WEBVTT - Biden Orders Huge Release of Oil Reserves

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Karl Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Weekend iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com. You

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>can also listen to our radio show at two pm

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>search Bloomberg clovel News. All right, we are watching the

0:00:32.159 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>energy markets. Of course, we just heard from President Biden

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>UH pushing the oil release, saying in his planned to

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>release a million barrels of oil a day from US

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>reserves as for the six for six months. It's really

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>massive and aggressive, laying a foundation for the country to

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.919
<v Speaker 1>achieve independence from foreign energy suppliers. This is our new

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>world order. As for w t I crude right now

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty much hovering near loads of the session, down about

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>uh six and a quarter percent, down almost seven bucks.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to it with our guest Julia Fanzeris

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is oil markets reporter for Bloomberg New She's with us

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>right now in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio. Julia a

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>journalist asking President Biden how quickly and how much is

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>this going to lower prices at the pump? The President

0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have a clear answer for that. Of course,

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it's market based, but based on your research, based on

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>your reporting, uh, how much is it going to affect

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>prices at the pump? Right? And it was a good question,

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's going to take at least three weeks for

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>any crude future price to reach to the pump, and

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so taking that into consideration, you have to realize that there,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned other aspects going into this. It's also

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.759
<v Speaker 1>we're going into summer driving season, and that in itself

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>is ratcheting up demand. And so even with these higher

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>crude amounts, they're still going to be high demand and

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.399
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be the real problem. So, yes, it

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 1>probably will lower gas prices for a little bit, but

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>traders and all of my sources are saying this is

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>just a short term band aid solution. It's not going

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to help in the long term. Well, the other thing

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that I had heard and this was gone back a

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of months when we're talking about higher energy prices.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this was pre war. Um is that you

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>know some states that added taxes, like you have to

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>understand that there's a lot of things that ultimately go

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 1>in to what you pay at the pump exactly. And

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>this is no one likes higher prices, no one. The

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>consumers don't like it. Obviously politicians don't like it. And

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 1>so but to try to game the market and to

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>try to lower prices like that, it's just not going

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to work. And we have to remember the spair is

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be used in emergencies, and so to use

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>such a large amount to try to fix these high

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.679
<v Speaker 1>gasoline prices. A lot of people have been talking to

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 1>him and saying, well, you're just going to drain the

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>spr how are you going to get all of that

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>crewed back and then when there's a real emergency that's

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge problem. Well, he called it a wartime bridge

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to up supply until production ramps up. He did say

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that they will uh sell the oil at market now

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and then use that money to then buy oil back

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>when the price you know, ostensibly goes lower. But I

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>want to go to the production part because he called

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>out companies. He was pretty harsh, Um, what was your

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>reaction to that? And what are they what could they

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be doing right now to help ease this supply crunch.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>What was funny about that is he saying, you know,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a bridge until the production ramps up. But why

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>would production ramp up in December and not right now?

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 1>If so, it doesn't really make sense that he's saying, well,

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a bridge until the later, until the winter when

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they start ramping up production. Because if companies wanted to

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>ramp up production, they were going to do it now.

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And as we mentioned previously, companies don't really want to

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>ramp up production for several reasons. One, this administration has

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>not been friendly towards oil companies, so the idea of

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 1>them ramping up production in the meantime just doesn't seem

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>like a good idea to them. They don't they don't

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>want to be stuck like two fourteen with all of

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>these extra barrels when demand then lowers down and it

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>takes a while to ramp up production. So Biden was

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>writ in the sense that it does take a while

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up production, but they would have to have

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>started months ago. So what's the likelihood if we take

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the big picture, especially if you consider the conversations and

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the aggressive ones that we've been having about a pivot

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>towards more alternative energy. Again, like you say, you know,

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I've seen you know, the rush up in the back

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>ends a few years ago with all of the frocking

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and everybody, you know, just frenetic activity. But that's an

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>area that's seeing boom and busts. So what is the

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>likelihood that companies do anything in terms of investments are

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>opening up the spigots when it comes to increasing the

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>oil supplies or how long, like how they're gonna wait,

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They're going to wait. And we've even had he even

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>sided that there was one oil company that said, even

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>at two dollars barrel, we're not going to drill more.

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>There are some companies that way, wait, slow down two barrel,

0:04:38.400 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and they still will not. So what is the break

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>even point or what is the tipping point that says okay,

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>we're in this. Well part of it is right now

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the market is fluctuating so much, the volatility so high,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>so it needs to be sustained higher prices and I

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>think that production. They're not seeing that, they're not seeing

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:56.479
<v Speaker 1>sustained higher prices, they're just seeing Okay, well, this is

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>because of the geopolitical risk premium, and so it doesn't

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>make sense for us to start upping up and it

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>takes months for it to get on the market if

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>prices are not going to stay elevated. But isn't the

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical risk premium going to be something that continues for months?

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't sustainable right exactly? See, and based on everyone

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:14.359
<v Speaker 1>we talked to, it doesn't look like if Russia were to,

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, suddenly pulled back from Ukraine. It's not like

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:23.359
<v Speaker 1>multinational energy companies would go back into that country or

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>start buying oil to the same extent that they were

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>buying it before. That is a really good point, and

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be to that extent. But right now, the

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.840
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical risk premium, it's a premium. It is not necessarily

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>pricing exactly what's happening, and so that is the big issue.

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But I completely agree, it's not like we're going to

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>go back to the before times, but there is going

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to be this easy Can you just explain something real quickly.

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:48.359
<v Speaker 1>We've only got about forty twos. I mean there's different

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>types of crewed, right, So the strategic SPR is that

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>is the oil the crew that we use at the pump, no,

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the thing it's going to. We also

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>need high refined new markets. We need refiners to be

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>able to turn that into gasoline because they're not just

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>giving out gassling. They're giving out crude and they're giving

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>out sour crewd, which is well, we're not sure yet,

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but the first time, the first SPR when it was released,

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it was sour, which producers didn't want to buy because

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not the good type crew. They wanted sweet crude.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So we need to see what type of crew they're

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna give us. You know, it's like when we were

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>making a vaccine, like we were learning about so much.

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think about how many times how long we've been

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>covering these markets, right, But it's something like a crisis

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that you really understand the intricacies of a market for

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>light sweet crewed or do you prefer sour crewed. I'm

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of a sour crude, can't you tell? All Right, Julia,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Well appreciate Julia Fanzaris. She's oil

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>markets reporter at Bloomberg News here and her Interactive broker

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>studio wt I crewed right now down about six and

0:06:40.920 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a half percent, down over seven bucks on five cents

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 1>a barrel. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey listen. We often tap the world of sports for

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>clues of leadership, business trends, investment trends, which takes us

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.719
<v Speaker 1>to this week's Bloomberg Business Week domestic cover story. It's

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>all about NBA superstar Chris Paul. The cover says it

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>all Chris Paul wants to win it all. This story

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is by Aaron Cohen and Joel Weber. Arian is a

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>writer at Bloomberg Business which she joins us down the

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>phone from Portland, Oregon. Joel Webber is editor at Bloomberg

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. He's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Joel,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with the cover though, because I

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>love this cover. This is the domestic cover story. Once again,

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it will be uh. It is available now on newsstands,

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com, Slash Business week, Um,

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>how do we get to hear so? Chris Paul is

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 1>someone that we've um watched on TV playing basketball for years.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>He has just an amazing on the court presence right

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 1>now Phoenix Suns, where he's the point guard UM our

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 1>top seed heading into the NBA playoffs. Uh. He has

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>also done something that's pretty remarkable off the court, which

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is build this little bursioning Uh it's not even a little,

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's huge, actually versioning business empire. And that was sort

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of what we were interested in it because you know,

0:08:03.280 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>increasingly we've seen athletes be able to do this where

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they can sort of create an off the court empire,

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>no longer waiting for retirement to do it. And Chris

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>is sort of the embodiment of that. And he's got

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>some pretty interesting mentors. Um. When in particular, uh, Arian,

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>what did you learn about his approach to business when

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>you got to talk to him? Yeah, Chris po is

0:08:25.320 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting guy. I really enjoyed getting to hang

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>out with him a little bit. Unlike most of the

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>retired athletes portfolios, when you kind of look at what

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>they own, usually it's like restaurants and you know, some

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 1>chain store somewhere. Um, you don't really get much of

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a sense of them and their interests. But um, with Chris,

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you really get a direct sense of what's in his refrigerator,

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what he's wearing on his wrist, what he's watching on TV,

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>from his investments on. One of the first questions he

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>asked when he's considering an investment is how does this

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>company impact my life day to day? Which is not

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the question that most of sirts are asking. Uh. And

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so he just has fingers and everything. He has a

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>large portfolio implant based foods, um, he has his own

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>media company. He has some family and child oriented uh

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>app that he owns parts of, and even like medication products.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>But he's just all over the place in it always

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>directly connected a personal atists. Well, let's go, Joel. I

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go right to this mentor here, because you

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>mentioned he's got a mentor and somebody who you got

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to speak to um our audience very familiar with him,

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger. How did this relationship come about, Joel? So,

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Chris got treated to the l A clippers and number

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of years ago, and and I think it sort of

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>coincided with a moment where he was also really interested

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in kind of taking his business game to the next level,

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and like, you do you just text the CEO, right, um,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 1>which was amazing insight about Chris. He basically learned like,

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if you text CEOs, um, nobody else is texting him.

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>They text you, right except for annoying with Hilari exactly.

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So he reached out to Bob Iger and uh, Bob Iger,

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and he sort of kicked off a relationship that was started.

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You know. Basically, Chris was like, hey, I need a mentor,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>and Bob was like, yeah, I've heard I kind of

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>heard that before. Um, and you're You're not the first

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>person who's asked this, so I don't know if it

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>was a brush off or not, but basically, uh, it's stuck.

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.959
<v Speaker 1>And Bob, who who I interviewed, has been genuinely impressed

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>with with Chris's business acumen um, and what started as

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of a mentor relationship has actually just become a

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>really close friendship and the two of them talk multiple

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>times a day. Uh. Bob watches a lot of the

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>basketball games. His sons are big fans, so it's it's

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty cool. I did ask Bob if he had

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a Chris Paul Jersey and he said not, but his

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>kids do what Yeah? Yeah, maybe would be a good

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>gift together, A mentor would be I'm sure you know,

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if Chris wins the championship this year, you know, I'm

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>sure Bob will will will you know, maybe I'll y

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>for that. I know we talked about this story earlier,

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but I still what sticks with me from this column

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is but uh Iger said about we talked about jettisoning

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>anything else discretionary from your life except for work and family,

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>because there just isn't room for anything else. When either

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, whether it's Bob or um, you know,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paul, this is going to have this kind of job. Hey, Arian,

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>let me just come back to you, because there are

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of athletes who get into investments, right successful ones.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh Lebron has been, you know, on the cover of

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Business Week as well. What is it that stood out

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>for you with Chris Paul? He is so personally involved

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>in all of this, and his family is very personally

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>involved in all of this. His brother c J. Handles

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his business ventures, and he's really hands

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 1>picking what he does, which is very different from the

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>model that other people have used, where they really sort

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of assemble a team to make good business decisions. Chris,

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean he spent ten years, you know, studying everything

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger does so that he can really understand it

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and make his own decisions and kind of build his

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>own empire. So arian a question that we talked about

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the day because we do feature in part

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 1>of our editor's roundtable in our Bloomberg Business Week weekend show,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>which will be available starting on Saturday morning. Um, I

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk a little bit about the actual investments

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.199
<v Speaker 1>that he's made because it's it's a really interesting group.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned some of the plant based companies beyond meat,

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>he was an investor in that, uh In, then the

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>media company. But what is the common thread that runs

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>through these companies? Yeah, you know, on the court, he

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 1>has this amazing vision where he can see up close

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>a play or a player and at the same time

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of zoom wide and see the whole court. And

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>he does the same thing in his investing. He really

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 1>invests end to end. So for example, in his plant

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 1>based food portfolio, he's got a farm investment called Bowery Farms.

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>He has a seaweed protein investment called Omarrow Foods, right

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning of the supply chain. Then you'll find

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>him in supermarkets he's heavily invested in Beyond Meat and Coya,

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a protein during company. And then you see

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>him at the end at the kind of delivery side

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of things, where he's invested in Roots Food Group, which

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they do at prepared meals, and another one called Go Cups,

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>which is grocery delivery. Because his his angle um and

0:13:16.160 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 1>his way of sort of encompassing the whole chain um

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is really quite a strong and notable strategy. Well, it's

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a great story. It's the domestic cover story of this

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.599
<v Speaker 1>week's edition at Bloomberg Business Week magazine, available now on

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>news stands, on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Slash business Week. A big thank you to Joe Webber,

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>editor at Bloomberg Business Week, and Aaron Cohen, writer for

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, who joined us on the phone from Portland, Oregon.

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Yes, President Joe Biden,

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>he had his second booster shot that was yesterday. He

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.839
<v Speaker 1>said it didn't hurt you know, every time I got one,

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, have you done it yet? Because I look

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>away because I'm a chicken. So then they're like, everyone

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>knows to look away when you're getting a shot. Are awful?

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>All right? Well, we do know the C A C

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>d C has recommended a fourth fiser and Madernak COVID

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>vaccine for those fifty and older. And we've also seen

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some data about rises in COVID cas, especially among a

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>younger population, particularly here in New York, even concentrated in Manhattan.

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Dr Chris Byra is director of the Center for Public

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Health and Human Rights at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>of Public Health. The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public

0:14:26.280 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Health is supported by Michael or Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>GELPI and Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dr Biro, it's good to chat

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>with you again. You know, it's so interesting because a

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of what I see on social media right now

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the pandemic is people, uh, my

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>friends uh and acquaintances testing positive once again. And it

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of feels like, you know, at least from a

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>numbers perspective, we're kind of at that pre amicron place

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are that we were at, you know, back in December,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering how we avoid another omicron surge in

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>just a few weeks. We've been in a lull um

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and of course we had that severe o macron surge

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>which then rapidly declined. That's what happens, and we've seen

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that many countries with a macron. But what's circulating now

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 1>is the sub variant, the B a two sub variant

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of a macron, which, like the parent a macron, is

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a very infectious virus. It does seem to bypass immunity.

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>There are more breakthrough infections with people who have been vaccinated. Uh,

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And of course the numbers are starting to creep up

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit. So we are worried about that. New York

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>has been in the vanguard of a number of surges

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in the past. That's one way to describe it, the

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>vanguard exactly. Story. But it's an international travel hub, of course,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's connected to Europe. So we keep calling it

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a global pandemic that we're in because we're not out

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. We're not on the other side of it.

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's why, like if we ever say, oh, the

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the you know, we're on the other side

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. Everybody's like, where do you live? Because we're

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>still in it. How do you see the rest of

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the year playing at Is there a point where we

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>look back at you know, by the end of the

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>year that we're saying, okay, it's endemic. You know, we're

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have some kind of universal vaccine. Okay, help

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>me here. Yeah, well there are there are some encouraging

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>things to say. And first of all, to say that

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>for people who are boosted, and of course it's good

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>news about the approval of the second boost or the

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>fourth dose for people over age fifty um amicron itself

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>had quite low rates of hospitalization and serious disease, and

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the same with the b A two um uh.

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It is really a problem. And for example, in Hong Kong,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>where we're seeing high death rates where you have elderly

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>unvaccinated people, they were very slow to get the elderly

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>population fully vaccinated there. Well, we're not expecting to see

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>as much of that um same situation. However, boosting has

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>been slow. People have not ramped up getting even that

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>first booster dose, so we're only at about under a

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>third of eligible adults being boosted. So the message, I

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>think really is get boosted now. We need to blunt

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>what is what is to come. The other reality is

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>that what we've seen in a number of populations is

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that the natural immunity to previous uh COVID nineteen infections wane,

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and the model is will tell you that the waning

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of many people in the US who are not vaccinated

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but who've had COVID is going to really be around June.

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>So the time to get boosted is now, before June

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and before what looks like the potential for another surge

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>probably of infections much less hospitalization. Dr help our our

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>listeners out. I got a text message from my mother

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in law yesterday asking if she should get boosted. She's

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.800
<v Speaker 1>over sixty five. Uh And I actually got the same

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>asked then asked my parents if they were doing it.

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>They're over sixty five. My mom text me back, she says,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Dad wants to I'm on the fence about it. What's

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the guidance doesn't seem to totally clear here. It was

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>very clear with the first booster, but with the second

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>booster is not totally clear. Well. Uh so the CDC

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>guidance um is that it's it's really and and this,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is based on the data from Israel.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Most of this decision has been driven by reports from

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Israel about how fourth boosters were reducing hospitalizations and serious

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>disease in older people and people with chronic conditions. So

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>really the window is five to six months. If you

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 1>are more than five months out from dose three, UH,

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it is time to consider a booster. H. If you

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>are fifty and older, and particularly if you have any

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of the chronic or underlying conditions that are associated with

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>poor outcomes from COVID, that time is now um and UH.

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.199
<v Speaker 1>And it's particularly important of course for people who have

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>somebody I you know, compromised in the home, also people

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.160
<v Speaker 1>living with kids under five, because as we know, they're

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>not eligible yet. Well, listen, we really appreciate your thoughts

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>on all of this, because this is certainly top of

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>mind amid everything else that's going on in the world.

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to stay on top of this, certainly for

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>our listeners and viewers. Dr Chris Buyer. He is director

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>of the Center for Public Health and Human Rights at

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Of course, supported

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.400
<v Speaker 1>by Michael R. Bloomberg, founder of Bloomberg LP and Bloomberg Philanthropies.

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>He joined us on the phone from Baltimore. One thing

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's five months out, he said, for the booster, after

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the after the third shot, and I think you know

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it all comes it's it's all happening at a time

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>when we're seeing, you know, increasing numbers of people not

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 1>wearing masks indoors, and in fact New York City telling

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.239
<v Speaker 1>young people to wear masks indoors despite the fact that

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the levels here are still remained long we've been masks off,

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've had colleagues given coming to me like I think,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>can I throw my mask back on? And I've been

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of wearing masks all right. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Business Week right here on Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So among our most read

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>stories on the Bloomberg throughout the day has been on

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Amazon renewing it's co branded credit card deal with JPMorgan

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and Visa. Tim bottom line, it is about bottom line.

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.479
<v Speaker 1>It's a big business for the big banks that compete

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for this. It is, well, Jenny, I want to get

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>your opinion because you a lot of times when you

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>write stories, they are among the most read on the terminal.

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh sorry, yeah, I'm so sorry. She's like in our

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.439
<v Speaker 1>studio and we've been talking to hers, so I just

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>like think everybody's with us. Jenny Seraine, finance reporter for

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. She's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Jenny,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>forgive me when you do when when you do a

0:20:37.560 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of your stories do end up at the top

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the most read and it's one of the reasons

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we love to have you come on the program. But

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 1>is it the fact that this is a big part

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of the company's business or is it a part that

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, our our our customers love to read about

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>credit cards. I think it's a little bit of both.

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the most popular credit cards in

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the country in general, so lots of users of the

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.199
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Chase card. Um, but I don't realized it was

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the most popular. Are you kidding? Yeah? Five

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>cash back on all Amazon purchases, right, really? Okay, Jenny's nodding, Okay,

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>bigger ones, Yeah, and then I think it's also the

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, last year there were a lot

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of headlines that Amazon was looking to possibly move this

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>away from Chase, away from Visa. So for a lot

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of the investors in those companies or employees in those companies,

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably welcome news that Amazon decided to stick with

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>its long, long time partners. How much this bank make

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>How like do banks make off of this? I mean

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>every transaction they get a little snippet right every Yes,

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's definitely true. I think with this it's like, um,

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a really good way to get lots of customers who

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>feel very loyal to these cards because they're usually very

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>loyal to the retailers that are attached to them. So

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>what about for the banks? Yeah, so I think it

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>swings both ways. So the banks they usually do a

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue sharing agreement. Um, they also do a lot sharing agreement.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>UM so you know, hopefully consumers can pick up with

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>their bills. But um, but yeah, so these are very

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:00.479
<v Speaker 1>lucrative portfolios for both the banks and the the merchants

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that they partner with on these. And so that's why

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you see there's so much interest in both Amazon's the Deltas,

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the Americans, the Uniteds of the world. UM, these big,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 1>big card portfolios, they're they're very lucrative. But there was

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>some drama in the past few months about this, and

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that's why I think it's also a surprise to many

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 1>people because Amazon in Singapore and Australia last year started

0:22:20.560 --> 0:22:23.399
<v Speaker 1>posing small search charges on Visa transactions you right, and

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>at one point announced its intention to ban UK issued

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Visa credit cards. So it's said it was Amazon was

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not happy about its relationship with Visa at a certain

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>point and is now renewing it. Yes, so they did

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>get into a little spat um for most of last

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>for the last few months of last year and starting

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>off this year. UM, they have reached a global agreement

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and so I think a lot of folks assumed that

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the credit card would be part of that. But today

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>really put that to rest and kind of confirmed that. No,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they seemed to be on good footing again and they've

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>renewed and they're gonna be partners for many, many years

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to come. UM. So I think it definitely was welcome

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>news for Visa investors and UM and kind of put

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that that we're eat to rest for a lot of folks. Yeah,

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>it is interesting, Like, I mean, is there something to

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Amazon staying with the same banks in terms of I

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't know does it matter if they

0:23:10.600 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>move it around to customers really care or what? Oh?

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean for sure we've seen I think the last

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>really big portfolio move we saw was when Costco moved

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>from m X to City Group, and um, there was

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 1>a big spat. I remember that there was. It was

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a very big sat Yes, And sometimes these get really

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>um yeah, really angry, and customers like what they like

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>and they're very used. They don't like change. And so

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I think whenever a retailer is thinking about this, that's

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in the back of their minds, Like if I move

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>from Chase and suddenly have to reissue a whole portfolio

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>of cards, am I gonna lose customers? Am I gonna

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>upset people? So I think that's always um in the

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.280
<v Speaker 1>favor of the existing partner. Um, you know, you always

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 1>have that in your corner. But um, this is at

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, is all about deals and economics,

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>and so that that's always a huge part of these negotiations.

0:23:54.800 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>One part I think that's really notable about this card

0:23:57.280 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>is that it's really simple in terms of benefits. You

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>know a lot of the cards that you write about

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are the really high end cards, the Chase Sapphire Preferred

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>in reserves and the amex platinums, and you know you

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>really have to kind of study the benefits. They're like,

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>activate them online and this quarter, it's this, this quarter,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it's that. It's it kind of is ever changing. Amazon

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Amazons is just simple. Yeah, I mean, if you're a

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>big Amazon spender, this is the best card to have,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>is I think what they want, and so that's why

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they they design it that way. They want their big

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>spenders to feel rewarded and feel loyal and and that's

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>what these cards do. Do people mostly use it for

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Amazon purchases or whole foods or do they also use

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 1>it for everything? Do you see diapers the Amazon more

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so than whole foods, but with online delivery for whole

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>foods as well. Yeah, and this card so Amazon has

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot of credit cards, so this is just

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>one of many that they offer, and this one is

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 1>designed to also be rewarding on purchases outside of the

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon ecosphere, So they also give you extra points on

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>restaurants and um, I think there was grocery stores and

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>there's so I think it's meant to be for more

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>than just Amazon. UM. They have other cards that are

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>really specifically for Amazon UM. But it's definitely lucrative for Amazon.

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Five points per dollar spent on purchases at the Amazon

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>side our whole foods market stores. That's a lot. We're

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>spending a lot on Amazon, like we are. All right,

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Jenny Seraine, thank you so much for coming in and

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>telling us more about this story. Jenny is financial reporter

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg News. Check her out at Jenny Seraine on Twitter.

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm yeah, but you let me drive. No, no, no no home, honey, please,

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll do the bride gravels. I want to drive. Good question.

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the Globe on Bloomberg Radio.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, just got about ten minutes left in today's

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>trading session, folks. We are at our loads of the day.

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing some selling into the closest. We get ready

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up that first quarter. Tim, I'm eager to

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>hear what our next guest has to think about this

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>quarter and the remainder of the year. Jimmy Lee is

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>founder and a chief executive officer of the Wealth consulting Group.

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from Las Vegas. Jimmy,

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>how are you great? Thanks for having me on again. Yeah,

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's good to have you back with us. And I'm

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:20.479
<v Speaker 1>looking over the notes that you sent our producer Paul Brennan,

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's really interesting to me to find that

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you actually think, uh, you're sticking to your outlook that

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you had prior to the war in Ukraine and not

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>making any changes to it as a result of that

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>when we're seeing so many changes when it comes to

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>commodities and commodities having it their best quarter in years

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and that leading to a spike in inflation. So why

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is that? Well, the ward certainly has changed my thinking

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>on the climbing and how often and how severe that said,

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 1>my rate raise rate, But it's still I believe that

0:26:55.320 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>there's uh potential optimism for inflation not being it is

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>ugly towards the end of the year, even with the war.

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Now what Kuryan sorts of is and how this war

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>concludes and what the effects of it will be in

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the long run, but in the short term, certainly, all

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>prices if you need to get you know, volatile and

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>UH with the news of the losing cstrate reserves. That's

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>helping a little bit. But until the war is over,

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that the volatility and oil and gas

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is uh going to be over. So I think that's

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>one commodity that's going to continue to see a lot

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of volatility, and also other commodities um potentially will continue

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to maybe go up in price until we get the

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>supply situation and inflation better. But I think that's going

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to be something down the road that we can go

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>forward to. Do you think about when you're having conversations

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about kind of longer term where equities go globally, is

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of a point in time where there are

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>some really dynamic, make longer term trends create being created.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's with energy and whether it's that shift to

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.520
<v Speaker 1>all energy, you know, whether it's global supply chains, maybe

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>there's more domestic production being done. I mean, I just wonder,

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>will we look back at some point at this time

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, Wow, there are a lot of major shifts

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that were going on globally economically market wise that ultimately

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:28.199
<v Speaker 1>will be reflected in global share prices. I absolutely believe

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that to be true. And I think that you know,

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 1>not just from the war in Ukraine, but also from

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic and as as many consumers and people realize

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the pharmaceutic the drug that we

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 1>produced company to produce UM depend on ingredients or nations

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that you can't necessarily always count on UM. I think,

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of different commodities in different ways

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've made products that we consume here in the

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>United States. I think, uh, you know, industry reason will change.

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And the automobile industry, for example, that's been reliant on

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>semi conductors and chips and all those different types of

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>model that they rely on too, you know, produce a

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>vehicle they can take off a lot UM. I think

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those UM industries are going to change

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in the supplight on how they look at the supply

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>chain and as tumors, we may end up with higher

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>prices at the end of the days over that, but

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I do believe that you're going to see a trend

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think that's going to stop. Actually, well,

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>higher prices for how long. Jimmy, Well, you know, globalism

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>has had a lot of advantages and over the years,

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I thinks really that the US has been a benefactor

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of that. The consumer has been a benefactor of that.

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's a negative to that, as we're

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:49.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing now when we have destructions um in the global

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>contunlector's had over the last but two years with the

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and now it's war in Russia. But I'm sorry

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine and Russia and what's going on duo plitically

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and the ramifications of that on a global basis for economics,

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 1>for the world of economics. Right, So I think, um,

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a longer term spend. So I

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're gonna see if anything immediate because as

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, UH factories and manufactually take years to be evolved,

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and so I think it's going to be something that's

0:30:18.920 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>more a longer term trend um. In the short term,

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna be continued. We're going to continue

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to see what we have in the past, and I'm

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>just helping that the supply situation gets better. Prior to

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the UH invasion into your train, the shipping prices that

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we track we're coming down substantially, the commodities we're coming down,

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and so there were some some optimism there and I

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>still think that the equities was a great place to be,

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd be very cautious as a bond investor. Bond investors

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have been very um you know, in been pits this

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>year so far more than they they thought that they

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>could get hit in from the bottle of their own

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>but from equities. From an equity standpoint, really have to

0:30:59.040 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>focus when you get kind the war on the FED

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and in past hiking cycles since like thank me do,

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in every cycle, stocks were get investment to own, and

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>actually growth performed values even though we're overlated, and some

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of the econmy opening value sectors right, Broth performed very well.

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think that actually investors we'll get back into

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the growth names, but maybe not the names that they

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>rallied into during the pandemic that that movie saw high

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>evaluations and and really investors have devastated some of those stocks. Hey,

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to let our audience know that we're

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>seeing some selling into the clothes here. So we've definitely

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>picked up some downward momentum here. We're now at our

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:39.240
<v Speaker 1>lows on the S and P, the Dow, and the

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Nazic down about one on all of those major averages. Actually,

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the NASAIC down about one in a quarter percent. But nonetheless,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>whether that has to do with some end of the

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>quarter adjusting perhaps, but we are definitely seeing um some selling.

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey Jimmy, UM just got about forty seconds left here.

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you had to put new money to work,

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>would Big Tech Mega Tech, which has had quite a

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>bounce back, would that be on your buying list? It is,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, very selectively. So I think this year is

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>an year where we're active investors for foil managers can shine,

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I think just going into exactly is not

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>good enough, and selectively buying companies that have good earnings

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and quality growth is where the money is going to

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>be going towards. And I'll say that I think with

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:29.040
<v Speaker 1>now the kind of Hockey sentiments that you've heard from

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Sherman Powell, he's given himself some room on both sides

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>either to when when maybe the does freeze rates you know,

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>if they do fifty most likely, and then but also

0:32:39.080 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>then the back off later on, depending on what the

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 1>economic gut is. So I would be a buyer on these.

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I know it's kind of cliche and saying this for

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a long time, but take advantage of it. Yes, all right,

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>good to leave it there. Hey Jimmy, thank you so much.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Lee. He's founder in chief executive officer at the

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Wealth Consulting Group. Joining us. They've got about four point

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>four billion of client assets. Joining us on the phone

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 1>from Las Vegas. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com.

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>And you can also listen to our radio show at

0:33:08.040 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube.

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Search to Bloomberg Global News