WEBVTT - Week 7 NFL Bets: Nick’s 5 Picks

0:00:01.520 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Love Herts kiw Week.

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Kwan has had quite a career, from childhood roles in

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom and The Goonies

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>to a recent Academy Award win for Everything, Everywhere, All

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>at Once. But now Keith finally stars as a leading

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>man in the film Love Hurts. Love Hurts is a

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 1>perfect date night movie with its mix of over the

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>top action comedy and a ton of heart. Love Hurts

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Only at theaters February seventh.

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 2>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 2>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 2>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 2>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheadle, Michael Panha, and

0:00:53.880 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Bobby Knavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in Episode eighty five, What's Right Nick right the

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 3>podcast the YouTube show. We are officially Am I going

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 3>to be right when I say this? I'm checking in

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 3>real time? Are we officially at eighty thousand subscribers on YouTube?

0:01:25.640 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 3>We were right? I mean this close? What'd you say

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.199
<v Speaker 3>to Monsey? See?

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.199
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'm mistaken. I thought we were at more than eighty.

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 3>No, seventy nine point six thousand as of recording, which

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 3>means by the time people see this, maybe we will

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 3>be at eighty thousand subscribers. Remember, Demons is on the

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 3>books for one thousand dollars bonus if we get to

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>one hundred thousand subscribers before the end of the football

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 3>regular season, so basically the first week of January. So

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 3>we'd appreciate you subscribing there, on iTunes, on Spotify, wherever

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 3>you get your podcasts, And if you're listening or watching

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>this show, our week seven gambling show, it means you

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 3>are a loyal consumer of the product. Demands and I

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 3>put out because thus far you haven't been here to

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 3>make money. Thus far, we have been costing you money. Now,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 3>have we been costing you outrageous sums? No, But however

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 3>we have been two and three or three and two

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 3>every god forsaken week. And that is because for five

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 3>weeks in a row, our lock, our right move, we

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 3>have been wrong. And for four of those five weeks,

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>our lock, our right move was covering at the god

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 3>dog two minute warning of the game. So last week,

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 3>let's go through it. There's the season record. It's horrifying.

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 3>The only thing that makes me feel better is Bill's Simmons,

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>who has a slightly more popular podcast and gambling show

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 3>than this one, is down about three million dollars of

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 3>money this year. Documented. I'm just four games under five hundred.

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.839
<v Speaker 3>As you can see, the lock is four games under

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>five hundred. So Cleveland minus two and a half against

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 3>New England was flatly the wrong side of it. There's

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 3>no justification there. I was dead wrong. Bailey's Appy continues

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 3>to impress. New England ran the ball great, Cleveland did

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 3>nothing well. I was on the wrong side of it.

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati minus two is good bet. When I said Cincinnati

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 3>was desperate, they were going to find a way to

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 3>win against New Orleans, even though New Orleans was getting healthier.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>They did. The Giants plus five and a half clearly

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>the right side of it. They won that game outright,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 3>as we said they might, so that feels good. CAC

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>plus two and a half did not cover, but I

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 3>don't feel like it was the wrong side of the bet.

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 3>They were winning the game with a minute twenty left,

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 3>so they were at one point in the game. They

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>were three point favorites. You there was, so that was

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>a little heart overhead. It was the game of the weekend.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 3>I thought the line you can't city at home should

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 3>never be underdogs, so I went with them. However, I

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 3>don't feel like we were on the wrong side of it.

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 3>And then the damn Jaguars ruined me once again. So

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 3>the Jaguars in this game. What makes that pick even

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 3>worse is they were I got them plus one and

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>a half on this. I had him as my lock

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 3>on TV. The line had moved plus two and a

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>half and with thirty seconds left they were up one.

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Now Indy was in field goal range with a good

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 3>not great, but a good kicker, and I was prepared

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 3>to lose the plus one and a half win the

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:53.000
<v Speaker 3>plus two and a half on the and my real

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 3>bet was plus two and a half. My real life

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 3>bet was plus two and a half. And then Indy

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 3>on third down throws a bomb instead of being conservative

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>kicking a field goal winning by two, they get it,

0:05:09.360 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 3>they get the two point conversion, they win by seven,

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 3>and we lose once again. However, unlike weeks four and five,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 3>this is more like week six, where I looked at

0:05:23.279 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the slate and I said, oh my god, I love

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>these games. I finally feel like I have a pulse

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 3>on the season. I know that two and three doesn't

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 3>feel like a pulse in the season, but two of

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 3>those games are two winners we won easily, are two losers.

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 3>We were covering both of them with one minute left

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>in that football game or a minute ten left in

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>that football game. We really only misanalyzed one game. You

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.280
<v Speaker 3>add to it, we are now getting great production help

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 3>because Victor, while I'm making my picks is sending in

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 3>his five picks, which is super helpful to make sure

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 3>that I'm not overlapping more than once with Victor. Victor,

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 3>I believe went OH for five last week, which is

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 3>why if you're watching on YouTube, he's down to just

0:06:13.520 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>T shirts. I OH for five weeks? Can really people

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 3>don't budget for an OH for five weeks. You don't

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.359
<v Speaker 3>anticipate the over five week, the over five week is

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 3>the how much money do you get for donating plasma?

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Those types of things go through your mind. So this

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 3>week we're gonna come out firing. We are starting with

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.559
<v Speaker 3>a big underdog that I think might win outright. I

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 3>certainly love them catching a full seven the Detroit Lions

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:50.279
<v Speaker 3>plus seven in Dallas in Dak Prescott's first game back.

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:54.359
<v Speaker 3>That is our first pick. Let me explain it. So

0:06:54.440 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the Lions this year had Minnesota beat and then fell apart,

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:05.599
<v Speaker 3>lost by four. They played Philly and lost by just

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 3>three points. They hung and I think they scored thirty

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 3>five on Philly, a Philly team that we now know

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 3>is excellent. They scored forty five on Seattle. Then what happened?

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 3>They played the New England Patriots. They got shut out,

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 3>They looked terrible, and then they had a buy. So

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 3>they are motivated and rested. They have that going for them. Dallas,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, I think it's gonna have a

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 3>super conservative game plan with Dak's first game back, make

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 3>sure they get the win. What has Dallas been the

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 3>best at in football this year? Rushing the passer Micah Parsons,

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 3>DeMarcus Lawrence Demonsei's about to sneez. Don't worry about it, buddy.

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh gosh, see, Demonsey's got this weird thing where the

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.680
<v Speaker 3>slaves pal He won't actually sneeze. He old to sneezes

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in and it gives him terrible medical problems. I don't

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 3>just sneeze, buddy, He's now his eyes are watering. Sorry,

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 3>everybody sneezes. He wanted himself sneeze. Now back to the picks. So, Dallas,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 3>what they do better than anybody is rush the passer.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Detroit has allowed seven sacks all season. They have the

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 3>best one of the best offensive lines in the league.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>They have been getting Jared goff time all year. He

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 3>has not been getting hit, so I think the pass

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>rush is neutralized somewhat. I think this is a game

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 3>Detroit could win, outright. I love the coming off of

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 3>bye and coming off their worst performance. So they're also

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 3>a desperate team. I'm not necessarily picking them to win outright.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>Then, Also, Dak's probably a little desperate too.

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, but I think it's gonna be in a

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 3>different way desperate in that I think Dak is gonna

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 3>make any mistake exactly right. I think Dak's gonna be

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 3>like listen if I don't. What I can't have happened

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.560
<v Speaker 3>is Cooper Rush after he played clean for four games

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 3>until it all fell apart against Philly. I can't go

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 3>out there and throw a bunch of picks. I can't

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 3>make a bunch of mistakes. I think Mike McCarthy and

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Kellen Moore are gonna have a conservative game plan. Makes

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 3>what they need is find a way to beat Detroit.

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 3>You then get Chicago the next week, then you're at

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 3>the bye and so for all those reasons, Detroit plus

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>the seven, I love it. That's our first pick.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 4>It's not mad at it.

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Next one, you're gonna be mad at next one. The

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:29.400
<v Speaker 3>entire world's gonna be on the other side. Usually, when

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the entire world's on the other side, when a line

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>looks too good to be true, we put it in

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 3>the be careful category.

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Yep, they're like.

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, just be careful there, it's a trap. Instead, I'm

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 3>just going with anti public. I'm going with the side

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 3>no one's gonna be on. It also happens to be

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 3>a team that I've been writing with, the Jacksonville Jaguars

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 3>and the Prince that was promised laying three points a

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 3>full three at home against the New York Giants. What

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:06.440
<v Speaker 3>do you want to say to monsay.

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 5>It's so crazy to hear this every gambling show I made.

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Your cry has got tears rolling.

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm hurting for you, man. This is this is this

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 5>what you do? What do you just You just pick

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 5>one team to ride with and lose heck a cash

0:10:20.600 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 5>with and you just stick with it.

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So this is what you're describing. Is like in

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 3>in blackjack or roulette, there's something called the Martingale method,

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 3>which is.

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Not hit hit me, hit me, hit it.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Just you bet one hundred dollars on black on the

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 3>Roulett wheel and you lose, so then you bet two

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 3>hundred and then if you lose your bet four hundred,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 3>and then if you lose your bet eight hundred, and

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>you only have to win once and you're up that

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.719
<v Speaker 3>one hundred bucks. Don't understand the problem with that is

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the casino is never gonna run out of money, and

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 3>you could run out of money before I.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 4>Like that little rule. That's that's interesting though.

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but it is like the number one way people

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 3>go broke gambling because it doesn't take that many in

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 3>a row for you to be out of money. So like,

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 3>if you start with one hundred and then two hundred,

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 3>four hundred, eight hundred, now you're fifteen hundred total in

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the hole. The next one sixteen hundred. Now you're over

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.400
<v Speaker 3>three grand in the hole. The next one is thirty

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 3>two hundred. Now you're almost sixty five hundred dollars in

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the hole. And the other thing at the casino, that'll

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>happen even if you brought one hundred thousand dollars with you.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 3>They have table maxes and they'll be like, sorry, sir,

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 3>you can't bet more than five thousand on the roulette spend.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 3>It's a terrible way to do it.

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's a good thing. What Weddy can tell you

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 4>to not bet on these shows?

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, with that exactly, With that said, the Jags are

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 3>The Jags are a good team. You can't convince me

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 3>they're not a good team. The Giants, meanwhile, are flying

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 3>a little too high. They're coming off back to back

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 3>huge wins for the franchise, by the way, and I

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 3>give the Giants massive credit. Can we discuss the circumstances

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 3>in which they won those games? Now again, I think

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the Giants are gonna I think we're gonna talk about

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 3>it later.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Maybe not.

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.439
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure. I think Giants are gonna make the playoffs. However,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 3>their last two wins they are impressive wins over Green

0:12:28.120 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Bay and Baltimore. Green Bay they're down fourteen in the

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 3>second half. Baltimore they are down ten in the fourth quarter. Okay,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 3>with seven minutes left, they're down ten. In that game,

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:46.479
<v Speaker 3>the Giants are five and one, and I give them credit. Tennessee.

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>The Giants win on a two point conversion with a

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 3>minute forty seven seconds left, and then Tennessee misses the

0:12:55.440 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 3>field goal Carolina. The Giants are the It takes a

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 3>missed field or they need a fifty six yard field

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 3>goal in the waning minutes of the fourth quarter to

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:12.839
<v Speaker 3>beat Carolina. Chicago. I give them credit for Chicago. They

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>beat by soundly, by eight points. But even Chicago was

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 3>a five point game midway through the fourth quarter. And

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 3>then we just talked about green Bay and Baltimore.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 5>You know what the Gates like all of that? What

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 5>the Jags losing to the Texans at home, but carry on.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 3>Losing to the Texans at home, then losing to the Colts,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 3>blowing a fourteen point lead to Philly losing to the

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Washington Command. Yeah, I've seen it all, but I'm well

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 3>aware this is the week they turn it around. Yeah,

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 3>your deep minus three? Now, am I gonna Am I

0:13:49.520 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 3>gonna lock them up as I have in the past.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Probably not.

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 4>That's probably not gonna be my.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Lock of the week. But I still believe in Trevor Lawrence.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 3>I do not as impressed as I am with the Giants.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 3>I do not believe in Dan that Daniel Jones has

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 3>turned some massive corner of the way. Some people seem

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 3>to think he has Jacksonville minus three. Next one, Cleveland

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>catching six against Baltimore at Baltimore lines just too high.

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Do I think Cleveland's gonna win this game? I do

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 3>not do. I trust Jakoby Brissett at all. I do

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 3>not do I think Lamar is gonna bounce back. I

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 3>actually do. But six points in a divisional game that

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland is totally desperate on, and that Baltimore because they

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 3>have blown three separate ten point leads this year, Baltimore,

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 3>this is crazy. Bill Barnwell had this stat prior to

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 3>this season. In Lamar's career ten point plus lead in

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter for Baltimore thirty one in two this season,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore with a ten plus point lead in the fourth

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 3>quarter two and three, they've already lost three times like that.

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Why does that matter for these purposes? If they are

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 3>up by ten, I don't think they try to pour

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 3>it on. I think that they are super conservative. Cleveland

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>can get a garbage time backdoor cover. There's just a

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>lot of ways that I think this is a Justin

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Tucker game. They try to What they don't want is

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.680
<v Speaker 3>for Lamar. They trust Lamar, but I think they want

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 3>to protect him from himself from some of these late

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 3>game mistakes he's been making. It's just too many points.

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 3>So Cleveland, who is a good overall team right now

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 3>with miserable quarterback play, You really do look at it,

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and as reprehensible as I think a lot of people

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 3>fairly find Toshan Watson off the field, you look at

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 3>it and you say, man if Deshaun had played all

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 3>six of these games, are they five and one?

0:15:58.320 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Are that? You know what I mean?

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Are they one of the best teams in the league? Instead?

0:16:01.200 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 3>Jacoby has made some critical late errors. They also you

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 3>like betting on or I like betting on teams I

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 3>know it's gonna sound counterintuitive coming off horrific performances because

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 3>I think the public overreacts to it and you get

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 3>a few points a line value. I think this should

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 3>be Baltimore minus three and a half or four. It's

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore minus six. So we're jumping on Cleveland plus the

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 3>six points that game. It doesn't seem like you hate.

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Seems like you don't. No, no, you like my logic. I

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 3>agree with that one. Yeah, all right, Seattle getting five

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 3>and a half at the Chargers. Okay, let's break down

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 3>why we like Seattle. First one is this every Charger game,

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 3>you have to keep in mind they will not have

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:53.560
<v Speaker 3>home field advantage even when they're at home. At best,

0:16:53.600 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 3>it's a push. Seattle has become something of a national

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 3>fan base because of the success of Legion of boom Era,

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 3>so there's gonna be a lot of Seattle fans there. Secondarily,

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers' injuries are so overwhelming that a team. I know,

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 3>they're four and two and they're happy to be four

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 3>and two, but they are nothing like the team we

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 3>thought they would be. The Chargers this year got so

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.640
<v Speaker 3>banged up in Week one. Since then, their best performance

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 3>was their loss to the Chiefs because they actually were

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 3>up ten in that game and then blew it. They

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 3>get blown out by Jacksonville. There it's a three point

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.359
<v Speaker 3>game that comes down to they went for a fourth

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 3>down and got it against Houston end up winning by ten.

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 3>They escaped against Cleveland thanks to one of those horrific

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Jacoby moves or Jacoby picks, but they really escaped, winning

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 3>by two.

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 4>And then we just.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Watched them against Denver. So the Chargers are on a

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 3>short week. The offense and offensive line looks incredibly shaky. Seattle,

0:17:57.560 --> 0:18:01.639
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, I do believe that Gino is

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 3>all year long. I don't think he's gonna have the

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 3>highest pass rating in football all year long, but I

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 3>do believe that Gino is going to continue to score points.

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 3>Seattle this year has had you know, they scored thirty

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.400
<v Speaker 3>two against New Orleans, they scored forty eight against Detroit.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 3>This past week against Arizona, they only scored nineteen. However,

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 3>that was a game where they could be super conservative

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 3>because Arizona's offense is in such shambles. By the time

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.159
<v Speaker 3>people will have seen this, by the way Arizona will

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 3>have played on Thursday, Night Football. We'll talk about them later.

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 3>So I think Seattle could win the game outright. I

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 3>also think if they're trailing by ten to eleven points,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 3>they are super live for a backdoor cover. I don't

0:18:44.359 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 3>think the Chargers are gonna have a real home field.

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:50.040
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of I think Seattle's defense is showing

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 3>after being horrific early in the year, it is improving.

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Seattle plus five and a half in what will be

0:18:57.400 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 3>essentially a neutral site game. I like them all right.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 3>Last one, Remember how I said I like betting on

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 3>teams coming off their worst performance. The flip side to

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 3>that is betting against teams coming off their best performance.

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Miami laying a full seven at home against Pittsburgh.

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 4>I like the Dolphins, Okay.

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 3>I went into last week's game feeling like Pittsburgh might

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 3>be the worst team in the NFL. Right, they had

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 3>played like the worst team in the NFL. They then

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 3>beat the Bucks, and now a game that should be

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Miami by ten is Miami only by seven. Also, Miami

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 3>was three and oh this year with victories over New England,

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 3>who we now know is decent, Baltimore who's good, and Buffalo,

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 3>who's excellent. In the three games two has played. They

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:03.719
<v Speaker 3>then had Teddy Bridgewater and then Skyler Thompson and then

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.239
<v Speaker 3>a Teddy Bridgewater Skyler Thompson combo and they went zero

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 3>to three. Tyreek Hill has been better than advertised. He's

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 3>been sensational. I think this is a game where let

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 3>me check what the weather, you know what. I should

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:20.879
<v Speaker 3>have checked this before. My apologies for not doing that.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 3>I want to check what the weather is this weekend

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 3>in Miami.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.640
<v Speaker 4>If you gets so eighty.

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 3>Two and Sonny is what Matt is telling me. So

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 3>that's to me. You know ho, Miami set up their

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 3>stadium to where the home benches are in the shade

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 3>and the road benches are in the sun. So it's

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 3>like twenty degrees hotter on the road sideline, and so

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that is damaging for Pittsburgh.

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 3>I think Miami is gonna score twenty eight points. I

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 3>don't see even in their win Pittsburgh only got to

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty against Tampa. I think Miami. I will lay the

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 3>seven with the Miami Dolphins.

0:20:57.119 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 4>Go ahead. Soay, you're going with.

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 5>Golf, Trevor Brissett, Gino and Post can cuss Tua.

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 3>How do you feel about all right, you know what

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 3>I had looked at it that way. You make some

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 3>strong points I am going with, okay, but let's break

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 3>that down. It's Goff against Dak in his first game

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 3>back after a thumb surgery. Remember how horrible now he

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 3>came back too soon. Russell Wilson looked in his first

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 3>game back from that thumb surgery, and Russ, by the way,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 3>has never looked good since then. I don't blame thumb surgery.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 3>Trevor is the prince that was promised, first of all.

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Second of all, he's obviously better than Daniel Jones. Jacoby

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 3>is like, yeah, Jacoby versus Lamar. But I said, I

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 3>just think that line should be four, and it's six.

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 3>Gino has been better than Justin Herbert this year, and

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 3>Tua post concussion pre concussion at any point is better

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 3>than what Pittsburgh's god at quarterback rookie Kenny Pickett and

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 3>Mitch Trubisky. So it doesn't look great quarterback wise. But

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 3>the only one where you're certain I'm at a disadvantage

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 3>is Cleveland against Baltimore and I'm getting six points.

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 4>Did you just openly say that Gino is better than

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Justin this year?

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 3>He has been this year. Doson Herberts got cracked ribs,

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 3>missing his left tackle. Keenan Allen's been out there, he's

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 3>he has not taken the lead people thought he would take. Meanwhile,

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Gino's been excellent, So lock him in Detroit plus seven,

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Jacksonville minus three, Cleveland plus six, Seattle plus five and

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.240
<v Speaker 3>a half, Miami minus seven. Thankfully, there is only one

0:22:37.280 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 3>of those picks that mirrors what Victor picked with his five. Victor,

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 3>we call him oh for five.

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Vic.

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna say, I think you know what I was

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna say. We'll see if he can run it up

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 3>to oh for ten. However, I don't want him to

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 3>go oh for five this week because we do have

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:56.200
<v Speaker 3>one of the same picks Seattle. Uh, we will break down.

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 3>There's seven other games this weekend. Wait more than seven,

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 3>nine other games this weekend. You know what, Let's go

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 3>ahead and yeah, nine other games this weekend, because four

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.120
<v Speaker 3>teams are on a bye with those are in three categories,

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 3>stay away, be careful and perfectly priced. We'll do that.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 3>And also, at the end of the show, I have,

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 3>for the first time in a couple of weeks, not

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 3>a good teaser, but a great teaser and the one

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:21.880
<v Speaker 3>thing we've been good at this year, giving you guys

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 3>survivor picks. We'll give you our survivor this week as well.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:31.879
<v Speaker 3>All that's next, we'll try, all right, welcome back in

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 3>What's Right? Nick Right? Subscribe on YouTube, on iTunes, on spotify,

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 3>wherever your podcast, or watch us on YouTube as we

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:41.560
<v Speaker 3>approach eighty thousand subscribers where if we get to one

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:44.959
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand Tomorrowsy gets a thousand bucks and a plaque

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 3>from YouTube. It'd be unbelievable. Have you seen the it's

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna be.

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 4>It'd be a.

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 3>Really cool thing. Put it on it on your dating profiles?

0:23:55.520 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Does that be a picture? They'll think you're like some influencers,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 3>exactly what you should do. By the way, I think

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 3>that's a I don't know what your relationship status is

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 4>I can already see the opportunities.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if those accounts are dormant or not,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 3>but I'm sure at some point they'll be reactivated. Use

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 3>it there, all right? For these other nine games three categories,

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 3>stay away, be careful and perfectly priced, and I will

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 3>alert you, as I feel is my duty. Which of

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 3>these games are on Victor's card this weekend. All right,

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 3>stay away first one, Tampa at Carolina. Carolina is getting

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 3>eleven points, so you can see the three stayaways or

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.439
<v Speaker 3>Tampa Carolina, Chicago at New England, Green Bay at Washington.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 3>Let me explain them more. Tampa Carolina Carolina is getting eleven.

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm just flatly not laying more than a touchdown on

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the road with a team in Tampa Bay that thus

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 3>far this year has given us no reason to believe

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 3>there are eight team With that said, I can't bring

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 3>myself to bet the Panthers. There's no I mean the

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 3>there is. The Rams looked terrible for five weeks, played

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.199
<v Speaker 3>the Panthers and won by two touchdowns. Like I just

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 3>I can't bring myself to bet Carolina just fired their coach,

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, PJ. Walker, Sam Darnold, the Quarck situation right now,

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 3>go ahead.

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 5>I've kind of noticed a trend with your betty You

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 5>never you stay away from games that spread was more

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 5>more than seven or eight.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like I, Well, here's the thing. If I were

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>a little sharper, I wouldn't stay away from those games.

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I'd bet the underdog in those games. It's so many

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 3>points right, But the reason teams are underdog by that much,

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 3>they're usually so bad that I just can't like earlier,

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, I bet Dallas plus I'm sorry, Detroit plus

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 3>seven seven because it feels like Detroit's a semi viable team.

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Carolina is so bad. I can't bring myself to bet

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 3>the eleven or to bet them even getting eleven. But

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I certainly can't recommend you lay eleven points with a

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Tampa team that is in shambles right now. And so

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 3>what's up?

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 4>I was thinking about like a teaser situation.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.440
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, no, a ten point there's a ten point

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 3>teaser option and tease Tampa all the way down to

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 3>basically pick them. Tampa's going to be in a ton

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 3>of those this weekend.

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:26.480
<v Speaker 4>I just.

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 3>I don't trust Tampa enough right now, Like I don't

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 3>think Caroline is gonna win. Don't get me wrong, but

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm not strong enough on it to even want to

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>put Tampa in a teaser. I do have a teaser

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 3>for you. This isn't one, all right? Next Chicago at

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 3>New England, New England laying eight points. That's this is

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 3>a very similar analysis to Tampa Caroline in this regard

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm just not gonna bet on the Bears. I'm not

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 3>gonna bet on Justin Fields against a Bill Belichick coach team.

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not doing it. With that said, New England laying

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 3>more than a touchdown with a rookie quarterback, while he

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 3>has played exceptionally, there's now more and more film on him,

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.119
<v Speaker 3>that's a stay away. I just I the I can't

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 3>call it perfectly priced because I actually think the right

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 3>number is probably New England minus nine and a half,

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 3>which means I should bet them at minus eight, but

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 3>I it's too many points. I'm certainly not betting Chicago,

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 3>and so I'm that's a stay away. And the last

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 3>stay away is Green Bay at Washington. This is a

0:27:36.520 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 3>stay away for a number of reasons, but most notably

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 3>is this one of the one of the telltale signs

0:27:44.840 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 3>of a stay away game is did one of the

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 3>teams just switch their quarterback? Washington?

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Did?

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 3>The question with Washington is now that it's Taylor Heineke.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Did they get better at quarterback? I don't know the answer.

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 3>If they did, then Washington plus five is the right bet.

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 3>Green Bay is you know, they've just lost the Jets

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.200
<v Speaker 3>and Giants and back to back weeks, blew the game

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 3>against the Giants, got blown out by the Jets Washington.

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 4>You're not seeing this is the time that they pick

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:18.479
<v Speaker 4>it up.

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 3>I would, so, I absolutely would, except for the fact

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Heinike has played. You know, he's started for most of

0:28:26.119 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the year for Washington, they won the division, they made

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs. He played well. They didn't start most of

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 3>the year. He started at the end of the year

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:33.959
<v Speaker 3>for them. Then he started in their playoff game and

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 3>played well. Heineke, in his brief moments, has had flashes

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 3>of oh, this guy's interesting. I need to watch Taylor

0:28:41.920 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Heinekee play a game in twenty twenty two before I

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 3>bet either side of a Taylor Heinekee game. That's why

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.400
<v Speaker 3>it's in the stay away category for our audience. Just

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 3>for the record, Victor has nobody in any of those games,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 3>so that's good to know. So you know what I mean,

0:28:58.080 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 3>So you don't have to worry about any of that.

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 3>There of our remaining seven games, four of them, is

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 3>it four? Or did we already do one of them?

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, oh yeah, no, one of them. One of

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 3>Victor's picks is the Giants. Of course, it is against

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 3>my chegs. What a fool. What he's taken the G's

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Giants plus three? What a fool? All right, now, be careful,

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 3>be careful. Three games in this category. There's Atlanta at Cincinnati,

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 3>There's Kansas City at San Francisco, There's the Jets at Denver.

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>All three of these games are going to have incredibly

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 3>lopsided action on one side. That's why we are telling

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 3>you to be careful. Two of these the side that

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking the general public is going to be on,

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 3>and now I feel like I'm bullying a bit. Happened

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 3>to be the side our guy Vickers on, which is

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 3>a good little lit mistest.

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 5>My man just woke up and came to work today

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 5>to get I know, getting Well, that's zero for five.

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Man can't share over five's the group chat. Just can't

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 3>do it, all right? First one, Atlanta plus six at Cincinnati.

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 3>Atlanta is six and oh against the spread.

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 4>They can't continue.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Here's what I know. Everybody is going to be on

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the falcons. Cincinnati has not looked overly impressive. They are

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 3>laying almost a full touchdown. Everyone is going to be

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 3>on the falcons. We are telling you to be careful.

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 3>We're not telling you to bet Cincinnati. Atlanta's run game

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 3>has been excellent. Atlanta right now is a fringe playoff team, amazingly.

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 3>What we are telling you is the whole world is

0:30:42.160 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 3>going to be on Atlanta plus six and going seven

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:51.280
<v Speaker 3>and zero against the spread seems incredibly difficult, but we

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 3>should deal with each week in and of itself. Nobody's

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 3>going to betting on Cincinnati. There's a reason this line

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 3>is not moved significantly. Atlanta plus six is a very

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 3>dangerous sign. This next one hurts my heart to put

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 3>in this category. The entire world is.

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 4>Going to be on the Chiefs.

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco is banged up. The Chiefs are coming off

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 3>a loss.

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm not being careful on that one. I'm gonna just

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't say that right now.

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:23.719
<v Speaker 3>You're betting the Chiefs.

0:31:24.640 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Man, Yes, they're just coming off that, coming off that

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 5>lost to Buffalo.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 4>They gotta put their foot down. Maybe.

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 3>See that's I mean, I trust me, That's how I

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 3>feel too. San Francisco is so banged up now. San

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Francisco is getting some people back. They can't see laying

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 3>less than a field.

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 4>They are in San Francisco.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 3>They aren't Yeah, they're in San Francisco, And let me

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 3>just tell you what I see happening in this game.

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely see a scenario where the Chiefs control this

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 3>football game and they're up three with the ball midway

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 3>through the third quarter, and they drive the length of

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the field. Mahomes looks great, they score a touchdown, they

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 3>go up nine, and Butcker misses an extra point and

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 3>it's like, well, they're still up nine, they'll be fine,

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 3>and all of a sudden there's a late San Francisco

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 3>garbage time touchdown. The Chiefs are in control the entire time,

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 3>and they win the football game. Uh what we find

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 3>that scenario right? Twenty six, twenty four And you're like,

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>how did I not cover?

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 4>What? In the how did I not This guy should

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 4>write for the Simpsons?

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well thanks, you see, I just I'm the two

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 3>and a half looks too good to be true. Be careful.

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:58.120
<v Speaker 3>And lastly, the Jets have blown out back to mac opponents.

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 3>The Broncos have the offense in football, their quarterback is

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 3>banged up every which way. No one is gonna be

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 3>betting Denver laying a point. Everyone is gonna be on

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the Jets, including Vic. Be careful, America, that Broncos defense

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 3>has been as good as the offense has been bad.

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Zach Wilson, despite being three and zero, has not played well.

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I am not out here picking the Broncos to win.

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 3>What I am saying is all three of these games,

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 3>the road team is gonna be getting seventy five percent

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 3>of the public money, So be careful. I'm adamant about that.

0:33:42.920 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 3>What's up?

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 5>So you're going against Denver or I guess you're not

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 5>going against Denver. You're going against the Jets coming off

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 5>a really good win, and you're betting on Denver. I

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 5>guess you're saying I'm saying.

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying, be careful like that. What I'm saying is

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 3>the whole world's gonna be on the Jets. Everyone's gonna

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 3>be on the Jets getting points on a short week.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 3>We've watched their offense all year be terrible. Just be careful,

0:34:06.040 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 3>That's all I'm saying. Everyone's gonna be on.

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 5>I feel like it's just both. It's far left for

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 5>the Jets because it's just.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 4>Like they came off the win and Denver came off

0:34:14.719 --> 0:34:15.400
<v Speaker 4>a bad loss.

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know, so that that's what the general public sees,

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, what's a shame about my terrible record this

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 3>year against the spread? I looked it up this morning.

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 3>If I simply just bet the be careful games, the

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 3>side that I'm telling people the opposite side where i'm

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:37.919
<v Speaker 3>saying so in this instance, I said Atlanta, Kin City

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 3>the Jets is where all the money's going to be.

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.399
<v Speaker 3>If I had just bet the other side of all

0:34:42.440 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of those games each week, I'd have a winning record

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 3>like the when I'm telling you the general public is

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 3>all going to be on one side, be careful. If

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I'd have just said screw it, I'm going the other way,

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 3>but I haven't had the courage for it. All right, Lastly,

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 3>we'll be quick here. Perfectly priced New Orleans and Arizona.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.359
<v Speaker 3>I've decided we're not going to spend time on these

0:35:02.360 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Thursday night games because we haven't seen them, but the

0:35:05.040 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 3>audience has by the time it's posted. I do think

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 3>this is just about the right line. New Orleans has

0:35:10.120 --> 0:35:13.479
<v Speaker 3>been mediocre at best, Arizona has been a train wreck.

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 3>So but they're at home. They do have the more

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 3>talented roster, so I do think they should be laying

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 3>just under a field goal. But you guys will have

0:35:21.719 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 3>already seen the game Arizona. I'm sorry. Indy at Tennessee.

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 3>I think Indie and Tennessee are essentially equivalent talented teams

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 3>right now. The Vegas is not giving you the full

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 3>three points. That's probably right. I think that's perfectly priced.

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 3>And Houston at the Raiders, I think the Raiders win

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 3>that game by a touchdown. I think that's perfectly priced.

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 3>Is there anything you want to die?

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Well? First off, yeah, shouldn't you. Shouldn't you want to

0:35:48.239 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 4>fade Matt Ryan after his first good game?

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Maybe? But I don't really trust Tennessee either, and so

0:35:56.239 --> 0:36:00.120
<v Speaker 3>I think this is maybe the perfect price on that

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 3>is Tennessee minus three. It's minus two and a half.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 3>It feels just right. And what's your other question?

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 4>Is seven too much for against the Texans? No?

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 3>And in fact, I think the line's just right. But

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 3>I really like the Raiders. As a teaser leg, we

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 3>will give you our teaser, our lock, and the one

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 3>thing we've been great at this year, our survivor pick

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:23.319
<v Speaker 3>all that's coming up next.

0:36:23.360 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 4>What's right? All right?

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in final segment. What's right?

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Nick?

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:33.280
<v Speaker 3>This is where we give you our lock, our exotic,

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:37.520
<v Speaker 3>our teaser. By the way, last week, Demanse and the

0:36:37.600 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 3>crew made a bet. They called it Nick's perfect week,

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 3>and it was the Jags win, the Chiefs win, and

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs Bills game to hit the over that went

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:51.240
<v Speaker 3>over three boys. That was zero for three. Chiefs lost,

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 3>Jags lost, and that game was under by ten points.

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:36:55.920 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 3>The only saving grace of you guys giving me that

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 3>bet was shortly before kickoff. I bet under in the

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs game. I was like, the whole world's on the over.

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Both teams are gonna run the ball because they're both

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.399
<v Speaker 3>defense is going to be playing the past. And that

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 3>thing was zero zero after the first quarter. So now

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 3>two red zone turnovers helped me there, But that was

0:37:22.520 --> 0:37:26.399
<v Speaker 3>the one saving grace. All right, right, move time my lock.

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 3>We've lost five in a row. We've lost five blocks

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 3>in a row. We are locking up. Oh look, Trevor

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 3>Lawrence is in the graphic.

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 4>I mean he's got to be at this point.

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 3>He's not the lock though. This week, the prince that

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:47.240
<v Speaker 3>was promised is not our lock. Instead is a man

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 3>who suffered the worst injury in the NFL this year

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 3>to a tongue of ailoa in his first game back

0:37:56.239 --> 0:38:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Miami minus seven against a bad Steelers team that people

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 3>right now are overvaluing because they found a way to

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 3>beat Tampa Miami minus seven. Lock it up, let's you

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 3>with me on it? You with me on it?

0:38:13.280 --> 0:38:14.760
<v Speaker 4>Hey, your wins winsman.

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, there we go. I like to hear that all

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 3>right Now, time for Survivor. It's a very interesting Survivor week.

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of decent options this this year

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 3>in Survivor, we have given you the Ravens, the Packers,

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 3>the Vikings, the Chargers, the Jags moment one moment there,

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 3>and then the Rams we lost on the Jacks. However,

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:44.239
<v Speaker 3>Survivor pools are one thing that I happen to be

0:38:44.360 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 3>exceptional at. And I'm still in a massive one that

0:38:50.160 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 3>started with twenty one thousand people. It is down to

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and sixty people. I have two entries left

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 3>in it, so we're going to continue to give you

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.880
<v Speaker 3>our pick. So we put the bills off the board.

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 3>As the week the Jags lost, a lot of people

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:08.439
<v Speaker 3>would have had the bills. So we're going to play

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 3>by the same fair rules. Those teams we can't use.

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.799
<v Speaker 3>I would strongly recommend and I almost don't want to

0:39:15.960 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 3>say that if I gotta tell America something real quick

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 3>that Survivor pool that I'm in once it gets to

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 3>under one hundred people, I don't know that I can

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 3>continue to give out Survivor picks on this show because

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 3>some of the people that are in that pool know

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 3>who I am, and they're going to be able to

0:39:36.920 --> 0:39:43.439
<v Speaker 3>kind of trail my picks. We're closed, We're closed, thank you,

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Sorry this listen. This is one of the things. Thank you.

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 3>There's one of the things happens when you do this

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 3>show from a store and Dendze forgets to lock the

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 3>door and our security is out next door getting a sandwich.

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.280
<v Speaker 3>That's bad timing demands locked the door, our security guard

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 3>isn't at the bodega getting again in a bacon, egg

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 3>and cheese, and all of a sudden, somebody came in

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 3>to buy some of these wonderful clothes. All right, back

0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.879
<v Speaker 3>to the Survivor situation. Right now, though I can still

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 3>give out the picks, I like, there are two teams

0:40:13.640 --> 0:40:15.400
<v Speaker 3>that I because you got to when you're at this

0:40:15.440 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 3>point the season on Survivor, you have to keep in

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 3>mind I want to use a team that I'm not

0:40:20.719 --> 0:40:25.479
<v Speaker 3>gonna want to use later in the year. This week,

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:30.479
<v Speaker 3>the survivor pick is the New England Patriots at home

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 3>against the Chicago Bears. I believe that's the Monday night

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 3>football game. I also do like the Raiders a bit

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 3>in Survivor, which actually leads us to our teaser. Our

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 3>teaser is our lock and our two survivors, but our

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 3>official Survivor pick is the Patriots. The Raiders teas down

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 3>to minus one. New England teas down to minus one

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 3>and a half, Miami teased down to minus one. A

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 3>three team six point teaser plus one forty. That's where

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.959
<v Speaker 3>it is. Play those what do you mean, parlay those?

0:41:09.160 --> 0:41:11.799
<v Speaker 3>It is parlayed, and to a teaser, all three of

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 3>them we're taking. They're all favored by seven or seven

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 3>and a half to teaser. So now instead of being

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 3>favored by seven, they're favored by one. You move the

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 3>line six points and they all It all has to happen.

0:41:24.480 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 3>So Miami's gotta win. New England's gotta win, The Raiders

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:29.120
<v Speaker 3>have to win. They all have to win by at

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 3>least one or one and a half, so essentially just win.

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 3>It's plus one forty. That's our teaser this week that

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 3>My Friends is gonna hit. We don't have a recap

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 3>for you of Demonda's picks last week because he didn't

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 3>make any. He's somehow found a way though, to still

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 3>bet games and lose both of them. It's bad job

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 3>by him. One of these weekends, he's gonna have a

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 3>winning week and everyone's making fun of me, and we're

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 3>making fun of Victor Demonday's Oh for the season on

0:41:51.680 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 3>winning weekends. What's the offer this week?

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 4>All right? Man?

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 5>So sometimes you just want to see the world burn.

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 5>So we've put together an annoying fan based team parlay. Yeah,

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:06.320
<v Speaker 5>so we've got Cowboys minus seven, Patriots minus eight, Yankees

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 5>win Game three versus Houston, and Philly wins Game four

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:10.520
<v Speaker 5>versus San Diego.

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 4>At plus eleven forty.

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 3>I like all parts of that to varying degrees, except

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I told you I like Detroit plus seven, so I

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 3>can't have the Cowboys minus seven in it. Detroit plus

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 3>seven is one of my picks. I reject your offer,

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.440
<v Speaker 3>even though it's plus more than a thousand, I reject it.

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:30.479
<v Speaker 4>That's all you had to say.

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh, now, Demonsi's in character. And then Demonzi was supposed

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 3>to be in this character the whole time for going

0:42:36.360 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 3>to be the Godfather guy and is trying to be

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.759
<v Speaker 3>Vito Corleone. Instead, he just gets in character at the

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 3>very end when he's off camera. There's our show for

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the week again. The five picks this week are Detroit

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 3>plus seven, Jacksonville minus three, Cleveland plus six, Seattle plus

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:54.640
<v Speaker 3>five and a half, Miami minus seven. Our lock of

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 3>the week is Miami minus seven. Our Survivor Pikets, the Patriots,

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 3>and our one team this week. Our one exonics is

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:04.360
<v Speaker 3>a six point teaser of the Raiders, the Patriots and

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:10.000
<v Speaker 3>the Dolphins. This was episode eighty six of or eighty five.

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure which of what's right with Nick Wright.

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 3>We'll be back on Monday, hopefully a little richer than

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 3>we are right now. See you guys then