WEBVTT - Surveillance: Bonds with Bill Gross

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jailey. We bring you

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations.

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>To find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>com and of course on the Bloomberg terminals in the

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>count Well. The outlooks that we had at the end

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of the year are basically useless, like all the outlooks

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross wrote over the years. Let's migrate on Thatch

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to a conversation with one William Gross, former PIMCO of

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>co c i O that barely describes his contribution to

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>bond investment. He's put out a book which is hugely readable.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.879
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't sure what to expect from the stamp collector.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm still standing has a lot of smart notes in it,

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in some extremely frank talk about his turmoil of the

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>recent years. Bill Gross, Um, thank you so much. I

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>love the idea in the beginning of the book there

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>never was a bond king. I met you the first

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>time at the Waldorf Story, and you were almost in

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>tears because you got the bond market wrong. I can't

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.200
<v Speaker 1>remember Bill if it was price up, yield down, or

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>yields up, price down. But you blew it on a

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>but at that at that time, you completely blew it.

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>What did you get right that made you the so

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>called bond king? Well, I think Tom that I from

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>an early stage I wrote a book called the you know,

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the Long Term Secular View of Financial Markets and UM.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It seemed to me that if you know, you could

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>eliminate human emotion, which is what you just talked about

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on a day to day basis that if you look

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>three to five years out and had a intelligent forecast

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>as to the direction of inflation, UM and the economy,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>than you have a better chance. Not not that you

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>terribly succeed, but you'd have a better chance. And so

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the the secular outlook at PIMCO, which was

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>three to five years was key going forward. You were

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>in Indian Wells. There's a small tennis tournament there UH

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>this week which will be of great interest to those

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that follow tennis. And part of his getting the ball

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in play and putting the ball back and forth across

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the net. You started out in the mail room at PIMCO.

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>How did you get the ball moving on the Pimco

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>tennis court. Starting out in the mail room, well, we

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>had a billion dollar portfolio. Pacific Mutual did. It wasn't

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Pimco at the time. And Uh I just graduated from

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>U C. L A. Anderson, I had a master's degree.

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I was clipping coupons, um, not exactly in the mail room,

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but clipping coupons. And uh I said to myself, wouldn't

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it be better to get out of the vault and

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.920
<v Speaker 1>into the chine and and maybe you could trade these bonds? Um.

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, back then there weren't computers, IBM at A

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>three sixty, etcetera. But um, you couldn't really move them

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>back and forth except physically. And so most banks and

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>most insurance companies didn't. And so I thought that if

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I could take five million of that one billion portfolio

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and traded and performed, then we could get some clients

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and grow a little investment company. Called a little investment company,

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they grew quite large. Bill. You talk also about your

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>start just even with education, with two hundred dollars into

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>your pants, going to Las Vegas gambling and getting ten

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars to pay for your college education. Partly that

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>gambling to the markets and how the game has changed.

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>How much has the game changed over your tenure? Those

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>change a lot, you know since I when I started, UH,

0:03:55.680 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>there weren't really liquid UH mortgage passed through certainly, wasn't

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>interest in foreign bonds. There weren't any tips, inflation protected securities, etcetera, etcetera.

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And so that and the evolution of financial futures, which

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is probably the biggest change. You introduced liquidity into the marketplace,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and it allowed for even a small firm at the

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>time like Pimco UH to to basically trade and to

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>make money. UH. Financial futures back in the day were cheap, cheap, cheap,

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>and we could buy a treasury bond through the financial

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>futures market and turn a at the time ten percent

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>yield into a twelve percent yield. And UH the first

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 1>mover advantage for Pimco in terms of all of these

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 1>categories was quite critical as well. Bill. The reason why

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I ask is because we're in an era where a

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of people talk about the distortions in the de

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>bond markets by the Federal Reserve, where the feed is

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>prepared to start moving back from some of their support

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 1>from their bond purchases. Today marks the last day of

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>those pandemic era purchases, at least the expansion much. Can

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the bond market really give the same kinds of messages

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as it did back when you started out clipping coupons, Well,

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly not as much. There's there's more involvement by almost

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all central banks, despite the pullback that you mentioned occurring today.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>And um, you know, interest rates are so artificially low

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that that it's hard for institutional investors or even individual

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and private investors too to make much of a difference.

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Central banks control the market. Um. I think they're terribly

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.599
<v Speaker 1>wrong in terms of what they've done, stayed so low

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>for so long. Uh, and now we have inflation, not

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>necessarily because of those policies, but probably in a large

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>part because of them. And so it's um, it's just

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a difficult market. You you try and anticipate the central banks,

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>which has been relatively seen the past few years because

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>they haven't done anything. But now they're about moving. It's

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>simply a question of what Coal and others UM do

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the policy rate. Bill Gross I've been

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>out to Newport to see your Monroe trader on your

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>desk of long ago and far away where you calculated

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 1>convexity like no one that could do it. And part

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of the as you mentioned, the first mover advantage of

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>PIMCO was intellect. I want you to speak about what

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you and Dr al Arian did when the two of

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you got together and put intellect first for a bye

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>side house. Every single by side shop had to react

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and pattern themselves against what you and Mohammed invented. Tell

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>us how you put intellect first at your Pimco. Well,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we we did build a small company than a larger

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>company of very smart people. And um, it wasn't just

0:06:57.279 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>myself and uh and Mohammed. Mommed came much later. PIMCO

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>was very much of a success before Mohammed, but Paul

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>mcculloy was very key in terms of FED policy and

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>anticipating the Great Recession. Chris Dialmus was very important in

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of bringing financial futures to the company. Um, there

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>were lots of others that were innovators, that were mild

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>risk takers, and um, you know, putting together a group

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>of bond kings and later Queen's was quite important. Was

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the challenges that you had later in your career and

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get into the soap opera of it,

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but Bill gross or the challenges that you had, like

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at so many other shops due to the decline and

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>profitability of the Bye side. It used to be a

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>cozy job bill. You'd show up for two hours, then

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd go pay cof golf trying to get your handicap

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>up and that bill the Bye side. You know, every

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 1>single by side story is about lower and lower and

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>lower reven new and squeezed margin. Is that what you

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ran into later in your career, Well, that's what I

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>was advocating. In the von market. There was this um

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>uh extension of trading into E T F s and

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 1>too um vehicles that charged lower and lower and lower fees.

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I sensed that as a trade, as a UM as

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a a sense, it as a trend because simply as

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>interest rates themselves lowered went down to five four three

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to one, UM, you know, you couldn't charge fifty basis

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>points on a one tenure treasure. That's half of the

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>half of the yield. And it was almost an egregious

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:50.079
<v Speaker 1>type of uh of situation, and so um, you know,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>fees became important, became important in terms of my leaving

0:08:54.800 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>PIMCO because the the surviving contingent basically wanted higher yield

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>products hedge fund types of products, and I wanted to

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>stick to the old total return formula that had done

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>so well. The total return formula is in a very

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>tenuous moment simply because of where yields are and where

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation is expected to be. Some people consider Jeff Gunlock

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>your successor when it comes to the bond king moniker.

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>You may disagree, others do. The question I have is

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>do you agree with his prognostications of a ten percent

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate this year and the likelihood that the FED

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is vastly behind the curve? Well, the latter, yes, Uh,

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a ten percent inflation rate is problematic. We'll

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>say a little bit of it tomorrow. And it depends

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a course on commodity prices, oil prices, and you know

0:09:45.960 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the wage follow on. But I do think inflation will

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>be in a fort five percent category for the next

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>several years. And and does that validated tenure at one

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.319
<v Speaker 1>eighty or eighty five It does not. Um does it

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>mean that there will be a huge amount of sellers

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the lack of FED buying um, you know,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>probably not. You know, as we've seen in the last

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, treasuries are a safe haven much like gold,

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and so investors that can hit to stick at one

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:21.320
<v Speaker 1>point eight percent until the coast clears. I do think

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>though that uh, you know, bonds are risk investment here.

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Durations are very very very low, as low as almost

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they've ever been. And so when uh inflation is accepted

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace at four to five percent, which I

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>think it might UM, then bonds are a sale. And

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, once we get above on the tenure, once

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we get above to fifteen UM, I think there's substantial risk.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a if you give me just one second, there's

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>a long term trend, a thirty five year downward trend

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the tenure and the third year UM

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't been broken. It's one of the most amazing

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 1>trend line that exist in financial markets. And right now,

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the tenure at two fifteen would break of the downward

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>trend for thirty or five years, and so I think

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:11.959
<v Speaker 1>that's critical, but I think it will happen. So you

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>do think that that trend will be broken. But do

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you think that we're going to escape the negative real

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>yield vortex or do you think that that's going to

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>persist well and might in certain areas. I mean they're

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>they're less fewer and fewer negative yielding bonds. I think

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we're down to four trillion as opposed to fifteen trillion

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and the German tenures of but a magnificent eight basis

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>points this morning, um so UM. I think ultimately we

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>have to as a finance based global economy. Negative interest

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 1>rates are definitely a negative, a detriment to UH to

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>economic growth because they encourage or discourage savers, which is

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the thrust of investment. If you don't have I means

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't have an investment, and UM to a certain extent,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.079
<v Speaker 1>if you stayed down there in negative territory, investors will

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>put some of that money into a mattress and it

0:12:09.320 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do very well in terms of productivity in a mattress.

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to continue with Bill Gross. He's gonna stay

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 1>where this with his new e book out. I'm still

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>standing right now and more timely, perhaps because of the

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>invasion of Ukraine. It is a launch of SpaceX. They're

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:30.079
<v Speaker 1>preparing uh that right now. This is SpaceX Falcon nine.

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a launch of forty eight Starlink satellites, and

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got to you've got to believe that it is

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>somehow changed off of Cape Canaveral. Then it would have

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>been Lisa thirteen or fourteen days ago. Well, and actually

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>this is important because it comes at a time and

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we do have this dominance of the tracking of a

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of individuals through their phones, which is part of

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>how Ukraine actually got ahead of Russia and even attract tanks.

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>There was an anecdote that actually they could tell where

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the tanks were because Google Maps was saying that there

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of traffic there. So these satellites are

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>integral in the way that we understand the world and

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>they we're operating, and it is a new regime. This

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>will be a number of minutes here of a launch

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and then fifty six minutes in is when we would

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>see a deployment. Make that one hour, sixty five minutes

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in we'll see the deployment of the starlink at satellites.

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll leave Cape Canado right now. For all of you

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and Bloomberg Television. Someone who's been of

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a great support to us over the years when William

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.079
<v Speaker 1>Gross always in forever of his Pimco and of course

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>tenure at Janice as well. Out with a wonderful new book,

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross. There is a hilarious moment in the book.

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:41.840
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not surprised because I've tried to fire you

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at least three times. Lu Roue Keiser went after you

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street Week and said, who is this young turk?

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of them? How did lu Roue Keiser fire

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross? Well, we always had a question as panelist,

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and my question was about the fiscal deficit and UH expanding,

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought I'd be cute and bring a

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>rubber band into the studio and fire it at lose

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>ear when I talked about an expanding fiscal deficit. I

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>did that. It was a good shot. Missed his ear.

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>He smiled, and UH went on in the conversation, but

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly it was very miffed and at the end UH

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>he had his producer farming. It didn't take long. An

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>important question. I know, Lisa and I've talked about this before,

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the parlor game of fed guessing. You've been a pinata

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on this. Sometimes you've got it right, sometimes you've got

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. Sometimes it's what you believe in and not

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>so much what you think the FED will actually do.

0:14:45.880 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I get it is their value to the modern FED

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 1>watching what I call the FED parlor game. Well, I

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>think there still is uh, you know, debating whether it's

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>a quarter or fifty base points may not have been

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of or may not be too much value. But if

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you can analyze the fits rather longer term moves in

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of twelve, thirty six months, and that's the critical judgment,

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and that becomes very difficult politically and otherwise. So I

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 1>still think since central banks control the market, do you

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>want to try and guess um what Powell and others

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are thinking in terms of interest rate hikes? And so yes,

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd say listen closely. Well, especially at a time when

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you think that the trend is going to be broken,

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the downward trend of yields that we had experienced for decades.

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>At what point or do you think that investors should

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>look to just break even on an inflation adjusted basis

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>rather than actually get returns from financial instruments the way

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>they've become accustomed to. Well, if you're talking about tips

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or in general, because I think that there's been this

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>feeling where you were talking about investing in risky your

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>assets to try to get bigger returns for the likes

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of pension funds and foundations. And you have a lot

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of big investors coming out and saying, look, you've got

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to lower your expectations in order to not just lose

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>your shirt in really risky assets. What's your view? Yeah, correct,

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think going forward, and I've said this for a

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>few years now, and obviously not with the fangs and

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the high flyers that hasn't been the case. They've done

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>very well until the last few months. But I think

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>an investor can really only expect five to six percent

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 1>going forward. Um. You know, these are days in which

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.119
<v Speaker 1>interest rates will be rising, They will be pressuring corporate

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>profit margins. They will be affecting the housing market and

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>slowing the economy down. Um, there's less liquidity in the

0:16:48.720 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>marketplace and and so UM, you know, a five to

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>six percent return instead of a tin banger like Peter

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Lynch used to call it, or even ten to twenty,

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>which millennials um and new investors think they deserve. Um,

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.040
<v Speaker 1>it is probably a pretty good number, Bill if you're

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>restarting a career now, which asset class would you choose

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as having the most promise, well, not bonds, um, you know,

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 1>probably commodities, and not just because it's hot. Um. I

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't choose real because I think that's um been thwarted

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>as well, because of the potential for higher indust rates.

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Bonds stocks um, you know, stocks are stocks for me,

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>would still be an exciting young person's type of asset

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>class despite the lower returns going forward. There's lots to choose. Uh,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>there's lots of a difference to make in terms of

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:56.640
<v Speaker 1>analyzing various sectors. And so I don't know I pick stocks.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I pick stocks in the beginning, but they wouldn't have me.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>So I I went down and clip coupons the girls.

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>How do was our listeners and our viewers? And I

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>love thank you for the mention of the Bloomberg in

0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 1>your book. I'm still standing where you say you get

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>up in the morning and look at the Bloomberg screen

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>for five hours. I mean, you know that's a great

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>retirement bill. But when you when you get up in

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the morning, and even with your caution over the years,

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you've never been associated with the gloom crew. How should

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>our listeners and viewers respond to? Typically the Friday data

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and Internet dump of gloom out there on the markets.

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Well should you should take it very carefully because you know, Tom,

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 1>human emotion is is critical in terms of an investor

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and attitudes towards markets. Um, you know, I've been a

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>glass half empty because that's what fund investors are. They

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>have to protect capital. But at the same time, PIMCO

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and myself rode the bond bull market from all the

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>way down to a few years ago, and that's a

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>very bullish, optimistic type of attitude in terms of bond prices.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:17.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think an investor has to know who they

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>are and then to to try and apply that servitablate

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to markets. You're more qualified on this and maybe five

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 1>or ten guys in the world. I've been preaching for

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 1>the last fifteen days that Ukraine is a crisis of

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>tangible assets, commodities, things, as Gartman says, things that fall

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in your foot, like an oil drum, et cetera. You're

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the king. Some would say, of financial instruments. What's different

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>about the financial system now given tangible asset crisis versus

0:19:52.600 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 1>intangible asset financial instrument crisis like what we saw. Well,

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly liquidity is different in terms of at

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>least Russia's central bank reserves, and I think that begins

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to affect other countries as well, and then ultimately it

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>effects investor's attitude. You know, UM momentum which is a

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>valid alpha generator meaning UM. Those that follow momentum types

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of trends have done very well over the past ten

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>or twenty years. As markets have moved up UM. Momentum

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is now of course shifted the other way UM, and

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>and so an investor has to be cautious of this

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ever increasing trend of higher and higher prices than buying

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the dips, because momentum is going the other way, and

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>so I think financially that's a key consideration relative to

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>what you mentioned with things, Bill, You've had a history

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>of bold bats throughout your career. What's your boldest bet

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>right now at this moment? Oh? Um, very few. You

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>know I'm doing UM. I'm doing arbitrage corporate buyouts by

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft and Google. You know Google announced one just the

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>other day. I'm content to take four or five. Actually,

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>my biggest bet has taken place over the last year.

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I did very well and have done very well in

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>gas pipelines partnerships, Uh, there aren't too many of them,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but they yield eight to nine percent and their tax deferred.

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Check your tax consultant. But um, you know they've gone

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>up as the fangs and high flighters have gone down.

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>And so the last six to twelve months have been

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>very good to my uh foundation. Girl. It's good to

0:21:43.720 --> 0:21:46.439
<v Speaker 1>see you. Thank you so Mutching. Congratulations on the essays

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>within your book, and of course of wonderful new text

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>as well from Bill Gross. I'm still standing. Let's get

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>to the institutional conversation of the day. All institutions react.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>We wait on the international Monetary phone in Christiana, Gorgeva.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>But David mel Pass is at the World Bank. To

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>his immense credit, they have not taken down World Bank

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>research on the Russian Federation, but front and center on

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the front of the page of their website, the World

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Bank Group is taking quick action to support Ukraine. David

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>mel Pass, what do you do this morning? Hi, good

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>morning Tom. Well, I'm grateful that our board on Monday

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 1>passed a major package Monday afternoon, so that money becomes

0:22:35.280 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>available right away, meaning I don't know today or tomorrow

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>through means for Ukraine, and that helps them survive as

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>there as they're fighting, uh, fighting back against the Russian invasion. UH.

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It goes for things like food and salaries and doctors

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that they desperately need. So today now we look to

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.439
<v Speaker 1>build a bigger, a bigger, broader package that can begin

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to think about reconstruction as well. But right now we're

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 1>focused on refugees, on the region, and on how do

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you how do you hold it together? Do you believe

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can have a relationship with Mr Putin the

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>invader where you can go directly into these these ravaged

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>cities and provide World Bank support, or you basically working

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 1>at the border like the Red Cross. Today we're working

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>through the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, which still exists

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and is operational, so they're they're supporting the basic services

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. We're not working with Russians in Ukraine or

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>with Russians in Russia. We've suspended, we've stopped all of

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>our operations in both Russia and Belarus. David, there's a

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of focus on Ukraine and helping the refugees, as

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>there should be. There's also growing focus on nations that

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>rely on Ukraine and Russia for wheat, for a lot

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>of the commodities and thinking of Egypt of their import

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of wheat come from Russia and Ukraine. How are

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you preparing a package to help some of those countries

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>as they deal with the food inflation and a commodities

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>inflation more broadly that they haven't seen before. Yeah, this

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is a huge problem for developing countries in general, and

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>especially the poorest ones. People at the that are that

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>are inland from ports are having a great deal of

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>trouble getting food because the supplies would cut off. I

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>spoke with the Prime Minister of Egypt on on Thursday

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>or Friday last week. The Egypt is a major importer

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>from Ukraine. But fortunately they have storage and their crop

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>will be coming in. So as you look around the world,

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:43.199
<v Speaker 1>the key variables here are how can global production be

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>boosted outside of Ukraine and Russia. So that would and

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know the US, UH and Canada and even Mexico

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>are major potential suppliers both of agricultural products and of energy,

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so making it productively rapidly available is going to be

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the key the key responses of the world

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.879
<v Speaker 1>to this horrible situation that's hitting Ukraine. I have to

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 1>say on efficiency there's lots of things that countries can

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>do and we urge. For example, in the US, the

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the the efficiency is constrained greatly by the Jones Act,

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>by the ethanol mandates that are hugely, hugely de productive.

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>They cancel production UH and in Europe they they have

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>restraints across their economy on what people can do and

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>what they can produce. So lifting some of that would

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>add to the global supplies and help respond to the crisis.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 1>When you talk about efficiencies, David how much you also

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about car free days or perhaps restrictions on how

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 1>food is consumed in certain places. I think everyone can conserve.

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>What we don't want to see is made is advanced

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>countries cording things. You know, it's income, but on people

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to allow their supplies to go into the markets and

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that allows them to get to the people that need

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it the most. That's part of an efficiency gain. But

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think there are some cost savings that can

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>be done. But as we look globally, the biggest issue

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>is how do you really how do you really tackle

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>UH the the output that can can be made available

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>by each country. For example, there's nickel supply shortages, the

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>London stock Exchange stopped its trading of nickel, but Indonesia

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is a big nickel producer, so there there are alternatives

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>around the world, and those can be ramped up, ramped

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>up as the world responds. The Russia situation right now

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like it will be it will be. Oh,

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it will be a temporary When it's a it's a

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:52.240
<v Speaker 1>longer lasting UH set of problems for the world in

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>interacting with Russia on oil, on wheat, on basic minerals,

0:26:57.040 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and there need to be supplies elsewhere. You just touched

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on a broader question, David, I wonder if we can

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>finish that please, the risk of a increase, an escalation

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and increase in nationalism. How do we prevent that from happening.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I think it's very hard to do that.

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>People live in nations and they feel nationalistic and they

0:27:19.400 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>feel patriotic for their nation. What we need to do,

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.399
<v Speaker 1>I think, is have a rule of law that's really meaningful. UH.

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 1>In the in the eighties and nineties, I talked a

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>lot about constitutional law for Latin America. It was having

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>severe problems forming democracies, and it matters a lot what

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>your original statutes are and how you can implement those

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>uh so worldwide. If we keep pushing on transparency, on

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.880
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, on on people finding ways to resolve

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>disputes without fighting. Uh that I think is the way forward. Unfortunately,

0:27:55.520 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 1>there arise authoritarian leaders that don't do that world because

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of trying to have good governance for

0:28:03.680 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>countries as we work with them. Devin mount Pass always

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>wonderful to catch out with you said, it's been so long,

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>David mount Past, the President of the World Bank. Right

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>now our interview of the day on the American response

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and particularly the American and NATO response to what we've

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>seen with war in Ukraine. James Trevidis UH who has

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>been a wonderful friend of the show, of course with

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>his public services UH in the Navy as a European

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Commander and also at the same time NATO Supreme Allied Commander.

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Author is two thousand thirty four. I can't say enough

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>how timely that frightening book is my book of the summer.

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe it was a year ago. I can't remember. James. Now,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.239
<v Speaker 1>James Trevidis, I'm gonna talk about Ben Hodges General, I'm

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about Mark Kimmitt General. They have an urgency

0:28:55.280 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 1>about urban warfare, give us the same urgency about able warfare.

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>In the Black Sea. What does Ukraine Russia look like

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>on water? Russia dominates the Black Sea and really has

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>for centuries. They've been the dominant power there. If you

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>spin around the Black Sea tom you see Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, Georgia, Ukraine,

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's Russia is the monster force there. They will

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to dominate it. Turkey has a choke hold on

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dark Knells, the Bosphorus, the strait that controls access

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Black Sea. But it's going to be Russia's

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>game up there because that's where their Black Sea Fleet

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is located. Think having the U. S. Navy's seventh fleet

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>inside the Black Sea. That's the advantage that Russians have.

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>And your important essay for Bloomer Opinion, the single money

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sentences that your time of duty. There were form in

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand Americans in service in Europe and that's been whittled

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>down for whatever reason, to a hundred thousand. What is

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>your timeline to see a rebuild of American military in Europe?

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Is it a question of weeks and months or is

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this going to be long drawn out extended process depends

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on Vladimir Putin, and so far he is certainly giving

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>us plenty of reason to think we are going to

0:30:15.680 --> 0:30:18.760
<v Speaker 1>increase our troop levels in Europe. I don't think we're

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>going back to four hundred thousand, the way we were

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>during the Cold War, but look for the US presence

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to go from around fifty thousand and perhaps seventy thousand

0:30:27.640 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>permanently based forward if Putin continues. And more importantly, Tom,

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the Germans and others increasing their defense spending

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>extremely quickly. All of that will move troops to the

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>borders of NATO. The NATO alliance will keep Russia out.

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>When you say the borders of NATO, Admiral, are you

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about Poland? Most importantly, I think it's Poland, but

0:30:52.920 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>also all around the eastern eastern Europe, So I think Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>They have either borders on Russia or borders on Russia

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>client states like Belarus, or as to the conversation, Tom

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I just had borders on the Black Sea. There's

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>going to have to be an upgrade, if you will,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 1>in troops forward. That alliance realizes that it's in progress now. Admiral,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a story today on a Bloomberg terminal that Putin's

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>endgame sorry to look more and more like simply reducing

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine to rubble. What do you suggest are the next steps,

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>since the sanctions have gone almost as far as they

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 1>can go at this point, the next steps to try

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to bring a swift end to this conflict. First, unfortunately,

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree. When you're the Russian military and you have

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:50.840
<v Speaker 1>performed as badly as they have with poor logistics, poor

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>command and control, war criminal behavior, at some point your

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>only tool left is a big hammer, and they're starting

0:31:57.760 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to swing that thing hard through Ukraine Indian cities, trying

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to make Ukraine look like Syria on the Dnieper River.

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a terrible outcome for everybody, and its war criminal behavior.

0:32:10.640 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>What we should do about it is continue the massive

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sanctions they will bite, that will take time. On the

0:32:17.000 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 1>military front, continue to supply the Ukrainians with absolutely everything

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they need short of our troops going in boots on

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the ground and fighting. That's a path to World War

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>three level confrontation. But that's more material going into Ukraine.

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And above all, let's get these mid twenty nine fighters

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>from Poland into the hands of the Ukrainians. It's complicated,

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I get that, but that could be a game change.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>We've gotta stop to show your general Adam, excuse me,

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I got the wrong service there. Almost Venus is really important.

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>The images right now are the opera House of seven

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in Odessa. This isn't Normandy where the Germans are shooting

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>from the lifts. This is Odessa with sandbags and a

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Ukrainians. How do we get those jets from

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Poland to Odessa to defend against a well equipped Russian navy.

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>The polls have said they're willing to turn them over

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to the NATO Alliance flyman Ramstein Air Base in Germany. Tom,

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the next stop for them would be put

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>them in Leviv. Um. Lviv is gonna stand for a

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>long time. Uh, the Russians are not on some effective

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>high speed blitz cried across Ukraine. Put them in Lviv.

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Build your defense from their turn them over to the Ukrainians.

0:33:35.920 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Let the Ukrainians do what they want to do, Let

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>them create a Ukrainian no flies on. What does that

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>do to NATO and NATO being independent? I mean if

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 1>we go into western Ukraine and Leviv, that's fine. But

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the zeitgeis this morning is this is hugely problematic for

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the NATO. You're experienced with the answer tom is turned

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>them over to the Ukrainians, do not operate them with

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>NATO pilots. When they are turned over to the Ukrainians,

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they become Ukrainian jets operating out of Ukrainian bases in

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:12.360
<v Speaker 1>western Ukraine. UM, NATO can correctly say it is not

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a belligerent in the combat. Is it somewhat risky? Absolutely,

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>but at this point go back to those images you

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>were showing a minute ago about two million refugees. We're

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to take some risk to solve this problem. Meanwhile,

0:34:24.719 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Russian side, Admiral, how much are they running

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the fuel? And I mean this in every

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>meaning of the word, to continue with this battle. And

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about this with parts that are getting stalled

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>out as some of these sanctions bites that they need

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to repair their planes. I'm talking about the fact that

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen the full air power of the

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Russian Army despite Vladimir Putin's resolution. UM, all of the

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 1>logistic failures are coming home to rust Um, Russia does

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 1>not have the kind of twenty one century military that

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>NATO does that the United States has. And you see

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>always and this is true in business as it is

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>in war. Logistics eat strategy for lunch um professionals. No

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.799
<v Speaker 1>logistics are what drive wars, and so we ought to

0:35:10.960 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on that at the back office end, crushing them

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>with the sanctions, and at the front office end, if

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you will, the client facing into this, by giving the

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainians the tools to take apart what they can put

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:28.239
<v Speaker 1>on the battlefield. Admiral A clinic as always James tur

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>Vedas that the fullness premount on Commander and nights South.

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Let us go to an important conversation. She has been

0:35:41.160 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>fabulous on the microeconomics of oil, and we're gonna pause

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:48.439
<v Speaker 1>with them. Rita send chief oil analyst Energy aspects here

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>with the tour de force. Coming out of the financial crisis,

0:35:52.239 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>which was my great mentor Magdan Desis of the London

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:59.680
<v Speaker 1>School of Economics and Amrita. Professor Desig got so upset

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and a misunderstanding of general equilibrium theory that he wrote

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a book about it. Tell us about the new oil

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>economics given this jump condition in price. Is there an

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>oil equilibrium out there this morning, right now, Tom, And

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a fantastic question that you've asked. There is

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>no equilibrium in the market, and that's why you've seen prices,

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>not just the level, but the volatility that you're seeing.

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>We've moved up ten dollars down, ten dollars up, ten

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a day. I mean, these kind of numbers

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>very much tell you that the market is struggling to

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>find what the true prices. These are incredibly complex things.

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Don't give us the math of an emerita, But which

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 1>part of our disequilibrium given massive jump conditions is the

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>disequilibrium we should focus on. The dissequilibrium is originating from

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the supply side. Obviously, because Russia is unable to sell production,

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>you are going to see some shot ins. But the

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>reason you see these jumps is absolutely on the demand side.

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 1>You and I both know that demand is very in

0:37:05.360 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the last thing, it takes a long time to react

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to such prices, especially by the way governments around the

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>world are reintroducing subsidies. So now suddenly consumers are not

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>even fully exposed to the true price of oil. But

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's precisely why you're going to get these big discrete

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.520
<v Speaker 1>jumps and prices until you get to that point where okay,

0:37:25.680 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>demand really starts to hurt and you get back to

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>that equilibrium. The problem is it's searching for that price.

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's in the price discovery mode this market, and whenever

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's in price discovery mode, which is very rare, you

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>are going to get huge volatility. Well I'm ready. Let's

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>sit on that point for a moment, especially because the

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:46.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of Phillips CEO came out yesterday and said he

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>does think that prices are getting to a place where

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to see demand destruction. You do see

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>airlines actually curtailing their schedules to preserve capital. Considering that

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the less flown or less popular routes are

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>consuming a lot out of expensive fuel. How much will

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this make a difference on the margins? How how big

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is that imbalance so that little moves can actually have

0:38:09.440 --> 0:38:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a big impact. I think the important thing to bear

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>in mind is that we started this year with nearly

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>record low inventories, and that's why we don't really have

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a cushion right. So now, if we're talking about losing

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:25.680
<v Speaker 1>to three million barrels per day of Russian production. That's

0:38:25.719 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>how much demand will need to come off. So to

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>your point, yes, we are seeing airlines at the margin

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 1>curtailing some routes. That's going to help. You are going

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to lose some demand in Russia as well in parts

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of Europe as well, But it's not big enough, especially

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:42.760
<v Speaker 1>if you think about Asia not exposed fully because subsidies

0:38:42.760 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>are coming back. B they are in a post pandemic

0:38:45.680 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>recovery where people are very very keen to travel both

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>by car and by a s. So that's the problem

0:38:52.760 --> 0:38:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in this cycle where we are in anything but the

0:38:55.640 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 1>recessionary environment. We are actually in a very it's it's

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a recovery environment. And then we've hated with a supply

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.640
<v Speaker 1>shock and we are given that back trap. How high

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>could oil prices go based on the sanctions that we've

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.520
<v Speaker 1>seen already put into effect. I mean, I would say

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 1>prices can easily go above hundred and fifty. Now beyond

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that honestly does become a number. And this is where

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>elasticity has become very difficult to a certain as well.

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Every retail prices different people. The government's put on taxes,

0:39:22.920 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>they put on subsidies, so the exposure is not going

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to be the same. The oil burden, as we call

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>on GDP, is going to be very, very different. But

0:39:31.040 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason I say it's above hundred and fifty and

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>not like two hundred or even higher is unlike in

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>the past, isn't just oil that's rising. It's natural gas,

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:44.280
<v Speaker 1>it's food, it's metal. So it's a very inflationary environment overall,

0:39:44.560 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>which is why oil doesn't need to do all the

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>work right to kind of curtail demand. Um, there are

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>other factors that are really pushing consumers to spend less

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and rita as always, thank you, I'm ready to send

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that of energy aspects. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast.

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. Join us live weekdays from seven to

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 1>each day from six to nine am for insight from

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the best in economics, finance, investment, and international relations. And

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the Surveillance Podcast on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course on the terminal. I'm Tom

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>keene In. This is Bloomberg