WEBVTT - Why does the Universe minimize action?

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Physics has set itself quite the task. The job is

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to explain the whole universe, everything inside of it, and

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>all of its doing and throwing. Usually we think of

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that in terms of the matter, the stuff, and the

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>forces how that stuff interacts. So when we count our

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>progress towards the big goal of physics, we sometimes think

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>about the number of particles and the number of forces.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>We reduce that number when we break open matter to

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>see what it's made out of, or when we unify

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>forces like we be merged electricity and magnetism into electromagnetism

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and then later added the weak force to make the

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>electroweak force sorry magnetism. Eventually, we hope we'll get down

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to one particle and one force that explains everything that happens.

0:00:59.080 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But what if there there is a better way. Maybe

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>forces are intuitive to us, part of the stories we

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>tell about what we see with a simple intuitive analog

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in our experience. But what if they aren't a natural

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fit to the real mechanisms of the universe itself? What

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>if forces emerged from something else. Today on the pod,

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about something we've mentioned many times in many contexts.

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It's time to dive in and talk about the mysterious

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>quantity that has no analog in our intuitive experience, but

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>seems to dominate in the events of the universe, action,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and specifically, why the universe seems to minimize it. Welcome

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Minimal Universe.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Hello.

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Kelly Wintersmith.

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 4>I study parasites and space and it's winter right now,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 4>so it is my season of least action.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist. It's winter here

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>in southern California, though I can hardly tell.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>So we're.

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about potential energy and kinetic energy a little

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 4>bit today, which reminds me of my intro physics class,

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 4>which makes me wonder, what is the coolest demonstration you

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 4>have done for your students as a teacher.

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Ooh, that's a good question. I think the coolest demonstration

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I've ever done doesn't actually relate to kinetic or potential energy.

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, there's like those famous ones where you like

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:48.960
<v Speaker 1>push a bowling ball away from your nose and then

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>you stand there all cool as it comes back and

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't crunch you in the face. But I think the

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>most interesting ones are the ones that reveals something about

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe you can't otherwise see. So I once brought

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in a homemade cloud chamber. This is something you can

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>actually build yourself in your garage with pretty simple ingredients

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that could show you muons flying through the air. It

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>reveals to you that the world around you is filled

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>with these invisible particles flying at high speeds, and you

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:20.840
<v Speaker 1>can build the device using fairly simple ingredients to reveal them.

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>These cloud chambers have like super saturated air, and as

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the muons fly through, they create these droplets which become visible.

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.079
<v Speaker 1>You probably have seen them at science museums. I just

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>think that's awesome because it shows you that the world

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is so much more complex than your senses can reveal.

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 4>Did we discover muons pretty early on? Because they're so

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 4>easy to see?

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>We discovered the muon years and years ago using cloud

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>chambers actually, and then you can spot them also using

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>big blocks of emulsion. Emulsion is sort of like a

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional bit of photographic plate that you later like

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>slice up and develop as photographs. And we put them

0:03:58.040 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on the tops of mountains and we saw a lot

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>of particles shooting through them, and that was the first

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>clue about muons.

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, who did we know what they were immediately or

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 4>did it take a while to work that out?

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Actually, it's sort of a famous surprise because we had

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like atomic structure and it was all

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>very nice and neat. We had protons and neutrons and electrons,

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we discovered the muon which wasn't part of

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>the atom. And a famous physicist I Robbie said, who

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 1>ordered that, like, we don't need this. We're you know,

0:04:25.440 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we have a pretty good thing going, like get out

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear universe with your pesky facts.

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.119
<v Speaker 4>No, I've been there running experiments and you're like, no, please,

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:35.160
<v Speaker 4>don't do that, universe.

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>But it does it anyway exactly.

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the universe is under no obligation to

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>make sense to us, or to do what we expect,

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>or to follow rules that sort of connect with our

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>intuitive way of thinking. Which is why I'm so excited

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>today to finally get to talk about this concept we've

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>been mentioning and referring to for months and months and

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>months now, and we're going to do a deep dive

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and an explanation of it today. And what is it

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>called called action and the principle of least action, and

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>it's a completely different way to think about motion in

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe and why things fall down, or why things

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>slide the way they do, or even how quantum fields oscillate. Really,

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it's the most basic principle we've discovered, but it's also

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of counterintuitive, so it takes a little bit of

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a mental mind shift to think about the universe in

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of action. It's also a terribly terribly named word

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>because it has nothing to do with the word action

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we use in English.

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, it is a physics concept, so it would have

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 4>to have a bad name.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Why did they do this? You know, they should have

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>just come up with a new name, plasma, cagical or

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>something and use that so that when you hear it,

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>you're like, Okay, this is something new. I have to

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>make a new space in my brain. But if you

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>use an existing word, that has to like share that

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>room in your brain with that other concept which has

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the same word.

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think somebody needs to hold on to plasmacajigle

0:05:58.279 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 4>or whatever it was that you said. Thing needs to

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 4>be named that, and you should be in charge of

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 4>naming things in physics from here on out.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I guess I just need to discover

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>something and then I can name it flasmaca jiggle, and

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>then we'll be all set. You know, I've done the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>hard part already, and you know, just the pesky bit

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>about actually discovering something in the universe.

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, right, yeah, that tiny bit.

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 4>And so we asked the extraordinaries, why does the universe

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:23.279
<v Speaker 4>flazmaca jiggle?

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>No, we didn't. No.

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I went out there and I asked folks what they

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>knew about action, because this is something we get requests

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>about a lot, and we've mentioned occasionally on the podcast

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and people ask us, ooh, would you go into more

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>depth about that? And it's something I love doing on

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the pod, is explaining something on a depth beyond what's

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>typically out there in popular science, but I hope in

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>an actual, approachable way that'll make people really appreciate the

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 1>way physics is done on the cutting edge. But of course,

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>before we dig into it, I wanted to know what

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>people already knew about this concept, So I asked, folks,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>why does the universe verse minimize action as usual? If

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you would like to join this crew of people who

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.279
<v Speaker 1>respond to these questions without the opportunity to google them.

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Please write to us questions at Danielankelly dot org. We

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>would love to add your voice in the meantime. Think

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>about it. Why do you think the universe minimizes action?

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Why does it flasmacajicle.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's what people have to say. Since I have no

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>idea what this means, I'm forced to fall back on

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a template answer of.

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 5>Entropy, because the universe is just bound to follow laws

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 5>with no shortcuts and no long cuts. So I think

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 5>that minimizing action is probably another way of saying minimizing

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 5>divergence from laws.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction, So

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess the universe minimizes reactions as well.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 4>To safe energy and to minimize possible outcomes.

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>To know, is the universe lazy? Is it just chilled out?

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It is the world likes to be in its lowest

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>energy state.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 2>Because actions speak louder than words, and there's far too

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 2>much noise pollution.

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Because anything that happens, or any force that exists, has

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a counter force pressing against it.

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's lazy, that's my excuse. I suspect that it

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>has something to do with entroview, though.

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Too optimiz for efficiency, kind of like natural selection.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 2>It's just something we observe, but we don't know why.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Do individual processes independently tend to pars the money or

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 2>is there an underlying unified model that polls all behavior

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>to a deeper minimization.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Seems like it would be the only way that it

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>could go, because if there was something at a higher energy,

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there was always something that could come lower.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 4>I was pleased to see I wasn't the only one

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 4>who didn't know the answer, and went with sarcasm.

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:57.839
<v Speaker 1>I never know what to expect from these responses. I

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>always learned so much. Sometimes bill know exactly what I'm

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:04.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about and get very insightful answers. Other times people

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>are confused by the physics word and as is not

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>their fault at all, and it seemed to have happened

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>in this case. But this is exciting to me because

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>it means that not a lot of folks out there

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>are familiar with this concept of action being minimized, which

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>means we get to teach them all something very very

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>cool about the universe.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we are helping to make you the most interesting

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 4>person at the party.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:30.959
<v Speaker 1>So let's say, Kelly, I'm trying to assess the level

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of sarcasm there, because I am one hundred percent sincerely

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>excited about action, and I don't talk about it at

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>parties very much, but it is something super duper nerdy

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and cool to discover, like an organizing principle of the universe,

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>especially when it's counterintuitive, when it's not the way we

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>typically think about stuff. That's like one hundred percent sincerity.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.199
<v Speaker 1>And I'm assuming you feel the same way I do.

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I do.

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't know what kind of parties you're thinking of, Daniel,

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 4>but the parties I go to we talk about things

0:09:59.400 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 4>like pleasma.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, Well we're not explaining plasmaka jiggle today

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>because I haven't discovered it yet. But we are going

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to talk about action. But let's start by thinking about

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a simple motion of an object, and then we'll talk

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about how we typically understand it, how people probably think

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>about its motion, and then we'll switch and think about

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it in another way. So the classic example, of course,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is a ball flying through the air. You have a ball,

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you're playing catch with your kid or your dog or whatever.

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You throw it and it goes across your yard and

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>hits the ground or gets caught by your dog or whatever.

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And from a traditional physics point of view, this isn't

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>too complicated. You can understand it by thinking, like you

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>throw it with your arms, so it has some initial velocity.

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>And we know that things in the universe, if they

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>have velocity, they just keep moving unless some force acts

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>upon them. And in this case, for example, the force

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is gravity pulling it back down to the Earth. And

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.360
<v Speaker 1>so we can use those various elements to understand the

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>motion of the ball. We have velocity, we have acceleration

0:10:59.800 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that changes its velocity. We can put that together to

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>get an equation that describes where the ball is at

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:08.959
<v Speaker 1>any time, and it comes out to be a parabola. Right,

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>It goes up and it comes back down and it

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>hits the ground.

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 3>It's also a great song by Tool. Do you think

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 3>everybody hum.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>A few bars of it for us? Kelly?

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no, no. Oh, hey, I'm not gonna

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 3>go anymore.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:26.199
<v Speaker 4>So do you think everybody knows what the shape of

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:27.240
<v Speaker 4>a parabola looks like?

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh? It's hard for me to remember a time when

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know what the shape of a parabolo looks like.

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>So I should ask you that question. Kelly, do you

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can you imagine a parabolo?

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I can, but I also do a fair bit

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 3>of modeling.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, so that's a good point. Let's help people

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:44.479
<v Speaker 1>visualize a parabola.

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 3>It's just a you. You're making it too complicated.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 1>A parabola is sort of like an upside down you. Right,

0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit tighter at the top, but basically

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a parabolo is well defined by what happens when you

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>throw a ball across your yard. Right, It's going to

0:11:57.920 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>go up, and then it's gonna turn around, it's gonna

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>come back to and that's the parabolic shape. It's defined

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.599
<v Speaker 1>by an equation that has like an x squerginit for

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>people who like to think about equations, but for visual people,

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it's basically an upside down you. And so that's what

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a brable looks like. Okay, So that's sort of the

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>traditional way to think about how things move. You have matter,

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>and you have forces. Forces act on matter to provide acceleration.

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>A few rounds of calculus and you get your equation

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of motion where the thing is at any time. We're

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>good with that.

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 4>So far, we're good, right, And so in this model,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 4>we're not paying attention to things like friction or wind

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 4>or anything like that.

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right, because those things are really hard to

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>add using this way. Like wind is a force, but

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.079
<v Speaker 1>it's not constant. Friction is a force, but it depends

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on velocity. So we're going to stick with a simple

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.599
<v Speaker 1>calculation because that's what this approach is good at. Simple calculations,

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 1>what we call conservative forces with constant acceleration. Very easy

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>to do those calculations. But there's something interesting about this

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>motion if you look at it from another point of view.

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>This is going to sound a little bit weird and random,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 1>but stick with me. So what you do is you

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think about the kinetic energy of this ball. Kinetic energy

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>is just the energy of motion, and you usually calculate

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it like one half m v squared vias the velocity.

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So you calculate the kinetic energy of the ball as

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>it moves through the air. Cool Now calculate also the

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.160
<v Speaker 1>potential energy of the ball. Potential energy here is just

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>from gravity, so it's like mgh just the height of

0:13:28.480 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the ball. As it goes up it has more potential energy,

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>as it goes down has less potential.

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 3>Energy, and m in both of those was mass.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, exactly. And so you calculate these things kinetic

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>energy and potential energy. Now do something weird, subtract them.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Usually we add these things to make total energy. But

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this time, let's subtract them. Let's do kinetic energy minus

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.679
<v Speaker 1>potential energy. So now we're calculating the difference between the

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy and the potential energy. You might think, well,

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? Intuitively, Like, if you add them,

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it may sense because it's okay, that's total energy. What

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>does the difference mean? It means nothing intuitively, It's just

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>this weird number we're calculating. Okay, okay. The cool thing

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>about this number, The reason we're talking about this number

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is that the path the ball took minimizes that number.

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Like we have the path the ball took. It was

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a parabola. We calculate the kinetic energy minus potential energy.

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.560
<v Speaker 1>That number is smallest for the path that the ball took.

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>If you change the path a little bit, you add

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a little divit or middle higher, a little lower, that

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>path would have a higher value of kinetic energy minus

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>potential energy. So the path that the ball took is

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the one that minimizes this difference between kinetic and potential energy.

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay, and so is that just because kinetic energy would

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 4>always be greater whenever you add like a divot, because

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 4>you're making the parabola longer, anytime you're adding a divot

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 4>or something.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you're asking, why is the parabola the path

0:14:56.560 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that minimizes this difference?

0:14:58.520 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and we're gonna explain that. The answer is yes.

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna explain that in detail in a minute, but

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>for now, let's stop talking about kinetic energy. Money is

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.440
<v Speaker 1>potential energy because it's a lot of words, and let's

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>just relabel it with a new word, right, so we

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have to use so many words. And we're gonna

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>call it action. Why we don't call it plasmaca jiggle,

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but we're gonna call it action. And

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>so this turns out to be a general principle in

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>physics that the path of things take you can figure

0:15:23.640 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>it out by finding the path that minimizes the action

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this weird difference between kinetic and potential energy. So we

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>started out just like I'm going to do this calculation.

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna tell you why or what it means

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or anything, and now we did it, and we discovered

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>something that's actually physically useful. The universe seems to pay

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>attention to this. It's not just a number, Daniel calculator.

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I could calculate anything like the number of walnuts times

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the temperature outside right. I can make up whatever quantity

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I want, But that doesn't help me solve a problem.

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It just seem to be important to the universe. This number,

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the action, the difference between kinetic and potential energy is

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all so an arbitrary, random thing that we constructed, but

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be respected by the universe somehow, because

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the universe, when the ball is flying through the air,

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>chooses the path that minimizes this weird number, this thing

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we call action.

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 3>So you can like tell the future if you know.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 4>So let me it's been a while since I've taken physics,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 4>and so so I'm imagining you've released the ball, and

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 4>so to do this is it like, you know, you

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 4>stop and you take a picture of the ball at

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 4>every second, and you redo this calculation at every second

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 4>and then you can predict where it's going to be

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 4>the next second by doing this calculation.

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>No action, It's exactly the opposite of that, which makes

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it a great question. So the way you described it

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in your mind is the way we typically think about

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the universe, that the past controls the future. We have

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like frame by frame, what happens now affects what's going

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen in a moment.

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>The ball moves this way because it has velocity and

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>it has a force pulling on it. That's sort of

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>like a computational way of thinking about the universe that

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you calculate it like frame by frame, and that's actually

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>called the Newton schema. Newton came up with this idea

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that like the future of the universe is determined by

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the present, and he thought about like universal clocks and

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so many fun digressions we could go on there. And

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that's the way that the typical force story works. You

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.399
<v Speaker 1>think about velocity and forces and you cycle through frame

0:17:21.440 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>by frame. That's not the way the action works. You

0:17:25.600 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>can't use action to predict the future the same way

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>because to calculate the path of the ball using action,

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>you have to know the initial position and the final

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>position already in order to find the path that goes

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>from So there's a weird thing here which seems to

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>imply maybe that the present depends on the future, you know,

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>like where the ball goes now depends on where it lands,

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you have to know the future to predict

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the present. Not quite that. We're going to dig into

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>it in a minute, but that's actually the fundamental misunderstanding

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of the movie Arrival.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>WHOA, yeah, I know, all right, stick with us to

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the end.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. So we have this other way of thinking

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about motion where if you know the initial point A

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and the final point B, you can figure out what

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>path something took just by calculating this weird thing called

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>action and finding the path that minimizes the action. So

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:20.359
<v Speaker 1>let's work through another example, just to make sure we

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>have this in our heads, because it's really important. Let's

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>take an even simpler example, a ball with no gravity.

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we're out in space. Okay, we've ignored Zach

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>and Kelly's advice, and you've gone to space and built

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a colony. We've made all sorts of mistakes, but now

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we're out in space and we get to play zero

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>G catch with our kids or with our space dog. Right,

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.479
<v Speaker 1>So what happens when you throw a ball in space?

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:43.160
<v Speaker 3>You die?

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>How's it? Going to move you die, Kelly. Doesn't happen immediately.

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we got lots of radiation and eventually we die,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>but we do we to have one nice afternoon of

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>playing catch with our space dog.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 4>Okay, right, right, So if you're in deep space in

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 4>your space suit, you're gravity's probably negligible. Right, So does

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 4>that mean potential energy is zero?

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Exactly right. So let's think about the motion of a

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>ball when there's no potential energy. So the force method

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is really easy here. You throw the ball that has velocity.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no forces, So what's gonna happen. It's just going

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to keep having that velocity. Very intuitive. It's going in

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a certain direction. It keeps going in that direction every

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>moment in time. You can predict the future because you

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>have its velocity and that tells you exactly where it's

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go. Very simple. Okay, Now let's try to

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>do that with the action method. So the action method says,

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you know where the ball started, and you know where

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball ends up, and you know how much time

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>it took to go from A to B. Find the

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>path that it took from A to B. And so

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to do this, what you do is consider all the

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:50.080
<v Speaker 1>possible paths, a straight line, a wiggle, a sinusoid, you know,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>any other sort of crazy path that goes from A

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to B in the same amount of time. Okay, now,

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>going from A to B in a specific time, that

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>already specifies the average velocity because you know how far

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's gone and how long it's taken, So you're already

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of restricted. So the simplest path, the straight line.

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>This one has constant velocity, and so it's going to

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>have the smallest action because it has the smallest integrated

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy across that path. If you imagine doing something

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>else like going super fast first and then slowing down

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end, or going super slow for a while

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and then speeding up to get there at the right time,

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 1>all of those things have more deviations in kinetic energy,

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and because kinetic energy has velocity squared in it, it's

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 1>going to end up with the larger kinetic energy integrated

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>over the path. So the way to have the smallest

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>integrated kinetic energy is to keep your kinetic energy constant.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>That's why straight line with constant velocity is the path

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that minimizes the action. Any deviation in a direction is

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>going to require more kinetic energy, which increases your action

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:01.959
<v Speaker 1>or any chain, the velocity is going to give you

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>larger kinetic energy overall. So in the simplest case, action

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>also predicts that the ball will go between you and

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>your space dog in a straight line.

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 4>Am I being pedantic by thinking like, well, it couldn't

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 4>have sped up halfway because you threw it, And wouldn't

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 4>it just stay the same speed the whole time with

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 4>no friction and no gravity, And so what do we

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 4>gain by thinking about it that way? Because it couldn't

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 4>have done any of those other things?

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right. So you're thinking about this still in

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the Newton force scheme, which makes total sense because it's

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>easy to understand why a particle would need a force

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>to deviate from the line it's moving on, and so

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for a force to explain any other kind

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>of motion than a straight line. Makes perfect sense. But

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.360
<v Speaker 1>right now we're thinking about this in another way. We're

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>not bound to forces as explanations. We're just considering the

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>action of various paths, and in this case we don't

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>gain anything. In fact, it feels like more complicated to

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>do with the action way right, And the action is

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going to make things simpler when we get into Hairer situations.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But I just want to sort of like line up

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a simple situation so we can get practice thinking about

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the action.

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 4>So you've got us all on the edge of our seats.

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 4>So we're going to take a break, and when we

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 4>get back, you are going to give us a Hairer

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 4>situation where the curse mack amiggle.

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 3>I said, oh, I'm so sorry. We'll get more complicated.

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 4>All right, We're back, and Daniel's going to give us

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 4>a more complicated situation where this concept of action is

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 4>going to help us understand what's going on better.

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 3>Maybe because it's physics.

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>It does make it easier to analyze it's really hairy problems.

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>It's also the way physicists think about motion, you know,

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>when we get to quantum field theory and all that stuff.

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>It's fundamentally based on action. And so I really want

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to move people out of the mindset of thinking about

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 1>forces and thinking about action, because like, welcome to the

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>cutting edge of physics. This is how we do it,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>all right. So we consider the very simple case you're

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>playing catch with your space dog. There's no gravity, things

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>moving a straight line, Kelly was bored by that. She's like,

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>why do we even do this? Fair point.

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:28.680
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't bored.

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>You were underwhelmed a little.

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 3>You know, probably death was imminent, which is interesting.

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't think about the death of my space dog. That's

0:23:36.720 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>not nice.

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, I do like space dog.

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we'll give lots of shielding in our space

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>dog spacesuit. Right, Yes, take care of our critters. Yeah,

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>because they didn't get to choose whether they go to space.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 3>Right, No, like I didn't get to choose. Didn't go

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 3>well Forlika.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>No, exactly. All right, so let's get back to other scenarios. Now,

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to your question about why a ball

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in gravity moves under a parabola. Right, So we're going

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>to add gravity back into our situation. Bring our space

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>dog back to Earth. Toss a ball to the space

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>dog in the backyard. It doesn't move in a straight line.

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 1>It moves in a parabola. The first picture tells us why,

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.919
<v Speaker 1>because you have an acceleration, and acceleration is a second

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>derivative of position, and so if you integrate that constant

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>acceleration twice, you get an X squared term. You get

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a parabola. It all makes sense. So things move in

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>a parabola because there's a constant force. What about the

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>action point of view, Why do we move in a parabola, Well,

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we want to minimize this difference between kinetic energy and

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 1>potential energy. Potential energy increases as we go up, right,

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>So because we want to minimize action, and action is

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy minus potential energy. That means we want to

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have lots of potential energy. So potential energy increases as

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>we go up. So we don't want to go up

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>fast to get high potential energy. Right, So instead of

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 1>going in a straight line, we go above our target.

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>We go higher up in order to get more potential

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>energy to minimize our action. But you don't want to

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>go too far from the straight line because going too

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 1>far from the straight line requires high kinetic energy. We're

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>increasing our speed on the way up and our speed

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>on the way down. So the parabola is a perfect

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>balance between these things. You get more potential energy without

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>getting too much additional kinetic energy. So the parable is

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the path that minimizes the difference between the kinetic energy

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and the potential energy when you have both at play.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It's this really fascinating harmonic balance between these two very

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.719
<v Speaker 1>different things. And you can think about what the universe

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 1>is doing in two ways. You can think the universe

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>is doing the Newton thing like frame by frame, it's thinking,

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>the ball is here, I have this force, so I

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have that velocity on it, so it's going to move

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.479
<v Speaker 1>this way. Or you can think about it from the

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>action point of view, and you can say, the ball

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>started here and went there. What path between those two

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and this amount of time minimizes the difference between kinetic

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>and potential energy, and this is the path that does it.

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:02.239
<v Speaker 1>And it's fascinating because this turns out to be a

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>general principle, not just in this one case where you're

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>playing ball with your dog, but in every case. The

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 1>least action tells you what the universe does, how things

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>get from A to B. And you can start from

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:18.439
<v Speaker 1>this principle least action, and you can derive F equals MA,

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>so you can derive the force equations from it. Like

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Newton just like writ it down. He's like, hey, this works.

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>And you might ask, well, where does that come from?

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is action. Right from action, you can

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>derive classical mechanics. Now classical mechanics doesn't then explain like,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 1>what is action? Why does the universe minimize it? To

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 1>get any insight in that, we're going to have to

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>go deeper into action in quantum mechanics and in philosophy.

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's fascinating because it seems like underneath all of

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 1>these things, this force picture of the universe, there is

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a deeper principle from which you can derive F equals

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>MA WHOA.

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So one thing I think I'm still stumbling on

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 4>a little bit is that I guess I still feel like, Okay,

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 4>so you throw a ball in the air and you're

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 4>subtracting the potential energy, I still feel like you should

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.280
<v Speaker 4>be getting the least path, not necessarily because you're subtracting

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 4>the potential energy, but because any other path would require

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 4>you to put additional energy into the ball at some.

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 3>Point as it goes through that path.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 4>And am I just thinking that because I live in

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 4>this world and that's my expectation and I don't realize

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't have to be my expectation, or am I

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:36.439
<v Speaker 4>misunderstanding something. No.

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you're saying this is the only path it

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>can take, because to take any other path something would

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have to do that. Yeah, like you need to go

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and push it or something. And yeah, you're thinking about

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>the universe in terms of forces. You have Newton's ideas

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>so deeply ingrained in your mind that like a ball

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to move it constant velocity unless something changes that, right,

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:00.919
<v Speaker 1>you have that so deeply ingrained it's obvious to you.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>But that comes from least action. All of Newton's laws

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>are derived from the principle of least action. And so

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that's not the fundamental way the universe works.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 1>That comes out of insisting that everything minimizes action. And

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.959
<v Speaker 1>it's actually super cool because, as we mentioned earlier, in

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>many cases, the force approach is simple and it works,

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's very intuitive and connected to our experience because

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 1>this is how our world works, right, Like, we notice

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>that you've got to push stuff to get it moving,

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to push it to turn it and

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. We think about the world in terms

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of forces, but sometimes that picture is hairy and it's

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>hard to use to do calculations, Like it's easy in

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the examples we talked about, But what if you add wind,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>or what if you add friction or what if, for example,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you take your ball and you attach a string to it,

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and the string is now tied to a squirrel, and

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the squirrel is on a roller coaster. How are you

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>going to do that calculation? Well, you still could in principle, right,

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there are still forces there on the string, and the

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>rollercoaster has some applies to force, and the wind is

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a force which now weirdly depends on velocity. And what

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you discover is that it's a mess. Like many things

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>in physics, we can only solve a few very simple

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>examples because everything else is totally intractable. So the reason

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>introductory of physics students usually calculate the path of a

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>ball without wind resistance and without friction is because otherwise

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a huge rain. And so this force picture is

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>good for simple examples, but it becomes totally intractable for

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>anything realistic.

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 2>That.

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>The amazing thing is the action doesn't The action remains

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>fairly simple because you can still just write down the

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy and you can write down the potential energy.

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>In many of these situations, it's not hard to calculate

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the kinetic energy or the potential energy, and then you

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 1>just find the path that minimizes them. And that's because

0:29:51.360 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>it relies on these concepts of energy, which helps you

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:56.719
<v Speaker 1>ignore a lot of the complicated details of what happens

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>between moment A and moment B. People who have done

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>physically problems know, for example, if you start, for example,

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>with a roller coaster and it starts from a certain

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>height and it goes through all sorts of crazy loop

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to loops, and then you're asked to like calculate the

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>velocity of this roller coaster car halfway down the track.

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>From a force point of view, you're like, oh, my gosh,

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:17.959
<v Speaker 1>how am I going to calculate that it's done? All

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>these crazy maneuvers have to know the forces and the

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:23.600
<v Speaker 1>acceleration every moment. It's a nightmare. But from an energy

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>calculation point of view, you just have to know, oh,

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's gone down a certain distance. I know the potential

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>energy that gets turned into kinetic energy. Boom, I have

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the answer in one step. This action approach is sort

0:30:34.760 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of analogous to that because it also relies just on

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>these energy quantities which are sort of deeper and more fundamental,

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and don't worry so much about these little details.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I like that.

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So when you get to like upper division physics, you

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>learn about Lagrangen and Hamiltonian mechanics, from which you can

0:30:49.960 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>derive F equals M. But they start out by calculating

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this difference between kinetic and potential energy, minimizing that and

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>use to so many really hairy problems you would never

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>imagine trying to calculate with Newton's method that you can

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 1>just pop out in a few lines and get the answer.

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It feels like magic when you first do it. But

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here is you're accessing a deeper rule of

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the universe.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Well what is the rule? Because now we're getting into

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 3>the good party tricks.

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>This feels like a deeper rule in the universe because

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it works not just for classical mechanics like the cases

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about, you know, squirrels and strings and wind

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and all sorts of stuff. It also works in every scenario.

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So this action formula that we talked about kinetic energy

0:31:35.880 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>minus potential energy, that's the action for classical mechanics with

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>conservative forces. But you can also do this, for example,

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for quantum mechanics, and instead of writing down kinetic energy

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 1>minus potential energy, which require things you don't always know

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>about particles, you write down something called the lagrange and density.

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>In the case of like quantum field theory, this is

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>just the fields that exist and how they interact with

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>each other. And so, for example, the standard model of

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 1>particle physics. If you google, like what is the equation

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of the standard model, it shows you this thing that

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>starts with L equals and then a bunch of terms.

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the lagrangeon of the standard model, and the action

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is the integral of that. And so the way we

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>specify what's in the universe, what's out there, all we

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>have to do is say what the action is, what

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>are the pieces of the action, and how do they interact?

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And everything else falls out of that, Like literally all

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the equations of quantum mechanics and quantum field theory say,

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>if you have this action, then all these things happen.

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 1>So the game of particle physics these days, and of

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>all physics is to say, well, what is the action

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. We try lots of different things. We

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>try this, we try that, we try the other thing,

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and the ones that turn into rules that align with

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>what we see out there in the universe, those are

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the ones we go with. So the standard model of

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>particle physics is just a description of the action of

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the universe, not in terms of kinetic energy of a ball,

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of the fields, their motion, and actually

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their oscillation, their kinetic energy, and their

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>potential energy.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so this seems pretty exciting because you know, you

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 4>and I have been recording for over a year now,

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 4>and I don't feel like there have been a lot

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 4>of instances where we've talked about things that play nice

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 4>with both classical mechanics and quantum mechanics. And that could

0:33:22.640 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 4>be because my memory is.

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 3>Kind of like a sieve, but I don't think so.

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 3>So is this pretty rare?

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>This is pretty rare, And it's actually a beautiful way

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to think about the connection between quantum mechanics and classical mechanics,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and it gives you some insight into like our classical world,

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.400
<v Speaker 1>because when you're calculating the quantum mechanical action, you don't

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>just think about an individual path. You think about all

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the various paths perhaps people have heard about, like the

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fine mean path integral approach to quantum mechanics. We imagine

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>like an electron goes from here to there. You don't

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just think about one way for it to go from

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>here to there. You think about all the well, what's

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>happening there is You think about all the possible paths,

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and in classical mechanics, you say, oh, I'm to choose

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the one path that minimizes the action. In quantum mechanics,

0:34:11.760 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>what you do is you take each path, and that

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>path has a complex number multiplied by it that depends

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>on the action. So you have all these paths and

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>each one has this complex number in front of it,

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 1>and the paths near the least action all interfere constructively

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with each other. These complex numbers allow them to contribute together,

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and the paths where the action varies a lot interfere destructively,

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.279
<v Speaker 1>so they cancel out. And so what's happening here is

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that all the paths are contributing, but just like in

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>famous quantum mechanical experiments, the ones that are far from

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the least action destructively interfere with each other. They cancel

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>themselves out, and so what happens is that you end

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>up with this like envelope of paths around the least action.

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>And this is so fascinating because that interference depends also

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>not just on the action, but on planks constant hbar,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and as h bar gets bigger, you get more contributions

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>from paths near the least action, and as h bar

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>gets smaller, you get fewer contributions from paths near the

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>least action. So, now here you have a knob that

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you can very smoothly you say, I'm going to crank

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>h bar all the way down to zero. What happens

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is that you have only a single path contributing. That's

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 1>classical mechanics. Classical mechanics is quantum mechanics with hbar set

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>to zero. If you crank hbar up to some number,

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>then you start to get quantum effects where you have

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 1>contributions from things near the least action path. And that's

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the quantum effects that we see. If you cranked up

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:43.240
<v Speaker 1>hbar beyond what it is in our universe, quantum mechanics

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>would be more obvious.

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And so this shows you that there's like not just

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>a smooth continuum where classical mechanics sits on like one

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>edge of it, right, But also that classical least action

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:59.799
<v Speaker 1>emerges from quantum interference. The reason it seems like we

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 1>live in a classical world is because HBr is so

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>small that it looks almost like it's zero from our

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>point of view, and you can understand that very clearly

0:36:10.000 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>using this least action approach and thinking about all the

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>various paths that the particle would take.

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 4>And so does thinking about things from a least action

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 4>approach make you feel more confident that we're going to

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 4>be able to one day sort of marry these approaches

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more effectively or not necessarily, because.

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 1>No, it's the most sensible way to think about the

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>relationship between quantum mechanics and classical physics. Essentially thinking about

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 1>classical physics as like a zoomed out version of quantum mechanics.

0:36:40.760 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>And we talk a lot about how, you know, classical

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>physics emerges from quantum mechanics, and we say, that's kind

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of a mystery because we don't know how to go

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from the laws of quantum mechanics. You know Schroeninger's equation

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>for an electron to zoom out to get f equals

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:58.880
<v Speaker 1>ma for a ball flying through the air, And that's

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>true for the force picture, but in the action picture,

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we actually do kind of know how to do that,

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 1>which is amazing. And so there is this connection between

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>classical physics and quantum physics, where classical physics is an

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.280
<v Speaker 1>extreme version of it. So that's very beautiful, and unfortunately

0:37:15.320 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't solve like the bigger problems in physics, which

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>is like how to integrate gravity into quantum mechanics. But amazingly,

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>you can also think about gravity from an action point

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of view. It's a very natural way to think about

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>general relativity.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 4>And when we get back from the break, that's exactly

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 4>what we're going to do, all right, So now we're

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 4>going to talk about what least action can tell us

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 4>about gravity.

0:37:58.120 --> 0:37:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Did I say that right?

0:37:59.320 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>You totally?

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 2>Did?

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:01.360
<v Speaker 1>You sound like a physicist?

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:01.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 3>Oh that's great. Now I'm going to get invited to

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:05.360
<v Speaker 3>all the parties.

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 1>And I meant that, of course, if it wasn't obvious,

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent as a compliment, and.

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 3>I took it one hundred percent as a compliment.

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad there wasn't any doubt, No, never would be

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all right. So we've been talking about least action and

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the way that helps us reimagine classical physics as stuff

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>moving from A to B not because of the forces,

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but because it's the path that minimizes the action. And

0:38:30.520 --> 0:38:32.399
<v Speaker 1>then we talked about how you can even use this

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in quantum mechanics, and it provides a nice bridge between

0:38:35.680 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 1>classical physics and quantum physics. But folks out there are

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of course aware that one of the biggest struggles in

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>physics is to unify quantum mechanics with gravity. They're classical

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>theory of space time and how things move. And so

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is action something we can use to understand gravity? And

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the answer is yes. In fact, it's quite natural because

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:02.440
<v Speaker 1>general relativity already has very similar minimal principles.

0:39:02.840 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:39:03.040 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The principle of least action says you find the path

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>that minimizes the action. Well. Already, in general relativity, light,

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:15.879
<v Speaker 1>for example, follows the path that minimizes its travel time, right,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And in general things in general relativity follow paths called geodesics.

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Geodesics are the shortest distance from A to B, right,

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 1>And you can calculate the shortest distance by calculating the

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>action across that path. Where in this case, what is

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the action. It's the curvature, the curvature along your path.

0:39:39.840 --> 0:39:42.759
<v Speaker 1>So to figure out in general relativity how something will

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:45.360
<v Speaker 1>go from A to B, you find the path where,

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>along with you minimize is not kindemic energy minus potential energy,

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>but the action of general relativity, which is just the

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>curvature of space. And so you can say, all right,

0:39:56.840 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>my action is the curvature of space, and then you

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>say find me the paths that minimize the action, and boom,

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 1>all of general relativity pops out from there. All of

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Einstein's equations just flow from specifying the action to be

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the curvature of space. It's really kind of incredible.

0:40:12.719 --> 0:40:13.359
<v Speaker 3>So I have a question.

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 4>So the curvature of space is influenced by gravity or

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:19.280
<v Speaker 4>is reflected by gravity.

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Gravity is the motion of things under the influence of

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>the curvature.

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, okay, So the equations that we were talking about

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 4>were kinetic energy minus potential energy and potential energy has

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 4>gravity in the equation. But when we think about general relativity,

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 4>are we not using those equations or like, how does

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 4>it mess things up that the term for gravity is

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:39.320
<v Speaker 4>in the equation.

0:40:39.640 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Great question. So when we were talking about our

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>simple scenario of a ball moving under as a parable,

0:40:45.560 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we were doing classical physics, but we weren't thinking about

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.480
<v Speaker 1>general relativity. We had a very simple model of objects

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>with kinetic energy and potential energy, and we were assuming

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>gravity with constants and G was just a number. Now

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>we're totally generalizing that and we're going to solve for

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>any sort of motion of any object through space and time,

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:06.399
<v Speaker 1>and the same equations do pop out. But we're doing

0:41:06.400 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Einsteini and gravity now instead of Newtonian gravity. You know,

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the previous version was like thinking about gravity as a force.

0:41:13.480 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Now instead we're doing general relativity, and so we're not

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>calculating action as kinetic energy and minus potential energy. That's

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the Newtonian way. We're calculating in the Einsteinian way. And

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the incredible thing is that you can just specify the

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>action and all of general relativity comes out. This is

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of why action is super amazing, because you specify

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it and you have this one set of rules, find

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:39.799
<v Speaker 1>the path that minimize the action, and that tells you

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>all of the physics. All the physics comes out of.

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 3>That tell me more physics that comes out of it.

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Danie, Well, the challenge now to like unify quantum mechanics

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and gravity is to find an action which has both

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>gravity and quantum mechanics in it. And we know how

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.759
<v Speaker 1>to define quantum mechanical action, and that gives us all

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 1>quantum field theory. We know how to define general relativity

0:42:01.000 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>action that gives us all of Einstein's equations. We don't

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 1>know how to find a unified action for both of

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>those things. So that's sort of the question of quantum

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gravity now expressed in terms of this action principle. What

0:42:13.360 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is the action that includes both curvature and quantum mechanical fields.

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that.

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 4>But if we could figure that out, then we would

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 4>know what exactly.

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>If we could figure that out, then we would have

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>the laws of quantum gravity. Okay, yeah, absolutely, and that

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 1>would be amazing. Yeah, but we can also like zoom

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in on one part of this to give another example,

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like Maxwell's equations. Maxwell's equations are these four equations. They're

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of complicated. They have all these differential terms in them,

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, changing electric fields costs, magnetic fields and vice versa,

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:47.719
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff. It was a huge stroke of genius

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>when Maxwell unified these, and then Heapicide clarified all of

0:42:51.080 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>them a century or so ago. And now it turns

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>out that all of Maxwell's equations pop out if you

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:00.400
<v Speaker 1>apply this minimal action principle to a vector Fiel. We

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 1>know that the electromagnetic field is a vector field, meaning

0:43:03.320 --> 0:43:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that at every point in space is not just a

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:07.600
<v Speaker 1>number but like a little arrow. So it has a

0:43:07.680 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 1>direction and a length. And if you say I have

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a vector field and I'm going to make some simple

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>requirements about symmetry, like there's gonna be no preferred frame

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of reference or there's no ether for example, then that

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:23.879
<v Speaker 1>really constrains the kind of action that you can have.

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's basically only one way to write it. And

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 1>from that way of writing it, boom, Maxwell's equations pop out.

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you might wonder, like, where do Maxwell's equations

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 1>come from? Well, this tells you if you have a

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 1>vector field that respects some basic symmetries, there's only one

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.160
<v Speaker 1>set of equations that minimize the action of that field.

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Those are Maxwell's equations. And so it tells us something

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe deep about the universe, that maybe everything that happens

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in the universe comes because the universe is minimizing action

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:59.439
<v Speaker 1>and only actions that respect some of these symmetries.

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.879
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so I'm still feeling grumpy at whoever called it action,

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 4>but it feels like this is so fundamentally important that

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 4>this is like Nobel Prize territory, So like, who figured

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:10.399
<v Speaker 4>out this action thing?

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, action has been around for a little while. Hamilton

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and Lagrange both came up with this alternative formulation of

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>classical mechanics more than one hundred years ago before the

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prize even was conceived of, and sort of generalized

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:30.399
<v Speaker 1>classical mechanics. And then it was Nuther who really gave

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 1>us some deep insight into it because Nuther's theorem is

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>this really deep theorem of physics that relates symmetries with

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:40.320
<v Speaker 1>conservation laws. It says like, well, where does conservation of

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 1>momentum come from? Why does that happen in our universe? Well,

0:44:43.760 --> 0:44:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it happens because of a symmetry. The symmetry is translational symmetry.

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't matter where you do your experiment. If you

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 1>build a large hadron collider here or around Jupiter or

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in another galaxy, you should always get the same answers.

0:44:56.719 --> 0:45:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Space is the same everywhere. That's where conservation and momentum

0:45:00.239 --> 0:45:03.280
<v Speaker 1>comes from. And check out our whole episode on Nuther's symmetry.

0:45:03.520 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>But there was a crucial detail we glossed over in

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that conversation. Those symmetries that we talk about in Nuther's theorem,

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 1>those are symmetries of the action, and we didn't dig

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 1>into it in that episode because, as you see, action

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is a whole set of baggage to introduce. But it's

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>only symmetries of the action that give conservation laws. So

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>that means that, like you write down your action, maybe

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kinetic energy, mutters potential energy, or it's the curvature

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of space, or its quantum field action. If that action

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 1>is the same here and Jupiter and Alpha Centauri, then

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you get the conservation of momentum. And so it's symmetries

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of this action specifically that Norther showed us give us

0:45:44.160 --> 0:45:47.440
<v Speaker 1>conservation laws. So Nother's theorem is a deep insight not

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just into where conservation laws come from, but why action

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is so fundamentally important.

0:45:52.880 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 3>It seems like she clearly should have gotten a Nobel.

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>She should definitely have. And these prints really guide the

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>way that we do particle physics, Like when we devise

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the action of the Standard model, we have to have

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>those symmetries because we know those symmetries will give us

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of conservation laws we see in the universe,

0:46:13.920 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>like we see momentum is conserved, and so we can't

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>build actions that don't respect the symmetry that gives us

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>conservation of momentum. And it's a bunch more symmetries that

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>we know we have to have in our action. So

0:46:27.000 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>when you're devising an action, there's not a lot of

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>choices to make, right because you're really restricted by all

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of these symmetries. You can't just add terms willy nilly

0:46:35.800 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>because they would break these symmetries. And so if you

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:41.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted to start from scratch and devise a new action

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>for quantum field theory, there's really only a couple ways

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 1>you can do it. The respect those symmetries, we're super

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:53.959
<v Speaker 1>duper limited. And so it feels like those symmetries tell

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>you what can happen in the universe, right, what's possible,

0:46:58.120 --> 0:47:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and the action tells you what does actually happen. And

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.520
<v Speaker 1>so like all of physics is basically that, right, what

0:47:04.640 --> 0:47:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are the symmetries of the universe, and then what actually

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>happens is well, what minimizes the action on those symmetries,

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>And so it's a completely different way of thinking about

0:47:15.160 --> 0:47:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the universe instead of like the way you were describing,

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>which I think is very intuitive and Newtonian of like

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>thinking about the universe frame by frame, what's happening, Let's

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 1>update things in a sort of like computational simulation sort

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of view. Instead, it's thinking about how things go from

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.600
<v Speaker 1>A to B to minimize the action along that path.

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 4>So when you were saying, devise a new action, I'm

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 4>having trouble wrapping my head around what that means because

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 4>when every time you've said action, in my head, I

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 4>have subtracted two different kinds of energy. So what does

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:48.080
<v Speaker 4>it mean to devise a new action? Is that like

0:47:48.120 --> 0:47:51.440
<v Speaker 4>think of a different path that something could take, or well.

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Everything comes from the action, right, So you want to

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 1>describe the universe, you write down an action, you apply

0:47:56.560 --> 0:47:59.759
<v Speaker 1>this minimal principle. It predicts how things will move, and

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you compare that to what you actually see out there. So,

0:48:03.400 --> 0:48:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in the case of a ball flying through the air,

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if I want to describe that, it works if I

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:10.279
<v Speaker 1>write down kinetic energy minus potential energy. If I write

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.760
<v Speaker 1>down kinetic energy minus three times potential energy, doesn't work.

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:18.160
<v Speaker 1>If I do kinetic energy time seven minus two potential energy,

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't work. It doesn't describe what I'm seeing out

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there in the universe. So if I want to describe

0:48:23.320 --> 0:48:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the universe, I have to find some way to describe

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the action, so that minimizing that action gives me the

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>things I see out there in the universe.

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 4>You were using the word action the way people people

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 4>actually use the word action, and the word action the

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:41.840
<v Speaker 4>way physics people use the word action, and that's what

0:48:41.960 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 4>was do Okay, I get it now.

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 3>You were using it both ways.

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh oops. And so kinetic energy, by the potential energy

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:52.160
<v Speaker 1>is a good approximate action for that one scenario we

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:55.160
<v Speaker 1>were talking about throwing a ball in your backyard. The

0:48:55.200 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>action of the universe we don't know, because we have

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>an action for quantum field theory and action for general relativity.

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't know how to put them together. But the

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>goal of physics now is to find what is the

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:08.279
<v Speaker 1>action of the universe, because once we know that, we

0:49:08.360 --> 0:49:11.440
<v Speaker 1>know what it does. And this is a different way

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.680
<v Speaker 1>of thinking about the universe, and it relies on knowing

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:17.880
<v Speaker 1>where something was and where something will be and figuring

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>out the path between them. And that's a very different

0:49:20.840 --> 0:49:23.960
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking about sort of computationally, frame by frame,

0:49:24.560 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and it has this sort of feeling this flavor to it.

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>As we were talking about earlier, that like the present

0:49:29.600 --> 0:49:33.000
<v Speaker 1>depends on the future. Like if you imagine a photon

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.320
<v Speaker 1>going from here to there, and we know the photon

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>follows the path that takes the least amount of time

0:49:39.680 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>from here to there. But when the photon is like

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>halfway along the path, we don't know where it's going

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to go yet, Right, it hasn't gotten there yet, So

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>how does it decide where it's going to go in

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 1>order to minimize the total path when we haven't figured

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>out yet where it is going to go, Right, it

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>feels like sort of backwards or it's like depending on

0:49:57.360 --> 0:50:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the future in some way. And this was the vague

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:04.239
<v Speaker 1>feeling that inspired ken ching short story which inspired the

0:50:04.280 --> 0:50:07.759
<v Speaker 1>film Arrival, the idea that like, maybe aliens come and

0:50:08.080 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't see time and the way we do flowing

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>from the past to the future. They experience all of

0:50:13.760 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>time like a book, and they can rifle forwards and backwards.

0:50:16.400 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's inspired by this exact concept, but

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a I don't know if

0:50:23.160 --> 0:50:27.319
<v Speaker 1>it's a misunderstanding or a misrepresentation, because there is no

0:50:27.480 --> 0:50:31.040
<v Speaker 1>actual retro causality here, you don't have to know the

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>whole history of the universe to solve these problems. It

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is true that the path depends on the final destination,

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 1>but you can't change that final destination. It's not like

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you can influence the present using the future. There is

0:50:47.560 --> 0:50:50.360
<v Speaker 1>a dependence on the future outcome, but it's not like

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you can control that. So you can't like change the

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:57.360
<v Speaker 1>photon's path halfway through. So there is a subtlety there

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 1>which is crucial for the movie Arrival to work as

0:51:00.320 --> 0:51:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a story, But fundamentally it's at odds with the actual

0:51:03.360 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 1>physics of it.

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 3>I like seeing you be a wet blanket to.

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:10.840
<v Speaker 1>All right. So we started this whole thing with the

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>question why does the universe minimize action? So now we've

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:18.640
<v Speaker 1>explained what action is and how minimizing action gives us

0:51:18.680 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the physical laws we already discovered in other ways,

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and turns out to be a very general principle. It's

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>connected to symmetry and helps us think about quantum mechanics

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and classical mechanics together and maybe tells us that our

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>concept of time is a little bit archaic and needs

0:51:31.760 --> 0:51:34.279
<v Speaker 1>to be updated. But what is the answer to the

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 1>question why does the universe minimize action? And the short

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>answer is, we don't actually know. It's hard to think

0:51:42.560 --> 0:51:46.840
<v Speaker 1>about action philosophically because it doesn't have a simple intuitive

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:50.480
<v Speaker 1>analog like forces. They make sense, right, we see forces happen.

0:51:50.560 --> 0:51:54.000
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to think about the universe as fundamentally a

0:51:54.040 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>set of matter and forces acting on that matter, because

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:58.799
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the way our minds work.

0:51:58.880 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Whatever action is, it seems to be vitally important to

0:52:02.560 --> 0:52:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the universe, even if it doesn't have a natural intuitive

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 1>analog in our minds. That doesn't mean it's not the

0:52:08.560 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamental principle of the universe. And so philosophers, of course

0:52:12.600 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>have latched onto this and they have raging arguments about

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:19.839
<v Speaker 1>what action is and what it means. Some suggest that

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>what it means that the universe minimizes action is this

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>constructive interference principle that like all possible histories do actually exist,

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just that most of them cancel each other out,

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:35.880
<v Speaker 1>and the universe minimizes action because the least action path

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:39.879
<v Speaker 1>is the only one that survives constructive interference. Between all

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of these paths.

0:52:40.920 --> 0:52:43.680
<v Speaker 3>What happens to the other kellys.

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>They cancel themselves out No, yeah, I know there's a

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:49.359
<v Speaker 1>plus Kelly and a minus Kelly out there that end up.

0:52:49.239 --> 0:52:53.000
<v Speaker 3>In zero, equally valuable Kelly's.

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, in the end, the universe minimizes action,

0:52:59.400 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>not because it's lazy or because it prefers simplicity, but

0:53:03.239 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe just because only self supporting things can exist. Things

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that persist and be observed as law governed are things

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that you know, don't interfere with themselves, that reinforce themselves.

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's still an open question. You know. Our job

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>as scientists and as curious beings in the universe is

0:53:21.480 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to be open minded about how the universe works, figure

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.359
<v Speaker 1>out those laws, and then just take a step back

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and be like, hmm, what does that mean about the

0:53:29.080 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 1>universe that it does this instead of that? Why is

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing so important to the universe? And that's the

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>juicy part, and that's the part we have not deeply understood.

0:53:37.640 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, friends, So put another tick in your tally

0:53:40.520 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 4>of dKu episodes that end with us saying we don't know.

0:53:45.880 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So we've done a deep dive into action, which I

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>always wanted to do. But even still, there are a

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:53.960
<v Speaker 1>few places where I was a little bit imprecise to

0:53:54.000 --> 0:53:57.320
<v Speaker 1>simplify things. So for those of you listening very closely,

0:53:57.360 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and I love all of you, there are some additional

0:54:00.400 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>details I want to mention. First, I said often that

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:07.280
<v Speaker 1>action is the difference between kinetic and potential energy. Technically,

0:54:07.280 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 1>that's the lagrong and density, and the action is the

0:54:09.800 --> 0:54:14.400
<v Speaker 1>integral of the difference between the kinetic and the potential energy. Similarly,

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>for gr the action is not just the integral of

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the curvature, its volume integral of the Richy scaler, which

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is something that measures the curvature, but it also includes

0:54:24.760 --> 0:54:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the determinant of the metric tensor and a couple other things. Secondly,

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I talked a lot about the principle of least action,

0:54:31.880 --> 0:54:35.320
<v Speaker 1>implying that the action is always minimized, but the actual

0:54:35.320 --> 0:54:37.840
<v Speaker 1>statement is that the action should be stationary, which in

0:54:37.880 --> 0:54:41.839
<v Speaker 1>calculus means its derivatives vanish. That means that it can

0:54:41.920 --> 0:54:43.759
<v Speaker 1>be a minimum, and it often is, but it could

0:54:43.800 --> 0:54:46.600
<v Speaker 1>also be a maximum or even a saddle point. In

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the case of geodesics, for examples, there are several different

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:55.000
<v Speaker 1>kinds of geodesics. Spacelike geodesics minimize the distance, cool timelike

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>geodesics actually maximize the proper time, and then null geodesics

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 1>for light have no proper time. Finally, remember that the

0:55:03.160 --> 0:55:07.239
<v Speaker 1>future does not depend on the past. The path we

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:11.600
<v Speaker 1>calculate using action between the past and the future depends

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on the boundary conditions including the future and the past ones.

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So knowing where and when the object starts.

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:22.200
<v Speaker 4>And ends and we look forward to seeing you next time.

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And I hope this has given you another way to

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think about how things happen in the universe and why

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:30.520
<v Speaker 1>some things happen and other things don't. In the end,

0:55:30.760 --> 0:55:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it all minimizes the action.

0:55:39.400 --> 0:55:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Daniel and Kelly's Extraordinary Universe is produced by iHeartRadio.

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.800
<v Speaker 3>We would love to hear from you, We really would.

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>We want to know what questions you have about this

0:55:48.920 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Extraordinary Universe.

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:53.600
<v Speaker 4>We want to know your thoughts on recent shows, suggestions

0:55:53.640 --> 0:55:54.640
<v Speaker 4>for future shows.

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 3>If you contact us, we will get back to you.

0:55:57.320 --> 0:56:00.839
<v Speaker 1>We really mean it. We answer every message. Email us

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at Questions at Danielankelly.

0:56:03.160 --> 0:56:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Dot org, or you can find us on social media.

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 4>We have accounts on x, Instagram, Blue Sky and on

0:56:09.239 --> 0:56:10.200
<v Speaker 4>all of those platforms.

0:56:10.200 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 3>You can find us at D and K Universe.

0:56:13.360 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't be shy, write to us,