Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Some new documents drop today.
Speaker 1: That's right. We've got a three zero two which is
Speaker 1: the record that the FBI compiled of that important interview
Speaker 1: with General Flynn. But it leaves more questions than it answers.
Speaker 1: We'll get into that. And also a tragedy at the
Speaker 1: border that the Democrats are exploiting right away. What does
Speaker 1: that mean for our policy and also for the possible shutdown?
Speaker 1: That is more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the mission or
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake America, You're a great American Again The
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show begins. No, Welcome to the Buck Sex
Speaker 1: and Show everybody. We're in the midst of a freestyle Friday.
Speaker 1: We're getting it started here. So you know, just late
Speaker 1: yesterday we had General General Flynn's case getting a possible
Speaker 1: boost of truth, finding out more information that would be
Speaker 1: I think quite necessary here to find out what's what's
Speaker 1: really going on. I mean, all along we've been having
Speaker 1: we've had people tell us, oh, you know, just don't
Speaker 1: lie to the FBI, Just don't lie to the FBI.
Speaker 1: This whole thing doesn't pass the smell test. The only
Speaker 1: reason that anyone over to anyone went over to interview
Speaker 1: Flynn was because of a league of classified information the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. The only reason that General Flynn, in my view,
Speaker 1: didn't fight these charges is because they were also going
Speaker 1: to stack another very kind of mickey mouse process. He
Speaker 1: crime on top of this of a a violation a
Speaker 1: Foreign Agent Registration Act, and they were going to go
Speaker 1: after his son too. And as a result of all
Speaker 1: the pressure they brought to bear, Flynn's had to say, fine,
Speaker 1: I lied, I lied. Why can't we know what was
Speaker 1: said in that room? Why can't we get full access
Speaker 1: to the FBI three O two? And also, why is
Speaker 1: it that we are supposed to treat the FBI's version
Speaker 1: of events as written out by some of these agents,
Speaker 1: including Peter Struck, who was the one who recorded the
Speaker 1: three O two and absolutely hated Trump. Why do we
Speaker 1: just take that as the be all and end all?
Speaker 1: I mean the I I. You could say that Buck,
Speaker 1: that's the only record we have. But are we supposed
Speaker 1: to be okay with that? Are we supposed to think
Speaker 1: that that's enough? If there is evidence that Flynn lied
Speaker 1: in that interview. I think we get to see that. No,
Speaker 1: where is the evidence? Why can't we see this? Here's
Speaker 1: what the FBI and the dj released today. They released
Speaker 1: a three O two. Remember three O two is the
Speaker 1: written report. When I was the NYPD, we called it
Speaker 1: a DD five, right, It's sort of a written report
Speaker 1: of what's gone on, whether it's the interview or the situation,
Speaker 1: or the information you get. And the FBI three O
Speaker 1: two that they released today is of Struck talking about
Speaker 1: the interview with Flynn when he's really also talking about
Speaker 1: something else, and it's six seven months after the incident.
Speaker 1: FBI policy is that you should get the three two
Speaker 1: set up right away, and that if it's more than
Speaker 1: five days old, got a big problem on your hands
Speaker 1: six or seven months. Not only that, but the information.
Speaker 1: Remember this is only because Judge Sullivan, who is hip
Speaker 1: to the ways that the federal government plays games and
Speaker 1: understands the ways that prosecutors can stack the deck and
Speaker 1: do injustice to people, especially when there are political motivations
Speaker 1: at play. Judge Sullivan has requested for the court that
Speaker 1: they produced this information. And you know what they produced.
Speaker 1: They produced the three or two from six months after
Speaker 1: the fact, what about the one from that day or
Speaker 1: that week. You know why we know it exists because
Speaker 1: in the one that the Muller team produced today, it
Speaker 1: references the other three O two. It references that there
Speaker 1: is a pre existing report, a contemporaneous report. And oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, the document from today also says, quote
Speaker 1: Struck and Blank both and we believe we know it's
Speaker 1: another FBI agent people. His name is out there, but
Speaker 1: they don't release it for some reason. Both had the
Speaker 1: impression at the time that Flynn was not lying or
Speaker 1: did not think he was lying. Flynn Struck Struck Struck,
Speaker 1: that's what it says, as quote bright but not profoundly sophisticated.
Speaker 1: The agents left Flynn in a collegial positive way. There
Speaker 1: was no discussion to follow up. Struck and Blank returned
Speaker 1: to FBI headquarters and brief McCabe and Blank on the interview.
Speaker 1: McCabe briefed Komy Struck, and Struck was aware that someone
Speaker 1: and a long thing later argued about the FBI's decision
Speaker 1: to interview Flynn. This was controversial at the time. They
Speaker 1: think now that maybe actually Sally Yates was the one
Speaker 1: who was saying, what are you guys doing so you know,
Speaker 1: you know, who knows if that's true and what's really
Speaker 1: going on here. But all these people were saying, Oh,
Speaker 1: you shouldn't have lied, You shouldn't have a lied. Yeah,
Speaker 1: there were arguments at the time, at the top reaches
Speaker 1: of the dj and the FBI about what are you doing.
Speaker 1: This guy's the incoming National security advisor. You're setting a
Speaker 1: perjury trap for him, sank to Komy McCabe. Oh, McCabe,
Speaker 1: who lied three times under oath? That guy, that guy
Speaker 1: better get criminally prosecuted. Don't let go of that. By
Speaker 1: the way, don't forget about that. Remember McCabe, who's intimately
Speaker 1: involved in all this, intimately involved in the entrapman, the
Speaker 1: setup of Flynn. He's a known liar, he's a perjurer.
Speaker 1: He thinks he doesn't have to tell the truth. He
Speaker 1: also plays games with what information the public is allowed
Speaker 1: to know. He's the one that was getting a seventy
Speaker 1: thousand dollars conference table that was redacted. Yeah, that's right.
Speaker 1: These are the people were supposed to believe. This isn't
Speaker 1: about the FBI and the FBI. There are people in
Speaker 1: the FBI. Listen to the show FBI folks and the
Speaker 1: you know, the Miami office, the Chicago office. You know,
Speaker 1: thank you for working on those drug cases and the
Speaker 1: kidnapping cases and all the other stuff that you're doing.
Speaker 1: It's not about you. It's about five or six people
Speaker 1: at the DOJ and the FBI who were trying to
Speaker 1: run a soft coup against the president and his top people.
Speaker 1: That's what this is about. And those who try to
Speaker 1: ignore this, you know, they always talk about all the
Speaker 1: Russians that have been indicted, you know, and the people
Speaker 1: that have lied. And the tax fraud, the tax fraud.
Speaker 1: You gotta be kidding me. Think about what would happen
Speaker 1: if you had had a special counsel go after Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton and the Clinton Foundation and look into their taxes
Speaker 1: and look into pay to play, you know, you want
Speaker 1: to talk, and took the approach that Muller and his
Speaker 1: little team apartisan hacks have taken, which is just the
Speaker 1: most bare knuckle tactics imaginable. You think you couldn't make
Speaker 1: a case about Hillary. You can't make a case about
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton running a corrupt scheme via the Clinton Foundation
Speaker 1: and Bill Clinton too. Their donations are down fifty percent.
Speaker 1: I mean, are we all supposed to be idiots. These
Speaker 1: people were all giving money because they thought they were
Speaker 1: buying access to the Clintons. You don't think the Clinton's
Speaker 1: encouraged that ever. Oh no, but that's right. You know,
Speaker 1: we're supposed to believe the decision to prosecute is the
Speaker 1: decision to destroy, and who gets prosecuted and who doesn't
Speaker 1: means a whole lot more than all these people who
Speaker 1: are making this huge stink about Oh Flint, he shouldn't
Speaker 1: have lied. Yeah, he shouldn't have been put in a
Speaker 1: position where people are trying to catch him in a
Speaker 1: lie because it was the line was also irrelevant, The
Speaker 1: line didn't matter and oh, by the way, yes it
Speaker 1: was out there. And I'm gonna get into this a
Speaker 1: special counsel, very special counsel, very prickly. Today they released
Speaker 1: a rebuttal memo to the Flynn sentencing memo, and they're
Speaker 1: very upset about how Flint is not is trying to
Speaker 1: mitigate what he said and mitigate his conduct. You know,
Speaker 1: you think that if you were federal prosecutors with near
Speaker 1: unlimited resources and an ever widening scope, you're destroying people's lives,
Speaker 1: bankrupting them over minor process crimes, all under this farce
Speaker 1: that it's about Russia collusion. You think you could handle
Speaker 1: like a little bit of somebody saying, hey, maybe don't
Speaker 1: send me to prison for that long because I served
Speaker 1: my country for thirty years and this wasn't a big deal.
Speaker 1: Oh no, they don't want to hear that. They released
Speaker 1: this this COUNTERMEMO today that was very you know, very
Speaker 1: sharp in its rebuke of Flynn for trying to mitigate
Speaker 1: what he did. What did he do again? Exactly lied
Speaker 1: about a non crime. I also, here's the real, the
Speaker 1: real center of this thing too. I don't believe that
Speaker 1: he lied. People will say, buck, he's admitted to lying. Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: he's admitted to lying, because if he doesn't, they're gonna
Speaker 1: completely ruin his life. They're gonna completely destroy him. You know,
Speaker 1: look at some of these people that they've gotten in
Speaker 1: lies that we weren't committing crimes. Look at Scooter Libby,
Speaker 1: also a special counsel, right, Look at him. He didn't
Speaker 1: do anything wrong. He was a he was a deputy
Speaker 1: or a national security advisor to the vice president and
Speaker 1: a seasoned lawyer and DC insider. You think that he
Speaker 1: just you know, he just lied. No, they just they
Speaker 1: construed a version of events where they could make the
Speaker 1: case that he lied about a non crime, and so
Speaker 1: they did. Does General Flynn know that line the FBI
Speaker 1: as a crime? Yeah? But where's the line? Man? If
Speaker 1: you work in the FBI and the FBI director wants
Speaker 1: to send somebody out for a beer with you and
Speaker 1: and asks you, you know, hey, did you you know,
Speaker 1: did you file a little extra overtime last week? And
Speaker 1: then goes, yeah, you know, I kind of you know,
Speaker 1: playing a little bit around the edges. Or let's say
Speaker 1: you say you didn't do that and it turns out
Speaker 1: you did. Can you get five years in federal prison
Speaker 1: for that? Live for a out of your colleague about
Speaker 1: something that no one cares about under Muller rules, Yeah
Speaker 1: you can. Don't. Don't sign me up for the for
Speaker 1: the FBI, man, That's for sure. It sounds rough over
Speaker 1: there these days. Judge Sullivan ordered the USG defile not
Speaker 1: just by the way, this is from my friend Benjamin Weengarten.
Speaker 1: The McCay memo on setting up the interview General Flint
Speaker 1: or structs three or two a month later, but any
Speaker 1: three O twos or memorand it relevant to the circumstances.
Speaker 1: The struck three O two that came out today does
Speaker 1: reference the original three O two with General Flynn. Why
Speaker 1: haven't we seen that one? We're supposed to believe that's
Speaker 1: a coincidence. Huh, the one document that's the very heart
Speaker 1: of this. Here's why if there is any indication and
Speaker 1: that three O two. And I don't think that the FBI.
Speaker 1: I don't think they're above scrubbing it. I don't think
Speaker 1: that they're above the people involved here. They'll destroy evidence
Speaker 1: because who will ever know, they'll come up some bureaucratic
Speaker 1: justification for while they destroyed it, just like they they
Speaker 1: wiped page and structs, instruments, They wiped their they wiped
Speaker 1: their personal not PD is what he calls smartphones. They
Speaker 1: did that. You know, we didn't get to find out
Speaker 1: what was really on there. Oh, they just had somebody
Speaker 1: to look it over. Yeah, we don't need to see more.
Speaker 1: How much communally trust these people. The Inspector General report
Speaker 1: came out with a conclusion that there was no bias,
Speaker 1: remember this, no bias in the you know, with with
Speaker 1: the Hillary situation and struck in page and the Trump
Speaker 1: and oh that's right there, was nothing but bias in
Speaker 1: the report. But they came out with a conclusion that
Speaker 1: there wasn't bias the judgment, the discretion, and that's where
Speaker 1: they cheat us. That's where the bad things happen. But
Speaker 1: now maybe even also on the facts, because I want
Speaker 1: to see what was said in the sturge it think
Speaker 1: this one through. It doesn't make any sense. Flynn knew
Speaker 1: that they had his phone call bugged, he would know
Speaker 1: that they have a transcript of it, and him lying
Speaker 1: about it to other people. You know, first of all,
Speaker 1: we're assuming that he lied. Maybe he just didn't remember
Speaker 1: what he said to the guy. How many phone calls
Speaker 1: is Flint taking at any given time. That's a possibility.
Speaker 1: They're saying, oh, he lied to this person, lie to
Speaker 1: that person, lie to this person. Okay, well maybe he
Speaker 1: actually thought that's what he said. It happens. People misremember things.
Speaker 1: I don't remember what I said to my you know,
Speaker 1: I don't remember where I said to Molly last night
Speaker 1: on the phone. Doesn't make me a liar. Then there's
Speaker 1: the other possibility here, which is that Flint didn't lie
Speaker 1: at all in terms of, you know, to the FBI.
Speaker 1: But the decision was made the decision was made after
Speaker 1: Comy was fired, because that's when the whole three O
Speaker 1: two they've shown came out, the second three O two,
Speaker 1: if you will, After COMI was fired, and once this
Speaker 1: whole Special Council situation was going, maybe the decision was
Speaker 1: made that, you know, they need they need to make
Speaker 1: an example out of this guy, and they think that
Speaker 1: they can flip him. He's got to be at the
Speaker 1: center of all this Russia stuff because he was talking
Speaker 1: the Russian ambassador, right, he's got to know things. And
Speaker 1: they sat him down, they said, you know, our agent.
Speaker 1: You know our agent says you lied. That's by the way,
Speaker 1: that's all we have. All we have is the word
Speaker 1: of this of these FBI agents, one of whom is
Speaker 1: Peter Struck, we don't believe and I mean I could
Speaker 1: be wrong, but we don't believe if there's any tape
Speaker 1: recording of this meeting. So at best, what you really
Speaker 1: have here at the heart of all of this is
Speaker 1: Peter Struck, who is a clown, a partisan hack, and
Speaker 1: some other FBI guy that we don't really get to
Speaker 1: hear from yet, who, according to other people in the
Speaker 1: FBI many many months later, feel that General Flynn lied
Speaker 1: to them. M that's enough, we believe that. I want
Speaker 1: to see some evidence. I want to see what was
Speaker 1: written in that initial port about that conversation, because remember
Speaker 1: that Flynn was the first domino to fall one state.
Speaker 1: Once they brought the charges against Flynn, then that became
Speaker 1: the justification for ever widening scope on this thing. And
Speaker 1: you know, Flynn lied, he perjured himself. He's pleaded guilty.
Speaker 1: Maybe they just said to him, look, we can do
Speaker 1: this the hardware of the easy way. You want your
Speaker 1: son to stay out of our crosshairs. You want to
Speaker 1: have any money left in the bank, you plead guilty.
Speaker 1: We'll make sure you don't spend a minute in jail.
Speaker 1: You fight this thing will ruin you forever. You talk
Speaker 1: about this thing publicly, you say you didn't lie, We'll
Speaker 1: ruin you forever. Do any of you think that Muller
Speaker 1: and the special counsel you think they're above that. I
Speaker 1: do not. I definitely don't think that Weisman's above it.
Speaker 1: We got more coming up your team. Stay with me.
Speaker 1: Sorry to spoil the surprise, but if you're getting gift
Speaker 1: from me this Christmas, you're getting coffee from my favorite
Speaker 1: coffee company Black Rifle Coffee. Every morning when I go
Speaker 1: into the hill, I have a steamy, hot, delicious cup
Speaker 1: of Black Rifle, just black. And that's also how I
Speaker 1: drink it. And the name of the coffee. By the way,
Speaker 1: it is delicious, Okay. The aromas, the different taste profiles
Speaker 1: that come through are incredible. Oh and by the way,
Speaker 1: this is a company run by and four veterans, including
Speaker 1: veterans of the United States Special Forces. These guys are amazing.
Speaker 1: Black Rifles Coffee Club makes things so easy. Just pick
Speaker 1: your blending amount you want and they'll ship the coffee
Speaker 1: right to your door. Check this out for yourself. They
Speaker 1: offer three, six and twelve month prepaid and pay as
Speaker 1: you go subscriptions. The best tasting, most energizing coffee imaginable,
Speaker 1: and they help veteran first responder causes. Black Rifle Coffee
Speaker 1: is the gift that keeps on giving. Visit Black Riflecoffee
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck for fifteen percent off your order.
Speaker 1: That's Black Riflecoffee dot Com slash buck for fifteen percent off.
Speaker 1: They were so focused on getting President getting President Trump
Speaker 1: that they were willing to set up a lieutenant general,
Speaker 1: a guy who served our country, as you said, thirty
Speaker 1: three years. So that's the most that's the most egregious
Speaker 1: part of this, what they did to General Flynn. The
Speaker 1: other thing I think it's important to understand is Mike
Speaker 1: Flynn ran the Defense Intelligence Agency. He had to know
Speaker 1: his conversations with kisleyak were being listened to, were being monitored,
Speaker 1: So he had to know that there's no reason for
Speaker 1: him to come in there and say something that wasn't true.
Speaker 1: He just got caught because he didn't know they were
Speaker 1: setting him up like they did. And so Judge Salivan,
Speaker 1: demanding these documents is exactly what needs to happen. Jim
Speaker 1: Jordan's right, it makes no sense. I mean the people
Speaker 1: that you know, what we keep getting told by the
Speaker 1: anti Trump special counsel loving zealots is well, there's so
Speaker 1: many lies. There's so many lies that there must be
Speaker 1: something more to this. Right where there's smoke, there's fire, essentially,
Speaker 1: is the explanation they give of all this. Well, someone
Speaker 1: tell me how that's supposed to make sense in the
Speaker 1: context of Flynn. He's gonna lie something knowing that. You know,
Speaker 1: if you sat down with the FBI they said, hey,
Speaker 1: we have your bank statement right here in our hand.
Speaker 1: What did your last bank statement say? Are you gonna
Speaker 1: lie to them just because you feel like maybe putting
Speaker 1: yourself in criminal jeopardy? There's no purpose for the lie.
Speaker 1: Why would Flynn lie for no purpose? What is more
Speaker 1: likely use Akam's razor here, that Flynn just decided to
Speaker 1: lie for no reason. Or two options that he was
Speaker 1: speaking off the cuff to people he thought were colleagues
Speaker 1: and he either misremember, he misremembered what he said, maybe
Speaker 1: they misconstrued what he said. Or the other option is
Speaker 1: they knew that they had Flynn in this thing where
Speaker 1: he had lied publicly about it, they say, and you know,
Speaker 1: he had lied publicly about it, and they they figured
Speaker 1: that they could make this stick, and they say that
Speaker 1: he lied to our FBI guys. And then they sat
Speaker 1: Flynn down behind closed doors and said, look, you either
Speaker 1: plead guilty here or we're gonna we're gonna completely destroy
Speaker 1: your reputation in your life and send your son to
Speaker 1: prison two for you know, whatever it is with his
Speaker 1: business stealings or something else that they're going to go
Speaker 1: after important. I have friends who are federal prosecutors, a
Speaker 1: federal prosecutor that decides he or she wants to get
Speaker 1: someone a is the most dangerous thing in this country
Speaker 1: to an individual's liberty. Number one, It's worse than you know,
Speaker 1: somebody who's gone rogue in law enforcement, because at least
Speaker 1: with law enforcement there's an additional layer of oversight. With prosecutors,
Speaker 1: it's whatever the prosecutor decides. Really, we got more stay
Speaker 1: with me. But I think the bigger picture here is
Speaker 1: that you are now seeing more evidence than ever that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump was associated with a criminal campaign, a criminal transition,
Speaker 1: and presides today very likely over a criminal presidency. And
Speaker 1: you've seen people in his orbit who are either under investigation,
Speaker 1: have pled guilty, or are serving prison time because of
Speaker 1: their association with one or all three of those different entities.
Speaker 1: You know, the people that are serving prison time, a
Speaker 1: lot of them are serving prison time for or will
Speaker 1: be serving prison time for things that have absolutely nothing
Speaker 1: to do with Donald Trump. But that that somehow gets
Speaker 1: lost in all of this. This is what I've been
Speaker 1: I've been warning about from the very beginning that the
Speaker 1: process is the punishment. Democrats know that, you know, think
Speaker 1: of all the think of all the lost hours of
Speaker 1: time here for people caught up in this investigation. Think
Speaker 1: of all the money they've spent trying to avoid getting
Speaker 1: jammed up in all of this, all the people whose
Speaker 1: careers have been, if not ruined, at least dramatically damaged
Speaker 1: by this, And for what, It's all based on a
Speaker 1: fantasy that that Russia, remember the reason we're really here
Speaker 1: at least this is what they said. The reason we're
Speaker 1: here is because of intervention in our election. Have we
Speaker 1: done anything to stop Russia intervening in our election and
Speaker 1: the next time? Not? Really? Can we stop Russia from
Speaker 1: interviewing the election election? Next election? Now? Not? Really? You know,
Speaker 1: do you think that there are other countries, given the
Speaker 1: unbelievable amount of attention and resources and anger that's been
Speaker 1: put into all this, do you think that other countries
Speaker 1: are more that want to mess with us, are more
Speaker 1: or less likely to do this the next time around?
Speaker 1: I think we all know the answer to that too.
Speaker 1: I mean, you create a situation where now anyone who
Speaker 1: loses a presidential election can just point to some shady
Speaker 1: Facebook ads and say, see see what happened here? You know,
Speaker 1: the the emails that were released from the DNC. I mean,
Speaker 1: we've lost sight of so much of this. The emails
Speaker 1: that were released from the DNC weren't some game changer.
Speaker 1: They were released and everyone thought Hillary had a ninety
Speaker 1: seven percent chance of still winning. The Podesta emails weren't
Speaker 1: supposed to change a thing, didn't change anything. We all,
Speaker 1: you know, I remember, we all thought Trump was gonna
Speaker 1: not some of you didn't, but I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: all the media folks, everybody, they all thought Trump is
Speaker 1: gonna lose. It was only when Hillary lost that all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, all the Russian interference, it must have
Speaker 1: been something profound me these people. This is why I
Speaker 1: keep saying they're delusional. The whole Russian thing is crazy. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Russia did some things here and there, but this is
Speaker 1: like when they say that we can tell what the
Speaker 1: global temperature average is gonna be in one hundred years,
Speaker 1: that's just absurd. They don't know what technology is gonna
Speaker 1: be like in five years. They don't know what technology
Speaker 1: is gonna be like in twelve months. Do you think
Speaker 1: they're gonna know what the temperature is in twenty ninety
Speaker 1: You know, we could have a nuclear war between now
Speaker 1: and twenty nine. Might not even be any people. I
Speaker 1: mean it's just not to frighten you, but you know,
Speaker 1: come on, this is idiocy. Hillary Clinton's campaign paid for
Speaker 1: paid for up a position research, that opposition research was
Speaker 1: used by the FB by people in the FBI, the
Speaker 1: DOJ to get a FISA warrant on carter page and
Speaker 1: George Papadopolis, this is insane. You know, you have to
Speaker 1: you have to take a step back. You have to
Speaker 1: remind yourself of what's really gone on here. These are
Speaker 1: the people that are saying they are all about the
Speaker 1: rule of law. Oh, how could he lie? There was
Speaker 1: so much abuse of power going on from people who
Speaker 1: were just deranged with fear of what a Trump president
Speaker 1: presidency would mean for their careers and for our democracy
Speaker 1: and everything else. FISA on carter Page, a full FBI
Speaker 1: and fuel investigation on George Popadopolis because of collusion measures.
Speaker 1: This is just how does anyone look at this and
Speaker 1: not understand what a big pile of bullcrap this is.
Speaker 1: Flynn is if Flynn is facing prison time now or
Speaker 1: he's probably not going to get time, but you know,
Speaker 1: he's a convicted felon. It's the whole thing. It just
Speaker 1: doesn't add up, and we're supposed to we're supposed to
Speaker 1: accept somehow that the only people that lie under these circumstances,
Speaker 1: the only people that just shoot themselves in the foot
Speaker 1: here for no apparent reason, are senior Trump associates, you know,
Speaker 1: people affiliated with Donald Trump. Has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: the way they're structuring some of these interviews where they're
Speaker 1: going after people, nothing to do with any of it.
Speaker 1: You know, people say, why would anyone lie in these cases?
Speaker 1: Why would anyone do this to themselves? And well, you know,
Speaker 1: if you are terrified and you're under pressure and you're
Speaker 1: being asked to recall things. Look, people say, there's no
Speaker 1: such thing as a perjury trap, don't know what they're
Speaker 1: talking about, or they're just not very smart. I've had
Speaker 1: to go through versions of interrogation. I've had interrogation training
Speaker 1: and also had to go through versions of an interrogation
Speaker 1: myself at different times. And let me tell you it's
Speaker 1: it's stressful. It's stressful when technically any thing you say
Speaker 1: that's untrue could be used in a criminal proceeding against you.
Speaker 1: It's stressful when your career rides on being accurate and
Speaker 1: truthful in everything you say, especially when you're talking about
Speaker 1: in the context of a background check or a background investigation,
Speaker 1: and they're asking you about some very very sensitive stuff
Speaker 1: and you're trusting the government's going to keep that all
Speaker 1: quiet and just for background purposes, you know, FBI investigation stuff.
Speaker 1: They say, oh, you know, we're just you can trust us,
Speaker 1: tell us these things. You know, the human mind keep
Speaker 1: certain things secret that should be secret. And then in
Speaker 1: some cases, when you're going to get a high level,
Speaker 1: high level clearance, you know, you got to tell them
Speaker 1: whatever it is they want to know. And your reaction is,
Speaker 1: you know, do not want to be forthcoming about that stuff.
Speaker 1: It doesn't make you a bad person. I mean, you know,
Speaker 1: we all have our secrets, we all have our lives.
Speaker 1: I mean, this idea that you could just go through
Speaker 1: endless interrogation of the FBI and they could not find
Speaker 1: something to claim that you said that was untruthful is
Speaker 1: just ludicrous. It's ludicrous. And that you have people like
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton and you know, the Clinton the whole Clinton
Speaker 1: Foundation thing. I haven't even talked to you much about
Speaker 1: the whistleblowers that have come out and said that the
Speaker 1: whole Clinton Foundation was essentially a pay to play scam
Speaker 1: and that it was. It was wasn't really a charity,
Speaker 1: that people were paying themselves outrageous salaries, that there were
Speaker 1: no real checks and balances in place. That yes, it's
Speaker 1: I'm glad that it's coming to light. But I knew
Speaker 1: all this. We've all known all this. But that's all okay,
Speaker 1: because she was part of the in club. She was
Speaker 1: supposed to be in charge, you see. She was supposed
Speaker 1: to be the one making decisions and telling you what
Speaker 1: to do with your life. Trump was not. That's his sin.
Speaker 1: That's the only sin that really matters here. And all
Speaker 1: these other people that are getting caught up in this
Speaker 1: that are being ruined by the grinding gears of the
Speaker 1: Special Counsel there either collateral damage or the Left is
Speaker 1: gleeful at their destruction because anyone associated with the Trump
Speaker 1: deserves that. This is a dark time for this country,
Speaker 1: and unfortunately, it is only going to get worse. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm hoping you all realize that this show for me
Speaker 1: for sure, I'm hoping for all of you will be
Speaker 1: an intellectual safe haven in the year to come, because
Speaker 1: this is going to get incredibly ugly. There's going to
Speaker 1: be a lot of lying, there's going to be a
Speaker 1: lot of personal destruction and character assassination going on, and
Speaker 1: anyone who stands up for Trump in any sense is
Speaker 1: going to be a target in some way. So we
Speaker 1: all better hold on to each other for the stormy
Speaker 1: ride ahead. We'll be right back something I probably wouldn't
Speaker 1: have done or maybe gotten away with in a more
Speaker 1: organized investigation, a more organized administration in the George W.
Speaker 1: Bush administration, for example, or the Obama administration. So if
Speaker 1: the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House
Speaker 1: itself to interview a senior official, you would work through
Speaker 1: the White House Council and then be discussions and approvals
Speaker 1: and who would be there. And I thought it's early enough,
Speaker 1: let's just send a couple of guys over. That's just
Speaker 1: the former FBI director saying, you know, we try to
Speaker 1: slip one under the radar, and then I have to
Speaker 1: hear from all these idiots, including a lot of lawyers.
Speaker 1: But by the way, law schools have been infiltrated by
Speaker 1: by the progressives the same way the college campuses are
Speaker 1: the legal profession, especially the loudmouths you see on TV
Speaker 1: that are in the legal profession. It's got a lot
Speaker 1: of far left wing types going on. All right, so
Speaker 1: you know that's you know, the legal profession is definitely
Speaker 1: not what it used to be in terms of a
Speaker 1: bastion of not even conservative values, just sort of equal
Speaker 1: representation of left and right. You got a lot of
Speaker 1: a lib legal eagle is running around. But they're all
Speaker 1: telling me, oh, well, you know this is that deception
Speaker 1: is a tactic use in law enforcement. Okay, yeah, but
Speaker 1: deception for what purpose? You tend to use deception to
Speaker 1: find out if someone's a drug dealer, to find out
Speaker 1: if someone's engaged in in high level corruption, if someone
Speaker 1: is you know, a murder for higher plot. You use
Speaker 1: deception to find out if the incoming National Security Advisor
Speaker 1: told the FIB about a conversation that was only known
Speaker 1: because of a very serious felony leak, an abuse of
Speaker 1: surveillance power to settle a political score given to the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. Oh, by the way, does anyone really believe
Speaker 1: that we couldn't figure out where that lead came from?
Speaker 1: Just pull the Washington Post phone Just pull it, Obama,
Speaker 1: pull the Washington Post phone records, pull all their journalist
Speaker 1: text messages from the period in question. I'm sure they
Speaker 1: can find Oh, Buck, that's terrible. That's against the first moment. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know, but it's what Obama did. That's what Obama did.
Speaker 1: And these smugs, sanctimonious little cowards the mainstream meter like, oh,
Speaker 1: we hold the Obama to account. Jake Kapper asked him
Speaker 1: like two or three hard questions during his presidency. It
Speaker 1: was really hard on Obama. They were like, you know,
Speaker 1: Erson Cooper once said, well, I don't know about whether
Speaker 1: Obama's telling the truth on that one. Oh, there were
Speaker 1: so mean to Obama. I don't think so. I don't
Speaker 1: think so. What we are seeing is the weaponization of
Speaker 1: law in order to restore the power of the elites
Speaker 1: once they feel like it has been taken from them.
Speaker 1: That's why there are so many people who are all
Speaker 1: in on this. But the way that they went after
Speaker 1: General Flynn, I mean, for anyone to say that this
Speaker 1: is normal, it's not normal. It was aberrant, it was strange,
Speaker 1: it was weird. But people are trying to make excuses
Speaker 1: for this. Look at the aggression with which they went
Speaker 1: after General Flynn on a non crime, and then look
Speaker 1: at the way that they went after Hillary. Look at
Speaker 1: the way that they went after everyone around Trump, and
Speaker 1: look at what happened to you know, really, not not
Speaker 1: a single only Trump. Only people around Trump lie, including
Speaker 1: three star generals with thirty years of service and former
Speaker 1: DII director. Those are the only people who lie. None
Speaker 1: of Hillary's people lie. Apparently Hillary can't open her mouth
Speaker 1: without lying. But she didn't lie. And all and all
Speaker 1: those hearings, well, I mean, she probably had her team
Speaker 1: of fifteen lawyers answering all of her questions for her.
Speaker 1: But you don't think the FBI could have gotten around
Speaker 1: that one. They found a way to get around it
Speaker 1: with Flynn. FBI couldn't have just said, hey, former Secretary
Speaker 1: of State, you know, we'd love to just talked a
Speaker 1: little bit about your email server. Of course they could have.
Speaker 1: It's about those decisions. It's about those differences. You see.
Speaker 1: What we have happening here is similar to the following.
Speaker 1: It's like if you have a prosecutor who you know,
Speaker 1: one person gets a you know, one person is engaged
Speaker 1: in a krupt kickback scheme who's a Democrat. Another person's
Speaker 1: engaged in a krupt kickback scheme who's a Republican. The prosecutor,
Speaker 1: for whatever reason, brings charges against the Republican, not the Democrat.
Speaker 1: And then all we get to hear about is the
Speaker 1: rule of law. A rule of law, this person wasn't
Speaker 1: this person pleaded guilty there? Well yeah, but that's because
Speaker 1: the choice was made to go after the Republican. The
Speaker 1: choice wasn't made to go after the Democrat. That's where
Speaker 1: the difference lies here. And they're supposed to be a principle,
Speaker 1: They're supposed to be something you can point to and
Speaker 1: understand and see and that makes sense, that separates those issues, right,
Speaker 1: that makes one different from the other. And it's not
Speaker 1: supposed to be the political affiliation of one of the
Speaker 1: people involved. But that's what's happening. This is really dangerous.
Speaker 1: Look at look at what happened with with Scooter Libby.
Speaker 1: The LA There was of course a special counselor in
Speaker 1: the last Republican administration, and they thought they were just
Speaker 1: so close to getting either Carl Roever Dick Cheney. They
Speaker 1: were going for Cheney. They got close, they thought on
Speaker 1: Rove and they ruined Scooter Libby. And I know the
Speaker 1: details that case very well. It was that it was bullcrap,
Speaker 1: bull crap, and the media was, oh, he's lying, he's
Speaker 1: a liar. He lies, lies, lies, It's just it's just
Speaker 1: it's supposed to be. And this is another part of
Speaker 1: this too. It's supposed to be a under one zero
Speaker 1: zero one, a material lie, meaning that it would change things.
Speaker 1: It's it's meaningful. So you can't say I wasn't I
Speaker 1: didn't commit that murder because I wasn't in Queen's Last night.
Speaker 1: That's a material lie. But you could say, you know,
Speaker 1: yeah I was in Queen's last line. I didn't commit
Speaker 1: that murder, but you know I did send that guy
Speaker 1: that email two weeks ago. It turns out it was
Speaker 1: three weeks ago. Well, that doesn't change anything meaningful necessarily, right,
Speaker 1: So that the material fact component of one zero zero
Speaker 1: one has just gotten run over rough shot by the
Speaker 1: government and now they just use it as a club
Speaker 1: to bludgeon defendants into submission all the time. And yeah,
Speaker 1: it's not just a problem with General Flint. It's not
Speaker 1: just a problem in the Mueller probe. But it doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that it isn't a problem in the Muller probe, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, you know I get this other than too,
Speaker 1: of these different attorney types left wingers, they come after me,
Speaker 1: Oh do you feel this way about a defendant when
Speaker 1: it's not Trump. Yeah, I do, Actually, I do think
Speaker 1: that the federal government has too much power in prosecutions,
Speaker 1: especially over matters that you know, a normal person wouldn't
Speaker 1: necessarily think is a criminal issue. And there's plenty of
Speaker 1: that going on. You've got all these people that are
Speaker 1: so upset over you know, they're acting like Trump was
Speaker 1: supposed to know whether or not a payoff to a
Speaker 1: porn star was illegal under campaign finance law. Meanwhile, the
Speaker 1: former federal election commissioner has written an op ed saying,
Speaker 1: and this is not illegal. So you know, if you
Speaker 1: have people that used to be the ones in charge
Speaker 1: of administering election law saying this was not illegal, you know,
Speaker 1: they don't say that about murder. No one's like, ah,
Speaker 1: you know, murder turns out it's not actually illegal. If
Speaker 1: you have people that are steeped in this issue and
Speaker 1: even they don't agree with this notion that what Trump
Speaker 1: did it so, I mean, oh, the Southern District of
Speaker 1: New York. Since when do we think that federal prosecutors
Speaker 1: are infallible and that the FBI doesn't lie and that
Speaker 1: there aren't people that have been corrupted and that aren't
Speaker 1: politicized in these processes. You know, Judge Emmett Sullivan the
Speaker 1: one that called for the release of the three O
Speaker 1: two that they did not release today, by the way,
Speaker 1: they released a different three O two. Judge Sullivan was
Speaker 1: the one who exposed what was going on with Ted Stevens, who,
Speaker 1: by the way, he lost that sentence. If Democrat headhunter
Speaker 1: federal prosecutors had not gone after Alaska Senator Ted Stevens
Speaker 1: cost him his election, then he died. Unfortunately, if they
Speaker 1: hadn't gone after him, you would not have had Obamacare.
Speaker 1: Those were the stakes that was a necessary vote, that Democrat,
Speaker 1: that seat, that flip Democrat was necessary for Obamacare's passage.
Speaker 1: I want to change history. And they knew, they knew
Speaker 1: that Stevens had exculpatory evidence didn't think what he was
Speaker 1: doing was wrong, which was was an affirmative defense that
Speaker 1: essentially meant that there was no corruption they could have
Speaker 1: proved against him. They knew it, and they went after him. Anyway,
Speaker 1: this happens, This happens. Komey's buddy Patrick Fitzgerald knew that
Speaker 1: the name was leaked by somebody that wasn't you know,
Speaker 1: you know, this Valerie play nonsense that it was leaked
Speaker 1: by Armitage. Armitage set up by accident. They knew, but
Speaker 1: they wanted to crush Scooter Libby because Bush. Don't let
Speaker 1: them lie to you, don't let them get away with this.
Speaker 1: We're gonna talk immigration. Come up here in a moment,
Speaker 1: big story on that. We'll be right back. It's about
Speaker 1: to be a new year and you want to kick
Speaker 1: it off the right way by making sure that the
Speaker 1: people that you have doing your background investigations and vetting
Speaker 1: are the best in the business. And a veteran owned
Speaker 1: company that's Global Verification Network. Global Verification Network is the
Speaker 1: only dual certified veteran owned background investigation and vetting company.
Speaker 1: No matter how big we're small your business may be,
Speaker 1: you're gonna need background checks done for all new employees.
Speaker 1: You might even have to re up background checks of
Speaker 1: those who are already in the company. Right and if
Speaker 1: you've got a property and you're gonna lease it out
Speaker 1: to somebody, you want to have a check down on
Speaker 1: that perspective tenant make sure they have no red flags
Speaker 1: in their background. Global Verification can handle all that for you.
Speaker 1: Just give them a call. Call eight seven seven six
Speaker 1: nine five one one seven nine. Tell them buck Sex
Speaker 1: then sent you, and then tell them what your needs are.
Speaker 1: They'll work with you to get a program set up
Speaker 1: for your background checks that's right for you. Call eight
Speaker 1: seven seven six nine five one one seven nine or
Speaker 1: go to my GVN dot com. The Democrats are absolute hypocrites.
Speaker 1: All along, they've been supporting walls and supporting fences and
Speaker 1: supporting all sorts of border security. Illegal immigration is wrong,
Speaker 1: plain and simple. I voted numerous times when I was
Speaker 1: a Senator to spend money to build a barrier to
Speaker 1: try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in. We simply
Speaker 1: cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.
Speaker 1: The fact is they've always supported fences and walls and partitions.
Speaker 1: But you know what, they only don't want to do
Speaker 1: it because of me. They have to put the people
Speaker 1: ahead of politics. We need to have the wall, We
Speaker 1: need border security. Whatever it takes to get border security,
Speaker 1: I will do it. I pledge that a long time ago,
Speaker 1: and I will pledge it always. We've done a really
Speaker 1: fantastic job with what we have. We can do an
Speaker 1: almost perfect job if we have the wall and proper
Speaker 1: border security, and that's what we're going to do for
Speaker 1: the American people. Thank you. You See, the separation on
Speaker 1: the issue of immigration is all about the difference between
Speaker 1: rhetoric and reality. You know. The separation between the Democrats
Speaker 1: and the Republicans is about Republicans at least trying to
Speaker 1: take steps, trying to take those initial actions to deal
Speaker 1: with the border. Where's Republicans, I mean, where Democrats just
Speaker 1: want to give lip service to it and never do anything.
Speaker 1: They have become an open borders party. I mean they
Speaker 1: are incentivized to continue the illegal immigration that happens at
Speaker 1: our border. And we have seen now another time when
Speaker 1: the entire debate and discussion and immigration is going to
Speaker 1: focus around one very emotional, very sensitive, and emotionally charged
Speaker 1: case involving a seven year old girl from Guatemala who
Speaker 1: died at the border after she was taken into border
Speaker 1: patrol custody. It goes without saying that a seven year
Speaker 1: old girl from anywhere, anywhere in the world, no matter
Speaker 1: where she is the world, no matter where she's from,
Speaker 1: that she died of dehydration and shock is terrible. We
Speaker 1: all know this. You know this, I know this. It's
Speaker 1: a tragedy for her family, and it's just a very,
Speaker 1: very sad thing. There are also seven year olds that
Speaker 1: die from air strikes in Yemen on a regular basis.
Speaker 1: There are seven year olds who have been dying in
Speaker 1: Syria for years. There are seven year olds who die
Speaker 1: for various preventable reasons in this country. I mean, there
Speaker 1: are terrible things that happen to small children all over
Speaker 1: the world, and we should do what we can to
Speaker 1: prevent that from happening at every instance that we in.
Speaker 1: But that then means we have to look at who's
Speaker 1: responsible for what, and we have to be able to
Speaker 1: have a discussion of the facts. We're not going to
Speaker 1: be yelled at and told that we're being monsters because
Speaker 1: we want to assign blame if that's what needs to
Speaker 1: be done, where it should be assigned. Here's what we
Speaker 1: know about this story that this young girl seven years
Speaker 1: old was taken into custody part of a group. She
Speaker 1: was part of a group of one hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: three people who approached US agents and turned themselves in
Speaker 1: and they then emergency responders came because eight hours later,
Speaker 1: so eight hours after she was turned in, the child
Speaker 1: was having seizures, and the emergency responders then measured her
Speaker 1: body tempershure to one hundred and five degrees almost one
Speaker 1: hundred and six, and then Customs and Border Patrol said
Speaker 1: that she had not eaten or consumed water for several days,
Speaker 1: so she was dehydrated. She hadn't had any food. She'd
Speaker 1: been put through this terrible ordeal. And immediately what I
Speaker 1: saw is the exploitation of this for a very political reason.
Speaker 1: The ACLU blamed a lack of accountability at a culture
Speaker 1: of cruelty with the Customs and Bordertrol for the girl's death.
Speaker 1: Down This girl was Medivact via helicopter to the hospital,
Speaker 1: all right, They had emergency emergency personnel to deal with
Speaker 1: her right away. The most likely situation here, and we'll
Speaker 1: find out more from this. The situation though, is that
Speaker 1: nobody knew, including her parents, that she was in jeopardy
Speaker 1: until she started having the seizures. He's only seven years old.
Speaker 1: And when as soon as it became clear that she was,
Speaker 1: she was in this situation. From what we have been told,
Speaker 1: Customs and Border Patrol did everything they could. This girl,
Speaker 1: you know, Medivact is not a US citizen. This is
Speaker 1: not a US person. She's a seven year old girl.
Speaker 1: And so we treat all seven year old girls who
Speaker 1: are in danger, all seven year old old kids as
Speaker 1: precious because they are and they you know, medivactor via
Speaker 1: helicopter and then she and she died. Now people are saying, well,
Speaker 1: the Customs and Border patrol is cruel. That's just not right.
Speaker 1: That's just not fair. Customs and Border Patrol, or you know,
Speaker 1: the folks that are down there at the border. They're
Speaker 1: trying to process these people from what we have been
Speaker 1: told that everything that they could in the circumstances. They
Speaker 1: are not a child intake facility. This is not how
Speaker 1: this is supposed to happen. The border is dangerous. People
Speaker 1: are coming across the border using coyotes. The coyotes are
Speaker 1: controlled by the cartels. The people who are getting to
Speaker 1: our border to turn themselves in are in any cases
Speaker 1: spending thousands of dollars thousands of dollars to be taken
Speaker 1: to that point in the border so they can come
Speaker 1: into the country illegally. They are doing something that is unsafe.
Speaker 1: Hundreds of people stretching back for years have died at
Speaker 1: the US southern border trying to make this crossing. Attorney
Speaker 1: General Jeff Sessions told me back in May that it's
Speaker 1: dangerous and people should not send their kids. Obama, when
Speaker 1: he was president, said it's dangerous. Don't bring your kids
Speaker 1: to the border. This is also one of the reasons
Speaker 1: why they had that child separation policy the border, because
Speaker 1: they wanted people to stop doing this. Stop using kids
Speaker 1: as the narrow end of the wedge to get you
Speaker 1: as an adult in the United States. Stop exploiting children,
Speaker 1: which is what is happening. You had over twenty five
Speaker 1: thousand individuals last month arriving in family unit formation of
Speaker 1: some kind or alleging to be a family unit. A
Speaker 1: lot of them are Some of them aren't arriving our
Speaker 1: southern border and turning themselves in claiming asylum. Most of
Speaker 1: them won't get asylum, but then we'll be told that
Speaker 1: we're mean if we want to actually send them back
Speaker 1: to their country of origin. So it's all it's all
Speaker 1: a scam with the Democrats. They're not willing to enforce
Speaker 1: the law, they're not willing to actually accept the process
Speaker 1: all the way through. They just accept the first phase.
Speaker 1: They pretend to care about the process at the first
Speaker 1: phase and then they abandoned it as soon as it's
Speaker 1: clear that these people are not going to get asylum.
Speaker 1: But I mean to blame Customs and Border Patrol, which
Speaker 1: is has a very large percentage as a federal agency
Speaker 1: of Latino and Hispanic law enforcement officers, has a has
Speaker 1: a large percentage of veterans. I mean, these are our
Speaker 1: fellow Americans, These are good people. Does anybody really think
Speaker 1: that the people that are working in CBPRE are heartless,
Speaker 1: cruel monsters that don't care about seven year olds. It's
Speaker 1: just a despicable thing to say without any evidence. That's
Speaker 1: what the media is saying because it's useful for them
Speaker 1: to make. It's useful for them. It's because, you know,
Speaker 1: Democrats will go on TV and they'll start crying and
Speaker 1: they'll act like this is the most important single case
Speaker 1: we could ever talk about it. How could you be
Speaker 1: such a cruel and in human monster. Meanwhile, if we
Speaker 1: then dur around and say, well, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: there are illegals that you know, joined MS thirteen and
Speaker 1: brutally raped and murdered a girl in Long Island and
Speaker 1: you know, chopped her up with knives. This is what
Speaker 1: happens with MS thirteen. That's not fair. You're using that
Speaker 1: one case to describe the whole issue. Right, they emotionalize
Speaker 1: these things. They don't want the emotion. They don't want
Speaker 1: cases to be emotional that don't favor open borders and
Speaker 1: the free and lawless immigration policies that they like. And
Speaker 1: then you get to the other level of this, which
Speaker 1: is where I think people get even more sensitive and
Speaker 1: more defensive. It's an unwise and reckless thing to do
Speaker 1: to put your child in a situation where they are
Speaker 1: in so much danger. And I don't understand why it's
Speaker 1: okay for the media to take the position that just
Speaker 1: customs and border patrol are a bunch of monsters and murderers,
Speaker 1: and why the ACLU and others are saying there's a
Speaker 1: culture of cruelty. And of course they're they're blaming this
Speaker 1: all in Trump too. Somehow it always goes everything that's
Speaker 1: bad goes back to Trump. But you know, these parents
Speaker 1: made these parents didn't did the child hadn't been fed
Speaker 1: in days, hadn't had any water in days. Because this
Speaker 1: is a dangerous situation. Now you might say, oh, I understand.
Speaker 1: This is where the conversation then turns to think about
Speaker 1: how desperate they much must be to be in the
Speaker 1: circumstance they're in Mexico. Over a hundred million people live
Speaker 1: in Mexico. Mexico is not a war zone. Mexico is
Speaker 1: not a place where you know, there's no hope or
Speaker 1: salvation or dignity, or you know, Mexico's are reasonably well
Speaker 1: off countries right next door to the United States, then
Speaker 1: they're not fleeing in refugee camps. On the Syrian border,
Speaker 1: where I was meeting people in large numbers who were
Speaker 1: saying I saw family members executed, and I knew if
Speaker 1: I didn't get out of there, I was going to
Speaker 1: be executed too. You know, my house was bombed, my
Speaker 1: village is gone. That's a refugee. I'm from Guatemala and
Speaker 1: I want to be in America because the economic situation
Speaker 1: is better, So I refuse to take asylum in Mexico.
Speaker 1: That's not a refugee. That's someone who's trying to get
Speaker 1: ahead of the immigration line. And you know, we either
Speaker 1: are operating the world's largest soup kitchen or we have
Speaker 1: a country that has sovereignty. It can't be both. We
Speaker 1: taken a million people a year, We have. I think
Speaker 1: either a quarter or a third of the overall migrants
Speaker 1: in the world are in America in terms of an
Speaker 1: immigrant population all in, I mean, we taken huge numbers
Speaker 1: every year, and we're just constantly berated as though the
Speaker 1: American people are not decent, We're not honest, we're not honorable,
Speaker 1: we're racist, we're bad, we're evil, and everything bad that
Speaker 1: happens to the border is our fault. Border. We have
Speaker 1: over seventy thousand Americans dying every year. What about what
Speaker 1: about those deaths? You know? What about the high school
Speaker 1: valedictorian and West Virginia who never wakes up after taking
Speaker 1: fentatal once because the cartels are flooding communities across the
Speaker 1: country with that poison. Does does his mom and do
Speaker 1: his mom and dad deserve someone to stand for them?
Speaker 1: Do they count? Do they count for something too? Are
Speaker 1: you so? Are you a monster? Because you don't want
Speaker 1: anybody to be coming to the border with their child,
Speaker 1: putting them in danger and breaking our laws, that makes
Speaker 1: you a monster? I'm sorry. I reject this. I reject
Speaker 1: the moral blackmail the left engages in on this issue,
Speaker 1: and I reject the notion that anybody who wants to
Speaker 1: take our laws and our border security seriously. Is a
Speaker 1: bad person who is unfeeling and does not care. And
Speaker 1: you know, ultimately parents are the ones who make the
Speaker 1: decisions for their kids. And if you're putting your kid
Speaker 1: in a dangerous situation, especially a young child like this,
Speaker 1: it was no say one way or the other. There
Speaker 1: is a degree of responsibility there. You know, people make choices,
Speaker 1: do not make bad choices. Don't blame it all in
Speaker 1: the government. When things go really bad, you know, it's
Speaker 1: we're gonna have to have real discussions, grown up talk
Speaker 1: about this and not just have people do a lot
Speaker 1: of virtue signaling and a lot of pointing fingers and
Speaker 1: claiming that everybody who doesn't agree with them is horrible
Speaker 1: and doesn't care about dead kids. They do this with
Speaker 1: gun control too. You'll notice this. It's always you know,
Speaker 1: you don't care about dead children. No, we do care
Speaker 1: about dead children. We just try to have policy discussions
Speaker 1: based on the facts and on merit, not on emotion
Speaker 1: and deception. They're almost all gone from my freezer, and
Speaker 1: I'm just a single dude who's ripping through those steaks
Speaker 1: and chops myself. Omaha, steaks is an amazing company with
Speaker 1: an incredible limited time offer that my listeners can get
Speaker 1: in on now. When you go to Omaha Steaks dot
Speaker 1: Com and enter promo code Buck in the search bar,
Speaker 1: you'll get seventy four percent off Omaha Steaks Family Gift
Speaker 1: Package that's originally one hundred and ninety five dollars now
Speaker 1: only forty nine ninety nine or now, and you'll get
Speaker 1: four hand cut age to tendatives, top sirloin steaks, two
Speaker 1: Savory Premium port chops, four chicken fried steaks for Omaha Steaks, burgers,
Speaker 1: four snappy Kibasa sausages, all beef meatballs, four perfectly brown potatoes,
Speaker 1: oh Grants half four made from scratch caramel apple tartlets,
Speaker 1: plus four more burgers free. It's a limited time package
Speaker 1: for only forty nine ninety nine. When you go to
Speaker 1: Omaha Steaks dot com, type Buck in the search bar
Speaker 1: and add the Family Gift Package to your card. Don't
Speaker 1: wait this offer and soon go to Omaha Steaks dot
Speaker 1: com type buc k in the search bar to send
Speaker 1: the Omaha Steaks Family Gift Package today. What we're prioritizing
Speaker 1: is the safety and public safety of our communities so
Speaker 1: first and foremost, we're looking for illegal aliens who have
Speaker 1: also committed crimes in our country or another country, and
Speaker 1: to make sure that we remove them to protect our communities.
Speaker 1: Entire department actually contributes to the mission of removing drugs
Speaker 1: from the streets. And that's in addition to one point
Speaker 1: three million pounds that CBP has interdicted out our borders.
Speaker 1: Every day, the Department of Home and Security prevents ten
Speaker 1: known or suspected terrorists from traveling to our country, and
Speaker 1: those are the ones we know about. So that's why
Speaker 1: the information sharing baselines that we've put into place, the
Speaker 1: partnerships with foreign countries and making sure that we know
Speaker 1: who is coming here and what they intend to do
Speaker 1: is just vital for our security. What do you there's
Speaker 1: very important reasons why we have to enforce the immigration
Speaker 1: laws we have. I mean, there you had Kirsten Nielsen
Speaker 1: talking about illegal immigration and what's really at stake here,
Speaker 1: and I can't help but notice but the same people
Speaker 1: who are absolutely rigid and fierce in their desire for
Speaker 1: the enforcement of the strictest federal election reporting requirements about
Speaker 1: funding as possible. You know, that's that's the downfall of
Speaker 1: our republic. If you're Steve Schmidt, the biggest crime committing
Speaker 1: history in the country might be the dumbest man on TV. Now,
Speaker 1: he might infest Steve Schmidt on MSNBC might be dumber
Speaker 1: than Anna Navarro on CNN. It is it is possible
Speaker 1: that that is the case. I did not think I'd
Speaker 1: ever be able to say that. But the truth is
Speaker 1: that the same people that are so strict when it
Speaker 1: comes to federal election law or federal election transparency regulations
Speaker 1: are very laxed when it comes to immigration, when it
Speaker 1: comes to repeat re entry into the United or re
Speaker 1: entry the United States, rather after somebody's already been deported,
Speaker 1: which is supposed to be treated as a felony. People
Speaker 1: are not supposed to be able to access public benefits.
Speaker 1: A lot of them do. There's many different ways that
Speaker 1: they do, even though that's against the law. There's laws
Speaker 1: on the books in fact, that say you can't be
Speaker 1: a public charge of the state if you are an
Speaker 1: immigrant in this country, and there are lots of immigrants
Speaker 1: you are. There's all kinds of rules. You know, the
Speaker 1: rules are not the rules when it comes to immigration.
Speaker 1: And this is why you can't take Democrats seriously on
Speaker 1: rule of law as a general matter, because the law
Speaker 1: only matters to them insofar as the law is useful
Speaker 1: to whatever they want at any point in time. And
Speaker 1: I just would like us to be able to at
Speaker 1: least have some honesty in this discussion. I think that
Speaker 1: would be I think that would be helpful. By the way,
Speaker 1: I was speaking about how all opposition to this is
Speaker 1: now referred to as racist. People are talking about how
Speaker 1: racist opposition to open borders and the notion of building
Speaker 1: a wall. What are we to say about the continued
Speaker 1: complaints from residents in Tijuana? Are Tijuana, some of people
Speaker 1: corrected me, I know, it's Tijuana. What are we to
Speaker 1: make of the fact that people who live in Tijuana
Speaker 1: are not exactly thrilled themselves with what's going on with
Speaker 1: this caravan? Place six no of incidences here in Tijuana
Speaker 1: and in other cities that some of these people that
Speaker 1: are coming into these with these caravans are coming in crimes.
Speaker 1: This is not about racism. We don't dislike a certain
Speaker 1: group of people because they're from a country, one country
Speaker 1: or another. We are here because our government has not
Speaker 1: taken control of these what we call invasion to country
Speaker 1: habit to baby with of these people because they have
Speaker 1: people who have bad people. I don't know. It sounds
Speaker 1: really racist to me. A lot of anti Guatemalan racism
Speaker 1: coming from the Mexican Mexicans, are a lot of anti
Speaker 1: Honduran racism coming from the Mexicans. How are they? I
Speaker 1: don't know. I mean, I guess they're racist, the same
Speaker 1: way that you know people in New York who make
Speaker 1: fun of people in New Jersey or racist. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Someone someone on the left is going to have to
Speaker 1: explain to me, because so are they allowed to have
Speaker 1: a problem with us? They're okay if you're if you're Latino,
Speaker 1: if you're a non American Spanish speaker, you're allowed to
Speaker 1: be opposed to other Spanish speakers trapesing through your country
Speaker 1: and causing problems in public disorder. But Americans are not
Speaker 1: allowed to feel that way. I just want to know
Speaker 1: where that where the standard is, and how we are,
Speaker 1: how we're going to be allowed to look at this,
Speaker 1: and how we're supposed to judge this going forward. You know,
Speaker 1: can they can they establish some degree of consistency for us,
Speaker 1: just so I know, I want them to let me
Speaker 1: know what's racist. I want them to let me know
Speaker 1: so that I can make sure that I don't care
Speaker 1: because they're full of it and they love How about that.
Speaker 1: That's probably a good way for us to go. We
Speaker 1: got more come stay with me. What we saw on
Speaker 1: full display for the world see in the Oval Office
Speaker 1: was Chuck Schumer, the head of the Democrats in the Senate,
Speaker 1: and Nancy Pelosi, the head of the Democrats in the House,
Speaker 1: say to the American people, we do not stand with you.
Speaker 1: That's a dangerous place for an entire political party to
Speaker 1: say we disregard the safety and security of American communities
Speaker 1: and American families and instead stand with those who come
Speaker 1: to this country illegally. And that's right. Democrats are all
Speaker 1: about supporting the illegals. This is something that is at
Speaker 1: the very very top of their list. And in fact,
Speaker 1: I've been saying this for a while. We've learned a
Speaker 1: lot about the Democrat Party's priorities because in the era
Speaker 1: of Trump, what are the two things the Democrats have
Speaker 1: shown themselves other than obviously hatred of Trump and the
Speaker 1: mullarprobe and all that, but the two policy areas where
Speaker 1: they will just they will take it all the way.
Speaker 1: I mean, they will fight with everything they've got. What
Speaker 1: is their focus, and their focus is on non Americans
Speaker 1: from a few Muslim countries being able to travel here.
Speaker 1: That's a huge issue for them, and illegal aliens and
Speaker 1: their status and their future in this country. I mean,
Speaker 1: these are top, top Democrat priorities. And it's for the
Speaker 1: reasons that I've been telling you. It's because they understand
Speaker 1: that if they win on this, they effectively win on everything.
Speaker 1: They get their way with this one, then there doesn't
Speaker 1: have to be a whole lot, a whole lot of
Speaker 1: time that passes before the Republican Party is just a
Speaker 1: permanent minority, a permanent minority party. I mean Nancy Pelosi
Speaker 1: as she's she's saying that, you know, if this is
Speaker 1: a game of Chicken, she's gonna just just slam down
Speaker 1: the accelerators. She doesn't care what happens, because you know
Speaker 1: she will not fund a board her wall no matter what.
Speaker 1: Play sixteen. He changes his calibration, even if you're in
Speaker 1: the Pastorville under your watch on the story of the
Speaker 1: January disposition. Offensively, what could change? Why would he sign
Speaker 1: that bill to open government up? In general? Does one
Speaker 1: have a government closed and forever. I mean, what's this about.
Speaker 1: I know he doesn't believe in government. I know he
Speaker 1: doesn't know that much about what is at risk to
Speaker 1: shut it down. He doesn't believe in government. I mean,
Speaker 1: how can somebody say that about the president of the
Speaker 1: United States. It's such a stupid thing to say. It
Speaker 1: reminds me of the other thing that you'll hear them
Speaker 1: say about President Trump. They'll claim that he does not
Speaker 1: believe in democracy. Well, I think he likes democracy just fine.
Speaker 1: He got sixty three million votes and beat the most entrenched,
Speaker 1: propped up by the media, establishment candidate in a history
Speaker 1: of America. I'm pretty sure Trump thinks democracy is pretty special, actually,
Speaker 1: considering what he was able to do, considering what the
Speaker 1: American people who voted for him we're able to do.
Speaker 1: But Pelosi's saying, you know that that they'll never budge
Speaker 1: on the wall. Well, here's the thing. The whole point
Speaker 1: of having the shutdown is to really focus the American
Speaker 1: public on this discussion, in this debate. This is politics.
Speaker 1: Politics is a means of settling differences. It's a means
Speaker 1: of settling conflict, and there is a conflict right now.
Speaker 1: Should the situation at our southern border continue as is.
Speaker 1: Republicans say no, you know, I asked General Stanley McCrystal today.
Speaker 1: He's now retired. He's retired, four star general. I have
Speaker 1: to say, a very a very polite, very humble, very
Speaker 1: insightful man. I enjoyed speaking to him on and offset
Speaker 1: I found him. I found him to be impressive without
Speaker 1: trying to be impressive, which is my favorite kind. But
Speaker 1: I asked him today, I said, does does the president
Speaker 1: have the right have the ability to order the military
Speaker 1: to build a wall? He said, you know, we have
Speaker 1: pretty much. He said he might. He doesn't agree with
Speaker 1: it necessarily, but he says the president can do that.
Speaker 1: The president can tell the military to build a wall.
Speaker 1: And you know, maybe that's what it's going to come
Speaker 1: down to. But in the meantime, we should at least
Speaker 1: understand that our government should be focused on issues that
Speaker 1: really matter. You know, this stuff matters, Stormy Daniels, doesn't
Speaker 1: matter to the American people. This whole situation with the
Speaker 1: Trump payoffs, it doesn't matter. They want to make it matter.
Speaker 1: But immigration, I mean, just spend some time in communities
Speaker 1: where there's been you know, a tremendous amount of legal
Speaker 1: alien influx. And what does what does that even mean
Speaker 1: for our similation processes? What does that mean for the
Speaker 1: political fabric of this country? I mean, what what holds
Speaker 1: us together? What we hold in common? You know. I
Speaker 1: hate to say, but one of the main things that
Speaker 1: makes you an American is the English language. And then
Speaker 1: another thing is ability to understand and abide by rule
Speaker 1: of law, you know, And then there's some shared culture.
Speaker 1: But in America is an idea, right. It's not a
Speaker 1: country based on on bloodline. And so that's why it
Speaker 1: really matters how you come into the country, how you
Speaker 1: exist within our system, and what you do to either
Speaker 1: undermine or support that system when you're here. You know.
Speaker 1: But the left doesn't want to have a serious conversation
Speaker 1: about it. They just want to demagogue, demagogue, and more demagogue.
Speaker 1: I'm now just saying this as I'm on air with you.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is this is pretty typical. Trump is
Speaker 1: considering a border wall delay, delaying the fight until January,
Speaker 1: now hearing that Republicans on Capitol Hill are considering a
Speaker 1: two week stop gap measure to fund the government into January.
Speaker 1: That would mean roughly a quarter of the federal government'll
Speaker 1: shut down next Friday absent a bipartisan deal. You know,
Speaker 1: we'll see. I mean, you know, this is this is
Speaker 1: one option we have here because all along I've said
Speaker 1: the idea that they're gonna want to that the Republicans
Speaker 1: are gonna want to pick this fight over the Christmas holiday,
Speaker 1: which could mess with their Christmas plans. I think that's
Speaker 1: probably not This is why. You know, what was it
Speaker 1: when I first talked about that, said, ah, it's not
Speaker 1: gonna be shut down. This is the same crap we
Speaker 1: always have. Well, now they're saying maybe they're gonna push
Speaker 1: the shutdown until after until after the holiday, Well, you
Speaker 1: know they're going to have to do something. If they're
Speaker 1: not willing to have this fight, then we have to
Speaker 1: ask why. And I do think that there's a lot
Speaker 1: of there are a lot of a lot of people
Speaker 1: who are on the right who claim to care a
Speaker 1: lot about securing the border, but are not willing to
Speaker 1: do what is necessary. Are not willing to take the
Speaker 1: consequences of a tough vote. I don't want to don't
Speaker 1: want to deal with it. Just they don't want to
Speaker 1: have to face their constituents and say you know what,
Speaker 1: we voted for a wall, We created a border wall,
Speaker 1: and the walls don't work. Line it. It's just so
Speaker 1: dumb of all the of all the things that people
Speaker 1: can say about it. You know, I would prefer it.
Speaker 1: I would feel more comfortable if there could at least
Speaker 1: just be some honesty from the Democrats on this whole issue,
Speaker 1: where they would say, you know what, we would really
Speaker 1: like to just bring in as many people as possible
Speaker 1: from as many Third world, non English speaking countries as possible,
Speaker 1: and we just want to bring as many of them in.
Speaker 1: And we don't care about family reunification anymore. We don't
Speaker 1: care about skills or merit or anything else. We just
Speaker 1: want to be the country where you could just get
Speaker 1: to come here. I think people would realize that that's
Speaker 1: a disastrous idea pretty quickly, but at least then Democrats
Speaker 1: would be honest about what their end goal is. Now,
Speaker 1: this is also where I see this this storyline that
Speaker 1: there are the deportion deportations rather under Trump or on
Speaker 1: the RYE, but they're still lower than Obama. This was
Speaker 1: reported that I has linked on Drudge Report. President Trump's
Speaker 1: pushed for tighter immigration policies has meant that there have
Speaker 1: been over two hundred and fifty six thousand illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: deported in twenty eighteen, the highest number since the Obama administration.
Speaker 1: And the Obama administration, they'll remember, they changed the way
Speaker 1: that deportations were counted. They changed it so that if
Speaker 1: you were caught at the border and turned away, you
Speaker 1: would be you know, you would be counted as somebody
Speaker 1: who had been deported. So it's very tough to get
Speaker 1: honest numbers because interior enforcement is supposed to mean that
Speaker 1: you're somebody who's in the interior of the the United States
Speaker 1: and then you've already entered the country illegally and then
Speaker 1: you're sent you're deported. Otherwise you're just caught at the border.
Speaker 1: So you know, as I look at this, first of all,
Speaker 1: you know, Obama as the deporter in chief was a
Speaker 1: line that the Democrats wanted to They were willing to
Speaker 1: accept that for while because they thought that it would
Speaker 1: give him the political leeway to get the comprehensive immigration
Speaker 1: reform deal which Republicans were on board for, which would
Speaker 1: have just been amnesty. I mean, that's all it was.
Speaker 1: And at that point the thing about amnesty is once
Speaker 1: it's done. The only thing that's assured is the amnesty,
Speaker 1: and everything else falls by the wayside very quickly. And so,
Speaker 1: you know, I think that that was a kind of like,
Speaker 1: if you like your healthcare, if you like your doctor,
Speaker 1: you can keep your doctor. With Obama was look at
Speaker 1: all the people on deporting You can trust me. I'm
Speaker 1: not just gonna give amnesty to twelve million, fifteen million,
Speaker 1: maybe twenty million people. No, no, I'm I'm the guy
Speaker 1: who deports people. You can trust me. But then at
Speaker 1: all all fell apart. Then the whole, the whole ruse
Speaker 1: was up over time. You know, John Kennedy is out
Speaker 1: there and he's he's a star wart on this one.
Speaker 1: All of a sudden, I don't even know this guy
Speaker 1: held these positions until the last couple of weeks. Play
Speaker 1: clip two. If you support legal immigration, then you've got
Speaker 1: to be against illegal immigration. I'm not saying that all
Speaker 1: of the people who try to jump the line to
Speaker 1: come into our country are bad people. I don't know,
Speaker 1: but I do know this. Some of them are terrorists,
Speaker 1: some of them are child sex traffickers, some of them
Speaker 1: are drug dealers, some of them are gang members. And
Speaker 1: if for no other reason, but national security, in public safety,
Speaker 1: we have to seal our border. And the sin of
Speaker 1: President Trump here in Washington, DC with the self styled elite,
Speaker 1: is that he's actually, for the first time in a
Speaker 1: long time, enforcing America's immigration laws. Our immigration laws are
Speaker 1: not broken, they just haven't been enforce Yep, it's true.
Speaker 1: People always say our immigration immigration laws are broken. What
Speaker 1: they really mean is we don't enforce our immigration and laws.
Speaker 1: We don't enforce them. Well, how can you know of
Speaker 1: the law is broken if you're not actually using the
Speaker 1: laws that you have. It's it's a it's a pretty
Speaker 1: amazing state of affairs now where you know, we're not
Speaker 1: even it's like we're not even having the same the
Speaker 1: same same discussion, you know, not even having the same debate,
Speaker 1: because the left has skewed this whole thing so much
Speaker 1: that it's it's hard. It's it's even it's hard to
Speaker 1: know what topic they're really even on. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: it just changes all the time. Their positions change all
Speaker 1: the time. They have no solutions. All they do is
Speaker 1: complain and not like a bunch of of huge babies.
Speaker 1: It's very very annoying. I've got some breaking news actually
Speaker 1: to get to when come right back to stay with me. Well,
Speaker 1: it looks like we know who the White House chief
Speaker 1: of staff is going to be in the immediate future,
Speaker 1: when you not yet have clarity on who the permanent
Speaker 1: chief of staff will be. But this was just breaking
Speaker 1: that Trump has named Mick mulvaney acting chief of staff.
Speaker 1: Mick is a he seems like a very sharp guy.
Speaker 1: He's a smart guy. But I mean, John, let's be
Speaker 1: honest here. I think in the office pool, we're all
Speaker 1: a little disappointed that the Trumpster still hasn't tracked me down.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm right here, man, I'm in the swamp.
Speaker 1: I'm not far away. You're a smart guy, exactly, thank you.
Speaker 1: You know, I think that this, this could have been
Speaker 1: the start of something beautiful. I would have run that
Speaker 1: White House like a Swiss watch. But you know, they
Speaker 1: haven't reached out to me yet. And then there's also
Speaker 1: one of the only people that might even be less
Speaker 1: likely than me to get the job, Piers Morgan threw
Speaker 1: his through his hat into the ring. Nobody else I
Speaker 1: think was taking him seriously other than Piers Morgan himself.
Speaker 1: But look, he understands. Man, you just need to get
Speaker 1: back in the limelight, and then everything else. Then everything
Speaker 1: else kind of follows. You know, he knows that all
Speaker 1: you need to do is get your name in the mix,
Speaker 1: and people will start to talk about you again, and
Speaker 1: that opens up all kinds of doors. Does he care
Speaker 1: about what happens to the Trump administration and to the
Speaker 1: to America. I'm pretty sure he's a British citisen non
Speaker 1: an American citizen. Uh No, but at least gets his
Speaker 1: name there. Anyway, mc mulvaaney is going to be the
Speaker 1: acting chief of staff. The only other news around this
Speaker 1: today was that he had what's his name, Chris Christie.
Speaker 1: Chris Christie was out of the running after briefly being
Speaker 1: in the running. And then you heard that Jared Kushner
Speaker 1: is the most likely replacement. And from what I'm seeing today,
Speaker 1: and I was told this by a congressman earlier today,
Speaker 1: it's who had just left the White House, it's looking
Speaker 1: like it's gonna be Jared Kushner. So the President's gonna
Speaker 1: make his his son in law the White House chief
Speaker 1: of staff. You know, I would I would just say that,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm I I do not I do not
Speaker 1: like political dynasties, and I do not like nepotism. That said,
Speaker 1: I do think the Trump administration in particular. I think
Speaker 1: President Trump has a need for people around him that
Speaker 1: he can truly and honestly trust, and that's very hard
Speaker 1: for him to find under the circumstances of, you know,
Speaker 1: what's going on around him. It's not an easy thing
Speaker 1: for President Trump to be in this situation where he's
Speaker 1: got not just the media totally set against him, but
Speaker 1: also these deep state leave behind or lifelong bureaucrats, you
Speaker 1: know Obama administration leave behinds and lifelong bureaucrats who are
Speaker 1: so dedicated to destroying him. But also this is not new.
Speaker 1: I mean, you had JFK appointed Bobby Kennedy to be
Speaker 1: Attorney general. Is brother, that's nepotism. Hillary Clinton, Yes, you
Speaker 1: could say she wasn't appointed to a role, but Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton was given a massively important portfolio of essentially reorder
Speaker 1: as an American healthcare as first Lady, so she was
Speaker 1: given a lot of power and authority. She was she
Speaker 1: was mean, that was she took the vice president's traditional
Speaker 1: office in the in the in the White House. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she was acting. She was acting like a white House
Speaker 1: official without even having an official title. Really, it's this
Speaker 1: first lady, and then she ran for senator based on
Speaker 1: who she was married too. Then she became Secretary of
Speaker 1: State based on her last name and the fact that
Speaker 1: she had been a senator, and then she ran for
Speaker 1: president based on those other things. And none of it
Speaker 1: was was earned in any meaningful way. It was all
Speaker 1: riding on her husband's coat tails. This is just a fact.
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't think anybody, well people could argue that,
Speaker 1: but they would lose. They would lose, you know. Oh, no,
Speaker 1: Hillary is so amazing, She's so perfect. No, no she's not,
Speaker 1: but she does have this there's a certain boomers sensibility.
Speaker 1: Sorry Boomers, I know I give you a hard time sometimes,
Speaker 1: but oh, you know, I went to this school and
Speaker 1: that school, so everyone should think I'm amazing. When Hillary
Speaker 1: went to Wellesley, it was like a fifty fifty shot
Speaker 1: if you were going to get in. I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: and if you want to go to I don't know
Speaker 1: why I just turned into Gilbert Godfrey there for second.
Speaker 1: I'm just saying, but you know, we don't have to
Speaker 1: always bow and genuflect before these people who went to
Speaker 1: look as George Bush a great student though of course
Speaker 1: I mean George w I'm talking about. Was he a
Speaker 1: great student? Of course not. He got good to Yale.
Speaker 1: I mean, look, there's a lot of This is the
Speaker 1: thing about the elites though they're within the power structure,
Speaker 1: but they're they're not special in terms of their skills
Speaker 1: and ability necessarily. And that's what's been so exposed, certainly
Speaker 1: to a people in the media. People are all replaceable,
Speaker 1: they're all jerks and clowns. A lot of them are
Speaker 1: way overpaid. And yeah, they're the elites and that they
Speaker 1: have powered influence, but they're not elite because they're so
Speaker 1: good in anything. It's a big difference. So we'll see
Speaker 1: what ends up happening in the White House. I don't
Speaker 1: think it's gonna make all that much difference to anybody.
Speaker 1: It's a little bit of palace intrigue. Who really cares,
Speaker 1: you know, we'll see, we'll follow it and it is
Speaker 1: what it is. Got a big Our three coming up, though, teams,
Speaker 1: so stay with me. You might have seen it earlier
Speaker 1: this week there was a huge hack. People say China
Speaker 1: might be behind it. In five hundred million hotel customers
Speaker 1: have all their information exposed. Now, you don't want to
Speaker 1: have to worry about that. You don't want to have
Speaker 1: your information just floating around out there. The bad guys,
Speaker 1: whether they're hackers or just people trying to use a
Speaker 1: scan to sell your information to third parties, they've got
Speaker 1: a lot of tricks. But I've got to way to
Speaker 1: neutralize this nonsense. Express vpn. Express VPN's got these incredible
Speaker 1: apps that run the background of your computer, of your phone,
Speaker 1: of your tablet, and then it is I'm telling you,
Speaker 1: anonymous and secure. So it takes your IP address, it
Speaker 1: encrypts it, and it's the number one in its category.
Speaker 1: You've got to try to Express vpn for yourself. If
Speaker 1: you don't want to hand over your online history your
Speaker 1: internet provider or data resellers, Express vpn as the answer
Speaker 1: protect your online activity today. Find out how you can
Speaker 1: get three months free at express vpn dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: That's Express vpn dot com slash buck for three months
Speaker 1: free with a one year package. Is it express vpn
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck to learn more? What more do
Speaker 1: we need to see or hear from this racist man? Here?
Speaker 1: We have a president who has once again he said
Speaker 1: racist and despicable words about African Americans people of color.
Speaker 1: All of a policy that he's put forward has been
Speaker 1: anti people of color. He has continued policies that I
Speaker 1: believe are racist in nature. The President of the United
Speaker 1: States is racist. All of us already knew that the
Speaker 1: President seems to harbor racist feelings about people of color.
Speaker 1: Do they ever have to provide any evidence of this
Speaker 1: stuff or is it just enough to always lender the
Speaker 1: president as being racist? That's right, This guy from Queens
Speaker 1: who grew up in New York City, who's been in
Speaker 1: public life for his entire life, he's now what seventy's
Speaker 1: he's a terrible racist. But you notice how we we
Speaker 1: just discovered that Trump is a terrible racist. According to
Speaker 1: the media, when he became a Republican that could beat
Speaker 1: the hand picked candidate of the establishment left in the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party, then Trump was the most racist, evil racist ever.
Speaker 1: But I had never heard. I grew up in New York.
Speaker 1: I knew of the Trumps. I was very familiar with
Speaker 1: a lot of the stories and laure around the Trump family.
Speaker 1: I never heard anything about them saying that Trump was racist.
Speaker 1: He's you know, he was generally considered a colorful character.
Speaker 1: I think you could say, and you know, a favorite
Speaker 1: of the tabloids, and you know, a little bit a
Speaker 1: little bit full of himself. But that was about it,
Speaker 1: and no one ever said he was racist. And now
Speaker 1: it's just taken it's taken as gospel by the media
Speaker 1: that Trump is racist, and they don't ever really get
Speaker 1: into why. I mean, really, they'll just talk about policy
Speaker 1: that I agree with the president on in some cases
Speaker 1: or well, almost all policy cases. So does that mean
Speaker 1: that I'm racist? Does that mean that everybody who thinks,
Speaker 1: for example, that Obamacare is not great they're racist? Is
Speaker 1: everybody who thinks that a walt or southern border is
Speaker 1: a necessary improvement to our existing border security infrastructure? Is
Speaker 1: that a racist position or is that just a sensible position?
Speaker 1: They don't give you specifics. And you'll also notice, and
Speaker 1: this is the other side of it. If they were
Speaker 1: really making this judgment about Trump's racism upon his deeds
Speaker 1: and upon things that they could point to, instead of
Speaker 1: just repeating and repeating and repeating and then hoping that
Speaker 1: the lie becomes the truth, wouldn't they give him some
Speaker 1: credit for non objectively, you know the opposite of racist
Speaker 1: behavior or you know, behavior that promotes racial healing, racial outreach,
Speaker 1: racial comity and togetherness. Oh, you never hear that, do you?
Speaker 1: How much credit have you heard the media give Trump
Speaker 1: for prison reform that will disproportionately help, as the media says,
Speaker 1: black and brown men in prison or men of color
Speaker 1: from disproportionately help them in transitioning to life outside of
Speaker 1: the big house, so to speak. You know, how many
Speaker 1: times have you heard that? You don't hear that? Does
Speaker 1: the president ever get credit for doing things that are
Speaker 1: supposed to help the black community? Just does he get
Speaker 1: any credit from the media for say, the incredibly low
Speaker 1: black and Hispanic unemployment rate, And no, of course none
Speaker 1: of that. So they tell you all these terrible things
Speaker 1: about him. They look for every opportunity to add to
Speaker 1: the he's terrible, He's a racist. But then they want
Speaker 1: us to believe they're journalists even though they don't cover
Speaker 1: the other side of this equation. You know, there was
Speaker 1: this meeting of the Opportunity and Revitalization Council, or actually
Speaker 1: it was created by Trump, and then they had a
Speaker 1: meeting and Bob Johnson, who is the founder of BEET
Speaker 1: is a media mogul he and I had to producer Mike.
Speaker 1: I mean, he brought this whole thing to my attention.
Speaker 1: I didn't even know about this, and I am reading
Speaker 1: the news and researching all day long. Mike caught this one. Otherwise,
Speaker 1: it really was under the radar as a story. So
Speaker 1: you know, I wanted to come in with the whole Trump. Oh,
Speaker 1: they say Trump is so racist, and this is this
Speaker 1: is now the criticism of lazy of lazy idiots in
Speaker 1: the media. It's just everything Trump does is racist. You know,
Speaker 1: he showed up late to a meeting with a foreign minister.
Speaker 1: All Trump is racist. I mean, everything he does is racist.
Speaker 1: But then they also don't even tell you about the
Speaker 1: very obviously non racist things or rather anti racist things
Speaker 1: that he does, like you know, reaching out to minority communities,
Speaker 1: trying to create better opportunity for minorities. I mean, I
Speaker 1: can tell you this, if President Trump, if you're sitting
Speaker 1: in a him and there was something that President Trump
Speaker 1: could do, if he could just wave his hand and
Speaker 1: you know, uh, double African American household income, if if
Speaker 1: he could, you know, make the African American unemployment rate
Speaker 1: go down by half, I am certain that he would
Speaker 1: do those things. Okay, I can tell you with complete
Speaker 1: assuredness that the President of the United States would take
Speaker 1: a very strong pride in doing things to help the
Speaker 1: black community in this country, and just based on his
Speaker 1: attitude as a guy, the way that he's conducted himself
Speaker 1: in much of his life. You know, Yeah, he's a billionaire,
Speaker 1: and he's a media guy, and you know, his toilets
Speaker 1: are made of gold and all this stuff. I get it.
Speaker 1: But you know, I think he also does have a
Speaker 1: certain fondness for the for the common man, for the
Speaker 1: working man. You know, he knows he's not one of them.
Speaker 1: He doesn't do this, you know, rolled up sleeves, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna pretend to be a hunter thing during the you know, campaign.
Speaker 1: He knows he's not one of them, but he appreciates them.
Speaker 1: You know, Trump appreciates cops, he appreciates fireman, he appreciates military,
Speaker 1: He appreciates doers, people that put things only. He appreciates
Speaker 1: construction workers, appreciates truck drivers. Nancy Pelosi does not. Okay,
Speaker 1: But but Bob Johnson, who's the BC founder and mediumogul,
Speaker 1: he spoke at the White House. That's got zero coverage.
Speaker 1: But so we're going to give it some coverage. Play
Speaker 1: clip eleven. Just recently, your Department of Labor signed a
Speaker 1: historic document that created something called auto portability. Auto Portability
Speaker 1: is designed to reduce retirement leakage among low income of
Speaker 1: four one K account holders who tend to cash out.
Speaker 1: And mister President, you should know this. Sixty percent of
Speaker 1: African American Hispanic Americans cash out of their four old
Speaker 1: one K account. This program will put close to eight
Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars back in the retirement pockets of minority Americans.
Speaker 1: So I just want to applause you for that. Trump
Speaker 1: is working with Bob Johnson, here's obviously very successful, very
Speaker 1: prominent African American mogul and and businessman, and and Trump
Speaker 1: is working with him and others to try and put
Speaker 1: a lot of money back in the pockets of folks
Speaker 1: who are doing the right thing, who are who are
Speaker 1: trying to save up, who are paying their bills, who
Speaker 1: are being productive citizens. A lot of them are minorities.
Speaker 1: And this this gets nothing. This gets nothing. I mean,
Speaker 1: no one's even talking about it. No one covers this.
Speaker 1: Doesn't think that it's it's worth worth attention, you know,
Speaker 1: it doesn't think that it's it's worth raising. You know,
Speaker 1: let's have another interview with Michael Cohen. Where's this you know,
Speaker 1: Trumps a lawyer. I mean this guy Cohen, he's like
Speaker 1: a you know, just just a broken down, broken down
Speaker 1: machine at this point. I mean, what do they want
Speaker 1: this guy to do? I mean, he's obviously been humiliated
Speaker 1: and Troy, they want to keep putting them on TV
Speaker 1: because he's useful right now in saying, you know, Trumpoozoo's
Speaker 1: a mistake, He's terrible. So after Trump signed this executive
Speaker 1: Opportunity for the Opportunity and Executive Order rather for the
Speaker 1: Opportunity and Revitalization Council, who wants to guess what the
Speaker 1: media was asking about? So he's doing this thing to
Speaker 1: put money in the pockets of black Americans, a lot
Speaker 1: of Americans, but black Americans, do you know, disproportionately? Um,
Speaker 1: And here's what the media does played twelve. This is great.
Speaker 1: You know, I got this whole thing of like the
Speaker 1: shouting the questions that the president and I know it's
Speaker 1: a tradition and I'm sure people in the White House
Speaker 1: were telling me, oh, that's you know, the White House
Speaker 1: Press Corps. They love that whole thing. It just strikes
Speaker 1: me is do we really have to do that? Yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: we just have a Q and a time be like,
Speaker 1: all right, guys, I'll take questions. Otherwise, you know, could
Speaker 1: ever just sit there and like, I guess they do
Speaker 1: what they do. But anyway, did Michael Cohen cover up
Speaker 1: your dirty deeds? That's what they ask him Forget about
Speaker 1: the fact that he's trying to help minorities in this
Speaker 1: country hold on to more of their harder in cash.
Speaker 1: Let's ask him about Michael Cohen. You know, I was
Speaker 1: telling you about how they they don't give you reasons.
Speaker 1: They don't give any of us reasons for why Trump
Speaker 1: is so racist, why he's so terrible. They just keep
Speaker 1: saying it and saying it and saying it. Pastor Darrell Scott,
Speaker 1: who've actually done some hits with back in the day
Speaker 1: on CNN, he I think put this in very clear
Speaker 1: terms Play thirteen. It's insulting to the intelligence of black America.
Speaker 1: Is the fact that the left does not give us
Speaker 1: one intellectual reason to not vote for President Trump or
Speaker 1: to not support him. They give us emotional reasons. He
Speaker 1: hates you, he hates blacks. Don't vote for him. He
Speaker 1: hates blacks. Well, he's creating opportunities angs, but he hates to. Well,
Speaker 1: he's in the prison we for him, but he hates to.
Speaker 1: And the insulting are in telling us about speaking to
Speaker 1: us like that, when the proof is in the pudding.
Speaker 1: This man and I said it. He could be the
Speaker 1: most pro active president for Black America in my lifetime.
Speaker 1: And he's proving me to be a prophet in that respect.
Speaker 1: He's doing things. If President Obama had done this, they'd
Speaker 1: be a parade down the street right now. Truth is,
Speaker 1: the President Obama was on the substance very disappointing to
Speaker 1: minority communities in terms of the numbers, in terms of employment,
Speaker 1: in terms of in terms of the national conversation on race.
Speaker 1: There were race riots during the Obama presidency. I remember them,
Speaker 1: You remember them. Look what happened in Baltimore, Look what
Speaker 1: happened in Ferguson. You know there was not this national
Speaker 1: healing that we were promised, that's for sure. Meanwhile, you've
Speaker 1: got Pastor Darrell Scott, African American pastors just saying, look,
Speaker 1: President Trump is doing the Bestie Kennedy. He's trying to
Speaker 1: do a lot for the black community, and the media
Speaker 1: just completely ignores it, shuts it out, doesn't want to
Speaker 1: hear it. All they want constantly is Trump bashing Trump
Speaker 1: is racist. This is why we don't trust the media.
Speaker 1: And you know that we can't forget that while they're
Speaker 1: always holding themselves up as you know, the guardians of
Speaker 1: democracy and the guardians of our republic and all this
Speaker 1: other stuff, the media doesn't deserve the respect that it
Speaker 1: wants from us. Media by and large is an industry
Speaker 1: and decline because now with the Internet, we have options
Speaker 1: and we have the ability to fact check and to
Speaker 1: know what they said yesterday, to know what they said
Speaker 1: last month, and this is why the bias. And then
Speaker 1: when you add social media into that, that's why the
Speaker 1: bias is so apparent. They can't hide anymore. They can't
Speaker 1: rely on having control of the printing presses, so to speak,
Speaker 1: to create whatever reality that they want. Now we all
Speaker 1: have access to the printing press. I thought with social
Speaker 1: media companies it's I'm worried about you know, who's at
Speaker 1: the levers now, who has control of these things? And
Speaker 1: I just think that if they were being fair, if
Speaker 1: it wasn't just all menium aligne Trump for being a racist.
Speaker 1: They would talk about the things that he's trying to
Speaker 1: do to help the black community, and they will never
Speaker 1: talk about that. Don't allow yourself to get trapped in
Speaker 1: a social media universe where the left gets to determine
Speaker 1: what you see. Snippy dot com is your answer. It
Speaker 1: is a new, up and coming social media site, and
Speaker 1: if you have checked it out before, you got to
Speaker 1: go back and see it again for yourself. Thousands of
Speaker 1: my listeners have joined snippy dot com and they're expressing
Speaker 1: their opinions and stirring up lively conversations. Snippy is a
Speaker 1: place where you don't have to worry about conversational health,
Speaker 1: shadow banning, any of the nonsense that you know goes
Speaker 1: against conservatives online. Snippy does not get involved with any
Speaker 1: of that censorship, any of that nonsense. It's totally free
Speaker 1: to join. It's open to everyone, so join us. I'm
Speaker 1: a member. You can being a member too. It's totally free.
Speaker 1: Let your opinion matter, no suppression of conservative thought ever.
Speaker 1: Snippy dot com now with an updated user interface an
Speaker 1: exciting new features. Also available in the Apple App Store
Speaker 1: and now available for Android. Snippy is your new alternative
Speaker 1: social media the president isn't coming hasn't come clean over
Speaker 1: over the course of time Anderson Anderson putting aside the
Speaker 1: whole issue of how amazing it is to listen to
Speaker 1: Rick Santorum, who made his entire career successful for a
Speaker 1: time on the basis of morality and politics, making excuses
Speaker 1: for paying off porn stars and women with whom you've
Speaker 1: had affairs. Putting that to one side, isn't the reason, Jeffrey.
Speaker 1: If you're not, you're not going to put that to
Speaker 1: the side. I'm not. I'm not making excuses for Donald
Speaker 1: Trump having an affair with a porn star. I mean
Speaker 1: that's it's disgusting, it's tawdry. I'm saying whether it's I'm
Speaker 1: addressing the question as to what is the illegality involved here,
Speaker 1: And the illegality is not the contribution. The illegality is
Speaker 1: not reporting it and not And don't suggest that I
Speaker 1: am good for good for Rick Santorum there for not
Speaker 1: letting slimy CNN tubin get away with a real dirt
Speaker 1: bag trick that they do on CNN all the time,
Speaker 1: and they're punnits. They love to pull this one. I look,
Speaker 1: I came up against it a few times where you're
Speaker 1: talking about an issue and then the other person will
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, very personally attack you. Rich and
Speaker 1: Toorum in that clip, I didn't play the whole of
Speaker 1: it for you, but if you, if you want to do,
Speaker 1: you could listen to it. And all he does is say, look,
Speaker 1: it's it's probably not illegal because of X, Y and Z.
Speaker 1: He's just talking about the legality of Trump paying off women,
Speaker 1: you know, for you know, hush money purposes. Right, He's
Speaker 1: just talking about the legality. And Tubin, who want to
Speaker 1: talk about tawdry? As I understand it, that guy's got
Speaker 1: quite his own, quite his own little tawdry history of
Speaker 1: personal conduct. And you know, Tuban goes after Santorum completely,
Speaker 1: you know, without provocation, just because he wants to take
Speaker 1: a dirty shot at him on Anderty Cooper's show, and
Speaker 1: you notice that, you know he was gonna move right
Speaker 1: past it. I will give some credit. See what Cooper
Speaker 1: didn't do there is jump in and not let Santorum respond.
Speaker 1: That's usually what the what the dishonest fake news CNN
Speaker 1: anchors do is once the person that you're supposed to debate, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, slimes you and then but then they want
Speaker 1: to move on to the subject at hand to make
Speaker 1: it seem like, oh no, we're actually going to talk
Speaker 1: about the real thing again. But once they've taken their
Speaker 1: cheap shot, they want to move on. And then the
Speaker 1: anchors no, no no, no, let him finish, Let him finish,
Speaker 1: And then the subject matter, I mean they're rather the
Speaker 1: conversation has moved. And so then when you come back,
Speaker 1: if you're in the Santorum seat, you know, this is
Speaker 1: the anatomy of a CNN smear. This is how they
Speaker 1: do it. When you come back and you're in the
Speaker 1: Santaorum position and you say, well, hold on a second,
Speaker 1: you talking, and they're go, no, no no, no, we're not
Speaker 1: talking about you anymore. Rick. You know, we're not talking
Speaker 1: about about that. Why why do you have to make
Speaker 1: it about you? You know that this is what they do.
Speaker 1: But these people are they're professionally dishonest. I mean Tubin's
Speaker 1: announce this is the chief legal anolse the CNN. I mean,
Speaker 1: his legal analysis is garbage. He is not He is
Speaker 1: not a first tier mind at all, maybe a third
Speaker 1: tier mind. But they love him over at CNN. I
Speaker 1: mean they think he's fantastic because he tells them exactly
Speaker 1: what that audience wants to hear. And look, this is
Speaker 1: a business, right, CNN is in the business of telling
Speaker 1: its audience of anti Trump lunatics exactly what they want
Speaker 1: to hear. Which is why you know, a while ago,
Speaker 1: I got CNN's VP of Communications or something came after me.
Speaker 1: This was maybe a month or two ago, because I
Speaker 1: pointed out how stupid CNN's coverage of Elizabeth Warren was
Speaker 1: when she released her released her DNA results, Because initially
Speaker 1: it was, you know, Elizabeth Warren, you know, sets the
Speaker 1: record straight with DNA results or whatever. You know, they
Speaker 1: they're really trying hard. Every person with a normal functioning
Speaker 1: brain was like, this is the biggest self own the
Speaker 1: biggest own goal I've seen from a politician in a
Speaker 1: very long time. Turns out that Elizabeth Warren is now
Speaker 1: thinking about giving an official apology. She's kind of testing
Speaker 1: the waters a little bit and saying that she is
Speaker 1: quote not a person of color. Oh oh, I'm glad
Speaker 1: she's willing to admit that now place seventeen. I'm not
Speaker 1: a person of color, and I haven't lived your life
Speaker 1: or experienced anything like the subtle prejudice or more overt
Speaker 1: harm that you may have experienced just because of the
Speaker 1: color of your skin. But rules matter, and our government,
Speaker 1: not just individuals within the government, but the government itself
Speaker 1: has systematically discriminated against black people in this country. I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: the government obviously has sytematically discriminate against black people. But
Speaker 1: the point here is really that Elizabeth Warren is like, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm not saying I'm a person of color.
Speaker 1: Thanks folkahuntas. We needed to be told that that. You know,
Speaker 1: this is the thing democrats lectures all the time about
Speaker 1: lies and lying. Elizabeth Warren's a liar. It's a liar.
Speaker 1: Her whole career is built on a lie. When when
Speaker 1: are we allowed to just all say that without people say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's not true. Grouse. You know, she's great on progressive
Speaker 1: issues and she wants wealth redistribution. Well that doesn't mean anything.
Speaker 1: She was celebrated by Harvard as a minority, as a
Speaker 1: minority professor in the law school. She never would have
Speaker 1: gotten that job. I thought, I'm sorry, Look, affirmative action
Speaker 1: is real. I are we supposed to pretend it's not real?
Speaker 1: It is better, you know, it is better to apply
Speaker 1: to Harvard as a member of the Sioux Nation than
Speaker 1: it is Buck Sexton from New York City, James Sexton
Speaker 1: for those of you who are wondering, but you know
Speaker 1: it is a better thing. Your odds are much better.
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren knew that. That is why she claimed to
Speaker 1: be Native American. I mean, people are just they're just
Speaker 1: ridiculous on this, and they're just preposterous. You know, get
Speaker 1: a grip everybody, Really, Elizabeth Warren is a clown and
Speaker 1: a laughing stock. The fact that she's even thinking about
Speaker 1: running for president tells you all you need to know
Speaker 1: about the Democrat Party. It seems like all the cool
Speaker 1: celebrities these days are starting their own spirits line. You know,
Speaker 1: they set up a tequilo or a rum or a
Speaker 1: bourbon or whiskey or whatever. I have not seen anybody
Speaker 1: who was hawking gin. I've not seen anybody who was
Speaker 1: really into gin. It about John. Do you ever drink gin?
Speaker 1: I don't really drink. I'm not a gin guy. Yeah
Speaker 1: I don't. You know, I'm I'm not a big drinker,
Speaker 1: but you know, Gin to me, it always feel like
Speaker 1: I'm drinking a Christmas I always feel like I'm drinking
Speaker 1: a Christmas tree or something. It's just a little but
Speaker 1: Ryan Reynolds is pretty funny. And since we're getting into
Speaker 1: the Christmas spirit a little bit here and some of
Speaker 1: you are gonna be asking me for gift ideas, I'm
Speaker 1: sure this was kind of a funny ad that I
Speaker 1: thought were It's even funny if you can see it,
Speaker 1: but I think the audio work roll it up. So
Speaker 1: Ryan Reynolds is the guy from Deadpool. Deadpool to a
Speaker 1: bunch of other sort of forgetful, you know, romantic comedy fair.
Speaker 1: But you know, he's a pretty self deprecating guy for
Speaker 1: a guy who's obviously made his career on being super handsome.
Speaker 1: But he's he's hawking this aviation gin, which I'd never
Speaker 1: heard of before. But I want to show that this
Speaker 1: is getting getting us all into the Christmas giving gin
Speaker 1: drinking spirit. Play clip three. There. People come up to
Speaker 1: me all the time and they say what makes aviation
Speaker 1: gin so delicious? Most of the time I run away
Speaker 1: because non slaveries frightened me. But here is the answer.
Speaker 1: It begins each morning at four am, the distillers of
Speaker 1: Aviation American Gin rise to greet the new day with
Speaker 1: four hours of silent meditation from the air. It's a
Speaker 1: quick scoot down to the grove. The citrus fruits are
Speaker 1: misted using only the tears of Aviation's owner, me Ryan Riddles.
Speaker 1: All of our botanicals are humanely caught, cage free, and
Speaker 1: grain fed. The reason some people don't drink gin is
Speaker 1: that strong juniper taste. So after apologizing to each very individually,
Speaker 1: we beat the living hell out of them, creating a smoother,
Speaker 1: more refined finish to ensure that heavenly taste. Every bottle
Speaker 1: of Aviation is ordained by the Unitarian Church of Fresno, California,
Speaker 1: and then before it departs home serenaded with the healing
Speaker 1: music of Sarah McLaughlin. Some might call this overkill, But
Speaker 1: the next time you visit your local mixologist and you
Speaker 1: murder that silky, smooth Aviation Martini, Well, who's the killer now?
Speaker 1: Aviation an American original, now owned by a Canadian. I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you, John, I feel like I might have
Speaker 1: to go out and give myself some Aviation Gin. What
Speaker 1: do you think I want to try it now? Yeah? No,
Speaker 1: it's a good commercial. It's very it's very effective. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, I like your music that. You know, there's
Speaker 1: some funny little jokes in there if they did a
Speaker 1: good job. I'm not a gin guy. I mean Hendrix.
Speaker 1: I remember I made a bet with a friend back
Speaker 1: in the agency a long time ago, and I had
Speaker 1: to get him a bottle of Hendrix, which I think
Speaker 1: was maybe forty forty or fifty bucks. But yeah, I
Speaker 1: will say now that when I when I do drink,
Speaker 1: I stay away from I drink less and I drink
Speaker 1: higher quality. That that's one thing that I have made
Speaker 1: the switch to. So I might only have one drink
Speaker 1: over the course of an evening, or you know, maybe
Speaker 1: a drink and then a glass of wine with dinner.
Speaker 1: But I I'm very picky about what I want to
Speaker 1: drink and I really just go for it either need
Speaker 1: or over ice, but no mixers and no, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't do any of that stuff anymore. So, you know,
Speaker 1: I started I started out in this in this world
Speaker 1: early on drinking wine coolers. That's what we were drinking
Speaker 1: in the you know, junior high that's what people drank
Speaker 1: and junior high, I guess eighth grades junior high. Right,
Speaker 1: you never went through that phase, did you? Jodd? The
Speaker 1: wine cooler face that doesn't sound like your jam. I
Speaker 1: do like and all that stuff. What I haven't had
Speaker 1: any since the nineties, But yeah, I do like wine coolers. Okay,
Speaker 1: you're calling me out a little bit since the nineties,
Speaker 1: that's fair enough. I mean, Zema is something different. If
Speaker 1: you remember those ads, they brought Zema back because people
Speaker 1: like me of such nineties nostalgia. It's also why Friends
Speaker 1: is the number three show on all of Netflix. I mean,
Speaker 1: a show that has been off the air for over
Speaker 1: a decade now people are still obsessed with it. Anyways,
Speaker 1: to Ryan Reynolds, hat tip to you, sir. And Deadpool
Speaker 1: one was very funny. Deadpool two was less funny, But
Speaker 1: you know, the guys earned my respect. And I also
Speaker 1: have not seen him at least in a while. He
Speaker 1: probably some of you're gonna yell at me and say
Speaker 1: he's terrible on the politics stuff too, But he doesn't
Speaker 1: seem like one of these guys who's shoving his annoying
Speaker 1: celebrity defeat politics in your face all the time. Roll
Speaker 1: calls up next, Rock and Roll. Fellow patriots, we made
Speaker 1: ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll Call,
Speaker 1: Roll Call, Roll Call. Indeed, that's what we got going
Speaker 1: on now. Facebook, Facebook, dot com, slash Buck Sexton is
Speaker 1: all you need to get in on the action here.
Speaker 1: Let's get right too, because it's Friday, Freestyle Friday. I
Speaker 1: gotta I got a weekend planning. Miss Molly and I
Speaker 1: are down here in DC. It's gonna be so much fun.
Speaker 1: Maybe even might go to hear a little music this weekend.
Speaker 1: I'm excited about it. We're gonna just other than that,
Speaker 1: drink some hot cocoa and snuggle in the ugliest Christmas
Speaker 1: sweaters we can find? John, do you have a an
Speaker 1: ugly Christmas sweater? Important? Important questions? More? All right? I
Speaker 1: mean I used to have some really ugly ones, but
Speaker 1: I've I've gotten rid of them over time. I was
Speaker 1: kind of a sweater collector for a while, until I
Speaker 1: realized that, you know, you should probably you know, if
Speaker 1: you're not gonna wear it, give it away to goodwill,
Speaker 1: or give it away to somebody who wants it. You know,
Speaker 1: it's not worth having. Were those sweaters? Yeah, sweaters just
Speaker 1: get piled up in your closet and you realize every
Speaker 1: time you did get on something else. Yeah, exactly. Salvation
Speaker 1: Armory for sure. So Lance is our first roll call
Speaker 1: dude in the mix tonight. He writes, Buck, what's your
Speaker 1: take on felony murder rule no longer being graded the
Speaker 1: same as first degree murder? Out here in California? They
Speaker 1: just overturned it, and I hear other states are following
Speaker 1: suit shields high. Well, Lance, you're catch me unaware, my friend.
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't even know what this rule change is.
Speaker 1: So you know this is what happens to the role call.
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't know everything. I don't know what
Speaker 1: this is. I'd have to look into it. An interesting question.
Speaker 1: I will check it out after the show and I'll
Speaker 1: get back to you with the response as soon as
Speaker 1: I can. But certainly it certainly sounds like something I
Speaker 1: should know about. Erica writes, I would blame you for
Speaker 1: not observing your co worker's beard. On lack of sleep
Speaker 1: As a narcaleptic, I am painfully aware that sleep deprivation
Speaker 1: destroys visual acumen. This is why I went exhausted. We
Speaker 1: find ourselves putting a phone in the fridge or milk
Speaker 1: in a cupboard. The visual cues that normally keep us
Speaker 1: on track are completely missed. Huh. Interesting and Also, Erica writes,
Speaker 1: Berlin Wall highly effective, not racist. Well, yep, that is true.
Speaker 1: The Berlin Wall was very effective, and all I was
Speaker 1: doing was separating a city. When you think about it's
Speaker 1: pretty remarkable. But this notion that the wall is racist,
Speaker 1: it's just this is a form of emotional blockmail. This
Speaker 1: is just trying to scare people away from thinking through
Speaker 1: this problem and coming up with a real solution to it.
Speaker 1: You'll owe, you'll. Democrats will talk a lot about border
Speaker 1: security in the abstract. When you ask what should we do?
Speaker 1: Then there's not anything that comes out of their mouths
Speaker 1: other than racist xenophobe, which doesn't help, does not help
Speaker 1: the conversation, it turns out, Jessica writes Buck with an
Speaker 1: exclamation point. I've been listening for about three years now
Speaker 1: and love the show. Well, thank you, Jessica, You're very kind.
Speaker 1: I have a question for you. I was scrolling through
Speaker 1: Twitter and I saw that someone tweeted at George Stefanopolupolis
Speaker 1: about how much ABC must have paid to Christine blasi Ford.
Speaker 1: George replied, not a dime. We don't pay for interviews.
Speaker 1: Other networks were chiming in, saying that they don't pay
Speaker 1: for interviews, and it is unethical. Is this true? I
Speaker 1: don't know why these people would do the interviews. Isn't
Speaker 1: there some kind of kickback so to speak? Jessica, it
Speaker 1: is true that most of what you'd consider your mainstream,
Speaker 1: mainline kind of interview locations, you know, the different platforms
Speaker 1: out there, ABC, CBS, NBCCNN, they do not pay for interviews. Um,
Speaker 1: the Blaze where I work, never paid for interviews. CNN
Speaker 1: doesn't pay for interviews. Fox doesn't pay for interviews. So EI.
Speaker 1: There are some places I know that some tabloids will
Speaker 1: pay for interviews, and some like date daytime talk shows
Speaker 1: and syndicated talk shows, things like that. You know, on
Speaker 1: the TV they will pay for interviews, But I don't
Speaker 1: know which ones do and which ones don't. But generally,
Speaker 1: these serious journalistic outfits, you know, whether you consider them
Speaker 1: serious or not. But the ones that think of themselves
Speaker 1: as serious as a rule, will not pay for interviews.
Speaker 1: They view that as as a line that they that
Speaker 1: they will not cross. It makes sense when you think
Speaker 1: about I mean, they're offering a platform for people to
Speaker 1: either share a story or share a point of view,
Speaker 1: and you know they also would then be in a
Speaker 1: situation where there's a competition for the highest dollar for
Speaker 1: some of these interviews that all said, access is money.
Speaker 1: It's one thing I can tell you about in great
Speaker 1: detail here in DC, here in the swampy swamp, the
Speaker 1: people who have connections to different administration officials, to whether
Speaker 1: it's a Democrat or a public in the White House,
Speaker 1: that means real dollars. And to the media organization, because
Speaker 1: it's all about views and cliques and subscribers and downloads,
Speaker 1: and so there's money at stake with the relationships that
Speaker 1: different media organizations have, particularly with political figures and in
Speaker 1: political journalism. So while we pretend that it's just all, oh,
Speaker 1: it's all just journalism and it's just whatever, you know,
Speaker 1: the made the best man and woman win, the truth
Speaker 1: is there are a lot of ways that you know,
Speaker 1: for example, MSNBC would have benefited under the Obama administration,
Speaker 1: and let's just say other networks would benefit now because
Speaker 1: of access to the White House or to Congress, to
Speaker 1: members of Congress. You know, one really big interview with
Speaker 1: a newsmaking senator for example, could be worth I mean,
Speaker 1: if you were to look at the monetization structures of
Speaker 1: some of these news organizations give me worth a lot
Speaker 1: of money, especially if they if it goes viral or
Speaker 1: if they have a viral moment. So, David right Buck
Speaker 1: listening on the podcast, really wish you would ask that
Speaker 1: protest answer what the heck Mike Pence had to do
Speaker 1: with a Pulse nightclub shooting or how many mosques he
Speaker 1: danced in front of? Shields Hie. You know, David, you
Speaker 1: raise a general point here that I have to tell
Speaker 1: you is fair, which is you know, I didn't I
Speaker 1: didn't really want to push that guy or try to
Speaker 1: get over the contentious He seemed just silly to me,
Speaker 1: and I just wanted to let him speak for himself.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of things I could have asked them. Also,
Speaker 1: they were they were kind of finishing up when I
Speaker 1: got there, so I didn't really have a whole lot
Speaker 1: of time, and so I just went down. I wanted
Speaker 1: to ask the most standard questions of somebody who's engaged
Speaker 1: in protesting outside somebody's home, and I think we were
Speaker 1: able to illuminate somewhat of what was going on there.
Speaker 1: But yeah, they what does the Pulse nightclubs shooting have
Speaker 1: to do with the border And you remember, though, when
Speaker 1: you're talking to people who don't have much of a
Speaker 1: context or a or a knowledge about any of the
Speaker 1: subject matter they're involved in, you know you don't want
Speaker 1: to drive yourself crazy with trying to make sense of
Speaker 1: what's nonsense nonsensical. You know that that's one way to
Speaker 1: put it. Chris writes Buck trying to fill last minute
Speaker 1: x miss gifts. Other than Black Rifle Coffee and Omaha Stakes,
Speaker 1: which I'm ordering from tonight, are there other products you
Speaker 1: endorse that are good to stuff stockings and put under
Speaker 1: the tree Freedom Hut stores so needed maybe recommendations, Thanks man,
Speaker 1: Merry Christmas shields hie from Chris, Uh Chris for I mean,
Speaker 1: obviously those are very high up on my list there.
Speaker 1: Thank you very much for being a supporter of this
Speaker 1: show and getting some great products. Subscribe to Black Rifle Coffee.
Speaker 1: Go to Black Rifle Coffee dot com, slash buck you'll
Speaker 1: get fifteen percent off and Omaha Steaks type Buck in
Speaker 1: the search bar. So if everyone listening just did that,
Speaker 1: that would really be that would be great. Christmas would
Speaker 1: come early for Team Buck over here. As to other products,
Speaker 1: I mean, all the products we advertise for are great.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, I don't know if you're gonna
Speaker 1: be able to give somebody the gift of background checks
Speaker 1: this holiday. I mean, I'm not sure that that they
Speaker 1: fit under a tree, so to speak. So we'll see.
Speaker 1: Let me think more about that. But yes, obviously Omaha
Speaker 1: steaks Black Rifle, those are high up. And listen, remember
Speaker 1: you can get T shirts and other things from Black
Speaker 1: Rifle too. I've got a few Black Rifle T shirts.
Speaker 1: They're really comfortable and they're I wear them all the time,
Speaker 1: So i'd give you that to putting your pipe and smoke.
Speaker 1: Michael writes, Hey, Buck, did you see this one? Thanks
Speaker 1: for being a voice of sanity and an increasingly insane world.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, this was the how the next Attorney General
Speaker 1: vows to probe into Donald Trump and his family. Indeed,
Speaker 1: I have seen this. I think I talked about this
Speaker 1: a bit on the show. This is the new world
Speaker 1: that we're entering into where you really just have the
Speaker 1: blatant politicization of prosecutors offices of the DOJ, and it's
Speaker 1: all justified under this idea that, you know, whatever they
Speaker 1: have to do in order to get Trump is fined.
Speaker 1: That anything that takes down Trump is worth doing, even
Speaker 1: if it destroys some of the most important foundational aspects
Speaker 1: of rule of law and in our society overall. But yes,
Speaker 1: the incoming Attorney general has strayed up said she's she's
Speaker 1: targeting Trump for political reasons, and then you'll have people
Speaker 1: turn around, so there's nothing weird going on here. They're
Speaker 1: just criminality with Trump and old people around them. Like really,
Speaker 1: because if that were the case, I don't think you'd
Speaker 1: have to have people who haven't even taken on the
Speaker 1: job of prosecutor yet who are saying, oh, we're going
Speaker 1: to prosecute those people. It's all politics, my friends, it's
Speaker 1: all politics. Bill Rights. If the worst that could possibly
Speaker 1: happen and the Democrats were able to remove President Trump
Speaker 1: from office, wouldn't Pence have to go too, because they
Speaker 1: were elected as one Bill No. My understanding of how
Speaker 1: this works is that if Trump were removed from office
Speaker 1: after impeachment at the Senate voted by a two thirds
Speaker 1: majority to remove the President United States from office, then
Speaker 1: Vice President Pence. I mean, that's why we have the
Speaker 1: succession in place that we do. Vice President Pence would
Speaker 1: become the president of the United States, So that's what
Speaker 1: I think would happen. By the way, this is from Arias.
Speaker 1: You mentioned something about wanting to look cool by growing
Speaker 1: a beard. And according to foxnews dot Com, sixty four
Speaker 1: billion narcotics crossed the border every year, so one hundred
Speaker 1: billion on the wall would pay for itself on about
Speaker 1: a year and a half, not counting all the cost
Speaker 1: with the incarceration of criminals. Now I mean areas. It's
Speaker 1: true that with all the narcotics that cross the border,
Speaker 1: when you think of all the first of all the
Speaker 1: death and misery and despair, let's cause by the mass
Speaker 1: of fentanyl and other things that come across the border,
Speaker 1: and then when you add to that all the cost
Speaker 1: that we have in trying to prevent this stuff from
Speaker 1: continuing on the law enforcement and health cost, and it's astonishing.
Speaker 1: And that's why I mean, the idea that we can't
Speaker 1: do the wall because it's too expensive is just idiocy.
Speaker 1: It's just not a serious argument against it. It just
Speaker 1: doesn't hold up when you apply even a rudimentary scrutiny
Speaker 1: to it. So that's total garbage. You know, I usually
Speaker 1: am very assure, a very self assured in my proclamation
Speaker 1: that you know you're not gonna have a shutdown. I'm
Speaker 1: not quite as sure now. Anyway, have a fantastic weekend. Everybody.
Speaker 1: Please tell somebody about the show, tell them to download it.
Speaker 1: It's a big favor to all of us here, and
Speaker 1: we'll see you next time. Shield Hie coffee is a
Speaker 1: constant my friends. I drink it every day. And as
Speaker 1: we're going to the holiday season, let me tell you,
Speaker 1: I'm thinking what gifts can I get for folks, And
Speaker 1: I know they're just gonna love. It's not gonna get,
Speaker 1: you know, stuffed under the bed somewhere. It's not gonna
Speaker 1: get stuck in the back of the closet. How about
Speaker 1: something you know someone's gonna drink every day. That's Black
Speaker 1: Rifle coffee. All right. I drink Black Rifle every morning.
Speaker 1: I've got a stack of cake cups next to my
Speaker 1: desk at work, and here at home, I'm on three
Speaker 1: cups a day, all right. I'm all about the Black
Speaker 1: Rifle mission of staying caffeinated. And in the fight. They
Speaker 1: have a coffee club that makes things easy. All you
Speaker 1: do is pick the blend you want and Black Rifle
Speaker 1: will ship coffee right to your door every month, it's
Speaker 1: Hasso free. Okay, just get on the get on the bandwagon,
Speaker 1: join the revel solution here. It's the best tasting, most energizing,
Speaker 1: most delicious coffee you can possibly find. Black Rifle Coffee
Speaker 1: is the gift that keeps on giving. Visit Black Riflecoffee
Speaker 1: dot com, slash buck receive fifteen percent off your order.
Speaker 1: That's Black Riflecoffee dot com, slash buck For fifteen percent
Speaker 1: off Black Riflecoffee dot com slash buck