WEBVTT - Free Agent Frenzy!


0:00:00.360 --> 0:00:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio. Time

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio. You're a weekly

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation, and

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show.

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Now here's your host, Paul Charge. This is not Paul Charci,

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>and this is Matt Harrison along with Brian Johnson. Fantasy

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, A day late, a book short. Well, I

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 1>ruined it by talking over you. I was gonna say,

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>what if we we're Paul charchiing. He was just one

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 1>person who did all the voices like he's been doing

0:00:42.560 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all of our voices for years. It's it's quite the impressive.

0:00:46.440 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>He's like the Frank Oz of fantasy football. Umar charches

0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>out today under the weather. So Matt and Brian filling

0:00:55.080 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>in on the weekly Fantasy Football Weekly show, and we're

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>going to talk free agency all over today, the guys

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.959
<v Speaker 1>at all of the positions that may land on a

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>different team this year. But we have to start with

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the big trade. And because we're recording this on Saturday,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 1>we got to see this trade that went down Friday

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>afternoon and the Bears trade out of pick number one

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>overall to the Carolina Panthers. The Bears receive pick nine,

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.759
<v Speaker 1>pick sixty one DJ Moore, which might be the most

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting trade piece so far. Twenty four first and a

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty five second Brian instant reaction, instant reaction, definite upgrade

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>for Jeffson Fields. Of course, it finally has a competent

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. Definite upgrade for DJ Moore too, right, it

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>almost feels like a lateral movement. I don't know. It's

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>not a bad thing, but um, people knock Justin Fields

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>as a pastor. I think he's a good pastor. He's

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>never had good weapons, he's never had a DJ more before.

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>But true, I'm not bumping. He doesn't change a whole

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>lot for me. I don't think it gets worse. It's

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not a worse situation for a more. Yeah, it certainly

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>helps fuels more than it helps more. I think Taras

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Marshall now is certainly very interesting on the Carolina side. Yeah,

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no one left there. Well, specifically, since they don't

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>have a first or a second, they're not taking a

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the second round unless they're making some

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy moves here. Unlikely. Um, yeah, they're not with the

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>first overall pick either you know Reiver. Well, maybe we'll

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about some wide receivers later in the show that

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Carolina can pick up. So Taras Marshall bumped up and

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe it Shy Smith who's getting some run last year.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Those are your two starting wide receivers for the Panthers,

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>who also don't have a running back and I've never

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>had a tight end. It's kind of a full rebuild

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>except for Dan Arnold for a couple of weeks, but

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>they traded him. That was stupid. But um, big win

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>for Chicago in reality football. But it was noted at

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>at Indie at the combine that Frank Reich said that

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Young was a little short for the position and

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>his liking. But so I'm interested to see if if

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers do go in on Bryce Young at number

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 1>one overall, or if they've got CJ. Stroud penciled in there. Yeah,

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly going to be a quarterback if you're if

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you're a gambling man, and then we both are. I've

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>already got my money on Will Levis. I do too.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I will Levis number one overall. Pick U bet in

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Vegas right now at MGM what odds did you get

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>on it? I think it was like plus eighteen hundred

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 1>or something I got. I got thirty to one. And yeah,

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a quarterback. I'm not sold on any

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. Yeah, I feel like the Panthers are

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with the high upside options and that's Richardson

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and Levis. Yeah, so I'm I'm I'm not saying Levis

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 1>is the best, but I'm like with those at those

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>odds all day that I'll take my chance. It feels

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like a twenty five percent chance to me, it's just

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna be one of those guys. And if you're gonna

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>give you thirty to one on one of them, I'm

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>taking it. That's true. All right. So let's talk about

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the free agent guys, and uh, you know

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy that is probably the most interesting player who's

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>not technically a free agent but kind of a free agent.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>That's Lamar Jackson, who's on the non exclusive franchise tag.

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of reports out there that say

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons are out, the Dolphins are out, and the

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins actually said that they're going to pick up two

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>as fifty year option. But There's there's a lot of

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>steam out there that says a lot of these teams

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>are out on paying two first round picks and then

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>paying Lamar Jackson. I it kind of feels a little collusiony,

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>like the Colin Kaepernick thing, Like nobody wants to give

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson guaranteed money for some reason. Yeah, he just

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>wants more than Deshaun Watson got. I don't believe what

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>anyone's saying about anything in a situation. It's strange. I've

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of steam on the Colts maybe being

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the team that goes after Lamar Jackson. The Lions are

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>getting thrown out there. Raiders would be an interesting spot.

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why the Jets aren't throwing their hat

0:05:04.000 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>in the ring. I think I think the Jets and

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the and Rogers, the Jets and the Packers have a

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>deal in place. They're waiting on Rodgers. Yeah, but still

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I would still be kicking the tires. Long story. I

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's gonna end up somewhere else, just even of

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>course the Ravens can match any offer. Yeah, Jackson's heart

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be in that with that organization anywhere.

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 1>It's true he didn't show up to the playoff game.

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He yeah, I think he's he's checked checked the box

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's done there. So he can't have more rushing

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>value outside of Baltimore. It seems because Greg Roman, the

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>former offensive coordinator, created some running place for him. The

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>good news is almost anywhere he goes, he'll have more

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>more targets, better targets than Baltimore because they just do

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>not incentivize that as a team. I was going to

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>say the Ravens have the worst wide receiver room until

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers just traded away anymore. But yeah, basically anywhere

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>else he goes. I mean, Mark Andrews is nice, nice

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>tight end. We like likely and Rashad Bateman can play,

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>but he's not hasn't proven to stay healthy. But yeah,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I like his prospects almost anywhere else

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 1>over Baltimore. Interesting that Carol Anna just didn't pull the

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>trigger on Lamar Jackson trading two first round picks. They

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 1>could have kept Dj Moore traded the two first get

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. That would have been an interesting play too.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So Todd Munkin is the new OC in Baltimore. His

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>resume isn't super inspiring. He was the Browns offensive coordinator

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen. The team finished twenty second points twenty

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:39.240
<v Speaker 1>second yards. Before that, he was Dirt Cutters o C

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa with Jamis Winston. That was kind of a

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>mixed bag of results there. I believe that was the

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>thirty interception season for Winston. So yeah, let's get Lamar

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>out of there. Yeah, long story short, let's get him

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>out of there. Huh. Let's talk about Danny Dimes though, Brian, Well,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>he's obviously staying in New York, so nothing's really going

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to change that. A whole lot we can get into

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.000
<v Speaker 1>if we think that contract is a good idea or not.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't really matter in fantasy football. The one thing

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that stands out, one thing that resonated to me was

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>next year. It's just one year, small sampler or every whatever,

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna have a bigger hit against the Giants

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>cap Daniel Daniel Jones than Patrick Mahomes is going to

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>have the Chiefs. Totally makes sense. So but you know, Dannydimes,

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>he he uh, you know, exceeded expectations last year, so

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what happens this year. The Giants are probably

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna add a wide receiver or two. You would think

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they got Arkley still, but uh yeah, yeah, they have

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to add a wide receiver, but some weapons. You know,

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he got paid off of that Vikings game, and the

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Giants are not going to be playing the Vikings every week.

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>That's true, So I think people are you know, the

0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>recency bias. I wonder if he's sending a thank you

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>card to the Vikings defensive staff. Done yead dontel getting

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the card in the mail, Donne Hill, send Danny Diames

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>your venmo. Jimmy Garoppolo is a free agent. There's a

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of reason to doubt whether Jimmy Garoppolo can succeed

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>outside of Kyle Shanahan's offense. He really never has had

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a chance much out of Kyle Shanahan's offense, but he

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was a middling fantasy producer. When when surrounded by really

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some Hall of Fame level talent and Deebo and George Kittle,

0:08:25.240 --> 0:08:28.320
<v Speaker 1>his value pretty much goes down wherever he goes because

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>he's unlikely to be an offense in an offense anywhere

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>as near as good as San Francisco's. I think that

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>goes without saying one of the best offensive lines in

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the league, he's a backup, or he's going to be

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy that maybe starts the first four weeks in

0:08:40.880 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>front of Bryce Young or CJ. Stroud and or Will Levice.

0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>From the Jimmy Garoppolo camp, he wants to be a

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>starter in the league. And I mean there's gonna be

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>some starting jobs open. There's still about half of the

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>league doesn't have a solid foundation of where they have

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>as a quarterback right now. So I think Garoppolo probably

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>will get a chance to start at the beginning of

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the season. We just don't know where. Probably an NFC team.

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of NFC teams game. He's not landing

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on an offense quite like the forty nine end of

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the end of the story there, So yeah, not too

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>thrilled about wherever he ends up. All right, let's move

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on to the running back position, where Josh Jacobs gets

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the franchise tag and sae Quon Barkley also got the

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>franchise tag and interesting to me, Brian, does it seem

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>like that might be the future of the running back position,

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Especially if you draft a running back in the first round,

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you you pay them their fifth year option, and then

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you franchise tag him one year, so you get them

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>for the six years and then you let them ride

0:09:38.840 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 1>off into the sunset, maybe maybe four years and then

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the franchise year. But that kind of seems like a

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.199
<v Speaker 1>good way to play the running back position. If you're

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>drafting a running back in the first or second round,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>just just let them let them go after doing a

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>franchise tag year. Yeah. If I was with Giants um

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and for whatever reason, Bijon Robinson old all the way

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>down there and you know you got I think he

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>probably will go there in the twenties, it's very possible.

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, you draft him, you got your brand new Barkley,

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>you still have old Barkley. You try to make a

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>run this year, you know things don't look good, You

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>trade Barkley to a contender, and then you got Bijan

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>because they're not gonna be paying Barkeley next year. No so,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>And the Jacobs thing is weird. We expect we said

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, ride Josh shake. The Raiders are gonna ride

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh Jacobs into the ground DeMarco Murray style, Marco Murray style,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>which they did and they'll probably do it again. But

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>now the Giants are gonna do that with Barkley. Yeah,

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'm kind of you know, bar people are drafting

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 1>right now and literally they're drafting Bijan over Barkeley, which

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is nuts because Barkley's gonna get twenty five carries a game,

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>Joan's probably gonna get Like you have to be bullish

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>on both Jacobs and Barkley playing a tag like this. Yeah,

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and redrafted leagues without a doubt. Now in Dynasty, they're

0:10:56.200 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>getting old, sadly Barkley's but twenty seven almost Yeah, time

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>flies a name that's getting old, but he's really not

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that old. David Montgomery, what do you think of his

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>prospects in the free agent market? Brand, Yeah, it turns

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty six in June, so he's right tail end of

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>his prime. But since his rookie year ficks the tail

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>end of his prime. Running backs, it's a tough life, man,

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a tough life. They live. They really just churned

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and burned. But m Monte's yards per carry since his

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 1>rookie year three point seven, four point three, three point

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>eight four point oh not very good at all, But

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry doesn't tell the whole story. Montgomery was

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>top fifteen and avoided tackle rates in three of his

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>four seasons behind a mostly below average offensive line in Chicago.

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know he was splitting time with Kuil Herbert,

0:11:47.320 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, who kind of looked better. It's a long

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>story short and Justin Fields an amazing Russian quarterback. I

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 1>think I think It's prospects are better wherever he ends up.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think Carolina certainly in the mix for running back.

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Denver would be because whereas Javonte Williams might not be

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>ready for the season at all. Yeah, so I think

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>wherever Montgomery ends up, he'll be given a chance to

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>produce a little more. They head in Chicago recently. Yeah,

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders is a free agent coming off a really

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>good year in Philly, but the Eagles really never made

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:22.960
<v Speaker 1>him the focal point of the rushing attack. It was

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because of the scheme, maybe because Jalen Hurts is frankly awesome,

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>especially near the stripe, or because Sanders just can't be

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a three down bell cow. Pro Football Focus grade at

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Sanders as the bottom ranked running back as a receiver.

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry watches Sanders film and then laughs at Miles

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Sanders hands. It's true. It's true, Derrick Henry he's always

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 1>laughing at others. Also, PF grade Sanders as the thirty

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>eighth ranked pass blocker. That's not very good for a

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>guy who's a starting running back. Will another team use

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders more or differently? I'm not really sure. It's

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it seems like he's just kind of a guy. Yeah,

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a Jag. Maybe he's a Jacksonville Jaguars back up.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Good news his next team won't have a quarterback stealing

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>double digit rushing touchdowns. I think there's a decent chance

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he just resigns in Philly too. Speaking of a Jag

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>or an ex Jag, Leonard Fournette, yeahs twenty turned to

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight in January, so he's an old man. Now.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>How long ago he was twenty seventeen, the fourth overall pick.

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah by my Jaguars, big big whoopsie there. But um,

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I don't really want to hear about Leonard

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Fournett anymore. He's he's gonna be a backup wherever he ends.

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:45.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not a starter. Don't you think it's kind of

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the way of Lashawn McCoy, Leveon Bell, Melvin Gordon, where

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>he's just like kind of a forgotten asset at this

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>point pretty much. And then granted Tampa Bay did not

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>have a great offensive line, but Fournette dead last in

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>his free agent class running backs in yards after contact,

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so you can't always blame that on the offensive line.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:07.200
<v Speaker 1>In most cases you can, So I'm not really there's

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>other free agent running backs more excited about seeing where

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they end up than Leonard four ninth. Well, maybe Devin

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Singletary is one of those guys. He's probably out in

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo as James Cook likely inherits his job in Buffalo.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you hear the thing that James Cook's middle name

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is Dalvin? Yeah? I heard that, and Dalvin Cook's middle

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>name is James. Some serious brotherly love. Devin Singletary is

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the best pass blockers in free agency. He's

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>got pretty low mileage on him too, never topping two

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fourteen carries in a season, but he's never

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>been a bell cow, probably because he's he's little. He's

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>five to seven decent receiver, but not a natural receiver

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>like a James White. He's probably a rotational back just

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>as he was with another team. But it would be

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see a guy like Devin singletary. He seems

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>like an like a Kansas City Chiefs kind of a guy. Oh,

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll because so gross, Like yeah, like like doesn't it

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>seem like that kind of player would just sign with

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs on like a mid budget deal and split

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the backfield with Pacheco. Yeah, and they probably just want

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the inside info on Buffalo more than anything obviously. Yeah. Yeah.

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>How about Damian Harris, Brian Damian Harris Charts loves Damien Harris.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>We should. He spent way too much of the season

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on the injured list, well, the last three years here

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>as games played, starving the most recent eleven, fifteen, and ten,

0:15:30.440 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so he's only sort of played one full season, so

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>he's not the most durable back out there. When healthy,

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>he was effective average four point seven yards for carry,

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like that was more being a Patriot

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>because they love to run, because they just run and

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 1>over there four Romandre really popped off, and then of

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>course Romandre looked like the better back even when both

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>were healthy. So I need to see. I'm not like,

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not like Wherebert Damian Harris ends up. I'm in

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>he's that talented back. I mean, he's a good running back.

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong, but he needs to find a

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>nice soft place to land for me to Yeah, absolutely

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be interested on draft day. Jamal Williams was the NFL's

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>leading touchdown scorer last year. That blows my mind. Seventeen touchdowns.

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>He's headed to free agency. He's kind of getting up there.

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>He's a finisher. He's the tenth most yards after contact

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, but that number drops the thirty eighth in

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>average yards after contact, which is bizarre. He's not a

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dynamic runner. Finished forty eighth in breakaway runs per carry.

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Although he saw a lot of stacked boxes in short yardage,

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't catch. Best case scenario, he probably just stays

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit because we know how he'll be used there.

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Second best scenario, he joins another skilled backfield with a

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>split where he's the short yardage specialist. Maybe maybe a

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>place like Buffalo, maybe a place like Kansas City, something

0:16:55.680 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. Another former Kansas City Chiefs running at Kareem Hunt.

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to be traded from the Browns mid season,

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't. What happened, Brian, Yeah, I don't know, huh.

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>What happened to Kareem Hunt in general? Remember he was

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year, he was awesome. He looked like Jamal

0:17:14.600 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Charles with two I remember it was the first game

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the season, like the Thursday in the open, and

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he had like the four touchdowns and I think I

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>think it was against the Patriots. But Hunts turns to

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight in August. That's old again. But he should

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of tread left on the tires. Outside

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of that his rookie year, he hasn't carried two hundred

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>top two hundred carries in any other season. He's always

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just kind of been the change of pace back. So

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I would love for him just to get a shot

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>like in Carolina, um maybe in Denver if John Te

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Williams is the miss an extended amount of time, just

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to be the guy again because I don't remember exactly,

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he at least to be the one a kind of

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>because when he was with the Chiefs his rookie year,

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>he looked like he was going to be a Hall

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of Fame running back and then he derailed his career

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially in his life for a little while, got back

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>on track a little bit, got another or got a

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>second chance with the Browns, but he's never you know,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he's always been the you know, the Robin to Nick

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Chubbs Batman. So I'm very so like this whole exercise

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is good for anyone doing Best Ball drafts right now,

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>or startup dynace leagues, or even if you're looking to

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>make a trade in your dynasty league, because right now,

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>all these free pending free agents there, they come into discount, yeah,

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're not gonna get They're not gonna really lose

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>any value because they've already discounted so much. Because everyone's

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like hesitant because they don't know where they're

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna play, but they land in the right spot, like

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Kareem Hunt ends up in Carolinas, they're starting running back.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Granted it's not gonna be a great offense, his ADP

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>as a stands of right now will jump up three

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rounds roughly something like that. Yeah, and what if he

0:18:57.880 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>ends up in New Orleans or something like that, and

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Kamara is looking at a long suspension that So

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.199
<v Speaker 1>he's the guy I've been targeting in Bestball right now.

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>It's hoping. I think he's got the talent that he's

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the running back a most except free agent running back,

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm most excited to see where he lands. Last running

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>back we'll mention is Jerick McKinnon, And I guess I

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>have to get this one out for Jerick McKinnon because yeah,

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I called that one a little bit and probably found

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>his stride in year seven. Weeks one through twelve, he

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.679
<v Speaker 1>was RB fifty and from week thirteen forward he was

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>RB two, making him maybe one of the least likely

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:40.119
<v Speaker 1>league winners in Memory's probably like wide receiver like twenty

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 1>two because he was really yeah, more so the receiving

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>than than the rushing. He was doing the age receiving

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in the final six weeks. So yeah, Jeric McKinnon,

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean talking about long in the tooth. I mean

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>his teeth got to be like, you know, sabertooth tiger

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>tusks or any something like that. You gotta think that

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>McKinnon's best option is to just stay in Kansas City

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>as long as he can. Yeah, I don't see like, yeah,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's leaving, We're gonna talk about a few Chiefs

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers, Like anyone leaving Kansas City, He's not like, oh,

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be better off, yeah in other place.

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take a quick break and when we

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 1>come back, we'll talk about the wide receivers and tight

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>ends that might make a difference in uh, you know,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the next the next couple of rounds of your best

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ball drafts, your dynasty drafts, anything like that coming up next,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and we're back to Fantasy Football Weekly Matt Harrison along

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with Brian Johnson. This week, Mat Hi good and true.

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>We went on a break. When we take a break,

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we literally take a break from each other and then

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>we come back. And that's true. I haven't seen you

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>since what December something like that. Yeah, good to see you.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's been a while. How how how how

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>are the how's the new puppy? Hanul? Yeah? I saw

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>that you tweeted a picture of her and Christopher walking.

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>They look very similar. Someone pointed that out to me.

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize it. In first I was like nah.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Then the more I looked at it, I was like, wow,

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you were like this a certain light like when it's

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>really bright, like it really brings out or walking like eyes.

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about some of the wide receivers

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. And um, I'm trying to find the tweet.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But Ian Hartitz, who's kind of a friend of the program.

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>He tweeted out something about some of the last decade

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of free agent wide receivers and how they almost never

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>work out. Like the best one has been Christian Kirk

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and that was that was the best one by far.

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>It certainly wasn't Kenny Galladay in recent memory, or Mark

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>has Valdez scantling Alan Robinson. But I still love you,

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Alan Robinson. I'm not giving up on you. Yeah, it's

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been a disaster. But Juju Smith Schuster hits free

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>agency for a second straight year. What do you think, Juju,

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>who's gonna do? Do we alluded to this before the break?

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, or jujus, I don't I don't even

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>care if Juju stays on the Chiefs. To be honest

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>with you, only two games over one hundred yards with

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City. Technically he was only two games over ninety

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>yards because he had like eighty eight and eighty nine.

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>But I don't like me in that much of a sticklers,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But like, you've never even top ninety yards, but only

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>two games over one hundred yards? Only three touchdowns of

0:22:25.640 --> 0:22:31.159
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City last year, including the playoffs. Clyde Edwards Hilaire

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:35.440
<v Speaker 1>had three receiving touchdowns in just ten games, like Juju

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:37.679
<v Speaker 1>had the twice as many games. He had twenty games.

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>He had his chance, he didn't. He didn't come. You know,

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City, they'll probably bring in if he even

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>if he stays. I don't, I don't, things will be

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.239
<v Speaker 1>worse off if he goes somewhere else. Obviously there's you

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine that they'd signed him to big money, right,

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.560
<v Speaker 1>he would probably take a pay cut to stay. He's

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:56.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly not going to go to the Eagles, who get

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>jumped as soon as he goes off the plane. Who

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they kind of need a slot receiver too. That would

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be something else they if he just went to the

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>NFC East, what about the Giants? Thankfully, I don't care anymore.

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But again I don't, I don't. Juju is not on

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>my radar whatsoever for the rest of my life, all right.

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Jacoby Myers was a quietly consistent flex level producer as

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a as a Patriots wide receiver, which is impressive. From

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Week five forward, he averaged four catches for fifty yards

0:23:26.640 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and about half a touchdown per game. That's roughly twelve

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>PPR points. That's enough to be a flex starter in

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 1>most cases. Tried to find some advanced stats about Jacoby

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Myers to be particularly good at anything. Nothing. He's just

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a dude. Five years, he's never topped nine

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards or six touchdowns. He had that long open

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of his career where he had never scored. I think

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.600
<v Speaker 1>he went like twenty some games without scoring a touchdown

0:23:54.880 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to start his career. Jacoby Myers a just an average guy.

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>That's what it looks like. Looks like on paper for sure,

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>but New England worst placed in the world to be

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver basically, unless you were Randy Moss in

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven. Outside of that, there's been no

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>success at the wide receiver position for the Patriots, and

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I test Jacoby can make play. I'm excited to see

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>where he If he gets put in the right spot,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I think he could be surprising people and if he

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.000
<v Speaker 1>stays healthy. Interesting spot. After the Vikings dropped, Adam feeling

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe Minnesota for Jacoby Myers is kind of a

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>sneaky landing spot, kind of on a prove it deal

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. He's not along justin Jefferson. He's not

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>a solely a slot guy either he can line up outside.

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Should be an interesting spot and the guy are about

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about here. I think can end up in

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota as well. Jaywicky Wicky Shark, Yeah, or he would

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:48.440
<v Speaker 1>be a good fit for DJ Turns twenty seven in September.

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So he's still got plenty of gas left in the tank.

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm like Adam Feeling, who I decided to laugh granted,

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>not knocking Feeling whatsoever. Paul Famer, Yeah, certainly will be

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Vikings Ring of Honor. Whoever first reported it.

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a Tom Pella sero, but it

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>just in his tweet. He's like, still with plenty of

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>gas left in the tank. Theland was looking to content

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you signed the contender and you're like, plenty of gas

0:25:13.960 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>in the tank. Did you watch football last year? Yeah?

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:19.879
<v Speaker 1>If he wasn't getting it done with Justin Jefferson getting

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 1>triple covered and dealing anyway and t J. Hockinson drawing

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of coverage for the second half the year. Yeah,

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Theland's thirty three, So so I guess out of the way,

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>how about I don't think anything's better. He's not gonna

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be better off anywhere else. If you didn't get it

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>done in Minnesota last year. So DJ charcol though, I

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>think I like his prospects if he can stay healthy.

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 1>The problem is he's played just fifteen games over the

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.239
<v Speaker 1>last two seasons, with the Lions last year and then

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>with Jacksonville the year before. He was drafted sixty first

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>overall by the Jags in twenty eighteen, so it was

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>somewhat of a blue chip prospect. He broke out in

0:25:57.440 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>his second year with a thousand plus yards and eight touchdowns,

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but since then he's struggled with injury as total just

0:26:03.040 --> 0:26:06.719
<v Speaker 1>ten touchdowns in the three seasons since. But again, if

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he can stay healthy and lands in the right spot

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 1>like he signed with the Minnesota and he's opposite Justin Jefferson, yeah,

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>who's still going to see double coverage every game? Well,

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Shark is very intriguing. So he's a guy

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I've been scooping up and just hoping he gets uh,

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, lands in a good spot, starting gig nice offense,

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and wherever he lands, it's probably the best quarterback of

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>his career for sure. I mean, Goff was decent, but

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>he didn't even play. He only played like nine ten

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>games last year. But hey, nine times nine waiting to

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>use that button. Yeah, all right, Alan Lazard, he's a packer, well,

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:49.360
<v Speaker 1>at least he will was a packer with Davante Adams gone.

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Last season, everything was in place for Alan Lazard's breakout

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>year and he went backwards. He's a clear second wide

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver at best, maybe a third option, and that was

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>on an Aaron Rodgers offense. And he's probably not going

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to sign in a spot where he's going to get

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a better quarterback seventh worst cushion, fifteenth worst separation per

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Next Gen Stats. We've seen him score touchdowns, He's had

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>fourteen over the last two years. Maybe that's like the

0:27:14.800 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>hope is that he finds a landing spot where he

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 1>can just be like a short yardage threat. You know.

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Like that's another one where you're just like, if you're

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>a big Alan Wizard fan, you hope he ends up

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in Kansas City, or you hope he ends up in Buffalo,

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or you hope he ends up, you know, as justin

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Herbert's third wide receiver. Yeah, I'm not not too thrilled

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about wherever Alan Lazard ends up. And uh, definitely not.

0:27:40.520 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't even want to get into this next guy,

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but google for a second, Kole Hardman another chief. I don't,

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I'm not gonna say dislike, but I'm just

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm about excited. It's about Kole Hardman ends up as

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 1>am about Juju Smith cheer. All I want to do

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is just go back and see what Kansas City could

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have done. Instead of drafting Hardman in the second round

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.719
<v Speaker 1>fifty sixth overall in twenty seventeen, you could have had

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers in the same range like uk Metcalf, oh God,

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:16.159
<v Speaker 1>Deonte Johnson, Terry McLaurin all could have been Kansas City chiefs.

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So but again, anyone leaving Kansas City, you're not gonna

0:28:20.200 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, they're gonna do better here. Nope. And

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>then especially not Hardman. We didn't get done in Kansas

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>City ever. So I would contend, even in kind of

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a shaky wide receiver draft class, that it's probably better

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>taking a rookie wide receiver than any of these guys

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that we've mentioned in drafts this year. If, especially if

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you're doing early best ball drafts, you can wait five

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>or six rounds and take a rookie wide receiver over

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Juju or Jacoby Meyers. Yeah, this is the least exciting

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>free agent class I can remember. So and the last

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>one we're going to talk about is Paris Campbell, a

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>chart favorite nor. Last year, his fourth season, Campbell finally

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>played a full year with okay results six hundred yards,

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>three scores. In fairness, the Colts were just bad. They

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>were diseased, and it was catching passes from the undead

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:18.440
<v Speaker 1>corpse of Matt Ryan, first time starter Sam Ellinger Ellinger sorry,

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and journeyman Nick Foles. What a trio of quarterbacks right there.

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Back to the combine, he was an athletic freak though,

0:29:27.280 --> 0:29:30.840
<v Speaker 1>top ninety percent guy just about everything. His ideal landing

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>spot is a team that needs a starting slot wide

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>receiver like New England, Baltimore, Cleveland, tons of other teams. Uh,

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>several options for him, but he's a slot guy, and

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>like the prototypical slot guy that is maybe four five

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>catches a game, and you hope he breaks one. But

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>but that's that's the high end. That's the upside for

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell is a five catch game in my opinion. Yeah,

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that's enough Paris Campbell talk for me. Okay, let's move

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>on to the tight end position. Dalt Schultz as a

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>free agent, and it would be surprising to me if

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>he left Dallas. But what do you think? I don't

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>know if they're gonna be able to afford to pay him,

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm pretty much envisioning he's gone. I've been scooping

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>up Jake Ferguson everywhere I can in the last round,

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>anticipating that Dalton Schultz leaves. Washington would certainly be an interesting,

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:24.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting landing spot for Schultz. Um turns twenty seven in July,

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>still pretty young, tight end standards. His first two seasons,

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he's really spent most of them is a backup, so

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of wear and tear on Schultz. But man,

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Dallas was such a tight end friendly offense and has

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>been for like, yeah, twenty years. It seems like yeah,

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. It's not like he was really

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>compete Jake Ferguson and I was named Peyton Hender shoot shock,

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they were. They were stealing some snaps. But um, wherever

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Schultz ends up, he's likely going to be the main guy.

0:30:58.080 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But I really want to see where it is. But

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it can get any better than Dallas

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for him. No, it seems like that was a good

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>landing spot for him, and the spot it may be

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 1>better than the talent, so he might get paid like

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a super talented tight end, but I'm not sure if

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>he fits that mold. He wasn't a full one system

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>tight end, but a partial, partial system tight end. Mike

0:31:23.360 --> 0:31:26.959
<v Speaker 1>Gasicki obviously wasn't a system tight end in Miami, at

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 1>least not the new system. He's got high draft pedigree though,

0:31:30.800 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and really, you know, the perfect designed body to play

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.400
<v Speaker 1>tight end, but it's just never come together for Mike Gasicki.

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>He limps into free agency off his worst season since

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year. He always started one game last year

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for the Miami What does that mean, Like he wasn't

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>on the field for the first snap or something that.

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But because he's not a he's never been a prototypical

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>tight end in that he doesn't block. Yeah, and you

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want that in fantasy football though, so that's a

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>good thing in my mind, But he was just never

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a good fit in Miami. He was more of a

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver and they had much better wide receivers on

0:32:11.280 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>my Ye, Tyrie Kill and Jalen Waddle. But um, I'm sorry,

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't done with Kiki. But he's another guy

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>who I've been grabbing him late in drafts because if

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>he you know, I'm not calling him Travis Kelsey, but

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he's like Travis Kelsey light light, Like he could be

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>light light. He could be, you know, essentially a wide

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver that you can put in your tight end position

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy football. He's kind of that kind of like

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.640
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't block, he's always lined up in the slot

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>or outside, and if he's a gets sent to a

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.320
<v Speaker 1>high functioning offense. I'm intrigued by Asiki. Based on his

0:32:45.400 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>price tag, he's like barely inside the top two hundred

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>players right now, so an interesting landing spot. We've talked

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>about this a little bit because of the trade, but

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>how about Carolina That that would be a kind of

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a cool landing spot for him because he'd probably be

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the top receiving option immediately in Carolina. I like that,

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>And you could get him at a pretty sizable discount

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 1>over some of the free agent wide receivers because his

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>tight ends go for less than wide receivers. Yeah, I'm

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>with that. I like that idea. Hayden Hurst is the

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>last guy on the list. And Brian I know that

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he's near and dirty your heart. Yeah. Hayden Hurst most

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>famous for getting drafted by the Ravens with the twenty

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>fifth overall pick in twenty eighteen, seven picks before Lamar Jackson,

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty one picks before the Ravens selected Mark Andrews in

0:33:32.960 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the fourth round, and the Hurst was also picked before

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard and Mike Asiki. So I guess never forget that.

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>That's just the weirdest draft in the world. How went before? Yeah,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>absolutely Jackson and then Mark Andrews rounds later, But anyways,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>turns thirty in August. I'm pretty much out on Hurst

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and re draft and Diansty Obviously zero spike weeks in

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the regular season with the Bengals last year, Ye was

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 1>so much you'd get a little bit more out of

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>him from from that standpoint. His best game was six

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.239
<v Speaker 1>catches fifty three yards and a touchdown. He only which

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>is a good game, but he's the only good game.

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>He only scored one other touchdown the rest of the

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.800
<v Speaker 1>season and never topped sixty yards at all. Like he

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just you can't get a better situation than then walking

0:34:21.160 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>into that one too. And of course you're competing for

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>targets in the Bengal who he was with te Higgins

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>and Jamar Chase. But I don't know. Hurst doesn't have

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like the skill set to go somewhere and just be

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>an impact player. I don't know. I'm it didn't work out.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I was really in on him last year when he

0:34:39.120 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>shot the Bengals. Was expecting something but got nothing. So

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of dead to me now, sorry, Hayden. Dan Arnold

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a free agent, by the way, No, unfortunately not, he's

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.839
<v Speaker 1>still under contract locked in if yeah, he's one more

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>year with Jacksonville, and I'm gonna get emotional. I'm I

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>got nothing against Evan Engram, and I'm not gonna say

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Dan Arnold is a better player than Evan Ingram, but

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.600
<v Speaker 1>comparable skill sets. Arnold would have put up great numbers

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.359
<v Speaker 1>if Evan Ingram was not on the Jaguars last year.

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And they just tagged Ingram in Jacksonville, so he'll be

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 1>there again. But I'm very excited for the team overall.

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I don't know. Dan Arnold's don't have to

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>wait one more year or he'll need injury. But uh,

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and on the Dan Arnold note, we wrap up the

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>show usually how it goes. You can follow Brian on

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at BTXJ. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Explosive Output, can follow Dan Arnold, who follows me on Twitter.

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 1>That's true. I don't know who's handled though, off the

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>top of my head at Dan Arnold. Yeah, just just

0:35:43.000 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>look at my top eight ad isn't that my space is?

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>They're probably people out there, like the twenty year olds, like,

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>what the hell is he talking about? Top eight? You

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 1>know my space? If Elon threw in a top eight,

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll on my Space onto Twitter? Would that be an improvement? Rule?

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>And then the profile you remember, you get your own song,

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.279
<v Speaker 1>you get on your page. Yeah, my Space was peak

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:16.359
<v Speaker 1>peak for about but that's then then the whole world

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:20.279
<v Speaker 1>went to hell. Absolutely all right. Well, well, uh, we're

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna hope that Charch is feeling better and ready to

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 1>go next week, and we'll be back with another Fantasy

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly next Friday. Thank you guys for listening, and

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk to you later. Fantasy Football Weekly is a

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.279
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.