WEBVTT - Press Pass: Chip Kelly At Owner's Meetings

0:00:00.480 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So yesterday Jeffrey said that in explaining the power restructure,

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to support your vision. He felt that obviously

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you needed you needed a guy you were comfortable with,

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you hired it. Why is Ed more a better fit

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>for your than what Howe was builable? Why are you

0:00:15.360 --> 0:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable with it? I think we just try to

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 1>maximize everybody's strikes and how he does an unbelievable job

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>from the contract side and capside, and we're just moving

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>into different directions from the personnel stand point. But you

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>were he did not do an unbelievable job on the

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>personnel side. As far as what now, I just think

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we're trying. It's the same thing with our staff. Sometimes

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 1>you shuffle those guys around. We're just trying to find

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a put everybody in the right position. Would you think

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of values counted out of there? I thought it was

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>good two years with team and whether he was even

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting jeff who marked out previous team with

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>blue and maybe with more skied guys, and now he's

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Drac to get different blues guy. He kind of getting

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you old players and felt now I think some of

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that it depends on what players are available. You know

0:00:58.120 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't You know, you can all evaluate and say

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that whoever the top pick of the draft was, that

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Watkins really talented, But you don't have an opportunity

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to get Sammy Watkins. So a lot of it also

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>depends on where you have an opportunity to make selections.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's easy to look at it and say, I mean,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>I said it a year ago, I thought Odell Beckham

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>was the best player in the draft. I was right.

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>We didn't have a chance to get at Odell Beckham.

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>But you know that a lot of it depends on

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>where you're selecting. So have you felt that in a

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>few years because you didn't have finals, say that if

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you had a feeling on a certain guy you didn't

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>always get you weren't able to get that guy even

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>if he was available. Yeah, I mean I didn't. I

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have the final say so, I mean you always

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>defer to losing charges. I mean, was that trub Was

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that disappointing for you? Wasn't? No? Those are the those

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>those are the rules going in. So did you try

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to get those rules changed over earlier? No? Why no,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not the way I operate. We have a meaning

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year every year with mister

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Lori and I. He gets my views on things, I

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>get his view on things, and then he ultimately makes

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the decisions on what he wants to do moving forward.

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>When you said ship, when you said you wanted to

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>maximize everybody's strengths if you didn't know your new guy was,

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so how did you know you didn't you strands? That wasn't.

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go in with a plan saying we need

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to make all these maneuvers. I just said, this is

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>how I think my vision is of how this organization

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>should be. But it's mister Lorrie's decision on what he

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>wants to do. If he came back and said, I

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>want to do this, this, and this, and I want

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>you to just concentrate on that, then that's what I

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would have done. So why wasn't Tom Gamble who you

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>brought in a string? I didn't bring Tom Gamble in.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>How we brought Tom Gamble in, so he and he wasn't.

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.520
<v Speaker 1>How he was in charge of the personnel department for

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>the last two years, so I didn't. I've never made

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a hire in the personnel department or a fire in

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the personnel I wasn't involved in that, You had input, Joe, right, No,

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I have no input. I had no input in who

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>was hired or fired in the personnel department, Nor do

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I have it now. Ed's in charge of personnel. I mean,

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>we've maximized everybody. So if it's something were to go

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>on in personnel now, then that's that's under Ed's domain.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>That's what I hired him to do. It's no different

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>than I hired Billy Davis to run our defense. I

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>don't turn around and ask someone else, you know, what

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think about what Billy's doing defensively? Our defensive

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>coaches of a certain role, our offensive coaches of a

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 1>certain role, our personnel department as a certain role. So,

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's a big misconception. I never

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>hired Tim againble. I was never in a position to

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>hire a Tim again. About that made you think that

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 1>he would brave? You know? It was an interesting process

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>for me. I went out for probably three weeks and

0:03:21.120 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>visited with a lot of people, talked to a lot

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of people, and um Ed was the one guy in

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>house that I really wanted to talk to, and I

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 1>actually interviewed him last you know too, we had never

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>really sat down. I was impressed with his work ethic

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and pressed with his knowledge, you know, just sitting in

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>draft meetings, sitting in free agent meetings, just listen to

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>him talk, listen to him to described players, and was

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>always like, Hey, that guy's really sharp. And then he

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was the last guy I interviewed, and then the last guy,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>mister Lorry interviewed, so you know, kind of came away.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he blew both of us away. It was like, wow,

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, this guy's extremely organized, extremely detailed, has a

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>real good vision of what we're trying to get accomplished.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And I thought he was outstanding. You made two major trades.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you physically on the phone and working these deals

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>in theogotiating those two trades? Well, sometimes it was a

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>speaker phone, So but I mean, what's that like, First

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>time you know, actually on the phone deals, first time

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on the phone talking to a person, it was you know,

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it was scary. I did not operate the phone itself.

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just how it's normally, how you do it.

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have conversations all the time, and it's

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>not I don't think it's I mean the biggest thing,

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>it's like these league meetings, like, don't peek behind the

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>curtain because it's not what you think it is. I mean,

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>just having a conversation. Who do you have? What do

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you have? What do you want to do? Can you

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>accept somebody from your cap standpoint? You know, a lot

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>of decisions are made, most of the decisions from a

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>trade standpoint. Are those decisions is you'd like to acquire

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of players, but you can't fit them in

0:04:43.120 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 1>under your cap, you know, so it really kind of

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>limits which teams you're dealing with, how you're dealing with them,

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and then what they're trying to give back. Some of

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 1>them don't have draft picks. You'd like to get draft picks,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but they may not have draft picks. So now take

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a look at your roster. Who do you like on

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the roster? Since we talked to you last, have you

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>received any more phone calls about Sam Bradford? I know

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you said other teams we're interested. No, Given the fact

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.279
<v Speaker 1>that thank you and d don't have a lot of

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>experience in your current roles, are you leaning on on

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>other people or whether it's trade evaluations, whether it's the

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>upcoming draft. People that are more active, No, safety what's

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>the planet next to Malcolm gen is that spot that

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>Nat and occupied? Mils? Well, that's we'll go through OTAs,

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>we go through the draft, we'll go through preseason camp

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and then figure that out internal off Yeah, that's well,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a look at that. I mean, that's what

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this process is all about. The offseason. You get a

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>chance to see guys on the field. What's are alike

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in year three. I mean there's guys on and on

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>our team right now that can certainly play that role,

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but it depends on where they are when you get

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance to see him through OTAs, through mini camp,

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>through preseason camps, the process of what's going to happen

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>next and the next couple of months. Sam Brad, we

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't get him back on the football field functioning as

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>cool as that. You know, well, he's back. I mean

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 1>he when we got him on a Wednesday, he was

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>there the following Sunday. So he's been with our training

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>staff every day rehabbing, and then uh, we get a

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>chance to finally meet with him on April twentieth, which

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>is the first day of Phase one, you know, and

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>then it's, uh, the normal process it is for anybody

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 1>on our our team, whether it's Uh. Sam's obviously new,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's no different than what Demiko Ryan's is going

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>through right now. So, UM, it's pretty detailed. I mean

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just straightforward. Phase one, you can talk to him,

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>but you can't be on the field with him. Phase

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>two you get to go on the field with him,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but there's no defense across from him. Phase three is

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of ootas in minicamp, and we'll go from that.

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>What do you hope to see for him physically? Um,

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like he's on target to be fully recovered.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know exactly what day he'll be clear

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a one hundred percent, but I know he's

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>running and uh moving around right now. I don't we're

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:51.919
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to be be there when any of that

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff's going on, so I couldn't tell you what he

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>looks like movement wise or anything like that. I don't

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>know that exactly. No, I don't. He should be ready

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to go UM because his was UH was done earlier

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>than Sam. So I think sometime during OTAs will be

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>able to see Kiko moving around a little bit A

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of most of the now, all our quarterbacks take

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>reps in the off season, So we don't. I don't.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>We never care in an ota if if G. J.

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Kenny or Mark or or matter in there that you know,

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>you never look up and say, why is that guy

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 1>with that guy? That's why we've we just rotate. Somebody

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>grabbed the snap, but that's not a big deal. At

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>some point during this it's all all depend all depending

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>on what the doctors say. So Jeffrey obviously very fine,

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>show what do you have to do convince him that

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it was better for the team. Well, I'm very fond

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of Lesha McCoy. I think we all are. But when

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at moving forward and that was just a

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>really big number, you know, when they weren't moving off

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, so that that that was where the decision

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was made. But I mean, you're talking about the all

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>time leading running back for the Philadelphia Eagles. He led

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the league in rushing two years ago. Um, it was

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a real difficult decision, but it was a decision we

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>felt we had to make. We had too much money

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at the running back spot, so we had to move

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in a different direction. Would you have to explain all

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that Jeffrey Lourie, Now he understood. He's pretty sharp guy.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But with the most said and done, is the money

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>any different? Now? Yeah? Art right? Now? UM to Marco's

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars this year. Uh, Ryan's two million dollars

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>this year, and I think um Darren's four point one.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So but with that adds up to less than eleven

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>point nine. So it was about the cap number this year.

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>And you approached him about trying to get that number. Now,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>our guys talked to his agent, but I don't, I

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have I don't negotiate with him. So I didn't

0:08:51.840 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>speak specifically with Drew. But prior day no, I think

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't. I mean, I've done it everyone. I was

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>at Oregon, I at Johnson Stewart in the Garrett Plant,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>both two thirty plus, so I also had La Michael

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.599
<v Speaker 1>James and Kenyan Barnard. I mean, we can work with

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 1>whatever we have. It's just depending on what you want

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to do and how do you want to scheme it up.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 1>But I think what was available if you if you

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>move Lashawan, what's available? The guys that were available are

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>one cut downhill runners, so can they fit into what

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 1>we do offensively? Yeah? About finding a franchise quarterback being

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important things as far as going

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>from good to great. Can Sam be that franchise quarterback

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>if you can stay healthy? I hope so, But I

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm not I'm not a predictor guy, So I

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>don't mean I'm not going to put a label on anybody.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So we're saying about how much research did you look

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 1>into players, especially a quarterback you're touring the same yea

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>twice and how productive day. I think we looked at everybody.

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at our starting receiver who had eighty

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>five catches, So specifically a quarterback, yeah, I would say

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably easier for a quarterback with a knee injury

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>than it is with a shoulder injury. As we went

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>through the history of it. You know, you know, we're

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.079
<v Speaker 1>not We didn't bring Sam to run the ball seventy

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>five times a game. So I think it's a lot

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>easier for a quarterback with an ACL than it is

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>for a receiver with an a cl But you know,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>you look at I think the history right now in

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of sports science and what doctors are doing now

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>has moved forward. It's unbelievable. You know, look at the

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>year Jeremy mclanad coming off with two acls. You know,

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>look at our center Jason Kelsey came off in a

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>cl when I first got there, was just coming off

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>in ACL had a sports NIU surgery in the middle

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the season and still made the Pro Bowl. Our

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>left tackle, who's arguably a Hall of Famer, is coming

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>off with two achilles and has played at an outstanding level.

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So to follow up with question, and basically I don't,

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't have that answer right now, So I don't

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>know exactly where he is. I haven't talked to Chris

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>or you know, we'll take that when it comes. I

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know when his final meeting with doctor Andrews is,

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>but I know he's progressing the way he normally should

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>progress from that injury trying. You don't deal with the contract,

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you guys approached Sam Bradford about redoing his

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>dealer you no, I and if if any of that

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>is I'm not going to discuss any current players. I'm

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with you with Sam as our quarterback. Did you

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>reach out to the Rams, were Sam Bradford or did

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>they reach out to you about trade? I think it

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.439
<v Speaker 1>was a mutual thing. You know, went on for a

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. You know, we were trying to keep

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick if we could, and that was we were trying

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>to keep Nick. You know. It was just at the

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.199
<v Speaker 1>at the last second they wanted players. We were trying

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to get it done with draft pick. But it didn't work.

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work out that way. Outside. I don't know.

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's it's a spring. Everybody plays everywhere in

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the spring and we'll figure it out. I don't know

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>if we add anybody and what are their strengths and

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>what are their weaknesses. And I mean it's not playing

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>inside receive. Well, he was a rookie, so we just

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted him to play one position and learn one position

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and come in. Yeah, he can do It's just like

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh can do it. You know, it's Riley Cooper could

0:11:57.920 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>move into the slot for us. I mean, once you're

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in there. The biggest thing we do is when we

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>get rookies in there, it's hey, you're playing one spot.

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's not put a lot on your plate. It's no

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>different than zach Ertz. We you know, his package was

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>expanded in year two than it was in year one.

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But because when they first get in there, it's a

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>totally different world for him. Once they get comfortable there,

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you start to see him move around and play a

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of different spots. So I can envision Jordan playing

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of different spots for us. Which most

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of the guys in your scouting department were brought in

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.719
<v Speaker 1>by how not if not most of them were with

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 1>Ed in charge of it now and with Jeffrey is

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that you you attack scouting with a different way

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that he's ever seen before. Does Ed have to train

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the scout? I mean is does there have to be

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>changes in the scouting department or really so that they're

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>getting your type of guy? I think that happens no

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>matter what coaches are. If you change from one scheme

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to another, than what you're looking for in a player

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is different. Four three world linebackers different than three four

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>outside linebacker. That's just that's football, right. But he's but

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey employee saying, it's you're doing so uniquely and so differently.

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 1>So I was wondering if you think we're very specific

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in what we're looking for. But I think you already

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>transfer our guys. Guys have done a great job on

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>now in terms of identifying it. So you don't see

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>yourself making Ed making sweeping changes in the scouting department. No,

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's a question for Ed. But he you know,

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>when I hire him run its personnel department, you go

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>make it the way you want to make it look.

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Two weeks ago you said it. You spoke against philosophically

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>trading way up in the draft learning resources that you

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:28.880
<v Speaker 1>needed for the future. If Marcus Mariota didn't go back

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 1>in the top five. Is there a point and can

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you give any idea of the point where it would

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>be reasonable to try to trade out? No? Yeah, Ever,

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Matthiss name is big men. Well, I mean I could

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with hypotheticals all the time. I mean, give me

0:13:46.559 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a scenario. If he goes to twelve and it's gonna

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>cost us a seventh rong conditional pick, then that would

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>be very I mean, you can go throw it back

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and forth. That's what that's what this is all about.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>So philosophically, I want to keep all our draft picks.

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>I think you build your team through the draft. So

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>if you got yourself for one year and for one guy, Philosophically,

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's the right thing to do. Does

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that mean you don't do that? Yeah, Marcus yeah, coach here, yeah,

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>don't answer hypothetical. So what's it costs out? Give me

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a number two first round picks? Where am I going

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>from where to where? Never get you there? Took two

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>first round picks to go from six to two three

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago. I consider mortgage in the future, giving up

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 1>your draft, like for Ricky Williams. What I give up

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a whole draft for Ricky Williams in my opinion? Now

0:14:52.520 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>do you think do you think he's the best quarterback?

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think because no word draft, I have no idea.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought Odell Beckham was the best player in the draft.

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>He went at twelve. He ended up a Rookie of

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the Year. What do you think of the quarterback? I

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's two really good ones, two really good ones.

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Jamis is really good. Do I what do I like

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Jamis more? I don't know Jamis as well. Jamis is

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a really good quarterback, really good quarterback. His name will

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>go very quickly, I would imagine. But the history of

0:15:27.240 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the league. Look at the quarterbacks that have been drafting

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the top. Mark Sanchez was a top five pick, Jake

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Glocker was a top ten pick. Gabbett went at ten,

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>um Ponder went at twelve. Quarterbacks school really fast in

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>this league, said in Philadelphia introducing the Breadford back then

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a teammate a offer for a first round pick. Day.

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Have there been others since the No, you may changes

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at the running back position, obviously, what about from the

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>scheme perspective, other changes you need to be excuse me?

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Are there changes you need to make from a scheme

0:16:01.640 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>perspective with the run game this offseason? No? I mean

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we run the same play, we run power, we run zone,

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we run outside zone. Of those guys, Ryan and DeMarco

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>both have done all those things, so they fit in

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what we do. Oh, we're talking more

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>about what worked and what hasn't worked last year. I

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>know I need to make additions, regardless of the persadel

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>just from what we worked from the scheme perspective. Scheme. No,

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll havn Matthews be on the team next year, I hope.

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So his name's come up a good Mountain trade speculation

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to see are you guys actively trading them? No, shop intive. No,

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, as I said the other day, everybody

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on our roster is available. If someone wants skull. You

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>know when we'll when if the scenario comes up and

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>someone says, I want to give you two first round

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>draft picks for somebody, then yeah, we would listen. I mean,

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>we traded Lasham and that was a very difficult decision

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to do. But we felt at the end of the day,

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna listen to every offer we have, and then

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you'd be crazy to say, no, this isn't gonna happen.

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna happen because you have no idea what

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get offered for somebody. I was given permission

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to seek a trade again like he was last year.

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Yes he was, and there hadn't been anything come of that, No,

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>not at all besides familiar counter We felt he deserved it.

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think his performance in the last two

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>years since I've been here was exceeded what his contract was.

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>That something that moved. Is that something that you feel

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you bring a different approach to given contracts, you guys

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that. There's no what I must then do

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it for you to give him, I mean, there was

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the reason for you. I believe you earn earn what

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you do, and and I think we all believed what

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Connor did h for us has has exceeded what he did,

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>what his contract was working. I'm not going to discuss

0:17:54.480 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>anybody's contract on our team. What else about kno him?

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I must get one hundred and fifty nine tackles in

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games, four interceptions played every defensive snap. I mean,

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:10.120
<v Speaker 1>just turn the tape on and you know what type

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of player are you getting for such a ship? Yeah? No,

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it's it's what makes it, what's what makes sports great.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've got nothing to talk about on sports radio.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about trades, and everybody's gonna go I want

0:18:24.960 --> 0:18:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy, that guy, and this guy. You know what's

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 1>unique about it? Though? How come no one asked Jim

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Harbaw about trading up for Andrew Luck? Same scenario, identical scenario.

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I never heard a word about Jim are you trading

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>up to get Andrew Luck? I don't know what. I think.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he actually may have. I think he compared.

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Figure out what he said about Andrew Luck. I know

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>how Jimmy feels about Andrew Luck before the draft, like

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>in January, like when you guys started all these conversations January. No,

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>but okay, it's just to just to carry us question

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm answering, Okay, I was just curious why no one

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about Jimmy and Andrew, and Jimmy's professed love for Andrew.

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you that. And he's right, because that

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>guy's pretty good to him. Heading back to the question, yeah,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>you can understand why we want to talk to you,

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and you can understand why I'm not going to answer you.

0:19:30.240 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So we've heard a lot of things about Maria's not talk.

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>What can you know about this player's specific character visibility.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody gets over analyzed. You know, there's just

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>so much time between it. And then I'll give the

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>credit to Bruce Felman told me it's it's interesting that

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the knock on Marcus is his baggage, is that he

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>has no baggage. Here's an outstanding leader. Look at his

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>one loss record. You know, you judge quarterbacks on what

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.960
<v Speaker 1>their one lost record is. You judge quarterbacks on touchdound,

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>interception ratio, you judge them on all those things. And

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>he's off the charts, and he's off the charts off

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the field. There was a report that some executives who

0:20:15.840 --> 0:20:17.520
<v Speaker 1>had talked to him didn't like the fact that he

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was not fiery, you know, where his emotions on his

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sleeve and the little on net. It just didn 'tear

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>to them. I mean, do you even evaluate that as

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>part when you're looking at you. I heard everything when

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you look at him. But just because a guy doesn't

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>yell and scream at a guy when he doesn't run

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the right route? Is ask any of those guys if

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>they take Eli Manning. I don't see Eli Manning screaming

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and yell at anybody. But you know, you talk about

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a stone cold killer in the fourth quarter. Look at

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:42.720
<v Speaker 1>how many fourth quarter comebacks Eli's had. I mean, I

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.120
<v Speaker 1>just it's just it's the silly season. I've said it before.

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>The NFL draft hype is the most crazy thing in

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the world. And they're gonna guys are gonna go up,

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Guys are gonna go down. The guys are gonna go up.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>Cam Newton couldn't play everybody. There's no reason draft him

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. All of a sudden, he goes

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 1>number one. I knew it. I mean, it's crazy. Explain

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>philosophically football wide, So why it's not good for team

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>trade back? For usually the last traft picks. Philosophically, more

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:18.119
<v Speaker 1>players are better than one player philosophically, that's bottom. I mean,

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the history of the game, study all trades. What set

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys going forward? They traded one player for multiple players.

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's just I got a better chance at hitting.

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:31.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not an exact science and draft you get. It's

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a better chance at hitting. If you have more draft picks,

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then you have less draft picks. That's basically it philosophical

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>harder to evaluate that physician, harder to evaluate when you

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>do those kind of things. If you if you would trade,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is it hard? I think a quarterback harder to evaluate

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>when you're trading all those picks than another position. Now,

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Saints traded all the way, all those

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>draft picks for Ricky Williams. Wander A get I'm at

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you tell me there are no exceptions to that philosophy

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>In Europe, it's a philosophy. There's exceptions to every philosopher.

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>People used to think the world was flat philosophically, right

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>until that guy took the boat and just kept going

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't fall off the edge. Right completion, more

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>chances and done with you next the same thing you

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>feel like um, I would look at Sam can't considers

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty yack or quarterback. They that naturally he should have

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that fun Now, I mean it's still all about the players.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can put some players in there and

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to complete a pass. I just it's

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>still a personnel driven you know, that whole it's the system,

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not the system. It's still about the players. It's

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.199
<v Speaker 1>just putting them in positions I think where you can

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>read their strengths and read their weaknesses and trying to

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>put them in position to make players. But I don't

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>think so, I don't know, I really I then I've

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 1>said it before. I didn't really what he was doing.

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I also think he had maybe you know, he had

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different coordinators, you know, from year to

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>year to year. So I wasn't really entrenched in a

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in one system. I don't. I mean I really don't.

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't study it that way, you know, going from

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>scheme where he had s a defense where he had

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>set down get a lot of responsibility. Project. Yeah, I

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>think that's a misconception because he didn't have two safeties

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>behind him. I mean they're either a Cover three or

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Cover one, and they don't play too deep, so you know,

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Cam's usually down in the box. But you know, the

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing I think that's interesting with Byron is that

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>because of how good Richard Sherman is, he got the

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>scheme was a lot of times the best receiver you

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 1>tried to get. Everybody tried to scheme people, and he

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>got the most balls because you're not going to throw

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>on Richard. So you know, he's got a great skill set,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>great size, great length, um, really smart intuitive football. Um.

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Benefited from really good coaching and Sattle Pete do's an

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>unbelieable job with defensive backs. But you know, I think

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>he also benefited again playing opposite or Richard because he

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>saw he saw a lot, did a really good job.

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The other thing they did with him his versatility is

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>he played in He played in the nickel, you know,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so he's played inside corner as opposed to just being

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>predominantly an outside corner. So he's he's got, uh, you know,

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of versatility in terms of being able to

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 1>move them around. I mean, I think there's a lot

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of ways you can use them. Well, we'll get we

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>won't get our hands on him until uh the end

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of April but I'm sure Billy will Will, you know,

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>is excited to have someone like him that has that

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>type of versatility to kind of move around. You know,

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we got Thurman, Nolan, Brandon. Yeah, they'll all play it

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>out right now, you know. And if unless we do

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>something here later, boy can Yeah. And unless we do

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>something here later, and you know, if if we add

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>somebody in free agency or the draft and they'll compete

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on on for that other spot, and now that will

0:24:55.760 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>work out a free agent move now percentage wise or

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>fractions or you know, I don't know, I mean, I

0:25:03.920 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>really don't. I mean, you haven't made one in a while,

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:07.359
<v Speaker 1>and guys are starting to come up the market and

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>now it's it's a different kind of market now. So yeah,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>he's trying to see what the market is. There's conversations

0:25:11.720 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>going on, but I couldn't say one way or the

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>other yet highly or I'm highly or unlikely. Do you

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>think you can, like, you know, find find a top

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the draft? Do you think there's someone

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>like you know, you mentioned Odell back on the last

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>year and everything kind of feeling what Jeremy did. Um, Yeah,

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think it's a talented draft class. We're

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>still kind of putting that all together. But it's another

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 1>year where there's some really really good receivers in the draft,

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's probably the one position again that

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>has the most depth in the draft is probably wide

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>receiver back. We felt, Yeah, last offseason you talked a

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>lot about having to beat man coverage. He's there a

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>similar theme or focus where we look at this offseason.

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>We need to get better in this area when we

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>make some of these personnel moves. No, I mean I

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:58.239
<v Speaker 1>actually flip for us. We saw less man last year

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>than we did the year before, so I think it

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was a sixty forty sixty man first year and forty

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>man the second year. So you know, it'll probably change again.

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>You've never seen interested in moving in Brandon to the outside.

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean basically cities some small to play outside for

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>bigger guys. Has that changed? I mean, it's just thinking too. No.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're show us what we have and what's

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>available to us, and everybody competes. But Brandon plays outside

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>every day in practice, you know. I mean that's something

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that I don't think. You know, when Brandon goes out

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to practice, he's not like this, like I don't look

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>at what the outside corners do. I mean, he's been

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:35.359
<v Speaker 1>our second corner behind Fletching Kerry, and it was Nolan

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and Brandon, so he's always played outside. But he also

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing nickel, you get less reps outside because

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:43.680
<v Speaker 1>how many reps do you have in seven on seven.

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>If there's twelve reps and seven on seven and seven

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>of them are nickel reps, well, he's getting all his

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>reps at nickels. He's not gonna get all He's not

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>going to go in with the twos and then and

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>go play outside receiver. It's the same thing with Nolan

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>when we used him a dime. It took away from

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>some of his reps at outside corner just because you're

0:26:57.840 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>not going to run them on every snap there and practice.

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>But whoever is the best out of that group will

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>play corner force first and second. I'm wondering what you

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>think about to see him first off season. I think

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Josh just consistency and the biggest thing with him is

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>getting hurt in that preseason game that kind of get

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>him put him behind everybody, and then when we got

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.719
<v Speaker 1>him back, I think it was after the San Francisco game,

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>so we had already played four or five games, you know,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so he was playing a little bit of catch up,

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully just to stay you know. It was just

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of a freak thing on that kickoff return, Um,

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>but contributed really well for us. He's a he's an

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>unbelieable teams player. UM. So we already know he's established

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there and now it's just getting a little bit more

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>consistent and given. And he'll get an opportunity now with

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>with Matt gon So. Um. You know, I just think,

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like everybody, you just hope that that year one of

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>year two jump. You know, we know he has the

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>physical skills and the mindset to do it is just

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>staying healthy and an opportunity to show us at the

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>same year the Mowtube routine Mark sam Chase, you talk

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 1>about what are you showing your last year and how

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>important is that? I think, I mean, quarterbacks the position

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in the National Football League, and you better have a

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of them. I mean, in my two years here,

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we've we've played multiple quarterbacks in every season. So, um,

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>we thought he was the most attractive free agent on

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the market and we were really excited to be able

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to get him back. You know, another year in our system,

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>another year working with him. Um got a tremendous work ethic.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he he's uh really come come along since

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the shoulder surgery that set him out the whole year

0:28:35.440 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>before that. So excited to see his growth in the

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>second year of our system. Another guy you mentioned like

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the second year of jo What does kind of like

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>take that next step? The same with all the same

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 1>thing I said about Josh consistency. You know, there's there's

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.239
<v Speaker 1>times he flashes, but can we get it from him

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>on a more consistent basis? SI, I know I'm in

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>your last person couple. Someone trying to ask you about

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>why you you wanted Sam and said of Nick, And

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you stopped him and said, no, it's not about what

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't like Nick. But you did trade one for

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the other. Essentially what is Yeah, But I, as I

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, I didn't want We didn't want to trade Nick.

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>That was really the biggest sticking point for us. We

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to lose Nick, right, But you did. You

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to lose him. Ultimate, Yeah, you have to.

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to make it. You have to make a

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>decision of of It's the same thing I didn't want

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to lose the shoan, but you have to make You

0:29:21.880 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>got to give something up to get something right. So

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>what did you think you were getting more of for

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you and for your scheme by getting Sam and giving Nick.

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think when you look at Sam, it's

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>his overall accuracy that I think impresses everybody when you

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>watch him play. You know, do you feel like he

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.479
<v Speaker 1>would at his best is a more accurate quarterback? Then

0:29:40.520 --> 0:29:43.000
<v Speaker 1>then Nick at his best? Oh, I don't know about that,

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>but I mean just looking at where we are and

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>what we need to do. But I think we've We've

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>got guys open him. We need to put the ball

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>on him and some from the situations, an offense faster.

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Going back to even Oklahoma, I mean the the pace

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that he runs with that was that wasn't I have

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>no idea what he did pace. I mean when you

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>watch college tape, there's no you don't know what's going

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>on between the players. You're just watching one play cut

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to the next place. Did you just look at his

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bro taper? Did you go back to the oko um

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the two um? I didn't go back to it, but

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I talked to his coaches at Oklahoma, so I didn't.

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't watch him at Oklahoma whatever. We watched every

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>throw he made in college, so I mean every throwing

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>made in the pros. Statistically he didn't throw guard. What

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>do you need. I'm really excited about Alan. We've we've

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we've been high on Allen for a long time. You know,

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>was playing really well and then hurt his ankle it,

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the first game. So you know, we

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we always considered Alan. You know, came in the year before,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>didn unbelieable job when JP was out against Green Bay

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and in a real tough matchup, um, you know, against

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a real good team in Green Bay and really did

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>it well from self versatile player. Um, but I feel

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.680
<v Speaker 1>very confident in Alan Barber. Yeah, when Miko help, how

0:30:56.720 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>do you invasion? Can flag Pico about Michaelmen? I mean's

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I never you have no idea. I mean, I don't

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>know what's going to happen for you four weeks from now,

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>five weeks from now, four months from now. You know,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>they all may be hurt and it may be Brad

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Jones and Acho. So what did make trades? That bringing key?

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>You think about how that will affect position? Yeah, I know,

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we we we knew we love I mean both those linebackers.

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, Demico missed eight and Michael missed four.

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it was really we getting depth at

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>our inside linebacker position and getting more players. It was

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a number really something where we were striving

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to striving to get accomplished in the offseason. Yeah. Yeah,

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>we call everybody when that happened. So I talked to Darren,

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Demiko. We've talked to everybody whenever we

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>do that. When we draft somebody, we talked to the

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>other guys at their position. So that's something we've always done.

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So is the team that I'm never going to discuss

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>who we talked to in trade and trade uh situations

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and Jeff Jeffrey said, you know, bringing free agents

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you don't know how they're going to fit into

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>your scheme and your system, your culture, or if they're

0:32:05.320 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>going to understand how things are done. You'd much rather

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>build a team through the draft and in the years

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>going forward because of philosophically. Yeah, yes, so this passed

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 1>off season, the risks involved with bringing in players free

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>agency and stuff like that, did you look into, you know,

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the personalities and every years. Yeah, you try to mean,

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you gather all the information you can. You don't have

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to meet with any of them, and you

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>go through all their couple you know, the research that

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was done on them in college coming out. You know

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>what they were like, and you know you have a

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>framework of kind of who they are, and you know

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>if you have an opportunity to maybe have a place

0:32:41.040 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>at somebody that knows them, or coach them, or you know,

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>when free agency opens, you get a chance to visit

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and talk with them. But you know that's just for us.

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>If you just look at it. There hasn't been a

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>real good history in the last ten years of draft

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the defensive backs at the Eagles, so you got to

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>go require them in free agency, so you hope we

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>could draft a little bit better so we don't have

0:32:58.280 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to do that and we go in the future. When

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>he was talking yesterday about why he felt changed with Estery,

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>he spoke about how esoteric your requirements are they you

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>understand what um you have really really specific requirements in specifically,

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>how hard is it to train scouts to do what

0:33:22.200 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>one can do to look at me, to look at

0:33:26.520 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and has that been a problem for you, No, not

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at all. I think we've got a great scott where

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>did very different from what other people want. No, I

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think everybody has specific needs and wants that they have

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>at their position. You know, what Seattle's looking for is

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>different than what San Francisco's looking for. I think the

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>teams that that do with the best are getting players

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that fit their system. Just the risk that you're run

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're you're shrinking the point too much if you're

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for this specifically sycheologically, this specifically from a measurable standpoint,

0:33:57.480 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>on and on. I mean there's a scheme talent. Could

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>that be a potential problem? How much do you think

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>about that? What's the solution? That's a sixty four thousand

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar question. But you can say, you know what, our

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.399
<v Speaker 1>parameters are too tight, so let's expand him, and then

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>what you if you accept it, expect it. So if

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you accept that you're going to take a five to

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>seven corner and the ball gets strown over his head,

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you can't say, boy, he should have made that play.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>It's he ain't gonna make the play. The receivers six four,

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, so there's a give and take. It's it's

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a it's a tough it's a tough deal. But if

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you you know, it's a if you take under overachievers

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that aren't the right size at every position, eventually you're

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a five ten nose guard but with a

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>five nine inside linebacker with a five eighth safety, and

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna run the ball right down your throat and

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you have no one to kick in the pants except

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>for yourself because you decided to make those selections. So

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>if if you're gonna have a standard in any operation,

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>your business, your newspaper, whatever, and say, you know what,

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I want a guy that's really good at this. This

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>guy doesn't really fit the criteria, but let's just hire

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>them anyways, And then you wonder why your business failed,

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>it's because you lowered your standards to get to a

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 1>certain point. Talking about you and should you said, well,

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you guys had to post mortem on the season. You

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>presented a vision to go for the goods he bought into.

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.239
<v Speaker 1>So when you plugged in the team, give us the

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>two or three things that you said to him, this

0:35:24.080 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is how we can go for. I think we have

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:30.399
<v Speaker 1>to improve on defense, you know, overall, I think, um,

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>we gotta be better in the back end. We weren't

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 1>good in the secondary. We had too many X plays

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>over our heads. UM. Offensively, we have to clean up

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the turnovers. You know, they were at an all time

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>high for any system that I've ever been in UM.

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:45.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, So we got to make decisions in terms

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of being better in terms of securing the football on

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the offensive side of the ball, and really felt like

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we had to get better depth at inside linebacker and

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>in the secondary. So that's really from a from a

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.160
<v Speaker 1>football standpoint, that's what we were talking about. Feel that

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>after plugging defense now that you needed physical Now I

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>think we're Our run defense is outstanding, So I not

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>at all I think I think that's the strength of

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>our defense. I think it's it was our past defense

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that we were trying to improve. Scout to the question

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:31.279
<v Speaker 1>countly draft, we're smaller now that you guys do the

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 1>first round, you get the many first round rades. Feel

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like that you guys draft now talking to guys that

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 1>were in other programs, now, post boards are similar. I mean,

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and if a guy doesn't have a first round grade,

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't look at the board and say, we don't

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>have enough first round so let's put this guy in

0:36:55.239 --> 0:36:59.879
<v Speaker 1>first round the draft. The pool is what the pool

0:36:59.920 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is is you can't make it. I mean, that's your selections.

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.839
<v Speaker 1>The presidential candidate, So the presidential candidates. You're you're picking

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.840
<v Speaker 1>between this presidential candidate and that presidential candidate. You just

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 1>can't say, well, I don't like that guy and I

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>don't like that guy. We gotta pick one of them, right, No,

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>never may we're doing. Sorry if you've been answering for

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Curly Cowboy. But he talked about what demarcol murder Bred

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.440
<v Speaker 1>would remute it to him two or three. Obviously you

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>just look at him statistically in terms of what he did.

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>We faced him four times. Yeah, you know what type

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.600
<v Speaker 1>of war Cris backing is. But um got unbelievable patients

0:37:32.600 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>and vision a toughness to him, you know, uh, never

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>really takes negative yardage plays. And then when I finally

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>got a chance to visit with him, I think it

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.080
<v Speaker 1>was on either that Wednesday or Thursday after pree agency started.

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, I didn't really know what type of

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>player he was. When the first conversation I had with

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>him on the phone, I was, you know, just impressed

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with him as a as a as a guy you know,

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>and what his mindset is and what he wants to

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:56.920
<v Speaker 1>get accomplished, and um, you know, really excited to add

0:37:56.960 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>him to to our and you take him away from

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboy because he's started an important to port against him. Now,

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we never look at it that way. We're just trying

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to acquire players and we don't say, you know, let's

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>take this player over that player because it's going to

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>make that team. You know, I think I know Dallas

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:14.839
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a real tougher punt of force

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 1>again when we playing this year. So there's a lot

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of conversation in Dallas about the workload with that. Marie

0:38:19.280 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>had last year rolled game role at mc glayed in

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that offensive I kind of thought, did you give to that?

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think he had four hundred and fifty

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>passes last year and type of guess type questions. Yeah,

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>we have thought with that, and that's why we wanted

0:38:30.719 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring in two running backs. So that's why we

0:38:32.200 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 1>brought to Marco and and Ryan Mathison. So you described

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>schools last week as a Swiss army night last week.

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Last year, you kind of used him a more straightforward role.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you didn't move them around a whole lot.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Did you anticipate maybe being creative with him this year, Yeah,

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:49.560
<v Speaker 1>we do, you know, and it's just acclamation, but also

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:51.640
<v Speaker 1>for us, you know, in a lot of times, especially

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the year, he was our only other running back,

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:55.359
<v Speaker 1>so you know, kind of move him around and put

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 1>him in a lot of different spots. You're kind of

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>holding your breath because early I think it was I

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:01.560
<v Speaker 1>can't remember if it was one or two games worth,

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>our third running back was Trey Burton because Chris was injured.

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you got a kind of that's why

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 1>our goal in this offseason, if if we move Lashawn

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was we wanted to bring two guys in. We want

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to have some depth at the running back spot and

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 1>possibly carry four guys um during the season, And you

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.120
<v Speaker 1>know that that's that there's a lot of factored into that.

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think obviously in year two, a lot more

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 1>familiarity with what we're doing and getting acclimated in terms

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of what we're doing. We need to get him on

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the field. Most seems like, if if your running backs

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are healthy, you know demarco' Ryan's and its roles that

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Chris Bob probably has again a limited role that's a

0:39:32.840 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>covered doing. Mean, it's safe to say it's not going

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 1>to be expanded from last year as long as everyone now,

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that's not safe to say. Do you expect it depends role?

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, we could get the game one.

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>He could be the only running back standing. So so

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about two physical running backs into Mark o'

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and Ryan, so you better have some depth. You know,

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.279
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a style that those guys run with

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 1>where they're gonna they're gonna take some hits and you

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:57.759
<v Speaker 1>gotta be able to have some depth when you have

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 1>those type of guys, you think, do you do you fine?

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Like going through the whole training process, you know, reporting

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>free agency stuff, do you find that's a lot like

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, do you find that's kind of like you

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>know what it's like, including when new or or you know,

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in college and everything now because they don't visit until

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them that I wish there was a

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.040
<v Speaker 1>visit period, but there's it's not a they don't really visit.

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're coming in and going, so it's it's

0:40:34.760 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit different. So there's not much from

0:40:37.200 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>from that. A lot of it's done over the phone

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 1>when you have first to have a chance to talk

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to him. So so then that's scout real short window. Sorry,

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>that's scouting philosophy. Then that you just articulated, where did

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you develop that, how was that influence that? That's how

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to do it at the NFL level, just

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>learning from a lot of people that have been in

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this league for a long time and picking their brains

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>on how you want to put things together. But philosophic,

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think everybody would say the same thing that they

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>have a Guys that can't tell you what they want

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in a player are probably the teams that aren't successful.

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>When you guys are specific and know exactly what they

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>want you know, then you have a chance to to

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>fix it from an understanding. But if you don't understand

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>what you want in a player or defensive scheme or

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>an offensive team, then you never can correct the mistake

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>because you don't even know if you're making a mistake.

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Challenge versus they're both. They both go hand in hand.

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.319
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think you can sacrifice one for the other,

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>or it doesn't work that way. You can have a

0:41:32.600 --> 0:41:34.120
<v Speaker 1>guy that's got all the intangibles in the world. But

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:35.879
<v Speaker 1>if he doesn't have the talent to play, it really

0:41:35.920 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. You can have the guy who's the most

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:41.800
<v Speaker 1>talented player ever, but if he doesn't fit into with

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the players on a team because it's

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>a team game, then that's not going to work either.

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So but Brad similarly, he had three offensive bold Dames

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>four years, didn't have a lot of offensive talent around.

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:00.920
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, when you watch each throw, you need

0:42:00.960 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>how do you project that. I don't think you're you're

0:42:04.680 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 1>not looking. I don't project. I don't think we look

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at it as a projection. I'm just looking at what

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 1>can he do and what can't he do when you're

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>watching film, because you don't know what he's asked to do,

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know what the play call is on

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the third throw of the game. You know when what

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 1>his progression was from one to two to three, or

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:23.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, was he told to throw it there? No

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>matter what, you just you're watching the skill set. How

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:27.360
<v Speaker 1>does he set his feet, how does he avoid a

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>rush or his eyes up? How does he take a hit?

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:30.800
<v Speaker 1>How does he deliver a short ball, how does he

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>deliver a deep ball? What's he like at intermediate throws.

0:42:33.080 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>What's he like when he sets his feet and throws.

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 1>What's he like when he gets flushed, you know, when

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 1>he can't get his his back foot down and has

0:42:38.440 --> 0:42:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to throw off balance. You know, that's what you're evaluating

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 1>when you're watching the tape aspect of you're not looking

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at it. How does this fit in schematically? You're just

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you're just looking at a skill set two years and

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>what have you learned about development? More specifically, do you

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:53.839
<v Speaker 1>guys think you put Marcus Smith back good position last

0:42:53.880 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>year to succeed now? I mean I think we we

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.319
<v Speaker 1>do a really good job because our guys get more

0:43:01.360 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>reps than everybody else. But the bottom line is you

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have to earn your position. You know, there's not a

0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't have time when you're competing for a division

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>title to throw a guy out there and say, hey,

0:43:11.440 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>let's see how he develops. Right now, I mean when

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the game's on the line. The game's on the line,

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and in the way it broke down for us, we're

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>one game away from making a playoffs. So you know,

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if shame on us, if we were just trying to well,

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>we didn't. We didn't get a chance to win that

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>game because we were trying to develop some younger players.

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's maybe if you're on a different team,

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:29.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe a team that's you know, you know it's a

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.040
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding project and it's a one or two or three

0:43:32.160 --> 0:43:34.160
<v Speaker 1>or four year deal from where you're gonna be, then

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a different mindset. But when when we got here,

0:43:36.640 --> 0:43:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that way. I mean, we won the division

0:43:38.160 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>in our first year. We were right in the heat

0:43:39.480 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of the battle last year. So um, but I don't

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 1>think from any standpoint, and I think it's the same

0:43:45.120 --> 0:43:46.480
<v Speaker 1>thing with the players. If you just put a guy

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:48.440
<v Speaker 1>out there that doesn't deserve to be out there, then

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you lose the rest of your team. You know, what

0:43:49.920 --> 0:43:52.200
<v Speaker 1>do you stand for? You know, and we're about competition

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and you earn it. You know, there's not one guy

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 1>on our team that can say, you know what, I

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't get enough reps. You know, they get a ton

0:43:57.000 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of reps and they get evaluated every day. And then

0:43:59.520 --> 0:44:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you're opportunity to show us what you can do to contribute.

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And if you show us that you can contribute, the

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get you on the field because you're gonna

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:11.400
<v Speaker 1>lpus win games. You did enough to done in the NFL.

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean the first year you're helping a lot to

0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 1>do with the success of plays last years and different

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>quarterback on majority season. How do you think that plays

0:44:23.800 --> 0:44:26.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't. We don't run as much zone read as

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 1>you think we run, just because we hint I know,

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.680
<v Speaker 1>probably less than two times a game, do you think,

0:44:32.880 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 1>um so, I think that depends on your personnel. I

0:44:36.600 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 1>think the Seattle Seahawks run it outstanding and it's a

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 1>real difficult play in terms of how they run it.

0:44:42.160 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But we I mean we I think we're maybe less

0:44:44.080 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 1>than one a game in terms of running zone read plays.

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's not a big part of what we do.

0:44:49.719 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Probably won't be, probably not now this second STA well

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it's so that earlier with Zach, but we'll see. We

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 1>got some guys in house, we'll take a look at well,

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:07.320
<v Speaker 1>there's still opportunities in free agency, and there's also opportunities

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in the draft, and we'll play it out through OTA's

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>mini camp in the preseason. Have you thought about give

0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it Nolan Carol will look at safety. No, No one's

0:45:14.120 --> 0:45:15.600
<v Speaker 1>going to compete for the starting corner spot. On the

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>other side, about the new responsibilities, that you is finding

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback and been figuring out how yet the quarterback

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the way that you obviously need to use exact the

0:45:26.160 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge that you had, I mean specifically about that

0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 1>position its opposed to No, I don't think that's the

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge. I think putting together a whole team it's

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest challenge. That doesn't weigh more than no, No,

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:42.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. You guys can you guys like, yeah, Jalen's

0:45:42.680 --> 0:45:46.000
<v Speaker 1>got versatility. How it We'll all play itself out. I mean,

0:45:46.080 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we got a ton of time and we have a

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:50.160
<v Speaker 1>ton of reps between now and when we gotta make

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a decision on who's gonna end upposite Malcolm so um,

0:45:53.520 --> 0:45:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jaylen Jalen is another guy that will have

0:45:55.840 --> 0:45:58.400
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity at the safety spot. What was your evaluation

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of how Michael Keedgriggs played less here and how he

0:46:00.520 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fits go work forward? Um. I thought when he was

0:46:03.120 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>healthy he played really well for us, But again we

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 1>missed him. I don't know if it was four or five,

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>four games, you know, it was just the health aspect

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of it was a difficult thing and we were a

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:14.680
<v Speaker 1>different team without him on the field. I think he's

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>but when he played, he played really well for us.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>What can from from franchise and him when you see him?

0:46:23.760 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Just the price of the tag, what you paid a

0:46:27.560 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of money for Byron Maxwell? So why was it?

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>We felt corner? So you felt corner. We felt corner

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was a priority position for us in terms of the questions,

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do we need to improve? We needed

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to improve our secondary, but do you feel like in

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>doing that though and letting in doing that improving your

0:46:42.320 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>secondary but also then not bringing back Jeremy. You weakened

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.480
<v Speaker 1>your wide receiver porter? And where's that? You can't You

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 1>can't pay everybody. I mean, that's just everybody has the

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:52.279
<v Speaker 1>same amount of money, and so you got to divvy

0:46:52.320 --> 0:46:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it up. However you're going to divvy it up. But

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>we were inadequate in terms of the money allocated defensively

0:46:58.200 --> 0:46:59.959
<v Speaker 1>as we were to offensively, and we're trying to balance

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that out, and I think it showed in our play.

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine what the offers you had Maco and

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you had money allocators to that spot to then when

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:11.959
<v Speaker 1>he didn't sign, how did he how did that change

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:14.879
<v Speaker 1>your offices and planes? And then we just we didn't

0:47:14.880 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>think there was another receiver that was in that price

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 1>range in the in the free agency, so it was

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we were gonna try to get mac Back. Felt like

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:23.719
<v Speaker 1>we gave him a real competitive offer. Kansas City offered

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 1>him a lot more than we did, and we just

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:28.879
<v Speaker 1>weren't going to go that high song getting Marco. Were

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>able to do that because now we had always planned

0:47:31.800 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 1>on taking to running back. So salary cap allocation. You

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>talked about using what you did at the running back

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>position spreading. Spreading carries out a little more than men.

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like your system offensively um helps you

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the salary gap because you didn't have

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to pay a top guy and a fil ran amount

0:47:54.920 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of money. Do I feel our system does No. I

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>think it's all based on what's available at the time

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and how do you allocate it, you know. I mean

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you can philosophically say, hey, we want to pay x,

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:14.200
<v Speaker 1>X and X at each position, but that's not available

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, we want to pay our center really

0:48:18.640 --> 0:48:20.840
<v Speaker 1>good money because he deserves really good money, because Jason's

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 1>really good. If somebody else was playing center, we wouldn't

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have that much money allocated at center. I think it's really,

0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't look at it and say, philosophically, let's put

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a price tag on every position, because number one, you

0:48:30.480 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 1>don't get to start from scratch. And then number two,

0:48:33.560 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just because you want to pay your left tackle ten

0:48:35.920 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>million dollars, what if there's not a ten million dollars

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>player available to you at that position. So you just

0:48:41.080 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 1>got to kind of it's it's an event of flow.

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>It's not a philosophical thing where you can say this

0:48:45.920 --> 0:48:51.799
<v Speaker 1>or that you're more of a team touches please out.

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:55.319
<v Speaker 1>It depends on what your players are. You know, if

0:48:55.320 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you add yeah, you're not going to say philosophically, we

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>want to spread it out. If you have a six

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:02.799
<v Speaker 1>five guy that's two forty and runs four three, you're

0:49:02.800 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna probably get him in the ball a little bit

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more than somebody else. I just think when you set,

0:49:08.920 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you see what's out here. To talk about the ball out,

0:49:13.320 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about spreadit. Now. What I was talking

0:49:15.320 --> 0:49:18.239
<v Speaker 1>about spreading the ball out is that the way those

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>guys run the football, he's I don't believe that one

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:22.399
<v Speaker 1>of those guys is going to carry the ball three

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:25.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty times. And I think it's it takes

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a physical toll on you that that wasn't a salary

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:32.320
<v Speaker 1>cap philosophical let's handle it. You know, I would we

0:49:32.520 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>ran multiple running backs at Oregon because we had multiple

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 1>running backs at Oregon. If we didn't have multiple running backs,

0:49:38.160 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 1>we would have just hung it on one guy. And

0:49:41.000 --> 0:49:43.239
<v Speaker 1>when we had someone like Leshawan who was head and

0:49:43.280 --> 0:49:46.640
<v Speaker 1>shoulders above everybody else, then he's he's gonna be the

0:49:46.719 --> 0:49:48.359
<v Speaker 1>guy that's going to carry the ball and very rarely

0:49:48.440 --> 0:49:50.640
<v Speaker 1>came out of the game. You know, that's just that's

0:49:50.680 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>just the nature of how it was set up when

0:49:52.280 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>I got here. You know, Leshan was a head and

0:49:54.120 --> 0:49:57.360
<v Speaker 1>shoulders above. Now when you have DeMarco and Ryan, you

0:49:57.440 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>can distribute those carris. I would have loved to I mean,

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Leshaun the most carries out of any running back over

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the last two years if we had, if we could have, philosophically,

0:50:06.040 --> 0:50:07.399
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to spread that out. But if you don't

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:11.479
<v Speaker 1>have that other guy, then well when wouldn't you who's

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy like Matt five receptions? I'll probably feel like

0:50:15.160 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you can make up some of that, you know, Josh,

0:50:17.480 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe Zachart's getting out a little more. You spread them

0:50:21.040 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>all around. Ryan mapps. I mean, is that kind of

0:50:26.800 --> 0:50:28.719
<v Speaker 1>yeah or what are you getting the draft? I mean,

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't. Our team's not set right now. I guess

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the best way to say, you don't know what you have,

0:50:33.160 --> 0:50:35.279
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we may get somebody in the draft.

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:37.279
<v Speaker 1>You're like, oh my god, he's better than I thought

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>he was. We need to feed him. You know, college

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and juries much more imperative. Is it to have a

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:48.560
<v Speaker 1>very very good cauterback at this level and maybe in

0:50:48.640 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>college to be successful, is it not? I think it's

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>a I mean I think in this sport, no matter

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:56.840
<v Speaker 1>what level, you probably better have a really good quarterback.

0:50:57.560 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, depending on what system you round. Now what

0:51:00.520 --> 0:51:02.320
<v Speaker 1>some people think is good, you know, it may not

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>translate to the next level. But no, I don't see

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.399
<v Speaker 1>um many teams that are that aren't successful that don't

0:51:09.400 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>have really good quarterbacks at any level, whether it's high school,

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:15.279
<v Speaker 1>college or the process every day and players would earn

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:17.320
<v Speaker 1>his drab a practice. But do think that's different with

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback LEAs and like getting the important to have

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a guy that you know is go starting with a

0:51:21.239 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>good game back and guy. No, I think all of

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:27.279
<v Speaker 1>our guys, once they establish who they are, but they're

0:51:27.280 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna win that position. You know before you get going,

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:33.160
<v Speaker 1>But in season, we don't make many changes once we

0:51:33.239 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>get going there. But I think everybody the way I

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 1>said is everybody has an ample opportunity before the season

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:40.320
<v Speaker 1>starts to earn their playing time and to set the

0:51:40.400 --> 0:51:46.600
<v Speaker 1>depth chart season. Or are you still planning? We don't

0:51:46.600 --> 0:51:48.440
<v Speaker 1>have a preseason schedule yet, so I'm not. We're not

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:50.839
<v Speaker 1>planning on anything, so I don't I don't know who

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we're playing. I mean, I don't think that comes out

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for I don't think that comes out for a couple

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. So would you try to avoid that though

0:51:57.760 --> 0:52:00.120
<v Speaker 1>play them in the season? Would you be opposed? But

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, we don't have wherever we're gonna scrimmage. If

0:52:03.160 --> 0:52:05.319
<v Speaker 1>we have an opportunity scrimmage, it's gonna be who we're

0:52:05.360 --> 0:52:07.400
<v Speaker 1>playing in the preseason. So it'll all be based on

0:52:07.719 --> 0:52:09.680
<v Speaker 1>what our preseason schedule is. We're not going to go

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:13.279
<v Speaker 1>train with a team and then we go play the

0:52:14.120 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>whoever the Baltimore and then they go play somebody else.

0:52:17.640 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't work that way. It just happened that when

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:21.799
<v Speaker 1>we looked at our schedule, our schedule came out, who

0:52:21.880 --> 0:52:24.120
<v Speaker 1>are we're playing? You know, we got a chance to

0:52:24.520 --> 0:52:26.400
<v Speaker 1>That's how everybody usually does it, when your schedule comes

0:52:26.400 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>out and say, hey, if we want to get together,

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>which game do you want to get together in? Let's

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:32.360
<v Speaker 1>do it with this team, and then you talk to

0:52:32.480 --> 0:52:34.319
<v Speaker 1>him and see if they if that's something they want

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to do. I mean, I think Bill did it two

0:52:36.800 --> 0:52:39.279
<v Speaker 1>years ago with Tampa and US and then last year

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 1>with Washington and US because they played Washington first and

0:52:41.480 --> 0:52:43.839
<v Speaker 1>they played out a second. So all those get together

0:52:43.960 --> 0:52:46.719
<v Speaker 1>deals are based upon your preseason things, so you gotta

0:52:46.760 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>wait until I do like the philosophically, I like the idea,

0:52:50.000 --> 0:52:51.920
<v Speaker 1>but it depends on who it is, how it's going

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to be run. You know. I was very intune to

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:55.759
<v Speaker 1>how Bill wanted to do it, and we had a

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:57.400
<v Speaker 1>great discussion about it. So it was something I was

0:52:57.440 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>on board with. But I don't know if we're gonna

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:01.880
<v Speaker 1>or not with anybody, just depending on how the preseason

0:53:01.920 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>schedule comes out. Can you just give your insight your

0:53:07.040 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on what? Yeah, Um, I love Fletch, the ultimate competitor,

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>works his tail off every single day in practice. Um

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:20.640
<v Speaker 1>is a physical player, um played really well for us

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:23.319
<v Speaker 1>also on special teams. Um, they're gonna get a guy

0:53:23.400 --> 0:53:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a great teammate. UM will buy into Bill system

0:53:27.080 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. So UM, I think I think rot

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:32.480
<v Speaker 1>highly about I know, you have to get back to

0:53:32.520 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it to do what you want to accomplish. Interview off

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the season with the defense and what you're thinking, that's

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:47.319
<v Speaker 1>still a work in progress. I mean there's a whole

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>component to it. So it's not a one day thing

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:52.360
<v Speaker 1>or a two day thing. I mean there's still players

0:53:52.400 --> 0:53:55.480
<v Speaker 1>available in free agency and there's also the draft coming up.

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we're we're we're again. It's we're a

0:53:58.880 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>long ways away from playing Sodian Zach Hurts and maybe

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you can do different. You see ye skill set of

0:54:12.960 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 1>how you guys can use Now. I think he's I

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think he's still growing. You know. I think in Zach

0:54:18.600 --> 0:54:20.320
<v Speaker 1>will be the first one to tell you that. You know,

0:54:20.400 --> 0:54:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I know he's working extremely hard in the off season,

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>um At continuing to get better. So I mean, I

0:54:27.040 --> 0:54:29.440
<v Speaker 1>still think there's a big jump that can occur between

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:31.399
<v Speaker 1>him even from year two to year three. What about

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Matthews, let's your attraction and ultimately acquiring him. I

0:54:35.000 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 1>think his style of running physical. Uh, his speed, you know,

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:41.719
<v Speaker 1>he's got legitimate breakaway speed. He ran for three seven

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 1>at the combine at two hundred and twenty two pounds. UM.

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>He's he's also uh physical player and pass protection. UM

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a bigger back. UM. You know, I think you know

0:54:51.960 --> 0:54:53.440
<v Speaker 1>there was there was a reason he was drafted where

0:54:53.440 --> 0:54:54.920
<v Speaker 1>he was drafted that high in the first round. So

0:54:55.560 --> 0:55:01.800
<v Speaker 1>after security, it's offseason season insistency. I just said it earlier,

0:55:02.120 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and there's times where he's flashed and you're like, wow,

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a great play, But I got to do it

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 1>on a more consistent basis. I don't. We'll see, we're

0:55:11.520 --> 0:55:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not playing today, so what if they break their ankle tomorrow,

0:55:15.960 --> 0:55:18.800
<v Speaker 1>then we move them back. That's why it's it's not

0:55:18.920 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a it is a hypothetical. So I can't give you

0:55:21.040 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>an answer. And then you'll go twenty seven weeks ago,

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you said he was definitely an outside linebacker. Well, Acho

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>broke his leg. Two other guys both have salmonilla and

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not here anymore, and he's playing inside linebacker. And

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:33.319
<v Speaker 1>you're like, you said he was never gonna play inside

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 1>linebacker before. So we went into the coaching staff changes

0:55:36.760 --> 0:55:39.360
<v Speaker 1>John Love at Ted Williams and the QBST coach Um

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Well Bill left right, but we've got an offensive coordinator

0:55:42.600 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>position UM and then Ted was transitioned and then discounting,

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he wants to watch his son play a

0:55:47.920 --> 0:55:50.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Was playing college football now, Um and then

0:55:50.520 --> 0:55:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we made maneuvers where we had to improved our secondary

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:56.600
<v Speaker 1>sea and right day, I think Ryan was a rising

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 1>star and in football, A lot of people understand that

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 1>he's done as the offensive coordinator Boston College. He's got

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a real good background from Florida to Temple to BC

0:56:05.239 --> 0:56:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and UM a couple of stops in between. U smart, intelligent,

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>very good teacher can really transferred from the board to

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:18.320
<v Speaker 1>his players. You know, I've seen that in action. So

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:35.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited to have him. I mean I didn't

0:56:35.400 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 1>really see it, and I heard about it, but I

0:56:36.600 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 1>was just disappointed. I mean, we gave Trey a great opportunity,

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 1>came in on him Bill Wash Minority internship program. Mister

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Lourie was nice enough to keep him on for two years,

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:46.960
<v Speaker 1>one on offense, one on defense, seeing if he could

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>find a job in the NFL. So I hope Trey

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>does find a job in the NFL, but we didn't.

0:56:51.040 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a job open did When he makes

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a comment like that and says that he heard it

0:56:55.719 --> 0:56:57.520
<v Speaker 1>from inside the locker room, do you feel like it's

0:56:57.560 --> 0:57:00.239
<v Speaker 1>something that you needed to look into or investigate it all? Now?

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Has it ever been brought up to you now in

0:57:02.960 --> 0:57:05.920
<v Speaker 1>college or prof now? Did you reaware of the report?

0:57:05.920 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess the Tree reference a study that you have

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>more white players and you're roster than other NFL team.

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't look at the color of any player. I

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:14.479
<v Speaker 1>just look at how do they fit in our team?

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're in twenty fifteen. I don't think

0:57:17.200 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that's something that's ever come into my mindset. You brought

0:57:21.000 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in Tim Tebo for a workout, you first see the chaser.

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You know, we brought a lot of

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:30.600
<v Speaker 1>players in for private workouts, so I mean that name

0:57:30.680 --> 0:57:33.120
<v Speaker 1>just obviously people look at it. But there's been a

0:57:33.160 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of players in for private workouts, so we're always

0:57:35.640 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>looking at who's available and making sure if all of

0:57:38.320 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a sudden we have to make them maneuver. It's like,

0:57:39.800 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 1>well what about that guy? I have no idea, you know,

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we have a framework of what we worked him out

0:57:44.120 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago, four weeks ago, two months ago. We

0:57:46.120 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>have film on it. We can study it. So, Jeffrey,

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so the notebooks work of informational division that you have

0:57:52.880 --> 0:57:57.280
<v Speaker 1>terms of integrating the system from scouting the coaches, such

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a division that you presented to him the song season,

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:02.920
<v Speaker 1>because maybe just a little clip nose for for it

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:07.120
<v Speaker 1>what vision is and how you say it. I don't

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think it benefits us to tell anybody else what our

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:14.320
<v Speaker 1>vision is between at least between scouts and the coaching staff.

0:58:14.680 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that, but I think I don't think that

0:58:16.680 --> 0:58:19.800
<v Speaker 1>benefits anybody thirty one other teams for us to say

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:25.040
<v Speaker 1>how we do things, even if it's I don't think

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:28.600
<v Speaker 1>it benefits anybody on the other thirty one teams for

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:31.560
<v Speaker 1>us to say how we do things so how we

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 1>find m I wonder you still had I had input,

0:58:42.240 --> 0:58:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't have final say about I stayed out

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of those guys. I've done it with every guy from Oregon.

0:58:49.200 --> 0:58:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I so you guys make your decisions. I had nothing

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to do with it. I specifically with any kid from

0:58:54.440 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 1>from Oregon that came up. I let you know, I

0:58:56.840 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 1>let our I let our scouts and coaches do that

0:58:59.480 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and where they fit. Do I want? I don't know. No,

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we've picked. I think a lot of people didn't.

0:59:12.320 --> 0:59:15.040
<v Speaker 1>How's that going to be going for in terms of

0:59:15.080 --> 0:59:19.720
<v Speaker 1>those evaluations. Removed yourself in the past obviously years you're

0:59:19.760 --> 0:59:21.840
<v Speaker 1>fun to say, now, how is that? How's that different?

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I still I when I say I removed myself. I

0:59:25.800 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>never told them how I felt about a player or

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:30.200
<v Speaker 1>what I know about a player, because I want them

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to make their own evaluation of what that player is.

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what I mean. You if you didn't want to

0:59:35.760 --> 0:59:38.840
<v Speaker 1>what Tim came in for a private workout, and that's

0:59:38.880 --> 0:59:42.640
<v Speaker 1>why they're private workouts. Chip, if you didn't want a player,

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>If I always said we want this guy and you

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:50.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't want, would you have said, listen, I'm not comfortable

0:59:50.320 --> 0:59:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with that player wanting you. Now I've given I'd give

0:59:52.520 --> 0:59:55.800
<v Speaker 1>my opinion. That's all done before the draft ever happens.

0:59:55.880 --> 0:59:58.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not a it's not a day of the draft.

1:00:00.280 --> 1:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, what are we doing? I mean, it

1:00:02.120 --> 1:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work over. There was a lot of moving parts

1:00:04.160 --> 1:00:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the last drafts, and things kind of kind of move

1:00:07.160 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>while you work while the draft was going on. Yeah,

1:00:09.320 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what happens on the draft taking. Yeah, but

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>then we're prepared for all that. We go through all

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>scenarios of what if this is there, what if that

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is there, what about this, what about that? And then

1:00:17.880 --> 1:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody weighs in so you're okay with the picks once

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they're pick. Everybody's okay with the picks once there pick,

1:00:24.000 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they're on your team, right, All right, guys, we're done.