WEBVTT - Best Of - Nick Wright's NFL Week 1  picks, predicting Chiefs' Super Bowl opponent,  Belichick debut 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Best of the Week for What's Right

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with Nick Right the best takes and moments from this

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>week on the show. Enjoy. I want to recap what

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we've done and then get to demand's picks and my

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>final picks. So we did six official If you want

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to hear all thirty two overs and unders again, like rate, subscribe, review,

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's on YouTube, it's on iTunes', on Spotify, everywhere you

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can get your podcasts, and you can hear my picks

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:35.880
<v Speaker 1>for all thirty two teams. But there are six bets

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that we are making. Okay, we are betting the overs

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for the following teams with the following Juice Jags over

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.599
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half minus one twenty five. I think

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Jags are going to make the playoffs. I think

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Trevor is going to have a bounce back year. I

0:00:53.040 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>also think he knows this is kind of a make

0:00:55.280 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>or break year for him. He luckily already got paid,

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>but as far as him being concerned, are like a

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>no doubt franchise quarterback. They've got to be good. I

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>think they will be, and they only have to win

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>eight games. The Bears over eight and a half at

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>plus one point fifteen. I like everything about the team.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I love the coach at least this. I love their

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator who's also their head coach. I can't yet

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>say if I know Ben Johnson will be good at

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the head coaching stuff. I know he's good at the

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>play calling stuff. I don't mind the tough love on Caleb.

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>So they'ren over. I have Kansas City. You just bet

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs over every single year. I mean it's since

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Andy's been there pri Ma Homes. It has failed to

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>hit one time, and they if they only win, if

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>they go twelve and five, people would consider that a

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a disappointment and it would hit their over.

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Tampa over nine and a half is probably my favorite

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>bet of all of these. I think the Bucks have

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a real shot to be the one seed in the NFC,

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they are going to win at

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>least eleven games, maybe twelve or thirteen. That's minus one twenty.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders over six and a half at minus one

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>forty five. They're the team everyone thinks it's going to

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>be bad that I think it's going to be good.

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And Atlanta over seven and a half at minus one

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>forty Again, they won eight games last year with Cousins

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>falling apart, and I think you know year or two

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of Raheem Morris with the defense. Those are my overs demons.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Of those six, what is your favorite and what is

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>your least favorite of my six overs?

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 2>Then favorite, I gotta say, man, I think it's the

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Jags over seven and a half. Least favorite. Uh, I

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 2>don't really. I guess if like, if I had to

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 2>choose one, my least favorite would be the Bears.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But like I like, I don't, but you don't hate it? Right? Yeah?

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>All right? Now? The unders six unders as well, Bengals

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>under nine and a half at minus one fifteen. I

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>just don't see a team with those. I think they

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>have real question marks on the O line and obvious

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>question marks all over the defense. And I think Zach

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Taylor's seat is very hot. I don't think they're getting

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to double digit wins. The Colts under seven and a

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>half at minus one thirty. This is my favorite of

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the unders. I think they could end up with the

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>number one pick of the draft. I think that is

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely on the board. The Broncos under nine and a

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>half at plus one ten. I I think the Broncos

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to get out to a decent start, people

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to be crowing. I think the final two

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 1>months of the season are going to be brutal for them.

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I also think people have overestimated what they're going to

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.600
<v Speaker 1>get from bo Nicks this year, and they're two major

0:03:56.120 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Their two major defensive editions are such injury risks of

0:04:00.200 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>me that I don't think. I don't know that they're

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>going to get the boost from them that people expect

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>under ten and a half weeks. Oh, if they get

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>off to a good start, Yeah, sure, absolutely, Yeah, that's

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>on the board. Cowboys under eight and a half minus

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>one forty five. I did this before the Parsons trade.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I assume you know, odds have shifted on this, but

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we've made these bets already. Vikings under nine and a

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>half minus one twenty five. I just think it's a

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>lot to ask in that division for de facto rookie quarterback.

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And I just think the Niners win totals wrong. I

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>think the Niners are looked at miners in the schedule

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>soft as like a Tier two Super Bowl contender. I

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>don't look at them that way. I think that they are,

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, a seven to eight win team, so I

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>will take under ten and a half for the Niners.

0:04:50.640 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>My favorite there is, as I mentioned, the Colts demands

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 1>your your favorite, your least.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Favorite, least favorite, there is angles favorite favorite. Yeah, I

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 2>agree with the Niners. Yeah, the forty nine.

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just a big number, man. They can win the

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>division and hit there under like that. It's just a

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>big number, all right, make miss playoffs, do it quickly.

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Jags plus one eighty, Chiefs minus three eighty Raiders plus

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>three forty for a half unit, Giant Giants five to

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>one for a quarter unit, and the Bucks minus one seventy.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Those are make playoffs, miss playoffs. Steelers minus one forty,

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Colts minus two sixty, Broncos plus one thirty, Cowboys minus

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>two to ten. Again, that one has moved, but I

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:47.280
<v Speaker 1>got it in time. The Vikings plus one hundred two

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>units on that one, and the Cardinals minus one forty

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and then a miss playoffs parlay. I did a few

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of these last year. That screwed me. I'm only doing one.

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Four teams that I think are likely to finish in

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>dead last in their division, Saints, Jets, Brown's, Colts all

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.719
<v Speaker 1>to miss the playoffs minus one thirty five to two units.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>I am acutely aware, demons that the Colts have a

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>chance to be the Jags for me this year or

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>two years ago. You remember, two years ago, I would

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 1>have had a hugely profitable preseason, you know, gambling shows.

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>But I had the Jags involved in four separate bets.

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:39.599
<v Speaker 1>I lost them all, and because the Jags weren't as

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>good as I thought the Colts if the Cults are

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>really good, I lose this. I lose to miss the

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 1>playoffs bet and I lose. They're under Luckily, Daniel Jones

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 1>is greatly involved, so I'm not worried about that.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm still I'm still getting accustomed to the betting and stuff. Yeah,

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.640
<v Speaker 2>parlaying four things to is just getting minus one? Is

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 2>that not terrible odds? Oh no, no, no, it's terrible value.

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Okaym yes, you you're you're you are correct in telling

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>me that is a square wager. Okay, together, putting four

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>things together just for the opportunity that lay minus one

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty five is terrible process.

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>But I'm seeing I just.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Feel yeah, no, you're right. I just feel like Saints, Jets,

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Browns are just do a for the playoffs, and so

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I have the Cults to miss the Platoves

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>at minus two sixty and then I have them basically

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>again to miss the playoffs at minus one thirty five.

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's the way I'm doing it. It's not

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>good process. You're right, all right. The new picks. Before

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we get to Demands's picks, which were wildly profitable last year,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we are only doing three division winner bets. And I

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 1>can't believe the first two of these demands are only

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifteen. Tell the audience the first one.

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, no surprise here. We got the Chiefs to

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 2>win the West of the AFC West, sorry, at minus

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>one fifteen.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they win it every year. Mahomes is thirty five

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and five in his career in the division. They win

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it by an average in Mahomes' career by four games.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Last year, the AFC West had three playoff teams. It

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>was such a tough division. They won it by four games.

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Despite throwing week eighteen, minus won fifteen. I'll take the

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs over the field. The next one. Another team, Demonse

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>that wins their division every year, only minus won fifteen.

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>What is it?

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 2>We've got the Bucks to win the NFC South at.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Minus one fifteen, like the Saints and Panthers to me

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>are no shot no shotters, and the I just think

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks are gonna be really good. And then the last,

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's I love. I might like that even more

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>than I like the Chiefs one. But I the just because.

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 2>How weak the division is.

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly right. And then I found I found a

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>plus money parlay here Demons only two teams.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 2>So we got a division winner. We got Baltimore plus

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo at plus one oh six. I'd say that's another

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 2>safe one.

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's really to me, just fading the Bengals.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm wrong. I'm not worried about the Steelers. It's

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>just maybe, you know, maybe the defense somehow with the

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>new decordinator is average. The offense is the same, and

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they have an awesome year. But Baltimore and Buffalo are

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>such regular season juggernauts that putting them together at plus

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one oh six to me makes sense. And then our

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:06.400
<v Speaker 1>annual tradition Super Bowl EXACTA. Three years ago we had

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs Niners, and the Niners found themselves in the conference

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>championship game. Last two years ago we had Chiefs Cowboys

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Cowboys found themselves with twelve wins. Last year

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>we had Chiefs Bears, and the Bears had a season

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>from hell and missed the playoffs. This year, the Super

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Bowl EXACTA at fifty five to one is drum roll please, Demonse.

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 2>We got Kansas City versus Tampa Bay and the Super

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Bowl exact plus fifty five hundred.

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>How about the and then obviously spoiler Super Bowl exactly

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>with the winner.

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, Kansas City defeat Tampa Bay at plus eleven thousand.

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Indeed, So, Demanse, here's something I didn't even think about

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:04.079
<v Speaker 1>when I made this pick. Brew mentioned it. The Chiefs

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>with Mahomes have been to five Super Bowls, all rematches,

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>played Philly twice, played San Francisco twice. The one other

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>team they played Tampa Bay, another Super Bowl rematch bake

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>show against Patrick revisiting the greatest, the craziest college football

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>game ever played. Do you know about their college game.

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Demonse, against each other? Yeah, I'm sure they each other up.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, well, let me, Demonse, so let me just

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you real quick twenty sixteen, because they have played

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs before. All right, so the final score, Tomanse,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>let me, I'm just actually hold on, let me just

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>go to Patrick Mahomes college stats. Final score was sixty

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>six to fifty nine, so that gives you a little

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of a preview. It was Texas Tech where Baker

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>started against Oklahoma, and hold on, where is it here?

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>It is? The final stats are as follows. Uh. Joe

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Mixon was in the game. He ran for two sixty okay,

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and four touchdowns, but that wasn't the story. The story

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>was Baker. Baker was twenty seven of thirty six only

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>through thirty six passes for five hundred and forty five yards,

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>seven touchdowns, no picks.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.599
<v Speaker 2>Jesus okay, okay.

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Patrick was fifty two of eighty eight for seven

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty four yards five touchdowns running well, No,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>they did have running back go twelve carries for eighty

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.679
<v Speaker 1>five yards and two touchdowns. That running back's name was

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes. So Mahomes in that game combined for eight

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:18.079
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten yards, seven touchdowns, one pick. Bake Show

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>in that game never ran the ball through for five

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>forty five and seven touchdowns on just thirty six attempts.

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes threw at eighty eight times. It is an all

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:38.199
<v Speaker 1>time legendary college football game. Yeah, yeah, October twenty second,

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen all timer. And so they've played in the

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>playoffs before Patrick got hurt against the Baker was there

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Browns and yeah that's my uh, that is

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>most Super Bowl exact. Cannot wait. We are so excited

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to announce our new presenting sponsor, hard Rock Bet. Everybody

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>knows and loves the hard Rock hotels and casinos, and

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>now you can use the top rated hard Rock Bet

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>sportsbook to place your bets all NFL season and beyond.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Hard Rock Bet is the only legal sportsbook in the

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>entire state of Florida. It is also available in Arizona, Ohio,

0:14:25.760 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, and Colorado, with more

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>states launching all the time. You can also play on

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bets online casino if you are in New Jersey.

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Throughout the football season, we will be using, as you'll

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>see here in a few minutes, hard Rock Bet lines

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to make our predictions for the biggest games as we

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>gear up for the NFL season. Sign up for a

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. Make a five dollars bet, you get

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets. If you win,

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>head over to hard Rock Bet, sign up and make

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>your first deposit to day payable and bonus bet. That's

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>not a cash offer offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida.

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.920
<v Speaker 1>In Florida offered by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC and

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>all other states, must be twenty one plus and physically

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia to play. Terms and conditions apply. Concerned about

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>gambling in Florida, call one.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Eight eighty eight.

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Admit it. In Indiana. If you were someone you know

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>as a gambling problem wants help, call one eight hundred

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and nine with it. Gambling problem called one eight hundred

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty four regular season, you went forty eight forty

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 2>and two, and your overall record was fifty six forty

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 2>four and three, and that also we got in the playoffs.

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 2>You also went undefeated in touchdown Genie. Now this wasn't

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 2>every week, but we were undefeated.

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I was very picky with when I went with the

0:15:56.080 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Bruisers love a good touchdown, Genie. They love an octopus

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>bet in the Super Bowl. They we'll have a touchdown, Jeannie.

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>They love all these things. I was very choosy on

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>when I wanted to do it, and I didn't realize it,

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>but I did go undefeated on it. All right, five

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.760
<v Speaker 1>picks every week? What's my first pick?

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 2>First pick? We've got Kansas City minus three versus the Chargers.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a neutral site and they're only laying three.

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not I think the Chiefs are the best team

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in football. I think the Chargers are around the fourteenth

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>best team in football. I do not think any team

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>is more used to handling odd environments than Kansas City.

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Patrick is five and two against the spread and openers.

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand Herbert is a really good against the spread

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>quarterback early in the season ten and five, but part

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of that is Patrick being five and two is even

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>more impressive when you consider the fact that the Chiefs

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 1>have become such a public team. Those lines are usually inflated.

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Chargers in the other direction. You know, they haven't had

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:11.719
<v Speaker 1>a ton of early season high high level expectations. I

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>just think I do not see I think that Trent

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>McDuffie is going to be able to neutralize Lad McConkie.

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And with if that happens, how else are the Chargers

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>who are they throwing it to? Like? How are they

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>moving the ball? And don't I know hardball is going

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to want to run the No Rashwan Slater is a

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>big deal. The Chiefs minus three against the Chargers is

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>my first bet of the year and spoiler a bit.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>It is the only favorite I am taking in Week one.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Next pick Demonse, next Weick.

0:17:52.280 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 2>You got Miami plus one at Indian.

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is a pretty simple for me. You get

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins indoors, controlled climate, obviously fast track like that,

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>You get too a healthy like that, You get Tyreek

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>something to prove early in the year like that, and

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>then you get a team in the Colts that I

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>believe might end up being the worst team in football

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's certainly it's possible. I am getting a

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>point now. Obviously getting one point doesn't help you a lot.

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It's you're really just picking a winner. Excuse me, I apologize,

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>But if the Dolphins, the Dolphins have any chance of

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>having a better season than I think the general public expects,

0:18:52.359 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>from them. They must start fast, Colts, Pats, Bill's tough, Jets, Panthers, Chargers,

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Browns like that. That's their opening slate because late in

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the year we go, you go Ravens, Bill's Commanders, Saints, Easy, Jets, Steelers, Bengals, Bucks,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Pats like and a lot of cold weather games in there.

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a as close to a Week one must

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>win for a team's playoff hopes as exist. I don't love, obviously,

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the the Colts quarterback in Daniel Jones. I think Miami

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>wins the game outright, and I think Miami's gonna be

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>able to move the ball in the Colts defense. I'll

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>take Miami plus one at.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Indy, and next you've got Cleveland plus five or Cincinnati.

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I do I love this? I don't.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Does it feel good including the Cleveland Browns and my

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>Week one picks? Of course not. However, what was lost,

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what's lost in the shuffle about the Browns in Week

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one is this, they'll be fine at quarterback this week now,

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>once Flacco starts taking some hits, once the season starts progressing,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you know how fine are they going to be? Probably

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>not at all, but this will probably be the best

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:28.719
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation they have all year. Cincinnati has Trey Hendrickson

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>coming off missing most of training camp, Shamar Stewart rookie

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher, missed a lot of the offseason, the first

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>game for a new defensive coordinator, and maybe most importantly,

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and this is a point I have been trying to make.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I have real concerns about since he's offensive line and

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you got Miles Garrett, since he also so just desperately

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>needs a win, that I don't think this is at

0:20:55.560 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>any point going to be a style points type of game.

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be a man, if

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're up three late, suck the air out of the stadium,

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 1>get out of there with a win. So I think

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that, you know, twenty one to seventeen Cincinnati

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty likely outcome for this game. I'll take

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the five points. I'm it's a home divisional dog against

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a team that is awful every single year in Week one,

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and so Cleveland plus five against Cincinnati is the way

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going. It's not calling a Cleveland win. I just

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think Cincinnati is gonna dominate the game because they

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>never dominate early in the season.

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Next to look there to you, pops, we got Vegas at.

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Plus two and you don't like that one.

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 2>It's it's yeah, because what if Cincinnati does what if

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 2>they don't come out slow like they usually do.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, then I'll lose the bet.

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Divisional.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I will also say, is here's the other thing we

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 1>know about Flacco. Flacco loves chucking it deep and going

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 1>for a back door cover like that is that's the

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 1>other piece, Like could this be Cincinnati up twenty seven

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:20.680
<v Speaker 1>seventeen with ninety seconds left and Flacco is you know,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>throwing bombs and we end up stealing a back door

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>cover for sure? All right?

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 2>Next next you've got a Vegas plus two and a

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 2>half at New England.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So this is, you know, basically just going with

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:42.639
<v Speaker 1>my preseason feel that the Raiders are better than people

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>think they are now. I also think New England could

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>be good, but iing New England is going to have

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>real trouble scoring points this year. I like the rookie

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>running back, I like Drake may I don't like the

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:01.919
<v Speaker 1>receivers at all. And where the Raiders are gonna be

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in trouble is against teams with explosive offenses. The Patriots

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>do not have that, So I think that this is

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the few matchups all year where the Raiders

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>defense is not going to be exploited. I think Max

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Crosby could have a big impact on that Patriots offensive line.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And if I know Vrabel, he's going to game plan

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to just not let Max Crosby stripsack flip the game,

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:34.239
<v Speaker 1>which leads to conservative play calling and a lot of

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>what he did at times in Tennessee, which is just

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>keep it close and try to out execute them late.

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Geno is gonna come out firing. I obviously

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>really like Ashton genty and I think the Raiders win

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>this game. And I'm getting two and a half points.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>This feels to me like twenty one to twenty Raiders.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take the Raiders plus two and a half. Also,

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Patriots won four games last year teams that won four

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>if you were the previous year, and our Week one

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>favorites are zero to five against the spread and the

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>last five it's it's a rare thing that happens, and

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so I will go with the Raiders plus two and

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 2>Last, lastly, you've got Buffalo plus one versus Baltimore.

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, here's the thing. This is not anti

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Lamar at all. He's a great player and a great, great,

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:37.400
<v Speaker 1>great regular season player. No, it's it's simply this. If

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo is at home, they shouldn't be underdogs, that's all,

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like Buffalo is too good

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of a team to be a home dog, and I

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>think that that is I also saw Baltimore last year

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>when people thought, oh, they have an extra chip on

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 1>their shoulder because that's the team that knocked him out

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of the playoffs in the Chiefs and the Chiefs controlled

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that game. And so this, by the way, is a

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>very similar situation. Last year, it was Kansas City minus

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>one and a half? Was it minus no? Yes, it

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>was Kansas City minus one and a half against Baltimore

0:25:24.480 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City. And that was why that likely play

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>was almost such an awful beat because I had KC

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:39.280
<v Speaker 1>minus one and a half, case was up seven. They score,

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 1>they think they score that touchdown, and then they're gonna

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.639
<v Speaker 1>go for two, which would have killed the bet. You know,

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Like if they go for two and they make it,

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they win. If they go for two and they miss it,

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 1>they lose. Either way, the Chiefs couldn't win by a

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>point and a half. But I just don't think Buffalo

0:25:55.359 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>should be home dogs. And this'll be the only time

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>where do they play the Chiefs, And by the way,

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't be home dogs against they play the Chiefs

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.239
<v Speaker 1>in Buffalo, but they'll be favored in that game. Like

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.679
<v Speaker 1>this is also a little too much, a little too

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>much respect for Baltimore. Like anytime this year, Buffalo is

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>a home dog all betam which means right now is

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the only time. This is the only time all regular

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:26.440
<v Speaker 1>season they'll be a home dog. So my five picks,

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of this does have to do with

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.360
<v Speaker 1>preseason priors, but what else can you do in Week one?

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City minus one in Brazil against the Chargers, Miami

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>plus one at the Colts, Cleveland getting five at home

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>against Cincinnati, Las Vegas getting two and a half in

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>New England, and Buffalo getting one at home against Baltimore.

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>My friends at boost Mobile ever signed up for a

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>phone play and thinking wow, amazing price. Then a few

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>months later, surprise, your bill's higher. With boost Mobile. You

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>pay twenty five dollars a month forever. That's a limited talk,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>text and data starting at just twenty five dollars a month,

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>no price hikes, no contract forever plus. Boost Mobile is

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 1>now a legit nationwide five G network. They've invested billions

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>building five G towers across the country. Visit boostmobile dot

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>com or head to your local Boost store today and

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.399
<v Speaker 1>get unlimited talk, text, and data for twenty dollars a

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.440
<v Speaker 1>month forever. Five G speeds not available in all areas.

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>After thirty gigs, customers may experience slower speeds. Customers will

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 1>pay twenty five dollars a month as long as they

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>remain active on the Boost Unlimited plan. Bill Belichick's debut happened,

0:27:38.320 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>started good hell of an opening drive, and then the

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>rest of the game happened.

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 2>He bamboozled in that opening drive, got that opening touchdown,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 2>and it was pretty much downhill from there. It was

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 2>this is a historically bad opener for you and c Actually,

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:55.919
<v Speaker 2>what's the what's the state of Bill Belichick? That was?

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 2>That was pretty rough him obviously, yes, NFL coach.

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So this was I when we were talking and we're

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get to Arch Manning in a second, but

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>when the discussion surrounding Arch Manning over the weekend was

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of well, what do you expect from him,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 1>it's up against that Matt Patricia pro style defense. And

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I said yesterday, I think that is underselling the impact

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio State players had and over selling the impact

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the actual coach had, because to me, that was more

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>about a young player who'd never played on the road,

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>playing in a brutal environment and the other team having

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all these pros on defense than it was about Matt

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Patricia's brilliant scheme. But that was not a popular take.

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>The popular take was that Patricia was Dick Lebou mixed

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>with Vince Lombardi out there, which would lead you to believe, well,

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>if that's what Patricia's defense looks like, holy smokes, wait

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>till you see his mentor Bill Belichick's defense, you know,

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Monday night against TCU. And then what happened. What happened

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Monday night against TCU was his team with the seventy

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>new players, with all the hype, with Jordan and Mia

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Hamm and Lawrence Taylor and all the North Carolina royalty

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in the stadium got absolutely dog walked for three hours.

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Because here's the truth, more than anything about college football,

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 1>scheme matters, to a degree, talent matters more than anything.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Why is college coaching so important for the recruiting for

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the in this day's NIA, the ability to acquire the talent,

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and it is colored. I looked at yesterday's game and

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, TCU has a veteran quarterback who's been with

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the program for three years. North Carolina is starting a

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>kid that transferred from South Alabama. I don't care that

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it's at North Carolina. That is not exactly a super

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>scary or intimidating place to play. And I thought TCU.

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think they were gonna win by thirty, but

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought they'd cover the three and a half. And

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think folks that expected Belichick to come in and

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>do a snap turn them into a contender turnaround were foolish. Now, oddly, Demonse,

0:30:50.440 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this actually makes it more likely that Bill

0:30:56.560 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Belichick is the North Carolina head coach in a year. Yeah,

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 1>because the only way he wasn't going to be the

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina head coach in a year was if this

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>went so well that an NFL team was like, Okay,

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's he's had his time off, we

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 1>now want to bring him in. I don't think it's

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go that way, and I do think that

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it is totally fair and totally in bounds to ask

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the question, does seventy something year old Bill Belichick have

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 1>his eye on the ball here? That how much of Belichick,

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>mister no distractions? Do your job, keep the main thing,

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the main thing? How much of that has been weakened

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>by this three plus year at this point relationship with

0:32:01.080 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>wanna be starlet Jordan Hudson. That's fair, that's not out

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of bounds. That isn't I you're bringing up the guy's

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>personal life because they have made their relationship super public

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>via Instagram posts, podcast interviews, the CBS Morning News, and

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 1>via the weirdest business run of trademarking attempting to trademark

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 1>gold Digger and other weird stuff that you just know

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>is going to shine the spotlight on the coach and

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>his girlfriend. Who is the coach is older than Demonse's

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>grandmother and the girlfriend is younger than Demonse. That's all fair,

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and the only way to knock that out and have

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it just be a side thing is to be great.

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>And not only do I not think they're going to

0:33:05.440 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>be great, I think they are going. I think the

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>expectations were a touch too high. You watch that game

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>last night and you said to yourself, Oh, are they

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have competent quarterback play? That's a fair question.

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Then you watched that game last night and you said

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to yourself, oh, does that defense. You've got to assume

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the defense is well coached, So how do we explain

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>what we saw? Do they just really not have the personnel?

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Then you ask yourself the question of how long has

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it been since we have known Bill Belichick is a

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>an above average talent evaluator. All those things come together

0:33:56.040 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for some very nervous times. So now listen, they get

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte Richmond and then UCF. I'll be totally honest, I

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know how good UCF is supposed to be this year.

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.799
<v Speaker 1>They will beat Charlotte and Richmond, and they don't have

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>because they're in the ACC and because of the draw,

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they have the only juggernaut on their schedules, Clemson. But

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in a month when they host Clemson, it's going to

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>look like the TCU game but works. And if TCU,

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a team on the fringes of the top twenty five

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>but outside of it, can do that to you, then

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you really worry about what any of the legitimate power

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>five programs are going to do to them. And so.

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 2>I think that anything that happens throughout this season is

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>going to affect his legacy. Can it do that positively

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 2>or negatively? Or is it too early?

0:34:57.800 --> 0:35:05.480
<v Speaker 1>No. Listen, if he went to college football and was awesome,

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that would positively affect his legacy. Him going to college

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>football and being awful will not, in my opinion, negatively

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>affect his legacy, except it will be it will affect

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it like this in thirty years demonse, when you're talking

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>sports with young people and they're talking about the greatest

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 1>coaches of all time and they're like, yeah, you know,

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and Bill Belichick at that point is like Vince Lombardi,

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:44.879
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, where they act like what

0:35:44.960 --> 0:35:48.360
<v Speaker 1>was you know, what made him greater? Whatever? You'll be

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like and really weird end for him, Right, he went

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and coached college and dated this twenty year old and

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like it kind of.

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's the last thing you remember about him.

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Right. But it won't be a thing. My point is this,

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>It won't be a thing that actually sticks to the legacy.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>It will just be a thing that people who were

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.600
<v Speaker 1>here for it remember, bring it, that's it. You know

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, but it won't it won't stick to

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it for those in the history books. Now here's where

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it does hurt his legacy to a degree, at least

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in my mind. And sorry, if we're taking some internet hits,

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we got nothing open but the script. So there's I

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>got no way around that. Oh there is one thing

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I can do, hold on the he needed to be

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>really good at North Carolina Demandsay to have a chance

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to get back to the NFL and run down Shula. Yeah,

0:36:51.239 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>so that part, you know what I mean, That part

0:36:53.120 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>hurts him. But no, this is not his NFL legacy.

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:05.520
<v Speaker 1>And listen, I know people are gonna throw up the

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>record with Brady, record without Brady. The problem for that

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is we all saw, like those of us that saw

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:23.600
<v Speaker 1>those first three Patriot Championships understand how great they were

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>defensively and that Brady wasn't Brady yet. And those of

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:34.839
<v Speaker 1>us that are being fair also remember the final Patriot

0:37:34.960 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Championship where they scored thirteen points in the Super Bowl

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and Belichick's defense made Sean McVeigh and Todd Gurley and

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Jared Goff look totally inept on the biggest stage. So

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>like that, I'm not gonna allow like the revisionist history

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>on that, But this is a really a very auspicious

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>inn or beginning to the final chapter.