Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: Arm Strong and get Katie and he.
Speaker 3: Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 4: Ten weeks into this war, Aron says it's considering a
Speaker 4: new proposal from the Trump administration to bring it to
Speaker 4: an end.
Speaker 3: They want to make a deal.
Speaker 5: We've had very good talks over the last twenty four hours.
Speaker 2: That is very.
Speaker 3: Possible that we'll make a deal.
Speaker 4: Sources one on ABC News, the administration has sent a
Speaker 4: RON a one page memorandum of understanding, laying the groundwork
Speaker 4: for thirty days of negotiations on major issues, including the
Speaker 4: future of Iran's nuclear program.
Speaker 2: That's interesting, but you don't know what reaction to that.
Speaker 6: Well, I'm trying not to be led by various pundits
Speaker 6: that I heard some pundits that I like saying, telling
Speaker 6: Iran they got thirty days, you know, to basically think
Speaker 6: about this or to take a break from being pounded
Speaker 6: or whatever, is nothing but a gift to Iran when
Speaker 6: you've got him on the ropes.
Speaker 2: So I don't know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and we can talk about China's involvement, and we
Speaker 1: really have to put I can't believe it's another tentative
Speaker 1: partial agreement with a run in thirty days of negotiations
Speaker 1: about this is what they've done the last three hundred
Speaker 1: and twelve times in a row.
Speaker 2: And then I was looking at this.
Speaker 6: Hugh Hewittt tweeted out that talking with John Potororitz, who
Speaker 6: is his stuff, is all what's best for Israel said
Speaker 6: the fourteen point deal is a disaster unfolding.
Speaker 2: In real time.
Speaker 6: And I don't know what parts of the fourteen point
Speaker 6: deal he doesn't like so much.
Speaker 1: He was a pretty sober guy too. He's not a
Speaker 1: bomb chucker.
Speaker 6: No, no, no, So I don't know what they feel
Speaker 6: the disaster is in this fourteen point deal, because it
Speaker 6: would they'd have to give up all their uranium. They
Speaker 6: twenty years before they can start doing anything with uranium
Speaker 6: again anytime anywhere inspections.
Speaker 2: At least, that's what we're asking for.
Speaker 6: They get a lot of money back, though I guess
Speaker 6: the idea would be that Iran has always lied and cheated,
Speaker 6: and you're gonna give them a bunch of money. And
Speaker 6: then you got, like basically the Obama deal. You give
Speaker 6: them a whole bunch of money to then lie and
Speaker 6: cheat with right, right, and.
Speaker 1: Then you know, you know, we could go over their
Speaker 1: playbook more specifically, of fourteen points, they'll agree to eleven
Speaker 1: of them. Then they'll say the last three were super
Speaker 1: close on these two, so they're not a big deal.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about this last one. And that'll go on
Speaker 1: for quite a while, and then finally they'll come up
Speaker 1: with a tentative settlement for that. Then they'll say, let's
Speaker 1: talk about those other two, and it'll turn out there
Speaker 1: is actually quite a gulf between them, and that'll be
Speaker 1: strung along for a long time. Then they'll go back
Speaker 1: on points two through five. Yeah, but man, then if
Speaker 1: you ever get to the conclusion, they'll immediately start cheating
Speaker 1: on it.
Speaker 6: Maybe that's fine though, which I will explain my thoughts
Speaker 6: after the rest of this report from ABC News.
Speaker 4: Iran has not agreed to anything yet and remains publicly defiant,
Speaker 4: one official declaring Iran has its finger on the trigger
Speaker 4: and is ready, but the American blockade is squeezing Iran's economy.
Speaker 4: Today the Pentagon announcing US forces fired on another Iranian
Speaker 4: flag tanker.
Speaker 6: Yeah, so she made the point that I was gonna
Speaker 6: make the people that say, thirty days is a gift
Speaker 6: to Iran. It is, We've got their country blockaded. They're
Speaker 6: losing a half a billion dollars a day, and according
Speaker 6: to a lot of reports, they're running out of places to.
Speaker 2: Store oil blah blah blah blah.
Speaker 6: So seems to me that we're putting the squeeze on
Speaker 6: them more and more every single day. Yeah, unlike a
Speaker 6: lot of the media, I like looking at both sides
Speaker 6: of the argument. So here's the counter argument to my rant.
Speaker 6: What if we got the squeeze and the inevitable capitulation
Speaker 6: of the regime, because I mean, they're really getting squeezed
Speaker 6: without the bad pr the bombs, well, right, and all
Speaker 6: it'll take this is a little more patience.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 6: I don't know that Trump did this on purpose, but
Speaker 6: it seems like where we are now is that we
Speaker 6: are committing a major act of war, blockading a country
Speaker 6: from being able to getting anything in or out. I mean,
Speaker 6: that's a you go to war over that sort of thing,
Speaker 6: and we're getting away with doing it, and it's being
Speaker 6: called a ceasefire by everybody. And you don't have people
Speaker 6: protesting in the streets that were starving Iranians or were
Speaker 6: imperialists or anything like that.
Speaker 2: People are treating this like it's part of the ceasefire.
Speaker 6: Blockading a major nation, which is a bit of jiu jitsu.
Speaker 2: With the coverage of this whole thing, it seems to me.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 6: Maybe I don't know that it was on purpose, but
Speaker 6: that seems to be where we are.
Speaker 3: If indeed the squeeze is effective.
Speaker 1: There are days I find myself wondering whether it will
Speaker 1: be just because the IERGC doesn't give a damn about
Speaker 1: the people of a and they have enough revenue streams
Speaker 1: that they can let oil go to hell for a while,
Speaker 1: counting on the US to step in and help them
Speaker 1: rebuild after they make nice. It's difficulties. Are some clever, clever,
Speaker 1: duplicitous people. I mean, they are the ultimate con man,
Speaker 1: so it's tough to know exactly how to deal with them. Obviously,
Speaker 1: I still like the fact that Iran threatened the UAE
Speaker 1: by by saying we'll send you back to the time
Speaker 1: of riding camels, which is a really good threat. That's
Speaker 1: a really good threat. Go ahead and say something or
Speaker 1: play another cliff. I'm working on something here.
Speaker 6: So to me, the question is is this blockade doing
Speaker 6: the sort of damage that Wall Street Journal and the
Speaker 6: Trump administration say it is. If it is, then I
Speaker 6: don't understand what the problem is with giving them thirty
Speaker 6: day thirty day ceasefire if it includes a blockade that's
Speaker 6: devastating their economy.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it says you. I say, this is just more toastata.
Speaker 1: Trump off installs temporarily after direct action. It's toastada. It's
Speaker 1: not taco anymore. That's just it's that's clearly not true.
Speaker 3: It's toastada. What do you think, Michael, You think that'll
Speaker 3: catch on the New York Times.
Speaker 2: I don't think so.
Speaker 6: Maybe it's an enchilada. Every new challenge iteration.
Speaker 3: Has idiotic something. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Anybody making, you know, definitive pronouncements about this is a failure.
Speaker 3: It's a Gragmeier. He's an idiot.
Speaker 1: Never listen to them again. And if you've seen them
Speaker 1: walking down the street, pelts them, pelt them with I
Speaker 1: almost said rocks and garbage, which was a catch flaight
Speaker 1: phrase on The Letterman Show like thirty five years ago.
Speaker 1: But I would never want anybody pelted with rocks eye
Speaker 1: poor violence. But yeah, it's it's a mystery what's going on?
Speaker 1: Uh one page memo of understanding.
Speaker 2: So did you want to do this Brett Bear walt
Speaker 2: stuff because I haven't heard it?
Speaker 1: Uh?
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I think so.
Speaker 1: So Brettbear had Mike Waltz on yesterday, Mike formerly National
Speaker 1: Security Advisor, and got kind of shoved as line to
Speaker 1: the UN. He was one of our favorite conversations when
Speaker 1: we were at the RNC, extremely bright, clear, a great patriot,
Speaker 1: et cetera. So he's now REPP in the US at
Speaker 1: the UN and he is pushing a UN resolution that
Speaker 1: essentially says he can't lay minds in charge tolls in
Speaker 1: international waterways that have been forever open to navigation and shipping.
Speaker 1: Can we at least get together and condemn that in
Speaker 1: the UN?
Speaker 3: And here's some of what he said.
Speaker 5: I mean, the administration doesn't hide the fact that it
Speaker 5: doesn't have a great relationship with the UN as far
Speaker 5: as its respect for its ability to get big things
Speaker 5: across the finish line. It would seem like this would
Speaker 5: be a thing that the world would say.
Speaker 2: Oh, no, you can't do this.
Speaker 7: One would the world saying that, well, one would think
Speaker 7: Last month, Bahrain, which is also on the Security Council
Speaker 7: that's been attacked by Iran.
Speaker 2: Led a resolution.
Speaker 7: A UN record one hundred and thirty six countries agreed.
Speaker 7: That resolution was condemning Iran for attacking civilian infrastructure, launching
Speaker 7: missiles into ports and airports and hotels and resorts. I mean,
Speaker 7: they've literally attacked their neighbors in all directions, trying to
Speaker 7: sow max pain in order to gain some kind of leverage.
Speaker 7: You saw international condemnation for them doing that. What we're
Speaker 7: asking is additional condemnation for the sea minds that they
Speaker 7: put in, for the toll and the toll system that
Speaker 7: they're trying to levy on every ship that passes through,
Speaker 7: which of course would then be passed on to consumers
Speaker 7: all over the world. And I just think, who's going
Speaker 7: to oppose that? I mean, that's the question we're really asking.
Speaker 7: China and Russia going to oppose that on Security Council?
Speaker 7: One would hope not, because their economies are affected as well.
Speaker 2: First of all, who knew there were one hundred and
Speaker 2: thirty six nations. Secondly, so a.
Speaker 6: Record number of nations voted, Hey, Rien, you can't do that,
Speaker 6: But no teeth to it as usual at all, Like
Speaker 6: there's no leverage whatsoever.
Speaker 2: To actually accomplish anything that's fantastic?
Speaker 6: What do you if you're a UN person and you vote,
Speaker 6: do you go back to your hotel room feeling like
Speaker 6: you're doing something.
Speaker 3: For the world.
Speaker 6: Now you feel like you're staying in a great hotel.
Speaker 6: You probably think paid. I wonder how long I can
Speaker 6: hold onto this amazing job. I vote on stuff, I
Speaker 6: talk about stuff. I stay at nice hotels. I write
Speaker 6: around in the back of fancy cars.
Speaker 1: This is going out to a three star Michelin restaurant
Speaker 1: tonight after cocktails.
Speaker 3: How long do I have to take a shower? Yeah?
Speaker 3: I'm good. Play that last clip? Why not, Michael?
Speaker 5: Even if this deal works out, and there are real
Speaker 5: questions about how the Iran Iranians who are doing the negotiations,
Speaker 5: are they the same Iranians who are going to back
Speaker 5: up what is put on the piece of paper. But
Speaker 5: let's just say a deal works out, it's still going
Speaker 5: to take time, right to make sure this all is implemented,
Speaker 5: that's right.
Speaker 7: Well, it's going to be inspect and verify there will
Speaker 7: be no trust involved there, and making sure another UN agency,
Speaker 7: the IAEA, the International Atomic Energy Agency, can get its
Speaker 7: inspectors in and inspect anytime anywhere that Iran is abiding
Speaker 7: by any deal that their negotiations sign up to. But
Speaker 7: regardless of that, to your point, you've still got c
Speaker 7: minds floating in international waterways. You've still got this attempt
Speaker 7: to extract tolls. And this is what we're asking the
Speaker 7: international community to condemn and say absolutely, not not just
Speaker 7: for now, but any future conflicts.
Speaker 1: You know how a giant company will occasionally spin off
Speaker 1: several of its divisions because they're not profitable, they'll go
Speaker 1: back to its core mission, etcetera. Sir, if the UN
Speaker 1: can't get together on this, they've got to be just
Speaker 1: diverged or whatever that, you know, just split up. Let's
Speaker 1: come up with like two or three things they do
Speaker 1: reasonably well, retain twenty percent of their current bloated, idiotic structure,
Speaker 1: and make that the new UN. You can't possibly defend
Speaker 1: it as it sits now.
Speaker 6: So the point that was being made there about you
Speaker 6: know which faction of Iran are you talking to, the
Speaker 6: country's foreign ministry spokesman yesterday said that his government is
Speaker 6: reviewing the American plan and would convey its views to
Speaker 6: the Pakistani side, which is not exactly a ring endorsement,
Speaker 6: will you go out with me?
Speaker 2: I will convey my views to others?
Speaker 3: That sounds like a no, I'm right here.
Speaker 6: And then earlier in the day a different Iranian official
Speaker 6: had dismissed the proposal the one page memorandum as a
Speaker 6: list of American wishes, So.
Speaker 2: Doesn't sound super positive.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 1: Wow, Let's pause for a brief word from our friends
Speaker 1: said in Cogni, your personal information is valuable and far
Speaker 1: more accessible than you may realize. Every time you shop online,
Speaker 1: your data is collected package sold the data brokers.
Speaker 3: That's why you got to use it.
Speaker 1: In Cognate like we do, works quietly in the background
Speaker 1: to wipe your personal data from people, search sites, data brokers,
Speaker 1: and hidden data basis you probably don't even know exist.
Speaker 6: Yeah, Incogny uses the laws that exist to go after
Speaker 6: these data brokers and make them get rid of your information.
Speaker 6: And you're gonna notice a drop right away in the
Speaker 6: number of spam calls, texts, and emails you get which
Speaker 6: are one annoying and two if you ever click on
Speaker 6: one by accident under fall for one, you could have all.
Speaker 1: Kinds of problems, obviously, and it's not one and done,
Speaker 1: they keep sending and sending and sending follow up requests
Speaker 1: so your data stays removed, protecting you from spam, scams,
Speaker 1: and real digital threats.
Speaker 3: Remember, they can't scam you if they can't find you.
Speaker 1: Take your personal data back within cogni i n cog
Speaker 1: n i is how it's spelled, gets sixty percent off
Speaker 1: the regular price when you use the code armstrong at
Speaker 1: incognit dot com slash armstrong.
Speaker 3: That's sixty percent off.
Speaker 1: Use the code armstrong at in cogni dot com slash armstrong.
Speaker 6: Joe needs to talk me down, oh, because once I
Speaker 6: get started on the topic of this whole hospitals separating
Speaker 6: pair parents from children thing, which I encountered again last
Speaker 6: night as my son had some minor surgery, it makes
Speaker 6: me so insanely angry. I am really actually worried I'm
Speaker 6: going to get arrested. I'm afraid I'm not the man
Speaker 6: for that job talking you down. So I'm trying to
Speaker 6: decide whether I even can start on that topic or not.
Speaker 6: I realize it's not happening everywhere in the country. I
Speaker 6: don't know how many places it's happening, but the hospital
Speaker 6: I go to, they are hell bent on the parents
Speaker 6: should not be involved, which is nuts, absolutely nuts. But
Speaker 6: I'll decide whether I can handle that topic or not.
Speaker 6: We got other stuff to talk about.
Speaker 2: Stay here. So I've been talking about this for a
Speaker 2: couple of weeks.
Speaker 6: Those you have been around you know this, this whole
Speaker 6: situation that's going on. I don't know if it's all
Speaker 6: of California or all California hospitals, but I have been
Speaker 6: dealing with this at the hospital that I use in California.
Speaker 6: And the reason you should pay attention to this if
Speaker 6: you live in somewhere else, because you know how bad
Speaker 6: California ideas spread across the country. But the current bad
Speaker 6: California idea they have is trying to separate parents from
Speaker 6: children at hospitals, to the point of with my sixteen
Speaker 6: year old, he was there a week or so ago
Speaker 6: with mom. They called his name and they got up
Speaker 6: to walk over there, and the nurse lady puts a
Speaker 6: brand No, no, you don't come in.
Speaker 2: It's just him.
Speaker 6: What the f are you talking about? I don't come in.
Speaker 6: It's my genie kid. I can't talk about this without
Speaker 6: getting so damn angry. I swear to God, I'm gonna
Speaker 6: end up. I was ready to go last night because
Speaker 6: my son needed minor surgery for a thing that happened
Speaker 6: but which turned out great.
Speaker 2: Doctor did a great job. But this.
Speaker 6: Topic I was ready to go on. Look, I've talked
Speaker 6: to multiple lawyers, which I have. I know what my
Speaker 6: rights are. I know you're doing this because you get
Speaker 6: paid per patient that you separate from their kids and
Speaker 6: a bunch of the I know it's an option. You
Speaker 6: don't have to do this, so you better let.
Speaker 2: Me in there.
Speaker 6: But uh, for instance, get in there with my fourteen
Speaker 6: year old. The first person that comes in, very nice person.
Speaker 6: I know they're just doing what they're trained to do.
Speaker 2: But she gets in there. They don't even look at
Speaker 2: you as the parent, and they start talking to the child.
Speaker 6: At one point she says to the child, which pharmacy
Speaker 6: would you like us to use? Wow, to a fourteen
Speaker 6: year old, I don't want you when you were fourteen.
Speaker 2: But I didn't say i'll use the CVS on covel boulevard.
Speaker 1: I'd have said mom or dad and shrug. Of course,
Speaker 1: why the heck? Hilarious?
Speaker 2: Oh it is?
Speaker 6: That one made me laugh because that one usually makes
Speaker 6: me so angry. But that one. I thought, that's hilarious.
Speaker 6: You're asking a fourteen year old is the one on
Speaker 6: West Covell Boulevard your favorite pharmacy?
Speaker 3: Is?
Speaker 6: How would they know their children not to mention the
Speaker 6: fact that the child is not going to get in
Speaker 6: a car and drive to the pharmacy and then walk
Speaker 6: up and use a credit card to pay for the
Speaker 6: medicine that they are because they are children not allowed
Speaker 6: to get well, right, So what are doing here? But
Speaker 6: the thing that made me so mad? And the doctor
Speaker 6: did a great job, and he really helped. Henry was
Speaker 6: scared and worried about it, and everything really helped with it.
Speaker 6: But he walks in the room and he says, he
Speaker 6: looks at He sees me in the corner, and he says,
Speaker 6: look at it, Henry.
Speaker 2: They don't even make eye contact. Must be what they
Speaker 2: treat him, says, who's this? Who's this?
Speaker 6: The person that's in charge, by law of every aspect
Speaker 6: of that person's life.
Speaker 2: That's who this is. And you could assume it's dead
Speaker 2: since it is ninety nine point nine nine percent of
Speaker 2: the time. What the hell is going on here? Boy,
Speaker 2: that's just bizarre. They start with that tone, who's this?
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's your tone. Okay, a couple of things.
Speaker 1: Number one, I would like to hear more about them
Speaker 1: getting paid per patient.
Speaker 3: Yes, what that is exactly. We don't have a lot
Speaker 3: of touch.
Speaker 2: Law California past.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and then you know, just again, and I've trotten
Speaker 1: this out before, but it's worth trotting out again. Marxist
Speaker 1: theory often advocates for the socialization of child rearing. Some
Speaker 1: of the key perspectives of that concept include abolition of
Speaker 1: the bourgeois family, state educated children, socialized child rearing, liberation
Speaker 1: from the family, and critique of the individual family. Marxist
Speaker 1: suggest the traditional isolated nuclear family often limits children perpetuates inequalities,
Speaker 1: which they believe should be replaced with community based upbringing.
Speaker 1: That's what this is.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: That doctor and that pleasant nurse or nurses assistant have no.
Speaker 3: Idea that that's what they're actually doing, but.
Speaker 2: That's what they're executing.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 6: They don't know that that's what they're executing. But how
Speaker 6: did they come to the conclusion. Who taught them to
Speaker 6: not even make eye contact with the parent when they
Speaker 6: walk into their own What is that?
Speaker 1: Do Kidnappers often bring their victims to such.
Speaker 6: A common problem You have to start from the assumption
Speaker 6: that this is a kidnapping and the kidnappers can worry
Speaker 6: about their health that brought him into have them looked at.
Speaker 6: We have to start at that assumption and work from there.
Speaker 6: What the f is going on here? Marxist insanity?
Speaker 2: But why is everybody going along with it? Drives me nuts? Okay,
Speaker 2: I'll stop Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 7: It is not consistent with the values of the West
Speaker 7: or America, and therefore you have no problem, you should
Speaker 7: have no problem standing up against it.
Speaker 1: That is Megan Kelly before she got on Cutter's payroll,
Speaker 1: talking about how fundamentalist Islam is so dangerous for the West,
Speaker 1: and that is absolutely as part of the Red Green Alliance,
Speaker 1: the main engine of all the incredible skyrocketing anti semitism
Speaker 1: we're seeing around the world just in the last few years.
Speaker 3: Been shocking to watch.
Speaker 6: Well, I've always been confused by an anti Semitism, which
Speaker 6: I've talked about for many, many years. It's hardly so
Speaker 6: I'm looking at this chart that came out yesterday. Axios
Speaker 6: had it. I forget what group it's from. Noah Rothmanrie
Speaker 6: tweeted it, so I trust it, but reported anti Semitic
Speaker 6: assaults in the United States.
Speaker 2: Wouldn't that very long ago that it was basically zero
Speaker 2: per year.
Speaker 6: I mean, you can't eliminate in a giant country, you know,
Speaker 6: all crime of any sort. But I mean it was
Speaker 6: basically as a percentage like zero per year attacks on
Speaker 6: Jews anywhere in the country. And that's why anytime anti
Speaker 6: Semitism would come up, I was like, what are you
Speaker 6: talking about? I mean, where do you come across this?
Speaker 6: I just I didn't hear much about it, and nobody
Speaker 6: was getting hurt or anything like that. But now we're
Speaker 6: at an almost half century high of anti Semitic attacks,
Speaker 6: with over two hundred last year, so we've gone some
Speaker 6: basically like I don't even know what it is, like,
Speaker 6: it seems like it's almost a made up problem to
Speaker 6: it's seriously a problem. People marching on college campuses, people
Speaker 6: being attacked. And see, you got the thousands of year
Speaker 6: old problem that for whatever reason, people latch onto the
Speaker 6: Jews for someone to blame for their economic situation or
Speaker 6: whatever problem they got right, and then you got the
Speaker 6: added thing of what you just mentioned. The Kataris are
Speaker 6: allegedly paying Tucker Carlson and maybe Megan Kelly to turn
Speaker 6: on Israel.
Speaker 3: Well, I would just put it this way.
Speaker 1: They are spending tens of billions of dollars, winning friends
Speaker 1: and influencing people, particularly in the United States, trying to
Speaker 1: warm people up to fundamentalist Islam, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc. Well,
Speaker 1: we don't know the extent that they're paying some hosts
Speaker 1: podcast as we do know the extent to what they're
Speaker 1: donating money to a lot of universities, and just coincidently, coincidentally,
Speaker 1: it's the universities that are most likely to allow people
Speaker 1: to you know, march on their campus or occupy school
Speaker 1: buildings in the name of down with the Jews.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: In fact, I've got something around here, Oh, man, I
Speaker 1: misplaced it that gosh at the University of Michigan.
Speaker 3: Or no, I think it was Georgetown.
Speaker 1: Actually, they're getting enormous funding from Cutter for some new
Speaker 1: Institute of Middle East Understanding or something like that, and
Speaker 1: they have oh, there it is Georgetown Islamophobia Initiative is
Speaker 1: required to consult with Cutter on guest speakers, university contracts,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. But a contract between an Islamophobia
Speaker 1: Initiative at Georgetown and Hamas Highlied Katar, where Georgetown operates
Speaker 1: satellite campus, includes a clause that requires Georgetown to consult
Speaker 1: with the Katari government group when selecting speakers and themes
Speaker 1: for events in Washington, DC.
Speaker 3: According to the.
Speaker 1: Documents released by the House Education Committee and reviewed by
Speaker 1: the Washington Free Beacon Show. Uh yeah, so we could
Speaker 1: get into that the infiltration of college campuses. It's absolutely
Speaker 1: unholy and ugly, but you know, anti Semitism. More generally speaking,
Speaker 1: there have been a handful of big, big incidents in
Speaker 1: New York recently which have been conveniently ignored by the
Speaker 1: lefty media because and it's interesting to watch as a
Speaker 1: hardcore ideology, like you know, the Red Green Alliance, Islamism
Speaker 1: and Marxism, which have joined together several times in the
Speaker 1: last century, that kind of leaches outward to like the
Speaker 1: impressionable college kid crowd and they become activists, and then
Speaker 1: it kind of leaches even further that lefty journalists who
Speaker 1: are not particularly activists about anything, but get the idea
Speaker 1: that our people think this. So I'm not going to
Speaker 1: distort people's understanding the world by reporting on a Jewish
Speaker 1: school in New York getting smashed up in, vandalized in
Speaker 1: the windows knocked in and the rest of it. Followed
Speaker 1: by a giant protest at a synagogue the other night
Speaker 1: in which protesters were chanting into fat a revolution there
Speaker 1: is that is the only solution, as the Wall Street
Speaker 1: Journal editorial board was covering. They often cover themselves by saying, hey,
Speaker 1: we're not against Jews, were against the state of Israel,
Speaker 1: but it was made clear by their chanting and what
Speaker 1: they were doing and saying that no, they're absolutely radical
Speaker 1: anti Semites in New York City and the headline of
Speaker 1: the editorials Mumdanni and the anti Semites, because Mumdanni, where
Speaker 1: is the quote here Mumdani said the mayor. A spokesman said,
Speaker 1: the mayor is deeply opposed to the Israel Expo, which
Speaker 1: was the event going on, and it included it was
Speaker 1: an expot of by real estate in Israel, including on
Speaker 1: the West Bank, which I get can be controversial. But
Speaker 1: Mayor Mamdani's people said the mayor is deeply opposed to
Speaker 1: the Israel Expo, but said nothing about those intimidating a
Speaker 1: Jewish congregation. There was a buffer zone law past forty
Speaker 1: four to five back in twenty twenty five to protect
Speaker 1: synagogues and Jewish schools and stuff from these violent demonstrations.
Speaker 3: You could move in immediately.
Speaker 1: But Mamdannie has dragged his feet on implementing it, and
Speaker 1: as the editorial board of The Wall Street General rates,
Speaker 1: at least as we write this, he has not denounced
Speaker 1: the protests that included a charge against the police, barricades
Speaker 1: and chanting. There is only one solution into fodder revolution.
Speaker 1: You got this headline from the New York Post. If
Speaker 1: you want it now, it's got to reload. Oh but first,
Speaker 1: an ad for Marshals so I don't shop at Marshalls
Speaker 1: is a fine place there, It is hateful. Anti Israel
Speaker 1: mob descends on historic New York City synagogue, clashes with
Speaker 1: cops in rowdy protest.
Speaker 6: This change by Megan Kelly. I feel like is a
Speaker 6: big deal. I feel like that is way more mainstreaming.
Speaker 6: I hope I'm wrong, but I feel like it's way
Speaker 6: more mainstreaming. Are reaching closer to the mainstream of.
Speaker 2: I bought the line from Israel that you know some
Speaker 2: Muslims are bad?
Speaker 3: What shut up? Meg?
Speaker 1: Some of the smartest convincers in our ecosphere have been
Speaker 1: bought and are now using their smarts and their abilities
Speaker 1: to become apologists for radical Islam and anti Semites. They've
Speaker 1: been bought. I'm completely convinced of it. Meanwhile, the September.
Speaker 6: Will be the twenty five year Anniverse of nine to eleven.
Speaker 6: Remember where we were on radical Islam twenty four and
Speaker 6: a half years ago. Now we've got some of the
Speaker 6: leading influencers in the country saying they're not that bad.
Speaker 2: The Jews just led you to believe that.
Speaker 6: I can't believe I fell for the jew propaganda that
Speaker 6: there's radical Islam out there.
Speaker 3: We should be worried about.
Speaker 1: Right after careers of pointing out how Islamism sharia law
Speaker 1: is completely incompatible with Western principles, which it is. Chris
Speaker 1: Rufo and Ryan Thorpe, Writing and City Journal. The Council
Speaker 1: on American Islamic Relations CARE presents itself as an innocuous
Speaker 1: Muslim civil rights group or reputation or reinforces with litigation
Speaker 1: and claims of anti Muslim bigotry, but the group finds
Speaker 1: itself under increasing scrutiny for alleged connections to the Muslim
Speaker 1: Brotherhood and it's offshoot Hamas. Last November Texas Governor Greg
Speaker 1: Abbott designated Care a terrorist organization. The following month, Rondo
Speaker 1: Santis did the same in Florida, citing CARES being listed
Speaker 1: as an unindicted co conspirator any major terrorism financing case.
Speaker 1: But as other states moved to sideline Care, California is embracing.
Speaker 3: This alleged tare front.
Speaker 1: Care CA, the organization's largest statewide affiliate, is flush with
Speaker 1: taxpayer cash. Taxpayer cash in the last five years, the
Speaker 1: California Department of Social Services as rubber stamped at least
Speaker 1: forty one million dollars in funding to the group. The
Speaker 1: vast majority of that money, it turns out, comes indirectly
Speaker 1: through the federal government. These federal dollars are flowing into
Speaker 1: CARES all coffers, even after it was the target of
Speaker 1: a recent Department of Justice investigation. And they go into
Speaker 1: the history of who founded Care and why, their Muslim brotherhood,
Speaker 1: hardcore leaders and adherents. I'm going to skip some of it,
Speaker 1: but I'll point out that during the twenty oh seven
Speaker 1: holy Land Foundation trial, which saw five of the sham
Speaker 1: charity's leaders convicted for collectively funneling more than twelve million
Speaker 1: dollars to Hamas. The investigation uncovered network of Hamas link
Speaker 1: to organizations. While Care was not prosecuted, the court found
Speaker 1: quote ample evidence to establish that it was associated with
Speaker 1: the Palestinian terror group. An FBI special agent reportedly testified
Speaker 1: a trial that Care was quote a front group for Hamas.
Speaker 1: California's piping money. It's mainstream, it has main streamed.
Speaker 6: Well, I've mentioned this many times before. The town I
Speaker 6: live in the uh Jewish Center here in town. I've
Speaker 6: been going to for twenty years for not for anything
Speaker 6: Jewish related. They had a different civic you know, Church's
Speaker 6: whole Loch kinds of different things in their building. They
Speaker 6: had a different civic thing that they did there, and
Speaker 6: I hadn't been there in quite a while, and I
Speaker 6: tried to go before Christmas and I couldn't get in
Speaker 6: because they now have a giant fence around the thing
Speaker 6: with a lock, like a really tall fence with a lock,
Speaker 6: and you can't go. So you need to know, you
Speaker 6: need to know somebody who lets you in to go
Speaker 6: to a non Jewish related anyway. My point being, forever
Speaker 6: there was no fence around that thing, giant gated fence
Speaker 6: for the parking lot in the building and now there.
Speaker 2: Is that's not good. That's a change.
Speaker 6: And then you know the chart I mentioned earlier, from
Speaker 6: basically no attacks on Jews in the country to now
Speaker 6: a record high in the last fifty years.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and there were dozens of attacks with deadly weapons.
Speaker 1: There are a trio of headlines over the last couple
Speaker 1: of weeks from the Free Press, this one I'd like
Speaker 1: to get into at length at some point. But Britain
Speaker 1: is way way worse than the US. I supported Keir Starmer,
Speaker 1: but he's failing Britain's Jews. The Prime Minister claims to
Speaker 1: have rid his party in the country of anti Semitism,
Speaker 1: but Jews are more unsafe in the UK than ever
Speaker 1: than a mom writing I thought my kids would be
Speaker 1: safer in the UK than in the United States.
Speaker 3: Now I'm not sure.
Speaker 1: And then they've got coverage on the Iranian terror group
Speaker 1: that's targeting Europe's Jews.
Speaker 6: That reminded me of the article I read by I
Speaker 6: think it was another American who went to England thinking
Speaker 6: it would be a safer place to be and saying
Speaker 6: that every Jewish person he talks to brings up the
Speaker 6: topic of how dangerous it is right now, like it's
Speaker 6: the the ongoing conversation.
Speaker 3: Wow.
Speaker 2: In England, Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah, in England, they're telling people don't look visibly Jewish.
Speaker 1: That's a quote for your own safety. But then when
Speaker 1: windows are smashed and jew Jewish businesses, the Guardian waves
Speaker 1: it away as small acts of petty symbolism. They've watched
Speaker 1: his Britain's finance, university's abuse Jewish professors and students, helping
Speaker 1: to create a culture where one in five British students
Speaker 1: said they would not house they would not house share, oh,
Speaker 1: house share, they would not be roommates with a Jew.
Speaker 1: One in five British students at West parliamentary candidates campaign
Speaker 1: on Gaza celebrating October seventh. They've watched synagogues implement airport
Speaker 1: style security and their children required to undergo security briefings
Speaker 1: for kindergarten and it's a labor did. Government responds with
Speaker 1: language of management and total inaction. Concern determination resolved, but
Speaker 1: they don't do anything.
Speaker 6: That's highly troubling. But back here in the United States,
Speaker 6: you do have the situation where, for instance, if Elon
Speaker 6: Musk raises his arm up while he's given a speech,
Speaker 6: is he a Nazi, clearly a Nazi symbol, clearly a
Speaker 6: Nazi salute, you know, a tell to the Nazis that
Speaker 6: they that he's with them or whatever. You extrapolate all
Speaker 6: this stuff from Emoriz in his hand. But you have people,
Speaker 6: you have people marching around saying out loud, Jews must go.
Speaker 6: You don't extrapolate anything about Nazis to them. I mean
Speaker 6: they're saying out loud, raised his arm up. Nothing about
Speaker 6: an ideology. The people spouting the ideology or attacking Jews
Speaker 6: not called Nazis.
Speaker 3: Well, I don't want to talk.
Speaker 1: I don't want to cover that story because it might
Speaker 1: lead to Islamophobia, says the media.
Speaker 3: It's discouraging. I'm getting very angry and discouraged.
Speaker 1: That's probably no way to be so we probably should
Speaker 1: move on to lighter fare.
Speaker 3: But yeah, it's as a.
Speaker 1: Student of history, it is incredibly troubling, also incredibly interesting
Speaker 1: to watch this unfold.
Speaker 6: Again, we're not at the end point of this either.
Speaker 6: Oh no, this isn't as bad as it's gonna get.
Speaker 6: Most likely, how bad is it gonna get? Tucker Megan,
Speaker 6: help us out. What's the plan?
Speaker 2: Oh more in the way I stay here than from
Speaker 2: all these days. This Sunday, it's the day we celebrate.
Speaker 7: All moms, grandma's and yes, even step moms. She's nice,
Speaker 7: she makes that happy and hey, she was in your
Speaker 7: chemistry class.
Speaker 2: Wow.
Speaker 6: Funny, but of course a cynical view of Mother's Day,
Speaker 6: which I look forward to now in the modern world.
Speaker 6: Every Mother's Day there will be pieces in the Washington
Speaker 6: Post particularly, but also.
Speaker 2: New York Times about some anti mom.
Speaker 6: Traditional family thing that they'll print on Mother's Day, with
Speaker 6: nothing positive about the traditional family and Mother's Day. Obviously,
Speaker 6: we live in a weird time, man, really weird time.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I got a different joke.
Speaker 6: I'm sending it to Joe because I will not say
Speaker 6: this word, but I'm sure he will.
Speaker 2: I just texted it to you. Okay, it's a babble
Speaker 2: on b headline.
Speaker 1: Standing by oh my, the T word third on San
Speaker 1: Francisco sidewalk now pulling second in California governor's race.
Speaker 3: Well, that is a surprise.
Speaker 2: I thought that was funny, but I didn't want to
Speaker 2: say that word.
Speaker 3: You know what.
Speaker 1: My friend i'll call him anonymous, who does not often
Speaker 1: find himself in San Francisco, texted me about some plans
Speaker 1: we have he said, just leaving a city doing better
Speaker 1: met new mayor at my conference, common sense changes are
Speaker 1: working cool?
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, you know it strikes me.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry you had something you wanted to do because
Speaker 1: I have just a truth bomb delay on people. Here's
Speaker 1: what we got wrong. We meaning, you know, a baby
Speaker 1: boomerus gen X, what was next gen Y?
Speaker 3: I know the alphabet.
Speaker 1: We assumed things were common sense, as if they were
Speaker 1: just in the air and people inhaled them, which was wrong,
Speaker 1: and we I was speaking for myself, but I think
Speaker 1: I can fairly safely speak for a lot of people.
Speaker 1: We thought saying things like freedom's really cool, liberty is great.
Speaker 2: Families are great.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 1: The United States is the life and of opportunity. I
Speaker 1: have irrefutable proof of that in front of me. By
Speaker 1: the way, how immigrants to this country, especially from cultures
Speaker 1: that prize hard work, make more than white folks ain't
Speaker 1: even close on average. But say that, say this is
Speaker 1: a great country. We've had problems, We've committed sins, but
Speaker 1: this is a great country. Boys shouldn't beat up on
Speaker 1: girls in girls sports. Girl sports are for girls. I
Speaker 1: mean this stuff that we thought, Why would you have
Speaker 1: to say that now we kind of have to. No,
Speaker 1: you can't hate Jewish people because they're Jewish and know
Speaker 1: they're not behind whatever bitch you have about the modern world.
Speaker 3: We've got to defend the.
Speaker 1: Most basic of reasonable quote unquote common sense ideas.
Speaker 2: We just have to.
Speaker 1: They're being taught the opposite in schools, for one thing.
Speaker 1: Get your kids out of government schools if you possibly can. Ugh,
Speaker 1: I know it's hard, I know, sympathize.
Speaker 6: Wow, what's in the Iranian deal? I can hit you
Speaker 6: with a little of that information. If it's as described
Speaker 6: in the Wall Street Journal, it sure seems like a
Speaker 6: good deal for us.
Speaker 2: I don't know if RAN's going to sign on to it.
Speaker 2: Maybe we'll get to that an hour four.
Speaker 6: If you miss hour four, you missed any segment earlier,
Speaker 6: you can get it through the podcast Armstrong and get
Speaker 6: it on demand. And I've got a great pro Trump
Speaker 6: grifter has turned into an anti Trump grifter and is
Speaker 6: making even more money.
Speaker 3: Everybody is a grifter? What the hell?
Speaker 2: Armstrong and Getty