WEBVTT - Musk’s SpaceX to Pay $17 Billion for EchoStar Spectrum

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>and Eva low in sentences go.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX acquires wireless spectrum from EchoStar for about seventeen billion dollars.

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Must starlink with a new director, sell opportunity plus.

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 4>We discuss Elomusque's one trillion dollar pay package offer.

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 3>But the corporate.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 4>Governance advisor for Tesla's special.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Committee, and we sit down with the CEOs of renowned

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.600
<v Speaker 3>public and private companies, roadblocks and Cognition late to this hour,

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to our top story. So SpaceX acquires spectrum

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 3>licenses from Echo Star in a seventeen billion dollar deal.

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 3>It's split between cash and SpaceX stock. There is a

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>lot more to it than that. Let's get out to Washington, DC.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloom As Kelsey Griffith has the details. Let's just start

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 3>with the basics of the deal. What is SpaceX offering

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 3>here and what is SpaceX.

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 5>Getting Absolutely so, SpaceX is offering a much needed infusion

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 5>of cash for EchoStar. It's helping EchoStar beat a regulatory

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 5>probe that's been hanging over it for months, in which

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 5>EchoStar could have lost many of its valuable spectrum licenses

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 5>because the FCC said that it wasn't putting them to use.

0:01:27.800 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 5>So this deal allows EchoStar to partner with SpaceX and

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.760
<v Speaker 5>delivered director device service, and that's a goal that SpaceX

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 5>has had for a long time. So both companies are

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 5>really getting a lot out of this.

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, it gets money EchoStar, but it's no longer going

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>to be a viable competitor to T Mobile, to AT

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.400
<v Speaker 4>and T. Meanwhile, T Mobile perhaps less viable as a

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>long term partner with Starlink.

0:01:55.760 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 5>That's right, there's a lot of moving pieces here, but

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:03.559
<v Speaker 5>exactly as you said, this sale does represent the sort

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 5>of closure of EchoStar being a fourth standalone wireless competitor,

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 5>as the terms of the Sprint T Mobile deal sort

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 5>of dictated. So we're seeing them sell off this remaining

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 5>crown jewel of echostars spectrum portfolio, and instead it's going

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 5>to be in more of a partnership mode with both

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 5>T Mobile on the direct to device side and also

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 5>on the side of AT and T where they're still

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 5>offering some mobile services there. So we're also seeing that

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 5>SpaceX really might become a bit more independent, like you

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>mentioned Caroline in offering these direct to device services on

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 5>its own terms.

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey, Spectrum refers to this sort of range of invisible

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 3>radio frequency, and I think that's really important to go

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 3>back to, like what are we talking about here. When

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 3>the FCC kind of looked at EchoStar, I think my

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 3>understanding was they were like, you're not even using the

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>space that you're assigned. So take that and what you

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>just said about starlink and standing on its own two feet.

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I was part of the T mobile beta when they

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 3>had that relationship.

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 2>How would this be different for SpaceX, So I'm.

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 5>Still kind of working through the details on my side

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 5>as well, But on a very high level, it does

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 5>seem that SpaceX is in a better position, owing more

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 5>spectrum to offer its own director device service on a

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 5>standalone basis. We're still waiting to hear more from the

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 5>company about what that might look like.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, thank you for the latest in the reporting. It's

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 4>an ongoing del that you're doing for us. Kelsey Griffith,

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 4>thank you so much on the deal. Meanwhile, turning to

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 4>the broader tech sector, let's bring in. Janetmui, head of

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 4>market analysis for RBC Brewin Dolphin. It's always great to

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 4>get your take because there are deals happening at the moment. Janet,

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 4>we are seeing new record highs for Broadcom after its earnings,

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>and yet there's this wall of worry that the market

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 4>has to climb up, and that's the macro picture.

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Caroline, thanks for having me. I think on the

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 6>optimistic side, we have seen Marquez climbed to the wolf

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 6>worry very well in the second quarter, So I guess

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 6>I would take a glass half fool view from here

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 6>because I think primarily the most important thing is that

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 6>you look at the earnings results, particularly technology, communications services

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 6>and discretionary I think these are really great results and

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 6>gives us more comfort that actually companies remain resilient and

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 6>they benefit from AI. Profitability is increasing. The visibility of

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 6>broadening in AI application is there, So I'm cautiously optimistic.

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 6>There are certainly micro headwinds there, but I am keeping

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 6>an optimistic view. But I think overall we are keeping

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 6>a modestly positive stands not overlaid bullish at this stage.

0:04:56.320 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 4>Janet. What was interesting as looking at Bloomberg Intelligence data,

0:05:00.400 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 4>This morning. It's showing that basically AI and capital expenditure

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 4>spending is propping up the US economic growth. It represents

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 4>about a percentage point of all GDP additions so far

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty five. How important is the AI story

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 4>to offset what is the weakness we see in the

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 4>labor market for example.

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think that is very significant. You mentioned the

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 6>contribution from AI Cappax. I think he has overtaken consumer

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 6>spending as a contribution to GDP groups, So that's unprecedented.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 6>It really just highlights how important this area is, and

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 6>we are actually seeing a lot of visibility in this

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.679
<v Speaker 6>AI capac spending. We already know the exact figures from

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.559
<v Speaker 6>the hyperscalers already, and there are also loads coming from

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 6>other sovereign states going into investments in the US for example.

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 6>So I think this is very exciting. This is an

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 6>area that keeps US investors excited because this is all

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 6>incremental demand which is arguably new which haven't existed before.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 6>So that that's I think a very positive thing.

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Dannet on the Bloomberg terminal this morning, the focus is

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.159
<v Speaker 3>a FED cut in September. Will it or won't it?

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 3>What's the technology investors' perspective on that.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think it is very much like very likely.

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 6>I would say, unless there's some surprise in this week's data,

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 6>I think it's pretty much baked in, to be honest.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 6>I think from an investor perspective, particularly in growth areas

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 6>like tech, a rate cut would be appreciated, and I

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 6>think further insight into how much the fat can ease

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 6>over the coming year would be important as well. And

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 6>I would suspect they may lean into a more davish tone, which, ultimately,

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.039
<v Speaker 6>if they're rade cuts that are outside of a recession,

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 6>recession is not a base case, by the way, that

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.279
<v Speaker 6>tends to benefit stocks. And as I said, you're adding

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 6>the earning store, you're adding the AI Capex story. So

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 6>I think that's a pretty much cautiously optimistic I would.

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Look cautiously optimistic. You know what does not appear to

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.840
<v Speaker 3>be cautious is activity. Karen and I did the story

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 3>about SpaceX buying spectrum licenses for Eco Star. There was

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:26.160
<v Speaker 3>still an earning story last week with Broadcom. Corporate America,

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 3>particularly in technology right now, seems full of confidence and

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 3>to have momentum.

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Is that what you see?

0:07:37.000 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, I will say, so, I think they're obviously

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 6>risk from the macroside. For example, most clearly we saw

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 6>that the labor market is weakening, so is it gonna

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.320
<v Speaker 6>be a further concern? Are there going to be further

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 6>worse data revision that shows things are actually worse than expects,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 6>And of course the potential inflation impacts from tarifs. You

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 6>can also argue that the markets are a bit complacent

0:08:02.360 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 6>on that, and of course President Trumken potentially flare up

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 6>any geopolitical nuance. We just don't know, so I guess

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 6>that's why I mentioned cautiously up Tomist. I think there

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 6>are lots of positive factors out there, but as investors,

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.240
<v Speaker 6>we just also have to keep an eye on all

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 6>the risks out there. So that's why, as I said,

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 6>we're modestly progressed, but we're not overly overly Poolish.

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 3>Janet Mauie from rbcper and Dolphin back on Bloomberg Tech,

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 2>They're coming up in the show.

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 3>The US considers a new option to try and prevent

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 3>disruptions to the global electronics industry. Going to have those

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>details next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 4>The US. Well, it's proposing annual approvals for exports of

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 4>chip making supplies to Korean giants such as SKA Heinek,

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.439
<v Speaker 4>Samsung with Chinese manufacturing hubs. Now, this is a compromise

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 4>to try and prevent disruptions to the global economic and

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 4>electronic industry after revoking Biden era waivers that could have

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 4>meant countless license requests a year. Bloomberg's Tech Executive editor

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Mike Shephard Joyce's in Washington.

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 2>This built on last.

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 4>Week's story where the waivers were taken away and it

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 4>meant that thousands of licenses might be having to be

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 4>asked for each year. Is this some sort of compromise.

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 7>Well, it sure is taking shape in that forum care

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 7>And that was one of our big questions and our

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.079
<v Speaker 7>discussions of this last week, is what would take its

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:39.719
<v Speaker 7>place the blanket waivers that the US government had been

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 7>granting to Samsung and sk Heinex to allow them to

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 7>continue sending supplies of restricted equipment to their facilities in China.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 7>That had really helped those plants remain in operation even

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 7>with US restrictions. More broadly applying to China, the revocation

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 7>of the so called balot dated end user agreement really

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 7>threatened to upend operations at those facilities. So now what

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 7>they will have to do is on an annual basis,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 7>basically come up with a shopping list for lack of

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 7>a better word, carrow for the US government to approve

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.719
<v Speaker 7>on an annual basis, and that would include semiconductor manufacturing

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 7>equipment and other inputs like chemicals in exact quantities to

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 7>get approval on an annual basis. Now, on one level,

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 7>it's a measure of relief for the companies which have

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 7>really been grappling with the prospect of a lot of uncertainty.

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:34.720
<v Speaker 7>At least they know that they'll have to do this

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 7>every year. But then again, Caro, they're going to have

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 7>to go through this exercise every year, and it's going

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 7>to be a bureaucratic headache for them, and it will

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 7>be a burden for the government agencies as well. It

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 7>also thrusts these companies right into the middle of the

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 7>competition between the US and China, and it's a new

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 7>headache on trade for Samsung, an sk Heinex, and the

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 7>South Korean government as it grapples with taris at The

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 7>Trump administry has also recently imposed.

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Mike There is a second and separate story about the

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 3>United States and South Korean firms. Last week, the US

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 3>raided a JV between Hyundai and LG Energy in Georgia.

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Now we're reporting that other South Korean firms are kind

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 3>of scrambling to get ahead of a bigger picture situation.

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.320
<v Speaker 7>What are the details, Well, the details are this that

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 7>there was a rate over the weekend at this battery

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 7>facility in Georgia operated by Hyundai and LG Energy, as

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 7>you noted, and a number of the workers involved were

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 7>South Korean. Now, one thing that's important to note is

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 7>that for these foreign makers not only of batteries and

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 7>other sophisticated electronic equipment, but also semiconductor makers, as they

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 7>try to put their plants from overseas here in the US,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.719
<v Speaker 7>they need that foreign talent, They need that homegrown engineering

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 7>know how, the technical skill. They need to be schooled

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 7>in the systems that have worked well in their home countries.

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 7>For instance, Hyundai and LG in South Korea, but also

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 7>Samsung is preparing to invest in its own plants here

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 7>in the US. They will have to bring in their

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 7>own engineers, and they are facing a squeeze in the

0:12:16.960 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 7>number of visas that they can legally obtain through the

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 7>US government.

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 2>The H one B.

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 7>Visa program annually allows for only eighty five thousand in total,

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 7>and of that total, South Korea gets a grand a

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 7>grand total of two thousand visas, and that's not nearly

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 7>enough to be able to supply those plants. So the

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:38.959
<v Speaker 7>companies have been trying to work around this. And it's

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 7>an example ed you know, we talk about this perhaps

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.839
<v Speaker 7>being separate from the other story on the on the waivers,

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 7>the end of the blanket waiver on exports to China,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 7>but really for South Korean companies, they really do see

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 7>this as another conflict with the US in terms of

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 7>how they're able to do their business here in the

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 7>US and abroad. So it really does become a challenge.

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 7>And now the question is how are the companies and

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 7>the South Korean government raised this with the US and

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 7>perhaps seek a solution.

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 3>Makes Mike Sheppard out of DC, thank you very much.

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 3>Chip Designer, Qualcom and Google Cloud deepening their partnership to

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 3>bring AI agents to cars. Qualcom CEO Christiano mum told

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 3>us people need to think of cars as digital firsts.

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Listen to this.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 8>We said that this is going to happen. We said

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 8>that once you are behind the wheel of a car,

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 8>you have you have no legacy of OSS and applications,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 8>and that the new agentic experiences enabled by Jenai will happen,

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 8>especially because voice is very natural as an interface. So

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:48.839
<v Speaker 8>the way you should think about this the same thing

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.560
<v Speaker 8>that is happening, for example, with smart glasses, and we're

0:13:51.600 --> 0:13:56.239
<v Speaker 8>incredibly excited about what's happening there as new personal AI devices.

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 8>It's going to happen when you're behind the wheel of

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 8>the car. The car has those answers were used for navigation.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 8>They can see things, they can see the road, they

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 8>can see different things as you navigate. And then you

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 8>have this computing power that can run AI models into

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 8>the car. The Gemini models get integrated the digital chassis

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 8>and now you can have a gentic experience in the car.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 8>You can do search, you can ask about a planning navigation.

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 8>You can ask you and I to tell you a

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 8>story of different things as you drive along. You can

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 8>ask about what is the review of a certain restaurant

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 8>that you want to do? Would stop if you want

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 8>a reservation. The possibilities are endless.

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 4>You paint a picture of the future of driving. What

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 4>about Gemini models that set them apart? Were they only

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 4>game in town due to the previous relationship. Did you

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 4>really set them versus some of the competition.

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot of development of foundational models, and one

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 8>thing that we've been saying for the past two years

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 8>now is happening. I think those models are evolving to

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 8>have big models in the cloud and models that also

0:15:06.920 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 8>run on the edge and work together. This is true

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 8>for all companies. It's true for Gemini, it's true for

0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 8>open Ai, it's true for what's happening in Meta and

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 8>in an Amazon and et cetera. And I think that's

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 8>a great opportunity. We have obviously a very close relationship

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 8>with Google, but I expect that maybe other car companies

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 8>may want other models as well. And I think that's

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 8>the change in the car computing. I think the car

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 8>is going to embrace those agentic experiences very very fast.

0:15:38.480 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 4>Well com CEO Christiana Aarman coming up Cognition CEO Scott

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 4>wu joins us to talk about the company's new fundraise

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 4>is valuation as it integrates Windsor following that acquisition of

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 4>the coding startup in July. This is really bad tech.

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Artificial intelligence startup Cognition AI has a new evaluation ten

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 3>point two billion dollars post money, coming from a roughly

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 3>four hundred million dollar funding round. The deal comes just

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 3>a few months after Cognition purchased AI coding start up Windsurf,

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 3>in the wake of Google's agreement to license windsurfs technology

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 3>and hire away pretty much most of its talent. Cognition

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 3>CEO Scott Wou is with us to talk about it.

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I think the most interesting part here is not that

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 3>you've been able to raise more money at a higher

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 3>evaluation necessarily, but since you guys acquired what was left

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 3>of Windsurf, you have seen massive acceleration. Why did that

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 3>happen so quickly?

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, yeah, no, it's it's been like pemut butter and chocolate,

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 9>basically having the two product experiences. And you know, I

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 9>think in code especially, I think AI has really really

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 9>taken off, and all the best software engineers have already

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 9>you know, entirely changed their workflorce. The two main product

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 9>experiences that you really see for that are one the

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 9>ad which is what Windsurf is, and to the agents,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 9>which is what Devon is. And now that we have

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.719
<v Speaker 9>that combined suite. We've just seen growth accelerating. We've been

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 9>able to you know, bring Windsurf customers onto Devon, bring

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 9>Devin customers onto Windsurf, and also just continue to.

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Grow much much better.

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Founders fun led this round eight vc Lux Capital prior

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 3>investors also participated many others. When you were negotiating the

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 3>funds and the valuation, how much was the sort of

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 3>what you got for Windsurf baked into that conversation.

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's funny.

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 9>And so we raised this round, you know, just recently.

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 9>But as we were doing the Windsurf deal in July,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 9>that weekend, I was on the phone with Peter kind

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 9>of giving an update on.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 2>The business, Peter being Pizza Tal, Peter Tal, that's right.

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 9>Giving an update on the business and how things were going,

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 9>and talking about the winster of opportunity that we had

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 9>in front of us. And they were, first of all,

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 9>you know, they were they were extremely supportive of doing

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 9>the deal and they saw the same synergy as well.

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 3>But they were very clear with us.

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.600
<v Speaker 9>That that they were very happy to give the support

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 9>that we needed to make sure that we could get

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.679
<v Speaker 9>the deal done as well. And so that was a

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 9>lot of what gave us the confidence to go ahead

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 9>and go through with the acquisition.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 4>How much is the money necessary right now, Scott to

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.159
<v Speaker 4>fend off competition? Now, I'm thinking of you as the

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 4>first AI software engineer.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 3>That's what Devon is.

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 4>But we hear some aman talking about GPT five, how

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.479
<v Speaker 4>good it is at coding. How much you seeing other

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 4>companies trying to get in the space.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely so far.

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 9>You know, we've been quite efficient as a business in

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:29.399
<v Speaker 9>terms of capital spend, but of course we see a

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 9>lot of ways that we can accelerate our business further

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:33.640
<v Speaker 9>with a lot more capital. There's a lot of work

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 9>to do on good of market and on just generally

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 9>growing the business out there, but of course much more

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 9>to do as well on research, model training and so on.

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 4>And many would say the talent wars, as many have

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 4>deen them, is an expensive habit for many.

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:46.959
<v Speaker 3>Scott.

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 4>I want to go into your talent because it's fascinating

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 4>the way in which you're offering incredibly generous buyouts to

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 4>certain Windsurf employees, largely because is it because the team

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 4>is too large or do you see it more as

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 4>a cultural alignment, Because it's about the grind You've tried

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 4>to make very clear to them.

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, it's more about the cultural alignment. And you know,

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 9>I think it's worth calling out that, you know, especially

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 9>in AI with things moving as fast as they are,

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 9>we have a very very intense culture and and and

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 9>that's a lot of what we are. And obviously it's

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 9>it's not it's not for everyone, and so we want

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 9>to make sure that it's clear for folks that that's

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 9>the case. And you know, I think for the right

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 9>people it's it's it's amazing and it's exactly what they're

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 9>looking for. But again, it really is not for everyone.

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 9>And we've been excited to grow the team. I mean,

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 9>we've brought in some incredible folks from from the windsurf

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 9>side now in the in the last six seven weeks

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 9>post this acquisition, and then also been growing the team

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 9>in a lot of other ways as well.

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 2>Well a lot of other ways.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 3>My understanding, Scott is that two historic or either participating

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 3>investors in this round have decided to join you full time.

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 2>That's who are they and why? Yeah?

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So so we had Christian Lawless from Conversion Capital

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 9>who came and joined us full time, and then Emily

0:19:56.560 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 9>Cohen from Neo. Both of those were early investors in US,

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.879
<v Speaker 9>supported US, you know, all the way through, and have

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 9>made the decision to come join US full time, which

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 9>we're extremely excited about.

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot to clarify and unpacked here. My understanding

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 3>is that when you close the Windsurf deal, revenues basically

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 3>doubled overall, and enterprise combined enterprise ARR is running at

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 3>thirty percent just in that period. But you said something

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 3>a minute ago, Well, we've been very disciplined. You founded

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 3>this company in late twenty twenty three.

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 2>Correct, Yeah, end of twenty three, started twenty four, and.

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 3>You've spent burned call it where you were about twenty

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 3>million dollars in that period of time.

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:33.120
<v Speaker 10>That's right.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Why do you need four hundred million dollars?

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, No, it's a great question.

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 9>I mean, And to be clear, you know, I think

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 9>Devin was already growing exponentially, you know, up until this deal.

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:42.919
<v Speaker 9>Windsurf was growing exponentially itself.

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Up until this deal.

0:20:43.720 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 9>You know, we got to bring the products together and

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 9>the businesses together and do that. I think from our perspective,

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 9>as the game gets bigger and bigger and bigger, to

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 9>Caroline's point. You know, it's very valuable to have the

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 9>capital to be able to do much larger work in

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 9>model training, or to be able to grow and blood

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 9>scale our business much faster.

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 3>You call it a game.

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 4>The game gets bigger and it is about mission focus

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 4>right now, Scott, so many people have so many questions

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 4>about the culture of building startups. Right here, right now,

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.639
<v Speaker 4>it does feel world changing. But Scott, I put it

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 4>to you, when you're talking about routinely being in the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 4>office through the weekend, doing some of your best work

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.639
<v Speaker 4>late at night, many of us literally living where we work,

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 4>how do you keep people engaged? Sure, within your talent pool,

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 4>you probably have to lose carers in some way. You

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 4>have to lose those who have other physical and mental passions.

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 4>But when you're asking people to develop the latest and

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 4>greatest product that maybe replaces them themselves, how do you

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 4>keep them grinding?

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you know, I think on the one hand, of course,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 9>there I think there's all of the incentives and the benefits,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 9>and it's you know, it's very important for everyone at

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 9>the company to be an owner of the company and

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 9>to hold equity in the company. I actually think that

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 9>the most important piece of it, to be honest, is

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 9>you know, for many of us on the team of

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 9>course are programming nerds ourselves, and because of that, I

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 9>think teaching an aid A program is maybe the funnest

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 9>thing that we could be working around and spending our

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 9>time on. And the truth is a lot of it

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 9>is very very self directed for us.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 4>The passion Scott, we we love having you want to

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 4>talk about it, and the fundraise congratulation co founder and

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 4>CEO of Cognition There.

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech.

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 3>I want to get back to that deal between Echo

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Star and SpaceX, who are buying spectrum licenses from EchoStar.

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 3>So the stocks up about sixteen percent in the session

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:32.880
<v Speaker 3>right a show that two day charts show the jump.

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 3>On August twenty sixth, the stock had jumped almost ninety percent.

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Because AT and T is also in the markets by

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 3>spectrum licenses, this is a stock that's trading at all

0:22:42.560 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 3>time highs. We focus very much on the SpaceX portion

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 3>at the start of the show if you're just joining us, Caro,

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 3>But for Echo Star, this is a company that's got

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 3>itself out of a bit of trouble by doing this

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:54.920
<v Speaker 3>transaction and.

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 4>The board market signaling at to Echo Star. But let's

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 4>dig in more to Musk Inc. And the recent board

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 4>proposed one trillion dollar potential pay package being put to investors,

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 4>an unprecedented incentive in corporate America. Of course, we're going

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 4>to bring in Professor Shane Goodwin. He's executive director of

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 4>SMUU Corporate Governance Initiative. You were brought in by Teslas

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 4>Special Committee to advise it on corporate governance matter, including,

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 4>and I'm quoting from Tesla's proxy here, satisfaction of fiduciary

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 4>duties under Texas law.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Take us to Texas law.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 4>Shane, How is that different versus Delaware, particularly when you're

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 4>thinking about more predictable corporate governance framework as it's said

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 4>in the proxy.

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 11>No, absolutely. First of all, thank you very much for

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 11>having me. It's a delight to see you again. With

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 11>respect to Texas law versus Delaware. The one thing I

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 11>do want to make clear for everyone is this pay package,

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 11>which is actually a pay for performance. It's not a

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 11>pay for promises, and that's one of the things I

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 11>want to make clear. There are a lot of headlines

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 11>right now, but this package as it's designed today actually

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.920
<v Speaker 11>works in Texas clearly, but it works in really every

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 11>other state, including Delaware. As everyone talks about the differences,

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 11>we can get into some of the details, but it

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 11>really is a pay for performance package and not a

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 11>pay for promises.

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 4>And some of those performances are interestingly around a million robots,

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 4>a million robo taxis, but actually it's still about getting

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty million actual evs on the road chain. How much

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 4>was there a focus still in the bread and matter

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 4>of what Teeser is, which is an EV maker.

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 12>Well, that's what it.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 11>Is today and obviously, as everyone knows, and something that

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 11>both Laon and the rest of the company and the

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.800
<v Speaker 11>board have talked about through at a critical inflection point

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 11>today moving from a traditional EV manufacturer into a world

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 11>that's with AI robotics, energy transformation, and as that master

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 11>plan for clearly demonstrated, this is about sustainable abundance and

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 11>this was the right time to actually make this decision today.

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 11>This is about timing and responsibility. It's certainly not reckless

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.560
<v Speaker 11>to make a decision today to keep the leadership and

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 11>vision of Elon and that's exactly what the board and

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 11>obviously the special Committee determined.

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 3>Professor Goodwin, the board addressed Musk's political activity and wrote

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.640
<v Speaker 3>in the proxy it had secured assurances that that activity

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 3>would wind down. Taking into account the shareholder initiated proposal

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 3>to invest in Xai, the board appears prepared to allow

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk to continue to have responsibility across a number

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of companies at the same time. How much was that

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 3>discussed the split focus as leader of a number of entities.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 11>Now, it's a great question, and look, this is not

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 11>a new topic. Obviously that the everyone has known that

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 11>Elon's had a lot of other ventures and interests. When

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 11>I say interest he before even came to Tesla, he

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 11>was at Space x So this is not new. What

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 11>I can tell you and what I have observed of myself,

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.040
<v Speaker 11>and this is something from being inside and watching it.

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.440
<v Speaker 11>The art of committee that has a related transaction oversight

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 11>as well as what the board and obviously the special

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 11>Committee thought through very extensively, is how do we harness

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 11>everything that is great that Elon brings to the table,

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:19.239
<v Speaker 11>and then how can we actually work together as we

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 11>move and transition Tesla from this EV manufacturer which is

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 11>a world class and moving that now to an AI

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 11>focused robotics and energy sustainable abundance company. And so this

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 11>has thought about very extensively and it has actually been

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 11>addressed throughout this whole process.

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 3>This committee, that the Board committee met with Musk ten times,

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 3>and in the course of the three hundred pages, a

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 3>negotiation plays out right where they Musk is able to say, well,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 3>here are my terms. How typical atypical is that given

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 3>that the big package is atypical? And what did you

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 3>advise the board on allowing must to come back and say,

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 3>here is what I want in return for what you want?

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 11>Well, no, you're absolutely correct that there is definitely a

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:12.679
<v Speaker 11>negotiation that goes between a board and a CEO on

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.359
<v Speaker 11>any of these topics. And what informs my view and

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 11>my decision is not just today as the corporate executive

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 11>director for our SMU's corporate Governance initiative, it was over

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 11>twenty five years of investment banking. I actually spent time

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 11>in the boardrooms with these companies, advising them on M

0:27:30.600 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 11>and A transactions. Today I'm I'm also a board member,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 11>I'm also an investor, but more importantly, as wearing the

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 11>hat as a professor and a teacher, if you will,

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 11>I actually teach on these topics all the time, and

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 11>this is a very important topic that comes up as

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 11>far as CEO compensation. How do you retain, motivate, and

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:53.399
<v Speaker 11>incentivize your management team to align with shareholder interests? And

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 11>that's fundamental here and that's exactly the process the undertook.

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 11>What I can tell you is that they had discussions

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 11>with Elon throughout the process. But any deliberations and any

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 11>thoughtfulness that went in, including all the alternatives and now

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 11>the alternatives were all detailed in the proxy. Those were

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 11>all done within the special Committee and then brought to

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 11>the board. But it's a very typical process to have

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 11>board members engage with their CEOs to understand what their

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 11>vision is first, and that was very clear. We need

0:28:24.000 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 11>to understand what the CEOs and management team's vision is

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:31.080
<v Speaker 11>and then how do we blind that to our shareholders.

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:34.159
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, of course on the board is Elon Musk, his

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 4>brother Kimmel Musk too. They recused themselves when it came

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 4>to putting forward this proxy to the investor base. But

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 4>the twenty eighteen pay package, it was challenged, it was

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 4>overturned because of so called conflicts of interest. What safety

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 4>guards have you in this time? Chane to push back

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 4>on any cynicism around it.

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 12>Sure, and there are going to be some critics, to

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 12>be sure, but this was.

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 11>Actually thought about with an address the twenty eighteen Delaware Considerations.

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 11>This has a fully informed, disinterested special committee. Both Robin

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 11>Denholm and Kathleen Wilson Thompson were not only viewed as

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 11>disinterested by the board when they formed the special committee,

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 11>but McDermott, led by Wilson Chew and Joanna Lynn, actually

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 11>conducted their own separate disinterested and not only at the

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 11>time of when this was occurred back in February, but

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 11>everywhere through and up until today. And I've seen all

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 11>the files and seen all the questionneers. That is a

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 11>very important point. The second point is that they acquired

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 11>and hired engaged independent advisors, and what I mean by

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 11>that are accounting firms, valuation firms, compensation companies and then

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 11>also in the case for me a governance to discuss

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 11>about the implications around that.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 12>So this was thought through with in contemplation. What happened.

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 11>It was a seven and a half month process. It

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 11>did include, as you already talked to about Elon's vision,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 11>but he was exclude from all the deliberations.

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Professor Goodwin, A question from our audience actually submitted to you.

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 3>If I may across the operational and financial targets and requirements,

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 3>why include the ebit DA goal.

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:22.479
<v Speaker 2>Were you involved in that?

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 11>I wasn't necessarily involved with certainly picking out any of

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 11>the operational targets. That was the special committee working directly

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.840
<v Speaker 11>with the company. There needs to be an alignment to

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 11>be sure between what operational goals and what that will

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 11>actually translate on financial performance. But what is clear is

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.960
<v Speaker 11>there are market capitalism targets all the way up to

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 11>eight and a half trillion dollars, but also you have

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 11>to meet operational targets as well, and obviously we talked

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 11>about that.

0:30:51.640 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 12>That includes.

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.960
<v Speaker 11>Robotics, the omnibile and then also the target you mentioned

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 11>about ebit DAH. That's extremely critical to make sure there's

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 11>an alignment between operational performance and also performance in the

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 11>performance of the stock.

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Shane, you advise on corporate governance, you sit on boards.

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 4>You're also a teacher a lecturer, Professor, how extraordinary is

0:31:16.720 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 4>this one key pay package offering when.

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 3>You teach about it?

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, I do think that the headlines obviously of a

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 11>trillion catches the attention for sure. But what I would

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 11>point out though, is that maybe the headlines chase those numbers,

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 11>but this plan chases results. And as I mentioned, there's

0:31:33.240 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 11>no pay unless there's performance.

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 12>So there are no results, there are no votes, and

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 12>there's no payout.

0:31:39.240 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 11>So what I would point people to is to say

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 11>this trillion, I would focus on seven and a half

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:50.719
<v Speaker 11>trillion dollars of performance, that generation that the shareholders are

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:55.760
<v Speaker 11>going to receive, and obviously alignment for Elon Musk along

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 11>the way and the rest of the management team as well.

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 3>Shane Goodwin, executive director at SMU Corporate Governance Initiative and

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:06.000
<v Speaker 3>an advisor to Tesla's board and the committee that did

0:32:06.000 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 3>that compensation package, thank you very much. Shares of Roadblocks

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 3>basically flat. Now they've been markedly higher after a big

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 3>moment for the company, and lists have been raising their

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 3>price targets for the stock because Roadblocks just held its

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>developers conference and it really reinforced its growth prospects. To

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 3>like to say that Roadblocks is CEO David Zuki is

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 3>with us here in San Francisco. Roadblocks moments now, I

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 3>don't know necessarily you put too much stock into the

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 3>headline of what an analyst says. But there are analysts

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 3>out there saying that this is potentially transformational for engagement.

0:32:45.720 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 3>So let's start with Roadblocks Moments. What is it and

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>why so important?

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so, thank you coming off a great developer conference

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 13>and coming off, you know, reiterating our audacious goal of

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 13>getting ten percent of all gaming running on roadblocks. Look,

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:03.000
<v Speaker 13>we're looking for ways that developers can share and people

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 13>can find their amazing experiences. A lot of people go

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 13>on to social media. Roadblocks Moments is right inside Roadblocks.

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 13>It allows users to capture a great moment, like at

0:33:13.480 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 13>the bottom of a roller coaster, or when you have,

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 13>like something really amazing happen, and turn that into a

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 13>short little video that other people can watch. What's really

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 13>exciting about roadbox Moments. If you really like what you're seeing,

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 13>you can click on it and jump directly into a

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 13>Roadblox game. So it's it's one hundred percent Roadblocks. It's

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 13>fun to watch and you find great new stuff.

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Dave, We've talked about this idea in the past. Is

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:40.520
<v Speaker 3>it a competition for ribles with the likes of TikTok

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 3>or is it something different? You know, gamers, actually people

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 3>playing the games go to Twitch and YouTube, this goes

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 3>back to the creator. It's slightly different.

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 13>There's a really interesting angle to hear and that anyone

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 13>on roadblocks can make a Roadblox moment ultimately, and also

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 13>a lot of the creators, whether we're playing minute golf

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 13>for something else, are going to have the capability to

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 13>let you automatically take a clip of your favorite thing,

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 13>like a hole in one. So we're hoping individual users

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 13>on roadblocks can make amazing moments other people can watch

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 13>them and then find them miniature golf game.

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 4>A developers conference is exactly about the creator's Dave, and

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 4>you offer them these moments, You offer them new AI improvements,

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 4>new tools, ultimately ways to thrive the take rate for

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the content creators. At the moment, Dave, talk us through

0:34:28.080 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 4>why you're recompensing them even more.

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, thank you. Long term, we've shared we want to

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 13>grow bookings faster than our employee costs or our cogs

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.760
<v Speaker 13>or infracosts, and we want to take that remaining cash

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 13>and as much as possible distribute it transparently directly to

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 13>the creators. So arguably the top applause at our developer

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 13>conference was for the first time in six years, we

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:57.399
<v Speaker 13>increased the dev x rate, or the percent that our

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 13>creators take home today for every robot they're they're earning

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 13>eight point five percent more than they used to. And

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 13>as you correctly know, we introduce this a pile of

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 13>new AI capability that we can talk about as well.

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what goes on behind that AI capability? How much

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:17.240
<v Speaker 4>you having to think through, get the right talent in place,

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 4>and what is it that it allows roadblocks to really harness?

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, rolling the clock back. We became an AI shop

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.720
<v Speaker 13>over four years ago and over the last four years

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 13>have developed over four hundred AI models, so text translation, safety,

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 13>voice filtering, text filtering, all of that. What's really exciting

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 13>is we have a vision not just of using AI

0:35:39.640 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 13>for safety, civility or for creating games, but AI should

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 13>be live inside of every experience. And so we were

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 13>demoing live three D experiences where people were creating vehicles

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 13>on the fly by talking about them, where in the

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 13>past it was very hard for many of us to

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.359
<v Speaker 13>create vehicles. So we would say for any form of creativity,

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 13>fashion vehicles, we're going to have more people creating in

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 13>roadblocks experiences.

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:09.359
<v Speaker 3>Dave when you bring all these people together in San Jose,

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.960
<v Speaker 3>what were the pieces of feedback you got from the

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 3>developer community, good or bad? That either surprise you and

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 3>you think, I got to go and act on that.

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 13>Now with the team, when people think about building a

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 13>high tech company and with us this really audacious goal.

0:36:23.040 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 13>Could we have ten percent of all the gaming running

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 13>on roadblocks, RPGs, auto racing, sports, all of that. Interestingly enough,

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 13>the creators really want raw scale, raw performance, raw realism.

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.720
<v Speaker 13>They're looking as we design this gaming platform in the cloud,

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 13>can it be bigger? Can it be better? So, in

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 13>addition to the devx rate and the economics, some of

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 13>the biggest applause was really around hardcore technical features that

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 13>support ultimately photorealism and scale.

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 3>Part of that is that use engagement. The data on

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 3>engagement for August is looking strong. Might carry through for

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:03.640
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the year. We've talked about this before

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 3>and it's worth repeating. You have had Friday nights and

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Saturday nights where the servers are melting. How are you

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 3>dealing with that?

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 13>I knowed, Yeah, we like the servers to melt. That's

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 13>obviously a good thing, not a bad thing. Last year,

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.880
<v Speaker 13>our peak concurrency around this time was eleven million people

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 13>playing Roadblocks at the same time. Two weeks ago, there

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 13>were over forty five million people playing Roadblocks at the

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 13>same time, and this was a coordinated event.

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 10>We like it.

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:33.399
<v Speaker 13>A lot of the creators of the top games all

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 13>had events at the same time to try to melt

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 13>our servers. What's beautiful about our architecture is in addition

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 13>to our primary focus, like we build our own data centers,

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 13>we have great cloud partners, and our cloud partners now

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 13>can come online for two or three hours on a Saturday.

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:54.040
<v Speaker 13>We can burst into this forty five million concurrency. So

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.879
<v Speaker 13>it's a really great problem. Tell all these creators try

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 13>to stress our system briefly at time.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.279
<v Speaker 4>A problem has been safety, Dave, and you've been leaning

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 4>into that with AIS. You just articulated still about what

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 4>is it forty percent of your users are under thirteens.

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 4>You've been making changes, particularly about estimates of user ages

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 4>and check ins, Dave. How is that being received by

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 4>developers and by countries at the Middle East, in particular of.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:20.520
<v Speaker 13>Late I'd highlight we have a history of leaning in

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:25.879
<v Speaker 13>before law or legislation. For example, California, age appropriate design code.

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 13>We leaned in on that because we were already doing it.

0:38:28.640 --> 0:38:32.240
<v Speaker 13>Last week we announced a somewhat bold and audacious vision

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 13>to lead the industry in using facial age estimation, id

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 13>estimation and other tools to know the age of everyone

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 13>approximately on our platform, who's using communication, and also to

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 13>use that to maybe adjust a bit who communicates with who.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 13>The key I'd like to highlight is this sits on

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:56.400
<v Speaker 13>top of everything else we do, which is filtering all texts,

0:38:56.400 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 13>filtering all voice, and also not allowing image sharing or

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 13>video sharing on the platform. We think it's going to

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:08.920
<v Speaker 13>set a standard that other social media, messaging and comms

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 13>products will look into.

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 4>Following David ZOOKI love having you on. Thanks for talking

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 4>us through it found a CEO of roadblocks. Appreciate the time.

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up, let's talk Apple. It's about to launch

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 4>its new iPhone seventeen air tomorrow.

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Will it live up to the hype?

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:37.880
<v Speaker 4>A's next as is a Bloomberg Tech Apple's biggest product

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 4>launch of the year.

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:39.480
<v Speaker 2>It's tomorrow.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 4>The company which has fallen behind in the generator of

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 4>AI race, shall we say we'll show if it's new

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 4>iPhone seventeen for more and what we can expect, Blue

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Most Chief Global consumer tech correspondent Mark German, Mark, you

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 4>always have it before, we told it tomorrow. What are

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 4>you most excited about?

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I'm excited about the new iPhone seventeen Pro line. Personally,

0:39:58.840 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 14>I think that the new design on the back looks

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 14>pretty cool. I think the camera upgrades are pretty substantial,

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 14>probably the most substantial in the history of the product.

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 14>And for Apple, that is what is going to drive sales.

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.280
<v Speaker 14>It is those new Pro models. They're going to heavily

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.880
<v Speaker 14>market and feature this new iPhone seventeen Air so to speak,

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:18.080
<v Speaker 14>which is this much slim down phone.

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 10>It's about a third thinner than the iPhones of today.

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 14>But I still think for Apple's revenue purposes, it's the

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 14>profones that are going to be the big driver here.

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Mark. I really appreciated how you set the scene for

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Air in your power on. You compared it to the

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 3>launch of Macair. Right, My first MacBook was like twenty

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 3>ten MacBook.

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 2>Pro at the time, a big, old, chunky thing.

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:43.719
<v Speaker 3>At first that was a difficult thing for Apple, and

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 3>with time and innovation things improved. Explain the pathway you

0:40:48.040 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 3>see for the Air going forward.

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 14>Well, it's the same as the MacBook Air pathway right.

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 14>It came out in two thousand and eight. It had

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:58.920
<v Speaker 14>some things that worked well. The screen was full size,

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.560
<v Speaker 14>the keyboard was full size eyes it was a nice

0:41:01.560 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 14>product with a touch track multi touch track pad, the

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 14>first in the industry. But it was too expensive, it

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 14>was too slow, and the battery life wasn't great. The

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 14>iPhone Air is going to be very similar. It's going

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.359
<v Speaker 14>to have a breakthrough design with its thinness, it's going

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.920
<v Speaker 14>to have great flagship features like a six point six

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 14>in screen with one hundred and twentyz refresh rate, but

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:24.000
<v Speaker 14>it's going to have limitations on its camera and its battery.

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:28.279
<v Speaker 14>Over time, you'll see the MacBook Air transition play out

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 14>as the iPhone Air transition.

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 10>So you'll see the ultimately the pro phones.

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 14>Get thinner, get lighter, get more processor heavy, and get

0:41:37.239 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 14>better cameras.

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 10>And so this is a peak of the future.

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 14>It's just your beta testing what's really to come here

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.720
<v Speaker 14>With something that ultimately will be a little bit subpar

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 14>compared to Apples other models.

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Many would say perhaps all of this so called innovation,

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 4>It really is innovative, but compare it to foldable phones

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 4>and compare it to generator AI use cases at Google

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.960
<v Speaker 4>and competitors. How are you expecting this one to stack up?

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 14>Well, if you take two iPhone error side by side

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 14>and you put some tape in the middle, maybe some glue,

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 14>there's your foldable phone. Because that's basically what Extra's foldable

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:11.799
<v Speaker 14>phone is going to be like. Right, This is to

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 14>prove out the concept of making a panel as thin

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 14>as possible, slimming down the battery.

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:18.720
<v Speaker 10>And so this is you know, Apple testing.

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 14>You know, Apple has much higher volumes than any of

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 14>these other companies that have foldable phones that we've been

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 14>talking about, right, and so they kind of need to

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 14>test these things in the wild. They need to test

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.360
<v Speaker 14>their manufacturing capabilities, They need to engineer these things earlier

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 14>on to make sure when they do release the foldable

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 14>next year, it's at that Apple quality level. And Apple,

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 14>at the end of the day, is a hardware company,

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 14>and they're doubling down on what they're good at and

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 14>how they make their money. And so this is going

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 14>to be primarily a hardware showcase. You're not going to

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 14>see a whole lot of new AI features. They may

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 14>refer to things as AI, but ultimately this is about

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 14>the products.

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:55.360
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Mark Gunman, Thank you, and Bloomberg Tech will be

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.359
<v Speaker 3>live from Apple's event tomorrow. Tune in for some great

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:02.399
<v Speaker 3>conversations before and after. That does it for this edition,

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 3>though a Bloomberg Tech carrot.

0:43:03.760 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah we can catch up. Don't forget to check in

0:43:06.480 --> 0:43:08.239
<v Speaker 4>on the podcast if find out on the terminal as

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:11.080
<v Speaker 4>well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart a Big

0:43:11.239 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 4>week to come to miss out. This is Bloomberg Tech