WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - September 19th, 2025

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:13.000
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business, finance

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, welcome to the Bloomberg Business Wee Weekend Podcast.

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We are coming off a FED meeting that played out

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>as many investors expected, with FED officials lowering their benchmark

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>interest rate by a quarter percentage point and penciling in

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 1>two more rate reductions this year. Policymakers pointed to growing

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>signs of weakness in the labor market, while also acknowledging

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that inflation has quote moved up and remained somewhat elevated.

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>End quote. For the latest on that FED decision and

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>all the analysis that we did here at Bloomberg and

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>post market action, head to the Bloomberg or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 3>Also happening this week, President Trump's second state visit as

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 3>president to the UK, bringing along with him the CEOs

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 3>of Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft, among many others, to an

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>ounce deals and spend tens of billions of dollars on

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 3>tech infrastructure in the UK.

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>We meantime, focused on the data center build out and

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>spend in the United States. We did that with the

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>CEO of the seventy seven billion dollar market cap reate Equinis.

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Plus the CMBs pioneer who's thrown his hat into the

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 3>California governor's race.

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>All that to come, we begin with a big story

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>in the chip world, and Vidia agreed to invest five

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in Intel and said the two will co

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>develop chips for PCs and data centers, a surprise move

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to help prop up an ailing arch rival that sent

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Intel shares soaring on the news.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:51.919
<v Speaker 3>For more on this, we were joined by Chris Miller,

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>professor at the Fletcher School at Tufts University. He's also

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 3>non resident Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and

0:01:58.360 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 3>advises businesses and more at the consultancy Green Mantle. He

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 3>of course, also is the author of the book Chipwar,

0:02:05.120 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology.

0:02:08.080 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 4>I think from the perspective of ten years ago, this

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 4>would have been a pretty surprising pair up, but today

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 4>there's a real logic for it. In Vidia is a

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 4>leader in AI chips. Intel has been trying to catch

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 4>up when it comes to AI. But also Intel's got

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 4>a lot of unique know how when it comes to

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 4>building processor chips, which AI servers still require. So certainly

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 4>on the chip design side, there's differing areas of expertise

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 4>that both of these companies can bring together, all.

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Right, but just all of it together. The US taking

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that ten percent, approximately ten percent stake in Intel over

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>this summer, You've got SoftBank, there are two billion dollar

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>investment now in Nvidia. What is this? I mean, is

0:02:49.400 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>this what you thought would happened need to happen to

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>ensure us remain a dominant player in the semi space.

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we're going to need to wait and

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 4>see what implication this announcement has, if any, for Intel's

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing business. I think there's no doubt that Intel's going

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.080
<v Speaker 4>to be an important chip designer in the future, perhaps

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 4>smaller than it used to be, but they've got a

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 4>unique position in the market on the chip design side.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 4>But from a national perspective, what really matters is Intel's

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:20.040
<v Speaker 4>manufacturing arm and that's where Intel has really struggled the

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:22.679
<v Speaker 4>last couple of years to stay at the cutting edge

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:26.799
<v Speaker 4>technologically and also to win customers away from TSMC, the

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Taiwanese market rival, and today in Vidia produces almost all

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 4>of its most advanced ships with TSMC. There's been a

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 4>big push from Washington to get companies like in Nvidia

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 4>to diversify their supply and to try to help Intel

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 4>become a more successful manufacturer of chips for other companies.

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 4>The announcement doesn't really say anything about that, but I

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 4>think a lot of people will ask whether this is

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 4>a stepping stone for other US companies in video or

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 4>some of its peers to bring more of their manufacturing

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 4>business to Intel's manufacturing arm.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So tip war it is on? Or where are we?

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Is it the beginning of the chip war? And I'm

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just curious, are you starting to think about I don't know,

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>another book and where it goes from here? Give us

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>your thought here?

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Why I think we're in the thick of the chip

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 4>war right now? Next to this news about in Nvidia

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 4>and Intel, there's a big debate going on in Beijing

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 4>and in Washington about which company should be allowed to

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 4>buy which type of the AI accelerators that Nvidia specializes

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 4>in designing that are almost exclusively today produced in Taiwan.

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 4>And so you've got these competitive commercial dynamics intersecting with

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 4>high geopolitics, and today you can't really separate the chip

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 4>industry from the decisions of President Trump or from Chairman

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>she Well.

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 3>That's a really good point and kind of brings me

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 3>to my question about Intel specifically in the US taking

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 3>this unprecedented stake in this chip maker earlier this year.

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.480
<v Speaker 3>What did you think of that, Chris.

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the US has been pretty clear in

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 4>its desire, going all the way back to the first

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration through the Bide administration, as well as both

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 4>houses at Congress, both parties that it sees Intel's success

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:15.119
<v Speaker 4>in manufacturing as important for US national security. Right now,

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.839
<v Speaker 4>most of the world's advanced processor chips are produced by

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 4>one company in one country, Taiwan, and the US wants

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 4>a more diversified base of manufacturing these ultra critical chips

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 4>that are key both for smartphones and computers, but especially

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 4>for ai and Intel is one of the three companies

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 4>in the world, alongside Samsung and TSMC, that can produce

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 4>these cutting edge chips, and it's the only US company,

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 4>the only company with a major US footprint, at least

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 4>right now. And so that's why the US government has

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 4>been trying to find ways to help Intel out. So

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 4>what wouldations get going?

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, what would it take for Intel to be able

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>to compete with TSMC? I mean it got money from

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the US government. It got money. It's getting money from

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Intel here. As Carol always says, the devil's in the details.

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>And you said, we need to see exactly where this

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 3>money goes. But what do we need to see to say, Okay,

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 3>this company, this US company, is now competing with TSMC.

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 4>So there's no doubt that Intel needs money, and it's

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 4>raised some money from soft Bank and the US government,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 4>But the key thing that it needs is customers for

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 4>its advanced manufacturing processes. You'd only prove whether or not

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 4>they work if you've got at least medium sized, but

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 4>ideally large scale customers that are going to let you

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 4>produce thousands, tens of thousands, eventually millions of chips on

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 4>your manufacturing process. You can't scale up without customers, and

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 4>right now, Intel's got a couple of smaller customers for

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 4>its manufacturing business, but it's thus far failed to win

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 4>a very large scale customer, and Nvidia's one example of

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 4>a company. There are others that could provide a really

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 4>large contract that would let Intel test out its cutting

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 4>edge manufacturing. And right now I think the entire ecosystem

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 4>is waiting to see will it win some big customers

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 4>that lets it complete that scale out and testing of

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 4>its cutting edge manufacturing.

0:06:57.800 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we're talking abou Chris Miiler, professor of

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.119
<v Speaker 1>International History at the Fletcher School at Tufts University, author

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of Chip War, The Fight for the World's Most Critical Technology. Hey, Chris,

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one thing I want to ask you, and I want

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to go back to China. There was a story I

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>was reading by our Javi R. Bloss an opinion police piece,

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and was asking why is China stockpiling so much surp

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 1>plus oil? And one of there were like five or

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>six different reasons, and one of it was does China

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>fear an interruption and supply beyond US and European sanctions?

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Oil traders who traffic and intrigue at are only one

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>word Taiwan. Do you believe that there is a strong

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>possibility that there will be a conflict involving Taiwan? And

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean for TSMC, who is so crucial

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the global chip supply chain, what could

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that potentially mean for the United States the global economy?

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can you play that out and what the

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>likelihood is?

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's no doubt it's a possibility. Nobody knows for

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 4>certain what the likelihood is. But I think the magnitude

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 4>of impact is so large that even if you think

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 4>it's only five or ten percent likely, you've got to

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 4>take steps to prepare. All of the biggest, most valuable

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 4>companies in the United States require silicon that today can

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 4>in some cases only be sourced from Taiwan. That's true

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 4>for Nvidia, Troop, for Apple Group, for Google Trooper, Microsoft Proof,

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 4>for Meta. The entire US tech ecosystem relies on Taiwan's expertise.

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 4>And that's why there's been this push for the last

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.559
<v Speaker 4>couple of years to find ways to diversify the US

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 4>from being so centrally exposed to China's decisions about war

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 4>and peace and the Taiwan Straits.

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reality is that the US is still very,

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>very exposed, correct because of how much TSMC still produces.

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 4>That's right. I think the US has made a bit

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 4>of progress, but there's still a long way to go.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 4>And it's a long way to go because TSMC is

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 4>an extraordinarily capable company and the entire Taiwan's ecosystem is

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 4>just so central to producing the semiconductor hardware that our

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 4>tech firms and aifirms beend on.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 3>What do you think of the politics of this and

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 3>the fact that TSMC, you know, has this facility in

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Arizona and is working to increase its presence here in

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 3>the United States, does it put that at risk?

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't think so. I think TSMC has got

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 4>a strong signal from its customers that they want US

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 4>space production. Its uncertainty created by the tariffs that incentivizes

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 4>more investment in the United States, and it's got a

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 4>signal from the US government again across multiple administrations both parties,

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 4>that they're going to keep pushing for a bigger US footprint.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 4>But I think the challenge that TSMC faces is twofold. First,

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 4>all of its keyr and D remains in Taiwan and

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 4>will be in Taiwan as far as we can see

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 4>in the future. So Arizona is helpful and diversifying today's manufacturing,

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 4>but it doesn't really get you diversification of the next generation.

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 4>The second thing is that the ecosystem in Arizona is

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 4>still less developed than it is in Taiwan, and so

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>sourcing the gases and the materials and all the spare

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 4>parts and specialized equipment you need for a cutting edge

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 4>chip plant, it's still harder and more expensive in Arizona

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:09.600
<v Speaker 4>than in Taiwan. And that's going to be the case

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 4>for some time until we keep building out the scale

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 4>of Arizona. And all of that means that Taiwan's going

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>to stay very, very important were our techie ecosystem for

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 4>many years to come.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Chris really quickly thirty seconds here, I mean, was President

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump wright in his increasing tensions on China. It started

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>in his first term and wrapped up in the second.

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Was he right, especially when you think about semiconductors, and

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>just quickly if you could.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the key driver of tensions in this

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 4>sector is actually China's desire to become self sufficient. We

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 4>were in a pretty stable gulibrium in twenty fifteen before

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 4>the Made in China twenty twenty five plan was released.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.120
<v Speaker 4>That happened before any of the US policies to support

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 4>its own chip industry, and that was really the catalyst

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 4>for introducing geopolitical tension as a central facet in the

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 4>chip industry.

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, So glad we could get some time with you,

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So relevant as always, Chris Miller, author of Chip War

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and professor of international history at the Fletcher School at

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Tufts University.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily podcast. Catch us

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube. Hey.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Over the summer, one of the things that caught our

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>attention Bloomberg News reporting the world's largest technology companies that

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking Microsoft, Amazon, Google, all of them planning to

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>spend billions of dollars more than three hundred and forty

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars on capital expenditures, with much of it

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>tim going to data centers for AI models.

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 3>According to Bloomberg intelligence analyst Amandy saying, companies have quote

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 3>basically tripled capex investment in cloud due to AI, with

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 3>executives emphasizing they need to invest quickly to get ahead.

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 3>Our next guests is helping those hyper scalers scale up

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to AI with a in studio as

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 3>a dere Fox Martin presidency of Equinix, the nearly seventy

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 3>six billion dollar market cap data center readA trades under

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 3>ticker EQIX down so far this year about eighteen percent.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 5>Dear, welcome, good to see.

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 6>You, Thank you so much, Thank you for having me.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you.

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 5>So, how's business?

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 6>Business is very good?

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 5>Like the best you've seen it.

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 6>Like we're in the middle of a very strong cyclical

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 6>demand cycle for you know, the products and services that

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 6>we offer.

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 3>When you say we're in the middle, help us understand

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 3>how long that means of a runway there is to

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 3>go here?

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 6>Sure? You know, at Equinos we see a very significant

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 6>trend from the training of models in the AI economy

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 6>that you refer to in your opening there with the hyperscalters,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 6>to the deployment of those models in enterprise systems, and

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 6>that deployment is called imprints. And we see that opportunity

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 6>as potentially double the size of the training opportunity. And

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 6>at our company, we feel we we're built for this moment.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Has that happened faster than everybody anticipated? Because I do

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>feel like the converse. Although we've been talking about AI

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of now almost two and a half years, well or

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>well into two and a half years, but we are

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>now increasingly talking about all this stuff starting to be

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>put to work.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 6>Right, you can certainly seek organizations. We have ten thousand

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 6>customers across the world moving from proof of concepts into

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 6>production systems and applications of the technology.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I think we're curious about is,

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>as you know that the news flow is fast and

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>furious from the White House and out of Washington, and

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 1>there have been some announcements out of Trump administration about

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>AI infrastructure initiatives specifically, So I'm curious, a dare have

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you seen any impact of that on your existing properties

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>leasing effort? And I'm curious how you compete with how

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>does that kind of compete their program with your own

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>development program.

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 6>Look, we very much welcome the focus that the current

0:13:48.120 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 6>administration has on data centers and the importance and the

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 6>recognition of data centers and their important role in the

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 6>infrastructure of any economy. And we certainly are looking at,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, some of the the properties that have been

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 6>you know, identified as potential for RFPs, and we would

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 6>choose based on locations that would be a creative to

0:14:09.360 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 6>our business because we're very focused in cities, in metro

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 6>areas close to where humans are who will use this technology.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you getting pushed back from cities and humans who

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily want.

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 6>Those data is interesting, not hugely. I mean, we're very

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 6>conscious of the role that we play and you know,

0:14:27.320 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 6>the role that we play with communities where we have

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 6>data centers, and we're very considered about our approach there.

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 3>What makes a good location for a data center because

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't actually apart from the construction, it doesn't actually

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 3>involve that many people to keep it up and running

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 3>relative to the amount of money that's spent on it

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and what actually happens in there.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's really interesting because I think you know, when

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 6>you think about the operations of a data center, you

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 6>tend in your mind to go immediately to technicians and technology,

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 6>but actually there's a whole series of unsung heroes in

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:01.239
<v Speaker 6>the operation of a data center, which are the craftsmen

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 6>and the tradesmen and women, you know, the plumbers, the electricians,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 6>the engineers who basically keep the Internet up and running,

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, through this data center infrastructure.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>So difficulties in finding those workers. We've done some reporting

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>about that that there's you know, okay, yay, great the

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.520
<v Speaker 1>spend and the build, but there's not enough workers to diet.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 6>So I think, you know, the constraints that the industry

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 6>are facing, or you know, are around energy and power,

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 6>around skilled workforce, and then into the supply chain for

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 6>the equipment. That's that's part and parcel of a data center.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's structuring the build that you guys are trying

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to do and meet the demand.

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 6>It is something that you have to actively manage as

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 6>you are looking to build. You know, for example, in

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 6>our case, around some of our supply chain portfolio, we've

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 6>pre purchased in order to ensure that we can have

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 6>the delivery dates that we need to bring capacity online.

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 3>We talked about the three hundred and forty four billion

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>dollars that some of the world's largest tech companies are

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 3>planning to spend. When it comes to CAPEX, it's like

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the thing we look for now quarterly when a company

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 3>reports results, how much of hyperscalers Capex budgets actually flow

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 3>through your company.

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 6>We have a very significant approach on a part of

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 6>the data center industry that we call co location because

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.239
<v Speaker 6>not all data centers are the same, and so colocation

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 6>is where enterprise customers businesses sixty percent of the Fortune

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 6>five hundred for instance, would locate their workloads or their

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 6>machinery with us and the inner shared facility. We have

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 6>a JV structure that works with the hyperscalers to build

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 6>to suit for the hyperscalers, and so that's how we

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 6>service the Hyperscaler opportunity and maintain that very important partnership

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 6>that we have with I mean, I guess we're.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Trying to figure out your exposure. I think your top

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ten customers represent about sixteen percent of monthly recurring revenue,

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>so your exposure to the hyperscalers is pretty big, right idea?

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it manageable?

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 6>It's manageable. You know, the hyperscaltors, for example, when they

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 6>operate in our retail facilities, they do so because of

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 6>the connectivity of ex X. So that's going to be

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 6>a requirement, you know, for inferencing and for the actual

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 6>activation of these AI workloads. So it is for us

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 6>about connectivity. Connectivity is the secret source of as a

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 6>data center p I don.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Means specifically by that because I think we can use

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the word connectivity to mean a lot of different things.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Certainly in the business world, what does it mean specifically

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for us?

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 6>So in our world, it essentially means we're located in

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 6>two hundred and seventy three data centers right across the planet.

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 6>Inside those data centers, we have ecosystems of customers, customers

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 6>whose value chains are connected to each other, and we

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 6>physically connect them, you know, literally internect interconnect those customers

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 6>one to the other. That's the first part of interconnection.

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 6>So that allows for low latency transactions to happen, say

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 6>for example, on a trading floor. That allows for that

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 6>to happen in real times.

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah right, we're speaking right now with the dere Fox

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 3>Martin presidency of Equinex joining us here. In the Bloomberg

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 3>Business Week studio, you mentioned the difference between training and.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 5>In inference. Thank you.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 3>When you think about this, like a company like corwe

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 3>for example, where does that fit into this, Well, a.

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 6>Core Weave is a neo cloud. They're a company you know,

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 6>that provides GPU capability to companies who want to train

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.639
<v Speaker 6>their models, so they fit into the ecosystem in the

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 6>same way for us as.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Other cloud like a GPU as a service correct, okay,

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.120
<v Speaker 3>So what are the average lease terms for an agreement

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 3>with GPU as a service comorganization?

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.439
<v Speaker 6>It would depend, you know, they can be relatively short.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 6>For us are leasing in our wholesale side is ten

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 6>years plus.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Now, one of the things I think is interesting is

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we're all trying to figure out the boom

0:18:42.480 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and bust of this. And there was an investor, Jack Selby.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>He is a z VC founder managing partner. He's longtime

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>managing director of billionaire entrepreneurs Peter Tiele's family office, and

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>he said the euphoria around AI may have led to

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the biggest bubble yet in private technology, and so sounding

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>warning bells that a correction startup valuations is in the cards. Now,

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>we understand when you throw AI there's a lot of

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 1>different players, but behind it all is the data center spend.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And we have had a lot of conversations about the

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>hyperscalers making you know, multiple duplicate arrangements with power providers

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that they're not going to use all of them, but

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>they just want to make sure they've got the power

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>where they need it. Is there any signs to you

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that there's exuberance that the spend is slowing down, starting

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to will start to slow down. Maybe next year you're

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing it. You've got a front row seat.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I guess we believe in the enduring nature of

0:19:40.200 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 6>the transformation that AI and the technology associated with it

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.120
<v Speaker 6>can bring and can bring to businesses. I mean, as

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 6>I said, we support moneyfold workloads of our customers, you know,

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:56.439
<v Speaker 6>not just AI workloads, but you know, standard business process workloads,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 6>and we really are about that, being that connectivity and

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 6>and so you know, I think in many ways our

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 6>business model is you know, somewhat protected from any any potential.

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Before we let you go.

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 3>As I mentioned some headlines on TikTok from the Wall

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 3>Street Journal, the deal would create a new US entity

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Oracle and recent horror with silver Lake.

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 5>Are you involved in this at all?

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.400
<v Speaker 6>Well, we partner very closely with Oracles, so it would

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 6>be through that partnership that we would be supporting.

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.480
<v Speaker 5>So you think you will support an independent TikTok.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 6>Potentially with Oracle with Oracle, yes, I very key partner.

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>One last question, your stocks down? Why if it's so,

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know there's also an incredible spend in

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>what you are doing. You've got to spend in order

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to meet the demand, you know, and so maybe that

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is why there isn't some reward from some of your investors.

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Is it kind of a conflict.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 6>Well, we're very focused on long term value creation for

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 6>our shareholders, and you know, we announced that we are

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 6>going to bring on as much capacity in the next

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 6>five years we have done in the previous twenty seven

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 6>years of our operations, and so we're very focused on

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 6>executing against our strategy. We believe in the opportunity that

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 6>we see in the market and hope to deliver proof

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 6>points to that to our investor community very soon.

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 3>That was a Deare Fox Martin, President and CEO of Aquinix.

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>We should point out that we talked to a Dare

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that was ahead of President Trump's visit to the UK,

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>where we know a lot was talked about when it

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>came to the tech CEOs that was with him, that

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>were with him, excuse me, and that also talked about

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.439
<v Speaker 1>investments over there in the UK. When it comes to

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the tech world, we should also point out that it

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:38.880
<v Speaker 1>was also before we got news of Nvidia's big investment

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>in Intel. So have to say when it comes to

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the tech world, semi world. There's a lot going on,

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but nonetheless an interesting conversation because it really plays into

0:21:46.800 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the bigger sex, bigger story, if you will, of why

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.199
<v Speaker 1>all of this is going on, because of the AI

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>spend and then the spend on data centers, it's all

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of connected.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah too.

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 3>That and Carol. Something else that's connected is the news

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 3>that we got on Thursday morning and that Huawei is

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 3>unveiled new technology from memory chips to AI accelerators, outlining

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 3>publicly for the first time, it's multi your plan to

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 3>challenge in video's dominance in a growing market.

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Huawei's approach seen as a significant milestone in China's

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 1>AI chipset industry, reflecting breakthroughs in system design and interconnect technologies,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and it really signals a stronger push toward self reliance

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and resilience in the face of export restrictions. This again

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>reporting all done by our team on the ground at

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News, but it's just you know, this is what

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>it's all about. It really we go back to I

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like when we talk so much about the war

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that's out there, it's not just geopolitical, it's really a

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>tech war, right, and tech dominance, and you're seeing China

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>making some moves. You and I talk about the EV

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>space and how advanced China has really become in that

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>world and dominating it feels like electric vehicles.

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I think one thing that's important to keep in mind

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>is where Huawei sits in the tech sphere in China

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 3>and globally. It's actually China's most advanced chip designer. It's

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 3>the strongest contender to build alternatives too in Vidia's industry

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 3>leading AI hardware, and as you mentioned, Carol, it also

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 3>is part of a bargaining chip when it comes to

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 3>trade negotiations between the US and China. And to that end,

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.400
<v Speaker 3>we did get news Thursday morning as well when we're

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 3>recording this that the call between President Trump and Shijin

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Ping is set to happen at nine am on Friday.

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:28.920
<v Speaker 5>So before we put this to bed.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and what's interesting too, I want to just say

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>from a market perspective, Chinese tech stocs have surged in

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>past weeks, driven by a perception that the nation's industry

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>leaders are making steady progress and developing homegrown AI and chips.

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So Ali, Baba by Do are among the companies that

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>have secured important clients for their in house designs and others.

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>But we've just seen kind of a big spend there.

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 3>For the latest, head on over to Bloomberg dot com

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 3>and check out everything on the Bloomberg terminal. Still ahead

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg BusinessWeek. He's a trader who helped transform the

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 3>way commercial property our finance.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And now he's launched a bid to become California's next governor.

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Penner is next. This is Bloomberg.

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.880
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 2>the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 2>York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.680
<v Speaker 1>The gubernatorial race in California definitely picking up momentum just

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more than a year away. We featured

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a few possible candidates on air, and our next guest

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>launched his own bid to become California's next governor, Targeting

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>voters disillusioned with Democratic rule but tim not ready to

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>vote Republican.

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 3>Our next guest launch his bid to become California's next governor.

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 3>He's here in the studio with us Ethan Penner. As

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 3>we mentioned, he's twenty twenty six candidate for governor of California,

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 3>also founder and managing partner of Mosaic Real Estate Investors.

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 5>Ethan Welcome. How are you.

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 7>I'm I'm very busy.

0:24:56.800 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Well you're you're going to run for governor of California. Yeah,

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>but you're in New York. Why are you in New York?

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 7>Hmmm, because you're.

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 5>Here talking to us. Well, why do you want to run?

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 7>Well?

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 8>I really didn't see anyone who was qualified to do

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 8>the job raising their hand, and so I decided I

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 8>would do it. I feel that we're in a desperate place.

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 8>I think that California has been so grossly mismanaged for

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 8>so long. All the statistics bear that out. The quality

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.919
<v Speaker 8>of life has deteriorated so amazingly over the last decade

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 8>and even two, and it's time for somebody with the

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 8>real qualifications to do this job to step up.

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 7>And that's what I decided I would do.

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>What would you do differently? What don't you like? What

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>needs to be changed that you think would change the

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>course of California? In what you would perceive as a

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 1>good way.

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.120
<v Speaker 8>There are a number of things, but the most obvious thing,

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 8>the starter, is that we've repelled people. So we've been

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 8>last in net migration for five consecutive years, which means

0:25:54.680 --> 0:25:57.680
<v Speaker 8>people in the United States have preferred to live anywhere

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 8>but California, which is shocking considering it's California, right gorgeous,

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 8>And I think that we need to be more welcoming

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 8>and inviting to businesses. We need to grow our economy.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 8>Our economy is important for everyone. It's important to create

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.840
<v Speaker 8>opportunities for our young people, but it's also important so

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 8>that we have the funds to make good on the

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 8>retirement benefit promises that people are counting on.

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 7>So I would do.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 8>The first thing I would do is change our tax policy.

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's talk about this, because our understanding is you

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>are releasing a tax plan that would turn California from

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the least friendly tax dates to one of

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the top five. So what details. That's a big broad statement.

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>The devil's always in the details. So what's specific?

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 8>So the Tax Foundation ranks all fifty states by their

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 8>tax policy. We're currently ranked forty ninth, and pro form

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 8>on my policy would move us to third according to

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 8>the Tax Foundation.

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 6>How do you do that?

0:26:57.320 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>How do you do that well? And what do you

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>do specific because you also talked about needing revenues for things,

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 1>so I'm just curious.

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 8>How you get Yeah, so it would be importantly, Carol.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 8>It will be a revenue neutral to revenue growth plan.

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 8>So everyone else on everyone that talks about changing our

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 8>tax plan talks about cutting taxes, and I understand kind

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 8>of the intuitive appeal to some people, but of course

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 8>that that really doesn't the math doesn't work. We need

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 8>to actually pay for the things we need in California

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 8>to support our society. So mine is a revenue neutral

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 8>that will ultimately be a revenue growth idea. It's about

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 8>replacing income tax with a consumption tax.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 5>Fun mentally, that's the plant, so explain the details there.

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 8>We will eliminate all state income tax, both corporate and personal. Wow, amazing.

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 8>We will replace all state sales tax, including our horrible

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 8>gasoline tax, and all of that will be replaced by

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 8>a single fifteen percent consumption tax on goods and search.

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 3>But does California Okay, So you're coming at this from

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 3>the angle where California has been a net loss when

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 3>it comes to migration, Yes, do you want can California

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 3>handle more people because the real estate price is there

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 3>well in so many places and very desirable places to

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:13.879
<v Speaker 3>live are out of.

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 7>Controls a phenomenal question.

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 3>But the challenge is on a local level because you

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 3>have all these people that say, yes, we want more

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 3>affordable housing, but do not build that multi family house

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 3>right here.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 8>Our problem has really nothing to do with having too

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 8>many people. It has to do with too few housing units.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 8>So the RAND Corporation published a paper last year that

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 8>showed that it costs one hundred and ten thousand dollars

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 8>more to build an apartment unit in the state of

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 8>California than in the neighboring state of Arizona or most

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 8>other states.

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 5>For regulatory reasons.

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 8>That's all driven by regulatory red tape. That's the second

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 8>thing I would have to do is really streamline our

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 8>regulatory approval processes. So the tax plan is stage one.

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 8>Stage two is the mining of regulatory processes.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about it against a backdrop or

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 1>climate change is certainly impacting California neighborhoods in a big way,

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the build back has also got to think

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>about how do you make it safer.

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 8>So environmental greatness is really at the foundation of California.

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you're from California and you know this. I

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 8>I take all of my vacations hiking in the nature

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 8>of California. It's amazing, right, And so first trip to

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm a few months ago for Carol, it's incredible.

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Gorgeous, everything exactly right, I really, and passing a massive

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>wind farm to get there. So it's certainly embracing.

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 8>So I think that we we have to be as

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 8>vigilant as we've ever been about protecting our natural beauty

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 8>and our resources. But but we don't need nineteen different

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 8>organizations that a developer of an apartment has to go

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 8>through an approval process for. We need one, one very

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 8>good one powered by AI with great responsiveness. Rather than

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 8>five years, how about five days to get your feedback,

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 8>how about fifteen minutes to get your feedback. There's no

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 8>reason that we can't use technology intelligently, and there's no

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 8>reason we can't have both both the things. We can

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 8>have environmental beauty and environmental soundness and make it easy

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 8>for people to build the units that we actually need

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 8>to drop costs and make living more affordable.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>One of the thing you're talking about too, when it

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>comes to housing, and tim see it. You know, we

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>see it when we've been to Seattle. We live in

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>New York City. Go any place where it's warm, the.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 5>Heart its warm, and there's a high cost of living, high.

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Cost, but the homeless populations and it's you know, I

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>went to college here in New York many many years

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ago and it was a homeless problem. And here we

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 1>are again in twenty twenty five and we haven't figured

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this out. What you are looking to build some communities

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 1>from my understanding in rural areas for homeless people to

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>live in, how would you fund that? How long do

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you would you expect it to take to get that done?

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>How do you roll that all up?

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 8>So it gets back to the original question of bringing

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 8>true competence, the required competence to lead the state at

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 8>this moment. We need the skills that I bring to

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 8>the table. We need an understanding of how to build things.

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 8>We need an understanding and appreciation for how to have transparency.

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 8>It's not that we don't have the money. We've spent

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.160
<v Speaker 8>twenty five billion dollars in the last state money in

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 8>the last four years and all that's gotten us is

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 8>nothing but twenty five percent more homeless. So nothing's been solved.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 8>We have systems that don't work. We have a management

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 8>system that's failing us. We don't know where the money is,

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 8>there's no accountability, So how do you do this?

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Then you're saying that with this consumption to actually have

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the money to do this, and how do you get

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>how quickly can you get it built?

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 7>Well, so it's a combination of things.

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 8>One is, yes, the money is there, although we've squandered

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 8>so much money ready, the money is there for this.

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 8>Second of all, we have to use smart building. We

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.960
<v Speaker 8>don't have government. We need public private partnerships and my

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 8>government will lean very heavily on private excells to work

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 8>in tandem with public oversight to get things done fast.

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 7>And I think that.

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 8>Modular housing is definitely one of the answers. Yeah, but

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 8>we have to combine competence, a commitment to safety, and

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 8>a love for our fellow people. Right especially I'm proud

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 8>to be in California. We care for our most vulnerable neighbors.

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 8>That will never change, but we need to do it

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 8>the right way. These people, unfortunately, with all the money

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 8>we've spent still sleep on the pavement.

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>We're speaking with Ethan Penner, twenty twenty six, candidate for

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Governor of California and also the founder and managing partner

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 3>of Mosaic Real Estate Investors, on the homelessness question. It

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 3>obviously has to do with housing, it has to do.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 5>With mental health.

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 3>There's no easy solution, as we've learned on the regulatory

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 3>side of things. You said, for building housing, you want

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>to streamline regulations, get rid of red tape. But how

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 3>specifically do you do that? Because it's an easy thing

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 3>to say. But as we're learning in the wake of

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the fires in Pacific palac aids and the waste removal

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 3>going to New Calabasas and the landfill there, people are

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:08.960
<v Speaker 3>not happy about that, Like, how do you do this

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 3>in a way that satisfies these constituents.

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think it's top down, actually, So I think

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 8>we have to set a standard from the from the

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 8>Governor's office and Sacramento, and that standard has to be Look,

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 8>if I get elected, it will be with a mandate

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 8>for change.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 8>I'm the consummate outsider. I don't belong to either of

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 8>the main parties. I've never had a day in political office.

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 8>So I'm running for a mandate for change with specific

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 8>policies in mind, and I believe the people's will will

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 8>be heard through me, and that will that will empower

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 8>me to actually make change.

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>But you understand, I mean.

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 7>I do understand me.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 8>I understand bureaucracy very well, have worked in big companies.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just thinking about Elon musk Doze even in

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, and yes, USA dismantled other offices or

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>other built departments. But it's not easy to kind of

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:05.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, all of these regulatory checkpoints. I mean, how

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 1>do you really do it when it gets down to it, how.

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you do it?

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 8>In you know, I'll tell you two things. One, I

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 8>am not willing to accept that it's hard or impossible

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 8>to do. And I'm going to commit myself fully to

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 8>doing that. And I know for sure, if people like

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 8>you and I don't commit ourselves to positve change, the

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 8>answer is one hundred percent bad. So I'm going to

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 8>commit myself and I'm going to do as as good

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 8>a job as I can. Second, I really do believe

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 8>that most people in government, in state government in California

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 8>go into their jobs wanting to do the right thing

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 8>for their people. I really do believe that, and I

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.120
<v Speaker 8>think that as a non partisan and a non career

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 8>politician who's not trying to advance my career at all,

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.320
<v Speaker 8>I think I'm going to be very uniquely well received

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 8>by the legislature because I won't be viewed as oppositional

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 8>in any way.

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 3>We got to talk property taxes. Do you think something

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 3>has to change with property taxes in California? And the

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.400
<v Speaker 3>context is that somebody like my parents, who've lived in

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 3>the same house since the nineteen nineties, pay basically nothing

0:35:08.360 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 3>in property taxes thanks to the passing of a certain

0:35:11.040 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 3>proposition many years ago. But if somebody were to buy

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 3>that house, like you know, the next family to own

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that house, the property taxes would be debilitating. And it

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 3>makes it so people stay in homes for a very

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 3>long time and contributes to the housing crisis. Some critics say, you.

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.919
<v Speaker 7>Know what, I don't believe that's true. Well, I don't

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:30.440
<v Speaker 7>accept that.

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 8>I think that I think that we our society, our

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 8>community is served well by continuity, and I think that

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 8>having people be forced out of their homes because of

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 8>appreciation it detegrates our community. It denigrates the continuity of

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 8>our community. So I would I would not try to

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 8>change that policy. I think that's a wonderful policy.

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Got to ask you, Aback, Governor Newsom, his feed with

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the President, the President's attention on California on many states,

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 1>how we would you posture yourself toward President Trump?

0:36:03.239 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think that.

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 8>Both parties are busy fighting with each other about the

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 8>president pro or against the President, and I feel that

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 8>it's a gigantic distraction from the incompetence that they've brought

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 8>to the table in actually doing their job for the

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 8>citizens of California. I will not be engaged in that distraction.

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 8>For me, I'm laser focused on serving the needs of

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:31.160
<v Speaker 8>the people in California who would be electing.

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 7>Me, who I care for.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>But what do you do, though, Ethan? If President Trump

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>you do a policy and you are a social media

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>post at seven am in the morning of something he

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like, and he says, maybe we're going to go

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>down to California and talk to Governor Penner, Well, what

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>do you do?

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.880
<v Speaker 8>I think that every leader Carol has to approach their

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.960
<v Speaker 8>job with humility, and I don't see that as often

0:36:57.040 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 8>as I would like, so Governor Penner would remember that

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 8>Governor Penner is a servant for the people, and Governor

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 8>Penner would understand that whatever he says or does he

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 8>has to take in mind. Is this in the best

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 8>interests of the people who he's serving and fighting with

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 8>the President of the United States, It's not in the

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 8>best interests of the people. Okay, this is definitely not.

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:23.480
<v Speaker 8>So I would try to have a workable relationship with

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 8>both the legislatives, the legislature that I would need to

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 8>work with, but also the federal government, because, as you

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 8>point out, that's a very important relationship. Whether it's this

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:37.800
<v Speaker 8>president or another president. It's not about my personality and

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 8>the personality of another, which I think, unfortunately we see

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:44.960
<v Speaker 8>today becoming the story. I don't need to be the story.

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 8>My personality is not that important to me. My job

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.520
<v Speaker 8>as serving the needs of the people who elected me

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 8>is the only thing I care about.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, stay in touch as this year progresses. I love

0:37:55.719 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to see how things are going. Ethan, thank you so much.

0:37:57.680 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 7>Thanks for having me.

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I really appreciate Ethan Penner twenty twenty six, candidate

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>for Governor of California, Founder and managing director of mosaic

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>real estate investors. We did not get to talk about

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the CMBs markets. May be next time around. Next time Ethan.

0:38:10.280 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 7>Thank you.

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Plenty ahead on our second hour of the weekend edition

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:35.439
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week, including how artificial intelligence is making

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the grade big time with the Dean of the ko

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Good School of Business.

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Plus speaking of AI is AI helping or herding the

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 3>language learning business at Babbel. The CEO joins us later

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 3>on First Up this hour.

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You might recall a story earlier this month from our

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News team. It was about Apollo Global Management being

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.720
<v Speaker 1>poised to launch a five billion dollar strategy to invest

0:38:56.800 --> 0:39:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in sports deals, marking another major asset manager target the

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>booming sector.

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 3>It's about long term lending of strategic capital with sports

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 3>leagues and clubs. Apollo's strategy is set to specialize in

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:12.040
<v Speaker 3>lending long term strategic capital to sports leagues and clubs.

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:15.360
<v Speaker 3>It will also consider owning stakes and teams, though this

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be a priority and may hire new staff. Our

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 3>next guest, too, is investing in sports teams for his investors.

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 1>He is, indeed, Jeff Luno is CEO Blue Crow Sports Group.

0:39:25.080 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>He's also former Houston Astros President of baseball Operations. He

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:32.120
<v Speaker 1>joined us from our Dallas News bureau alongside Bloomberg News

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Texas Bureau chief Julie fine Well.

0:39:34.640 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 10>You rightly pointed out there's a lot of interest in sports.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 10>A lot of American investors are investing in European football, etc.

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:45.640
<v Speaker 10>We started as a startup four years ago. We wanted

0:39:45.680 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 10>to pick our niche. Our niche is to find own

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 10>and operate clubs in desirable locations that have big growth opportunities.

0:39:55.560 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 10>So we invested in KANKUNFC and Mexico Glub Deportivo GOSS

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 10>in the suburbs of Madrid and luav in the Normandy

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 10>area of France. And those are the three teams, one

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 10>in first division and two in second division. And the

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 10>key for us is to operate those clubs well and

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 10>allow them to make money and to win games.

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 11>Jeff, you talk about the key is to operate them

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 11>well and to win money in games but really, what's

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 11>the long term plan? Are you looking at other sports?

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.839
<v Speaker 11>Do you want to stay in the in the soccer world,

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 11>what's next?

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, we've got a lot of work to do in football.

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 10>We want Leganes to get back to first Division. We

0:40:31.760 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 10>want LUOV to establish itself in second Division, and now

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 10>that promotion relegation is coming back to Mexico, we'd like

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 10>KANCUNFC to get into LEGAMX. So I think our to

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 10>do list for the next five years is pretty busy

0:40:44.160 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 10>and pretty filled, but I think over time we will

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:49.200
<v Speaker 10>certainly look at other sports, where right now our focus

0:40:49.320 --> 0:40:49.760
<v Speaker 10>is football.

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 11>I want to talk a little bit. You were with

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.480
<v Speaker 11>the Houston Astros. You were fired after a baseball scandal.

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.359
<v Speaker 11>You have denied any wrongdoing, but you are going now

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 11>and asking people for money. Has there been any issue

0:41:01.600 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 11>when it comes to.

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Trust now, Not at all.

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 10>In fact, many of the investors in Blue Crow are

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 10>people that were either investors in the Astros or knew

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.240
<v Speaker 10>me from that time. If anything, it's been an advantage

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:15.200
<v Speaker 10>because people knew of what happened with the Astros after

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 10>we got involved in getting the World Series in twenty

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 10>seventeen and reaching it in twenty nineteen, and you know,

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 10>making money for the club and its investors. So we

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:29.919
<v Speaker 10>have a very diverse group of investors, people from private equity, entrepreneurs, technologists,

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 10>et cetera, and they're all very bullish on what we're building.

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Does it ever come up though? I am curious, Jeff,

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Like I know, we all have our past and histories,

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and I just think, you know, sometimes when it comes

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to money, people do at least be like, well, just

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>let me just talk to you a little bit about

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>this before maybe I think about investing.

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think a lot of people want to know

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 10>about my time in baseball and what we did and

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 10>how it relates to football.

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:56.720
<v Speaker 5>It's never come up as a negative.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 10>I was telling Julie earlier that in Europe, base is

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 10>not a very big sport, so people don't even know

0:42:02.600 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 10>who the astros are or who josel To is, so

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 10>they really just care about whether we're going to win

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 10>on Sunday and whether we're going to get three points

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:10.680
<v Speaker 10>or one.

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey. One thing I want to ask you too, though, Jeff,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to owning a team, is it a

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>buy and hold strategy or because you have investors, is

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it buy hold, build up and then sell for a

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.200
<v Speaker 1>premium so that there are returns to your investors. I'm

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>just curious.

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 5>That's a great question.

0:42:26.040 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 10>And the way to make money and football, as you noticed,

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:31.440
<v Speaker 10>is you can either hold and sell for more than

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.360
<v Speaker 10>you bought, but you usually have to cover losses in

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 10>the meantime. But we're trying to run these clubs to

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 10>win and grow revenue and eventually be profitable so that

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 10>we can potentially return some money to our investors as

0:42:44.520 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 10>we go along. We're not looking to buy and flip.

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 10>A lot of the things that we do in our

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 10>clubs require three or four years, five years for them

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 10>to start working, and that's why for us, we're talking

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 10>about more long term holds.

0:42:56.840 --> 0:42:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Talking about long term and working.

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 11>We talked earlier about technology and analytics.

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>What role is AI playing in.

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:04.000
<v Speaker 7>All of that.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, the world of football has lagged baseball and basketball

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.279
<v Speaker 10>and other major sports in terms of the use of

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 10>analytics and technology, but that's changing. And part of the

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 10>reason it's changing is in football, you have eleven v eleven,

0:43:18.040 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 10>so there's a ton of data, and there's a ton

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 10>of games all over the world, and it's hard to

0:43:22.600 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 10>analyze that with just a few data scientists, So AI

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 10>allows you to analyze a much much larger volume of

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 10>data and to generate insights from it. So I think

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:35.120
<v Speaker 10>it's going to be increasingly important in our world.

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Jeff, we talk a lot here in the US about

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 3>ballooning sports team valuations. I mean, you're certainly familiar with this.

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 3>We just had the deal news about the New York Giants,

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 3>for example, with American football, and I'm curious if you

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 3>think the growth here in the US will start to

0:43:52.920 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 3>slow down and the real opportunity for valuations to grow

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 3>as they did here in the US in the last

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.400
<v Speaker 3>two decades. That opportunity is outside of the US now.

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 10>I think that, well, first of all, I've always been

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:08.840
<v Speaker 10>skeptical about valuations of major US sports, but I've always

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 10>been wrong. I've been saying that things are overvalued for

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:14.400
<v Speaker 10>the last thirty years, and they keep selling for more

0:44:14.440 --> 0:44:16.759
<v Speaker 10>and more down the road. So I'm not good at

0:44:16.800 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 10>predicting that. I do think that buyer beware on European

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 10>football because there is relegation and promotion and you have

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:27.080
<v Speaker 10>to do things well in order to increase value, and

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of investors that are losing money in

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 10>this sector as well. So we're hoping to be one

0:44:32.640 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 10>of the winners, but we're being very cautious about what

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:37.359
<v Speaker 10>we invest in and how.

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:37.640
<v Speaker 1>We do it.

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:41.360
<v Speaker 3>What makes you skeptical about US team valuations? It's a

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 3>supply and demand question, right Is it more complicated than that?

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think that generally the revenue is driven from

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 10>TV contracts for most of the sports, and I just

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.279
<v Speaker 10>can't see those continuing to grow at the rate that

0:44:55.360 --> 0:44:58.759
<v Speaker 10>they've grown. But I know it's happened, so, like I said,

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 10>I'm not a good predict sure of that, but I

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:04.440
<v Speaker 10>think ultimately everybody's going to want to consume sports on

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 10>their mobile or on their you know, their handheld, and

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.480
<v Speaker 10>that that changes the dynamic a little bit, and some

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 10>of these bigger contracts, you know, may not get renewed

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 10>at the increases that have happened in the past.

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 11>This is going to be a very big time for

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:21.399
<v Speaker 11>football coming up with the World Cup. We have here

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:24.800
<v Speaker 11>in Dallas, we have the most matches. Houston, your hometown

0:45:24.920 --> 0:45:27.200
<v Speaker 11>has a lot of matches as well. What do you

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 11>think this attention on the sport in the United States

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 11>will do for it overall?

0:45:32.719 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 10>I think it's going to be great for all of

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 10>North America, Mexico, United States, and Canada. I'm very bullish

0:45:38.640 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 10>on North American football. I have been since the beginning

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 10>when we invested in Cancun. And you know, I lived

0:45:44.640 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 10>through the ninety four World Cup and everybody who's expecting

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 10>football to suddenly become one of the big four sports.

0:45:51.560 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 10>I think it has grown, but I think it's poised

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:56.440
<v Speaker 10>to continue to grow. It's never going to beat NFL,

0:45:56.480 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 10>it's never going to beat MLB or NBA, but I

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.279
<v Speaker 10>think it can continue to grow its fan base and

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:03.920
<v Speaker 10>I think it can continue to produce good results.

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 12>You know you are now in soccer, you came from baseball.

0:46:08.000 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 12>I want to know what your future is. Well, like

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 12>I said, we're just at the beginning. We've been doing

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 12>this for four years. We've got a lot on our

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:17.720
<v Speaker 12>to do list. I'm going to be focused on building

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:20.400
<v Speaker 12>Blue Crow for the foreseeable future.

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Is there an investor that you would love to have

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>with you for the ride? Is there a team that

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you would love to go after? And I know who's

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:30.040
<v Speaker 1>going to talk, right because you don't want to kick

0:46:30.080 --> 0:46:32.759
<v Speaker 1>up the valuation, But I am just curious because and

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 1>anything you can share on your investors or who else

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to have with you.

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.239
<v Speaker 10>Well, we have a great cap table. We've got some

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:43.439
<v Speaker 10>people that have in the NBA, in the NFL and MLB, etc.

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 10>I don't like to disclose who they are because that's

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 10>their business. But we're well funded. All of our investors

0:46:52.200 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 10>have offered to put more money in if they need to.

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 10>So really, at this point, I think we have an

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 10>all star cap table. We've got a plan and now

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 10>it's just a matter of going out and continue execute.

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeff twenty seconds. Women's sports. How does that play into it?

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:08.319
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of popular. I don't know if you've heard

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that really quickly.

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:11.439
<v Speaker 10>It is, and there's a lot of money going into

0:47:11.480 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 10>women's sports. We have a female team in Spain. We're

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 10>looking at the sector very closely and trying to figure

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:22.400
<v Speaker 10>out what our strategy is. But it's growing in the

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 10>US a lot, and it's growing in Europe quite a lot,

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:26.359
<v Speaker 10>and I think it's going to continue to grow.

0:47:26.480 --> 0:47:28.160
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, you're always welcome to come back and

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 1>share some more, Jeff, thank you so much. Jeff Leno,

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO Blue Crow Sports Group, along with our Bloomberg News

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Texas Bureau Chief Julie Fine. This is Bloomberg Business Weekdaily.

0:47:38.480 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Listen live

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:45.279
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Play and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:47:48.280 --> 0:47:51.040
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:55.200
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:57.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, So we've talked a bit about the resistance

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to artificial intelligence and classrooms here on Business Week, with

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>some educators raising concerns on how to effectively integrate AI

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>into their teaching practices, students overly relying on AI for homework,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and of course the effect that AI is going to

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:13.879
<v Speaker 1>have on the labor market. There's a lot of play here. Tim,

0:48:14.120 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>our next.

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Guest, is looking to infuse more AI across the classroom

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:21.279
<v Speaker 3>by helping students collaborate with the technology. David Marchik is

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:24.320
<v Speaker 3>dean of the co God School of Business at American University.

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:26.920
<v Speaker 3>He also served in different capacities in the Biden and

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:30.359
<v Speaker 3>Clinton administrations, as well as spending a dozen years at

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 3>the private equity giant Carlisle Group.

0:48:32.800 --> 0:48:35.560
<v Speaker 9>So I'm not a techie person, but we had the

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.840
<v Speaker 9>president of Google, Kent Walker, who basically said that AI

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 9>was going to be as profound as fire or electricity.

0:48:41.640 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 9>And I said, well, that seems like a strong statement,

0:48:44.680 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 9>but even if it's zero point one percent true, it's big.

0:48:49.080 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 9>Then we had a fellow named Brett Wilson, who's a

0:48:51.160 --> 0:48:54.520
<v Speaker 9>CEO of an AI venture capital firm, and a student

0:48:54.719 --> 0:48:56.440
<v Speaker 9>raised his hand and said, am I going to be

0:48:56.520 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 9>replaced by AI? And Brett said, you likely won't be

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.479
<v Speaker 9>replaced by AI, but you could be replaced by someone

0:49:02.520 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 9>who knows AI if you don't. So at that moment,

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 9>I said, we need to infuse AI into everything we

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 9>do to prepare our students for an AI workforce. And

0:49:12.680 --> 0:49:14.200
<v Speaker 9>we've done that over the last three years.

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:16.640
<v Speaker 5>So what does that actually look like in the classroom.

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 9>So when you start at co God School of Business,

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 9>if you're an eighteen year old, the first day is

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.399
<v Speaker 9>you do you undergrad, undergrad and grad. The first day

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 9>of orientation, we tell you you're going to use AI

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 9>every day. Most students were prohibited from using AI in

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 9>high school, but they did it anyway. So we want

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 9>to teach students how to use it properly. We actually

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:42.200
<v Speaker 9>start by teaching what's wrong with AI before we teach

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 9>them what's right with AI, and then over the four

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 9>years or if you're getting an MBA, we want them

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 9>to learn how to underwrite an investment, how to do

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 9>fundamental research, how to develop a marketing plan, how to

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 9>learn to negotiate, all using AI because they'll be expected

0:49:57.760 --> 0:49:59.400
<v Speaker 9>to use AI in the workforce.

0:50:00.080 --> 0:50:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what we keep hearing increasingly is the people who

0:50:04.239 --> 0:50:06.560
<v Speaker 1>know and understand how to use it as a tool

0:50:07.160 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>will really do well going forward. Okay, so talk to

0:50:12.160 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>us little bit more though about because I think one

0:50:14.719 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things that we're playing around with David is

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that we use it too and then it's like okay,

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:20.960
<v Speaker 1>but then we kind of check it out because we

0:50:21.160 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>just don't totally trust all of it. So tell us

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>how you guys teach that aspect of it, like what

0:50:28.719 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to trust, what not to how do you fact check

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:33.360
<v Speaker 1>some of this information that comes across Still, so we.

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:37.000
<v Speaker 9>Have a professor Ed Walsall who teaches advanced Data Management

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 9>data analytics. His whole class is used to show how

0:50:41.000 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 9>AI comes up with wrong answers in correct information. So

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:48.320
<v Speaker 9>he has students analyze data sets come up with predictive analytics,

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:51.359
<v Speaker 9>and he shows that AI makes mistakes all the time.

0:50:52.120 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 9>That's as valuable as learning what's right with AI. So

0:50:55.840 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 9>AI can be a powerful tool, but you need to

0:50:58.400 --> 0:51:01.880
<v Speaker 9>be skeptical. You need to test it, you need to probe,

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 9>and you need to be able to shape it to

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:04.800
<v Speaker 9>produce the right answers.

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, I want to talk about your background a

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:09.720
<v Speaker 3>little bit and then talk more about AI and perhaps

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 3>why you approach it this way. You have a really

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 3>interesting background a lawyer. You served in the Clinton and

0:51:14.280 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Biden administrations in very different capacities. You did more than

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:19.840
<v Speaker 3>a dozen years as a managing director and member of

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the management committee at Carlisle. You've written a book, a

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:27.239
<v Speaker 3>co author to book on presidential transition transitions. You don't

0:51:27.239 --> 0:51:30.360
<v Speaker 3>have the traditional background of a dean, like traditional academic

0:51:30.440 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 3>background of a dean.

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 9>I also had poor grades and was not the best student.

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:38.399
<v Speaker 3>That wasn't in the bio that I read. But I'm

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 3>glad you're bringing us that color. How does that perhaps

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 3>make you think differently about the workforce and what they

0:51:45.640 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 3>need to be prepared to do once they leave the

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 3>academic world.

0:51:49.640 --> 0:51:52.720
<v Speaker 9>So I had the best boss ever who actually hosts

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 9>a show at Bloomberg David Rubinstein. David also was probably

0:51:57.440 --> 0:52:00.719
<v Speaker 9>the least likely person to run an equity firm, he

0:52:00.760 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 9>had no private equity background. What I learned from David

0:52:03.640 --> 0:52:06.280
<v Speaker 9>is surround yourself with people that are better and smarter

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 9>than you in each of their areas and empower them

0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.920
<v Speaker 9>and you can do anything. So what we're basically focused

0:52:13.960 --> 0:52:16.560
<v Speaker 9>on is ensuring that our students are prepared for the

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.920
<v Speaker 9>AI workforce, the AI economy, which is changing rapidly. Stanford

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 9>just put out a study that shows that AI exposed

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:27.440
<v Speaker 9>jobs for twenty two to twenty five year olds are

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:29.960
<v Speaker 9>shrinking between thirteen and twenty percent.

0:52:30.160 --> 0:52:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It's terrifying.

0:52:31.120 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 9>It's a very hard time. My daughter graduated last year.

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:36.879
<v Speaker 9>It was very hard for her to get a job.

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:39.839
<v Speaker 9>We see it every day, and so what we're trying

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:41.880
<v Speaker 9>to do is make sure that our students have a

0:52:42.040 --> 0:52:44.920
<v Speaker 9>leg up when they apply for jobs, which means you

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:51.320
<v Speaker 9>need to have the fundamentals of a business education marketing, accounting, management, finance,

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 9>et cetera, plus know how to use AI and everything

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:58.359
<v Speaker 9>you do. And we're also doubling down on what used

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 9>to be considered soft skilled communication teamwork, the ability to

0:53:03.800 --> 0:53:07.360
<v Speaker 9>think on your feet. Those skills are more important today

0:53:07.680 --> 0:53:10.719
<v Speaker 9>than in an AI economy. Look at your jobs. You

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 9>have to think on your feet every day, react to.

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:14.319
<v Speaker 5>News from times.

0:53:14.400 --> 0:53:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It works, sometimes it doesn't, But.

0:53:17.000 --> 0:53:19.759
<v Speaker 9>Having an entrepreneur mindset and being able to think and

0:53:19.920 --> 0:53:22.280
<v Speaker 9>create is essential for today's economy.

0:53:22.360 --> 0:53:25.719
<v Speaker 1>How do you, as an educator but also somebody from

0:53:25.800 --> 0:53:28.799
<v Speaker 1>the business world think about how important it is? Though?

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:31.600
<v Speaker 1>When somebody their first couple of jobs or their first

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>job at they're learning so much. The learning curve is

0:53:34.360 --> 0:53:37.960
<v Speaker 1>so much, but it teaches their brain to think in

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe different ways that they maybe didn't get when they

0:53:41.239 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>were at university or at college. And so I'm just wondering, like,

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are we cutting that out of younger generations, that ability

0:53:49.440 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to mess up learn I learned so much from mistakes

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I made in kind of my first couple of jobs,

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just wondering, are we getting rid of that?

0:53:57.800 --> 0:53:59.800
<v Speaker 9>So I think we are getting rid of at and

0:54:00.239 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 9>ways because AI will replace some jobs. In my view,

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:08.279
<v Speaker 9>is incumbent on universities and educational institutions to be able

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:12.080
<v Speaker 9>to foresee that and to give students the skills that

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:14.879
<v Speaker 9>you may have learned in your first job. We're trying

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:18.080
<v Speaker 9>to give them those skills at the university through in

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 9>classroom and out of classroom experiences. So we have a

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:24.360
<v Speaker 9>lot of competitions for students to learn how to pitch,

0:54:25.200 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 9>where they have to answer questions on their feet. We

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 9>have investment clubs where students are investing actual money and

0:54:32.120 --> 0:54:35.400
<v Speaker 9>they need to present and defend and investment ideas. The

0:54:35.480 --> 0:54:39.000
<v Speaker 9>ability to give a pitch, to communicate orally, to work

0:54:39.080 --> 0:54:41.200
<v Speaker 9>in teams is as important as ever.

0:54:41.880 --> 0:54:45.000
<v Speaker 3>How do you have to think about the admissions process

0:54:45.120 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 3>differently as a result of what happens now or what

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 3>you want to have happen in a school right now.

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:54.000
<v Speaker 9>Traditionally, and maybe this is why I wasn't a great student,

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:58.239
<v Speaker 9>a teacher stands in front of a classroom and communicates,

0:54:58.280 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 9>disseminates information, which is student absorbs, and then the student

0:55:02.360 --> 0:55:05.120
<v Speaker 9>is assessed on how good they are by how much

0:55:05.200 --> 0:55:09.480
<v Speaker 9>they can retain and regurgitate AI replaces all that. You

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:12.520
<v Speaker 9>can get any piece of information on your fingertips. So

0:55:12.680 --> 0:55:14.600
<v Speaker 9>now the best students are going to be ones that

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:18.239
<v Speaker 9>are most curious, that have an entrepreneurial mindset. They're going

0:55:18.280 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 9>to be able to take risk they're going to be

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:22.560
<v Speaker 9>able to figure out stuff on their own, and so

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 9>we're looking for that in the admissions process.

0:55:25.239 --> 0:55:26.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's funny, Karl and I talked about this

0:55:27.000 --> 0:55:29.439
<v Speaker 3>a lot because one of the things that we found

0:55:29.480 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 3>these lllms are so good at is if you prompt

0:55:32.000 --> 0:55:35.360
<v Speaker 3>it properly, it can essentially write you a paper to

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:37.800
<v Speaker 3>answer question and that a teacher. I mean, I'm not

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:39.920
<v Speaker 3>giving anyone any news here that they don't already know who.

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 9>Students starre way ahead of us.

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:42.719
<v Speaker 5>You are ahead of us here.

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:44.759
<v Speaker 3>I mean for me, as somebody who graduated from what

0:55:44.920 --> 0:55:48.640
<v Speaker 3>like twenty ish years ago, this is like kind of crazy.

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think back to my own experience in college.

0:55:50.960 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 3>I went to a liberal arts school, and some of

0:55:52.480 --> 0:55:56.160
<v Speaker 3>those aha moments that occurred for me were like late

0:55:56.200 --> 0:55:57.759
<v Speaker 3>at night when I was trying to write a term

0:55:57.840 --> 0:56:00.279
<v Speaker 3>paper or trying to write some sort of analysis of

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:02.719
<v Speaker 3>a book I read, And those are the moments that

0:56:02.800 --> 0:56:04.520
<v Speaker 3>stuck with me. Those are the moments where I learned

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 3>how to make those connections. Do we lose the ability

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:09.839
<v Speaker 3>to make those connections because of this technology.

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 9>I don't think so. I think it actually aids you.

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:14.680
<v Speaker 9>So you were probably a better student than I was.

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:16.800
<v Speaker 9>But when I was writing an essay, I had a

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 9>hard time figuring out topic sentences, structuring an essay, structuring

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:24.880
<v Speaker 9>an argument. AI can help you do that. It's a collaborator,

0:56:25.320 --> 0:56:29.480
<v Speaker 9>and so those aha moments are still there, they're just different. Also,

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:31.680
<v Speaker 9>the ability to work in teams is going to be

0:56:31.880 --> 0:56:34.680
<v Speaker 9>much more important today than it was when we were

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:36.640
<v Speaker 9>growing up. And I have students come to me all

0:56:36.640 --> 0:56:38.759
<v Speaker 9>the time and say, boy, this team work is hard.

0:56:39.280 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 9>This one student is a show off, this one doesn't

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:46.360
<v Speaker 9>do their work, this one has views that I can't understand,

0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 9>and they don't change. And I'm like, welcome to the

0:56:49.320 --> 0:56:51.960
<v Speaker 9>real world. I have that every day in my job,

0:56:52.040 --> 0:56:53.360
<v Speaker 9>and I've had it every day in my job for

0:56:53.400 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 9>the last forty years. So teaching students not only the

0:56:56.600 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 9>fundamental basic skills that you learn reading right now, reasoning,

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:05.799
<v Speaker 9>plus AI skills and these soft skills which I call

0:57:05.960 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 9>power skills, that's the future of education in my view.

0:57:10.960 --> 0:57:13.640
<v Speaker 1>But are we also losing though, the ability of people

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:16.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of struggling David through something and like maybe having

0:57:16.600 --> 0:57:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to work a little bit hard and understanding the idea

0:57:18.840 --> 0:57:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that Okay, maybe spend a little bit more time with it,

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:23.600
<v Speaker 1>dig a little bit deeper, I don't know, look at

0:57:23.640 --> 0:57:27.479
<v Speaker 1>some different sources and like figure something out versus going

0:57:27.640 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like I'm blown away by some of the stuff that

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you get off of chat, GPT and other chatbots, if

0:57:35.160 --> 0:57:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you will, And I'm just kind of wondering, are we

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:38.520
<v Speaker 1>losing something?

0:57:38.640 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 9>Maybe they're still struggling. But let's say I were a

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 9>twenty two year old and I wanted to be your

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:47.200
<v Speaker 9>research assistant. You would expect me to be able to

0:57:47.320 --> 0:57:51.000
<v Speaker 9>find any piece of information at my fingertips any day

0:57:51.120 --> 0:57:53.400
<v Speaker 9>and deliver it to you. You'd expect me to have

0:57:53.800 --> 0:57:57.160
<v Speaker 9>much more advanced skills today than if I were applying

0:57:57.680 --> 0:58:00.520
<v Speaker 9>twenty years ago or in my case, forty years ago.

0:58:01.040 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 9>So it's just a different type of struggle, and the

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:07.320
<v Speaker 9>students today need to learn how to do the stuff

0:58:07.360 --> 0:58:09.000
<v Speaker 9>that's required in an AI economy.

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Can I ask you about teachers how they've had to

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 1>rethink how they teach, because that's something you guys have

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 1>had to deal with as well.

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:17.920
<v Speaker 9>That is a great question. Faculty traditionally are very resistant

0:58:17.960 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 9>to change. We have faculty that have taught the same

0:58:20.360 --> 0:58:22.960
<v Speaker 9>thing over and over again for we've actually created a

0:58:23.160 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 9>very arentrepreneural culture among our faculty, where we started with

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:30.160
<v Speaker 9>a few early adopters, then we had some others that

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 9>we dragged along. Today, ninety percent of our faculty are

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 9>infusing AI and in their classroom. At the end of

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:39.680
<v Speaker 9>the spring semester it was fifty. So over the summer

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 9>there was just a cultural change where everybody said, the

0:58:42.880 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 9>parades leaving, either need to get in front of it

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 9>or I'm going to be left behind.

0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think David is constructive for we

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:53.640
<v Speaker 1>as communicators and having guests and we're talking about A

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like every conversation somehow, you know, all roads

0:58:56.240 --> 0:58:56.960
<v Speaker 1>lead back to AI.

0:58:57.280 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 3>Are you trying to get him to give us advice

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 3>about how we AI prove our no no, because I

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:02.360
<v Speaker 3>would be open to that too.

0:59:02.640 --> 0:59:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Just thinking about the smart way to deal with it,

0:59:04.400 --> 0:59:06.280
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's really easy to get caught up

0:59:06.400 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in the exuberance around it. There's so much spending that's

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:11.919
<v Speaker 1>going on and we're trying to Like we even today

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:13.760
<v Speaker 1>did kind of a reality check about where we are

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in AI.

0:59:14.520 --> 0:59:16.240
<v Speaker 3>Like it's kind of a wild world where we're talking

0:59:16.240 --> 0:59:19.120
<v Speaker 3>about two hundred million dollar salaries for people who are

0:59:19.200 --> 0:59:23.240
<v Speaker 3>poached and brought to metaplatforms for specific technology, just trying.

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 1>To understand what do you think is constructive based on

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:30.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of the experience you have had reorienting your approaches there.

0:59:30.880 --> 0:59:34.360
<v Speaker 9>So I think what we're seeing is a technology revolution

0:59:34.600 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 9>in a much more abbreviated version than we've seen it before.

0:59:37.920 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 9>It's the fastest technology ever to be adopted. So chat

0:59:42.080 --> 0:59:45.880
<v Speaker 9>GPT has acquired the same number of users. They you know,

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 9>five times as fast as Netflix or Amazon, twenty times

0:59:50.000 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 9>as fast as Facebook. So when the mobile revolution took place,

0:59:55.160 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 9>which we all live through, it took thirty years for

0:59:58.080 --> 1:00:02.040
<v Speaker 9>us to really use the phone for everything. AI is

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:04.400
<v Speaker 9>changing that in a matter of months. So I do

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:07.280
<v Speaker 9>think this is a transformational change that we're seeing. It's

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:10.760
<v Speaker 9>going to change everything in the economy faster than any

1:00:10.800 --> 1:00:12.440
<v Speaker 9>technology change that ever has happened to.

1:00:12.480 --> 1:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we know if yet it's good for

1:00:14.040 --> 1:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the economy.

1:00:15.120 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 9>I don't think we know. I think there's big pluses

1:00:18.360 --> 1:00:20.800
<v Speaker 9>and I think there's big minuses. My view is that

1:00:21.160 --> 1:00:24.920
<v Speaker 9>there will be winners and losers, and my focus is

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:27.080
<v Speaker 9>taking care of the students that are at my school

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:28.400
<v Speaker 9>to help them prepare well.

1:00:28.480 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk a little bit about the outcomes that you've

1:00:30.360 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 3>seen thus far. You're really still early into this experiment.

1:00:33.320 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Three years ago, as Carol mentioned, was when you set

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 3>out to become the first AI first business school in

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the country. What can you tell us about graduates who

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>are finding full time employment on the undergrad side, then

1:00:44.440 --> 1:00:46.360
<v Speaker 3>also on the MBA side.

1:00:46.320 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 9>It's helping them. It's helping them have a leg up

1:00:49.400 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 9>in me or be more competitive. One of the things

1:00:51.880 --> 1:00:54.320
<v Speaker 9>I'm most excited about this year is we're offering an

1:00:54.360 --> 1:00:57.440
<v Speaker 9>AI minor to non business schools. So let's say you're

1:00:57.440 --> 1:00:59.560
<v Speaker 9>a student that wants to go to med school. You've

1:00:59.600 --> 1:01:02.520
<v Speaker 9>done what traditionally as student does, taking a biodegree, you

1:01:02.600 --> 1:01:04.640
<v Speaker 9>have some labs, you're applying to med school. If you

1:01:04.720 --> 1:01:07.280
<v Speaker 9>have an AI minor, you're going to be much more

1:01:07.320 --> 1:01:10.440
<v Speaker 9>attractive because AI is going to transform healthcare more than

1:01:10.520 --> 1:01:14.240
<v Speaker 9>perhaps any other field. If you want to be a

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 9>policy major and go work for a United States senator,

1:01:17.320 --> 1:01:19.760
<v Speaker 9>and that senator the chief of staff says, Okay, you're

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:21.280
<v Speaker 9>a policy major from a good school and you have

1:01:21.320 --> 1:01:23.880
<v Speaker 9>an AI minor, I know you're going to be able

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:27.520
<v Speaker 9>to do research for me for any hearing for any

1:01:27.640 --> 1:01:31.320
<v Speaker 9>questions for anything, I need to know much faster, and

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 9>you're going to be able to analyze data much better

1:01:34.400 --> 1:01:37.240
<v Speaker 9>than others. So I think it's a huge leg up

1:01:37.680 --> 1:01:40.280
<v Speaker 9>for both business students and non business students.

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever envision a class where it's just someone

1:01:42.840 --> 1:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>talking to you like chat, GPT or whatever version might

1:01:46.360 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>ultimately come out, like you just think about the We

1:01:49.120 --> 1:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>always talk about a great conversation, how much we can

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>learn if you need to ask the right questions. But

1:01:53.520 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think about that back and forth.

1:01:55.440 --> 1:01:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I think duelingo CEO has said that AI could replace teachers.

1:02:00.160 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 9>AI could disintermediate the whole education system. Okay, and we're experimenting.

1:02:06.480 --> 1:02:08.600
<v Speaker 9>I'll give you an example. We have a professor named

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:11.920
<v Speaker 9>Tommy White. He runs our entrepreneurship program. He's incredible, one

1:02:11.960 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 9>of those popular professors. He created a class this year

1:02:15.400 --> 1:02:18.960
<v Speaker 9>using all AI to create the class. It has no books,

1:02:19.560 --> 1:02:25.560
<v Speaker 9>no reading. The only assignments are prompts prompts plus teamwork.

1:02:26.160 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 9>We'll see how it goes.

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:27.920
<v Speaker 5>Will it work?

1:02:28.040 --> 1:02:31.760
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, but we're trying so maybe so maybe.

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:33.520
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we're experimenting, and that's one of the things

1:02:33.520 --> 1:02:36.080
<v Speaker 9>that we've done to create this AI first culture is

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 9>We've told our faculty it's okay to fail because nobody

1:02:39.240 --> 1:02:42.400
<v Speaker 9>really knows what's going on or what we're doing because

1:02:42.440 --> 1:02:46.120
<v Speaker 9>it's so new. So try something. It doesn't work, try

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:48.560
<v Speaker 9>something else, really interesting stuff.

1:02:49.040 --> 1:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully you'll find some time to come back to us

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in case with lot of conversation. Love love. Maybe we

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:55.439
<v Speaker 1>talked to some students at some point.

1:02:55.560 --> 1:02:57.280
<v Speaker 9>That'd be great. We have some incredible students.

1:02:57.360 --> 1:02:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that would be a lot of fun.

1:02:59.160 --> 1:02:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Get on the road.

1:03:00.920 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to do that.

1:03:02.920 --> 1:03:03.840
<v Speaker 5>Come to teach a class.

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Try that good stuff. Thank you, David. Thanks really appreciate

1:03:08.920 --> 1:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>David Marcheck. He is the dean of the co God

1:03:11.520 --> 1:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>School of Business at American University. Really fascinating conversation. If

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>you've missed any of it, but please be sure to

1:03:17.120 --> 1:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>check out our podcast. You can download it whether they are.

1:03:23.880 --> 1:03:27.840
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Weekdaily Podcast. Catch us

1:03:27.960 --> 1:03:31.360
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

1:03:35.160 --> 1:03:36.920
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>All Right, so, earlier we talked about AI's role as

1:03:40.760 --> 1:03:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a tool in academia and how it can help students

1:03:43.360 --> 1:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>better prepare for the future of work. On the other hand,

1:03:46.040 --> 1:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>certain AI tools can be seen as a real competitive

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>threat to companies in the language learning space.

1:03:51.360 --> 1:03:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Apple unveiled its new AirPods three with a live translation feature,

1:03:55.040 --> 1:03:58.240
<v Speaker 3>giving us a glimpse into a future where global communication

1:03:58.480 --> 1:04:01.040
<v Speaker 3>might be seamless. What does that mean though, for the

1:04:01.080 --> 1:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>way we actually learn languages and how does AI fit

1:04:03.600 --> 1:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>into that picture.

1:04:04.640 --> 1:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So to help us answer some of those questions, we

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>were joined by the CEO of Babbel, Tim Allen.

1:04:09.760 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 13>You know, language learning is the oldest software known demand,

1:04:12.680 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 13>so it's not going anywhere. What I love about what

1:04:15.400 --> 1:04:18.200
<v Speaker 13>Apple and Google have done is it actually generates more

1:04:18.240 --> 1:04:21.520
<v Speaker 13>interest in the space. So what we find interesting, especially

1:04:21.560 --> 1:04:25.160
<v Speaker 13>on our product Babble, is when users or learners go

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 13>to take a trip or go into a foreign country,

1:04:28.520 --> 1:04:30.919
<v Speaker 13>they actually come back and they're more interested in learning

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:33.240
<v Speaker 13>the language. So we see all of this as a

1:04:33.320 --> 1:04:36.320
<v Speaker 13>tailwind because we think that ultimately, you know, I think

1:04:36.360 --> 1:04:38.320
<v Speaker 13>the technology is really cool as well, Right, it's so

1:04:38.440 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 13>interesting put in AirPods you can go from one to

1:04:40.520 --> 1:04:42.800
<v Speaker 13>the other. But what people will then do is adopt

1:04:42.880 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 13>and go Oh, I really want to get into the language.

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:47.480
<v Speaker 13>I really want to belong to the language.

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:50.280
<v Speaker 3>That's happening right now because it's volume. Well, so Tim,

1:04:50.320 --> 1:04:52.560
<v Speaker 3>I get that that's happening right now because that technology

1:04:52.600 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 3>isn't widespread. But I can just imagine in a few years,

1:04:55.600 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, we won't even need maybe we won't even

1:04:58.120 --> 1:04:58.920
<v Speaker 3>need another device.

1:04:59.040 --> 1:04:59.400
<v Speaker 7>We'll have it.

1:05:00.440 --> 1:05:03.120
<v Speaker 3>It'll be a wearable and then it'll be even more seamless.

1:05:03.160 --> 1:05:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Do you see that continuing to drive demandin.

1:05:06.800 --> 1:05:09.920
<v Speaker 13>What's interesting about that is, like I think, short of

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:12.880
<v Speaker 13>a neural implant, people are going to always be learning languages, right,

1:05:13.040 --> 1:05:15.200
<v Speaker 13>so that in a universal language, those are the two

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:17.600
<v Speaker 13>things that could disrupt the market. So what will end

1:05:17.680 --> 1:05:19.360
<v Speaker 13>up happening is that the iPhone when it came out,

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 13>everyone declared the death of language learning, right because you

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:23.480
<v Speaker 13>could hold up your phone you could do the same

1:05:23.560 --> 1:05:27.160
<v Speaker 13>translation that the AirPods are offered today. Even a wearable

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:29.720
<v Speaker 13>can do it. The difference is that people actually want

1:05:29.800 --> 1:05:33.000
<v Speaker 13>to live and breathe inside of the language. In fact,

1:05:33.320 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 13>we just launched a part of our new technology that

1:05:36.600 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 13>explores AI that brings both the pedagogy and the human

1:05:39.840 --> 1:05:42.600
<v Speaker 13>learning aspect of it together with AI called babble Speak,

1:05:43.160 --> 1:05:45.360
<v Speaker 13>and what that does. It allows people to actually practice

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:47.680
<v Speaker 13>the language of learning with with an AI coach, an

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:50.600
<v Speaker 13>AI tuner, So there's pre defined conversations you can practice with.

1:05:51.120 --> 1:05:54.280
<v Speaker 13>It does small corrections, but we see this as a compliment.

1:05:54.400 --> 1:05:56.400
<v Speaker 13>We see this as a way for people to actually

1:05:56.560 --> 1:05:59.480
<v Speaker 13>learn and accelerate the transmission of the language. I think

1:05:59.480 --> 1:06:01.960
<v Speaker 13>the new technies are really going to allow for dabbling

1:06:02.000 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 13>inside of the language. It's going to be great on

1:06:04.720 --> 1:06:06.320
<v Speaker 13>the go, it's going to be great for those one

1:06:06.360 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 13>time use cases, but people will always want to learn

1:06:09.800 --> 1:06:11.560
<v Speaker 13>and live inside of a language themselves.

1:06:11.720 --> 1:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>How do you do them? More generally? Tim kind of

1:06:14.440 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the landscape of learning apps With the introduction of GPT five,

1:06:18.360 --> 1:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>we saw the team create a custom language learning app

1:06:22.400 --> 1:06:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in minutes during the demos. I mean, it's kind of

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>amazing how quickly all this is happening and how quickly

1:06:28.960 --> 1:06:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you can do things. Do you view AI products like

1:06:31.880 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a real competitive threat and what can you

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:36.160
<v Speaker 1>do to keep your user base and sustain growth?

1:06:37.360 --> 1:06:37.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1:06:37.600 --> 1:06:39.760
<v Speaker 13>I watched the same demonstration. It was a cool friendship

1:06:39.840 --> 1:06:41.760
<v Speaker 13>that they had created. It has limitation.

1:06:41.920 --> 1:06:42.440
<v Speaker 7>Is it cool?

1:06:42.720 --> 1:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Are you like, oh, my god, this is going to

1:06:45.800 --> 1:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be what was difficult for us?

1:06:49.000 --> 1:06:51.160
<v Speaker 13>It was cool. No, definitely not in Oh my god.

1:06:51.360 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 13>It was a cool because it was created so quickly.

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:55.280
<v Speaker 13>And what I think is so cool about it is

1:06:55.360 --> 1:06:58.200
<v Speaker 13>people are starting to learn on demand. What the difference

1:06:58.320 --> 1:07:01.040
<v Speaker 13>is though, is I think that people will want want pedagogy,

1:07:01.080 --> 1:07:03.320
<v Speaker 13>they'll want lessons, they'll want content. They'll want to be

1:07:03.360 --> 1:07:05.600
<v Speaker 13>able to actually know that they're getting a trusted guide

1:07:05.720 --> 1:07:09.040
<v Speaker 13>through the language learning process. Large language models, as you know,

1:07:09.520 --> 1:07:12.240
<v Speaker 13>are good at many things. They're good everywhere. They've been

1:07:12.320 --> 1:07:15.160
<v Speaker 13>declaring for now almost two years that they're going to

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:17.840
<v Speaker 13>take away all of the jobs and just really disrupt

1:07:17.840 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 13>all the markets. But I think what ends up happening

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:22.400
<v Speaker 13>is when you start to get into really narrow spaces

1:07:22.440 --> 1:07:24.760
<v Speaker 13>such as language learning, people want to know that they

1:07:24.840 --> 1:07:26.680
<v Speaker 13>have a real lesson plan, that they have really the

1:07:26.720 --> 1:07:28.880
<v Speaker 13>transmission of the language in a way that's going to

1:07:28.920 --> 1:07:31.200
<v Speaker 13>adapt to them. And that's what we think AI is

1:07:31.240 --> 1:07:33.200
<v Speaker 13>going to empower. Inside of babble, we think it's really

1:07:33.280 --> 1:07:37.160
<v Speaker 13>going to allow for the personalization of your individual learning plan,

1:07:37.880 --> 1:07:41.640
<v Speaker 13>but with the content, the pedagogy, the transmission, so you

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 13>retain you're able to speak it, you feel fluent and

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:47.400
<v Speaker 13>you actually feel comfortable with it. So I think from

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:50.000
<v Speaker 13>a build perspective, it's really interesting. We look at it

1:07:50.040 --> 1:07:52.080
<v Speaker 13>as a tool to really help facilitate and go to

1:07:52.160 --> 1:07:54.680
<v Speaker 13>market a lot faster. I think for a transmission and

1:07:54.760 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 13>a trusted content, it'll actually end up being niche markets

1:07:57.680 --> 1:07:59.160
<v Speaker 13>with real players such as ourselves.

1:07:59.160 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So the truth I'll probably be in usage

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>or the stickiness. And I'm assuming then you're signing up

1:08:04.520 --> 1:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>more and more people. You're very enthusiastic amid all of

1:08:07.360 --> 1:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this potential competition. So give us an idea of customers, usership,

1:08:12.840 --> 1:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>people sticking to the platform. Give us some metrics.

1:08:16.360 --> 1:08:20.280
<v Speaker 13>We're growing, we're going on, we have large demand. In fact,

1:08:20.320 --> 1:08:22.519
<v Speaker 13>September is one of our larger months. Just give it

1:08:22.680 --> 1:08:25.320
<v Speaker 13>back to school and back to office after the summertime

1:08:25.880 --> 1:08:27.320
<v Speaker 13>that in New Year's as you can tell, the New

1:08:27.360 --> 1:08:30.040
<v Speaker 13>Year's resolutions tend to be really heavy periods for us.

1:08:30.720 --> 1:08:33.120
<v Speaker 13>What I can say is we have millions of subscribing customers.

1:08:33.240 --> 1:08:36.720
<v Speaker 13>We're signing up thousands every single day. Demand has not

1:08:36.880 --> 1:08:39.360
<v Speaker 13>waned on this side of the equation. We're really excited

1:08:39.400 --> 1:08:42.280
<v Speaker 13>about the future. I actually get more excited about more

1:08:42.320 --> 1:08:45.200
<v Speaker 13>of the players showing interest and actually saying, hey, look,

1:08:45.400 --> 1:08:48.040
<v Speaker 13>this is cool. Understand a language. Play with a language.

1:08:48.240 --> 1:08:49.880
<v Speaker 13>But when you want to go really learn a language,

1:08:50.160 --> 1:08:51.320
<v Speaker 13>go to the providers you trust to.

1:08:51.920 --> 1:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>TAMU say millions, it'd be great if you get one millions,

1:08:54.080 --> 1:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot different than ten million or twenty million. So

1:08:56.240 --> 1:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>just give us an idea if you could. And how

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>much is corporate versus kind of individual and what are

1:09:01.280 --> 1:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>folks paying for a subscription and how long do they

1:09:03.640 --> 1:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>stay with you?

1:09:05.360 --> 1:09:05.559
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1:09:05.600 --> 1:09:07.680
<v Speaker 13>No, probably have over two thousand business clients B to

1:09:07.760 --> 1:09:09.240
<v Speaker 13>B clients. So I can tell you that we just

1:09:09.320 --> 1:09:12.800
<v Speaker 13>signed Inner Miami Football Club. They're using it for their players,

1:09:12.800 --> 1:09:15.479
<v Speaker 13>their coaches, their teams in order to teach them the

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:17.559
<v Speaker 13>languages and what they need to be. We've created custom

1:09:17.600 --> 1:09:20.120
<v Speaker 13>content for them as well, which gets really exciting. But

1:09:20.160 --> 1:09:22.600
<v Speaker 13>I can tell you it's millions of consumer customers. And

1:09:22.600 --> 1:09:23.880
<v Speaker 13>I can tell you it's more than one million, and

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:25.760
<v Speaker 13>it's more than two million, and it's more than three million,

1:09:25.840 --> 1:09:27.479
<v Speaker 13>So it goes on up from there.

1:09:27.560 --> 1:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, and what do people pay corporate versus individuals?

1:09:32.200 --> 1:09:32.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

1:09:33.640 --> 1:09:36.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So on individuals, there's a variety of packages. As

1:09:36.360 --> 1:09:38.320
<v Speaker 13>you can imagine, there's a variety of price points. We

1:09:38.400 --> 1:09:40.679
<v Speaker 13>have a lifetime price point that we can that users

1:09:40.720 --> 1:09:42.360
<v Speaker 13>can subscribe for a life and they get all of

1:09:42.439 --> 1:09:44.519
<v Speaker 13>the features and all of the things that we actually

1:09:45.320 --> 1:09:48.840
<v Speaker 13>upsell to and then you know, there's monthly plans. It

1:09:48.960 --> 1:09:51.519
<v Speaker 13>is the normal subscription model for what users want from

1:09:51.520 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 13>any moment of time.

1:09:53.520 --> 1:09:55.519
<v Speaker 1>All right, but give me an idea. So Tim wants

1:09:55.600 --> 1:09:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to learn what language, Spanish? Spanish?

1:09:58.880 --> 1:10:00.200
<v Speaker 5>Practice my Spanish better.

1:10:00.280 --> 1:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>He just wants to kind of learn Spanish, So give

1:10:02.120 --> 1:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>us an idea. So he signs up, and what would

1:10:03.800 --> 1:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>he be paying, like on a monthly basis or if

1:10:05.800 --> 1:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>you wanted the lifetime yes, yeah.

1:10:08.280 --> 1:10:10.880
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So if Tim you came to the site and

1:10:11.040 --> 1:10:13.720
<v Speaker 13>signed up and downloaded the app, you could pay one

1:10:13.800 --> 1:10:16.160
<v Speaker 13>hundred and ninety nine for the lifetime and then there's

1:10:16.160 --> 1:10:19.439
<v Speaker 13>also disicates available, as all good subscription sites have. But

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:21.559
<v Speaker 13>then there's the monthly fee of twenty nine ninety nine

1:10:21.600 --> 1:10:22.479
<v Speaker 13>that you could be paying as well.

1:10:22.880 --> 1:10:24.800
<v Speaker 5>So okay, so why could do one n nine for life?

1:10:26.160 --> 1:10:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a lot less expensive than competitors such as

1:10:28.360 --> 1:10:30.600
<v Speaker 3>du Lingo, which is you know that plus sum I

1:10:30.640 --> 1:10:33.040
<v Speaker 3>think per year so no catch.

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Come on, no catch, So Tim signs up. I mean,

1:10:36.400 --> 1:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's provided you stick around. No, I'm not trying

1:10:38.840 --> 1:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to say, but right like you got to be around, right.

1:10:42.320 --> 1:10:42.519
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

1:10:42.600 --> 1:10:44.880
<v Speaker 13>Look, with any language learning, there has to be a

1:10:45.200 --> 1:10:47.439
<v Speaker 13>real commitment to it and you have to actually practice

1:10:47.479 --> 1:10:48.040
<v Speaker 13>and utilize it.

1:10:48.160 --> 1:10:48.280
<v Speaker 10>Right.

1:10:48.360 --> 1:10:51.960
<v Speaker 13>But we see the life happens right the families.

1:10:52.040 --> 1:10:53.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, I have kids.

1:10:53.400 --> 1:10:55.439
<v Speaker 13>I'm learning German right now, right, I've moved to Berlin

1:10:55.520 --> 1:10:58.320
<v Speaker 13>for the job. I knew very little German altogether. But

1:10:58.400 --> 1:11:00.200
<v Speaker 13>what I could tell you is I have life about

1:11:00.200 --> 1:11:02.439
<v Speaker 13>the kids of school. The kids have activities. I will

1:11:02.479 --> 1:11:04.479
<v Speaker 13>pick up, I will put down. I will pick up

1:11:04.520 --> 1:11:05.000
<v Speaker 13>and put down.

1:11:05.200 --> 1:11:10.040
<v Speaker 3>But the one nine nights at life, okay, interesting. We

1:11:10.640 --> 1:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm curious about do a lingo in the competition that

1:11:13.160 --> 1:11:16.400
<v Speaker 3>you see there. I'm wondering if you've considered moving outside

1:11:16.439 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>of languages. We use dual linguo at home, but more

1:11:19.439 --> 1:11:22.559
<v Speaker 3>so for chess and reading with our kids.

1:11:23.200 --> 1:11:25.439
<v Speaker 5>I don't know if it works, but it's great.

1:11:25.520 --> 1:11:28.360
<v Speaker 3>The six year old has fun than we do for

1:11:28.680 --> 1:11:29.439
<v Speaker 3>Spanish right now.

1:11:30.880 --> 1:11:33.720
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, you hit the core market there, which is the

1:11:33.800 --> 1:11:36.600
<v Speaker 13>games are great and the great learning transmission, especially for

1:11:36.680 --> 1:11:40.439
<v Speaker 13>the younger audiences right now. Our specialty is language learning,

1:11:40.680 --> 1:11:43.720
<v Speaker 13>where we're we really focus on that. We focus on

1:11:43.760 --> 1:11:46.439
<v Speaker 13>the transmission of language learning. We want to make sure

1:11:46.520 --> 1:11:48.360
<v Speaker 13>that you have the most effective means in order to

1:11:48.439 --> 1:11:50.960
<v Speaker 13>go from a zero to one conversation. And the way

1:11:51.000 --> 1:11:53.599
<v Speaker 13>we look at that is you feel confident walking into

1:11:53.680 --> 1:11:56.040
<v Speaker 13>a room and being able to know that you're speaking

1:11:56.080 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 13>the language in which you're looking to speak. So we

1:11:58.400 --> 1:12:02.000
<v Speaker 13>focus all of our our linguistics, all of our teachers,

1:12:02.400 --> 1:12:04.920
<v Speaker 13>all of the human centric pieces, and then we actually

1:12:05.000 --> 1:12:08.280
<v Speaker 13>use AI as the tool to facilitate that in order

1:12:08.360 --> 1:12:10.800
<v Speaker 13>to help make that happen faster. So that Will Speak

1:12:10.920 --> 1:12:12.720
<v Speaker 13>is a good example of that, where we continue to

1:12:12.760 --> 1:12:16.080
<v Speaker 13>allow you to practice speaking, continue to allow you the conversations.

1:12:16.320 --> 1:12:18.360
<v Speaker 13>But we're hyper focused there. We really think that the

1:12:18.360 --> 1:12:20.360
<v Speaker 13>games are going to lead to other people. We're focused

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:21.559
<v Speaker 13>on the languages you are.

1:12:21.720 --> 1:12:24.959
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So that's a note like moving outside of languages.

1:12:25.120 --> 1:12:27.400
<v Speaker 13>Okay, Yeah, languages are sweet spot.

1:12:28.080 --> 1:12:29.680
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to the AI spend and something we

1:12:29.760 --> 1:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot, right, I'm curious about what you

1:12:32.479 --> 1:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>guys are spending. What are you spending it on? Is

1:12:34.720 --> 1:12:37.639
<v Speaker 1>it on engineering? Talent? Is a data centers, is it content,

1:12:37.800 --> 1:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>is it something else?

1:12:39.960 --> 1:12:42.560
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we've been cashful positives since twenty eleven. It's a

1:12:42.600 --> 1:12:45.760
<v Speaker 13>private company, so we're not out there raising capital. We

1:12:45.840 --> 1:12:48.480
<v Speaker 13>are well funded. We're doing very well. Where we reinvest

1:12:48.560 --> 1:12:50.920
<v Speaker 13>on our capex is. We look for engineers, we're looking

1:12:50.960 --> 1:12:54.240
<v Speaker 13>on AI talent, We're looking at the infrastructure. We're investing

1:12:54.280 --> 1:12:56.759
<v Speaker 13>in what's going to actually transmit and actually forward the future.

1:12:56.800 --> 1:12:59.160
<v Speaker 13>We actually think that this is an exciting time to

1:12:59.280 --> 1:13:02.000
<v Speaker 13>be really looking looking at product features with our proprietary

1:13:02.120 --> 1:13:04.559
<v Speaker 13>data set and our proprietary motes that we have inside

1:13:04.560 --> 1:13:07.599
<v Speaker 13>of our ecosystem. You know, we have hundreds of millions

1:13:07.640 --> 1:13:11.280
<v Speaker 13>of lessons completed a year. That's very rich data to

1:13:11.400 --> 1:13:14.800
<v Speaker 13>be taking into proprietary llms and data models and really

1:13:14.880 --> 1:13:17.360
<v Speaker 13>working inside of the AI to work towards the most

1:13:17.360 --> 1:13:19.360
<v Speaker 13>effective products in terms of transmitting the language.

1:13:19.560 --> 1:13:24.160
<v Speaker 3>Are you at this point able to use AI to

1:13:24.280 --> 1:13:27.720
<v Speaker 3>create language courses? Are you able to use AI to

1:13:28.000 --> 1:13:30.479
<v Speaker 3>do what humans used to do in recent years?

1:13:31.880 --> 1:13:33.960
<v Speaker 13>We actually married the two. You know, where the real

1:13:34.080 --> 1:13:37.719
<v Speaker 13>sweet spot was is not in removing people from creating

1:13:37.760 --> 1:13:40.479
<v Speaker 13>the languages. It's a facilitating the people to create the languages.

1:13:40.560 --> 1:13:40.840
<v Speaker 10>So we do.

1:13:41.040 --> 1:13:43.560
<v Speaker 13>Just answer your question directly, we do use AI, but

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:46.080
<v Speaker 13>we use it with the human centric piece. We've always

1:13:46.160 --> 1:13:48.439
<v Speaker 13>found that our linguists and are also our teachers are

1:13:48.479 --> 1:13:51.360
<v Speaker 13>the best to formulate all of the content so it

1:13:51.439 --> 1:13:54.720
<v Speaker 13>can transmit better than anyone else and more effective. And

1:13:54.880 --> 1:13:57.200
<v Speaker 13>so what we find is we marry the human with

1:13:57.400 --> 1:13:59.840
<v Speaker 13>the AI tools, so we're using the blend of both roles.

1:14:00.080 --> 1:14:02.880
<v Speaker 13>We haven't replaced jobs in order just to replace jobs.

1:14:03.479 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, I got one really really important last question

1:14:06.520 --> 1:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>for you, Tim, how's the German going? Sure, how's the

1:14:08.680 --> 1:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>German going?

1:14:09.439 --> 1:14:14.439
<v Speaker 13>You know, I'm beschinspec and de Deutsch so babel every

1:14:14.520 --> 1:14:17.639
<v Speaker 13>day very little, but I'm learning very slowly.

1:14:17.760 --> 1:14:19.640
<v Speaker 3>So okay, maybe next time he's on we do the

1:14:19.680 --> 1:14:21.360
<v Speaker 3>interview in German, we get Matt Miller in here.

1:14:21.600 --> 1:14:23.360
<v Speaker 13>Oh I'm on, I'm game.

1:14:23.560 --> 1:14:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt would definitely do that really really well. All right, Tim,

1:14:26.280 --> 1:14:29.639
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. Fun to talk with you and get

1:14:29.640 --> 1:14:31.439
<v Speaker 1>some time and hear what you guys are doing, especially

1:14:31.479 --> 1:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to AI to incorporated and get in

1:14:33.880 --> 1:14:37.679
<v Speaker 1>Tim allan, chief executive officer of Babbel, joining us from Berlin, Germany.

1:14:38.560 --> 1:14:43.840
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week daily podcast available on Apple, Spotify,

1:14:44.040 --> 1:14:47.759
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

1:14:47.760 --> 1:14:51.479
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

1:14:51.840 --> 1:14:55.679
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:58.759
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

1:14:58.960 --> 1:15:01.080
<v Speaker 2>and always on a bloombergy terminal.

1:15:08.040 --> 1:15:08.519
<v Speaker 7>Mm hmm