Justin Jefferson. Oh okay,

0:52:05.960 --> 0:52:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson, Brian your number four of next year's draft.

0:52:11.520 --> 0:52:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor, Javonte Williams, and Cooper Cupper off the board?

0:52:14.760 --> 0:52:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Who are you taking? I was gonna go wide receiver

0:52:17.239 --> 0:52:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to not Justin Jefferson was still gonna Davante Adams. I'm not.

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going with Adams either. I'm going back to

0:52:22.719 --> 0:52:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry. Um only eight games played this year, He's

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:30.200
<v Speaker 1>still like running back seven right now, while most running

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>backs have played thirteen fourteen games. I don't think the

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:36.840
<v Speaker 1>wheels have not fallen off Henry entirely. He's not falling

0:52:36.840 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>off the cliff however you want to put it. Who'll

0:52:39.200 --> 0:52:41.919
<v Speaker 1>be turning twenty eight going into next year. He didn't

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>get crazy usage in his first three seasons in the NFL. Yes,

0:52:45.680 --> 0:52:47.920
<v Speaker 1>his last two seasons he's seen three or three rushing

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:51.879
<v Speaker 1>attempts three hundred seventy eight last year. But I'm bank

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he could come back this year. By the way, for

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, the big to come back this year. So

0:52:56.400 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>assuming he doesn't seriously injured himself with the remainder the season,

0:53:00.560 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he goes through training camp unscathed, I'm just gonna go

0:53:03.160 --> 0:53:06.360
<v Speaker 1>back to Derrick Henry. You're not gonna win your league

0:53:06.360 --> 0:53:08.080
<v Speaker 1>because of him, but you're not gonna lose your league

0:53:08.080 --> 0:53:11.840
<v Speaker 1>by taking Derrick Henry fourth overall. One more year Henry's

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>got has premium production left in him, by the way,

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:16.439
<v Speaker 1>best wide receiver not named Cooper Cup I should say

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.279
<v Speaker 1>best wide receiver on the board, justin Jevers that is,

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that's probably true. Um, Derrick Henry is very tempting, and

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he will go in this spot in most drafts.

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But the problem is one thousand, five hundred touches for

0:53:33.640 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry. The injuries have already started, and I worry

0:53:37.080 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna keep mounting. And I'm not taking him and

0:53:39.239 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>picked four. Next year, we are going with Travis Kelsey

0:53:44.080 --> 0:53:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and inconsistent. Even in this a more inconsistent season than

0:53:48.760 --> 0:53:53.240
<v Speaker 1>most of his past several he's still the top scoring

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:55.719
<v Speaker 1>tight end and all probability this year he's basically tied

0:53:55.760 --> 0:54:00.800
<v Speaker 1>almost with Mark and Andrews in receptions, yards and touchdowns

0:54:00.800 --> 0:54:03.279
<v Speaker 1>for number one, And just what's how do you not?

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I do argue with any of that? In the tight

0:54:05.040 --> 0:54:10.680
<v Speaker 1>end position remains fraught with danger, agony, pain people trying

0:54:10.680 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to find anybody with a pulse Outside of Andrews and Kelsey,

0:54:14.440 --> 0:54:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it's been a brutally or even other guys that we like,

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like George Kittle, Dawson Knox have missed long stretches of games.

0:54:20.480 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You get a guy who never misses games at the

0:54:23.280 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at the positions, at the position of greatest scarcity. You

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:31.359
<v Speaker 1>know who's regretted drafting Travis Kelsey over the last five years,

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Over the last five years, nobody ever. And that's why

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he is the correct answer for pick number four and

0:54:37.200 --> 0:54:43.080
<v Speaker 1>next year's draft. I figured you'd go there. It wasn't hard,

0:54:44.760 --> 0:54:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Davante Adams was gonna be my

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 1>was my number two choice. By the way, see where's

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 1>it gonna be? Who's this quarterback? And threw it out

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is I don't know who's quarterback is gonna be Patrick?

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I know who Patrick Mahomes is gonna be thrown to,

0:54:57.440 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and it's Travis Kelsey. Let's go back to the matchups. Oh, hey,

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:04.359
<v Speaker 1>it's me Pittsburgh Steels taking that Kansas City. Hey, that's

0:55:04.400 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 1>my matchup. Um, you'll want to as we talk about

0:55:07.360 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Steelers, you want to watch the status of

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City secondary, specifically starting cornerbacks chair Various Warden,

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Rashad Fenton. They're in the COVID protocol and right now

0:55:18.080 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming they're out, and so the grades you're going

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to hear are actually uh now my grades are in

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>as if they are playing. You can bump everybody up

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a letter grade if they do not go so right now,

0:55:30.480 --> 0:55:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming they're out. No, I'm assuming they're in. I'm

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 1>confusing myself. Now I'm assuming they're in. You can bump

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody up. Ben Roethlisberger on the bench. He whipped badly

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in a smash spot last week, and I can't recommend

0:55:42.560 --> 0:55:44.800
<v Speaker 1>him in a far tougher matchup against a much improved

0:55:44.840 --> 0:55:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs past defense. No opposing quarterback is top two hundred

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty three yards and seven games. Kansas City allowing just

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>one passing touchdown per game since Week eight, and I

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:55.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's about what one touchdown feels about right for

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben here, the loss of touchdown score Pat Fryarmouth is

0:55:59.560 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a big loss ends up to this and he is

0:56:02.160 --> 0:56:04.399
<v Speaker 1>not expected to play in this game. Let's talk about

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Yante Johnson. In the five games prior to last week's dud,

0:56:08.880 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Diante had commanded double digit targets in every game. I

0:56:11.960 --> 0:56:15.320
<v Speaker 1>averaged ninety two yards and he scored three times. Nobody

0:56:15.360 --> 0:56:19.240
<v Speaker 1>will benefit more then Johnson, if Ward and or Fenton

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:22.399
<v Speaker 1>can't go in this game. Chief secondaries improved a lot,

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.239
<v Speaker 1>but they've given up five scorers and four seventy five

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>yard receivers in the last five games. Johnson's a B

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:33.880
<v Speaker 1>grade for now. Chase Claypool is so dangerous. It's been

0:56:33.920 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a brutal couple of weeks for Chase. Chase Claypool. He

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 1>selfishly botched the end of the Minnesota game two weeks ago,

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:43.560
<v Speaker 1>and then last week he saw the lowest snap count

0:56:43.560 --> 0:56:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of his season, just thirty one plays, and he finished

0:56:46.840 --> 0:56:50.239
<v Speaker 1>last week with one reception. It sure looks like he's

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in the doghouse. Ray Ray McLeod had more snaps and

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>more targets than Chase Claypool last week. Claypool assuming when

0:56:58.320 --> 0:56:59.840
<v Speaker 1>he is on the field to see a fair amount

0:56:59.840 --> 0:57:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of the Chiefs only non COVID cornerback Mike Hughes, who

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:05.560
<v Speaker 1>has been shockingly competent. And that's why just the C

0:57:05.719 --> 0:57:08.640
<v Speaker 1>grade on Chase Claypool in this game, all right, then,

0:57:08.719 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Nazi Harris, I think he bounces back from last week's

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>horrific game. Despite a dominant stretch over the middle of

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the season, Kansas City has been giving up a lot

0:57:16.640 --> 0:57:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of yards lately, to opposing running backs over the last

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>three games, opposing runners averaging one hundred eighty one total

0:57:24.640 --> 0:57:27.560
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. That is staggering. That would be the

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 1>worst total if applied over a full season. One total

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>yards per game. Steeler's offensive line, though, is so bad

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that I can't give Harris An a grade in this

0:57:38.160 --> 0:57:40.360
<v Speaker 1>game like I would want to, and he's posted so

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:43.640
<v Speaker 1>many duds. Still, this looks like a good opportunity for

0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>him and a B grade for Nazi Harris alright, let's

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:50.240
<v Speaker 1>go over to Kansas City, which has got its own issues, well,

0:57:50.280 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot of issues. Uh. Tyreek Kill and Travis

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey in the COVID protocol both could be cleared before kickoff,

0:57:57.360 --> 0:58:00.280
<v Speaker 1>so apply your own judgment and what you've learned closer

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to kick off. Tyreek Hills and obvious A if he

0:58:02.920 --> 0:58:05.760
<v Speaker 1>can go. Um, even with all of mahomess ups and

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>downs over the past two months, he's been by in large,

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>very consistent obvious A for him. Travis Kelsey, though, um,

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm only giving a B grade even if he can go.

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Despite last week's obvious blow up game, it was just

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>his second game with a touchdown in the last nine

0:58:23.520 --> 0:58:26.480
<v Speaker 1>weeks and the steel is really good against tight ends.

0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That sounds like a guy you should take. Justin Jefferson

0:58:28.600 --> 0:58:32.640
<v Speaker 1>over correct. Josin Jefferson also would be great in this

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this week. I'm just kidding. That's fine. No tight end

0:58:35.360 --> 0:58:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is scored in ten weeks against Pittsburgh. No tight end

0:58:38.360 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 1>his top fifty yards in six games against Pittsburgh. Other

0:58:42.120 --> 0:58:45.840
<v Speaker 1>excellent tight ends like Darren Waller, t J. Hockenson, Mark Andrews.

0:58:46.600 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Those guys averaged three catches thirty eight yards. None of

0:58:50.160 --> 0:58:52.840
<v Speaker 1>them scored. That's why I've only got the B grid

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and Travis Kelsey. If he can go in this game,

0:58:55.840 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and if they can't go in this game, you may

0:58:59.680 --> 0:59:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be happened to pivot to Mi Cole Hardman, Josh Gordon,

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Byron Pringle, or DeMarcus Robinson. But that's the whole problem.

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Which one would you even pivot too? In that scenario,

0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you'd be just throwing darts and that's not worth anything.

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Good luck figuring out which guy would be the best one.

0:59:16.520 --> 0:59:18.960
<v Speaker 1>We won't pivot to any of those guys. So what

0:59:19.000 --> 0:59:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to do about Patrick Mahomes? B greade on him will

0:59:21.440 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 1>upgrade him to an A. If Hill and Kelsey become available.

0:59:24.680 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 1>If not, I worry about an unusually run heavy game

0:59:28.680 --> 0:59:32.720
<v Speaker 1>plan favoring Clyde Edwards a layer against a terrible Steelers

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:35.439
<v Speaker 1>run defense. And let's talk about Clyde Edwards a layer

0:59:35.480 --> 0:59:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for a minute. If you believe like I do, that

0:59:38.720 --> 0:59:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this team is gonna run more than they usually do,

0:59:40.760 --> 0:59:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you'll like Clyde. His sent snapshare last week was a

0:59:44.640 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>great indicator, although it didn't turn into a lot of

0:59:46.960 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>good stats for the Steelers. Every game seems to keep

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:57.360
<v Speaker 1>getting easier. This team has allowed one fifty nine total

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:01.680
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, third most to opposing running backs, and

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they've just been gouged over the last three weeks in particular.

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So Clyde Edwards Larry won't get all of the hundred

1:00:06.920 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine yards, but I think he could get easily

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred yards. And he gets a B grade

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And you could pivot if if necessary,

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to Darryl Williams as well, who continues to be a

1:00:17.640 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>shockingly big part of this game plan and continues to

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>be productive. And again, Steelers a terrible run defense. Let's

1:00:25.880 --> 1:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>take a break when we come back. New York Giants

1:00:28.960 --> 1:00:34.200
<v Speaker 1>take on the Philadelphia Eagles, Giants passing game is a disaster.

1:00:34.400 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>But say Kwan Barkley, what do you do about him

1:00:38.360 --> 1:00:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and a tricky matchup with the Eagles. Yeah, we'll talk

1:00:41.480 --> 1:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that through in moments when we come back to segment

1:00:43.840 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>number two, our number two Fantasy Football Weekly, Welcome back

1:01:05.920 --> 1:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Fall Weekly. Paul Charchy and Scott Fish and Brian

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Johnson with you. If you'd like to follow us on Twitter,

1:01:11.600 --> 1:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you can do so. I am at Paul Charchy and

1:01:13.480 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Scott is at Scott Fish twenty four and Brian is

1:01:17.000 --> 1:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that bt x J which sounds like a weather thing?

1:01:21.000 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>When you got that random X, like right in the

1:01:23.160 --> 1:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>middle of things, do you want to do a lot

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of quick the quick origin Actually I don't know. I'm

1:01:27.560 --> 1:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>not gonna say what my middle name is, but it's

1:01:29.600 --> 1:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>sorts of the T. But the X. You have to

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>pick a confirmation name, right if I didn't go to

1:01:34.640 --> 1:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Catholic school, but I went to like Sunday School or whatever.

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>When you get confirmed, you pick a saint and I

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>went with with Xavier because I grew up liking the

1:01:42.880 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Knicks and Davior McDaniel. And you're supposed to do a

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>speech on like why you you picked the Saint, and

1:01:48.960 --> 1:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I did say that, and okay, thankfully it wasn't in

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the days where I get beaten by like a yardstick,

1:01:54.080 --> 1:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>by a note, but they were not. And that's always

1:01:57.200 --> 1:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of be like my user name, so I picked

1:01:58.880 --> 1:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>us my Twitter name. You've carried it across all this time.

1:02:02.720 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Chargers take on the Texans, Brian, it looks like Austin

1:02:06.080 --> 1:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Ekeler is not gonna go in this game, and man,

1:02:08.840 --> 1:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>whoever does start, he's got a juicy matchup against a

1:02:11.880 --> 1:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>bad run defense. Yeah, yeah, I was gonna give Eckler

1:02:15.160 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the A, but uh, basically, in his own words, it's

1:02:18.160 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>not looking good for him to play, even though he

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is vaccinated, but he's not feeling too hot. So under

1:02:24.360 --> 1:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that assumption, I'm gonna, I mean, if Eckler goes, gonna

1:02:27.240 --> 1:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>give him the A. But it's really looking like it's

1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be Justin Jackson and the Joshua Kelly. I'll give

1:02:31.200 --> 1:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Jackson a B and Kelly a C. And this one

1:02:33.920 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a great matchup. Houston has allowed the most rushing

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>yards and the second most rushing touchdowns to opposing running back,

1:02:38.720 --> 1:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So just a situation you're gonna have to monitor leading

1:02:41.240 --> 1:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>up monitor leading up to kickoff. Unfortunately, it doesn't sound

1:02:45.040 --> 1:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like is gonna go though, um Keenan Allen will go

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>knock on wood. Hopefully he goes. Uh, no reason he wouldn't.

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Opposing wide receivers haven't posted big numbers lately against Houston,

1:02:56.360 --> 1:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but the competition has been pretty weak outside of Tyler Lockett.

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Very comparable Tyler Lockett to Keenan Allen lock It at

1:03:03.080 --> 1:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>five catches, one two yards and one touchdown against the

1:03:05.920 --> 1:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Texans in Week fourteen. So Alan gets an a Mike

1:03:09.280 --> 1:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Williams man major disappointment after a monstrous start to the season,

1:03:14.400 --> 1:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just to see for him here. But Williams six four

1:03:17.480 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>two five pounds will square off most with the five ten,

1:03:21.640 --> 1:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>two hundred pound Desmond King on the outside. He just

1:03:24.760 --> 1:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>surrendered at least fifty yards and already touchdown in three

1:03:27.840 --> 1:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>of his last four games with a safe sea. Yeah,

1:03:29.960 --> 1:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, it's anything safe with him. And how many

1:03:31.880 --> 1:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>times have we got to talk about positive matchups for

1:03:34.520 --> 1:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams that he does not make good on. I

1:03:38.720 --> 1:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>know you gotta temper your expectations with Williams, but he does.

1:03:41.920 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>He's he's pretty much a boom or a bus player,

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but it is a it is a boom matchup, or

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it should be, but no promises there um a great

1:03:49.120 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>matchup for Jared Cook. Because of the unfortunate and scary

1:03:52.800 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>injury to teammate Donald Parham last Thursday, Parham unlikely to go,

1:03:56.960 --> 1:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>so Cook should see the most of the work at

1:03:59.400 --> 1:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>tight end for the Argers against the Texans, who have

1:04:01.800 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fourth most touch tight end touchdowns and just

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>last week, Jacksonville's James O'Shaughnessy and Chris man Hurts combined

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>for five catches and seventy one yards against Houston, So

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that's almost a safe floor for cooking this matchup. And

1:04:15.120 --> 1:04:24.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking of safe, justin Herbert the air Bear get today again.

1:04:24.720 --> 1:04:27.720
<v Speaker 1>The Houston secondary looks like it's been playing better as

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>of late, but they faced the Jaguars, the Seahawks, the Jets,

1:04:30.760 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Titans, the Dolphins before good quarterbacks to face the Texans.

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson and Josh Allen, Kyler Murray and Matthew Stafford

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have averaged two sixty nine yards and two and a

1:04:39.640 --> 1:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>half passing touchdowns and a half that that's a floor

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for the air Bear here, so he gets the a

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and Rex Burkhead. I'm sorry we go over to Houston now.

1:04:48.520 --> 1:04:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Not a lot to talk about here. Rex Burkhead the

1:04:50.520 --> 1:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Sea Rex was might take a chance to be running back.

1:04:53.400 --> 1:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Great matchup for him. Brandon Cooks gets to see might

1:04:58.440 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>not play. Probably will helped a lot of people advance

1:05:01.960 --> 1:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>or surviving their guillete league. Last week. I don't like

1:05:05.000 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>his prospects. Prospects as much of this week he doesn't.

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>He's not playing the Jaguars again. The Chargers have given

1:05:10.760 --> 1:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>up good wide receiver numbers as of late, but that's

1:05:13.520 --> 1:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>been to the Chiefs, the Bengals, the Steelers of the Vikings,

1:05:18.160 --> 1:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>all those teams have multiple good receivers on their team.

1:05:21.080 --> 1:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>It's all Brandon Cooks for Houston. He's gonna draw a

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>ton of attention from Assante Samuel tend Or Derwin James.

1:05:27.800 --> 1:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Just for the listeners. He tested positive on Wednesday, so

1:05:31.400 --> 1:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>he can test out. He could test out if if

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, he's just close contact whatever. No, he

1:05:36.440 --> 1:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>tested positive, Okay, so yeah'm not looking good for Cooks

1:05:40.880 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and if he does go, uh, temporary expectations for him.

1:05:44.440 --> 1:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Not gonna mention any other wide receivers for the Texans.

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Even if Cooks somehow sits, he can't go Nico little

1:05:53.840 --> 1:05:57.280
<v Speaker 1>too risky for a week sixteen And sadly, my boy

1:05:57.360 --> 1:05:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Davis Mills also on the bench, and this one is

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>not a good week. No. And we like Davis Mills

1:06:02.400 --> 1:06:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and what he's been able to do, but it's it's

1:06:04.520 --> 1:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not he has and he's been fantasy friendly and a

1:06:07.120 --> 1:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of a lot of spots where nobody would have

1:06:09.120 --> 1:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>expected it. Sure Scott for the Giants, I don't think

1:06:12.880 --> 1:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to spend really any time on the passing

1:06:14.800 --> 1:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>game left by is it Jake from right game? No,

1:06:19.240 --> 1:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they're being coy with it because there's a distinct is

1:06:23.560 --> 1:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it Glenden? Is it from that's you know that's a

1:06:26.400 --> 1:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>competitive advantage, right, But let's talk about ske Kwon Barkley,

1:06:29.760 --> 1:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the only guy that a playoff team might be considering starting. Yeah, yeah,

1:06:33.920 --> 1:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not been great. And we were mentioning off

1:06:36.200 --> 1:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>air that him and Booker both looked like you couldn't

1:06:39.200 --> 1:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>tell who is who because the Booker looked good, and

1:06:42.280 --> 1:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there's their snaps and their touches were split more evenly

1:06:45.360 --> 1:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>than you'd like. I Barkley, I am giving a C

1:06:48.360 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>grade too. And here's why he gets about three to

1:06:51.320 --> 1:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>six catches every game. He gets about thirty yards receiving

1:06:54.640 --> 1:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>most games or more forty whatever. But here's his yardage

1:06:59.200 --> 1:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>lines in the last seven or so games. Fifty seven yards,

1:07:03.000 --> 1:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty two fifty five, sixty four fifty Those are the

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>rushing stats. Just rushing, he's getting you five to six

1:07:09.280 --> 1:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>points rushing, he's getting you a few catches, he's getting

1:07:12.200 --> 1:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you twenty thirty. You're you're already up to ten, eleven,

1:07:14.840 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve exactly. That's basically all you're getting. So I'm giving

1:07:19.760 --> 1:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade. That's like a sea worthy amount.

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:28.280
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, Jalen Hurts. Jalen Hurts, I have

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>an eight grade on Jalen Hurts. He has finished as

1:07:30.720 --> 1:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a top twelve quarterback this year nine times, nine times,

1:07:37.000 --> 1:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>nine plus another two times, making eleven total. When when

1:07:42.720 --> 1:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't get it done with his arm, his legs

1:07:45.520 --> 1:07:47.439
<v Speaker 1>get it done. I don't know if did you miss

1:07:47.480 --> 1:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that that I added to to make it eleven total.

1:07:49.760 --> 1:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted you to play the calendar. Sometimes you

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>get both and the Celia sky High. Four weeks ago

1:07:56.080 --> 1:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>these two Matt he had three rushing touchdowns. Since then,

1:07:58.960 --> 1:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Giants of alloudon average of nearly two hundred and

1:08:01.240 --> 1:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards and two scores passing. You might you might

1:08:04.280 --> 1:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>get the double deps, you might get the double dip

1:08:06.440 --> 1:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>here A grade on Hurts, C grade on DeVonta Smith.

1:08:10.120 --> 1:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>With the running game becoming a bigger and bigger thing,

1:08:12.240 --> 1:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the passing game has really fallen off. Smith doesn't hit

1:08:14.880 --> 1:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>those AIRB categories anymore, but he has top forty yards

1:08:18.880 --> 1:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in three straight. He's got that that upside. He's he

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:24.920
<v Speaker 1>can occasionally score touchdowns. The Giants have allowed fifty plus

1:08:25.000 --> 1:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>yards and or score to eight wide receivers in just

1:08:27.160 --> 1:08:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks. This is the only wide receiver

1:08:29.840 --> 1:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you can start. But I'm only giving him a C grade.

1:08:32.479 --> 1:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard a grade hundred plus and two straight fifty

1:08:36.160 --> 1:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>plus and or scoring eight of his thirteen games. That's like,

1:08:39.520 --> 1:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that's that's really you just plug and play him when

1:08:42.240 --> 1:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>he's starting. The Giants has given up a lot of

1:08:44.920 --> 1:08:47.679
<v Speaker 1>big plays the big days to tight ends. Ten different

1:08:47.680 --> 1:08:50.479
<v Speaker 1>tight ends have gone for sixty plus and or a score.

1:08:51.120 --> 1:08:55.880
<v Speaker 1>That's yeah, it's definitely a grade there. In the running game.

1:08:55.960 --> 1:08:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I told you Jordan Howard was might take a chance

1:08:58.080 --> 1:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on me runner. That's because the girls are running constantly.

1:09:01.720 --> 1:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>They're the first team with a hundred seventy five plus

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards in seven straight games since the Bears. Wow. Yeah,

1:09:10.320 --> 1:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Adam Aser for that stat um. This is

1:09:14.080 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a team that gives the running backs over

1:09:16.320 --> 1:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty touches per game. If Sanders go he should. He's

1:09:20.520 --> 1:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>he's got a quad inury he's dealing with. He played

1:09:23.200 --> 1:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>right u ntil the end of the last game. If

1:09:24.920 --> 1:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Sanders goes, I have an A grade on him. He

1:09:26.880 --> 1:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>exploded last week. He should be in line for fifteen

1:09:29.160 --> 1:09:32.519
<v Speaker 1>to twenty touches. The Giants are allowing, just like the

1:09:32.520 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Eagles are doing thirty plus touches to running backs the game.

1:09:36.640 --> 1:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Hundred forty plus totally yards and back to back for Sanders.

1:09:39.200 --> 1:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So I have an A grade on Sanders a C

1:09:41.080 --> 1:09:43.759
<v Speaker 1>grade on Howard, hoping he gets that ten plus touches

1:09:43.800 --> 1:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that he normally gets. Bears take down the Seahawks, and

1:09:48.560 --> 1:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>let's talk to the Bear side of this. Beginning with

1:09:50.360 --> 1:09:52.759
<v Speaker 1>David Montgomery. We'll start with the running game here. Slumping

1:09:52.800 --> 1:09:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Seattle run defense allowing the fifth most rushing attempts, the

1:09:55.800 --> 1:09:58.960
<v Speaker 1>most receptions, the fourth most receiving yards per game to

1:09:59.000 --> 1:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>opposing back so the last five weeks, and Montgomery a

1:10:02.479 --> 1:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>capable receiver, so I think he cashes in aaron ground here.

1:10:05.720 --> 1:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>They've also given up four touchdowns to runners over the

1:10:08.120 --> 1:10:11.040
<v Speaker 1>last five games. He could find the end zone. On Tuesday,

1:10:11.120 --> 1:10:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Sony Walkman and Darryl Henderson combined for a hundred forty

1:10:14.120 --> 1:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>two total yards against Seattle, and really, Montgomery doesn't share

1:10:17.280 --> 1:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>much workload with anybody else, he might get a lot

1:10:19.320 --> 1:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>of that same kind of hundred forty two. I could

1:10:21.439 --> 1:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>see him easily going over a hundred here in the touchdowns,

1:10:24.160 --> 1:10:27.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly within the realm of possibility. I've got a B

1:10:27.320 --> 1:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>grade on David Montgomery. Let's go to the passing game

1:10:30.040 --> 1:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>where Justin Fields get this. I don't think most listeners

1:10:34.320 --> 1:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>would guess this. Justin Fields has been a top ten

1:10:37.280 --> 1:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>fantasy quarterback in four straight weeks. All four full games.

1:10:43.120 --> 1:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>He has thrown for at least two hundred eighty five

1:10:45.439 --> 1:10:48.880
<v Speaker 1>yards and or multiple scores in his last three full games,

1:10:49.160 --> 1:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>and over the last five weeks, he's averaged eight rushing

1:10:51.840 --> 1:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>attempts in fifty six rushing yards which gives him a

1:10:54.880 --> 1:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>very safe floor for fantasy production as well. When you

1:10:57.800 --> 1:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>get those rushing yards. Seattle is allowedly three hundred passing

1:11:01.439 --> 1:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>yards and or multiple passing touchdowns in four the last

1:11:03.920 --> 1:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>five games. I've got to be grade on Justin Fields.

1:11:07.160 --> 1:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>If the Jaguars could turn back the clock, do they

1:11:09.640 --> 1:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>take Justin Fields number one overall? Don't they? I think

1:11:15.040 --> 1:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>they would. I mean it would have it probably would

1:11:16.960 --> 1:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>not be Trevor Lawrence. But I don't think Justin Fields

1:11:19.160 --> 1:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>has yet turned this into any kind of mandate. I

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know. That's a great question though, but and one

1:11:24.080 --> 1:11:26.519
<v Speaker 1>for probably a different show. When we're trying to kill

1:11:26.560 --> 1:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>time in February, that's our time to talk about that

1:11:30.200 --> 1:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>that particular topic. I think, all right, let's go to

1:11:32.840 --> 1:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Darnell Mooney, the number one receiver for Justin Fields. He's

1:11:36.080 --> 1:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>had exactly five receptions in four of the past five games,

1:11:40.439 --> 1:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but five receptions for him could mean anything between twenty

1:11:43.240 --> 1:11:46.040
<v Speaker 1>seven yards and a hundred twenty three yards. I wish

1:11:46.040 --> 1:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd find the end zone more often as well. For

1:11:47.680 --> 1:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Mooney just three touchdowns on the season, which is a

1:11:50.080 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit disappointing. Seattle, listen, give up a lot of

1:11:53.200 --> 1:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>scores to wide receivers. Prior to Cooper Cups breakout game

1:11:56.800 --> 1:11:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, no receiver had scored in five straight games

1:11:59.360 --> 1:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>against Seattle, so I can only get him to a

1:12:01.520 --> 1:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>C grade on yardage when I don't expect Mooney to score.

1:12:05.400 --> 1:12:07.799
<v Speaker 1>Alan Robinson should be off the COVID list by kickoff,

1:12:07.880 --> 1:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's barely played in two months and the matchups

1:12:10.000 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not that favorable, so he's on the bench. Cole Commet

1:12:13.720 --> 1:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is a startable commodity at tight end, averaging a whopping

1:12:17.120 --> 1:12:20.599
<v Speaker 1>eight targets per game over the last month, or as

1:12:20.640 --> 1:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish would call it, nine one targets over the

1:12:25.040 --> 1:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>last month. Seattle has been hammered by high volume tight

1:12:28.320 --> 1:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>ends lately. George Kittle zach Ertz killed him. Now, granted

1:12:31.880 --> 1:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they're way better than Cole Commet, but still only three

1:12:34.800 --> 1:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>teams have allowed more tight end touchdowns than Seattle's eight,

1:12:38.200 --> 1:12:40.759
<v Speaker 1>So I like Commet. Here spots start, So Jimmy Graham

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed touchdown? Can probably he's so far. Hey, revenge game,

1:12:45.360 --> 1:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham, second second leg of the That is a

1:12:49.439 --> 1:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>good point. Revenge game, Jimmy Graham. But we're not starting

1:12:52.479 --> 1:12:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Graham, We're giving the dart throw to cold Commet.

1:12:56.640 --> 1:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Seattle side. Okay, what to do

1:13:00.360 --> 1:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with Russell Wilson after the great start of the season

1:13:03.880 --> 1:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>averaging a full touchdown? Oh sorry, that is sorry, wrong

1:13:07.400 --> 1:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>guy for Russell Wilson. We're gonna upgrade him to a

1:13:10.160 --> 1:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>B if a bunch of the members of the Bears

1:13:12.320 --> 1:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>secondary are out again, which is possible, and unlike Minnesota

1:13:16.280 --> 1:13:18.719
<v Speaker 1>last week, Seadle is actually gonna throw on the Bears.

1:13:19.439 --> 1:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Why the Vikings didn't to me is utterly head scratching,

1:13:22.160 --> 1:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and I don't understand it. Seattle will not make the

1:13:24.040 --> 1:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>same mistake. The Bears have allowed the second most passing

1:13:27.000 --> 1:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns over the last five weeks. You can start Russell Wilson.

1:13:30.280 --> 1:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got a C grade on him now, It'll be

1:13:32.000 --> 1:13:34.479
<v Speaker 1>higher if a lot of that secondary does not come

1:13:34.479 --> 1:13:38.599
<v Speaker 1>back from COVID. So how about his receivers? Tyler Lockett

1:13:38.640 --> 1:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>expected to clear the COVID protocol by kickoff. He's got

1:13:41.760 --> 1:13:44.879
<v Speaker 1>a favorable matchup in the slot, a position that Chicago

1:13:45.000 --> 1:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>keeps trying and failing to fix by rotating various guys in.

1:13:49.240 --> 1:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll try Xavier Crawford if he's available. If

1:13:53.080 --> 1:13:54.519
<v Speaker 1>he can't go, they might have to go all the

1:13:54.560 --> 1:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>way down to Marquis Christian who is allowing a perfect

1:13:57.080 --> 1:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>passer rating in his coverage. So I like Tyler Locket

1:14:00.400 --> 1:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>here a lot. He was red hot before the COVID

1:14:02.320 --> 1:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>list as well, So I've got a B grade on

1:14:05.040 --> 1:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Lockett. Then the DK Metcalf, Wow, he has not

1:14:10.960 --> 1:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown since Week eight, total disaster. After being

1:14:15.600 --> 1:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>a very bankable commodity at the start of the season,

1:14:20.000 --> 1:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>He's had a bunch of positive matchups and failed to

1:14:22.800 --> 1:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>come through for you. This is another one. Take it

1:14:25.280 --> 1:14:28.519
<v Speaker 1>with a grain of salt. If Chicago's best cornerback, Jalen

1:14:28.600 --> 1:14:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Johnson returns from COVID, he will shadow Metcalf here. Johnson

1:14:31.760 --> 1:14:34.280
<v Speaker 1>had a similar assignment against Davanta Adams two weeks ago,

1:14:34.320 --> 1:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>although they're totally different receivers, and he allowed fifty eight

1:14:37.120 --> 1:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown in his coverage. If Johnson can't go,

1:14:40.080 --> 1:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll bump DK Metcalf up to a B. But I've

1:14:42.160 --> 1:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>got him into C grade right now. So then the

1:14:46.120 --> 1:14:49.559
<v Speaker 1>Seattle running backs, so we've had Rashad Penny had the

1:14:49.800 --> 1:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>blow up game two weeks ago when he when he

1:14:51.960 --> 1:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>had two long runs for touchdowns and he did absolutely

1:14:54.560 --> 1:14:58.599
<v Speaker 1>nothing last week. Then also disturbing last week, DJ Dallas

1:14:59.240 --> 1:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>had a fifty percent time share with Rashad Penny. Now

1:15:04.040 --> 1:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>kim Kiem Hicks is out, so maybe that makes things

1:15:07.160 --> 1:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit easier to run up the middle. But

1:15:09.680 --> 1:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have been a really good run defense. It's

1:15:11.760 --> 1:15:14.639
<v Speaker 1>only allowed one runner to top eighty nine yards all

1:15:14.720 --> 1:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>season long. They just bottled up way better running back

1:15:17.880 --> 1:15:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook for three point two yards per carry last week.

1:15:21.640 --> 1:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I just I can't. I can't advocate any of these guys.

1:15:24.880 --> 1:15:26.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm keeping them all on the bench in bench grades

1:15:26.760 --> 1:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>for Penny and d J Dallas. Gerald Evard tight end

1:15:30.000 --> 1:15:34.240
<v Speaker 1>also on the bench mile He's been mildly fantasy relevant lately,

1:15:34.560 --> 1:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but Chicago has been an elite tight end defense, including

1:15:38.240 --> 1:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a ranking fourth among all defenses in tight end defense. UM,

1:15:45.160 --> 1:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>let's try to work in one more matchup. Tampa Bay

1:15:47.720 --> 1:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina can go quick, alright, good, then let's do it.

1:15:50.160 --> 1:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones, was you take a chance to be running back? Charge?

1:15:52.360 --> 1:15:54.679
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty easy call. I like that one. Mike

1:15:54.760 --> 1:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Evans not so easy. You can give him a see

1:15:56.960 --> 1:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna try and play through this hamstring injury, but

1:15:59.400 --> 1:16:02.599
<v Speaker 1>likely to be shadowed by Stephan Gilmour plus the hammy

1:16:02.680 --> 1:16:05.599
<v Speaker 1>these are very very bad things, so we see both

1:16:05.640 --> 1:16:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of them for Mike Evans. Antonio Brown, gonna give him

1:16:08.640 --> 1:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a buh. Brown will seemingly step into the Chris Godwin

1:16:12.520 --> 1:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>role that Godwin had when Antonio Brown was out. Now

1:16:16.439 --> 1:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown is in without Chris Godwin, so we're basically

1:16:19.000 --> 1:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>looking at guaranteed double digit targets for Brown. Caroline has

1:16:22.880 --> 1:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>surrendered seven wide receiver touchdowns over their last four games,

1:16:26.240 --> 1:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>so if you're super desperate, you can also throw a

1:16:28.800 --> 1:16:32.799
<v Speaker 1>seed dart Eva harpoon at Scott, don't call me Scotty anymore.

1:16:32.880 --> 1:16:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Miller uh in deeper league, Scott Miller uh Worth worth

1:16:36.680 --> 1:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the shot, and Rob Gronkowski certainly worth the shot. And

1:16:42.920 --> 1:16:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I should say divisional matchup first meeting very rare. We

1:16:47.560 --> 1:16:49.479
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned it earlier in the show. They're gonna play

1:16:49.479 --> 1:16:52.519
<v Speaker 1>again in week eighteen, so there's not any recent history here,

1:16:52.520 --> 1:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna give be Uh a gran could be

1:16:54.840 --> 1:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup. Over the last week. The Panthers up

1:16:57.360 --> 1:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>loudly sixteenth most Fantasy points to opposing type ends, and

1:17:00.760 --> 1:17:03.519
<v Speaker 1>on the year, Carolina has only allowed two top twelve

1:17:03.520 --> 1:17:07.160
<v Speaker 1>finishes to the position. But Gronk should push double digit

1:17:07.160 --> 1:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>targets in this one as well. He's an easy start,

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:13.559
<v Speaker 1>and Brady Tom Brady, of course not very easy start

1:17:14.000 --> 1:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>because of the loss of Chris Godwin. Leonard Fournett, the

1:17:16.360 --> 1:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>hobbled Mike Evans still gave him a be um despite

1:17:19.360 --> 1:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact the Panthers only fourth lowest opponent passing play

1:17:22.280 --> 1:17:26.080
<v Speaker 1>percentage and are allowing just one seventy nine passing yards

1:17:26.120 --> 1:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>per game. That's the second fewest. But I don't trust

1:17:28.920 --> 1:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks run game a whole lot. I still like

1:17:31.560 --> 1:17:34.599
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones won't get me wrong charge, and Carolina's offense

1:17:34.640 --> 1:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>should struggle to stay on the field. So let's talk

1:17:36.680 --> 1:17:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about them for about five seconds. Tuba Hubbard, Uh, he's

1:17:41.400 --> 1:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>on the bench. The Bucks are allowing just ninety six

1:17:43.680 --> 1:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>combo yards and just over half a touchdown per game

1:17:45.960 --> 1:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. Well, and he's not good enough to

1:17:47.880 --> 1:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>keep a mirror Abdula off the field. Tuba not gooding?

1:17:53.920 --> 1:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Just stop? You know, DJ Moore if he plays, he's

1:18:00.280 --> 1:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a hamstring injury himself. I will give him

1:18:02.840 --> 1:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a see just based on expected volume. Uh, he should

1:18:06.000 --> 1:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>be a lot for double digit targets if he goes

1:18:08.240 --> 1:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>as far as the quarterbacks go for Carolina, we'll see

1:18:11.160 --> 1:18:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the sum of Sam Darnold come back nothing and stills

1:18:15.720 --> 1:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>confidence like we're starting camp. But you'll see Sam darn

1:18:18.840 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>cam les say about cam Well, his play on the

1:18:23.120 --> 1:18:25.519
<v Speaker 1>field says a lot. It's overall this very very gross

1:18:25.560 --> 1:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for Carolina. I know poor d J. Moore deserves better

1:18:28.400 --> 1:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>than what he's gotten through that offense. When we come back,

1:18:31.200 --> 1:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>final segment for Fantasy Football Weekly. In this semi finals edition,

1:18:34.920 --> 1:18:39.640
<v Speaker 1>including Denver Broncos taking on the Las Vegas Raiders, Javante

1:18:39.720 --> 1:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Williams is just gonna be one of his big games.

1:18:41.880 --> 1:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>He was trending towards more use last week. We'll see

1:18:45.000 --> 1:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>what Scott Fish has to say about his prospects when

1:18:47.720 --> 1:19:03.559
<v Speaker 1>we return the final segment of the semi final edition

1:19:03.920 --> 1:19:10.559
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasy Football Weekly. It's three matchups left, beginning with

1:19:10.720 --> 1:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Denver taking on the Las Vegas Raiders. Scott talked to

1:19:14.040 --> 1:19:17.839
<v Speaker 1>me about the running back situation. We saw Javonte Williams

1:19:18.320 --> 1:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>edge out a little bit of a lead and runs

1:19:20.760 --> 1:19:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and touches last week. Do you think that continues? I do.

1:19:24.320 --> 1:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I do. I have Williams slightly over Gordon, but I

1:19:26.680 --> 1:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>still have them both B grades. I wish I could

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>give one of them a B plus, but appearingly I

1:19:31.120 --> 1:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>cannot do that on this show. Uh. Since Gordon has returned,

1:19:34.880 --> 1:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Gordon has outtouched Williams four, Williams has has out gained Gordon.

1:19:43.840 --> 1:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Williams gets more receiving work, Gordon gets a ton more

1:19:47.360 --> 1:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>red zone touches eleven to three. It's split all over.

1:19:51.280 --> 1:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But the snaps went really down for Gordon last week,

1:19:53.880 --> 1:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if that's a trend because they were

1:19:56.000 --> 1:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>going down two weeks in a row before the injury

1:19:58.960 --> 1:20:01.519
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I like Williams a little bit more.

1:20:01.600 --> 1:20:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I do have B grades on both of them. In

1:20:03.240 --> 1:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. This is one of those super weird

1:20:06.200 --> 1:20:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I like Drew Lock. You had him as you take

1:20:08.479 --> 1:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a chance. I don't know who to start. He was

1:20:12.120 --> 1:20:14.639
<v Speaker 1>great with Sutton two years ago in the one game earlier.

1:20:14.680 --> 1:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>This year's Sutton had like fifty yards, but Judy didn't play.

1:20:19.560 --> 1:20:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Judy didn't play, and at the end of last year,

1:20:21.760 --> 1:20:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Locke was great with Judy. Judy like had a hundred

1:20:24.040 --> 1:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>and forty yards in this matchup last year with Locke.

1:20:27.000 --> 1:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But can we trust it here? Can we trust Tim Patrick?

1:20:29.680 --> 1:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to trust Fanton Albert? Oh? Together they

1:20:32.400 --> 1:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>had fifty seven and fifty eight yards last week. No,

1:20:35.439 --> 1:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders have allowed a lot of touchdowns to tight ends,

1:20:38.320 --> 1:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but not a lot of yards. You don't know where

1:20:39.800 --> 1:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going. I'm starting no receivers for the Bronco, but

1:20:43.920 --> 1:20:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting the quarterback. It makes sense. On the other side,

1:20:48.200 --> 1:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr, I have a bench grade on Over the

1:20:50.520 --> 1:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>last five games, the Broncos held Prescott, Hurts, Mahomes, Goff Burrow,

1:20:54.600 --> 1:20:56.759
<v Speaker 1>all under two and thirty five yards. And those aren't

1:20:56.800 --> 1:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>terrible quarterbacks, won't you know? Say what you go a

1:20:59.080 --> 1:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>buck off? But the rest pretty good, three of them

1:21:02.280 --> 1:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>under two hundred. Uh Car On the other side, he's

1:21:05.680 --> 1:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>thrown for about an average of two hundred and fifty

1:21:07.479 --> 1:21:09.719
<v Speaker 1>yards of the last five, but just three touchdown passes

1:21:09.760 --> 1:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>over the last five. I have him on the bench.

1:21:12.439 --> 1:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I have the tight ends on the bench. Waller is

1:21:14.720 --> 1:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>probably not gonna go, and if he doesn't, Moreau is

1:21:17.320 --> 1:21:20.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the work. But the Broncos defense hasn't allowed

1:21:20.439 --> 1:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to tight end over thirty yards in six weeks. Hunter

1:21:24.080 --> 1:21:26.880
<v Speaker 1>renfro Though, b Grade. At this point, you just got

1:21:26.880 --> 1:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to believe he's a stud. It was a little bit

1:21:28.360 --> 1:21:31.920
<v Speaker 1>of a dud last week. Before that, he had a

1:21:32.000 --> 1:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred plus yards in three straight eight plus catches. He's

1:21:34.800 --> 1:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>getting tons of targets. Even even last week he add

1:21:38.120 --> 1:21:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a decent amount of targets. I think he goes back

1:21:40.479 --> 1:21:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to the double digits here. Um, last time they played

1:21:43.880 --> 1:21:45.680
<v Speaker 1>he at eight for seventy three. I think this is

1:21:45.880 --> 1:21:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a spot where he's going to get bad again.

1:21:48.560 --> 1:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh Josh Jacobs, b Grade. It was nice to see

1:21:51.920 --> 1:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs get back to the eighteen plus touches after a

1:21:54.840 --> 1:21:58.240
<v Speaker 1>light day in week fourteen. Drake is still out. Jacobs

1:21:58.320 --> 1:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is getting that catching works seventeen catches and less since

1:22:01.160 --> 1:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Jacob's gone since uh Kennan Drake has gone out. So

1:22:04.040 --> 1:22:06.559
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see three, four, five, six catches. You're gonna

1:22:06.560 --> 1:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>see B level workout of Jacob's here, all right, washington't know,

1:22:10.800 --> 1:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually I go last sorry, we go to Miami

1:22:14.000 --> 1:22:17.760
<v Speaker 1>taking on the Saints. Bryan Guy almost nailed might take

1:22:17.760 --> 1:22:19.839
<v Speaker 1>a chance of running back last week with Salvin Acamed

1:22:19.840 --> 1:22:21.679
<v Speaker 1>I knew a backup and running back for the Dolphins

1:22:21.760 --> 1:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>can go off, but it was Duke Johnson, which was

1:22:24.000 --> 1:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of odd because Myles Gaston was running well. Maybe

1:22:26.000 --> 1:22:28.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little lingering effects of COVID UH more of

1:22:28.400 --> 1:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a time split. I'm looking at here. I got them

1:22:30.160 --> 1:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench. It's a tough matchup. The Saints

1:22:32.240 --> 1:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have allowed the fourth fewest rushing yards UH and the

1:22:34.680 --> 1:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>fifth fewest touchdowns will opposing running backs. You can't trust

1:22:37.640 --> 1:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>either of the either of these guys in the semifinals

1:22:40.560 --> 1:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>this week, so both on the bench. Jalen Waddle though

1:22:42.840 --> 1:22:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not on the bench. He will make his return from

1:22:44.960 --> 1:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>COVID reserve. We're gonna give him a B. He will

1:22:47.320 --> 1:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>line up most often against Saints slot corner Chauncey Gardner Johnson.

1:22:51.439 --> 1:22:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football focuses on fifty first ranked corner Love Waddle

1:22:55.479 --> 1:22:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and his return and DeVante Parker. Canna give him a C.

1:22:58.320 --> 1:23:00.640
<v Speaker 1>He could avoid Marshawn Laddi if he stays on the

1:23:00.720 --> 1:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>left side. Primarily there's a small chance they have Lattimore

1:23:03.680 --> 1:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>shadow Parker, but either way, I think too. Of throws

1:23:06.080 --> 1:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it a ton in this game, and Parker plays well

1:23:08.320 --> 1:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>when he's healthy, take advantage of advantage of that when possible,

1:23:12.160 --> 1:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and he is healthy right now, So I like Parker.

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I will start Mike Gasicki with a s grit. I

1:23:17.240 --> 1:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like him a whole lot though. Since his goose

1:23:19.320 --> 1:23:22.120
<v Speaker 1>egg in Week ten, Gaski has only been averaging five

1:23:22.160 --> 1:23:24.799
<v Speaker 1>targets and thirty nine yards per game. He hasn't scored

1:23:25.160 --> 1:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>since weeks seven. The Saints have only given up given

1:23:28.000 --> 1:23:30.280
<v Speaker 1>up three touchdowns to tight ends all season, and over

1:23:30.280 --> 1:23:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks posing tight ends are averaging just

1:23:32.920 --> 1:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>forty three yards per game. I do like two of

1:23:35.000 --> 1:23:36.759
<v Speaker 1>though he was might take a chance and met quarterback

1:23:37.200 --> 1:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and now speak of taking a chance on a quarterback.

1:23:39.560 --> 1:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Don't take a chance on Ian Book who's most likely

1:23:43.040 --> 1:23:45.799
<v Speaker 1>will be starting this game with Tayso Hill testing positive

1:23:45.840 --> 1:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>for COVID Book, Yeah, he's on the bench. All the

1:23:49.160 --> 1:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>receivers are on the bench, and really they were gonna

1:23:50.840 --> 1:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>be on the bench anyway, even with Tayston Hill a

1:23:52.840 --> 1:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback like this also hurts Camara too, obviously. Yeah, I

1:23:56.680 --> 1:23:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like to Camara a little more with Hill at quarterbacks.

1:24:00.040 --> 1:24:02.160
<v Speaker 1>A book in college, like through his running backs, like

1:24:02.200 --> 1:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent of time in the preseason. Like Lot's a

1:24:05.320 --> 1:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>good sign that he'll be leaning on Kamara a lot.

1:24:08.040 --> 1:24:11.439
<v Speaker 1>But uh, but so the Dolphins who to voke key

1:24:11.439 --> 1:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>in on it's Alvin Kamara is just to see for him.

1:24:14.040 --> 1:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins are the only team that has not allowed

1:24:16.000 --> 1:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a single running back touchdown over the last five weeks.

1:24:18.360 --> 1:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Opposing backs of average the third fewest rush attempts over

1:24:21.800 --> 1:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that span. The Dolphins have only allowed two receiving touchdowns

1:24:25.280 --> 1:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>all season. Kamara went the bed last week. You could

1:24:28.280 --> 1:24:30.559
<v Speaker 1>do it again, but uh, you can't. You can't bench him,

1:24:30.560 --> 1:24:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So he gets a sea Watchington takes on the Dallas Cowboys,

1:24:36.120 --> 1:24:38.839
<v Speaker 1>and there's not a lot to like on the Washington

1:24:38.920 --> 1:24:41.799
<v Speaker 1>side of this. Uh. Antonio Gibson miss practice on Wednesday

1:24:41.800 --> 1:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and Thursday with a toe injury. J D. Mckissics on,

1:24:44.680 --> 1:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I are Jared Patterson might be the last minute. It

1:24:46.840 --> 1:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is worth noting Gibbs had played almost the entire game

1:24:49.000 --> 1:24:51.719
<v Speaker 1>on the toe. That is true, and I'm not reading

1:24:51.720 --> 1:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>too much too much into that at this point. So

1:24:54.320 --> 1:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll assume he's gonna start in this one. The

1:24:56.880 --> 1:24:59.599
<v Speaker 1>only thing going for him is just volume. He's averaging

1:24:59.640 --> 1:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty four touches per game since Week nine, but he's

1:25:02.800 --> 1:25:05.160
<v Speaker 1>not doing anything with it. He's been below four yards

1:25:05.160 --> 1:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>per carry in four straight games, so and Dallas is

1:25:08.479 --> 1:25:10.439
<v Speaker 1>giving up four and a half yards per carry. So

1:25:10.479 --> 1:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that gives Gibson a little bit of hope here. Opposing

1:25:13.080 --> 1:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>number one receivers. Sorry, runners have scored in three of

1:25:15.800 --> 1:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the past four for Dallas. So I've got a B grade,

1:25:18.880 --> 1:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and Antonio Gibson under the assumption he's gonna go and

1:25:21.240 --> 1:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>get the twenty four carries he usually gets. The passing game,

1:25:24.360 --> 1:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't like very much. Taylor heineke Is has cleared

1:25:27.120 --> 1:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>the protocol, but he's start exactly one touchdown in six

1:25:30.720 --> 1:25:33.599
<v Speaker 1>of the past eight games, including his last game, which

1:25:33.680 --> 1:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was against these same Cowboys. It's just one touchdown. If

1:25:36.840 --> 1:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna get it, it'll go to Terry McLaren. Fortunately,

1:25:40.040 --> 1:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys secondary has been vulnerable lately. McLaren has been has

1:25:43.200 --> 1:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>done by the way, but you can dust him off

1:25:45.920 --> 1:25:48.439
<v Speaker 1>here with a C grade. Dallas giving up one hundred

1:25:48.520 --> 1:25:51.519
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight yards per game to receivers. That's sixth most

1:25:51.880 --> 1:25:55.200
<v Speaker 1>McLaren's gonna draw a lot of cornerback Trayvon Diggs. But

1:25:55.240 --> 1:25:58.400
<v Speaker 1>as I like to remind people, he's allowed the most

1:25:58.560 --> 1:26:02.759
<v Speaker 1>yards of any player in his coverage eight hundred yards

1:26:03.160 --> 1:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>charged to Trayvon Digs. So far, let's go to the

1:26:07.080 --> 1:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Dallas side. Many Washington players still in the COVID protocol,

1:26:11.560 --> 1:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and maybe most significantly among them, two starting cornerbacks. Kendall

1:26:15.920 --> 1:26:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Fuller's in the COVID protocol as well, and William Jackson's

1:26:18.600 --> 1:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>just beat up. So we're gonna follow their status pretty

1:26:21.240 --> 1:26:23.519
<v Speaker 1>closely here and see what we can figure out for them.

1:26:23.600 --> 1:26:28.439
<v Speaker 1>For Dak Prescott continually disappointing in a month of straight

1:26:28.800 --> 1:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>good matchups on paper, he continues to disappoint, and I

1:26:32.560 --> 1:26:35.479
<v Speaker 1>keep grading and fire, then he ends up finishing. He's

1:26:35.520 --> 1:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>now thrown one touchdown pass in three straight games and

1:26:38.640 --> 1:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>averaging just two two passing yards over those games, and

1:26:42.040 --> 1:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those games is against Washington two weeks ago.

1:26:44.600 --> 1:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So I love the On paper, he should be in

1:26:46.720 --> 1:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a grade, but I'm only giving him a B grade here,

1:26:48.760 --> 1:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, it's put recent play do he does to

1:26:52.600 --> 1:26:56.599
<v Speaker 1>me personally because he's let me down. Ceedee Lamb has

1:26:56.600 --> 1:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>posted has posted seven catches for six He did post

1:27:00.680 --> 1:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>seven catches sixty one scoreless yards when these teams met

1:27:03.320 --> 1:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago, and that's almost exactly his

1:27:06.200 --> 1:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>average game over the last three seven catches sixty one yards,

1:27:09.880 --> 1:27:12.840
<v Speaker 1>which is very average. Washington's a middle of the pack

1:27:13.240 --> 1:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>receiver defense, um, but again they could be missing two

1:27:16.920 --> 1:27:19.439
<v Speaker 1>key cornerbacks, at which point I would upgrade Ceedee Lamb

1:27:19.640 --> 1:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>from a B to an A. A. Marie Cooper, what

1:27:22.920 --> 1:27:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a disaster season has spent for him. His fifty one

1:27:27.000 --> 1:27:30.360
<v Speaker 1>yards against Washington two weeks ago is the most he

1:27:30.400 --> 1:27:33.679
<v Speaker 1>has had in any of his last five games, fifty

1:27:33.680 --> 1:27:37.439
<v Speaker 1>one yards. Washington has improved the middle of the pack

1:27:37.479 --> 1:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>against receivers over the last six games, is giving up

1:27:39.720 --> 1:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred fifty yards per game to the position. So

1:27:42.120 --> 1:27:44.599
<v Speaker 1>just a C grade on a Marie Cooper C grade.

1:27:44.600 --> 1:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And Michael Gallup who's getting targets, but he is not

1:27:47.439 --> 1:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot with them unfortunately, and it hasn't scored

1:27:50.880 --> 1:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>only one tour score on the season so far. And

1:27:54.240 --> 1:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>then the last guy in the passing game dimension, Dalton Sheltz,

1:27:57.560 --> 1:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>only one catch for four score less yards when these

1:28:00.840 --> 1:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>teams first met in Week fourteen, But the football team

1:28:04.040 --> 1:28:05.599
<v Speaker 1>will be playing on a short week and they were

1:28:05.640 --> 1:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just lit up by Dallas Goddard. So there's that. Then

1:28:08.360 --> 1:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you do about Zeke and Pollard? Elliot's now

1:28:11.439 --> 1:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gone eight consecutive games a thout clearing sixty yards on

1:28:14.439 --> 1:28:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the ground, which is gross. Pollard shockingly active last week

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>coming off his and he did look good. Really they

1:28:22.439 --> 1:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>should both be bench grades, but I'm gonna put give

1:28:26.000 --> 1:28:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Zeke a C grade because he continues to get the

1:28:28.400 --> 1:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>ball at the strike and that might be your best

1:28:30.720 --> 1:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>chance for him against a very good Washington run defense.

1:28:34.760 --> 1:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm leaving Pollard on the bench. So there you go.

1:28:38.200 --> 1:28:41.559
<v Speaker 1>Who all right? Play? Some part of this holds up

1:28:41.600 --> 1:28:44.559
<v Speaker 1>for you in the semifinals, a lot of moving parts

1:28:44.720 --> 1:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>really testing your skills. Will be back next week for

1:28:47.439 --> 1:29:01.639
<v Speaker 1>the championship edition of Fantasy Football Weekly. Fantasy Football Weekly

1:29:01.760 --> 1:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts

1:29:04.400 --> 1:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

1:29:06.800 --> 1:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.