Speaker 1: Right classual with us and write down our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number. We'd love you to be a part of this.
Speaker 1: The funniest thing that's going on in the impeachment shift
Speaker 1: show charade today is that they've got sixteen hours to
Speaker 1: fill and they do not have sixteen hours worth of material.
Speaker 1: They just don't have it. And then it gets repetitive,
Speaker 1: and then it gets you know, then they go off
Speaker 1: into the weeds here, there, everywhere. None of this is
Speaker 1: even remotely in any way significant to this case or
Speaker 1: the charged and the trial, and it's just a farce.
Speaker 1: The whole thing is a farce. It is theater, It
Speaker 1: is a show trial. It is a predetermined outcome. It
Speaker 1: comes down to three very simple defense issues, and when
Speaker 1: the defense finally gets to make their arguments, it really
Speaker 1: shouldn't be any more complicated then the constitutionality or lack thereof.
Speaker 1: You can't impeach or remove somebody from office that's already
Speaker 1: in office. The next big problem they have is it's
Speaker 1: all you know, now, all the evidence, the FBI investigators,
Speaker 1: court documents, Congresswoman Acacio Cortez, videotapes, the medium mob all
Speaker 1: reporting that this was there was plotting and planning and
Speaker 1: scheming in the lead up to all of this, and
Speaker 1: what we should be now investigating, Like last February, we're
Speaker 1: doing the last impeachment. I guess this is the annual
Speaker 1: event that what they ought to be looking at is
Speaker 1: how the hell were they not prepared and how did
Speaker 1: they miss every sign and every warning and every bit
Speaker 1: of intelligence that the FBI knew? And where's Director Ray
Speaker 1: to answer some of these questions? So you know now
Speaker 1: that it's pre planned, you can't make the argument that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump incited in direction with his speech on January sixth,
Speaker 1: that is rally where he said, many of you will peacefully,
Speaker 1: patriotically march to the Capitol so your voices can be heard.
Speaker 1: This is simple stuff. And with all the pre planning
Speaker 1: we now know. This is why you don't do a
Speaker 1: snap impeachment. This is why it is a deliberative process.
Speaker 1: You need to investigate, You need to get solid answers,
Speaker 1: You need to know the facts, not just be driven
Speaker 1: by rage, psychosis and hatred of all things Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: That's why that now you also get into the insurrectionist language,
Speaker 1: and that would be what every Democrat out there if
Speaker 1: their definition of insurrection or inciting insurrection. If that's their
Speaker 1: standard and you apply it to them, then we've got
Speaker 1: an awful lot of people that should be impeached and
Speaker 1: read need to stand trial in the United States Senate.
Speaker 1: That gonna happen, of course, not the media gonna call
Speaker 1: for it, of course not. Why should they? You know,
Speaker 1: there are many many things. If you look at well,
Speaker 1: the president said to fight, like hell, okay, we've played
Speaker 1: the fight montage of every Democrat saying fight, you need
Speaker 1: to fight, you need to fight, you need to fight,
Speaker 1: you need to fight, you need to fight, you need
Speaker 1: to fight. We have all the media saying, oh, the
Speaker 1: FBI now says that it was coordinated, predetermined, planned, in
Speaker 1: advanced by this group that group, and all the evidence
Speaker 1: now moving in that direction. Okay, that's a big part
Speaker 1: of one's defense, wouldn't it be. You know, they've wanted
Speaker 1: to impeach this man from day one, since he's gotten
Speaker 1: into office in twenty seventeen. It has been their sole obsession.
Speaker 1: And a lot of people asking me, well, why aren't
Speaker 1: we demanding that Joe Biden be impeached or yea, if
Speaker 1: you want to apply the same standards they're applying to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Well, the quid pro quo, the bragging on
Speaker 1: video about leveraging a billion tax dollars so that a
Speaker 1: prosecutor in Ukraine gets fired for so zero experience hunter
Speaker 1: can make more money. Yeah, that would probably I would
Speaker 1: probably fit right into that. Absolutely true. But they're not
Speaker 1: gonna none of this is gonna come up on their part.
Speaker 1: So you know, this is where we now find ourselves.
Speaker 1: How about this. Somebody sent me this today and I'd
Speaker 1: forgotten about it, and you know the content. If you
Speaker 1: look at Kamala Harris, she was on the Ellen program.
Speaker 1: We had played it in the past. If you had
Speaker 1: to be stuck in an elevator with either President Trump,
Speaker 1: Mike Pence or Jeff Sessions, who would it be? Harris asked?
Speaker 1: Does one of us have to come out alive? Ha
Speaker 1: ha ha, Okay, imagine somebody said that about Joe. Imagine
Speaker 1: any conservative, prominent conservative in the country that talked about
Speaker 1: you know, when they're down, you kick them, or I
Speaker 1: want to take the president behind the back of a
Speaker 1: gym and beat the hell out of them. Or after
Speaker 1: after violent rioting results in a police precinct being burdened
Speaker 1: to the ground and police officers injured, and you know,
Speaker 1: nationwide thirty killed. Having a vice presidential candidate say they're
Speaker 1: not gonna stop, take note on both sides of this.
Speaker 1: You take note, you beware, They're not gonna stop. They
Speaker 1: shouldn't stop, and we shouldn't stop. Well, saying this in
Speaker 1: the middle of all the insurrection that was occurring at
Speaker 1: the time, they found the one example, after all the
Speaker 1: rioting in the last year in the country they fly,
Speaker 1: they finally found one that bothers them, the one that
Speaker 1: impacted them. What about the ones that were impacting all
Speaker 1: these Americans living in in American cities? You know, did
Speaker 1: they miss the interview with Horace Lorenzo Anderson Senior who
Speaker 1: lost his son Horace Lorenzo Anderson Junior in the Chop
Speaker 1: Chaz Summer of Love, spaghetti potluck, dinner zone and occupation
Speaker 1: of city blocks in Seattle? Or what about when the
Speaker 1: courthouse was being burned to the ground, remember that they
Speaker 1: would trying to burn into the ground on a nightly basis.
Speaker 1: Or the fact that the president had called and asked
Speaker 1: for troops before the sixth doesn't sound like he wanted
Speaker 1: anything that bad at that point, you know, And if
Speaker 1: you watch the videos, and this is just typical of
Speaker 1: a lying medium mob and a lying Democratic party. It's
Speaker 1: all edited, it's all sliced, and it's all diced, and
Speaker 1: it's all conveniently sliced and diced. If they were gonna
Speaker 1: be honest, they would play the president's comments about peacefully
Speaker 1: marching so voices could be heard. But you wouldn't expect
Speaker 1: that from them, and you go their their press outlets
Speaker 1: and the mob, the media, you know, CNN comparing the
Speaker 1: Capitol riot to genocide, Rwandan genocide. You know, part of it,
Speaker 1: I think, just based on what you were just saying,
Speaker 1: it comes to mind. The idea of other rising people
Speaker 1: is something I think we saw a lot of over
Speaker 1: the last four years. I mean something we've seen a
Speaker 1: lot over the last decades. But it's so easy to
Speaker 1: otherise people, to make people other than other than American,
Speaker 1: other than patriotic, other than than human, you know. And
Speaker 1: we've seen it in Bosnia, we've seen it in Rwanda
Speaker 1: where radio was telling people that you know, hutus were
Speaker 1: telling the radio listeners that tuti or cockroaches for you know,
Speaker 1: getting them gin duped for genocide. Um. And you see
Speaker 1: it in these videos were people who claim they are
Speaker 1: patriots are in the face of a police officer calling
Speaker 1: him uh, you know, as we're seeing it right there,
Speaker 1: and and you know, gouging out the eye of one,
Speaker 1: you know, squeezing one in, you know, suffocating one in
Speaker 1: a doorway. The same media mob, the same Democrats that
Speaker 1: that that bent over backwards not to identify the riots
Speaker 1: in the summer as the riots that they were. We
Speaker 1: saw rioting all over the place this summer. And if
Speaker 1: one of my favorite videos is a fake news CNN
Speaker 1: reporter literally the shop behind him looks like an entire
Speaker 1: city is on fire. Oh, it's mostly been very peaceful
Speaker 1: here I can report to back to our audience at home,
Speaker 1: it's mostly peaceful. There's a fire raging behind you in
Speaker 1: the city you're reporting on. That doesn't look mostly peaceful
Speaker 1: to me. I mean fake news CNN's one, you know,
Speaker 1: Trump advisor, first day at trial. Trump is ft. Well,
Speaker 1: if anyone ever charges him, no one wants to work
Speaker 1: with him. Yeah, where did that report come from? Fake news? Acosta? Seriously,
Speaker 1: you know it is what it is. It's we have
Speaker 1: a real crisis and institutions in this country that bombard
Speaker 1: us with lies and a hypocrisy and a double standard.
Speaker 1: I don't even think it was was ever possible in
Speaker 1: our lives, and this is what we're It's all unfolding
Speaker 1: right before our eyes. You know, headline Biden laser focused
Speaker 1: is how ABC covers Joe Biden laser focused, pushing, pushing
Speaker 1: his agenda. As the Senate starts in peachment trial, the
Speaker 1: President has urged the Senate to walk and chew gum
Speaker 1: at the same time. Other no walking in the no
Speaker 1: chewing gum. So if they want to bring witnesses, I'm
Speaker 1: leaning towards. I want to bring in Pelosi. I want
Speaker 1: to bring in Director Ray, I want to bring in
Speaker 1: uh Schumer. I want to bring in Joe. I want
Speaker 1: to bring in Kamala. I want to bring in Maxie Waters.
Speaker 1: And I want to bring in a whole lot of
Speaker 1: people that I think that we would have to as
Speaker 1: witnesses in this thing. The whole bunch of people we
Speaker 1: could be bringing in. You know, it's it's just never
Speaker 1: end madness and insanity. I see that Representative Senator Bill
Speaker 1: Cassidy louis yet he is getting hammered, as is Ben
Speaker 1: Sass the jackass in Nebraska. Boy, what a disappointment he
Speaker 1: turned out to be. And I mean, I can't even
Speaker 1: I don't even know what to say. It's you know,
Speaker 1: Mitt Romney, what happened to Mitt Romney? GOP senators, they're
Speaker 1: clear they had forty four votes twice. Now one change
Speaker 1: Cassidy Change hasn't really given a reason as far as
Speaker 1: I can see. And but the trials, you know, you
Speaker 1: look at it. The trial is going to go on,
Speaker 1: and it is what it is. Great Jarrett made a
Speaker 1: point He's going to join us at the top of
Speaker 1: the next hour. When a lawyer is a weak case,
Speaker 1: he ignores facts and gins up a note emotion. And
Speaker 1: he's talking about Jamie Raskin. Now Jamie Raskin, we forget
Speaker 1: he was one of the guys that challenge the results
Speaker 1: of the twenty sixteen election. Talk about great irony here,
Speaker 1: and you know what he did is rather than you know,
Speaker 1: they edit out the exculpatory evidence that many of you
Speaker 1: will will march to the Capitol to peacefully and patriotically.
Speaker 1: That's all taken out. They took three words that Trump uttered,
Speaker 1: fight like hell. And we have played these montages of
Speaker 1: all these Democrats saying got a fight, fight, Fight, fight, fight, fight, fight, fight.
Speaker 1: They clip it. Had they played it in full, it
Speaker 1: would have been clear that Trump used the word fight,
Speaker 1: not in the literal sense, in the obvious sense, in
Speaker 1: a figurative sense, and the way lawmakers all use the
Speaker 1: word fight on the floor of the of Congress. I
Speaker 1: mean it is. He did not encourage people to go.
Speaker 1: He actually asked that they send people, send the NA
Speaker 1: National Guard in, and it requested it, just like the
Speaker 1: capital chief of police. Why this guy left, I don't
Speaker 1: know that he was the only guy that was leading,
Speaker 1: trying to lead six separate times he's saying, please send
Speaker 1: the guard in. We have all these people here. We
Speaker 1: don't have the ability to protect this place. They knew
Speaker 1: hundreds of thousands of people were coming. And now we
Speaker 1: know that there was plotting, planning, scheming. And don't think
Speaker 1: that every hostile nation in the entire world is not
Speaker 1: watching the shift show charade and seeing a vulnerability that
Speaker 1: they're probably a ghast. How could the United States of
Speaker 1: America have their capital breached in thirty seconds to a minute.
Speaker 1: We can't have that in this country. And we ought
Speaker 1: to have a commission in an intro and we better
Speaker 1: have a short term plan to prevent it from ever
Speaker 1: happening again. Protect politicians. It has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: what your politics are. We have to protect any elected official,
Speaker 1: and we've got to protect our institutions. We can't How
Speaker 1: did this happen in a post nine to eleven world?
Speaker 1: You know who dropped the ball? Who did Acasio Cortez tell?
Speaker 1: She needs to tell us. If she told Pelosi, then
Speaker 1: Pelosi needs to be a witness. Why didn't you do anything?
Speaker 1: Why wasn't the request for National Guard troops? Listen to
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine for one, Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of this extra ravaganza. Now,
Speaker 1: we've got some research we've been working on here and
Speaker 1: we've pulled together today. We're gonna play a lot of
Speaker 1: it when we get back because we've been pointing out
Speaker 1: a lot of just just breathtaking hypocrisy. I'm pretty much
Speaker 1: every issue that is that defines these institutions, the media, mob,
Speaker 1: big tech, and the Democratic Radical Socialist Party. So the
Speaker 1: Stacey Abrams. I actually have respect for Stacey Abrams because
Speaker 1: Stacey Abrams fights like hell and she is in to win,
Speaker 1: and I respect it, you know, and I think people
Speaker 1: in Georgia that, for example, want to win elections, they
Speaker 1: need to learn from the great work that she's done
Speaker 1: for her party. I have nothing but respect for Stacey
Speaker 1: Abrams in terms of her political You know, her ability
Speaker 1: to fight for the things that she wants, and she
Speaker 1: has been really successful. I'd even argue this the election
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty and the Senate runoff earlier in January.
Speaker 1: I don't think without Stacey Abrams the Democrats would have won.
Speaker 1: She is formidable and she works hard. The Republicans have
Speaker 1: been complacent, and then you've got this this dopey governor
Speaker 1: and dopey Secretary of State, and neither one of them.
Speaker 1: It seems to understand that they have that she has
Speaker 1: been outthinking them, out working them, and she has profoundly
Speaker 1: shifted and changed the electorate in Georgia, in large part
Speaker 1: because of the idiotic consent decree. And I know that
Speaker 1: Georgia Senate is now in the process of hopefully fixing
Speaker 1: some of these things. If they don't, it's a big mistake.
Speaker 1: I'll explain. But she sounds an awful lot like Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: What do I mean? Next twenty five to the top
Speaker 1: of the hour eight hundred and ninety four one sean
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. So
Speaker 1: a lot of this is based on then with the
Speaker 1: case to trying to lay out as well Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: it's not just what he said on the day, fight
Speaker 1: like hell, ignoring the exculpatory comments that he made. But
Speaker 1: then they say, but you know he kept talking about
Speaker 1: election interference that said or etc. Well, Stacy Abrams still
Speaker 1: to this date, never conceded the race in Georgia to
Speaker 1: Governor Kemp. She never did, you know, let me be clear,
Speaker 1: this is not a concession. Still never did it. Georgia
Speaker 1: democracy failed. She said, bad actions, bad information that she
Speaker 1: was quote peddling. According to people that were in Georgia
Speaker 1: at the time, people were still denied the ability to
Speaker 1: elect their leaders. This is what she was saying. Mistakes
Speaker 1: clearly altered the outcome. The incompetence of mismanagement we witnessed
Speaker 1: had been on display for months before. Is any Democrat
Speaker 1: ever criticized Stacey Abrams. She said she planned to start
Speaker 1: an organization to fight for more equitable voting laws and
Speaker 1: would soon bring a major lawsuit federal lawsuit against the
Speaker 1: state of Georgia for gross mismanagement of this election. To
Speaker 1: watch an elected official who claims to represent the people's state,
Speaker 1: you know, boldly and pin their hopes for election on
Speaker 1: the suppression of people's democratic right to vote has been appalling.
Speaker 1: She called Brian Kemp the architect of voters suppression, you know,
Speaker 1: The Hill reported and CBS this morning she was on.
Speaker 1: She said she won't concede the race, arguing that that
Speaker 1: would make her complicit in accepting voters suppression. Concession means
Speaker 1: to say that the process was fair. But when I
Speaker 1: run an organization that in ten days between election night
Speaker 1: and the night I refuse to concede, we received more
Speaker 1: than fifty thousand phone calls from people who were denied
Speaker 1: the right to vote, I am complicit if I say
Speaker 1: that the system is fair. These are all very similar
Speaker 1: to the things that Donald Trump was saying. You can
Speaker 1: have higher turnout, but that doesn't diminish the fact that
Speaker 1: voter suppression is real and affecting people across the country.
Speaker 1: He says, they stole this election from the voters of Georgia.
Speaker 1: That's what she said. You can't trick me into saying
Speaker 1: it was right. You can't shame me into pretending that
Speaker 1: what happened should have happened. If you're fighting against the
Speaker 1: system and it's designed to oppress you, sometimes you have
Speaker 1: to fight a little bit longer than you think. Oh,
Speaker 1: Stacy Abrams, Now let's play a little Stacy Abrams in
Speaker 1: her own word, when she says it was stolen his
Speaker 1: a montage, Cliff said she lost him Like, no, I
Speaker 1: just didn't win because we don't know what really happened
Speaker 1: because of the neasthma of voter suppression. Was the election
Speaker 1: in Georgia statewide of free and fair election? It was
Speaker 1: not free and fair election. But I say that this
Speaker 1: election was not tainted. I will not say that, and
Speaker 1: I will not conceive because the erosion of our democracy
Speaker 1: if not right. We have this little election back in
Speaker 1: twenty eighteen. I do have one very affirmative statements bank
Speaker 1: we want. The process was not fair. I can't say
Speaker 1: that empirically I won, but I will never know because
Speaker 1: we did not have a fair fight. Five months later,
Speaker 1: do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Yes,
Speaker 1: to what I believe was a stolen election. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying they stole it from the voters. Off they stole
Speaker 1: it from the voters of Georgia. And here's Stacy Abrahams
Speaker 1: also saying that election that she predicts there's gonna be
Speaker 1: election chaos unless Congress expands mail in voting nationally. Listen,
Speaker 1: we know that the risk to people for standing in
Speaker 1: line to be high, and Americans are going to be
Speaker 1: desate to change what's happening. And so if the Senate
Speaker 1: will do its part, then we will be able to
Speaker 1: process those returns to very quickly. As to say it
Speaker 1: does not do its part, that will not stop Americans
Speaker 1: from trying to vote it. As both Leah and John
Speaker 1: articularly pointed out, they're going to have to risk their
Speaker 1: lives to do it, or they're going to have to
Speaker 1: face chaos and responder. And then saying that Georgia governor
Speaker 1: Georgia's governor's election was not free and was not fair.
Speaker 1: Was the election in Georgia statewide a free and fair election.
Speaker 1: It was not a free and fair election. We had
Speaker 1: thousands of Georgians who were purged from the roles wrongly,
Speaker 1: including a ninety two year old woman who had voted
Speaker 1: in the same area since nineteen sixty eight. As civil
Speaker 1: rights leader. It was not fair to the thousands who
Speaker 1: were forced to wait in long lines because they were
Speaker 1: in polling places that were under resourced, or worse, they
Speaker 1: had no polling places to go to because more than
Speaker 1: three hundred had been closed. It was not fair to
Speaker 1: the thousands that were put on hold with their registrations,
Speaker 1: and it was not fair to those who filled up
Speaker 1: absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to,
Speaker 1: either it was counted or not counted, assuming you received
Speaker 1: it in time. Hillary Clinton in September twenty seventeen NPR
Speaker 1: said that she wouldn't rule out questioning the election results.
Speaker 1: This is September twenty seventeen, nine months into Donald Trump's presidency.
Speaker 1: You know, I want to get back to the question,
Speaker 1: would you rule out the questioning or the legitimacy of
Speaker 1: the election if we learned that the Russian interference in
Speaker 1: the election is even deeper than we know. No, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't rule it out. I don't know if there's any legal,
Speaker 1: constitution a way to do it. I think you raised
Speaker 1: good questions. Mother Jones interview, November twenty seventeen. You know,
Speaker 1: Clinton said the Russians meddling in the election was one
Speaker 1: of the major contributors to the outcome. We now know
Speaker 1: that's a lie. We now know that the only Russian
Speaker 1: interference came from her dirty bought and paid for Russian
Speaker 1: disinformation dossier that its own author says was designed to
Speaker 1: distract the public from Hillary Clinton's email server problems. On
Speaker 1: top of the subsource for the steel Dosier that said,
Speaker 1: none of this is true. This was like bar talk.
Speaker 1: It was never meant for this, you know, the hookers
Speaker 1: urinating in the ritz Carlton and Moscow and Donald Trump's room.
Speaker 1: Republican efforts to make it harder to vote through measure
Speaker 1: measures such as a voter ID law shortened early voting periods.
Speaker 1: Hillary says, new obstacles to registration. How do you how
Speaker 1: do we know? You need an ID to get into
Speaker 1: the DNC, You need an ID to get into the
Speaker 1: US Capital. You need an ID to get into the
Speaker 1: White House. You need an ID pretty much to buy
Speaker 1: Essig's jewels at the at your local store. For crying
Speaker 1: out loud, I know, because I still like my jewel
Speaker 1: to get a cartridge and they and they limit in
Speaker 1: New York how many you can buy. It's ridiculous. It's unreal,
Speaker 1: you know, in a couple of places, most notably Wisconsin.
Speaker 1: I think it had a dramatic impact on the outcome.
Speaker 1: Talking about voter suppression, how do we have free, fair
Speaker 1: elections that people can have faith and confidence in if
Speaker 1: you don't have voter ID. You know, how long are
Speaker 1: we going to have early voting periods for? How much
Speaker 1: is it going to be two months? At what point?
Speaker 1: What about chain of custody, ballot custody issues? Are we
Speaker 1: gonna we gonna institute those those plans. I guess we
Speaker 1: don't need ID to vote. I guess we shouldn't need
Speaker 1: an ID to get to the Democratic National Convention or
Speaker 1: get into any government building of any kind. But there's
Speaker 1: you know, nobody seemed to ever get outraged the way
Speaker 1: they did the way you know, well, Donald Trump pushed
Speaker 1: it too far. All right, maybe you think he did.
Speaker 1: That's fine, Well, then if he did, so did Stacy Abrams,
Speaker 1: and so did Hillary Clinton. They needed the investigations to continue.
Speaker 1: We had four investigations into her phony narrative that we
Speaker 1: know she helped begin. She helped start this phony narrative,
Speaker 1: and she paid for the Russian dirty dossier. The dirty
Speaker 1: dossier was then used unverified on top of a FISA
Speaker 1: application Verified supposed to verify it. They didn't verify anything.
Speaker 1: It was unverifiabull Hillary warning democrats of the potential of
Speaker 1: stolen elections in May of twenty nineteen. You can run
Speaker 1: the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and
Speaker 1: you can have the election stolen from you, Hillary Clinton said.
Speaker 1: She pointed to the FBI director Director raised warning that
Speaker 1: Russia continues to pose a very significant counterintelligence threat. We
Speaker 1: knew about her tourney Docier. There's audacity here at a
Speaker 1: level that's pretty breathtaking. Clinton says. Americans need to make
Speaker 1: sure the election is not interfered with in that sweeping
Speaker 1: systemic way that Muller found it was in the prior
Speaker 1: election she had the only Russian disinformation. Unbelievable. You know,
Speaker 1: Trump is an illegitimate president. She was saying as late
Speaker 1: as September twenty seventh, twenty nineteen, And she said as
Speaker 1: late as October ninth, twenty nineteen, implied she won the election.
Speaker 1: I can quote beat him again, telling people in August
Speaker 1: to twenty twenty that Biden should not concede the election.
Speaker 1: He said that this year's election day results might point
Speaker 1: to Trump, how having a narrow advantage. But in that
Speaker 1: case Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances, because
Speaker 1: I think this is gonna drag out. October twenty twenty,
Speaker 1: Yahoo News, Hillary raised additional questions about the integrity of
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen election. You look at the list of
Speaker 1: excuses Hillary had given since twenty sixteen, and we've played
Speaker 1: most of them over the year's sexism, Barack Obama's fault,
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders fault, Jim Comey's fault, wouldn't women wouldn't let
Speaker 1: men tell them how to vote? Remember that lines of
Speaker 1: my email account was turned into, you know, the biggest
Speaker 1: scandal since lord knows when. This was the biggest nothing
Speaker 1: burger ever. It was a mistake. I've said it was
Speaker 1: a mistake. I know. You had Dean Backet here from
Speaker 1: New York Times yesterday and they covered it like it
Speaker 1: was Pearl Harbor. The Russians, in my opinion and based
Speaker 1: on the intel and counter intel people I've talked to,
Speaker 1: could not have known how best to weaponize that information
Speaker 1: unless they had been guided and here as Americans, guided
Speaker 1: by Americans and guided by people who had you know,
Speaker 1: polling and dating. I never said I was a perfect candidate,
Speaker 1: and I certainly have never said I ran perfect campaigns.
Speaker 1: But I don't know who is or did, And at
Speaker 1: some point it sort of bleeds over into misogyny. Okay,
Speaker 1: Blame the media, blamed uninformed voters, blamed voter suppression, blamed Putin,
Speaker 1: blamed Russia, blamed her campaign staff, Blame Jill Stein, blamed
Speaker 1: the DNC, She blamed campaign finance laws, the Electoral College,
Speaker 1: Anthony Weener Uh, she used race in a couple of occasions,
Speaker 1: democratic predecessor, wiki leaks, debate questions, and then, of course
Speaker 1: when all those fails, blame Fox News and people like
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity. I get blame for everything. How can I get, Linda?
Speaker 1: Why do I get blamed for everything? And I'm not
Speaker 1: a bad person. I'm a nice person. What it's a
Speaker 1: lot of fun to make fun of you. You know,
Speaker 1: you're an easy target radio show, TV show man. It's
Speaker 1: a lot of material. I never never, It doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: Every day in my life is a shift show. Sure,
Speaker 1: you do know you could say the alphabet and they
Speaker 1: would say you did it wrong. You're probably right, that's
Speaker 1: all that you just know, you know, if it's raining,
Speaker 1: if it's outside it's raining and you walk out and
Speaker 1: you get wet, they're gonna tell you it's sunny. The
Speaker 1: best thing that is evolved in my life, whatever chip,
Speaker 1: whatever switch is supposed to have that gives a flying
Speaker 1: rip about these people. I don't have that switch anymore. Well,
Speaker 1: that's just as you have so much of it now
Speaker 1: you're immune. Is that I have? Now? What heard? Immunity
Speaker 1: on getting the crappiat out of me? Yeah? I mean
Speaker 1: I think after a while you get to a place
Speaker 1: and it's just like forget about it, you know, like
Speaker 1: I've heard it all. What can you tell me that
Speaker 1: I haven't heard. Let's see Leonardo de Crappio. No, that's good,
Speaker 1: the Crappio. I like that. I like that. Huh A
Speaker 1: little little well playing any his name? All right? We
Speaker 1: have Amy Schumer, Kerry Washington, Robert Downey Junior, Scarlett Johansson,
Speaker 1: Chris Hemsworth, Mark Ruffalo in all the usual suspects. They're
Speaker 1: now urging Biden to shutdown the Dakota Access pipeline. Isn't
Speaker 1: that nice of them? Isn't that really? Because I think
Speaker 1: they're all probably pretty wealthy I'm I'm all four people
Speaker 1: making money. Yeah, but I think jobs. Yeah, those guys
Speaker 1: that lost their jobs were making We had one guy
Speaker 1: on made one hundred grand year. All those guys made
Speaker 1: one hundred grand year, high paying career job, specialized years
Speaker 1: and years of specialized training, and now they're out of work.
Speaker 1: Neil Crabtree. Neil Crabtree, And then I had the guys
Speaker 1: on TV. He said, some of these jobs are paying
Speaker 1: these guys two hundred and fifty grand a year. They're
Speaker 1: paying drivers training them and starting at eighty grand a year,
Speaker 1: and all the overtime they can handle. These are you know,
Speaker 1: serious career job? Went on, Well, you just have to
Speaker 1: get another union job in the green energy field. Well,
Speaker 1: how do you translate the skills from that industry into
Speaker 1: the new one that doesn't even exist? And what the
Speaker 1: hell do you put on you? How do you how
Speaker 1: do you pay the rent, the mortgage, the card, the
Speaker 1: truck payment, how do you pay for your kids college
Speaker 1: or retirement? If God, for the first of all, have
Speaker 1: we seen any evidence of these green jobs? Did they exist?
Speaker 1: They didn't, That's the point. They do not. It's a
Speaker 1: bunch of crap. I gladuate with us, our two Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show. All right, Democrats forso they can't fill the
Speaker 1: sixteen hours. That's just like all over the place today.
Speaker 1: And it's as dull and boring and monotonous as it
Speaker 1: ever could. Whatever they had they used yesterday. But they're
Speaker 1: gonna use a ball their time and just take I
Speaker 1: don't think in the end it helps anybody or helps
Speaker 1: them for sure. And and now they're using Mitch McConnell's
Speaker 1: comments to convict Trump. Anyway. Our legal team is with us.
Speaker 1: We have Greg Jared Beck podcast The Brief to number
Speaker 1: one best sellers The Russia Hoax and witch Hunt. Don Brown,
Speaker 1: former US Navy jag officer, author of Travesty of Justice.
Speaker 1: Thank you both for being with us. You know you
Speaker 1: wrote something in a column Greg that I you know
Speaker 1: about Jamie Raskin and if you don't have facts on
Speaker 1: your side, you get emotional, which was part of his
Speaker 1: appeal yesterday. And I'm watching all of this today, it's like,
Speaker 1: you know, scatter shot here, there and everywhere, and they
Speaker 1: don't have sixteen hours of material to fill. They barely
Speaker 1: have three hours to fill. Yeah, you know what was
Speaker 1: so remarkable yesterday and today is that Democrat House managers
Speaker 1: are spewing inflammatory rhetoric to make their case for incitement.
Speaker 1: In other words, they're trying to incite emotion to make
Speaker 1: a case for incitement of violence against President Trump. And
Speaker 1: really the irony should be lost on no one. What
Speaker 1: I object so much to is that they keep playing
Speaker 1: over and over again, and they did this today clips
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump talking to the crowd, and you know,
Speaker 1: ten times already they've played the clip fight like hell.
Speaker 1: The use of the term is common political rhetoric. It
Speaker 1: doesn't mean literally fighting or you know, taking up arms. No,
Speaker 1: you know, it's an allegory. It's a metaphor, and it's
Speaker 1: commonly used by politicians, as I pointed out to you yesterday,
Speaker 1: even by lawmakers on the floor of Congress all the time.
Speaker 1: And they left out and deliberately deleted the most important
Speaker 1: clip of all, and that's Donald Trump. When he encouraged
Speaker 1: the crowd to conduct themselves peacefully and patriotically. He didn't
Speaker 1: encourage people to breach security, launch an attack on the Capitol,
Speaker 1: attack police, and engage in acts of violence. And think
Speaker 1: about this. If it were other wise, Trump would have
Speaker 1: been criminally charged because he's a private citizen. His words
Speaker 1: don't come close to incitement. They cannot make a case
Speaker 1: of incitement. And if this were a real court of law,
Speaker 1: the case would be over already. Well, if it was
Speaker 1: a real court of law, you would actually have a
Speaker 1: real judge in this particular case, that would have been
Speaker 1: the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. But no, we
Speaker 1: have the Honorable Patrick Lahey presiding, the guy that before
Speaker 1: the trial ever began, had already declared Trump's guilt in
Speaker 1: all of this. That's not a trial by any definition,
Speaker 1: no fairness, no due process, just like the House snap impeachment.
Speaker 1: And what are we learning. We're learning that a lot
Speaker 1: of plotting and planning and scheming and organizing went into
Speaker 1: all of what happened on the sixth, which renders the
Speaker 1: entire incitement to insurrection charge Don Brown completely null and void.
Speaker 1: It's just it's not even relevant anymore. We have a
Speaker 1: kangaroo court sean disguise as an impeachment proceeding by the Senate.
Speaker 1: The President of the United s States is not being tried.
Speaker 1: The former presidents being tried. And Article two, sections four
Speaker 1: does not give the Senate jurisdiction do that. I don't
Speaker 1: care how many times they voted to hear the case.
Speaker 1: Just because they vote to hear the case doesn't mean
Speaker 1: it's constitutional. And to follow up on what Greg said
Speaker 1: a moment ago, I went back and looked at the
Speaker 1: President's speech on the sixth and he only mentions the
Speaker 1: phrase capital three times into speech. And here's the crucial
Speaker 1: language I'm reading from it. Here's what President Trump said.
Speaker 1: I know that everyone here will be marching over to
Speaker 1: the Capitol Building to get this peacefully and patriotically make
Speaker 1: your voices heard. Again, the President's words to peacefully and
Speaker 1: patriotically make your voices heard, and they're trying to spend
Speaker 1: that into some sort of high crime or misdemeanor. He
Speaker 1: is calling for peaceful protests, by the way, which the
Speaker 1: First Amendment guarantees the right of the people to peaceably assemble.
Speaker 1: And they're right at the petition the Government for Redress
Speaker 1: of grievances. Greg is right, they're going a field here.
Speaker 1: I mean, I watched watching mister Cast earlier today playing
Speaker 1: clips of President Trump back in September in August properly
Speaker 1: warning about the Democrats using the virus as a cover
Speaker 1: for election. For every right to do that, well, they're
Speaker 1: charging him for statements mail the sixth of January. Now
Speaker 1: they're going back in playing statements from August and September,
Speaker 1: without one shred of evidence that one thug who broke
Speaker 1: the windows of the capital ever heard any of those speeches.
Speaker 1: To us, emotionalism is tripe, is hyperbole, and it is
Speaker 1: an embarrassment to the United States. This is happening. So
Speaker 1: we have forty four senators on two occasions, forty five
Speaker 1: the first time, forty four yesterday, that say this is
Speaker 1: unconstitutional and shouldn't even proceed. Why are Republicans offering any
Speaker 1: validity or legitimacy to the horrific process in the House
Speaker 1: that didn't They offered no due process, they offered no defense,
Speaker 1: they brought in no witnesses, And now the evidence suggests
Speaker 1: that their entire impeachment article is null and void, based
Speaker 1: on the recent discoveries and developing story that in fact,
Speaker 1: it was all planned. Greg Jarrett, Yes, all fifty Republican
Speaker 1: senators should have voted for the motion to dismiss. It's unconstitutional,
Speaker 1: And you're right about due process. You know there was
Speaker 1: never a single hearing. I mean, if Nancy Pelosi had
Speaker 1: actually taken the time to conduct an investigation to examine
Speaker 1: the true facts instead of making a hasty decision to
Speaker 1: impeach without holding a hearing, doing it literally days after
Speaker 1: January sixth, then she would have realized, I think what
Speaker 1: we now know documents presented in federal court show the
Speaker 1: attackers planned their assault days and weeks in advance. It's
Speaker 1: impossible for a person to incite a pre planned event.
Speaker 1: But none of that mattered a Nancy Pelosi. She wanted
Speaker 1: to rush to impeach Donald Trump yet again, so she
Speaker 1: cooked up a case without waiting to scrutinize the facts,
Speaker 1: and all of it is such a charade because we
Speaker 1: know the outcome. There's no way that Democrats can reach
Speaker 1: the threshold sixty seven required votes to convict. So you know,
Speaker 1: we have to go through this fatuous exercise. That's an
Speaker 1: extravagant waste of time. Will there be witnesses? No, No,
Speaker 1: they won't any witnesses. Look, there's no appetite for a
Speaker 1: prolonged Senate trial here. So at the conclusion of the
Speaker 1: presentation arguments of house managers and then the rebuttal by
Speaker 1: the defense team, there'll be a vote on whether to
Speaker 1: hold witnesses, And I just don't think there are enough
Speaker 1: Democrats who really want to elongate this thing. I mean,
Speaker 1: then you're gonna have to be talking about depositions of witnesses,
Speaker 1: the right to cross examine, the right of the defense
Speaker 1: called their own witnesses, and so forth, and they have
Speaker 1: any excuse for voting down witnesses. Nancy Pelosi's job was
Speaker 1: to call witnesses during hearings. She failed to do it.
Speaker 1: We're not going to do your job for you, Nancy.
Speaker 1: What about the insurrectionist language of the left. Now, I
Speaker 1: don't buy their definition, but if we applied their definition
Speaker 1: of what they believe is incitement to insurrection, Don Brown,
Speaker 1: if you applied it to Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Chuck Schumer,
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, Maxie Waters, just to name a few, and
Speaker 1: I've got many more that I can list, wouldn't they, then, therefore,
Speaker 1: again applying the same standard, all be impeached and put
Speaker 1: on trial. As well as the ultimate example of political hypocrisy,
Speaker 1: you have on your show, play many montages with this
Speaker 1: incendiary rhetoric use by these democrats. Take Chuck Schumer, you know,
Speaker 1: hey Cavin, Hey Gorss you reached the horror wind and
Speaker 1: you don't know what it's going to hit you. I
Speaker 1: mean that sounds like the Senate Majority leader threatening to
Speaker 1: justice of the United States Supreme Court. And then, of
Speaker 1: course is a clip with Maxine Waters. You know, if
Speaker 1: you see these cabinet members in her restaurant or at
Speaker 1: a gas station, you know, you work up a crowd
Speaker 1: and you surround them and you push on them. It
Speaker 1: sounds like she's physically and specifically calling for people to
Speaker 1: a pushing someone as an assault the president, as I
Speaker 1: read a moment ago, say go peacefully. So you have
Speaker 1: incendiary rhetoric where these Democrats and you can throw Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris and others in there have called for riots, who
Speaker 1: apparently have called specific threatning against cabinet members and Supreme
Speaker 1: Court justices against the President of the United States who
Speaker 1: says go in peace. It is the ultimate in political hypocrisy.
Speaker 1: I agree with the greg I don't think they'll call witnesses.
Speaker 1: I think they want to over as quickly as possible.
Speaker 1: They don't want to open that can of worms because
Speaker 1: it can come back to bid them if they do
Speaker 1: call witnesses. When you look at the Republicans House Senate
Speaker 1: wherever that went against the President, Greg Jarard a political
Speaker 1: question starting with Liz Cheney or Adam Kinsinger or Ben
Speaker 1: Sas the jackass or now Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, all
Speaker 1: of them now are eat rebuking and even censure within
Speaker 1: their own states, within their own party over this. How
Speaker 1: would that resonate with maybe Republicans in the Senate, in
Speaker 1: the House, what message would they would they take out
Speaker 1: of that? Because most politicians I know are pretty ambitious
Speaker 1: and want to keep their job. Well, I think Republicans
Speaker 1: recognize that it's fundamentally wrong to follow the course of emotion,
Speaker 1: facts and evidence and the law and the standards historically
Speaker 1: of impeachment or which you should should follow. And most
Speaker 1: Republicans are doing that. There are a handful, as you
Speaker 1: point out, who are not, and there will be a
Speaker 1: political price to pay for that, as it should be.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's why representatives and editors, you know, are
Speaker 1: ultimately accountable to the people that they serve. If those
Speaker 1: people don't like what they're doing, um, you know, they're
Speaker 1: they're going to get defeated in the next election. And
Speaker 1: I guarantee you the people and we already know this.
Speaker 1: For people like Les Cheney and others, they're going to
Speaker 1: get primaried. You know, there are the vast majority of
Speaker 1: Republicans agree that, you know, there were improprieties and irregularities
Speaker 1: associated with the election, and they have serious questions about
Speaker 1: the legitimacy of it. And there has been no comprehensive
Speaker 1: investigation as there should be by Congress to look into it.
Speaker 1: And they're aggrieved about it. And you know, so these
Speaker 1: people who are jumping on the anti Trump bandwagon, I
Speaker 1: mean there are consequences for that. All right, thank you
Speaker 1: both of your expertise. We continue to watch the Shift
Speaker 1: show Charades sixteen hours. They already ran out of material.
Speaker 1: It's getting interesting, and I would say for the defense,
Speaker 1: anything over four hours is too much. All right, let's
Speaker 1: go to the phones. We'll take phones for the rest
Speaker 1: of the hour today. Then all things bill O'Reilly dot com?
Speaker 1: Simple man coming up. Let's say hi to Tom Is
Speaker 1: in California. Hey, Tom, how are you glad you're with us? Hi? Sean,
Speaker 1: thank you. I wanted to chime in on earlier conversation
Speaker 1: regarding the pipeline being cut off. I think it's totally wrong.
Speaker 1: How Biden went about just cutting off tens of thousands
Speaker 1: of jobs to people that are providing great services to us.
Speaker 1: Why didn't he first have a plan in place and
Speaker 1: figure out what positions were going to be filled, how
Speaker 1: to train these guys to fill the positions, and give
Speaker 1: them an opportunity to get trained in the new positions
Speaker 1: while still working and still having an income, and then
Speaker 1: at the appropriate time switch over from the old technology
Speaker 1: to the new technology the new way of doing things. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: we got lots of people in harm's way on top
Speaker 1: of all the stresses related to that. That would be
Speaker 1: the appropriate order of things, wouldn't it. That would be
Speaker 1: that would be the common sense of a way you know.
Speaker 1: Oh no, no, well we just go get another union job.
Speaker 1: What do you mean, go get another high paying union
Speaker 1: job when you have specialized skills. There's These are professionals,
Speaker 1: these people that have developed specific skills for decades, and
Speaker 1: they just here's your pink slip. Oh, but hopefully you
Speaker 1: get another job later. Wow. Thanks Tom. Jerry Maryland, Hi,
Speaker 1: how are you? Hi? So, and I wanted to talk
Speaker 1: about the Keystone workers. I believe that on Saturday May first,
Speaker 1: May first, being the day of internationally. The Day of
Speaker 1: the Workers, there should be peaceful demonstrations. Peaceful demonstrations in Washington,
Speaker 1: DC of the Keystone Workers, all union members. They should
Speaker 1: go there in the spirit of the organization put together
Speaker 1: in Martin User King in nineteen sixty Tree and for
Speaker 1: the Lincoln Memorial. All these peoples have come forward fill
Speaker 1: DC and show the pain and destruction being caused by
Speaker 1: pulling this permitting. It's unconscionable. Eleven thousand workers with families, husband,
Speaker 1: wives and children, no paychecks, worst time of the year.
Speaker 1: It's it's an outrage and I really think it should
Speaker 1: be done before May one, but you need time to organize.
Speaker 1: It's a Saturday. These these are now the thousands that
Speaker 1: lost their job. And then then the Leonardo de Crappios
Speaker 1: and Scarlett Johansson's of the world demanding we closed the
Speaker 1: Dakota Pipeline. It's easy for them to say, but these
Speaker 1: are real jobs, real families, real people, fellow Americans and
Speaker 1: their their dismissive closed this closed, this stop this stop
Speaker 1: that it impacts directly people's ability. And this is my
Speaker 1: twenty years you know, doing real work of my life,
Speaker 1: right and it impacts directly their ability to put food
Speaker 1: on the table, a roof over their head, the cars
Speaker 1: to drive at, a future for their kids and a
Speaker 1: future for themselves, and a retirement. In the end, it
Speaker 1: just rips it away from them, and it's causing real
Speaker 1: pain and real difficulty for our fellow Americans. More calls. Next,
Speaker 1: Cliff said she lost. I'm like, no, I just didn't
Speaker 1: win because we don't know what really happened because of
Speaker 1: the miasma of voter suppression. Was the election in Georgia
Speaker 1: statewide a free and fair election? It was not a
Speaker 1: free and fair election. But I say that this election
Speaker 1: was not tainted. I will not say that, and I
Speaker 1: will not conceive because the erosion of our democracy if
Speaker 1: not right. We have this little election back in twenty eighteen.
Speaker 1: I do have one very affirmative statements bank we want.
Speaker 1: The process was not fair. I can't say that in
Speaker 1: pirically I won, but I will never know because we
Speaker 1: did not have a fair fight. Five months later, do
Speaker 1: you still feel like your opponent one through voter suppression? Yes,
Speaker 1: I believe it was a stolen all right. That's Stacey
Speaker 1: Abrams gladuate with us twenty five till the top of
Speaker 1: the hour, eight hundred and nine four one sewn. You
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program. You know,
Speaker 1: it's it's amazing. Stacy Abrams the the icon of the
Speaker 1: beloved liberal Democrat from Georgia. UH. Let's be clear, I'm
Speaker 1: not conceding. This is not a concession speech. You know. Uh,
Speaker 1: democracy failed Georgia. Uh, pedaling claimed bad actions, misinformation, people
Speaker 1: denied the ability to elect their leaders. Mistakes clearly altered
Speaker 1: the outcome. The incompetence, the mismanagement we witnessed has been
Speaker 1: on display for months before, you know, going on planning lawsuits,
Speaker 1: major federal lawsuits stated Georgia for gross mismanagement of this election.
Speaker 1: To watch an elected official who claims to represent the
Speaker 1: people in this state baldly pin his hopes for election
Speaker 1: on the suppression of people's democratic right to vote has
Speaker 1: been truly appalling, the architect of voters suppression. And it
Speaker 1: goes on for there. And I can go on all
Speaker 1: day long and all of these tapes, and we're going
Speaker 1: to put a lot of them together for you tonight
Speaker 1: on Hannity. And how come the Democrats you know, never
Speaker 1: challenged to this day, She's never conceded. Okay, that's our option,
Speaker 1: that's her choice. We never bother to talking much about it.
Speaker 1: And because that's her choice and that's our right, and
Speaker 1: she wanted it. But if you look at almost the
Speaker 1: same exact thing, they stole this election from the voters
Speaker 1: of Georgia. If you're fighting against the system and it's
Speaker 1: designed to oppress you, sometimes you have to fight a
Speaker 1: little bit longer than you think. That sounds familiar, That
Speaker 1: sounds what all the Democrats are all outraged about, their
Speaker 1: feigned phony, selective moral outrage eight hundred and nine four one, Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program. All right,
Speaker 1: let's say hi two, Let's say Carmen is in Minnesota. Hi, Sean,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called? I'm good, thank you
Speaker 1: for taking my call. So my concern is a fanti
Speaker 1: Kolosi h one Gail, the so called people's fact. I
Speaker 1: think it's really personal to me because I'm an election Josh,
Speaker 1: and we saw lots of scenarioms in Minnesota, and this
Speaker 1: built to me, doesn't this bill just basically try to
Speaker 1: legitimize what so many of us stopping they did this
Speaker 1: farm like with about how the stating and the lack
Speaker 1: of photo ideas, the mail and balance, all the lack
Speaker 1: of signatures for panc occation just to me is so
Speaker 1: offensive and it's to me an emission of their own guilt.
Speaker 1: They think they got it in the bag at the
Speaker 1: states and now they're going to take it to the
Speaker 1: federal level and they're just going to push you know,
Speaker 1: votos over all of our rights. And it just it's
Speaker 1: upsetting because Minnesota, now you can be an election judge
Speaker 1: at sixteen, and they're trying to push elect you know,
Speaker 1: voters at sixteen to be able to vote as well.
Speaker 1: None of this went through our state legislators, none of
Speaker 1: it did. It all went through the Secretary of State
Speaker 1: Steve Simon. And now we're not allowed to talk about
Speaker 1: voter fraud the league when voters is on it. They
Speaker 1: don't want us talking about it. They're trying to suppress
Speaker 1: a few of our legislators that are talking about it.
Speaker 1: And you know, we do have a few of the
Speaker 1: standing up here in Minnesota. We've got at home. He's
Speaker 1: our district a state Senator from District thirteen. He's working
Speaker 1: on the voter to allow to kind of reflect with
Speaker 1: Indiana's doing. And we've got Steve Descous and another state Senator,
Speaker 1: Mike dog and working on some things with you know,
Speaker 1: voter sup Well, I could tell you what else is
Speaker 1: happening in your state? Fox nine in I believe it
Speaker 1: was Minneapolis. I think it was, you know, I'm pretty sure, okay,
Speaker 1: Fox News, Fox nine. And for example, you know that
Speaker 1: Minnesota Freedom Fund that was promoted by Kamala Harris, and
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris tweeted, well, if you're able to chip in
Speaker 1: now to the and then she gave the address of
Speaker 1: the Freedom Fund to help post bail for those protestings
Speaker 1: on the ground to Minnesota. Remember her remarks were made
Speaker 1: after the police precinct burner of the ground and the
Speaker 1: rioting was taking place. And we learned that, you know,
Speaker 1: for example, the organization that bailed out people like a
Speaker 1: guy in the name of Darnick A. Floyd charged with
Speaker 1: second degree murder after allegedly stabbing a friend to death,
Speaker 1: or Christopher Boswell facing charges of sexual assault and kidnapping.
Speaker 1: And the group put up one hundred grand on behalf
Speaker 1: of Floyd and three fifty grand on behalf of Boswell. Um,
Speaker 1: then you got another guy that was arrested. Is all
Speaker 1: on foxnews dot com and I've been researching it and
Speaker 1: I have many more examples well as Kamala Harris at
Speaker 1: all responsible for the money she helped raise that helped
Speaker 1: free people that were involved in the insurrection to go
Speaker 1: out and commit more prompt crimes because it was Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: You and I both know that they would. They would
Speaker 1: blame Donald Trump, wouldn't they They sure would, and she
Speaker 1: should be held accountable for that. And do you know
Speaker 1: that when minneapolists just laid off like a hundred officers
Speaker 1: municipalities in the area to help out, they still haven't
Speaker 1: paid those municipalities and they're hiding too. It's just it's
Speaker 1: upsetting and all of us feel like we were taken
Speaker 1: like fools. And nobody wants to vote because their vote
Speaker 1: won't mean anything. Well, I listen, I totally get it,
Speaker 1: and I totally understand. You know, hr one, they want
Speaker 1: to bake in the changes supposedly and the the guys
Speaker 1: of COVID restrictions right mail in voting. They want now
Speaker 1: to expand this to the largest level possible. They want
Speaker 1: no voter ID whatsoever, They want drop boxes everywhere, they
Speaker 1: want no signature verification. If we go to that system.
Speaker 1: If we go to that system, we will never ever
Speaker 1: ever see a Republican in my view, ever elected president again.
Speaker 1: I mean, it would have to be the perfect storm
Speaker 1: of threading the perfect needle, and that is what that
Speaker 1: is about. Now they forgot the guy they worshiped the most.
Speaker 1: Doctor Anthony Fauci had said, Yeah, no, people can vote
Speaker 1: in person in twenty twenty, as long as they wear
Speaker 1: a mask and are socially distant. That was ignored by
Speaker 1: everybody in the media, mob, big tech, and of course
Speaker 1: the Democrats because and New York Times is no longer
Speaker 1: talking about how mail in balloting lends itself to greater
Speaker 1: fraud potential and other people. All right, thank you, Carmen good.
Speaker 1: Call Caleb Montana. Hi, how are you glad you called?
Speaker 1: I'm good. How are you doing, John? I'm good, sir. Hey.
Speaker 1: I have two points to make, real quick, if I may.
Speaker 1: The first point is the hypocrisy that we know exists,
Speaker 1: but with can you imagine if anybody did what Kathy
Speaker 1: Griffin did, except with Joe Biden, Effagio, Joe Biden, they
Speaker 1: would be called a domestic terrorist, arrested and put into jail.
Speaker 1: And I'm just sick of the hypocrisy. It's terrible. Listen,
Speaker 1: this is what we deal with as conservatives every single
Speaker 1: solitary day. Now, Kathy Griffin was out there yesterday saying
Speaker 1: America's and experiencing a collective trauma as the second impeachment
Speaker 1: trial begins. I mean, look, you have another former FBI
Speaker 1: assistant director, an assistant director, saying large scale program is
Speaker 1: needed to deradicalize political cult members. I'm like, okay, re
Speaker 1: education camps will take the kids away from Trump parents
Speaker 1: and we'll send them to PBS indoctrination school where they
Speaker 1: get to watch PBS all day. That's been said as well. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's terrifying and scary. And I've been thinking what do
Speaker 1: we do as citizens to take back our country? And
Speaker 1: the only thing that I can think to do is
Speaker 1: to educate our children. It starts in the home with
Speaker 1: mom and dad. Parents in stealing values and principles and
Speaker 1: do what like Trump said, to peacefully and patriotically make
Speaker 1: our voices heard. And that's why A buddy and I
Speaker 1: started a podcast to encourage parents to show up and
Speaker 1: do their best. You know, the best thing that we
Speaker 1: can do is we need to be shining examples to
Speaker 1: our kids. If there are gaps in our kids education,
Speaker 1: we need to find ways to help fill the apps.
Speaker 1: You know, if they refuse to teach history, real history
Speaker 1: and they only want a distorted version of history, we
Speaker 1: have to find those ways. Is if we have much time,
Speaker 1: because we're working so hard to pay all of our
Speaker 1: taxes and every other bill that we all have, and
Speaker 1: life and living is hard enough and expensive enough. And
Speaker 1: the next thing you gotta do is you just have
Speaker 1: to have to stay engaged in this process. If you
Speaker 1: go to HR one, which our last caller was talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, the People Act, Okay, it is basically to
Speaker 1: get to the cut to the chase here, cut through
Speaker 1: the clutter introduced in the House of Representatives. They want
Speaker 1: to expand voting rights, change campaign finance laws. They also
Speaker 1: want no voter ID at all whatsoever. It is viewed
Speaker 1: as a comprehensive statement of priorities and it's got everything
Speaker 1: they want. Quote an act to expand America's access to
Speaker 1: the ballot box, no voter ID, no signature verification, nothing
Speaker 1: mail in balloting and perpetuity. And I don't see anything
Speaker 1: addressing chain of custody issues as well, no, you're exactly right,
Speaker 1: And I just want to tell you you're a great
Speaker 1: American and I appreciate what you do, all right. I
Speaker 1: appreciate what you're doing too. We're all in this together.
Speaker 1: We're all spokes on a wheel here, and look, you
Speaker 1: give me this microphone every day. We try to earn it,
Speaker 1: we work hard. You give me that camera every night.
Speaker 1: I can't do it without you. There are enough people
Speaker 1: that want me canceled every single second in my life.
Speaker 1: Alicia Oregon Next Sean Hannity Show, how are you hi?
Speaker 1: Thank you for taking my call. I'm a military veteran
Speaker 1: at twelve years of the US Marine Corps Mountain Portland,
Speaker 1: and I just want the nation to at least hear
Speaker 1: one voice that's not on the left. Over here on
Speaker 1: the West Coast with the supposed blue state, there's a
Speaker 1: lot of upsets. We the people have stepped up and
Speaker 1: we march to the capital because the Democratic Party they
Speaker 1: provoked this. This is a direct response to what it
Speaker 1: is that they're doing. They're theatrical plays of this impeachment
Speaker 1: in the Senate, the election, all of this is a
Speaker 1: direct response to that. If they think that people are okay,
Speaker 1: with this. They're not They're upset. And I just have
Speaker 1: so many people over here on the West Coast that
Speaker 1: are just they don't have a voice. And so I
Speaker 1: do appreciate what you do. I do appreciate that you
Speaker 1: have that voice for everybody. So you give me this voice.
Speaker 1: It's the honor of my life. It is, and I
Speaker 1: will tell you the fight for liberty and freedom never ends.
Speaker 1: And you know, even though it seems like, you know,
Speaker 1: all of these powerful institutions have aligned against us, you know,
Speaker 1: history has a way of correcting itself. The pendulum does swing,
Speaker 1: the ebb and flow of political cycles does happen, and
Speaker 1: hopefully we can begin to right the ship as early
Speaker 1: as twenty twenty two, because the stakes have never been higher.
Speaker 1: You're right, Alicia. Last word, Yes, I just want to
Speaker 1: say that they can't just attribute some of Trump's word
Speaker 1: because he's a political figure and he's going to speak
Speaker 1: in public. They can't just attribute that and say, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, he was being liberal, And they can't clump
Speaker 1: all of US Republicans into one dangerous group. That's absolutely ridiculous.
Speaker 1: Appreciate the call, thanks for being with us. Everybody do
Speaker 1: their part. We're spokes in a wheel. You need every
Speaker 1: spoke to make the wheel go round. And what we're
Speaker 1: doing it for our kids and grandkids. We want a
Speaker 1: better country. All Right, we got a full minute left.
Speaker 1: We're gonna give that minute to Leah in New York. Clea,
Speaker 1: you get it, make great use of it. How are
Speaker 1: you glad you called? Hi? Son, Thanks so much for
Speaker 1: taking my call. Greetings from Miller Place, New York. I'd
Speaker 1: like to say that although we have this impeachment going on,
Speaker 1: and it did go to the trial in the Senate,
Speaker 1: I think that we can use that maybe as a
Speaker 1: platform to finally get the whole truth out there and
Speaker 1: also to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the left. I can
Speaker 1: only hope, though, that President Trump's legal team can do
Speaker 1: an excellent job in presenting all the material that they
Speaker 1: need to well listen, they can. I would advise, in
Speaker 1: the setting, in the place, the moment, that that's not
Speaker 1: the argument to be made. I think we're going to
Speaker 1: use the I think they would use, and I would
Speaker 1: use the constitutional argument as we've discussed. I would discuss
Speaker 1: the developments that we now know that there they were plotting, planning,
Speaker 1: scheming weeks in advance and many people knew about it.
Speaker 1: That's a scandal of itself. And next I would point out,
Speaker 1: well this is the definition now by Democrats of insurrection.
Speaker 1: Well then you're all guilty of insurrection and inciting insurrection.
Speaker 1: And I'd probably leave it there. I wouldn't take more
Speaker 1: than four hours in a defense answer the questions of senators,
Speaker 1: and it's over. Let them vote. All right, quick break,
Speaker 1: we'll come back. Thanks for being with us, and thanks
Speaker 1: for a good call. More of your calls coming up
Speaker 1: in our news round Up Information Overload Hour. Bill O'Reilly's next,
Speaker 1: al Right, News Roundup Information Overload Hour. Hang on, I
Speaker 1: hear it the sound of Leonard skinnerd simple man. That
Speaker 1: can only mean one thing on this program, and that
Speaker 1: means all things, Bill O'Reilly, Bill O'Reilly dot com. He
Speaker 1: claims to be a simple man. We have a slight disagreement.
Speaker 1: I think he's a complicated guy that thinks he's simple,
Speaker 1: which makes him even more complicated. A bit of a paradox,
Speaker 1: mister O'Reilly, sir, how are you? I'm still battling with
Speaker 1: the dog who won't go out in the snow. No, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: We're not going back to snow shoveling after las week's
Speaker 1: a mitigated disaster, and darned dog of mine won't go
Speaker 1: to the bathroom. I took that right out loud. Listen
Speaker 1: to me, oh man, all right, well you love you?
Speaker 1: What kind of dog is it to Cordy Holly the
Speaker 1: terra dog and dog if I have food anyway? All right,
Speaker 1: So we got the impeachment shift show charade, as I
Speaker 1: call it, going on in DC. We know it's a
Speaker 1: predetermined outcome. Um, I'm watching. I can't really watch much, Bill,
Speaker 1: I can't and I'm lucky I have a big staff
Speaker 1: on radio and TV, and we kind of we say, Okay,
Speaker 1: you have to watch this hour. You have to watch
Speaker 1: this hour. You have to watch this hour. Take copious notes,
Speaker 1: and then we'll we'll we'll inform our audience as best
Speaker 1: we can, because it would be torture to watch this
Speaker 1: thing the whole time. Now. A lot of editing, cutting,
Speaker 1: slicing and dicing going on. And I have been making
Speaker 1: a big deal I'm do in TV pointing out the
Speaker 1: insurrectionists incitement language as defined by liberal democrats in the media.
Speaker 1: Of these prominent democrats, we have been pointing out fight
Speaker 1: like hell. Every single Democrat, every politician at some point
Speaker 1: says we gotta fight. Is if I'm good at fighting?
Speaker 1: You know all of that. The hypocrisy rank hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Speaker 1: And your thoughts are, well, I'm doing what Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is doing. I'm not watching the impeaching stuff. I have
Speaker 1: a much smaller staff than you, but they have the
Speaker 1: same assignment. So full of comic ahead, just tell me
Speaker 1: if there's anything I should know. And you know, this
Speaker 1: will all be over by Monday and then everybody will resume.
Speaker 1: But there are a couple of interesting wrinkles that I
Speaker 1: don't know whether you've talked about. Number One, USA Today
Speaker 1: runs an article, and USA Say is a very avowed
Speaker 1: left wing newspaper out of the Geneche, and the article
Speaker 1: is about people who have been charged themselves breaking into
Speaker 1: the Capitol, and they paraded out a few lawyers and say,
Speaker 1: oh no, our defense is going to be Trump made
Speaker 1: them do it. So Trump made these people violate federal law.
Speaker 1: I mean that in itself can be used as the
Speaker 1: defense for President Trump. It's so insane. Nobody makes anybody
Speaker 1: commit a crime unless you know you're threatening them with
Speaker 1: a weapon. So that was in USA today. Then the
Speaker 1: Fulton County, Georgia DA far far left, Fanny, somebody I
Speaker 1: figured in the last name. He's going to investigate President
Speaker 1: Trump on criminal charges because Trump made a phone call
Speaker 1: it said, Hey, I think I got jobbed in Georgia.
Speaker 1: I think it was a fraud, and I want you
Speaker 1: guys to look into it. And then in artfully, the
Speaker 1: president said in find eleven thousand votes. Okay, we all
Speaker 1: know what he was talking about. Well, no, no, in context,
Speaker 1: because I've listened to the whole thing. Well, I've read
Speaker 1: the entire transcript. In context, the President kept saying over
Speaker 1: and over again in that call, we won by hundreds
Speaker 1: of thousands, that's right, he get. He kept purporting that
Speaker 1: he had won the state handily and they needed to
Speaker 1: get that investigation up and running and prove it. So.
Speaker 1: But just before I came on with you, I was
Speaker 1: listening to CBS Radio's Hourly Update, and they're making a
Speaker 1: big deal out of this Georgia thing, this Faulton County thing,
Speaker 1: and everyone knows this is a pure political play by
Speaker 1: the DA. The guy in Manhattan close to where we
Speaker 1: live does it all the time. I'm going to arrest
Speaker 1: Steve Bannon. Yeah, I don't care if he's pardoner, right,
Speaker 1: and then the court in New York says, um, no,
Speaker 1: you can't do that. CBS News knows this, they know
Speaker 1: it's it's just some flaming left wing da down and
Speaker 1: Georgia trying it makes a name for herself, but they
Speaker 1: don't ever put anything into perspective ever. So the casual
Speaker 1: American just picks this stuff up on television and radio
Speaker 1: is so deluded at this point. And what the reality
Speaker 1: of the situation is that it's really worrisome that now
Speaker 1: we live in a country that depends upon free flow
Speaker 1: of information and you can't get that anymore. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's really frightening. It's very Bill. These are frightening times.
Speaker 1: So this is simple and there's going to be a
Speaker 1: lot of noise. And the Georgia call it nothing to
Speaker 1: do with the charge of impeachment, and all it is is,
Speaker 1: let's bludge in Trump over a possible issue. Well, they
Speaker 1: got they got sixteen hours to fill Bill and they
Speaker 1: don't have sixteen hours worth of material here, so they've
Speaker 1: got to make it up as they go along. But
Speaker 1: there there's three things that just remain the same. That
Speaker 1: is the constitutional argument, including whether they would even have jurisdiction,
Speaker 1: which they do not have according to the people I
Speaker 1: respect at our constitutional attorneys. Now all the new evidence,
Speaker 1: and I'm having a great time playing the liberal media
Speaker 1: say we now have evidence the FBI, says cogress Woman
Speaker 1: Accio Cortez says, court documents say, yeah, it was all
Speaker 1: pre planned. People plotted, planned, schemed, orchestrated this attack. Well
Speaker 1: that the gates the entire incitement to insurrection based on
Speaker 1: the words a Trump argument and the last thing. And
Speaker 1: it also tells you why you don't have snap impeachments.
Speaker 1: And then you use the left's insurrectionist language themselves, and
Speaker 1: if you've applied the same standards, pretty much all these
Speaker 1: leaders get impeached. Well, now, impeachments a joke, you know,
Speaker 1: it's it's lost its constitutional authority. I think you'd agree
Speaker 1: with that, right, Oh yeah, absolutely So as a historian,
Speaker 1: I'm saying, well, we just lost a major correction that
Speaker 1: the Constitution had the founding fathers put in. It's gone.
Speaker 1: So we had two impeachments Andrew Johnson, Bill Clinton, and
Speaker 1: now we have two under Trump that both were trumped up,
Speaker 1: pardon upun and everybody knows that this is a political play.
Speaker 1: It's not. It is not a crime anywhere all right,
Speaker 1: in civil court, criminal court, or impeachment court. It is
Speaker 1: not a crime to hold an opinion as the President did,
Speaker 1: that the election was not fair. That's not a crime.
Speaker 1: And it's not a crime to rally his supporters and say,
Speaker 1: please let your beliefs be known to Congress. Those are
Speaker 1: not crimes. And that's what this is. That's exactly what
Speaker 1: this is. Now. I wrote a book on Trump, United States,
Speaker 1: a Trump and I said clearly in the book, one
Speaker 1: of the weaknesses of Donald Trump, and you know this
Speaker 1: better than anyone, Hannity, is that he doesn't think out
Speaker 1: what he said, as he just says whatever he wants,
Speaker 1: doesn't think out the consequences many many times. But that's
Speaker 1: not a crime either. And so all of this is
Speaker 1: wasting the country's time. Overseas, they're mocking us. What kind
Speaker 1: of US country is this? And um, I'm you know,
Speaker 1: I'm saying I think we'll make a comeback, but right
Speaker 1: now the toughest then we get into the whole policy
Speaker 1: aspect of all of this. And and you know, I'm
Speaker 1: watching all this and you see that you and I
Speaker 1: know TV, right, Bill, O'Reilly is you know you're genius
Speaker 1: on television and you've done it your whole life, and
Speaker 1: we know how you can edit anything. I was seeing
Speaker 1: the Democrats edit and I think you tweeted about this
Speaker 1: today if I remember correctly, um their videos to conveniently
Speaker 1: exclude and I did this last night on TV as well,
Speaker 1: the President's call. Many of you will now peacefully, patriotically
Speaker 1: march to the so voices can be heard. That would
Speaker 1: be an important part of of the narrative, don't you think? Well,
Speaker 1: but that's that's the whole farce. I call this impeachment
Speaker 1: to the fiasco. Anyone, anyone, whether you're far left or
Speaker 1: far right, or in the middle, whatever you are, does
Speaker 1: anyone think there is a modicum of fairness in any
Speaker 1: of this? Bill, We know the answer. The answer is no, now,
Speaker 1: I think, But now this phrase is a question that
Speaker 1: I want your take on because I'm torn. Originally, I'm
Speaker 1: like the looks and we've got we've got to get
Speaker 1: vaccines and people's arms. Uh. By the way, your numbers
Speaker 1: should be coming up soon. You're much older than me
Speaker 1: did your number come up yet, Um, I have one
Speaker 1: Moderna in my body. Cannady, you do one, one Moderna.
Speaker 1: It's maderna when you get whatever it is. Some lady
Speaker 1: came up and stabbed me and said, what do you
Speaker 1: mean they didn't come and stab you? You got a
Speaker 1: shot for crying out loud. You sound like a little
Speaker 1: kid going to the doctor for the first time that
Speaker 1: the man stabbed me. Come on, I was, I gotta
Speaker 1: go one more and uh but I'm still gonna wear
Speaker 1: eighteen masks or whatever. It's twenty two now, all right,
Speaker 1: so now I forgot what? Oh so the Democrats, you
Speaker 1: know they're now they're going to distract the country. There's
Speaker 1: a part of me that actually says, you know what,
Speaker 1: I think I might want witnesses. Now now I know
Speaker 1: this would drag well, no, no, no, no, no no.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you why. Because the country needs to see,
Speaker 1: in all its splendor and all its glory, how absolutely
Speaker 1: sick and and what what swamp sewer creatures exist in
Speaker 1: their nation's capital, and watch it. To watch it. Everybody
Speaker 1: knows that this is a fiasco. Let's just get it
Speaker 1: over with. You know, I'll tell you one thing. Hanny
Speaker 1: You're really lucky because you're gonna have me on next Wednesday.
Speaker 1: You know why you're lucky. Why, let me say, in
Speaker 1: the name of the Father, and of the Son and
Speaker 1: of the Holy Spirit, right, you should be on your knees.
Speaker 1: You a Wednesday, and the Biden town hall is Tuesday night.
Speaker 1: That's true that town Let me let me let me
Speaker 1: tell you what I figured out they do with Joe. Now,
Speaker 1: watch the days leading up to the Tuesday night town hall.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna see Joe a lot. And what I
Speaker 1: what I believe is that he gets just like before
Speaker 1: the debates, they super rest him up and they kind
Speaker 1: of shift the highest alertness hour of his day to
Speaker 1: whatever time he has some big challenge. Now, did you
Speaker 1: see last week when he's talking about the vaccine and
Speaker 1: he says, oh, yeah, we're gonna go from four hundred
Speaker 1: and fifty million to six hundred millionvaccines, and three hundred
Speaker 1: Americans by the summer will be we'll have the vaccine. Okay,
Speaker 1: you could say he missed spoke once in the same speech,
Speaker 1: he goes and let me repeat, three hundred Americans will
Speaker 1: be vaccinated. Yeah, I know. Look, I don't think Joe
Speaker 1: knows as a town hall. I think they just told him.
Speaker 1: He's gonna tell him the day of Yeah, he doesn't know.
Speaker 1: He's miss Preside going to Wisconsin to tour cheese factory
Speaker 1: and maybe Anderson Cooper will be there. But you know
Speaker 1: it's amusing. Um heard what Anderson said, right? You know
Speaker 1: he compared the Capitol riot to Rwandan genocide. Yeah, okay, Um.
Speaker 1: CNN puts out a thing today and says, okay, I
Speaker 1: want we want people to submit questions to us, and
Speaker 1: if if we like your question, then you can appear. Well,
Speaker 1: that means the Biden campaign's gonna have all the questions
Speaker 1: in advance, of course. Well, yeah, how about how about
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly submits a question. Sean Hannity submits a question.
Speaker 1: Wouldn't that be a nice town hall? Oh? That'd be
Speaker 1: great town hall. Y. You know, there's only one question.
Speaker 1: I got only one, mister President, where's a vaccine? Where
Speaker 1: is it? How come we uh we don't have it?
Speaker 1: Or where where is it? Tell me where it? Just
Speaker 1: don't blame Trump and I don't want out your vaccine.
Speaker 1: You know, the New York Times out a calculator. You
Speaker 1: know when i'd be eligible and believe it or not,
Speaker 1: because I'm in the media, I am viewed as essential,
Speaker 1: but I'm not using that category. I don't feel that.
Speaker 1: Don't hold it Annie. The New York Times wrote an
Speaker 1: editorial that they don't want you to get it. Hannity
Speaker 1: doesn't get it. Accuse me of murder. Country gets for you,
Speaker 1: including undocumented immigrants. Everyone gets it, everybody beforehand on well,
Speaker 1: they basically accused me of murder. And this is the
Speaker 1: same paper that said after the travel ban in last year,
Speaker 1: who says it's not safe to travel to China, Like,
Speaker 1: you can't be any dumber than the New York Times.
Speaker 1: But listen, I'm gonna you know what I'm not. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna wait my turn when when my doctor says you're you're, you're,
Speaker 1: you're on this group, you get on the list. I
Speaker 1: get on the list. Until then I'm and I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna suck it up. Bill, I got another minute. Let
Speaker 1: me just give this to you. Yeah, so I see
Speaker 1: people getting pink slips. Peter Doocey did a great job.
Speaker 1: Peter Doocey honed in, what are you gonna do? What
Speaker 1: do you tell the people that got the pink slips
Speaker 1: is now Leonardo DiCaprio and Hollywood leftists now pushing to
Speaker 1: close the Dacota pipeline. Okay, well they have enough money. Good,
Speaker 1: then they got their jobs. Question is they couldn't answer.
Speaker 1: These are high paying jobs one hundred grand and a
Speaker 1: lot more with great benefits, union jobs gone. And they
Speaker 1: couldn't answer when the millions of jobs are going to
Speaker 1: be online that they're promising, like they promised Cylindra. I
Speaker 1: know they have no clue, but I want a windmill
Speaker 1: put in Leo's backyard. If we get just one windmill
Speaker 1: and Leo DiCaprio's backyard, just one, just one, and we'll
Speaker 1: put one of Bill O'Reilly's backyard. You know he will have.
Speaker 1: But you know those windmills kill the birds. That's not good. Bill.
Speaker 1: I like birds, birds of God's creation. All right, O'Riley,
Speaker 1: Bill O'Reilly dot com, all things Bill O'Reilly. Take a
Speaker 1: quick break. We'll come back on the other side and
Speaker 1: your calls. Final half hour Sean Hannity Show continues. If
Speaker 1: I've till the top of the hour, eight hundred and
Speaker 1: nine four one, Shawn, and if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of this extvaganza. Let me go back to
Speaker 1: this whole argument, the whole impeachment shift show, charade, the
Speaker 1: whole thing. What is it predicated on that the comments
Speaker 1: of Donald Trump in the January sixth rally incited people
Speaker 1: to go and then invade the Capitol building. Well, they
Speaker 1: completely the managers negate the main point, which which is
Speaker 1: pretty simple, and that is, many of you will pe peacefully, peacefully,
Speaker 1: peacefully and patriotically march to the Capitol so your voices
Speaker 1: will be heard. Well, he said fight like hell. Well,
Speaker 1: we've played over and over again Democrats and even media
Speaker 1: figures you need to fight, you need to fight harder,
Speaker 1: you need to again, based on their definition, that would
Speaker 1: be inciting insurrection. But now there's a big, big problem
Speaker 1: with their entire snap impeachment, and that is and the
Speaker 1: media is having to report it. Will play the long
Speaker 1: version here of how media now has to admit that
Speaker 1: the Capitol attack was pre planned. Acasio Cortez knew it.
Speaker 1: Apparently the FBI knew it. We now have court documents,
Speaker 1: we have investigators from the FBI, and we have video evidence,
Speaker 1: we have everything in between. Well, it totally dismantles the
Speaker 1: idea that this was a spontaneous incitement of insurrection. Anyway,
Speaker 1: here's your medium mob Democrats, Yeah reporting that whoopsie Daisy,
Speaker 1: Trump couldn't have caused it unless he was part of
Speaker 1: the planning, and nobody's even making that charge. One of
Speaker 1: the big questions for investigators has been whether or not
Speaker 1: whether the people who attacked the capital, whether this was
Speaker 1: just a mob that just got out of control, or
Speaker 1: whether there was planning. And we're learning from people who
Speaker 1: were talking to familiar with the investigation that they're getting
Speaker 1: indications some evidence that they've seen that indicates that there
Speaker 1: was some level of planning. They've noticed from looking at
Speaker 1: surveillance cameras, from looking at some of the weaponry that
Speaker 1: showed up, that there were people who were at the
Speaker 1: ellipse where there was a Trump rally earlier in the day.
Speaker 1: Some people left the scene of that rally early and
Speaker 1: appeared to have gone to retrieve weapons that then turned
Speaker 1: up at the scene of the riot at the Capitol.
Speaker 1: Based on everything the FBI has learned, it was not
Speaker 1: some sort of spontaneous decision by a bunch of quote
Speaker 1: protesters to go up to Capitol Hill and storm Capitol Hill.
Speaker 1: This was all planned out. And now to that chilling
Speaker 1: new report that there was an FBI internal report the
Speaker 1: day before the siege warning of a violent war at
Speaker 1: the capitol. In new reporting that the FBI received a
Speaker 1: very specific warning before the riot. Let's bring in CBS
Speaker 1: as Jeff the Gays, who's been reporting all day, good evening, Jeff,
Speaker 1: or that fea I noticed warned of war at the Capitol,
Speaker 1: but for some reason, security wasn't stepped up there to
Speaker 1: meet the challenge that that attack would post on how
Speaker 1: much of it was planned? How much of this was
Speaker 1: strategized ahead of time? People wandering around exercising their First
Speaker 1: Amendment rights don't bring ropes and ladders and sledgehammers to
Speaker 1: a spontaneous event. This was a planned assault, as if
Speaker 1: one week before the week prior to the insurrection, I
Speaker 1: started to get text messages that I needed to be
Speaker 1: careful and not in particular, I needed to be careful
Speaker 1: about six Oh everybody knew, well, how did Donald Trump's
Speaker 1: wards then on the sixth in cite the insurrection that
Speaker 1: was already pre planned, predetermined, plotting, planning, scheming that went
Speaker 1: into this apparently went on for weeks and apparently everybody
Speaker 1: knew did What steps did these people take to stop it?
Speaker 1: That's the bigger, scarier scenario if you believe in protecting
Speaker 1: our institutions and protecting our elected officials. All right, let's
Speaker 1: get to our phones. Say hi to Bob's in Texas.
Speaker 1: What's up, Bob? How are you glad you called hi?
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me on your show. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 1: There's been a lot of discussion about the constitutional issues here,
Speaker 1: but I'd like to raise one that I haven't seen
Speaker 1: raised before, and that is that many members of Congress
Speaker 1: said that they feared for their life and they ran,
Speaker 1: and they witnessed this crime of the capital being invaded,
Speaker 1: well under two hundred years of a con jurisprudence. This
Speaker 1: disqualifies them to sit on a jury. And the Senate
Speaker 1: should have really all the senators who said that they
Speaker 1: were harmed by this, are you know, now invalidated as
Speaker 1: being jurors in this trial in the sense that you're
Speaker 1: claiming that they're witnesses or that they're aggrieved. I mean,
Speaker 1: I've sat on juries before, and anybody who's a witness
Speaker 1: of the crime or anyone who's aggrieved, they can't sit
Speaker 1: in They can't sit in the jury box, so they
Speaker 1: will all refuse themselves. Okay, that that would be in
Speaker 1: a system that actually cared even the slightest bit about impartiality,
Speaker 1: due process, fundamental fairness. Before we even get to that
Speaker 1: point that you're making, which is a great point and
Speaker 1: probably would be valid in a real court of law,
Speaker 1: not this show trial, this theater that's going on in
Speaker 1: the swamp. You wouldn't have a guide that is presiding
Speaker 1: presiding over these proceedings that has predetermined the guilt of
Speaker 1: the person that now he's presiding over, and that would
Speaker 1: be Patrick Lahey. So it's a kangaroo court if you've
Speaker 1: ever seen one. And the fact that this can even
Speaker 1: happen in this great country, this great constitutional Republic, is
Speaker 1: beyond any comprehension that any any clear thinking, intellectually honest
Speaker 1: American could ever support. Everybody sees right through this. John
Speaker 1: Roberts is not there for a reason because he doesn't
Speaker 1: believe it's constitutional. That's why he's not there. Now, the
Speaker 1: constitution calls for the Chief Justice, he's not gonna do it.
Speaker 1: So we'll replace him with a guy that has already
Speaker 1: said to convict Trump. And we're supposed to buy that.
Speaker 1: I don't think so anyway, Bob Goodpoints Doyle Mabelton, Georgia.
Speaker 1: What's up, Doyle? Thank you for holm glad you joined us.
Speaker 1: Hey man, I've got to do a better jump of
Speaker 1: keeping in touch with you since you left Atlanta. Instead
Speaker 1: of calling you your show every once in a while,
Speaker 1: now I only call it every once in a decade
Speaker 1: or so. Well, by the way, thank you for sticking
Speaker 1: with me. It means a lot. I really appreciate it.
Speaker 1: And uh, it means more than you know. Absolutely. Twenty
Speaker 1: eight years ago. I found you twenty eight years ago,
Speaker 1: and hey, if I can just refresh your memory right
Speaker 1: quick and tell you a little quick story. Um, the
Speaker 1: last time I talked to you, it was actually nine
Speaker 1: years ago, and I told you that I had actually
Speaker 1: gotten into radio myself because it's always what I wanted
Speaker 1: to do. And when I was on the show with you,
Speaker 1: we actually carry your show on our little AM station. Uh,
Speaker 1: well it's at him too now w LBB. You just
Speaker 1: talk we say it again, yes, sir, m And the
Speaker 1: funny story I wanted to tell you is my my manager,
Speaker 1: the fire stay An owner, was actually listening when I
Speaker 1: was on there. He didn't know I had called into
Speaker 1: your show, and he hears me talking to you, and
Speaker 1: he says, he told me later, said you're laughing and
Speaker 1: cutting up with John hannedy like YO are the best
Speaker 1: of friends. And he said, you can imagine my shot
Speaker 1: when I realized, just one of my own boy he's
Speaker 1: talking to Oh, that's funny, that's very funny. You know,
Speaker 1: I was blused. You know what I learned, I'll tell you.
Speaker 1: I learned a lot of lessons in Georgia, and I
Speaker 1: had four wonderful years there. I have in my office
Speaker 1: a year and addition of the Atlanta Journal Constitution, right,
Speaker 1: and in it it says nineteen ninety six was a
Speaker 1: great year. But for two reasons. The Olympics came and
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity'd left, and I left to go to, you know,
Speaker 1: a startup news channel nobody had ever heard of, called
Speaker 1: Fox News. And by the way, I can't tell you
Speaker 1: how many people told me you're an idiot for doing this,
Speaker 1: And I said, okay, well I'm an idiot, you know
Speaker 1: whenever I got to lose right and I you know,
Speaker 1: and ended up being a Now I have no idea
Speaker 1: how it was possible twenty five year journey, and I
Speaker 1: feel honored, I feel blessed. I'm very appreciative, humbled even
Speaker 1: And but I will tell you I love my time
Speaker 1: in Atlanta and I've learned some big lessons there. Learn
Speaker 1: the Richard Jewel lesson there. Tell you another story. And
Speaker 1: I don't know if you heard this show. There was
Speaker 1: a time that a guy, a regular caller, called in
Speaker 1: and said, I just wanted to call and say one
Speaker 1: last goodbye. I'm checking out. And I'm like, okay, what
Speaker 1: are you're moving? What are you you know, what's going
Speaker 1: on where you're going. I hate to lose listeners. I
Speaker 1: don't want to lose one listener, right, I don't want
Speaker 1: to lose one viewer. And he said, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: I'm checking out. Long story short. My program director picked
Speaker 1: up before I did. He's like, keep this guy on
Speaker 1: the line, blow every break, keep him on the line.
Speaker 1: Try and get the location, Try and get the location,
Speaker 1: Try and get the location. And we just we were talking,
Speaker 1: and you know, I was talking about let's talk about
Speaker 1: your family, Let's talk what are the things in life
Speaker 1: you love? If you made a list of all the
Speaker 1: good things in your life and you made a list
Speaker 1: all the crap in your life, which which things? You know? Look,
Speaker 1: look we got to balance it. What do you love
Speaker 1: more than anything? Do you have kids? Yes? Do you have?
Speaker 1: You know? Do you do you love sunshine? Do you
Speaker 1: love a beautiful sunset? The love of a sport? Do
Speaker 1: you love watching sports? Do you like uh, Georgia football,
Speaker 1: whatever you happen to love? Right? And you know, I
Speaker 1: kept him a line, just said, please tell me where
Speaker 1: you are. He said he had taken a bottle of pills,
Speaker 1: and he said he had drank like a you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know the measurement. Not I
Speaker 1: guess a quarter of vodka something like something like that.
Speaker 1: It's a long time ago. And and if I said,
Speaker 1: please tell me where you are, just tell me people.
Speaker 1: We're gonna send help. We want you to stay around.
Speaker 1: I need listeners. I can't lose the listener. You're a
Speaker 1: great guy. I love you. Okay, gives the location, and
Speaker 1: within thirty seconds, like a hundred cars and an ambulance
Speaker 1: descended at that location. And I realized then, I'm like, holy,
Speaker 1: you know wow, that that's that That kind of blew
Speaker 1: me away, But it taught me a lesson. About responsibility.
Speaker 1: Richard jule Ta taught me don't rush to judgment. Um.
Speaker 1: You know my buddy Neil Barts. Remember you listen to Neil.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah, matter of fact, he said he ran you
Speaker 1: out of town when he left. He says that to me,
Speaker 1: I ran your ass out of town. I'm like, well,
Speaker 1: I'm the only one that ever beat you in and
Speaker 1: even a single rating book in your in your incredible career. Um.
Speaker 1: And anyway, but we were still friends by that. He
Speaker 1: tells me all the time, and he sends me pictures
Speaker 1: of all these beautiful places he is with the Boarts bus, right,
Speaker 1: and he just to drive me nuts because he knows
Speaker 1: I'm working my tail off and just to say, oh,
Speaker 1: retirement's great. I'm like, I hate you, um so, but
Speaker 1: Neil anyway, Neil was just a great talk show host.
Speaker 1: And you know Neil Neil was you know, he's very gifted,
Speaker 1: very talented. And Neil once said to me, after nine
Speaker 1: to eleven, he goes, you know, I used to think
Speaker 1: you were too serious. He used to think, you know,
Speaker 1: this is all well, this is all BS what we do.
Speaker 1: And after nine to eleven, after a period of time,
Speaker 1: we were just hanging out one day and he said,
Speaker 1: I don't believe that anymore. What we what we're doing
Speaker 1: is important, and it was it was interesting because he
Speaker 1: changed and I said, yeah, I said, Neil, the country.
Speaker 1: There's not a lot of us that believe this and
Speaker 1: not even have a voice to say this. And that's
Speaker 1: why this deep platforming, the cancel culture is so dangerous
Speaker 1: because they want to cancel anybody that has alternative use.
Speaker 1: That's why they're after me and a couple of us
Speaker 1: on Fox too. Right, I'll give you the last work. Yeah,
Speaker 1: oh uh god, I could. I could talk for hours
Speaker 1: just talking about memories and different things, but I'll just
Speaker 1: tell you this. You know, you talk about going to
Speaker 1: Fox News and all that what you've done is spectacular.
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean to think that, you know, I
Speaker 1: used to h you know, call your show and came
Speaker 1: to the some of the events that you went to.
Speaker 1: You remember the right wing being with Paul Shanklin, the
Speaker 1: right wing wing thing we called it, Yes, I did, um.
Speaker 1: I came to that And to think that, you know,
Speaker 1: this guy that was just in Atlanta, you know when
Speaker 1: I met and you know, you're always nice and cool
Speaker 1: and you're welcoming to think that you know, all these
Speaker 1: years later, you know you're on you know, hundreds of
Speaker 1: radio stations and on television. I mean, it just shows.
Speaker 1: It goes to show you can you can go from
Speaker 1: nowhere to everywhere if you just you know, pursue it. Listen.
Speaker 1: You know, look, my life is I never expected any
Speaker 1: of this, Linda. How many stations are we on now?
Speaker 1: I don't even know. Um. You you keep bigger track
Speaker 1: of that than I do. Um oh, I know it's
Speaker 1: over six hundred. That means Linda's not paying attention. She's
Speaker 1: she's distracted. I'm looking at her, she's not even paying
Speaker 1: any I'm sorry, I'm sorry. How many stations are we on?
Speaker 1: We're on over six hundred, close to seven hundred now,
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, I didn't even know that. All right.
Speaker 1: So my point is, and I Doyle, I want you
Speaker 1: to know something. And I feel like blessed beyond anything
Speaker 1: I deserve. I'm humbled by it. I'm appreciative beyond what
Speaker 1: I could words can express. I take my job seriously.
Speaker 1: I don't take myself seriously. I get hit a lot.
Speaker 1: I'm hit almost every day, and I don't care because
Speaker 1: people like you, for all these years have given me
Speaker 1: an opportunity to say things that others won't say, to
Speaker 1: investigate things they won't investigate, and fight for values that
Speaker 1: we all share. And I can't thank you for your
Speaker 1: support all these years. Don Lake, Ronkonkoma, Joe and Elija
Speaker 1: another another listener in Georgia. But I'm very blessed. All right,
Speaker 1: my friend, listen, God bless you and keep calling. Don't
Speaker 1: make it every ten years. I may not be here
Speaker 1: in ten years, eight hundred nine for one Sean, if
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: everybody thought I was nuts when I came up here
Speaker 1: and went to Fox. They just thought it was crazy. Nobody.
Speaker 1: Fox wasn't on the air yet. What's Fox? Fox News?
Speaker 1: What's that anyway? Yes? People know? Now, all right, that's
Speaker 1: gonna wrap things up for tonight. All right, full complete
Speaker 1: coverage news you won't get from the mob, Mark Levin,
Speaker 1: Senator Graham, Judge Pierro, Greg Jared, Jim Jordan. He'll join us,
Speaker 1: Herschel Walker and Leo Terrell two point zero. Say your
Speaker 1: DVR Hannity nine Eastern on Fox. We'll see you then.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being with us as always and back here tomorrow,