WEBVTT - Call-In Ep w/ George and Sam

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Boody who. This is George with a very special announcement.

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>First of all, my debut stand up comedy special is

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 1>coming out officially on December second. It will be available

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>to rent or purchase on Amazon and Apple and various

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>other websites. But that is not what I'm here to announce,

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>because it is not available yet. I am merely saying

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 1>that because I wanted to tell everyone that I am

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>having a big special release show at the Bellhouse in Brooklyn,

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.840
<v Speaker 1>New York on December third. That is the day after

0:00:45.840 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>the special comes out, So come to the Bellhouse, come celebrate.

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>It will be a big show. It'll be like a

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>George and Friends style show with some extra special guests

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and surprises. And if you buy tickets now then you

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:00.080
<v Speaker 1>won't have to buy them later when I announced the

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lineup publicly, so you heard it here. First, Bellhouse, December third,

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Special Release Georgian Friends show. And then the second thing

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is that Sam and I are doing a sort of

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>last minute kind of industry adjacent show, a special edition

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Stradio Lab Live at on Air Fest in Los Angeles

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>on November eleventh. It is a podcast festival and there

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are a few tickets set aside for sort of the

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 1>ga general admission crowd. If you don't professionally work in podcasting,

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>you can still see us do our thing. So in conclusion,

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>come to my special release show at the Bellhouse in

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn on December third, and if you're in LA come

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>see us at on AirFest on November eleventh. The tickets

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>for that are on the Bellhouse website, on my link

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>tree on the Stradia lablink tree. Honey, if you look

0:01:56.120 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for them, y'all find them. Enjoy The showcast starts now.

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Hello all, we are coming at you bi coastally once again.

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Our New York records have officially ended. We did six

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 2>weeks of New York recordings.

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We did six weeks of New York recordings. And now

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, also, I have to say those recordings were

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>recorded during such an optimistic time. We were both in

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>such good moods. We were frolicking around various food trucks

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Dumbo, Brooklyn area. It was pretty much still

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>summer in the sense that it was, you know, September. Yeah,

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and now I am first of all, let's get this

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>out of the way. I'm sick. It's okay, you don't

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have semi flowers, but it is what it is. I

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have what is known in the medical community as brain fog.

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>It is absolutely kicking my ass. I'm taking fifteen minutes

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to complete one sentence. So that's one thing. Drop that down.

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Second thing. It is a gloomy New York day. I

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>would say the light that is reflected on my face

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>is the color gray.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 2>I have to say. I still follow like a New

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 2>York weather account, and it like every day like says

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 2>like ten out of ten, like Sonny and seventy five,

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.519
<v Speaker 2>and today it was like two out of ten. Torrential downpours,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 2>miserable energy, avoid at all costs, And I was like,

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I really want to come back to New York and

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 2>I really forget, Like I'm like scared for that moment

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 2>when you're like, damn, today is just miserable. There's no

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 2>way around it.

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what though it is, however, there is something

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>so almost there's this sort of joy and the self

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>flagellation of just being like I can't do anything. I'm

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>basically Sylvia Plath, and I'm gonna sit here and just

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of sink deeper and deeper into my couch and

0:03:57.120 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>just be depressed doing emails I'm gonna make tea, but

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>then forget the tea bag and the tea thing and

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>then have one sip and be like this is absolutely disgusting,

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and then throw it out and be like, you know

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what I should get into tea? Finally, I can't keep

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>only drinking tea that's from the grocery store. But it's like,

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that is such a high bar to entry. So then

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of course you start googling tea. Next thing, you know,

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you have seventeen tabs open, and you're like, I wonder

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>what my ex is up to, and then you go

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.599
<v Speaker 1>on his Instagram, et cetera, et cetera.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 2>No, I think, what's so at least in New York

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 2>when you're when it's cloudy slash rainy and you're in

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a bad mood, and you're like, well, of course I'm

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 2>gonna mood bad moods cloudy slash rainy today. I'm let's

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.160
<v Speaker 2>let's be upfront. I'm in a horrible mood for seemingly.

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 2>I guess the reason is because I slept badly and

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.279
<v Speaker 2>it's sunny and about eighty five degrees outside. I simply

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>have no excuse. I was mad that it was too sunny.

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>I was mad that it was nice out, and I'm like,

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 2>now this has to stop. You can't. The way that

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 2>La is turning me against sunny summary weather is shocking.

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I used to because because yes, well exactly, because what

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Ela does is infuse sunny summary weather with a sort

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of like grim film noir element. It's like, it's like

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 1>did you It's very like David Lynch, It's like, did

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know that actually when it's sunny, that's because there's

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>darkness in the world and this is hiding it.

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's really really bleak.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm glad you mentioned being in a bad mood

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>because we are honestly both in pretty terrible moods today.

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And I'm feeling that there's a there's a part of

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>me that wants to address each of our bad moods

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>or for me to be like what's wrong, Like is

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>everything okay? Blah blah blah. But I'm kind of like,

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>put your own mask on first. I'm literally like I

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:43.679
<v Speaker 1>can't think of anyone else's bad mood except except my own.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I just want to add to what's going

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>on with me? Is this so this will come out

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>after Halloween so I can say this now and it

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:53.760
<v Speaker 2>won't be a spoiler, which why are to be a spoiler?

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Who do I think I am? But for Halloween, Misha

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>and I've decided. First we were like, we're gonna be

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Ham and Mitch. How funny. I bought a red wig,

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I got red dye from my and I'm growing my beard.

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Misha's got like a contrast cuff flowed shirt. Oh yeah,

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 2>and so we're like, okay, that's so fun. And then

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 2>we put the costumes on roughly and I was like, wait,

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 2>I kind of just like a normal guy in a

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 2>red wig, of course. And then it's like, okay, wait.

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 2>We were talking to some people and they were like,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 2>what if you're sexy Camon Mitch? And I'm like, now

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>that's funny. And so I was like, okay, so it's

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 2>the same costume but like with like soft garters on

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and like maybe like playing boxers on.

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>It's really good, but.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Still like sweater and like v nex sweater and collared

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 2>shirt up top for me. And but then I've been

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 2>on various websites all morning. I can't find st Garters

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 2>for the life of me. They they they don't have,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.720
<v Speaker 2>like there are none in Los Angeles that I can

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 2>find and Amazon sorry is not delivering until Saturday.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. This is of course when those things where

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>my instinct is to google it and think I'm gonna

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>find it in two seconds, and it's like, no, you're smart,

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>you've tried. You've tried what I'm about to try.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 2>It's I mean, there is like I could like look

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>up like men's suiting stores and like call them and

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 2>be like do you have these? But it feels like

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:18.800
<v Speaker 2>such a niche product at this point, or like even

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 2>like I'm like sex stores, Like I'm like, has it

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>just gone into full kink wear where like the sock

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 2>garter for men?

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>But I don't you think so. I mean, I understand

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the desire for a sock garter, but there are other

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>ways to make a costume sexy, Like I think if

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you can't find one, you will find other ways to

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>pull off the iconic costume sexy.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Cam and Mitch, of course, it's just a SoC guard

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>would really sell it.

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, are you gonna have a lily?

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Because we wanted to have like, you know, we're going

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to a house party first, so we were like, oh,

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 2>we should like bring a bottle of something wrapped up

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 2>in a baby blanket. But then we were worried that

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 2>people would like, if we posted a picture of us

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 2>as Cam and Mitch with a baby, they would think

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 2>it was a baby innouncement, right I do.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that many people would think that,

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but I respect it. I was more thinking that you

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>were worried that like libs of TikTok would pick it

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>up and then it would be like, look, these these

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gays think that having a child is kink.

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, that's true. I mean, you're right, and I

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.200
<v Speaker 2>should let go of the salt garter, but I really

0:08:22.080 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 2>committed to it in my mind.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I get it, and it is the perfect

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>way to make It's the perfect way for something to

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>be kinky while also gesturing at preppy dad, which is

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:37.199
<v Speaker 1>basically what you're trying to do with them with your

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Mitch costume. Yeah that's really good though, and I mean

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Mitch is a little more challenging. But Cam, if you

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>have one of those contrast cuff shirts, it's like so

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 1>immediately clear what you're being.

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I was honestly like jealous that got to be Cam,

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and then I was like, we're both Cam, and then

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 2>I like no one of us has to be match.

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>It would be really funny if you.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 2>Were nine of one thousand cams.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>So basically, this is a call an episode, and we

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>are having disagreements about which calls to.

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Take, huge disagreements.

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Huge disagreements to the point where I was actually like,

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we have to start recording otherwise we'll get into a fight.

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's kind of this ever happens to us.

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it was a real I mean, I think

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this has to do with both of us are not

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.719
<v Speaker 1>feeling great and are sleep deprived. I'm not going to

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>get into it, but when you mentioned sleep problems, I

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to also talk about how I've been having insane insomnia.

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Like last night, I watched after we had watched TV

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and went to bed by myself. I watched five episodes

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of thirty Rock just in bed in the dark, like

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>with my laptop there, which usually would put me to sleep,

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and I was just eyes wide open, staring into my screen.

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And this has not been happening for like a week.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like being up until four am, not being

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>able to fall asleep, and I think it's stress related

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and and I don't know. Also the like travel over

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the summer didn't help, but I'm I'm so tired.

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>We I'm gonna I like the idea of sort of

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>reading through we have. We get so many calls and

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I want everyone to know that there are I put them.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We put them all in a spreadsheet. Then we like,

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>based on our whims that day, we highlight them that

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we think are good. That we end up doing whatever

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we feel like in the moment. There are questions that

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 1>keep getting asked over and over again, and we are

0:10:45.880 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure if we've ever answered them.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 4>We are.

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It also depends on our mood. Sometimes we want to

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>do more advicey questions. Sometimes we want to do pop

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>culture questions. Sometimes we want to do more like conceptual questions.

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>What are the ones that we're sticking out to you?

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 2>I wonder I was preferring the ones that were sort

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 2>of like either like very open ended pop culture. I

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 2>think I don't like when it feels like a quiz. Yeah,

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 2>And I also don't like when I feel like I

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>have to like speak from huge authority, because sometimes say

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I find that to be like, I'm yeah, but I

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 2>was liking the open ended pop culture ones, which just like,

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 2>what are your thoughts? On this, and I was also

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 2>liking sort of the like maybe options, like I have

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 2>I have a choice. I can either do this or this,

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.719
<v Speaker 2>Which should I do? Like that was really speaking to

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:39.440
<v Speaker 2>me because I was like, it feels easiest, not that

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 2>not that it's all about ease. I'm just sort of

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 2>like that was what was speaking to me. We was

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 2>speaking to you.

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>So here's what I think. Maybe this is a crutch

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm falling on, but I think people generally like recommendation culture.

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I have mixed feelings about how every single

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>thing now is like so and so is five favorite

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>skin care product, so and so is five favorite movies,

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>things you can't live without, Like that like questionnaire that

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:09.959
<v Speaker 1>people do on Instagram that's like things things Amanda Seifried

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>loves and things Amanda Siphreid hates, uh huh, or like

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the perfectly imperfect newsletter where it's like all people recommending

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>things and you have to do two things that are

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>specific and then one thing that's like the feeling after

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a rain when you have a burger, and you have

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to like be just of Carrie Bradshaw enough about it

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>and be like like things you don't like compulsory child

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are airing or whatever, and I and I think that

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>adds enough structure. Like, for example, we got a question

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that was like, what is the last truly perfect movie

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you watched? And I was like, Oh, that's fun because

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I can It's limiting enough that I can go back

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 1>through the movies I watched recently and just like pick

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a few. And then you were like, why would anyone

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>want to listen to me talk about how I thought

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>one battle after another is good? Everyone think it's good.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was like, I'm not like reinventing the wheel here,

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Like I was kind of like you could like to me,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 2>and all respects to that caller, but I was like

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>the perfect what I think is the perfect movie that

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I watched?

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.559
<v Speaker 1>Like a perfect movie.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 2>To me? I was like, like, it's I also think

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm sort of like maybe I don't believe in I

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>think for some reason, the phrasing of the question of

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>like what is a perfect movie you watched is like

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.560
<v Speaker 2>stressing me out because it invites like people to be

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 2>like you thought that was perfect?

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Like don't you love just recklessly having an opinion?

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 2>And maybe part of it is like I don't think

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 2>I've ever thought any movie was perfect, like like it's

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 2>a wonderful life maybe, but I bet you could trim

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 2>a couple of mens, like like, I'm just sort of

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 2>like nothing's perfect.

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>No, that's tea I was. I recently randomly watched Invasion

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Body Snatchers for the first time, the one

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>with like Donald Sutherland, and I guess I would say

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I had low expectations, but I was like, this is

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>someone else, you know, Matthew put it on. I was like,

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>all right, I guess we'll watch it. And then by

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the end, I was like having such a good time

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was like so simple and not trying to

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have like a million twists and turns and like really

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>well shot in this sort of fun seventies like paranoia way.

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And I also recently watched in the Mood for Love

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, and so those were gonna be

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>my two sorry, not interesting, and then the other and

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>then wait, so you you were drawn to? You were

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>drawn to for example, what celeb or what popstar right

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>now has the gay men, gay women and straight women

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in a choke hold?

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Well? And I thought the call behind that was very

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 2>smart when I read through it, a bit like.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's maybe do how about we do our first

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>how about we do our first call and start there

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and then get the wheels turn in.

0:14:56.920 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Okay, I sayim and George. My name is Casey.

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm calling from Massachusetts. My husband and I went to

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 5>your Summerville show.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 6>We loved it.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 5>He was really not too familiar with your work until then,

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 5>but he laughed the whole time, and I'll just say

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 5>he was particularly charmed by Sam.

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>My question for you is interesting.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 5>This is a Lily Allen breakup album happening right now.

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:28.000
<v Speaker 5>It's amazing, incredible. What was your perception of their relationship

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 5>pre breakup and now with this album post breakup? Did

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 5>you I'm curious what the gay community thought, particularly of

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.920
<v Speaker 5>David Harbor during his height of like people loving this

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 5>sad dad thing and now knowing what we know now,

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 5>have things changed at all? Thanks for your thoughts and

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 5>your amazing.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Podcast by well, what can you say? Straight guys love me?

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>It was such an interesting choice to include in a

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>call that you know that had it all. It was complimentary.

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>You're building up to a great relevant question to want

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to immediately create a rift between us by saying your

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>straight husband liked Sam Moore.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean this is there is a toxic desire among

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 2>all to pit gay podcasters against each other.

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>It's so the phrasing of and I'll.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Just say, don't just say, don't say he was.

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Especially charmed by Sam. Why would you just say that?

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 2>Why would you say that?

0:16:28.920 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Someone recently commented on a on one of our clips

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>with Adam Friedlanden was like, it's my duty to say.

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, no, it's not. Shut the hell up,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 1>shut up, Go okay, what do you to? Obviously, David

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Harbor is so comically your type that it is even

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a cliche to bring him up.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 2>So David Harper is a huge sex symbol in the

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Barrack community. It is not just me, of course, that

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>finds him hot. It is anyone who finds Bear. He's

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 2>like on Bear fan pages constantly, and it's like very

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>interesting for the Bears. I don't think this is gonna

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 2>make a splash. I think everyone will still want to

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 2>have sex with him. For the general public, I'm interested

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 2>in how you feel, George about will people like turn

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 2>on him?

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, I am so confused about where we are

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as a like mainstream, sort of straight leaning culture on

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>men and women right now. And I'm saying that in

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>complete earnestness, like there is I believe this very kind

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of predictable but grim backlash against it started out as

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>being a backlash against quote unquote girl boss culture, which

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I hate to use a word that has never literally

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>meant anything. Literally. It is something that from the beginning

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>was a punch line that the book girl Boss by

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Sophia Marusso came out and immediately was a punchline. This

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>idea that we have in retrospect that at one point

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>we were in the girl Boss era and now we're

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>not is stupid and only people who write for digital

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>media believe it, So wake the fuck up and be

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.200
<v Speaker 1>an adult. So anyway, first it started as a backlash

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>against girl boss culture, which is in its own way

0:18:21.000 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>completely like veiled misogyny and sexism. Then it became a

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>backlash in an even more dark way against like me too,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because of course like people were like very confused how

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to act, and so then you know, you suddenly had

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like the random Babe dot net article about Azaz, which

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone felt weird about blah, and so then every the

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>water's got muddied so much that basically anytime, anytime a

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>woman speaks now she sort of is like not quite trusted.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Would you agree?

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 2>I would agree. I think we're in a really complicated spot.

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 2>And this particular drama is interesting too because it's like

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 2>both new and old. Yes, it's like sort of a

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 2>cheating scandal, which is classic vintage. She's not necessarily saying

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 2>like he abused me. She's saying like he was like

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>a horrible partner and we've had a miserable couple of years,

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and that makes it old. But then it's new because

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 2>it's like, well, we were open, so it wasn't like

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 2>fully illegal, and like it was just like he broke

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:21.880
<v Speaker 2>the rules of our open agreement.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So there's something very very now about it. Yeah,

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's also something very sorry, aging millennial about it.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Like it is so Lily Allen is such a classic

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>millennial voice, and you know, I hate to talk about generations. Yeah,

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.159
<v Speaker 1>but you just have to, like she is. She is

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>someone who could only be the exact age she is.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for sure.

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So when we were talking about like the status of

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Data Harbor, I'm like, I don't think the quote unquote

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>cancelation of a man has the same uh weight that

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>it did in like twenty eighteen, twenty nine. Yeah, but

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, this album is clearly making a

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>big impact. Yeah, but in my world, I'm seeing it

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>more as like you go girl, Lily Allen, than like

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>David Harbor is an asshole.

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think it's you go girl.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's almost beside the point who he is.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's like interesting. It adds a level of intrigue

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 2>that it's someone famous that we all can just like

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 2>recognize instantly. But it's not. It doesn't it's not the

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>whole story. It is more like you did that thing,

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 2>you got out of there, and your body looks amazing.

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I do feel like that's we're not talking about that. That

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that's part of the album. Roll out is like her

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 2>being like and also, look at how my body looks amazing.

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>No. Yes, she's almost leaning into this sort of imperfect

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>victim narrative in a way that I actually find kind

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of fun because Lilyana Lily Allen is an insane.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Person, always has been.

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Lily Allen is not like some innocent, you know wifey

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>who like was so optimistic about this relationship and she's

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.239
<v Speaker 1>always been looking for love and then she got her

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>heart broken like Lily Allen is a psycho.

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, she's a bad girl.

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>She is a bad girl. She's a psycho. She's done

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>insane things in the past. She I would say, like

0:21:16.840 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>partially owns it. Like I think, for example, she she's

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>openly being like, well, I was the bad person in

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>my previous marriage, so like I was able to relate

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to him whatever. But then she hasn't quote unquote owned

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>some of the other insane shit she has said, you know,

0:21:31.280 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>over the year. She's very much a classic like celeb

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.719
<v Speaker 1>who is on social media, whether it's podcasting, whether it's

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:39.959
<v Speaker 1>the whole stunt sheeted where she like ran her own

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>only feet or whatever.

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh sure, sure, is that what that website's called Wiki.

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Feet not only fee.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I am impressed with the whole album in general.

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I think if we're just talking about broad broadly, I'm

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of like I think we had we talked about

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 2>how like it's both like very interesting and you're like

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the first few listens you're like, wow, this is great,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and then you were saying that you like kind of

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>feel gross.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Now well I find oh wait, sorry. One more thing

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>about David Harber is that he has a sort of

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:19.959
<v Speaker 1>evil looking face. Yeah, And I actually sort of think

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>part of his appeal is this kind of villainous energy.

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, if anything, in terms of my

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>attraction to him, for example, this album is not making

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>me less attracted to him or making him less of

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a desirable object if you are prone to be attracted

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to him. If anything, I'm like, Wow, it's so hot

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that he had a bag of dildos or whatever she

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>accused him of having.

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, butt plugs and stuff in the lube, and I'm

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 2>literally like, wait, were you using them on yourself? Wait?

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Wait, wait, wait wait wait wait yeah, I e lube.

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So wait, sorry, but you asked me a question. Oh yes.

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there is something about the entire album,

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.919
<v Speaker 1>the entire album being about the same thing. And I

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>know that it has a narrative arc to some extent,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>but honestly, it's mostly that every song is about the

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And you know what, it almost feels like

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it almost feels like being waterboarded with like pornography. Like

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it reminded me of the Goonerer article where it was like, yes,

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>like in small doses, it's like really cathartic to listen

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to Lily Allen like say, like, fuck this guy and

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>he did this to me, and he did this to me.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>But to listen to that for like fifteen songs straight

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of makes you want to do something else.

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, it can feel a little. It's it's just

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 2>so confessional that I'm sort of like you like you

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 2>let like a recording studio here, you do.

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.439
<v Speaker 1>This right, And I sort of respect that she is

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>not she's kind of avoid Well I haven't listened to

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the final songs that many times to remember, but I

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>don't think she's sort of avoiding like a catharsist at

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the end, or like an empowerment narrative, right, Like, it's

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really just like you're an asshole, You're an asshole, You're

0:23:57.600 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 1>an asshole, You're an asshole the end. Yeah, which I

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>do respect, like totally. Something like something like Lemonade, while

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>being more artful, is also more calculated and can feel

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>too overwritten, Yeah, whereas this one really does feel like

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 1>she just like put it all out there.

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's I respect that I respect to an extent.

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So final thoughts on David Harbor. You know we

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>would both still have sex with him probably.

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, send nudes David Harbor. I will do whatever you want.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And Lily Allen, it's like, you know, if nothing else,

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, good for you for still getting lips of flappen.

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I fully agree.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of like you know, I I obviously I'm

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>holding you at arm's length and I would never want

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to be your close personal friend because I know you

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>would ultimately betray me and then potentially post screenshots of

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>our texts. But that said, you know you are kind

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of one of the og And I love Lily Allen

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>when I was a teen, and as much as I

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>am being a little mean to her, I get defensive

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>if someone else is mean to her.

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Of course you've earned it.

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Like she's she's kind of a legend.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:15.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah she is.

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't know people cared so much about her.

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 1>I was like, she's one of those people to me

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>that I'm like, isn't it weird that I listened to

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Lily Allen when I was like seventeen, I am not

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>seventeen whatever, fourteen.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 2>It's it's one of those things where I'm also surprised

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.159
<v Speaker 2>that everyone knows her, but I celebrate it.

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:33.720
<v Speaker 3>You Sam and George love.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>You girls, Love you down.

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, my question is for stand up comedians, which you.

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Guys are Clockett.

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 2>We're at like.

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 3>A really intimate venue or any venue, I guess, and

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:56.199
<v Speaker 3>you're performing in front of someone that is just like

0:25:56.520 --> 0:26:01.199
<v Speaker 3>so hot and sexy, and you're like you want to

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe fuck them? Does it like improve your performance or

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 3>do you And yeah, I'm just curious what it's like

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 3>behind the scenes.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, love you, love you too. I try to

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:24.199
<v Speaker 2>remain professional for the most part, but it does distract me.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.840
<v Speaker 2>I will say I do notice, like if there's someone

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 2>like you know, a lot of venues, it depends on

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 2>the lighting. Sometimes you can see the audience very clearly,

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.440
<v Speaker 2>and sometimes you can't see them at all. And when

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 2>you can see someone who's like very hot and you're

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 2>there's like I'm like, so, what's your deal? Like there's

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a part of me it's like, what's your deal?

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 2>And I know, like you know, it's I know, nothing

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 2>can happen. You know, I'm on stage and they're in

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 2>the audience. That's like a barrier that can't.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Be right, Like that going through your head. You're like, okay,

0:26:51.960 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>like we could hook up now wait no, I'm on stage.

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Fuck, But I'm like there's something but I do have

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 2>I have one story George about this where one time

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 2>I was doing like my very first like solo show

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 2>at the Annoyance Leader in Brooklyn, New York. And it

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 2>was like a mixture of characters and stand up and

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I did a character then right at the beginning and

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I where I talked to an audience member, I picked

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>an audience member and there was a hot person there

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 2>who you know, I think I told you the story

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and I'll say, yes, you have you have yeah, okay,

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 2>and I called on him and he immediately was like

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 2>mad at me, like right at the start, mad at me.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, damn, I shouldn't have called on

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the one person that I found hot. And it was

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 2>like the first bit in the show, and it did

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of ruin it slightly.

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I actually think that's very you because you like giving

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>yourself a challenge, ah, like, because you know that's not

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>going to go as well as picking like a random

0:27:55.119 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>ugly person. It's so classic, this classic.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to have my cake and eat it too, Honestly.

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like when I see a hot person

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in the audience, this is so humiliating. But rather than

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 1>thinking wow, I'm in a position of power because I'm

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the one with the mic and they must really like

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:19.920
<v Speaker 1>me and that's why they paid to see me. I'm

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking the exact opposite, which is I'm thinking I'm the

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>theater kid loser on stage and this person is sitting

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there with her arms crossed, being like the hell does

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this like idiot have to say, Like I'm going to

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>go to football practice after Like, I revert back to the

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:37.159
<v Speaker 1>high school damage realm. You're you're the hot person and

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm like the loser that is trying a draft of

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>my art project on stage. Wow, So I'm not. I

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>don't love when there are hot people that I can

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 1>see from stage, and it does not in any way

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>turn me on. What I do enjoy is a hot

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>person potentially talking to me afterwards and complimenting the show,

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 1>potentially sitting in the back so I don't see them

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 1>as I'm performing, and then coming up to me afterwards.

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I I'll enjoy that. Yeah, that's and

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's why we do it.

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 2>That's why we do it, folks.

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>So wait, I want to just quickly say one of

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the ones we disagreed on is what is a piece

0:29:14.880 --> 0:29:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of media we loved in our youth that we now hate.

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And I want to say, get ready because this is

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>a shocking thing to say. I tried rewatching Austin Powers

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.560
<v Speaker 1>recently and really could not get into it. You already

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy such a bit.

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 2>You knew that would hurt my feelings, and I to

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 2>hurt my feelings.

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I almost want to try again because I think maybe

0:29:32.560 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I was in a bad mood. And then the other one,

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>which I think I've talked about before, is the movie

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>rat Race. I have a memory of loving and I

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>watched it recently. Just stonefaced. Mmm.

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey, my name's Jeff and my name's Connor. Long time

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 4>gay guys, first time callers.

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 7>We're calling today because of a debate that is absolutely

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 7>tearing our friends group apart.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 4>We want to know is Lord a gay pop diva.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 7>I think Lord is absolutely a gay pop diva, but

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 7>I think she's not there yet.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 4>We agree that Charlie Mariah Resa, for example, are gay

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 4>pop difas, and we.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 7>Also agree that Dua Lipa Pink and Atlant morsett as.

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 4>We have all kinds of arguments either way, but we

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 4>don't want to give them to you because we want

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 4>to sway your decision. But if we keep talking about this,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 4>our friends are going to kill us. So we need

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 4>to call in professional help from the girls. So please respond.

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 7>We need this debate suttle.

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Thank you so much, Diva and soon Hi.

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Love you Diva, Love you divas. This is so interesting,

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 2>you know it's it's I'm feeling a little bit like

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 2>when someone tells you who they are, believe them, and

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, so you think du A Lipa is not

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 2>a gay pop diva and I'm supposed to sort of

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 2>listen to your rankings. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. If she's

0:31:11.280 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 2>not a gay pop diva, then what is she a

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 2>pop singer?

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I'm sorry, but this is like, you know,

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 1>this is like, however, how everyone is over using iconic

0:31:24.960 --> 0:31:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and legend and blah blah blah. I was you know

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>what my pet thieves is like when people are like,

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>happy birthday to this New York darling, It's like, what

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the hell are you talking about? That is? Jason? Yeah,

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so I like du A Liipa, but you know, give

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>her she's still cooking.

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't disagree more. I'm like dou A Lipa like

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>with future nostalgia alone. I think she like has made

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:04.160
<v Speaker 2>an impact, is so big and is so specifically like

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 2>for like the gay community.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I love dou A Lipa. I need more vulnerability

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>if I'm gonna call her a gay pop diva. The

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>whole point of being a gay pop diva is that

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you are. You have this narrative of being the underdog

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and then persevering you have gone through and I understand.

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Does give vulnerability.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, she's Australian and she had cancer. Did how about

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you check yourself?

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm not seeing vulnerable from her. I'm seeing perfection.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Listen. Ah, okay, hold on. So you're saying you don't

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>trust the people that made this call because they don't

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:49.680
<v Speaker 1>think dou A Lipa is a gay.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 2>A gay pop diva, That's what I'm saying.

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But that actually doesn't really answer their question, which you know,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone can ask whether or not you agree with your

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>opinions or not, which is lord of a gay pop diva?

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I hate this, by the way, this is an example

0:33:04.440 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of a question you like and I don't like.

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, why don't you like it?

0:33:09.760 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Because it I have because it it damns us into

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>being like chatty gay guys.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 2>But that's what we are. I know, it's one part

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 2>of us. We have a multifaceted personality.

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Is Lord a gay pop diva?

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think I kind of think. See

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 2>the thing is, I think you have to like consent

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 2>to being a gay pop diva, like, and I don't

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 2>know if she's consenting to that. I think that, Like,

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that's sort of what what I'm talking about

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 2>with like dua lipa honestly is like she's like, I

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 2>think she kind of considers herself a gay pop diva,

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 2>like and Lord is sort of being like Lord thinks

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 2>she's the Strokes. She's not, but she thinks she is.

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 2>And so that to me, like seeing her call answer

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 2>in Vegas famously was to die for let's start there.

0:34:05.040 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 2>But she really wants to be like I'm a I'm

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 2>a like I'm just like you. Like I'm like, yes,

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm up here, Yes I write these songs, but I'm

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.600
<v Speaker 2>merely a reflection of you. And I'm like, I don't

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:20.360
<v Speaker 2>see myself as larger than life. I see myself as life.

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 2>And so I'm like, I think I don't I think no,

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 2>because she doesn't think yes, yeah.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I would say I'm sorry to this

0:34:32.480 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>group chat. I would say self, evidently no is the

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.440
<v Speaker 1>correct answer. I just don't think that is what she

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is striving to be or accomplishing being. And I also

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think part of the gay pop diva thing is obviously

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>overcoming adversity and at some point being an underdog and

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>being crucified by the media whatever. But then another part

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>of it is being kind of like difficult and having

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.880
<v Speaker 1>literally diva bea. I mean, that is why Mariah Carey

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is a diva. That is why beyond uh Madonna is

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a diva, Like that's the whole. And Beyonce, I'm not

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>not to say she's difficult and that she's like like

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>treats people poorly, but difficult in the sense that she's

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>famously particular and is like always with the laptop and

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>like calling the shots and like you gotta have some

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 1>of that energy. And I'm not I think the pure

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>joy of a dua lipa or the pure like emoness

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of a lord is not quite there. Like you got

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to sort of combine it all and come out and

0:35:35.640 --> 0:35:44.960
<v Speaker 1>be and become like share, sure, share, But that doesn't.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Mean gay guys don't like lord, it just means yeah.

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess I'm even like, is what gay

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pop diva? Maybe you know what, I'm being so old fashioned.

0:35:55.080 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of being old gay guy that is at

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the gay bar and is like reminiscing about the eighties. Like,

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>to me, a gay pop diva is a very specific thing.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think Charlie is a gay pop diva,

0:36:07.239 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not saying that as a nock to her.

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I love Charlie, but I think you need it's a

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>specific thing.

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think that is. I think to fully answer

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 2>this question, we would have to define what is a

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 2>gay pop diva, because I think that's where the disagreement

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 2>is coming in, is that we have not defined the term.

0:36:26.280 --> 0:36:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Well, I would say that a gay pop diva is

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of dangerously close to the definition of a glamour girl,

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>which is someone who is glamorous, wounded and seeking truth.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 2>But there's the added definition of like and also is

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:40.080
<v Speaker 2>known for belting totally.

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's true. Yeah, Like, does a gay pop diva

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>need to be a vocalist? I would argue probably yes.

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 2>I would argue probably yes, whereas maybe a gay pop girlye.

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 1>That Wow, that's a really good point. And in fact,

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I actually do think that's why the phrase gay pop

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.719
<v Speaker 1>girly was sort of on the rise, is because there

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>was a crop of these gurly that were not quite

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 1>diva status yet and.

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 2>They don't want to be like they they don't they're

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 2>not looking to be.

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>And also, you know, I gotta say there is an

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>age element to the diva thing too, Like I'm a

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:20.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit like graduating towards diva status means, oh, you're

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>about to age into Vegas residency.

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Right right, right, right right.

0:37:25.239 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It is too early. Even if Lord was going for

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a Mariah thing, which she obviously is not, it is

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>too early to graduate her into diva.

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:38.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Diva is your masters that's right.

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know or PhD. We Curly is your master,

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Curly is your mass. Diva is your PhD.

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:47.279
<v Speaker 3>See.

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you're just pop singer, you're you have a bachelor's. Yeah. Yeah,

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and I do think do It for the Record has

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a master's.

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you can agree.

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you know, she might be what she might be

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:02.680
<v Speaker 1>doing her PhD. You know, when you do a PhD,

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>part of it is getting a master's. Like anyone who

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gets a PhD also gets some masters, so I think

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Dua is on the PhD track potentially. But she's presented

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.759
<v Speaker 1>her master's season. Everyone's saying, this is promising. Can't wait

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to see how you make it into you know, your

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>monogram monogram monograph.

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, So since we're talking about the podcast, when we

0:38:21.080 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 2>make the podcast, I have to say, see, that's why

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 2>I like questions like that. Oh shot, What you're forgetting

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 2>is that we will put the pop star diva question

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 2>through our lens and we make it our own.

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Whereas you think if I were to ask you what

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is a piece of media you love in your youth

0:38:37.520 --> 0:38:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that you now hate? Nothing would come out of that conversation.

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It would be very straightforward, and your answer would just

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.240
<v Speaker 1>be titanic George.

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 2>When I say, when I say, my answer would be

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 2>well nothing, because I respect the child that I was

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:54.480
<v Speaker 2>and the journey that I had.

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, there you go.

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 2>That's not a fun answer. Oh that's a that's a

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 2>void the question.

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:08.400
<v Speaker 8>Hey, good guys, calling from Miami. Yeah, yeah, you're je No.

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 8>I know, I know nobody likes Maammy, but my question

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 8>I should out to questions protein proteins everywhere, and I

0:39:15.600 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 8>think we haven't really heard from you guys about protein

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 8>and if it's gay or or what. I think it's

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 8>straight in an obvious way, but you guys always come

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 8>up with new perspectives and as where we listen and

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 8>then yeah, never mind, that's gonna be my only question.

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 9>Bye.

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 4>I love you guys.

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Keep doing great work saving the world.

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Something I love about gay guys is myself included is

0:39:45.719 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that they will be giving you a straightforward compliment, but

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the tone of voice is like, but I could change

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>my mind at any second.

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's it's comforting. It keeps me in line.

0:39:57.800 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Is protein gay or straight?

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:05.240
<v Speaker 2>This is so complex because I like protein is everywhare

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 2>Like we all know this. This is not a hot take.

0:40:08.080 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 2>It is just like like when there's protein cold foam

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.879
<v Speaker 2>at Starbucks, Like you have to take a step back.

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean for me, I'm literally being like, okay, then

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 2>what is protein? Like where are they getting all this stuff?

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 2>What mine is this coming from? I guess I have

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:25.680
<v Speaker 2>no understanding what protein is. If you can just put

0:40:25.719 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 2>it in anything, I find it like it's there's like

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:34.319
<v Speaker 2>a curve or something where it's like I think ten

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 2>years ago, protein was very straight and it was like

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 2>the stereotype of like the guy with the jug of

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 2>creatine powder and that's like the only food he has

0:40:43.880 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 2>in his kitchen, and it's like the straightest guy in

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.839
<v Speaker 1>And then like muscle milk, muscle milk, Like muscle milk

0:40:51.920 --> 0:41:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is such a classic kind of straight phrase, straight combination.

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and even the branding of musclemilk it was very masculine,

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 2>and there was something like where it was like this

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:11.760
<v Speaker 2>is for straight guys, this this whole system, and now

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it's turning into like like again Starbucks cold foam with protein,

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'm like, it's becoming queer, and for yoga girl.

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>It's becoming feminized. I mean basically what happened with protein,

0:41:24.640 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just on a literal level, Sorry to absolutely blow the

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>alarm on this, is that the way capitalism works is

0:41:32.560 --> 0:41:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that one market was cornered fully all men were into protein,

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.800
<v Speaker 1>so then they were like, how do we expand this market.

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>We feminize protein and make it also for women, And

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly you have Goop and Gwyneth Paltrow promoting cottage

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>cheese pancakes and Starbucks cold foam that's advertised by some

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>brain dead influencer and you know you have like I

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you can put proteins in your protein powder

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in your what's the smoothie place in La and your

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ear wan smoothie. That's literally what it is. Yeah, that's

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened, and you all fell for it. And where

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>gay people come in is that there are both men

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 1>and women who are gay, which is interesting, and so

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they are implicated in this.

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:20.760
<v Speaker 2>They are implicated in this. I will say, I still

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.120
<v Speaker 2>on the whole think it is actually more straight male

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 2>to have the big jug of protein powder in your kitchen,

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:30.280
<v Speaker 2>but gay guys do do it well.

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the protein powder and the protein maxing is obviously

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>very straight, but an attention to protein is also very

0:42:39.840 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like just mom Like it's kind of like following, you

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>know what's very straight the food pyramid. Like that, like

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:52.160
<v Speaker 1>believing in and following the food pyramid and making three

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:55.239
<v Speaker 1>plates for your three boys and making sure they get

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>their chicken and their broccoli and their rice. That is

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:04.320
<v Speaker 1>also very mom and straight. Yeah, food is complicated obviously

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:10.319
<v Speaker 1>because it is such a third rail. It's like I

0:43:10.360 --> 0:43:13.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like, honestly, in a post cancel culture world, food

0:43:13.360 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>is still the one thing I don't quite know how

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:20.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Yeah, because people are obsessed with pathologizing everything,

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>either accusing you of having an eating disorder, accusing you

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of you know, in terms of meat, veganism, dietary restrictions,

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>accusing you of being an ethical in any in whatever

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:35.759
<v Speaker 1>way they believe in that one moment, if you are

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:40.920
<v Speaker 1>too ethical, then suddenly you're like a blue haired leftist cuck. Yeah,

0:43:41.520 --> 0:43:44.880
<v Speaker 1>so this is like I do find that nutrition wise,

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it is an interesting question. What is a straight versus

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.359
<v Speaker 1>gay outlook on nutrition? Like what do you think?

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is like such not to be completely insane,

0:43:56.320 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 2>but I'm like, this is why we need our institutions back.

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Like we literally need like a standard of eating that

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>is like so this is sort of what you should like.

0:44:04.360 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 2>The food pyramid has fallen and we need to rebuild

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 2>it because we need just like a like here's sort

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:12.879
<v Speaker 2>of what you should be shooting for. It's neither good

0:44:12.920 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 2>nor bad. It's just average, like feel free to have

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>some of this, have some of that, And instead it's

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 2>like everyone is polarized and they're eating in ways that

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:22.879
<v Speaker 2>are insane.

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's but again it has it goes back

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to marketing and moving product like, the reason all of

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>this is happening is just so that people are so

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:40.840
<v Speaker 1>confused that they are convinced into doing whatever you know,

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Procter and Gamble wants them to do. There is no

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, if the government were to step

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>into making new food pyramid, you know who that would be,

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:48.440
<v Speaker 1>RFK Junior.

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I know this is why it's not fair. We need

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 2>good government. I want government issued meals.

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, it's literally my number one dream.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:58.239
<v Speaker 2>I would I would love that.

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's interesting about and also is this is a

0:45:02.120 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>known fact that people say, you know, when they're sort

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of debunking the protein craze. In general, Americans on average

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:11.799
<v Speaker 1>do get enough protein. It's not one of the it's

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>not one of the things we need more on average,

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a strange thing to have so much

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>emphasis on it. To me, the reason why I became

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of obsessed with protein over the last couple of

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:26.880
<v Speaker 1>years because I was like, ooh, I'm like experimenting with

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>working out more and it's like fun to it's I

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:34.239
<v Speaker 1>want to gain muscle. I never thought of it as

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:37.320
<v Speaker 1>something I'm doing for my general health. It was always

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a vanity thing, you.

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Know, I've heard that the next big craze is going

0:45:41.080 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 2>to be fiber. Yes.

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:46.040
<v Speaker 1>No, everyone has been saying that, Yeah, it's.

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 2>The thing gay appropriation once again.

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 1>I know, No, I you know I have straight women

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:57.799
<v Speaker 1>in my life have borrowed back when I would take

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Pure for Men have borrowed my Pure for Men pill

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>because they are apparently because they thought they were better

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>than other fiberpills. I do think that's been debunked. Unfortunately.

0:46:06.600 --> 0:46:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the exact same as.

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:09.839
<v Speaker 2>Any other thing. Yeah, I'm just taking them meta mucil. Now,

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 2>what are you so?

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.839
<v Speaker 1>I have a I don't. I we need to move on.

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>But maybe there's no time for us to actually go

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>into this. But I'm interested in the process of something

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 1>normal and conventional becoming a trend, because there are trends

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that are new, unique, updated things Like a trend could be,

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, tiny sunglasses. I'm not saying that's new and

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:40.319
<v Speaker 1>has just been invented, but that is something that you

0:46:40.400 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't see as much of before and now you're seeing

0:46:42.480 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>more of. But protein is something that is so classic.

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:48.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like seeing the American flag is trending, Like it

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is something that is so classic that it really takes

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a big push to make it into a trend. Yeah,

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>And I think maybe that's what's straight about it. Like,

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to me, a gay trend has to be niche that

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>then enters the mainstream. But as straight trend, it's like

0:47:03.680 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the lack of imagination, you have to have to think

0:47:06.239 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 1>protein is an interesting thing to promote. Yeah, it's very

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>like Thursday Nights on NBC.

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, in that case, I love it period.

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing okay? Next call? Hi?

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.399
<v Speaker 5>Sam? Did you ever finish the Shards?

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 4>And George, what are you reading?

0:47:30.520 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I did finish The Shards last week, two weeks ago. Uh.

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 2>I really enjoyed it. I felt like it was I

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:45.160
<v Speaker 2>haven't read like a quote unquote page turner in a while,

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 2>and that one I felt like a little kid again,

0:47:47.840 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 2>kind of glued to the book. And I will say

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 2>it didn't end as satisfyingly as I had hoped, and

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:59.839
<v Speaker 2>that's all I'll say about that. I loved everything leading

0:47:59.880 --> 0:48:00.319
<v Speaker 2>up to that.

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Did it make you want to read more Brett Easton Ellis?

0:48:03.280 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 2>I actually did kind of like his vibe. It's my

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 2>first Brett Eastnelli's book, and.

0:48:08.640 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 1>It's such a hard one to start with. Because it's like,

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it's his longest.

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 2>It was long as hell, but it hit it was juicy.

0:48:17.760 --> 0:48:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I am actually rereading a book, which I'm ashamed to

0:48:21.000 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>say I do very rarely.

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:23.000
<v Speaker 2>I have very rarely.

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I have this need for newness at all times, even

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.080
<v Speaker 1>though I really think that, you know, much like the

0:48:30.120 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>second sip of a wine is more complex than the

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:34.400
<v Speaker 1>first ship. I think the second time you read a

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:36.200
<v Speaker 1>book often you get way more out of it than

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the first. But I am, no, that's amazing.

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that's great.

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I am rereading this book called Satn Island by Tom McCarthy.

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>It is about it's very like my interest circa twenty

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:53.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen when I first picked it up. It's about someone

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>who is a corporate anthropologist. So his job is to

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.920
<v Speaker 1>like study human behavior for a company that then you know,

0:49:00.040 --> 0:49:02.640
<v Speaker 1>sells products to them. And he was working on the

0:49:02.680 --> 0:49:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Great Report, which is basically like a report on the

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:10.839
<v Speaker 1>behavior of like the entire world. But it's very sort

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of weird and avant garde and sort of post post

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:18.160
<v Speaker 1>post postmodern. And the reason I was inspired to reread

0:49:18.200 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it is because, as listeners of the podcast might know,

0:49:21.360 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I was rereading or I was reading for the first

0:49:23.800 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>time this book of Zadie Smith Essays that contained this

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>famous essay she wrote that was called like two Directions

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for the novel or something or two ways for the novel,

0:49:34.520 --> 0:49:39.959
<v Speaker 1>And one of them was like sort of a conventional

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>realist novel with like a bunch of different characters and

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:47.360
<v Speaker 1>different themes. And then the other one was this super

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:50.000
<v Speaker 1>weird novel called Remainder by the same author, which I've

0:49:50.040 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>also read and I liked less, and so that inspired

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 1>me to reread this book. And while we're on the

0:49:55.280 --> 0:49:56.960
<v Speaker 1>topic of books, I just want to very quickly say,

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we got another call asking us to recommend books that

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:07.480
<v Speaker 1>are similar to The Secret History, and I guess I

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:11.400
<v Speaker 1>would say, what about Brideshead Revisited, which is kind of

0:50:11.400 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the og Secret History.

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I've never read that.

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And also, if you want a book set in academia,

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I love the book Lucky Jim by Kingsley. Amus. Next call, Next.

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Call I Sam and George.

0:50:27.280 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 6>Last time I called in I mumbled a ton, so

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:32.200
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to do that this time.

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Hamy.

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:40.160
<v Speaker 6>I have a question about miss Charlie Xux. She you know,

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:44.240
<v Speaker 6>had a great brat era, but she's pivoting into acting.

0:50:44.480 --> 0:50:47.759
<v Speaker 6>She's like going to be in like twenty movies and

0:50:48.040 --> 0:50:52.200
<v Speaker 6>was on SML. So I want to hear YouTube geniuses

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 6>come up with like what a movie is going to

0:50:57.040 --> 0:50:58.280
<v Speaker 6>win her the oscar?

0:50:58.680 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Like, what is the campaign?

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 6>What is the role? How are we going to get

0:51:03.760 --> 0:51:10.000
<v Speaker 6>her that little gold Man? Should she be the sexy

0:51:10.080 --> 0:51:13.560
<v Speaker 6>step mom in a drama and she has tenants of

0:51:13.600 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 6>screen time steals the show? Should she fall into a

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 6>magical world Narnie style? Should she have Sandra Bullock's role

0:51:22.320 --> 0:51:25.960
<v Speaker 6>in a reboot of Speed where that bus is zooming around?

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 6>I would love to know your guys, just thoughts. I

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:35.399
<v Speaker 6>love you both, fearly love from Alaska.

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Work it out, Wow, work it out out.

0:51:41.320 --> 0:51:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Shout out to Alaska. I like this question because I'm like,

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Charlie as an actress. The Oscars loves

0:51:52.960 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 2>someone to play against type, like people love to see

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 2>like a transformation. So I think she would have to

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 2>play like a dowdy mother who was like dealing with

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 2>intergenerational trauma and it's like very and maybe it's even

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 2>in like the Victorian era and like essentially like maybe

0:52:14.640 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 2>like her son is at war and she's like thinking

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 2>about him quietly for like two hours, like maybe you

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:22.359
<v Speaker 2>never even see him.

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sharing my screen with you, which I just remembered.

0:52:25.719 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 1>So you did see me googling Mariah Carey Precious. Oh and.

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 2>My browser was blocking it, so I missed it.

0:52:34.040 --> 0:52:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Got it? I wanted to address that in case you

0:52:36.920 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>had seen it. I was trying to remember what the

0:52:39.640 --> 0:52:44.760
<v Speaker 1>famous like, Okay, well it ended up just googling Mariah

0:52:44.800 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Carey pr and it's now showing me who her publicity

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 1>team is.

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:51.400
<v Speaker 2>I have been wondering, Yeah, totally.

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:56.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, recently, some a clip of Precious was randomly

0:52:56.920 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>going viral on my feet and it's the clip where

0:52:59.239 --> 0:53:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Precious goes to see Mariah Carey, who is playing a

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:06.080
<v Speaker 1>social worker. Now, of course, you know, there's an argument

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to be made that that movie is evil, and I

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.719
<v Speaker 1>definitely recognize that argument. However, we have to admit that

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:16.520
<v Speaker 1>every single woman in that film is giving the performance

0:53:16.520 --> 0:53:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of her career, and it sucks that it's all in

0:53:19.480 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the service of this narrative.

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:23.879
<v Speaker 2>But it's facts, fully right, You're fully right.

0:53:24.680 --> 0:53:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Monique, is that is like a generation defining

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>If the movie was more well written, that would be

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a generation defining performance.

0:53:32.640 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 2>Well, literally, what was going on over there? How are

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:37.040
<v Speaker 2>they all so? I know that acting over there?

0:53:37.160 --> 0:53:39.840
<v Speaker 1>No, it's crazy. I mean even Mariah who famously, I

0:53:39.880 --> 0:53:42.600
<v Speaker 1>mean her one movie flop, she's not you know, you

0:53:42.600 --> 0:53:44.439
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't think of her as someone who has acting range.

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 1>She's doing a great job Paul at Patton anyway. So

0:53:49.520 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to think, like, should Charlie do something

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that is sort of Mariah Carey? Im precious You're going

0:53:56.520 --> 0:54:05.280
<v Speaker 1>more period drama. I'm going more rim like present day

0:54:05.440 --> 0:54:11.080
<v Speaker 1>set movie in like in London that's about kind of

0:54:11.120 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>like a working class community in London, and Charlie is

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, but this has not been filmed yet, and

0:54:19.120 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>then it would take even longer to come out. So

0:54:20.880 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just thinking about her age. She could play a mother,

0:54:24.360 --> 0:54:28.640
<v Speaker 1>she could play a teacher, she could play honestly, a

0:54:28.719 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 1>reporter that is reporting a big story about, you know,

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:35.799
<v Speaker 1>water pollution in the community or something like that. I

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like that, And then I think, in a completely different direction,

0:54:39.600 --> 0:54:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Charlie could be then you m in James Bond, Well, yes,

0:54:45.640 --> 0:54:48.239
<v Speaker 1>because I that's fun, because I think both of us

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are going very obvious with this question. Which is like, okay,

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:55.320
<v Speaker 1>what's an oscary role? But I think and then of course,

0:54:55.400 --> 0:54:58.279
<v Speaker 1>the less imaginative thing is being like, okay, well she

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:00.600
<v Speaker 1>should play an actress or a pop star, whatever she's

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:03.200
<v Speaker 1>doing in that movie that she's writing herself. But I

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:07.600
<v Speaker 1>think if she were to do a cunty role that

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:11.359
<v Speaker 1>isn't someone in an entertainment industry, that would be fun,

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like a CEO, an editor in chief of a women's magazine,

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who is, you know, a weapons manufacturer. That's why

0:55:19.040 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think being em and James Bond could be a

0:55:21.239 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 1>real breakthrough for her.

0:55:22.400 --> 0:55:25.200
<v Speaker 2>That could be a real breakthrough. Not Oscar worthy, but

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:27.799
<v Speaker 2>it would be a breakthrough. It would be fun for sure.

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Because I think people think people think playing against type

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:35.200
<v Speaker 1>for her would mean dressed down, but actually playing against

0:55:35.200 --> 0:55:39.600
<v Speaker 1>type with her would mean not messy like super type

0:55:39.680 --> 0:55:44.040
<v Speaker 1>A and buttoned up. She plays Margaret Thatcher, Yes, exactly,

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>she should play Margaret that It's called young the Iron

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Lady too. No more free handouts vibes. That's the full

0:55:59.880 --> 0:56:00.920
<v Speaker 1>time idle vibes.

0:56:01.880 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 2>It would be like it would be about Margaret Thatcher,

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 2>like when she's young, like being wronged by like people

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 2>getting free stuff, and like it's sort of her villain

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:13.560
<v Speaker 2>origin story.

0:56:14.640 --> 0:56:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like there was one maybe she had one experience

0:56:17.280 --> 0:56:19.480
<v Speaker 1>where everyone else got free stuff and she didn't. Or

0:56:19.480 --> 0:56:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like everyone was handing out the free government tunics

0:56:23.080 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 1>and all the rest of the people's fit and hers

0:56:25.920 --> 0:56:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was like too small or too big, and she was like, wow,

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I've always thought that a one size fits all approach

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:33.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. It turns out no one should have healthcare.

0:56:36.040 --> 0:56:37.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that could really work.

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 9>Hey, guys, what are your thoughts on dating someone who's

0:56:41.280 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 9>really hot, has good morals, votes, loves you one conditionally,

0:56:46.520 --> 0:56:50.720
<v Speaker 9>but just is a little bit dumb, Like you regularly

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 9>get to a world events and history, et cetera. To

0:56:54.440 --> 0:56:57.239
<v Speaker 9>this person. They have plenty of other skills, but just

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 9>like general knowledge is not one of them.

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, think that feeling when general knowledge is not one

0:57:03.600 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 2>of the skills.

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Damn for general knowledge to not be one of the

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:12.600
<v Speaker 1>skills is tough. I also I do want to kind

0:57:12.640 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of make a draw a line between intelligence and general knowledge.

0:57:20.120 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>What you're describing is someone being uninformed, which in fact

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:29.960
<v Speaker 1>can be fixed and is not difficult. Like I think

0:57:30.240 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it can take a couple of years, but you know,

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you teach this person this is the morning news digest.

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:40.240
<v Speaker 1>You should read. These are a couple of books about

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:44.480
<v Speaker 1>world history. Maybe let's sit down together. You know, this

0:57:44.520 --> 0:57:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is sort of like a big oaf of a man.

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.920
<v Speaker 1>He can barely like swing his limbs around without knocking

0:57:48.960 --> 0:57:52.440
<v Speaker 1>over a picture of pink lemonade. You sit him down,

0:57:52.480 --> 0:57:56.400
<v Speaker 1>You say, we're gonna watch the evening news. Yeah, so

0:57:56.560 --> 0:58:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that to me is fixable. Intelligence is a tough one.

0:58:00.880 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was I'm torn on I wish we had

0:58:03.920 --> 0:58:06.360
<v Speaker 2>an example of the intelligence because right now I'm thinking

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm more on your first statement, where it sounds like

0:58:11.040 --> 0:58:16.120
<v Speaker 2>he is the total package, except like so he doesn't

0:58:16.160 --> 0:58:18.920
<v Speaker 2>know like about the Revolutionary War, like and I'm sort

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:22.120
<v Speaker 2>of like, like if the other skills are like he

0:58:22.280 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 2>knows how to cook, or like he knows how to

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 2>like he has like a good sense of direction or something. Yeah,

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm like that counts too, That counts towards intelligence,

0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Like being able to like win at trivial pursuit is

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:35.360
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily intelligence.

0:58:35.720 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're also saying, you know, he has good morals

0:58:37.920 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and he votes correctly without having general knowledge. That's emotional intelligence.

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 2>To know you can't buy that. You can't you can't

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 2>buy that.

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Like there are people that have so much general knowledge,

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 1>too much in fact, and you know they are voting

0:58:50.560 --> 0:58:55.200
<v Speaker 1>for insane things out there in the world. But I

0:58:55.320 --> 0:58:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have to say, you know, I must admit that it

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:02.760
<v Speaker 1>would bother me if my significant other lacked general knowledge

0:59:02.800 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to use your terminology. So I understand where you're coming from,

0:59:06.000 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's something that can be taught. I

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>am a little bit more interested in the question of

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:16.400
<v Speaker 1>genuinely if if someone is a little actually dumb, cause

0:59:16.440 --> 0:59:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that is challenging.

0:59:21.480 --> 0:59:24.640
<v Speaker 2>It's so specific because it's like how are you dumb?

0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Like there are metrics in which I am dumb, But

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:32.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, like, I feel like if it's like sort

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:33.959
<v Speaker 2>of like if you were to tell me, like, hey,

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 2>could you like take care of this child? Could you

0:59:41.360 --> 0:59:43.160
<v Speaker 2>take care of my child for the day? My child

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:45.640
<v Speaker 2>is too could you take care of her for the day?

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>You could figure it out.

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I'd figure it out, but I'd have a lot of

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 2>questions and it wouldn't come naturally. Uh, And like like

0:59:53.000 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 2>even if it was like okay, like, uh, there's a

0:59:56.240 --> 1:00:01.120
<v Speaker 2>chicken in the fridge and you like my mother is

1:00:01.160 --> 1:00:05.880
<v Speaker 2>coming over, Can you please prepare it a period?

1:00:06.160 --> 1:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, okay, well that is simply just cooking.

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That is I would say that falls under general knowledge.

1:00:12.600 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I think, yeah, I think I think there's

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a world in which yeah, I guess. How would you

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 2>define a little dumb.

1:00:20.000 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think a little dumb is, to be honest, I

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>define it as like someone who says something that is

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>completely uninteresting and thinks it's groundbreaking, like I think of this.

1:00:34.320 --> 1:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is honestly, I think about it so often

1:00:37.040 --> 1:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>when I go home degrease, Like you talk to Greek

1:00:40.880 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>guys and they will have this like they'll just be like.

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:47.200
<v Speaker 10>The thing with men and women is like you have

1:00:47.320 --> 1:00:51.680
<v Speaker 10>to like women expect you to be romantic, but they

1:00:51.680 --> 1:00:53.720
<v Speaker 10>don't know how they want you to be a romantic,

1:00:53.720 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 10>Like they just think of this thing. It's like, so

1:00:56.160 --> 1:01:01.160
<v Speaker 10>what you're saying is sort of like a cliche line

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:03.840
<v Speaker 10>a guy would say in a movie before the woman

1:01:03.880 --> 1:01:04.920
<v Speaker 10>broke up with him.

1:01:04.720 --> 1:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Like or.

1:01:07.400 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here's an example. It's like when people have

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:14.680
<v Speaker 1>really lukewarm opinions about something like cancel culture and think

1:01:14.720 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting, or when people are really you know, inspired

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>by by the show the newsroom, like just like things,

1:01:26.280 --> 1:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>just like your brain is simple and so it is

1:01:29.920 --> 1:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>easy to hit the right buttons and make it go off.

1:01:33.400 --> 1:01:35.080
<v Speaker 2>No, I I now that you're saying that. I know

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:39.120
<v Speaker 2>exactly what you mean, and it's it. That is tough.

1:01:39.240 --> 1:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>If it's like dumb as in like uninteresting and uninspiring,

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>that is kind of unfortunately they like fantasy of like

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the dumb guy who's like so sweet and good is

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:54.040
<v Speaker 2>like not like it's like if they're like really genuinely

1:01:54.120 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 2>dumb like that, like it's kind of it's over for me.

1:01:57.680 --> 1:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And it's also I do get I would get embarrassed,

1:02:01.880 --> 1:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like in social situations, like it's not a nice thing

1:02:04.160 --> 1:02:06.800
<v Speaker 1>to admit, but like I would hate to be in

1:02:06.800 --> 1:02:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the position of having to like explain myself for dating

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>someone who is saying dumb things in this company. Yeah

1:02:15.520 --> 1:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been in those Yeah, yeah, I've been in those situations.

1:02:18.520 --> 1:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Not with my but I've been I've had friends of

1:02:21.520 --> 1:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>mine dates someone who like clearly is a dummy, and

1:02:25.440 --> 1:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone this sort of has to like pause when it's

1:02:29.040 --> 1:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>their turn to speak and be like share share a

1:02:31.360 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>little cutie.

1:02:33.640 --> 1:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>That is tough.

1:02:34.880 --> 1:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That is really tough.

1:02:36.440 --> 1:02:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I is there anything that like I was trying to

1:02:39.360 --> 1:02:42.800
<v Speaker 2>think of, Like this question was make me think about

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:46.480
<v Speaker 2>our partners, and I was kind of like like, like,

1:02:46.720 --> 1:02:49.640
<v Speaker 2>is there any dumbness that you overlook? Because I was

1:02:49.640 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>thinking about like like Misha is really unaware of like

1:02:53.200 --> 1:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>internet culture like at all, and mostly that's like fine,

1:02:57.960 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 2>but it will be funny to be like have you

1:02:59.320 --> 1:03:01.560
<v Speaker 2>heard about this? And he's like no, And it's just

1:03:01.600 --> 1:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of that thing where it's like I'm I'm I'm

1:03:04.320 --> 1:03:07.280
<v Speaker 2>just like it. My role is like always explaining what

1:03:07.400 --> 1:03:08.480
<v Speaker 2>is on the internet.

1:03:09.240 --> 1:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>The thing is because I have also I have that

1:03:12.320 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>role in various not necessarily with Matthew, but with friendships

1:03:16.040 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I have. It's easy to take that as meaning that

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>you are somehow smarter, but in many ways it means

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you are dumber, you know what I mean. Like it

1:03:26.200 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is it's like I mean, it depends, of course what

1:03:30.640 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the other person is doing instead of being on the

1:03:32.360 --> 1:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet at that time. But it's like I've had to

1:03:34.280 --> 1:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>explain stupid Internet things to someone knowing that they are

1:03:37.160 --> 1:03:39.959
<v Speaker 1>smarter than me and spend their time reading books rather

1:03:40.000 --> 1:03:42.840
<v Speaker 1>than you know, being online. Okay, I have an answer

1:03:42.880 --> 1:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to what is the dumb things Matthew and I overlook

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on one another. I hope it doesn't get mad at this.

1:03:48.720 --> 1:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>For him, it is a lack of spatial reasoning in

1:03:54.440 --> 1:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the on a small scale, so for example, trying to

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>make a salad in a bowl that's too that's self

1:04:00.560 --> 1:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>evidently too small, just being like, yeah, I can definitely

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>dress this salad in like a like a bowl.

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>That's like for Cereal, that's so funny.

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>And then for me it's actually spatial awareness on a

1:04:11.600 --> 1:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>larger scale, which I've talked about before, which is a

1:04:13.800 --> 1:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>lack of a sense of direction. Like I really am

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>like a little child when I'm walking around in New

1:04:18.840 --> 1:04:21.720
<v Speaker 1>York City even though it's a grid, like I just am.

1:04:21.840 --> 1:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I always have a difficult time orienting myself knowing what

1:04:25.000 --> 1:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>direction I'm going to. And I do think each of

1:04:27.080 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>us has learned that it's not something the other person's

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna like learn, Yeah, and you just have to like

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be okay with it.

1:04:35.400 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I definitely have a horrible sense of direction, and

1:04:40.640 --> 1:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm mostly I'm like inefficient in many ways in my life,

1:04:44.360 --> 1:04:47.640
<v Speaker 2>like and I think Misha overlooks that, like where it's

1:04:47.640 --> 1:04:50.080
<v Speaker 2>like he like cares about efficiency, like in the grocery store.

1:04:50.080 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>He like has a plan, and I'm like, I'll get

1:04:52.920 --> 1:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>it done when I get it done, like it takes

1:04:55.360 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I have a different journey.

1:04:56.880 --> 1:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. God, I'm just thinking that the top of the

1:05:00.960 --> 1:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>dumb boyfriend is really uh, there's a lot there. I

1:05:05.200 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>also want to say, it's interesting that the two kinds

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of bad boyfriends are almost too dumb and too smart. Yeah,

1:05:14.000 --> 1:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>if you sort of think about it, because the too

1:05:16.520 --> 1:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>smart one is almost the stereotype of like a man

1:05:21.120 --> 1:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that is so intellectual he becomes a misogynist, like he's

1:05:24.640 --> 1:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>so focused on his brain that he doesn't see his

1:05:27.960 --> 1:05:31.280
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend as a full person yea. And then the dumb

1:05:31.280 --> 1:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>one is like so dumb that he doesn't get that

1:05:33.480 --> 1:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>he should. Like, it's like the dumb one doesn't buy

1:05:37.160 --> 1:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a birthday gift because he's stupid. The smart one doesn't

1:05:40.040 --> 1:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>buy a birthday gift because he has some theory about

1:05:42.160 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like physical possessions. But both of them are ultimately not

1:05:45.720 --> 1:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>buying a birthday gift.

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's like a really smart thing you just said.

1:05:50.960 --> 1:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I think.

1:05:57.560 --> 1:06:00.840
<v Speaker 11>Is sama, George. I did colin earlier about time, but

1:06:01.000 --> 1:06:04.800
<v Speaker 11>I'm calling back with a different theory about pop girls

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:07.720
<v Speaker 11>and I would love for two of the greatest minds

1:06:07.760 --> 1:06:10.680
<v Speaker 11>of our generation to weigh in. So my friends and

1:06:10.680 --> 1:06:12.920
<v Speaker 11>I were at the Chapel Roon show in LA and

1:06:12.960 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 11>it got me thinking that I think a big reason

1:06:16.560 --> 1:06:19.600
<v Speaker 11>that why Chapel got so big so quickly is that

1:06:19.640 --> 1:06:24.440
<v Speaker 11>she had really strong appeal to the big three demographics

1:06:24.480 --> 1:06:29.480
<v Speaker 11>of pop girl fandom, so that is straight women, gay guys,

1:06:29.520 --> 1:06:32.520
<v Speaker 11>and gay women. And I think my friends and I

1:06:32.560 --> 1:06:34.920
<v Speaker 11>were actually struggling to think of another pop girl that

1:06:35.120 --> 1:06:39.000
<v Speaker 11>really has all three of these demographics to.

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:40.280
<v Speaker 4>The same extent that Chapel has.

1:06:40.280 --> 1:06:42.560
<v Speaker 11>I think it's common for people to have two of

1:06:42.640 --> 1:06:44.919
<v Speaker 11>the three, like Dua Lipa as an example. I think

1:06:44.960 --> 1:06:47.400
<v Speaker 11>straight women and gay guys she has, but I don't

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:51.120
<v Speaker 11>think lesbians cared about du Alipa. Lord is one that

1:06:51.120 --> 1:06:53.640
<v Speaker 11>we were torn on. We were I think Lord actually

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:56.120
<v Speaker 11>has had all three over the course of her career,

1:06:56.160 --> 1:06:58.680
<v Speaker 11>but I don't think she's had all three at the

1:06:58.720 --> 1:07:02.240
<v Speaker 11>same time. But we were really split on that one.

1:07:02.520 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 11>So yeah, I just wanted to get your guys thoughts.

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree?

1:07:05.400 --> 1:07:07.760
<v Speaker 11>Can you think of other pop girls that have all

1:07:07.760 --> 1:07:09.120
<v Speaker 11>three the way that Chappel does?

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Well?

1:07:10.320 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 11>Love for you guys to win in all right, love

1:07:12.200 --> 1:07:13.040
<v Speaker 11>you guys bye.

1:07:13.680 --> 1:07:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I think this is very smart. I really like this call.

1:07:18.560 --> 1:07:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I think I think the obvious one who has them

1:07:21.840 --> 1:07:26.880
<v Speaker 2>all is Gaga true. I think you know who did

1:07:27.000 --> 1:07:30.160
<v Speaker 2>who doesn't anymore. I think Casey Musgraves did with Golden

1:07:30.200 --> 1:07:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Hour and then doesn't anymore.

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I have an answer that you're not gonna like, but

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it is objectively true. Hit me with it, Taylor Swift

1:07:41.680 --> 1:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that it's just like we might not like it, but

1:07:45.160 --> 1:07:47.919
<v Speaker 1>it is completely true that Taylor Swift has all three

1:07:49.440 --> 1:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and has them bad. Like lesbians literally think she's gay.

1:07:54.000 --> 1:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Straight women think they are her like, they're literally like

1:07:56.960 --> 1:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>she is writing these songs for me and we had

1:07:58.560 --> 1:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the same exact experience growing up. And then gay men

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are of course like completely insane and basically like jumping

1:08:03.960 --> 1:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>off of various windows at all times. Yeah, and I

1:08:07.360 --> 1:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>just I do actually think it is an underdiscussed part

1:08:11.920 --> 1:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of her story is that sort of despite the fact

1:08:16.880 --> 1:08:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that she seems like a very specific kind of blonde

1:08:19.200 --> 1:08:24.559
<v Speaker 1>woman performer, she has this near universal appeal. And of course,

1:08:24.840 --> 1:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the thing with her brand of appeal to straight women

1:08:28.479 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is they will even like there's a sort of inoffensive

1:08:34.360 --> 1:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of pop culture product that straight women can introduce

1:08:39.000 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to their boyfriends and husbands. Yeah, I think it's more

1:08:42.080 --> 1:08:45.759
<v Speaker 1>challenging for them to introduce, I don't know, even something

1:08:45.800 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like Lord to their husbands, whereas I think Taylor Swift

1:08:49.479 --> 1:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me of how straight men love to joke

1:08:52.880 --> 1:08:55.520
<v Speaker 1>about how they watch like Love Island with their girlfriends.

1:08:55.600 --> 1:08:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

1:08:56.479 --> 1:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's actually like kind of the the barrier

1:09:02.040 --> 1:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>entry is low enough that they're able to kind of

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>like hop on and understand it and do it half earnestly,

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>half literally mocking their girlfriends and just sort of get

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>on board. And so I think, honestly, that would be

1:09:14.920 --> 1:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>my answer.

1:09:15.439 --> 1:09:17.679
<v Speaker 2>That's a good one. Beyonce I think has all three.

1:09:18.880 --> 1:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Beyonce has all three.

1:09:20.560 --> 1:09:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think of like who's close, Like I

1:09:24.120 --> 1:09:28.599
<v Speaker 2>think it's interesting. I'm thinking about like Ariana Grande, and

1:09:28.640 --> 1:09:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I actually think like doing Wicked is the closest she's

1:09:31.200 --> 1:09:32.599
<v Speaker 2>gotten to like getting all three.

1:09:33.320 --> 1:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>That's true actually, because then it's like the whole her

1:09:35.720 --> 1:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and Cynthia Revac connection and everyone loves her. I mean,

1:09:42.400 --> 1:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>does Demi have all three?

1:09:44.040 --> 1:09:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Demi kind of might have all three.

1:09:45.400 --> 1:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Actually might have all three, and I would even go

1:09:49.120 --> 1:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>so far as to say, okay, carry me out. Miley

1:09:52.960 --> 1:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>has all three, but it's like the niche. It's like

1:09:56.040 --> 1:09:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a minority of all three. Yeah, like there are passion

1:09:59.439 --> 1:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a passion memory of lesbian's, passionate minority of gay

1:10:01.760 --> 1:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>men and passionate minority of straight women.

1:10:03.520 --> 1:10:05.559
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but it's not enough. We don't know it.

1:10:05.560 --> 1:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not enough. And to be honest, I would even

1:10:07.880 --> 1:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>go so far as to say Pink has in her

1:10:10.840 --> 1:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>own way all three. It's just not the ones we

1:10:12.680 --> 1:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>would interact with. But I think lesbians love pink.

1:10:17.200 --> 1:10:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, we actually got a comment somewhere that was like

1:10:20.479 --> 1:10:20.960
<v Speaker 2>mad at.

1:10:20.920 --> 1:10:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Us, that was like that we erased lesbian fandom.

1:10:23.720 --> 1:10:26.360
<v Speaker 2>No, no, the opposite. They were like, lesbians don't love pink.

1:10:26.479 --> 1:10:29.160
<v Speaker 2>Don't say that. And I was like, WHOA, Okay.

1:10:29.320 --> 1:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. I've known lesbians who love pink. So maybe

1:10:32.160 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you get your facts straight, Chica, Yeah, say Sam and George.

1:10:37.920 --> 1:10:40.559
<v Speaker 11>So, my friends and I were at the Heim show

1:10:40.680 --> 1:10:43.799
<v Speaker 11>in La a few days ago. We had one observation

1:10:44.120 --> 1:10:48.240
<v Speaker 11>and one question. So the observation was that we were

1:10:48.280 --> 1:10:52.320
<v Speaker 11>all really surprised that Alana was actually the main talker

1:10:52.600 --> 1:10:55.240
<v Speaker 11>in between songs. She was like big bits and telling

1:10:55.320 --> 1:10:58.759
<v Speaker 11>stories and jokes, whereas we thought that would be SD's

1:10:58.840 --> 1:11:01.240
<v Speaker 11>role as like the stand up comedia in so they

1:11:01.320 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 11>kind of subverted our expectations on that one. And now

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:07.800
<v Speaker 11>the question, so we have we wanted to bring back

1:11:07.880 --> 1:11:11.839
<v Speaker 11>the Heimlich game. We're thinking about other bands with three

1:11:12.320 --> 1:11:18.280
<v Speaker 11>women and non binary people. So of these three bands, Heim, Muna,

1:11:18.439 --> 1:11:22.439
<v Speaker 11>and Boy Genius, which one is the Danielle, which one

1:11:22.479 --> 1:11:25.719
<v Speaker 11>is st and which one is Alana? This might break

1:11:25.760 --> 1:11:28.400
<v Speaker 11>the game, but we have our ideas of who's who.

1:11:28.400 --> 1:11:30.120
<v Speaker 11>Would love to hear your take.

1:11:31.160 --> 1:11:32.799
<v Speaker 5>All right, love you guys. Bye.

1:11:33.120 --> 1:11:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, First of all, this is the same color of

1:11:35.479 --> 1:11:36.719
<v Speaker 2>the chapel roone call.

1:11:37.400 --> 1:11:38.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh no is it?

1:11:38.560 --> 1:11:42.479
<v Speaker 2>It's yeah? Because she said, like I just called in

1:11:42.560 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 2>about him, But I have another question.

1:11:44.479 --> 1:11:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh whiopsis?

1:11:45.640 --> 1:11:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean shout out. I think I think Muna

1:11:54.960 --> 1:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>is SD because Muna loves comedy and Muna has a podcast,

1:11:59.479 --> 1:12:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and Muna has a podcast. I think you know what though,

1:12:05.160 --> 1:12:11.760
<v Speaker 2>what Heim's vertical video output is nearing st levels? Oh

1:12:11.800 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 2>my god, you know what I mean? Not really, but

1:12:14.360 --> 1:12:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm listening.

1:12:15.840 --> 1:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Wait, you don't I feel like I'm all Heim does

1:12:18.520 --> 1:12:21.519
<v Speaker 1>is do vertical videos that are like various dance challenges

1:12:21.520 --> 1:12:23.599
<v Speaker 1>and memes, and like they're being so silly and they're

1:12:23.640 --> 1:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>always making funny faces together and I almost think they're

1:12:28.040 --> 1:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like outsilly ing Muna, really, is this not like so

1:12:33.720 --> 1:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>much of your feed?

1:12:34.960 --> 1:12:35.680
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not.

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>That's so funny. I'm doing the very unhelpful thing of

1:12:39.280 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>being like, don't you know, don't you know this?

1:12:41.800 --> 1:12:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm looking, I'm looking at their Instagram now

1:12:43.760 --> 1:12:44.320
<v Speaker 2>is that you're talking?

1:12:44.360 --> 1:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like it's always some It's always some

1:12:46.800 --> 1:12:48.799
<v Speaker 1>dance challenge with Jimmy fallon with them.

1:12:50.720 --> 1:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, legit, like not seeing that on their on

1:12:54.960 --> 1:12:55.599
<v Speaker 2>their ig.

1:12:56.560 --> 1:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>That is shocking to me. To me, I mean, listen,

1:12:59.040 --> 1:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>maybe they maybe they've regretted their choices and have deleted

1:13:01.840 --> 1:13:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the videos. To me, when I when I envisioned Heim, okay,

1:13:06.560 --> 1:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>time to me the music aside, because I like the

1:13:09.320 --> 1:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>music of all three bands. Iim is doing a vertical

1:13:14.240 --> 1:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>video dance that ends in them doing a funny face.

1:13:17.320 --> 1:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Muna is they have a podcast and their guest is

1:13:20.439 --> 1:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Herron and boy Genius is they're randomly dating one another. Yeah,

1:13:28.520 --> 1:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>boy Genius is like the two It's like Lucy and

1:13:32.000 --> 1:13:36.479
<v Speaker 1>uh Julian are dating and then Phoebe Bridgers is dating

1:13:37.920 --> 1:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, Harris Dick consider or something.

1:13:39.479 --> 1:13:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I mean I think we have to at

1:13:42.880 --> 1:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>least agree that boy Genius is Danielle.

1:13:46.320 --> 1:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so.

1:13:47.600 --> 1:13:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And so the question is Alana or Muna is wait?

1:13:53.000 --> 1:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, Alana arresty. Well, I do think in a sense,

1:13:57.560 --> 1:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Muna is a Lana because they're like younger coded hmm,

1:14:04.479 --> 1:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that's true, and more like they're like care free and

1:14:11.240 --> 1:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>uh music, you know, like soundtrack soundtrack to like a

1:14:14.800 --> 1:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>cool movie. Sure, sure, sure, but then that would make

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm esty. I'm telling you. Heim is going Esti mode.

1:14:25.680 --> 1:14:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So him is Esti I'm okay. I mean I

1:14:28.680 --> 1:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>see what you mean. Like they're they're silly. They're like

1:14:31.560 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 2>like Muna likes comedy, but like in a sort of

1:14:36.600 --> 1:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>prestige way, like.

1:14:38.040 --> 1:14:40.599
<v Speaker 1>They like part of the comedy community. Muna is part

1:14:40.640 --> 1:14:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of the comedy community, right, Like they've been accepted into

1:14:43.320 --> 1:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the comedy community.

1:14:44.280 --> 1:14:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, whereas Heime is doing comedy like like Estie would.

1:14:52.720 --> 1:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly, I'm sorry, Sam. Go to Heim's Instagram and

1:14:57.160 --> 1:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>go on the reels. Tab you are gaslaighting me boots,

1:15:00.280 --> 1:15:01.439
<v Speaker 1>well the reel and.

1:15:03.160 --> 1:15:03.479
<v Speaker 3>They're not.

1:15:04.680 --> 1:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Go to the reels, tap and tell me what you're seeing.

1:15:11.560 --> 1:15:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Is every single one of them not a dance challenge.

1:15:15.800 --> 1:15:27.720
<v Speaker 2>They're literally not. They're making videos, but they're I'm I'm

1:15:27.760 --> 1:15:31.439
<v Speaker 2>not seeing any I'm okay, here's a dance challenge after

1:15:31.479 --> 1:15:36.639
<v Speaker 2>I've scrolled. Okay, the first one's dance challenge. Okay, the

1:15:37.439 --> 1:15:44.519
<v Speaker 2>fourth ones a dance challenge. I mean, they exist. I'm

1:15:44.560 --> 1:15:47.360
<v Speaker 2>just saying it's not it's not as prominent as what

1:15:47.479 --> 1:15:48.599
<v Speaker 2>you were saying.

1:15:49.160 --> 1:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's well, I'm looking at the rest of these.

1:15:53.880 --> 1:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm loving. First of all, I love the question we

1:15:56.240 --> 1:15:58.679
<v Speaker 1>got that was just dew. We like penises. I would

1:15:58.680 --> 1:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>say for me, it's a yes.

1:16:00.360 --> 1:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a yes for me.

1:16:03.360 --> 1:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I like the question. You know, we get this one

1:16:06.200 --> 1:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot, which is what do you do if you

1:16:07.600 --> 1:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>hate your job? Yeah, we have answered it a lot

1:16:10.960 --> 1:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in the past that I'm afraid that we don't have

1:16:12.880 --> 1:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>any new insights in that vein.

1:16:15.600 --> 1:16:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but listen to him's new album, but I quit.

1:16:19.280 --> 1:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Listen to him's album. Might quit. Someone called about the

1:16:22.840 --> 1:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>content versus context binary, which I wanna this is maybe

1:16:28.840 --> 1:16:30.640
<v Speaker 1>not the time for it, but I'm it's like one

1:16:30.640 --> 1:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite things we've talked about is that we

1:16:33.439 --> 1:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>are going from an era of content to an era

1:16:36.000 --> 1:16:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of context. Like what's more valuable now is not more content,

1:16:40.720 --> 1:16:43.439
<v Speaker 1>it's more context because there's so much content out there

1:16:43.600 --> 1:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that the person that's actually offering something new as a

1:16:46.000 --> 1:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>person who's able to recontextualize it. So that's fun, but

1:16:50.680 --> 1:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it does.

1:16:51.000 --> 1:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Get complicated when contextualization becomes content becomes content.

1:16:55.320 --> 1:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing because then if you're, for example, if

1:16:58.160 --> 1:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you are doing a let's say you're releasing a voter

1:17:03.040 --> 1:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>guide or let's say you're releasing a breakdown of a

1:17:06.800 --> 1:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>recent US story, you have to ask yourself, are you

1:17:09.880 --> 1:17:13.759
<v Speaker 1>actually providing context or are you just creating content.

1:17:14.880 --> 1:17:17.840
<v Speaker 2>My least favorite context is people that are like, did

1:17:17.880 --> 1:17:20.599
<v Speaker 2>you know that in two thousand and three this happened

1:17:20.600 --> 1:17:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and it caused this. I'm like okay, Like I'm sort

1:17:24.840 --> 1:17:27.479
<v Speaker 2>of like, yeah, we can all pull like random things

1:17:27.880 --> 1:17:31.400
<v Speaker 2>that have happened, Like what is the broader arc that

1:17:31.439 --> 1:17:33.599
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to write, Like, is this like a six

1:17:33.680 --> 1:17:36.559
<v Speaker 2>week course on like yeah, two thousand and three, or

1:17:36.560 --> 1:17:38.760
<v Speaker 2>are you just like saying, like, isn't it crazy that

1:17:38.800 --> 1:17:39.719
<v Speaker 2>this boat crashed?

1:17:40.360 --> 1:17:42.599
<v Speaker 1>I know, well, what you're talking about also is very

1:17:42.640 --> 1:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like the There's been a huge increase in celebrating anniversaries

1:17:51.439 --> 1:17:54.519
<v Speaker 1>of pop culture events. It's always like today, Mark's the

1:17:54.600 --> 1:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth anniversary of Demita Joe. I'm like, I love Dmia Joe,

1:17:58.640 --> 1:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>but I actually don't need to know about the seven

1:18:00.080 --> 1:18:00.960
<v Speaker 1>teenth anniversary.

1:18:01.920 --> 1:18:04.000
<v Speaker 2>That is unfortunately one of my favorite things.

1:18:04.120 --> 1:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Where they're like.

1:18:05.080 --> 1:18:09.120
<v Speaker 2>Twenty second anniversary of Blank Yeah, and I'm like, damn slow.

1:18:08.920 --> 1:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>News dash And I know that it's also like sort

1:18:11.800 --> 1:18:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of like they're doing it because they want people to

1:18:14.960 --> 1:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>make fun of them.

1:18:15.920 --> 1:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:18:18.439 --> 1:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Very quickly. People have been really asking your thoughts on

1:18:21.600 --> 1:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Tyra Banks releasing hot ice cream, which is something you've

1:18:25.000 --> 1:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>always wished what happened?

1:18:27.360 --> 1:18:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I've always I thought ice cream was far

1:18:30.840 --> 1:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>too cold. This is a known opinion of mine, and

1:18:34.040 --> 1:18:36.280
<v Speaker 2>I stand by it. That being said, do I want

1:18:36.360 --> 1:18:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to be hot? Not necessarily. I've always said I want

1:18:39.080 --> 1:18:43.560
<v Speaker 2>lukewarm ice cream that it still has its texture.

1:18:44.320 --> 1:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So you don't want like a crembulet or like a.

1:18:46.960 --> 1:18:51.880
<v Speaker 2>God No, if anything, the closest thing that I want

1:18:52.200 --> 1:18:54.559
<v Speaker 2>is a soft cookie. Like a soft cookie to me,

1:18:54.640 --> 1:18:56.920
<v Speaker 2>is the closest thing we have to warm ice cream.

1:18:57.080 --> 1:18:59.759
<v Speaker 2>I see, I see, And.

1:18:59.680 --> 1:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>So don't you don't like like a panacatta or like

1:19:02.760 --> 1:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a custardy dessert. I mean cheesecake. Okay, cheese cake, I

1:19:08.840 --> 1:19:11.599
<v Speaker 1>would say, is pretty close to room temperature ice cream.

1:19:12.160 --> 1:19:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's you know, You're right, You're right, it's close,

1:19:16.320 --> 1:19:19.920
<v Speaker 2>but it's not exactly on the nose. And I don't

1:19:19.920 --> 1:19:21.880
<v Speaker 2>know what science she's cooking up. I have not like

1:19:22.000 --> 1:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>watched the full video, even though people have sent it

1:19:25.080 --> 1:19:28.120
<v Speaker 2>to me. I was just like, I don't want to support, oh,

1:19:28.160 --> 1:19:29.599
<v Speaker 2>someone losing their mind.

1:19:29.880 --> 1:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. You know, there's a whole genre of things people

1:19:33.920 --> 1:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>send to us that we just never address, and this

1:19:36.960 --> 1:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>is one of them. And I actually think that's I

1:19:41.040 --> 1:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think there's a way to drive yourself crazy where you're

1:19:43.120 --> 1:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>like interacting with something like that and constantly being like

1:19:45.160 --> 1:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>stop sending please, we've seen it, and then you it

1:19:48.840 --> 1:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>like makes you drive yourself crazy. Honestly, one thing like that,

1:19:52.240 --> 1:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>And I want to say this publicly because we've never

1:19:53.920 --> 1:19:55.519
<v Speaker 1>addressed this. The meme.

1:19:55.760 --> 1:19:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Address it.

1:19:57.000 --> 1:20:00.400
<v Speaker 1>The meme where there are two doors once they one

1:20:00.439 --> 1:20:02.880
<v Speaker 1>says top a twink, and the other one says stop

1:20:02.920 --> 1:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>and think, and there are a lot of people lined

1:20:05.720 --> 1:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>up behind the door that says top a twink. Okay,

1:20:08.880 --> 1:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>So this is sent to us once a day. It

1:20:12.080 --> 1:20:16.680
<v Speaker 1>has been happening for pretty much five years. Yeah, and

1:20:16.760 --> 1:20:19.479
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, all of we've seen it.

1:20:21.400 --> 1:20:24.880
<v Speaker 1>You don't understand the frequency with which it is sent

1:20:24.920 --> 1:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>to us. This is something that is reposted by meme

1:20:27.280 --> 1:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>accounts daily, like it is something that has existed out there.

1:20:30.920 --> 1:20:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Every day, someone discovers it and sends it and says, oh,

1:20:34.479 --> 1:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a straight shooter if I've ever heard one.

1:20:36.920 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they do do that, and we appreciate support. But

1:20:40.600 --> 1:20:41.320
<v Speaker 2>we have seen it.

1:20:41.800 --> 1:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>We have seen it, and we think it's high hilarious.

1:20:47.200 --> 1:20:49.639
<v Speaker 2>As we're wrapping up, I'm like, yes, what's your mood

1:20:49.760 --> 1:20:50.360
<v Speaker 2>like right now?

1:20:51.280 --> 1:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not good, But it has nothing to do with

1:20:53.880 --> 1:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you or this recording. It has to do with like

1:20:56.360 --> 1:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>me being in a bad mood.

1:20:57.479 --> 1:21:01.840
<v Speaker 2>How is your mood the same? I guess. I was like, sometimes,

1:21:01.880 --> 1:21:04.000
<v Speaker 2>if I'm being honest, when we do these and we

1:21:04.160 --> 1:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>both start in bad moods, we end in amazing moods.

1:21:07.760 --> 1:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And I was like kind of hoping for that, like

1:21:09.920 --> 1:21:16.720
<v Speaker 2>take off, I know, but we will push through. And

1:21:18.560 --> 1:21:20.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm coming to New York next week. We're going to

1:21:20.479 --> 1:21:22.479
<v Speaker 2>start and then you're coming to LA. We're gonna do

1:21:22.479 --> 1:21:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of amazing records.

1:21:24.200 --> 1:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to pull up our straighter lab email because

1:21:27.080 --> 1:21:29.679
<v Speaker 1>there were some written ones, and of course my internet

1:21:29.720 --> 1:21:30.559
<v Speaker 1>is like not loading.

1:21:30.680 --> 1:21:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Oh I can do that. This one is from Toronto.

1:21:35.479 --> 1:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We can.

1:21:35.840 --> 1:21:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I can just read it out loud, me to side, Okay.

1:21:38.160 --> 1:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm taking trans vocal lessons and in these classes usually

1:21:41.120 --> 1:21:43.080
<v Speaker 2>your first assignment is to find out who your voice

1:21:43.080 --> 1:21:46.599
<v Speaker 2>inspiration is a celebrity or a podcaster whose tone rasp

1:21:46.680 --> 1:21:50.000
<v Speaker 2>intonation you like to work towards your men? Who's your

1:21:50.120 --> 1:21:53.720
<v Speaker 2>vocal inspiration or if you were to transition mask or

1:21:53.800 --> 1:21:55.320
<v Speaker 2>fem you pick who would it be.

1:21:56.680 --> 1:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's a good one.

1:21:57.760 --> 1:21:58.559
<v Speaker 2>That is a good question.

1:21:59.080 --> 1:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>What is yours? This is a fun one to end on.

1:22:02.400 --> 1:22:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, this is an interesting one as especially considering our

1:22:07.680 --> 1:22:13.120
<v Speaker 2>voices are our jobs for this podcast currently. And I

1:22:13.160 --> 1:22:15.640
<v Speaker 2>think it's weird because I've never considered my voice to

1:22:15.640 --> 1:22:19.960
<v Speaker 2>be particularly good like I have, Like when I was

1:22:19.960 --> 1:22:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a kid, I went to like speech therapy because I have,

1:22:22.280 --> 1:22:25.680
<v Speaker 2>like a something in my nasal path is weird that

1:22:25.760 --> 1:22:27.760
<v Speaker 2>makes my voice sound nasally, so I had to like

1:22:28.400 --> 1:22:31.200
<v Speaker 2>go to speech therapy to like it' stop talking like

1:22:31.479 --> 1:22:35.920
<v Speaker 2>this and and so I'm like, I even feel like

1:22:35.920 --> 1:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>what I do already is put on, but I don't

1:22:38.160 --> 1:22:42.840
<v Speaker 2>know how. I think it's sort of like a I

1:22:42.880 --> 1:22:47.160
<v Speaker 2>also think you have a potentially interesting answer similar because

1:22:47.160 --> 1:22:49.479
<v Speaker 2>I had, like, because I moved around to different regions

1:22:49.479 --> 1:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>of the US, I never like got one accent. Like

1:22:53.920 --> 1:22:55.280
<v Speaker 2>there was a point when I was in Midwest long

1:22:55.360 --> 1:22:57.120
<v Speaker 2>enough where I got a Midwestern accent, but then I

1:22:57.160 --> 1:22:59.639
<v Speaker 2>moved and but I never picked up like a Southern accent.

1:23:00.200 --> 1:23:03.400
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just like this sort of vague, but I

1:23:03.439 --> 1:23:06.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know what my voice fantasy would be.

1:23:06.439 --> 1:23:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you have one? I know it's I don't. I

1:23:11.040 --> 1:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>The dream, of course, is like a neutral voice that

1:23:13.960 --> 1:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>only sounds slightly sophisticated, because you don't because it's so

1:23:17.840 --> 1:23:21.400
<v Speaker 1>easy to sound either quote too gay or too like pretentious,

1:23:21.840 --> 1:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>like there is just anytime you're expressing an opinion in

1:23:26.680 --> 1:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>an audio mode, it's easy to become obnoxious or sound condescending,

1:23:33.280 --> 1:23:37.360
<v Speaker 1>or sound like you're way too sure of yourself. This

1:23:37.439 --> 1:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>is I m'd say it's a humiliating thing. But I

1:23:40.439 --> 1:23:42.560
<v Speaker 1>think that because both of us have listened to this

1:23:42.600 --> 1:23:45.759
<v Speaker 1>slave culture gap fest semi ironically for the last ten years,

1:23:46.320 --> 1:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think often I will emulate Stephen Metcalf's vocal patterns.

1:23:50.320 --> 1:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting, or at least attempt to.

1:23:55.479 --> 1:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I would say that it would be really nice for

1:23:59.360 --> 1:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>me to have a vote goal, because what ends up

1:24:02.120 --> 1:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>happening with me is there are so many people that

1:24:04.360 --> 1:24:07.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to sound like that. I'm constantly having to

1:24:08.040 --> 1:24:12.519
<v Speaker 1>find my I'm constantly finding myself going a little too

1:24:12.560 --> 1:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>far in a direction I don't want to and then

1:24:14.320 --> 1:24:16.559
<v Speaker 1>bringing it back such that I end up having an

1:24:16.560 --> 1:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>almost monotone, boring voice because I don't want to sound

1:24:20.400 --> 1:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>like too much like one or other person. And so

1:24:26.240 --> 1:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely true and stand up. Yeah, Like, there

1:24:30.320 --> 1:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>are just certain other gay comedians that it is easy

1:24:33.439 --> 1:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to emulate if you allow yourself. I think for straight people,

1:24:36.200 --> 1:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>so many of them fall into John Mulaney, so many

1:24:38.120 --> 1:24:41.559
<v Speaker 1>of them fall into Luis c. K, so many of

1:24:41.560 --> 1:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>them fall into like like Bill Burr, like it's it's

1:24:50.600 --> 1:24:53.680
<v Speaker 1>such a thing, or even like a lot of old

1:24:53.720 --> 1:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>comedians will fall into Maria Bamford. Yeah. Yeah, so so

1:24:58.760 --> 1:25:00.599
<v Speaker 1>it would be nice. It would be nice to have

1:25:00.760 --> 1:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a vocal a vocal goal. Okay, I'll say this.

1:25:06.000 --> 1:25:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Is okay, here we go, let's hear it. I can't wait.

1:25:11.360 --> 1:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Wait, did you have something you wanted to say?

1:25:12.680 --> 1:25:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was gonna say that. Ever since I've moved

1:25:15.280 --> 1:25:16.760
<v Speaker 2>to LA and of course I've been listening to How

1:25:16.760 --> 1:25:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Long Gone constantly, I do find myself butchering it up

1:25:19.840 --> 1:25:23.640
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more. Really, yeah, I hear myself like

1:25:23.960 --> 1:25:28.400
<v Speaker 2>say more mask things that are like like I have

1:25:28.520 --> 1:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>like a little cadence of like slightly butcher.

1:25:32.240 --> 1:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, dude, like like like.

1:25:35.400 --> 1:25:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to think of like it was hard to

1:25:37.600 --> 1:25:41.400
<v Speaker 2>think of an example, but I do find myself like

1:25:41.439 --> 1:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>almost like it's sort of like a you're gonna want

1:25:44.080 --> 1:25:47.320
<v Speaker 2>to go ahead and do that like that type of thing. Yeah,

1:25:47.360 --> 1:25:49.880
<v Speaker 2>where it's it's not fully like I'm not pretending to

1:25:49.960 --> 1:25:52.120
<v Speaker 2>be straight, but it is like a little bit of

1:25:52.120 --> 1:25:54.880
<v Speaker 2>a straight eye cadence that I've picked up from listening

1:25:54.880 --> 1:25:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to them.

1:25:55.680 --> 1:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you listen to Doom Scroll?

1:25:57.640 --> 1:25:57.720
<v Speaker 2>No?

1:25:58.600 --> 1:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>So it's the it's a it's an interview show. The

1:26:02.479 --> 1:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>host name is Joshua Ciderella. He like used to be

1:26:04.720 --> 1:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>an artist or maybe sell identify an artists I know,

1:26:06.840 --> 1:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>but is also does this podcast. He's had good people.

1:26:10.240 --> 1:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Actually Grimes was just randomly just on it this way.

1:26:14.000 --> 1:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But he has what I would describe as like a

1:26:16.560 --> 1:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>truly like neutral male voice. It's like not too mask

1:26:21.400 --> 1:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and not too gay, and I almost think that's like

1:26:28.240 --> 1:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>best case scenario. And I think, honestly, and I'm sorry,

1:26:31.120 --> 1:26:33.799
<v Speaker 1>if he's listening, it makes him sound a little less

1:26:35.120 --> 1:26:37.599
<v Speaker 1>confident in what he's saying in a little and even

1:26:37.640 --> 1:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes a little less smart because he isn't like doming

1:26:41.439 --> 1:26:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the interviewee, which I think is nice. It's nice to

1:26:44.680 --> 1:26:49.879
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of curiosity and not immediately know exactly

1:26:49.960 --> 1:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>what you want to say. And it's almost like the

1:26:52.800 --> 1:26:56.360
<v Speaker 1>less harmful, the less harmful version of like THEO Vaughn

1:26:56.439 --> 1:26:58.160
<v Speaker 1>doing that but being like a complete moron.

1:26:58.560 --> 1:27:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, yeah, yeah yeah yeah.

1:27:01.400 --> 1:27:05.559
<v Speaker 1>So I guess that would be one of my vocal

1:27:06.360 --> 1:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>vocal role models.

1:27:08.080 --> 1:27:10.439
<v Speaker 2>I definitely also when we started this podcast, I remember

1:27:10.520 --> 1:27:13.080
<v Speaker 2>being like that being more of a pressing issue of

1:27:13.439 --> 1:27:15.400
<v Speaker 2>being like how do we want to sound?

1:27:15.720 --> 1:27:17.559
<v Speaker 1>I know, but then you just sort of like find

1:27:17.600 --> 1:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>all into a pattern.

1:27:18.600 --> 1:27:21.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because it was like I remember like always joking

1:27:21.560 --> 1:27:24.360
<v Speaker 2>at the beginning and being like, we're being Mark Mayeron,

1:27:24.400 --> 1:27:26.320
<v Speaker 2>We're being Pete Holmes, We're being.

1:27:26.160 --> 1:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, we were so self aware parentheses derogatory sometimes

1:27:32.600 --> 1:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>like there was just I was so petrified of coming

1:27:35.280 --> 1:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>across as either stupid or unoriginal or whatever. And you

1:27:41.040 --> 1:27:45.599
<v Speaker 1>just gotta gotta have faith that like on average, you're

1:27:45.640 --> 1:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>occasionally saying some insightful things.

1:27:48.960 --> 1:27:51.960
<v Speaker 2>God. I also just.

1:27:51.880 --> 1:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Want to say, just because this color is talking about transitioning,

1:27:54.560 --> 1:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we get a lot of calls from callers who are transitioning.

1:27:59.200 --> 1:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I will say it. And we had another one that

1:28:01.640 --> 1:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was a trans guy that is wondering if he should,

1:28:06.240 --> 1:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's a gay trans guy, and he's wondering if

1:28:08.920 --> 1:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>he needs to abandon indie rock because he needs to

1:28:13.160 --> 1:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>get into pop girlies because he's a gay guy. And

1:28:15.640 --> 1:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say, no, you should. It's cool

1:28:19.200 --> 1:28:21.479
<v Speaker 1>to like being a gay guy who likes indie rock.

1:28:21.600 --> 1:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is honestly one of the most ethical things

1:28:24.080 --> 1:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you can be at this moment in time.

1:28:25.400 --> 1:28:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I completely disagree.

1:28:26.920 --> 1:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Wow, really.

1:28:30.640 --> 1:28:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I think you have to like let go of indie

1:28:34.360 --> 1:28:38.840
<v Speaker 2>rock for like five years and like be the dumb

1:28:38.960 --> 1:28:41.800
<v Speaker 2>gay guy you've heard about in the stories, and then

1:28:42.000 --> 1:28:45.000
<v Speaker 2>you have to find your way back home like once

1:28:45.040 --> 1:28:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you've fully immersed yourself. Yeah, I think it like hits

1:28:48.840 --> 1:28:51.360
<v Speaker 2>harder when you like let go of the wall and

1:28:51.439 --> 1:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>are sort of like you'll never forget the indie rock

1:28:54.800 --> 1:28:56.800
<v Speaker 2>and you can always you can always revisit and it

1:28:56.880 --> 1:29:00.000
<v Speaker 2>will come back around. But to make the full commitment

1:29:00.280 --> 1:29:04.839
<v Speaker 2>to the like and also just like you'll find yourself

1:29:04.920 --> 1:29:08.680
<v Speaker 2>being like well to have a conversation with these like

1:29:09.240 --> 1:29:11.519
<v Speaker 2>random gig guys I just met, I do actually need

1:29:11.560 --> 1:29:15.759
<v Speaker 2>to know like what Sabrina Carpenter's fifth album was about,

1:29:16.479 --> 1:29:19.360
<v Speaker 2>like rather than the one before, Short and Sweet, like,

1:29:19.600 --> 1:29:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and so you find yourself like becoming encyclopedic about that,

1:29:23.560 --> 1:29:27.000
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's a helpful tool. And then one

1:29:27.040 --> 1:29:29.639
<v Speaker 2>day you'll you know, you'll go back home.

1:29:30.200 --> 1:29:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you find yourself having constant conversations about pop stars

1:29:34.960 --> 1:29:39.519
<v Speaker 1>outside of this podcast? Literally yes, Okay, because I don't,

1:29:39.720 --> 1:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's actually always like, actually, something I've really

1:29:43.160 --> 1:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>like appreciated and enjoyed about our time together is that,

1:29:48.479 --> 1:29:50.720
<v Speaker 1>like I because I know it's something we're going to

1:29:50.800 --> 1:29:54.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about I'm becoming more informed, but I don't feel

1:29:54.400 --> 1:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>like with the other gay en in my life, that's

1:29:56.160 --> 1:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>like one of the main topics.

1:29:57.800 --> 1:30:01.519
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like like drag Race, where of like

1:30:01.840 --> 1:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>at this point, I watch it in the same way

1:30:04.120 --> 1:30:06.679
<v Speaker 2>that like I think many straight men watch sports, where

1:30:06.680 --> 1:30:08.080
<v Speaker 2>it's like I just need to be able to have

1:30:08.120 --> 1:30:10.439
<v Speaker 2>a conversation with like the gig guy I just met.

1:30:12.400 --> 1:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's true. That's true. Well, oh and by the way,

1:30:16.080 --> 1:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>another thing we keep getting calls about is our thoughts

1:30:19.320 --> 1:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on marriage and open relationships, and I'm kind of like, hmmm.

1:30:24.080 --> 1:30:33.400
<v Speaker 2>No, yeah, and mostly I have to agree.

1:30:34.040 --> 1:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And that's pretty much it. I enjoyed the question

1:30:39.439 --> 1:30:42.879
<v Speaker 1>that asked us if you got paid seven thousand dollars

1:30:42.920 --> 1:30:46.559
<v Speaker 1>every time you gave Zach Braf a concussion, how many

1:30:46.560 --> 1:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>concussions would you give him.

1:30:48.960 --> 1:30:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Enough concussions to have three million dollars?

1:30:51.720 --> 1:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and rest in power, Zach Braf.

1:30:57.000 --> 1:30:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Not because I particularly hate him. It's just a cruel,

1:30:59.439 --> 1:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>cruel world we live in, and of all the ways

1:31:01.880 --> 1:31:04.080
<v Speaker 2>to make three million dollars, that's almost more ethical.

1:31:04.800 --> 1:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It is a little bit like you would harm fewer

1:31:07.200 --> 1:31:10.519
<v Speaker 1>people literally you would only in fact harm Zach Braff,

1:31:10.560 --> 1:31:13.519
<v Speaker 1>who's had a pretty long, in full life, full career.

1:31:13.560 --> 1:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>He got to Dave Florence Pew.

1:31:15.280 --> 1:31:16.080
<v Speaker 2>That must have been fun.

1:31:16.479 --> 1:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>That must have been great. Not a lot of people

1:31:17.960 --> 1:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>can say that. No, he was in a hit show.

1:31:20.360 --> 1:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>He got to literally become an indie Darling filmmaker.

1:31:23.200 --> 1:31:26.320
<v Speaker 2>For a while. He pretty much invented the shins.

1:31:26.560 --> 1:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>He invented the shins and invented the idea of a

1:31:28.840 --> 1:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>manic Dixie dream girl. There's enough. If Zach Braff died

1:31:33.080 --> 1:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of thirty five million concussions tomorrow, there would be so

1:31:36.760 --> 1:31:37.639
<v Speaker 1>much in his oh bit.

1:31:38.040 --> 1:31:40.880
<v Speaker 2>People would be and people it honestly would be good

1:31:40.880 --> 1:31:44.200
<v Speaker 2>for his career because he could be like like that.

1:31:44.240 --> 1:31:47.160
<v Speaker 2>People would come back around, because people really don't like

1:31:47.240 --> 1:31:49.599
<v Speaker 2>him right now in a way that as soon as

1:31:49.600 --> 1:31:53.120
<v Speaker 2>he were to get thirty five million concussions, he would

1:31:53.160 --> 1:31:56.799
<v Speaker 2>be like a fucking saint. Move over, Charlie Kirk.

1:31:57.080 --> 1:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>No, completely, it would be. It would it would be

1:31:59.680 --> 1:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the chart crcification of Zach Braff, and people would you know,

1:32:02.960 --> 1:32:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Garden State is not a great movie, but it's good

1:32:05.600 --> 1:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>enough that people can read it like if he died,

1:32:08.479 --> 1:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, young people who didn't live through the Manic

1:32:12.160 --> 1:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Pixie Dream Wars would reclaim it and be like, this

1:32:14.720 --> 1:32:17.439
<v Speaker 1>is actually like really aesthetic. Yeah, that's what they would say.

1:32:17.439 --> 1:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>They would say, that's really aesthetic, that's really aesthetic.

1:32:20.040 --> 1:32:23.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Manic Pixie Dream Wars is one of that's an

1:32:23.120 --> 1:32:23.920
<v Speaker 2>amazing sentence.

1:32:24.200 --> 1:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's true that was the original Girl Boss.

1:32:26.840 --> 1:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, they keep inventing archetypes so they can tear

1:32:28.760 --> 1:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>women down.

1:32:29.960 --> 1:32:33.680
<v Speaker 2>George, I have to sincerely apologize about what because I

1:32:34.000 --> 1:32:37.439
<v Speaker 2>was really against the Zach Braff question and that was

1:32:37.479 --> 1:32:38.360
<v Speaker 2>my favorite one.

1:32:38.920 --> 1:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, this is and I don't want to like create

1:32:41.920 --> 1:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>more drama. But but that's why I was like confused.

1:32:45.160 --> 1:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, you're not attracted to the fun ones.

1:32:49.000 --> 1:32:51.200
<v Speaker 2>That's not that it's I was sort of like, he

1:32:51.439 --> 1:32:54.519
<v Speaker 2>can I okay, sometimes we also need to stop. We

1:32:54.640 --> 1:32:56.280
<v Speaker 2>literally need to stop. This is a This is an

1:32:56.280 --> 1:32:59.920
<v Speaker 2>interesting exploration. Sometimes when people and shout out to the caller,

1:33:00.160 --> 1:33:03.120
<v Speaker 2>nothing but love, nothing but respect, But when a call

1:33:03.200 --> 1:33:05.840
<v Speaker 2>is trying too hard to be funny, I get turned off.

1:33:06.120 --> 1:33:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure, no, I get it, and you're saying your happy

1:33:11.080 --> 1:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>medium is what movie would win. Charlie and Oscar because

1:33:14.200 --> 1:33:17.559
<v Speaker 1>it's funny enough. But it's not like I'm the joker

1:33:17.640 --> 1:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>on stage with my notebook doing stand up in Todd

1:33:20.120 --> 1:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Phillips as the joker, exactly.

1:33:23.240 --> 1:33:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Exactly.

1:33:24.640 --> 1:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>That's fair.

1:33:25.600 --> 1:33:28.599
<v Speaker 2>But what I forget is when I don't love a question,

1:33:28.800 --> 1:33:33.559
<v Speaker 2>I can almost answer it with more disdain and more

1:33:34.040 --> 1:33:37.639
<v Speaker 2>abandoned because it's less pressure.

1:33:37.920 --> 1:33:41.479
<v Speaker 1>And and that's the other thing with like the non

1:33:41.520 --> 1:33:44.240
<v Speaker 1>pop culture ones, because I don't want to be part

1:33:44.240 --> 1:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of a discourse.

1:33:46.160 --> 1:33:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Honey, you believe in discourse you're in.

1:33:49.000 --> 1:33:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't want to.

1:33:52.920 --> 1:33:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to.

1:33:54.439 --> 1:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's it.

1:33:56.360 --> 1:34:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Like this episode is amazing, of course I agree, it's

1:34:02.240 --> 1:34:05.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be not amazing for our editor, shout out sorry,

1:34:06.160 --> 1:34:10.519
<v Speaker 2>and other than that, thanks for listening, thanks for calling.

1:34:10.920 --> 1:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And in conclusion, Sam, I was just wondering, what is

1:34:13.080 --> 1:34:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a piece of media you loved in your youth that

1:34:15.000 --> 1:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you now hate nothing.

1:34:18.720 --> 1:34:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I the little boy that loved whatever was right, and

1:34:21.960 --> 1:34:25.160
<v Speaker 2>while I'm not able to appreciate it now, it meant

1:34:25.200 --> 1:34:29.160
<v Speaker 2>something then. And I guess I would have to say.

1:34:29.360 --> 1:34:31.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, I will say I was gas lit by

1:34:31.280 --> 1:34:32.280
<v Speaker 2>some things as a child.

1:34:32.720 --> 1:34:34.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny, is I said that as a joke,

1:34:34.439 --> 1:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>so we would end there. But I love that you're

1:34:36.200 --> 1:34:37.799
<v Speaker 1>answering question because.

1:34:38.320 --> 1:34:41.760
<v Speaker 2>I never liked you liked I never liked Flubber. I

1:34:41.840 --> 1:34:43.720
<v Speaker 2>was gaslate and just having to tell people that I

1:34:43.800 --> 1:34:45.519
<v Speaker 2>like Flubber. I never liked Flubber.

1:34:45.720 --> 1:34:47.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, this morning I had breakfast with my dear

1:34:47.760 --> 1:34:52.320
<v Speaker 1>friend Jenna. She goes, she was like, it's like she

1:34:52.439 --> 1:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>was talking about something else, and she goes, it's like,

1:34:53.920 --> 1:34:57.720
<v Speaker 1>how I hate Robin Williams. And I was like, excuse me,

1:34:59.720 --> 1:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that's crazy.

1:35:00.360 --> 1:35:01.080
<v Speaker 2>What was her take?

1:35:01.160 --> 1:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Did she say? I don't know, but I think it's

1:35:03.040 --> 1:35:05.519
<v Speaker 1>like he's doing too much and it like, which I get,

1:35:05.600 --> 1:35:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's of course your first one's first reaction to

1:35:10.360 --> 1:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Robin Williams. Then you have to like move past that

1:35:13.200 --> 1:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in order to like understand his genius. But I guess,

1:35:16.040 --> 1:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>but I do think Flebber because you know, just on

1:35:18.400 --> 1:35:20.479
<v Speaker 1>a script level, there's not much happening there. It is

1:35:20.640 --> 1:35:21.679
<v Speaker 1>just him doing too much.

1:35:22.280 --> 1:35:25.759
<v Speaker 2>No, that movie I went and saw in the theaters

1:35:26.240 --> 1:35:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and it was that thing where you're a little kid

1:35:27.880 --> 1:35:30.040
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, I know, I should have liked that more.

1:35:30.080 --> 1:35:31.760
<v Speaker 2>So I'm just gonna say I liked this.

1:35:32.280 --> 1:35:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, here's the thing. When we were little kids,

1:35:35.160 --> 1:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>seeing Robin Williams, Jim Carrey and Eddie Murphy overact could

1:35:41.479 --> 1:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>be scary. Yeah that's scary.

1:35:46.040 --> 1:35:47.080
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot for a child.

1:35:47.320 --> 1:35:49.559
<v Speaker 1>That's an adult man doing all that.

1:35:50.120 --> 1:35:53.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's not right, that's not okay.

1:35:55.439 --> 1:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Those actors are not safe for children. Those actors should

1:35:58.760 --> 1:35:59.439
<v Speaker 1>be for adults.

1:36:00.280 --> 1:36:03.120
<v Speaker 2>The actor should be for adults. And then the other

1:36:03.120 --> 1:36:05.160
<v Speaker 2>one I want to say is this is going to

1:36:05.200 --> 1:36:09.599
<v Speaker 2>be really controversial, but I can't stop thinking it. I

1:36:09.640 --> 1:36:12.080
<v Speaker 2>love Spice World as a child. I think Spice World

1:36:12.160 --> 1:36:15.320
<v Speaker 2>has some amazing alt comedy bits and it's really impressive

1:36:15.439 --> 1:36:17.840
<v Speaker 2>that the level of humor they were working with. But

1:36:17.920 --> 1:36:21.920
<v Speaker 2>when you rewatch it, it is long as fuck. No,

1:36:22.000 --> 1:36:25.920
<v Speaker 2>it's bad, and they should make a compilation of all

1:36:25.960 --> 1:36:28.120
<v Speaker 2>the amazing bits in it and cut out all that

1:36:28.240 --> 1:36:29.160
<v Speaker 2>fucking filler.

1:36:29.840 --> 1:36:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Spicer wyl would be an amazing movie to cut into

1:36:32.280 --> 1:36:36.280
<v Speaker 1>vertical videos that are shareable online and if anyone over

1:36:36.320 --> 1:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>there is.

1:36:36.600 --> 1:36:39.639
<v Speaker 2>Thinking, and according to our Joe Sunday interview, the youth

1:36:39.720 --> 1:36:40.120
<v Speaker 2>needs it.

1:36:44.520 --> 1:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to say people are feel free

1:36:46.400 --> 1:36:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to stop commenting on that specific video. I think we've

1:36:49.160 --> 1:36:51.720
<v Speaker 1>heard all the takes we need and by the way,

1:36:51.760 --> 1:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>none of you are funny.

1:36:53.560 --> 1:36:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Whoa Okay, love y'all, Love y'all, Happy November bye podcast and.

1:36:58.840 --> 1:37:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Now want more more? Subscribe to our Patreon for two

1:37:02.560 --> 1:37:06.280
<v Speaker 1>extra episodes a month, discord access and more by heading

1:37:06.320 --> 1:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to patreon dot com. Slash Stradio Lab.

1:37:09.320 --> 1:37:11.920
<v Speaker 2>And for all our visual earners, free full length video

1:37:11.920 --> 1:37:13.400
<v Speaker 2>episodes are available on our.

1:37:13.320 --> 1:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube now Get back to Work.

1:37:15.280 --> 1:37:17.639
<v Speaker 2>Stradia Lab is a production by Will Ferrell's Big Money

1:37:17.680 --> 1:37:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Players Network and iHeart Podcasts.

1:37:19.560 --> 1:37:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Created and hosted by George Severis and Sam Taggart.

1:37:22.479 --> 1:37:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Executive produced by Will Ferrell, Han Soni and Olivia Aguilar.

1:37:26.200 --> 1:37:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Co produced by by Wang, edited.

1:37:28.080 --> 1:37:29.640
<v Speaker 2>And engineered by Adam Avalos.

1:37:29.960 --> 1:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Artwork by Michael Failes and Matt Grugg.

1:37:32.200 --> 1:37:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Theme music by Ben Kling.