WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2021 NFL MegaPod Week 6 Preview

0:00:03.440 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Check it on Man No Down Thursday morning, October one,

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>The Beating the Book podcast megapod live from the d

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>It's Skill Alexander, Thanks for listening. Is always the staples

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the show are here. Uh Mikey Palm, the vice

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>president of operations at Circus Sports. Also Derek Stevens conciliary.

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Mikey you good, Yes good. I'm so excited for tonight

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the baseball. Yes, yes, I can't wait. I

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>can't wait, dude, I I'm going to be a ball

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of nerves during this. Mitch said to me, will the

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>volume of the Dodger game be on anywhere in your properties?

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I said, well, wherever I am. I'm not sure where

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll be, but it's sure it's gonna be on wherever

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I am. You mean Tampa Philly is not going to

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>be your priority of mind? Cannot be. I might not

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>see too many players of that game today. And and

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Mike Palm also the co host of

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>odds on on Visa and the Sports Betting Network of

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>course with them all Shaw weekdays eleven am Pacific, two pm,

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Easter right in the East. The Life from Circus. After this,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you race over there, run sprint dead stript So you

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>see Mikey underneath the zip line sprinting, Uh, Todd wishing

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>him from his mom's cork addic in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Star Up, Showtimes,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>docuseries Action. How you doing, Toddy? Hey, he's not happy.

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>He's not happy. Okay, we'll just leave it at that.

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Some people are gonna appreciate that you just went. Hey,

0:01:33.240 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and ladies and gentlemen, this is a This is an

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>annual treat. We hope to make it an annual treat.

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>He was kind enough to come on last year as well.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>This megapod Is is the mountain that it is because

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>it was built on this man's shoulders. We know him

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as Ace, We know his him as as Jannie or

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Johnny pardon me, however he's pronouncing it these days. Uh,

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>And of course we know him as vr Vegas runner. Ace.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>How you doing? Man? Never better? All are the ball?

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>All proper pronouns. I'm good with either or so we're good.

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Just help yourself there. We're good to go, and thank

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>you for having me again. This is that one show,

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL show, honestly, even not on it, that I

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>listened to every week like consistently, not not stroking you

0:02:18.000 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>because I'm on here, but the information you share it

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 1>just keeps you up to date and it's current. And

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>because I'm in the sports betting industry, you have to

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:30.639
<v Speaker 1>be current. And again we take it for granted being

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas Point spreads all that, like other cities just

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. So to have something like this to

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>depend on weekly where I know that's what you guys do.

0:02:41.160 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You're in the grind all day, every day, not just

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>doing this once a week or for certain season. Again, man,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm just happy to be a part of it and

0:02:50.760 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>humbled and privileged to be here. Brother. Hopefully I got

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>some winners for the for the listeners and viewers, hopefully

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.119
<v Speaker 1>got some winners. There's also there's also VR bingo, where

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>people are like never better, blah blah blah, Sprinkle, what

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a country, what a country? God less Samerica? All your

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>old things people, those things live on. Man. I still

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>get tweets from people who, again when they heard that

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>you were on today, already got a couple of tweets

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>about it. But but but Sprinkle, people still remember that you

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>were the guy that, uh that made these things famous

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and we uh we Appreciate podcast. We originated sprinkling sorry

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>for a decade ago, Gil, Well, over a decade ago.

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Now it's in the sports betting Lexica. Everybody uses it.

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>It's awesome, it's it's a beautiful thing, a beautiful thing. Yeah.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 1>We used to throw that E forty music behind it too,

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. Um, great to have you, man. Let's do

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it so so we always start with an update from

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike on the Circum Millions contest and the reds. Okay,

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll do the records first. Pardon me, what are what

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>were the records last week? We always do the records first, Gilly,

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>That's what we always Sorry, I'm sorry, okay, uh, and

0:03:57.080 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a maye of culpa. I have a may

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 1>culpa it Uh. Mikey pulls in the first place with

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>uh his eight six and one. He was one one

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in one last week because I went oh and three.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>He goes ahead of me. I'm seven and eight now

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.719
<v Speaker 1>he's eight six and one, and you, Gilly, are pulling

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>up the rear at five and ten. What did I do?

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>One and two? Yeah, one and two on the teaser side,

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm still in the lead at five and oh, Gilly,

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you're four oh and one because you pushed one of

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>your legs last week and the Patriots. I think, oh,

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that's true. I did push him. Yeah, okayo, and Mike

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is three and two on teasers, so really, I mean

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the only important thing is how you're doing on teasers,

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>because no one would bet these games pre game anyways,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>So it's teasers, is what's important. I would like to

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>go and I'll ask Gill as well. I'd like to

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>go last on teasers. I have two games behind you,

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and I can't catch up when you keep copying mine.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'd like to go after you. And that's funny

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because if I keep topping you, how my five and

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and oh and three and that you were four and

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>oh I was to to I gave a teaser you

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>copyy that I can never catch you. Try again? Come on,

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you could do better than that. Should I just call

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you email? I'll just call you okay? Um anyways, No,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that that was too low. I retracted. Um

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>My mayor is I thought the Raiders would not be

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>affected by the first email and would play National Football

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>League football and I took them in my Survivor And

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>this will go into our next discussion that you're gonna

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>bring up a survivor and I paid for it, especially

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>when that kid dropped the sixty five yard bomb wide

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 1>open and it was just not the raider's day. So

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I am out of Survivor, and I guess I will

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>learn to not take a team that has email problems

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>prior to the game. I still contend that Urban Meyer

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and his team, you know, it's not affected by his

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>lap dances. But anyways, go ahead, Well, survivors a whole

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>another discussion. But let me just say this that the

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that Minnesota, New England, and Baltimore all survived miraculously

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>last week is such a testament to how difficult this

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff is to be. That's just to pick one team

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to win regardless of spread. That's what you're tasked with

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>every weekend Survivor. That's difficult enough to pick. Let's say

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>in circle millions five against the spread every week and

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 1>somebody's twenty two and three three. God, you know, the

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>records were going to be better by the sheer number

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of entrants, right that had m But this is five

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 1>guys eighteen and two, two and three. I don't know

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>how long it can keep up. I mean you and

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I are looking at the board trying to find three

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>games not right, E slops the board. We struggled a

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>couple So how many people didn't submit in millions? I

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know about me. It's it's getting better, getting better.

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>And really the Raiders were the only blow the fifty four.

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Like Todd that chose the Raiders six Panthers, one Bagels,

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>one Jets. We still have sixty eight. But if you

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>brought this point up, this is this is incredible. If

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota doesn't kick the last second field goal, if New

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>England doesn't rally from down sixteen, if Baltimore doesn't rally

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>from down nineteen, we'd have to twenty nine left, one left.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I thought I was such a genius

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>for avoiding Kirk Cousins because I can't stand betting on

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins. I thought, oh my god, I'm gonna be

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a genius here, and somehow Kirk Cousins gonna blow it,

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and then it doesn't happen. I kept texting the whole

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>time with Minnesota, I'm like, this is gonna end badly,

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>even though when they were up seven or ten, it

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>was just never felt right. I wish Todd that I had,

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a mall on Thursday after we did this,

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>said to me, I think Pittsburgh is really the only

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>survivor played this weekend. I thought he was being funny

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and like miss guiding because he's in it. He actually

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>used it. No, he said, Pittsburgh is not losing this

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>week to Denver at home. And he said, I don't

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>want Kirk cousins. I don't want you know all this,

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and he may. And I wish I could have told

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Todd because maybe he had taken Pittsburg instead of the Raiders.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I would I wouldn't have taken he was all right,

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So against Fields, I was betting against Fields. That's it.

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I just thought Fields is not going and you know what,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Field wasn't good't do anything. Yeah, it's just that the

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Bears ran the ball and the Raiders didn't do anything

0:08:18.640 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on offense, So you know what, what are you gonna do?

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>All right? Before we get to our best bets? Three?

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Can I talk some more surviving please? I'd like to

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>actually you can talk survivor, And I'd like to ask

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you this question because you talked about miss Name Miss

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Named contest. You've also talked about you don't really try

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to survive until you get five or six weeks in

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you start only try to I mean you don't, yeah, Corect,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry mistaking. Then you get into it. Is this

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the point now where you try to use the winner

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy instead of the survivor because the last three weeks

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you've been surviving with a consensus pick. Yeah, but I

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>also think that the there's been a little bit of

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a mix of both because I have taken so the

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>first two weeks I took good teams. Yeah, but you

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>took some chances early well, I had multiple entries. On

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the multiple entries, I took the chances, which again is

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 1>my theory that the multiple entries don't matter, it's just

0:09:07.120 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the one that you would play openly. So the one

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>that I was left with was the one that I

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 1>played Tampa Bay the first week. I lost all my

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>other entries with the more random picks. I've only played

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay and Green Bay good like really solid teams,

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>top ten power ranked teams in that entry. The rest

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of it so far is Carolina, Cincinnati, UH, Minnesota. And

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm playing with that theme. I'm gonna think

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Indianapolis again this week, and that way

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.200
<v Speaker 1>if I get through, and that's a big if with Indianapoles,

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>even though they're a big favorite, I really do think

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that that entry becomes pretty solid because I've I've used

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>at least four kind of random teams and I still

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.679
<v Speaker 1>have a bunch of top tenors left. So I think

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Indianapolis just to call my shot now. Um,

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that's how I'm going because I've already used

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay and I can use the Rams later, and

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>I think this is the time to use the Colts

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>because I'm in the end. I'm playing. That was my

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>second that was my second mayicle. But um, Carson Wentz,

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Frank Greig. I always like Frank Greig, but I thought

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>even Frank Gregg can't rehabilitate this idiot Wentz. But he

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>actually looked good on Monday nights, so I have to say,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, he looked good once. So let

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't don't you don't need to get to the

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>may but just yet, all right, before we get our

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>best bets Ace, any thoughts on tonight's game? Are you

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>betting the Tampa Bay Philly game? Anyway? I've been to

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>over fifty two and I leave Philadelphia, I haven't gotten

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>to the window yet. I'm hoping he gets the seven

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and a half. That's why I haven't. And I'm even

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>considering sprinkling a little bit on the money line. And

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 1>here's why we have a winless home team in Philadelphia

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>there oh and two. And I've gone back and Philadelpia

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>has had a pretty good home field advantage. I mean

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>even going back when they finished in last place and

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they were a six and two team at home. So

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the winless so far, I think that gives you a

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit of incentive. You don't want to keep losing

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>there obviously, uh, coupled with Tampa Bay a little bit

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of over value I think coming into this one, the

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>over seems so square obviously, um, but just all the

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>metrics point to that. Signed you have two offenses that

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are top ten in yards per play and two defenses

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that are in the bottom ten and points allowed, that's

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like the perfect storm to see over fifty two and

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>again sounds square as anything. Um But if I've learned

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>one thing being here as long as I have in

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, you can't just play contrary and the goals

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>try to get ahead of the market and hopefully have

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>some good luck as well. And I think the Eagles

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>tonight may have that. If Jail and Hurt gets it

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>going and could distribute the ball and not try to

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, be not leading the team in rushing yards

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and in everything and gets the rest of uh, I

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>think they could create some problems for Tampa Bay. So

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>for me, I like the over, and I'm trying to

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>get their window on the Birds too, and maybe a

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>sprinkle on the money line the sprint calls defend it

0:11:55.679 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>if I take the seven. The sprinkles for sure? Is

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that is that one of your three? No? No, I

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't use it as a as a like a

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>best bet. I did back it with my that's an opinion.

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I backed with my money. I will say that, um,

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't call it the best bet. And I

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>want to try to do that for the show because

0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I fired. I said, I like this week, win or lose.

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>I keep it real. I'm down this year going into

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. I'm down in college football. I'm down in

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>NFL for a year to date one, um, but you know,

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>long term, over the last four NFL bets, I've gotten lucky.

0:12:29.360 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm profitable, so I'm hoping that it continues

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>going forward. But again, I haven't been winning this season,

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>but I feel confident in this week. Take it how

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you will, You'll get those better beds. No, no shame

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and no shame in being down this thus far through

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the season. Todd or mikey any uh any thoughts on

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>tonight at all? Uh? I lean over just because I

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>think this. You know, the secondary is so bad at

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Um even though Hurts isn't the most accurate passer.

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>I think Philadelphia will score tonight, and I'm gonna tease them.

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Uh tease Tampa Bay in this spot here, because I

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:08.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're losing. Let me ask you this, Ace.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.559
<v Speaker 1>You went back to two thousand, fifteen or sixteen with

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles in their home record in general in the NFL?

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Has it home field advantage dissipated between that time and

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>now one I used to think standard was three points,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm hard pressed to give two points. I

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>agree one one percent, and I'm not sure if the

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>markets caught up with that. I don't. I don't think so.

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're right there. There is that loss

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of value from that perspective as far as home field

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>advantage goes, But I kind of weigh it with that

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they haven't won there yet, and I know the deuce

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:51.160
<v Speaker 1>it the dude doesn't work in sports betting. Um. But again,

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>you're even bad teams managed to win a home game,

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>like you should be able to the red should like

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>you should have even some good luck, like even bad

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>cole should go your way. So again, you don't want

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to depend on not to cash a ticket. Um. But

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just hard for me to see a Philadelphia team

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that's close to five hundred on the season and just

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.560
<v Speaker 1>winless at home for that trend to continue. I don't know,

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>it's it's difficult to continue seeing that happen. By the way,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>last week, Tom Brady against Miami thirty of forty one

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for four eleven, five touchdowns, no picks. He was sacked

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>two times. It's his eighth career game with five touchdowns

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and no picks, the most ever in the NFL. His

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>first career game at the age of forty four with

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>four hundred plus yards and five touchdowns. They outscored Miami

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty one and nothing in the fourth quarter tonight, sore

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>thumb but he says he's a go. Tom Brady says,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>no big deal, he's gonna play. But they don't have

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Rob Gronkowski, they don't have ants on winfield. There's some

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>others they're missing. Tampa Bay is not at full strength tonight.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Anything from Utah on that, I'm probably going to use

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the bucks in my teaser. I'm surprised that A said

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that the Eagles were top ten in yards per play.

0:14:56.640 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>If that is true, they are the most pagazy to

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>up ten I've ever seen in my entire life. Um,

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>they played Atlantas exactly tenants offensively, and that's fine. All

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say is I think it's phaghazy because they

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>played at Atlanta and they moved the ball. Very nice.

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Tip your hat. Everyone moves the ball in Atlanta. Thank you.

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. They played at home, didn't do Jack squad

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>on offense. At Dallas. They got a lot of garbage yards.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>That's going into that garbage number. You know, they got

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a ton of garbage yards. At the end of the game.

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>They were completely blown out. In Kansas City. Everybody moves

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball in Kansas City. Me, Gil and Mike and

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>you playing white out to move the ball in Kansas City,

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>so that throw that out. And then last week at

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Carolina they didn't do anything. They blocked upon at the

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the game and got lucky. So to me,

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. No. By the way, that being said, I

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't disagree with you that the Eagles could win

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the game and the game could go over. Obviously, all

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is I think that to think that that

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles are the top ten offensive team in football

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is just not fair because as you can see, a

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of this is phaghazy. But with that said, I'll

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>take the bucks as part of my um my teaser later.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, Neat, you'll never catch him. You'll never catch

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>him in teasers. As soon as I said it, he

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>wants I have full disclosure. Here's the new thing. You

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>see where we're going to, the new narrative, Gilly. You

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>see the new narrative, the Mikey Palm. He starts playing

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>laying the Seeds, Mr No hyper Bowl, the Steeler of

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Grievances, Gentile Grievancesances, Grievances. The I have the Tampa

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Bay Buccaneers tied into Last Monday Night's Baltimore Ravens teaser

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>leg which was never in doubt got completely lucky with it.

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But that's what I have as a Tampa Bay teaser like.

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I'm going to use it moving forward.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>We'll see where we get to. That best bets are

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>top three. Let's start with our first ace. What is

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>your number one spread or totals bets sir that I'm

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>going to have to go split the Monday night, abolutely

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>loved the Buffalo Bills. I jumped on them immediately and

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 1>laid the five. And this has come from experience, meaning

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>back in the day, I would have never bet a

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>team like Buffalo in this spot. They've scored thirty plus

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>points three straight weeks. They've outperformed the betting market by

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>double digits four straight weeks. That tells me from everything

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're gonna be overvalued, that the betting

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>market is going to add a premium, that if I

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bade you, I am certain I'm getting more points than

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I should. And long term, that's the best you could

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.359
<v Speaker 1>ever hope for as a sports Better doesn't guarantee you're

0:17:38.400 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>cashing a ticket that night, but guarantees you're gonna be profitable.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Long term if you manage risk correctly. Um, With all

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of that said, I have seen certain outliers. I bet

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:52.760
<v Speaker 1>long enough that's have seen certain outliers. And there are

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>some teams in the regular season that when they get going,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.400
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna just continue to steam roll opponents. I saw

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City do it, I've seen Seattle do it, and

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>now we're seeing Buffalo do it. And back in the day,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I got in front of those trains and all I

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>did was lose money, thinking I was getting the best

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. When I found out looking back, I was

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>taking the worst of it because they were outperforming the

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.879
<v Speaker 1>betting market continued to do so, so they proved the

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>betting market wrong. Yes, it's efficient, it's as efficient as

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it gets, but it's still we know, historically ten points

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>off the closing line when it's all said and done.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think this is one of those teams that

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we're they're gonna get sharp money fading them. So that's

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna eliminate some of the risk for the books. But

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the public is gonna roll on this team and gonna

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>keep cashing tickets, and I'm not gonna stand in front

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of it. I'm gonna roll on top of them. That's

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>what I've learned betting. As long as I have that,

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:59.719
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you gotta put those old school, you know, rules

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of the side and realize things change and you gotta,

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, be able to adapt. So for me, I

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>saw that immediately, and I'm like, that's a game where

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>I would have been all over Tennessee. I would have

0:19:13.000 --> 0:19:15.320
<v Speaker 1>been certain I got the best of it. So that's

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>why I'm not even going into metrics or any of

0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that on this game. It's simply reasoning, and for me,

0:19:22.080 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>like it doesn't make it any more simpler than that. Yes,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>this team is probably gonna be favored more than we

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>think they should, and they're still gonna go out there

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and cover even though Sharks think fading them has given

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>them the best of it. Because I've seen, like I said,

0:19:37.080 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I've seen New England do it. I've seen Kansas City

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>do it. I've seen Seattle do it during the regular season,

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and I'm watching Buffalo do it in real time and

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to fade that. And you learn from

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>history or you fail, you know you're doomed to repeat it.

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And I paid a lot for my education. I've got

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a Harvard education, an Ivy League education, the amount of

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>money I've lost to learn how to win, and I'm

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>not losing any more fading teams like Buffalo. It's it's

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing that the game has so evolved since

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you and I used to do this megapod back in

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the day. It is such a and from a betting perspective,

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure, the most interesting Buffalo stad. I don't know

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>if it's the most interesting, but it is an interesting

0:20:14.960 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>one to me. And they sort of flashed this up

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 1>quickly the other night when they were crushing Kansas City

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>during the lightning delay. Buffalo has led it halftime in

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>fourteen straight regular season games. Now, when you hear that,

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you're like, that's interesting. That's an NFL record that's never

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>happened before. Fourteen to thirty minutes of football. It's one

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>thing to be tied, right, but to lead by the

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>half in fourteen consecutive games is also perhaps another way

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to bet the Buffalo Bills. If if that you're such

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a big favorite though, to win the game, if you

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>go into a half with the lead, I mean we

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:50.959
<v Speaker 1>know that historically, so I mean they're doing everything right.

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>It's just as if they're grasping analytics, like somebody's teams

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to be grasping it quicker than others. They know,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>if you jump on your opponent, it it puts you

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>in a higher probability of winning. If you take a lead,

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 1>it puts you in a higher probability of winning. So

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you see these coaches devising these game plans to jump

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on opponents, and some teams have been able to do it.

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>We saw Kansas City do it and have such success

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>with it, and Buffalo is copying that same blueprint offensively.

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>And it seems to me like their defenses come around

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>now because they posted two shutouts in the last four weeks.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So again, it's just a team. I don't want to

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>get him run up. Even if they lose this game,

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to fade on when they're rolling like

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they're rolling. A lot of people have in power rated

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>number one. I do. They were doing this at the

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:38.640
<v Speaker 1>end of last year. Remember in the last five six

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>weeks they were blowing everybody out and mostly division games

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>by twenty or thirty to aces point. This was one

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest decisions of the year at CIRCA was

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night. We needed Buffalo. The sharp money was all

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>on Kansas City. It's on Kansas City, Yes, exactly, exactly that,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and little quickly start not not to go long. That's

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 1>what I'm talking about. It's it's that kind of thing,

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing it even with Kansas City, where now

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it's like, are people willing to admit that are they

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not as good as we think? Are they going to

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>keep betting them? But with Buffalo, like you said, they

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we're looking to fade. Then, like, wait, this team and

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>they're too hot, they're they're winning, they're outperforming too much.

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>They're due to regress. I don't see it. You said,

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>they've continued it from last season as far as the

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 1>metrics go. So again, they're just a dangerous team that

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>got ahead. They're going to regress. They might not aggress

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>against Tennessee, well said Ace. Does it give you any

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>pause that this was the worst spot last you remember

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>this was the weird Tuesday night game and it was

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a house of horrors for them down there. Everything went

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:47.159
<v Speaker 1>wrong in Tennessee, the turnovers and they got actually by

0:22:47.200 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the third quarter they pulled Allen and

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they just gave up on the game. Remember does that?

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>How does that? How does that affect your handicap. Does

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that make you think they have that game on their

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 1>mind from last year or does it make you think

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking about what can go wrong again. If it

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't Monday night, I'd be a little bit concerned that

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they're coming off a big win and they don't have

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>much on deck. They have winnable games I had. They

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>have Miami, they have Jacksonville, they have the Jets, so

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing to really worry about coming ahead. But it's

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night football. You just beat Kansas City as a dog.

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>Everyone thought you're gonna lose that game. You need to

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>showcase your team where if you are legit, you're supposed

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>to show off on Monday Night. You're supposed to come

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>out and crush this team, especially after what happened last season,

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.879
<v Speaker 1>gives you even more of the reason to show us

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>things that you are now the best team in the

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a f C. Like this is good. This is a

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>telling game. Even though they're not playing a Tampa Bay,

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they're not playing a Green Bay, it's still a telling

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>game because again, you're supposed to be able to win

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>these games. Coming off a win in Kansas City. If

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you're a legit so for me that the Monday night,

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact they're playing on under the lights on prime time,

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.160
<v Speaker 1>coming off a win like that, I think gives them

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the motivation to keep going, to not have that potential

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 1>let down against a team like Tennessee, especially, like I said,

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>with nothing ahead to get excited about. Key yours number one.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I thought this game opened wrong with the wrong favorite

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>with Carolina and the Vikings. I like the Vikings here,

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it's now Vikings one. Is that the number todd Yes, yeah,

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll lay the one here. I'd lay up to a

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>field goal here. Um, this is like this this Sam

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Darno is not a winner. Okay, he's never won anywhere.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>He didn't win. They were bad at USC, He didn't

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>win with the Jets. They beat the dregs of the NFL.

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>This first three games, right what Carolina played early with

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with Houston Denver dregs. But still they're similar. I mean,

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and you can only play. But they're not good. I mean, look,

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't put up any points against Philadelphia the second

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>half last week. They had so many chances to extend

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the game and they and they hung around. I still

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>think this Vikings team is a playoff team. I know

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's Kirk Cousins. I know Todd doesn't like Kirk Cousins.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to trust Kirk Cousins. But look and they

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:11.480
<v Speaker 1>play if you go back and look at them in

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cousins there, and they play better on the road.

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>On grass, they played very well. Uh, they played very

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>well um at San Diego last year. I like this

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>team when they get outdoors and on the grass, I

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>think they're better. I don't think Carolina has much offensive

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>punch here. I think the Vikings are appreciably better on offense.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I can't see them losing this game really, even though

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a road spot. They gotta stay in

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 1>this race. Uh, in the in the NFC North, And

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to me, this is clearly the best play on the

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>board this that Vikings game for those who missed it,

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for those of us who had survivor will will not

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>soon forget it. Vikings up sixteen and nine. They're trying

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to milk the clock. There would have been about one

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:47.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty left for the Lions to try to go downfield

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:51.080
<v Speaker 1>for a touchdown instead, and Alexander Madison fumble after they

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 1>didn't call forward progress. He gets stripped. Lions touchdown that

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Dan Campbell goes for two and gets it. But five

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>plays forties six yards later in thirties seven seconds. Greg

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Joseph from fifty four Vikings win, what what do you

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>make the number gill at the point that Detroit's kicking

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.160
<v Speaker 1>off the Minnesota with thirty seven seconds? I think it's

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>like a pick him at that point, whether the Vikings

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to kick a fiegal? Then why do you

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>think the Vikings are favored to get a field goal? Oh? Dog? Well,

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they became a dog because remember they kicked

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it short of the goal line, and they spent six

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>seconds only got back to the fift They played it

0:26:26.400 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, but then they allowed the big pass down

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.479
<v Speaker 1>the middle of it all. Well, the problem is they

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.560
<v Speaker 1>had two time outs left, which is a It's a

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>very different game when you have thirty one seconds and

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>two time outs versus thirty one seconds and no time outs.

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a gigantic difference. I'm so, you know the Vikings

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>had more chance than you would have otherwise thought, but

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>still at the fifteen yard line, I think they're a dog.

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.119
<v Speaker 1>You didn't say it the fifteen I said before the kickoff, Okay,

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>before the kickoff fair enough, but the two time outs

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 1>was the huge thing because it means they can throw

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it over the middle a couple of times. That's huge. Obviously,

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still cut presence, and it's still Detroit. It's still Detroit,

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 1>sadly for them. Yeah, Todd, your first my first picket's

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 1>very interesting. I liked what it said because I think

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sports gambling is always will the street

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:16.239
<v Speaker 1>continue or will the regression happen? That's a lot of

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>what you're gonna do if you get into nitty gritty

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>sports gambling often is what am I? You know, many

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>most of the teams in the NFL are gonna finish

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>between you know, seven and nine, six and ten, you know,

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the sixteen games season, not in the seventeen games.

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.240
<v Speaker 1>But against the spread, they're gonna be very close to

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the to the average most of the teams. So there

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be the outlier team that just steam rolls.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And my pick is gonna be similar to that in

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the sense that I'm gonna go over fifty five and

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a half in the Chiefs game. Now that you you

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>might say, well, wait to say, but the Chiefs go

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>over every single week. So you're paying a premium to

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>bet them over, but the thing is on the over unders.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I find it even more. I don't know if you

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>find it even more ace, but I find it even

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>more that they're regression often doesn't happen. A couple of

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>years ago, I was on Guilt Show a bunch of times,

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>uh in two thousand nineteen, and I kept hammering Tampa

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Bay to the over Tampa Bay, to the over Tampa

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Bay to the over. Jameis Winston would give you a

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>touchdown for on his side, and their defense was horrible,

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and they would go over every single week, and it

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't matter how high they made it. I think that

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what's going on with the Chiefs um in this

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>football season, because the Chiefs are the greatest over concoction

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that you can create the best offense, or at least

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the top three offense and a defense that's worse than

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty second. I put them at thirty seven in d

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>v o A, you know there. I put a bunch

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of college teams ahead of them and then their thirty seven.

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But the Chiefs are not a legitimate NFL defensive team,

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to give up points. Tyler had Taylor

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Henneke is not that terrible. He can move you down

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the field and get your point. Look at the Eagles

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can get thirty points against the Chiefs and get some

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>backdoor touchdowns. Why can't the Redskins do or the Washington

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>football team do it? The washingt football team can do it.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know the chief just are going to score

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this week week. You know they're going to score. So

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>put mark them down for thirty eight. And how many

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>do I need to go over? Fifty five and a

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>half after that? Whatever, it is, fifty five and a

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>half minus thirty eight, that's seventeen and a half. Give

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>me Washington for more than that and I get the

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.479
<v Speaker 1>over fifty five and a half, Thank you very much.

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm want to know Casey allowed four hundred thirty six

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>total yards to Buffalo on Sunday night, but minus four

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and turnovers did them in. By the way, I don't

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>know if you heard Rick doc Walker on Lombardi. Someone

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>told me he sub was like, hey, Rick doc Walker

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was on Lombardi. He's an old, old Washington football teamer,

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>won Super Bowls with Joe Gibbs, and he is uh.

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>He still is very tied into the Washington football team,

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and he was just going off on that defensive line,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and specifically without saying his name, he was going off

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on Chase Young and basically saying, it's all ego, like

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>these guys only care about their specific role. They're not

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>playing team defense. And he's flying by the quarterback. Lombardi

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>always talks about no one likes flying back past a

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>quarterback more than Chase Young. It's just I don't know

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>if they can get it together this defense. But Gil, you,

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>but Gil, wouldn't you. Let's say you're on a mediocre

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>football team. You you're gonna play for two or three years,

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the average length of your your your NFL careers, two

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or three years. You've got a cash in immediately right now.

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>This is your only opportunity. I know. We say, oh,

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do it for the team. You gotta do

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it for the team. It's bs. These guys aren't stupid.

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>They know they're a brand. They know that they only

0:30:31.840 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of years to play. I probably do

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Now. You know, you want to say

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's horrible and that's not what we were led

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to believe here in America. You play good for the team.

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's let's be realistic. These guys aren't stupid. They

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 1>know if I get more sacks, I get more money. Right,

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But you may be right is the point. But you

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>know what he was saying is and it's a great

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>point about those Super Bowl teams that were coached under

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Richie petty Bone, which is we Washington had a guy

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Dexter Manley back in those days that did his own

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>thing right and sometimes we'll get you three sacks on

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a drive against Phil Sims. He was just unbelievable, but

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>he played his own defensive concept. It was Dexter doing Dexter,

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and you had other guys like Rich Mullott and like

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Darryl world Grant who knew what Dexter was doing and

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>almost made up for it right, Like they were playing

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>with that kind of thinking. And you just don't get

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that from these guys you know today. As talented as

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that Washington front four is, and it is talented, but

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that secondary is a brutal and if the defensive front

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is not pressuring the quarterback consistently and getting to him, uh,

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>they're in trouble. And Patrick Mahomes may score a million

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>points on them. They got two turnovers off Jamis right

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 1>off the bat and couldn't do it. I mean and

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and couldn't. The hail Mary was was like you're literally

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>watching that. You're like, you guys, aren't you guys didn't

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>jump for it for that ball. No, no one jumped

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for it. Was unbelievable, how ridiculous that was at the

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>end of the first half. My my first picks a

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>is the Los Angeles Chargers. On guessing lines with Christy

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, this was the line that made no sense

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to me. That was before were the Ravens played Monday night.

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess to pick him. This was this was at

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that moment, Ravens minus three and a half even, and

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I just thought that was ridiculous. It's Ravens, I guess

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>minus three still, uh, in most spots, maybe there's two

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Either way, give me the Chargers. Every

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>time Brandon Staley opens his mouth, I fall deeper in love.

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Like this guy is to me, he's the best coach

0:32:23.720 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Said it last week on the show.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I cannot be talked off this position, and I think

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>justin Herbert besides Patrick Mahomes, is the guy start an

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL franchise with that defense. By the way, they do

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>play team defense. They know what their strength is, they

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>know what the weakness is. They play a Cover two,

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they know that that's their identity. I think they can

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>outscore anybody. And Baltimore, even in victory, even then I

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>come back win over Indianapolis did nothing to let me

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think that they're that great of a football team. Give

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 1>me the points. What is it three or two and

0:32:53.600 --> 0:32:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a half, Todd, We'll give you the three two and

0:32:58.120 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a half. We'll give you the three. He's given me

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the three Chargers plus three. That's my first pick, Ace

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>number two. Oh, we sneaking this? What are we doing?

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Are we sneaking? We should go first? Go first, go first,

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:16.160
<v Speaker 1>go ahead. I'm gonna go with that same football game.

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go over forty nine and a half in

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the Browns against the Chargers. I really like, I'm sorry,

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, sor I'm sorry, I screwed up. I'm sorry

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Browns against the different, different, different game, not the same game.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about last week's. I was thinking about

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>last I'm sorry the Browns. I just kept watching Kareem

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Hunt and the other guy just run for like a

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand yards um Cleveland against Arizona. I want the over

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>forty nine and a half. Arizona to me is also

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a very over ish team this year. They're scoring a

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>billion points. Uh, Cleveland gave up, I think to to

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Charges last week. I you know, I think Cleveland's

0:34:03.080 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>defense is pretty good, but you know this Kyler Murray guy,

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.239
<v Speaker 1>they're very good on offense. Arizona, I really like what

0:34:10.280 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>they're doing on offense, and uh, you only have to

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>go over forty nine and a half on the other

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. I don't know how Arizona is

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop Cleveland from running because you know, I don't know,

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>have you guys seen this Twitter stuff where Brian Baldinger

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>puts up these uh the all twenty two and then

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>he goes through like what different plays almost like they

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 1>used to do on NFL Live. I don't know if

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.839
<v Speaker 1>you guys have seen that happen, but yeah, yeah, it's

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>really good. But anyways, that he's showing like some of

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the running plays against the Chargers last week with the

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Browns getting just gigantic holes, I really realistically think the

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>over under on a prop for me at fullback for

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the Browns right now is probably over fifty eight and

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a half because the holes are so big you can

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.839
<v Speaker 1>just drive a mack truck through. I think Cleveland's gonna

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 1>move the ball. I think Arizona is gonna move the ball.

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>Arizona and another shootout game. Give me over forty nine

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:00.439
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Let me let me interject though, Todd,

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you're aware of this. So yesterday

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Chub and Hunt not practicing, and on defense Jadeveon Clowney

0:35:10.000 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and Miles Garrett both with injuries that they have to

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>do that part for you, but the offensive part is

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>not good for you. So here's the thing. The one team,

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the one position that I don't care if I have

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 1>injuries at is running back because I feel that the

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 1>reason Hunt and and Um and Um Chubb are running now.

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Granted they're good backs, but the holes that they're getting

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to run through them are so massive. I mean, they're

0:35:36.000 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just it reminds me of Terrell Davis. Do you remember

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 1>when Terrell Davis was with Elway and they would hand

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>him the ball and he would just have like huge

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:45.919
<v Speaker 1>caverns to run through. And they're just running the ball.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't care who they give it to they give

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it to Mike Paum in the backfield, he's gonna run

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>for Andrew Well. They had in defeat last week against

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Charges. They had five one total yards, two hundred

0:35:55.120 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and thirty rushing to your point, Todd, thirty six minutes

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of possession. The third and the first team since the

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>eighty nine Bengals with a hundred and fifty plus rushing

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>yards in each of the first five games of a season.

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Ikey Woods, I was right, I was saying. I was saying.

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>The only thing I remember the eighty nine Bengals team

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is Washington played them the last game of the season.

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.400
<v Speaker 1>It was one of Joe gibbs few non playoff seasons

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and Jamie Morris carried the ball forty five times against

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:26.919
<v Speaker 1>him for Washington. He was like, let's just get out

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of here. Go ahead, Jamie carry the rocket. But by

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, and it's not a phaghazy stats. These are

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not phaghazy stats. Watched the games. The Browns are running

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:38.960
<v Speaker 1>through holes that are ridiculous. It's ridiculous. You don't see

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that in the NFL. Todd, you said you really like

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>this Arizona offense. Did you like him not scoring for

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>three quarters against San Francisco after they got up not

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>saying I mean, and do you think that Kyler is

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>starting to take He's a little man that your friend

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Lombardi calls him the mayor of Munchkinville. He's starting

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to show a little bit of wear and tear. And

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's early in the season. But they're not what they

0:36:57.960 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>were early. Okay, I mean we'll see. You know, one

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>game they scored seventeen points and you go to they

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>scored thirty seven points at the Los Angeles Rams, reposed

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the vaunted Los Angeles Rams. They scored thirty

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>four against Minnesota. I mean, come on that. I think

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that was one of the great reactions. Okay, okay, okay,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you gotta make up. Yeah, I get it, and I

0:37:22.600 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>get it. It's number two. I'm gonna take the I'm

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>forced to make two more picks. I'm gonna take the

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys and lay the three and a half. Here, boy,

0:37:30.920 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 1>this New England defense looked so slow in that game.

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 1>They just look I mean, they made they made they

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>made uh Davis Mills look like John Elway there from Stanford. No,

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but they did. I mean, they looked like Houston had

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a formable, a formal offense. They just went came from

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo where they scored zero points. I mean, look, they're

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they're just not good. And now you're gonna take on

0:37:54.600 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a Dallas team. Dex got all these weapons. I mean,

0:37:57.360 --> 0:37:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Dallas is gonna score a ton of points

0:37:59.239 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in this game. And here's to Todd's point about New England,

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the dinking and the dunking, and I mean, when you

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 1>have to play have fourteen fifteen yard drives, the holding

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 1>penalty stops it and the likelihood of a turnover, and

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Dallas is so good at creating these turnovers. I think

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Dallas has a big upper hand in this game. And

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this number is short. I can't argue with her.

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>What's that Houston spread against the Colts? I have uston

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:27.680
<v Speaker 1>against the Colts. I see do you see ten? Todd?

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that we're going ten? Okay, Well, I'm taking Houston. Um,

0:38:34.200 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm having an indian I'm taking Indianapolis and survivor. Here's

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 1>how I know Houston is gonna cover because I'm doing that,

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and so I know I know it's gonna be close.

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Um listen, I'm not racing to the window about Houston.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Plus ten. I'm not I'm not gonna give the impression

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that I am super excited about that. But on principle,

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the Indianapolis Colts should not be ten point favorites against anyone.

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Should not be And I don't trust Carson Wentz. I

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>don't trust that team in any situation. And Houston really

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>did show me something last week. Uh for gonna say

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 1>they had to Rod Taylor. They may actually win few

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>ball games, but they don't. And it is Davis Mills.

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And I do expect Indianapolis to win, but I expect

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it to be far more of a sweat um than

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>than his imagined. And they still have Brandon Cooks. He's

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>like the one real football player on that team. I

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>just don't get the sense from the Colts that they

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>are in any way. And Carson Carson Wentz does a

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>few things every game where he's spinning, whirling dervish and

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Jamis Winston style. He just tries to do something and

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, when did he start doing that? Um? So

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that comes into playing this game. Um, I

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>just think it's too many points. The Colts should not

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>be ten point favorites against anyone. Give me the ten

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 1>points on principle, It's like Ace was talking about, just

0:39:49.000 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of the Malcolm Gladwell blink thing. I don't have

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>any super analysis other to say, like, give me all

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of them points and if you can, if you can

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>beat me Indianapolis and cover that tip of the cap.

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they Houston number two a well. Green

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Bay's getting steamed right now. They just got hit in

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>my accounts at minus four and a half. That's going

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:11.319
<v Speaker 1>up to five five and a half soon, if anyone

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:13.840
<v Speaker 1>out there is paying attention. But here's my pick. I

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>wish you wouldn't have stay snake because I'm opposite of

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Todd and now that worries me because he's on the show.

0:40:22.040 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, I'm down for the NFL season, but

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I went under fifty and I know it's forty nine

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>and a half now and that wouldn't change my mind.

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't still think it's plus c V. Here's why

0:40:32.760 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>hear me out. I just think this is the perfect

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:38.800
<v Speaker 1>storm for an under. The books have done a really

0:40:38.840 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>good job of pricing the totals for both of these teams.

0:40:42.800 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>They knew coming into the season that Arizona offense was

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna score and the Cleveland offense was gonna score. The

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.880
<v Speaker 1>question with Cleveland was did they do enough on the

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:53.879
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the ball in the off season when

0:40:53.880 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they picked up those free agents and through the draft.

0:40:56.680 --> 0:41:00.080
<v Speaker 1>That was the question. The offense was already set of

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.759
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we're going into Week six and they're

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 1>five and five combined over and under, meaning you haven't

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>made money betting the overs on these teams combined. The

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 1>books have done a very good job. I pay attention

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to that because that tells me they have a really

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.439
<v Speaker 1>good grasp of these teams. They're not beating them, they're

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>not hurting them. A team like Arizona that's five and

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>ohs straight off four and one a t s and

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 1>betters are betting them every week for them to be

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>two and three towards the under tells me the books

0:41:30.600 --> 0:41:33.160
<v Speaker 1>have a really good grasp of this team as far

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:37.280
<v Speaker 1>as total goes, and they're managing that risk really well.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think with this game, fifty was too high.

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine and a half is still too high. And

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>here's why. Yes, the offenses are potent, but it's the

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the bull that's not getting enough credit.

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 1>And some of the reason for why these teams are

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>where they are. I mean, you look at now scoring defense.

0:41:55.960 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Arizona sixth in the NFL A Cleveland's eleven in the

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>NFL scoring defense. Usually that's not the case when you're

0:42:03.120 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>lighting up the scoreboard. Just think Kansas City. They didn't

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>have a top scoring d y because when you're up

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:12.400
<v Speaker 1>forty points, how much effort can you possibly put on

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the defensive side of the ball. The teams are more

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>or less just thrown all the time anyway, make a

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:21.120
<v Speaker 1>long story short, that's very impressive that their defense is

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>holding teams like that even though they're they're crushing um.

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And then it's not just on the scoreboard. You dig

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a little deeper and yards per play, they're really shutting

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 1>these teams down. Another situation where Cleveland's a top ten

0:42:35.360 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>defensive yards per play team and Arizona is just outside

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the top ten. So as dangerous and the narrative is,

0:42:44.560 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, lethal they are offensively, it's on the defensive

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.359
<v Speaker 1>side of the ball. I think that they don't get

0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:53.440
<v Speaker 1>enough credit. And what Gil touched on stuck out to

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:56.920
<v Speaker 1>me a lot. Also, just how many players are questionable

0:42:57.200 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>or injured on both these teams offense to believe. For Arizona,

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:06.719
<v Speaker 1>you got Murray questionable, Edmunds, Hopkins, Daniels, Hudson out. I

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 1>mean the fact that questionable tells me they're not. And

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>then on the Cleveland side, both running backs with chubbing

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>her they're hunt they're both questionable, So don't banged up.

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>And even though the wide receivers receivers, if you look

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:25.120
<v Speaker 1>at the skilled positions, if one of those guys god forbid,

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 1>twists and ankle, they're in a lot of trouble. Two

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of their three backup wide receivers are on injured reserve.

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>So this team, again on the offensive side, aren't all

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:36.319
<v Speaker 1>that deep. And we're getting into the part of the

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>season where injuries start to matter whether it's gonna start

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to play a role, specially in the ease coach, especially

0:43:42.120 --> 0:43:45.360
<v Speaker 1>on the cold weather cities. To me, I I just

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 1>this one screamed up perfect storm for value on an under,

0:43:49.840 --> 0:43:52.479
<v Speaker 1>so I bet it. But again, you know the fact

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that Todd faded me doesn't make me all that confident.

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't bet a lot of pregame. It's on NFL

0:44:01.160 --> 0:44:04.560
<v Speaker 1>A so if if so, you shouldn't be too worried.

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But the only thing that I would say about that

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>is Cleveland played well defensively at Minnesota. I'll give them

0:44:10.800 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 1>credit for that. They played well against the Chicago Bears,

0:44:14.360 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll give them no credit on that. And they played

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>well decently against Houston and weren't really playing that well

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 1>and Tyrod Taylor was in the game on defense at all.

0:44:23.320 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And they didn't play well against Kansas City. And last

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:27.440
<v Speaker 1>week against the Charges, I do believe they gave up

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:31.200
<v Speaker 1>almost fifty points, so I maybe they're a little bit

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>not as good as everyone thinks they are. Um And

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>then you know, on the Arizona side, Arizona gave up

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:41.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty three to Minnesota. I mean he played Jacksonville would say,

0:44:41.400 --> 0:44:43.359
<v Speaker 1>I think the Chargers got some luck in that game

0:44:43.360 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>with some calls and he's fourth down, And I mean,

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:47.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that the Cleveland defense is as bad

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as the final score indicate. Remember I'm not saying they

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:54.919
<v Speaker 1>remember that game against Minnesota. Minnesota had that long drive

0:44:54.960 --> 0:44:56.919
<v Speaker 1>to open the game, they scored on fourth and goal,

0:44:57.080 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>they never got back in the red zone at home.

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:03.399
<v Speaker 1>A good offensive team against the lines, and how many

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 1>did Minnesota score against the lines in Minnesota? Is not

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this Juggernaut offensive team anymore. I don't see them as

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, stopping them as said, well, look, we'll see

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.759
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's what makes it fun. But and you could

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you can make the argument both ways. All I'm saying

0:45:17.040 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>is I think sometimes the Browns are a little bit

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.320
<v Speaker 1>over inflated on defense since we talked about home field advantages,

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the macro things that have changed betting

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. The other thing is that injury report stuff

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>like so I do primetime Action with Matt Brown, who,

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was three and oh want to know

0:45:33.440 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>teaser when he was on the shows What's Rufus? Three?

0:45:37.800 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And all with and Losch the teaser. Wait, I'll tell

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you Rufus was Saints minus two e one, Bengals plus

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>three was a push, Pittsburgh was a win. He had

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Browns in Seattle, so he did not win. He got

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Gino Smiths. Yeah. Yeah. The other thing is the injury

0:45:58.600 --> 0:46:01.080
<v Speaker 1>reports stuff. I do primetime Action with Matt Brown and

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Bidlin on MSG plus Monday through Friday night, our

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Friday night show for three hours. I'm not been kidding,

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like maybe two hours and forty five minutes of it

0:46:09.960 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>is nothing, but going through NFL injury reports, because if

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:18.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't have that information, this is all nonsense. Like,

0:46:18.320 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing how much now teams have cluster injuries in

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a way that they never did before. I don't know

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if it's because we lost one preseason game and the

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:30.160
<v Speaker 1>injuries happened quicker. I think it's been going on for

0:46:30.160 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years now. Like fantasy players will tell

0:46:32.000 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you this, it's like, oh, my team's decimated. It's Week three.

0:46:34.640 --> 0:46:38.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's always huge to know because a lot

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of big names appear on these things. Um a spot

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>why it built, by the way, which is why in

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:46.200
<v Speaker 1>game is the way to bet the National Football League,

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Because if you know that there's injuries, guess what. See

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:51.440
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing I don't like. You go in, they go, oh,

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there's so many injuries. They don't tell you that the

0:46:53.120 --> 0:46:55.279
<v Speaker 1>second stringer is good or the second stringer is bad.

0:46:55.320 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 1>You don't know. But you watched the game. Now you

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:00.439
<v Speaker 1>watch the first twenty minutes of the foot all game

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and you get to see you are the cluster injuries

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 1>hurting them, the cluster injuries not hurting them, And now

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:07.839
<v Speaker 1>you have all so much more information. So I don't

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>know why. I know what. People don't don't want to

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:11.839
<v Speaker 1>bet ind game, but to me, it's the only way

0:47:11.880 --> 0:47:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to go. Ace before you give you a third pick.

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>You're still doing UFC stuff? Oh yeah, absolutely. I do

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Contender Series show every Tuesday, Danavits Contender Series and

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>then you know, I do uh the show for Fight Pass.

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:27.120
<v Speaker 1>We're on our third season and I do that pretty

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 1>much once or twice a month, we do a show. Yeah,

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm still with them. I'm moving like the fourth year,

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the last year of my contract, so we'll see what

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:36.279
<v Speaker 1>happens after that of it. I'm having a great time.

0:47:36.280 --> 0:47:37.960
<v Speaker 1>It's been a great Bryan. I didn't want to go

0:47:38.000 --> 0:47:40.520
<v Speaker 1>through the whole show without plug in your UFC stuff.

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you. It's a lot of fun. What's

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:47.560
<v Speaker 1>your number three? All right, I'm gonna share this one

0:47:47.600 --> 0:47:49.400
<v Speaker 1>because I kind of have an opinion on the side

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:50.919
<v Speaker 1>and the total, so you kind of get a little

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 1>bonus pick in there. But we'll we'll use I'll go

0:47:53.880 --> 0:47:56.399
<v Speaker 1>to the side as the pick. And here's why, because

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going against even one of the groups that I

0:47:58.719 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 1>moved for that bet to my Aami Dolphins, but they

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>bet him at minus three, and they're one of those

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>groups that they do really good at getting out ahead

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:07.520
<v Speaker 1>of the market and knowing which direction it's gonna go.

0:48:07.760 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think it was a case of them believing

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna go to three and a half, if not four,

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's Jacksonville Jaguars. So I'm not afraid there's a

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit of sharp money against me. Here's my bet

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:21.799
<v Speaker 1>on the Jaguars. It's not a bet on Jacksonville. I

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:25.439
<v Speaker 1>am fading the Miami Dolphins, and hear me out. This

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:30.399
<v Speaker 1>is my only argument that they have no business at all,

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins being a favorite on the road against

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.799
<v Speaker 1>anybody at all. If you look at Miami so far

0:48:39.880 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this season, they've been a dog every single game except

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:46.839
<v Speaker 1>once at home against Indianapolis, and they lost that one

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 1>by double digits. So this team number one has no

0:48:50.320 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>business being a favorite, let alone no road favorite against anyone,

0:48:56.640 --> 0:49:00.480
<v Speaker 1>right right, right, right, right right regardless. Okay, I got you,

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm saying that they're they're even favored anywhere on

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the planet, even in Moore's This team shouldn't be favored

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:11.320
<v Speaker 1>over anyone at all. Now you look at the Jacksonville side,

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:16.719
<v Speaker 1>all right on the performing just as expected. But why

0:49:17.080 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>where in the metrics other than strength of schedule should

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Miami be a favorite. I look at yours per play,

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:28.279
<v Speaker 1>the only team worst than Jacksonville on the offensive side

0:49:28.280 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of the ball is Miami. The only team worst than

0:49:31.680 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville on the defensive side of the ball is Miami.

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>If I look at oh, well, how do you win

0:49:37.520 --> 0:49:42.839
<v Speaker 1>football games? Scoring points scored, points allowed offense defense, the

0:49:42.880 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>only team worst than Jacksonville that's scored less Miami. The

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:52.000
<v Speaker 1>only defense that's allowed more points than Jacksonville is Miami.

0:49:52.520 --> 0:49:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So why in what world is Miami favor over Jacksonville?

0:49:56.960 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And makes absolutely no sense except the thorough win team

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.399
<v Speaker 1>against a winless team. And personally, I think the winless team,

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:08.800
<v Speaker 1>if anything, has incentive and motivation to not remain winless.

0:50:08.840 --> 0:50:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Like to me, that's something you can't quantify obviously, So

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that's one of those edges I think is a better

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that is impossible for the oddsmaker to factor into the price.

0:50:19.239 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>But I think if I'm a winless team, that's got

0:50:21.719 --> 0:50:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to give me some kind of motivation, man, to like,

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>just get that that monkey off your back. You gotta

0:50:26.760 --> 0:50:29.080
<v Speaker 1>get a win and then it don't matter after that.

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.160
<v Speaker 1>For Miami, this has just been a disappointing season because

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they came in, they beat the New England Patriots as

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.799
<v Speaker 1>road underdogs, and then what happened? The wheels have come

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.880
<v Speaker 1>off and now they're looking at No, they're going nowhere.

0:50:40.920 --> 0:50:43.400
<v Speaker 1>You're not making the playoffs, you're not catching up in

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the a f C East. So for me, it's just

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a spot where I'm not betting Jacksonville again. Jacksonville is

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a terrible team, arguably the worst team in the NFL.

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Um They're not the lowest on my power ratings, but

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure on a few they are and I couldn't argue.

0:51:00.680 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 1>But does it give you does it give you any

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:04.880
<v Speaker 1>pause that it could be to a here this weekend

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and not Jacoby for said, you know, because what's the

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>drop all like? And that's what I want to touch

0:51:11.000 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on in Seattle Pittsburgh? Can we I won't take that

0:51:14.719 --> 0:51:16.879
<v Speaker 1>time now, but let's touch on that Sunday night game

0:51:16.920 --> 0:51:20.040
<v Speaker 1>before we go, even for twenty seconds, because that's such

0:51:21.360 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a big line move from switching favorites over the quarterback spot.

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 1>But to me, it doesn't matter who's the quarterback in

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>this situation because neither of them are elite, so the

0:51:32.840 --> 0:51:36.040
<v Speaker 1>drop off isn't all that significant. You're not going from

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers to a number three, You're going from a

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:42.080
<v Speaker 1>number three to a number three? Like where is the

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:46.200
<v Speaker 1>drop all? So to me, like that, all that is noise,

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:48.960
<v Speaker 1>none of its signal for me to run and and

0:51:49.280 --> 0:51:54.120
<v Speaker 1>back Miami and fade Jacksonville again. I I just it's

0:51:54.120 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the kind of bet where it just doesn't make sense

0:51:57.000 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to me. Even if Miami goes out there and wins

0:51:59.200 --> 0:52:03.239
<v Speaker 1>by three touchdowns, there's nothing in the metrics that convinced

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>me that Miami should be favored again even though it's Jacksonville,

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:13.040
<v Speaker 1>especially through a key number of three. To me, that's ridiculous,

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Like we know how important three is, and for Miami

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to be above that now with three and a half's

0:52:19.440 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 1>hanging out there makes no sense. I also bet the

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:26.759
<v Speaker 1>game over again, two bad teams. You gotta look at

0:52:26.800 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the over. You're gonna give all points. It takes a

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:31.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more effort. We've gone up there over and had

0:52:31.400 --> 0:52:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a million times. No reason to revisit it, um, but

0:52:34.880 --> 0:52:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the reason the Jacks might actually the Jags might actually

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:39.879
<v Speaker 1>make it from fourth and goal at the half yard

0:52:39.880 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 1>line one of these days to exactly. And it's something

0:52:42.920 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the week and I didn't use it as a bet

0:52:45.239 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>because I bet over forty five and a half forty six,

0:52:47.960 --> 0:52:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's up to like forty seven forty

0:52:49.800 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. But you just still get three

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half minus one twenty right now in Jacksonville,

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that three and a half's gonna be

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 1>even money by Sunday. For some reason, I think vetters

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are gonna bet Miami. I mean, I don't know why, um,

0:53:02.800 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but I like the Jacksonville side. Miami uh last week

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:09.560
<v Speaker 1>snapping their streak of twenty six straight games with a takeaway.

0:53:09.640 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville the second team in NFL history to lose twenty

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:15.880
<v Speaker 1>straight Tampa Bay in seventies seventies seven. Ace, do you

0:53:15.920 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 1>have a play on the Sunday night game? I know

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 1>you love Pete carroll Is as a game planner, one

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of the great coaches of Here's what I wanted to

0:53:23.840 --> 0:53:27.719
<v Speaker 1>touch on that I've now lived here long enough, been

0:53:27.800 --> 0:53:32.320
<v Speaker 1>betting long enough. Mike and Gil knows this. I've lived

0:53:32.320 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>through the outliers. I've lived through bating the narrative and

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the old school me would have sat back and said,

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:44.319
<v Speaker 1>let them bet up Pittsburgh, and I'm gonna go in

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and take the best of it with Seattle because the public,

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>the public, the squares are gonna overreact and think he's

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:55.680
<v Speaker 1>worth more to betting line than he is. So I'm

0:53:55.680 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the best of it. I'm gonna have a

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:59.760
<v Speaker 1>ticket in my pocket that's two or three points better

0:54:00.040 --> 0:54:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because they're stupid and I'm smart. Here's what I found

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>out that I'm not as smart as I thought I was,

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>because over the last two decades or so betting, I've

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:12.879
<v Speaker 1>seen outliers on teams that the drop off is that significant.

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I've seen Aaron Rodgers do it in Green Bay, where

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:19.320
<v Speaker 1>we thought he was worth five points, than six points,

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 1>than eight points, and the books found out he was

0:54:21.840 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 1>worth a lot more to his team than we ultimately thought.

0:54:25.320 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And I saw that happen and they continued to cover

0:54:28.680 --> 0:54:32.759
<v Speaker 1>spreads um and I think it's one of those situations

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:36.440
<v Speaker 1>where you just have certain players that really are worth

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:41.359
<v Speaker 1>more to the betting line than even reason in metrics

0:54:41.400 --> 0:54:46.440
<v Speaker 1>makes us. I'll arguably conclude they are, because again, we

0:54:46.520 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>all know nobody's work should be worth more than a

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown to a betting line. We know, no non quarterback

0:54:52.640 --> 0:54:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is when your backup. Though when knows the backup sometimes

0:54:56.360 --> 0:55:00.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you, thank you. And even though even though the

0:55:01.239 --> 0:55:06.080
<v Speaker 1>qb R right now of Russell Wilson isn't off the charts,

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>he's still so much better and just such a big

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 1>part of this team that I don't it's it's so

0:55:14.120 --> 0:55:18.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult to quantify in points what he's worth. That's the problem.

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>That's why the old man, I'd have been all lover

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the Seattle side. I'd have sat back in bet Seattle

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and phone I had the best of it. Like I said,

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been here long enough not to get trick rolled,

0:55:29.760 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and I've been here long enough not to sit there

0:55:33.120 --> 0:55:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and take the five. I'm getting the best of it

0:55:37.120 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>because Russell Wilson ain't worked seven points to the betting line.

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>He ain't worked seven points that the betting line. He's

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 1>probably worked more than seven points that a betting line,

0:55:46.840 --> 0:55:51.840
<v Speaker 1>especially and otherwise I'm passing. It's Pittsburgh or pass, because

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to be the smartest guy in the

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:56.840
<v Speaker 1>room anymore, especially when it's around it when it's a

0:55:56.880 --> 0:55:59.439
<v Speaker 1>small number. As well, the numbers are even worth more.

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:01.239
<v Speaker 1>But the one thing that's not in the line right

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 1>now is that I'm going to the game in the

0:56:02.960 --> 0:56:09.680
<v Speaker 1>club seats, and and I don't rather vociferous, and you

0:56:09.719 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 1>know when a guy as loud as me is the

0:56:12.600 --> 0:56:16.279
<v Speaker 1>service announcement that that's like, Well, once I make my

0:56:16.360 --> 0:56:19.239
<v Speaker 1>in game bet, you know, probably early second quarter, I

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 1>will tweet it out and then you realize that's worth

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:24.400
<v Speaker 1>at least to happen. Let me jump in here because

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:26.440
<v Speaker 1>that and we did not plan this. That is my

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:30.320
<v Speaker 1>third bet. I'm on the Pittsburgh Steelers minus the points.

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So much of what you said, Ace, I don't need

0:56:32.160 --> 0:56:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to repeat. I love the point you're making about how

0:56:34.600 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you think differently. Now it is Geno Smith Russell Wilson

0:56:38.160 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 1>targeted for a Week ten return for the Seahawks. I

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have said many times on a Numbers game, if not

0:56:44.640 --> 0:56:46.120
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast, I think I didn't say it on

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>this pot, but on the Numbers game rather where I said,

0:56:49.200 --> 0:56:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when the day is coming when when

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Russell Wilson can't put on his cape and save Pete

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Carroll from his own devices, whether it's by injury, whether

0:56:56.040 --> 0:56:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's by age, whatever, it is, and it happened that

0:56:58.800 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 1>when that day comes, the Sea Hawks are gonna fall

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:03.879
<v Speaker 1>off a cliff. And Gino Smith was was great in relief.

0:57:03.880 --> 0:57:06.160
<v Speaker 1>He was really good. He was the other night. We

0:57:06.200 --> 0:57:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have to give him credit for that. But even big Ben,

0:57:09.920 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 1>who did get the ball out there for two or

0:57:11.719 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty three yards is last week. Naji was great. Two

0:57:14.960 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, Claypool uh six excuse me, five for

0:57:18.480 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 1>one thirty and a touchdown, Deante Johnson two for seventy

0:57:20.760 --> 0:57:23.920
<v Speaker 1>two touchdown. I just think even Ben big Ben in

0:57:23.960 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that offense is going to be able to cover this

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because I think that Seattle defense ultimately is going to

0:57:29.240 --> 0:57:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be on the field a lot because Gino is gonna

0:57:31.560 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of short drives, a lot of three

0:57:33.520 --> 0:57:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and outs as good as he played the other night.

0:57:35.720 --> 0:57:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I will take Pittsburgh as my number three pick. But

0:57:37.840 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Pete Carroll's a defensive mastermind, mastermind, mastermind, You're number three.

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go Chargers Ravens over fifty two on this

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Ravens defense is not good. We said Momby either good

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 1>because Denver didn't score against him, but that was Petty

0:57:54.160 --> 0:57:55.959
<v Speaker 1>was out in the second half of that game, as well,

0:57:56.600 --> 0:57:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the Targers will get stopped too many

0:57:58.600 --> 0:58:01.400
<v Speaker 1>times in this game. Um, and I'd like to see

0:58:01.480 --> 0:58:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore get behind and Lamar have to throw the ball

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>around the field. That will be good for for the

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 1>total as well. I think this Charger team is legitimate,

0:58:08.600 --> 0:58:10.920
<v Speaker 1>and we'll find out going on the road, going east,

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 1>playing outdoors, playing on grass if they are. But I

0:58:13.760 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 1>really do believe they are. And I think the Chargers

0:58:15.760 --> 0:58:18.480
<v Speaker 1>put up thirty five or more themselves. Chargers twenty six

0:58:18.560 --> 0:58:21.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter points last week, fourth two at their own,

0:58:22.040 --> 0:58:24.600
<v Speaker 1>down fourteen with ten thirty four left of the third quarter.

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:27.480
<v Speaker 1>But Brandon Staylors like, I don't care if we lose

0:58:27.480 --> 0:58:29.320
<v Speaker 1>by a hundred, We're going for it. I love that

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>nine yard game. Um. They matriculate the ball downfield, then

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:35.240
<v Speaker 1>they go for two to cut it from eight to six.

0:58:35.400 --> 0:58:37.240
<v Speaker 1>And then they had a later one where they eschewed

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the field goal and they're like, no, we're going for

0:58:39.360 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it again, down four team and they got it done. Um,

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:44.600
<v Speaker 1>one of these days they won't convert one of those fours.

0:58:44.600 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 1>But so far, so awesome. Uh, Todd, your last one,

0:58:48.760 --> 0:58:52.040
<v Speaker 1>My last one is gonna be the Cincinnati Bengals game

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 1>versus Detroit. I'm going under forty seven and a half.

0:58:58.000 --> 0:59:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bengals are a sneak decent football team.

0:59:01.440 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>On defense, I've seen them play. They played green Bay

0:59:05.520 --> 0:59:10.240
<v Speaker 1>played very well defensively last week. Hung in the game, Uh, Pittsburgh,

0:59:10.280 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they shut down. They shut down the Bears with it.

0:59:12.840 --> 0:59:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Who cares everyone shuts down the Bears. They played decently against.

0:59:15.960 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I just think they're the kind of team. They have

0:59:18.000 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty decent defense. Detroit has done nothing to show

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:24.720
<v Speaker 1>me offensively that they can be great except between the twenties.

0:59:24.960 --> 0:59:26.880
<v Speaker 1>When you get inside the twenties, all of a sudden,

0:59:26.880 --> 0:59:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Detroit can't get the ball in the end zone. You know,

0:59:29.200 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>unless it's the last minute of the game. The Detroit

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:36.600
<v Speaker 1>really you know, golf is killing them inside the red zone. Uh,

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, seventeen against Minnesota, four d against the Bears,

0:59:39.400 --> 0:59:42.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy against Baltimore, seventeen against green Bay. Throwout the San

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Francisco game because they got all those touchdowns late Detroit,

0:59:45.600 --> 0:59:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and they're also running the ball, and they got that

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that coach with our we're gonna run the football, yeah,

0:59:50.040 --> 0:59:52.240
<v Speaker 1>because we're gonna we're gonna be tough. We're gonna eat

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:54.320
<v Speaker 1>change dollars for lunch and we're gonna run the football.

0:59:54.520 --> 0:59:57.760
<v Speaker 1>So Lions are gonna run the ball. I think Cincinnati

0:59:58.160 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>is a sneaky decent defensive team. And to me, this

1:00:01.840 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>game could be twenty and I get even even I

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>still get under forty seven and a half. So I

1:00:08.840 --> 1:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>just think Cincinnati's a little bit better on defense and

1:00:11.320 --> 1:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>people realize and Detroit's really not that good on offense.

1:00:14.880 --> 1:00:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh So I'll go under the forty seven and a half.

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:18.760
<v Speaker 1>It's stuff we were trying to do. Our power rankings

1:00:18.760 --> 1:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>are top ten power rankings the other day, both on

1:00:21.120 --> 1:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>prime time and on a n G. And once you

1:00:24.560 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>get past eleven, you're like it's a cliff and you're like,

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>who's twelve Cincinnati? Like maybe because you can't really come

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>up with it. Carolina Cincinnati one of those kind of teams. Alright,

1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Teasers of the week because Mike's gotta go do uh

1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>odds on with the mall at circle. Mike, he wants

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>me to go before him on teasers because he thinks

1:00:41.080 --> 1:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that down somehow gaming him Bucks and l A Chargers.

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the l A Chargers are not going to

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>lose by more than nine, give me l a Chargers

1:00:51.840 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>plus nine, give me bucks minus a half. Do you

1:00:55.400 --> 1:00:58.439
<v Speaker 1>want me to jump in alight? He took one of months.

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Chiefs and the Chargers as mine. Cheeps

1:01:01.400 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and Chargers Chargers not at all. We don't want to

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>get tweets from people. It's not a Stanford won well

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>either is the Chiefs, by the way, but Chiefs Chargers

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:12.840
<v Speaker 1>for me. Che's the Chiefs down to basically beat Washington Chargers.

1:01:12.880 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Give me nine points to work with against Baltimore Ace

1:01:16.240 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Ace before you go ahead, And I'm glad you've cleared

1:01:20.400 --> 1:01:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that up because the wrong teaser has been absolutely crushing

1:01:24.120 --> 1:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at this season. Yes, if you just wait in and

1:01:26.520 --> 1:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>pick those apart um, you've done a lot of damage

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in this week. Even with the lines moving, there's none

1:01:34.400 --> 1:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>have opened up. I mean, the only one you could

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>possibly categorize right now would be the Chargers the Baltimore

1:01:40.360 --> 1:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>at two and a half taking the Chargers up the

1:01:42.280 --> 1:01:45.960
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half. But there really isn't no reason

1:01:46.040 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to tease again. I'm a true believer of just trust

1:01:49.200 --> 1:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the math and if you have something that's plus c V,

1:01:52.440 --> 1:01:55.439
<v Speaker 1>don't reinvent the wheel. Like you know, if you tease

1:01:55.520 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>through three and seven, that's where you're getting the vout.

1:01:57.880 --> 1:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Knew if the opportunity isn't there, why teeth just lay

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the minus one ten. You're not increasing your odds by

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>taking the six. The math is already been done by

1:02:08.400 --> 1:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>guys smarter than all of us, like the quantz figured

1:02:11.280 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that ship out that if you tease through these numbers,

1:02:14.160 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>it's worth doing it. If you don't, don't, don't um.

1:02:17.800 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But for action, and because we're grading, I'm gonna I

1:02:21.280 --> 1:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have a gamble in me like everybody else. I'm not

1:02:23.600 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in this industry by accident. Um. So I'm gonna touss

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in my teaser and I'm and this is a way

1:02:29.160 --> 1:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to share another pick Kansas City because I laid the

1:02:31.720 --> 1:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>six and a half, so why not take them down

1:02:33.400 --> 1:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the minus a half? And uh, I'm gonna have you

1:02:36.560 --> 1:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>already know I like Buffalo. That's too easy, So let's

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>add Pittsburgh. Let's let's confirm that Pittsburgh already I'm getting mney. Yeah,

1:02:42.760 --> 1:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll take Pittsburgh plus a point plus a half. Again,

1:02:46.080 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>these aren't plus TV by any stretch of the imagination,

1:02:49.120 --> 1:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's a lot of fun in its action. As

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>long as you know that when you walk through the window,

1:02:53.360 --> 1:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that's there's nothing wrong with placing it. But if you're

1:02:55.840 --> 1:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>investing that way, then you've got to take a step back, man,

1:02:58.800 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and actually, like I think of what you're doing, I

1:03:01.520 --> 1:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help you're actually getting I could have used Pittsburgh too,

1:03:04.360 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>but somehow I didn't conclude it in my teaser. I'm

1:03:07.240 --> 1:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna use because I have to go oppo Todd to

1:03:09.520 --> 1:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>try to gain ground. Um, you're also chasing me, my friends,

1:03:13.320 --> 1:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not But he's the guy. He's not he's not

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>worried about you, and I'm the guy. I'm honestly not worried.

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really worried about you. I'm I'm gonna go

1:03:24.360 --> 1:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Bucks Chiefs for mine to go opposite Todd, Um or

1:03:28.600 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>not opposite, but use one, you know, Ace. I received

1:03:31.680 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a telegram from a former listener and he said, ask

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Ace if he has that Patrick Mahomes member size update.

1:03:42.920 --> 1:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Actually you'ing hanging on it in a while a while,

1:03:48.560 --> 1:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Antully, they hung on it for so long

1:03:52.280 --> 1:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got a lot to stare Um. But it's been

1:03:55.800 --> 1:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a while since they pulled on it for him unfortunately. Alright,

1:04:00.880 --> 1:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Final two questions, Final two questions, Ace, you remember these,

1:04:04.840 --> 1:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Which of the big favorites is the most likely to

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>lose outright? In your opinion? We usually do this at

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>six and a half and and uh and higher. Um,

1:04:15.400 --> 1:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>here are your candidates this week of the possible ones

1:04:20.320 --> 1:04:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to lose. Tampa Bay minus six and a half or

1:04:23.240 --> 1:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>minus seven at Philadelphia that is tonight on Thursday night.

1:04:26.600 --> 1:04:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City minus six and a half on the road

1:04:28.760 --> 1:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at Washington, Indianapolis minus ten, minus nine and a half

1:04:32.720 --> 1:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>at home against Houston Rams ten point favorites on the

1:04:36.560 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>road against the Giants. Those are the candidates. Who's the

1:04:41.080 --> 1:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>most likely to lose outright? Ace? Oh, you made this

1:04:43.960 --> 1:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>so easy for me. I'm already sprinkling and just waiting

1:04:47.000 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>for see if it gets to seven and I had

1:04:48.600 --> 1:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>give me Philipe, help ya give me an Eagles at

1:04:51.360 --> 1:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>plus money. That's a nice money line. Um, the last

1:04:55.840 --> 1:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw plus two fifty plus two fifty five not bad.

1:04:59.320 --> 1:05:02.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a winnable game. I am also taking Philadelphia. I

1:05:02.560 --> 1:05:04.920
<v Speaker 1>believe Tampa Bay is the most likely to lose outright

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of those groups teams. Mikey, there there's only three, right,

1:05:09.200 --> 1:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>there's chiefs. You conclude the Chiefs said the Chiefs. Okay,

1:05:13.080 --> 1:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I gotta pay attention, he said, cold. What about you, Todd?

1:05:20.560 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the Colts can lose too. I'm with Mikey

1:05:22.560 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>on that one. I mean, the Colts are nothing. I mean,

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they played really well. Would you say you're

1:05:29.120 --> 1:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>right there? In four team It's not like they're turning

1:05:31.400 --> 1:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. And they and they beat the Dolphins, and

1:05:34.480 --> 1:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I've got them in Survivors and I've got him in

1:05:36.360 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the Survivors. So you know it's gonna be tight. We

1:05:38.200 --> 1:05:40.400
<v Speaker 1>will be We'll have a chance with We'll have a

1:05:40.480 --> 1:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>chance with the Texas of course. Alright, final question, Uh,

1:05:44.320 --> 1:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we have bys this week, by the way, four teams

1:05:46.120 --> 1:05:49.120
<v Speaker 1>are in by so we do have fourteen games. Let's

1:05:49.120 --> 1:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>say you lived in a bizarro world where you were

1:05:50.960 --> 1:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>forced to bet all of them, but one thirteen of

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the four teen you must make a play on, but

1:05:55.600 --> 1:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>one you want no part of. On the side whatsoever? Ace,

1:05:58.880 --> 1:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>what is the game you want no part of? Oh?

1:06:02.680 --> 1:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I told you I liked this board, so I it's

1:06:05.080 --> 1:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>difficult to call him out, um, but honestly, it probably

1:06:09.840 --> 1:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>would be the Chargers Ravens game. Um, that's more one.

1:06:14.720 --> 1:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to see both these teams play this game

1:06:17.080 --> 1:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>than getting bobbed in it. It's around that key number

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of three. Um. Again, it's just where I had it waited.

1:06:24.920 --> 1:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's right on the number. I just don't see

1:06:27.600 --> 1:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>much value either way. Maybe if you could late two

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half or get three and a half, you

1:06:31.920 --> 1:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>could say you have a good ticket in your pocket. Um,

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's just one of those stay away from me.

1:06:37.400 --> 1:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean in the game. I like Baltimore, but again

1:06:39.920 --> 1:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>not I wouldn't bet it Todd the Raiders game. I

1:06:43.520 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want any part of the rage. That's fine. I mean,

1:06:48.480 --> 1:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>what what in the world, What in the world is

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>going on over there? I mean, you know, I know

1:06:54.680 --> 1:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there's emails. I mean some emails. I just came to

1:06:57.760 --> 1:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>light about Mike Palm and that's why I want to

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:01.920
<v Speaker 1>try to get him knocked off odds On or the nuts.

1:07:01.920 --> 1:07:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he should be thrown out of their and

1:07:04.240 --> 1:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>circle as the operations manager because he called me a

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>fat jew one time and h no, I'm just kidding.

1:07:10.520 --> 1:07:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He would never call me that. But uh, I don't

1:07:12.640 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on in that raiders offer room. Who

1:07:15.880 --> 1:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>knows any more? But if you're not fat anymore, oh yeah,

1:07:22.000 --> 1:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>anymore exactly. And you know what I did. I did

1:07:26.280 --> 1:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the mask. I should have lost forty three pounds of

1:07:28.400 --> 1:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>this summer playing tennis, but instead of gained one because

1:07:31.400 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I've eat too many calories even though I've been playing

1:07:34.320 --> 1:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>tennis every day. I'm a big fat causer and I've

1:07:36.760 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gone from two six times to to seventy. Very bad

1:07:40.320 --> 1:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>job by me. That's all right, You're better than you

1:07:42.200 --> 1:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>were were also you and I also Raiders Denver part

1:07:45.200 --> 1:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of who knows knows what's gonna happen. We gotta run

1:07:48.280 --> 1:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>because Mike He's got a show to do. Ace love

1:07:51.040 --> 1:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you man great. Thanks for having me by big point

1:07:56.720 --> 1:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>before it's too late. Follow Faid. I hope you make

1:08:04.640 --> 1:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>money Thanase because I want to talk shit if my

1:08:08.720 --> 1:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>overs had Breefunderscore Gambler Yeah you too, so please so

1:08:12.280 --> 1:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I can follow back through that at Greek Underscore Gambler

1:08:15.640 --> 1:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>please Todd at let's see add Greek Underscore Gambler. Yes

1:08:21.439 --> 1:08:24.519
<v Speaker 1>please four Ace Vegas runner for Todd, wishing that for

1:08:24.680 --> 1:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Mikey palm Gill Alexander, thanks for listening. Appreciate everybody listening

1:08:29.080 --> 1:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>to the megapod this year, record numbers, record numbers. We

1:08:32.280 --> 1:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. Great legals, Talk to you next week. Good

1:08:34.479 --> 1:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>luck with all your bets. Week six in the Ashen

1:08:36.840 --> 1:08:37.599
<v Speaker 1>Football League