WEBVTT - Emojis: A New Language? Nah.

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stuff you should know from how Stuff Works

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:13.399
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Clark with Charles W. Smiley Faced Bryant and Jerry party

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>face rolling. I got no emoji. I'm just Josh wink face. Sure,

0:00:23.160 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>eggplant and peach. Whoa, I know that's dirty, but you

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>can say eggplant and peach and get away with it

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>even on the team. Sounds like a the lightful meal.

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It does. Actually it doesn't at all, but not at all.

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>It is cute for sure. I use the bitmoji now

0:00:39.960 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>some some which I see is not even in this research.

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So I just thought to throw it out there early.

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to go on record as saying that my

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bit mooji is one of the best, because I'm honest,

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>even do a bit moji? Do you even have that? Sure?

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I've going okay, because you know, you design your own thing.

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So I found that a lot of people's bitmoji's aren't

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>very honest. You mean, the the the image of the person.

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, you know, I got a little chubby bearded guy,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and every time I sent it to someone there like,

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, that looks just like you. And I

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>said yeah, because I'm honest, I didn't make myself a supermodel.

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I got you. I got you. I thought you meant

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you were just like like you'd say like I don't

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 1>like that and mean it kind of thing. Now, I

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if I've ever sent you a bit moji,

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna do that right now. I don't think

0:01:27.840 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you have checked in real time. What do you want? Uh?

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You want me on an elephant? Yes? Or me crying

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the rain because you're not near me. Can you

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 1>cry in the rain on an elephant? I don't think

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I can bind either. One's fine, elephant, we'll do elephant.

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I love elephants. Well, I can't find the elephant now,

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so I'll diploy you a kiss. Okay, So what we're

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about today are not bit mooji's, although they would

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>qualify as a sub type of this, I guess. But

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they use a lot of words. It's kind of like

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're playing charades and somebody's like, that's close. That's close.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>It's like you can't talk, man, you have to just

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>shut up. You have to charade it. That's the difference

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>between bit mooji and emoji, and emoji is really what

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about today, which is a pictograph basically like, um,

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a hieroglyph okay, but it's a modern hieroglyphic. Yeah. And

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I will also go on record as saying I don't

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:35.359
<v Speaker 1>really use emojis anymore because of the bit moji um

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and I don't use them that often, but it's always

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>funny to send a bit moji to someone, like kind

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of go out on a limb and be like, should

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I send this? And then you get one back? Like

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember the first time I bit moji Hodgeman. I

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>thought he's gonna think I'm just so stupid, and he

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:54.960
<v Speaker 1>sent one right back. He's on the bitmoji train. I

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>can buy that for sure. But I don't use the

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.399
<v Speaker 1>emoji as much anymore. But I did when they when

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I I guess they first kind of hit the scene

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on the smartphone. Um, and now I get a little

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, kissy faces and stuff are fine, but I

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>don't like when I just get like a thumbs up

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>reply for okay, that's fine, or thumbs up is almost

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>like I can barely tolerate you. Yeah, that's what it

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>feels like to me. That's what they're saying. I can't

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>be bothered to type okay, Right, I say k K

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>because it really kind of takes okay and and turns

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it even more personal. I always thought you were just

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>jittery admitt to type k and just said it. No,

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying kak. So now you have legendarily fast thumbs.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I do. It's from all the coffee I drink and

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the speed. I will also say this that this article,

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and I mean I kind of picked it because well,

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be honest, we needed something a little easier

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this week because it's a tough week. This is a

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>little more in depth than you may have thought, more

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in depth and like way more interesting than I thought.

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>The whole history of it I thought was pretty fascinating.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the history of it. Man. The

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the widely agreed upon start date for emojis comes back

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>in Night two, all the way back in two. And

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't an emoji that first came out. It was

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what are known as emoticons, the predecessor of emoji. Remember

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>those days, And we're all just big dummies and type

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 1>colin parentheses on a way. It wouldn't mean that that'd

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be that's not even a thing. Yeah, colin parentheses is

0:04:31.200 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>smiley face. I was thinking quotations. Sorry, yeah, right, So

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>colon in a parentheses either way is a smiley face

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>or a frownie face. And that we can point to.

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>This is so cool that that they know who did this.

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But a guy named um uh Scott Falman, and he

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was either an admin or a frequent user or whatever

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>had something to do with the message board, the electronic

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>message board UM which was a very very early like

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>chat room forum prototype back in two for Carnegie Mellon University. Yeah,

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>which we did some time there. We served out of

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>sentence there, we did. Now we did a little uh,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a little short video Carnegie Mellon for days. Yeah, short

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>video for days. But yeah two he uh and I

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>don't even know if you said specifically, but September nineteenth.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>They actually have the actual date, which is amazing. And

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>he said on this bulletin board, if you put a

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 1>smiley face using this actually he even gus seated up

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>with the dashes the nose that they lost the dash

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:43.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty quick. I like the dash, do you it gets overdone?

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I like? It's like it's a

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 1>horse face. What I like her? The people that are

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>can do like a whole picture out of typing things?

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, like the Shrug Guy. Yeah that's no, no, no,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean like this whole page would be a big rooster.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like the kids and me, you and everyone we know.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. They had like the Book of Them that

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was the cutest touch. Yeah, good movie. That is the

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>one movie that has ever done whimsy right and didn't

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>go over the edge. It was whimsical to an exactly perfect,

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>non annoying degree. So every other movie with whimsy you hate, yes, okay,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like hate. I do like Shrug Guy, though Shrug Guy,

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never learned it just copy and paste him. Well,

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I've never done it myself, but I just like the

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.919
<v Speaker 1>way it looks. And I thought that's creative because it

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>looks exactly like what it is. Um And I was

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>always partial to as well to the awkward which was

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>which was that Colin slash. Oh that one's kind of

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>makes feelings about because it can also mean like wow,

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm really disappointed, or it's like sure it means that's

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>why I like it. I think very versatile. It is versatile.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot to it, all right. So anyway, he said,

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>if he used a smiley face with a colon and

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that dash in parentheses in your comment to say it's humorous,

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>then I think we can avoid it was kind of

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>used to clear up like the ambiguity of text and

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>things like that, not texting, but you know, sometimes it's

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to read, like wait, does this person making a joke? Right? Right?

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>So if somebody was joking or being sarcastic, yeah, like

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he used this thing, you right, and then the person

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>will know and we won't have an argument on the

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>message board because the person will know you were joking, right, Yeah.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>And it started in and what as we'll see. What

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Falman hit on the head was the very point that

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>emojis fulfill, which is they add context to plain text,

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>which is important. Yeah. So um, Falman came up with

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>his triumphant victory, like you said, September nineteen, and now

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting on a mountain of cash and oh yeah, man,

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he trademarked it very wisely. So hope everybody's sending him

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the money in the time they used that emoticon, but

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:09.119
<v Speaker 1>before him and I thought this was super interesting. People

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>have always, of course put little smiley faces and letters

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. So this was an extension of that.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But um, some historians say in Robert Herrick wrote a

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 1>poem entitled to Fortune, and it seems as if he

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>is purposely included an emoticon in a line upon my

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>ruins smiling Yet and he puts a colon in a

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 1>parentheses after the words smiling, And people say that may

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>have actually been the very first use of this. I

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>read the little article that had that, and there was

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a um. There was a note in addendum and appendage,

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if you will, basically said and it was from an

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>English professor who said that at this time, in what

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.719
<v Speaker 1>sixt in the mid seventeenth century, there was no no

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>standardized punctuation, and so even a poet writing something sending

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it off to the printer would not necessarily expect the

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>printer to follow his punctuation to a t. I think

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of a lame explanation. Why even go

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to the trouble. Maybe maybe this professor was saying the

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>printer himself could have added this, and that it wasn't

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the poet's intent, and that it was just accidental. I'm

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I like to think that. Yeah, this guy

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>had a tremendous amount of foresight and and in sixty

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Robert Herrick said, here's your first emoticon. Everybody, come back

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and find me in two thousand twelve. I'm gonna go

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with that story. Okay, that's where we're going with. So

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we had the emoticon either beginning in six or definitely

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>beginning in nine two, and that's all we had to

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>deal with for a good thirteen years if it was

0:09:55.160 --> 0:10:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the latter UM. And then in we finally get our

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>first emojis, and we know where those came from too,

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and believe it or not, everybody, they came from Japan.

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't no surprise, right right. It was a company

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>called n T t uh D Little Low Big Seed,

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Little low M Little Low Como. We're gonna call it

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>DoCoMo because that's what it spells. And they had to

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 1>icons a phone and a heart. And this is when

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>people um had pagers beepers. Did you ever have a pager? Tons?

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you really? You had like two or three at

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a time, depending on you know, what you needed. I

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think I maybe I did. I think when I

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>got into the film business, I had to get a pager.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>But it was very very soon after that my first,

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>like Nokia phone came into play. I didn't have a

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>pager for years and years. I didn't had a page

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of like a year, if I remember correctly. Yeah, I

0:10:57.960 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>mean they were for those of you, for you kids

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. There's probably plenty of kids who listen to

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>us to have no idea what a page is, all right,

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like a little a little I guess digital thing

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that was like the size of it was like the

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>size of a cigarette pack. But you guys all vape,

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you don't smoke cigarettes. It was smaller than that. Okay,

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>it was the size of I don't even know what

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it was, the size of a very tiny cell phone.

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess we could say inches. It was about like

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>two inches by an inch and a half, which is

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.079
<v Speaker 1>some unknown amount of centimeters, right. But it was a

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>very small little box and you carried it with you

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and clip that you could put on your belt. It

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 1>was a magic little box because somebody would call a

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>number that was associated with your pager and they would

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>like type in their phone number after the beep and

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.200
<v Speaker 1>hang up or press pound I think afterwards. Then you

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>hang up and then you got a little alert on

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that little thing you wore on your belt. Then it

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>would be like bee. It was very annoying, and the

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>person's number would be next to it, and if they

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>really needed to talk to you, they put nine on

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>one after. So you would then pull your car over,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>find a pay phone, call the number on your pager

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and say you got the stuff. I'd be like, what's up?

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>What's so important? Right? Yeah, that was how people communicate

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>with one another before cell phones. It's really it seems

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>like a hundred years ago, and it's really funny that

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it was the mid nineties, right, and then people said, well,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.679
<v Speaker 1>why don't we just make phones more portable? And they're like, oh,

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>that's actually had thought about that, good idea, because I

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>mean you had that bag phones and car phones at

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the time. It was a thing. So the the Japanese,

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the entire country of Japan had pagers in the early nineties.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>They were early adopters. Yeah for sure, and um this

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>DoCoMo uh. They had a line called Pocketbell Pagers and

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they were the ones that first added emojis. There was

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>a heart and a phone. Yeah. The phone meant call

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>me the heart very sweetly. I love that. The heart

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was one of the first ones basically sending a message

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of love. Uh. And then later on in the nineties,

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 1>late nineties, I guess they streamline streamline that got rid

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 1>of those icons because apparently uh pocket Bell pagers with

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of business people that used them, and they

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't into it. So the teenagers were like, forget you, then, DoCoMo,

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>we're out of here. We're going to Tokyo messaging because

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.239
<v Speaker 1>they've got these little what would eventually be called emoji's.

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I love that that. Um, the docmo like they got

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.599
<v Speaker 1>all business like. They were like, we can't have the

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>heart on there. Yeah. Um, that reminds me of probably

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>my favorite Onion headline of all time. Man accidentally ends

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>business call with I love you the greatest one ever.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a good one. My favorite was always Drugs Win

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>War on Drugs. Oh yeah, did you see the video

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they made with I think Little Wayne. But they were

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>saying the d e A Had tapped Little Wayne to

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.319
<v Speaker 1>go like carry out the war on drugs by doing

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>all the drugs. Well just to picture of his face,

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>yeah right, yeah, but they would they use like clips

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of him like on a on his tour of us

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to talk but he's just so waste. He's not

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>even making sense, and but they clipped, they interspersed it

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>in like it was a news report, and he was

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>doing a great job. It's funny too. After our ten

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>years of doing this, we've gotten to do so many

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>cool things because of the show. And one of my

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite things ever still is that when we knew people

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Onion, they took my picture one day and

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll still trot that out as Aria man and I

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>will be My mug will be in an Onion article

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>every now, and it's because area man. Yes, shout out

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Randazzo for there. Yeah, back in the day, getting

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>us in the office. All right, so should we take

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a break. Oh god, we haven't yet, haven't we. Now,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>let's take a break and we'll be back to talk

0:14:45.160 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>about where they went with Dokomo right for this? All right? Man?

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>So DoCoMo said we're done with you kids, and then

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they said, oh wait, god, come back, you're like a

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>third of our business. We had no idea. Um, Luckily

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>they had an engineer named Shiga Takakura. You're really good

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Japan much. I'm around it a lot, and

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>uh I guess coud tasan Okay, we'll go with that

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>he was working on a mobile internet platform called i Mode,

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know what, we're just trying to

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:43.080
<v Speaker 1>get some pretty basic thoughts across here, like on a

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>on like a mobile network, so like your phone, stuff

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like the news or the weather or something like that.

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Headlines literally had news headlines and what the stock markets doing,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>or if it's sunny out so right, right, and stuff

0:15:55.640 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going to like repeat on like pretty predictable over

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like fairly short time scale. So it's gonna be sunny

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this day, and it's probably going to be sunny again,

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so you're gonna go back to the sunny thing over

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and over again rather than you know, typing out sunny.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>What if he just had an icon of a son, right,

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And this is a huge breakthrough. And what this guy

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>did was create the very first emojis for this imode platform.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And he actually coined the term emoji two shigy taka kurita,

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right, uh. And there was a character e limit,

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>a two character limit, which is kind of the main

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>reason behind why we have emojis as good. So, like

0:16:33.280 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you said, he didn't have to type out sunny. You

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>could use one character uh. And in nine it sounded

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>like the future back then. Remember it's crazy. Um he

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>developed a hundred and seventy six of these initial emoticons

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for things dealing with the weather, sports, food and drink,

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>love of course, and like you said, he made up

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the word E which was a picture emoji, which was

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>character and that's where it comes from. Yep. So the

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.719
<v Speaker 1>thing was then you had how many did he come

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>up with? Two hundred seventy six initial ones? Okay? Um,

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>so the thing is is this this whole mobile platform

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I mode and again this is we're talking about. Um.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>They they had like two fifty characters tops. But these

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>broadband networks weren't invented yet. This was all like really

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>low fi stuff still, so it was very much ahead

0:17:32.880 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of his time, so he kind of had to reverse

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>engineer how to get these things across. They had a

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>stroke of genius since there was a finite number of

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>these things. Rather than sending a picture from one phone

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to another when one user wanted to send that emoji,

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 1>they stored the pictures in the phone and then you

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>could activate those emojis from a simple too to alpha

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>too I guess to bite alpha numeric code. So when

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>your phone got the right alpha numeric code. It would

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>produce a smiley face. Yeah. It really set the stage

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>for what we have today. Yeah, you know, yeah, yeah.

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Umi was over there at this time. She was in

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Japan teaching and she told me, like, you know, I

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>came back and I was like, wait, we're not We

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have texts, like everybody texts. You don't have Hello

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Kitty right exactly. And it was like years before, Like

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Japan was definitely doing this fairly early compared to us here. Yeah.

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing, um, the first handheld cell phone that

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the big brick phone. I saw one of those

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>in l a in the in the late eighties or

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, like on a literally in a Hollywood backlot,

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>some producer had a brick phone, Like, oh my god.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But the first I kind of cell phone cell phone

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I ever saw was in London, and I guess it

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>would have had to have been ninety five or ninety six,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and I had never seen one. Was like the big

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>rectangle with the flip down mouthpiece and the pull up

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>antenna something like that. It may not have had to

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>flip down, but it was, you know, it was smaller

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>than a brick phone. Um, but I just remember thinking

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.719
<v Speaker 1>a while, like London, that they're on the leading edge

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of technology here. I've never seen that before. What in

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the world's that guy doing? Let me see that thing?

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>All right? So many years passed more they called them.

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how much they called them emojis

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>or icons back then. Probably well now the guy had

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>coined the term emoji, yeah, but I just don't know

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 1>if it was like the popular term at the time.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 1>I see, I think it was Japan. Okay. Yeah, again,

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the ahead of the thing, ahead of the curve. Yeah,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I just want to make sure that that's been gotten

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:47.920
<v Speaker 1>across very much ahead of the all right. In two

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand ten, a company called Unicode Consortium, well it wasn't

0:19:52.840 --> 0:19:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a company, it was the Unicode Consortium or a nonprofit

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and they are a group of tech companies and volunteers

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>from the tech industry that basically really understood this stuff.

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Saw the writing on the wall with the emoji on

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the wall and where it was going, and they says,

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 1>why don't we do this. We need to create a library.

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>It needs to be standardized. Because I even remember early

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on with smartphones, you know, different platforms, someone would send

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you an emote, an emoji from an Android to an iPhone,

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't come across. So they said, we need to

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>standardize this so it can operate across all iOS devices. Yeah,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 1>or even if like the phones had the same emojis,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>they might not use the same codes, so you might

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>get like the opposite of what you're looking for. You're

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for a peach and you get a big right exactly,

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>and they're like, wow, are you trying to say? Man?

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>So there was there was this great need for uniformity,

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't come out until what what year was

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the two So this Unicode Consortium and the Daily Mail

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, called it the Unicorn Consortium if you noticed,

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and I called it the Unicode Consortium either way? Can

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you pronounce it both ways? I think the Brits do that.

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's when you saw your first cell phone, so

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 1>full circle. Yeah. So, um, Unicode got together and they

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>said we're gonna we're gonna make this this like collective,

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>open source, nonprofit effort to encode these things and create

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:20.719
<v Speaker 1>a universal standard. And in doing so they've made what

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>some people point to is we'll see as one of

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the first universal languages. Yeah. And also but it's not

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>really um. Strangely, it's it shocked me to know that

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>no one owns this. I love that there is no

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>patent or i P property rights to emojis. That it's great,

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's kind of shocking that something so ubiquitous

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>some like no one's making money off of it. I

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>love that it's wonderful and rare and so rare. That's

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.159
<v Speaker 1>why it's shocking them. It is now. Um, we should

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>say that some people point to the Unicode Consortium being

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 1>uh dominated by some major major companies. I think Google

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and Apple really have a lot of people in there.

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:15.959
<v Speaker 1>But again it's a nonprofit group and there are rules

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that are followed. I think the implication is is that

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>there if Google or Apple puts up some suggestions, which

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>they do sometimes, they may have a little more likelihood

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of getting past than other people's emojis. Maybe probably uh.

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And then also since they're both American companies, the universal

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>set of emojis tend to skew a little more American.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Like hot dogs and hamburgers and French fries are there,

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and now they're just now starting to get to like

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>euros and things like that. Those are not too huge

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>downfalls in return for this thing being open source and

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>unowned by anybody except for the entire world, right. But

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>one huge downfall because it's open source and anyone can

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>do anything with these emojis is that we got the

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Emoji movie because some Hollywood executive was like, well, we

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have to pay for this. We can just go

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>out and make a movie. Will be the first one

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>with an emoji movie, and since we don't have to

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>pay for it, we can put all of that money

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>into making something really great, and they did. I I

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it, obviously, but I remember when it was

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>announced there would be an emoji movie. I just remember thinking,

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>come on, well, it really delivered on on that reaction.

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>From what I understand, I mean think it was a

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 1>bomb in all respects, but they still made like four

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>times what they put into I think the box off

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>million and they spent like fifty million on it. I

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but I will say this, I have no

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>idea what it's about at all, but I know but

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 1>my prediction, having not seen it or read anything about it,

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>is that it was some dumb story about the different

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>emotions coming together in the end to solve some problem.

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're right. I'm sure Hugh Jackman was in it,

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and Jared from Subway was beaten up by a bunch

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of people. Yeah, and then there was a Sharknado. Although, um,

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the one of the guys who used to be on

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, t J. Mitchell, J. Miller, Miller, he was

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in it. And so I was looking up the Emoji

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>movie and he apparently is accused of making a bomb. Man,

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I saw that. Isn't that crazy? Yeah? He I don't

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how he's doing. That article made me

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>worry for him. He I think he got in some

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 1>argument on a train with a lady and then and

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>then was taken off the train and called in a

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>bomb threat on the train that she had a bomb

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>and you can't you can't do that, allegedly allegedly allegedly,

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>yeah you can't do that, t J. Miller, that you

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.199
<v Speaker 1>really can't, man. But yeah, I lay all this at

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the feet of the Emoji movie because he was the

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>star of absolutely what was he uh see the egg

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>plan of the Peach? I don't know. Well, if he

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was the star, then he probably would have been crying

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with laughter because in two thousand seventeen. I believe for

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>three straight years US fifteen, sixteen, and seventeen, crying with

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>laughter was the most popular emoji, which I have issue

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with that, and in two thousand fifteen it was Actually

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what I have a problem with. Oxford Dictionary

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>chose it is the word of the year. I don't

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have a problem with that part. Yeah, that shows Oxford

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Dictionary is keeping up with with the ever evolving language.

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Their descriptive ist not prescriptive ist. All right, that makes

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>him a okay in my book, So what's your problem?

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>My problem is that that means that crying with laughter

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is overused. None of the people maybe one hundreds of

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the people who sent the crying with

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>laughter emoji actually crying with laughter over like laugh out loud?

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>How many people are like l o ol, Like that's

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>not that's not what that means. Everybody, you ruined it.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You ruined laughing out loud, and you're ruin in the crying.

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, literally, if you're crying with laughter, is

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the only time you can send that, not just saying

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 1>hey that's really funny. Yes, all right, I think it

0:26:10.960 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>would it would be a much better world if that

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>were the case. Okay, I just think it's overused, and

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that's part of the I think that's one

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>reason why everybody is so cynical and sarcastic, is because

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>they're so out of touch with our emotions that we

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have the similatroom to stand in for us that instead

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of actually experiencing them, and everything has to be so

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>much bigger and bolder than it actually is. There's no

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>subtlety your nuance, which is ironic because there's tons of

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>subtlety and nuance in actually communicating with emoji, right, I

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>mean there's like a medium laughter emoticon probably right, I'm

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sure probably. But it's the same thing is using exclamation points.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>You get trapped in it, you know what I'm saying, So, like,

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, if you take away the exclamation points,

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 1>people are like, are you mad at me? What's wrong?

0:26:54.760 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I've definitely gotten in texts exchanges like hey, do you

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>want to go do this thing or whatever? And if

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>someone sends back, sure you do that, or yeah, you

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>do that a lot. If you just send back sure,

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, I guess Chuck's not very happy about this.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll start adding exclamation points. No, but you

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have to, is my point. You should not have to,

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and I think we just need to rip the band

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>aid off. I don't ever want to see an exclamation

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>point for you again that you don't mean much less

0:27:27.320 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of double. The one that really is unsettling, though, was

0:27:30.920 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>when when somebody replies with sure period and the s

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is lower case, that means that means things are not

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>going well? Right? Then sure? Yeah? Don't You don't want

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>me to be a funny because when I say sure,

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean sure, but that's how I say it my head.

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But I guess lower case sure period is definitely that's

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>saying something. Adding the period onto a lower case word,

0:27:53.920 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you're sending a message. But if you're not, if you're

0:27:55.920 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>just saying sure like normally, that that's the problem Bloom

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>with with text based um communication. It lacks context, that

0:28:06.560 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>lacks emotion. So we're used to communicate any kind of

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>text base. Yeah, that's what I'm saying, like, just just

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>let right that. You have to add some sort of punctuation.

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That's the role that emojis fulfill. And we'll talk about

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that after a break. How about that sure lower case period. Alright,

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so we'll go over some interesting stats here of people

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>use emojis online. What that's a that's almost everybody, surprising, Yeah,

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and the other eight percent, I don't know. The other

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>eight percent have their arms folding. They're like, I'm not

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it, darn it. That's right. Uh, we've been

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>dancing around this peach in the eggplant thing long enough.

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Are we getting there now? Well we might as well.

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So these have famously become uh stand ins for body parts, right,

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>like the peaches, like the Almon brothers sense of the words,

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>so what they meant? Yeah, I never really thought about that.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, eat a peach. Huh. All right, so it

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>soon became a thing to send a peach with an eggplant.

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>I am so old and out of that loop that

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this was a real thing. I didn't

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>either until um this article, and I was like, oh yeah, obviously,

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>especially after reading about it, I'm like, then you look

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at the egg plane, You're like, um. Another uh famous

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>emoji is the poop i con. It's one of the

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>most ubiquitous, very popular in Japan and has become huge

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in Japan popular in America with its fun little googly eyes,

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think didn't Google even have flies buzzing around

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the poop the first poop, which was a little much, frankly,

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I think back in like two thousand eight

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>or something like that, Google came out with their their

0:30:24.760 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>own poop icon for Gmail two seven and they put

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>flies around and it was just gross, um, but they

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it's since somebody added the Google eyes later on and

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>now it's like a mascot the poop. The poop emoji

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>without the eyes is like gross, Like, what's wrong with you?

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Why would you send that? It's like sure, period, right right?

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But the poop with Google eyes is like sure exclamation

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>point right, Okay, I think you're right. I'm following along. Uh.

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's been a lot of kind of um I

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>would call them folk controversies over the years, like last

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>just last year, Goal in two thousand seventeen had a

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>cheeseburger icon that had the cheese under the meat patty

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and people went berserk. That's really stupid that people went berserk,

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's also stupid to put the cheese under the meat. Yeah,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just a weird choice. Did that. It's some the

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 1>person who make that never see a cheeseburger before. It's

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a really ducking stupid thing to do. But if it

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was somebody who really had never seen a cheeseburger before,

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>then God bless them, and I feel bad for him

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for the outrage they created. Because even if even if

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they put the bun on upside down, even if they'd

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>left off the ketchup, okay, it doesn't matter, it still

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>looks like a cheeseburger. Settle down. Sometimes I wonder if

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they do that, some of that stuff that these programmers

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.560
<v Speaker 1>or designers or coders or whoever does these they do

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that on purpose, just to rib people like, I'm gonna

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>put the cheese. Yeah, We're going to set the internetut,

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And they did. Apparently the CEO of go goal Um,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that this was the CEO of

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Google sundar Okay, he said, we are going to drop

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>everything else we are doing to go sort this out. Yeah,

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I imagined fairly sarcastically. I would think so sarcastic emoticon, right,

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 1>whatever that is that is, Like, I don't know what

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that would be. I think you've got to use I

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you would what is a sarcastic emotive?

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I bet there's one people use and we're just not

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>hip to. That would be my guess. Another word is old.

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>There was a survey for match dot com that claimed

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that people who used emojis had sex more often than

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>those people who didn't. Apparently, the wine emoji is huge

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in Britain and Australians love their drug related emojis. We're

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in Australia, it's right, So we're gonna find

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>out what that's all about when we went down enda. Uh,

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course we need to talk about the skin tone.

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Very early on it was um I think in two

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand fifteen, the Unicode Consortium changed the default skin tone

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to what they call Simpson's Yellow. But then you have

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the ability to tend them two different I think five

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>different skin tones to represent um, you know, at least

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>five different shades of skin. Right, which was a good start, right,

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a good start. And there, I mean there's

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they are still just getting going. There's plenty that have

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>been left off. Um like they just now are starting

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to add redheads to things and curly haired people. That's crazy,

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 1>which is crazy, um cool that they're adding it. But yeah,

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>there's there's always somebody whose feelings are hurt because they're

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>left out by the emoji people every year. They also

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>say that too many smiley faces, Uh, if you're dealing

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:50.880
<v Speaker 1>with work, And if you're dealing with work, maybe avoid

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>emojis would be my guess. It depends on who you're

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>talking with. I mean, if it's a friend or whatever. Yeah,

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>it depends on your job too. Yeah, if you're in banking,

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>in your community, hating with the client you've just met.

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It depends on what job it is too, of course.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>But there is apparently a study out there that said, um,

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>contrary to what you think, using too many smiley emoticons

0:34:13.200 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>don't increase your perception of warmth. They decrease perception of competence.

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I totally get that. But like the study was from oh,

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the Journal Social Psychological and Personality Science. It was a

0:34:27.760 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen study and they said, um, not only

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is it a smiley face emoji not a smile, it

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>has some of the opposite effects, which is like, I mean,

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 1>it totally makes sense if you think about it, Like

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:44.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody smiling, You're like, oh, I want to be around

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that person. Somebody's saying a bunch of smiley face and

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you're like, oh, what an idiot. You know, it's really

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>easy to cross that line. Well, yeah, and it's also

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really easy to get in trouble. Um, do do not

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>send emoji threats because that's a real thing. There have

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 1>been people all over the world that have been arrested

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for sending like handgun emojis two people that they were

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>angry at and getting arrested. Yeah, for making like actual

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 1>threats threats, right, that that counts legally, which so that raises,

0:35:17.560 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>um some questions about what emojis are? Are they language?

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>Are they are? There's actually I want to give um.

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.479
<v Speaker 1>There's this guy I think he's a rapper actually named

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Young Jake y U n G Jake. So the absence

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the oh and young indicates he might be a

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>rapper Young right, Young Jake? You and Carl um. But

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Young Jake is an emoji portraitist. Man, that stuff was

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so cool, didn't that awesome? Yeah? So this guy does

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>portraits of people, like really good portraits strictly from emojis

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>layered in really interesting ways. He's got like a really

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>great Instagram to check out too. Why you eng Jake?

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But go check that one out. And then there's also

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a dude named Fred Benninson and he translated um Moby

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Dick into emojis. It's called emoji Dick. And every word

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of every line of Moby Dick has been translated into emojis.

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And this guy did this right. He hired three people

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to translate every single line, and then he had he

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.919
<v Speaker 1>hired another group of people who would look at each

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>line and then look at the line of text and say,

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the one of the three that's the that

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>best gets this across for every line. So you can

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>get Emoji Dick online for two hundred bucks. For hard

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>copy two dollars, but I think he sells it by

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the PDF for five bucks and as Moby Dick represented

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 1>by an egg plant in the peach, or at least

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the egg plant. So there's a lot of like, it's

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:56.480
<v Speaker 1>obvious that emoji is art, but there's a lot of

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>people out there, linguists included, who are saying emoji she

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>is words too, and it may be a language that's

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>developing in front of our eyes. It's pretty interesting as

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it stands now, though technically, if you're a linguist, it

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.520
<v Speaker 1>is not a language because it lacks grammar, which is

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>structures that allow you to take words and put them

0:37:14.400 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>into different combinations to create higher thoughts. Emojis do not

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>yet allow us to do that because there's not real rules. Yeah,

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but there, I mean, there are people studying at this

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>one article you sent a woman named Rachel Tatman Uh,

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a linguistics PhD candidate from the University of Washington, Go Huskies. Uh.

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>She did some studies like where she would show people

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>pictures like photographs and then say, how would you emoji

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that description of that picture? Right right? And there are

0:37:49.080 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>different pictures that were subtly different, I mean, they were

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously different, like the the first one was a man

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 1>counting money, and she would say, would you would you

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>say what this picture is doing by emoji man emoji

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>dollar bill or emoji dollar bill emoji man. And the results,

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seemed like she didn't get a lot

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that were fifty fifty for any of these. It seems

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>like most of them that she got were like seventy

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>eight of people kind of citing one way or the

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>other as far as far as far as order goes.

0:38:25.800 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>So she believes kind of firmly that she's proven that

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>their bidirectional well, depends, It depends. So with the one

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of the man counting money, of the people said that

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>they would they would depict that emoji wise with man

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and then dollar bill. And the reason why she said

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>it was because there was an agent patient relationship. The

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>agent was the man acting on the money the patient,

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:51.399
<v Speaker 1>and it was very clear. So there's really only one

0:38:51.400 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>way to say it. Man money, man is counting money

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>very much like a subject and a predicate in a sense.

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>That's one way they could act. They can also be um.

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>They can also kind of describe the layout of a

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>photo too, if there's not a very strong agent patient relationship, right,

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So her takeaway basically is that they can represent like

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the physical arrangement of things and also words. So there's

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>another one was a picture of a man walking past

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the castle, and the castle's basically the big part of

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:27.839
<v Speaker 1>the picture and the man's pretty small, but the man

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is in the lower right corner. So most people said

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that they would do castle man because the man is

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 1>not acting on the castle. Castle is not acting on

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the man, but that's the yeah, and that's the way

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>it's arranged in the picture. So she was saying that

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it can it can it can mimic the structure of sentences,

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and it can also mimic the structure of pictures, which

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 1>makes emoji definitely their own thing. But the whole reason,

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the whole point of emoji, the reason that we use them.

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a guy named Viv Evans think he's at a

0:40:00.640 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Banger University. He's a huge proponent of emojis as a

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 1>new way to communicate rather than a step backwards, because

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of people, probably people who

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>hate vocal fry or like emojis so stupid. Anybody who

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>uses emoji stupid, And it's a giant step backwards for language,

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>which is what why I think the Oxford English Dictionary

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>was making such a statement by choosing the crying face

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:31.399
<v Speaker 1>as the word of the year. They were they were

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 1>casting their lot on the side of emojis as being

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a new form of communication. Um so, Viv Evans is like, yes,

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely true. And they what they do is they

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:47.080
<v Speaker 1>stand in for things like gestures and intonation, things that

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are missing in its strictly text based message like texting

0:40:51.360 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>or Twitter or an email. And that's what emojis do.

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>They add emotion, they convey nuance to it that otherwise

0:40:57.840 --> 0:41:01.399
<v Speaker 1>in there, and they're fun sure, like get the stick

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:05.080
<v Speaker 1>from your peach, you can stick out of your peach

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and have a lot fun with emoji's. You know what's funny?

0:41:07.719 --> 0:41:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Chuck is um the Apparently the mystery has never been

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>solved as too exactly why eggplant is in there in

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the first place. It's kind of a weird one to add,

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.800
<v Speaker 1>considering we didn't have redheads until recently or curly heard people,

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's always been an eggplan. It makes you wonder, Yeah,

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Uh and this is the last thing I've

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>got was something you sent, which is kind of a

0:41:32.440 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>cool move. Apple wants to be more inclusive with their emojis,

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.880
<v Speaker 1>so they are proposing as a starting point and not

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a comprehensive list there proposing including emojis uh to represent

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>people disabilities, so things like uh a man or a

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.920
<v Speaker 1>woman with a cane, prosthetic legs and arms, guide dogs,

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.360
<v Speaker 1>hearing aids, people in wheelchair stuff like that, right, and

0:41:56.400 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 1>those would be part of Emoji twelve point oh, which

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>would come out in March of two thousand nineteen. And

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they just released Emoji eleven point oh to the publicum,

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>which includes the partying face cupcakes? Is that what this

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>huge list is? So these are all available now, they're

0:42:13.400 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be available on phones in August, but they

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.279
<v Speaker 1>were what the list was released to the public, and

0:42:19.320 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this this Unicode consortium. They take all these under advisement,

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but they also put him out into the public to say,

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys think about these two write um

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 1>and there's a few that they will never take. They

0:42:30.440 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>never will will accept when of a living person, a deity,

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>or a business logo, all those are off the table immediately.

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>But then other ones they want to make sure aren't

0:42:39.239 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>too specific. And then like the Golden Arches, you'll never

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>see something like no, not as long as it's open source.

0:42:45.560 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But there are some pretty good ones coming down the

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pike this August. I wonder what super villain is. It's

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>um Mustache. It's kind of like a doctor Stranger, Professor

0:42:57.160 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Stranger or whatever, kind of like pop call cape. Yeah,

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it obviously gets across, especially when it's next to the

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:09.239
<v Speaker 1>superhero one that it's the super villain. I think my

0:43:09.320 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>favorites coming soon are nazar Amulet. I don't even know

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 1>what that is. I don't either, Mosquito that seems relevant

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 1>there's there's one that's coming that's it's probably the best

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>emoji of all time. The clown face. Oh, that's not

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a thing. It's really well done. Yeah, because that's so versatile.

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>It is, but it's also like a good looking emoji. Um,

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is it a scary clown or now? No, it's a great, perfect,

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 1>universally beautiful clown. And I can't remember, you know, we

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:43.120
<v Speaker 1>did our clown episodes, so I can't remember if it's

0:43:43.160 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>an August clown or what what type of clown it is,

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>but it's a great clown. Um. And you can see

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>all these by the way at emoji Pedia. I just

0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:55.919
<v Speaker 1>saw it. Oh what do you think? Did you see it? Yeah,

0:43:56.640 --> 0:43:59.279
<v Speaker 1>it's good. The guy who did Pennywise the I can't

0:43:59.280 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>remember which he's he's a Scars guard. That's why you

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.480
<v Speaker 1>say we don't know. We'll never know, but um, he

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>did just an amazing job. Yeah. And I had no

0:44:08.800 --> 0:44:10.560
<v Speaker 1>skin in the game. I had never read any of

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>it or seen any previous versions at all, and I

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.040
<v Speaker 1>just thought it had a lot of heart and was creepy,

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and I thought it was really good. I thought it

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>was good too. But you could also tell that stranger

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Things had come out while they were writing this, and

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 1>they were like, oh, let's retool this a little bit

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:28.879
<v Speaker 1>to really hit the Stranger Things crowd. I don't think

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I think it is true. I think they

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>were I think that script was locked long before Stranger

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Things came out, and I think they retooled it. Uh,

0:44:37.080 --> 0:44:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else on the kid from Stranger Things

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>is in it? That was a little on the nose.

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious about the timeline there. So, Um, there's another

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:48.120
<v Speaker 1>one coming out to It's a dude with a frow

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>who looks exactly like Slim Good Body. That's coming out

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in the mod Slim Good Body. Remember the guy who

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>wore the suit that showed his internal back in the day. Yeah,

0:45:00.000 --> 0:45:02.479
<v Speaker 1>just like Slim Good Body. And then there's a mind

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:05.560
<v Speaker 1>blown one in a vomiting one too. But the clowns

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>the best one. Okay, I'm excited. Do you want him

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 1>more about emojis? Go out, go forth, start talking in emojis.

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty interesting. Uh. And since I said it's interesting,

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it's signed for listening to me. I'm gonna call this

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:25.919
<v Speaker 1>meals on wheels. We got a lot of great follow

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.560
<v Speaker 1>up from people who were in fact inspired to go

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.799
<v Speaker 1>out and join Meals on Wheels, which was best case

0:45:31.840 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 1>scenario exactly what we're in Meals on Wheels was hoping for.

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So Hey, guys, thanks for your commitment and in awesomeness.

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I've been an a listener for the past few years

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 1>your might go to for workouts a long car rides.

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:44.919
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks ago, I heard your episode of Meals

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on Wheels was absolutely blown away. I'm not sure if

0:45:47.960 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it was the sliding scale model for just the overall

0:45:50.520 --> 0:45:52.439
<v Speaker 1>effects of the program, but you encourage me to sign

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>up to serve with my local community center that offers

0:45:55.600 --> 0:45:58.919
<v Speaker 1>Meals on Wheels in central Ohio. He's in Columbus. Yeah.

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>After getting thing your printed a few days ago, I

0:46:01.480 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>guess you gotta do that. Sure they don't want any weirdos. No,

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I am awaiting come for me like weirdos with no fingerprints.

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm awaiting confirmation before going on my first and only

0:46:12.280 --> 0:46:15.360
<v Speaker 1>shadow ride before being a driver myself. The program is

0:46:15.480 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>very easy to learn, and I was surprised to hear

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that most drivers are actually between the ages of fifty

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and sixty. I signed up for once a week for

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 1>about two hours and that is considered average. Highly encourage

0:46:26.120 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone of any age to look for the opportunity look

0:46:29.000 --> 0:46:31.319
<v Speaker 1>into this for meals on wheels, as you can do

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>things like food prep, administration work and more. I know

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>if I would have signed up. I don't know if

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I would have signed up if not from learning about

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it on your program. That's awesome. Yeah, that is from

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Dalton Schaefer. Good work, Dalton, and Dalton wrote back after

0:46:46.080 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I told him he was going to be a listener,

0:46:47.400 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>mail said, tell Josh, I live in Columbus now, and

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I purposefully do not say the Ohio State University and

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the natives are getting restless and angry. Be careful, Dalton,

0:46:57.280 --> 0:47:00.360
<v Speaker 1>be careful, watch yourself. Thanks for signing up for we

0:47:00.400 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>want you to stay alive so you can keep delivering

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>meals on wheels and for lots of other reasons. Sure. Uh,

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>if you did something pretty great because we told you too, well,

0:47:08.920 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we want to hear about that. You can tweet to

0:47:10.680 --> 0:47:13.279
<v Speaker 1>us at s y SK podcast at Josh I'm Clark,

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:16.120
<v Speaker 1>or at movie Crush or slash Charles W. Chuck Bryant.

0:47:16.400 --> 0:47:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email. The Stuff podcast at

0:47:18.680 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>house to works dot com and has always joined us

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>at our home on the Web. Stuff you Should Know

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:29.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:47:30.000 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Is it How Stuff Works dot com