WEBVTT - Week 11: Hill Freezes Over

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>advice Now League dot com. Here's your host. Welcome to

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>week e Love and it is Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Paul Churchy and your host. My co host today are

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Brian Johnson. I've never met this guy

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>before and it's been a while. It has been a

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>long time first or something for you two to be together. Okay, man,

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that's going back a ways. Holy cow. You know back

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>then John ou Smith was good. Um, you know there

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>was all the running backs are healthy. It was a

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>whole different landscape that Christian McCaffrey still still was a

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>great pick. Now it's Dan Arnold's time. There is touchdown

0:00:55.880 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday night is upon us. Yes, exactly, exactly. Plenty

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to get you over the course of the show, will

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>break down every matchup fantasy style letter grades on all

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 1>the meaningful players. Will give you nine players upon whom

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you can take a chance. We'll give you three tough

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>questions to ponder, and of course premature speculation. Look my

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>track record on premature speculation has been spotty this year,

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:28.759
<v Speaker 1>but last week DeAndre Booker and I thought about using

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 1>again this week, but decided that was too easy. It

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>was just the revenge game, that's all. It was the

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>revenge game maybe, so um, let's get Let's dive right

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 1>into the matchups, beginning with the Detroit Lions taking on

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the Carolina Panthers. Scott, it looks increasingly like DeAndre Swift

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>will not play this game. Him and have both been

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.639
<v Speaker 1>ruled out now, so Marvin Jones is limited in practice too,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and Matthew Stafford's got thumb injury. So it's it's gonna

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit of a rough one there. I

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>still have the C grade on Stafford. Caroline has been

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>destroyed the last couple of weeks through the air. Uh,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's a situation where I think he can

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 1>get some deep balls off to Marvin Jones and Marvin Hall,

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the two Marvin's as you talked about the other week. Uh.

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And Hockinson has been incredibly consistent this year all but

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>one week. He had fifty yards and or a score

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in all but one week. So I have an A

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>grade on Hockinson. I think he's gonna have to lean

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on Hockinson more with Golladay out. Both Jones and Hall

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>because Golladay's out, I've upped them to see grades. Marvin

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Hall is averaging well over twenty yards per reception, so

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it only takes a couple of them and there's gonna

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>be targets to go around. Uh Amndola also out, so

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that means Jones and Hall are going to be on

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the field the entire time. That's why they both get

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 1>C grades. DeAndre Swift would have been an A grade

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>with a smash spot. Yes, he was in my top

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>five earlier in the week. Is there any chance the

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Lions bring back Drew Peacock would be the best? They

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 1>need a Drew Peacock in their lineup? They do, and

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that's if not now when so Adrian Peterson has that

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>was that was a terrible by transition. But I just

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>got back to work just right. I'm sorry, I can

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>no way to improve alright. Yeah, for the Panthers of

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the fourth worst against fantasy running backs, so it was

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a great spot. Peterson and carry On are going to share.

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>But Peterson has gotten more touches and more snaps and

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>carry On every week. That they've played together. So I

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>am giving Peterson the B grade and I'm benching carry on.

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I just don't trust that he's gonna get enough work.

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>He could, But do you want to try? I really don't. Yeah,

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's such a nice matchup for Peterson. It is.

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised if you finished eight yards

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and two touchdowns. Yeah, their bottom five in in rushing yard,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns, and yards allowed. I think they've allowed like

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>nine touchdowns to running backs and last like five weeks

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>or carry on. Carry on, Jesus, no, I'm can We're

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>making it worse. You're taking a hole for yourself. Right now,

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they're still not on the other side, they're still not

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ruling out Bridgewater. If p. J. Walker is the starter,

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he might get a good amount of rushing yards to

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe be a dart throw. But I have them both

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on the bench just because you don't know. At this point,

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do the cop out that Matt did

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Petsburgh Steelers wide receivers a couple of weeks ago,

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm giving all three wide receivers for Carolina Panthers

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>C grades. Oh, I know you hate it. DJ Moore

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>his top fifty five yards in in all but one game.

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>He gets fifty plus yards every single week, three four

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>five catches. That's solid enough for a SEA grade. Curtis

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Samuel had a down week last week, but he's had

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty total yards in six of his seven games. Like,

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about guys that are going to get you

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>three four receptions, fifty plus yards. Maybe they get us

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or that's Sea level production. And it sounds like we've

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>got to a point with Curtis Samuel where you can

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>count on Russia. Last week it was a little bit

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of a dog in the red zone too. Inside the tea,

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson started the league this season off really hot.

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>He's been weekly, you know, just week or later. But

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>he's still top five in yards, catches, and targets in

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, which is which is pretty crazy. And a

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>step I I heard this week is that most of

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>his yards and catches and have come against man coverage,

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's what the Lions mostly play and Bridgewater's best

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>games are against man coverage. So if Bridgewater does go,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Anderson, even though I gave a C grade, is

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>probably the one of the three you want because that's

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the type of that's the type of defense that he

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>excels against. Mike Davis, I have an A grade against

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 1>against the Lions here. This is the Lions are the

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>worst in the NFL against fantasy running backs. Davis is

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>a good pass catcher. Lions have allowed the most receiving yards,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>most receiving touchdowns over the last five weeks to running backs.

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>On the ground, they're no not much better most rushing

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns six, most rushing yards and if if p J.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Walker does start, rushing quarterbacks have opened stuff up for

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:13.359
<v Speaker 1>running backs. It's just what they do. Happen. Yeah, So

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Davis, I gave an a grade to unless you're

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 1>care unless you're Kenyan Drake, at which point there there's

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:21.359
<v Speaker 1>no such thing as a as a good enough rushing

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback apparently to open things up for him. Let's go

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to Miami taking on Denver Brian for the Dolphins. We've

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of moving parts here, injuries at wide

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>receiver and running back. We've got two at the at

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the helm. What are your thoughts on this offense as

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>they faced the Broncos. Let's start at the running back

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>position for Miami, because we've got a Bell cow on

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>our hands and Salivin Akhmed Jordan Howard is gown. Matt

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Brady spends more time in the blue tend than on

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the gridiron, and we'll see Ahmed operating his Miami's bell

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>cow once again. And he scored from the one yard

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>line last week. He's not a between the twenties pony here.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So Denver's d rundy has been very leaky over the

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks too. They've allowed one rushing yards per

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>game to opposing back to go to go along with

0:07:04.960 --> 0:07:08.119
<v Speaker 1>five ground scores. They've also allowed more than five catches

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>per game to the position. Patrick Layard and DeAndre Washington

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>might steal some third down work, but a very safe

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>b for Salvin Achmed uh be for Davante Parker as well.

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't posted big numbers with two at quarterback, but

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>his air yard shares have risen each week since two.

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>It took over from eighteen percent to thirty one percent

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to thirty seven percent last week. The Broncos held Raiders

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers scoreless last week. That's not hard to do,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but before that, Denver surrendered six wide receiver touchdowns over

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>their last three games. Uh Denver's top corner A J.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Booyer might not play as well. He's questionable with the

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>hip injury, so be for Parker with a upside, and

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to give the seed to Jachim. Grant was

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on the field. I'm really interested in Grant. Jackim the

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>dream And there's a great daily angle which I was

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to give my followers last week and it almost

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 1>came through. But played in more than seventy percent the

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>snaps last week and he returned kicks. So if you

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>play a cheap wide receiver like Grant, we can produce

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on the field. And Miami's got a very viable team

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>defense play this week and if he returns to kick,

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>you get the double bonus points there. So if you're

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a daily player, that's some stage advice for you. Uh,

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>some more stage advices Benching Mike GISSICKI. Yes, he put

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>together consecutive games with more than one catch for the

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>first time since weeks one and two. That's where the

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>bar is right now with catch totals of two and three.

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is a brutal matchup. Only one opposing tight

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 1>end is cracked fifty yards against Denver, who also has

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:33.599
<v Speaker 1>not allowed a tight end touchdown since week one on

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>benching GISICKI, did you know dermis smite has played over

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>him to our last three weeks? Unbelievable this is and

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 1>then Adam is the thing too that's always threatening, Ghisicki. So, yeah,

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he's fallen off the wayside. I'm on the fence with

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>two a tongueo violoa. I'll put him on the bench. Though.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>He does have two passing touchdowns and back to back

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 1>games with at least six rush attempts in each of

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>those games, but he hasn't hit thirty pass attempts yet.

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>He's the sound of volume there to trust him in

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>standard formats for me, So bench or two U over

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to the Denver side. Not a lot to love here,

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Melvin Gordon a very soft Sea, only averaging eleven touches

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last three weeks. Miami is not allowed back

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to top ninety rushing yards in their last twelve games

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and has held the positions scoreless and four straight. So

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you're getting a little bit of volume from Gordon, but

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't expect much. Did you consider instead of a

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>soft Sea giving him a strong D or a hard D. No,

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he didn't because we don't use d S.

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I would never do such a thing Scott never ever, ever,

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and I would never play Philip Lindsay at least not

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>right now. Four carries for two yards of one target.

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Last week, he's on the bench. Jerry Judy uh see

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 1>for him. Played through a shoulder injury last week. Looks

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like I will play through an ankle issue that has

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>limited in practice this week. But he has commanded a

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:46.560
<v Speaker 1>target share of nearly over the last three weeks, so

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to start him. If he suits up, he

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>will see a lot of his Avien Howard probably, but

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Howard has surrendered his score in two of his last

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>three games, so I'm still starting Judy. I'm gonna start

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim Patrick as well, giving him a see. The Dolphins

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>only allowed twenty points game on a whole, but wide

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>receiver has had have had success against Miami over the

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>last three weeks, surrendering three touchdowns to the position in

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>two one hundred yard performances. Patrick has a very safe

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>PPR floor. He scored double digit PPR points in five

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of his last six games, including three touchdowns in that span.

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Noah fant Uh last player with a starting grade. He

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>gets a C he's pretty banged up, but should play.

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Hasn't delivered a score or a fifty yard game since

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Week two. But the and and not but and the

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins have allowed the ninth views receptions and fourth view

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>as yards to opposing tight ends. So that's not good.

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But you're hoping for a score here. Miami has given

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>up three touchdowns to opposing tight ends over the last

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.080
<v Speaker 1>two games. And then Drew Lock, No, young, jeez, this

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>week he's on the bench, and I gotta leave us

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>with this quote on this matchup. Drew Lock on his

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>bad plays quote. Half the time, right as the ball

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>leaves my hand, I'm like, oh no, half the time.

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>You don't want to hear that. Your half of your

0:10:55.360 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks passes he instantly knows are in trouble. No, this week, no,

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid not. Philadelphia takes on Cleveland. This will be

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>our last matchup of this segment. Let's start with the

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>running game in Miles Sanders. In his four full games,

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Sanders has averaged sixteen rushes. Each of the backs who

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>have hit sixteen rushes against Cleveland have topped one hundred yards.

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Sanders is averaging five targets per game in the last

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>two opposing backs. That's off five targets per game combined

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>for a hundred thirty yards in a touchdown. He's got

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to start catching him. Fourteen catches on thirty targets is

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>not good. Well, but you know what, in that offense,

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it's probably much more on. Carson Wentz has been tremendously

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>inaccurate so far this year. Pressure, a ton of pressure.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>So let's go right, let's go right to Carson Wentz.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I love that Wentz has got all of his available targets,

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>but it hasn't changed his horrible protection. He is constantly

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>being harassed. Wentz his bottom four in sacks and hits

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>absorbed per Pro Football Focus, or you top four if

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you're getting the most, get top top, but tops usually

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>good if you're the tops of something. So when either way,

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.520
<v Speaker 1>he's getting hit and sacked a lot. Now, Fortunately Cleveland

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>star defensive end Miles Garrett is out for this game,

0:12:12.200 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>so maybe WinCE gets a cleaner pocket here, puts things together.

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>That would be nice. Now, Cleveland's had their last two games,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks have been monsoon, bye week, monsoon,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so we really don't have an accurate reado where this

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>defense is right now, but maybe they'll treat it like

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a bye week with that. Maybe prior to those two

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Bonsoon games in the bye week, they had allowed three

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to four passing touchdowns to half of the opposing quarterbacks.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Once got some nice upside here. I'm gonna give him

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a C grade in this matchup. Let's talk about its

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>receivers a little bit. Jalen Reagor gets a B grade.

0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Remove removing the past two games where there was all

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the wind and everything else in Cleveland. The monsoon games,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>they had been averaging two yards per game to receivers,

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>which was third most. And since returning from injury, Jalen

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Reagor has led Ladelphia and targets, and last week he

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>led the team with ninety six air yards. I think

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to my great towards Jalen Reagor. He is good.

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not as good as Justin Jefferson who was taken

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>after him, but he's good. And next, Travis Fulgan moves

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>down to a C grade here. He had been very

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>reliable when everybody else was hurt, but now that they're

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>all back, Fulgan fell off the face of the earth

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 1>last week. One catch his usual safe floor is gone here.

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>He runs from both sides of the field and is

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>generally outmatched by both of Cleveland's quarterbacks, cornerbacks Terrence Mitchell

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and Denzel Ward. Let's go to Dallas Goddard, who is

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>uh depressingly not produced with zach ertz out. I really

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>thought with Earth's out that Goddard was gonna go like

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>into tighten one territory. They need to be pushing each

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>other in the lineup. I guess, right, maybe, I guess.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The Browns have allowed the fifth most receptions to opposing

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, but most of the damage was done earlier

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in the season. They haven't done much lately. They've given

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:58.439
<v Speaker 1>up just one score and one fifty yard game over

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the last five weeks, including shutting down Darren Waller and

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Eric Ebron over that stretch. All right, let's go over

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Cleveland side. We begin with Austin Hooper. He's

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>got an opportunity, which is odd to start with the

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>tight end, but am he's got an opportunity to start

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to get back to his pre Appendix surgery form against

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a soft Eagles back seven. Philadelphia is allowing the fourth

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>most receptions and touchdowns as well as the ninth most

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>yards to opposing tight ends. They've been using Jalen Mills

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to cover tight ends in man looks lately, and Hooper's

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty pounds heavier than the former cornerback. So if Jalen

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Mills ends up lining up against Hooper, that is a mismatch.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>And I like Hooper and I start with him because

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got the highest grade of any of the receivers here.

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I will talk about Baker Mayfield in just a few

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes as well. Kareem uh see the receivers. Let's go

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to Jarvis Landry still scoreless on the season and has

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>been held under sixty yards and seven of nine games,

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's set to face Philadelphia slack cornerback Cravan le Blanc,

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>who's been generous to his opposition. Lebron yields a one

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>fourteen passer rating and is allowing catch rate. So even

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>though the Eagles secondary surrendered the third fewest touchdowns opposing receivers,

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Landry's got a positive match up here and this could

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>be the one where he finally breaks his touchdown made

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in Plus, he's had like a targets here in the

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>last three three weeks in a row. He break his

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown maiden. Yeah like that? Do there? You go? Richard

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Higgins is a startable commodity this week. He's the only

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>other wide out who gets targeted really at all in

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>this offense. Anytime he lines up on the left side

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of the field, he's got a very positive matchup against

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>cornerback and Vante Maddox, who Pro Football Focus ranks as

0:15:43.640 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>cornerback one eleven. And Maddox yields five inches and twenty

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>pounds to Higgins. So I kind of like Higgins is

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a dart throw in this one. And then let's go

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to the running backs and we'll wrap this up. Nick

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Chubb has one hundred plus rushing yards in each of

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 1>his last three full games, but the Goals have not

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of back more than sixty three rushing yards

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>in their last seven straight and just one back has

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>gone over ninety two yards in the Eagles last twenty

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>eight games. That's incredibly impressive run defense. They're giving up

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>just three point three yards per carry game. Script could

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>be a problem for the as the Eagles are are

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>far easier to pass upon than run. So I'm nervous

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>about Nick Chubb and he drops to a B grade here.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt is um has maintained all pretty much all

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of his workload with Chubb back. In Chubb's four full games,

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Hunt his average fifteen carries for seventy seven yards, which

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is exactly what he was doing without Chubb. But again,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>tough matchup against a terrific run defense. And mysteriously Hunt

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>has not been using the passising game, which I don't understand.

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>He's an incredibly gifted pass catcher. He's scored though. He

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like when they target him, he produces, but don't target him.

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't target him. It's it's baffling. They need to

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>unfurl that sooner or later. Uh. The Eagles have allowed

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>just two receiving touchdowns to running back in their last

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty six games. So it's not happening this week. And

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt is just a C grade, all right? When

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>we come back, take a chance on me. These are

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>nine players not normally in your starting lineup. Many of

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>these guys are on the waiver wire. We've got some

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>deep calls this week, and there are a lot of

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 1>guys on the waiver wire. We'll tell you who they

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>are when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>back to the show Fantasy Football Weekly, Scott Fish and

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson with you. It's a segment we call take

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. We give you a player at

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>each position we believe you should take a chance on,

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and we begin at the quarterback position. Scott, I am

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Taysom Hill. I know that you can

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>play him a tight end in some silly places, but

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>come on, he gets the Falcons. They've allowed eight three

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>plus yard passing days, six multi touchdown games. I don't

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>expect him to be a huge pastor if he does

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.160
<v Speaker 1>get the start, but if he's gonna have to pass,

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.159
<v Speaker 1>it might as well be against an easy past defense.

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>What I do like is his rushing ability. It's shown

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>good floors for for fantasy quarterbacks. He has seven yards

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>per carry over the last three and the fact of

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the average is that in in that last three games,

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 1>says to me, if he gets the ball, and he's

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>averaging seven carries per game also over the last three,

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so if he gets seven to ten carries and some

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>passing yards, he's an okay take on. Okay, I like it.

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about his his position eligibility in some

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>leagues later in the show, thee there and there isn't

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>There is an issue there, and my phone is blown

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 1>up with people that want guidance on this. Uh all right, Brian,

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>your take a chance. And the quarterback is Joe Flacco

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Chargers. He's a Black Leagues flack at lack.

0:19:14.119 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to say that flack at lack. But

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers are one of twelve teams with an opponent

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>passing play percentage north of sixty percent. They've also surrendered

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 1>multiple touchdown passes and five of their last six games,

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and with a suddenly somewhat dangerous trio wide receivers in

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>New York now with Crowder Perriman and MEM's, Flacco has

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:36.960
<v Speaker 1>looked pretty good, especially his last game out when he

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:40.199
<v Speaker 1>had to sixty two passing and three touchdowns against the Patriots.

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 1>The return of starting left tackle McKay Beckton has been huge,

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and Flacco's airing it out. He leads the NFL in

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>most air yards per attempts at nine point five. He's

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the third lowest and checkdown percentage among all quarterbacks. I

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>do not trust the run game for the Jets, and

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll be playing from behind. Joe Flacco's gonna win someone

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars this weekend. I hope it's me. Okay,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I might take a chance to be quarterback. Is Baker

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield who I alluded to last segment. It's tough to

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>evaluate the O b J. Liss Brown's offense when they've

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 1>had a bye week in two months soon since his injury.

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>But in Baker Mayfield's last normal game, Week seven, when

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham got knocked out very early, Mayfield still piled

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>up five touchdowns without Odell Beckham, So he's got some

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>sneaky upside against a Philadelphia secondary that looks good on paper,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's seen very few good passers. If we take

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>away Philadelphia's games against Daniel Jones, Daniel Jones, Bend Nucci,

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>C J. Bethard, Nick Mullins, and Dwayne haskins Man, that's

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bad quarterbacks. The Eagles are allowing two

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty one yards and two and a half touchdown passes

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>per game. The Eagles are a fantastic run defense, and

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the path of least resistance runs through Baker Mayfield's arm.

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the running back position. Who's your taking chance?

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, runner, Scott, I am going a little deeper

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 1>here with a backup Rex Burkhead. Uh. He plays against

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the Texans who have allowed the second running back, the

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:10.680
<v Speaker 1>backup running back to average well over fifty yards per game.

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>That's how many yards they give give up rack backs.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>The backups are getting over fifty yards per game. Birkhead

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is getting a bunch of goal line work. Has three

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns the last two games. He's getting the goal line

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>work when Cam Newton doesn't. Basically, Uh, he is now

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>playing thirty more snaps than James White over the last

0:21:29.040 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. James w has kind of disappeared in

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that offense. Yeah, he's gone straight Casper on that and

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Birkhead's had eight targets in the last two games. He's

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>getting those targets. So I got Rex Burkhead. All right, Brian,

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you take a chance for me runner. It's come to

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this for Jonathan Taylor, has he take He's take a

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>chance worthy as I was thinking using Klein balage, but

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that's too obvious these days. Taylor get contrarian with everyone's

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite rookie nup from not long ago. But u niheem

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>Heinz technically the starter now for the FLTs. But the

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Colts will look to run the ball as much as

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 1>possible against the Packers, keep Aaron Rodgers and company off

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the field for as long as they can. And yes,

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Taylor only handled of the running back touches for the

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Colts in the last game, but in his eight game career,

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>his illustrous eight game career Jonathan Taylor here, he has

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 1>more double digit carry games at nih Hinz or Jordan

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Wilkins and both of their respective careers. So there's a

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>good chance he leads the team and carries against the Packers,

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>who have allowed these second most fantasy points to running

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>backs and have been especially bad since the week five

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>by So now we're never Jonathan Taylor. It's like dropable

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in redraft formats. If it's not this week, you could

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>almost start Taylor just on the fact that he's gotten

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so little used the last couple of weeks. He's fresh.

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Now that seems to be like when the guys pop

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the Indianapolis rotation of backs, it's inexplicable. Might

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.119
<v Speaker 1>take a chance of me. Running back is Devonte Booker.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Now you might be saying, where was that last week?

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.160
<v Speaker 1>While we did talk about him last week, So take

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that he's averaging six yards carry. His workload is increased

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 1>in four straight games, and in the earlier matchup with

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>this week's opponent, Kansas City, Booker had sixty two yards

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>on just seven carries. John Gruden runs the ball whopping

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 1>thirty one times per game, and the Chiefs are seeing

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine rushing attempts, So we know to expect a

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of ground and pound in this game. And Josh

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs is not going to get thirty one or twenty

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>nine carries a bunch of it's gonna go to Davante

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Booker because he's just too good to keep off the field.

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the receiver position, not necessarily wide receiver Scott.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Who's gonna take a chance on me player? I'm going

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>with Logan Thomas. Since Alex Smith took over, he's got

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.959
<v Speaker 1>twelve targets in the last two weeks. It's only culminated

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in seven catches for ninety four yards. But this week

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>he gets a Bengals d that has given up five

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>games of over fifty yards to tight ends six tight

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>end touchdowns in just the last five weeks. And this

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is a Bengals defense that has allowed eighteen passing touchdowns

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>over the last six weeks. Actually like Alex Smith this

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>week to give me, give me Ligan Thomas. I've slowly

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>moved Alex Smith up my rankings all week. I think

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>now he's like quarterback ten. All right, Brian, you take

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a chance to me receiver is give me Saints tight

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>end taste somehow. I'm just kidding. I'm perring Prescott Perriman

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with Flack at LAC. Two jets for me this week.

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Perriman was my prespect a few weeks ago. Looks like

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:20.959
<v Speaker 1>he's coming to fruition after a monster game against New

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 1>England in Week nine hundred plus yards and two touchdowns.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily a smash spot here, as the Chargers have

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>only surrendered a handful of big yardage outputs two wide

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>opposing wide receivers, but they still allow four yards per

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.400
<v Speaker 1>game to the position. That's pretty decent. And since Week four,

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>l A has allowed seven wide receiver touchdowns in six games,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's basically been to four teams. The two teams

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that failed to score a wide receiver where the Michael

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Thomas less Saints and the Dolphins last week, who only

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>had twenty pass attempts. So I'm rolling with Perriman. I'm

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>going with Michael Gallup against the Vikings. The Vikings secondary

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>is likely without its number three, number four, number five cornerbacks,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and if Cameron Danzler can make his way through the

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>concussion protocol, they're also without their number one cornerback and

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>their number one quarterbacks. Like a number four cornerbacks for

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>anybody else, the Cowboys can stretch thin any secondary with

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>their three excellent receivers. They get Andy Dalton back. What

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 1>little help the Vikings can muster will be dedicated to

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>stopping a Marie Cooper and Ceedee Lamb, and that leaves

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Michael Gallup most often on six string cornerback Chris Boyd,

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>who is allowed to passer rating of one D thirty

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>four in his coverage. There you go, nine players, take

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me. Let's work. In one more matchup,

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons take on the New Orleans Saints. The

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Saint side is a lot more interesting, but let's start

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>with the Falcon side. Calvin Ridley likely back. This passing

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>attack is at full strength. Do you like Matt Ryan

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I kind of do. After allowing multiple touchdowns in each

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of their first seven games, this is the Saints. They

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>have buckled down, picking off five passes and giving up

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>just one touchdown in their last two h granted one

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of them with San Francisco, the other was Tom Brady.

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Though they're a good game against Tom Brady and um

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Lattimore should be back. He should be quite I think

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>he's questionable. Should play. Uh, they still love Jenkins. They

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>have a good past defense. I'm keeping Ryan a CEE,

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's a pretty strong cee. I could go be too.

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I could go be too, but I'm gonna leave it

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>as a see Julio Jones plus yards and or a

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in four straight, I gotta be grade on him.

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't, I don't. I don't love either Jones or

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Ridley's matchups in this one, but they're just too good

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to sit well. Unless doesn't doesn't go. At the moment,

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm assuming that they go full strength. His lowest yardage

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>game of the last four weeks was the Week nine

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>game without Ridley. Weirdly, that's you think they could be

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>lower with Ridle either. Ridley sixty plus yards in six

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of his seven games, has six touchdowns in those. Uh.

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>If he doesn't go, but he should go all along

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>day Zakis would get a C grade, but it sounds

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>like Ridley's going I gotta be great on him too.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Hayden Hurst, I'm given a C great too, even though

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>only two tight ends of top fifty yards, and both

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>were because they were the top two receiving option on

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>the team. Uh, they stopped six plus targets and and

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>players that gets six plus targets against the Saints have

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>done well. Hurst hit fifty yards in five of the

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 1>six games he hit six targets. I think if he

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>can get that, he's got a fair shot to see

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>grade there. Todd Gurley, don't super love him this week,

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.919
<v Speaker 1>but he gets so much volume eighteen plus touches in

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>five straight. How he turns eighteen touches into like sixty

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards every week? Touchdowns got nine. I think he's

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>got nine touches. It's unreally scores all the time. The

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>downside also only two catches per game, and over his

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>last four he's averaging two point six yards per carry.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.199
<v Speaker 1>As you just kind of alluded to, it's unreal. The

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Saints on the other side, have given up over a

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred total yards to just one back this year. So,

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as I said, don't love the matchup, but he gets

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>so much volume and he gets those goal line with touches.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I gotta give him the C grade. On the other side,

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Taystom Hill was my take a chance on me player.

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>At this point, we we assume he's gonna start, even

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>though there's mind games going out there. Adam Schefter reported

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>he'd taken all the first team snaps. I think he's

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna start, so he's might take a chance on me player.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>I have eight grades on both Michael Thomas and Alvin Kamara.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>If Winston does start. Winston's ten attempts last week, I

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>believe he targeted Michael Thomas five times and and twice

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone. So if it's Winston Thomas, and

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:31.679
<v Speaker 1>if it's not, I feel like Taysom Hill's gonna trust

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 1>more as a passage where your bread is buttered right

0:28:35.119 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>well as a past more as a pastor Winston or Hill.

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Hill has eighteen past attempts in his career. I mean, yes,

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's Winston. Hew Bizarre was the verbage from Peyton. He's like,

0:28:45.360 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>no offensive packages will Jamis Winston be involved in? That's

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>like a failed smoke screens. That's like, yeah, I don't. Yeah,

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that means entirely, Like who says that?

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Not anyone? So you're not gonna line them up at

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a receiver? What does that mean anyway? Onto Alvin Kamara?

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Why the A grade the Falcons against past catching running

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>backs for about five years in a row? Now, Uh,

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 1>they allow six running back receptions per game. They can't

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>seem to figure it out. And Alba Camara, I have

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to do some more research, but I think he's good.

0:29:23.680 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Can I make note? Though he has never scored against

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons in his career, which yeah, I do

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>have Murray on the bench, though he hasn't topped thirteen

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 1>touches since Week four, and uh, normally ten to twelve

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>touches is good. But but against against the Falcons, no

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>running back with a fewer than thirteen touches has top

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty yards. So they allow three point six yards per carry.

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>They keep people down, but not receiving backs. So I'm

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.719
<v Speaker 1>benching they all right? Makes sense? We don't even need

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Jared Cook anymore? Do No? No, I don't.

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you're probably right about that at

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>this stage. Hopefully you're not so desperate that you're actually

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>starting him. Hey, if you want all my player rankings,

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we encourage you to go to Guillotine leagues dot com.

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 1>All the players ranked and many of them explained as well.

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>You can you can read up on your favorite players,

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>find out who to bench, who to start, everybody's graded.

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>You should also continue to listen to the show because

0:30:16.520 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>coming up next we got a block of matchups, including

0:30:19.360 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the Jets at the Chargers. Air Bear are is there's

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the air Bear bear justin Herbert will he thrashed the Jets.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Find out when we come back. Fannessy Football Weekly, Welcome back.

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Then the Football Weekly Puled Church and Scott Fish and

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson with you and Brian you already told us

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you love the Jets passing game as a dark throw

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>black over Flacco. Yeah, what do you think about the

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>rushing attack? Well? And and is there anybody else that

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to talk about, like Denzel Mims maybe rushing

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>attack that's rushing attack. I got Frank Gore and le

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael Pernin on the bench. He was a fifty percent

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>forty six percent snap split in favor of Gore. Last week.

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Gor saw fourteen touches to just eight from peyin. I

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you'd want all twenty two from just

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>one guy in this game. It's it's it's an easy

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 1>bench for me, uh, an easy be though for Jamison

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Crowder only two catches on two targets UH his last game,

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>but one went for a touchdown. He's virtually a lock

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>for ten plus targets every week running went healthy, which

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>he is now running and the Jets coming off there by,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:49.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, running from the slot, he'll avoid Casey

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Hayward with Chris Harris on I R. He draws rookie

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>slot corner to Van Campbell, who's allowed two scores in

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>his last three games. So b for Crowder and Brashot

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Perry and was might take a chance on me wide receiver.

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a coin food between he and Denzel Mims.

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>We like a lot on this show. But we're gonna

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>talk more about later, even more about Mims later. But Uh,

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I went with Perim and he does lead the Jets

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in first down receptions and yards per target with Flaco

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>at quarterback. So I'm just gonna I'm gonna bench Mims

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>for here, uh for this week, but he should be

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>rostered for sure. And a flac of again might take

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance in the quarterback flack at lack over to

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers side. In a for Kalin Balage, I'm flabbergacid

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>flustered all those actives. The Jets are top five and

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>red zone touches and red zone targets yielded per game

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs. It's no surprise top five in

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a good way in the most red zone touches and

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 1>red zone targets for the Chargers. For Kalin Balage in particular, yes,

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's no surprise. The Jets have allowed the eighth most

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.960
<v Speaker 1>fantasy points to running backs, including the league's fifth most

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>receptions to running backs at fifty eight. Blage has been

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>very active catching the ball at the backfield of the

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>last two games, turning nine targets into seven catches for

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>forty nine yards and a touchdown. So in a for

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Klin Balage, holy f over. Keenan Allen can give him

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>an a as well. He was wide receiver twenty like

0:33:11.640 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in late August. That's criminal right now, He's Eclipse has

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>scored endoor Eclipse the hundred yards and six of his

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>last seven games. And here come the Jets, who are

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bottom ten and yards receptions and fantasy points allowed to

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, and that's bottom ten in terms of the

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 1>most in a very good way for Keenan Allen and

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the Jets have also surrendered four touchdowns and two one

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>yard games to wide receivers over their last three for

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>those very same reasons of giving Mike Williams a very

0:33:35.640 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>easy B here and Hunter Henry gets a B as well.

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Four tight ends have seen at least four targets against

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the Jets this year. All have put up at least

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards or a touchdown. Henry has four targets and

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>all but two games this year. If you get opportunities

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 1>against the Jets, he turned them into something. And that's

0:33:50.800 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>why your boy charge the air bear Justin Herbert Uh

0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>just to be though the haircut worries be. He looks

0:33:59.800 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 1>like a looks like Sampson. Yeah, it looks like like

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a Juviy mug shot now for Justin. But that fourteen

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>year old just leading rookies, that's right. And you know

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>what the Jets are not leading Uh in his sacks.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>They only have eleven on the season, that second fewest

0:34:17.360 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>air Bear. It's gonna have plenty of time to play

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>with all of his poison. The air Bear. I like it,

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the air Bear. Uh. There was a little Ardvark in

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.240
<v Speaker 1>there for just second. If you're wondering accidental Ardvark appearance,

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not there. It's dark cross cross mate. Uh. Getting

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr Moreau over here. Uh, Cincinnati and Washington face each other.

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin on the Cincinnati side where Joe Bernard will

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>get the start. With Joe Mixon nursing his foot injury,

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Bernardo face a Washington run defense that is law just

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 1>one back to top eighties six rushing yards. But we

0:34:53.120 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 1>just saw DeAndre Swift post a solid all purpose game

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.480
<v Speaker 1>against Washington last week, so it can be done here

0:34:58.760 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 1>by Bernard, both on the ground and through the air.

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington has given up a running back score one way

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>or another in five of their last seven games, so

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Bernard gets a B grade. I like him here.

0:35:07.880 --> 0:35:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Going to the passing game, Joe Burrow gets a seat.

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>Good defenses have mostly held Joe Burrow in check, and

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>he'll face a good one this week. Washington is allowing

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the second fewest passing yards and the sixth fewest passing touchdowns.

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.319
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals struggling offensive line is gonna get ambushed by

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>those four first rounders that Washington's got on their defensive line.

0:35:26.239 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm worried about Joe Burrow having time to get downfield,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and that means I'm not crazy about his receivers either.

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:34.680
<v Speaker 1>We love Tee Higgins on this show, but there's a

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>bad matchup. Now, he did practice on Friday. I think

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he plays here. I worry about Burrow having enough time

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to find him. He may have to settle for the

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>underneath stuff to Higgins. Now, Higgins runs from both sides

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of the field, but when he runs from the left,

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>he faces incredibly tough coverage from Kendall Fuller, who has

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>been basically invincible before yielding a bit last week. Then

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd gets a sea great. I say c great

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and tigins if I didn't use a sea see great

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and Tyler Boyd again. Washington secondary very good. They surrended

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the second fewest fantasy points per game to opposing receivers.

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Boyd runs overwhelmingly from the slot. They'll face slot cornerback

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Moreland most often. Moreland has yet to allow a

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 1>score this season, and has allowed thirty eight or fewer

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 1>yards in his coverage in every game since Week two.

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>That is a bad matchup for Tyler Boyd and he's

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just got to see a. J. Green is on the bench.

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>He's been held scoreless this year and he has totaled

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen yards over the last two games. There. That is,

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? Remember when it when more and Andre Johnson

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>hit the wall. I'll say, yeah, that's a great point.

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I haven't thought about that comparison. That's very good. Let's

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:39.799
<v Speaker 1>go to Washington and start with the running game there.

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Gibson with the two touchdown game last week, Yeah,

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 1>that felt good. He's a good player. He ranks third

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and missed tackles per Russia attempt that's very good. And

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>he just passes the eye test. He didn't see that.

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 1>He's good. This is a This is a far tougher

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>matchup on the ground than through the air. Going all

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the way back to Week three, Cincinnati is allowed just

0:37:03.280 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>one rushing touchdown and that was the Derrick Henry and

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and only Henry's top seventy five rushing yards against Cincinnati.

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So this is a tough matchup. And I've only got

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on Gibson. I almost gave him a seat,

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but I like him too much Gibson with his pass

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>catching skills without Kissick, I know, and I don't understand

0:37:20.760 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>where they never throw to him. He's a converted wide out.

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>He'll catch it if you throw to him, but they

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>never do. Sticking with the running back, so let's go

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to j. D. McKissick. He's been a PPR superstar over

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks with target totals of fourteen

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and fifteen from Alex Smith up. But those numbers are

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>unsustainable and he's only scored once all year, and the

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Bengals have been very good against receiving backs, allowing the

0:37:46.000 --> 0:37:50.360
<v Speaker 1>third fewest receptions and only two receiving scores two running backs.

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>So I only have a C grade on J. D. Mckissic.

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.479
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to chase his production the past couple

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:57.439
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, all right, So let's go to the Let's

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 1>go to the receiving game. In the passing game, Scott

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about Alex Smith a little while ago.

0:38:02.400 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>He has top three hundred yards in both of his

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 1>full games and now meets his easiest opponent, Cincinnati. The

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.919
<v Speaker 1>Bengal secondaries devolved before our very eyes over the past month,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>they've given up three touchdowns, five touchdowns, two touchdowns and

0:38:14.600 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>four passing touchdowns. So lots of upside for Alex Smith

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in this one. And that means I love Terry McLaurin,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>who's an obvious A grade. I don't even need to

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>expound on him here. And Logan Thomas was your take

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me tight end receiver earlier today, Scott,

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>So there you go. Let's go to a final matchup.

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>It is the Patriots taking on the Houston Texans. Scott.

0:38:38.640 --> 0:38:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Sure Cam Newton the running back, right, He's right, there's

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>not even a reason to talk about him as a passer.

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>He he only gets a C grade from me on

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>his rushing ability and his ability to get touchdowns. Sure,

0:38:49.120 --> 0:38:51.759
<v Speaker 1>he might get a hundred hundred and fifty yards, but

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:54.319
<v Speaker 1>it's all about all about the rushing for him. He's

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 1>only has three passing touchdowns on the season. This Houston

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 1>defense is is a defense that he can work against.

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>I have a B grade on Damien Harris. Such a

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>good much matchup for running backs, it's hard not to

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>like him. The main problem is Damian Harris doesn't catch

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>passes and he doesn't get touched on opportunities, which he

0:39:13.200 --> 0:39:17.240
<v Speaker 1>should because he's built for gold line use. He's a bruiser. Yeah,

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I I don't get it, but Texans are second worst

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>against fantasy running backs, allowing by far the most rushing

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:26.279
<v Speaker 1>yards to running backs, which is what Harris gets. He

0:39:26.320 --> 0:39:28.399
<v Speaker 1>has fifty two touches in the last three weeks. I've

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.920
<v Speaker 1>B grade on him, but I could go higher, but

0:39:30.960 --> 0:39:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a very very solid, strong B grade. Then

0:39:34.160 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we get to the passing game. Because Newton doesn't throw

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I don't like a lot of the receiving

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:43.000
<v Speaker 1>options except for the guy that has forty press plus

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>target share in three straight games, Jacoby Meyers. He gets

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>everything that they throw, so he's the only one I trust.

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>Uh sixty plus yards in four straight games, averaging over

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:57.959
<v Speaker 1>nine targets per game. In that uh the average stat

0:39:57.960 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>line for wide receivers that get nine targets a game

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>eight for one thirty four and one point to five touchdowns.

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Against these Houston Texas, we would certainly take that. Let

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>me ask you, I don't know that he gets it,

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, do you think every time Cam throws

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to Jacoby he just sales Jacoby? Do you get what

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, yeah, Kobe, I get it. I get it,

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you say, Kobe Brant, Yeah, it's like going in. It's

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna score throwing it away, not in the garbage

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:29.720
<v Speaker 1>growing throwing it throwing period, throwing away, Jacoby. Let's assume

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.879
<v Speaker 1>there's a quarterback upgrade of some kind coming next year

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>for the Patriots. Kobe Myers gets kind of interesting next season,

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:39.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't he does. I picked him up in a couple

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of dynasty leagues just to just to see what happens

0:40:41.360 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>over the offseason. On the other side of the ball,

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm gonna be Oprah with some a's here

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:51.240
<v Speaker 1>getting away. If at some point you need to award

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy hard Park, just let me know, because I'm

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ready to go again. I don't think so. Deshaun Watson

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>giving an A grade two multiple touchdowns in six of

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>his last seven New England has allowed the most twenty

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>plus yard completions on the season. Could you could one

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of you guys do some research on me. Twenty plus

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.160
<v Speaker 1>yard completions a team that gives up a ton of them?

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that good for Will Fuller and Brady Cooks? That

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>might match what they do well, that might match what

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they do well, so I have a grades for both

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of them. Fuller head touchdowns and of sixth straight before

0:41:23.960 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the Monsters to a grades. There you go at your

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 1>fantasy ard Vark right there. Ry Yeah, six straight games

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>with a touchdown before the bad weather game last week.

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Cooks eight targets in five at least eight targets

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in five straight uh and the and in the four

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that weren't hampered with terrible weather, he had sixty plus

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in each of them and scored in three of them. Also,

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>if Gilmore misses, which he might upgrade him even more.

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Uh Over. On the running back side, Duke Johnson missed

0:41:57.880 --> 0:41:59.839
<v Speaker 1>some practice this week with an illness. Sounds like he's

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to go anyway. David Johnson is on it, obviously, but

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:06.280
<v Speaker 1>I gave him a C grade. He has thirty carries

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in the last two weeks. He's getting so much volume

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's hard not to give him a C grade, even

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 1>though he's only averaging three point one yards per carrying UM.

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Not that effective getting the touches. So I'm giving him

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.919
<v Speaker 1>a volume C. A volume C I like that when

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>as I look forward to next week's show, Chris Carson

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>likely to be back, does he immediately go right back

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to being the workhorse or do you think that they

0:42:30.640 --> 0:42:34.840
<v Speaker 1>saw enough from Carlos Hyde and DJ Dallas and Travis

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Homer that they start distributing the ball a little bit more.

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they would have seen enough from DJ Dallas

0:42:40.680 --> 0:42:42.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago when he had that big game,

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>and then they went right back to Carlos Hides, And

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think so Carlos look good on Thursday,

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.319
<v Speaker 1>I know, I don't. I think they just go back

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to Carson. Honestly, we have a lot of history that

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>suggests that that the Seahawks like their main heavy workload,

0:42:57.400 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and that probably goes right back to being Chris Carson.

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And he'll enjoy whatever ten days off. So he ought

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>to he ought to be fully healthy by then. He

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was almost ready, So almost ready. So there's a there's

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a sneaky opportunity out there for Chris Carson to dominate

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>fantasy leagues the rest of the way. This offense is

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:23.080
<v Speaker 1>so high scoring, there's so many scoring opportunities. Carson is

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 1>a good running back now healthy. Look what Carlos High

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>did is fractionately as talented and pt Sunshine had to

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:33.520
<v Speaker 1>quote this Pee Carroll obviously, pet Sunshin had to quote

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this week about wanting to get back to the run

0:43:35.520 --> 0:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>more when everybody wants rust to cook. He's like, I

0:43:38.480 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 1>want to get back to the run more so if

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that comes to fruition. Chris Carson, Chris, back to Chris Carson,

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I just get I got this feeling. We're gonna be

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>get doling on a lot of a grades to Chris

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Carson between now and the Fantasy Football Championship. When we

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>come back, three Tough Questions. I will pepper my co

0:43:57.840 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>host with well, three tough questions. You get to play along,

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>see if you can go three and oh. When we

0:44:03.840 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>returned with Fantasy Football Weekly, don't don't you don't don't

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't you do you don't don't don't if you don't,

0:44:23.960 --> 0:44:49.040
<v Speaker 1>don't you don't know you Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:53.279
<v Speaker 1>Our number two, as usual, begins with the game we

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>call three tough questions. I will hit my co host

0:44:56.800 --> 0:45:00.760
<v Speaker 1>with three tough questions. They will try to get them correct.

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 1>You can play along, try to go through. You know.

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>We begin with tough question number one and this is

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the big e for the weekend, isn't it? Should commissioners

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in ESPN leagues where Taysom Hill is tight and eligible

0:45:13.719 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>allow Hill to be played as a tight end? Scott Man,

0:45:19.920 --> 0:45:22.439
<v Speaker 1>If if your question was should he be allowed, I'd

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 1>be like no. But should commissioners in leagues that have

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>been set up since the beginning to allow it? I

0:45:29.040 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta say yes for this one week before they change

0:45:31.640 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it next week. I'm very against changing it. They might

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:36.799
<v Speaker 1>change it after this week. That's what they said. That's

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:38.839
<v Speaker 1>what they said, and it was also in Taysom Mill's

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 1>outlook that if he starts at quarterback, they will change

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>they will remove strip the tight end designation. They should

0:45:44.200 --> 0:45:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and they should have done a long time ago. This

0:45:46.040 --> 0:45:48.240
<v Speaker 1>has been a budding This has been a budding problem

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>waiting to happen for them for a long time. But continue,

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I I say, I say, that's this has been the rule,

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:55.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the way it was set up. You got

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to play with it for this week, and when they

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>strip it next week, it's gone. I I hate I

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 1>don't like the decision that ESPN made. I don't I

0:46:03.400 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>don't like any of that, But I say, you gotta

0:46:05.600 --> 0:46:08.640
<v Speaker 1>play with the rules that that were in place. Okay, yeah,

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the site allows it. You'd have to adhere to the

0:46:11.200 --> 0:46:14.520
<v Speaker 1>settings unless before the season all the league members wrote

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>in blood, we will not start Taysom Hill at quarterback.

0:46:17.600 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But uh, this isn't the first instance of something like this. Uh.

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Several years ago, Joe Webb was wide receiver eligible, but

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he was starting at quarterback for the Vikings, and people

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>got to play Joe Webb at wide receiver. And the

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>most famous instance didn't involve a quarterback, but Marquez Colston

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:35.359
<v Speaker 1>in YAHOO leagues in like two thousand five or six,

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:38.120
<v Speaker 1>it was tight end eligible when he was clearly a

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.719
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. And I remember every week someone being like,

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't do that, and I'm like, okay, but I'm

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:46.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna because I'm allowed to. So that's the answer. Yes,

0:46:47.160 --> 0:46:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it sucks, but that's the way it goes. Well. Uh,

0:46:50.360 --> 0:46:52.759
<v Speaker 1>first I will say this, Yes, pen should not have

0:46:52.840 --> 0:46:54.600
<v Speaker 1>him his tight end eligible. They should have known this

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>years ago he did. The problem goes back like when

0:46:58.000 --> 0:47:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he entered the league, they didn't really know what to

0:47:01.080 --> 0:47:02.919
<v Speaker 1>do with him and at what position he was gonna play,

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:04.840
<v Speaker 1>and he got designated as a tight end by somebody

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhere who like put a finger in the win and

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:12.240
<v Speaker 1>went tight end and because well, I'm not gonna even speculate,

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:15.399
<v Speaker 1>but ESPN and others continue to carry that tag as

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 1>tight end for years and years and years forward, despite

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact Taysom Hills never once appeared on an NFL

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>roster as listed as tight end, not once, So ESPN

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:31.319
<v Speaker 1>should never have had it this way. Taysom Hill as

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a tight end is a loophole. If you've got Taysom

0:47:34.560 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Hill and you're starting him as a tight end, it

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is a cheap and unfair advantage that you are putting

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on your league. I personally question your personal integrity and

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:50.919
<v Speaker 1>your sense of fair play. I don't run any leagues

0:47:51.000 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on ESPN. If I did, and I had Hill, I

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>would only start him at quarterback. I would not start

0:47:57.440 --> 0:47:59.399
<v Speaker 1>him at tight end. I don't care who my tight

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>end is. I wouldn't do it because in my heart

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I know he's not a tight end, and I care

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:08.480
<v Speaker 1>about my personal integrity more than I care about trying

0:48:08.520 --> 0:48:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to find a loophole for a victory. That's not how

0:48:11.160 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I want to win. Now, commissioners want to talk to

0:48:14.320 --> 0:48:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you for just a minute. Who runs your league? Is

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it you or is it your software? Who runs your league?

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Does a software dictate who runs your league? Or do

0:48:24.680 --> 0:48:27.479
<v Speaker 1>you run your league? This you need to make this call.

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And simply abdicating to the software is spineless. Is like

0:48:36.440 --> 0:48:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I like, I like that My b by laws in

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:41.960
<v Speaker 1>my league specifically state we are at the complete mercy

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of the designations of the site, which you can do.

0:48:44.880 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's great, and that from that point someone you

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 1>have to know that's my private leagues too. But but

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.640
<v Speaker 1>still the Tystom Hill owner would argue with me, Hey,

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what your by law says. If it's in

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the by laws one way or another, you live by

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>those by laws for sure. Our listeners do not have

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:10.120
<v Speaker 1>this situation in their by laws. So Commissioners, you need

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to make a call. But let me give you a

0:49:12.239 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit of data. Taysom Hill has played forty two

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:21.960
<v Speaker 1>snaps this year at quarterback, forty two. He has played

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:28.919
<v Speaker 1>fifty six snaps at wide receiver. He's played thirty two

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:34.360
<v Speaker 1>snaps at tight end, so he has played at the

0:49:34.400 --> 0:49:40.360
<v Speaker 1>tight end position. It's fair to say he's not a

0:49:40.480 --> 0:49:43.839
<v Speaker 1>tight end, but he plays at least some tight end.

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:46.800
<v Speaker 1>You can make a case and you should make the

0:49:46.840 --> 0:49:49.560
<v Speaker 1>call commissioners that he should be allowed to be a

0:49:49.640 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>tight end. Now, my preference and the correct answer is

0:49:54.680 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>should Taysom Hill be allowed? Should commissioners allow him to

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be played as a tight end? Yes, he should because

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>of the thirty two snaps at tight end. That said,

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:08.200
<v Speaker 1>those of you that have him, I hope you will

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>play with integrity and you will not start him that

0:50:11.120 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>way because winning is not winning a game of fantasy

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:18.880
<v Speaker 1>football is not worth the loss of integrity for yourself

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:24.080
<v Speaker 1>or the league when you know he's a quarterback. Wo

0:50:25.080 --> 0:50:29.000
<v Speaker 1>tough question number two, Alex Smiths posted back to back

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:33.000
<v Speaker 1>three yard games. Will Alex Smith finished the year? Is

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a top six quarterback, a seven through twelve quarterback or

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:42.279
<v Speaker 1>worse than twelve? Brian, I have to mention that back

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to back three yard games, Yes, but just one passing

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:48.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdown across those two games. So top six. If he's

0:50:48.520 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna finish top six, he's not gonna beat out Kyler, Murray,

0:50:51.520 --> 0:50:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes, Russell Wilson, and Josh Allen in particular order.

0:50:54.480 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>That leaves two spots, and those two spots he still

0:50:57.280 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 1>got to compete with Aaron Rodgers, air Bear l Jack's

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Watson, Matt Ryan, Tom Brady. He's not finishing top six,

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and that really doesn't leave a whole lot of meat

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on the bone for seven to twelve because Ryan Tannehill

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:13.479
<v Speaker 1>is still in the mix. Joe Burrow, I know Fish

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>has a lot of stats that are probably gonna support

0:51:15.360 --> 0:51:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the same answer. But he's worse than twelve. But he's Ah,

0:51:18.400 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's great to see him back. Okay plus plus all right, Scott,

0:51:23.200 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 1>this is easy. He scored thirty four Fantasy points. QB

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:28.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve has scored a hundred eighty five Fantasy points. He's

0:51:28.680 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>got a hundred points to bake up. Just clearly. The

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 1>question was why did I think of that from this

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:42.360
<v Speaker 1>point forward? Oh? Okay, So he has very positive matchups

0:51:42.360 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>against the Bengals, we've already I think those touchdowns are

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>coming this week. Uh Seattle Carolina his even a decent

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:52.399
<v Speaker 1>matchup against Dallas. San Francisco has giving up like four

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:54.919
<v Speaker 1>huge games in the past six weeks, even though they're

0:51:54.920 --> 0:51:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in middle of the road defense. The only tough spot

0:51:57.719 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>is Pittsburgh. That's said Brian gave the list. I just

0:52:01.200 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>don't see how he can. I don't see how he

0:52:03.520 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 1>can get to top six at all, I have trouble

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:08.959
<v Speaker 1>even seeing it always in the second tier of six.

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I can see him getting into that ten to twelve range.

0:52:13.400 --> 0:52:15.719
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to place money on it, and

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:18.959
<v Speaker 1>you do, that's how this game works, I'm gonna go worse.

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Washington's path to victory real life victories is with an

0:52:24.560 --> 0:52:28.600
<v Speaker 1>efficient Alex Smith, which is in his DNA anyway, because

0:52:28.600 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 1>that's who he really is. You know. They want to

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 1>continue to play very good defense, which Washington has. They

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:35.200
<v Speaker 1>want to run in town Antonio Gibson a fair amount

0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 1>because he's pretty special, and mix in a lot of

0:52:37.560 --> 0:52:41.000
<v Speaker 1>high percentage passing from Alex Smith. In these two games

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:45.799
<v Speaker 1>with the three yards, he's completed sevent his passes very

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:49.879
<v Speaker 1>efficient only the one touchdow. What you mentioned, efficiency does

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:54.080
<v Speaker 1>not equal fantasy stats. He doesn't have the receivers. Teddy

0:52:54.120 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Bridgewater is that That's kind of what I'm saying. He

0:52:57.160 --> 0:53:00.799
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the receivers to unlock big performance. He's only

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:04.080
<v Speaker 1>got the one receiver, Terry McLaurin. And here's really I

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think the crowning blow. In his fifteen year career, Alex

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Smith has never not once finished as a top twelve quarterback,

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>not even the the m v P year. He probably

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.439
<v Speaker 1>got hurt at the end. Even in the old days

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>he was in the running. I thought you made on

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a weekly basis for a second, but that's not what

0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I never finished the season at the top twelve quarterback

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in his fifteen year career, So the answer is worse

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:39.480
<v Speaker 1>than twelve. Tough question Number three. Minnesota wide receiver Justin

0:53:39.600 --> 0:53:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson leads all rookie receivers by almost one hundred fifty yards.

0:53:44.480 --> 0:53:48.399
<v Speaker 1>Is he an every week starter? Scott? Of the time,

0:53:48.480 --> 0:53:53.759
<v Speaker 1>he's aid every week starter all the time he has.

0:53:53.800 --> 0:53:55.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a movie that keeps on giving. Yeah, that was

0:53:56.760 --> 0:54:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the movie. But half the time he's he has boom games.

0:54:00.719 --> 0:54:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The other half the time not so much. He's he's

0:54:02.719 --> 0:54:05.880
<v Speaker 1>got that Brandon Cooks, Will Fuller, Amari Cooper, Lee Evans

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:11.799
<v Speaker 1>type of remember four to six big games a year.

0:54:11.880 --> 0:54:14.920
<v Speaker 1>That's it. Oh with peerless price on the other side, right,

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Drew Bledsoe, I believe, yes, just two negative matchups left

0:54:19.520 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on the schedule. One again is against the Bears, who

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we just torched. But you can't bench Justin Jefferson just

0:54:25.080 --> 0:54:27.799
<v Speaker 1>because of those explosions are going to happen. I think

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:31.000
<v Speaker 1>he's flexworthy at minimum every single week, So yeah, he's

0:54:31.000 --> 0:54:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a never a week starter. Yeah, on a PPR points

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:36.719
<v Speaker 1>per game basis. Right now, he's wide receiver twenty and

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:38.879
<v Speaker 1>that's after a very slow start to the season, which

0:54:38.920 --> 0:54:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is understandable for rookie, where he had six targets across

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>his first two games, and now since Week three, the

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:46.279
<v Speaker 1>target totals have been a bit of a roller coaster ride.

0:54:46.320 --> 0:54:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's gone nine, five, five, up to eleven, then four, four,

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.240
<v Speaker 1>then back up to ten last week. But he checks

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>virtually every box when it comes to the eye test,

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and he can turn one target into a productive box

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:00.600
<v Speaker 1>score and there's no way he falls below wide receiver

0:55:00.800 --> 0:55:04.760
<v Speaker 1>three or flex territory any given week, even based on matchups.

0:55:04.760 --> 0:55:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So yes, and every week starter. Moving forward, Justin Jefferson

0:55:08.239 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is ahead of Randy Moss's epic rookie season by yards.

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:14.960
<v Speaker 1>He's already at seven hundred sixty yards. He has a

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>deep downfield threat averaging eighteen yards per reception, which is

0:55:19.080 --> 0:55:21.880
<v Speaker 1>fourth most in the entire NFL, not just among rookies,

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and despite how deep those passes are, he's got the

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:29.839
<v Speaker 1>seventh highest catch rate in the NFL. Normally, you're deep

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>ball receivers have a low catch rate because those are

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 1>hard to complete passes. It. But here's the problem, Dalvin Cook.

0:55:38.960 --> 0:55:42.439
<v Speaker 1>He's so good and the Vikings are so run oriented.

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's dead lasting pass attempts twenty seven. When you divide

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:48.880
<v Speaker 1>up twenty seven pass attempts among all the wide receivers,

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:52.320
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, running backs, there are just some games that

0:55:52.520 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson can't be a big part of. But here's

0:55:56.960 --> 0:56:00.000
<v Speaker 1>why he's still an every week starter. There isn't necessary

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 1>really a script for knowing when the dud game is

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:05.760
<v Speaker 1>going to come. It could have come against Chicago, it didn't.

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And even in games where Dalvin Cook has had high

0:56:08.719 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>usage games, Justin Jefferson's posted good games and some of

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:13.880
<v Speaker 1>those two So he isn't every week starter, But that

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:17.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean he's gonna turn out every week big totals

0:56:17.840 --> 0:56:20.160
<v Speaker 1>because the volume is not going to be there some games.

0:56:20.400 --> 0:56:24.040
<v Speaker 1>So couldn't you have just said, okay, Scott, what you said, Well,

0:56:24.080 --> 0:56:26.320
<v Speaker 1>why I can't I can't give you that kind of credit.

0:56:26.360 --> 0:56:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, No, I can't do that. Uh. Brian green

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Bay takes on the Indianapolis Colts is the toughest matchup

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:34.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year for the Green Bay Packers. Yeah and

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>this this would be a shootout in years past, but

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:41.000
<v Speaker 1>not so much this year. We'll start with Aaron Jones

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Packers side, Gonna give him a beat. Despite

0:56:43.520 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the painstaking, painstaking over usage of Jamal Williams, Jones has

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:49.359
<v Speaker 1>still garnered at least fifteen touches in every game he's

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:52.160
<v Speaker 1>played this year, and his role is expanding at receiver.

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Last week he played eight snaps lined up either in

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the slough or out wide, so he's usage is expanding

0:56:58.160 --> 0:56:59.960
<v Speaker 1>all over the field. In a tough spot though, against

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 1>the Colts, who are ranked fourth against the run by

0:57:02.040 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Football Outsiders. Indias allowed just seven total touchdowns to running

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:09.600
<v Speaker 1>backs this year, but six of those seven touchdowns have

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:11.960
<v Speaker 1>come over the last five games, so there's hope Jones

0:57:12.000 --> 0:57:13.600
<v Speaker 1>can score in this. One's still gonna give him a b.

0:57:13.920 --> 0:57:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bench Jamal Williams, though only one opposing running

0:57:17.320 --> 0:57:19.680
<v Speaker 1>back has managed to top a hundred combo yards against

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the Colts, and of course Williams is not the lead

0:57:21.760 --> 0:57:25.479
<v Speaker 1>back and the one and that one back who topped

0:57:25.480 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the hundred compoy yards was Derrick Henry who ran for

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:30.560
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred yards and added to to receiving yards

0:57:30.640 --> 0:57:33.800
<v Speaker 1>or something. So I will say it's if Davante Adams

0:57:33.840 --> 0:57:36.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go, which he should go. Jamal Adams in his

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:39.880
<v Speaker 1>last three games without Davonte Adams has like two receiving

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in an eight catch game like he gets involved in.

0:57:43.280 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>If Adams does not go, You're absolutely right. Yeah, a

0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of a few players will get bumped up into

0:57:48.760 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 1>sea range if Adam, Robert Tonyan would be one. Remember

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Tonyans big games happened without Adams. We're gonna I'm gonna

0:57:55.240 --> 0:57:59.440
<v Speaker 1>assume Adams play plays he practiced on Friday. Um, I'm

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:01.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna give him. He's banged up and it's not a

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:04.680
<v Speaker 1>great matchup. But Adams is an auto a at this point,

0:58:04.720 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 1>regardless of matchup or or weather, which has been proven

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks. The Colts did just

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hold a j. Brown to one catch for twenty one yards,

0:58:12.480 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but Brown did drop a seventy yard touchdown bomb twice

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:19.000
<v Speaker 1>on the same route, bobbled it, dropped it again. Uh,

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and Adams should see a lot of Xavier roads a

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>very familiar face from Rhods, this time with the Vikings.

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Adams has had either a hundred yards or a touchdown

0:58:28.040 --> 0:58:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the lack last six times he faced off Againstxavier Roads.

0:58:31.640 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>So I'm giving Adams in a here, and if Adams plays,

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm benching all the other pass catchers not named Adams, Alan, Lazard,

0:58:37.680 --> 0:58:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Marcus of all this gambling. I don't even know if

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Lazar is coming back this week, and even Robert. Yeah,

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's a tough matchup against the Colts.

0:58:44.080 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So all their past catch catchers around the bench for

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:49.880
<v Speaker 1>me and Aaron Rodgers just basically off the Bench's gonna

0:58:49.880 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 1>give him a see. The Colts defense ranks third in

0:58:52.680 --> 0:58:55.880
<v Speaker 1>passing touchdowns allowed and that means the fewest bad for

0:58:56.040 --> 0:58:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers and first in passing yards allowed allowed the fewest

0:58:59.760 --> 0:59:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and Rogers has faced one other defense that's been comparable

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to the Colts, and that was Tampa Bay and they

0:59:04.640 --> 0:59:07.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty much shut him out. So, uh, A tepid c

0:59:07.320 --> 0:59:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for Aaron Rodgers, a lot of a lot of trepidation

0:59:10.600 --> 0:59:13.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Colt side. Uh nahem Hines gonna give him

0:59:13.400 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a see. Looks like the lead back, but he's followed

0:59:17.160 --> 0:59:20.640
<v Speaker 1>up these monster games with duds. Remember weeks one, everybody

0:59:20.720 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ran to the waiver wire to get nih Hines and

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:25.400
<v Speaker 1>then in week two do you remember me touches he

0:59:25.480 --> 0:59:29.520
<v Speaker 1>had one? See, I ran to get him in week one,

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:34.000
<v Speaker 1>knowing I was gonna stash him till week ten, arbitrarily

0:59:34.000 --> 0:59:37.520
<v Speaker 1>playing in weeken and only week ten. Yes, it's a

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>great matchup though for running backs, but I got Jonathan

0:59:40.120 --> 0:59:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Taylor's might take a chance of me running back, invite

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to pick between the two. I'm I'm gonna ride with

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Taylor this week. We'll see how that plays out. I'm

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna bench both Michael Pittman and t Y Hilton. Pittman

0:59:49.840 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is the lead receiver on this team as far as

0:59:51.520 --> 0:59:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm concerned at this point, he's really coming on strong.

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:58.080
<v Speaker 1>But both starting cornerbacks for the Packers, Jaire Alexander, who

0:59:58.160 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>might be the best cornerback outside of j and Ramsey

1:00:00.400 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, will probably be shadowing Pittman and Kevin

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>King also making their return from injury, So both the

1:00:06.040 --> 1:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>receivers on the bench as are the tight ends for

1:00:08.080 --> 1:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the Colts. Mo Aali Cox out targeted Trade Burton last week.

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Jack Doyle is slated to return again. They're all on

1:00:16.360 --> 1:00:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the bench, and so is Philip Rivers. Six of the

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>last eight quarterbacks who face Green Bay have basically finished

1:00:22.400 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>outside the top twenty range and that secondary was dinged

1:00:26.080 --> 1:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>during that tenure or so easy bench for Phil. By

1:00:29.840 --> 1:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, Michael Pittman roster, everybody go get now, Go

1:00:35.040 --> 1:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>get Michael Pittman. And if you're in a dynasty league,

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the love it God, get him. Although we don't know

1:00:38.720 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>his quarterback is gonna be next year, even it'll be

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody better than who they got now in all probability,

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>but I couldn't tell you who it is. That is

1:00:46.440 --> 1:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a That is a tricky spot for the Colts. If

1:00:48.880 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you're next year, who is your quarterbacks? You're too good

1:00:51.040 --> 1:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to land a premier quarterback in the draft. When we

1:00:54.520 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>come back, the Dallas Cowboys face the Vikings. Will Andy

1:00:58.440 --> 1:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Dalton sparked the passing game back to LFE. Find out

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>when we returned to Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy

1:01:30.200 --> 1:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly on the fan. While charting with you, Scott Fish,

1:01:33.200 --> 1:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson, Cowboys go to Minnesota. Let's start with the

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>passing game. Andy Dalton back under center. He battled concussions

1:01:41.880 --> 1:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>then covid. Now he's back, but remember he looked really

1:01:47.680 --> 1:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>bad last time we saw him. Dallas does attack with

1:01:51.120 --> 1:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>three excellent receivers. Each of them was far better than

1:01:53.880 --> 1:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings cornerback counterparts. Even if Cameron Danceler they're they're

1:01:58.960 --> 1:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>presumptive number one cornerback is able to clear the concussion protocol.

1:02:04.040 --> 1:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Prior to facing the completely helpless Bears offense last week,

1:02:07.120 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings were allowing almost three hundred yards and two

1:02:10.400 --> 1:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half touchdowns per game. That is a lot.

1:02:13.320 --> 1:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton is a legitimate starter in this offense. I've

1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>got him against the Bikers. I've got him with the

1:02:18.280 --> 1:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>C grade, but he does have B grade upside, But

1:02:21.160 --> 1:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving him a C grade here to play it safe.

1:02:23.320 --> 1:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper B grade. In three games Dalton has been

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>under center. Cooper seen eighteen targets from Dalton and led

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the team with seven catches seventy nine yards in one

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in the one game Dalton started and finished. If

1:02:36.360 --> 1:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get the same thing from Dalton, that's I

1:02:38.640 --> 1:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>would take that. Seven catches, seventy nine yards and one touchdown.

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Um Cooper draws the Vikings probably the Vikings most favorable

1:02:46.480 --> 1:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>matchup against Chris Jones, allowing a passer rating of a

1:02:48.760 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty two in his coverage. Ceedee Lamb works out

1:02:52.280 --> 1:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of the slot and he has actually seen the most

1:02:54.600 --> 1:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>targets from Dalton and running from the side of face

1:02:58.120 --> 1:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>off against Jeff Gladden e in all probability glad and

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he's given up five touchdowns and is allowing a pass

1:03:03.280 --> 1:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>writing up in his coverage. So I've got to be

1:03:05.840 --> 1:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>grade on Ceedee Lamb C grade and Michael Gallop he

1:03:09.080 --> 1:03:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was might take a chance on me wide receiver against

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this already thin Viking secondary. And let's go to the

1:03:16.200 --> 1:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>running game. Zeke. I've never been more unhappy to be

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>right about a preseason prediction. But this is everything we're

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>worried about. Was Zeke in the off season. He's failing

1:03:29.600 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the eye test and the analytics are not favorable either.

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Compared to Tony Pollard running with the exact same offense,

1:03:36.800 --> 1:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Zeke is averaging few yards per carry, fewer yards after contact,

1:03:41.120 --> 1:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>fewer more more, fewer forced missed tackles than Tony Pollard.

1:03:46.080 --> 1:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Pollard is the better running back right now. That doesn't

1:03:48.280 --> 1:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>mean poll It's going to get more work. Yet I'd

1:03:52.080 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>even start guy ze right now. Oh yeah, I think

1:03:55.320 --> 1:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I would do. And I've only ever see grade on

1:03:56.920 --> 1:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Zeke Minnesota. And here's a part of it is Minnesotas

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>run defense suddenly very good. They have only a lot

1:04:01.080 --> 1:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of one total touchdown to running backs over the last

1:04:03.360 --> 1:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>five games, and during that span, no back has managed

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to crack seventy five rushing yards. That said, the Vikings

1:04:10.160 --> 1:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>have yielded the second most touches to running backs in

1:04:13.400 --> 1:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>goal to go scenarios, So maybe those touches go to Zeke.

1:04:17.200 --> 1:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>They're still giving Zeke the ball to goal line, so

1:04:19.600 --> 1:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe he gets a touchdown here. And that's where the

1:04:21.440 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>sea grade comes from. Let's go to Minnesota. Dalvin Cook

1:04:24.880 --> 1:04:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating, and normally this is where I would just

1:04:27.440 --> 1:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>say Dalvin Cook, he's an obvious. Hey, let's move on.

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>But I want to spend a minute talking about the

1:04:32.880 --> 1:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty two touches he had, the twenty four touches he had,

1:04:36.880 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>and the thirty four touches he's had the three weeks

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>since coming back from injury, the whole lot of touching,

1:04:44.320 --> 1:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta I gotta wonder if Dalvin Cook will

1:04:48.000 --> 1:04:50.840
<v Speaker 1>be rested a bit in this game, and especially if

1:04:50.840 --> 1:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you believe the Vikings are I don't like, like ten

1:04:53.520 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>point favorites or something, especially if you if the Vikings

1:04:56.760 --> 1:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to get ahead in this one, we might

1:04:58.680 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of Alexander Mattis sin to try to

1:05:00.720 --> 1:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>keep some fresh legs for Dalvin Cook, And that part

1:05:03.120 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>does worry me a little bit. Still, if the Legis

1:05:06.240 --> 1:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do get ahead, he's probably Dalvin Cook's probably already had

1:05:09.000 --> 1:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>a good game, so you know he's still in a grade.

1:05:12.600 --> 1:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just putting that out there that I think

1:05:14.800 --> 1:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a snare where they rest him a bit. Dallas

1:05:17.280 --> 1:05:20.520
<v Speaker 1>is allowing one d twenty seven rushing yards per game

1:05:20.560 --> 1:05:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to running backs, and they've already let three different backs

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:27.720
<v Speaker 1>record multiple touchdown games. So Dalvin cooking a if you

1:05:27.760 --> 1:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like throwing darts, you could go to Alexander Madison.

1:05:30.520 --> 1:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>But I don't have a starting grade on and I'm

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna guess those three backs that scored multiple touchdowns were

1:05:34.800 --> 1:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>not as good as Dalvin Well. I don't think from

1:05:37.120 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, I don't think. I don't think anybody's as

1:05:39.720 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>good as Dalvin Cook. Right now, Let's go to the

1:05:41.880 --> 1:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>passing game, Kirk Cousins gets a B grade. Now, Cousins

1:05:45.280 --> 1:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>often suffers from these Dalvin heavy game plans, but as

1:05:48.480 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I just explained, I think they could dial back Dalvin

1:05:51.360 --> 1:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and this one a lot to keep him fresh, and

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there's an up There's a little upside on

1:05:55.320 --> 1:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Cousins for volume. But even if he doesn't get it,

1:05:58.040 --> 1:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the beauty of playing the cow Boys. They give

1:06:01.080 --> 1:06:04.840
<v Speaker 1>up big games even without seeing many passes. In recent games,

1:06:05.400 --> 1:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray, Kyle Allen, and Carson Wentz only through twenty

1:06:10.920 --> 1:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>seven passes. They all scored two times. What's more, Dallas

1:06:14.160 --> 1:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>has allowed multiple passing touchdowns in every game since the opener.

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Kirk Cousins is sitting on multiple passing touchdowns.

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And if I like Cousins as a B grade, I

1:06:21.960 --> 1:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>must like his receivers Adam Theland and Justin Jefferson. They

1:06:25.160 --> 1:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>both come in with B grades as well. For Theland,

1:06:28.160 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>he's become touchdown dependent and this is an ideal matchup.

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Theland has been Kirk cousins favorite Weds red zone weapon,

1:06:34.840 --> 1:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>drawing a team leading fourteen red zone targets. Dallas has

1:06:38.440 --> 1:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>allowed sixteen touchdowns to receivers that is the most, including

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing multiple receiver scores in three of the past four games,

1:06:47.800 --> 1:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and I expect that to happen here as well. Justin

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson has it mentioned already already a B grade. Dallas

1:06:55.080 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>has allowed sixteen touchdowns and receivers, which I just said, um,

1:06:58.440 --> 1:07:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is a sellent opportunity for him

1:07:01.040 --> 1:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as well. Trayvon Digs is out cornerback. Jefferson has a

1:07:04.880 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>dream matchup against an inexperienced, undrafted rookie and Savan Smith,

1:07:09.680 --> 1:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who has played just fourteen defensive snaps in the NFL

1:07:13.960 --> 1:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>against Justin Jefferson. That is a rookie on rookie matchup

1:07:17.280 --> 1:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>that heavily favors Justin Jefferson. It is Savory uh irv.

1:07:22.960 --> 1:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Smith is shaping up as a game time decision. If

1:07:25.840 --> 1:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>he does not go, you can start Kyle Rudolph. Much

1:07:29.320 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>like last week, good tight ends are generally faring well

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>against Dallas, and if Kyle Rudolph's going to get the

1:07:34.000 --> 1:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>overwhelming majority of the tight end snaps, he is a

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that you can use. All right, Let's go to

1:07:39.560 --> 1:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>our next matchup, which is the Pittsburgh Steelers taking on

1:07:42.560 --> 1:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the Jacksonville Jaguars. Scott actually want to start with James

1:07:45.800 --> 1:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Conner and this one. He has been stone cold for

1:07:48.640 --> 1:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a month, even in favorable matchups games. Do you think

1:07:51.720 --> 1:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he would do really well bad field conditions where he

1:07:54.520 --> 1:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>should be running the whole thing, and none of it's

1:07:56.520 --> 1:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>works for James Connor. But here comes to Jags. What

1:07:58.720 --> 1:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think you know what is bad? They got

1:08:00.880 --> 1:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>up by a couple of scores in the Bengals, didn't

1:08:03.280 --> 1:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>kept throwing, kept throwing, didn't didn't even care. Gabe Connor

1:08:06.680 --> 1:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>nine carries the week before, thirteen carries last week, even

1:08:09.760 --> 1:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>up big points. They did not care. They just keep throwing.

1:08:13.200 --> 1:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's the big problem. I I am giving Connor

1:08:15.880 --> 1:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a C grade here, but as you alluded to, under

1:08:18.840 --> 1:08:21.559
<v Speaker 1>sixty yards in three straight, hasn't had more than three

1:08:21.640 --> 1:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>catches in a game since week three, So he's not

1:08:24.720 --> 1:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>even getting the receiving work. It's all going to. You know,

1:08:27.840 --> 1:08:30.879
<v Speaker 1>they're amazing receivers. They just have a ton of options.

1:08:31.000 --> 1:08:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Now you think that at some point they're gonna start

1:08:34.160 --> 1:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>switching to Benny Snell Anthony McFarland because James Conner is

1:08:38.200 --> 1:08:41.479
<v Speaker 1>getting it done. See I don't know. I mean snow

1:08:41.600 --> 1:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>has six carries in the last two weeks for thirteen yards.

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You know it's not I'm just talking future out a whole.

1:08:47.520 --> 1:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There might be there might be a

1:08:48.880 --> 1:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>spot to speculate there. McFarland three for seven yards in

1:08:51.680 --> 1:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. So I did because he's gonna

1:08:57.400 --> 1:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>get the volume he'll get. He'll get ten to all

1:09:00.080 --> 1:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>thirteen cares. He might get a reception or two. He

1:09:02.360 --> 1:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>might get you fifty sixty yards maybe. So I give

1:09:05.840 --> 1:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>him a C grade here. I'm giving Ben in a grade.

1:09:08.720 --> 1:09:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving Juju in a grade. I'm giving Claypool in

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:14.479
<v Speaker 1>a grade. I'm giving Deonte Johnson in a grade. I

1:09:14.600 --> 1:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>don't even care because, as I said, they just keep

1:09:17.680 --> 1:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball and they keep racking up scores. The

1:09:20.880 --> 1:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Jags are bottom ten in passing yards and passing touchdowns alone.

1:09:24.560 --> 1:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Allowed UH Steelers hitting their stride right now. Juju has

1:09:28.320 --> 1:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>averaged over ten targets per week over the last four

1:09:32.000 --> 1:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>UH topping six for sixty seven and scoring in all

1:09:35.520 --> 1:09:37.719
<v Speaker 1>scoring in two of them, topping six for sixty seven

1:09:37.800 --> 1:09:41.879
<v Speaker 1>in all of them. But most importantly, Scott, it's his birthday.

1:09:44.320 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Uh. The reason his yardage totals are

1:09:47.120 --> 1:09:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the are the low ones though, because Deonta Johnson he's

1:09:49.840 --> 1:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the deeper guy. Claypool is the deeper guy. Deante Johnson

1:09:52.439 --> 1:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>double digit targets in every full game he's playing. That's

1:09:57.080 --> 1:10:00.519
<v Speaker 1>that's the he's played one of those. He has played

1:10:00.920 --> 1:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>four of those. Uh, he has four scores in those

1:10:03.920 --> 1:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>games and at least seventy seven yards in each of

1:10:06.160 --> 1:10:10.000
<v Speaker 1>those games. Uh, Claypool, Uh, let's talk about the rushing.

1:10:10.680 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Nine carries and two touch does rushing? Yeah, he's already

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>like seven right now. James Conner just shaking this fist,

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:20.759
<v Speaker 1>who probably is. Uh, he's running up thirty two targets

1:10:20.800 --> 1:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>in the last three weeks as well. They're all averaging

1:10:23.280 --> 1:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>ted plus targets a game, three scores in that span.

1:10:26.240 --> 1:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I'm giving all a's. Maybe one of

1:10:28.479 --> 1:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>them turns into B performance. You don't know which one

1:10:30.960 --> 1:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is gonna blow up, though, and they should all be fine.

1:10:34.000 --> 1:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>James Washington four touchdown, that would be That would be insane.

1:10:39.520 --> 1:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, I'm giving I'm giving a bench

1:10:42.400 --> 1:10:45.479
<v Speaker 1>grade to Jake Luton. The Steelers have not allowed a

1:10:45.600 --> 1:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>single top twelve fantasy day from a quarterback. Yet this

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:51.519
<v Speaker 1>year they're getting pressure on the quarterback thirty percent of

1:10:51.520 --> 1:10:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the time, they're dialing up a blitz forty two percent

1:10:54.680 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 1>of the time. If they do that on a rookie

1:10:56.600 --> 1:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>quarterback like Luton, I don't have a lot of faith

1:10:59.520 --> 1:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in what he can do. Uh. They haven't allowed over

1:11:02.000 --> 1:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and fifty yards passing since Week five either, Uh,

1:11:06.120 --> 1:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>DJ Shark. I'm giving a B grade though, too, because

1:11:08.760 --> 1:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with Luten in, Luton has just lasered in on him

1:11:11.880 --> 1:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen targets in the two in the last two weeks.

1:11:14.560 --> 1:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Similar size number one receivers against the Steelers have actually

1:11:18.400 --> 1:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>had decent days against them, So I think if Luten

1:11:21.320 --> 1:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>gives it enough volume, he could get up to that

1:11:23.560 --> 1:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>B grade. I don't think Cole's getting there though. He's

1:11:26.680 --> 1:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>been a forty to fifty yard guy every week except

1:11:29.439 --> 1:11:31.799
<v Speaker 1>for one blow up where he had three huge plays

1:11:31.840 --> 1:11:34.559
<v Speaker 1>in garbage time. Otherwise he's like a forty yard guy

1:11:34.640 --> 1:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and you hope for a touchdown. I think it's only

1:11:36.920 --> 1:11:41.360
<v Speaker 1>about Shark here in the running game. Robinson B grade.

1:11:41.479 --> 1:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I won't sugarcoat it though. It's it's not a great matchup,

1:11:44.640 --> 1:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>but Robinson gets of the touches in percentage of work.

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:53.439
<v Speaker 1>The last four Backs to hit fifteen touches against the

1:11:53.479 --> 1:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Steelers all had seventy plus yards UH, and fifteen touches

1:11:58.439 --> 1:12:02.639
<v Speaker 1>for Robinson is like, and that's below his floor. He's

1:12:02.720 --> 1:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>he's a guy that's more likely to get twenty to

1:12:04.560 --> 1:12:07.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. He gets. He's he's had twenty five or

1:12:07.520 --> 1:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>more in three straight games. So I gave him the

1:12:10.240 --> 1:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>B grade. Rams take on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and

1:12:13.200 --> 1:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Brian we all started every part of the Rams passing game.

1:12:17.600 --> 1:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Last week in the seemingly obvious matchup against Seattle, we

1:12:21.920 --> 1:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>got nothing. Now here comes in in much much tougher

1:12:25.439 --> 1:12:28.479
<v Speaker 1>test against Tampa Bay. Do we dare go back to

1:12:28.600 --> 1:12:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Jared goffin company? No? Not, at least not Goff. The

1:12:33.040 --> 1:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>last time Goff flew to Florida, things did not end well.

1:12:36.200 --> 1:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll playing across the country and we went to play

1:12:37.840 --> 1:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in Miami. I think he had about four four or

1:12:40.040 --> 1:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>five turnovers. And I hate golf in Florida, and I

1:12:42.920 --> 1:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>don't like a lot of his pass catchers. The only

1:12:44.800 --> 1:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>one to truly like his Cooper Cup and give him

1:12:47.120 --> 1:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a b Cup of scene at least seven targets and

1:12:49.000 --> 1:12:51.879
<v Speaker 1>six of the past seven games, Tampa Bay has surrendered

1:12:51.920 --> 1:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown from the slot in three of the past

1:12:54.280 --> 1:12:58.680
<v Speaker 1>four games. Couple see plenty oh Sean Murphy Bunting, who

1:12:58.720 --> 1:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>has yielded a total of four scores and is allowing

1:13:01.960 --> 1:13:04.519
<v Speaker 1>a passer rating of one nine and his coverage that

1:13:04.560 --> 1:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>would be for Cup. You made him sound irash when

1:13:06.720 --> 1:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you called him oh Sean. Well, that was kind of

1:13:10.240 --> 1:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what I was going for, but the oh was like

1:13:12.360 --> 1:13:18.559
<v Speaker 1>plenty of twenty of. But to the other receivers, Robert

1:13:18.560 --> 1:13:20.879
<v Speaker 1>Woods and Josh Reynolds. I wanted to write a Reynolds

1:13:20.920 --> 1:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>wrap this week, but they're both on the bench, so

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll have to save that for later. Woods has seen

1:13:26.320 --> 1:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>nine fewer targets then Josh Reynolds over the last three

1:13:30.000 --> 1:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>games and has failed to reach thirty five yards and

1:13:32.640 --> 1:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>three of those past four Robert Woods that is, and

1:13:35.840 --> 1:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>over the past five games as a whole. This is

1:13:37.680 --> 1:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a bad matchup for both. The Buccaneers have only allowed

1:13:40.000 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>two receivers to top seventy five yards. They'll both base

1:13:43.360 --> 1:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>a tricky matchup in Jamal Dean, probably more so Woods,

1:13:46.520 --> 1:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>but Dean is uh allowing just thirty one yards per

1:13:49.240 --> 1:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>game and his coverage and is ranked ninth among corners

1:13:52.080 --> 1:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>by Pro Football Focus. So Woods and Reynolds are on

1:13:54.640 --> 1:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the bench for me this week, but they're both both

1:13:56.880 --> 1:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>should still be rostered, of course. And then Tyler Higby

1:13:59.400 --> 1:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>and Gerald writ I had them on the bench as well.

1:14:02.320 --> 1:14:04.519
<v Speaker 1>H The Bucks have left three tight end touchdowns over

1:14:04.520 --> 1:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the last two games, the likes of Adam Troutman, Josh Hill,

1:14:08.560 --> 1:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and Colin Thompson Carolinas Colin Thompson. But opposing type and

1:14:16.640 --> 1:14:19.439
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight ends are averaging five catches for fifty plus yards.

1:14:19.479 --> 1:14:21.519
<v Speaker 1>That's decent, but this is just a coin flip. I

1:14:21.600 --> 1:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>want no part of Tyler and Gerald Everett, so they're

1:14:24.400 --> 1:14:26.439
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench, and all the running backs with

1:14:26.479 --> 1:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>their rams on the bench as well. Last week, here's

1:14:29.320 --> 1:14:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the snapshare breakdown. Malcolm Brown, Darryl Henderson percent Cam Akers

1:14:35.640 --> 1:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and he's the one that got start to Yeah. Acres

1:14:38.320 --> 1:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>led the way with ten opportunities and opportunities either a

1:14:41.080 --> 1:14:43.519
<v Speaker 1>carry or a target. The other two had eight. And

1:14:43.640 --> 1:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>this is just a brutal matchup. Tampa Bay ranked second

1:14:45.880 --> 1:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>against the run by Football outsiders. Opposing running backs are

1:14:48.960 --> 1:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>averaging less than a hundred combo yards per game. That

1:14:52.080 --> 1:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely insane, rushing receiving yards under a hundred and

1:14:56.000 --> 1:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>less than a touchdown per game. So they're both on

1:14:57.840 --> 1:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the bench, uh quickly over the Tampa base Ronald Jones,

1:15:01.200 --> 1:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>can you give him a ce? I need to eat

1:15:03.360 --> 1:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>some crow here. We're really ragging on Ronald Jones last week.

1:15:08.000 --> 1:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe what's our anti our anti peacocks sounds? The barnyard

1:15:15.280 --> 1:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is does a turkey on there, thank you. But Ronald

1:15:21.960 --> 1:15:25.759
<v Speaker 1>Jones looks to be the Bucks lead back again. Assuming

1:15:25.880 --> 1:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Jones the bulk of touches, which again is never a

1:15:29.720 --> 1:15:32.519
<v Speaker 1>safe assumption in Tampa Bay, He'll have to tough matchup

1:15:32.560 --> 1:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Rams. Los Angeles has only allowed five total

1:15:34.960 --> 1:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and running backs this year, and since Week four,

1:15:37.439 --> 1:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>no loan back has managed to top eighty combo yards

1:15:40.320 --> 1:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>against the Ram. So it's just awful matchup for running

1:15:42.840 --> 1:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>backs on both sides. But I will give Jones the sea.

1:15:45.520 --> 1:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bench Mike Evans because I'm gonna assume he

1:15:47.840 --> 1:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>sees the most of Jalen Ramsey, which is just the

1:15:49.960 --> 1:15:53.639
<v Speaker 1>hard st anyone who's gonna see the majority of Jalen Ramsey.

1:15:53.680 --> 1:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You gotta benjam. I don't care who they are at

1:15:55.240 --> 1:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this point. Davante Adams maybe, but we'll see if we

1:15:58.080 --> 1:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ever get there. But anyway, that gives UH definitely not

1:16:03.880 --> 1:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that leads me to believe Antonio Brown deserves a C

1:16:07.920 --> 1:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>target share since uh starting to share punk beds with

1:16:10.800 --> 1:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady. He should have had a fifty plus yard

1:16:13.200 --> 1:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>touchdown last week as well, Brady overthrew him and now

1:16:16.080 --> 1:16:18.559
<v Speaker 1>now Brown could see an equal amount of Jalen Ramsey here.

1:16:18.600 --> 1:16:20.759
<v Speaker 1>But I still think h Evans is of the majority

1:16:20.760 --> 1:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of shadow coverage from Ramsey. But on Ahold of the

1:16:23.280 --> 1:16:25.919
<v Speaker 1>Rams are allowing the fewest yards to opposing wide receivers,

1:16:25.960 --> 1:16:28.439
<v Speaker 1>just one seven per game, and they haven't allowed a

1:16:28.479 --> 1:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>receiver to top seventy yards in the past six So

1:16:31.280 --> 1:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>just a CEE for Brown. Chris Godwin is gonn give

1:16:33.720 --> 1:16:35.479
<v Speaker 1>him a C too, but he feels like the safer

1:16:35.600 --> 1:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sea to me. Uh, Godwins has at least six targets

1:16:39.400 --> 1:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in every game. He definitely won't see Jalen Ramsey. Instead,

1:16:42.240 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 1>he gets slot corner Troy Hill, who was allowing forty

1:16:44.520 --> 1:16:46.960
<v Speaker 1>two yards per game and a past rating of ninety

1:16:47.000 --> 1:16:49.519
<v Speaker 1>five in his coverage. Not amazing numbers, but it's the

1:16:49.560 --> 1:16:52.479
<v Speaker 1>best you're gonna get. Nobody going out against the Rams. Actually,

1:16:52.520 --> 1:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the best you're gonna get it is probably Rob Gronkowski.

1:16:55.160 --> 1:16:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Gonna give him a b um a lot of mouse

1:16:57.479 --> 1:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to feed in Tampa Bay, of course, but um, his

1:17:00.920 --> 1:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>matchup is with Kenny Young, who allows an catch catch

1:17:04.080 --> 1:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>rate and coverage and his Pro Football focus is worst

1:17:06.760 --> 1:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>graded tight end defender. So Gronk probably your safest pass

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>catcher this week with a B and because I'm ragging

1:17:12.720 --> 1:17:15.439
<v Speaker 1>all the past catchers, just a cee for Tom Brady.

1:17:15.760 --> 1:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>The Ram secondary has been great, blanked Russell Wilson last week.

1:17:19.600 --> 1:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Non Josh Allen. Quarterbacks have averaged a paltry and Allen

1:17:24.280 --> 1:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>six passing touchdowns. Not good, but that list does include

1:17:28.439 --> 1:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Daniel Jones, Kyle Allen, Alex Smith hybrid, and Washington Nick

1:17:33.280 --> 1:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Foles to uh, not too impressive. So you're not bentioning Brady,

1:17:37.040 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but temporary expectations, all right? That sounds like a very

1:17:40.200 --> 1:17:43.479
<v Speaker 1>good plan when we come back premature speculation. This is

1:17:43.560 --> 1:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the bit where we give you players you want to

1:17:45.360 --> 1:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>pick up now that everybody else is going to be

1:17:48.160 --> 1:17:51.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick up next week, but they're already on

1:17:51.800 --> 1:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>your roster because you jumped into the premature speculation. Sounds

1:17:57.240 --> 1:18:00.120
<v Speaker 1>just like that also from last segment. If you can

1:18:00.160 --> 1:18:02.559
<v Speaker 1>figure out the natural predator to the peacock, let us

1:18:02.600 --> 1:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>know so we can start getting the natural predator to

1:18:05.240 --> 1:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the peacock on at the button bar here because we

1:18:07.880 --> 1:18:10.479
<v Speaker 1>we're a little bit flummixed by that. What what eats

1:18:10.479 --> 1:18:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a peacock? What doesn't eat a peacock? I don't know

1:18:12.920 --> 1:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>if I'm gonna google that right now. I'm nervous about

1:18:16.840 --> 1:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>tiger and mongoose. We didn't want to go the fantasy

1:18:21.400 --> 1:18:24.559
<v Speaker 1>mongoose for when we have to anti peacock. That would

1:18:24.600 --> 1:18:28.559
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. The fantasy monk Ricky Ticky Tabby coming up

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>when we come back to Fantasy Final thing in a

1:18:54.080 --> 1:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly Paul church In, Scott Fish and Brian John.

1:19:00.320 --> 1:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're listening over the air, we are also a podcast.

1:19:03.600 --> 1:19:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Look for the Fantasy Football Weekly podcast or whatever platform

1:19:06.840 --> 1:19:09.839
<v Speaker 1>you prefer to get your podcasts on. We're pretty much everywhere,

1:19:10.080 --> 1:19:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for subscribing, rating and reviewing the show.

1:19:13.360 --> 1:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We always are grateful and we care what you think.

1:19:15.680 --> 1:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>This segment is called premature speculation. We give you three

1:19:18.000 --> 1:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>players to pick up that other people will be trying

1:19:19.680 --> 1:19:21.799
<v Speaker 1>to pick up next week. But you're ahead of the game, Scott,

1:19:22.200 --> 1:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you got so I gotta. I got a kind of

1:19:24.800 --> 1:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>a weird one here because he's going to be on buy,

1:19:26.960 --> 1:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>so I want you to get him before the Weavers

1:19:29.760 --> 1:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>after the buy. So I want you to get him

1:19:31.520 --> 1:19:35.880
<v Speaker 1>now in the next five games. Jordan's Red faces three

1:19:36.000 --> 1:19:38.759
<v Speaker 1>bottom seven teams against tight ends. Two are just middle

1:19:38.760 --> 1:19:40.479
<v Speaker 1>of the pack and the other two are just middle

1:19:40.479 --> 1:19:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of the pack. But those teams have govern up nine

1:19:43.040 --> 1:19:46.519
<v Speaker 1>games of sixty plus and or a touchdown uh combined.

1:19:46.960 --> 1:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Those are the tough matchups. So he's got a greade

1:19:49.880 --> 1:19:52.720
<v Speaker 1>five games late. Kittle is I would tell December, and

1:19:52.800 --> 1:19:55.519
<v Speaker 1>if San Francisco gets eliminated, Read might be good to

1:19:55.560 --> 1:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>go for the entire season for you. That wouldn't surprise me. Yeah,

1:19:58.280 --> 1:19:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So go get him now, all right, Jordan Read, I'll

1:19:59.920 --> 1:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>like everybody, everybody needs tight end help right now. That's

1:20:02.439 --> 1:20:05.519
<v Speaker 1>a great angle, Brian, Mine's them a little more of

1:20:05.560 --> 1:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a dynasty angle. But I'm going Autumn Tate wide receiver

1:20:08.400 --> 1:20:10.360
<v Speaker 1>for the Bengals. Now, if something happens to a j Green,

1:20:10.520 --> 1:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>which might very well happenings happening right, he's decomposing in

1:20:15.479 --> 1:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>front of our eyes. But more importantly, Tee Higgins, uh

1:20:18.600 --> 1:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>would would see more targets. But when he does see targets,

1:20:21.360 --> 1:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he's producing. He's got good size, six five pounds and

1:20:26.040 --> 1:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>he leads. He's a big boy. Takes a lot of

1:20:28.439 --> 1:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>really nice looking catches too. Next year, Tates and Higgins

1:20:32.200 --> 1:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on the boundaries of Boyd running out of the slot

1:20:35.000 --> 1:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>with Joe Burrow is going to be scary, and Tate,

1:20:37.320 --> 1:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>despite his opportunities being limited, does lead the team in

1:20:40.400 --> 1:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>yards per pass route run. So when he gets the ball,

1:20:43.320 --> 1:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>he makes things happen. So if you've got a dead

1:20:45.560 --> 1:20:48.559
<v Speaker 1>dynasty team, he's he's a good stash right now. Most

1:20:48.600 --> 1:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of this year's rookie receivers started blowing up right around

1:20:52.240 --> 1:20:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like week four. You know, they got through what was

1:20:54.880 --> 1:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of like their version of the preseason, and you know,

1:20:57.560 --> 1:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>right around week four, second round pick Denzel Mims didn't

1:21:01.960 --> 1:21:05.120
<v Speaker 1>play until three weeks ago. This is week four coming

1:21:05.200 --> 1:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>up for Denzel Mims. You may remember from the draft

1:21:08.120 --> 1:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Mims, he's big, he's physical, he's fast, He's a

1:21:11.240 --> 1:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>big play down field threat. In his three games so far,

1:21:15.360 --> 1:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>he's been getting a bunch of targets and the Jets

1:21:17.240 --> 1:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>are gonna want to work him in for the rest

1:21:18.680 --> 1:21:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season as they try to get some reps

1:21:20.280 --> 1:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>for him this year. That will pay off next year

1:21:22.479 --> 1:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>with Trevor Lawrence. Game scripts always favored the Jets passing

1:21:26.160 --> 1:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>game because they're constantly behind. They're going to be passing

1:21:28.320 --> 1:21:31.200
<v Speaker 1>throughout and Mims has got a bunch of plus matchups left,

1:21:31.240 --> 1:21:34.479
<v Speaker 1>including two in the playoffs. He will face Seattle and

1:21:34.640 --> 1:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland in the Fantasy Playoffs weeks fourteen and sixteen. That

1:21:38.760 --> 1:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>might be a flex starter for you in fourteen and sixteen,

1:21:41.600 --> 1:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Mims, let's get in our final two matchups of

1:21:45.680 --> 1:21:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the show, including Kansas City taking on the Raiders. Patrick Mahomes,

1:21:50.000 --> 1:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill, Travis Kelsey. All obvious a's and do not

1:21:53.240 --> 1:21:57.360
<v Speaker 1>require elaboration. They are my third, first, and first ranked

1:21:57.400 --> 1:22:02.400
<v Speaker 1>players at their respective positions. Clyde Edwards, a layer, clocks

1:22:02.479 --> 1:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>in with the C grade. He's at a grand total

1:22:05.439 --> 1:22:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of Since Bell arrived, he's had a grand total of

1:22:08.560 --> 1:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen carries, a lot even though Bell isn't taking the work,

1:22:13.920 --> 1:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Bell's not getting it, isn't getting any work score in

1:22:17.040 --> 1:22:20.519
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns now a little bit. Clyde Edwards Laire has posted

1:22:20.640 --> 1:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>eighty combo yards and no scores on thirteen touches, and

1:22:24.320 --> 1:22:26.599
<v Speaker 1>the earlier matchup Agains Las Vegas he had eighty combo

1:22:26.720 --> 1:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>yards in and no score. The Raiders haven't allowed it

1:22:29.120 --> 1:22:32.360
<v Speaker 1>back to top seventy rushing yards in their last six games,

1:22:33.080 --> 1:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so there's just not a lot to like here from

1:22:34.680 --> 1:22:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Edwards Laire feels like he's sitting on fifties sixty

1:22:37.760 --> 1:22:40.559
<v Speaker 1>yards and maybe a chance at a touchdown, let's hope.

1:22:40.600 --> 1:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So um Levy on Bells on the bench, as I

1:22:43.280 --> 1:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned before, almost totally unused since his acquisition by Kansas City.

1:22:47.479 --> 1:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Apparently not everybody who leaves Adam Gaze automatically becomes a

1:22:52.600 --> 1:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>star player, because Lavia Bell is doing less now with

1:22:56.280 --> 1:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the high the best offense in the NFL. Go figure. Last,

1:23:00.000 --> 1:23:03.519
<v Speaker 1>I want to mention, there's a chance that both Sammy

1:23:03.600 --> 1:23:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Watkins does not play because of his hamstring and Mikole

1:23:06.840 --> 1:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Hardman doesn't clear the COVID protocol. If both of those

1:23:10.360 --> 1:23:13.519
<v Speaker 1>things happen, then I think you could throw into Marcus

1:23:13.640 --> 1:23:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Robinson because he'll be on the field like every snap,

1:23:17.280 --> 1:23:19.719
<v Speaker 1>so he might be a sneaky play. If both Watkins

1:23:19.800 --> 1:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and Hardman can't go, let's flip over to the Raider's side.

1:23:22.760 --> 1:23:24.479
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with the running game, which makes sense for

1:23:24.560 --> 1:23:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this team. Josh Jacobs posted seventy seven yards and two

1:23:28.080 --> 1:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>scores against the Chiefs earlier this season in Kansas City

1:23:31.840 --> 1:23:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is allowing the sixth most rushing yards, and the game

1:23:34.439 --> 1:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>script almost certainly involved another run heavy attack in an

1:23:37.880 --> 1:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>effort to keep the ball away from Patrick Mahomes. As

1:23:40.000 --> 1:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier in the show, John Gruden runs the

1:23:42.840 --> 1:23:46.559
<v Speaker 1>ball thirty one times per game. Kansas City sees twenty

1:23:46.680 --> 1:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>nine rushes per game. You figure Josh Jacobs gets like

1:23:50.439 --> 1:23:53.599
<v Speaker 1>two thirds of the work. That's twenty touches for Josh

1:23:53.720 --> 1:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Jacobs in. That's an A grade for Josh Jacobs and

1:23:58.479 --> 1:24:00.880
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Booker was might take at Anthony player with the

1:24:01.000 --> 1:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>C grade. All right, let's go to the passing game.

1:24:04.560 --> 1:24:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr comes out of the C grade here. Posted

1:24:06.840 --> 1:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>his best game of the year in the earlier meeting,

1:24:09.280 --> 1:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>throwing for three hundred forty seven yards and three touchdowns.

1:24:13.200 --> 1:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>But that was an absolute anomaly for both Car and

1:24:16.200 --> 1:24:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs against one of the best past defenses. Cars

1:24:19.800 --> 1:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>average game in the month since that Kansas City win

1:24:23.520 --> 1:24:26.640
<v Speaker 1>just one hundred seventy eight yards and one point three touchdowns.

1:24:26.720 --> 1:24:29.360
<v Speaker 1>That's it. That's the real Derek Car here. He's been

1:24:29.479 --> 1:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>under one hundred sixty five yards in three straight games.

1:24:32.760 --> 1:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And for the Chiefs, they've only allowed one hundred eight

1:24:35.360 --> 1:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>yards in one touchdown to the rest of the league

1:24:38.200 --> 1:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>other than Derek Carr in the previous game. So let's

1:24:40.840 --> 1:24:42.599
<v Speaker 1>talk about his receivers. If Derek car is a Sea,

1:24:42.600 --> 1:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>who do we like? Darren Waller. Good tight ends have

1:24:45.360 --> 1:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>gotten it done against the Chiefs Hunter Henry and with

1:24:47.920 --> 1:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers and Mark Andrews and the Ravens and Noah Fanton.

1:24:51.080 --> 1:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>The Broncos tight ends averaged seven catches seventy two yards.

1:24:54.960 --> 1:24:59.519
<v Speaker 1>Good tight ends get it done here. Waller had five. Sorry,

1:24:59.600 --> 1:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Waller's had at least five catches and sixty yards or

1:25:02.880 --> 1:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a score in each of his last three against the Chiefs,

1:25:06.000 --> 1:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and he did well in the previous matchup this year,

1:25:08.680 --> 1:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody else is on the bench. Nelson Aguilar three catches,

1:25:13.479 --> 1:25:17.320
<v Speaker 1>across his last three games and a bad matchup Henry Ruggs.

1:25:17.560 --> 1:25:20.479
<v Speaker 1>He had the long bomb touchdown when these teams played

1:25:20.520 --> 1:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>each other last time, but he's done nothing else all

1:25:24.479 --> 1:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>season besides that one long reception. That's it. He is

1:25:28.840 --> 1:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a low, low volume dart throw at best against a

1:25:32.320 --> 1:25:36.360
<v Speaker 1>very good secondary a million times already. But just imagine

1:25:36.880 --> 1:25:39.599
<v Speaker 1>Steedee Lamb or Jerry Judy on the Raiders or Justin

1:25:39.680 --> 1:25:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson rookies. They got it wrong. They flat out got

1:25:44.600 --> 1:25:48.479
<v Speaker 1>it wrong. Our last matchup of the day, Tennessee Titans

1:25:48.600 --> 1:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>at the Baltimore Ravens Scott. This has been a sleepy

1:25:53.400 --> 1:25:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee Titans offense and now they go at Baltimore. This

1:25:57.560 --> 1:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is not a get right spot. It's really not. The

1:26:00.000 --> 1:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Evens have only allowed five passing touchdowns since Week three.

1:26:04.560 --> 1:26:07.640
<v Speaker 1>That's not many. Week four is the last time a

1:26:07.720 --> 1:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>QB through for more than two thirty yards against them. Conversely,

1:26:12.080 --> 1:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill's best yardage day in the last four weeks the

1:26:15.040 --> 1:26:18.519
<v Speaker 1>sleep before week run two or thirty three yards. It's

1:26:18.600 --> 1:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they're just really off. It's a tough draw. I have

1:26:21.200 --> 1:26:24.519
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill on the bench. I actually have the whole passing

1:26:24.600 --> 1:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>game except A. J. Brown on the bench. Sorry about John,

1:26:27.320 --> 1:26:29.720
<v Speaker 1>who I I just know I'm with you. John is

1:26:29.760 --> 1:26:33.320
<v Speaker 1>not startable to eight catches since week five? John, John,

1:26:33.600 --> 1:26:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah John and JOHNU uh A J. Brown? Though he's

1:26:37.400 --> 1:26:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just too good not to start. He had a terrible

1:26:39.439 --> 1:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>leak week last week, but he has scored in five

1:26:41.840 --> 1:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>straight prior to that. He has he's getting seven targets

1:26:45.160 --> 1:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>per game. Even in a tough matchup. If he's getting seven,

1:26:48.080 --> 1:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>eight nine targets, he might be able to get something done.

1:26:51.400 --> 1:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And they gotta they gotta pass somewhere. So uh A

1:26:54.280 --> 1:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>J A J. Brown. I do have a soft be

1:26:57.400 --> 1:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>on Derrick Henry A grade for Derek Henry. There isn't

1:27:01.160 --> 1:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>benching Henry anyway. Uh. He scores most weeks, hits a

1:27:04.400 --> 1:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred most of the time. Ravens have been good against

1:27:06.880 --> 1:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>running backs, but David Damian Harris just at a hundred

1:27:09.200 --> 1:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and twenty two yards and and he's a big bowler

1:27:11.800 --> 1:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of a running back. Henry is a little bit bigger

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit a little bit more of a

1:27:15.800 --> 1:27:19.559
<v Speaker 1>bowler than him. Also, Clais Campbell and Brandon Brandon Williams

1:27:19.720 --> 1:27:22.800
<v Speaker 1>might be missing from that interior defensive line if they

1:27:22.840 --> 1:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>are more for Henry On the other side, Lamar Jackson,

1:27:26.840 --> 1:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee is bottom five against quarterbacks, but Lamar Jackson only

1:27:31.000 --> 1:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>has two games with more than passing yards. He gets

1:27:34.880 --> 1:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>it done on the ground now. In his first five

1:27:38.479 --> 1:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>games he only had forty two rushes. He's got forty

1:27:41.040 --> 1:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>in his last three a round alone. He's he's starting

1:27:43.760 --> 1:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up that rushing again. I'm still giving him

1:27:46.439 --> 1:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>an A grade. It's a bottom five pass defense, so

1:27:48.800 --> 1:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>he might be a little more prolific there and he's

1:27:51.320 --> 1:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>getting the rushing at least recently. Willie Sneed and uh

1:27:56.320 --> 1:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and Marquis Brown, this is a matchup call. The Titans

1:27:59.360 --> 1:28:02.599
<v Speaker 1>are bottom five against wide receivers. They've allowed nineteen different

1:28:02.640 --> 1:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers to top fifty yards. That's sea level production.

1:28:06.040 --> 1:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And the Titans are the worst team in the league

1:28:07.840 --> 1:28:10.400
<v Speaker 1>against slot receivers, which is good for Sneed. So I

1:28:10.439 --> 1:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have SEA grades on both of them. Mark Andrews gets

1:28:13.200 --> 1:28:15.599
<v Speaker 1>an A grade, obviously a grade for me. Boil out

1:28:15.640 --> 1:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for the season. And you are not touching those running

1:28:17.840 --> 1:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>backs with that split. No, Unfortunately, you can't use any

1:28:21.160 --> 1:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of those running backs right now. We um when Ingram

1:28:24.360 --> 1:28:25.839
<v Speaker 1>was out you you know, it gave you a glimmer

1:28:25.920 --> 1:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>hope for using Gus Edwards and j K both you know,

1:28:29.560 --> 1:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>but immediately Ingram comes back. Last week they split it

1:28:32.400 --> 1:28:35.120
<v Speaker 1>up three ways and now they're all unusual. I can

1:28:35.240 --> 1:28:38.679
<v Speaker 1>only hope next year we've got a little more clarity

1:28:38.720 --> 1:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, one less guy in that backfield for us

1:28:41.240 --> 1:28:43.479
<v Speaker 1>to worry about exactly. If you miss any part of

1:28:43.479 --> 1:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the show, you get all my player rankings available at

1:28:45.960 --> 1:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine leagues dot com. We encourage you to go there

1:28:49.439 --> 1:28:51.599
<v Speaker 1>for that. Also, if you missed any part of the show,

1:28:51.600 --> 1:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you can also read listen to the entire thing on

1:28:53.960 --> 1:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the podcast version of Fantasy Football Weekly. Good luck in

1:28:57.320 --> 1:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>week number eleven, everybody, We'll talk to you next week,

1:28:59.800 --> 1:29:04.519
<v Speaker 1>but I Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of I

1:29:04.760 --> 1:29:07.439
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. For more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit

1:29:07.479 --> 1:29:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

1:29:10.600 --> 1:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.