WEBVTT - NFL Week 1 Game Lines Preview (Ep. 6)

0:00:07.680 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everyone, and welcome back to another episode of

0:00:10.119 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros NFL Podcast, brought to you by play MGM.

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Dan Harris. You can find me on

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Dan Harris eighty. We've talked about the sports

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>betting landscape. We've talked about wind totals and team futures

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and player futures, and how sportsbooks reacted to the Andrew

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Luck news and betting trends that we've noticed. But now

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>finally we get to move away from the longview and

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>focus on a weekly analysis. Starting now, we're going to

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>have two shows each week. The first one, which we'll

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>record Monday night, will take a look at the spreads

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and over unders for every game that upcoming week. That's

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:43.960
<v Speaker 1>just going to be our reaction to the lines and

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>where we think they might move by game time. The

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>second podcast, later in the week, we'll address some of

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>our best bets. This in case you hit your head

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and blacked out for a bit and think it's Thursday

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>or something. Is the first one of the week, and

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>with me to break down all the lines for week

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>one is Sean Green. Usually I try to give like

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a five word description of who our guest is, but

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 1>I cannot possibly sum up Sean that quickly. He is

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the co creator of the sports Gambling podcast. He is

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the host of Sewan's Sports Show. He is the co

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>host of Untied on Mad Dog Sports Serious XM. He

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>is a comedian and a writer, and he invented that

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>valve do Hickey on the artificial Heart. Fine, I made

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that last one up. That's actually just a line from

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the most underrated movies of all time, My

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Blue Heaven with Steve Martin Rick moranis but the rest

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of that is all true. You can find him on

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Seawan T. Green Shawn. Thank you for coming

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on the show. How is it going?

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 2>Awesome? Man, Thanks for having me on. Yeah. I probably

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 2>need that heart valve thing. Sweating out these week one

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:41.959
<v Speaker 2>NFL games.

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, I am so excited that it's finally time.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>It's so ridiculous. And look, I mean, you know, I'm interested,

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of course in sports gambling in every single sport. Frank,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I love the WNBA actually, and I've talked about that

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times. I think that sometime where you

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>can really if you're attention, you can really make some money.

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>But there is nothing like real football to get us going.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So for me, this is basically like the last It's

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like leading up to Christmas morning, you know what I mean.

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh, totally yeah, And through the summer, the long summer,

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 2>you're just counting down the days to finally bet on NFL.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I did. I Actually I hit a couple of parlays

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>betting the NFL preseason, so I'm already ahead of the game,

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 2>which is pretty rare. Normally I don't do that much

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>NFL preseason, but I dabbed a little bit, hit a

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 2>couple and yeah, I'm already I'm starting out ahead, which

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>is a nice place to start.

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>That's always great. You know, we were thinking about doing

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>a couple of preseason episodes to address, you know, betting

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>on some of the preseason games, so we just did

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 1>not have enough time. But that's good because now I

0:02:43.560 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>know I can book you for next season and you

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>can be the preseason betting experts since you're clearly one

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of the top minds in the game when.

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 2>It comes to well, spoiler alert, just keep betting on

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens. For some reason, they keep winning every Harboll's

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 2>won seventeen preseason games in a row or something. Insane.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 2>So there you go. That's a little nugget for next season.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>You can do absolutely nothing else on this podcast, and

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>you have already provided tons of value to the listeners.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So congratu. Like you're betting you're already off to a

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>great start. So all right, Look, it's opening week. Things

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>are a little different than usual here in that there

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>really isn't all that much recent news for sportsbooks to

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>react to at this point. For example, on any given week,

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be injuries or developments on that

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>previous Sunday. But here, other than things like whether Cam

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Newton is gonna play and he probably will, or whether

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon is going to report and he probably won't,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>there's not much that's going to make a difference. So

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Shawn and I are going to quickly hit all the

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>lines here. But as I said earlier, we're not going

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to be giving picks on this show. This is really

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>about going through the lines and giving you our reaction

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to them. So Sewan, look, you host plenty of shows,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>as I listed, but this is my show, and it

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is a no nonsense show, and I make the rules,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>so we are going to go through them in the

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>order of least interesting to most interesting based on my

0:03:57.320 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>unofficial boring rankings.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, i'd like, yeah, I like this. I want to,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>I want to. I'm interested to see where you're gonna

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>start off as the Borinus game of the NFL Week one.

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, look, there's like an eight way tie,

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna I'm gonna just pick one of them

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and go with it. Now, for the spreads and the

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>over unders, we're gonna be using the bettingpros dot Com

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>consensus numbers. That is an aggregation of the odds that

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>are available on the market. And you're gonna hear me

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>say this a lot over the course of these shows,

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but there are occasionally pretty significant differences in the odds

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that are available in the market. For example, with the

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Cults and the Chargers, you'll see that you can get

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>a full point difference in the spread depending on where

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you look. For the Bengals and the Seahawks, there's actually

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a point and a half difference between two of the sportsbooks.

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 1>And again, we're gonna be using the bettingpros dot Com

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 1>consensus odds because that best represents what the market is showing.

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But bettingpros dot Com will also let you see all

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.479
<v Speaker 1>the odds that are available at various sportsbooks. So it

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing to check out if you're looking

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to maximize your return on your investment. And as we'll

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:59.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about more next show, you can do a ton

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>more over at bettingpros dot com, like at consensus picks

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>from experts, and you can see accuracy rankings. But for now,

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just know that when I list any given odds, they're

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot Com consensus ods. So, Sean, let's start with

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a game that few people outside of gamblers and fantasy

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>players are gonna watch, and that's gonna be the final

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.279
<v Speaker 1>game of the week, The Broncos at the Raiders Super

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>late for me on the East Coast on Monday night,

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>just getting started for you on the West coast. The

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Raiders here are laying half a point and the over

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>under is at forty three. Now, when the lines first

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>came out months ago, that's where the overunder was forty three.

0:05:31.360 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>It has not moved, but the line actually opened at

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders laying two and a half points, so it

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.280
<v Speaker 1>has dropped two full points. What is your reaction to

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this line, if.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Any Well, yeah, I mean, uh yeah, see that's right.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, uh whatever, Right, that's exactly right. It's just it's

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the most boring. It's not the one on the list

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of boring lines.

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I think the it's interesting. I'm surprised it wouldn't be

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a little higher for the Raiders. The public seems to

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 2>be somewhat high on the Raiders, and they usually the

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>hard knocks team will usually get a little bit of

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 2>a push. I think there's been a crazy trend of

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 2>the visiting team going six to zero or something like

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>that in this division matchup. But yeah, to me, the

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 2>matchup here is Vic Fangio versus John grud as far

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 2>as coaching, So that's what I'm really looking forward to.

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, we're gonna be watching it because we're

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be watching every football game. But I mean, when

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I see this line, it looks relatively where it needs

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to be. There's nothing too exciting here. There's no real developments.

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Brown is going to play, he was always going

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to play. It's essentially a pickham game. Now it's a

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>low over under total and that makes sense to me.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But really, Raiders laying half a point relatively a pick them.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll hold that half a point, and I

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 1>think the over under is going to wind up at

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>forty three. So again, nothing really exciting here. It's not

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a game that anybody except gamblers and fantasy players really

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>want to watch. So let's move on to number two

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>in the boring rankings, and that's the Falcons at the Vikings.

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings here are laying three and a half points.

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>The over under is at forty seven. Now again, the

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>spread opened at the Vikings laying four and a half

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and a forty seven and a half total, So the

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>spread has moved in favor of the Falcons just a

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit since it first opened months ago. Do you

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>have any thoughts when looking at those numbers?

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I guess it's kind of where I expected. I

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't be surprised if this number closes closer to three.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I think these teams are pretty evenly matched, both Dome teams.

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting to me that they're you know, the betting

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 2>public has got it so that the Vikings are laying

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 2>that extra half point. You know, normally you're saying home

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Field's worth three, they're giving them three and a half.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they're just factoring in. I know Minnesota has a

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 2>pretty good home field advantage usually that really helps their defense,

0:07:49.000 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 2>but again, the Falcons are a dome team, so I

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know if the noise and that kind of stuff

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 2>affects them as much as your typical road team.

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right. The surprising thing to me was honestly that

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it opened at four and a half, because to me,

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this does feel everything about it kind of feels like

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if they're on a neutral field, it's a pick them right,

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>which would make it essentially three. So at three and

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a half, I think it's fine. I could see it

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>moving to three, as you said, But in the end,

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>my guess is this is not something where I think

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>better as sharps or the public are really going to

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>push one way or another. The over under at forty

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>seven is right around I think where it needs to be.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Both teams have relatively strong defenses. The Vikings certainly have

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a strong one, so it's kind of high when you

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think about it in that sense, but again, both teams

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>are basically capable of bearing it out at any given moment.

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh sorry, I was just going to say the Vikings.

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>There's been a couple offensive coordinators teams that have kind

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 2>of signaled their intention as far as what they're going

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 2>to do on offense, and the Vikings have kind of

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 2>gone out of their way to say they're going to

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 2>pound the rock more and run the ball more. I mean,

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 2>they do have two really good receivers, but that's something

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 2>that I would keep an eye on because listen, if

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you're running the ball more, it could have an impact

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 2>on the total.

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for sure. In the end, my guess is Vikings

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>three and a half at most. You're gonna see Vikings

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>go to plus three minus three at this point, and

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure that the over ender is going to

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>stay right at about forty seven. If or no of

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason. Then again, both teams have kind of telegraphed

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 1>what they do, especially the Vikings. Next on our list

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is forty nine ers at Bucks. The Bucks are laying

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>one and the over under is at fifty. This opened

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Bucks laying two and a forty nine total,

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>so it has moved slightly. Look, you must be super

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>excited about this line, right, This has just got strong

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>reaction written all over it.

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 2>Oh. I mean not to tip my hand, but I've

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 2>been super high. If you listen to our division previews,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 2>super high on the Tampa Bay Bucks and really down

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>on the forty nine ers. Jimmy Garoppolo has just not

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 2>looked great in preseason at all, in practice at all.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And it's one of those old betting trends of a

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 2>West Coast team go to an East Coast team or

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, going to the East Coast. And another trend

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:57.839
<v Speaker 2>worth looking at is these Florida teams at home in September.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>If you saw last year, I think I think all

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:03.679
<v Speaker 2>three Florida teams went three and zero to start off

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 2>the season. And with the way that they've kind of

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 2>adjusted in the collective bargaining that they can't practice these

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 2>guys as hard, humidity and heat early increases the home

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 2>field advantage. So that's definitely something I factor into my

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 2>handicapping is high elevation teams and Florida teams are where

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 2>it's going to be super hot or humid, especially early

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>in the season.

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>So out of curiosity, if you were going to predict

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:29.960
<v Speaker 1>a line, if you didn't know what it was, would

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you have thought that the Bucks were then laying two

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>or three or something like that.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess I think it should be Bucks, mindus three. However,

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>I know the forty nine ers the public is kind

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 2>of on them, so I'm not surprised that they've kind

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of made it a pick because the forty nine Ers,

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>the consensus I think from the public is, oh, they

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 2>have a really good team, sh had hands, a really

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>good coach. All they got to Jimmy G was hurt

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 2>last year. That's why they were bad. Just swap him in.

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Now that he's healthy, they'll be fine. One I don't

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 2>think Jimmy G is completely healthy or completely right. He

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 2>also struggled in those three games before he blew out

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 2>his ACL and Nick Mullins didn't do a horrible job

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 2>for that forty nine ers team. Like, there's a lot

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 2>more issues going on in San Francisco than just Jimmy

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 2>G not being there.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, So let me ask you this, then, what

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>about the total at fifty that's a fairly high total.

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not you know, I think it's probably fourth maybe

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>fifth highest for the week, but fifties a fairly high total.

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I know the Bucks have what may be an explosive offense,

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>especially with Bruce arians running the ship, But do you feel,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if the forty nine ers, you know, you

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sound of course down on that offense? Did you expect

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the total then to maybe be a little lower. Is

0:11:37.000 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it more a question about the Bucks defense?

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the Bucks could still have issues on defense.

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 2>You're right, fifty for an opening day is kind of high.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>That's really what what came out to me. I mean,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I know it opened at forty nine. If anything, I

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of expected it to go down to forty eight

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half, especially, you know, given how hot it's

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be, which you mentioned assuming because it's in Florida.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, I just feel like in the end, you know,

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>guys are going to be you know, they're not going

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to be ready to go yet. You know, it's the

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.840
<v Speaker 1>week one. I thought because of the question marks on

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>offense with the forty nine ers, which are right. Everything

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 1>you're saying about Garoppolo is right. And you know, the Bucks,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>although they're pretty explosive, you know, the Winston was sacked

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>five times in that third preseason game. You know, the

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>running game can't do anything. I'm not sure they're going

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to be able to score it well. So for me,

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing that stuck out to me was less about

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the spread Bucks laying one. I'm fine, I could see

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it anywhere from the Bucks laying one two, as you said,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks laying three I think would be fine. But

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the over under at fifty, I really felt like when

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I was predicting it that that was sort of it

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>would have been about a point and a half lower

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere around there.

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I mean, you look at some of the the

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 2>other games Tampa Bay hosted in September last year, and

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>they did score in the high forties. Eagles they beat

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven to twenty one, so that's forty eight, and

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Steelers they lost twenty seven to thirty. So I guess

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>that's kind of what they're that high total on. But

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm worried about I'm worried about San Francisco's ability to

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 2>score on the road.

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I guess you know, one thing to

0:13:09.960 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>take away from this is that the preseason probably doesn't

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>move the needle very much from the opening lines, right,

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>because that you know that the forty nine ers, as

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you said, look terrible. Garoppolo other than Week three where

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>he looked passable, you know, not great, but certainly did

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not shine in the preseason, But the it didn't move

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>much that the line moved in favor of the forty

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>nine ers. Actually so yeah, yeah.

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.680
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think you know, the betting public, I

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>think is since so few of starters are playing now,

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 2>I think it's impacting even less and less as far

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 2>as what they do to adjust the number based off

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 2>what happens in preseason.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Yep, I think that makes sense. All right, Let's move

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Titans at the Browns. The Browns here are

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>laying five and a half points. The over under is

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>that forty five and a half, and this has really

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>barely moved since it opened. It opened at the Browns

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>laying five with a forty five point total, so a

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>half a point movement in both of those lines. Any

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>reaction to those numbers, Yeah, I.

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Would say that that kind of makes sense. Again, you know,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 2>when they're setting these lines, they're looking to get even

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>money on both sides. And I know the Browns are

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 2>just have been a huge public team. They just are

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 2>like they're the kind of the darling as far as

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl picks.

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Or you know, and Mayfield is MVP. The public's all

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>over them.

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 2>The public's all over them. No one's hyping up Tennessee.

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 2>And so you know, there's probably a point point and

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>a half baked into that line. Listen, Tennessee, they were

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 2>what nine and seven last year? Brown seven, eight and one.

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Brown's kind of had a thing last year where they

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 2>stuck up on people. Now they've they've cho you know,

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>they painted a giant target on their chest. And if

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 2>you're looking to find value long term and betting, fading

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 2>the public.

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Is always the thing to do, correct always.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, one in doubt, just go against the betting public.

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 2>They didn't build these million dollars sports and casinos by

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 2>being on the wrong side historically. So if you see

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 2>a team that's getting a ton of early hype, the

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 2>public's clearly backing them, you know, be hesitant on taking them,

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 2>or just know that if you are going to take them,

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 2>you're probably you know, paying an extra point point and

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>a half premium to bet that team. So all that

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 2>stuff's kind of worth factoring in.

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I expected this spread is fine. You know, I

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have no problem with five and a half. I would

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have felt that it probably should have been in around

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>five where it opened. But the over under strikes me

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>as a little high. I mean, both these teams are

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>defensive teams. Again, it could just be sort of public perception.

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>As you said, they're trying to get you know, basically

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>even money on both sides. So it could be really

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the public perception, but it seems to me, given the

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>strength of the two defenses, that would be more like

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a forty four and a half, you know, instead of

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>it moving up moving down. My guess is that that's

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>based much more on the money coming in rather than

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>what they expect.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, And I'm looking over at betting pros right now.

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 2>They have the consensus numbers and just as I thought,

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland getting sixty nine percent at minus five and a half.

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 2>So anytime you get like high sixties, seventies, I mean,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 2>anything that's up around eighty, then you really gotta like

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 2>just factor that into decide you're on.

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Let's move on now to the Redskins at the Eagles.

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got the Eagles laying nine and a half and

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the over under at forty five and a half. Now,

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>this is actually one of the more significant movers since

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the totals first opened. The Eagles were originally laying eight

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in most places, and the total was at forty six

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Basically, it looks like there's just doubt

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as to whether the Redskins can actually score any points,

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and I don't necessarily think that that doubt is unfounded.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts there on the nine and a

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>half and the over under at forty five and a half.

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I'm a Dahard Eagles fan.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So can you be objective?

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you be objective? I'm a Jets fan, man, So

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I can still do this. I can still get up

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. You just got to power through.

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Any The NFCA is historically has been a super competitive

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 2>division and anytime a divisional game you're getting close to

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 2>double digits, I mean you gotta look to the dog.

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 2>The issue here is Washington's left tackle, one of the

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 2>strengths of their team, is just refusing to play because

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 2>of his issues with the medical staff. They're starting Eric Flowers,

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 2>a right guard who is a horrible offensive lineman, and

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 2>they're bringing in Case Keenum, who the last time in

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Case Keenum was a quarterback for the Redskins. He got

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 2>destroyed in the NFC Championship game with a much more

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 2>talented Vikings team. So I think Washington is going to

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 2>have trouble moving the ball and scoring.

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Wait, look, hold on, everything you were saying is dead on.

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And because of that, How is it possible that this

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't actually double digits. That's really what I'm surprised that.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, legitimately, everything you're saying is absolutely correct. I mean, look,

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe not. I'm going to be so prize that if

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this does not get to ten by the time game

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>time rolls around, because there's got to be money coming in.

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>This seems to me. I was shocked, honestly when I

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of closed my eyes and said, okay, let me

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 1>think before I started even looking at any of this,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.239
<v Speaker 1>what this would be at this point, given everything that

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>you just correctly brought out, I would think that it's

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>honestly got to move a little to I'm fine with

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the over under. I'm fine with that, but I would

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>think would go over. But it's worth noting I mentioned

0:18:25.480 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>that you can sometimes get different odds at different sports books.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This is at nine and a half across the board.

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Everybody is in unison, so I must be missing something here.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But to me, I honestly think that this should be

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:39.600
<v Speaker 1>at ten, maybe even ten and a half, probably ten,

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and that I think it might end up there when

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden done.

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, I don't know if you on the

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>podcast if you discuss key numbers a lot, but for

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the NFL, key number three, four, seven,

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 2>in a weird way, nine is oftentimes a key number

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 2>for the sportsbook. So if the spreads at seven and

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 2>a half a lot of times and gonna move it

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 2>up a lot of times, they'll jump it up to

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 2>nine to kind of they call it teaser protection, right,

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>So if you're doing a six point teaser, they don't

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:11.879
<v Speaker 2>want you to be able to get the game down

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 2>to three or you know, under three, and you're getting

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 2>under that key number of three. So that's why, you know,

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 2>once it was at seven and a half eight, and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 2>then they saw it was gonna go up, they jumped

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>it up to like nine and a half. So if

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 2>you tease it down, it only goes down to three

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I do get that. I completely get that. Still,

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this line needs to move to ten. And I'm going,

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's go to the only line in any

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>normal regular sports fan should ever care about the only

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>game bills of Jets. Of course, the Jets here are

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 1>laying three. The over under is set at forty. Now

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 1>this open up. The Jets lank three and a half

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.959
<v Speaker 1>with a minuscool thirty eight and a half point total,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but it has moved just a little bit up. Any

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on those lines, No.

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you give me a blindfold and told

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 2>me to pick the spread, I would definitely would have

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>guessed three. Yep, very very similar, similar teams, similar states

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 2>of where they're at. The Bills defensive minded team, Sean

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 2>McDermott really coached up the defense well, and then you

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 2>got just a real wild card of quarterback Josh Allen,

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 2>who's made some plays, have made some crazy turnovers. And

0:20:22.520 --> 0:20:24.679
<v Speaker 2>then you got the Jets, who they got some weapons

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 2>for Sam Darnold. I do think Donald will have a

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 2>much better second year under Adam Gase and just helping

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 2>him out with Le'Veon Bell. There's certainly some questions Jets defense.

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I three totally makes sense, and I think

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 2>this is a good a good barometer game for both

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:46.719
<v Speaker 2>these teams. I think you'll get a kind of idea

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 2>of where these teams are at. As far as who's

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 2>gonna be runner up to the Patriots, No offense.

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm none taken. I mean to even be in the

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>conversation of being a quote unquote runner up I will

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>take any day of the week. Two questions. Robbie Anderson

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is likely to play in this game if he misses

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the game. I mean that's the last I heard. He

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was questionable for the week. If Anderson missed the game,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think that moves the spread at all?

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 2>No? No, I mean I would be pretty surprised if

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 2>you're if you're a non quarterback, you have to be

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 2>really like top tier to have an impact on the

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 2>on the spread. Usually it could be maybe Robbie Anderson

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:28.720
<v Speaker 2>goes out and a lot of people at him on

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 2>their fantasy team and all of a sudden they're they're

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>pounding the bills. But generally the linemakers won't really adjust

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 2>their number off a guy. It has to be a

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty big name running back or receiver for to really

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 2>make an impact to me when I'm when I'm looking

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 2>at games, left tackle is a huge one, and offensive

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>line in general, and this is again a nice way

0:21:53.160 --> 0:21:55.719
<v Speaker 2>to find values. A lot of times, you know, jo

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Q Public when on offensive lineman like Trent Williams for

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 2>the Redskins, or or Laramie Tunsell, who the Dolphins just

0:22:01.920 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 2>traded away. A lot of times when stuff like that happens.

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 2>The public, in their mind, doesn't compensate enough for that,

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and they'll compensate more for a guy like Robbie Anderson,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 2>who they'll probably be able to still have some offensive

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 2>production without, but not having a left tackle, especially with

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 2>a guy like Sam Dartled. If the left tackle was

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.480
<v Speaker 2>supposed to go out, that would definitely adjust my number,

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and maybe not for the public.

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're gonna talk about the left tackles, actually, because

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.199
<v Speaker 1>when we get to the Texans, we'll talk about the

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that hasn't really moved very much, and I thought

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that the addition of Tunsel actually might move that line

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a little more. I said two questions, but I'm going

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to skip the second one because frankly, we just can't

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>spend too much time on the pills and the Jets.

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's be honest. Let's move on to another not all

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>that exciting game, the Lions at the Cardinals. The Lions

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>are laying two and a half here. The over under

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is at forty seven and a half. This originally opened

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as a pickum game and the over under was at

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>forty nine, so the over under has been steadily dropping.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>It was forty eight just a day or two ago.

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Now it's at forty seven and a half. How do

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you feel about both those lines?

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean Detroit as a road favorite is historically

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of scary. Yeah, but again, that's what Matt Stafford does.

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 2>Matt Stafford beats bad teams. And I think the line

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 2>movement came courtesy of watching Kyler Murray play in the preseason.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 2>So this is a game where I do think watching

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 2>the players in preseason did rightly adjust the line movement.

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Huge questions on the Cardinals on the defensive side of

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 2>the ball, and just Kyler Murray in general, rookie quarterback

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 2>making his first home start. I guess it kind of

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 2>makes sense. I wouldn't be surprised if this gets above

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 2>three at kickoff. I wouldn't be shocked to see Cardinals

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 2>plus three and a half because they're just Yeah, it's

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Cliff Kingsbury's first start in the NFL, A guy who

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 2>wasn't competent enough to coach coach college football and then

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 2>somehow got a promotion into the National Football League. A

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of questions and I'm not even them, not even

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>a huge Lions backers. There certainly questions about Matt Patrician

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 2>and the stuff they're doing.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I think for me, the bigger number here was the

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>over under. Yeah, forty seven and a half. I you know,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand the questions on defense, especially for the Cardinals,

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>but you know, it struck me as too high, and

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised that it moved and that it was,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, originally forty nine, recently forty eight. Now at

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:26.120
<v Speaker 1>forty seven and a half. I could see it even

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>going to forty seven. I think that, you know, it

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>just it seems given what we saw for exactly what

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you said, given what we saw from the Cardinals offense

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason, and it might be different. I mean,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Kingsbury said that he was keeping at vanilla,

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 1>so you never really know how it's going to go.

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>But to me, the total seemed to be a little high. Again,

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that's right about you know where you know, not not crazy,

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but I would have thought it more like forty seven,

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe forty six and a half.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I do think that's reaction to seeing the

0:24:56.600 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Arizona Cardinals offense in preseason. Yeah, even if they're doing

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 2>a vanilla scheme, there's still some basic execution stuff that

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 2>he was clearly struggling with. So I think originally when

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 2>they hung a forty nine, their thought was, Wow, they're

0:25:09.920 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna move the ball on offense with struggle and defense,

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 2>and now they become less certain about them moving the ball.

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>No, absolutely, And again I check the lines every day

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>just to see where it was, and again it was

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>forty eight either yesterday or maybe two days ago, and

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>it's down to forty seven and a half. So I

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be completely surprised to see if drop half a

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>point further, as probably more money comes in, We're gonna

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 1>get into some of the more interesting lines here in

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a second, including the Chiefs that the Jaguars and the

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Patriots and the Steelers. But first I do want to

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 1>tell everyone about the sponsor of our show, play MGM.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Week one lines, So if you're listening

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to this podcast, you're probably thinking about placing a bet

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>on one of those Week one lines. And if you're

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey and you want to place any wager

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>on any sporting event, really especially Week one of the NFL,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>then the place to do that is on the play

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>MGM Sports app. Just search your app store for play

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>MGM Sports. You're going to see it right there. Download

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it and you can place a bet straight from your

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>phone and play. MGM has a ridiculous offer for new users.

0:26:08.080 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 1>If you sign up to play DM Sports and you

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>use our offer code Harris that is my last name,

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>then not only can you bet on sports from your phone,

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>but your first water of up to one hundred dollars

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>is risk free. Seriously, use our promo code. Place a

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>wager of twenty five dollars or more and your first bet,

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you lose, play MGM is going to credit

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>your account up to one hundred dollars in cash. Again,

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that's promo code Harris. To be able to place your

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>risk free one hundred dollars bet, it must be twenty

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>one years or older. And although you can sign up

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>an easily deposit money anywhere, you must be in the

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 1>state of New Jersey to place a sports bet. Visit

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:44.880
<v Speaker 1>playmgm dot com for the full list of terms and conditions.

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>And if you've got a gambling problem, call one eight

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 1>hundred gambler. All right, let's move to the Chiefs and

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars. Here the Chiefs are laying three and a

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.960
<v Speaker 1>half and the over under is at fifty two. Then

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs actually opened at minus five with a fifty

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:58.959
<v Speaker 1>two and a half over under. So what are your

0:26:58.960 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>thoughts there on those?

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean lots of unpack here because you got

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Andy Reid, who historically has done pretty well on opening day,

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.919
<v Speaker 2>and he's going up against a quarterback that he knows

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 2>with Nick Foles. They just saidden Mishawe McCoy. It's interesting.

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 2>So you said it open at five and now it's

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 2>three and a half.

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, and again these are months ago when

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it first up, but when it first came out. Yeah,

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was that minus five when it first came on the board.

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's it. I mean that's interesting too, because yeah,

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.199
<v Speaker 2>I would think it could even be you could probably

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>get away making it a little higher. So the fact

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 2>that it's three and a half, even though you're talking

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 2>road favorite, you know, it's the travel isn't as bad

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Week one because they're not coming off another game.

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it might be some of it. Of course,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they struggled a little bit against the Jaguars last year.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You know that was Mahomes's worst game as a pro.

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean part of it could be that. For me,

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>it's the total be over under at fifty two. I

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>mean I get it.

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 2>The Chiefs, you.

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Never know they can, you know, put up a four

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>spot with ease, but it's the second highest total of

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the week. It felt me more like a like a

0:28:04.640 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>fifty one or fifty one and a half, just because

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Jaguars have a strong defense. The Chiefs

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>have improved someone on defense. You know, the Jaguars are home,

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it strikes me as a close game. I

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just you know, I thought that the over under struck

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>me as a little high.

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the Chiefs have brought in new guys on defense.

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, you got Tyron Matthew, the Honey Badger, you

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 2>got Frank Clark helping out with the pass rush. And

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 2>the Jaguars have seemingly again they're they're making it clear

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to try and get Fournette back to

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 2>back to form, and I think they'll be running the

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 2>ball more, doing some rpo stuff, which is I think

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the Jaguars formula for victory in this game and in

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 2>general is ball control and good defense. And that's usually

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 2>something that would shade the under rather than the over.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Right. That that's really what struck out to me. I mean, again,

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>not not crazy, but it struck me as fifty two

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>seems a little high given what I think the game

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>is likely to unfold as All right, let's move to

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the Packers at the Bears. The Bears here are laying

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>three points. The over under is at forty six and

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a half. Now, this has not moved from when this

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>first came out months ago. It opened up with the

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Bears laying three and a half and the over under

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>at forty six, So very very minimal movement here. What

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts?

0:29:14.400 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this again probably makes sense as far

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 2>as the spread. You know Division games early on, it

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 2>makes sense to be three and a half the total.

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>The total again, yeah, forty six and a half. You're

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 2>dealing with a couple new variables with this Packers offense. Again,

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>they they seemingly haven't shown much with the floor. The

0:29:40.640 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 2>dynamic between Rogers and Lafleur is interesting, and the Bears

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 2>don't have vic fans here anymore. So I think I

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.239
<v Speaker 2>think there's a chance, especially Packers first half. I think

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the Packers are really going to have a chance to

0:29:54.760 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 2>put up some points just because you know they're gonna

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 2>come in with that Lafleur offense. That there's no tape on,

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 2>and instead of going up against Vic Fangio, they're going

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 2>up against Chuck Pagano, which is definitely a step down

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 2>in my mind as far as the coordinator.

0:30:11.240 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, without question. But you know, the other on the

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>other side of the coin, the Packers defense is greatly

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 1>improved too, right. I mean they added a lot of

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>pieces there last year when they played twice when the

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Bears were at home, the Bears won twenty four to seventeen.

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, for me again, you know, I feel

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>like I've been talking much more about the over unders

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>generally with these things. But again, I kind of expected

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the over under to be more like forty five and

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a half or somewhere like that because but you raise

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a good point with Fangio. So it's possible the Bears

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>defense takes a little step back here and we don't

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what the Packers' offense is going to look for. Yeah,

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's fair to me, you know, when

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it stuck out, this is where it's going to end up.

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I mean, the Bears are going to

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>be laying at game time. The Bears are going to

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>be laying three, and the over under is going to

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>be at forty six and a half. I can almost

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>guarantee you which is fine, and it's around there, but

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I kind of thought it might be more at forty

0:30:57.280 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>five and a half forty.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Six I could. I see where you're come up with that.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, let's move on to the Ravens at

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins. Now the Ravens are laying seven and the

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>over under is at a ridiculously low thirty seven and

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a half. Now, this opened up with a thirty seven

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>over under, but the Ravens were actually laying three and

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a half when this first opened up. And I look

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the other day and the Ravens were laying six and

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a half. It has now moved to seven. There are

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a ton of changes recently for the Dolphins. So what

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts? Do you think that this is a

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.880
<v Speaker 1>where the lines are going to end up at seven

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>and thirty seven and a half or what?

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think what will happen is it'll

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 2>it'll stay at seven just because the anti dolphin sentiment

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 2>from the betting public is so strong. I think it

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 2>could even go up to if it goes anywhere, I

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 2>think it could go to seven and a half.

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 1>One hundred. That's where I think it ends up. Seven

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's where I see it closing. Ass I'd really

0:31:48.560 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 2>be shocked if the underclose, if the total closes this low.

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>But again that's just based on the anti Dolphin sentiment.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, so the trends or stuff I'm looking at

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>when I'm handicapping this game home Dogs, historically, there's a

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 2>bunch of value there. Again, the Dolphins were one of

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 2>those Florida home teams, so that's something I'm factoring in

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson on the road. But the Dolphins they just

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 2>got rid of their left tackle, So that's that's the

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>other side. That's the other side of the handicap. And

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, Fitsmagic, who from what I've read, is going

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 2>to be starting. He's he's a guy, he's a guy

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 2>that you can tell him you're taking. But this guy,

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 2>especially early on or a couple of games, he's going

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to be scrappy. The problem is this, This Ravens defense

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 2>is really strong. Earl Thomas seems to be kind of

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 2>in fu mode. I mean literally, the last time he

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 2>was on the field, he's being carted off, giving Pete

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Carroll the finger. So he seems highly motivated. Those are

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.000
<v Speaker 2>kind of the things I'm looking to handicap. But as

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 2>far as where I think it'll close, I didn't think

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the under or sorry the total, the line will close

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:01.000
<v Speaker 2>higher to seven and a half. And I think if

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna bet the over, bet it now, because I

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 2>do think it'll go up a couple points.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's fine. I think the over under,

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll say roughly around where it is. I

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 1>mean again, if it goes anywhere, maybe have a point.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>But I agree I will be shocked if this ends

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Ravens laying seven. At this point, I mean,

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got to go up. For all the

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>reasons you talked about. It's just really difficult to see

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>how the Dolphins are going to be able to put

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>up any points whatsoever in this game. Steelers at the Patriots.

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Pats are laying five and a half. The over under

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is at fifty and a half. This opened at the

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Pats laying six and the over under at fifty one

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half, so they're not too much movement here.

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on this one?

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's see. Yeah, it's interesting the Patriots are they're one

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 2>of the teams. You said the Pats, right, Yes, the Pats. Yes, Okay, yeah,

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 2>they're one of these teams that I mean, hey, they're

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots. They're amazing. But when they have struggled, it

0:33:56.160 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 2>has been early on, right, you know, September is in

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the rough Mont, the Steelers playing against the Patriots. That's

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 2>always their super Bowl. That's the game they get up for.

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 2>When I'm betting, I usually look at what will happen

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 2>the Steelers a lot of time the game before they

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 2>play the Patriots. They often overlook that game because they're

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 2>so jacked up for the Patriots. The fact that they're

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 2>playing the Patriots the first game that I think actually.

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Is a huge benefit for the Patriots or sorry for

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.919
<v Speaker 3>the Steelers, because they get so jacked up to play

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots they can't overlook another team and they've you know,

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 3>just basically spent the whole offseason with the Patriots on

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 3>their calendar.

0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 2>There. Yeah. Other than that, I guess the number seems

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 2>about rights. I don't know. It'll be interesting to see

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 2>if there's any kind of crazy action one way or

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:46.879
<v Speaker 2>the other, because it is Sunday night, so there could

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 2>be some line movement as far as people looking to

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 2>catch up from what happened during the day. But and

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 2>let's see the total. Yeah again probably well, no, fifteen

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 2>and a half seems in the ballpark, Steelers have been

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:03.760
<v Speaker 2>able to show that they can just put up points.

0:35:04.440 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 2>The real thing that's interesting is Ben Roethlisberger on the road.

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 2>He's had some Sure, he's had some wildly poor performances,

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 2>but then also he's thrown for five thousand yards, so

0:35:14.400 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 2>he's kind of been a wild card on the road.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 2>Patriots at home and in Foxborough are just, you know,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 2>machines when it comes to winning games and covering spreads.

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 2>So I wouldn't be surprised it's five and a half,

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe it gets up to six. Stuff usually doesn't close

0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 2>a five and a half, so I wouldn't be surprised

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 2>if he gets the six. It's definitely not going to

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 2>get up to a full touchdown, and I don't see

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 2>it getting down to four.

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. My reaction essentially is a giant shrug emoji. I honestly,

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, these teams, they play each other hard. It's

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>weird because it's the first game of the season. As

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>you said, there's always build up to it. It did

0:35:51.560 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 1>strike me as roughly fifty, roughly five and a half,

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.480
<v Speaker 1>roughly six. I bet you that's probably where it stays.

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like, you know, we don't really know

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>what these teams are going to look like. I do think,

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Patriots have a better defense, I think,

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>than they've had in a couple of seasons. So I'm

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>interested to see, you know, whether that total, if anything,

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe drops half a point. But in the end, I

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's really tough to gauge.

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.879
<v Speaker 2>And primetime games where there's gonna be more public action,

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:24.919
<v Speaker 2>especially teams like the Patriots and the Steelers too. I mean, listen,

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 2>there's a reason it's on Sunday night NBC is two

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.360
<v Speaker 2>huge fan bases that will really helped the ratings and

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 2>drive a lot of action. And you know, when the

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.240
<v Speaker 2>public gets involved, they're gonna want to take the over Simply,

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 2>it's simple, simple brain mechanics. It's not fun to root

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:43.959
<v Speaker 2>for the under. You know, everyone's probably got a bunch

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 2>of their fantasy players, so they're rooting for scoring in action,

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 2>so you know, they're probably gonna be people hitting the

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 2>over all.

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, let's move here to what I will call the

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty zone. Okay, there's a lot of moving parts that

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>could have affected the lines, and I want to explore

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that a bit. And let's start with the Bengal at

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. The Seahawks here are laying nine points. The

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 1>over under is set at forty four, and this originally

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>opened at the Seahawks lank seven and a half points

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>with a forty three and a half over under. So

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts on this game?

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that open at seven and a half

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 2>was probably pre aj Green injury. But I do think

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of this is, you know, the Clowny news,

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 2>so possibly it's a it could be a little bit

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 2>of an overreaction, but again, going from seven and a

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:33.080
<v Speaker 2>half to nine is usually just them kind of protecting

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 2>themselves for teasers. And you got this Bengals team. It's

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 2>a non conference road game in Seattle. Seattle again, super

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 2>tough place to play, pretty solid home field, I mean

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 2>it used to be amazing. It's cooled off as of late,

0:37:48.400 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 2>so I wouldn't be surprised if this gets a little higher.

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.280
<v Speaker 2>People talk to themselves into the Seahawks and Jadevian Clowney,

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:58.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, going to town on Andy Dalton and the

0:37:58.440 --> 0:38:01.799
<v Speaker 2>fact that the Bengals don't and have Aj Green. I'm

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:04.680
<v Speaker 2>really high on Joe Mixon as a running back this year,

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 2>so I think if they can run the ball, maybe

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 2>they'll maybe they'll stay in this game. Forty four sounds

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 2>about right.

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:13.479
<v Speaker 1>YEP.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's gonna be a much crazy shift

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 2>as far as the total, but yeah, it seems to

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 2>make sense.

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the total probably stays where it is. I

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>could see it moving to nine and a half just

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 1>because there's some positive news coming out of Seattle. Sounds

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like DK Metcalf might actually play, and they re signed

0:38:32.000 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Jaron Brown, and I think Cody Glenn is in the

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>concussion protocol so he may not play for the Bengals.

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's a lot of factors here that

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>could certainly move the line a little bit more towards

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks. So I think probably when all of a

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sudden done, it ends up at nine and a half.

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with you, I think forty four probably

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the right number. Let's move on now to

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the Giants at the Cowboys. The Cowboys are laying seven

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>points in the over unders at forty five and a half.

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>It opened pretty close to that Cowboys minus seven and

0:38:58.960 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>a half. When it first came over, the over under

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>was at forty six and a half. Now, we've got

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty here right as we record, there's

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.880
<v Speaker 1>not quite as much optimism, or now there might be more.

0:39:08.120 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It's changing by the minute as to whether Zeke signs,

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.120
<v Speaker 1>But even if he signs before week one, it's unclear

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>what his workload is going to be. Amari Cooper is

0:39:16.400 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit of a question mark. So what

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>are your thoughts here on the Cowboys laying seven and

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the over under at forty five and a half.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I guess this is kind of earlier

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.320
<v Speaker 2>we had talked about Robbie Anderson and would he possibly

0:39:27.840 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 2>move the line, and you look at Zeke Elliott and

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean maybe he moved at half a point, because

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I would be surprised he plays or at least plays

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 2>his normal load at this point, you know, when we're

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:43.680
<v Speaker 2>recording this. So even Zeke Elliott, who's you know, a

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 2>huge part of the Cowboys offense, he only maybe moved

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 2>it a half. You could certainly make a case for

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the Giants offensive line look better in preseason,

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:57.319
<v Speaker 2>and you know slight optimism coming out of Giants camp.

0:39:57.360 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 2>There's also been a number of you know, the Giants,

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:04.919
<v Speaker 2>it's got a Golden Tate suspended. Certainly, Shepard broke his thumb,

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.120
<v Speaker 2>although it seems like he's close to one hundred percent.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Their offensive line seems a little stronger. You know. The

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 2>interesting thing here is again division game. That's a big number.

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the betting public is pretty down on

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Eli Manning as a quarterback, and rightfully so. So that's

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 2>if that's who the Giants are going to try it

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 2>out as a starter. I think plus seven makes sense.

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 2>It's certainly is not gonna go below seven. If it's

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 2>gonna go anywhere, it'll go up to seven and a half,

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 2>maybe eight. You know, if Zeke plays, maybe they'll bump

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 2>it up to eight. But yeah, and the Mary Cooper thing,

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of people are talking about Zeke,

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 2>whether he plays or not, as we're doing here. But

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 2>I think if you if you look at the Cowboys offense,

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 2>what really impacts him more has been a Mary Cooper

0:40:56.600 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 2>playing or not playing. At least if you look at

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 2>the numbers last year, he seemed to have a bigger impact.

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Interestingly enough, on the offense. If you compare it to

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 2>when Zeke has missed time the previous year and Planner

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:12.080
<v Speaker 2>fasciitis is a that's a red flag injury because a

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.799
<v Speaker 2>lot of times what happens is a guy thinks he

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:17.439
<v Speaker 2>can play, or he does try and play, and he's

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:21.239
<v Speaker 2>just he's like sixty percent or like they It's an

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 2>injury where a lot of guys try and play through

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 2>it but are just very they're just have no bursts.

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 2>And that's what you could really get in trouble if

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 2>you're talking about handicapping the game or setting a fantasy lineup,

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 2>because yeah, they'll be listed as probable or questionable and

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 2>then you see they're out there and you're like, oh,

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 2>it must be all right. But that that's a tricky,

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 2>lingering injury and definitely something to keep an eye.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and his history with it is not great. When

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>he's dealt with issues around that area, he has not

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:51.799
<v Speaker 1>played all that well. So out of curiosity, if it

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.040
<v Speaker 1>comes out that Cooper is going to miss the game,

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:55.919
<v Speaker 1>used to you don't think it drops the line below

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:56.399
<v Speaker 1>seven though?

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Right? No, that's the thing. I yeah, I don't think

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 2>it'll move it a line, but I definitely think it

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 2>should impact how you see the game going because I

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 2>think if Zeke's out and Cooper's out, they're really gonna

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 2>be in trouble as far as skill positions and and

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 2>Cole Beasley was kind of his safety blanket. He doesn't

0:42:14.640 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 2>have him there.

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>But the Cowboys got Jason Witten back, baby, Yeah, don't

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:19.200
<v Speaker 1>worry about it.

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that was a Jerry Jones didn't want the Cowboys

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 2>brand being tarnished every Monday night by here and Jason

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 2>witting on the broadcast.

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's exactly right. It's not a bad move. I

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>like his strategy.

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey, you know, protect the brand. That really seems like

0:42:35.200 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 2>you just bailed him out.

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But well, good for him. At least hopefully he can

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>at least contribute.

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I wish my boss was as generous as Jerry Jones.

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope your boss isn't listening to this, all right?

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Rams at the Panthers rams laying three. The over under

0:42:49.920 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>is at fifty. It started at the rams lank two

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and a half and an over under fifty one. Not

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:57.200
<v Speaker 1>too much movement here. We've got Cam Newton's injury. It

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>looks like he's going to be good to go. But

0:42:58.640 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts here?

0:42:59.760 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And again the line makes sense because it's

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 2>a West Coast team going to the East Coast. People

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 2>have talked themselves into the Panthers once again. I'm really

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.479
<v Speaker 2>worried about Cam Newton. Like you watch Cam Newton before

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 2>they shut him down last year. That shoulder, it just

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 2>doesn't look right, and he like completely had to redo

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 2>his throwing motion. And he listened to Ron Rivera and

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.320
<v Speaker 2>they're talking about how they're just gonna have to manage

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 2>him throughout the season and that's just his shoulder, and

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 2>then he had this weird foot sprain. I think he's

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of stuff to work through. On the

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:37.319
<v Speaker 2>other side, if you look at this Rams team, there

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 2>is something if you lose the Super Bowl that next

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 2>season is really tough. And you look at the trend

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 2>of teams coming off a Super Bowl loss, their ats

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 2>is not good. I don't but I think the public

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 2>is kind of high on both these team so but

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.760
<v Speaker 2>obviously higher on the on the Rams. And that's why

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the spread is minus three for a road favorite. I

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:01.279
<v Speaker 2>don't think it's gonna be shifted one way or the other.

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.280
<v Speaker 2>The only thing that could shift it is if somehow

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Cam Newton is a late scratch.

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>What happens? Out of curiosity to the line, do you

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:09.640
<v Speaker 1>think if Newton is scratched?

0:44:09.960 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it would go up to like six and

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 2>a half or seven, Okay, I mean the thing is,

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 2>which would be great for me because I like Will Greer.

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, obviously that's a tough first start for you,

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.800
<v Speaker 2>showing up against the Rams, but seven points is huge.

0:44:29.000 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 2>But starting quarterbacks are really something that they'll automatically jump

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 2>into the next key number.

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I feel like gotcham All right, let's move on to

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Texans at the Saints. The Saints here are laying seven.

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>The over under is at fifty three and a half.

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty interesting because you were we've been talking

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about tackles, of course, but you've got essentially an offense

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:50.439
<v Speaker 1>that has entirely remade their team a little bit over

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:52.959
<v Speaker 1>the last few days. They lost. The Texans lost Lamar

0:44:53.040 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Miller and j Davian Clowney. They've added Laramie Tunsel and

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Duke Johnson and Kenny Stilson. Yet everything has stayed almost

0:44:59.160 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 1>exactly where it is. It opened at seven and a half,

0:45:01.960 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's moved only half a point. With the Saints

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>now laying seven and the total has not moved at all.

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It opened at fifty three and a half. That is

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the highest of the week. So what's your reaction here

0:45:11.239 --> 0:45:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to these lines?

0:45:12.120 --> 0:45:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I what I opened up the week one lines and

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't been tracking this line, you know, the entire

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 2>summer or whatever. I was shocked. This was the most

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 2>surprising line. Honestly thought this was gonna be like three

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and a half four.

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 1>You see why I kept it for our last right,

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you see why it ranks so low on the boring meter.

0:45:32.520 --> 0:45:34.759
<v Speaker 2>No, and I think it'll be I think it'll be

0:45:34.800 --> 0:45:38.640
<v Speaker 2>an exciting game. And just man, last season when the

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Saints lost outright to the Tampa Bay Bucks, I go,

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:43.959
<v Speaker 2>what the hell? And then you look back at their

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 2>history and they've under Sean Payton, They've been horrible opening

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 2>day and just early on in September. I don't know.

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.840
<v Speaker 2>They suffer from the same thing that the Patriots do,

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.759
<v Speaker 2>and this to me is shocking. The Texans come in

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:03.000
<v Speaker 2>highly motivated. Bill O'Brien is just saying, yeah, he's like

0:46:03.880 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 2>he's like the drug friend, just you know, doing whatever

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 2>it takes at the end of the night to talk

0:46:08.800 --> 0:46:11.799
<v Speaker 2>to talk to a girl or whatever, because he is

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:16.680
<v Speaker 2>just clearly desperate. And I think that's I think that's

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:19.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just way too high. Like the Texans have a

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 2>competent team. Larry By Tunsel. I don't know if he's

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:25.839
<v Speaker 2>still gonna start week one or whatever, but I mean

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:27.839
<v Speaker 2>they were eleven and five last year, like they're not

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:30.800
<v Speaker 2>They're not a tray, you know, they should be getting

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.760
<v Speaker 2>more respect from the line. I was really shocked.

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.319
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't agree more. And I when I looked at

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:40.720
<v Speaker 1>all the lines that are available, I expected to see,

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.359
<v Speaker 1>all right, somebody's got to at least be it, you know,

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>minus six or something like that. So not now they

0:46:46.200 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 1>are in locks that it is all the Saints lank

0:46:48.920 --> 0:46:51.879
<v Speaker 1>seven across the board, and I completely agree. I tried

0:46:51.920 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to look at it now. I knew what it was originally,

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:55.560
<v Speaker 1>but I kind of put that in the back of

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>my mind and I looked, yeah, this is more like

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Saints lane forward, you know, some somewhere around there

0:47:01.520 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 1>four and a half something, three and a half four. Yeah,

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not moving though, I mean it hasn't moved at all,

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.239
<v Speaker 1>So this is I mean, it's gonna be.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Drew Brees the second half. You know, after he

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 2>took that crazy shot on Thanksgiving, he his numbers really dropped.

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:17.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he got rocked on that play and he

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 2>was way more hesitant pushing the ball downfield. And perhaps

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 2>we're kind of seeing him on the downward slide at

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:27.400
<v Speaker 2>the edge of his career. And Shaun Watson, by all

0:47:27.440 --> 0:47:30.880
<v Speaker 2>accounts fully healthy. You know, he hasn't. He had the

0:47:30.880 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 2>whole offseason to really get right physically. They brought in

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Duke Johnson, and it just Bill O'Brien is just, you know,

0:47:39.320 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 2>coaching with some urgency and.

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Just yeah, he's going for it doing whatever.

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be if I'm a Texans fan, I'm seriously

0:47:46.520 --> 0:47:48.640
<v Speaker 2>worried about their long term prospects.

0:47:48.680 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But you just got to block all that out, man. Yeah,

0:47:51.120 --> 0:47:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just push all your chips in for this year.

0:47:53.239 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're a Texans fan, all I can say is

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 2>enjoy this season.

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's hope it goes. Let's hope it goes better

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:02.920
<v Speaker 1>than than what your next several years and the draft

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is going to look like. So all right, let's finish

0:48:05.440 --> 0:48:07.479
<v Speaker 1>up here with what I felt like was the most

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting game just because of Andrew Luck and everything that happened,

0:48:10.880 --> 0:48:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's the Colts at the Chargers. The Chargers are

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:15.640
<v Speaker 1>currently laying six and a half and the over unders

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>had forty five. So, you know, originally when Luck was,

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they thought Luck was healthier, even with some

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of the question marks, the Chargers were laying three and

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>a half and it was a forty eight point total.

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:28.359
<v Speaker 1>Now when the Luck news broke, this initially moved the

0:48:28.400 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>line from three and a half to the Chargers laying

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. But it's gone down at this

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:35.600
<v Speaker 1>point to six and a half. I mean, is this

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>just sort of is this money coming in? Is it

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:40.960
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with the Melvin Gordon situation? What do

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you think it is? And at the line at six

0:48:43.120 --> 0:48:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half, what are your thoughts on that?

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean this is this is the most interesting game,

0:48:49.120 --> 0:48:52.640
<v Speaker 2>right and I think they've probably found the right number.

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't. I think I could get to an even seven.

0:48:56.360 --> 0:48:59.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a it's a weird line history because it almost

0:48:59.480 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 2>seemed like too much of a reaction when Luck was

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:05.799
<v Speaker 2>out because Jacoby Brissett was in the system. He's gotten

0:49:05.840 --> 0:49:08.319
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of reps. They have a solid team around him.

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:12.280
<v Speaker 2>The Chargers have no home field advantage. Again, they're also

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 2>missing their left tackle, so that should be a concern

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 2>and something to factor in. You know, the Chargers always

0:49:20.600 --> 0:49:23.840
<v Speaker 2>deal with these random injuries. The Chargers haven't looked great

0:49:23.960 --> 0:49:26.640
<v Speaker 2>opening day as well. They've gotten off the slow starts.

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:31.960
<v Speaker 2>The Colts are really well coached. Frank Wright, he's just

0:49:31.960 --> 0:49:35.879
<v Speaker 2>a solid coach. I think the Colts in a weird way.

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 2>If I was just you know, looking at the emotional

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:42.760
<v Speaker 2>handicapping of this game, the Colts I do think rally

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:45.200
<v Speaker 2>around and this is kind of like, hey, win one

0:49:45.280 --> 0:49:48.000
<v Speaker 2>for us, show people we're more than Andrew Luck, Like,

0:49:48.040 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 2>it feels like they're coming in with something to prove.

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 2>I think seven is probably I think where it would

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 2>close eventually, because once the public gets involved in this

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 2>game and does the mat that you know, Andrew Lux

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 2>not the coach or sorry, not the quarterback anymore, or

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:06.479
<v Speaker 2>the coach. Maybe he'll one day we've got a coach

0:50:07.520 --> 0:50:11.719
<v Speaker 2>through his backpacking the adventures are done. As far as

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the total, yes, forty five. Yes, it's kind of right

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 2>in the middle. I think they're and you look around,

0:50:20.400 --> 0:50:22.840
<v Speaker 2>this is probably one of the one of the bigger

0:50:22.880 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 2>totals that has discrepancies, Like I'm over at betting pros

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 2>and I'm seeing forty seven and a half to forty

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:31.479
<v Speaker 2>four and a half or even forty three and a half,

0:50:32.040 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 2>but you're paying a little juice on that minus when thirty.

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 2>So I think they're throwing this total out to kind

0:50:37.640 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 2>of see where the market goes, because I don't think

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:44.120
<v Speaker 2>the the people said in the lines have a great

0:50:44.160 --> 0:50:46.680
<v Speaker 2>idea as to how this colts. Offense is gonna look

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of uncertainty, So I would think this is

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 2>kind of at forty five. I wouldn't be surprised if

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 2>it if it goes down rather.

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Than yeah, to me, I think this is roughly where

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna end up. I would think that the line

0:51:00.040 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>line the spread is probably going to be at seven

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:05.319
<v Speaker 1>when all things are sent in. And again same thing

0:51:05.320 --> 0:51:07.960
<v Speaker 1>with you over under with the spread. You can get

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:10.359
<v Speaker 1>it at plus seven at certain places, you can get

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:12.879
<v Speaker 1>it at plus six at some places. I mean, I mean,

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I know what to do.

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I saw like when the luck news happened, I saw

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 2>as high as nine and a half some places, So

0:51:19.840 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's crazy just comparing a nine and a

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 2>half point spread to a six and a half point spread,

0:51:23.960 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 2>when in between there no news has occurred. I think

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 2>they're really struggling if I'm looking for this number. Yeah,

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 2>if I was running a sportsbook, I would say it

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 2>at seven and just walk away.

0:51:34.320 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. I think of all the numbers, this

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is the one that I can see changing probably the most.

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I could see it. I think it's probably

0:51:42.280 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>going to end up at seven, and I think it'll

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 1>stick at forty five, but I could see it moving more,

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 1>just because it really feels throughout this entire thing like

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:50.640
<v Speaker 1>they don't really know how to get a handle of it.

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they're I think they're letting the volume

0:51:53.600 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 2>really dictate this one. Sometimes they'll, you know, they'll they

0:51:57.320 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 2>won't be afraid to take a position or a side

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:02.520
<v Speaker 2>or based on seeing, you know, where the money's coming

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 2>in really kind of way in. But this one, I

0:52:05.239 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 2>think they're kind of just leaving it out there for

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the public to figure out. Yep.

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>That's why it was the most interesting lines, my friend,

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:13.880
<v Speaker 1>That's why I said it that. Thanks man, All right,

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Well that's going to do it for today's show. Sean.

0:52:15.600 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>It was really great having you on. I really hope

0:52:17.600 --> 0:52:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we can do it again during the season.

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Awesome man, Yeah, drop me a line and you don't

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.239
<v Speaker 2>have to twist my arm to talk about NFL gameless.

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, thanks again to the sponsor of today's show, Play MGM.

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>Remember to download the play MGM Sports app and use

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the promo code Harris to get your risk free first

0:52:33.600 --> 0:52:35.640
<v Speaker 1>wager of up to one hundred dollars. And if you've

0:52:35.640 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 1>been listening to this podcast regularly, you know that we

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 1>had an August contest where we were giving away an

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>autographed Christian McCaffrey helmet. I am going to randomly select

0:52:44.080 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>a winner and I will announce it on our next show.

0:52:46.440 --> 0:52:48.439
<v Speaker 1>And if that winner is not you don't get down.

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be running another similar contests for September.

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:53.759
<v Speaker 1>And if you left the review for the podcast and

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sent it and already you are automatically entered. We'll be

0:52:56.560 --> 0:52:58.760
<v Speaker 1>back later this week giving some of our best bets

0:52:58.760 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for Week one. Until then, enjoy your last few days

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>without football.