WEBVTT - NFL Week 6 Picks & Best Bets + Against the Spread Selections (Ep. 358)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in, everybody to betting pros. It's time to place

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>your bets. It is me, Joey P.

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Joe P's a P and it's week six, so you

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:07.480
<v Speaker 2>know what that means.

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:09.959
<v Speaker 1>It's time to start looking at some of our favorite

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 1>plays of the week. Andrew Erickson, the prop Profit, is

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>here as always. He is fresh from a little extended

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:19.120
<v Speaker 1>vacation last week, but he is ready to go now

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.479
<v Speaker 1>and of course back again. One of our favorite guests

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>here on the show Joe Ranieri from sportscrit TV. You

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>can catch him on Sports Career. It feels like every

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>single day you're the hardest working man in show business.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 2>What's that like for you, Joe?

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>You ever get a day off for no great? I'm

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 3>so glad you texted me this morning because I really

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 3>have no idea what day it is. So the fact

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 3>that you helped me along with this has been great.

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 3>I do know. There is some football tonight, which ultimately

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 3>is all that matters here at this time of the year.

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there is football tonight. There is football on Sunday

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>morning for those of us on the East Coast. There's

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>football way too early in the morning for those of

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you on the West Coast. But there's a lot of

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.280
<v Speaker 1>football to talk about and a lot of bets to

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>be made. Andrew Erickson, I knows a lot of injuries too,

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So in your opinion, have the injuries this week really

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>impacted your look at some of these lines?

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think so, especially when you look at teams

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 4>that have the cluster injuries where it is one team

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 4>just so much healthier than the other team. I think

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 4>that in itself is just like looking at I know

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 4>last week, I like the Falcons a lot, and you've

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 4>just looked at how healthy they were entering that game

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 4>versus the team that they were playing like they were

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 4>the more healthy team, and sometimes that can be enough

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 4>for a team to just kind of get that slight

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 4>edge over a team that's potentially coming in more injured,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 4>more banged up. And if it's not as factored into

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 4>the line itself.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Buffalo Bill's defense too, man. Have they taken a

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of shots the last couple of weeks.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>But lucky for them, they get the Giants this week,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>so shouldn't show up too much.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 2>But let's get to some of the picks before we do.

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Just reminder, if you want some free stuff, all you

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>gotta do is drop a comment below and subscribe to

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>our Betting Pros YouTube channel, because when you do, you

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>could win an Odell Beckham Junior Baltimore Ravens autographed jersey

0:01:58.960 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>signed by Odell.

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't use it, so we're giving it to you,

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 2>the people.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>We want you to take this jersey off of his hands.

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 1>He signed it for you. And again, just click that

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>little beltill it goes ding for notification, so you know

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 1>if you are the big winner of the Odell Beckham jersey,

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>comment subscribe.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 2>That's it really easy to do. Joinier. Here are our guests.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's kick things off for week six. What do you

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 2>have for the people?

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 3>All right, well, we'll start with the early game on Sunday.

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.360
<v Speaker 3>That's right. Those of you are on the West coast,

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 3>so sorry, you'll have to get up early, just like

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 3>us on the East coast to enjoy a little London

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>affair between Baltimore and Tennessee. And I think this has

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 3>got Baltimore written all over it. And I'll tell you why.

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Anybody to watch that game last week you saw what

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Baltimore's receivers dropped seven passes in that game, including three

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 3>potential touchdowns and What I love is I love what

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 3>Todd Monkin has brought to Lamar Jackson and to this team.

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 3>He's averaging more passes over ten yards this season than

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 3>has ever before. That's what Mounkin brings to the table.

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 3>He loves passing downfield. Those passes will not be dropped

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.919
<v Speaker 3>again this week. And I'll tell you why. The last

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 3>time Baltimore was in England playing in one of these games,

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 3>it was embarrassing, to say the least. I believe it

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>was a forty four to seven loss back in twenty

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 3>and seventeen. So Harball, remembering that, decided that is not

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 3>going to happen again. As soon as that game was

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 3>over this weekend against Pittsburgh, guess where they left to England.

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 3>They had been there. They brought the entire team. We're talking,

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 3>video team, medical stamp, everybody has been there the entire

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 3>week here for the Baltimore Ravens. So there will be

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 3>no adjusting of the clocks. It won't be this nine

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 3>to thirty Eastern time game, which will be two thirty

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 3>local there. The Ravens no have been there, have done this.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>They are not going to make the same mistake twice.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 3>That's what Harbor does. Tennessee can't run the ball, which

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>is relying way too much on Ryan Tannehill. They got

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 3>healthier on the offensive line. That being Baltimore, they're not

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to run against. All of this

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 3>leads me to believe this is a big bounce back

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 3>spot for Baltimore. Here, I'll lay the three to four

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 3>to four and a half, whatever it is you want

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to give me. I'm laying at Baltimore routes Tennessee in London.

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, interesting things there, And you're right, Tennessee you

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>can't run and really run against them. They've proven that

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:29.359
<v Speaker 1>all year. But talk about literally letting a game slip

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:30.000
<v Speaker 1>through your fingers.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Last week it's Burke.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean literally, they're over and over and over again.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I agree it bounce back there, but at least we're

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing Lamar throw the ball in the right spot. It's

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:41.359
<v Speaker 1>not on Lamar, it's on the receivers and tight ends

0:04:41.360 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and everybody. All right, Andrew Erickson, let's go to you

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.040
<v Speaker 1>week six. Let's start with your favorite picks of the week.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>What do you have?

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going right back to the Atlanta Falcons because

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 4>I like betting on them when Desien Ritter plays at

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 4>home because that's where he's good. Yeah, you look at

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 4>him during his professional career college career, has not yet

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 4>lost a home game. So as bad as he is

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 4>when he plays on the road, when he's able to

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 4>be kept upright in a clean pocket and operate the

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 4>offense and get it to his playmakers, this offense can

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 4>score points. And their defense is underrated. So and we're

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>also seeing regression kind of kick in favorably.

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 3>For the Falcons.

0:05:13.720 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Last year lost eight of their ten one possession games.

0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 4>This year they're two and zero because unlike the Vikings,

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 4>who are losing all their one possession games, the Falcons

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 4>are winning all their one possession games, as it should

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 4>be when a regression comes into play. So you're looking

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 4>at an offense I think can score against the Commanders.

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean their commanders got lit up against basically everybody

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 4>at this point if it weren't for the Denver bron

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.239
<v Speaker 4>because we talked about them as one of the worst.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Defenses in the NFL.

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 4>And I think again, the Falcons defense underrated when you

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 4>look at Sam Howell and this Washington Commander's offense when

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 4>they've faced any above average defenses, which in my opinion,

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 4>the closest defense to the Falcons that they've played is

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 4>the Bills. They got destroyed in that game against Buffalo.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Two weeks ago in all fairness, and they did.

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 3>But the Eagles.

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but the Eagles defense though, is overrated. Like we know,

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 4>they have a good passers, but their secondary.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Secondary second years not secondary.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 4>So the thing with the Falcons. The Falcons have a

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 4>complete defense. They can bring pressure, they have good cornerbacks,

0:06:12.320 --> 0:06:17.039
<v Speaker 4>good safeties that can cover. So for me, their statistical

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 4>output on defense has been solid, but it has not

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 4>translated into turnovers. They only have one turnover on defense

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 4>since Week one, despite playing great across the board, So

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 4>I think they're overdue for turnovers. I mean, you look

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 4>at whether the commanders have covered or not. This year,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 4>it's almost always dictated by if they win the turnover battle.

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 4>They win the turnover battle, they cover, they don't, they

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 4>don't cover. So I'm gonna bet on regression again kicking

0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 4>in for the Falcons at home with their defense, getting

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 4>after Sam Howell the sack machine himself, and they're gonna

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 4>get I think it could be a route, honestly, so

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with the Falcons minus two and a half.

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, so the Falcons minus two and a half,

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as Scott Bagman has coined him a few weeks ago,

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>jack Lyn Howell, We'll see which version shows up. You

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>think Desmond River has one of those sleep number beds ericson?

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>You think that's why you play so well at home?

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that?

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 4>What is?

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Does he send it to like, you know, sixty eight

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>degrees and you know he's got like he's a four

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half of the sleep number scale. I don't

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>even know if that's the thing, but I'm pretty sure.

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, he seems like a guy that's very much

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 4>into routine, and maybe that's what kind of does it

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 4>for him. I mean the sleep number. I mean it's

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 4>not helping Dak Prescott, so that is true. I'm so

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 4>sure that that is the number is the key for

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 4>any of these NFL quarterbab It's.

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Time to get rid of him as the spokesman.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're the sleep number of people, you're like, hey, look, Dak,

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been a good run, but maybe we're gonna go

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>pivot to somebody else. Let's pivot to another game here.

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ranieri, what do you have in Week six?

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 2>For the folks.

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, try to couch Dak. Maybe that'll work. Maybe that'll

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 3>help you out there. Might send him to the couch

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 3>after last week. I do at least on my next

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>game is gonna be a game I've already bet twice

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 3>because I've been keeping an eye on the weather report

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and you guys should as well. Minnesota at Chicago, and

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 3>it was confirmed again earlier today weather it's going to

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 3>be atrocious. We're talking about wet and windy, real windy

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 3>in Chicago for this game here, which all leads me

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 3>to believe I got it at forty five. I think

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 3>it's forty four and a half now it was forty four,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's gonna keep dropping here. We know

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 3>Minnesota and Kirk Cousins, Oh guess who won't be on

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 3>the field anymore for him yet, justin Jefferson, which according

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>to my numbers, is worth about two points of offense

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 3>for that Minnesota team. They won't be able to throw

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the ball all that well. And this is about matchups

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>here right now. We've got a defense of Minnesota that

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>loves to come and blitz here, and we've got an

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 3>offensive line Chicago that is a little bit less than

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 3>spectacular and got a couple of more injuries there last

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 3>time out where DJ Moore gained two hundred and twenty

0:08:49.760 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 3>one yards and I've never seen this on simple hitches

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:54.960
<v Speaker 3>and go routes. It was the most unbelievable thing I

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 3>have ever seen in my entire life there, Washington. I

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 3>appreciate that, really, but that will not happen in this

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 3>weather and in these conditions. This is going to be

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.680
<v Speaker 3>a rock fight. The weather is going to dictate what

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 3>happens here. No Justin Jefferson, no downfield threats, Yeah, no

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 3>downfield threat for Chicago either. It's a dead under for

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 3>me in this one here with Minnesota in Chicago.

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 2>It's funny, Joe. I actually earlier in the week.

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Was touting the Chicago Bears to just win this game

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>out right on the money line plus one twenty six,

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just because I feel like the weather coming into play,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the lack of Justin Jefferson, the fact that the Bears

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>offense starting to look a little bit more explosive. Yes,

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the defense is a problem, we all know that, but

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>soose the Vikings defense, and the Bears are at hole

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just I don't know, man, for the this

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>is like, this is like that deathnel game for the

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Vikings I feel like, which I know is very depressing

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>for all the Vikings fan I know you know Thor

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is very upset about it. We'll do a check on him,

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>see how he's doing. Ericson, let's go to you again

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for another pick and Week six, what.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you have.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm avoiding all weather in this game because I'm going

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 4>to a dome. So on the money line against the

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 4>New Orleans Saints. Now, I think that the Saints are

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 4>being back because they killed the Patriots, but we've seen that, Hey,

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 4>killing the Patriots just makes teams overvalue the next week.

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 4>That's Dak Prescott on his sleep number bed. So for me,

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 4>when I first looked at the Week six lines, the

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Texans at plus two and a half was what really

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 4>stood out to me because they should have. They came

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 4>really close to winning last week, you know, if it

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 4>hasn't been for the regression for the Falcons in one

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.040
<v Speaker 4>score games like C. Stroud set that team up to

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 4>come away with the victory last week against the Falcons,

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 4>and they came up just short.

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 3>But I want to point out that C.

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 4>Shard has obviously played really well this year, and the

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 4>offensive line is finally starting to get healthy for the

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Houston Texans. Last week they had Laramie Tunsel, Titus Howard,

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 4>and Shack Mason all back in the lineup. Stroud faced

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Week five's lowest pressure rate among all quarterbacks. So the

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:54.199
<v Speaker 4>issue with Stroud has been okay, like he's going to

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 4>rind a patchworks in the line, Like how is he

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:57.959
<v Speaker 4>going to get the ball out? That's not gonna be an

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 4>issue anymore because the Saints aren't overright defense when it

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 4>comes to their pass rush twenty fourth in pressure rate.

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 4>So yes, the Saints have been good on paper. They've

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 4>played a lot of bad teams. I would argue c J.

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 4>Stard is the best quarterback that they've played this year.

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 4>So I think the key is going to be able

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 4>to come in there and just dice up this secondary.

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 4>So I love back in the Texans. Here on the

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 4>money line again, I think Derek Carr the Saints team. Yeah,

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 4>they beat the Patriots, Okay, a lot of teams can

0:11:24.400 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 4>beat the Patriots at this point, so I think that

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 4>they're overrated, and I think the Texan's coming off a

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 4>loss when everyone was really high on them. I think

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 4>This is a good value spot for them to bounce

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 4>back here and get the win in a matchup that

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 4>I think that CJ. Stroud can take advantage.

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff being the Patriots is not that impressive of a feat,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and beating in the New England is not impressive of

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a feat anymore. More on them later in the show

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>before we keep going. Just to remind y'all, make sure

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you're making your picks through the Betting Pros app. Make

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>sure you sink all your sports books and join our

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>NFL contest because it's free. Even if wagering isn't available

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in the state you live, it doesn't matter.

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 2>Come make some picks with us, have some fun.

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Go to betting pros dot com slash NFL contest today

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 1>on the Betting Pros app. Just clicked that community tab

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and joined through there. The winner for the season long

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.520
<v Speaker 1>whever as the best picks of the year, gets a

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Smith and Jigba jersey. We're also giving away weekly prizes,

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>monthly prizes. We're giving away Fantasy Pros and Betting Pro swag,

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and also upgrades to our premium features at Betting Pros

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and at Fantasy Pros. So again, free stuff for just

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>picking games. Sounds pretty good to me. Bettingpros dot Com,

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Slash and fl Contest join it today, Jo Niri, let's

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about the same game that Erickson

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.680
<v Speaker 1>is in on, because you've got some thoughts when it

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to Houston as well.

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I absolutely agree with him. This New Orleans

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 3>defense might just be the most overrated group in the

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 3>National Football League given who they've played through the first

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 3>five weeks. Here, I mean, when the Titans, who ranked

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>nineteenth offensively in yards per play, are the best offense

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 3>that you had faced thus far this year, ye had

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 3>no there are going to be I love the over

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>in this. I think Houston's offense and he mentioned it there.

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 3>With Tunsel Titus Howard back healthy, this is going to

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 3>be not only the best offense that they have faced,

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's also a matchup nightmare because it's

0:13:13.400 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 3>gonna be the best quarterback they faced and CJ. Stroud,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 3>who will be protected and the problem with New Orleans

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 3>and the matchup is not great. Now, we'll have to

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 3>wait and he I know TANKDLL obviously in the concussion protocol,

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 3>will see what he's gonna be. But there if there's

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 3>a shot he goes. It makes it an even better

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 3>bet for me to look at the over in this game,

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:38.079
<v Speaker 3>simply because the New Orleans defense plays the second highest

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 3>rate of man coverage in the secondary there. And the

0:13:41.720 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 3>problem is, guess what CJ. Stroud does better than just

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.200
<v Speaker 3>about anybody. It's complete passes down the field against what

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 3>man coverage. It's a mismatch here. I do think Derek

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 3>Carr's shoulder injury we saw improvement last week. Usually when

0:13:56.920 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 3>you get that whole that ligament thing there, the ac

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 3>sprain that they were talking about, usually by the time

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 3>you get to the third game, after you have received

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 3>that injury, it starts to get a little more normalized.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I do think they'll take some shots downfield. I think

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 3>Kamar will have some success, especially in the screen game.

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 3>When you put it all together. I certainlyleen Houston, but

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely think we're getting more than forty two and

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 3>a half points in this game.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a proud dad about c J. Stroud

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>because he was my number one quarterback on the board

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was kind of unpopular back in draft season.

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Erickson and I did five twenty one draft shows together,

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and then that couple of days before when all that

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>stupid Reddit Will Levis stuff broke, I did a special

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>video where I was like, the best bet you can

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>make is c J Stroud right now because that numbers

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>moved going second overall, it would be crazy for the

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Texas to pass on him, and you know what they didn't.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 2>It was whole bunch of nonsense. And c J. Stroud

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>has been excellent. So good on CJ. Stroud.

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad that he's having such a good season. I

0:14:57.960 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>drafted him in every super Flex league that I have.

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Erickson, We're so proud of our boys. Sea dress dress,

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>so proud, so proud.

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm proud of whoever from the Texans leaked

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 4>the S two scores that made him fall s two?

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>What the scores are? Can you throw the football and

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>complete it when it matters? That's all that you see.

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 4>Over the offensive line.

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 3>That's bad awesome.

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of that, let's go to Carolina. Look at that segue.

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the Carolina Panthers and the Miami Dolphins,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>who set me up perfectly because you've got some feelings

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>about this game now. The Dolphins will be without Devon

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>han for this game, so the explosive young running back

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>who has been very fun to watch will not be

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in this game, but still a lot of firepower there

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Miami Dolphins and the team in the Carolina

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Panthers that frankly struggles to push the ball downfield. So

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>can they keep pace at all to hit this number?

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Here? Ericson, So I do, I do think they can here?

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 4>So I like the overhere, even at forty eight and

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 4>a half. So Miami's three and two towards you over

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 4>the season, and the unders have come when they've played

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 4>the Giants and the Patriots. So two of the worst

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 4>scoring offense in the NFL. Now you're gonna probably look

0:16:02.080 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 4>at Carolina, probably similarly to the Patriots and Giants, but

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 4>Carolina has been better than both those offenses.

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Like everyone's been better than the Patriots off exactly.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Those are the bottom.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Eleven points again, eleven eleven on offense.

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, it has not been pretty for those two offenses.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Where last week we did see Carolina's offense start to

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 4>move the ball a little bit better. They were okay

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 4>in the first half. It was kind of turnovers that

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 4>kind of had them spiraling, but even in the fourth

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 4>quarter they were still out there trying to score points.

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 4>They were scoring touchdowns even at garbage time, because why not.

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, they had they drafted Bryce Young first overall,

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 4>so it's like they're going to want to pat his

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 4>stats in any way, shape or form to justify the pick.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 4>So I don't think that we're going to see Carolina

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 4>just give up at any point in this game, even

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 4>if they are giving up twenty thirty points. So for me,

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking at the offense. I think that we've seen

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 4>that when they've been able to put up points so

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 4>far this year has been facing other top offenses on

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 4>the road. So when they played Seattle Seas, they scored

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 4>a bunch of points. We saw it last week a

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 4>little bit. They were putting up more points than they

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 4>have in previous weeks. So I think that with that

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 4>type of game script where they are chasing points against

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 4>the high powered offense, that they are going to score.

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 4>And the fact that Bryce Young has kind of been

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 4>so turnover worthy in terms of his play rate, like

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 4>he's kind of been loose with the ball, fumbling the ball,

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 4>throwing interceptions like that gives Miami access to scoring the

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 4>ball quickly, and Miami doesn't even need more help to

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 4>score the ball quickly because we know all the speedsters

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 4>they have they can score lickety split. So I think

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 4>that the team split can I I mean it is

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 4>a class.

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean the next thing, you know, is a bunch

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of blarkie like. That's That's what I'm waiting for. I

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>know you're an old soul ericson. I know you're from

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the New England area, but.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 3>You got to change my defend.

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Let me tell you, man.

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're right, and I think you make a

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>good argument for it, that's for sure. Remember everybody too,

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 1>is you're trying to stay on top of all the stuff.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:56.479
<v Speaker 2>You're going on.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, from now until kickoff, make sure you're looking

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>at the line movement alerts you can get on the

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>VP app because you could set certain games for those

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>game notifications, so you know, you know, if you're anticipating

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe some line movement, or as Joe pointed out earlier,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>you know some weather's gonna be affecting some of these

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>games here. You want to make sure you're staying on

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>top of all those things so you can know and

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>get your best possible wager in there.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 2>From all the sportsbooks that's a whole point.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So sink all your sportsbooks and don't forget to set

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>those game notifications so you know when those line alerts happen.

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ranieri, let's get another one off your list.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>It's number four and it's the Patriots.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have to sell me on this one because

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>I am so far on the other side of this

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>after watching the Patriots, who have no defense, they have

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>no pass rush, they have no secondary everybody's hurt, they

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>have no offense. How in the world do you justifying

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>New England in the minus three?

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:50.160
<v Speaker 3>I gotta it's simple. Jimmy Garoppolo makes life very easy here. No, listen,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about a as bad as New England has been,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 3>there's about there are Situationally, this is a spot you

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 3>want to go with the home team getty, or you

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 3>want to go with the team getting points given how

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 3>bad they have been over these last stretch of games here,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 3>and it's no doubt bit disgusting. But I'll take you

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 3>back a year ago. While New England's offensive line, I

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 3>think they ranked close to dead last, if not thirtieth,

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 3>inn pass blocking efficiency this year, which also explains a

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of the problems that Matt Jones has been having.

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 3>But look at who they've had to go up against

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to pressure on the quarterback. Cowboys, Jets, Dolphins,

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.280
<v Speaker 3>all ranking in the top five here of getting to

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback here. Now, Max Crosby is an issue, but

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 3>Max Crosby can be neutralized. You know how doing exactly

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 3>he was an issue last year, and you know how

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.120
<v Speaker 3>they neutralized them. They ran for two hundred and six

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 3>yards on the ground, which is exactly what they are

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 3>going to do here. In fact, the Raiders their defense

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 3>just twenty fifth and expected rushing. Their ability to be

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 3>able to stop the rush has not been great. So

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 3>if New England wants to get back on track, and

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 3>no doubt they are looking to score more than well

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the points that they have scored the last couple of weeks,

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna happen. If they're looking to see, we don't

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 3>set the bar high we wanted, we just want to

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.359
<v Speaker 3>go above that bar. Uh. And the way that you

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.040
<v Speaker 3>do that is simply go ahead and uh and rush

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.640
<v Speaker 3>the ball, which is exactly what they're gonna do. I'll

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 3>also say this, the Patriots uncharacteristically have lost a league

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 3>worse twenty four points because of special teams. That is

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 3>not going to continue with Bill Belichick. I don't care

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>if he's got to start over. When he said we're

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 3>gonna start over, he's gonna start over, and he's gonna

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 3>start with special teams first, because they have been an

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:50.120
<v Speaker 3>absolute abomination. He's losing nearly five points a game when

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 3>it comes to special teams. I don't see that happening.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I also don't see the Raiders being able to run

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the ball at all. Uh, the reason of the offense

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 3>kick it off the ground, and we're talking they're only

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 3>averaging fifteen point eight points a game here, guys, they're

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 3>twenty night. They were twenty almost twenty four points the

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 3>same time last year offensively, and the big difference is

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 3>they can't run the ball. Not to mention, Garoppolo lost

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 3>his starting right tackle, so that's not great. They've got

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 3>backups now on the offensive line. When you put it

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 3>all together, as discussing as this may seem here, you're

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna trust Jimmy Garoppolo to do what some of these

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 3>other teams have done to New England. If New England

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 3>stops shooting themselves in the foot and goes back to

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 3>old hard Nos football, where run the damn ball down

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the throat of the Raiders and clean up the special

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 3>teams that I'll take all the points you want to

0:21:49.560 --> 0:21:53.440
<v Speaker 3>give me all day long. In this spot, Belichick knows

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 3>he is not going to go to Vegas and get

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.439
<v Speaker 3>embarrassed once again. He's not gonna let a guy he

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 3>knows better than anybody in that building and including the

0:22:02.440 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 3>other coach, ain't gonna let them beat him. Didn't do

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 3>it last he ain't gonna do it this year either.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 3>So I'm taking the Patriots and the field goal in

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>this spot.

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>As a Patriots fan, I hope you're right. As a

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>better I'm already on Vegas, just like last week. I

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>teased up the New Orleans Saints to three and a

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>half and I said, let's go. Let's get that plus money.

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I should have teased it to thirty, and I still

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be okay. But we'll see. Maybe they will get.

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Back to basics.

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I think they're closer to Caleb Williams than they

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are winning this football game. Andrew Jackson, for you, my friend,

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 1>give us number four on your list for Week six.

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing the Cincinnati Seattle Seahawks. Game like the over here.

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 4>I know there's a little bit of weather concern, so

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 4>kind of keep an eye on that, but it doesn't

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:44.639
<v Speaker 4>look like it's gonna be as bad as some of

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 4>the other games. Maybe some rain, but as long as

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the wind stays below that fifty miles per hour usually

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:53.440
<v Speaker 4>were pretty good. So I just the Seahows defense not good.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 4>Let ranks dead last, red zone efficiency thirty, first and

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:00.360
<v Speaker 4>third done conversion rate, the Bengals defense outside the top,

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 4>twenty points per game, third down yards per play, and

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 4>when you look at the Cincinnati run defense specifically not great.

0:23:06.760 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 4>It's basically the same as like the New York Giants

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 4>run defense, and we saw Seattle rush for one hundred

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 4>and twenty plus yards against them. So I don't have

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 4>any issues with Seattle moving the football against the Cincinnati

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 4>run defense. I don't have any issues with Joe Burrow,

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 4>healthy calf moving the ball against Seattle's defense overall. So

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 4>to me, it's kind of just like, yeah, this is

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 4>pointing to a place where I could either be a

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 4>lod of points scoring in this particular matchup, especially with

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 4>the Seattle side. Their offensive line is finally healthy, like

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 4>they're coming back off the bye week. They had a

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.120
<v Speaker 4>ton of offensive line injuries to open the year. It's when

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 4>they dropped that first game to the Rams and we're like,

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>oh no, it's Gino Smith, Like is he horrible? Like

0:23:45.040 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 4>what's the issue here? But offensive line should be healthy.

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.919
<v Speaker 4>They're gonna be runn the ball effectively. I think that

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 4>we saw last week the Bengals kind of bounce back

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 4>on offense. I think that starts to continue as they

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:56.800
<v Speaker 4>head into their bye week because they need to pick

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:00.359
<v Speaker 4>up steam. The AFC North is again, it's still open

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 4>because teams keep losing games, because the Steelers keep winning

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 4>games somehow, So I think this is a spot where

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:08.360
<v Speaker 4>their offense cooks. Seattle's cooks and we get the over.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Ken Walker's price on FanDuel this week, by the way,

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's ridiculous, Like I've never seen ken Walker's price so high,

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and I want it anyway against Cincinnati and DK is

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>questionable for this game. He's dealing with an injury as well,

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's interesting piece there. But I'm with ericson. I

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a decent sized number of the forty five

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and a half. But I'm with you on the over there,

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 1>all right.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Last one.

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Boys, here we go make a good week six in

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFL JO Niery, what do you have for us

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the lines, the spreads?

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>What do you like?

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 3>All Right? So in the last one here, I'm a

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 3>big believer of if it ain't bro, do not fix it.

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 3>And when it comes to the Chargers and Justin Herbert,

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>it's a tail of two halfs with this guy and

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 3>this team, and I do feel terrible for him, But

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:54.479
<v Speaker 3>I also have a side bet on Brandon Sally being

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 3>the first coach fired this year. And I'm fingers across.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Here that that good before the end of the year.

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 3>But the reality is we're talking and it's amazing to

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 3>the last twenty two games the Chargers have played, seventeen

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 3>of those twenty two have finished within a touchdown. So

0:25:12.880 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 3>they play these unbelievably close games here. But I don't

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>want nothing to do with full game simply because of

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 3>this stat. Justin Herbert in this spot thirty two twenty

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 3>two and one in the first half against the number.

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 3>He is fifteen and seven in the first half against

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 3>the number since the start of last season. The biggest

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 3>problem with Justin Herbert and the Chargers. Anybody want to

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 3>take a guess is they burn money in the second

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 3>half because whatever lead, and they usually do have the

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 3>lead in the first half because gim Wrollerer faults. They

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 3>usually script a good enough start to the game plan

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 3>and lead the game, but then go into the half

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.479
<v Speaker 3>when the other team of just guess what happens, they

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:04.879
<v Speaker 3>get absolutely buried. He since two thousand and five, ranks

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 3>as two hundred and forty seventh of the two hundred

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 3>and fifty quarterbacks least profitable in the second half. I

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 3>want nothing to do in a full game on this.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 3>But if an ain't pro, guy, I am not fixing it.

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 3>The guy is an absolute ATM machine. This Chargers team

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:24.479
<v Speaker 3>has been an ATM machine early in games. I am

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 3>taking them on the money line in the first half

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 3>against Dallas, but unfortunately it probably won't stick in the

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 3>second half because again, if it ain't pro, don't fix it.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 2>It sounds like you're giving us an easy plan. Though.

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>You bet the Chargers on the first half, and then

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you wait for the Dallas Cowboys money line at halftime

0:26:43.080 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>live and then you go bet that and you just

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>keep winning like that. I mean, this is the perfect script.

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ranieri this is a gift you've given the people.

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much today. I can't wait to do

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>this on Sunday. This is exactly what I'm doing.

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 4>No, it's Monday, Monday Night, Monday Night, Monday Night.

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>More focus, even better, I forgot this is the Monday

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>night game. Yes, it's perfect, fantastic all right. Andrew Erickson

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>closes out here strong last pick four, Week six?

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 2>What is it?

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Detroit Lions minus three playing in Tampa Bay. I think

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 4>that this is disrespectful to the Lions to be twenty

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 4>one and seven burst to spread in games with fifty

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.160
<v Speaker 4>four points or fewer scored. Since the beginning or since

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:24.439
<v Speaker 4>the middle of last season, basically when Ben Johnson started

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 4>taking a larger role and calling the offense that's best

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 4>in the NFL, the Lions have been a team that

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 4>have met expectations with this new pairing. I think they're

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 4>a legitimate four and one team had it not been

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 4>for that one loss against Seattle in overtime because Jared

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:41.919
<v Speaker 4>Goff broke his interceptions record in terms of throwing a

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.680
<v Speaker 4>pick six, Like that's the only blemish that I'm really

0:27:44.720 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 4>finding on this Lions team. And the Buccaneers are the

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 4>most fraudulent three and one team I can find. They

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 4>beat two teams that were winless, they beat another team

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 4>that tried out a quarterback after he had an AC's

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 4>shoulder injury. And the Buccaneers are basically running hot on

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 4>every efficiency metric that is not sustainable over a long

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 4>period of time. Number one in turnover margin. Baker Mayfield

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 4>is the highest rated quarterback under pressure. He's been the

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 4>best quarterback on third downs. Those are great descriptive statistics,

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 4>they are not predictive statistics.

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Like that's the.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Thing, Like Baker may is playing out of his mind

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 4>right now. It's not going to continue, especially against a

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 4>team like the Lions, who are showing that hey, we

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 4>can meet an elite team in this in this league. Yeah,

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.000
<v Speaker 4>and against Tampa Bay. Mike Evans is banged up. That's

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 4>been Baker Mayfield's guy. Like, I don't understand if the

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 4>line is because Jared Goff is like playing outside, it's

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 4>not because jaredside or he's but he's yeah, but it's yeah,

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 4>but he's playing seventy seven degrees in Tampa Bay. It's

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.160
<v Speaker 4>not like we're going to Chicago and twenty degree weather.

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 2>They're indoor cat at Jared goffin indoor cat.

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 4>It's it's it's bad weather and cold that affect Jared Goff,

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 4>not oh, I'm playing outside seventy seven degrees and it's

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 4>sunny out.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that he's going to be fine. He can

0:28:58.000 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 3>hold the ball, he's got small hands.

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that he'll be fine. You can go glove

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 2>shopping his holiday season.

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 3>Kind of like that. So I'm going Lions. I'm Mayfield.

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 4>I like it. Yeah, minus three Detroit.

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Here you have it, everybody.

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Just a quick recap of with the guys like Joe

0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Ranieri's on Baltimore at the minus three or the four,

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to give him. He likes the under

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Chicago Minnesota game. He likes the over in

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans and Houston. The New England Patriots at minus three.

0:29:25.720 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see on that one, Joe. I love you, but

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I gotta see on that one. The Chargers first half

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>money line, this is the best bet of the week.

0:29:32.960 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I love this.

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Juranniuri's crush this one. And then you can make double

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>your money by betting the Dallas Cowboys in the second

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:41.120
<v Speaker 1>half of that because I'm sure it's gonna go to

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>what like, if they're up by ten, it's probably gonna

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>be like, well plus three twenty or something like that.

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Or I mean, let's go Ericson's favorite bets the Falcons

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half, the Texas on the money line,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Miami Carolina over forty eight and a half, Cincinnati Seattle

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>over forty five and a half, and the Lions minus three. Gentlemen,

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>so much fun, great insight, great stuff. Follow Joe over

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on x at Joe Ranier and check him out every

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>single day over at sports grid TV, talking ball, talking

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:07.640
<v Speaker 1>everything he does, baseball, does football.

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean he might even do basketball nowadays. I don't know.

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:11.959
<v Speaker 1>Joe Ranieri doesn't know what dat is. He doesn't get

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>any sleep. But how about that Bryce Harper performance by

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, Joe, I know you're a baseball guy.

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Pretty impressive last night, right, Love that.

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 3>But the Diamondbacks, quite honestly, that's the story. There's one

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 3>team every year, yeah that you go, nah, yeah, and

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 3>lucky to get it yeah well yeah, good luck. Yeah,

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 3>I get in front of that team.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Crushed a lot of hopes and dreams of the Dodger fans,

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>ask for sure. So that'll do it for us. But

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the story of the game goes on for Joe and Andrew.

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time kids. Thanks

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 2>for listening to the Betting Pros podcast.

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at betting Pros NFL.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.