WEBVTT - #735 Packers Unscripted: Vegas trip

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. Welcome to another edition of Packers Unscripted from

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot Com. I am Mike Spoffer, joined as always

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:16.319
<v Speaker 1>by my partner in crime, Wes Hodko. It's we're coming

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>to you here from our studios at lambeau Field and

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Wes here to preview Monday Night Football, the first of

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>two Monday Night games that the Packers will play this year,

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>both on the road. This one will be in Las

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Vegas at Allegiant Stadium against the Raiders. The Raiders are

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>one and three, the Packers are two and two, and

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.839
<v Speaker 1>I guess the first question you ask with regard to

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.599
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders heading into this Monday Night game, and since

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it's only Thursday, we don't really have much of a

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>read on anything yet, but who's going to be playing

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for the Raiders? Will Jimmy Garoppolo be back or

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>will it be the second NFL start for the rookie

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>out of Purdue, Aidan O'Connell, who made his NFL debut

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>last week.

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the number one thing to track here this

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 2>week because we'll see, obviously too DeVante Adams dealing with

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 2>the shoulder injury. I would be absolutely flabbergasted if he

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 2>doesn't play in this game.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Though, Yeah, I'm with you there.

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 2>But Garoppolo that kind of crept up out of nowhere.

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it was almost like an aftermath kind of

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a thing that happened with one of the games that

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders played and then wasn't available last week.

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 3>Oh don you know. It led to O'Connell getting his

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:22.639
<v Speaker 3>first start.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 2>And realistically, it hasn't really mattered who the quarterbacks been

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 2>for the Raiders. They've had some issues there. Offensively, have

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 2>not been able to run the ball very well. They've

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>given up way too many turnovers. I said this in

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 2>our Insider Inbox column. I mean defensively they've been okay,

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 2>they've been fine. Max Crosby is an absolute beast, but

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 2>they only have one takeaway. And when you have ten

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 2>giveaways on offense and you can't get you know, Josh

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Jacobs going, it's gonna be uphill sledding. So whether it's Garoppolo,

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>whether it's O'Connell, the Packers have to pressure the quarterback

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>in this one. This is I hate to use the

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.200
<v Speaker 2>term get right game because you can look past any opponent,

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>but this is the type of opponent that I look

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>at the Green Bay Packers on paper, and I think

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 2>to myself, it's on the road, but this is a

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>game the Packers should win.

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so too. And you said it with

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>regard to the turnovers ten to one through four games,

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean to be minus nine after four games. That's

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a stark statistic. And certainly the Packers have to

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>keep the Raiders, you know, down in the dumps, so

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to speak, with regard to that statistic. And and but

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>you talk about you talk about a get right game,

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's not something you you want to overplay in

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the National Football League. But we suggested this a little

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>bit on our last show. The Raiders offensively are going

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at this as their potential get right game.

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>With regard to Josh Jacobs, a you know, the NFL's

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>leading rusher last year who has not been able to

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>get going this season, and the Packers have had their

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>struggles against the allowing two hundred plus rushing yards to

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>two of their first four opponents. Jacob's averaging just two

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 1>point seven yards per carry through four games, which is

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which is a noticeably low number for a guy with

0:03:15.080 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>his production. Packers have talked about adjusting some things schematically

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and what not to to defend the run better. That's

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that's really going to be I think a big, you know,

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>secondary storyline maybe you say, aside from the turnovers with

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>regard to the to the Raiders. Here is Josh Jacobs

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and Raiders trying to get him going and the Packers

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to get their run defense fixed and uh and

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be in front of a national TV

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>audience on Monday night, and.

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 2>It's the cat and most game that the Raiders were

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to play here. They've been doing this for the

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 2>last year. Where it's you know, Josh Jacobs in your backfield,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 2>DeVante Adams and the perimeter. Where are you going to

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>deploy your safeties? Where are you going to give attention?

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 2>And and Adams is you know, just a complete mind

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 2>boggle because you could put two defensive backs on him.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 2>We've seen three people on him and he still finds

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 2>a way to get open.

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. He likes to count them, yeah, to see how

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>many people are guarding him.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 2>But the way I count him is, well, if you

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>have three people back on number seven tight, you have

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, eight others that are responsible for the other

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent of the field, and right that's where I

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 2>thought Josh Jacobs, that that compliment of one another really

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 2>helped them last year having the seasons that they had.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 3>But Jacobs had the holdout.

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 2>He obviously felt some type of way about his contract

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>and how he wanted to be paid, and like a

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of these running backs, working through that, he finally

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 2>comes back and this just hasn't been able to get

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 2>back on the tracks. I'm fully aware of this because

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 2>he's on my fantasy football team and I'm also off

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to a one and three.

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Start to this season, so we're doing great right now.

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Well there you go.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>But I will say this though, Michael, the Greenmit Packers

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 2>have to be up for this matchup, and they have

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to look at Josh Jacobs as the threat that he

0:04:56.680 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>was last season, yes, and being able to contain him,

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 2>whether that is Rudy Ford or Darnell Savage being in

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 2>the box, whether that is you know, Devondre Campbell if

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 2>he's not out there, and it's Isaiah McDuffie running with

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>kway Walker, the Packers have to find a way to

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 2>clog the holes because whether they got stretched against Atlanta

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 2>or they kind of got bulldozed a little bit, against Detroit.

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay has just had a hard time getting hats

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to the ball and that has to change or Josh

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Jacobs will very seriously make make you pay for that.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so. That is definitely a top priority

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>here for the Packers. You said it earlier from within

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the context of it doesn't seem to matter who's playing

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>quarterback for the Raiders. Their offense has just kind of

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>been what it's been this year, and DeVante Adams continues

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to prove that it doesn't matter who's throwing him the football.

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, thirty three catches, three hundred ninety seven yards

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and three touchdowns through four games. Like, oh, by the way,

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Adams is just on pace for another sixteen hundred

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>yard fifteen touchdown season here for an offense that that is, uh,

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, hasn't found its way yet. I mean what

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams, and I mean you and I know this,

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody I understand you know Adams, he left Green Bay

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on good terms. He had his own reasons for wanting

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to go. The front office accommodated him. The Packers made

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the best they could out of the trade, and DeVante

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Adams has said in certain public forums that you know,

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>he felt he needed to he needed to prove he

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>could be who he was, you know, without Aaron Rodgers,

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>without a Hall of Fame quarterback.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:33.120
<v Speaker 2>All that.

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, those of us who were here knew that. Anyway, Like,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised in the slightest what he's done with

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders because look at the second half of twenty seventeen.

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>For half a season, he had a backup quarterback in

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Brett Hunley throwing him the ball and he produced. Yeah,

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>he was the focal point of the offense. Everybody knew

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>he was the focal point of the offense with Hunley

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback, and he still produced on a regular basis

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and won some games for the Packers with some big plays.

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.559
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't surprise me at all what Adams is doing.

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 1>If he slowed down a little bit by that shoulder injury,

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that won't bother me too much here because that could

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>help the Packers defense. And we'll see from a matchup standpoint,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, if Jyu Alexander is back from the back injury.

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>There was some positive news earlier this week. Now, the

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Packers haven't gotten into their full blown practice preparation mode

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for the Raiders at the time we're taping the show.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Because of the Monday night game, things have been pushed back.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But after the weekend following the Thursday night game, the

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Packers were back on the practice field Tuesday. Elton Jenkins

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>was back at what was back at practice after missing

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a couple of games. Alexander was back on the practice field.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Luke Musgrave, who left the Lions game with a concussion,

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>he was back on the practice field, and it appeared

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>as far as we can tell that Aaron Jones and

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Christian Watson were going through their practice routines coming out

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Lions game. No worse for Whear when they

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>had made their returns following injury. So David Baktieri is

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>on injured reserve Andandre Campbell wasn't practicing. John Runyan wasn't practicing.

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So there were some guys who remain out at least

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>as of this moment, but some potentially good news for

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the Packers on the health front.

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 2>And I will hop over to that party with you

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 2>in a second here, but I just want to close

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 2>on one more thing about DeVante Adams. Just strange. There's

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 2>two strange anomalies right now with Adams in addition, you

0:08:27.880 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>mentioned him already had four hundred receiving yards. He still

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 2>hasn't even broke one yet this season. That's just pure

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 2>possession type receiver stuff, and that will happen. The Packers

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>have to hope that it's next week or further down

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the line. But the other thing too, he is the

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 2>Raiders offense right now too. That's probably the thing that

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 2>has confused me the most. I mean, Hunter Renfro has

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 2>not done anything so far this season. Austin Hooper has

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 2>not produced anything. I mean, and I'm not trying to

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>be a jerk about I'm just saying, like they have

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>like fifty receiving yards. Jacoby Myers came over, He's had

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.839
<v Speaker 2>a couple opportunit. Josh Jacobs has gotten some opportunities in

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 2>the PASK game. But Tay is it right now? Yeah,

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's the part I'm really curious to see. We'll

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 2>see about Ji R Alexander getting back over to the

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 2>injuries and how the package, but how they match up

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 2>with this because if the Packers were defending the run

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.960
<v Speaker 2>better right now, on paper, it would seem like, Okay,

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 2>well yeah, Jy your travels with them, you give him

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 2>some cloud help things you can do with the cover

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>two to facilitate that. But if you do need to

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of give some extra thought early on to the

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 2>to the run defense, that's where I if again we

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 2>got to see how Jaws back is, but that this

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>seems like the type of matchup where you actually do

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:38.199
<v Speaker 2>want to see those guys kind of go head to

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 2>head and see if your best can try to negate

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 2>their best.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, well. Most of most of the health news with

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>regard to the Packers is on the offensive side of

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and you already mentioned on the defensive side

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the ball. For the Raiders, you got Max Crosby.

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>He is a handful to deal with. The Las Vegas

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Raiders have seven sacks as a team through four games.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Max Crosby has four of them. He's he is the

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>He is the guy on the defensive side of the ball,

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and it would certainly help Green Bay in terms of

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 1>finding some level of stability on the offensive line if

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Elton Jenkins can can get back in there. We don't

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>really know what his status will be as the week

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>goes along, but the fact that he was back on

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the practice field Tuesday. He only missed the two games

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 1>after getting hurt in Atlanta. He said, you know, now

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they weren't in you know, full full pads and you

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>know all the banging and stuff. But he told reporters

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>after practice on Tuesday, he got through the Tuesday practice

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>with no you know, with no pain or no real

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>issues at least in that moment. So you know, it

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>looks like Rashid Walker is is the guy the Packers

0:10:49.480 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go with at left tackle in Bakhtiari's place,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>if you can get a veteran pro bowler like Jenkins

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>back at left guard to be next to next to

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>that young guy. And uh and obviously the hope is

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>also that Zach tom is you know, a little further

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>removed from whatever happened to his knee in the Saints game,

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and he's had a little bit of extra time as

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.319
<v Speaker 1>opposed to having to deal with that knee on a

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>short week, which is what happened against the Lions. So

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>hopefully some things turning in the right direction health wise

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers. On offense.

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and again, Max Crosby, he won't be moved around

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.840
<v Speaker 2>as much as Hutchinson was last week. I mean, Aiden

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Hutchinson was playing everywhere, but cornerback, it felt like. But

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 2>the thing about Crosby is he's just a mauler. He

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 2>is just a marauder. I mean, he just goes at

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 2>you play after play after play.

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>He's like a back alley dude in a sense, like

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>out a football field, like you just it's like you

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with him, but you really don't want

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to mess with him, like I don't know if that

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>makes any sense.

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 2>And his size, I mean for that position, he just

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 2>he is a sixty minute headache to deal with. And

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 2>going back to a couple of years ago, even when

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't necessarily producing the sacks, I think he still

0:11:57.520 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>ended up being All Pro that season because of how

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>much teams are his pressure, how which he got the

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 2>quarterback off the spot. Now, the difficult thing for the

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Raiders is I think they had certain feelings, you know,

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a year ago when they get Chandler Jones, that was

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 2>going to be the one too. Now Chandler Jones is

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 2>out of the picture, so there is going to be

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot more attention. There has been a lot more

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>attention on Crosby, who has entered this kind of the

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 2>peak of his powers sort of stage of his career.

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 3>What I like about.

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 2>Elton though, if he can play in this one, even

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 2>if he's not at left tackle, even if he's not

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the guy that's solely responsible for Crosby, having someone like

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>Rashid Walker, having a resource like that with Jenkins is

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>really valuable. You know, all credit in the world to

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Royce Newman, but Jenkins is a two time Pro Bowler

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>now that has played really every position at the NFL

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:43.400
<v Speaker 2>level to the highest ability, And if you have him

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>on the field, as much as you want to have

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Dave out there, and as much as we talked about

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 2>that all off season, Elton was a part of this future.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 2>He was the guy that they just extended. He was

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be sort of this building block for them

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>moving forward. I think that can go a long way

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 2>for this Packers' offensive line. In addition to the fact

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 2>that despite whatever Zach Tom was going for last week,

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 2>you and I talked about it, he wasn't flawless against Detroit,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 2>but he gave them a yeoman's effort against the Lions

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.720
<v Speaker 2>to hold down that right tackle spot in a week

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 2>in which Green Bay was really hurting on the offensive

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 2>line with John Runyon also dealing with the ankle here's.

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing to me schematically with regard to Crosby.

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>If the Packers can get Elton Jenkins back, because if

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you're Max Crosby and you're trying to rush Jordan Love's

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>blind side, so you're coming off of the left side

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of the offense, how often do you want to stunt

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>inside where then you know the guy who's going to

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>pick you up as the pro bowler, as opposed to

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>stay outside where it's a first year starter in Rashid Walker.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>So it would make sense that Crosby is going to

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>want to perhaps stay outside a little bit more rather

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>than you know, run, run the games and the stunts

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.440
<v Speaker 1>with his fellow defensive lineman. Well, if that's the case,

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>then that helps the Packers zero on him in a sense,

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, like because as you said,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>he's not moving around in terms of where he lines

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>up the way Hutchinson did. But you know, they're always

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be doing stunts and games and things like that.

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And if and if Elton jenkins presence maybe just maybe

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>limits what they want to do there schematically because of

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the matchup, well then you know x's and o's wise,

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you can figure out how to give Rashid Walker a

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of help and protect Love's blindside. And and

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, so I think there's a there. There is

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>an interesting piece to the uh to the chess match

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>there with regard to Crosby. But the other thing with

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>this Raiders defense, as you said at West four games

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>into the season, they have one takeaway, one interception. They've

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not recovered an opponent's fumble. I think the opponents have

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>only put the ball on the ground a couple of times.

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 2>Ye.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's a defense that has not been able to

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>generate takeaways and that's something that the Packers have to

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>continue as well, have to protect the football the way

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>they were protecting the ball in the first couple of

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>games of the season.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 2>And much like you know, everyone always likes to talk

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 2>about the Packers and all they have all these first

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 2>round picks on defense, the Raiders don't have very many

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 2>at all. And that's a product I think of kind

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 2>of getting out of the Mayock era a little bit

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and now transitioning into this new spot where they're in

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 2>a way of which they're trying to compete, but they're

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>also kind of rebuilding. It's like this this half life

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 2>that kind of the vikings are in as well. For

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay standpoint, though, the part I'm really curious to

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>see is, Okay, if you get Aaron Jones out there

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 2>finally where he's uninhibited, if you get Christian Watson out

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 2>there more than you did a week ago, being able

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 2>to kind of start to play the chess match with

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 2>defenses rather than more of the checkers, because it's like, Okay,

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:48.120
<v Speaker 2>I give Matt Lafleur in the offensive coaches a lot

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 2>of credit the game plans that they came up with

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 2>when you're featuring you know, don Davian Wicks is a

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 2>rookie fifth round pick when you're trying to get the

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 2>ball into Jaden Reid's hands. But let's be real, all

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 2>summer long, it was about Jones, it was about Dobbs,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 2>it was about Watson. That's the building block, that's the

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 2>foundation of this offense, and we haven't been able to

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 2>see him together at all so far, realistically, outside of

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 2>a couple snaps last week. Right, If those guys, when

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 2>you talk about the health of this football team, in

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 2>addition to the offensive line, you get your skill position

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 2>players going here, Now, what can you do now? What

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of matchups can you do because I really don't know,

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>not knowing every forty time of the Raiders, I'm not

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>sure how many people can run with Watson in this

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 2>defense right now. I'm not sure how many people can

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 2>go sideline to sideline the way that Aaron Jones is

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>going to stretch you. That's the aspect, that's the dimension

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 2>of this offense that we have yet to see. And

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 2>I really wonder when you're looking at this matchup and

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 2>what Green Bay needs to achieve to slow down Max

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Crosby and to be able to get downfield with the

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>football start faster, how those two guys could play into that.

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think certainly with the way the Packers want

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to get their running game going, as you know, sort

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of that best friend for Jordan Love, you know, the

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>boost to the pass protection is going to come from

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>getting the running game. And if you get Elton Jenkins

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and Aaron Jones back on the field for a full

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>compliment of snaps, I think that could potentially do wonders

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Packers running game. I want to ask your

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on some other keys to victory here in a moment,

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but first some sponsor business serious XM NFL Radio delivers

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>hard hitting analysis and up to the minute NFL news

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that true football fanatics need. Twenty four to seven, three

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty five at a Cousin Subs, we have something for everyone,

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>like our Wisconsin Cheese Kurds, mac and cheese, golden fries,

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and creamy shakes, all paired with your favorite sub or

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.600
<v Speaker 1>sub in a bowl. Cousin Subs fifty years of better.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we've talked quite a bit about the

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 1>turnover issue. But aside from that, what is the at

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the top of Wes Hodkowitz list as far as a

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.400
<v Speaker 1>key to victory for the Green Bay Packer.

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 2>It's all the run game, all of it. The Green

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Bay Packers thirtieth ranked run defense against you know a run,

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 2>a run offense, it hasn't really been very proficient so

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.280
<v Speaker 2>far against the Raiders. The Packers run offense as well,

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that has struggled out of the gate without Aaron Jones.

0:18:03.280 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 2>How do they handle I think the twenty fifth rank

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 2>run defense against the Vegas Raiders. We made so much

0:18:11.560 --> 0:18:13.959
<v Speaker 2>about Jordan Love and I give Jordan so much credit

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the first month of the season, the way he's handled

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>this thing, how he's helped this team get to two

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 2>and two, but we never anticipated these fourth quarter comebacks.

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Everything being on his shoulders right away, and that's the

0:18:24.880 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>way it's kind of worked out. He's been put in

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 2>a position, some of it himself, some of it some

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>things around him. But the Packers need to be able

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to take care of business against the run here because

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>for two reasons. One you have to execute against the

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Raiders team that there appears to be room.

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 3>To execute against.

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:42.640
<v Speaker 2>But two, the bye week is on the other side

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>of this thing. Packers, I'm sure we'll do their cross

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 2>the hall meetings. I'm sure they'll make some corrections, but

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 2>you want to feel good about where you're at. You

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 2>want to feel like you're making positive strides. If they

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>come out here and Aaron Jones can put together another performance,

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 2>let't have to touch the ball eighty times. But if

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 2>he can put together another performance like he did against

0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Chicago in week one, if you can get a big

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 2>explod to play from Christian Watson, then that gets generated

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 2>off of the defense having to get pay more attention

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 2>to Green Bay's backfield. Those are the type of things

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>that I think you can kind of give a hang

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 2>your hat identity sort of thing to your offense moving forward.

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 2>But I said in an inbox Mike, I'll say it

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 2>again to close out my point. I think this game

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 2>is going to be won and lost in the run game.

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 2>One team's gonna win because of it, and one team

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 2>likely will lose.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm with you there. The only thing I will

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 1>add to that is the fact that you you mentioned

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Adams hasn't you know, really broken a big one

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>yet this year. That that concerns me because a guy

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>like that is always due, right, and.

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 3>He's a thirty two yarder, but he doesn't have like

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:41.120
<v Speaker 3>that sixty years.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but here's but here's here's here's the thing for

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>all of the focus in you know, the narrative in

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 1>what the Packers need to do to stop the run,

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, to improve in that area, and they absolutely

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:57.600
<v Speaker 1>do by the same token. You know what what concerns

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>me there is, you know, are they're going to be

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>end up being more vulnerabilities to give up the explosive plays.

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>And you look at the Detroit game and I've said

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this in a couple of different forms already.

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:11.520
<v Speaker 3>For as much as the.

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Packers got bulldozed by the run and the Lions racked up,

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the two hundred plus rushing yards. The Lions

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>had five explosive plays in the first quarter, five explosive plays.

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>When the Packers are playing their defense that is supposed to,

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, guard against explosive plays, the Lions had five

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of them in the first quarter that were worth I believe,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty eight of their one hundred and

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety four yards in that first quarter when they completely

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>dominated and took control of the game. The Packers can't.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a it's a tough balancing act for

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>Matt Lafuer and Joe Barry and everybody who's involved in

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>this because for everything that you need to do to

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>as we talked about in our last show, to improve

0:20:56.480 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>against the run, to take opposing offenses out of that

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 1>mente of where you know, the Packers are just inviting

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>teams to run the ball because they're struggling so much

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to stop it. You can't you can't suddenly start giving

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>up explosive plays because that's a recipe for defeat as well.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>And and the Lions. The Lions didn't take control of

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Thursday night's game because they ran the ball down the Packers' throats,

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they ran the ball down the Packer's throats after they

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>took control of the game with explosive Plays's that's how

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>this happened, and you can't lose sight of that as

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:32.239
<v Speaker 1>you move forward here trying to fix some of the

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>things that are ailing you.

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 2>We get these nice Microsoft surface tablets. Thank you, Microsoft,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 2>appreciate you. I didn't even realize this until I was

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 2>messing around at NFLGIS here. So Packers had seventeen interceptions

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 2>last season.

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Gyra had a big year.

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I'll pro Yeah, the Raiders since twenty twenty one, how

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 2>many interceptions do you think they have as a defense,

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:59.120
<v Speaker 2>So two point two five seasons, I don't know, thirteen.

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Interceptions in two and a quarter season.

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 2>Six six and one. Wow, that's all that is, Like

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 2>you almost think you'd get a couple of like just yeah,

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>just tip balls or you know, or that's wild. Yeah

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>that so it's not really been an anomaly. They're off

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 2>to a slow start with the I n TS. It

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 2>did a hard time getting them the last two years too.

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>They're yeah, they're not a they're not a defense. They're

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>not a defense that takes the ball away. They do

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they do like to pressure the quarterback though, and Crosby, Uh,

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Crosby certainly is that guy other games. You know, here's

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the here's the other thing. It'll be very interesting to

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>see Minnesota coming off of its first victory of the season. Now, oh,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you have to go play the Super

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 1>Bowl champs and the Kansas City Chiefs to try to

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>avoid a one and four start as the defending NFC

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>North champions. So a lot of Packers fans have their

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>eye on that on Sunday.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Packers had to do it last year too.

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, enjoy it, Yeah, enjoy enjoy that first place Enjoy

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that first place schedule in in the now seventeen game era.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing too, You know, you talked about

0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the Packers. You know you want to go in you

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>want to go into your bye week feeling good about

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 1>some things. You know, you want to go in with victory. Obviously,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be three and two, nothing's given in this league. But

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>the Detroit Lions have a Carolina Panthers team that is

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 1>really really struggling, and it's you know, by and large,

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>most likely the Detroit Lions are going to be four

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>and one after this week. If you're the Green Bay Packers,

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, and if you lose to the Las Vegas Raiders,

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you are most likely two games out of the division

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>leads suddenly after five weeks, when when you were just

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>tied with the Lions before they came into lambeau Field.

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So this game is this game is about getting some

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>things right, about getting a win going into the bye week,

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's also going to be about keeping pace with

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that Detroit Lions team that is the team to beat

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in the division.

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 2>The Lions have to be salivating right now, especially the

0:23:57.960 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 2>veterans that have been on that team that have seen

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the kind of rise up here the last few years,

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 2>from a three win team to a team that you know,

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 2>finally got a winning season last year to now being

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the division. In addition to obviously

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay, it's gonna be a tough matchup. You gotta

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 2>go down there, you got to go on the road

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:14.919
<v Speaker 2>a stadium they've never played in before. Take care of business.

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 2>But then there's Minnesota against Kansas City. Then there's Chicago

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>against a Washington team in Washington that I think is

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot better than teams you know that they've been

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 2>given credit for. I mean, they took the Eagles right

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>down to the wire last week.

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know what you're Honestly, I'll say

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know what you're gonna get from Washington. Yeah,

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they got absolutely blown out of the stadium by the

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills or was it thirty seven to three or

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>something like that. And then so they're, you know, a

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>huge underdog on the road against the Philadelphia Eagles and

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they take their division rival right to the wire, and

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you know they had a shot to win if they

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.120
<v Speaker 1>go for two that on that last second touchdown pass.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.359
<v Speaker 1>But not only that, they were beating the Eagles for

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>a good portion of that game and then had to

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>score a touchdown at the end to force the overtime.

0:24:57.720 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what you're gonna get with Washington. When

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>you throw throw in that, it's on a short week,

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.239
<v Speaker 1>it's even I think it's even less predictable as to

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>what the commanders are going to look like.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll take it up in one more notch. What

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 3>are you going to get from the Chicago Bear?

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no kidding When you have that type of performance

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 2>against that opponent and then finally lose.

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to blow a twenty one point lead at home

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>against a winless Broncos team and now you have to

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>go travel to the East Coast on a short week.

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So getting back to my original point, like, Okay,

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 2>let's just say the odds are what they are, and

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:39.159
<v Speaker 2>you know they have the Bears. Let's say they take

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 2>an elegance Washington. Let's say Kansas City finds itself offensively

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 2>and takes care of business against Minnesota, Detroit beats Carolina.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 3>They're going to.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>Be looking alright going into that Monday night game against

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay, you know, trying to see what the Packers

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 2>do against the Raiders. That's the benefit of being the

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 2>front runner. That's the benefit of being able to handle

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 2>those situations. For the Packers' perspective, though, there's one opponent

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 2>you can worry about now, and I thought they had

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the right mentality in that locker room coming out of

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that loss against the Lions. Kenny Clark Echoedoya earlier this

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 2>week as well, you can't do anything about that one yet.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Six weeks from now, seven weeks from now, you have

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity again, but you don't have that now. The

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 2>only thing you can do now is try to go

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 2>into allegiance, try to shut down DeVante, try to take

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the ball away a little bit, keep your quarterback clean,

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and get into that by with three victories.

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, quickly before we go big game in the NFC.

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>In the larger picture of things, the Dallas Cowboys against

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco forty nine Ers.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Your thoughts on that, well, I'm really interested to see

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 2>how Dallas handles the forty nine ers now offensively.

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I now Deebo has been kind of banged up as well,

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:43.360
<v Speaker 2>so we'll see how he's doing.

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas doesn't have digs on the defensive.

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 3>They don't have digs.

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>And Christian McCaffrey when he's healthy, man, he's arguably the

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>best player in the NFL.

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Here's what I love about it.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>There was a tweet I saw earlier today before we

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 2>hopped in the studio from Robert Mays and an incredible

0:26:57.560 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 2>look into what Kyle.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Shanahan is doing right now.

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 2>And he is playing teams two steps ahead of what

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.680
<v Speaker 2>they're giving them defensively, I mean, they whatever the plan

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 2>is that they're getting, it's like they're just turning it

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.159
<v Speaker 2>on its head and finding some type of weakness to

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 2>exploit on a week to week basis. And with that quarterback.

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:18.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, here's the thing, Mike. You can draft a

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 2>quarterback second overall, you can take them with the last pick.

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 3>In the trap.

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 2>What you ultimately need is you need somebody that is

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 2>going to play the scheme as it's intended and make

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 2>plays when they're presented. Brock Purdy gives you all of that.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 2>May not have the biggest arm, may not have the

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 2>prototypical size, but he executes this scheme better than anybody

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:37.919
<v Speaker 2>I've seen.

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>And he protects the football, and he protects the football.

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 2>So when you have McCaffrey of all this, I think

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 2>this is a gut check moment for the Cowboys because suddenly,

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:50.640
<v Speaker 2>if the forty nine ers run you over, now you're

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:53.200
<v Speaker 2>three and two. Now you've got questions to answer. So yeah,

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 2>I like the forty nine ers chances in this, but

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously Mike and I love the scheme that they run

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 2>down there with O'Brien. It's just a question of whether

0:28:00.680 --> 0:28:03.199
<v Speaker 2>or not Digs. Everybody laughed at the Digs injury, not

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the injury per se, but it's like, oh, he's not

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 2>that big of a player. Anybody can cover for two

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 2>seconds and it's like that was it. He was a

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>big ball hawk. Yeah, and now he's not there.

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. I mean, there are guys who have a

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>nose for the ball in this league and uh, and

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>turnovers play such a huge part in the outcome of games.

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And and Trayvon Diggs was a was a turnover machine

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in some respects for the Dallas Cowboys, and and losing that,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you just you just don't you just don't replace that,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and you know, and from the Cowboys perspective,

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is the team that knocked him out

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the playoffs, and you know, and all that kind

0:28:36.640 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So big game in the NFC, it should

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>be a fun one, uh, to keep an eye on

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. But with that we will call it a

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>rap on this edition A Packers Unscripted. Be sure to

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>follow all of our coverage of the team and all

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage of Monday Nights big game from Las Vegas.

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Packers and Raiders will have it all for you on

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Packers dot com. For Wes, I am Mike. Thank you

0:28:58.200 --> 0:28:58.720
<v Speaker 1>for tuning in.

0:28:58.760 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Everybody.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>We will see next time.

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>M HM.