WEBVTT - Plosser on Fed: Data Reliance Fluctuates, No Strategy (Audio)

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live to New York, Bloomberg eleventh Rio to Washington,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg twelve hundred to San Francisco,

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine to the country, Jam General one and around

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the globe the Bloomberg Radio plus SAP and Bloomberg got gone.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>This is taking Stock. I'm Kathleen Hayes long pim Fox,

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a special edition of Taking Stock. As we look at

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserves, a decision is decision to hold his

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>key rate steady and send a message to the market said, well,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>it may be less worried about the economy, that doesn't

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 1>mean it's ready to send a signal yet that it's

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>ready to hike than pim Now we're gonna have more

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.840
<v Speaker 1>with Charles Plosser, former president of the Philadelphia Federal Reserve.

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Also coming up, we've got earnings from Alphabet, the parent

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>company of Google, as well as Facebook, am Chin and

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods. Right now, that's got to Charlie Pellet in

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg News from for Bloomberg Business Plan. I thank

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you very much, pim Fox. Thank you, Kathleen Hayes. Let's

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>begin with stock quotes there on Alphabet parent of Google

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>up seven tenths of one percent, seven forty three seventy

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.320
<v Speaker 1>four right now on alphabet Facebook half of the ball

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is tim mentioned up one point four percent, gaining a

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>dollar seventy two one right now on shares of Facebook.

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>While we're talking about earnings in the Bay Air Hill,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:19.480
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Apple surging seven point three percent, up

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>seven oh seven right now one oh three seventy three

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>on Apple. But the other big story, Twitter, it is

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>plunging fourteen point two percent, down two sixty two to

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen dollars and eighty three cents. Today's big story. We've

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 1>got the Federal Reserve. It does see diminished economy risks,

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Stock showing a little reaction right now the f SMP

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>five hundred index climbing a point to seventy, a gain

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of less than point one percent. The Fed leaving interest

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>rates unchanged, while saying risks to the U S economy

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have subsided. On the labored market is getting tighter, suggesting

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>conditions are getting more favorable for an increase in borrowing costs.

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Arianna Coach Lacorda is a Bloomberg View columnist former FED official.

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>He is now at the University of Rochester, and he

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>was interviewed reacting to today's FED decision on Bloomberg Radio

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>and Television. I think the big challenge with the FED

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is that you're not It's not just about your what

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>we were with the central Bankers like to call your

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>modal outlook where you expect the economy to go. It's

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>about the risk that outlook, and in particular, you're really

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>worried about the downside risk that outlook because you don't

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 1>have as many tools in your your kid to offset

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>those those downside risks. P five hundred indecks off a point,

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a little change. Their gold up one to thirteen thirty

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:45.239
<v Speaker 1>seventy ounce. Now the other stories making news. Thank you,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Charlie from the Bloomberg Newsroom. I'm Jill Schneider. This news

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>update is brought to you by the Jeep Grand Cherokee,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the most awarded suv ever. The Grand Cherokee continues to

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>raise the bar with its luxurious interior and legendary four

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>by four capability. Drive one your local Jeep dealer. Today,

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump lashed out at President Obama

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>at a press conference in Florida today. I think President

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Obama has been the most ignorant president in our history.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>His views of the world, as he says, don't jive,

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and the world is a mess. Vice President Joe Biden

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>spoke to ABC News today about why so many middle

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 1>class Americans are supporting Donald Trump for president. Very successful

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.359
<v Speaker 1>on playing on their fears and there's not been enough

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>focus on playing on their hopes. Biden will speak at

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic National Convention tonight, as will President Obama. President

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan's daughter is criticizing a judge's decision to allow

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the release of John Hinckley Jr. From a psychiatric hospital

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>where he has been confined for more than thirty five

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>years after he tried to assassinate Reagan. In a lengthy

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>statement on her website, Patty Davis says she will forever

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>be haunted by the day her father almost died in

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>one and it's the end of an era for the

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Big Apple Circus. The New York Institution is folding its

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>tent after thirty five years, announcing the end today of

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>all public performances. Big Apples, clowns, acrobats, and animals performed

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>free for disadvantaged kids and the elderly since but the

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.239
<v Speaker 1>nonprofit ran out of money as support from Wall Street faltered.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Global News twenty four hours a day, powered by more

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>than journalists and analysts in more than one d twenty countries.

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jill Schneider, and this is Bloomberg, Charlie, and we

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you and again recapping a move higher for equities

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>were brought to you by national Realty Providers of one

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent satisfaction guaranteed New York City realty investments. See

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>them at n r I a dot net smp up

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a point to seventy. I'm Charlie Pelt. That's a Bloomberg

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:53.400
<v Speaker 1>business flash. He's taking stock the Fed in focus on

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. What did the FED say in its policy statement?

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>A tersely worded I've paragraphed piece of paper that markets

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>around the world dissect to get a sense of what

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the fet is telling us about a possible interest rate

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>increase this year. Let's put that question to someone who

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>who they are recently helped craft those policy statements. That's

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Charles Plaster, former president of the Fetter Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Charlie's great to have you back on the show. Good

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to be here. Kathleen, But I want to get right

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to it. What do you take away from this statement? Well,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the same. It was pretty much as expected.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.600
<v Speaker 1>The most interesting part of it was they went a

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>long way, I think, uh, to disavowing, in other words,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>undoing all the fears that they placed at the last

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>meeting that prevented them from moving ahead with an interest

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>rate hack. So basically what happened in June was as

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they were incredibly sensitive to short term data and they

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>instilled fears about all the bad things that could happen,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and the sense of the two biggest things that they

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>stressed with employment and Brexit, those years have clearly not

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:05.359
<v Speaker 1>come to pass, and um, yes they're still they're always

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>risks in the future. And the Committee has been really

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>adept at um, you know, pulling risks out of the

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>hat and emphasize them to give them an excuse not

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to to move rates up. And so now they kind

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>of had to recant. And Uh, it's going to be

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>entering to see what they're gonna do because they claim

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>their data dependance, but they get whip side by the

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>data so easily. So I think they have a huge

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>communication problem with the public about what's driving their policy decisions.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>They are basically have no strategy. Mr Plosser, I wonder

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 1>if you could comment on the distinction between being inside

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the bubble of the Federal Reserve and now that you

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>are outside, and how you explain to people that are

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>trying to invest their money how to do so based

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in the context of what you just described as a

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>non policy strategy from the Federal Reserve. Currently, Well, I

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>did they have a non policy. They just don't have

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>a strategy. I think it's really important for the Fed

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to try to communicate, and I've said this for years,

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>what are the data that are driving their decisions and

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>how have they react that data? And they typically have

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not been able to articulate that strategy or articulate their

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>reaction function, if you will, to the data. And so

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>every new meeting there is a new set of data

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on the table that seemed to be driving their policy decisions.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I mean is they don't really have

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a having they will articulate a strategy to the markets,

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's part of the problem that the

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>markets have and why you can get whipstocks so reacently.

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So as an investor, you know I think you need

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to look at fundamentals, and I don't think paying much

0:07:50.640 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>attention to the short term movements and and uh comments

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>by the said is as important as some people like

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to think. If you're a FED policy meet or UM,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you could you could argue that in fact, they are

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on fundamentals of the economy, and they've got two mandates.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 1>One is inflation. It's got to get up to two

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on that key measure they watch, and unemployment has to

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>move lower. And part of the mandate has occurred, and

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>unemployment has moved a lot lower, but the inflation number

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.640
<v Speaker 1>has not moved up that much. That seems to be

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>one of the reason why people have been hesitant without

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>a clear inflation signal, a clear need to fight inflation. Now,

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it seems that many, including FED chair yelling, have been

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>willing to just wait and see what happens. So so

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let's be clear here one on the employment

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>mandate monetary policy in terms of its stance, it's accommodative stance.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's more accommodative today on the unemployment rate is four

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>point or seven percent, whatever it is, UM, it's more

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.719
<v Speaker 1>accommodative today than it was when the unemployment rate was

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. Now with an economy that's moved from ten

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>percent to less in five percent unemployment rates, and we

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>still have an accommodative monetary policy that's even more accommodated

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>than it was earlier on. And too we have inflation.

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I agree inflation is below it's its target, although not

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>all elements of inflation. If you look at you know,

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the c p I UM you've got, the core c

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>p I is to percent or better. UH. The CPI

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>for services, which is what what consumers spend their money on,

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is over three percent, and the trimmin and medium c

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>p I s are all two percent or better. So

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that's really holding back headline inflation seems

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>to be mostly energy and its effects on the overall.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So so it's not my concern that inflation is UH

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit below two percent. You know, wh

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>who's going to tell we are we can't forecast. The

0:09:55.000 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>FED nor anyone else can either forecast or even control

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:04.559
<v Speaker 1>inflation as precisely if somehow we think they can. And

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, what's the difference between one point eight inflation

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and to persent inflation? Most people can't tell the difference.

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>They only can tell the difference when they read the numbers.

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think we're getting a little fixated on the

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>precision by which the FED can control inflation. So I'm

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>all for the fact that inflation below target means, uh,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED funds rate and the target for FED policy

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>ought to be somewhat more accommodated than if there were

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>at two. That's perfectly reasonable, but that's it's hard to

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>justify it near zero interest rates because inflation is running,

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, few tenth books and few tenths below its target.

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave it there, Thank you very much, Charles

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>plas a former president of the Philadelphia Federal Reserve. You're

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to taking Stockheim pim Fox my co host Kathleen Hayes.

0:10:55.920 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg coming up, a look at the markets,

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the reaction or lack of reaction the Fed's decision, and

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>we're also going to be looking at Apple's impact on

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets today. This is Bloomberg