WEBVTT - OpenAI, Broadcom Ink 10-Gigawatt Chip Deal

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is live

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and Ed lave Lowe into San Francisco.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Broadcom surges as it signs a multi year agreement with

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 3>OPENINGI to design.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Custom chips and networking equipment.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Plus market spouts back as President Trump signaled open US

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 3>to a deal with China. Amid the latest trade showdown

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:37.559
<v Speaker 3>what it means Tech.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>And Rare Earth and Warner Brothers.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Discovery has read buffed Paramounts Guide Dancer's initial takeover approach

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 3>for being too low according to sources. We'll have the latest,

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 3>but first we go out to the Middle East, where

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>President Trump is in the middle of a visit in

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 3>recognition of the end of the war in Gaza, with

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 3>both Hamas and Israel releasing hostages and prisoners. Today, let's

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 3>go live now to Bloomberg's Oliver Crok, who's injury for

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 3>the latest sun setting with you. We understand now President

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Trump has arrived in Egypt.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's right.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 5>Really the sun setting here and closing what is a

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 5>truly historic day for the region and certainly for the Israelis.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 5>Where we've see, as you said to Caroline, the release

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 5>of the last twenty living hostages into Israeli custody there

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 5>now back on Israeli soil, the release of those prisoners

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 5>from the jails and being held by the Israelis, back

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 5>to the West Bank, back to Gaza, back to a

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 5>number of other places. A deal that was struck by

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 5>President Trump through his sort of unorthodox foreign policy, and

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 5>something that really was inconceivable two weeks ago. The next step, now,

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 5>the next chapter is beginning in Egypt. As you can

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 5>see Donald Trump sitting next to LCCI, the President of Egypt,

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 5>to try to figure out the sort of very difficult

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 5>phase two of this, which is what do security conditions

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 5>look like going forward? In Gaza. Hamas is still armed.

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 5>They have not agreed to put down their arms. That

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 5>is really a precondition to make any of the sort

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 5>of US plans of the Trump twenty point plan come

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 5>into being. That is a requirement. And of course the

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 5>question long term of governance of Goza and this so

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 5>called Board of Peace that will be chaired by Donald

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 5>Trump and potentially other leaders. Those are the conversations that

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 5>will beginning be beginning right now in Egypt.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Oliver Crook A long day. Let's now listen in

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.079
<v Speaker 3>to President Trump as he speaks in Egypt.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 6>And it continues till today. So I want to thank

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 6>you all very much. I appreciate the way you covered

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.280
<v Speaker 6>this really momentous. I've never seen anything like it, the

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 6>level of love, the level of respect for what it is,

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 6>and it's you know, it's pieces of the Middle East,

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 6>and everybody said it's not impossible to do, and it's

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 6>going to happen, and it is happening, is before you

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 6>very eyes, and that's why it's become so fascinating.

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 7>Marco, do you have anything to.

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 8>Say to Egypt's been a phenomenal participant. I think Golo,

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 8>Steven Jerry will tell you the critical role they played,

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 8>and they can tell you themselves. They hosted the talks

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 8>here and they're going to play a very important role

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 8>now in the follow up implementation of this, which is

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 8>really it's not simply about restoring Gaza, it's about transforming

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 8>the region. So we have an incredible partner along the Alliance,

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 8>very capable partner here and a tremendous collection of leaders.

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 9>This is clearly in my mind.

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 8>I think, in the mind of everyone in this room,

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 8>probably one of the most important days for world peace

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 8>in fifty years. That's not an exaggeration, only fifty, maybe one.

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 9>Hundred in the World War two.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 3>Mister Wickcof and mister Kushner, I'm curious you've played such

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.959
<v Speaker 3>an important role in the tactical negotiations here.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 10>Or its as a lot more has to be brought

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 10>to the table here.

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 8>Oh, the minute, the minute we at ink the deal,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 8>Jared and I were already working on the implementation side

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 8>of the deal, so we've dug in.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 9>We'll be here quite a bit. That's at the direction

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 9>of the President.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 6>That's probably when it's going to be one of the

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 6>most important pass here.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 9>Jared is remarkable to work with.

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 6>I talk about it all the time, and of course

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 6>we both love working for the president.

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 7>So I would say, uh, feels like.

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 9>A very honorable job.

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 6>Mister President, Would you like to say something would be

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 6>a bit better?

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 11>So, what do you if the bead in a a

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 11>hub of a coup of dice and that's hanged with putty,

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 11>shot out this shotting shit, it's.

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 12>It's wickyser this way this way they put in the sweet.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 4>When we can had the but wouldn't have you.

0:04:26.880 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 7>Set out and look at like.

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 13>The hanger type.

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 4>I had to hang it as at right as a rounds. Well.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 7>First of all re elections say I welcome to you

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 7>between each other. It's a great pleasure and the honor

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 7>to have you with us here in the city of

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 7>peast tram Shaknus would extend uh on behalf of all

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 7>reluctions and the beasts lovers around your elds, so you

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 7>your appreciation. I never facts as I'm president and momentus

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 7>accomplished by your hands.

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 4>And they're going to do the hypercundaries and they can

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 4>hate the cold.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:12.560
<v Speaker 9>Where ahead.

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 7>I'm very confident that your Excellency is the only one

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 7>who's killed of bringing this about and bringing them to

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 7>this war, whether you're been.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 6>To start the counties, because that was the bitter counties.

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 9>And then I had a conclusion. I had a pers people.

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 14>Contin are you even said that very precisely during my

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 14>communication with your excess, that you are the only one

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 14>who is able to bring about peace and to achieve.

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Peace in this moment.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>We head back now to Juristen and Bloomberg's Oliver Crook

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>stands by to interpret what is currently momentous occasion in Egypt,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 3>President Trump, alongside the leader of Egypt, of just interpret

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:02.800
<v Speaker 3>the next steps that everyone.

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Now focuses on.

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, what is going to be the next

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 5>step is really marking the moment for which we shouldn't

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 5>sort of undervalue how significant it is, and that is

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 5>going to be the signing of the sort of peace document,

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 5>sort of ceremonial moment by presumably Donald Trump and a

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 5>number of others who have been very active in the

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 5>negotiations here. I mean there have been a few nations

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 5>that Trump has talked about a lot being very actively

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 5>involved in the negotiations. Of course, the Egyptians having played

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>a crucial role, the Kataris of course, as we know,

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 5>but then quite unexpectedly and quite significantly, the Turks and

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 5>President Erduwan who really came in and put a lot

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 5>of pressure to bear on Hamas, which we understand it

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:45.040
<v Speaker 5>was really the Kataris and Turkey that put that pressure

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.240
<v Speaker 5>onto Hamas that got them really over the line to

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 5>come to this agreement and finally release those last twenty hostages.

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 5>That has been the sort of one of the main

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 5>war aims of the Israelis. One was to destroy Hamas.

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 5>The other was the release of the hostages. And as

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 5>far as Hamas will be viewing, the situation really relinked

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 5>puishing their last sort of piece of leverage that they

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 5>have against the Israelis, so absolutely significant. So bringing all

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 5>of these nations together to start to discuss what the

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 5>sort of posts war the day after Architecture looks like

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:13.880
<v Speaker 5>is I think has gone. It was always going to

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.680
<v Speaker 5>be the most difficult part of this conversation, and that

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 5>is a conversation that begins now with President Trump sitting

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 5>alongside President Cci and Charmel Shaik and starting to begin

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 5>to build those coalitions of trying to build a security

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 5>apparatus within Gaza, one that is both credible to the

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 5>Israelis and to the Palestinian people, in order to bring

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 5>in this sort of technocratic, Palestinian led governance structure that

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 5>can sit a top of Gaza in order to facilitate

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.040
<v Speaker 5>the rebuilding and of course getting aid and ultimately potentially

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 5>and this is a provision theoretically that is possible with

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 5>this twenty point plan, a Palestinian state.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Oliver Krook life from Jerusalem. We thank you very much.

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Indeed, now let's turn out attentions to the broader markets

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 3>right now. It has been a risk on mood to

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 3>those that are participating one and a half percent on

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq one hundred a bounce back from Friday when

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>the anxiety around US China relationship du back risk taking.

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 3>We now see one and a half points added. It's

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 3>interesting that, of course we've got to dive into the

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>Ai side of the story.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 2>The key deal that you've got to keep.

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 3>An eye on is that between Broadcom and open Ai,

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:20.360
<v Speaker 3>absolute surge in this particular chip stock. It's going to

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>design not only chips, we're also networking equipment. We're up

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 3>nine one hundred and fifty billion dollars being added to

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>the market capitalization of Broadcom. We're going to dig into

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 3>that exact story right now because Bloomberg, Seth Spiegerman joins us.

0:08:32.160 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>And this is interesting because and.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 3>Video and AMD seemed to be able to get deals

0:08:36.480 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 3>but had to sweeten them for open Ai. This time

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.439
<v Speaker 3>it's just plain old ten billion dollars to ten giga

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 3>what's it feeans Seth.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean, we're still trying to figure out the

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 15>exact financial contours of this deal book. It's also a

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 15>bit different than some of the other deals that we've

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 15>seen Opening Idea recently. I mean, they're trying not only

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.200
<v Speaker 15>to pave the way for more computing capacity, but also

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 15>to play a more central role in sort of the

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 15>stack that supports AI by working with Broadcom to begin

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 15>customs designing their own chips. And I think we should

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 15>expect to see more of this from open Ai in

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:05.599
<v Speaker 15>the next couple of years, as they want to be,

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 15>you know, kind of simultaneously owning the AI models but

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 15>also having startain to have some proprietary intelligence into how

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 15>to best set up data centers and chips to facilitate

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 15>those models.

0:09:16.160 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 3>And it's interesting Braallcom of course doesn't supply the data centers,

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 3>but it provides a lot of the equipment that's going.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 2>To be going into them.

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Seth, what is the argument, how much more efficient can

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 3>your own design chips be? Alphabet already does it for

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 3>example with will come.

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean it remains to be seen, but I

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 15>think for OpenAI, there's a couple of clear incentives here. One,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 15>it doesn't have to you know, it's at the front

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 15>of the line for these chips. Two, as it is

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 15>closest to its own AI models, its own needs, and

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.599
<v Speaker 15>the future of AI development, the company might be the

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.760
<v Speaker 15>best position to figure out what it most needs from

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 15>the chips out there. And three, Opening has a lot

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 15>of experience now and setting up these data centers. When

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 15>you think about the chips, rats and servers like, it

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 15>has a unique proprietary perspective on how to best design

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 15>these data centers. All that combined might help Opening I

0:09:57.640 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 15>cut costs and also build more efficient.

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 3>System berg Seth Figerman. We so appreciate you joining. Let's

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 3>get a portfolio management perspective right now. Ude Charuvu is

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 3>portfolio manager Harding Lovner, and I'm really interested in the

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 3>fact that you've got holdings in VideA. You're clearly a

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.200
<v Speaker 3>supporter of the AI theory. But are we looking at

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 3>a bubble and you get these sorts.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 12>Of deals, Well, go to look at a cho race

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.559
<v Speaker 12>one in terms of timing of the deals. If it

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 12>is a bubble, it's potentially an MPV issue. Is it

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 12>Are we going to get all this revenue.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 4>In ten years time?

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 12>For five years time? And that's what the market is

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 12>trying to figure out right now. People try to compare

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 12>this to the dot com bubble, et cetera. But there's

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 12>a difference here. A lot of the companies who are

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 12>buying a lot of these products are supported by strong

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 12>cash flows, free cash flows, which means that there is

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 12>potential for these revenues to come through, especially if AI

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.280
<v Speaker 12>demand take up goes along the lines of what we're

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 12>seeing in the last two three years.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, none more so have the financial flex than

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 2>in video.

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:57.440
<v Speaker 3>And it's interesting that in Vidia when signing that ten

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:01.320
<v Speaker 3>gig or what compute capacity with open Ai, did give

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 3>one hundred million dollars in terms of support buying equity.

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 3>Is those sort of circular financing deals something that gives

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>you pause or do you think that that's part.

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Of what the deal needs to be?

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 4>No, that does give us posts.

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:15.079
<v Speaker 12>You do look at that and say, hang on, this

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 12>is not clear blue sky. There are some things need

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 12>we need to think of. So that's why the next

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.199
<v Speaker 12>two three is are going to be really important because

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 12>what we want to see is the return on the

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 12>capis that companies like Alphabet Meta, a lot of these

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 12>big companies are spending to show up. If it shows up,

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 12>then what you realize is that this hundred billion dollars

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 12>is not circular but just the kickstart. So that's what

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 12>that's what we want to try and see.

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you own meta.

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.760
<v Speaker 3>A meta has shown up in terms of generative AI

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 3>being folded into the advertising model being able to be

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 3>built in and bring real revenue to bear right here

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 2>But how long you're.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Going to have to weigh for Alphabet's bet to really

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 3>pay off? For we already see a nvideo, but do

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 3>you think more broadly opening eye eventually really showing that

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 3>productivity is going to gain them in terms of revenue.

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 12>So from an Alphabet from the software companies perpective, we

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.439
<v Speaker 12>do think that the next twelve months are going to

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 12>be really important. What you do need to see is

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 12>not just the return on capex going through, but the

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.840
<v Speaker 12>revenue growth coming through to support that in twenty seven

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 12>twenty eight that we are going to see a continued

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 12>acceleration or at least stability in revenue growth. Without that,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 12>it's very hard to see how the market gets really

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 12>comfortable with the amount of capics that's being spent right now.

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you just said it does give you pause,

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and there isn't just blue sky when it comes to

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 3>in video.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.360
<v Speaker 2>So have you just been trimming some of the exposure.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Has now been the time to just stay holding pat

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 3>and not adding to some of the overall portfolio exposure.

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>To some of these names.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 12>So we tend to think of in terms of longer terms.

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 12>So what does this look like in the next five years?

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 12>When we look at from that perspective, the evaluation doesn't

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 12>look extreme at this.

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Point in time.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 12>It does look at a point give us a pause

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:48.719
<v Speaker 12>in terms of, look, what else do we need to

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 12>factor in to keep buying more? But at the same time,

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 12>it doesn't give us any fear that, hey, this is

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 12>an imminent bubble as you want, As.

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>You asked at the start well on Friday, there was

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pause between US and China and particularly

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 3>access with some of these companies to rare earth that

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 3>ultimately are very dependent on China. How much have you

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 3>been making that into a supply chain headache for some

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of the companies you own.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 12>So that's again it's a timing issue.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 4>So there's two parts.

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 12>The first part is is this has become a prolonged

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 12>issue due a political issue. Then there's a lot of

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 12>other things that you think of, not just the semiconductor companies,

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 12>with all the FMCG companies, all the other companies that

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 12>sell into emerging markets, and all global treats.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 4>So let's set that aside, that this is.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 12>A solvable problem that gets solved at some point in

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 12>the time, then it's a timing issue already. What the

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 12>companies are telling us is there's a real supply issue

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 12>that they don't have enough computing power. So that means

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 12>that people who make these chips benefit from any of

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 12>these supply chain issues because to them they get pricing

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 12>power in the short term, but in the long term

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 12>this gets solved, so it's a temporary issue. So if anything,

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 12>these sort of market dips is an opportunity that you

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 12>look at saying, what are the good quality companies that

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 12>you do know have pricing power that you want to

0:13:57.400 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 12>buy into right now.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 3>And what are they If it's not the obvious AI

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 3>winners and darlings who've already seen hit are trillion dollars.

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 12>No, No, they still remain as I said, they still

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 12>remain attractive.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 4>But there's there's a broader spectrum out there.

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 12>If you look at companies like Delta Electronics, which provides

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 12>electronics and cooling, coqruitment to data centers. You look at Schneider,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 12>you look at SAP, which is going to benefit from

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 12>the fact that AI gets taken up by more and

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 12>more enterprise. So there's a bigger ecosystem than just the

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 12>semiconducted companies or just the cloud companies, and.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 3>A global ecosystem. Your name and a couple of Europeans.

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Then Ude Charuva is so good to have him in

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Harding Lovner. We have come back soon. Meanwhile, coming up

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 3>rare earth stocks, they've been surging. We've just been talking

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 3>about them. US trying to trade spats have reignited. We're

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 3>going to dig into that next. This has been bad tech.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Rare ear and.

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Critical minerals producers surged after President Trump and China reignited

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>fears of a potential trade spat between the two countries.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 3>But just today JP Morgan articulating it will funnel one

0:14:57.600 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 3>and a half trillion dollars into companies that will US

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 3>security and resiliency, including earth minerals from all.

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Senior Tech.

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Editor Mike Shepper joins us on what is a geopolitical

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>story that is really affecting some of these stocks.

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 2>What's your key takeaway today, Well.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 11>The key takeaway is that the ball is still moving

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 11>between the two sides.

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 4>We are seeing JD.

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 11>Van's playing bad cop in the discussions. Right after Donald

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 11>Trump signals some openness to trying to back away from

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 11>this standoff that just erupted over the past several days,

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 11>Jdvan saying, look, it is up to China now to

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 11>make the next move. Beijing in turn responding with the

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 11>same saying, look, it is Washington that now needs to

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 11>make some sort of concession for US to relax.

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 4>Some of these newly imposed export controls.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 11>And what is really hitting a nerve here in Washington

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 11>is that it is a reimposition of export controls on

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 11>rareerads that are critical to so many industries here in

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 11>the US, everything from consumer electronics to defense. It is

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 11>also the imposition of controls and the technology used to

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 11>extract it, and that poses a complication for US efforts

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 11>potentially to try to do more of this at home.

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 11>China is exerting what it sees as leverage in rare

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 11>roots because it holds roughly half of the world's reserves

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 11>in rare orts and It dominates production and refining of

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 11>these materials which are used, as I said, across the economy,

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 11>and iPhones in consumer electronics, even smart vision goggles, night

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 11>vision goggles used by the military. So we are seeing

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 11>something crucial for the US. But China is also trying

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 11>to exert this leverage to perhaps get some concessions from

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 11>the US on export controls governing things such as semiconductor

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 11>manufacturing equipment and AI chips as well, and so this

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 11>will be playing out rapidly. They don't have a lot

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 11>of time to solve this before those tarifts that Donald

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 11>Trump threatened take effect on November first.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Now, the key thing Caro to watch this week.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 11>Later this week will be that there will be a

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 11>Chinese delegation here in DC for the IMF World Bank

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 11>Annual semi annual meetings. We'll want to see what may

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 11>emerge in terms of first steps toward a rap Rochemont.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 3>Mike Shephard, we appreciate the breakdown and let's stick with

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 3>China and joining us as Michelle Guide, our CEO of

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the CROC Institute for Tech Topomacy and Purdue. Are we

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 3>expecting a dayton? Are we expecting a pullback? From the brink,

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 3>because Friday it.

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Felt very much live and well when it comes to anxiety, well.

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 10>I think what we're seeing is that this type of

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 10>volatility is just the cost of doing business with a

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 10>totalitarian state, and as long as it involves China, volatility

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 10>and uncertainty in the market is really going to be

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 10>a fat rather than a problem.

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 9>And so there's two really important.

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.160
<v Speaker 10>Things here for business leaders to understand as we watch

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 10>these negotiations continue. First is that every time that there's

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 10>a ninety day extension here, it's not really a pause.

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 10>We're just entering an other inning of negotiations, and so

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 10>this type of posturing is going to continue to happen,

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.200
<v Speaker 10>and markets need to bake that in. So it's like

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 10>make a note for February, because if we get to

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 10>November and then we get another extension, then this is

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 10>all going to happen again.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 9>So it's peace number one.

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Second, and even more importantly.

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 10>Is even when we have an agreement, we are doing

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 10>business with a totalitarian state in the Chinese Communist Party,

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 10>So we still can't relax because they aren't in the

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:34.119
<v Speaker 10>business of honoring agreements until the point that it becomes

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 10>inconvenient for them, and so real stability here in the

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 10>long term isn't going to happen until not just when

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 10>there's another agreement, but real stability is going to come

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 10>from when there's total American dominance in the next generation

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 10>of industry. So it China becomes a non issue.

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk about rare US. For example.

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 3>We had the CTO of Palanteer Michelle on the show

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 3>on Friday, and really sham Sanka was saying he thinks

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the leverage is being exerted by China and right here

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>right now because of the independence starting to be shown

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.440
<v Speaker 3>with MP materials in the state being built there. The

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 3>idea that the US has got the memo that they

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 3>need to be more dependent on themselves for rare US.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Is that the reality here? And how quickly can that unfold?

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 10>I think all of this is going to be a

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 10>tit for tat and a grinding, incremental struggle until the

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 10>United States pulls away. And you know you mentioned Palentier.

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 10>I know you were also talking to Palmer Lucky at

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 10>and Roll last week. When you think about total American

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 10>dominance in the next generation of industries that's going to

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 10>come from the private sector and so what we're watching

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 10>on a day by day basis is the governments go

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 10>back and forth, and our government in the United States

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 10>plays a really important role when it comes to defense

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 10>export controls, leveling the playing field like with tariffs. But

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to offense, that is going to be

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 10>a private sector role. We have to build new technologies,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 10>we have to manufacture them here at home. We have

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 10>to create new categories. We have to regain control over

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 10>materials over all of our supply chains. We have to

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 10>move really fast. And so you mentioned the investment at

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 10>JP Morgan now pumping billions or trillion and a half

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 10>dollars into really important national security industries you talked about

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 10>palanteer anderl I was in Austin last week with the

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 10>team at Saronic doing really amazing things with the next

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:18.399
<v Speaker 10>generation of autonomous vessels, building them here at home with

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 10>speed and scale.

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 16>That is what victory looks like, the.

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 3>JP and Morgan event and well signaling it's five hundred

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars more than perhaps would have been down anticipated

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 3>one and a half trillion. What really can they do

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 3>in terms of funneling channeling money to these sorts of

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 3>key industries because many would say, look, this is just

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:38.720
<v Speaker 3>the right sort of lip service you need to pay

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 3>to the current administration.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think when they're pumping capital into really important

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 10>businesses and industries, what they're allowing them to do is

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 10>go faster. And I think that's been the name of

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 10>the game here. China has a competitive edge because they

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 10>can move fast. Since they're a very top down totalitarian state.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 10>Here in the United States, speed has to be our

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 10>next weapon, and so pumping capital into these really important

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 10>industries are just going to enable us to move faster,

0:21:05.320 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 10>to build, to rebuild, and to dominate these important sectors

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 10>in order for us to leave the twenty first century

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:12.479
<v Speaker 10>shell geide.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 3>At Psoronic two, I've had them on the show and

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 3>can't wait to talk more a little bit about autonomous

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 3>vessels from the Kruck Institute.

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 2>We so appreciate your time.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, coming up, elol Musk's Dubai loop set to open

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty six, according to Amorati official.

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that plan next. This has been bed tech.

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Commuters in Dubai could travel along Elon Musk's underground transit

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 3>system as soon as next year, as according to an

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 3>Emarati official now. The project, announced back in February by

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Musk's boring company, would be a rare success for the

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>tunneling startup. The first phase is set to span ten

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 3>point six miles and carry twenty thousand passengers an hour,

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 3>and it is part of the UAE's broader push to

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 3>ease congestion from its growing population. Let's put it now

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>and look at what's happening in the crypto markets, because Bitcoin, boy,

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 3>did we have a significant sell off in the last

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 3>three days. We want to push back to what happened

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 3>on Friday evening. It crypto marketing experience a brief but

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 3>so is the intense crash that was particularly felt in

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 3>the old coins at one point, using much as forty

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 3>percent within minutes as the one hundred percent tariff on

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 3>Chinese imputs came from President Trump. Critics really talking about

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 3>crypto market structure here, a lack of liquidity, excesses, leverage

0:22:29.800 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 3>and particular some glitches that seem to occur and autoly

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 3>leveraging control mechanisms over in exchanges like finance. But we

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 3>keep an eye Bitcoin now up and flat over the

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 3>course of three days. We're coming up plenty more on

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 3>Open AIM Broadcom a multi year arrangement for custom chips

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 3>and networking equipment. Then is sent broad comstock soaring from

0:22:49.520 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 3>New York. That's a Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Blomberg Tech.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 3>We check in on these markets that are back in

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 3>rally mode after Friday's anxiety China US dialing up once

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 3>again the trade tensions. We bounced back as both seem

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 3>to calm rhetoric on the day. We are almost two

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 3>percentage points, particularly chip stocks. Let's just dive in and

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 3>see what's happening in terms of the Semiconductor Index, which

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 3>is basically got every single member in the green.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 2>All bar one in video up two point eight percent.

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 3>As we continue to dial in on the AI opportunity,

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 3>AMD is at one point six percent, but Broadcom it

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 3>leads the charge more than nine percent one hundred and

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 3>fifty billion dollars added in market capitalization, as we see

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a deal to be helping with custom chips and indie

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 3>networking gear for Open AI, and they don't you even

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 3>have to spend their own equity, it seems. Let's get

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to that key story of the day between Broadcom and

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Open AI. We Mandat seeing his BlueBag Intelligence, Global head

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 3>of tech Research. And what's been so interesting about these

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 3>golden touches from open ai for some of the big

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 3>publicly traded companies is usual. Open ai has been given

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 3>a sweetename buying video by IMD Broadcom.

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 2>It just seems to be independence that they give to

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 2>open Ai.

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, and I think the model here is the Google

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 17>GPU model. I mean, when you think about Broadcom's almost

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.919
<v Speaker 17>twenty billion dollars rund rate for AI chips, more than

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 17>half of that.

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Is from Google GPUs.

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 17>So what open ai is saying is you help us

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.040
<v Speaker 17>get there in terms of the ramp up like Google TPUs,

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 17>which is in their seventh version of chips.

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean, and they've done it at a very quick pace.

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 17>So from that perspective, it will help open ai produce

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 17>costs of up to thirty to forty percent per gigawat.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 17>If you think about, you know, one gigawatt takes forty

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 17>to fifty billion. One gigawat with Broadcom chips would be

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 17>at least thirty to forty percent cheaper because the cost

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 17>of those chips is the highest component in that gigawat buildout.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 17>So Broadcom helps you lower that cost of chips, and

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 17>I think that's some here that yes, we want merchant silicon,

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 17>but we also want custom silicon with Broadcom because that's

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 17>the kind of diversification Google has and that's why their

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 17>cost of infrastructure is the lowest among all the hyperscalites.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, do the read a cross for the TPUs from

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 3>and from Google? Who else is in the mix there?

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Because hair Broadcom says I'll help you custom designer chip,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll help you with networking gear. But there's a lot

0:25:23.840 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 3>more to an AI data center than all of that.

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 17>Absolutely, and you need to source the power you need.

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 17>All the other deals fit in the end when you

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 17>look at you know what Amazon is trying to do

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 17>with Tranium, they're doing that with Marvel. Microsoft is doing

0:25:37.480 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 17>that with Marvel as well, and they haven't had the

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.919
<v Speaker 17>same kind of success that Google has had with TPUs

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 17>with Broadcom. So to my mind, you know, it was

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 17>natural for open AI to try with Broadcom given the

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 17>success that again Google has had compared to everyone else

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 17>who is trying to do custom silicon.

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:58.359
<v Speaker 4>And yeah, they will do deals for power.

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 17>That's what open EI is good at in terms of

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 17>sourcing different providers. That's what Sam Altman has shown. But

0:26:04.359 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 17>clearly chips is the component that costs sixty to seventy

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 17>percent of the data center, so you want to make

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 17>sure you get that at the lowest cost.

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 4>You won't be able to do that with Nvidia.

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 17>Vidia will still be the highest cost chip provider, even

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 17>though they are making an investment. AMD has will likely

0:26:22.720 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 17>cut its cost, but it won't be the same performance

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 17>per What Broadcom will do it custom specs for you,

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 17>and then they can do it at scale that Google

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:31.640
<v Speaker 17>is doing.

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 2>And it's for inference.

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 3>And I'm interested if you can interpret when open Ai,

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Sam and hop Tan get together on a podcast and

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 3>announce this sort of a deal. What is it by

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 3>understanding your own large language model and the needs of

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 3>it that can really be built into the custom silicon.

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 17>I mean, just this past weekend I read about tiny

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 17>recursive models. So everyone is looking at how these large

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 17>models can be run more efficiently in terms of inferencing costs.

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 17>And you know, whether it's tiny recursive models or some

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 17>other farm, you want minimum latency as well as you

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 17>know power is your real constraints, so you want maximum

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 17>performance per Why so if you're optimizing for those two,

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 17>you are going to go with custom silicon because that's

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 17>what Google has shown us. They can run YouTube videos

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 17>best because it's their custom silicon. No other merchant silicon

0:27:22.160 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 17>can give you that kind of performance, and I think

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 17>that's what Open Eye is.

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Going after multi year deal.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Ten million dollars is what they signal back on their

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.880
<v Speaker 3>earnings of the villion. In September, mandep seeing BlueBag Intelligence

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 3>really breaking down the why. Now let's go to Bluemoe's

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 3>tech equity reporter round Blastelica. Now, who can help talk

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 3>through the US tech stocks, the rebound that we're seeing

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, and indeed what Oracle is up to

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.800
<v Speaker 3>on the day. But first Rhyn, we talk about the

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 3>rally we're seeing in tech stoks. How much is that

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>a relief from some of the talk between US and

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 3>China of the weekend or indeed this latest bro Con deal.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 4>Hey, good morning.

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 16>So when I came in this morning, everything was pretty

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.120
<v Speaker 16>broadly higher, which did seem to be some relief over

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 16>the latest developments with respected China. But certainly when we

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 16>got the news about Broadcom and open Ai, that' stock

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 16>absolutely skyrocket. I think you mentioned before one hundred and

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 16>forty or so billion dollars in added market cap really

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 16>helped augment the moves that we are seeing in the

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 16>chip space today. And obviously this comes in the week

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:19.639
<v Speaker 16>of several other deals involving open Ai, AMD, Oracle and Video,

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 16>so on and so forth. Obviously this has become an

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 16>incredibly influential company that is really destriving massive gains across

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:26.160
<v Speaker 16>the space.

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking of massive gains throughout the year, but now

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 3>perhaps also rallying on the day is Oracle. We've had

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 3>an interesting narrative come back to a really realization last

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>week that maybe Oracle doesn't make that much margin every

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 3>time that it's selling compute to open Ai. What has

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Oracle got on the agenda this week and the time

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 3>that they need.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 4>To prove it well.

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 16>They have their Ai World conference this week. I believe

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 16>it starts today and goes all the way to a Thursday.

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 16>A lot of highlights. There's going to be a couple

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 16>of keynotes tomorrow, including from Larry Elson and the new

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 16>co CEO. There's going to be an analyst day on

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 16>Thursday where they people are expecting some updated financial targets.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 16>So there is a lot that's going on this week

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 16>and there's going to be a lot that people are

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 16>going to be paying attention to. One person I spoke

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 16>to said he's actually hoping Oracle increases its CAPEX guidance

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 16>here at the conference, because that would be an indication

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 16>that people are feeling pretty confident that the recent deal

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 16>they announced with open Ai, which was I think for

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 16>three hundred billion over five years, that that money is

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:22.560
<v Speaker 16>going to be a pretty reliable driver for them. There

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 16>is some concern right now about, you know, where's all

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 16>this money coming from. How is open ai going to

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 16>finance all these massive deals it's doing right now? So

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 16>maybe getting some more CAPEX erg is there. That's something

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 16>people are watching out for to maybe justify some of

0:29:33.920 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 16>the moves that we've been seeing.

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 3>I mean, and thirty five billion was where capex was

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 3>meant to be hitting in fiscal twenty twenty six.

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 2>They see that that was at more than.

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 3>Sixty percent year on years, So Ryan talk to some

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 3>of that anxiety about where money is ultimately coming from.

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you think this week we will still see the

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 3>concerns around an AI bubble.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 16>I think it's going to be hard to ease those

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 16>concerns completely unless we get some real sort of updated

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 16>numbers out of some of these companies. I know a

0:29:57.840 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 16>lot of people are really looking ahead to the upcoming

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 16>Earth Earning season and see what we get out of

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 16>Microsoft and Amazon and Alphabet and Meta, you know, all

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 16>the major cloud companies, all the major customers to Nvidia

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 16>and the other AI infrastructure stocks. That's going to be

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 16>really key for people to feel like that the spending

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 16>train continues to move on. And of course anything we

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 16>get that sort of speaks to the ROI that these

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 16>companies are seen from AI, that's going to help ease

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 16>concerns as well.

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Make Sure and Vasilica thank you very much indeed for joining.

0:30:26.680 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 3>While coming up Warner Brothers Robusts to takeover approach from

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Paramount Skydunce. While on that next in the future of

0:30:32.880 --> 0:30:34.600
<v Speaker 3>the companies, this will be back tech.

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 13>You actually need more content to yield more engagement, and

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 13>so we would actually want to be in the business

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 13>throughout whatever lens we're looking at of actually producing more

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 13>you know, more movies, more television series, more at the

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 13>scale because you need that content, you need that great

0:31:03.360 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 13>storytelling to yield engagement. And from that standpoint, we're also

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 13>in the business first and foremost of creating long term

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 13>value creation.

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:16.719
<v Speaker 3>David Ellison, their CEO of Paramount Skuidance of course our

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 3>screen Time summit last week for a moment, his company

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 3>seems won't be getting more content from a takeover of

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Warner brother Discovery. According to sources, Warner Brothers rejected Paramount's

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 3>offer for being too low.

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's get more on this from LEITHA.

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Wraganath, and she's a US media analyst from Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 3>And it seemed from your analysis that really Paramount needs

0:31:36.880 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 3>the content, perhaps more than Warner Brothers needs the price point.

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 18>Absolutely, Paramount really needs a strategy, Caroline.

0:31:44.240 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 4>So yes, they have skydanced that deal.

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 18>It took, as you well not, it took months, played

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 18>out for months, but finally everything was done and dusted

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 18>in early August. But really, I mean, as you kind

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 18>of look at Paramount, you kind of look at the assets,

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 18>you look at the business, there's really not a whole

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 18>lot get excited about. You know, you have the linear

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 18>TV networks they bring in majority of the profits, but

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 18>remember that's a declining business. We've seen profits almost being

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 18>halved over the past you know four to five years.

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 18>You have streaming, which is the way of the future.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 18>But it's really not generating profits yet, and it's a

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 18>subscale business when you compare it to the likes of

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 18>Netflix or Amazon or even Disney. Plus they have only

0:32:22.960 --> 0:32:26.320
<v Speaker 18>about seventy million subscribers, so they absolutely need content. There's

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 18>no doubt about it. Warner Brothers arguably one of the

0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 18>best businesses out there in the media ecosystem. You just

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 18>look at some of the you know the IP. It's

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 18>top tier IP. I mean, whether you're thinking of Game

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 18>of Thrones or you know, Harry Potter or DC Comics,

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 18>they have it all. So I think definitely that you know,

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 18>Paramount needs them pretty badly.

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk about what Warner Brothers Discovery is currently up to.

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 3>Though they're splitting in two feeling that more or certain

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 3>more value can be accreted to the streaming and the

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 3>movie side, what then happens to your average cable that

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 3>they continue to have as a separate part of the company.

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 18>Yeah, So that really, I think is the major dilemma

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.240
<v Speaker 18>right now for david'sazz Loave and his team at Warner

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 18>Brothers Discovery, because they know very well that once they

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 18>split the company, I mean streaming and studios will be

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 18>off to a fabulous start. There's going to be a

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 18>lot of demand of you know, in terms of content.

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 18>The profitability looks good. The real problem is with what

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 18>is called the global networks business in which is being

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:27.440
<v Speaker 18>called Discovery Global just to kind of reflect all of

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.239
<v Speaker 18>the cable networks. So the problem here again is right now,

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 18>actually it brings in majority of the company's profits, so

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.920
<v Speaker 18>it's about seventy five to eighty percent of the company's profit.

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 18>But again here it's the same old story, which is,

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 18>you know, advertising revenue, affiliate revenue in decline, so we're

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 18>going to see you know, EBITDA fall and so that's

0:33:47.360 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 18>kind of where really the big head scratcher is for

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 18>David's as love because the offer that Paramount is giving

0:33:52.360 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 18>now is for the entire company, so he's also kind

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 18>of he can get to offload the TV networks basically

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 18>kind of say bye bye and not have to worry

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 18>about it if you go through with the split. The

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 18>problem is what happens to the TV networks. There's not

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 18>a whole lot of bright prospects in terms of growth,

0:34:07.200 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 18>and the bigger problem is that it will also have.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:09.839
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the debt.

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 18>Remember Warner Brothers right now has about thirty to thirty

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 18>five billion dollars in debt, majority of which will travel

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 18>with that Global Networks segment.

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 2>The story will keep on folding.

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 3>We thank you Ethan Ranganath and US Media and analyst

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 3>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Sticking on entertainment, jares A Disney. They

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 3>spiked earlier this morning after Taylor Swift announced new content,

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 3>including a docu series that were premiere on Disney Plus

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.920
<v Speaker 3>in December. Company, as you see, shares at one and

0:34:35.960 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 3>a half percent at one point up three and a

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 3>half percent in pre market training. Really another sign of

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 3>the economic power of Taylor Swift. Meanwhile, President Trump's proposed

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 3>TikTok transfer plan will give Washington greater oversight over the

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 3>apps safety and data security, and could allow US authorities

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 3>access to use a data For more on the future

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.439
<v Speaker 3>of TikTok, Bloomberg's Alex Ravine, who covers the platform, joins

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 3>US now and we we've got to put us in

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 3>the context of US China diplomacy or lack there of

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, and the worries about dining up of

0:35:06.640 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 3>trade tensions.

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 2>And what that means. A TikTok But Alex, what's really.

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Important about your BusinessWeek's story is it shows how much

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 3>control the.

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 2>US government can have over data, not just the Chinese government.

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 19>Now, absolutely, you know, there's still lots of details around

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 19>the steal that are being worked out, and as you've said,

0:35:23.280 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 19>there's questions about US China relations and how things could

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 19>really change as they have over the last couple of

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:31.080
<v Speaker 19>days that could affect how this steal plays out. But

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 19>one thing we've been very interested in focusing on is

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 19>the role that the US government could play, really raising

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 19>the question that the US government may be able to

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.440
<v Speaker 19>do some things on TikTok here that Americans have for

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 19>many years been concerned China is doing on its own

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:51.720
<v Speaker 19>version of TikTok there in potentially determining, you know, inspecting

0:35:51.800 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 19>code on the app, and in potentially determining how the

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 19>algorithm is retrained. There's some sort of reading between the

0:35:58.640 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 19>lines in the executive order that President Trump signed on

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 19>TikTok and some briefing that the White House put out

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 19>with reporters that can suggest that the White House may

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 19>actually have more sway over a future TikTok than people

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 19>may be aware of.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Yet there's a line in your story when President Trump

0:36:16.680 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 3>was quoted as saying, if I can make it one percent, Magga,

0:36:19.320 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 3>I would, he said from the Oval Office, set Tom

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 3>and the twenty fifth.

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 2>But I'm not going it's not going to work out

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 2>that way.

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Just Alex, we have so many questions around ensuring that

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 3>these social media companies aren't biased in any way. So

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 3>what do you think ultimately will become of trying to

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 3>signal that lack of bias or not in the future

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:38.360
<v Speaker 3>for TikTok.

0:36:39.239 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 19>Well, I think what Trump's you know, the rest of

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.400
<v Speaker 19>that quote is that Trump really wants to ensure that

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.919
<v Speaker 19>there is no bias on the platform. But I think

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 19>that based on what we have seen with other social

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:50.760
<v Speaker 19>media platforms and the way that they have gone, especially

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 19>since since President Trump has taken office again, we know

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:54.800
<v Speaker 19>that there are really.

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.840
<v Speaker 9>No guarantees and also that ownership of these platforms really matters.

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 19>When Elon Musk took over took over Twitter, which he

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 19>now renamed to X, it became a very political platform.

0:37:04.800 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 9>Even though he allowed a lot more.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 19>Speech to flourish on the platform than previously, it really

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:11.480
<v Speaker 19>became a bullhorn for his own politics. Similarly, since Trump

0:37:11.560 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 19>took office. We saw that Mark Zuckerberg has made meta

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 19>platforms more in line with the Trump administration's policies and

0:37:18.480 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 19>allowing more speech. So I think even though Trump, you know,

0:37:21.280 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 19>reassured everybody in the Oval office and that statement that

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 19>you that you just pointed to, that he does want

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 19>this to be a platform that's not just one hundred

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 19>percent MAGA, but that does include, you know, perspectives and

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 19>philosophies and ideologies from across the spectrum. There is always

0:37:35.480 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 19>the chance that the ownership could have some sort of

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 19>a role in what people ultimately see on the platform.

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 3>And talking of that platform, TikTok has not been pulled

0:37:44.560 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 3>off the table at this point, according to James Singwere,

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 3>he's negotiating with China Lumbags.

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Alex Slovene, thanks for the update.

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we'll discuss the business of space and growing

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 3>space tourism industry ESNE. It was Okoro from that Harvard

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 3>Belfa Center as a brute meg Tech SpaceX plans to

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 3>launch flight eleven of its Starship Mega Rocket tonight, the

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 3>last one using Starship version two. This is the company

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.200
<v Speaker 3>prepares to transition to Starship Version three, which is expected

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 3>to perform orbital launches and recoveries. Joining us now is

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Sna Zookoro, senior fellow at the Harvard Belfer Center. You

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.279
<v Speaker 3>used to be serving as a NASA executive and a

0:38:31.360 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 3>former assistant director of Space Policy at the White House,

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 3>so you are in the know. Just how crucial is

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:37.400
<v Speaker 3>this test later this evening.

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 9>Oh, it's critically important because what we're going to see.

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 20>Are thermal tests, some stress tests, some flight maneuvers as

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.800
<v Speaker 20>they prepare for the next version, as you indicated, and

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 20>it's going to take them several months because they are

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 20>going to ensure that Starship version three will go into orbit,

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.800
<v Speaker 20>conduct some recoveries, and it will be very exciting to

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 20>see what's coming down from SpaceX After that. I think

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:10.360
<v Speaker 20>that the market will be very interested in where this

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 20>unstoppable company is headed.

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.320
<v Speaker 3>And put into the context of how unstoppable it is.

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 3>Because we've had a slight delay on delivering Amazon's Kaiper

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:23.560
<v Speaker 3>satellites into low mid Earth orbit, but that's still on track.

0:39:23.640 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 2>And the fact that.

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Basically SpaceX is helping other competitors enter and get into space,

0:39:28.239 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 3>what does that signal about its dominance?

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Still any lamsques, I think that it's.

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 20>Just clear how important this company is as a whole,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 20>not just as a competitor, but as a leader in

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 20>the sector.

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 9>So as a leader in.

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:49.040
<v Speaker 20>Space at launch, they are able to help competitors get

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 20>up to space, and as a leader in broadband communications

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 20>and in the space sector writ large, they are able

0:39:57.920 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 20>to continue to accelerate their progress. So this is very

0:40:02.239 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 20>big and with Kuper, we also have to acknowledge that

0:40:06.640 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 20>what this does is it's great news for the US

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 20>to use strategically, since that we will now have two

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 20>major at least two major players in the broadband from

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:21.319
<v Speaker 20>space ecosystem, as other countries you know, continue to build

0:40:21.360 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 20>their satellite constellations to provide the same service.

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 3>When we think about dominance not only in the provision

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 3>of satellite communication but just in rockets full blown, how

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.840
<v Speaker 3>are we seeing other companies perform? I mean, Blue Origin

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 3>has been active in the last month.

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 9>They have been and they have been doing quite well.

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 20>So you see New Shepherd, which was designed for commercial purposes,

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:50.080
<v Speaker 20>has taken six additional people up to space and their numbers.

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 9>Are totally at about eighty six, which is exciting for

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 9>space tourism. You know, you and I should be able to.

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 11>Get on.

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 20>Their backlog of space, the tourist tickets, you know, perhaps

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 20>soon as they continue to complete these these launches. So

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 20>it's really important to see the companies continue to show consistency.

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 9>You know, when you particularly in a business, it's so complex.

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 20>And that consistency really helps to ensure that, you know,

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 20>the market keeps moving, the space economy keeps growing bigger

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 20>and bigger.

0:41:26.920 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 3>Are they getting consistency from NASA at the moment? I

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 3>put a pointed question to you, because our own ed

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.840
<v Speaker 3>Ludlow has been breaking extraordinary stories here at Bloomberg, and

0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.280
<v Speaker 3>really one of them being that Jared Isaacman is perhaps

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.600
<v Speaker 3>back back in the mixed discussions with President Trump to

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:45.640
<v Speaker 3>potentially lead NASA him of course of shift for payments

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.879
<v Speaker 3>and close relationship with himself being an astronaut and having

0:41:49.960 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 3>relationship with with of course Elon Musk. Is there need

0:41:54.360 --> 0:41:57.719
<v Speaker 3>to avoid felt in NASA right now without someone at

0:41:57.760 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 3>the helm.

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.440
<v Speaker 20>The agencies closed at the moment given the government shutdowns?

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:06.360
<v Speaker 2>So true is that political.

0:42:08.080 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 9>Political pause? And secondly, you have to think of this

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 9>technically as well as economically.

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.839
<v Speaker 20>So technically, while NASA's needed, these companies are mature enough

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:21.920
<v Speaker 20>that they can continue to show consistency and their products

0:42:22.320 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 20>without NASA conducting reviews, which is fantastic news. And then economically,

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 20>quite like with space tourism and with SpaceX's starship tests,

0:42:34.000 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 20>you don't really need the agency around as these companies

0:42:37.160 --> 0:42:41.319
<v Speaker 20>continue to show the commercial space sector continues to grow,

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 20>so we do need them politically and strategically for the future.

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 9>But the companies are showing that they are part of

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 9>a growing.

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:53.400
<v Speaker 20>Asset class, and they're part of a mature sector, and

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 20>they are not completely reliant on an agency that is

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:57.320
<v Speaker 20>currently closed.

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 3>What it seems though, is that perhaps miss operations over

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.719
<v Speaker 3>NASA have been saying perhaps look, then will still be

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 3>stop start when it comes to getting to the Moon

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 3>or getting to Mars. Just update us on what the

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 3>longer term goals are for NASA and for US space

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 3>more poorly briefly.

0:43:14.360 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 9>So, currently the Trump administration is supportive of US.

0:43:19.040 --> 0:43:21.840
<v Speaker 20>Returning to the Moon and then moving on to Mars.

0:43:22.320 --> 0:43:25.279
<v Speaker 20>They are interested in moving that timeline closer so that

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:26.280
<v Speaker 20>we get there.

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 9>Sooner than probably twenty twenty eight.

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 20>And at the intersection of all those timelines is SpaceX,

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 20>and not a surprise, they are going to supply some

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 20>of the critical transportation, and there are some NASA vehicles

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.960
<v Speaker 20>that are going to also conduct these transportation to the

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 20>Moon and elsewhere. But we do stand a good chance

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 20>to meet both the administration's goals and NASA's goals of exploration,

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 20>given how mature.

0:44:02.560 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 9>As the technical team are.

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 3>As the name of OCORRA, we appreciate your time at

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 3>the Harvard Belfare Center.

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech Markets

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Rally Today.

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 2>Don't forget our podcast. This is Bloomberg