WEBVTT - Why You Really Should Read Your Employment Contract

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>From executive search to talent strategy, leadership development, rewards, and

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>succession planning. Corn Fairy can help you realize the full

0:00:06.880 --> 0:00:09.879
<v Speaker 1>potential of your people so you can take your business

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>where it wants to go up. Learn more at corn

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Ferry dot com slash up. So I've been thinking a

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:21.439
<v Speaker 1>lot about employment contracts lately. I know it sounds really

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>boring and lame and weird, but it's been in the

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>news a lot lately this year, from the Chump Campaign

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>to Fox News. So this week on game Plan, we're

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be talking about all the stuff you sign

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>when you sign on for a job. I'm Rebecca Greenfield,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:48.879
<v Speaker 1>a reporter for Bloomberg where I cover workplace culture. And

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Sam Grobart. I'm a writer at Blueberg Business Week magazine. Okay,

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>so just last week, this employment contract stuff came up

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>with Mark Burnett. Mark Burnett co creator of Donald Trump's

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>famous reality show The Apprentice, and he's like pretty successful, Yeah,

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>tons of other things, but in this case we're talking

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about The Apprentice. And so, as you know, this tape

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>came out revealing that Donald Trump said some unsavory things

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>on a bus, and so people are wondering if there's

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>other footage of Donald Trump saying unsavory things from the

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>many many years that he was the host of The Apprentice, right,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>And so there was this suspicion that Mark Burnett somehow

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>was holding onto all of these tapes. And there was

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>even the rumor that got out that he was threatening

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>other employees from the production that if they leaked any

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of that information, they would be sued, right, and he

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>could sue them because of their employment contracts, particularly the

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>non disclosure agreement part of their employment contracts, which is

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>something you sign when you either join or leave or

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>both unemployer that says that you won't do certain things

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like league footage of Donald Trump exactly. And this is

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>something we experience all the time. If it's not about

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>an n d A, it's about signing up for the

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of agreement with you or internet provider or your

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>mail service or what have you. There are just tons

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>of legal ease that we sort of ignore and agreed to.

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And this is particularly true I think when you're in

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the excitement of joining a new company and getting hired.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure I did not read my employment contract

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and I came to no idea what is in my

0:02:19.480 --> 0:02:22.239
<v Speaker 1>employment contract, which I know you're supposed to read everything

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you sign, but if it feels like I couldn't do

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>anything about it, and I wanted the job and I

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to say no, so whatever, I mean, I

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:30.359
<v Speaker 1>think you know we were talking about this earlier. It's

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>like you checked maybe three things. It's you know, salary, Yeah, okay,

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what we agreed on vacation days, that's cool, and

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe title. Yeah. I looked back at an email with

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the recruiter here, and the things I asked about were

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>can I have these vacation days? Right? But there's a

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>ton of other stuff you sign and it's not just meaningless.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It turns out I've learned this last year of paying

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>attention to the news. Like in addition to the Mark

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Burnett thing, another scandal that brewed this year was Roger Ales,

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the of Fox News, was accused of sexually harassing many

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>women and had to step down eventually left the company.

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>And there was all this talk about nondisclosure agreements and

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>non disparagement agreements and how that led to women being

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>able to or not being able to talk about their

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>harassment right, and in some cases it was a question

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of had they accepted money from their former employer, which

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>may make it more difficult for them to speak out

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>or not, in which case maybe they had that ability

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>because they never received anything in exchange for it. I mean,

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you certainly don't go into a job thinking you might

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>be sexually harassed. No, I shouldn't sign this enda. Well,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. I think these employment agreements that we

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>sign for the time that we're working at the company,

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>generally they don't have that much to do with our lives.

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>It's when we decide if and when we decide to leave. Yeah,

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>when ship gets real. Oh yeah, people stop being polite

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and start breaking their ends. So nondisclosure agreements are just

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>one of many aspects of your employment contract that can

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>come back to bite you or be something you wish

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you hadn't signed. And clearly Sam and I know nothing. Yeah,

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>So we have here with us Brett Galloway. He's a

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>partner at McLoughlin and Stern, where he specializes in labor

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and employment law, and we're going to just ask him

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>some what we think are super basic and super interesting

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and important questions about our employment contracts. Thanks for coming on,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me, guys, Hey, Brett, can we start

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>by just asking you a very basic question defining what

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a standard employment agreement is. What what is that document

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that we get when we start a new job trying

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>to do who is it protecting? What are some of

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the overall points of having that document? Sure, sim an

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>employment agreement is a contract just like any other contract. However,

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a contract between people, obviously for services, and the

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>consideration is you get money. There are various caveats in

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that contract, like non competes, non disclosures, binding, arbitration, confidentiality

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>agreements uh that employees may not be aware of or

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>may not be knowledgeable enough to ask questions on, and

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 1>those all really benefit the employer. And most of the time,

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, unless you are a really specialized employee in

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a specialized area with some great superpower skill, employees are

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of bound by the terms of the agreement, i e.

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>A boiler plate agreement. So the various terms that I

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>just went over, non compete, nondisclosures, arbitration, those are things

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that employees should certainly be weary of, especially before signing

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>any employment agreement, because they're going to dictate the terms

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of their employment. So yeah, actually, really want. That's exactly

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>what I wanted to ask you next, is can you

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>just define some of those terms, Like we've been talking

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 1>about nondisclosures and nondisclosure noncompete, What do these things mean? Sure,

0:05:59.000 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>a nondisclosure or confidentiality agreement are kind of one and

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the same, and those are typically more enforceable than the

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>other restrictive covenants. A restrictive covenant is a restriction, i e.

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>What we're gonna be talking about. The non disclosure agreements

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or the confidentiality agreements particularly deal with what's known as

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a trade secret. So if you have access to the

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Coca Cola recipe, you know, McDonald's secret sauce, something that's

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a trademarked piece of intellectual property that the company owns,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you must sign or usually or will be required to

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>sign a nondisclosure agreement stating that if you ever leave

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the employment, you won't disclose the special sauce. That makes sense,

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>But that makes sense, But in the way we've seen

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it in the news, it seems like you're signing nondisclosure

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>agreements to not say anything about your employment at all. Ever,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is that legitimate? That's where the courts come in in

0:06:56.320 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of um looking at the employment agreement as a

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>whole and seeing what aspects about it are reasonable and

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>what are unreasonable, and courts can come in and just

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>because an employment agreement covers the entire universe, that doesn't

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mean that you're actually going to be bound by the

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of that employment agreement. The courts will then come

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in to the extent it's too overbroad or burdensome or

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>vague or otherwise and carve out what's reasonable and what's unreasonable.

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.559
<v Speaker 1>So this happens in the context in my experience, where

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>an employee has signed on to an internet startup company,

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for example, and what that internet startup company does is

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:39.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe the next Uber or the next Venmo, and they're

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to discuss what it is that that company

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>is doing. That's a reasonable nondisclosure agreement, and that would

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>be a broader non disclosure agreement. Then you know you're

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to take the Coca cola recipe and go

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>over to pepsi M. Let's talk a little bit. You've

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned binding arbitration, so sometimes you wind up in a

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>court of law, but sometimes you don't even get that far.

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct? If you're unlucky enough. Yeah, yeah, So

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>tell me a little bit about what binding arbitration means.

0:08:09.240 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Arbitration is a form of what's known as a d

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>R or alternative dispute resolution. And you have two forms

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of a d R. You have mediation and you have arbitration.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Mediation is not binding. You go before a mediator. It's

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>a neutral third party. Both sides come and present their case.

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>At the end of the day, the mediator may make

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a suggestion or try to bring the two parties closer

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to a resolution, but if one or both parties doesn't

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like the decision, they can walk away from the table. Arbitration,

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, is binding, and more importantly, the

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>rules of evidence that you're afforded to in a court

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>don't exist in an arbitration. And also more importantly, there's

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>no appeal. So, once you go to an arbitrator and

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that arbitrator makes a decision based usually on not all

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the facts, because not all the facts are discoverable i e.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You get them through evidence, you're stuck with that. Decisions

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>up happens when the power and potential of every employee

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and leader in your workforce is released and corn Ferry

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>can get you there by aligning your people to your strategy, attracting, developing, engaging,

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and rewarding them to reach new heights. With corn Ferry,

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you get a partner who truly understands people, leadership, and

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the new landscape of work, a partner who knows how

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to take your business up. Learn more at corn Ferry

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash up. So, I want to go back

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>to noncompete. Um, that was something else that we saw

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in the news recently in our industry specifically. UM. I

0:09:34.160 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you saw this, but some BuzzFeed staffers

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>were fired for making a web video that wasn't a

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 1>BuzzFeed web video while they were buzz Sweed employees. UM.

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And we've been told, or they've said that everybody had

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>done that and everybody was doing it, but then the

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>company decided to make an example out of them, and

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was a pretty big conversation about non

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>competes in the creative industry because I don't think anybody

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>had really thought about it before then. So I want

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to ask you kind of what is a noncompete? Are

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>there cases where am I just signing away my rights

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.679
<v Speaker 1>to do anything else? Are there exceptions? Sure? In New

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>York especially, the courts will look at noncompetes uh and

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 1>highly scrutinized them, you know, especially in the creative industry,

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.400
<v Speaker 1>because the courts, just like everybody else, wants people to work,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and non competes are a restrictive covenant. They prevent people

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>from working, and we want as many people in the

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>workforce as possible doing as much good for you know,

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>our fellow man as possible. So, yes, an employer can

0:10:38.760 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>put and usually does put a non compete in any

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>employment arrangement or agreement to the extent that that non

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:49.199
<v Speaker 1>compete is actually enforceable. It's a lot different than binding

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 1>arbitration agreements, which or arbitration agreements which usually are enforceable

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.599
<v Speaker 1>non competes. On the other hand, the employee is in

0:10:56.640 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the driver's seat. The burden is on the employer to

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>show really three facets to make a non compete justifiable

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and allow the courts to uphold it. The first is

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that it can't be broader than required to protect the

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>employer's legitimate interest. It can't impose undo hardship on the employee,

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and it can't injure the public. The first is really

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the biggest hurdle. You know, there's no specific defined thing

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:28.439
<v Speaker 1>for employers legitimate interest, but you know, things like trade secrets, copyrights,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>taking very important employees away from the corporation, that's in

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the employer's best interest. But just you making a video

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't necessarily compete with buzz feed, or you jumping

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ship to a different employer without taking um valuable employees

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 1>from employer A to employer B, that's not in the

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>employer's best interest. And yes, they can send you a

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>cease and desist letter, but those are just words on

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a paper. I wanted to ask you about that in

0:11:56.400 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of the practical effects of UH non competes. As

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.559
<v Speaker 1>you said, the law makes it very difficult for an

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>employer to enforce that noncompete. But practically speaking, can they

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>through the saber rattling, if you will, of cease and

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>desist letters and the threat of prolonged legal action that you,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a single employee, may not be able to support, can

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they somehow almost intimidate people effect, you know, which comes

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>to the same effect almost as enforcing the noncompete. Yeah,

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it almost seems like all of this is intimidation, very

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>very much. So, it's a it's a lot of saber rattling,

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's a lot of David versus Goliath intimidation tactics.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>You're a little employee, they're a big company. They send

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you a threatening letter on legal letterhead. You go, woe

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is me? I just wanted to get a better job

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and better myself, And just to be clear, So when

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they decide to file that, it goes to the individual,

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>not to your new employer. It could go to both.

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>They could go to both, but you could be affected

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>by it, just as as you're saying, little old me yes.

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>So usually it will be sent directly to you, and

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it will be a strongly worded letter that says, hey,

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>we know that you're you know, cohooting with the enemy

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and you better stop. And you signed this agreement which

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>binds you not to work in a ten square mile

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>radius of New York City for six years. Good luck.

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to be enforceable. But when we're talking

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>about the Fox News Roger Ales sexual harassment debacle, um,

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>if someone you know, many women wouldn't speak about it

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.319
<v Speaker 1>because they had signed ndias or so they say. If

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they had broken that NDA and then Fox sued, wouldn't

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that look really bad for Fox? Or is that is

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.319
<v Speaker 1>there that NDA enforceable if they if Fox had done

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>something rong? Like how does that work? Or is it

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just intimidation again? And people don't want to get into

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits and people don't want to be the person who

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>broke an NDIA. Well, are you talking about if a

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.000
<v Speaker 1>settlement has occurred and then there's a confidentiality provision of

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that settlement? I guess that's one part or well, I

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>guess so that's a little bit different from a you know,

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a standard n d A and and Fox and you know,

0:14:07.640 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I I've had potential Fox News clients and I'm just

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna go out on a woman said, I don't think

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>it's good to be a woman and work for Fox

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>News in this day and age. Um, they may have

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a provision in there that says that you can't talk

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>about um litigation or potential litigation. I don't think that's

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>very enforceable. Interesting, or like if you have a lot

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know this happens. You sign a severance agreement

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>and and it as an n d A and you've

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>been sexually harassed? Was that enforceable? That's different because when

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you sign a severance agreement, You've been given consideration, and

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>consideration is the golden rule here. That's contracts one oh one.

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>What is an enforceable contract? You need bargain for consideration.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Person A needs to give up something of value i e.

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And employment in return for person B giving them something

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>of value I eat. Money. Once money and employment is

0:15:04.680 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>exchanged hands, then you have consideration. In a severance agreement,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you're terminating your employment relationship. And you can go the

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>route of not accepting any severance and not releasing any claims,

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and then every the whole world is available to you,

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>or they can make a nice, juicy golden parachute for you,

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can then be forced or required to sign

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>a general release in relation to the severance agreement. Once

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>you sign a general release, that's pretty much that's the

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the road. You've accepted your money effectively as

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>hush money, uh in terms of Fox News, and the

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 1>NDA will likely be enforceable. So what can employees do?

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you starting your job and most people don't

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>even read these things. You get, you know, flori of

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>emails and some paper mail maybe as well, including these agreements,

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and you feel lucky and I'll sign anything I instruct

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>our caution all clients and in general speak to a lawyer.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, nothing is gonna happen overnight. And if the

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>employer is putting a gun to your head and saying

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>sign this right now or else the job is gone,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>there's something there's more problems than just that with the

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>with the employer. So first things first, you should always

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>contact a lawyer to review through the employment agreement or

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 1>arrangement and see if there's any um area for movement

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>or negotiation. Two, you should document any conversations that you

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have with the employer, showing the employer that you may

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:39.000
<v Speaker 1>want to change this provision you have questions about that provision.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>The more documentation that you have um to show you

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>know if and when there's a problem later down the road,

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the better. It's certainly always conferred with a lawyer. Going

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.280
<v Speaker 1>back to that heavy time when you've just been hired

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're going through the process of sort of onboarding

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to the company, and you get that employment agreement just

0:16:57.160 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's been written down and put on a piece

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>of paper, though from what I'm getting from what you're saying,

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make it final. Everything is negotiable, and I presume

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>that employment agreements can be changed. It's just words on

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a paper, Sam. So when they give you that employment agreement,

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:14.919
<v Speaker 1>that's what we call boiler plate agreement. Unless you're some

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 1>specialized superhero, that's what they've given to you, and everybody

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>else that's come before you, and everybody else that it

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>will come after you. There is nothing to prevent you,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>as an employee from picking up the phone or looking

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 1>your manager's hiring HR person straight in the eye and saying, listen,

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I have a little problem with X, Y and Z,

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And they can go in and blue line, red line,

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>black line, whatever line you want to call it that

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>agreement and change it to tailor your needs. And if

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you are a valuable employee and the employer does want

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to keep you on, that's in their best interest to

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>make you happy, to make you feel comfortable, because nobody

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to start a new job where you know they

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>feel intimidated or they've signed something that they don't understand.

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>So you heard it from the lawyer, A lawyer, lawyers,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>let's get a lawyer. Um, Well, thank you so much.

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think those are all the questions I have. Likewise,

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it was really great having you. Thank you so much

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>for having me on guys. Thanks pleasure. So that was

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of encouraging. I mean it's definitely informative. I'm glad

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>that I and a little bit empowering too, I think. Yeah,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's like, don't be so scared by a

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper. I think that is like the takeaway

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>from both when you are going into signing an agreement

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 1>or from when you like potentially think you break one.

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Like right, There's just nothing is really ironclad. The power

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of letterhead is illusory. Yeah, you shouldn't be intimidated by it,

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and you probably have a little bit more negotiating power

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>than you think. Yeah yeah, yeah, So there you go. People,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sorry for us. Yeah, okay, now it's time for half

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>big takes, happy fake takes. Half big takes are when

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>we have a great opinion on something and the only

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 1>place that we can air that opinion is right here.

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So Sam, what's your hat pick? Take? So, I been

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>doing a fair bit of karaoke lately, and let's be honest,

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>when am I not? But I surely do. I have

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>been thinking a little bit about karaoke with coworkers. I

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's a tremendously good bonding experience for people who

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>work together. There's something about sort of mutually assured embarrassment

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that helps kind of break down some of the barriers.

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But there are rules that you do need to follow

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that are specific to when you're with co workers as

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>opposed to friends. For starters, I would say that you

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 1>should get everybody a little bit drunk before you suggest

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the karaoke. People will be much more open to it

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>after a couple of drinks at like your after work

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>bar than if you just spring it on them in

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the office. And then the other thing you want to

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>remember is that karaoke is actually a group activity. It's

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>not so much about your own specific performance. So you

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>want to pick songs that everybody can enjoy and hopefully

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>participate in. Can I ask what your song is? Everyone

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>has a karaokes on, a practice karaoke, here has a

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>karaokes on. Oh I have a list I been on

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>my phone so I never forget them. But I like

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to open up with a nice, sort of group friendly song,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe like We Built This City on Rock and Roll

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>by Starship That's a good one, or Freedom ninety by

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>George Michael. Everybody can sort of participate later in the evening.

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>If you want to come out with a few solo

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>show stoppers, that's fine, but get everybody involved from the beginning.

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>My karaoke song, thank you for asking Sam. Of course,

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this is how we do it by Montell Jordan's It's

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the only karaoke song I can do, and I've practiced

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it alone in my apartment many times. So when you

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>do it now, do you not even look at the screen? Well,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.199
<v Speaker 1>I came on recently and I had forgotten a lot

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>of the words, So I think it was good to

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>have a Yeah. You have to keep that right at

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the top of your head. Yeah. So my half big

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 1>take for your half bag take is that you need

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to practice your karaoke songs alone. We can do an

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>entire episode on karaoke. I have many thoughts. No, I know,

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a full bake take. Yes, can't wait. My

0:20:55.840 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>half big take is so half big I don't even

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>know what it is. But something about email subject lines.

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 1>This is also in the news last week, um and

0:21:05.040 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>some Hillary Clinton released emails. There was an argument the scandal.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>There was an argument over email subject lines, and this

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>man said that he wants better email subject lines. It

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>needs to convey what is in the email, and then

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>he said, this discussion has been broken down along gender lines.

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 1>What so I'm not really sure, like what the male

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>versus female email subject line? Yeah, I've never been able

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to detect the gender of the sender by the subject line. No, no, So,

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess I think a lot about email subject lines,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and I do think that you want to put kind

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of more information in the subject line than you think

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>you need to. I agree. I make it almost like

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>like a sentence. I feel like I want the subject

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>line to be what the recipient would label it. Yeah you, yeah,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned this to me. Yeah. It's like so that

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>when they're looking in their inbox quickly they can know

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it is, and you're doing them. That's so

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>selfless of you. I'm a very generous person, Becca. I

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's pretty clear. Yes, all right, Well that has

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>been happ Big takes, halfag takes. Thanks for listening to

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>another episode of game Plan. You can find me on Twitter.

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm at r C. Greenfield and I am at Sam

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Grobart and well see you next week. By get the

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>most from your people and send your business soaring with

0:22:50.280 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>corn Ferry from Executive Search to talent strategy, leadership development,

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>rewards and succession planning. Corn Ferry knows Up is more

0:22:57.400 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>than a direction, it's your future. Learn more corn ferry

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash up. What's the Z for? My middle

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>name is? O eight has always been a part of

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>my brand.