1 00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:14,360 Speaker 1: Hey, Brian, Hi Katie, Brian, that song is for you 2 00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:18,160 Speaker 1: because it's a wonderful day here at the pod because 3 00:00:18,200 --> 00:00:21,200 Speaker 1: the mid term elections are right around the corner on Tuesday, 4 00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:25,000 Speaker 1: November six and it's all about the mid terms today 5 00:00:25,239 --> 00:00:28,280 Speaker 1: on our podcast. Brian and I couldn't be more excited. 6 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:31,120 Speaker 1: I'm like a kidna candy store, Katie. Most polls, as 7 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:33,519 Speaker 1: you know, are favoring Democrats to take control of the 8 00:00:33,560 --> 00:00:36,920 Speaker 1: House and the Republicans will likely keep control of the Senate. 9 00:00:37,200 --> 00:00:40,280 Speaker 1: But then again, after two thousand sixteen, who really knows, 10 00:00:40,440 --> 00:00:44,280 Speaker 1: right nobody, Well, if that does happen, Katie, if the 11 00:00:44,280 --> 00:00:46,920 Speaker 1: projections are right, it would really change the balance of 12 00:00:46,960 --> 00:00:49,519 Speaker 1: power in this country. And on the off chance that 13 00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:52,560 Speaker 1: the Democrats take the House and the Senate, well things 14 00:00:52,560 --> 00:00:55,320 Speaker 1: will look a lot different for President Trump and for 15 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:58,760 Speaker 1: American politics. We've been hearing so much about the mid 16 00:00:58,880 --> 00:01:01,720 Speaker 1: terms in the news the days, it's sometimes hard to 17 00:01:01,720 --> 00:01:05,679 Speaker 1: cut through the opinions and memes and downright vitriol to 18 00:01:05,720 --> 00:01:09,280 Speaker 1: actually understand what's happening in all these races. So today 19 00:01:09,600 --> 00:01:12,600 Speaker 1: we've invited Claire Malone, a senior political writer at five 20 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:14,960 Speaker 1: thirty eight, to give us a picture of where all 21 00:01:15,000 --> 00:01:17,680 Speaker 1: these races stand and which ones we should pay attention 22 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:20,959 Speaker 1: to on Tuesday, and also to give us her view 23 00:01:21,040 --> 00:01:23,360 Speaker 1: on the big picture, Brian kind of what are the 24 00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 1: stakes of this election? And then we're going to talk 25 00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:28,920 Speaker 1: to a wonderful author, Michael Lewis. He has a new 26 00:01:28,959 --> 00:01:31,680 Speaker 1: book out called The Fifth Risk, which is actually very 27 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:34,679 Speaker 1: relevant to the election next week. Michael Lewis, of course 28 00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:37,440 Speaker 1: wrote The Big Short, he wrote Moneyball, and now for 29 00:01:37,520 --> 00:01:40,800 Speaker 1: The Fifth Risk, he spent months talking to former and 30 00:01:40,840 --> 00:01:44,280 Speaker 1: current employees of the federal government and he believes that 31 00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:48,800 Speaker 1: the Trump administration is wreaking havoc from within. In his view, 32 00:01:49,120 --> 00:01:53,280 Speaker 1: either political hacks are in charge or appointees more concerned 33 00:01:53,560 --> 00:01:58,080 Speaker 1: about self interests than the public interests. We've got a 34 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:01,160 Speaker 1: lot to cover today. So oh wait a second, Brian, 35 00:02:01,320 --> 00:02:03,440 Speaker 1: are you hearing that or is it just in my head? 36 00:02:03,880 --> 00:02:07,040 Speaker 1: It's just in your head. No, I'm actually hearing that. 37 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:09,440 Speaker 1: That's right, it's our new theme music. We've given our 38 00:02:09,440 --> 00:02:13,359 Speaker 1: show sound a bit of a facelift. No funny remarks here, 39 00:02:13,520 --> 00:02:15,720 Speaker 1: by the way, you should say to the tabloid reporters, 40 00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:18,839 Speaker 1: that's the only facelift that's happened around here. But I'm 41 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:20,880 Speaker 1: pumpch and we want to say a big thank you 42 00:02:20,919 --> 00:02:24,800 Speaker 1: to Jared Arnold, who composed the new music for us. Yeah. 43 00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:27,400 Speaker 1: I really like it. It's it's sounding, it's sounding kind 44 00:02:27,400 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 1: of groovy. What do you think? Well, I try to 45 00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:32,160 Speaker 1: avoid using the word groovy. I haven't used that since, 46 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:36,160 Speaker 1: but I would give it a ninety eight for dancing. Anyway, 47 00:02:36,320 --> 00:02:39,160 Speaker 1: enough about our new music, Let's get to our conversation 48 00:02:39,520 --> 00:02:42,520 Speaker 1: with Claire Malone from five thirty eight. We began by 49 00:02:42,560 --> 00:02:46,079 Speaker 1: asking her what's really at stake in next week selections 50 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:58,680 Speaker 1: for people who aren't like us, who haven't been glued 51 00:02:58,720 --> 00:03:01,639 Speaker 1: to their seats paying attention to every healthy people, Yeah, 52 00:03:01,760 --> 00:03:04,520 Speaker 1: normal people. In other words, what is its stake for 53 00:03:04,600 --> 00:03:09,320 Speaker 1: these elections? Well, uh, midterm elections are pretty much always 54 00:03:09,360 --> 00:03:11,920 Speaker 1: a reaction to the party who's in power, and the 55 00:03:12,000 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: Republicans have a lot of control over the government. So 56 00:03:15,760 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 1: they have the White House, they have the House of Representatives, 57 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:20,080 Speaker 1: and they have the Senate. And I think is is 58 00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:23,240 Speaker 1: probably no surprise to anyone in America. Um, we're in 59 00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 1: a highly polarized partisan period of American life, and we 60 00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:31,240 Speaker 1: have a president who has played into that quite a bit. 61 00:03:31,320 --> 00:03:33,280 Speaker 1: And so, UM, I think when we talk about the 62 00:03:33,320 --> 00:03:36,280 Speaker 1: stakes of this election, we are talking about, for getting 63 00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: nitty gritty, you know, the possibility that, you know, if 64 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:43,600 Speaker 1: Democrats theoretically retained control of both houses of Congress, they 65 00:03:43,640 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 1: could potentially impeach the president or you know, try to 66 00:03:46,880 --> 00:03:49,040 Speaker 1: remove him from office. So that's I think the if 67 00:03:49,040 --> 00:03:51,480 Speaker 1: you're going for the thirty thousand foot up view of things, 68 00:03:51,560 --> 00:03:54,400 Speaker 1: that's what's at stake. We're talking about all House seats, 69 00:03:54,520 --> 00:04:00,760 Speaker 1: thirty three Senate seats, thirty six governorships, state legislatures, basically 70 00:04:00,880 --> 00:04:04,200 Speaker 1: a lot of a lot of bots. Yes, I'm glad 71 00:04:04,240 --> 00:04:07,280 Speaker 1: you brought up state legislatures, and there's also attorney general's racist. 72 00:04:07,360 --> 00:04:09,240 Speaker 1: There's a lot of state level seats that are at 73 00:04:09,240 --> 00:04:11,480 Speaker 1: play here that we don't talk as much about. Um. 74 00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:13,720 Speaker 1: But right now, it's looking like the Democrats have a 75 00:04:13,760 --> 00:04:17,080 Speaker 1: pretty good chance of taking back back the House of Representatives. 76 00:04:17,400 --> 00:04:20,240 Speaker 1: So we have a forecasting model and we give them about, 77 00:04:20,440 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 1: let's say, an eight percent shot of taking back the 78 00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:25,920 Speaker 1: House of Representatives. The Senate is kind of flipped where 79 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:29,800 Speaker 1: the Democrats have about only chance of taking the Senate. 80 00:04:30,000 --> 00:04:31,360 Speaker 1: And I think you can kind of if you want 81 00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:33,960 Speaker 1: to look back two years to the split that we 82 00:04:33,960 --> 00:04:36,680 Speaker 1: saw in the popular vote and the electoral college, they're 83 00:04:36,680 --> 00:04:38,360 Speaker 1: sort of mirror in the patterns that we're seeing in 84 00:04:38,360 --> 00:04:41,000 Speaker 1: the House of Representatives in the Senate. So the House 85 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:43,960 Speaker 1: of Representatives that's parallel is the popular vote, which the 86 00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:47,280 Speaker 1: Democrat Hillary Clinton one by three million, and then you've 87 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:50,280 Speaker 1: got the Senate, which we can compare to the electoral college. 88 00:04:50,279 --> 00:04:52,680 Speaker 1: And and it's interesting because the Senate sort of plays 89 00:04:52,720 --> 00:04:57,120 Speaker 1: to Republicans advantages in these rural states where votes are 90 00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:00,200 Speaker 1: I guess more effectively economically distributed. We talk a about 91 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:02,840 Speaker 1: that where people aren't clustering in certain places. Yeah, we will. 92 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:04,960 Speaker 1: You just explain that a little bit for people. Give 93 00:05:05,040 --> 00:05:08,679 Speaker 1: us a quick civics lesson if you could clear on 94 00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:11,920 Speaker 1: on Gerrymanderin and sort of why the Senate is so 95 00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:14,719 Speaker 1: different than House races. Yeah, well, I think we always 96 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:16,960 Speaker 1: want to start and talk about the way that Americans 97 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:21,479 Speaker 1: have self sorted. Um, so Democrats have tended to in 98 00:05:21,520 --> 00:05:24,359 Speaker 1: the past few election cycles, past couple of decades, be 99 00:05:24,520 --> 00:05:28,239 Speaker 1: in big cities or in suburban areas surrounding big cities. 100 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:32,320 Speaker 1: And the reason why that why Republicans have um an 101 00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:34,760 Speaker 1: advantage in the electoral College and in the Senate map 102 00:05:35,120 --> 00:05:37,840 Speaker 1: is that their votes are in there all over, even 103 00:05:37,839 --> 00:05:41,799 Speaker 1: in small states. So, uh, they might win a bunch 104 00:05:41,839 --> 00:05:44,839 Speaker 1: of small counties in North Dakota and that counts for 105 00:05:44,880 --> 00:05:46,800 Speaker 1: a lot. A Senate seat in North Dakota is worth 106 00:05:46,839 --> 00:05:50,039 Speaker 1: just as much as a Senate seat in California. And 107 00:05:50,240 --> 00:05:53,760 Speaker 1: the appeal right now of Republicans seems to be being 108 00:05:53,760 --> 00:05:57,960 Speaker 1: received better by people in these x urban or you know, 109 00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:01,920 Speaker 1: rural rural places, and that's a problem obviously the Democrats 110 00:06:01,960 --> 00:06:03,440 Speaker 1: are trying to kind of claw their way back on. 111 00:06:03,760 --> 00:06:05,799 Speaker 1: So if you want to think about it in terms 112 00:06:05,800 --> 00:06:09,040 Speaker 1: of waves, people have talked about this election potentially being 113 00:06:09,040 --> 00:06:12,279 Speaker 1: a wave election for the Democrats. There are a couple 114 00:06:12,320 --> 00:06:15,279 Speaker 1: of sea walls that the Republicans have built up to 115 00:06:15,360 --> 00:06:19,839 Speaker 1: protect themselves from these waves. One is just because of 116 00:06:19,839 --> 00:06:22,040 Speaker 1: the way the House seats are drawn and in some 117 00:06:22,080 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 1: cases jerrymander to benefit one party. The Democrats have to 118 00:06:27,279 --> 00:06:30,480 Speaker 1: win the House popular vote by about six points, which 119 00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:33,640 Speaker 1: is like a near landslide margin in order to win 120 00:06:33,760 --> 00:06:36,640 Speaker 1: control of the House. And in the Senate, it's not 121 00:06:36,720 --> 00:06:40,800 Speaker 1: jerrymandered because the state borders are what they've always been, 122 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:44,279 Speaker 1: But North Dakota has two Senate seats, Wyoming has two 123 00:06:44,320 --> 00:06:47,320 Speaker 1: Senate seats, etcetera. And California has two Senate seats, and 124 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:50,080 Speaker 1: so there's a there's a bit of a bias there 125 00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:52,920 Speaker 1: as well. But didn't things start to change a bit 126 00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:55,240 Speaker 1: even just a couple of weeks ago for the Democrats? 127 00:06:55,240 --> 00:06:58,400 Speaker 1: And why well, things have sort of as the as 128 00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:00,680 Speaker 1: the last month of a campaign kind of comes in, 129 00:07:00,839 --> 00:07:04,800 Speaker 1: you start to see basically partisanship kick in um so 130 00:07:05,040 --> 00:07:06,800 Speaker 1: on the House side of things that that got kind 131 00:07:06,800 --> 00:07:09,040 Speaker 1: of a little bit better for for Democrats, and it 132 00:07:09,080 --> 00:07:10,640 Speaker 1: got a little bit worse for them in the Senate, 133 00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:14,280 Speaker 1: where you saw states like Nevada, states like Tennessee where 134 00:07:14,320 --> 00:07:17,880 Speaker 1: you have a pretty centrist Democrat, Phil Brettison, who's the 135 00:07:17,920 --> 00:07:20,640 Speaker 1: former governor of Tennessee, running for a Senate seat, and 136 00:07:20,680 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 1: he was a pretty popular guy and that race was 137 00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:26,640 Speaker 1: pretty close. But you're starting to see voters sort of 138 00:07:26,720 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 1: kick in and say, well, I kind of like the 139 00:07:29,320 --> 00:07:31,600 Speaker 1: guy from the opposite party, but I'm gonna put on 140 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:33,760 Speaker 1: my team jersey and wear it and vote for that 141 00:07:33,760 --> 00:07:35,640 Speaker 1: person in election day. And that's sort of what's showing 142 00:07:35,680 --> 00:07:37,920 Speaker 1: up in polls. So you are seeing a little bit 143 00:07:37,920 --> 00:07:41,320 Speaker 1: of a return to what we generally expect. If it's 144 00:07:41,320 --> 00:07:43,800 Speaker 1: a red state, you're probably going to think that, Well, 145 00:07:44,120 --> 00:07:46,520 Speaker 1: a lot of those undecided voters that were getting pulled 146 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:49,360 Speaker 1: in late September, they might be returning home and saying, well, 147 00:07:49,400 --> 00:07:51,200 Speaker 1: I'm gonna vote for my party, even if I'm not 148 00:07:51,560 --> 00:07:53,560 Speaker 1: loving what the president is doing. And I wanted to 149 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:56,000 Speaker 1: ask you about early voting because someone told me over 150 00:07:56,040 --> 00:07:58,920 Speaker 1: the weekend that early voting wasn't looking great in terms 151 00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 1: of turnout for Latino voters and millennials. Is somebody just 152 00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:08,640 Speaker 1: saying that to me without any any real knowledge helped 153 00:08:08,680 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 1: me out here. So we have kind of a five 154 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,400 Speaker 1: thirty eight line where we say early voting there isn't 155 00:08:13,400 --> 00:08:15,200 Speaker 1: actually any real proof that it gives us a lot 156 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 1: of information about, you know, who's going to win an election, Democratic, Republican, 157 00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:21,120 Speaker 1: because it doesn't. You know, all you know is the 158 00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:23,320 Speaker 1: early voters. You can tell what their party registration is, 159 00:08:23,480 --> 00:08:24,960 Speaker 1: we don't know who they voted for, and a lot 160 00:08:24,960 --> 00:08:27,720 Speaker 1: of times, as we saw in where a lot of 161 00:08:27,760 --> 00:08:31,120 Speaker 1: Democrats voted for Trump, people cross party lines. But I 162 00:08:31,160 --> 00:08:34,640 Speaker 1: do think that we are probably going to see. I mean, unfortunately, 163 00:08:34,640 --> 00:08:38,800 Speaker 1: certain demographics in this country haven't been reached by the 164 00:08:38,800 --> 00:08:42,240 Speaker 1: political community. The outreach community. Latinos, I think, are one 165 00:08:42,360 --> 00:08:45,600 Speaker 1: that Democrats had hoped in to really turn out and 166 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:49,720 Speaker 1: say the Southwest, and even with Trump's inflammatory rhetoric, they 167 00:08:49,760 --> 00:08:51,880 Speaker 1: really didn't turn out. And I think that's sort of 168 00:08:51,880 --> 00:08:55,320 Speaker 1: what people are thinking might happen this year. Although I 169 00:08:55,320 --> 00:08:58,240 Speaker 1: will say in general it is predicted to be a 170 00:08:58,320 --> 00:09:01,360 Speaker 1: high turnout election on both sides, Democrat and Republican. What 171 00:09:01,440 --> 00:09:04,360 Speaker 1: about millennials. It seems to me that young people are 172 00:09:04,440 --> 00:09:08,600 Speaker 1: so energized, at least from everything I see in my 173 00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:12,120 Speaker 1: social media feed, which maybe I'm not getting a completely 174 00:09:12,960 --> 00:09:16,480 Speaker 1: clear perspective. But what about those numbers. I don't think 175 00:09:16,520 --> 00:09:18,560 Speaker 1: we really know um and I think we kind of 176 00:09:18,600 --> 00:09:20,400 Speaker 1: have to rely this is the five eight thing. We 177 00:09:20,480 --> 00:09:23,000 Speaker 1: kind of have to rely on historical trends, and generally 178 00:09:23,040 --> 00:09:26,760 Speaker 1: younger voters aren't a constituency that you can necessarily count 179 00:09:26,800 --> 00:09:29,440 Speaker 1: on to turn out in elections. I will say, going 180 00:09:29,480 --> 00:09:31,600 Speaker 1: back again, I'm not going to make any predictions because 181 00:09:31,600 --> 00:09:33,400 Speaker 1: it is going to be a high turnout election. That's 182 00:09:33,400 --> 00:09:36,160 Speaker 1: what's being sort of forecasted from these polls where they 183 00:09:36,240 --> 00:09:39,120 Speaker 1: you sort of posters ask about your enthusiasm to vote, 184 00:09:39,280 --> 00:09:42,640 Speaker 1: and the enthusiasm to vote is extremely high, so perhaps 185 00:09:42,640 --> 00:09:45,599 Speaker 1: we will see higher numbers of millennials voting. Are you 186 00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:48,240 Speaker 1: a little gunshy because of two thousand sixteen over there 187 00:09:48,240 --> 00:09:52,080 Speaker 1: at eight? No, I think, I mean, I think, I 188 00:09:52,120 --> 00:09:54,120 Speaker 1: will say I think. The one thing that is annoying 189 00:09:54,160 --> 00:09:56,640 Speaker 1: to interview people from the site is that we always 190 00:09:56,679 --> 00:09:58,640 Speaker 1: kind of do this thing well where we'll say, well, 191 00:09:58,679 --> 00:10:01,520 Speaker 1: we can't predict it, because but I will say that 192 00:10:01,559 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 1: we did rethink some of the ways that we present 193 00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:07,560 Speaker 1: our probabilities for people. Is kind of a big with Claire. 194 00:10:08,080 --> 00:10:10,120 Speaker 1: Well we are we will say that we were the 195 00:10:10,200 --> 00:10:16,040 Speaker 1: least wrong of anyone congratulation. We should fact check that, 196 00:10:16,160 --> 00:10:18,920 Speaker 1: and we should actually also explain to our listeners what 197 00:10:19,080 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 1: these forecasts really means. So two years ago, five thirty 198 00:10:22,720 --> 00:10:25,680 Speaker 1: eight said Hillary Clinton had a seventy one percent chance 199 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: to win the presidency. Now that was notably lower than 200 00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:33,840 Speaker 1: some of the others. The New York Times said, Huffington 201 00:10:33,920 --> 00:10:37,599 Speaker 1: Post really went out there and said, but how do 202 00:10:37,720 --> 00:10:42,439 Speaker 1: these models work and how do they differ? Yeah? Sure, so, um, 203 00:10:42,480 --> 00:10:44,600 Speaker 1: the way that the five thirty model works is that 204 00:10:44,679 --> 00:10:48,600 Speaker 1: we take all of the public polling that's available and 205 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:51,959 Speaker 1: we put it together, and we waited based on how 206 00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:54,720 Speaker 1: good we think the polster is, so better posters get 207 00:10:54,760 --> 00:10:58,000 Speaker 1: a heavier weight in the model. So we take polls 208 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:00,560 Speaker 1: and so that's that's the poll component. Well, also add 209 00:11:00,600 --> 00:11:03,200 Speaker 1: in whether or not their incumbent. That helps a person 210 00:11:03,240 --> 00:11:05,760 Speaker 1: if they're an incumbent and they're running. We take into 211 00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:10,760 Speaker 1: account how partisan a state is. We take into account fundraising, 212 00:11:10,760 --> 00:11:13,360 Speaker 1: how much a candidate has raised. We smush all those 213 00:11:13,400 --> 00:11:15,240 Speaker 1: things together in a model. And Um, what I always 214 00:11:15,240 --> 00:11:19,240 Speaker 1: like to point out is was a really interesting election. Yes, 215 00:11:19,360 --> 00:11:22,400 Speaker 1: we were, and all of the other models were off. 216 00:11:22,720 --> 00:11:25,160 Speaker 1: And what was the reason why polls were so off 217 00:11:25,760 --> 00:11:29,240 Speaker 1: in the election is that, if you'll remember, Donald Trump 218 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:33,360 Speaker 1: had huge media reach, he had name recognition, and he 219 00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:35,319 Speaker 1: motivated a lot of people who had fallen off the 220 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:37,480 Speaker 1: voter rolls to come out and vote, and so polls 221 00:11:37,520 --> 00:11:40,040 Speaker 1: missed a lot of those people. And so we did 222 00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:44,160 Speaker 1: have a polling problem in And um, yeah, I think 223 00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:45,679 Speaker 1: there's a lot of you know, a lot of us 224 00:11:45,679 --> 00:11:49,880 Speaker 1: ineen who are trying to make people basically more I 225 00:11:49,880 --> 00:11:52,400 Speaker 1: guess literate readers of polls and to know we're not 226 00:11:52,559 --> 00:11:54,360 Speaker 1: pulling us out of nowhere. And we also want you 227 00:11:54,400 --> 00:11:56,840 Speaker 1: to know that there is a possibility that this is wrong. 228 00:11:56,880 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 1: This is how probabilities work. So but it is I 229 00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:01,000 Speaker 1: think it's a learning process for for all of us 230 00:12:01,000 --> 00:12:05,320 Speaker 1: to make people better news consumers more. Literally, what you 231 00:12:05,400 --> 00:12:08,000 Speaker 1: meant two years ago was if you were to run 232 00:12:08,120 --> 00:12:11,160 Speaker 1: this election with all the information and data we have 233 00:12:11,400 --> 00:12:15,480 Speaker 1: ten times, seven out of ten times Hillary Clinton would 234 00:12:15,480 --> 00:12:18,199 Speaker 1: win and three out of ten times Donald Trump would win. 235 00:12:18,920 --> 00:12:23,079 Speaker 1: And so it's not like your quote wrong when you 236 00:12:23,240 --> 00:12:25,920 Speaker 1: say seventy one percent chance to win and she loses. 237 00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:29,360 Speaker 1: It's that this was one of those events where it 238 00:12:29,520 --> 00:12:33,080 Speaker 1: was more likely than not that she would win, but 239 00:12:33,160 --> 00:12:35,800 Speaker 1: she actually didn't. Yeah, And that's and so this year 240 00:12:35,840 --> 00:12:39,520 Speaker 1: in our model, we've tried to switch it from making 241 00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:41,680 Speaker 1: the big bold number instead of it having b oh, 242 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 1: it's an eight percent chance, you know, we'll try to say, oh, 243 00:12:44,679 --> 00:12:46,600 Speaker 1: it's a two and six chance, or it's a three 244 00:12:46,640 --> 00:12:49,360 Speaker 1: and ten chance that this person will win, just to 245 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:51,440 Speaker 1: give people because I think that when we talk about 246 00:12:51,440 --> 00:12:54,079 Speaker 1: gambling odds, that's kind of the vernacular that we use 247 00:12:54,120 --> 00:12:56,000 Speaker 1: and so we want to try to make it clearer 248 00:12:56,040 --> 00:12:58,480 Speaker 1: to people what we're saying. When we do that, Let's 249 00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:01,280 Speaker 1: talk about recent events layer, because it has been a 250 00:13:01,440 --> 00:13:04,200 Speaker 1: insane news cycle. As you know, we had the Brett 251 00:13:04,280 --> 00:13:08,200 Speaker 1: Kavanaugh hearings. We have the pipe bombs that were sent 252 00:13:08,280 --> 00:13:12,520 Speaker 1: to a number of Democratic officials, philanthropist George Soros CNN, 253 00:13:13,160 --> 00:13:17,679 Speaker 1: and now most recently, the massacre at that synagogue in Pittsburgh. 254 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:22,920 Speaker 1: How do you measure the impact those events have on voters? Yeah, 255 00:13:23,240 --> 00:13:25,760 Speaker 1: I guess I'll start with Kavanaugh, since it's a bit 256 00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:30,720 Speaker 1: easier to parse the Kavanaugh hearing. Certainly senators who are 257 00:13:30,800 --> 00:13:33,600 Speaker 1: voting on the Kavanaugh hearing, some of them in red states. 258 00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:37,400 Speaker 1: Those red state Democrats had to make tough choices that 259 00:13:37,440 --> 00:13:39,679 Speaker 1: I think probably for some of them, let's say Heidi 260 00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:43,080 Speaker 1: hide Camp in North Dakota, probably endangered their their chances 261 00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:45,560 Speaker 1: on the on the Senate map um and she's someone 262 00:13:45,559 --> 00:13:48,880 Speaker 1: who's a pretty moderate Democrat. You know, she's from a 263 00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:51,280 Speaker 1: state that really likes Trump, and she's one of those 264 00:13:51,280 --> 00:13:53,640 Speaker 1: people that's really been trying to sort of say, run 265 00:13:53,640 --> 00:13:56,920 Speaker 1: a campaign that says, listen, I'm first and foremost in 266 00:13:57,000 --> 00:14:00,240 Speaker 1: North Dakotin. I'm not here for Pelosian schumers, a da 267 00:14:00,360 --> 00:14:01,720 Speaker 1: right as a kind of a response to a lot 268 00:14:01,760 --> 00:14:04,920 Speaker 1: of Republican tack ads that try to tie red state 269 00:14:04,960 --> 00:14:08,600 Speaker 1: Democrats to unpopular figures um. And so Heidi hide Camp 270 00:14:08,920 --> 00:14:11,680 Speaker 1: was sort of chugging along in a re election effort 271 00:14:11,679 --> 00:14:13,440 Speaker 1: that was, you know, it's a hard state to win. 272 00:14:13,960 --> 00:14:17,360 Speaker 1: And when the Kavanaugh vote came up, I think she 273 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:18,840 Speaker 1: would be open and saying it was a sort of 274 00:14:18,840 --> 00:14:21,080 Speaker 1: a wrenching decision for her to have to make, because 275 00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:24,440 Speaker 1: on the one hand, I think she's a woman who 276 00:14:24,840 --> 00:14:26,880 Speaker 1: was not in favor of this guy who had been 277 00:14:26,880 --> 00:14:30,160 Speaker 1: accused of um of sexual assault. And on the other hand, 278 00:14:30,400 --> 00:14:31,880 Speaker 1: I think she knew it was a little bit of 279 00:14:31,880 --> 00:14:34,960 Speaker 1: a you know, it was gonna it was gonna really 280 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:37,320 Speaker 1: diminished the chances that she would be able to win 281 00:14:37,520 --> 00:14:40,240 Speaker 1: her race in that state, and she made the choice. 282 00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:43,280 Speaker 1: She voted against Kavanaugh, and it has unleashed, you know, 283 00:14:43,320 --> 00:14:46,720 Speaker 1: a string of basically attacks against her that says, listen, 284 00:14:46,760 --> 00:14:50,000 Speaker 1: this this person is not who you are North Dakota. 285 00:14:50,120 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 1: So do you all measure For example, you know, I 286 00:14:52,600 --> 00:14:54,920 Speaker 1: I spent the weekend in Virginia with my daughter and 287 00:14:54,920 --> 00:14:56,400 Speaker 1: we spent the night with a friend of mine from 288 00:14:56,480 --> 00:14:59,320 Speaker 1: high school and we were talking about the Kavanaugh hearings 289 00:14:59,480 --> 00:15:02,680 Speaker 1: and she was troubled by the way he was treated 290 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:08,440 Speaker 1: and felt, you know, sympathetic to his outrage when he testified. 291 00:15:08,480 --> 00:15:10,720 Speaker 1: And I said, hey, you're one of those white suburban 292 00:15:10,760 --> 00:15:15,400 Speaker 1: women growing up, you know, in Arlington, Virginia, and that's 293 00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:20,760 Speaker 1: where we were. Who is you know, supporting perhaps Republican 294 00:15:20,840 --> 00:15:24,240 Speaker 1: candidates because of what happened to Brett Kavanaugh? Do you 295 00:15:24,280 --> 00:15:28,320 Speaker 1: are you able to to get that specific in terms 296 00:15:28,360 --> 00:15:31,560 Speaker 1: of how you're looking at at segments of the electorate, 297 00:15:31,880 --> 00:15:34,560 Speaker 1: so that doesn't go into the model per se, but 298 00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:36,520 Speaker 1: you you've hit that nail on the head when you 299 00:15:36,640 --> 00:15:39,960 Speaker 1: when you bring up demographics that we watch as ones 300 00:15:40,000 --> 00:15:44,000 Speaker 1: that are shifting post So if we take I'm gonna 301 00:15:44,080 --> 00:15:46,360 Speaker 1: I'm gonna make a wild guest that your your friend 302 00:15:46,400 --> 00:15:49,720 Speaker 1: might be college educated, she might be white, and those people, 303 00:15:49,800 --> 00:15:52,760 Speaker 1: white college educated women are kind of the new swing voters. 304 00:15:53,040 --> 00:15:56,560 Speaker 1: They used to vote Republican pretty steadily, and now I 305 00:15:56,600 --> 00:15:59,760 Speaker 1: think post Trump, there maybe in the middle like true 306 00:15:59,760 --> 00:16:04,000 Speaker 1: into Pennant voters or their trending Democratic. So we I 307 00:16:04,040 --> 00:16:07,640 Speaker 1: think we'll be watching for women in general and how 308 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:10,480 Speaker 1: they vote on election day, but college educated white women 309 00:16:10,560 --> 00:16:14,240 Speaker 1: in particular, because their constituency that was traditional Republican that 310 00:16:14,480 --> 00:16:17,320 Speaker 1: more and more seemed to moving over to the Democratic 311 00:16:17,360 --> 00:16:20,200 Speaker 1: side of things. Well, this was a reality check for me, though, 312 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:24,200 Speaker 1: because I think that there are a lot of women 313 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:29,760 Speaker 1: who sympathized with him and Brian. I'm curious in Los Angeles, 314 00:16:29,880 --> 00:16:33,640 Speaker 1: you know that hotbed of conservativism, if you've run against 315 00:16:33,760 --> 00:16:38,440 Speaker 1: run up against um women who share my friend's point 316 00:16:38,440 --> 00:16:41,280 Speaker 1: of view. I actually had a conversation with one woman 317 00:16:41,320 --> 00:16:45,240 Speaker 1: I know who wouldn't tell me what her personal views are, 318 00:16:45,280 --> 00:16:48,640 Speaker 1: but said that she was convinced that other women would 319 00:16:48,680 --> 00:16:52,760 Speaker 1: sympathize with Kavanaugh because we've all seen women who make 320 00:16:52,840 --> 00:16:56,600 Speaker 1: false allegations to get something, and it was hard for 321 00:16:56,640 --> 00:17:00,000 Speaker 1: me to imagine what Dr Ford would get in this situation. 322 00:17:00,120 --> 00:17:02,280 Speaker 1: And I mean, last time I checked, she wasn't even 323 00:17:02,320 --> 00:17:05,200 Speaker 1: allowed to or able to go back to her own home. 324 00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:09,280 Speaker 1: But I think we've seen in the data that the 325 00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:14,680 Speaker 1: Kavanaugh hearings energized a lot of Republican voters who might 326 00:17:14,720 --> 00:17:18,600 Speaker 1: not have voted or and motivated some right leaning independent 327 00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 1: voters to stick with the Republicans. Yeah, I think that's 328 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:27,600 Speaker 1: fair because women, these these you know, college educated white 329 00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:31,400 Speaker 1: women were probably already a more activated constituency to begin with. 330 00:17:31,520 --> 00:17:35,520 Speaker 1: So the perceived mistreatment of Kavanaugh, I think, yeah, that 331 00:17:35,640 --> 00:17:38,760 Speaker 1: certainly has played a factor. Now we kind of have 332 00:17:38,840 --> 00:17:42,840 Speaker 1: the X factor of these really terrible events of the 333 00:17:42,880 --> 00:17:47,680 Speaker 1: past week basically, and I we're not quite sure how 334 00:17:47,680 --> 00:17:49,560 Speaker 1: these are going to affect things. I mean, you know, 335 00:17:49,600 --> 00:17:52,680 Speaker 1: potentially they could have an effect on Trump's approval rating, 336 00:17:52,800 --> 00:17:55,200 Speaker 1: and that is often a sign of how people might 337 00:17:55,280 --> 00:17:58,679 Speaker 1: vote in their congressional races. But it's just you know, 338 00:17:58,760 --> 00:18:00,479 Speaker 1: I don't mean this is sound flip, but model does 339 00:18:00,520 --> 00:18:03,080 Speaker 1: not take into account I hate crimes. You know how 340 00:18:03,080 --> 00:18:07,040 Speaker 1: that factors into American elections, And unfortunately that's something that's 341 00:18:07,040 --> 00:18:09,359 Speaker 1: happening right now. And doesn't that also, Claire, take a 342 00:18:09,400 --> 00:18:12,280 Speaker 1: while to seep into the public consciousness and to be 343 00:18:12,520 --> 00:18:15,600 Speaker 1: reflected in polling data. It does take a little while 344 00:18:15,640 --> 00:18:17,760 Speaker 1: to seep in. So we're recording this the week before 345 00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:20,960 Speaker 1: the election. I'm guessing that pollsters will be putting out 346 00:18:21,080 --> 00:18:24,600 Speaker 1: polls into the field. They probably started last week after 347 00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:27,920 Speaker 1: the bombings, and so we might see some some data 348 00:18:27,960 --> 00:18:31,240 Speaker 1: on how people are perceiving those events visa VI the election. 349 00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:35,600 Speaker 1: Trump's comments in the wake of the synagogue shooting were 350 00:18:36,320 --> 00:18:39,680 Speaker 1: I found them totally odd, um, And I'm not sure 351 00:18:39,680 --> 00:18:41,640 Speaker 1: how how people will react to that. But you're right, 352 00:18:41,680 --> 00:18:44,680 Speaker 1: it does take a little bit of time for these 353 00:18:44,680 --> 00:18:47,199 Speaker 1: things to seep in, and um, you know, the election 354 00:18:47,240 --> 00:18:49,280 Speaker 1: is a week away, so we might end up seeing 355 00:18:49,320 --> 00:18:53,359 Speaker 1: some of those results. Frankly, the day of aren't politics local? 356 00:18:53,400 --> 00:18:56,120 Speaker 1: I mean, do they really? Is it really a direct 357 00:18:57,119 --> 00:19:00,360 Speaker 1: reaction to the presidency? In other words, if I live 358 00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:03,280 Speaker 1: in a state, couldn't I say, I don't really like 359 00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:06,200 Speaker 1: Donald Trump, but I do like that, you know, my senator. 360 00:19:07,240 --> 00:19:10,240 Speaker 1: That happens less and less. We call it ticket splitting, um, 361 00:19:10,320 --> 00:19:13,560 Speaker 1: And because Americans are so much more partisan, we see 362 00:19:13,560 --> 00:19:16,200 Speaker 1: a lot more people just voting straight down the ticket, 363 00:19:16,240 --> 00:19:19,440 Speaker 1: Republican or Democratic. There is the old truism, right that 364 00:19:19,480 --> 00:19:21,800 Speaker 1: all politics is local, but I think more and more 365 00:19:21,840 --> 00:19:26,040 Speaker 1: it's become nationalized, in part because this was happening pre Trump. 366 00:19:26,080 --> 00:19:28,399 Speaker 1: But I do think Trump is a He has a 367 00:19:28,440 --> 00:19:30,960 Speaker 1: talent for driving new cycles, and I think that that 368 00:19:31,080 --> 00:19:34,159 Speaker 1: is something that that propelled him into office and continues 369 00:19:34,200 --> 00:19:38,560 Speaker 1: to dominate our politics new cycle. Overwhelmingly, we've become much 370 00:19:38,600 --> 00:19:42,120 Speaker 1: more like a parliamentary system where people aren't paying attention 371 00:19:42,160 --> 00:19:45,840 Speaker 1: as they used to a generation ago, to local factors, 372 00:19:45,920 --> 00:19:49,720 Speaker 1: local candidates. They're really just voting for what team they 373 00:19:49,760 --> 00:19:52,679 Speaker 1: want and charge in Washington, particularly in these House and 374 00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:56,040 Speaker 1: Senate races, I want to ask you about one candidate 375 00:19:56,080 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 1: in particular who's been perhaps the star of this cycle, 376 00:19:59,640 --> 00:20:02,760 Speaker 1: better or Rourke. In Texas, he has just a one 377 00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:05,679 Speaker 1: in five chance to win. I haven't seen a single 378 00:20:05,760 --> 00:20:08,520 Speaker 1: poll with him in the lead. He's usually mid to 379 00:20:09,119 --> 00:20:15,240 Speaker 1: high single digits behind. Have journalists given voters a false 380 00:20:15,280 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 1: sense of his chances, and especially donors who poured more 381 00:20:19,240 --> 00:20:24,000 Speaker 1: than seventy million dollars into his campaign. Yeah, So I 382 00:20:24,040 --> 00:20:27,080 Speaker 1: wrote a piece about Beatto about a month ago that 383 00:20:27,160 --> 00:20:29,439 Speaker 1: was a little bit premised off this Brian and in 384 00:20:29,480 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 1: my lead was basically the number of times he's been 385 00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:34,480 Speaker 1: compared to a Kennedy And I think it was a 386 00:20:34,560 --> 00:20:37,080 Speaker 1: hilarious piece. Everybody should read it, by the way, But 387 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:39,840 Speaker 1: I think that there's something real there, which is the 388 00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:42,719 Speaker 1: midterm elections are I guess, distinctly unsexy as far as 389 00:20:42,760 --> 00:20:45,160 Speaker 1: there's tons of races, there's not one, one or two 390 00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:48,680 Speaker 1: candidates that you could follow along with. And O'Rourke is young, 391 00:20:48,840 --> 00:20:51,120 Speaker 1: He's a Democrat making a play in Texas, so there's 392 00:20:51,119 --> 00:20:54,520 Speaker 1: sort of a substantive political story there. But I do 393 00:20:54,600 --> 00:20:58,639 Speaker 1: think he is a telegenic person running against Ted Cruz, 394 00:20:58,720 --> 00:21:03,760 Speaker 1: the Republican incumbent, who is not a particularly beloved figure 395 00:21:03,880 --> 00:21:07,399 Speaker 1: even by Republicans. Lindsay Graham had a great line that 396 00:21:07,560 --> 00:21:09,080 Speaker 1: you know, you could you could shoot him on the 397 00:21:09,080 --> 00:21:11,160 Speaker 1: floor of the Senate and none of his colleagues would 398 00:21:11,600 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: would convict the person who shot him. So he's it's 399 00:21:14,320 --> 00:21:17,240 Speaker 1: it's a he's not a popular guy, let's say. But 400 00:21:17,359 --> 00:21:21,080 Speaker 1: I think that the media has a little bit hyped 401 00:21:21,160 --> 00:21:24,800 Speaker 1: up his chances, perhaps to the to the regular reader 402 00:21:24,920 --> 00:21:29,440 Speaker 1: or media consumer, because of these attractive telligen he's kind 403 00:21:29,440 --> 00:21:31,760 Speaker 1: of the it guy of the campaign. Yeah, and I 404 00:21:31,800 --> 00:21:34,560 Speaker 1: think what I do think is really real and something 405 00:21:34,600 --> 00:21:36,639 Speaker 1: to be taken seriously about Beata o rourke. Listen, I 406 00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:39,879 Speaker 1: think that he probably won't win the Senate election, but 407 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:43,600 Speaker 1: he's raised huge, huge amounts of money Barack Obama two 408 00:21:43,680 --> 00:21:48,119 Speaker 1: thousand seven financial quarter kind of money, and the comparison 409 00:21:48,160 --> 00:21:50,879 Speaker 1: to a former president is on purpose because I think 410 00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:54,240 Speaker 1: a lot of people say, listen, Donald Trump is a celebrity. 411 00:21:54,240 --> 00:21:57,240 Speaker 1: He was a celebrity before he was the president. Maybe 412 00:21:57,280 --> 00:22:00,160 Speaker 1: you need someone who has that kind of ineffable our 413 00:22:00,160 --> 00:22:02,280 Speaker 1: power if you want to beat Trump. I mean, you know, 414 00:22:02,320 --> 00:22:05,320 Speaker 1: as much as people want to say that voters care 415 00:22:05,480 --> 00:22:09,159 Speaker 1: more about policy than they do about politics and the 416 00:22:09,200 --> 00:22:12,000 Speaker 1: things that seem superficial, it's not true. I think people 417 00:22:12,119 --> 00:22:15,120 Speaker 1: I think politics is a lot more fairmonic, and more 418 00:22:15,200 --> 00:22:19,119 Speaker 1: like like dating or tribalism than it is referring to 419 00:22:19,200 --> 00:22:22,159 Speaker 1: pair mony. I am, I am Katie. But but what 420 00:22:22,200 --> 00:22:24,080 Speaker 1: I mean by that is people vote for the person 421 00:22:24,119 --> 00:22:25,840 Speaker 1: that they like, the person that they think is kind 422 00:22:25,840 --> 00:22:29,560 Speaker 1: of like, you know, the person they have a beer with, right, yeah, exactly. 423 00:22:29,920 --> 00:22:31,720 Speaker 1: And I think that the person I think they want 424 00:22:31,720 --> 00:22:35,119 Speaker 1: to watch on on a screen, or the person or 425 00:22:35,160 --> 00:22:37,600 Speaker 1: the person for Democrats who they find inspiring. And I 426 00:22:37,640 --> 00:22:39,840 Speaker 1: think that the one thing about a Rourks campaign is 427 00:22:39,880 --> 00:22:43,520 Speaker 1: it has been a positive campaign. You know, he's a 428 00:22:43,600 --> 00:22:46,840 Speaker 1: demographically a person who could perhaps be more appealing to 429 00:22:46,840 --> 00:22:49,280 Speaker 1: people outside of Texas. He's a young white man with 430 00:22:49,280 --> 00:22:53,399 Speaker 1: progressive values, which which might be more palatable to you 431 00:22:53,440 --> 00:22:56,199 Speaker 1: know Obama Trump voters, which is what we refer to, 432 00:22:56,400 --> 00:22:58,720 Speaker 1: you know, voters who voted for President Obama but then 433 00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:01,920 Speaker 1: switched voted for Trump. So there's a lot of a 434 00:23:01,960 --> 00:23:03,720 Speaker 1: lot of things to think through with bouto Rourke, and 435 00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:06,920 Speaker 1: I think he represents more than just his Senate campaign 436 00:23:06,920 --> 00:23:10,480 Speaker 1: in Texas. Let's just run through a few more campaigns. 437 00:23:10,560 --> 00:23:13,040 Speaker 1: O'Brien is going to be so excited. I'm excited about 438 00:23:13,080 --> 00:23:15,240 Speaker 1: the first one. And this is the Senate race in 439 00:23:15,520 --> 00:23:20,440 Speaker 1: in Tennessee, and Marcia Blackburn may have to shake it off. 440 00:23:21,280 --> 00:23:23,120 Speaker 1: Do you like that? You guys? That was very clever. 441 00:23:23,760 --> 00:23:28,160 Speaker 1: I just pulled that out him. Well. Taylor Swift made 442 00:23:28,160 --> 00:23:30,720 Speaker 1: a big difference when she finally came out of her 443 00:23:31,160 --> 00:23:35,760 Speaker 1: a political cocoon and spoke very candidly about her feelings 444 00:23:35,800 --> 00:23:39,840 Speaker 1: on Instagram, my favorite social media platform. Tennessee. Yes she 445 00:23:39,920 --> 00:23:42,960 Speaker 1: lives in Tennessee. And then all these people yes, and 446 00:23:43,000 --> 00:23:45,520 Speaker 1: all these people came out and registered to vote. So 447 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:49,400 Speaker 1: what's happening there? Claire. I mentioned Phil Brettison, the Democratic 448 00:23:49,440 --> 00:23:52,480 Speaker 1: candidate running against Marcia Blackburn a little earlier. That's a 449 00:23:52,480 --> 00:23:55,399 Speaker 1: really interesting race because Tennessee is a super red state. 450 00:23:55,400 --> 00:23:59,520 Speaker 1: It's very Republican. Marcia Blackburn has been a longtime congresswoman 451 00:23:59,520 --> 00:24:03,360 Speaker 1: and she really well she actually goes by Congressman Marsha Blackburn. 452 00:24:03,400 --> 00:24:06,160 Speaker 1: That's her official title. UM, and she sort of took 453 00:24:06,160 --> 00:24:08,200 Speaker 1: on the Tea Party mantle. So she's a very sort 454 00:24:08,200 --> 00:24:12,520 Speaker 1: of popular, super conservative candidate. UM. And Phil Bretta is 455 00:24:12,600 --> 00:24:13,880 Speaker 1: in is you know, he used to be the mayor 456 00:24:13,920 --> 00:24:17,760 Speaker 1: of Nashville. He brought the Tennessee Titans in into the state. 457 00:24:18,119 --> 00:24:20,480 Speaker 1: He was governor, and he was a sort of popular 458 00:24:20,640 --> 00:24:24,320 Speaker 1: moderate governor Bill Clinton we're running in the mid terms, 459 00:24:24,440 --> 00:24:26,280 Speaker 1: he'd probably be something like Phil Breda is in, like 460 00:24:26,359 --> 00:24:29,480 Speaker 1: a southern moderate Democrat. You know, we've we've got it 461 00:24:29,520 --> 00:24:31,720 Speaker 1: as a pretty close race for a red state and 462 00:24:31,800 --> 00:24:35,000 Speaker 1: part because of Bret is is basically an incumbent. He's 463 00:24:35,000 --> 00:24:37,320 Speaker 1: really well known to the state. UM and he's a 464 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:40,080 Speaker 1: popular guy. And so we're basically it's almost like the 465 00:24:40,080 --> 00:24:44,920 Speaker 1: forces of partisanship, super red, super Republican versus the forces 466 00:24:44,960 --> 00:24:48,800 Speaker 1: of I guess personality and all politics is local? Can 467 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:52,760 Speaker 1: bretas in win on all politics is local platform in 468 00:24:52,760 --> 00:24:55,600 Speaker 1: a state that is very very partisan. Well, and another 469 00:24:55,680 --> 00:24:59,119 Speaker 1: interesting little wrinkle in Tennessee. As red as the state is, 470 00:24:59,720 --> 00:25:03,600 Speaker 1: it is never elected before a right wing Republican to 471 00:25:03,720 --> 00:25:06,440 Speaker 1: statewide office, to the Senate, or for good. I think 472 00:25:06,440 --> 00:25:09,320 Speaker 1: it's a good point. Yeah, let's talk about Missouri Claire 473 00:25:09,359 --> 00:25:13,640 Speaker 1: McCaskill versus Josh Holly. Claire McCaskill is the incumbent Democrat 474 00:25:13,640 --> 00:25:16,800 Speaker 1: and Josh Holly is the the attorney general in that state. 475 00:25:16,920 --> 00:25:20,160 Speaker 1: It's an interesting one. I mean, Claire McCaskill has had 476 00:25:20,200 --> 00:25:23,080 Speaker 1: some luck that's come her way. Uh. The last time 477 00:25:23,160 --> 00:25:26,240 Speaker 1: she ran, she ran against Todd Aiken And if you 478 00:25:26,240 --> 00:25:29,320 Speaker 1: remember Todd Aikin's name, it's because you remember he talked 479 00:25:29,320 --> 00:25:34,040 Speaker 1: about legitimate rape, which did not play well. Uh. And 480 00:25:34,119 --> 00:25:38,240 Speaker 1: she won that election against the ultimate oxy moron, Yes exactly. Um. 481 00:25:38,280 --> 00:25:40,680 Speaker 1: And then she had a little bit of quote unquote 482 00:25:40,760 --> 00:25:45,520 Speaker 1: luck this year because Missouri had a governor scandal. Eric 483 00:25:45,560 --> 00:25:47,879 Speaker 1: Grayten's who was the governor, had to resign because of 484 00:25:47,920 --> 00:25:50,800 Speaker 1: a potential sexual assault that he was accused of. So 485 00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:54,000 Speaker 1: Missouri has had a weird political year. Um. And so 486 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:56,119 Speaker 1: I think Claire McCaskill was doing pretty well because the 487 00:25:56,119 --> 00:25:59,359 Speaker 1: Republicans in the state, frankly weren't looking good. They weren't 488 00:25:59,400 --> 00:26:01,639 Speaker 1: a good light, but it has. It's a red state. 489 00:26:01,640 --> 00:26:05,320 Speaker 1: Trump won that state and Josh Holly and Clara McCaskill 490 00:26:05,359 --> 00:26:08,400 Speaker 1: have basically been battling it out over healthcare. We did 491 00:26:08,400 --> 00:26:11,160 Speaker 1: a podcast in five last week where we talked about, 492 00:26:11,240 --> 00:26:14,560 Speaker 1: you know, the number one campaign ad topic is healthcare, 493 00:26:14,880 --> 00:26:17,320 Speaker 1: and that's what Claire McCaskill is running on in that state. 494 00:26:17,359 --> 00:26:20,080 Speaker 1: And Josh Holly is one of the attorneys general who 495 00:26:20,160 --> 00:26:23,080 Speaker 1: is signed on to this make Obamacare illegal, and so 496 00:26:23,160 --> 00:26:26,560 Speaker 1: he is in a bit of a tight spot in 497 00:26:26,560 --> 00:26:29,040 Speaker 1: a state where where healthcare is a big issue. But 498 00:26:29,080 --> 00:26:31,800 Speaker 1: a lot of Republicans O'Brien, right, I mean, I've been 499 00:26:31,800 --> 00:26:37,000 Speaker 1: reading increasingly that Republicans have co opted the healthcare conversation 500 00:26:37,040 --> 00:26:41,960 Speaker 1: are basically, uh, presenting themselves as the candidates who are 501 00:26:42,000 --> 00:26:46,480 Speaker 1: going to preserve and save healthcare and pre existing coverage 502 00:26:46,480 --> 00:26:49,920 Speaker 1: for pre existing conditions, etcetera. And on the other hand, 503 00:26:50,000 --> 00:26:54,520 Speaker 1: they want to dismantle Obamacare. So frankly, I'm confused, Well, 504 00:26:54,640 --> 00:26:58,480 Speaker 1: they're attempting to do that because healthcare has turned from 505 00:26:58,480 --> 00:27:00,680 Speaker 1: a good issue for them in all ast mid term 506 00:27:00,680 --> 00:27:03,560 Speaker 1: four years ago to a really bad issue for them 507 00:27:03,640 --> 00:27:05,720 Speaker 1: this time. Under the category of you don't know what 508 00:27:05,720 --> 00:27:08,800 Speaker 1: you've got until it's gone. A lot of voters are 509 00:27:10,240 --> 00:27:17,520 Speaker 1: Mitchell just pandering the always seemed to go Brian UM. 510 00:27:17,600 --> 00:27:20,440 Speaker 1: So a lot of voters are concerned about the protections 511 00:27:20,520 --> 00:27:23,360 Speaker 1: that they've come to enjoy under the Affordable Care Act 512 00:27:23,400 --> 00:27:26,080 Speaker 1: going away, and so the Republicans are making a big 513 00:27:26,119 --> 00:27:29,080 Speaker 1: effort to say no, no, no no, we're for preserving UH 514 00:27:29,119 --> 00:27:32,760 Speaker 1: protections for people with pre existing conditions. If Claire mccaskell 515 00:27:32,800 --> 00:27:36,240 Speaker 1: can't win in Missouri, probably no Democrat can win for 516 00:27:36,320 --> 00:27:39,840 Speaker 1: federal office, at least in this environment in Missouri. Because 517 00:27:40,560 --> 00:27:44,560 Speaker 1: she's run a really effective campaign. Um. She's a very 518 00:27:44,600 --> 00:27:46,960 Speaker 1: good senator, and I think if she were to lose, 519 00:27:47,000 --> 00:27:49,920 Speaker 1: it would be basically just that they want a supporter 520 00:27:50,000 --> 00:27:52,320 Speaker 1: of Donald Trump's in the Senate. Claire. Let's talk about 521 00:27:52,320 --> 00:27:55,080 Speaker 1: the governor's race in Florida between Andrew Gillam and ron 522 00:27:55,200 --> 00:27:58,160 Speaker 1: De Santis. Andrew Gillam is doing pretty well, so so 523 00:27:58,359 --> 00:28:02,080 Speaker 1: the background. Andrew Gillam is the is the Democrat, he 524 00:28:02,200 --> 00:28:06,440 Speaker 1: is the black mayor of Tallahassee. UM, and Rhonda Santis 525 00:28:06,560 --> 00:28:10,000 Speaker 1: is a pretty right wing Republican and they are locked 526 00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:13,200 Speaker 1: in a race that is looking increasingly bad for De Santists, 527 00:28:13,200 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 1: I think in part because of his his pretty far 528 00:28:15,880 --> 00:28:19,960 Speaker 1: right policies. Florida is a purple state. Gil Him and 529 00:28:20,000 --> 00:28:23,400 Speaker 1: De Santis were both kind of surprises in their primaries. 530 00:28:23,760 --> 00:28:25,359 Speaker 1: Then the Democratic side there were a lot, you know, 531 00:28:25,359 --> 00:28:27,199 Speaker 1: a lot of centrists that people thought would win. And 532 00:28:27,240 --> 00:28:29,200 Speaker 1: gil Him is kind of trying to run as an outsider. 533 00:28:29,240 --> 00:28:30,920 Speaker 1: So I think that's appealing to a lot of people. 534 00:28:31,040 --> 00:28:35,840 Speaker 1: And actually the governor's race might have cascading effects on 535 00:28:35,880 --> 00:28:39,040 Speaker 1: the Senate race because Bill Nelson is the Democratic and 536 00:28:39,080 --> 00:28:41,680 Speaker 1: coming in the Senate and he's running against Republican Governor 537 00:28:41,760 --> 00:28:44,360 Speaker 1: Rick Scott for the seat. And some people are saying 538 00:28:44,400 --> 00:28:46,640 Speaker 1: these are both older white men. Some people are saying 539 00:28:46,640 --> 00:28:50,200 Speaker 1: that gill Him might actually turn out certain constituencies that 540 00:28:50,240 --> 00:28:53,680 Speaker 1: wouldn't that Bill Nelson, the white older man, wouldn't necessarily 541 00:28:53,680 --> 00:28:56,400 Speaker 1: be able to get on his own. What's interesting, immediately 542 00:28:56,440 --> 00:28:59,120 Speaker 1: out of the gate, as the general election began, De 543 00:28:59,240 --> 00:29:06,200 Speaker 1: Santis mixed up um in racial politics um and arguably 544 00:29:06,240 --> 00:29:09,280 Speaker 1: it was his own fault because he used the phrase, 545 00:29:09,520 --> 00:29:12,080 Speaker 1: let's not monkey up the progress that we've made in 546 00:29:12,120 --> 00:29:15,080 Speaker 1: Florida with a liberal governor and a lot of people 547 00:29:15,120 --> 00:29:17,400 Speaker 1: took that to be a racial attack on Andrew Gilham, 548 00:29:17,440 --> 00:29:21,560 Speaker 1: and it's basically not gone very smoothly for de Santis 549 00:29:21,600 --> 00:29:24,640 Speaker 1: since then. Well, Andrew Gillham was so effective I think 550 00:29:24,680 --> 00:29:27,520 Speaker 1: in the debate and that sound bite got played over 551 00:29:27,560 --> 00:29:29,480 Speaker 1: and over again where he said, I'm not saying you're 552 00:29:29,480 --> 00:29:33,320 Speaker 1: a racist, I'm saying racist, think you're a racist. Good line. 553 00:29:34,240 --> 00:29:39,000 Speaker 1: Let's talk about Georgia, the race between Stacy Abrahams, who 554 00:29:39,000 --> 00:29:42,920 Speaker 1: would be the first black female governor in history, and 555 00:29:42,960 --> 00:29:46,240 Speaker 1: Brian Kemp. There's been so much debate. I saw that 556 00:29:46,320 --> 00:29:49,800 Speaker 1: President Carter spoke out about this and said that Brian Kemp, 557 00:29:49,840 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 1: who is the Secretary of State for the State of Georgia, 558 00:29:54,760 --> 00:29:57,760 Speaker 1: should step down from that role during the campaign because 559 00:29:57,800 --> 00:30:01,080 Speaker 1: he controls a lot of the vote. Dean and how 560 00:30:01,080 --> 00:30:04,760 Speaker 1: it's carried out. Um, so help us understand that, Claire. Yeah, 561 00:30:04,800 --> 00:30:07,520 Speaker 1: So that the controversy in Georgia is that it has 562 00:30:07,560 --> 00:30:11,720 Speaker 1: a pretty restrictive voting law and a lot of African 563 00:30:11,760 --> 00:30:15,400 Speaker 1: American voters that their registrations now have problems and they 564 00:30:15,480 --> 00:30:18,040 Speaker 1: might not be able to vote in the election. And 565 00:30:18,400 --> 00:30:21,760 Speaker 1: what President Carter was saying is basically that Brian Kemp 566 00:30:21,760 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 1: is not an impartial administrator of this election and that 567 00:30:24,200 --> 00:30:26,840 Speaker 1: he shouldn't be able to administer it. Now, what's interesting 568 00:30:26,840 --> 00:30:30,120 Speaker 1: about Georgia is one it's got these racial dynamics, both 569 00:30:30,120 --> 00:30:32,320 Speaker 1: in the voting stuff but also in the in the 570 00:30:32,360 --> 00:30:35,640 Speaker 1: candidates themselves, with Stacy being black and Brian Kemp being 571 00:30:35,920 --> 00:30:38,680 Speaker 1: a pretty far right Republican. He's also white, white guy. 572 00:30:39,000 --> 00:30:41,760 Speaker 1: What I think is interesting about this campaign is she 573 00:30:42,040 --> 00:30:44,560 Speaker 1: is trying to win a southern state as a black 574 00:30:44,600 --> 00:30:47,720 Speaker 1: woman with a kind of new proposition, which is she's saying, 575 00:30:47,840 --> 00:30:50,880 Speaker 1: I am going to register and turn out a whole 576 00:30:50,880 --> 00:30:54,760 Speaker 1: bunch of minorities in addition to winning the moderate swing voters. 577 00:30:54,920 --> 00:30:59,360 Speaker 1: Those white college educated women said my friend like your friend, um, 578 00:30:59,440 --> 00:31:02,040 Speaker 1: And that's that's kind of a new proposition for the 579 00:31:02,080 --> 00:31:03,760 Speaker 1: South a little bit. I mean, you saw a little 580 00:31:03,760 --> 00:31:07,200 Speaker 1: bit with Doug Jones in in Alabama and that special election, 581 00:31:07,280 --> 00:31:08,680 Speaker 1: and I went and hung out with him in the 582 00:31:08,720 --> 00:31:11,600 Speaker 1: spring and for a profile I did, and Jones is, 583 00:31:11,800 --> 00:31:14,520 Speaker 1: you know, he's really trying to maintain ties to the 584 00:31:14,560 --> 00:31:18,680 Speaker 1: black community because they turned out in huge Obama level 585 00:31:18,720 --> 00:31:21,840 Speaker 1: numbers for him. Black women, Yes, exactly, And in order 586 00:31:21,880 --> 00:31:23,520 Speaker 1: for him to, you know, when he's when he's up 587 00:31:23,520 --> 00:31:25,800 Speaker 1: for re election again in he's going to need to 588 00:31:25,840 --> 00:31:28,560 Speaker 1: have that huge turnout of those black voters. So the 589 00:31:28,600 --> 00:31:32,080 Speaker 1: South we're seeing, you know, potentially with Abram's a bit 590 00:31:32,120 --> 00:31:34,360 Speaker 1: of a new dynamic of the kind of candidate that 591 00:31:34,400 --> 00:31:37,120 Speaker 1: Democrats see as winnable. Because I think that's what's different 592 00:31:37,160 --> 00:31:40,200 Speaker 1: with Southern Democrats in those Deep South states is often 593 00:31:40,560 --> 00:31:42,640 Speaker 1: I think black populations have felt like they don't have 594 00:31:42,680 --> 00:31:45,120 Speaker 1: a viable candidate on a state level that they want 595 00:31:45,120 --> 00:31:47,320 Speaker 1: to turn out for and vote for um And so 596 00:31:47,360 --> 00:31:49,000 Speaker 1: I think that's what those are the that's the different 597 00:31:49,040 --> 00:31:51,280 Speaker 1: dynamic that you're seeing with Stacy Abrams. When you say 598 00:31:51,360 --> 00:31:56,160 Speaker 1: problems with their registration or with something associated with their 599 00:31:56,280 --> 00:31:59,120 Speaker 1: ability to vote, what do you mean by that? So 600 00:31:59,200 --> 00:32:02,800 Speaker 1: Georgia's law has it that if anything on your registration 601 00:32:03,200 --> 00:32:05,720 Speaker 1: card doesn't match your I D. So it could be 602 00:32:05,760 --> 00:32:08,640 Speaker 1: a typo in your name or a number is off 603 00:32:08,640 --> 00:32:12,880 Speaker 1: on your address, then it invalidates the voter registration. So 604 00:32:13,480 --> 00:32:16,200 Speaker 1: if you're thinking that that has echoes to old Southern 605 00:32:16,880 --> 00:32:19,640 Speaker 1: poll laws, you are you are right. It's an incredibly 606 00:32:19,680 --> 00:32:23,720 Speaker 1: restrictive law, and I believe Kemp was, you know, basically 607 00:32:23,720 --> 00:32:26,840 Speaker 1: caught on tape at a fundraiser saying I'm gonna lose 608 00:32:26,920 --> 00:32:29,680 Speaker 1: if if all these people vote, which I think is 609 00:32:29,680 --> 00:32:32,760 Speaker 1: probably where President Carter's comments come from. A bit that's 610 00:32:32,800 --> 00:32:35,080 Speaker 1: quite a quite a skewed thing for a Secretary of 611 00:32:35,120 --> 00:32:38,720 Speaker 1: State to say. So. So, Georgia certainly has a long 612 00:32:38,840 --> 00:32:43,600 Speaker 1: history of restrictive voting laws and it continues in well, 613 00:32:43,640 --> 00:32:46,480 Speaker 1: and restrictive voting laws could be to go back to 614 00:32:46,560 --> 00:32:48,600 Speaker 1: my metaphor from the beginning, that the kind of the 615 00:32:48,640 --> 00:32:51,920 Speaker 1: third Sea wall against a democratic wave that Republicans have 616 00:32:52,000 --> 00:32:54,880 Speaker 1: put up that particularly in states that they've controlled for 617 00:32:55,000 --> 00:32:58,720 Speaker 1: some period of time, they can shape the electorate based 618 00:32:58,720 --> 00:33:02,200 Speaker 1: on who's allowed to vote and who isn't um. But 619 00:33:02,320 --> 00:33:06,720 Speaker 1: you know, those two governors races are really interesting because 620 00:33:06,720 --> 00:33:09,160 Speaker 1: they go to a larger debate that's happening within the 621 00:33:09,200 --> 00:33:13,160 Speaker 1: Democratic Party about where the party should go. Particularly in 622 00:33:13,200 --> 00:33:18,800 Speaker 1: advance of Gilham and Abrams are both considered sort of 623 00:33:18,880 --> 00:33:23,480 Speaker 1: mobilization candidates. That is, they're more about exciting the base, 624 00:33:24,280 --> 00:33:28,840 Speaker 1: getting large numbers of millennials African Americans to turn out, 625 00:33:28,920 --> 00:33:32,360 Speaker 1: with a more explicitly progressive agenda and that's been kind 626 00:33:32,360 --> 00:33:34,120 Speaker 1: of the way they've been covered by the media. But 627 00:33:34,120 --> 00:33:36,080 Speaker 1: I would say I think there's a piece that's missing, 628 00:33:36,480 --> 00:33:39,920 Speaker 1: which is that Gilham and Abrams have both also spent 629 00:33:40,000 --> 00:33:43,640 Speaker 1: a lot of time and effort trying to win over white, 630 00:33:43,760 --> 00:33:46,720 Speaker 1: moderate swing voters because they both have to do that 631 00:33:46,760 --> 00:33:49,240 Speaker 1: because the Democratic base alone is not big enough to 632 00:33:49,280 --> 00:33:51,120 Speaker 1: win in either of these states. And so I think 633 00:33:51,120 --> 00:33:53,240 Speaker 1: it's a little bit of a kind of a misperception 634 00:33:53,600 --> 00:33:56,080 Speaker 1: that they're just doing one and not the other. But anyway, 635 00:33:56,080 --> 00:34:00,400 Speaker 1: I'll get off my soapbox now. Finally, Claire, if Amocrats 636 00:34:00,440 --> 00:34:04,640 Speaker 1: win the House, which it looks fairly likely, is that 637 00:34:04,680 --> 00:34:09,239 Speaker 1: a yes, How will it change Washington? I mean, you know, 638 00:34:09,280 --> 00:34:14,080 Speaker 1: Washington has had basically one party rule during the Trump administration, 639 00:34:14,120 --> 00:34:17,200 Speaker 1: which means Republicans have controlled the House, the Senate, in 640 00:34:17,239 --> 00:34:19,640 Speaker 1: the White House. So I think if Democrats win the House, 641 00:34:20,080 --> 00:34:24,759 Speaker 1: they will be going gung ho on oversight, so you know, 642 00:34:24,800 --> 00:34:29,640 Speaker 1: looking into Trump's taxes, looking into abuse at certain agencies. 643 00:34:29,680 --> 00:34:32,279 Speaker 1: The e p A jumps to mind with Scott Pruitt's 644 00:34:32,400 --> 00:34:36,080 Speaker 1: uh sort of financial mismanagement. I think there's going to 645 00:34:36,160 --> 00:34:39,880 Speaker 1: be a lot more vocal oversight of what the Trump 646 00:34:39,920 --> 00:34:45,320 Speaker 1: administration is doing, and perhaps you know, investigations will be open. 647 00:34:45,400 --> 00:34:47,919 Speaker 1: So I think that's one thing. I mean, I think 648 00:34:47,960 --> 00:34:50,440 Speaker 1: that Nancy Pelosi, if she were sitting here at this table, 649 00:34:50,440 --> 00:34:52,720 Speaker 1: would say, we do not want to impeach the president. 650 00:34:53,280 --> 00:34:58,880 Speaker 1: And this goes to, you know, Brian's point about alienating voters. 651 00:34:58,920 --> 00:35:04,400 Speaker 1: I think people remember or how divisive the impeachment proceedings 652 00:35:04,440 --> 00:35:08,640 Speaker 1: against Bill Clinton were. I think people feel impeachment would 653 00:35:08,680 --> 00:35:11,319 Speaker 1: almost be a bridge too far. There will certainly be 654 00:35:11,400 --> 00:35:15,719 Speaker 1: Democrats who will be calling to bring articles impeachment against 655 00:35:15,760 --> 00:35:19,600 Speaker 1: President Trump, but I'm not sure that the Democratic leadership 656 00:35:19,640 --> 00:35:22,440 Speaker 1: wants to go that far and alienate a bunch of 657 00:35:22,440 --> 00:35:24,200 Speaker 1: people that they need to win over in twice. So 658 00:35:24,320 --> 00:35:27,480 Speaker 1: the Senate has to convict, right, convict. I mean, so 659 00:35:28,040 --> 00:35:36,040 Speaker 1: isn't it sort of just um kind of a pr stunt. Yeah, 660 00:35:35,600 --> 00:35:38,480 Speaker 1: it's a base it's a base rally. I think it's 661 00:35:38,480 --> 00:35:42,160 Speaker 1: a base rallying effort. Pre that would be the argument 662 00:35:42,200 --> 00:35:45,520 Speaker 1: for for bringing up impeachment, and I think the counter argument, 663 00:35:46,120 --> 00:35:49,719 Speaker 1: which again Pelosi vouches for, is listen, we can't do 664 00:35:49,800 --> 00:35:51,880 Speaker 1: this right now. We need to win. Yes, we need 665 00:35:51,920 --> 00:35:53,399 Speaker 1: to win the base, but we also need to win 666 00:35:53,960 --> 00:36:00,440 Speaker 1: Obama Trump voters in the Midwest. Claire Malone from Claire, 667 00:36:00,480 --> 00:36:02,879 Speaker 1: thanks so much. This was so much fun. I haven't 668 00:36:02,880 --> 00:36:07,760 Speaker 1: seen Brian this happy in months, honestly, Oh my god, 669 00:36:07,960 --> 00:36:09,880 Speaker 1: it was. This was very big for me. Thank you 670 00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:11,719 Speaker 1: very much. Thank you so much for having me. It 671 00:36:11,760 --> 00:36:19,800 Speaker 1: was very fun. From my into. Before we take a break, 672 00:36:19,880 --> 00:36:23,160 Speaker 1: a quick announcement. This week is our pre mid terms show, 673 00:36:23,560 --> 00:36:27,800 Speaker 1: so naturally next week will be our post mid term show. Gosh, Brian, 674 00:36:27,840 --> 00:36:30,080 Speaker 1: I don't know what you're gonna do with yourself as 675 00:36:30,120 --> 00:36:32,439 Speaker 1: part of that show. By the way, we want you, 676 00:36:32,520 --> 00:36:35,000 Speaker 1: our listeners, to call in and tell us what you think. 677 00:36:35,320 --> 00:36:37,040 Speaker 1: We really want to know what's on your mind, what 678 00:36:37,200 --> 00:36:40,359 Speaker 1: questions you have about what it all means. So if 679 00:36:40,360 --> 00:36:43,319 Speaker 1: you'd like to talk with Katie or me, which is 680 00:36:43,320 --> 00:36:45,239 Speaker 1: hard to believe, but mostly if you'd like to talk 681 00:36:45,239 --> 00:36:48,160 Speaker 1: to Katie, call nine to nine to two four four 682 00:36:48,280 --> 00:36:52,279 Speaker 1: six three seven, leave a voicemail anytime between now and 683 00:36:52,400 --> 00:36:55,120 Speaker 1: Wednesday morning, and we'll select a few of you to 684 00:36:55,200 --> 00:36:58,359 Speaker 1: be on next week's show. In your voicemail, make sure 685 00:36:58,360 --> 00:37:00,480 Speaker 1: to tell us where you're from, why you're hauling, and 686 00:37:00,560 --> 00:37:02,879 Speaker 1: your phone number. So that we can call you back. 687 00:37:03,080 --> 00:37:05,200 Speaker 1: We can't wait to hear from you again. That number 688 00:37:05,280 --> 00:37:09,120 Speaker 1: is nine to nine, two to four, four, six, three seven, 689 00:37:09,280 --> 00:37:11,760 Speaker 1: and we'll be back with Michael Lewis to talk about 690 00:37:11,800 --> 00:37:15,120 Speaker 1: the decay of the federal government. Yep, b that's right 691 00:37:15,120 --> 00:37:22,520 Speaker 1: after this. Now, before we talk with Michael Lewis, we 692 00:37:22,560 --> 00:37:25,600 Speaker 1: have an important message for you, and that message is 693 00:37:26,360 --> 00:37:31,880 Speaker 1: it's fun when everybody v O T S. That's my 694 00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:35,719 Speaker 1: new voting song. Brian, Yeah, Katie, I think what you're 695 00:37:35,719 --> 00:37:38,560 Speaker 1: saying is it's really important that everybody votes and that 696 00:37:38,640 --> 00:37:41,840 Speaker 1: they sing along with me. Research shows that the majority 697 00:37:41,880 --> 00:37:44,560 Speaker 1: of young people still are not sure whether they'll vote. 698 00:37:44,640 --> 00:37:48,000 Speaker 1: Can you believe that? What is wrong with you people? Brian? 699 00:37:48,040 --> 00:37:50,879 Speaker 1: Does that mean you're not sure yet? Well, I don't 700 00:37:50,880 --> 00:37:54,600 Speaker 1: think I'm still considered a young person anymore. Sadly, anyway, 701 00:37:54,640 --> 00:37:56,520 Speaker 1: if I am, I'm in the minority because I am 702 00:37:56,560 --> 00:37:59,319 Speaker 1: already a positive that I'm going to vote, and I 703 00:37:59,400 --> 00:38:02,160 Speaker 1: even have a plan to do so. And how self 704 00:38:02,360 --> 00:38:05,480 Speaker 1: confident do I sound? You sound very confident and I 705 00:38:05,520 --> 00:38:08,359 Speaker 1: am as well. I plan to vote. But I get 706 00:38:08,360 --> 00:38:10,800 Speaker 1: it some of you young people don't know where to vote. 707 00:38:11,080 --> 00:38:13,120 Speaker 1: You're not sure what's on the ballot. You don't want 708 00:38:13,120 --> 00:38:14,799 Speaker 1: to vote the wrong way, or maybe you just think 709 00:38:14,840 --> 00:38:17,880 Speaker 1: your vote doesn't matter. Well, surprise, surprise, We're here to 710 00:38:17,880 --> 00:38:20,520 Speaker 1: tell you it does matter. Look at two thousand, look 711 00:38:20,520 --> 00:38:24,120 Speaker 1: at one vote per precinct can make all the difference. 712 00:38:24,400 --> 00:38:26,880 Speaker 1: And lucky for all of us, our friends at Crooked 713 00:38:26,880 --> 00:38:30,440 Speaker 1: Media have launched votes save America, a step by step 714 00:38:30,480 --> 00:38:33,239 Speaker 1: guide to answer all of your questions. On votes save 715 00:38:33,320 --> 00:38:35,840 Speaker 1: America dot com, you can check if you're registered and 716 00:38:35,960 --> 00:38:38,840 Speaker 1: register if you're not. You can see what the rules 717 00:38:38,840 --> 00:38:42,080 Speaker 1: are in your state about registration deadlines and voter i D. 718 00:38:42,560 --> 00:38:45,640 Speaker 1: You can learn more about candidates and close races, and 719 00:38:45,760 --> 00:38:48,400 Speaker 1: you can look at a ballot guide that explains what 720 00:38:48,600 --> 00:38:52,359 Speaker 1: is on your specific ballot in plain English. So visit 721 00:38:52,480 --> 00:38:55,560 Speaker 1: votes save America dot com and remember to vote. On 722 00:38:55,640 --> 00:38:58,960 Speaker 1: November six, we turned out to Michael Lewis. He's written 723 00:38:59,000 --> 00:39:02,560 Speaker 1: bestsellers like The Blindside, The Big Short, and Moneyball, all 724 00:39:02,560 --> 00:39:05,040 Speaker 1: of which were adapted for the big screen. By the way, 725 00:39:05,200 --> 00:39:07,840 Speaker 1: Michael has a knack for taking a topic that seems 726 00:39:07,840 --> 00:39:11,360 Speaker 1: boring or complicated, like statistics in baseball, for example, and 727 00:39:11,400 --> 00:39:14,759 Speaker 1: making it very exciting and relevant and that's exactly what 728 00:39:14,800 --> 00:39:17,239 Speaker 1: he's done in his latest book, which is called The 729 00:39:17,239 --> 00:39:19,920 Speaker 1: Fifth Risk. The new book tackles the decay of the 730 00:39:19,960 --> 00:39:23,160 Speaker 1: federal government under the Trump administration. So we'll talk with 731 00:39:23,239 --> 00:39:26,880 Speaker 1: Michael about why this could be really, really dangerous for 732 00:39:26,920 --> 00:39:30,120 Speaker 1: the world, for our country, and how it could be stopped. 733 00:39:34,400 --> 00:39:36,759 Speaker 1: Michael Lewis, Welcome to the podcast. We're thrilled to have 734 00:39:36,880 --> 00:39:38,920 Speaker 1: you here. Pleasure to be here. I know that your 735 00:39:38,960 --> 00:39:41,960 Speaker 1: book tries to pull back the curtain and really show 736 00:39:42,000 --> 00:39:44,600 Speaker 1: people with the impact of two years of the Trump 737 00:39:44,640 --> 00:39:49,120 Speaker 1: administration has had on the federal government. And you really 738 00:39:49,160 --> 00:39:53,080 Speaker 1: talk about the importance of the transition from the very 739 00:39:53,120 --> 00:39:57,440 Speaker 1: beginning as there's a transition from one administration to another. 740 00:39:58,120 --> 00:40:01,400 Speaker 1: So tell us why the this period of time is 741 00:40:01,480 --> 00:40:07,080 Speaker 1: so critical. Well, the United States government, unlike most governments 742 00:40:07,080 --> 00:40:10,360 Speaker 1: in the world, has a layer of leadership. It's politically 743 00:40:10,360 --> 00:40:13,320 Speaker 1: import appointed four thousand or so people who are actually 744 00:40:13,400 --> 00:40:17,960 Speaker 1: run the place are appointed by the president. And what 745 00:40:18,080 --> 00:40:22,000 Speaker 1: you have after a presidential election, assuming that the incumbent 746 00:40:22,040 --> 00:40:25,799 Speaker 1: doesn't win, is someone's leaving with their four thousand people 747 00:40:25,840 --> 00:40:28,840 Speaker 1: who have been running the place for a while, and 748 00:40:28,880 --> 00:40:31,440 Speaker 1: someone's coming in with their four thousand people, many of 749 00:40:31,480 --> 00:40:34,360 Speaker 1: whom have never been there before. There's this transfer of 750 00:40:34,440 --> 00:40:37,920 Speaker 1: knowledge that is absolutely critical, and it is has nothing 751 00:40:37,960 --> 00:40:40,640 Speaker 1: to do with political ideology. It's so sort of how 752 00:40:40,760 --> 00:40:43,319 Speaker 1: to So you go into the Department of Energy and 753 00:40:43,320 --> 00:40:46,600 Speaker 1: they say, we managed the nuclear arsenal. Here's how you 754 00:40:46,719 --> 00:40:52,440 Speaker 1: test stomic weapons without actually blowing one up. Important. In fact, 755 00:40:52,640 --> 00:40:54,880 Speaker 1: you can think of the federal government as like this 756 00:40:55,000 --> 00:40:58,719 Speaker 1: huge portfolio of risks that are being managed, and many 757 00:40:58,760 --> 00:41:02,240 Speaker 1: of which we don't even think about. And the idea 758 00:41:02,480 --> 00:41:05,240 Speaker 1: is that you know, before the election, well before the election, 759 00:41:05,440 --> 00:41:09,480 Speaker 1: the candidates of both major parties have hundreds of people 760 00:41:09,680 --> 00:41:12,239 Speaker 1: waiting to rush in the day after the election, because 761 00:41:12,239 --> 00:41:16,160 Speaker 1: you really only have from from that day until the inauguration. 762 00:41:16,320 --> 00:41:19,160 Speaker 1: And then by a law, the people who have left 763 00:41:19,239 --> 00:41:20,959 Speaker 1: are not allowed to get in touch with the people 764 00:41:20,960 --> 00:41:25,120 Speaker 1: who are there. They can be solicited. And the thing 765 00:41:25,160 --> 00:41:26,799 Speaker 1: that interested me in the story in the first place, 766 00:41:26,840 --> 00:41:28,840 Speaker 1: because I did not have a native interest in the 767 00:41:28,840 --> 00:41:31,320 Speaker 1: Department of Agriculture, you know, I mean, they didn't occur 768 00:41:31,360 --> 00:41:35,359 Speaker 1: to me that would be material, was that the Obama administration, 769 00:41:36,120 --> 00:41:38,120 Speaker 1: partly because there was a law requiring them to do it, 770 00:41:38,719 --> 00:41:41,040 Speaker 1: but partly because Bush at handed the government off so 771 00:41:41,120 --> 00:41:44,520 Speaker 1: well to Obama had to go on to great links 772 00:41:44,600 --> 00:41:47,759 Speaker 1: to create essentially the best course ever created in how 773 00:41:47,800 --> 00:41:51,040 Speaker 1: the government works. Thousand people across the government for the 774 00:41:51,040 --> 00:41:53,719 Speaker 1: better part of the year putting together briefings. So if 775 00:41:53,760 --> 00:41:57,200 Speaker 1: you got made secretary of the Interior, you would be 776 00:41:57,239 --> 00:42:00,360 Speaker 1: briefed by people who really understood how the Interior Department worked, 777 00:42:00,400 --> 00:42:03,279 Speaker 1: and you would be hit the ground running. They were 778 00:42:03,280 --> 00:42:07,000 Speaker 1: expecting the day after the election for hundreds of people 779 00:42:07,000 --> 00:42:09,640 Speaker 1: to come in. So let's let's back up one day 780 00:42:09,680 --> 00:42:13,520 Speaker 1: before that, those meetings uh to election night, and you 781 00:42:13,600 --> 00:42:18,000 Speaker 1: tell this really incredible story about Mike Pence and his wife, 782 00:42:18,040 --> 00:42:22,040 Speaker 1: which is really indicative of how the Trump people felt 783 00:42:22,160 --> 00:42:25,640 Speaker 1: about their chances of winning and may explain the chaos 784 00:42:25,680 --> 00:42:27,960 Speaker 1: of the transition. So this is actually right. The key 785 00:42:27,960 --> 00:42:30,000 Speaker 1: to the whole thing is that they weren't running to win. 786 00:42:30,040 --> 00:42:32,200 Speaker 1: They didn't think they were going to win. Bannon would 787 00:42:32,200 --> 00:42:35,040 Speaker 1: take exception to this. Bannon may have actually, in his 788 00:42:35,120 --> 00:42:37,360 Speaker 1: heart of hearts, believed it, but most everybody involved with 789 00:42:37,440 --> 00:42:41,160 Speaker 1: it thought, including Trump, was not prepared to win. So 790 00:42:41,200 --> 00:42:44,040 Speaker 1: they had not written an acceptance speech. They had written 791 00:42:44,080 --> 00:42:48,359 Speaker 1: a concession speech. That explains why a lot of people 792 00:42:48,360 --> 00:42:50,520 Speaker 1: are willing to go along for the ride, and how 793 00:42:50,560 --> 00:42:53,280 Speaker 1: they go along for the ride because they aren't thinking 794 00:42:53,280 --> 00:42:55,520 Speaker 1: this man is going to actually run the federal government. 795 00:42:55,520 --> 00:42:58,400 Speaker 1: They're thinking he's building a brand. I think it's what 796 00:42:58,480 --> 00:43:02,040 Speaker 1: they were thinking. And I'm I'm building my brand being 797 00:43:02,040 --> 00:43:04,719 Speaker 1: associated with it for some period of time. I'm not 798 00:43:04,760 --> 00:43:08,760 Speaker 1: actually preparing to govern in the country. The Mike Pence 799 00:43:08,800 --> 00:43:13,680 Speaker 1: story was I mean Karen Pence, Mike's wife. Mike apparently 800 00:43:13,760 --> 00:43:16,759 Speaker 1: leaned over to kiss her when Pennsylvania was called for 801 00:43:16,800 --> 00:43:19,080 Speaker 1: Trump and it was clear Trump's could be president, and 802 00:43:19,080 --> 00:43:22,520 Speaker 1: and and she says, pushed him away and says, you 803 00:43:22,640 --> 00:43:26,360 Speaker 1: got what you wanted, Mike, leave me alone. And yeah, no, 804 00:43:26,440 --> 00:43:29,839 Speaker 1: I don't. She was the people in the room. It's 805 00:43:30,000 --> 00:43:34,520 Speaker 1: something that really makes feelings about winning. And Trump himself 806 00:43:34,680 --> 00:43:37,960 Speaker 1: had been playing the game. It's like he really is 807 00:43:38,000 --> 00:43:40,440 Speaker 1: a guy whose bluff is called. He had not taken 808 00:43:40,480 --> 00:43:42,759 Speaker 1: seriously the idea he had to take over this operation. 809 00:43:42,800 --> 00:43:45,960 Speaker 1: But Chris Christie had been appointed head of the transition, 810 00:43:46,600 --> 00:43:50,000 Speaker 1: and what happened right after election night to him. So 811 00:43:50,200 --> 00:43:52,320 Speaker 1: we really need to know is what happened before because 812 00:43:52,600 --> 00:43:55,719 Speaker 1: Christie had seen in the newspaper that they were required 813 00:43:55,760 --> 00:43:58,960 Speaker 1: to prepare for the transition and that there were federal 814 00:43:59,080 --> 00:44:02,040 Speaker 1: resources of ail able to do it. And he called 815 00:44:02,080 --> 00:44:03,839 Speaker 1: Trump and said, let me do it, because he said, 816 00:44:03,920 --> 00:44:05,279 Speaker 1: I'm not gonna be president, but the next of us 817 00:44:05,280 --> 00:44:08,560 Speaker 1: thing that's kind of planned to be president. And this 818 00:44:08,600 --> 00:44:10,640 Speaker 1: isn't my view, this is a view of just independent 819 00:44:10,719 --> 00:44:14,399 Speaker 1: referees like that. Christie did a superb job. He got 820 00:44:14,520 --> 00:44:18,239 Speaker 1: lots of really qualified people ready to go into the agencies, 821 00:44:18,640 --> 00:44:21,000 Speaker 1: and had also vetted a lot of the people who 822 00:44:21,160 --> 00:44:24,480 Speaker 1: might have be plausible candidates for the top jobs in 823 00:44:24,480 --> 00:44:27,280 Speaker 1: the government. So they vetted out Mike Flynn, for example. 824 00:44:27,800 --> 00:44:30,360 Speaker 1: And it's all ready to go in spite of Donald 825 00:44:30,400 --> 00:44:33,200 Speaker 1: Trump's actual hostility to the whole operation because they were 826 00:44:33,280 --> 00:44:36,279 Speaker 1: he thought they were spending his money and then and 827 00:44:36,360 --> 00:44:38,520 Speaker 1: that he wasn't gonna win, and he wasn't gonna win, right, 828 00:44:38,560 --> 00:44:41,680 Speaker 1: so why bother right? And Bannon said to Trump, well, 829 00:44:41,719 --> 00:44:43,759 Speaker 1: if you fire the transition, how's that gonna look on 830 00:44:43,800 --> 00:44:45,840 Speaker 1: Morning Joe. It's gonna look like you're given up already. 831 00:44:46,120 --> 00:44:47,720 Speaker 1: And so he said, all right, I just don't spend 832 00:44:47,800 --> 00:44:50,640 Speaker 1: very much money. But ultimately he did fire Chris Christmas, 833 00:44:50,640 --> 00:44:52,840 Speaker 1: So the day after the election they fired him. So 834 00:44:53,200 --> 00:44:56,440 Speaker 1: it was only for show. They built this great operation. 835 00:44:56,840 --> 00:44:59,080 Speaker 1: It turns out only for show that the minute they said, oh, 836 00:44:59,120 --> 00:45:01,400 Speaker 1: we're gonna do this, Trump got rid of him. And 837 00:45:02,000 --> 00:45:06,479 Speaker 1: the natural next question is why, uh and Christie would 838 00:45:06,480 --> 00:45:09,080 Speaker 1: tell you that it's because he put Jared Kushner's father 839 00:45:09,120 --> 00:45:12,880 Speaker 1: in jail back when he was a prosecutor for I 840 00:45:12,880 --> 00:45:16,640 Speaker 1: think that didn't help. Jared clearly wanted Christy gone, but 841 00:45:17,080 --> 00:45:20,120 Speaker 1: you had to have Trump's approval of that. And why 842 00:45:20,320 --> 00:45:23,839 Speaker 1: would Trump? If I were Donald Trump, I would have 843 00:45:23,920 --> 00:45:26,120 Speaker 1: somewhere deep in my soul a sense that I don't 844 00:45:26,160 --> 00:45:28,120 Speaker 1: really know how this thing works, that I'm gonna be 845 00:45:28,120 --> 00:45:30,400 Speaker 1: taking over and it would be nice to have all 846 00:45:30,440 --> 00:45:32,839 Speaker 1: these people who kind of know the thing, and they 847 00:45:32,840 --> 00:45:34,759 Speaker 1: can I don't have to pay attention to it then right, 848 00:45:34,800 --> 00:45:38,200 Speaker 1: and it'll all just kind of run. I think he 849 00:45:38,280 --> 00:45:41,279 Speaker 1: had positive reasons for one in chaos. I think that 850 00:45:41,400 --> 00:45:44,640 Speaker 1: they were friends of his people who were and people 851 00:45:44,680 --> 00:45:47,960 Speaker 1: have connections to Russia, like Mike Flynn, who he wanted 852 00:45:48,000 --> 00:45:51,200 Speaker 1: to be able to put in important positions. I think 853 00:45:51,200 --> 00:45:53,919 Speaker 1: he functions better. I think he thinks he functioned better 854 00:45:54,000 --> 00:45:56,759 Speaker 1: if it's not things are not orderly. So I think 855 00:45:56,800 --> 00:45:59,080 Speaker 1: he was just kind of attracted to, like, let let 856 00:45:59,080 --> 00:46:01,799 Speaker 1: the chips fall or they may. I'll take care of 857 00:46:01,840 --> 00:46:03,880 Speaker 1: all this. I'll decide who's going to be in the 858 00:46:03,920 --> 00:46:08,480 Speaker 1: cabinet mainly by casting them by appearance. And it wasn't 859 00:46:08,520 --> 00:46:12,520 Speaker 1: sufficient that Jared Kushner wanted Christie out. Trump also had 860 00:46:12,560 --> 00:46:14,919 Speaker 1: to say, I'm I want this whole thing gone. You're 861 00:46:14,960 --> 00:46:18,160 Speaker 1: saying that he wanted Mike Flynn in there because of 862 00:46:18,239 --> 00:46:21,640 Speaker 1: his connections with Russia. I can't imagine why else? Like 863 00:46:21,680 --> 00:46:24,839 Speaker 1: why else? Go to that trouble? Christie's operation had said 864 00:46:24,880 --> 00:46:27,440 Speaker 1: Mike Flinch did not be national security advisor. He's got 865 00:46:27,840 --> 00:46:30,319 Speaker 1: shadowy problems you don't want to know about, but just 866 00:46:30,320 --> 00:46:33,839 Speaker 1: don't put him in any important position. The Trump's are 867 00:46:33,880 --> 00:46:37,520 Speaker 1: insistent that Mike Flynn be in, and to the point 868 00:46:37,520 --> 00:46:41,319 Speaker 1: where they want to get rid of the entire transition operation, 869 00:46:41,800 --> 00:46:45,439 Speaker 1: which would prevent it from happening. Why else, I mean, 870 00:46:46,560 --> 00:46:49,239 Speaker 1: it's it's hard to it just it seems I don't 871 00:46:49,280 --> 00:46:51,960 Speaker 1: know this for a fact, but it seems a plausible explanation. 872 00:46:52,040 --> 00:46:55,160 Speaker 1: And to what end, you know? I wonder about this 873 00:46:55,640 --> 00:46:57,799 Speaker 1: that I think that we will find out eventually when 874 00:46:57,800 --> 00:47:01,600 Speaker 1: we untangled Donald Trump's finances and his relationships to the Russians. 875 00:47:02,120 --> 00:47:04,680 Speaker 1: What he's thinking in the back of his lizard brain 876 00:47:05,040 --> 00:47:10,120 Speaker 1: is if this proceeds normally, and the State Department is 877 00:47:10,200 --> 00:47:14,120 Speaker 1: run normally, for example, it could be harder to cloud 878 00:47:14,520 --> 00:47:16,919 Speaker 1: my relations with these people. People are gonna know things, 879 00:47:17,040 --> 00:47:20,760 Speaker 1: find out things people who aren't allies. Um, I want allies. 880 00:47:20,800 --> 00:47:24,719 Speaker 1: I want loyalists around this issue, because loyalists will keep 881 00:47:24,760 --> 00:47:27,439 Speaker 1: the trap shut that if I had to bet, But again, 882 00:47:27,480 --> 00:47:30,120 Speaker 1: I don't know that. But never mind the motive for 883 00:47:30,160 --> 00:47:33,799 Speaker 1: a second. Just the fact of it is astonishing. You know, 884 00:47:34,000 --> 00:47:36,560 Speaker 1: in a normal society that understood the value of its 885 00:47:36,600 --> 00:47:38,840 Speaker 1: government that had been a revolt, we're not going to 886 00:47:38,960 --> 00:47:41,640 Speaker 1: show up for the briefings. It's crazy. I mean three 887 00:47:41,680 --> 00:47:44,080 Speaker 1: months ago when I was finishing, I was still getting 888 00:47:44,120 --> 00:47:48,719 Speaker 1: briefings from very important people in the government that had 889 00:47:48,800 --> 00:47:51,480 Speaker 1: never been given because no one had ever showed up 890 00:47:51,800 --> 00:47:54,760 Speaker 1: to hear it. And it's just a loss of knowledge. 891 00:47:54,760 --> 00:47:57,520 Speaker 1: Who run anything that way? It's just there's no decent 892 00:47:57,640 --> 00:48:00,799 Speaker 1: argument for not learning about the thing you need to run, 893 00:48:01,480 --> 00:48:03,680 Speaker 1: which leads perfectly to the title of the book, the 894 00:48:03,719 --> 00:48:06,080 Speaker 1: fifth risk. Can you go through the first four risks 895 00:48:06,120 --> 00:48:09,040 Speaker 1: and then we'll talk about the fifth one. Well, there's 896 00:48:09,080 --> 00:48:12,320 Speaker 1: something that's not in the book that informed the title. 897 00:48:12,920 --> 00:48:14,880 Speaker 1: When I first started, I was talking to people in 898 00:48:14,880 --> 00:48:20,160 Speaker 1: the White House and they had planned a exercise which 899 00:48:20,200 --> 00:48:23,759 Speaker 1: was going to happen between the outgoing Obama cabinet and 900 00:48:23,760 --> 00:48:27,360 Speaker 1: the incoming Trump cabinet. They would scheme out what happens 901 00:48:27,400 --> 00:48:30,360 Speaker 1: is several terrible things happened. One was a pandemic, another 902 00:48:30,520 --> 00:48:33,040 Speaker 1: was a terrorist attack inside the United States with a 903 00:48:33,120 --> 00:48:36,879 Speaker 1: nuclear weapon. Another was a hurricane that surprised some part 904 00:48:36,880 --> 00:48:40,040 Speaker 1: of the country. The fourth was an earthquake in the 905 00:48:40,040 --> 00:48:42,600 Speaker 1: Pacific Northwest. And I said, what's the fifth and said, 906 00:48:42,600 --> 00:48:45,359 Speaker 1: we hadn't thought about the fifth. And I realized that 907 00:48:45,440 --> 00:48:47,680 Speaker 1: what I was writing about at that moment was the 908 00:48:47,719 --> 00:48:50,520 Speaker 1: stuff that nobody's thinking about because there's so much of 909 00:48:50,520 --> 00:48:52,480 Speaker 1: it within the federal government. It's sort of like the 910 00:48:52,960 --> 00:48:57,000 Speaker 1: risk we're not attending to sufficiently. This then happens again 911 00:48:57,080 --> 00:48:59,680 Speaker 1: when I go into the Energy Department and I'm sitting 912 00:48:59,719 --> 00:49:02,360 Speaker 1: down with a guy who had never given his briefing, 913 00:49:02,640 --> 00:49:05,560 Speaker 1: the chief risk officer, and he worked in the Obama ministry. 914 00:49:05,560 --> 00:49:07,520 Speaker 1: He worked in the Obama administration. He was brought in 915 00:49:07,560 --> 00:49:11,080 Speaker 1: by Ernie Monies, m I T physicist who had run 916 00:49:11,120 --> 00:49:15,640 Speaker 1: the Energy Department. His name is John McWilliams, and John said, 917 00:49:15,960 --> 00:49:17,480 Speaker 1: he said, actually, I came up with a list of 918 00:49:17,560 --> 00:49:20,560 Speaker 1: hundred and forty two basically existential risks. I said, I 919 00:49:20,640 --> 00:49:23,080 Speaker 1: don't have time pretend I'm like a Trump guy who's bored. 920 00:49:23,080 --> 00:49:25,920 Speaker 1: Give me five. And he says, I think in no 921 00:49:26,000 --> 00:49:29,440 Speaker 1: particular order, but he says one, Uh, that a nuclear 922 00:49:29,440 --> 00:49:31,640 Speaker 1: weapon will go off when it's not supposed to think. 923 00:49:31,680 --> 00:49:34,839 Speaker 1: He said then the Iran, that the Iran deal would 924 00:49:34,880 --> 00:49:38,360 Speaker 1: come unraveled, that the next administration would not appreciate how 925 00:49:38,400 --> 00:49:40,680 Speaker 1: important it was and how good a deal it was, 926 00:49:40,800 --> 00:49:43,040 Speaker 1: because they wouldn't bother to listen to the physicists who 927 00:49:43,080 --> 00:49:45,960 Speaker 1: would explain to them that now Iran cannot build a 928 00:49:46,040 --> 00:49:50,160 Speaker 1: nuclear bomb. And that's exactly what happened. Uh. North Korea 929 00:49:50,440 --> 00:49:53,399 Speaker 1: was I think the third. The failure of the nation 930 00:49:53,480 --> 00:49:55,920 Speaker 1: is in the electrical grid, which is a monitor. And 931 00:49:55,960 --> 00:49:57,640 Speaker 1: you think, oh, well, that's just the lights go out, 932 00:49:58,000 --> 00:50:00,560 Speaker 1: that's a disaster. People die, And then we get the 933 00:50:00,560 --> 00:50:02,880 Speaker 1: fifth and actually he said, let me think a little bit, 934 00:50:02,920 --> 00:50:04,520 Speaker 1: and I thought, well, we have a pattern. When we 935 00:50:04,560 --> 00:50:06,000 Speaker 1: get to five, we've got to think a little bit. 936 00:50:06,160 --> 00:50:10,080 Speaker 1: And then he finally said, very kind of innocuously program management. 937 00:50:10,520 --> 00:50:12,920 Speaker 1: And when he meant by that, which sounds incredibly tedious, 938 00:50:13,040 --> 00:50:15,160 Speaker 1: and in some ways it is incredibly tedious, but what 939 00:50:15,280 --> 00:50:18,920 Speaker 1: he means by that is that the government is managing 940 00:50:19,160 --> 00:50:24,400 Speaker 1: really dangerous situations that are very long term situations. And 941 00:50:24,440 --> 00:50:27,759 Speaker 1: the example I plucked out of the Department Energy to 942 00:50:27,880 --> 00:50:31,080 Speaker 1: use to illustrate the point in the book was, Uh, 943 00:50:31,120 --> 00:50:34,440 Speaker 1: the nuclear waste clean up in hand for Washington. Eastern 944 00:50:34,480 --> 00:50:38,920 Speaker 1: Washington is where the plutonium was created for the Adam 945 00:50:38,960 --> 00:50:42,839 Speaker 1: bombs that were dropped on Japan. In the course of 946 00:50:42,840 --> 00:50:45,040 Speaker 1: creating it, they were in such a rush they didn't 947 00:50:45,040 --> 00:50:47,960 Speaker 1: pay attention what they were doing. The waste materials hundreds 948 00:50:47,960 --> 00:50:51,040 Speaker 1: of millions of gallons filled with with stuff you don't 949 00:50:51,040 --> 00:50:55,960 Speaker 1: want to touch. Uh. Beer anywhere near I mean anybody. 950 00:50:56,080 --> 00:50:57,479 Speaker 1: A lot of people who have worked at this side 951 00:50:57,480 --> 00:51:00,440 Speaker 1: of die of cancer. Uh. But just poured into the 952 00:51:00,560 --> 00:51:04,799 Speaker 1: into the soil, and there's this plume of it moving 953 00:51:04,840 --> 00:51:07,359 Speaker 1: through the earth to the wards the Columbia River and 954 00:51:07,360 --> 00:51:10,120 Speaker 1: it's being managed by the Department of Energy. They're spending 955 00:51:10,160 --> 00:51:13,640 Speaker 1: three billion dollars a year to clean this up. If 956 00:51:13,680 --> 00:51:17,080 Speaker 1: we just don't do that right and the stuff gets 957 00:51:17,120 --> 00:51:20,600 Speaker 1: to the Columbia River, it's catastrophic for the Pacific Northwest. 958 00:51:21,080 --> 00:51:25,839 Speaker 1: He said that was just one example. That's professional technical management. 959 00:51:25,960 --> 00:51:28,760 Speaker 1: That's got to be there. People who know about things, 960 00:51:29,120 --> 00:51:31,080 Speaker 1: and that's what the Trump people didn't bring in. They 961 00:51:31,080 --> 00:51:33,920 Speaker 1: didn't bring anybody who knew about anything. It sounds like 962 00:51:34,000 --> 00:51:37,120 Speaker 1: you really outline a lot of disasters waiting to happen, 963 00:51:37,120 --> 00:51:40,080 Speaker 1: and not just at the Department of Energy, but in 964 00:51:40,200 --> 00:51:44,879 Speaker 1: other very frankly unsexy agencies like the Department of Agriculture 965 00:51:44,880 --> 00:51:47,759 Speaker 1: and the Department of Commerce. The whole point was to 966 00:51:47,800 --> 00:51:50,120 Speaker 1: take things that nobody's paying attention to, which is kind 967 00:51:50,120 --> 00:51:52,800 Speaker 1: of your area of expertise. I feel like you always 968 00:51:52,800 --> 00:51:55,879 Speaker 1: take these sort of arcane, dry subjects and you kind 969 00:51:55,880 --> 00:51:58,359 Speaker 1: of make them fun and entertaining. You have to hear 970 00:51:58,400 --> 00:52:00,239 Speaker 1: three or four times that you should read the book 971 00:52:00,239 --> 00:52:02,360 Speaker 1: before you actually think I better read the book, because 972 00:52:02,360 --> 00:52:03,799 Speaker 1: it really do I want to read a book about 973 00:52:03,840 --> 00:52:07,000 Speaker 1: the Department Agriculture, but talk about the Department of agriculture 974 00:52:07,040 --> 00:52:10,280 Speaker 1: and Commerce, and I think a lot of listeners Michael 975 00:52:10,320 --> 00:52:13,319 Speaker 1: will be surprised to hear what they have per view 976 00:52:13,560 --> 00:52:17,840 Speaker 1: over and how important they are. They're all misnamed, these departments. 977 00:52:18,160 --> 00:52:21,919 Speaker 1: I mean, we've gotten so detached from our government. That's 978 00:52:21,920 --> 00:52:24,279 Speaker 1: so the reason I picked the ones I picked was 979 00:52:24,400 --> 00:52:27,719 Speaker 1: I just wanted to dramatize how little we all know 980 00:52:27,920 --> 00:52:31,680 Speaker 1: about what our government does. But the Department Agriculture, it 981 00:52:31,760 --> 00:52:37,239 Speaker 1: does subsidize farming. It was created by Lincoln during the 982 00:52:37,280 --> 00:52:41,480 Speaker 1: middle of the Civil War UH with the explicit mission 983 00:52:42,120 --> 00:52:46,719 Speaker 1: to turn agriculture into a science so farming could be 984 00:52:46,800 --> 00:52:49,920 Speaker 1: very more efficient, so we need fewer farmers, so those 985 00:52:49,960 --> 00:52:52,000 Speaker 1: people could go then go do other things, and the 986 00:52:52,040 --> 00:52:57,720 Speaker 1: economy would grow. The enterprise has been spectacularly successful. Farmers 987 00:52:57,800 --> 00:52:59,279 Speaker 1: used to feed a few people, and now they feed 988 00:52:59,440 --> 00:53:01,680 Speaker 1: each heeds a few hundred people who we need many 989 00:53:01,719 --> 00:53:06,120 Speaker 1: fewer farmers. It is now expanded into a science project 990 00:53:06,239 --> 00:53:09,880 Speaker 1: that UH that just distributes about three billion dollars a 991 00:53:09,960 --> 00:53:13,480 Speaker 1: year in grants to researchers, almost all of them one 992 00:53:13,520 --> 00:53:17,240 Speaker 1: way or another related to how we secure the food 993 00:53:17,239 --> 00:53:20,440 Speaker 1: supply UH in the face of climate change, UM and 994 00:53:20,520 --> 00:53:24,440 Speaker 1: food safety by the way, I just want to interject food. Yeah, 995 00:53:24,680 --> 00:53:27,200 Speaker 1: you know, how do we make sure that our chicken 996 00:53:27,320 --> 00:53:30,879 Speaker 1: doesn't poison us? Among other things, the Department of Agriculture 997 00:53:31,440 --> 00:53:35,359 Speaker 1: inspects the nine billion birds a year that are killed 998 00:53:35,360 --> 00:53:37,640 Speaker 1: in America so we can eat them, not to mention 999 00:53:37,760 --> 00:53:41,440 Speaker 1: cows and all kinds of others, all kinds of other things. Now, 1000 00:53:41,480 --> 00:53:44,960 Speaker 1: if you're hiring someone to pass out three billion dollars 1001 00:53:45,000 --> 00:53:46,680 Speaker 1: a year in grants, too, you would want to probably 1002 00:53:46,680 --> 00:53:49,160 Speaker 1: want to hire someone who knew about agricultural research. And 1003 00:53:49,160 --> 00:53:51,479 Speaker 1: that's usually who occupies the job of scientists, someone who's 1004 00:53:51,520 --> 00:53:54,160 Speaker 1: done their own research, is respected in the field. Uh. 1005 00:53:54,200 --> 00:53:56,600 Speaker 1: And that's who was there when Trump came in and 1006 00:53:56,640 --> 00:54:01,120 Speaker 1: Trump nominated to replace her, uh, a right wing talk 1007 00:54:01,160 --> 00:54:03,839 Speaker 1: show radio host from Iowa who supported him, who has 1008 00:54:03,840 --> 00:54:08,240 Speaker 1: no science background whatsoever. I mean, just this kind of stuff. 1009 00:54:08,560 --> 00:54:11,320 Speaker 1: It's like like I don't know about agricultural science, but 1010 00:54:11,360 --> 00:54:13,880 Speaker 1: I stayed it in a holiday in express. It is 1011 00:54:14,000 --> 00:54:17,480 Speaker 1: like happened across the government. Uh So that's three billion 1012 00:54:17,480 --> 00:54:20,040 Speaker 1: dollars a year. I think the Agriculture Department budget is 1013 00:54:20,080 --> 00:54:23,120 Speaker 1: close to two hundred billion, and much of that if 1014 00:54:23,120 --> 00:54:26,480 Speaker 1: you follow just the money, it's feeding people. It's feeding 1015 00:54:26,800 --> 00:54:29,440 Speaker 1: poor kids, it's feeding old people. It's food stamps, and 1016 00:54:29,440 --> 00:54:31,920 Speaker 1: it's school nutrition programs. That's where the bulk of the 1017 00:54:32,000 --> 00:54:35,000 Speaker 1: money goes. And those programs, when you actually dig into 1018 00:54:35,000 --> 00:54:37,279 Speaker 1: them and talk to the people who administer them, the 1019 00:54:37,280 --> 00:54:39,319 Speaker 1: Trump people would love to cut them. But you're what 1020 00:54:39,400 --> 00:54:41,919 Speaker 1: you're doing is you're you're leaving kids hungry and old 1021 00:54:42,000 --> 00:54:45,680 Speaker 1: people hungry. I describe how ignorance is actually a tool 1022 00:54:45,719 --> 00:54:48,400 Speaker 1: for Trump that if you do remain ignorant of the 1023 00:54:48,760 --> 00:54:50,959 Speaker 1: of the thing, you can you can do all sorts 1024 00:54:51,000 --> 00:54:55,120 Speaker 1: of brutal stuff and positiblemility you can put if as 1025 00:54:55,160 --> 00:54:57,240 Speaker 1: long as you don't meet a kid who's going hungry 1026 00:54:57,400 --> 00:55:00,320 Speaker 1: and as a result can't concentrate at school as a result, 1027 00:55:00,360 --> 00:55:02,640 Speaker 1: one thing leads to another and the life ends and tragedy. 1028 00:55:03,400 --> 00:55:05,000 Speaker 1: You can say, oh yea Alice has cut the school 1029 00:55:05,080 --> 00:55:08,040 Speaker 1: lunch program. In fact, when you get into it, you 1030 00:55:08,080 --> 00:55:12,839 Speaker 1: find these dedicated public servants who really understand the programs 1031 00:55:13,000 --> 00:55:16,680 Speaker 1: and understand that, like the problem with the programs isn't fraud, 1032 00:55:16,880 --> 00:55:19,239 Speaker 1: which is what some people have you believe, they're very 1033 00:55:19,239 --> 00:55:22,160 Speaker 1: little fraud and and they work very hard to eliminate it. 1034 00:55:22,360 --> 00:55:25,480 Speaker 1: The problem is if they're not as heavily used as 1035 00:55:25,480 --> 00:55:27,880 Speaker 1: they should be, that the people who need them don't 1036 00:55:28,360 --> 00:55:31,120 Speaker 1: have too much trouble getting access to them, and the 1037 00:55:31,120 --> 00:55:34,319 Speaker 1: people who really care about them solve those problems so 1038 00:55:34,360 --> 00:55:37,239 Speaker 1: on a state by state basis, When you don't we 1039 00:55:37,280 --> 00:55:39,120 Speaker 1: don't acknowledge any of that. When you say, oh, just 1040 00:55:39,120 --> 00:55:41,239 Speaker 1: get rid of the government is too big, what you're 1041 00:55:41,280 --> 00:55:44,840 Speaker 1: doing is just ignoring the problem altogether. And when you 1042 00:55:44,880 --> 00:55:49,480 Speaker 1: say that government workers are these incompetent bureaucrats who don't 1043 00:55:49,520 --> 00:55:52,520 Speaker 1: know what they're doing, you sort of support the idea 1044 00:55:52,600 --> 00:55:54,960 Speaker 1: of just cutting off all these programs, no matter how 1045 00:55:55,000 --> 00:55:57,680 Speaker 1: valuable they are. I think that's absolutely right. And what 1046 00:55:57,840 --> 00:56:02,520 Speaker 1: I found in talking to these people, bureaucrats, civil servants, 1047 00:56:02,680 --> 00:56:09,320 Speaker 1: public servants, was that they were, as a rule, extraordinarily dedicated, 1048 00:56:09,360 --> 00:56:14,239 Speaker 1: hard working, mission driven people operating in a hugely dysfunctional system. 1049 00:56:14,320 --> 00:56:18,280 Speaker 1: And the fact that system is dysfunctional is our fault, 1050 00:56:18,440 --> 00:56:22,040 Speaker 1: not theirs. It's because we've resisted any kind of decent 1051 00:56:22,080 --> 00:56:25,400 Speaker 1: reforms of government. If you want to make the argument 1052 00:56:25,800 --> 00:56:29,480 Speaker 1: that our society is disintegrating and in decay, you might 1053 00:56:29,640 --> 00:56:32,120 Speaker 1: start by looking at what we've done with the government 1054 00:56:32,239 --> 00:56:35,200 Speaker 1: five times as many people in the federal workforce over 1055 00:56:35,239 --> 00:56:37,640 Speaker 1: the age of sixty then under the age of thirty, 1056 00:56:38,040 --> 00:56:41,440 Speaker 1: ninety billion dollars spent on i T in the federal government. 1057 00:56:41,719 --> 00:56:45,440 Speaker 1: Seventy billion is spent just on these ancients just maintaining 1058 00:56:45,480 --> 00:56:48,719 Speaker 1: these ancient, decrepit systems from the sixties. It's it's a 1059 00:56:48,760 --> 00:56:52,799 Speaker 1: system that's almost built at this point to fail. And 1060 00:56:52,880 --> 00:56:55,440 Speaker 1: in spite of that, people want to come in and 1061 00:56:55,480 --> 00:56:58,560 Speaker 1: do stuff and sometimes do. Did President Obama when he 1062 00:56:58,640 --> 00:57:01,759 Speaker 1: was in charge, do anything to try to fix these 1063 00:57:01,760 --> 00:57:05,959 Speaker 1: problems you've identified? Not enough. The Bush administration had been 1064 00:57:06,800 --> 00:57:09,880 Speaker 1: beginning to engage with how you reform the government, and 1065 00:57:09,920 --> 00:57:13,320 Speaker 1: the Obama administration has kind of started over. The world's 1066 00:57:13,320 --> 00:57:15,960 Speaker 1: authority on this is Max Styre, who runs something called 1067 00:57:15,960 --> 00:57:19,800 Speaker 1: a Partnership for Public Service, which is this extraordinary nonprofit 1068 00:57:20,080 --> 00:57:22,800 Speaker 1: started by one guy who basically said, I'm going to 1069 00:57:22,880 --> 00:57:25,439 Speaker 1: try to fix the government. I'm gonna start by trying 1070 00:57:25,440 --> 00:57:28,560 Speaker 1: to get young, talented people into the government. The only 1071 00:57:28,600 --> 00:57:30,280 Speaker 1: way I can do that is if I fixed this thing. 1072 00:57:30,560 --> 00:57:33,160 Speaker 1: He's managed to get the laws passed that require people 1073 00:57:33,160 --> 00:57:35,400 Speaker 1: to prepare for the transition, and he's got a lot 1074 00:57:35,400 --> 00:57:38,520 Speaker 1: of ideas about ways you might reform the place so 1075 00:57:38,640 --> 00:57:44,280 Speaker 1: it is more agile, responsible, responsive, and and just works better. Uh. 1076 00:57:44,280 --> 00:57:47,320 Speaker 1: And he would tell you that Obama was disappointing to 1077 00:57:47,400 --> 00:57:50,240 Speaker 1: him this way, but nothing like Trump, I mean really 1078 00:57:50,280 --> 00:57:52,280 Speaker 1: responsible and the kind of people he put into the 1079 00:57:52,320 --> 00:57:55,640 Speaker 1: government for example, that that he said, you never seen 1080 00:57:55,680 --> 00:57:59,160 Speaker 1: anything like Trump. We're two years into the Trump administration. 1081 00:57:59,600 --> 00:58:02,840 Speaker 1: Do you see it getting any better? At if the 1082 00:58:02,880 --> 00:58:07,520 Speaker 1: Democrats Michael take the House, will they have any control 1083 00:58:07,720 --> 00:58:12,880 Speaker 1: over the current state of disarray? So the answer is no, 1084 00:58:13,040 --> 00:58:16,280 Speaker 1: and no. Trump is symptom, not just cause here we 1085 00:58:16,360 --> 00:58:21,440 Speaker 1: don't elect someone who is so ignorant and negligent unless 1086 00:58:21,480 --> 00:58:25,280 Speaker 1: we have got to the point where were so misvalue 1087 00:58:25,360 --> 00:58:28,600 Speaker 1: and misunderstand the thing he's running. If the society understood 1088 00:58:28,600 --> 00:58:30,560 Speaker 1: the government, we all had a good civics lesson, we'd 1089 00:58:30,600 --> 00:58:32,960 Speaker 1: all say that person shouldn't be running that because that's 1090 00:58:32,960 --> 00:58:35,080 Speaker 1: going to be a catastrophe, because that that enterprise the 1091 00:58:35,120 --> 00:58:38,640 Speaker 1: government is really important. The narrative needs to change first. 1092 00:58:38,880 --> 00:58:40,240 Speaker 1: I mean, that's why I wrote the book. I mean, 1093 00:58:40,280 --> 00:58:42,520 Speaker 1: if they just try to start to change the narrative 1094 00:58:42,600 --> 00:58:45,960 Speaker 1: so people stop seeing the government as the problem and 1095 00:58:46,000 --> 00:58:49,840 Speaker 1: start seeing it as a tool as a solution. But 1096 00:58:50,400 --> 00:58:53,080 Speaker 1: you know, it's if this society is gonna survive, that's 1097 00:58:53,080 --> 00:58:55,000 Speaker 1: got to happen. So it's a big deal. I think 1098 00:58:55,040 --> 00:58:58,640 Speaker 1: it actually could happen. But you can change narratives. You 1099 00:58:58,640 --> 00:59:01,320 Speaker 1: know this, You've told stories. But yeah, we have to 1100 00:59:01,320 --> 00:59:05,880 Speaker 1: stop undermining this institution and starts trying to be constructive 1101 00:59:05,880 --> 00:59:08,560 Speaker 1: about it and understanding it. And meanwhile, if the Democrats 1102 00:59:08,600 --> 00:59:10,640 Speaker 1: take the House, they don't really have any power to 1103 00:59:10,680 --> 00:59:14,200 Speaker 1: do this, do they. If Trump is removed, that would help, 1104 00:59:14,720 --> 00:59:18,919 Speaker 1: but uh, it wouldn't solve the core problems. What's really 1105 00:59:18,960 --> 00:59:21,880 Speaker 1: needed is a political leader, probably will come out of 1106 00:59:21,880 --> 00:59:23,680 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, but could easily come out of the 1107 00:59:23,720 --> 00:59:27,160 Speaker 1: Republican Party who can make the positive case for government, 1108 00:59:27,480 --> 00:59:30,160 Speaker 1: which is with caveats, which we need to change this thing. 1109 00:59:30,440 --> 00:59:33,880 Speaker 1: We have a nineteen forties automobile on a twenty one 1110 00:59:33,960 --> 00:59:38,320 Speaker 1: century highway. Someone who can sell that case. I think 1111 00:59:38,360 --> 00:59:40,040 Speaker 1: you can get elected selling that case. They just have 1112 00:59:40,080 --> 00:59:42,760 Speaker 1: to be good at it. And this is something that Obama. 1113 00:59:42,840 --> 00:59:45,640 Speaker 1: President Obama may try to sell because he's optioned the 1114 00:59:45,680 --> 00:59:49,800 Speaker 1: book to come up with the series for Netflix to 1115 00:59:49,920 --> 00:59:52,960 Speaker 1: help people better understand the government. Yes, it's just as 1116 00:59:52,880 --> 00:59:56,280 Speaker 1: a civics lesson, that's right. And I did three departments 1117 00:59:56,400 --> 00:59:58,880 Speaker 1: because it would be the work of many lifetimes to 1118 00:59:58,920 --> 01:00:01,560 Speaker 1: do the whole government. But you could do this in 1119 01:00:01,600 --> 01:00:05,640 Speaker 1: a fun way across the entire government. Well, Michael Lewis. 1120 01:00:05,680 --> 01:00:08,160 Speaker 1: The book is called The Fifth Risk. Thank you so 1121 01:00:08,280 --> 01:00:10,560 Speaker 1: much for coming into and talking to us about It's 1122 01:00:10,560 --> 01:00:16,680 Speaker 1: always great to see you. Thanks for having me. So 1123 01:00:16,720 --> 01:00:19,240 Speaker 1: that's all for today, and a reminder one more time, 1124 01:00:19,320 --> 01:00:23,320 Speaker 1: please vote on Tuesday, November six in the midterm elections. 1125 01:00:23,440 --> 01:00:26,439 Speaker 1: It is really important and on next week's show we'll 1126 01:00:26,480 --> 01:00:29,520 Speaker 1: be taking your calls and making sense of all the 1127 01:00:29,560 --> 01:00:33,200 Speaker 1: election results, or at least trying to. Emma Morgan Stern 1128 01:00:33,280 --> 01:00:36,680 Speaker 1: is our producer, Nora Richie is the associate producer, and 1129 01:00:36,760 --> 01:00:40,120 Speaker 1: Jared O'Connell is our audio engineer who makes every show 1130 01:00:40,560 --> 01:00:44,320 Speaker 1: sound like a dream. Ryan Connor is our audio engineer 1131 01:00:44,400 --> 01:00:46,640 Speaker 1: here in l A. I'd also like to shout from 1132 01:00:46,640 --> 01:00:50,240 Speaker 1: the rooftops about my team at Katie Kirk Media, my 1133 01:00:50,320 --> 01:00:54,160 Speaker 1: assistant Beth Dems and Julia Lewis my social media mix 1134 01:00:55,280 --> 01:00:58,120 Speaker 1: and a saucy one at that. Jared Arnold wrote our 1135 01:00:58,160 --> 01:01:00,560 Speaker 1: new theme music you can find me on Twitter I'm 1136 01:01:00,560 --> 01:01:03,800 Speaker 1: at Goldsmith b and you can follow Katie on Twitter, Facebook, 1137 01:01:03,800 --> 01:01:09,080 Speaker 1: at especially Instagram under Katie Kurk. Those Instagram stories are 1138 01:01:09,200 --> 01:01:12,840 Speaker 1: really something to follow. I notice you do, Brian, because 1139 01:01:12,840 --> 01:01:14,919 Speaker 1: I see your name all the time, so don't mock 1140 01:01:15,040 --> 01:01:18,440 Speaker 1: me too much. One more reminder. If you want to 1141 01:01:18,480 --> 01:01:20,680 Speaker 1: call in to ask us a question or share your 1142 01:01:20,720 --> 01:01:23,440 Speaker 1: thoughts about the mid terms, you can reach us at 1143 01:01:24,720 --> 01:01:27,520 Speaker 1: four four six three seven. Just leave a voicemail with 1144 01:01:27,560 --> 01:01:29,720 Speaker 1: your name, where you're calling from, and what you'd like 1145 01:01:29,800 --> 01:01:32,440 Speaker 1: to tell us, or leave us a message about something 1146 01:01:32,560 --> 01:01:35,040 Speaker 1: other than the mid terms, or you can always email 1147 01:01:35,200 --> 01:01:39,360 Speaker 1: us at comments at current podcast dot com. Thank you, 1148 01:01:39,480 --> 01:01:43,360 Speaker 1: as always for listening. We really appreciate your support and 1149 01:01:43,440 --> 01:01:45,240 Speaker 1: we'll talk to you next week.