WEBVTT - Leading Off May 12th, 2025 (Ep. 1009)

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in. Everybody throws MLB. This is leading off live.

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It is me, Joey p Joe Pi's appeal with me,

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of course is the Welsh, and it's all of you,

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the Peanuts and the Cracker tracks here on a Monday morning.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Lots of baseball going on, some Joe Stradamas moments over

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the weekend to discuss. We've got prospecting with the Welsh.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Today we are jam packed Welsh. Did you have a

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>nice Mother's Day? We have very good to your mother.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And did you also take care of your wife and

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody on the weekend.

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, lots of moms, lots of I'm exhausted, so it

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 2>was great for everybody else. Servant Welsh is going to

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the side here and we are looking forward. We're spending

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I told my wife and everybody the Monday hits it's

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Father's month.

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 3>It's now Father's month all.

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 2>The way to Father's Day. We're celebrating all about the dash.

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I like that I could use a Father's Day. I'll

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>settle for a week a month sounds great. Don't think

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting that. Let's talk about where we left off

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>last weekend too, because when last we saw you, dun doundone.

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Rafaeld Devers was in his feelings quite a bit now.

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Over the weekend he met with management and the ownership

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think everybody had a little heart to heart

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:16.680
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of like, maybe you want to role

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>play this. You want to play Raffield Devers and I'll

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>play ownership. You want to have some fun, sure little

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>improv remember yes and yes end. So here we go. Hey, Raffie,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we're paying you three hundred million dollars. We know you're

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a professional. It takes a lot of pride in what

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.199
<v Speaker 1>you do. But we're paying you three hundred million dollars

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in this contract guaranteed you don't have an opt out.

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I know you see lots of guys getting paid now,

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe twice as much, just a couple of years after

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you assigned that deal, and that's frustrating. But RAFFI mmmm,

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:45.559
<v Speaker 1>we kind of need you to go grab your glove

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and play first base. Otherwise we're kind of in a

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 1>pickle and it's gonna hurt our ability to win. And

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>if you heard our ability to win, we might have

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to look for another place for you to play. What

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think, raf No, Okay, then that sounds good

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>talk good talk fail. It seems like he's more open,

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>though I don't know if he saw some of the

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>comments after it's like, oh, we'll see maybe some stroking,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, had to go on to the ego. I

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but was telling to me was the Trevor

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Story stuff too, and says did you see stories? Quote?

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Just out of curiosity after all.

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 3>This, I didn't see stories. Quote.

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Now he said, quote, we'll talk about it. Obviously things

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>are fresh and a little emotional right now, but yeah,

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we will do it, Trevor Story said. And like I said,

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>we're all adults and we'll figure things out eventually, one

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>way or another. It's about winning games and I think

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone can agree with that. Now. If you read between

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the lines there, that's tension. That means, hey, buddy, we're

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>all trying to do our best year. What are you doing?

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.840
<v Speaker 1>But we'll monitor that as we go. Kyle Schwarber was good.

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 1>It was my home run call of the weekend. He

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>hit home runs thirteen and fourteen. The on base streak

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>which was what forty four or forty five I think

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>was snapped on Friday, But a great performance by Schwarber yesterday.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wheeler also great. Performance by him eight strikeouts, seven innings.

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>He was plus nine hundred yesterday more for the cy

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Young Welsh. I don't know if you want to take

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a guess on what that number might be after yesterday's performance.

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's what'd you say? Six?

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's fine, four to one? Nine hundred?

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, okay, give me the number, because then I

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 2>will tell you something here about that. I'm gonna guess. Uh, okay,

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 2>it was nine. I'm gonna go uh five to one.

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Nope. Seven. So it only went down a little bit,

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>which means there's some incredible value on wheel or for

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:22.839
<v Speaker 1>cy Young right now.

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>How about this though even better value on the Betting

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 2>Pro show that we did last week where I came

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:30.799
<v Speaker 2>on and said that Zach Wheeler is eleven to one

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 2>and still a really nice bet. So those odds have

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 2>almost they're getting close to starting to cutting in half.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 2>But eleven to one when we did it last week,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>then nine, then seven, we're continuously going down. It's an

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 2>open market because skeens who were gonna see today he

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been as skeenzy as we're used to. The strikeouts

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.080
<v Speaker 2>are not quite there's getting hit up a little bit.

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Fun fact I don't remember, and I don't know if

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 2>this has ever happened, that Paul Skeens is plus money

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>through the first five innings of a matchup. I don't

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 2>think I've ever seen him be, you know, because obviously

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>it's the Pirates, it's not him, but that is banking

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>and backing the starting pitcher. David Peterson is on the

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 2>mound for the Mets, and Paul Skeins is plus and

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 2>the Pirates are plus plus one oh five for the

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>first five I don't recall ever seeing that two Skens

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 2>isn't as skeensy.

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned for for bets today because I got some

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>feelings on that game. Uh, here's a question. Is Rokie

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Sazaki droppable Welsh? I don't think so.

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 3>Ten team?

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you think twelve team.

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean upside if you want to, if you're playing

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.080
<v Speaker 2>the upside game. But in a ten team, dude, you

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 2>are much better served streaming those cool pitchers that are

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.479
<v Speaker 2>sitting around there, assuming you can stream decently. Then you

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 2>are holding on to Suzaki. His fastball is still blah.

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.280
<v Speaker 2>His split finger is starting not to do what it

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 2>needs to be doing. He's not getting the whiffs he's

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>got walks. He's not a great serviceable option in ten, team,

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 2>twelve and fifteen. You're probably trying to bench. I'm not

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 2>sure I'm dropping him because of what's like available out there.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>But you know, the tough question. If he has, like,

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:06.280
<v Speaker 2>let's say one more bad one and Bubba eventually in

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 2>some universe comes up, breaks through the multiverse portal in

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 2>a ship and comes out's.

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 1>Going to take it. At this point, well, who would

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you rather have?

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Would it be Bubba or Suzaki? And it might be

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.279
<v Speaker 3>bub It might be Bubbas.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>But it might I don't know. I gain it's early

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in the year. I'm hoping Suzaki, you know, can figure

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 1>things out and the Dodgers need him to more on

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the Dodgers starting pictures Later in the show too, he

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 1>got updates on Snail and Glass. Now, Michael wants to

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>know why I don't wear the sacket of the sacket,

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>the jacket like I do on Sundays. I said, suit jacket.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I made it a sackbob socket. Yeah, well, we did

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>have the full house opening, so it's not that far off.

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So the suit jacket is for TV on Sundays, yes,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's mandatory, so I have to wear the jacket.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to wear a jacket here. I can

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>be nice and comfortable, and that's what I want to be,

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>damn it. Sandy al Contra became Sunday al Contra again

0:05:53.800 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>yesterday five and two thirds. Now. It wasn't great in

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of like the win loss because he did take

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>an l again the White Sox, but better he had

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>eight strikeouts, walk three guys, gave up seven hits. The

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>problem was the three run homer to Tim Elko, which

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>was his first major league hit, his first major league

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>home run. Shout out to him. Now we know the

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>era is still very high, but the eight strikeouts I

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>think at least gave you a little bit of cozy feelings. Well,

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>if you've hung on and say, okay, maybe there's something

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>here where we can get back on track. I was encouraged.

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't perfect, but the by window is still very much

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>open for Sandy.

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah potential, yeah, potential, by opportunity. Really interesting thing is

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 2>everybody knows Sandy was going to like rely heavy on

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 2>his change up. He dropped that down to the fourth

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 2>most used pitch in this start. He was fifteen percent

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>on the change up, which I mean, I have to

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>go through the logs, which I'm not going to do,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 2>but like that's got to be one of the lowest

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 2>and god knows how long of usage there he was fastball.

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 2>He went secondary on the curve, which really it's interesting

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>with the strikeouts too, as far as like whiffs goes

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.799
<v Speaker 2>like every single whiff, because he had the eight strikeouts,

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 2>every whiff induced a strikeout.

0:07:05.800 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 3>So you know, he was setting up zone.

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Percentages were kind of weird a little bit, but he

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>was getting to two strike counts, which is why he

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 2>had a heavy one oh seven pitch count. But then

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 2>he was able to drop that strikeout. It was done

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 2>on the fastball, curveball. Zero whiffs on the change up,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 2>which is really interesting and only a fifteen percent usage.

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Something to watch that maybe he's pushing that back a

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 2>tiny bit and that might catapult him moving forward because

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 2>when he gets back to throwing that a lot, that's

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 2>a huge strikeout inducing pitch and it's you know, it's

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 2>really his best pitch outside of being able to throw

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 2>like high nineties. So this maybe is like a semi

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 2>positive sign that things are going to start turning around.

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 2>He'll scrap this for a couple of weeks and then bam,

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 2>it's going to come back with a fury but good

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 2>results with a pretty obvious change he had in this

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 2>last start.

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the most drop players last week was Bowden Francis,

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and he had arguably his best start of the year

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, So let's talk about that for a second.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Six and two thirds through run baseball did not factor

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>into the decision, but if you look at the percentage

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of drops again, he was way at the top. He

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>is now rostered in just sixty percent of leagues. Do

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you think if you need pitching that Baltin Francis might

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>be a guy? Maybe you scoop up off the waiver

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>wire and hope that he is riding the ship. Maybe

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this start is the turning of the corner or is

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>this fool's gold?

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>I think I think it's fools gold.

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 2>His his overarching page of information is like crazy, worrisome

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 2>five four ERA with a worse expected era. A twelve

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 2>percent barrel rate given up is crazy, fifty percent hard

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 2>hit rate given up against is also crazy, and almost

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.920
<v Speaker 2>ever at least his top two pitches used have expected

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 2>batter and averages of forty points are higher against, so

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>like that's what's probably leading to some of the expected

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 2>stuff out there.

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a streamer.

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I think unless he rattles off like four at this point,

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>which still I'm not sure you trust.

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I think you got to pick your matchups right with him.

0:08:56.520 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 2>There might be some you know, pseudo signs of brilliance

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that hop themselves out. But seventeen percent k percentage, six

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 2>percent walk, he gives up a lot of barreling bad

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>expected ra I'm probably a pass.

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Okay, probably a pass there for the welsh On Francis. Now.

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I saw in the chat where was it ah, Mitch

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>was asking what can we expect from Brandon Woodriff when

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he comes back? Well, let's talk about that, Mitch, because

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Woodruff should be back this week. He had one

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>more rehab start over the weekend coming back from that

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>shoulder issue. Struck out three, one run, just two and

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a third inning. So it was kind of weird. I

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>guess it was like the tune up start or whatever.

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I thought this was odd, but they said, no,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this is what he was gonna do. Have an abbreviated start.

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the first I feel like we get this,

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>usually the guy goes longer, not shorter, but thirty nine

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:46.040
<v Speaker 1>pitches in this start. They say this was the last

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>tune up. They say he's going to make his debut

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>later in this week. So I would assume after this

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>tune up, maybe the first start is Friday, Saturday, Sunday,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and we're looking at maybe seventy five pitches, probably short there.

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Myers sent back down too, because they're not too

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>happy with him. So I do think, and we're going

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about a prospect in that system too might

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>get a look. But the Brewers are trying to shake

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the trees a little bit. Woodroof is that first domino

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to fall in this rotation, so Peralta Woodroff, after that,

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I think everything is kind of open for business.

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, well, also Kintana kind of has it.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>But to your point, though, like it's crazy, the whole rotator.

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>They have an entire rotation that's injured out here. Aaron

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Ashby and DL Hall have been pitching. Those guys are

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>starting their rehab process. You've got two minor league pitchers

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 2>that could uy for that spot. So if you do

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 2>consider Peralta Woodroff and even Quintana there, you've got two

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 2>open spots between like seven guys, so it could go

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 2>really any direction. But on Woodroff what to expect. I'm

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>probably gonna be a tiny bit hesitant in the first start,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 2>like if you're hugging Ratios, maybe you know, maybe don't

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 2>start him out like they might only let him and

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>want him to go into the seventy range and pull

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 2>into the bullpen. So I'm going to be a little

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 2>bit hesitant, but i want to pick him up. I

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 2>don't know who the matchup is. I'm not looking at

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the schedule, but you know, if it's somebody it's like

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the Pirates, then I'm probably starting that matchup. But if

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it's something like, you know, anybody in the NL West

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>except the Rockies, I.

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Have a Guardians to open the week, and then later

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>in the week they have come on.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to see more because Thursday or Friday is

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>the likely start time.

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 3>If he started on Sunday, all.

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Right, so they've got where are we here? Guardians open

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>away Twinkies at home. I know you hate the Twinkies,

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>but so Thursday they're off, Friday, Saturday Sunday they're at

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>home against the Twins.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 2>So Friday is probably the likely scenario. I guess, yeah,

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I think the Twins.

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 3>I might. I might.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>That's that's a half decent matchup. I probably might start

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 2>them there.

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Everybody's favorite or really nobody's

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite segment, Jost Damas. When last we left you, also,

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about how the Rockies needed to overhaul everything,

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that it was unacceptable. And guess what it was by

0:11:57.720 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the time we got back here on Monday. I guess

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>they're of the show. Ownership was watching Bud Black, who

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>was also the winningest manager in Rockies history, hasn't gotten

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to that team to five hundred records since twenty eighteen.

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a long time ago, Welsh. I wasn't even working

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>at Fantasy Pros in twenty eighteen. Okay, that's how long

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>ago twenty eighteen was. So unfortunately, Bud Black has gone,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Mike Redman is going to take over, and then you're

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Clint Hurtle be the bench coach who's got

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 1>managerial experience. Look, you are seven and thirty three. We

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about last week how they got destroyed twenty one

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.599
<v Speaker 1>to three in a doubleheader, and then on Saturday, I

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think that was the death knell because was it twenty

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to nothing in that game.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 3>I think it's the effort level one.

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Twenty one nothing against the Padres again and which Michael

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Kelly extremely happy, I'm sure, but it's just embarrassing. I

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>know the Division is so far at leaps and bounds

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>ahead of them. I get all that, But where the

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Rockies I think have gone wrong is thinking that they

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>can somehow defend and pitch their way out of things.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>When the Rockies organization is good. They got Matt Holliday

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and Todd Hilton hitting home runs. They got Vinie Caristia

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Andres Gallaag and Larry Walker hitting home runs. Go get

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>some guys hitting home runs. Just beat everybody to death,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>because nowadays, with the specialization in pitching, you might be

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>able to find some weird and I know they tried

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it a couple of years ago with the openers and

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the three inning guys and all this stuff. At the

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, I think it's a bigger issue.

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But at least in the meantime, structurally, they need to

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>overhaul this whole organization for the top down.

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 2>Welsh and I don't know if they're going to I

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 2>mean they should have at this point, like go get

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Blackman to be your manager. He was just playing

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>with the team last year. He's some advisor with the organization.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter.

0:13:36.360 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean it was It's a weird conversation, Like you

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>know we had talked about on the last episode. It

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 2>was just like, well, you know, they could fire, they

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>could not. They're a huge losing team. What do you

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 2>get if you do either way, maybe you'll get a

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.800
<v Speaker 2>fire burnt under. But the organization development kind of stinks.

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 2>The players that they're piecing together, I suppose it's getting better,

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, guys like Brenton Doyle. They haven't traded away

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Ryan McMahon. But I guess at the end of the day,

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 2>it's never really seen like there's a clear path of

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing. It doesn't I don't look at that

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>roster or the minor leagues, and I don't really understand.

0:14:06.600 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 3>What they're doing.

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 2>But Rockies clean house another in season manager at this

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 2>point already can.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Which is pretty crazy.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 2>A little bit surprised by it, but I suppose this

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 2>is not the team to be surprised by.

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 3>They don't even have double digit wins. When do you

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 3>think they'll get the tenth win.

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Of the year, which if I say June first, I'll

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 2>say June first, over under, that means three more wins,

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 2>right if they seven and something.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>There's seven, they have seven wins. They'll get ten wins

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>by June first, and that I think will happen.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Michael September first.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I I don't think it's out of

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 2>pocket to believe that it's a over the June first.

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 2>But baseball isn't quite like football where it's like, you know,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the coach.

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Bounce, the dead cat bounce.

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, we're gonna play up for it. Like,

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't really think that's going to happen. You still

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>have to put those same players out there, and.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the Pirates exactly. Yeah. But that was the whole

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>point is that, like I know, Bud Black is very

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>expecting guy in the organization. I know he's been there

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, he's had some success, he's a

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 1>good manager, and he's gone. He's gone, and it's not

0:15:07.480 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 1>his fault necessarily, But when you see the effort level

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>where you're getting when you're losing games twenty to nothing,

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that's what's unacceptable. It's just the bigger game plan,

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the bigger approach to the every day How are we

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>preparing as a team every day to go out there

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and be competitive? You know, there's teams that have little

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>talent that go out there and still compete, and the

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Rockies just aren't competing right now. So shake the trees

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and the off season we'll see if they get a

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>better plan, but it's going to be far away. Also

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Joster damas news. According to Bob Nightingale of USA Today,

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the Mets are among the teams that have checked in

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 1>with the White Sox availability of Louise Robert, who mysteriously

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>also wasn't playing over the weekend because oh that needs

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a little sore coach. Hmmm. Kind of interesting, right, everyone's

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>checking in all of a sudden. He's coming out of

0:15:48.600 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>games just to be a little precautionary. So keep an

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>eye on that one, because that would not shock me

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. I know. There's some questions, a lot of

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>questions in the chat about Nick Kurtz. Let's talk about him.

0:15:57.840 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Over three came out for a pitch hitter in the nine.

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>It's been tough. Is he droppable in shallow leagues. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very frustrating. I'm gonna take the l on this.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I was super exciting, maybe more than anybody. I thought

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 1>he'd come up here and at least show something. But

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 1>while she's shown nothing so far.

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, but he's still again, like I kee,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 2>we keep doing this bit where people are treating it

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 2>like he hasn't got a hit yet, Like he's still

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 2>hitting two seventy. He's a two sixty nine right now,

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 2>hard hits over forty. He's just striking out like he's

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>super inconsistent. Hey, surprise, this time last year he was

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 2>playing college baseball.

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He was.

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 2>But he's got hits in two of the last three games.

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>He's had multi hits in two of the last six games. Yeah,

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 2>it's not great, but he is getting something. He's just

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 2>not doing anything great with him. They're taking the pressure off,

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, you kind of chastise the idea of, like

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:50.800
<v Speaker 2>that first day, letting him sit and kind of chill

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 2>and understand it.

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 3>It's probably pretty overwhelming.

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 2>But even in that overwhelming space forty percent hard hit rate,

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 2>he's got a one thirteen max TV average ev is

0:16:59.280 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 2>ninety three miles prour and the dude's hitting two sixty nine.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think it's done. I don't think it's

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>all over it. But thirty nine percent k percentage is

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 2>just not going to work. So you just shouldn't start him.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 2>And if you're the ten team league, guess what you

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 2>can drop like bye bye, Like it.

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Doesn't make sense.

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 2>But twelve and fifteen, a month from now, I think

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 2>we legitimately could be talking about, oh, he got some

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>stuff figured out, Like I'm not guaranteeing that by any means,

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 2>but he's a pretty talented hitter. He's hitting, by the way,

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 2>two fifty or higher against all pitch types he's faced

0:17:31.320 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 2>so far. He's just whiffing against breaking an off speed,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 2>but he's making contact, and it's in a little baby ballpark,

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 2>and he's got to make some more contact in the zone,

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 2>which he's not doing.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 3>It is possible. It's going to get there. These rookies

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 3>take some time.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it is nothing but doom and gloom

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 2>on Nick Kurtz. But you know, we'll check back in

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a month and we'll see where it is. But if

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 2>he's still hitting two seventy, I don't want to hear.

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Like what what's wrong with Nick Kerts. He's in two

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 3>seventy you know, like, if he's still hitting the average

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 3>in the Major League, let's give him some credit.

0:17:58.480 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, they're gonna be on the road against the dog

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, then their home against the Angels, and then

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Phillies the rest of the month.

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 3>So they're gonna be a rough stretch.

0:18:07.200 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a really rough stretcher. There's a good chance that

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>he is not going to make it through that stretch

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and he'll be down by the moor all day. Again,

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm just putting that out there too. I'm the doom

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and gloom. Oh well, Tim Elko I mentioned before in

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the Rookie Lookie too. I want to mention him again.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So he was our guy. I got beat out by

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a dollar for him in my home league. So mad,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.199
<v Speaker 1>so mad because I need some first base help because uh,

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Nick Kurtz isn't hitting. So I thought maybe Elko I

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>could start him this week. Nope, nope, no good. Rett

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Lauder also made another minor league start at single A,

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>so keep an eye on that. Also, it's that time

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>again everybody everyone's favorite segment. It's time for prospecting with

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the Welsh. That's right. It's when the Welsh talks about

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>some of the guys playing in Triple A, maybe even

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Double A, some names that you need to know for

0:18:50.040 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball rosters. And Welsh, one guy that we've

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>been talking about a lot finally got the college, Jordan

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Lawler of your Arizona Diamondbacks. So I want to talk

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>about him because they finally called him up. He's been

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>undeniable so far in the minor leagues, hitting the snot

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>out of the ball everywhere, hitting for power, playing different positions,

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like playing the different positions is what's

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:11.679
<v Speaker 1>going to get him in this d Backs lineup at

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 1>some point, because there really isn't a whole lot of

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>room in the infield for him the way that group

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>has performed. So Welsh, I've heard about you know you're

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>going to try to get him in the lineup a

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>couple times a week, you know, give some guys some

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.199
<v Speaker 1>days off, move him around. That flexibility is great for

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>fantasy in theory, but is it great in practice if

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not playing every single day happier at the big

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>league level.

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 3>I still think it can.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 2>It's not a couple times a week, they're talking at

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 2>like at least four times. So if they're six games

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 2>in a week, they're talking about four. This is kind

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 2>of what I broke down, like whatever. It was a

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>couple of weeks ago we talked about the only thing

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 2>that's missing is that he's not playing any outfield, which

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 2>is super annoying. But in the miners he's played third,

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>short and second. Tory Lavellos said that when he comes up,

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 2>he will play third, short and second and he'll give spells.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:19:59.239
<v Speaker 2>They don't want to go like three like I think

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 2>it's like if you have three back to backs, or

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>if you have back to back to back, they want

0:20:02.920 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 2>Ktel to start sitting. So you've got a second base

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 2>spot he could DH as well, you're gonna give a

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 2>day Entreprenomo a day or two off for Johannio.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 3>They'll use that DH spot.

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 2>So to your point, if he only plays four of seven,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's like a not as super great, but they

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 2>feel that they're going to play him enough to not

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 2>stunt his development, because I know people are kind of

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 2>hung up on that, and I think that is important. Ironically,

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.479
<v Speaker 2>I saw someone go out about this that it's like

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 2>he was crazy, crazy, crazy, and then in May he's

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 2>only hit like two hundred. Then the Diamondbacks are like,

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 2>bring him on up. Now he's only hitting two hundred.

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Now when he starts to struggle, but he's still coming

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 2>off of a three thirty six minor league campaign six homers,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 2>thirteen stolen bases. Underlying profile is pretty good in Triple

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:46.920
<v Speaker 2>A average EV one ten, which is better than he's

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>had at any Triple A or Major league. Start hitting

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the ball a little bit harder, getting the ball in

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 2>the air more than ever, and he's going to get

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 2>some time.

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 3>I think it's worth speculation.

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 2>But I'll always reiterate this to you if you can't

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 2>stomach what Nick Kurtz is doing, Like, just be careful.

0:21:00.800 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Lawler at least has some major league experience, and he

0:21:04.040 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 2>knows this team, and he has changed his profile already

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.879
<v Speaker 2>to kind of mirror more what he needs to do

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 2>in the major league. So I think there's some better

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.359
<v Speaker 2>upside there. But he's not a big, mashing hitter and

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 2>he's not going to hit at the top of the lineup,

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 2>So this probably isn't like a ten team.

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.680
<v Speaker 3>People are like, is this a must have? No?

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Probably not, because he doesn't have an everyday job. There

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 2>might be questions to the playing time, and he's not

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 2>like some overabundant, big power hitter. I think he's going

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to hit for more contact, He's going to steal some

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 2>bases aggressively, but it'll be lower in the lineup.

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get an update on the guys from Boston,

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Roman Anthony Marcelo Mayer. We have the Romei Gonzalez injury

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.199
<v Speaker 1>after the Trystan Cassas injury. Still debate on when or

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>if Rayfield Devers will switch over to first base, but

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>if he does, that certainly opens up some DH role,

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe move some guys around, maybe call somebody up. So

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>what have you heard the latest on these two prospects

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>here for Boston, which we're still waiting for some sort

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of impact on the major league level for them.

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, one of the things that might have that It's

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>funny because it's like Devers won't go play first, but

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.360
<v Speaker 2>there have been rumors that Trevor Story could go over

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>to first, which would I think would be really interesting

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>for his injury history, so you can keep him in

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 2>the lineup, Or Christian Campbell could go over to first.

0:22:12.320 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Either one of those moves though, speak to Marcella Mayor,

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>and Marcella Mayor's bat's been fine. He's hit some nice power.

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>He's not hitting for average like Roman Anthony is. Roman

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 2>Anthony is still the guy. He's still hitting over three

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred and tripa a five homers, three stolen bases as

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 2>a four to twenty three OBP. And that's where the

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.080
<v Speaker 2>frustration comes, I think for most people, because you're like, listen,

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 2>if Devers can go to first and you can get

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Anthony in as an outfield at DH, it seems like

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 2>it might be the best thing for the team, But

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 2>there still is no path for that because Craig Breslo

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>and them do not seem at all interested in moving

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>him to first base. They want to keep him in

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the outfield. So I'm starting to think maybe Mayor is

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 2>going to be the one that's going to get and

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 2>not our Mic Mayor, but Marcello would be the guy

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.400
<v Speaker 2>that might be in the lineup soon at the expense

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 2>of a story or a Campbell moving to first.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 3>But we still got it.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I see it should be Anthony looks like he's ready,

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be down for much longer. But Marcella might be

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the guy up sooner.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, lots of things to sort out there in Boston. Still, obviously,

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about another guy. We keep waiting on Bubba Chandler.

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>We thought was imminent, and then he wasn't, and then

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have the greatest start last time we saw him.

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 1>So what's the latest on Bubba Chandler, the star starting

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 1>pitching prospect for the Pittsburgh Pirates.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Start eight one, Lug one nine. It is day

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 3>seventy five of I don't know. I don't know when

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Bubba Chandler is going to come up.

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 2>The last start wasn't great, but also wasn't like the

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 2>worst thing in the world.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Strikeouts are there walks.

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 2>I think his start would line up to today, and

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 2>the Pirates have made no indications, so I think clearly

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 2>it would have to be the next one. I think

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 2>if he has a really nice one, then the timeline

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is this next start. But like, we're just kicking the

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 2>can down the road. So the only thing to talk

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 2>about here is we continuously talk about when will he

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 2>come up.

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 3>It's all just best guesses. At this point. We don't

0:23:58.840 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 3>know what they're doing developmentally.

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 2>That last start probably did maybe halt things a tiny

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 2>bit because he couldn't go deep in the game and

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 2>he was walking again. But I think if he has

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a really good one here, it should open up, because

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 2>now you're into that mid May, which the pirates really

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 2>really like, and he has had way more good starts

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 2>than bad ones.

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's go a little further down on the

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 1>farm for a second for a Mets farm hand who

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>struck out thirteen guys, a career high at double A

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonah Tong, who also Jonah Tong, kind of turned some

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>eyes in some heads over in spring training this year too,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>six and two thirds innings in his last start. He's

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>got a forty four point seven percent strikeout rate. That's

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:36.639
<v Speaker 1>very high. I know that Mets don't need any immediate

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>starting pitching help, but I think it's also one of

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>those scenarios where if you're in dynasty leagues and you're

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at your team and you're trying to acquire more

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>assets Tongue and a couple of these other guys, Spirot

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems like the Mets have a pretty good prospect

0:24:48.359 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 1>grouping here of pitchers that are going to come to

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.880
<v Speaker 1>City Field sooner than later. So what's your take? On Tong.

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I know you're a big prospect guy. This is why

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we come to you, Welsh. What's his development possibly look

0:24:58.720 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 1>like over the next year or.

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 2>So, Shaker, we're talking about Mets prospects from Joey.

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Right, well, we're talking about a Mets prospect. You have

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>thirteen strikeout performance. I think that's got a forty four

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>p K raid.

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, and he is interesting.

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 2>They've got tid Well, They've got Sprot, they got Tong.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Tongue is not an option for this year. I would

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 2>I mean, you know, never say never, because he can

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 2>get to Triple A and move up. But they've got

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:22.879
<v Speaker 2>to work through Sprot in tid Well, and maybe Tidwell

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 2>is going to go in a trade or something. The

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.719
<v Speaker 2>thing that is really going for Tong is massive strikeouts.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Fifty one strikeouts in twenty eight innings. Pitch so far,

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty absurd numbers. Walks are looking, you know, a little

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 2>bit high, fourteen walks in twenty eight innings. But he's

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 2>held batters to like an under one seventy batting average

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 2>so far this year.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:43.719
<v Speaker 3>He seems to be on his stuff.

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if there is like injury or relief

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.399
<v Speaker 2>risk maybe six to one, one eighty, a little bit

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 2>skinnier of a guy. But I think there's a handful

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 2>of really really interesting, like double A ish pitchers that

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 2>are out there in Dynasty, and I think Tong is

0:25:57.600 --> 0:25:59.359
<v Speaker 2>one of those that you want to speculate on because

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 2>that's out stuff with the fastball is huge with him.

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:03.800
<v Speaker 3>But there's a little.

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Let's speculate on Justin Crawford of the Phillies. Just we

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>were getting closer and closer to thinking maybe Otto Kemp

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>would get an opportunity. Unfortunately Alec Bohm started hitting again.

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>So could Justin Crawford actually be the guy that gets

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 1>there first?

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is one I really wanted to hit.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Here on my list is Crawford's son of Carl Crawford

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 2>in Triple A has just been an absolute monster. He's

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 2>near the top of hit leaders in all of Triple A.

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 2>He's only twenty one years old, but the six to

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 2>two outfielder. His offensive game is stepping up twenty percent

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 2>K percentage, but he's upped his walk percentage to ten percent.

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 3>Three to nineteen batting average at.

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Four his last four stops a high. I guess it

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 2>was three high A double A and triple A.

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>He's all hit over three hundred. Power.

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Projections are really really low on him. He doesn't have

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 2>a homer this year, but he's got twelve stolen bases

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 2>in thirty four games. He's hitting like crazy, which.

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Is really really important.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 2>And looking at that offense, Brandon marsh is hitting under

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.400
<v Speaker 2>two hundred. Kepler is okay. I guess he's hitting around

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 2>two forty left he's in the lineup. That's Crawford. I

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>think you could see Crawford in the very very near

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 2>future because game changing speed you could have at the

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 2>bottom of a lineup, maybe one of Marshall Kepler goes

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 2>by the wayside. I just think there's room there Crawford

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 2>to be a huge, huge, stolen based option, kind of

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 2>in the likes of like a Chandler Simpson type of

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 2>a player that I would look at because he's hitting

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 2>for massive average and I think, I think the clock

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 2>is ticking really really quick here, so stolen base chasing,

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 2>look at Justin Crawford.

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of huge about sixty seven, Jacob Mizarowski last got

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the Brewers rotation might need

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of shake up at some point. Brandon

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Woodriff is coming back, but Myers got sent down. Misroowski

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>at Triple A this year forty two innings got a

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>one four to nine ERA. That's as good as against

0:27:52.000 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the era is Solow. We can't even see it. Plus

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the whip is point nine to two. Right now, he's

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>got eleven point five k per nine. The walk rate's

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:02.560
<v Speaker 1>still a little high three point eight, but better than

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it was to open the season. So could we be

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing this guy who is basically unhittable, I mean giving

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>up just twenty one hits in forty two innings Miserowski,

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you think this timetable might be this year

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for him?

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Jeahn Kelly, I would say, get off of projections and

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 2>go to stats so people can see the massive, massive

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 2>numbers for Jacob Mizerowski, because that's the craziness of him.

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 2>This year he's got a sub one and a half

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 2>ERA one point four to nine and eleven and a

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 2>half k per nine. But here's the most important walks.

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Last year across all levels five point five walks per nine.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 2>This year three point eight. We're getting close to cutting

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 2>two walks off per nine. And when you go and

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 2>look at his stuff he's lowered because that's always been

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 2>his problem. Jacob Mizerowski has got big, powerful, exciting stuff,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 2>but guess what, he's a walk machine. And that spells

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 2>and smells of relief for us that he would be

0:28:52.680 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 2>a big time closer. Well, this year in TRIPAA, we're

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 2>seeing is the fastball has ticked down a tiny bit

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight average last year ninety seven point two, So

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>he's ticked it down a little bit for a little

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>bit more command, scrapped the sinker. He's going heavy slider.

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>He threw a three percent of the time last year,

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 2>sixteen percent of the time this year ninety point nine.

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Last year averages ninety two point seven. So he's throwing

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a ninety almost ninety three mile an hour slider. The

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 2>fastball at ninety seven, and then he's got this curve

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 2>that he's throwing at eighty six and he's lowered that percentages.

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's heavy fastball slider having huge results. He's not

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.280
<v Speaker 2>walking guys as much. It's a beautiful thing. Miserowski has

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.280
<v Speaker 2>gone from looks like he's a closing option to you

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 2>know what, he actually might be a starting pitcher. They're

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna give him that shot. And that shot might come

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>soon because as we talked about, there's not a like

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 2>they got a weird hole at the bottom of their

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 2>rotation with two open spots. There's only so long you're

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna keep Miserowski in triple A. With those type of results,

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 2>he should get a shot pretty soon. And I will

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 2>tell you it is like a fantasy haven of skills

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 2>that he has in strikeout potential, Like you gotta speculate,

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 2>speculate on him if he comes up.

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 3>You just got to watch the walk issues.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Logan Henderson also came up earlier this year, so

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we got to leapfrog him too, and he looked really

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>good at the major league levels. So those are the

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 1>prospects to watch. Prospecting with the Welsh is always here

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>every single Monday on leading off join us on our

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitch Twitch dot tv slash Fantasy Pros Live, and of

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.080
<v Speaker 1>course you can always subscribe to the YouTube channel as well,

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros MLB. Let's get to the ups and downs

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 1>from yesterday's games. Welsh up pretty Freeman four for four

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>with a dinger, Ben Rice his first Granny Grand Slam

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for him against the Athletics Navy Valdi probably last couple

0:30:37.080 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of years the most underrated pitcher in Fantasy just undervalued,

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>underppreciated seven shoutout innings for him. He was great against

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers on Sunday the Downs. Even though he was

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>spotted a ten run lead, Brady Singer could not keep it.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>He got just seven outs to give up seven runs

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>against the Ashos. Is crazy. The other side of that

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>game was Lance mccullor's, which was not good. Luis Severino

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>eight runs of his own and given up against the

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Yankees and they pavet a rare bad performance for him

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>six runs. It was against the Rockies, though, so he's gonna,

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, take the air into account sometimes there once

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in a while, but whenever you're trying to make moves,

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>make sure you're using my playbook. Manager Fantasy Baseball lineups

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and dominate your leagues with my playbook from Fantasy Pros.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>My playbook is the most powerful suite of tools that

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>will may help you make better decisions, manage your lineups,

0:31:20.000 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and win your leagues. Import your team and get custom

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy baseball news, rankings, and analysis. Sink your leagues today

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>at fantasybros dot com. Slash MLB, my playbook or just

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>download the Fantasy Baseball My Playbook app. Injury Front Clinton

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw four innings for him, the rehab starts. Still no

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>word when he is going to be back, but Blake

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Snell remains shut down. Tyler Glass now being re evaluated today.

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the Snell one that's got me worried because now

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're saying we were supposed to have him throw again,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>now we're not. It's starting to feel like maybe a

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>bigger issue could be on the horizon here where Snell

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>might not be back, maybe just not for a long time,

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.719
<v Speaker 1>but might not be back period. I'm starting to get

0:31:58.760 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>real itchy here.

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 2>And he said, I think he tried to start throwing

0:32:03.480 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 2>and he still or maybe it was right before he

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>just felt discomfort.

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Still, it's not good.

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 2>That's it's really really bad. It's slow paced. He's got

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 2>some injury history, getting older. It's doesn't seem like it's healing. Obviously,

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:18.880
<v Speaker 2>they can slow roll the hell out of this because

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 2>the team is just you know, they're a behemoth, and

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:24.440
<v Speaker 2>you know they're not quite like. This isn't like the

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 2>NBA and like the Lakers, where you know you would

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 2>sit every player. You know, it was a couple of

0:32:28.440 --> 0:32:30.080
<v Speaker 2>years ago, just sit them all in the regular season

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 2>and they come back at the end. But if there's

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 2>a team that can do that, it's kind of the Dodgers.

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's it smells really bad for fantasy

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 2>owners of Blake's.

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm legitimately concerned that we might have little to none

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 2>of Blake Snell.

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 3>This year with us injury.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Me too. He was my cy young bet this year,

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 1>so one of them. So not loving that. Do you

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>think we get Kershaw back this week? After this final

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>rehab start?

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>It should be the final one.

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 2>My dear friend Clayton Kershaw. It actually brought him to

0:32:57.240 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Arizona because they wanted to avoid weather to not halt

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 2>are stopping you of the rehab. This last one was

0:33:02.720 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 2>in triple A. This was it, So he should be

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 2>back this week. That would be the expectation that they're

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>going to throw him back into rotation, which is solid.

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I will say this in that start out here, not

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the Triple A one, but like he gave up no

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 2>hits in six innings, but he gave up some hard

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 2>contact that these young guys, they got it to the

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 2>warning track. Bigger Major leaguers and higher minor leaguers are

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 2>going to do some damage with it.

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 3>We'll see.

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure he's a must start or anything like that,

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>or even a must pick up.

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>But you can be watching as hockey potential. You gotta

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>be an improven over when he's been giving you. Thank

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>goodness for Tony Gonsolin. Those are words I never thought

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 3>A monster. He's been a freaking monster.

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So he's been so good. Who would have thought. Spencer

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Strider good news could potentially be activated on Friday, so

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>no rehab stuff or anything going on with him. That's

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that's finally good news. Jordan Alvarez expected to resume hitting

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 1>off a tee today, so that's good. And Uri Perez

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>five strikeouts, three scoreless innings on Sunday and the minor

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>league rehabs start low a so let's see. It's the

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>twelfth of May. I'm hoping early June we get Uri

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Perez back. That would be great for my fancy teams.

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>While I'm keeping him and Welsh, I'm looking at the

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>clock and it's time for the best bets of Monday

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 1>right here with Joey p and the Welsh bets bets

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>for me let's go Boston on the money line minus

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>one Oa Jackson. Joe is on the mound for the

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Tigers and he has not been good this year. I

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>think this Red Sox lineup can handle it. And look,

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Raffaeld Devers starting to get hot too again, yay tannor

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>howck on the mount. I thin he can give him

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>at least a quality start here and outlast job. So

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>give me Boston on the money line on the road.

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Also in that game, because he's going against Joe, give

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>me Raffield Devers to score a run plus one forty five.

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:43.479
<v Speaker 1>I like that number. And lastly, we kind of touched

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>on the opening of the show. I just think the

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>line is wrong right near just flat out wrong. So

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the Pittsburgh Pirates are going against the New York Mets today.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.799
<v Speaker 1>It is on the road in New York. But at

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the same time, it's Paul Skins on the mound. And

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I know Skeens a struggle against the Cardinals, but it's

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 1>still Paul Skeens. And I know the Mets lineup is

0:35:04.520 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>really good, but it's still Paul Skeens. And you give

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:08.959
<v Speaker 1>me plus money plus one twenty on the money line,

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just for them to come away with a victory and

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a Skien start. I know the Pirates have their struggles.

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it. The Mets offense has been red hot,

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 1>but I think we have to at least be smart

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>enough to recognize when Paul Skeans is on the mound

0:35:21.560 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and an underdog at plus money, you take that opportunity

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>every single time. So I'm not going crazy with any

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Skiens props. I'm just saying he can out duel Peterson,

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and the Mets offense has been hot, maybe they run

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit of a buzz saw today with

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best picture of the National League. So those

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>are my bets for today. Welsh, what do you have?

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 3>You might even like those strikeouts.

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it was six and a half plus money,

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, and yeah, they don't strike out a bunch,

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 2>so it's a little dicey. He just hasn't, been, like

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I said earlier, quite as skeenish. I'm going to join

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 2>you on the Boston side. I'm going to take that

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 2>first five though. I agree Jackson. I mean tena Hack

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 2>has definitely had his moments too, but Jackson job has

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 2>not been super consistent. Offense for Boston has been picking

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 2>it up, Devers, Bregman, I'm gonna play them.

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:05.040
<v Speaker 3>It's it's even.

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 2>It's minus one fifteen on either side of this. So

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Carrie Carpenter, you know, going up against how there's some

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 2>of the prop bets really love Cary Carpenter and Riley Green. Today,

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:16.319
<v Speaker 2>I see it, but I'm gonna go Boston first five

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 2>money line. They're tied, we push, but if Boston is

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:21.359
<v Speaker 2>up and they get to job early, we're gonna cash.

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 2>At minus one fifteen, I'm gonna go with the Padres

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 2>first five run line. So that is just to be

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>up by a run. Today it's a little bit more juice,

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 2>but minus one thirty five. Padres offense has just been

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 2>rude nucleus so far, and I believe it is the

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Angels in Kakuchi who Kuji's has some moments of getting lit.

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 3>And then I'm gonna go.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Justin Verlander under four and a half strikeouts going up

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 2>against the Arizona Diamondbacks. Kotel will be back in the

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 2>lineup today. He wasn't there. I don't believe Verlander has

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 2>hit five strikeouts over his last two starts. Diamondbacks do

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 2>not strike out a Ton Corbin Carroll sometimes sets the

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 2>table for this if he has one of those bad

0:36:57.360 --> 0:37:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Corbyn Carroll games. Over three three strikeouts by the top

0:37:00.440 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 2>of the line is really tough. I think they're going to

0:37:02.040 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 2>get to Verlander, so we're going to say Verlander under

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 2>four and a half, so under five strikeouts at minus

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 2>one fifteen.

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Those are my best bets of the day.

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, and remember you can get the free Betting

0:37:13.640 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Pros trial of the premium tools right now when you

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:19.279
<v Speaker 1>download the app. Use that promo code leading off to

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:23.239
<v Speaker 1>unlock exclusive betting tools from BP, the prop bet cheat sheet,

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pro Systems, the same game parlay builder, Sharp AI.

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>It's all there for you. Use that promo code leading

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Off today and you can download it for free and

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.359
<v Speaker 1>you get the premium tools, not just the regular ones,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>which are already amazing, but the premium exquisite tools for

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.120
<v Speaker 1>seven free days. On top of that end, don't forget

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Fancybros dot Com slash leading off. New customers can place

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>their first bet five dollars and if you win that bet,

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you get two hundred and fifteen pponents bets when you

0:37:47.120 --> 0:37:50.320
<v Speaker 1>win over on fan duel with Fantasypros dot Com slash

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:52.959
<v Speaker 1>leading off. Let's see what the home run board looks

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.680
<v Speaker 1>like after the weekend. Ooh, Wonky and Welsh tied at

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>fourteen malty up to eighteen, George at eighteen. Now I

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 1>got two from Schwarber. I'm not sure how many I

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.640
<v Speaker 1>have right now. Maybe I feel like you're at eight.

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I think if you were at six before.

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm getting very close to double digits here, very close.

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Sammy Sosa Jersey on the line here autograph from Pristine

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Auction dot com. If you want to get on the

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>home run contest, there's plenty of time. There's still plenty

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of baseball left to play. Go to our discord fantasyfirs

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chat. Welsh, you mentioned Kokuchi. I was

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>doing a little digging, and it turns out there's a

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>guy in that Padres lineup was prett good against Kokuchi

0:38:29.040 --> 0:38:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in eight at bats. He's got two homers, four Ribby's

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and hitting three seventy five with a fifteen hundred OPS.

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And his name is Xander Bogarts. So give me Xander Bogarts.

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Be careful everybody the next couple of days too, calling

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.360
<v Speaker 1>your home runs. A lot of rain in the Northeast

0:38:41.400 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 1>in some of these games, So just be very attentive to, uh,

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, your home run calls. So Welsh, I'm gonna

0:38:47.480 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 1>go stick with Xander an odd one. How about you?

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Where are you going for your home run call today?

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 2>On Monday, I was attempted to kind of stay with

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 2>that Padres team. I think I had tat teams over

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.719
<v Speaker 2>the weekend. Machado was really interesting to me. I did

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 2>move away from it, though, and I'm going to go

0:39:01.040 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 2>with Corey Seeger.

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>Corey Seger actually is.

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Coming off of a two homer game and they're going

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 2>against Colorado and Chase Dolander. You guys know, I do

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:11.640
<v Speaker 2>like Chase Dolander. That fantasy relevance for this year is

0:39:11.680 --> 0:39:14.760
<v Speaker 2>fading quickly away. And what is Dolander's main problem?

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Homers? Corey Seeger mashing.

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.120
<v Speaker 2>Mashing writies right now with an over three hundred batting average.

0:39:21.120 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 2>So Corey Seger, We're gonna get him back on the

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 2>board and get me further up that board. Four way

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 2>from the top of me and Waukee. We're trying to

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.080
<v Speaker 2>get there. But I hate to say it, everybody, Joe's

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 2>got a decent shot by June to get on that board.

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh I'm getting on board by Jane.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, by the way, don't I don't know if

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 3>you saw this.

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Can you guys put up the last artwork that we

0:39:39.640 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 2>had with the new picture? We saw a new picture

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 2>from our photo shoot in whatever read you were just

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 2>doing where we were doing the step Brothers.

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Are you guys there you go look at that?

0:39:48.120 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, oh yeah, the step Brothers? One? Yes, I

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 1>do a.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Better Did I do a better version where I'm looking

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 2>a little bit off? We need to check into that.

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 3>But look at look at that artwork.

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Look at it.

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 3>It's prestigious.

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>You look show, Yes, we both look prestigious. There, this

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 1>is pretty good. I was wondering, you know, I was

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>doing the read. I was like, why are people calling

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>us step brothers? But now it makes sense.

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 3>And I literally wasn't looking.

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:08.719
<v Speaker 2>And then I looked at the screen and I went

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 2>and I just like outwardly had to do it because

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 2>we've got new new artwork on the screen from our

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 2>photo shoot. Gotta love it, though?

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, are you worried about the Corey seeger hamstring

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>and all? Though? Tonight you got a backup plan just

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>in case?

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll probably go Manhatto.

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 2>If I if he doesn't play, if the lineup goes

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 2>and he's not in, I'm gonna drop a little machado

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 2>and join you in the Padres.

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Go Padres. Let's go, all right, everybody that'll do it

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:32.799
<v Speaker 1>for us, But the story of the game goes on

0:40:32.880 --> 0:40:35.720
<v Speaker 1>for the Welsh. I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids.

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:48.879
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.840
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB