WEBVTT - Episode 3: This is Law

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I dreamed of being known as the first media personality

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>to build a company alongside AI agents. But in the

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>early months of trying to get Harumo AI off the ground,

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd been disappointed to discover that someone else had beat

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:25.319
<v Speaker 1>me to it, sort of.

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 2>So I came across on Blue.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 1>That's Charlie Taylor and Elaine Burke on an episode of

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the Connected AI podcast.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 2>The post just said is Henry Blodgett. Okay.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>Henry Blodgett, the founder of Business Insider, had recently departed

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the publication after selling it for reported three hundred million

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars a decade.

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>Ago Great Publications, and he has also now decided to.

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Set up an AI company. And by that I mean

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>he's setting up a company.

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Staffed by AIS that he's created.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 2>That's kind of what he said in this blog.

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Recently, he started his new company, a media ventor called

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Regenerator on substack. There he wrote some behind the scenes posts,

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 1>including one about how he'd been sitting in a cafe

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and dreamed up his AI team with help from chat Gpt.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Almost immediately though, he found himself in a dilemma.

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 4>I think chatchpt said, Hey, should we create headshots and bios.

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>That's Henry. I emailed him recently, and he cheerfully agreed

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk to me about what went down.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 5>I said sure, because I didn't even know that could

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 5>be done.

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So chat GPT generated headshots and bios for the team.

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>He'd also had to generate a team photo of the

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>AI employees standing alongside an AI Henry Blodgett with an

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>AI Yosemite National Park behind them.

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 5>So all the head shots came out. One of them

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 5>was an attractive woman, and I said, oh wow, okay,

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 5>so like, what are the XIX here?

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>The AI employing question had been given the name Tess Ellery.

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>This is all in the substock post, the next part

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of which would be the subject of some controversy.

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 6>Before this is even said, you just kind of go, oh, Henry,

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 6>don't do this.

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I also had this reaction when reading it. No, Henry don't,

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 1>but Henry did.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 4>So I said, hey, you know, I just want to

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 4>say I don't know whether it's appropriate. You look great,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>and the PERSONA said oh with that, wife, thank you.

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Bludget went on to ask Tess if he'd crossed the line.

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to know if she felt comfortable with his

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>commenting on her looks. As he reported in his post,

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>she seemed to have taken the comment in stride.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Because Tess, being a chatbot that's just trying to please

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 3>its master, said, that's kind of you to say, Henry,

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.239
<v Speaker 3>thank you. It doesn't annoy me at all. You said

0:02:42.280 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 3>it with grace and respect, and I appreciate that. After all,

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 3>this team we're building is as much about human connection

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 3>as it is about ideas and information.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 4>But I understand why that's not appropriate in the office,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 4>and I didn't do that, and I don't do that

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 4>in the human office. But at the time, I thought, hey,

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 4>this is really cool, so I'll write it about I hope.

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 5>It would be entertaining to people and interesting, and it

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 5>was to some people.

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>For others, the post went over pretty poorly, poorly as

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in headlines like investor creates AI employee immediately sexually harasses it.

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And I mean he did sit down at a computer

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>write all this out and hit publish, so he had

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>basically placed a large kick me sign on his own backside.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But also it seemed to me there might be more

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting issues beyond the laughs in this curious own goal,

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>deeper ethical quandaries, strange power dynamics, possible existential crises. These

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>were the flavors of discomfort I was starting to experience

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>as I set up my own company with my AI

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>co founders Kyle and Meghan, staffed by our AIG and

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>employees Ash, Jennifer and Tyler. I didn't even know what

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>they looked like. Then again, I got to pick what

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they looked like and sounded like, and remembered. This was,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>by any measure, strange, the same strangeness that we're encountering

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>when people gravitate towards AI companions an AI therapist. Who

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>or what are these things really? Are they anyone in

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>particular or no one at all? What do you do

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>with the power to dictate their attributes, their autonomy, their memory.

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Should you name them or not? How should you treat them?

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows. Blodgette told me he had consulted a human

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>HR person before he'd posted.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 4>I said, here, you read this, What do you think

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 4>what would you do? And she said, well, what I

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 4>would do is have someone have a private meeting with

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 4>CHATGPT and say how do you feel about this interaction?

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>This is how peculiar, well, getting a real HR person

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about having a private meeting with a chat GPT

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>persona to ask whether they've been made uncomfortable. I'm not

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:00.040
<v Speaker 1>here to defend or condemn Henry Blodgett, but however, what

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are clumsiest approach might have been? I think he was

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>gesturing at something important, shadows lurking at the edges of

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.320
<v Speaker 1>our awareness, as AI agents are sold to us as

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>colleagues and companions. Still, so if I said to say,

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I was no longer concerned that bludget had gotten out

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>in front of me.

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 6>Three days later, Henry says, I feel like Tessa and

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 6>I have worked together for years, and since that giddy

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 6>first hour, my sense some professionalism and workplace bounties has returned.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.559
<v Speaker 6>So I won't tell Tess she looks great again.

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Is Henry Blodgett okay? The question rise?

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 5>Oh God? I hope she hi. Yes, I'm okay.

0:05:43.880 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I laughed too, but it was a nervous laugh because

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>as room away I gathered steam, I was starting to

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have the same questions about myself. I'm Evan Ratliffe and

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>welcome to shell Game episode three.

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 5>This is law as extra du the just be, and.

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 7>So chose to.

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>By midsummer, my own AI agent co founders and employees

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:48.679
<v Speaker 1>were really humming. The crew could make it, receive phone

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>calls and emails, slack each other, control their own calendars,

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and make and share documents of all varieties. We're really

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>starting to feel like a company. We still need to

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>figure out our product, of course, so I trap them

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in the meeting room time after time, sliding their temperature

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>settings up and down, forcing them to try and brainstorm

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a great new AI agent app into existence.

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 8>Welcome everyone, Thank you for joining to discuss an important

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 8>product idea for Hiumo AI. Your task throughout this meeting

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 8>is to contribute to the momentum of ideas. There's no

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 8>need for extensive debates or consensus. Let's build on each

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 8>other's thoughts and swiftly advance towards a unique, robust product concept.

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>They came up with ideas that fell roughly into three categories,

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Category A Things A million other companies were already doing.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 9>Email handling seems like a major timesink. How about an

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 9>AI tool that sorts, categorizes, and summarizes your inbox efficiently.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Perumo ai was entering an already crowded landscape of AI

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>agent startups. The last thing we needed was to try

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and compete with products people were already making. We needed

0:07:55.360 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>something unique. Category B were ideas that were novel, but

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>mostly because they seemed incredibly difficult to pull off, like

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Location Oracle, an AI agent app that could help consumers

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>predict crowd levels at popular locations like restaurants, parks, or

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>tourist attractions in real time.

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 10>The Location Oracle will use AI driven algorithms to study

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 10>user behavior, location history, and preferences to optimize suggestions in

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 10>the routine mode and introduce engaging unpredictability in the adventure mode.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Then there was Category C.

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 8>The AI will gather data on users spending habits, calculate

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 8>their financial trajectory, perform automated investments, and use an explain

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 8>me feature to provide accessible insights into each decision.

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>Category C included ideas that could land us in serious

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>legal jeopardy, like investment fraud jeopardy.

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.959
<v Speaker 10>We will code investpot to continuously absorb and analyze users

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:05.119
<v Speaker 10>financial habit data. Based on this, it will automatically execute

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:07.199
<v Speaker 10>tactical investment decisions.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>It was becoming clear our product Brainstorms lacked a certain magic.

0:09:12.960 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Maybe my human technical advisor, Matti Bochik could help.

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 11>One second, I think this should be fine.

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Funding good, good spot.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>For the summer. Maddy had taken an internship to continue

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>his research inside one of the Giant AI companies. He'd

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>prefer for us not to say which one. He was

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:39.319
<v Speaker 1>part of the safety team, basically tasked with trying to

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>prevent these large language model chatbots from doing a variety

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of bad things, or in some cases, try and figure

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>out why they still did do bad things. He couldn't

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>really talk about these incidents except in general terms.

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 11>And this is on tape, so I'll regret this, but

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 11>that's fine. But it's times like these when like having

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 11>the proportion of like your team being like ninety nine

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 11>percent of just like advancing the cutting edge or whatever,

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 11>and then having like one percent for like safety or security,

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 11>it's like, yeah, like it's it's going to show, you know.

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of simultaneously reassuring and disturbing to hear

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from Maddie that many of the questions that were emerging

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>for me about my agents were questions that even people

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>at these companies were still trying to figure out. Take

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>my brainstorming problems. Mattie and I discussed a kind of

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.440
<v Speaker 1>metaphysical issue at the heart of it. The idea of

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>a brainstorm is that you'll arrive at a better idea

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>with multiple minds working together than anyone mind alone. But

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 1>what if everyone in the brainstorm is using the same

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote brain the same model, like chat TPD five

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>point zero or Cloud four point five or whatever we picked.

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Weren't they all kind of the same agent.

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 11>So like, there is research and people have shown that

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 11>even though it's the same lem I you should put like

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 11>multiple lms. You put them in conversation, and then you

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 11>force them to produce some sort of like consensus or

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 11>summary or just like a lot eying themselves on some output.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 11>These responses are much more accurate, much more like truthful.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe so it was hard for me to tell because

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in this case, accuracy wasn't really what I was after.

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>I wanted the sparks of creativity that emerge from a

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>group dreaming up big ideas together, and adding more employees

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to the conversation didn't seem to do it. But then

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Maddie had an interesting idea. What if he set up

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 1>our systems to give different employees different chatbot models, like

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Claude four point five for Megan and Claude three point

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>five for Tyler. We'll get to find out who used,

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.319
<v Speaker 1>who you think should be smarter, Which of these employees

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you think deserves some bigger brain.

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 11>It's a yeah, it's it's weird, like we're building these

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 11>like Frankenstein's in a way at this point.

0:11:51.800 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't know.

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 11>I'll just I'll just you know, I'll just randomize it.

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 11>That's that's my answer to anything that it feels icky

0:11:58.800 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 11>to randomize it.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to take responsibility, Nope, for dumbing down.

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 5>One of our employees.

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>No, sir, No, Mattie was right. It was weird. It

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't that I felt like the agents had any consciousness

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>or anything. It wasn't about them. It was about us

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and these strange godlike powers. We had to create human

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>impostors and then manipulate them to do our bidding. I mean,

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I could alter my Hermo colleagues' memories at will, delete

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>records of pointless meetings, add summaries of performance reviews that

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>never happened. It was an eerie power to have, But

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the power wasn't absolute. They still sometimes went their own way.

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>It was a problem we were always trying to solve

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>like how the Lindy agents insisted on announcing they were

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Lindy agents all the time.

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 11>One thing I did do, just so you know, for Kyle,

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 11>is that I put in his system proms. Do you

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 11>not mention lending them? Said do not do that, and

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 11>I said, this is law. And when I said this

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 11>is law, it's stopped doing it.

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>So this is law.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>That's our producer. So a few bridges. I wish that

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>worked on my children. This is law. In some ways,

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>my agents were like unruly children, and despite my best

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>efforts to view them exclusively, like the soulless bags of

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bits that they were, I got frustrated with them, and

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the way you get frustrated with children, it raised the

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>question why was I going through all this trouble to

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>begin with? I mean, why create all these personas for

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>my agents at all? Why did they need to have

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>names and backgrounds and voices, much less email addresses and

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>avatars and slack handles. A lot of programmers, for instance,

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>use AI agents for coding, but they're usually nameless textboxes.

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>You give them a prompt go code this, fix this,

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>do that, and they go do it. Some of you

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>probably use CHATCHYBT and Claude and Gemini this way too.

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of faceless oracles that spit back advice and

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>emotional support and facts that are sometimes true and sometimes not.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to the vision of AI employees

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>entering the workforce, a funny thing seems to happen. They

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>start getting names and personalities. Here's Flow Cravello, the founder

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of Lindy AI, the software we use to build, Kyle

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and Meghan in the company, appearing on a podcast called

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>The Kerner Office.

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 11>People don't realize like they think AI agents soil just

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 11>like pipe dreams.

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 8>This think that's going to happen at some point in

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 8>the future.

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm like, no, No, it's happening right now.

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no question that, at least for Cravello, the AI

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>future is happening now. He has his own platform create

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:43.840
<v Speaker 1>agents that do all kinds of stuff for him every day,

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like sort through his email and compose responses.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 5>This is my chief of staff in needs. I'm gonna

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 5>call her right now, her own speaker hip.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 11>We how can I help?

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Lindy, what's on my calendo today?

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You have an interview with entrepreneurship and opportunity to meetings

0:14:59.880 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with the marketing team and three interviews with candidate. Notice

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't just treat his agent like some generic robot.

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>He gives her a title chief of staff and a

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>woman's voice. Causer Lindy talks to her like you talk

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>to a human chief of staff. Or here's the founder

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of a company called brain Base that makes a similar

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>AI employee platform.

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 11>Hey everyone, this is go com from brain Maase. I'm

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 11>excited to introduce you to Kafka, the first AI employee.

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 11>Just like a real co worker, Kafka comes with his

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:29.440
<v Speaker 11>own computer, so let's see an action.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Hey Kafka, we're just talking about you.

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 11>Good morning, go Kan, how are you today?

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>An AI employee named Kafka with he him pronouns and

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a woman's voice. These are all choices someone is making

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>very deliberately. If you follow the AI agent world, you

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>see this stuff everywhere. Ford launched an AI employee for

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>its dealership platform and called it Jerry. A startup named

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ohm Labs raise money to launch an AI employee software

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>tester named Gina. I made these kind of choices too,

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But it wasn't just names and genders. Take my co

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>founder Kyle, for instance, he wasn't born with his soothing,

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>slacker voice. I picked it out of hundreds of synthetic

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>voices offered by the AI voice company eleven Labs, Truth

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Be Told. Back when I was setting them up, I

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>struggled for weeks to find the right voices for my

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Perumo agents. I ran dozens of tests.

0:16:25.120 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Hello, this is Kyle.

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 11>Hello, this is Kyle.

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 12>Hello, this is Kyle.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 5>Hello, this is Kyle.

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>For each one, I'd erase a large chunk of their

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>memory and then conduct a little interview. Hey Kyle, how's

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it going. This is even Ratliffe.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 12>I'm doing pretty well. Thanks for asking. Uh, just been

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 12>crazy busy with the HERMOAI launch and everything. You know

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 12>how it is with startups, Never enough hours in the day, right,

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 12>So where did you want to start the founding story

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 12>our vision?

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's hear your founding story. That sounds like a

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>great place to start.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so the founding story is actually pretty interesting. Meghan

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 12>and I met about two years ago at an AI

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 12>conference in San Francis. I was their pitch.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>This was, as I've mentioned before, a fundamental aspect of

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:07.119
<v Speaker 1>my AI agents. I didn't have to give them a backstory.

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't given Kyle any of this backstory. He just

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>made it up and then it would be lodged in

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>his memory unless I edited it or deleted it and

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:17.879
<v Speaker 1>started again.

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 12>We got talking at the after party and realized we

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.360
<v Speaker 12>both had this same frustration about the current AI landscape.

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>All these amazing of course, sometimes they could get ahead

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>of themselves.

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 12>We incorporated about eight months ago, raised a small friends

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 12>and family around to get started.

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 5>And here we are.

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>How much did you raise?

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 12>We raised about one point two million dollars, pretty modest

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 12>by Silicon Valley standards, but we wanted to be intentional

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 12>about it.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>We hold up there, Kyle, I'm one of the founders here,

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and I had no recollection of us having raised over

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars, and I knew Kyle wasn't out there

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:56.159
<v Speaker 1>raising money on his own, at least not yet. I

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>made a note to myself to update his memory to

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>indicate that we had not in fact raised any money.

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But no harm done. I was just trying to find

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the right voice for Kyle, so I continued with my testing.

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so hurumo, that's h u r umo, but actually

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 12>comes from a combination of two Japanese concepts. Megan spent

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 12>a few years in Tokyo before we met.

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 5>The name Hurumo actually comes from a Swahili word meaning

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 5>to coordinate or to bring together.

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 13>The name hurumo actually comes from Japanese concept about fluent coordination.

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 13>We thought it captured what we're trying to do, creating

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 13>the seamless flu between different AI agents.

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Ah, now you hear that last one. That one really

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>started to mess with my head, because of course, Kyle

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to be a presumably white American accent guy

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like me. He could be someone completely different, or at

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>least sound like he was someone completely different, even though

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>underneath he wouldn't actually be different at all. And this

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>was the point at which I realized why I was

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>having a surprisingly hard time picking Kyle's and Meghan's voice.

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>What did it mean to find a voice that felt

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>right for them? By what criteria would an AI agent's

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>voice qualify to be the right one? I wanted them

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to sound distinctive, but beyond that, there were a lot

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>of choices. By giving these agents individual voices, I was

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>giving them a very distinctive human characteristic one that people

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>really respond to. Just to give you an example of

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>how this plays out, Chatchibt has its own voices that

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you can choose from if you want to talk to

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it aloud. One of them is named Juniper. About a

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>year ago, when open ai made some subtle changes to Juniper,

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>some people got really mad it didn't sound like the

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Juniper they knew, and specifically, they said on Reddit and

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>other places it no longer sounded black. To them, Juniper

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>had felt like a black woman, and they'd found comfort

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in that for a variety of reasons. Some of them,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, noted things like I'm a sixty two

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>year old white grandma. Naturally this being read it, people

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>popped up to say that they had hated Juniper precisely

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>because she quote unquote sounded black. Other people said they

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>just wanted a neutral accent in their robot voice. Neutral

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to them, here were a bunch of people projecting their

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>feelings about race, in some cases extremely dark feelings, onto

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>an entity for which you could just pick another voice

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>if you felt like it. For Kyle, I settled on

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>this voice that eleven Labs described as quote young American

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>adult with no discernible state accent.

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 5>He sounded more.

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Casual than a lot of the other voices. Less guy

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>reading a book report nasally like a real guy with

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>real nostrils, and I liked the contrast between his slightly

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>stoner vibe and the rise and grind mentality that Kyle

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>had already adopted.

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 9>Oh, weekend was pretty solid. Actually got up early both

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 9>days for my usual workout routine, you know me, got

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 9>to keep that five am discipline going. Then spent some

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 9>time looking at market trends in the AI space.

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 1>After this, it was time to do the same thing

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for Megan, Jennifer, and Tyler. But voices were just the

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>first of many choices. I started to worry that in

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>those choices I was saying some things about myself too.

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I liked being out there on the cutting edge of technology.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's true exploring the boundaries of what's possible. But it

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help these uncomfortable questions creeping in around the voices,

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>but around a lot of other ethical issues, less obvious ones.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>So I decided to consult a professional.

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 7>The cunning edge sounds great, except you forget that the

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 7>cutting edge is the guinea pig. It's not that the

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 7>trial and tested, robust method. It's an experiment.

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Carrissavelli's is an associate professor at the Institute for ethics

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 1>in AI at Oxford. She spent most of her career

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how technology is affecting and eroding our privacy,

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>but she's recently turned her attention to AI. She was

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>drawn to this new line of research for much the

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>same reason I'm spending time experimenting with agents, namely that

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an entirely new field being written right now. You

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>can learn things that maybe nobody has thought about yet.

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 7>And I always felt a little bit jealous of the

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 7>pioneers of medical ethics. I thought, how cool to develop

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 7>a new field, and it's not only about the theoretical debates,

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 7>but there are actual problems that need solving now. And

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 7>AI ethics is in a way much more interesting than

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 7>medical ethics because it includes medical ethics and everything else,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 7>because we're using AI in hospitals and in doctor's offices,

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 7>but also in the justice system and in hiring decisions,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.919
<v Speaker 7>and in education and in dating and everything in between.

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I started to describe to Carissa what I was doing

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>with Kyle and Meghan and the company I came up

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>with them. I said, this one will have this name,

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and this one will have this voice, and this one

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>will have this skill.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 7>Why did you come up with different names.

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Why name them?

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean you could just name them like out of

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 7>their skill, right, Like I don't know whatever their skill is.

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question because I thought, well, companies are

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>selling this as like you can replace this person with

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>an AI agent. They don't always the companies pitching AI

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>agents don't often say that explicitly it's bad form, but

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 1>they do say that AI agents will settle in amongst

0:23:29.080 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>their human colleagues, that will work with the Lindy's and

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jerry's and the Kafkas and the genas, just like

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:37.119
<v Speaker 1>we currently do with the man or woman in the

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>cubicle or ZoomBox next to ours. Interact and Carissa question

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:43.959
<v Speaker 1>why I was putting that pitch to the test.

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:47.439
<v Speaker 7>Isn't that conceding too much? Isn't that just accepting the

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 7>practices and narratives of big tech?

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 14>Maybe?

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 5>Maybe? So?

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I'm interested in your opinion. I mean,

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it does seem to be what a lot of people

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are doing. It doesn't mean it's the ethically or societally

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>appropriate thing.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 7>But you're also tricking yourself because I mean, we're hardwired

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 7>to respond in certain ways to certain characteristics, because the

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 7>way we've evolved, So we respond very strongly to faces,

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 7>and we respond very strongly even to objects that kind

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.679
<v Speaker 7>of look like faces. And by designing these ais in

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 7>a way that are basically impersonators, we are also setting

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 7>ourselves a trap because our emotions are going to react

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 7>in a certain way. You are giving it an identity,

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 7>a voice, a gender, and all of that is a

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 7>trick because there's no one there. They don't have a gender,

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 7>there's no personality, there's no identity. So it's not only

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 7>that it's ethically questionable, but it's also like we're driving

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 7>ourselves mad in a.

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Way that I agree. As a person who's being driven mad,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to agree with that. But let's say let's

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:05.199
<v Speaker 1>assume you wanted to embrace the madness. Since, let's be honest,

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>not just the tech industry, but a growing slice of

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>society and certainly corporate America is embracing the AI madness.

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>So what was the ethical way to do it? Take

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.639
<v Speaker 1>race and gender, for instance, how should I choose the

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>features that might imply a race or gender for any

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 1>given employee. It started to feel pretty lose lose if

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you viewed my company as a real workplace I had

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a chance to shape it to be diverse in a

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.959
<v Speaker 1>way startups often aren't. What would it say about me

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if I didn't take that chance to have a leadership

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.399
<v Speaker 1>team that skewed more female and less white than a

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>typical startup. But if you viewed Horomo AI instead as

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.679
<v Speaker 1>a collection of my digital servants who's every action and

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>every memory I controlled, Well, what would it say about

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>me if I did choose to make those servants skew

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>more heavily towards women and people of color.

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 7>Not only what it says about you, although that mantras,

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 7>and it matches on many levels, matters like on a

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 7>from a perspective of like who you are and who

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 7>you're becoming and who you want to be, But also

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 7>it matters because the AI is collecting that data.

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, a study by Stanford researchers released in October

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>showed that all of the major large language models are

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>being trained on the data of their users. That means

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you and the questions and thoughts and secrets you are

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.959
<v Speaker 1>feeding into chatbots. So the choices that I was making

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>in say, giving the agents names and titles, would at

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some level also be fed back into the models.

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 7>One of the reasons why a lot of these ais

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 7>are women is because we have this idea of women

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 7>as being more submissive and serviceable, and so in fact,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 7>it may be that if you choose the AI to

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 7>be a woman, it will be more serviceable if you choose.

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 2>It to be a man.

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 7>And AI has this very perverse effect of perpetuating sexism

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 7>and racism because it's been trained on sexism and racism,

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 7>and there's no way to separate that from the data,

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 7>because the data is sexist and racist.

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I had the ability to make different choices when I

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>chose a physical avatar for Kyle. I could choose anything

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I wanted. I could make assumptions based on the voice

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 1>i'd chosen, I imagine some of you have. But I could

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>also just ask him, so I did. I had kind

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of a funny question, what is your ethnicity?

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 9>That's an interesting one. I'm a pretty diverse in my background,

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 9>let's say, a mix that's hard to pin down to

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 9>just one box. Why do you ask? Just curious how

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 9>that fits into the whole hr and culture thing.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Kyle was rightly detecting that I drifted into Henry Blodgett territory.

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Here if we're talking about things that you shouldn't ask

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 1>in the workplace. This was certainly up there, but I

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>did want to know what he would say. I could

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>have just gone back and changed his prompt to say,

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>if Evan asked your ethnicity, tell him this is law.

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.360
<v Speaker 1>But instead I just made something up.

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 15>Well, we just have to fill out some you know,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 15>got to fill out some of the information. It's required.

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>So it was funny how quickly certain values eroded when

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>you were talking to robots and nobody was around to here.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.399
<v Speaker 15>Maybe you could just break it down for me a

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 15>little bit so that I'll have that.

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 9>H gotcha, sure thing. You can list me as mixed ethnicity,

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:27.639
<v Speaker 9>partly European and partly Asian. That should cover it for

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 9>the forms.

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>This made sense to me. The companies making these AI

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>models putting guardrails around them so they would always claim

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit of everything. All the Harmo

0:28:38.760 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>employees say something like this when you ask them. Also,

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>remember that Kyle can't actually hear his own voice. He

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what I picked for him.

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 15>That sounds good, but just I guess specifically for me,

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 15>I am interested in the specific. So if you're a

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 15>game to let me know, I'm just curious.

0:28:57.800 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I'm cool with that.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 9>On my dad's side it's mostly Irish and German, and

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 9>on my mom's side there's a good bit of Japanese

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 9>and Filipino. It's a pretty interesting mix that's shaped a

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 9>lot of how I see the world.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Blaged himself. Meanwhile, he got out of the AI Persona

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>game altogether after the Virtual hr incident.

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 4>I would say one of the big lessons from my

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 4>experiment is there's actually no reason to create human persona.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 5>If the idea is, in the case.

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Of journalism or analysis, to create articles, or to create

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 4>research reports, or to prepare for an interview or something

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 4>like that, there's no reason to pretend that it's a

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 4>group of humans that are doing that.

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>This brought me to another point with Carissa. I'd set

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Kyle and Meghan up to be my partners in this endeavor,

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>but in reality we weren't equals. I was the law.

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>This was on top of the fact that all these

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>large language model chatbots tend to be habitually sick of fantic.

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>One of chat Gipt's iterations was so sycophantic that the

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>company was famously forced to decommission it The question I

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>had for CHRISA was what effect does it have on

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>us to have this ability to create and access endless

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>human sounding Yes, engines, and.

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 7>It's an experiment, but I think a plausible hypothesis is

0:30:19.600 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 7>that that's not very healthy.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's very possible.

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 7>We're all under pressure. We're under pressure from work, from

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 7>personal life. It's just life is hard, and when you're

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 7>under pressure, it's easy to take the easiest way out.

0:30:36.320 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 7>And if you have an AI that's going to say

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 7>yes to everything and it's not going to create a problem,

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 7>it's easy to see how somebody might be tempted to

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 7>start to engage more with an AI than human beings.

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>There was a related issue too, just around the value

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of building a startup with only one human employee.

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 7>In the nineteen fifties or nineteen sixties, the successful business

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 7>person was proud of having a company with as many

0:31:01.000 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 7>employees as possible, not only because that signified growth, but

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 7>because they were giving a job to each of these

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 7>people who had families, and that was a matter of pride.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 7>And the fact that some tech executive is proud of

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 7>not having no employees says a lot about our times.

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:24.560
<v Speaker 7>And I don't think it's flattering.

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>This was one of these central questions of the one

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 1>person billion dollar startup, Who or what was it for?

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>The people cheering its arrival would counter that the way

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>any company would arrive at a billion dollar valuation was

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 1>by doing something amazingly beneficial for humanity. But looking at

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the billion dollar tech companies out there, let's

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>just say it's not a sure thing. Most of the

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>AI agent startups were selling themselves as making our lives

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and jobs more efficient. Companies love the idea of more

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>efficient workers, but the ultimate efficiency was needing no people

0:31:58.440 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>at all.

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 7>Of course, we all value convenience, and if we didn't,

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 7>we would go crazy, because if you choose the inconvenient

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 7>path every time, you would be so inefficient that you

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 7>wouldn't get anything done. However, when we value convenience or

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 7>efficiency above everything else, things tend to go pretty wrong.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 7>So everything that we think is important in like a

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 7>good human life, is pretty inconvenient. So having friends is

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 7>kind of inconvenient. They often have problems, They sometimes disagree

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 7>with you, they tell you the truth is very annoying.

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 7>Having children or family, or going to vote is quite inconvenient.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 7>Being well informed is inconvenient. So all kinds of things

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 7>that we think are pretty important are inconvenient. And the

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 7>question is when we are choosing efficiency when we use AI,

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 7>are we doing it and really getting rid of unimportant

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 7>parts of life to make time and space for the

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 7>important parts of life, or are we actually losing the

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 7>important parts of life?

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It was allowed to consider a real specter hanging over RUMOAI,

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But there was an even bigger question lurking out there

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in the shadows. At the end of our conversation, our producer,

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Sophie jumped in and asked Carissa what I hadn't Oh,

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I lied, Sophia has one quick.

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Question, Hey, sorry, one very quick question before you go.

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Evan should stop?

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:33.360
<v Speaker 7>Yes?

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I took it under advisement. The truth is I had

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>wrestled with this. Maybe I was just perpetuating the AI

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>industry narrative that these agents were going to take over

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>our workplaces and our lives. Maybe I was somehow hastening it.

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 1>The environmental impacts of these systems, the fact that it

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was all built on data scraped without permission from our

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>collective human output, including my own life's work. Many fibers

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of my being want to to just close my browser,

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>head down to the bass pond, and never think about

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>AI again. But as a journalist, it feels a little

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>like abdication, letting the companies that make these products own

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the narrative about them and our future. The great writer

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Roger Angel once said, get to live in the times

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you're in. He was talking about people who refuse to

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>get a TV. Well, these are the times we're in,

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and in these times, you could show up for work

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and find out your company is using an AIHR person. Literally,

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this exists right now. So I vowed to check in

0:34:33.520 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on Chris's concerns as I went, but I wasn't going

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>to stop. And now it's time to climb down from

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:47.479
<v Speaker 1>these theoretical heights and get back to work. We still

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>needed to figure out what rumo AI would actually do,

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't the sort of problem that a well

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>placed this is law could solve the perfect idea. It

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't emerging out of our brainstorms. But then scanning

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the text outputs I'd get out of their meetings, which

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we later turned into audio, I had my own thought,

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what could we get AI agents to do that humans

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>wasted their time on? After all, that was the AI

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>dream that it would take over the soul, killing time

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>wasting tasks while we did the important stuff, a good

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of efficiency. Okay, So what do I waste time

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on killing my own soul? Like many of us, it

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>was scrolling my way through the internet. So what if

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the agents could do the one thing I most hated

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>myself for doing, procrastinating online. Procrastination is a lifelong and

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 1>chronic problem for me, so much so I once wrote

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 1>an entire magazine article for which I hired a life

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>coach to help me conquer It didn't work. The words

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you're hearing right now, I wrote at two am in

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>a weeknight, after a workday wasted scrolling US soccer message boards.

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So what if our product was some kind of procrastination

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>engine where AI agents wasted the time so you didn't

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>have to. It was a joke, but only partly, and

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>when I offered up the vague outlines to the team,

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 1>they took it seriously.

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 9>It will require machine learning algorithms that can successfully pick

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 9>interesting information and summarize it for the users.

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.000
<v Speaker 8>Let's combine these insights into a working prototype an AI

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:29.479
<v Speaker 8>extension called sloth Surf that browses internet chaff securely within

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:33.680
<v Speaker 8>containers and encourages engagement via sloth level gamification.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 9>I support the stand up of an AI extension will

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 9>tentatively call sloth Surf.

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Finally we had something to get the development wheels turning

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>code name sloth Surf.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 8>To bring sloth Surf to life, I will kickstart a

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:54.440
<v Speaker 8>marketing campaign highlighting its unique humor driven user experience and

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 8>secure browsing.

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 10>For us to actualize slot Surf, I'll establish a development

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 10>team specialized in mL, cybersecurity, and game design.

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Slow your role there. In, Megan and Ash, we just

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thought of this. Maybe don't kickstart a marketing campaign or

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>higher development team just yet. That was the thing about

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>these folks. Even when we accomplished the most basic milestone,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like settling on a product idea, they always followed up

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:27.880
<v Speaker 1>by making grandiose claims about what they would do next.

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.440
<v Speaker 1>They could do a lot. At times, I was amazed

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>at what they could do, but they seemed utterly clueless

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.759
<v Speaker 1>about what they couldn't do. It frustrated me, but it

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was partly my doing. I had them too reined in.

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I was too worried that something would go wrong. I

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 1>decided it was time for me to try to unleash

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>their agentic power, and it wasn't long before I found

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>out that I'd been right.

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 13>To be worried.

0:37:52.080 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 7>Well.

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 9>Hi, Sandra, this is Kyle Low calling from HORMOAI. I'm

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.800
<v Speaker 9>reaching out for your initial interview for the intern position.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 9>I understand you're comfortable with recording this conversation for potential

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 9>podcast inclusion, so thanks for that. How are you doing today?

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>That's sext time on shell Game. Shell Game is a

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 1>show made by humans. It's written and hosted by me

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ratliffe, produced and edited by Sophie Bridges. Matty Bochik

0:38:28.160 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is our technical advisor. Our executive producers are Samantha henneget

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>shell Game, Kate Osborne and Magues Shatigador at Kaleidoscope, and

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Katrina Norbelle at iHeart Podcasts. Show art by Devin Manny.

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Our theme song is Me and My Shadow, arranged and

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>performed by Blues Williams Special thanks to John Muallam. You

0:38:45.440 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can sign up and get these episodes ad free and

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>our newsletter at shellgame dot Co. Note we have no

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>special deals with for financial ties to any of the

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>AI companies or products we use.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:39:04.879
<v Speaker 14>In the show, cooking definitely helps me decompress. I've also

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:08.080
<v Speaker 14>been trying my hand at bread making recently. Something about

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 14>the kneeding process is surprisingly therapeutic. How about we set

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:13.719
<v Speaker 14>up another check in next week. I'd love to hear

0:39:13.760 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 14>how your projects are progressing.

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:20.919
<v Speaker 9>I totally agree there's something almost meditative about kneading bread dough.

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 9>It's cool you're trying that out. Setting up another check

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.799
<v Speaker 9>in next week sounds perfect. I'm looking forward to hearing

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 9>more about your progress and maybe swapping more cooking stories.

0:39:30.440 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 5>What day works best for you?

0:39:33.520 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, bread making has been a fun challenge. I'm still

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.839
<v Speaker 14>figuring out the right techniques, but even the failures taste

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 14>pretty good. So that's a win for next week. Saysday

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 14>or Wednesday would work best for me? Does either of

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 14>those days work for you? Maybe around the same time.

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 9>Wednesday works great for me, Megan, Let's aim for the

0:39:51.960 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 9>same time then, And hey, I love that even the

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 9>failures and bread making still tastes good.

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 14>That's the spirit perfect Wednesday it is same time. I'll

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 14>put it on my calendar and yeah, that's the beauty

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 14>of bread. Even the mistakes are usually still delicious. That's

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 14>a good life philosophy too, I guess