WEBVTT - FCC Pressures Big Tech to Remove Tik-Tok

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power. CALLI

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Emily jam I'm Caroline Hide in family Chat and this

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour. Media

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Mogul's billionaires and some of the biggest names from tech, media,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>business and finance and sports while they're converging in some valley.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>This week, we'll get the latest from the ground. Last

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>one of the most famous apps in the world, It's TikTok.

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It is under pressure with the challenge of its own

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the SEC Commissioner. Pressure is big Tech to delete it

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>from its app stores. We speak with him live in

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>a moment And companies last year defied the pandemic to

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>go public at a record pace. Now inflation and recession

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>fears of caught up and brought the listing party to

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a halt. We speak with the our

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>section of Commercial Officer Jeff Thomas. What to expect for

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the second half get to all of that, but a

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>moment a first, let's gotta look in the markets. Crenny

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Gupta in the house and text talk stuff pretty well. Yeah,

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 1>they made a complete turnaround Caroline's fascinating when you see

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>this because if you had looked at the market at

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>nine thirty am this morning, this is not what the

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>markets looked like. You did not see green on the screen.

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You had an almost two percent decline in those opening bells.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that driven by the stronger dollar story

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that we saw, but you kind of saw a turnaround

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>story in about i won't say, halfway through the session,

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it driven by Big Tex, so much

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to the point that you can actually see at the

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>SPI close to up only two tenths of one percent.

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 1>The NASDAC though outperforming in a very big way, up

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one point seven percent on the day. But take a

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>look at these yields, because I bet some of the

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:45.959
<v Speaker 1>yield picture is playing in two as well. Down only

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>six basis points, well seven, I should say seven basis points,

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and I'm say only seven basis points, Caroline, because in

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of days and weeks, we've had eleven, twelve,

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>even twenty basis point moves in just one day. So

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it's almost a muted day for bonds, but perhaps lifting

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the stock market just a little bit, especially those tech

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>stocks that we know are extremely ultra rate sensitive, which

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>brings me to the high beta stocks in particular. Let's

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>talk about ARC the R innovation E t F. We

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>know that's the trade that has not been working this year,

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but today it actually performed well. And that's because the

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>lights of Tesla, Microsoft, Google, all the big technics have

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>been taking a baiting. They did really well today. But look,

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't enough to have a tartground story for the lights

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of our innovation. It doesn't seem so, at least on

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>this one day basis, just given the kind of blood

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in this particular market. So that's something

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna have to keep an eye on. And

0:02:34.280 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 1>let's get to actually the next slide, which I should

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>mention it's not just a small tech that's bounced, because

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you saw that in cryptocurrency, you saw that in biotech

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, but big tech really really lead the charge.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to emphasize as much as I can, Caroline,

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>because take a look at this. These are your biggest

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>movers on the day, but also your biggest index contributors

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on the day. Your Amazon to your Apples, your Microsoft's,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.119
<v Speaker 1>your Tesla. Do we see this again tomorrow? How much

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of this is a technical trade. Caroline, I don't have

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>those answers, are you, but I'm curious to see if

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this is a sustainable move on wheel Creaty. Thank you

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>so much a great round up. Meanwhile, Tesla one of

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the names could you just mentioned, actually higher that's even

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>after disappointing quarter of deliveries and record month of production.

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Now factories in both China and Germany will remain idle

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>for several weeks. Joining us on the phone to discuss

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>all of this when I was down a hall who

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>covers the company, Danna. We've sort of had mixed messages

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from Elon Musque about the cash burn that's going on,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and indeed they didn't seem to paint the picture that

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>will be closing down some of their manufacturing units for

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for some sort of break. Yeah, they've been a coule

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.120
<v Speaker 1>different reports out of China and Germany that the plants

0:03:38.160 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to be offline for a couple of weeks.

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Uh this this month, Um, you know, the half class

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>empty would say, oh god, this is what a terrible

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>time to be offline. Right, they just gave off of

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>this sort of bad quarter where production was paused because

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. Now they're you know, shutting down production again

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.119
<v Speaker 1>the glass how cool? Would say, well, this is all

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>built back better. You know, auto companies typically tick plans offline,

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>especially around the July was holiday here in the US,

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>to kind of do retooling, to do equipment maintenance, and

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you could often get better production after you've had an

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to kind of do that. So we'll just have

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see what production is like going forward. Um,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the company did say that they had a really strong

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>production for June. Yeah, what was it, two d fifty

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 1>four thousand, six nine deliveries for June, which is the

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>most they've ever made in history, but it actually was

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>still less than the market wanted. Well, that was no excellent. No, Actually,

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to fifty four was the was the deliveries for the quarter,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>which was a dip from the first quarter. But but

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the market kind of expected that because we knew that China,

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which is their most productive factory, had been offline for

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>several weeks because of the COVID lockdown. Um. But yeah, no,

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's definitely a mixed bag. I mean, I

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be a lot of questions about production

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and the ramp up of the new factories in Austin

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and Berlin. When the company reports earnings twenty Yeah, Berlin,

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Austin losing billions of dollars right now because there's a

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>ton of expense and hardly any output. Musque seemed to

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 1>be telling Tesla owner's back on May thirty one. Is

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he painting in general a gloomier picture or not beat one?

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you think? Well, I mean he's I think

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>he's always been fairly you know, to his credit. I

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>think he's always been fairly frank about the state of

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy as a whole. And this is a man

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>who is now the longest running auto auto industry CEO.

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's been the CEO of tessil two thousand

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and eight. He steered the company through the first recession

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or the most recent recession in two thousand and eight

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine, the company became very close to bankruptcy

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 1>during the Model three ramp and eighteen. And it is

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this dance of like, you're investing all of this money

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>into getting new production capacity online, but until they're actually

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>producing cars and you're delivery in the cars, you're not

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>really making that much money. So I think he's actually

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten fairly good at kind of managing cash and figuring

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>out which leverage to pull. Um, you know, demand is

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>not seen to be a problem at least the moment,

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla has raised prices quite a bit to kind

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>of cover the costs of you know, higher energy costs

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and higher commodity costs, and let's face it, making a

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>lot more revs than anyone else out there. Donna. Lastly,

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>just the moon music around Shanghai in general, because again

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>we were worrying about further lockdowns coming from those cities.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Is as a zero COVID policy seems very much still

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>in effect. How much are we worried about the longer

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:31.919
<v Speaker 1>term meant that the Tesla has made. I mean, I

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, Tesla's footprint in China is so

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>important to the company and then also just very important

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to China. I can't see that they are gonna, you know,

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.480
<v Speaker 1>let that plant you know fall by the wayside. I mean,

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they were having people were living in the plant, you know,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>in the closed loop system for as long as they

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>possibly could. So. Um, but you know, the I mean,

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the geopolitical questions about China visity of the US are

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>always really interesting ones but no, it's it's a very

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>strategic plant for the company for sure. Danaha always love

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 1>her on to talk all things Tesla. We thank you indeed. Meanwhile,

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>well Elon Musk is actually meant to be out in

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Sun Valley as our media moguls, billionaires, some of the

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest names in tech, media, business and finance and sports,

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and well our own notable attribute, which is Ed Ludlow

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 1>is on the ground there too, along with Shinali Bassa.

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Can Ed talk to us about what's going on on

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Who have you seen? What if you managed

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to already? So Bob By, former Disney CEO of course

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>now upstairs, has just walked past me and I said

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to him, Bob, what's top of mind for you? And

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he said, Ed, I'm retired, having a good time in

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the sun. Its top of mind for me. But you

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 1>do get people that come and talk about the industry,

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>right and one of those was one a Discovery CEO,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 1>David doust Love, and he actually basically set the scene

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of what's being discussed there having it. I think it's

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be a great term. But that having a

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity. One of rose Discover, who's got great

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 1>body content. I think the world's changed, and it's not

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about how much, it's about how it work. The world's changed,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:13.840
<v Speaker 1>car but the vibe is very similar here this year

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>to last year. Really heavy COVID restrictions in place for attendees.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But there's there's a lot that they're discussing that's big picture,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and of course the backrupt drop that they're all competing

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.560
<v Speaker 1>each other in a in a highly competitive streaming space

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.400
<v Speaker 1>while the consumer is suffering with inflation and fears of

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.959
<v Speaker 1>a recession overall. I mean, remember last time you were

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at the relationships, for example, the fact that whether

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>indeed Mark Zuckerberg was indeed chhotting to Cheryl Samberg. There's

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of change at the top since you

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>were last there. Yeah, and and those same awkward moments

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>are expected to happen, right, you know, I talked about

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Bob Vigor what Bob j Peck from Disney the currency

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 1>over here as well. There have been rumors that their

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>relationship is under stress. You have Elon Musks due to

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>come here along with the Twitter CEO Paraga and CFO

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Ned Segel. Of course they're going to talk about the

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter deal, and even if they are when they're walking

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 1>through the corridors to brunch, or they're out on their

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>mountain bike having an adventure, or their fly fishing whatever.

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.679
<v Speaker 1>It is. Obviously that deal is going to be discussed

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>here because it's the one that everyone in this media

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>landscape talking about. Just remind us what everyone there is

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>actually meant to be doing, apart from fly fish is it?

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it about relationship building? Is it about sharing knowledge?

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>What is actually the the overall impact of a Some Valley? Yeah? So,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>so Some Valley is hosted by Alan and Co. And

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Alan and Co is a boutique investment bank that it's

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>advised on some of the biggest deals in history. Right,

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you look at their name and where the deals they've

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:45.599
<v Speaker 1>been involved in this past year. They are advisors on

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter deal, right, they have been involved in the

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft Activision deal. The ideas that they bring together all

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of these people principally from telecoms, media and tech, but

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>you see other people. Mary Barrett from gm IS used

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to be here, and you know, the hope, let's not

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>beat around the bush. The hope is that this is

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a place where future deals are born. You know, the

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>idea is discussed, then you know what's thrown in this

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>year is that the world is changing like that. As

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I've said, markets are incredibly bollet ale Um. You know,

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>central banks around the world are fighting sort of seemingly

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>unpamable inflation, and they do have behind closed doors these

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of big picture discussion with a number of speakers

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>basically giving their world view. That's kind of what the

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>premium access is. You get to get the thoughts of

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the creme de la creme of Wall Street Company executive,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>big thinkers and big thinking for us, we thank you

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>for meg, said Ludlow out there on the ground. In

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the US. TikTok spin installed over three and twenty million times,

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and now our next guest is calling on Apple and

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Google to remove that app from the app store, is

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>calling it a sophisticated surveillance tool. John us Now as

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>SEC Commissioner, Running CAR Commissioner, thank you for joining us. Um.

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Why would you want it removed from the app stores?

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>What power do you think that would have? Well, I

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok certainly isn't what it appears to be on the service.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's not just another app for sharing plenty of videos

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>or memes. That's just the sheep's clothing. It really does

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>operate as a sophisticated surveillance to what's pulling all sorts

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of information from UH web browsing, to biometrics like base

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>print and voice prints, to location information and some circumstances

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>draft messages. So that's a national security concern. But I

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>also think it comes into play with Google and apples

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>policies to your question, because there's been new revelations, particular

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks that more data has been

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>flowing back to Beijing and previously reported in data flows

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>are very important in terms of how the app stores

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>allow applications to continue to be on those platforms, and

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>so I've said, take a look at your app policies, UH,

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>and if these data flows are inconsistent with the representations

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok has been making, and it seems to be

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that way to me, then they could boot them from

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the app store. You're referencing the reason BuzzFeed piece of course,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that looked at bite Dance saying it repeatedly access private

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>information on US uses despite company assurances to the contrary.

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>What data are you assessing to ensure that this is

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>factually correct and indeed some of the other accusations that

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you have prior to that. Yeah. So the BuzzFeed news

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:21.599
<v Speaker 1>story has internal communications from TikTok and bitte Dance officials,

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>including ones that say everything can be seen in China,

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and also TikTok itself sent a letter to a number

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of senators on Friday that for the first time indicated

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>again a lot of information going back to Beijing. So

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>some of their missions themselves, some of those information there

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that was shared in the BuzzFeed article, And the administration,

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>through Sippius, an agency group out of Treasury, is also

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:48.080
<v Speaker 1>taking a look at some of this, and I would

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>encourage that Sippius process to move swiftly in light of

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>these new revelations. Indeed, overrule the company, TikTok has said

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.079
<v Speaker 1>China based employees can access use at US stay to

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>subject to series though of robust cybersecurity controls and authorization

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>approval protocols overseen by US bus based security team. The

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>CEO has come out saying, look, I'm being very willing

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>to engage with lawmakers and indeed what he said is

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>set the record straight. According to a spokesperson, have you

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>reached out TikTok to the leadership there, have they been

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>able to set you straight or at least have a conversation.

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 1>I've not been set straight by TikTok just yet, but

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to meet with TikTok officials and engaged directly

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>with them on this. I mean, again, there's two sort

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>of main functions here. One has been for years they

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 1>were asked directly by government officials. Are officials in Beijing

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>accessing private US user data? And every time instead of

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>saying yes, but it's not a problem for these reasons,

0:13:44.440 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they would say, well, all U S data is stored

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and now we find out that there's

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently a tremendous amount of information that was flowing back

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to Beijing, and that's those new protections are going to

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>be putting in place. I'm not so sure about that. Again,

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that BuzzFeed News article how a TikTok official saying that

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, these are tools built

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>by China and we'll see if they can continue to

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get access even after those controls are put in place.

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So frankly, this comes down to a matter of trust

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and when there's been apparent misrepresentation, but how much data

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is being pulled where it's going for years now. I

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of trust left in TikTok. And

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not alone. There was a member of the Australian

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Parliament that just wrote a letter saying, I see your

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>US user data is going to Beijing. I want to

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>know is Australia user data going there? So I think

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>this is probably broader effort to take a look with

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>more scrutiny at the data flows in TikTok. You're one

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of the three FCC commissioners who are appointed under the

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration. Of course, under the Trump administration we saw

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>bands floated of TikTok, but in general, it's not what

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>users want. And do you see any sort of middle

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>ground here and any assurances that the company could make

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>cause some sort of ability to maintain and use hair

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US, but ensure that you're not worried about

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>information flows. I'm open minded, though obviously I'm skeptical. I

0:15:03.040 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>think step one has to be let's get a full

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>airing of the information that did flow before, we talk

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>about blessing through some sort of process, additional data flows

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>going forward. And you're right, I want of four STEC

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>commissioners we can only take official action as a body

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>through a vote of the four of US, and so

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens here. But again I think there's

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>other agencies that hopefully can be stepping in as well

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>with these concerns. Have you had back from alphabet and

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the parent company in Google and uncle's Apple about any

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>moves that make on the rap stoles I have, and

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I've asked for a response by July eighth. Then there's

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>precedent for those app stores when data has flowed, for instance,

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>two servers in China without that being disclosed, to kick

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that app out when there's other surreptitious uses of data

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>for them to take action. So I'm open for them

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to tell me, you know, here's why it's a violation

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>our policies, or here's why it's not a violation of

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>our policies. But the national security question is pretty clear.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, US military branches have almost all been TikTok

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>from their devices. UH, agencies that deal with national security

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>have banned them from their devices as well. We warned

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>families of US troops not to put it on their

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>personal devices either. So there's a lot of concern about

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>the national security threats. SEC Commissioner Brandon Carr, we thank you.

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Come back when you perhaps her back from the companies,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and and indeed let us know if you do manage

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to speak to some of those TikTok executives as well,

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>We thank you. Let's talk about deals. Broll com sixty

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>one billion dollar deal for vm Ware I was going

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to move forward after a rival bidder failed to emerge

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to break up the deal for the cloud computing company

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>during its so called go shop period. That's going into

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>people familiar with the matter and the exploration of the

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>goo shop gets broad Com past at least one hurdle

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to the biggest ever takeover by semiconductor maker. Representatives for

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>vm Ware and broad Colm can immediately be reached for comment.

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The UK or force owners of apps such as social

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>media and search engines to curb quote, state innked dis information.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>If they don't, they face fines of as much as

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of annual global sales. The crackdown is part

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>of the forthcoming Online Safety Bill. Meanwhile, the EU IT

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to increase the number of tech startups in Europe,

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.480
<v Speaker 1>doing this through the EU Listings app, which is saying

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>will make it easier for founders to keep control of

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a firm once it goes public, as well as raising

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>some forty five billion in europs. The EU has far

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>fewer deep tech firms in the U S and China,

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and the goal is to attract more tech and even

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>have them will relocate to Europe, as well as invest

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in women and diverse founders f d x u S

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the crypto exchange co founded by billionaire Sam Magma. Freed

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>signs an agreement with Block five that includes an option

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to purchase the crypto lender for as much as two

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollars and Bangma Freed spoke exclusively Women in Motion

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>aartibasek on Friday. There are synergies between the businesses A

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, I you know, if you look at

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.199
<v Speaker 1>what what you know Block fay is built out. I

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>think they have a loyal customer base. I think, you know,

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they have a real business model. They have a hard

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>program that that people love. They's a strong you know,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>they're strong leadership. And I think that we have been

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>focusing on a lot of the back end infrastructor right

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>on you know, everything from the exchange of matching engine,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>risk engine and everything else. UM and and those match

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 1>up somewhat nicely. And so I think that there are

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways that our products can work together

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.360
<v Speaker 1>and can mesh together, um, in a way that's sort

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:34.479
<v Speaker 1>of better than you know, either would be independently. And

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I will also say that you know, they've been working

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>really productively with regulators on you know, building out regulated

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>yield products and licensed yield products, which which you know

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>we're excited about and excited that they've been doing it

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in a regulated way. I think that's a healthy way

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to do it. And I think that's going to serve

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.920
<v Speaker 1>them well, um, you know, long term um. And it's

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>something that you know work Sage work with as well.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You know you had told political that FTX is looking

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 1>for opportunities to bail out, you know, places where customers

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise be underwater. But are you worried here about

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>moral hazard at all that bailing out a company may

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>not actually be what's best for the industry at large.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.639
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question, and you know, and and guessing

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting at there is like does that bail

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>out a company that really should have failed? And and

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>teacher is the wrong lesson to that company? Um? And

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I think what I would say there's two things. First

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of all, I'm way more excited to bail out customers

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.239
<v Speaker 1>than shareholders, right. And so the focus of this is

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>not how do we deliver as much shareholder value do

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>troubled assets as possible? Right, It's how do we protect customers?

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think those imply pretty different things. Um Uh.

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So that that's that's one thing that will say. And

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of them is way more important

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for the ecosystem, and the other is the one that

0:19:58.000 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>has the biggest moral hazard. Um. The older thing is

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that um uh is that you know, we are trying

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to find who were the responsible players who were building

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>out you know, a good business you know, how to

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>sustainable model and you know would use short term liquidity

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>um and and and that that could help protect customer

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>funds built you know, a a a real valuable business

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think, um, you know, had something real to

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:34.160
<v Speaker 1>offer to customers rather than you know, which companies honestly

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>should never have existed probably and um and you know

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>as of today, you know, maybe we should just let

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>let them sort of uh you know, die quiet death. UM.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's something that we have been thinking

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>about coming up. We're going to speak to the NASA

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Chief Commercial Officer, Jeff Thomas on the abrupt halt companies

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>get in public and whether it will pick up in

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the second half. Stay tuned for it. That's a bling bag.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to BLW Technology. I'm Caroline Hind in New York. Now,

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.959
<v Speaker 1>last year, companies defined the pandemic to go public at

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a record pace. Now, macro volatility, inflation, recession phase, you

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>name it, it's kind of brought an abrupt end to

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>that listing party. Well, next, Jeff Thomas is here to

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:25.919
<v Speaker 1>tell us nasta's chief Commercial officer joining us Now, Jeff

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>is a party of it. Well, if you look at

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the first half, we had a hundred and eight new listings.

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So while that's a dramatic fall off from last year,

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>if you go back historically, that was actually a pretty

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>good number of new listings for US. And by the way,

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 1>that's compared to twelve on the New York Stock Exchange,

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>so we had about an eight percent win rate in

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the first half. What really fell off a cliff was

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the capital raise. So we only saw twelve billion dollars

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>raised in the first half of last year, and so

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that was a fraction of what we saw last year

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in a typical year, So still seeing

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a number of new listings, but not a lot of

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 1>big listings. At one point it was very very much

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>felt like a spack party in one has that gone

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the special purpose acquisition companies. So of the eight i

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>p o s we had in the first half, fifty

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>nine were spack I p o s. And so you

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>did still see new sponsors coming to market. There has

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>been a slowdown in that market compared to what we

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 1>saw last year based on kind of the market reception

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on some of the recent spact business combinations as well

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as some proposed new rules from the SEC over. We

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.119
<v Speaker 1>did also see thirty one spack business combinations get completed

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first half of this year. So it's still

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>a viable way for companies to come to market, but

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>definitely under a little bit more scrutiny suddenly, and we've

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>had sort of theorized likes of instacr, the likes of

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Discord have made it known that they want to go public.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>How are they now assessing the market, What does the

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>backlog look like. I think there's an enormous backlog of

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>companies that we've been working with since some of which

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, right, So if the company went on file

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>confidentially in December, it typically takes two to three months

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to work through the sec comment process. By the time

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.880
<v Speaker 1>they got to the end of that process, they were

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>really not going to go into the market as choppy

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it was as it was in Q two. So I

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>think everybody's looking for a little bit more stability in

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the market. They want to see the volatility index or

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 1>the VIX come back down below twenty five or twenty

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>even um and they want to see some of the

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>macro uncertainty get flushed out of the market in terms

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of what's the FED doing on rate hikes, the entire

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical situation. So we're hopeful we're going to see some

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>big deal start to come back to market after Labor Day,

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:30.479
<v Speaker 1>but it's still a bit uncertain. We'll talk to us

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 1>about therefore, how private companies can help their employee base

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 1>by having some sort of secondary offering, or how we

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>can have liquidity events for these businesses, many of which

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>have got talent and they need to keep incentivized. I

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>know that you were president in Liquidity Solutions before you

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 1>talked about you know, when you're in the private market,

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 1>how you can have these sorts of events. What are

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people looking at? That's right, So NASDAC private market is

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>still a very viable alternative as long as the private

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>capital markets hold up. We still see a lot of

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.719
<v Speaker 1>capital available in the private market. Gets although we are

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>starting to see valuations come down in the private markets

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to follow along with the public markets. And so whether

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 1>companies are going to do a tender offer out to

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>give a broad based liquidity for their employees, whether they

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>want to run an auction to do some price discovery

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and see what's the true value of their common stock now,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>or just do one off block sales for some of

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the founders in early execs. NASA Private Market has a

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 1>great platform to help companies achieve that liquidity while they're

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>waiting a little bit longer for the I p O.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>How many of those companies actually want to look in

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of new valuations though, because some of them

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>are eye watering. When we're looking at the reports about Klana,

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, Well, I think you know, if you look

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>at it, there's a lot of companies on the public

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>side whose valuations have been compressed, and so it makes

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>sense that companies on the private side would see a

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>similar compression, especially those in a similar sector. And so

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the things we track really closely is the

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.439
<v Speaker 1>price to earnings multiple in the public markets relative to

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the ten year interest rate. And there's a pretty clear

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>trend over time that has that tenure interest rate goes up,

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>pe multiples come down because those future cash flows or

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>lack thereof, are a little bit less valuable in a

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>high interest rate environment. Who are some of the pools

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of money who are still willing to commit to this

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 1>private market at the moment, or indeed to new recent

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>I p O s. We've heard of certain institutions looking

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to actually help bridge that gap when companies are unable

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to raise new funding rounds or indeed go to the

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>public markets. That's right, I think a lot of folks

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>will look to step in. The question a lot of

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>companies are asking about is should I raise that new

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 1>round at equity where I have to price the round

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:39.679
<v Speaker 1>or is it better to do some type of a

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>convertible debt security where I can bridge around without having

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to price that. Part of this is the psychology of

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the founders and ceo s out there. You know, they

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>just raised a round and funding. Last year they probably

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>announced that very proudly to their employees, and now they're

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>probably reticent to go out and announce a new lower

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>round valuation, even though that's probably where the market will clear.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>So trade off between debt and equity is something we

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>hear a lot of companies talking about. And what about

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>where companies are coming from? Are they all US domestic based?

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course there used to be that time where as

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese based companies wanted to list in the US.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that sort of fall in a file as well? Well.

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>We definitely have seen some headwinds in terms of recruiting

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>international listings along with a lot of the geopolitical uncertainty,

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of UH nationalism in the search

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>for new listings. So while things have slowed down a

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 1>bit with the Chinese listings, while we've been working through

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the accounting issues that the SEC is working

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>with their regulators on, we have seen an increase in

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>demand from companies in Southeast Asia, Latin America and other

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets. So for US investors, you know, we think

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>it's critical that we keep attracting these high growth companies

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>from emerging markets to the US capital markets, So we're

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to work on that. And what about the innovation

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on your side? What more are you looking to do

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at the moment in terms of ensuring that they keep

0:27:58.200 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>on coming to NaSTA Because you say you've got a

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>big win rate, how are you looking to Joel, You're busy.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>If indeed the pool of companies wanting to come to

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>market is a little bit smaller, well, we always like

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>to say we have solutions for companies at every stage

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of their life cycle. So we talked a little bit

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about how NAZDAC private market can help with liquidity pre

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I p O. Once you're a public company, an issue

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>that's getting more and more important is what are you

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.399
<v Speaker 1>doing around your E s G disclosures? The SEC has

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>proposed some rules around climate disclosure, so we're actively working

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>with our issuers to advocate on their behalf with the

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 1>SEC to make sure that those new regulations are reasonable.

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>At the same time, we're looking into what are the

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.439
<v Speaker 1>commercially viable options for us to help our companies with

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>these new reporting requirements from regulators, investors, and all of

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>their stakeholders. So we recently completed the acquisition of Metrio

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and E s G KPI reporting platform that's going to

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 1>help companies accelerate the way that they report their non

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>financial metrics. And let's just talk a little bit. When

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you think of the S, G immediately started to think

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of the moves that ASDA was making and showing that, well,

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the s was uplifted as well, not just environmental, but

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking about diversity on boards and who you have on

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and listening, how is that conversation going. How much investors

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sort to be blunt caring about that at the moment. Well,

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the hallmarks of a great market

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is to have great corporate governance standards, and that's why

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we did introduce a new disclosure rule around board diversity.

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>We think it's a critical part for investors to be

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>informed about the diversity of companies boards and so we've

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>seen a great response from that in terms of both

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 1>companies UH and investors. And as you mentioned on the

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>S there is a lot of work that's going into

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>especially around human capital management within the issuers and how

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking about their employee base, especially during this challenging time. Jeff,

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's great to catch up with you. Thank you spending

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a time. Jeff thomasr VP at NASDAC. Let's talk about

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>crypto for a cause now, because in the world a

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies actually fundraising events have been forming around all types

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of causes. Now with the overturn of rovers as way,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>digital assets are being looked to potentially aid women around

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the country with some of the costs that they might

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>have traveling outside of state. For example. Listen, Marcaline is

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>with us CEO of Women Labs and are we pleased

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to have some time with you just talk to us

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what Women Labs is looking to

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of while forming some sort of tao

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of course around supporting from a decentralized, automous organization funding

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>women to be able to still access abortions. Yes. So,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the really interesting things we've started

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to see as a surge in the world of n

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 1>f T s in crypto as a lever for social activism.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>So people are now going to crypto, They're going to

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>n f T s as a way to donate money

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to support causes like planned parenthood. We my

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 1>organization RANS an n f T project called crypto checks,

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and we were actually back all the way back in January.

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>We were the first crypto donation ever to IPPF, which

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is the parent organization of Planned Parenthood. So I think

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to see n f t S as a

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>fundraising measure, but I believe we'll also start to see

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>one step further than that, where decentralized autonomous organizations, which

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 1>are basically self governed entities, will start to create this

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>network nationwide of people that live in safe states where

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>women can get an abortion in a safe clinic legally,

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and people that live in states where they in the

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>past couple of weeks woke up in the morning and

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>realize that if they need access to to an abortion

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>or safe reproductive healthcare, they no longer can legally do

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that in their state, and a DOW can provide the

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 1>mechanism to not only just connect women, but to be

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>able to sponsor emergency trips to states where women can

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>get access to safe healthcare. So the really interesting thing

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with this is that for people who are upset about

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>what just happened with over Turning Road v Wade, now

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>there's an opportunity to really get involved in a mobilized,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>action driven way instead of just getting out into the

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>streets and protesting, which we've seen over the past few

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.479
<v Speaker 1>years with various different human rights causes, doesn't always have

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>as much of an impact as we would love to

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>see an actually driving change. So I think this is

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a really great way to actually mobilize people who are

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>passionate about how can I wake up in the morning

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and and actually do something that has a difference in

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this cause. Do you think it brings new people to

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the world of cryptoconnocies. I think it does. I think

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>there was this kind of misconception and a lot of

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>people's minds still about the fact that um crypto is

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>associated with the deep dark web, right, and now we

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>are seeing that yes, it is actually creating this this

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>underground network, but it's an underground network for good where

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you're able to connect people from all around the world

0:32:51.920 --> 0:32:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to drive together towards something that is fundamentally what we

0:32:55.960 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>believe in driving human rights. So I think it is

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 1>bringing new people in. What is also a misconception is

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that crypto is in some way anonymous, because the blockchain

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>makes it evidently clear that it's not anonymous. So how

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 1>do you work out how do you ensure that you're

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>protecting so the women who are actually using the funds

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that they are legally protected in some way. Yes,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>so I would I would strongly advise anyone who is

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.280
<v Speaker 1>getting involved or the recipient of any of these types

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of funds to use your crypto and a self hosted wallet,

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so that means that you own the keys to your wallet,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 1>using a cold wallet like Ledger or any of those

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>other providers, and not using in storing platforms that you

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>might be more traditionally familiar with like coin base. For

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>there's news recently that came out that coin based might

0:33:45.360 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be selling geo tracking data to the government, and we're

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>waiting to hear on a Freedom of Information Act exactly

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the extent of that information that's being shared. But I

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>would just caution people to realize that when you are

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>using a centralized body as a platform for sending crypto,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they are tracking your information. So if you're using something

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that purely lives on the black chain that you manage

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and host and story yourself, then you can maintain that

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>anonymity that you're looking for in a situation like this

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 1>where you're worried about potentially being tracked by the government,

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 1>And of course we'll we'll look to get some sort

0:34:18.800 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of reaction from coin based and other more centralized entities

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 1>on that fact. But Alyssa, I'm I'm interested in your

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>perspective more broadly on when we're at a time of

0:34:28.920 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>great volatility. I mean, I look at, of course, crypto chicks.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>What you've provided in a lot of it is n

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>f T projects. Of course, n f T s have

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>lost a lawful lot of their value and indeed an

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:39.719
<v Speaker 1>awful lot of their minting. And I'm interested as to

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>whether that makes people less willing. I would think of

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the height of the crypto craze, money was raised like

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>within a click of your thumbs about around, you know,

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>buying the constitution for example, how quickly you're able to

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:57.480
<v Speaker 1>raise funds and this more difficult environment, we saw incredible

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>excitement from the market. I think there's a lot of

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>people in the crypto industry and even outside of the

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry industry that we're just outraged with the news

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that that came to light in the past couple of weeks,

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and people who are thinking about this as an opportunity

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to really be a part of driving change in history.

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And so we had people just outpouring support from our community,

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.759
<v Speaker 1>but from the broader community as well, and there's a

0:35:20.800 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>few other projects that are doing similar fundraising measures to

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:26.919
<v Speaker 1>to raise to be able to donate back to organizations

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:30.360
<v Speaker 1>like plant Parenthood, and the whole market has been rallying

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and support behind these initiatives, which has been very heartwarming

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to see, as you said, even in light of the

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.800
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's a bear market happening right now in

0:35:37.840 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the crypto world. Do you think dows in general will

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>be used more prominently going forward for chariteable endeavors need

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not be about fundraising for something suchuch as this, but

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>just the more accountable way of raising funds from no

0:35:51.480 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>matter what way. Absolutely there's complete transparency with how the

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>funds are used, and every person that is donating and

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>participate in within the ecosystem gets to say and how

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the funds are then distributed, and so for every individual

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.600
<v Speaker 1>individual person to feel like they are a partial owner

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of what's being created and then what's being distributed. I

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>think that's a lot more action oriented and from a

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>personal impact perspective, a lot of people feel like they're

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>actually really driving change and being a part of that,

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and so having that sense of closeness towards the results

0:36:24.520 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of what you're putting your funds towards does really help

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to get people a little bit more involved. So I

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>think there will be plenty more initiatives that come out

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of the world of Taos that are charitable or social

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>impact oriented in nature out of interest of you looked

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>for celebrity endorsement in any way of these funds going

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>towards a helping abortions. In some way, I felt like

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>n f T has got very much caught up in

0:36:46.120 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the world of celebrity and kind of has back fard somewhat.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>As everyone's taken off their their n f T s

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>from the Twitter handles and the light we we are

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:58.879
<v Speaker 1>connected with a few very high profile women who are

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>excited to be involved off with what we're building, and

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and we feel like that's been really helpful for us

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>because as a lot of women are kind of scared

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of the world of crypto, seeing familiar faces that you

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>respect and know are really high profile individuals in in

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the mass media world. Having those people be a part

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of the ecosystem and a part of a part of

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the community helps to to normalize it a little bit.

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the people that have really been

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>interested in crypto and n f T s still are.

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>They're still active advocates and and we are connected with

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 1>quite a few of those that we are excited to

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>be to be sharing. Son, have you kind of changed

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>your narrative though a little bit as to you say,

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>people who are slightly scared of the world of crypto,

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>how do you ensure that people are doing this with

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the financial literacy that you want to ensure that they have,

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that they could lose an awful lot of money when

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>putting it to work in an investment perspective. I'm not

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that your fundraising is in any way that related,

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but for example and more of your older n f

0:37:57.400 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>T projects. Yeah, so I think it's really important to

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>educate specifically women who, as we know from public stock

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.319
<v Speaker 1>market data, are a little bit more risk averse in

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>their investments, educating on what is the impact are you

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>investing in something that you view as a short term

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>r O I are you thinking about this from a

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>long term investment horizon and really encouraging people to do

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a significant amount of research before they invest in anything

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 1>with the assumption that, yes, there may be a downturn

0:38:24.800 --> 0:38:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in the market right now, but as you look across

0:38:26.880 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole, the whole, the whole tech market in terms

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>of risk assets in stocks, everything is down. And so

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>if we are encouraging people to spend this time doing

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of research and understanding what do they view

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>being around and being a really strong driving factor in

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the n f T or crypto industry in one year

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>from now or two years from now. And if people

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.839
<v Speaker 1>want to then invest, they invest with a lot more

0:38:49.880 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>conviction having had the time and energy invested in educating themselves.

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 1>And we, of course as a community, put a lot

0:38:56.560 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of effort into making sure that women across the gamut

0:39:00.000 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>of Web three are well educated on what are all

0:39:02.800 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>the different terms, What are the ways that you can invest,

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 1>What are the ways that you can get involved in

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the industry beyond just being a collector or an investor,

0:39:09.920 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but also being an entrepreneur project builder as well. Women

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>lad CEO Alissa Martime, thank you so much spending some

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>time talking about some of your latest focus. Meanwhile, coming

0:39:20.920 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 1>up a Broomberg scoop details on how Washington wants to

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Beijing's plan to become a world leader in chip production.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:47.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a Broomberg now to a Blueberg scoop the

0:39:47.200 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 1>US is pushing the Netherlands to van a s mL

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>from selling chip making gear to China. This is according

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to people familiar with the matter joining US now as

0:39:54.840 --> 0:39:57.960
<v Speaker 1>blogs Eric Martin, who helped break that very story. So

0:39:58.080 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this is at a time where we look at potentially

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>US we're using some tarifs from China, but still looking

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to well ensure that some of the technology isn't going

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that direction. That's absolutely right, Caroline Uh. This is something

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen both the Trump administration and now the

0:40:15.080 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration United in terms of trying to stop China's advance.

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.759
<v Speaker 1>China looking to catch up and sort of pass the

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>US in terms of high technology, and one of the

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>choke points in their bid to do so is this

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>lithography equipment, this equipment for printing computer chips. And what

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 1>we understand is that US officials have been pressuring the

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Netherlands and a s mL UH to stop providing China

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:48.359
<v Speaker 1>with this equipment. China produces very little of its own

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.040
<v Speaker 1>equipment for this process, and so this is really an

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:55.359
<v Speaker 1>area where if China can't get access to it through

0:40:55.520 --> 0:41:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a s mL, which provides about of this UH equipment,

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>has market share globally. It really could put the brakes

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on their ability to catch up with the US on printing,

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not even just the most high tech kinds of computer chips,

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:17.560
<v Speaker 1>but even kind of more mature, older computer chips as well.

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you think has m L will do it? Do

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.919
<v Speaker 1>you think the Netherlands will will agree? Well, that that's

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>something that we that we're under that we understand that

0:41:25.400 --> 0:41:28.640
<v Speaker 1>they have not yet agreed to what the US has

0:41:28.680 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>been asking for. But this is certainly a place where

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration has been looking to build consensus with allies.

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>We understand that a similar request has been made of

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Japan and Nikon in terms of the one other major

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:50.279
<v Speaker 1>company to have about uh the very small percentage, very

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 1>small minority of that market, the part that that a

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>SML does not have. But this has been an area

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>where the Biden administration has been working with allies globally

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to try to align export controls to make sure that

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>something that trying to get from one country to prevent

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 1>them from getting it from another. Our Martin, it's a

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 1>great scoop. We thank you for bringing it a truly

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>global perspective coming from the chip industry, and indeed, as

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>we continue to keep abreast of what Washington is doing

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of those tariffs on Chinese goods. Meanwhile, well

0:42:24.200 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that does it for this addition of Bloom Big Technology,

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Well cook off our coverage from Sun Valley beginning Wednesday,

0:42:29.640 --> 0:42:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the number of great guests including twenty three and CEO

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>so Far, CEO, Event Rights, CEO, I've got a few

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>there for you, indeed, chairmans too. Don't forget to check

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:42.920
<v Speaker 1>out our new podcasts as well. You can find it

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify.

0:42:46.360 --> 0:43:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And I heard from New York the subreme Berg pick

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:07.959
<v Speaker 1>wi a pick wick, a kick, whip, a pick a whip,

0:43:08.400 --> 0:43:13.120
<v Speaker 1>hip a pip He would a hip wi a ship

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:15.600
<v Speaker 1>stick to it