WEBVTT - Bitcoin Sell-Off Reflects Volatility--Not A Bursting Bubble

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Bitcoin

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>has declined seventy five percent since its peak. Danny Masters

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us down chair of coin Shares Group, which oversees

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>more than a billion dollars in crypto assets from London. Danny,

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for being with us. Are we

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>watching the bitcoin bubble burst right now? And is this

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:48.640
<v Speaker 1>just a fad that has ended? Hi? Lisa, great to

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 1>be with you again. UM. It's certainly been a challenging

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>week in the bitcoin space and market that's had an

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>enormous excursion over the last few years from very low

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 1>numb as to very high numbers. UM certainly has been

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>taking um some heat in the in the last a

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>few sessions, and ironically, when sort of global markets started

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to become more volatile a month or so ago, Bitcoin

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>remained stable for a period of time and then seems

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to have succumbed to UM, not just it's unique internal

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>but also you know, a more global macro sense of pressure. UM.

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>The bears in bitcoins have definitely scored a win in

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>this phase. UM. There is a lot of seems to

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of celebration amongst the sort of new

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>real Roubini's and dan Crumbs of the world that finally

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>their price predictions seemed to be coming right after a

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>number of years. UM. But when you really put it

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in perspective, I mean this this last couple of weeks alone,

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen oil go from seventy five to fifty

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>three dollars, and we've seen bitcoin go from sixty seven,

0:01:55.600 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty eight to forty forty dollars. You know, there are

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>some big moves out there in other commodities to UM.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>For some reason, the moods seems to be a little

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more negative in bitcoin as you sort of correctly

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>stay say, you know, with some sort of bubble bursting

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>phenomena rather than the sort of inherent volatility we have

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in the market. As a bitcoin practitioner, and like many

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>others who've been around for a while, one tries not

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to get too excited when it goes up or too

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>disappointed when it goes down. So you know, I'm calling

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this just a very bolatle period, not a bursting Danny,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>can you just give people a little background on coin

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>shares because there are a couple of different pieces to

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the coin shares story and on. For example, you own

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>x BT. This is the exchange traded product in Europe

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that tracks the value of bitcoin. That's correct. Yeah, We're

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>an asset management company in the cryptocurrency space. Um. So

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>we provide active products like XPT, provider private strategies like

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>coin sches from one and even third parties, ruages like

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a fund of funds that we that we market for

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>other people. We provide research, we provide execution custody, and

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we hold ourselves out to be an emerging

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>black rock type of organization where customers can come for

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>portfolio structuring, performance measurement, execution, custody and so on. All right, So, Danny,

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 1>given that sort of bird's eye view on the market

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and the interest from institutions and others for bitcoin and cryptocurrencies,

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing a material decline in interest as the

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>price goes down? Um? I think that the tip of

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the iceberg. When it comes to crypto assets. You know,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 1>our prices and these prices gonner by far the largest

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of attention. UM. Last time, you know, we all

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>sat together in New York, we talked about the emergence

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the security token regime. You know that continues to

0:03:55.400 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>build a pace and you know, more security tokens are

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>coming to market. Those security to is the beginning to

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>gather their sort of smart contracting ability and will see

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of this year or the first quarter of

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>next year, UM, some new use cases for crypto and

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>using these security tokens broadly for private assets and hard assets.

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the the infrastructure development that's going on

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>in crypto assets goes on regardless, and I think you know,

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>prices tend to be up and down. When I look

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>at the names of companies coming into the crypto space.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>You're familiar with Fidelities Investment we talked last time, or

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>activity with the mura UM, the ice market coming on

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>stream now towards the end of the year early next

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>year with their Bitcoin futures contract IBM and now in

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the mix as well. UM. You know, you're seeing a

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.359
<v Speaker 1>number of large companies coming to the market that weren't

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>there before. You know, is this price decline, you know,

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>switching off those plans not that I can see. Do

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a view towards pegging digital tokens to the

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>value of the U s starle are because some cryptocurrency

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>trading platforms like coin base, they've joined this consortium that

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>is designed to peg the digital tokens to the to

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the green back. It's an interesting development. Um. Certainly there

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is demand for that digital dollar. We've seen Packsos developed,

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Gemini developed, and there are some other earlier adopters with

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps lower brand names, lesser brand names in the space.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>The primary use for these so called stable coins is

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to switch from volatile crypto assets into stable dollars while

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>remaining within this electronic environment, digital environment, So that's quite appealing.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>What has come before is the tether coin, which is

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>sort of unregulated outside the banking system m dollar that

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>has been widely adopted, probably the tune of two or

0:05:57.279 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars as a placeholder for digital assets in

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a way to exchange value amongst them between different venues

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>electronically without going through the banking system. But ted has

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>been plagued by lack of transparency and some of the

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the participants not being of the highest caliber.

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So the new coins that have come in a much

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>higher caliber. They're fully in light of New York Department

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of Financial Services UM. The exchanges on which they're trading

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are typically now sort of fairly widely regulated and based

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and therefore they're more legitimate that

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The trouble with the new dollar coins is they're open

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to interdiction by any regulator that i'd believe chooses to

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>do so. So you've got you've got more more certainty,

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>but more interdiction. Thanks very much for being with us.

0:06:45.160 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Very illuminating. Danny Masters, chairman of coin Shares Group. It's

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>got over a billion dollars worth of crypto assets under management,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:59.359
<v Speaker 1>joining us from London. Bitcoin up about four percent today.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. We have been talking a lot this

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>week about the weakness that we've seen in the credit markets.

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>High old bonds just suffered their worst months since late

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fifteen, yield climbing to the highest similar

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>for investment grade credit. But is this a buying opportunity?

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And joining us down to discuss. Ken Monahan, a Moody

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>pioneer co director of High Yield, joining us here in

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>our eleven three old studios can wonderful to see you.

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So are you out there buying or do you think

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that this is the beginning of a more protracted sell off? Um?

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd say at this stage, Lisa, we're nibbling at the

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>edges rather than buying in a big way. UM. It's

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.320
<v Speaker 1>clear that the high yeld marketplace has widened out significantly

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of spreads and in terms of returns. We've

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>been flirting with zero percent all year long, so we're

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>now a little underwater. Go back thirty days ago, we

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>were a little above water. Uh, who knows where all

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the year. But it's not going to be a

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>big year in terms of returns, that's for sure. We are,

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, though, having uh said that, setting ourselves up

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for a potential for an attractive two thousand and nineteen.

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you buy for capital gains or do you buy

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>for the coupon? You know you gotta buy for total return.

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>If you buy for coupon alone, I think you're setting

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>yourself up for for trouble. I always tell my analysts

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that the worst way to achieve a seven percent return

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is to buy a seven percent coupon bond, you gotta

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>buy either something that's going to move up in credit quality,

0:08:20.760 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>or you can even buy something that's gonna move down

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in credit quality or down in price, but where you're

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be very your self assured of what your coupon

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>income is. So, having said that, when you take a look,

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>just as an example at the e t F that

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>many people track, to look at high yield performance h

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>y G, the I shares eyebox. It's down, as you said,

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>three tents of a percent so far this year. So

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is that the incentive to buy it because it's down

0:08:47.200 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>or do you wait until credit quality gets really bad

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and then go looking. Well, they're clearly your investors that

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>want to buy at the bottom in a hig yield marketplace.

0:08:56.400 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>So they bought in two thousand and nine, they brought

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in two thousands three coming out of a recession. Having

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>said that, I don't think that's what you need to

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 1>do to be successful in high yield. Interestingly, if you

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 1>look at the risk adjusted return, and so you plot

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>risk on one side and return on the other, and

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>you use volatility as a proxy for risk, and you

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>look at the high yield market returns over three, five, ten, fifteen,

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five years, you consistently see the same thing

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that the high yeld marketplace achieves an above average risk

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>adjusted return, meaning it's above the plot line that you

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>would run through all the other asset classes. And I

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's really what makes it attractive. It does generate

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>an attractive returning over a long period of time, and

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I think if you think of the high yielded investing

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of on a three to five year horizon rather

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>than a one to two that's the better way of

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of approaching it. Okay, So can you said that you're

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 1>nibbling at the edges. What are you nibbling on? Well,

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we're selectively looking at some things, for example, in Europe

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>because Europe has badly beaten up as the United States

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>has been, Europe's even been worse. Uh, And we're beginning

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to look at some things in a margin market as well,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>because some emerging market corporate debt has been hit hard.

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Also countries. Oh, well, you know, there's some attractive things

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>going on in some of the Latin American countries where

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that clearly under some pressure. Argentina would be a very

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>good example. Of that, but we think that there's some

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>companies that are there that have longer term possibilities of success.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I just want to go back to the comparison because

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to try to understand this. For example, I

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>looked at the performance of h y G just to

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>use that um from all of year to day today.

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Up right, Okay, if I look at the SMP five

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>D we're up right. So I'm trying to understand the contradiction. Well,

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing you need to keep in mind

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>is that if you look at the high yield market

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:51.439
<v Speaker 1>place and you look at the e t f s

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>in particular, they have not had a great return over

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>a long period of time. They have underperformed the broader

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>in a season the high yield market you want more

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>active man, I think you do need active management. And

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not only have the e t f s underperformed the

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>major indicase, they've actually underperformed the media and high yield

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>manager as well. If you're looking at what their performance

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>has been, you said that we're setting up for a

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>strong what kind of returns are you expecting? Well, you know,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a strong nineteen Let's recognize you know we're we're talking

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>about that in the context of what will still be

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a marketplace where we're gonna have headwinds from the FED.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think the expectations for a December right rise

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from the FED is pretty much locked in, and I

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>think the markets are already adjusted for that. I still

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think there will be several whether it's three or four

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and nineteen, we'll have to see. I

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>think that the comments that are coming out today that

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED may be slowing down in the spring or

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>pulling back maybe a little too optimistic. But I think

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>if we look at high yield, it can certainly have

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a mid single digit return, and if and if we

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>have headwinds from the FED, that means investment grade is

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna lose money. Thanks very much trip being with

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>us pleasure. Ken Monahan, director of a global high yield

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>for a MUNDI pioneer helping to manage more than ninety

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars, based in Durham, North Carolina, but joining us

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>here on our Bloomberg Interactor Broker Studios. Thanks very much

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for being here. I will just say him that today

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it does look like other people seem to agree with Ken,

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at credit to fault swaps that

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there is clearly a bid here. In other words, the

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>perceived risk in high yield credit is declining today in

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:31.319
<v Speaker 1>tandem with the games that we're seeing in stock market.

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So it does seem to be a little bit of

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a reprieve from the super risk off feeling that we

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>had yesterday. It'll be interesting to see whether that continues though.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Right Indeed, Apple's largest iPhone assembly partner, Fox con plans

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to reduce expenses by nearly three billion dollars in as

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it faces quote a very difficult and competitive year. Here

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to tell us more about apple It's supply chain and

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the future is none other than John Butler, our senior

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Telecom services and Equipment analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. John Butler,

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what's happening to the new iPhone supply chain? Morning, Pim. Well,

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what's happening is these suppliers are adjusting to

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the new reality for Apple, which is they are going

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to keep driving hopefully revenue gains and revenue growth through

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>price not volume. In fact, it was interesting because I

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>d C, which gives us great data on the whole market,

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>came out with Q three numbers and globally the smartphone

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>market shipments, We're down almost six percent year on year,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's sort of the new reality for the supply

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>chain for not just Apple suppliers. I know Samsung, for example,

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>has been struggling for unit growth as well. So I

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's what we're seeing. John. If this is something

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>that everyone has known that Apple plans to generate the

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>increase in growth in revenues from higher prices, why have

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple shares responded so badly to the ongoing bits of

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 1>information that its suppliers are kind of struggling right now. Well,

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it sort of begs the question, you know, did Apple

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>expect stronger sales of the new phones, particularly the ten are,

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>which released in late October. It's a low it's a

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>great phone. It is a low cost version of the

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>iPhone ten. It has an LCD screen, so if you

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>can live with that, you're getting all the other features

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the ten and I think that Apple and everyone

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>had high hopes for that. The early reports are it's

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>not selling. Well, they're just anecdotal reports. It's it's tough

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to really tell whether that's true or not. I personally

0:14:52.800 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>think the game begins on Black Friday, UM because the

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>holiday selling season is so big for smart phones. But

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you know it's tough to say. I mean the supply chain,

0:15:04.600 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>our semiconductor manufacturers, they tend to be very cyclical, right.

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>They expand capacity until suddenly the market turns down and

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>then there's over capacity, pressure on pricing and they need

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to cut back on personnel and facility. So I think

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that right now. But I'll say this Lasia,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple does come up against very tough comps beginning next

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>year too, So they're going to hit what I'll call

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a transitional period with iPhone growth, or at least that's

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>my expectation. John Butler, I'm sure you've read the reports

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about Apple working on electronic medical records for US veterans.

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>What does that tell you about Apple's future strategy. So

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that speaks to the strategy of growing services to a

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.479
<v Speaker 1>point where it can pick up any slack and iPhone

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>sales and services has been a great area for them.

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Everyone knows about Apple Care and and Apple Music. Those

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are well known consumer services. But they're also doing a

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>very good job in healthcare. They're pushing on fitness very hard. Uh,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>They're doing a lot in medical records. I'll believe it

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>when I see it pim By the way, medical records

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are one of those areas. You know that privacy is

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>such a big issue. It's been very difficult for the

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>world to get to a common platform and frankly for

0:16:33.320 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you and I to access their own medical records. So

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully Apple can push through that all the regulatory mess

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to get there. But that's the endgame, and I think

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a big market when they get there. John,

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>just real quick here, do you think that the sell

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>off and Apple shares over the past few weeks has

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>been overblown? I think people are looking ahead and seeing

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a slower growth environment. What the right number is is

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>tough to say, but I think that's what you're seeing

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is a response a growing realization that iPhone really is

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>coming up against tough comps, and we don't have any

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>new hardware innovations yet. I think five G phones and

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>flexible smartphone screens are going to drive that next cycle,

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not coming next quarter. John Butler, thank you

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Happy Thanksgiving, Have a

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>wonderful Turkey day. John Butler has senior Telecom services and

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Equipment analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. Apple shares rebounding a little

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>bit today, after a bunch of brutal days, the NAZZAC

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>down quite a bit, Apple shares up at this point

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>about nine tenths of one. It's been a rough couple

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of months for equity treagers and frankly for anyone who

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.640
<v Speaker 1>deals in risk. And the big question is why does

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this have to do with expectations for slowing growth and

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a possible recession in the near term. John us sound

0:18:00.359 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to discuss Marvin Lowe, global macro strategist at State Street

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.239
<v Speaker 1>in Boston. Marvin, thank you so much for being with us.

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>So what's your view? I mean, do you think that

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden traders are suddenly waking up to

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the realization that there could potentially be a downturn in

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the near future. Yeah, yeah, I think that's definitely. Um

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly made its way into the narrative, and data kind

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of supports people being a bit more concerned. You know.

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Certainly the rebound in some of the global economic data

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that we expected after the summer hasn't really come our way.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And then most recently there has been a slowing of

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>um U S data, which, while expected, is still you know,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>something that people might not have anticipated given how strong

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>data had been um going into the fall. Marvin, it's

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>the federal reserves still going to raise interest rates in

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>December and then four times in Yeah, December's December is

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 1>the easy part of the equation. Yeah, I think that

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>they will. I think that there's a very high threshold

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>for them to change their mind done that, and I

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>really don't see that happening going forward. I do think

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're committed for at least one or two more.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.399
<v Speaker 1>I know there's been a little bit of back and

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>forth in terms of how committed they are in nineteen,

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>but the data is still there for them to continue

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>along the path, you know, whether we get to the

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>four or five that they're talking about, you know, late

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteen early, I think that's really where the question starts

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to emerge. So, Marvin, what do you think that that

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>would have to see to slow down? You know what,

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that we would need to really see data

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of come in. I think that we would need

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to see the jobs market really start start to um

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>peek if you will, um uh, you know, decreases in

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate would have to uh would have to

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>slow up. Um. But you know, short of that, they

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>are they are looking at an economy which is still

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>at or you know, slightly above trend going into next year. Marvin.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Earlier today we had a discussion about high yield debt.

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:57.919
<v Speaker 1>We were speaking to Ken Monahan of a Mundy pioneer.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>He was bullish on high yield. Do you see any

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>problems with investing in high yield debt given that we

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>may be turning in the interest right cycle. Yeah, I'm

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>not anywhere near as optimistic unhigh yield in particular. I

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>think that, you know, certainly we are talking about a recession.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the way you see as a classes behave

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they're starting to show concern about when that recession is

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>going to occur. I think that there are, you know,

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.120
<v Speaker 1>certain aspects of high yield that are very different now

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>than they were before the crisis. Also that give me

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a concern, some of it coming from the investment grade

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>space in terms of how large the triple be part

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>of the market is, but also how a liquid and

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>how um we've kind of changed, uh, the way high

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 1>yield is traded. It kind of will make for volatility

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and will make for a challenge once we do get

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to that turn. So in this period of time, what

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think is the riskiest asked as a class

0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>UM you know what I'm gonna say, I'm gonna say that,

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the corporate UM credit parts of

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the market do do frighten me a bit? You know,

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they have not certainly sold off as much as a

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of the other asset classes, so there is a

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of catching up to do. Are you talking about

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>high yields or investment grade? You know, probably more probably

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>more high yield at the moment, but you know, certainly

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.680
<v Speaker 1>investment grade, and you know, blindly just buying the index

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is UM is wrought with a lot of triple bs

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>these days, so you know, really understanding those market dynamics

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>are very important. How do you understand the market dynamics

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of what is going on in the European Union, specifically

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:28.359
<v Speaker 1>in Italy and will that affect interest rates in the

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 1>United States? You know what, at the moment, I think

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that UM it would have a minimal effect that at

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.439
<v Speaker 1>this point. You know, certainly longer term, there are a

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions as to how the EU is going

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to deal with Italy. You know, certainly all of the

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>problems with regard to the amount of debt remains, but

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in terms of it producing volatilely and a catalyst for

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>increased volatility. I think I think the markets and investors

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>are correctly looking beyond maybe the certain headlines that we're

0:21:56.359 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>seeing over the last couple of weeks. Alright, So, given

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that works probably going to see increased volatility,

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and you think that there is still a lot of

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>risk in the lowest rated credit, what do you expect?

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you expect we're actually going to get a downturn.

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, right now, very few people are saying it's

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be the next six or twelve months. Yeah,

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, certainly, certainly the next six months looks

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's going to be okay, you know, and you know,

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>put that in the perspective of certainly where we were.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we're talking about two two and a

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>half percent growth versus the three and a half four percent,

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to feel that great, but it still

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>is a trend or above trend um. I do think

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that from the perspective of liquidity um coming out of

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>the market, whether it's the ECB's position and or the

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>FEDS continuing hiking and and and reducing their balance sheet,

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see kind of that market volatility from

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>UM an economic perspective, however, you know it is it

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>is a two way going into type of type of

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>discussion for me, Marvin, what do you make of companies

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that have either pulled or postponed their initial public offerings

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>because of market volatility and I'm thinking about and the

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>possibility of an uber I p O. Do you think

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>those things are off the table now? You know what

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>UM no I I don't think so. You know, particularly

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>when you talk about companies that have as large as

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a cachet um as you describe, Remember there is always evaluation.

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if these business models are worth zero.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to sell it from a hundred. You know.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Certainly we've gone through that UM you know, in the

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the early two thousands. By the time companies come

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 1>to market, they generally have a much more developed business

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 1>model that people understand, and we've kind of seen that

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>with Spotify, you know, certainly Uber. Everybody everybody knows Uber.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So there's a value to that. Whether or not the

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 1>valuations are what UM the sellers want, now that's a

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>different story. So we've seen a number of big analysts

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>say it is a time to start adding to cash allocations.

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree, And how much higher should cash be

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>uh than over the past few years in your opinion, Yeah,

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I I think that, um, you know, whether it's a

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>function of kind of UM anticipating the volatility and or

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 1>keeping some powder dry. Cash does feel like UM, it's

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a decent place to get into. UM. You know,

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't necessarily have an asset allocation. Uh. It's certainly

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it is a larger percentage than it was over the

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>last few years when things were you know, much easier

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to see from a from a risk taking perspective, Marvin,

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.199
<v Speaker 1>the sense that there is a dollar shortage outside of

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>the United States, Yeah, I do, UM, and you know,

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of as we get into the year end, I

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think that um, that's going to play for the traders

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how they want to position it. Um.

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>The dollar remains UM, you know, in demand. UM. We

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of see it coming from the emerging markets as

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>well as other areas where you know, for the most parts,

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, our markets are are the most stable.

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that that that that continues, you know, ironically, UM,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>whether or not we get um much appreciation in the

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>dollar given everything else that's going on is a pretty

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>active debate the market right now. Thank you very much

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>for spending time with us today. Marvin Lowe is global

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>macro strategist for State Street, joining us from our Boston

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>studios talking about interest rates, the European Union, Italy contagion,

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as HI yield debt. What do you think

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the main topic of discussion is going to be this

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 1>year at Thanksgiving tables across the country. Uh, don't eat

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the romane lettuce. Indeed, last year was bitcoin, right, so

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this year, you know, bitcoin is ten years old. This year, well,

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>how's it doing? Not so hot? No, but I'll be

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see whether there are discussions about markets. You know,

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I know certainly my own family has been asking me

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>what does this mean? What does this mean? Yeah, well

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you won't open your statements for the month. Yes,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we leave it to leave it to left the pumpkin pie. Yes,

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>leave it to lead and November. Thanks for listening to

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, sound Cloud, or whatever

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 1>at pim fox I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>one before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio