WEBVTT - Stimulus Gridlock Will Test Fed's Toolbox: State Street's Loh

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. It is time to bring

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:23.159
<v Speaker 1>in our next guest. Now we have Marvin Low. Very

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>lucky to happen because he deals in all sorts of

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>derivatives and trades that I'm sure are particularly exciting at

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a time like this. Marvin Low of State Street in Boston. So, Marvin,

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>have you been having found the last couple of days

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in the market. It certainly has been a wild ride,

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it. Um. I'm I'm tired like everyone else, so

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:42.839
<v Speaker 1>we would like to move on to the next thing.

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, clearly we're still in the service of

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the election and you know, waiting outcomes. How do you

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>read it, though? How do you read this market where

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we've had a vix all the way off, as Paul said,

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>coast of forty but way back down now, even though

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>there's more more uncertainty over who's actually going to be

0:00:57.200 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>president of this country? Yeah, I mean, I mean only UM.

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I had always thought that the Senate was the you know,

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and of course the um who occupies the White Houses

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is clearly important for for tone, but the Senate was,

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>um potentially one of the most important outcomes, UM, particularly

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for businesses and how to approach the next four years.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And from that perspective, we do have clarities. So I

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a lot of pricing around, UM,

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>around kind of the gridlock that divided Congress provides. So Marvin, again,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it looks like if current transfold, we we will have

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a split government in terms of the Democratic White House

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and a Republican Senate. What what do you think the

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from a fiscal stimus package can get done? Should get done?

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>What's kind of in your forecast? Yeah, should should get done,

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely can get done. UM. I think it's the size

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately it has has been um the unknown over

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks. Ultimately, you know, ultimately once again, UM,

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm I'm are marking somewhere around a trillion dollars,

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly much less than the conversation around the Blue Wave,

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:09.520
<v Speaker 1>which was closer to three. But even more important, Um,

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.359
<v Speaker 1>that blue Wave discussion also included you know, infrastructure spending

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and potential transfer of wealth types type strategies, if you will.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And and that is off the table with kind of

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>this divided Congress that we're looking at now. But but

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>should happen, um, And and now we're kind of parsing

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>when it will happen. Alright, So you think a trillion,

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty stunning given that we were at one

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>point eight trillion on the Republican side before this all happened.

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>What brings you down to a trillion? Do you think

0:02:41.360 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that because Mitch McConnell seems to have work control over

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the santut now and there may not even be Speaker

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi in the next version of Congress, that that's

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 1>why we'll come back down again. Yeah, you know, I

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 1>mean the the um the Senate Republicans certainly were at

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a much lower level than even even that brilliant Um. Uh.

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:05.359
<v Speaker 1>It does depend I think who occupies the White House. Um.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's all conjecture at this point. Um, But

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could see I could see if um,

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>President Trump somehow is reelected that the package might be

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>larger because he would be able to um UH to

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>pressure the Senate Republicans in a way that President Biden couldn't.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So you know, there's still ultimately a lot in flux.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think the key is that UM

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it is needed and likely will happen UM. You know,

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly as we're on the eve of non you know,

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>the next employment report, and you know we're we're we're

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>parsing economic data which, while not terrible, certainly isn't improving

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that much. Margaret, are you surprised at perhaps how well

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>risk assets, equities credit is holding up in the face

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of what are just the worst pandemic numbers we've seen

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning of this Yes and no, UM. I

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>mean certainly, if you asked me in the middle of March,

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you know where where a lot of these risk levels

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>would be, I would not be here UM. And and

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm not ashamed to ultimately say that UM.

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 1>The biggest determinant for risk assets has been the amount

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of stimulus UM, and it has been kind of the

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>dual approach of both fiscal and monetary UM. I think

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>what we wind up with is UM comfort, or the

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.960
<v Speaker 1>need for the Fed ultimately to remain very very active

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>in these markets, and I think and I think we're

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of that make its way through risk assets

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of days. UM that the Fed

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>has no choice now but to really go full out

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 1>on anything that it can UM, because we're not going

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the degree of fisical that I think that

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 1>they had been hoping for and that the Blue Wave

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>would have implied. So the trillion that you think might

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>come out of Congress, where will it go? Will there

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 1>be help for the states? Will there be any targeted

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>stimulus for certain industries? Yeah, you know, and and and

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of this still UM still kind of

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>requires UM knowledge of who's gonna sit in there, who's

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna sit in the in the White House. But certainly

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>unemployment benefits UM kind of a restart of that. Uh.

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Certainly something UM on the small business side of things,

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>because I do think that there is agreement that we've

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>got to help mainstreat more. UM. There's still contention around

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>around state eight and kind of I think that's one

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of the more volatile aspects of the discussion. UM. So

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the easy parts of small business and certainly the certainly

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>UM bring unemployment benefits kind of back into discussion. So Marvin,

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>as a global macro strategist, where do you see I

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>guess the best opportunities. Here's you as you look at

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve months are you are you geographically diversified to the

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:45.799
<v Speaker 1>extent you'd like to be or do you find yourself

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more concentrated in the US? Yeah? You

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>know what, I still find myself concentrating in the US.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think US companies UM have an advantage

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>over many of the other companies around the world. So

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>really this kind of tech discussion that you know, we've

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>all participated into the last six months still makes sense.

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>UM yields themselves. You know, I think that without stimulus

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and kind of with UM, the potential of inflation UM

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>increasing as part of UM kind of the reflation trade

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 1>going away keeps yields kind of at these levels. The

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>FED ultimately UM needing to be aggressive, will you know,

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.280
<v Speaker 1>help those yields remain at these levels. So, you know,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>taking that threat and kind of UM figure out which

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>asset classes are most attractive to you and that environment

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what we do. So certainly the tech

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>discussion still makes makes sense to reach for yield still

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. UM. I think emerging markets become more interesting

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if there's a little bit more stability, But it does

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:43.559
<v Speaker 1>wind up being, you know, what parts of the world

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in which countries are most interested in UM, and then

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>reach for yield really does uh go into go into

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>various parts of the spread market, so kind of looking

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>for those spread products, which makes sense in this in

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this new if you will, divide a government is what

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we're doing now. Why though our equities rallying as well

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>as all sorts of safe haven assets from bonds, treasuries

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously to gold. You know, I I think I think

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>UM kind of them. The spectr that yields might rise

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>UM to an uncomfortable level is off the table right now,

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>so you're kind of seeing that long duration trade uh

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>play its way into it. UM. I do think that

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>investors had been somewhat neutral kind of going into the

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>elections with with the risk associated with it and UM.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's still a lot of repair that needs

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to be done in the economy. But kind of a

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>divided government is you know, with an active FED UM

0:07:36.280 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is good for financial assets UM. You know, uh, you know,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>as as kind of a base case, if you will,

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we're speaking with Marvin Low, Global macro strategists at State Street. Marvin,

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned you touched on just emerging markets. It's it

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>seems like, I know a lot of people are tempted

0:07:53.240 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to go out on the risk curve and take a

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>look at emerging markets. But boy, with this pandemic backdrop

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and with some of the economic uncertainty that's like it

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>to continue from it, it just feels like it just

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't a time. How do you guys think about it? Yeah,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean generally, um, but most certainly there's

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, and we're all making implications, um, and assumptions

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as to what the new government is going to try

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to do without really knowing you know, firmly what the

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>new government is going to look like even you know,

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>even if even if we're correct, and who sits in

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the White House and how kind of how Congress is divided, um,

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, where we're making guesses on what those policies

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>look like. So in terms of reflation and in terms

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of um potentially um you know, uh, some benefits associated

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>with commodities and therefore commodity countries where we're we're making guesses.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So so gingerly, I do think that there is a

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of liquidity in the market. Um, So funding for

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for what the emerging markets might need to do to

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of get their economies back in place seems to

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>be available, and that does provide some comfort, um, so

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, parcel through it. There are there are ways

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>within the fixing come market to take out the FX exposure.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, certainly have liked hard currency and bonds

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>as part of the discussion. UM in Asia right now

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is certainly interesting, given that the virus seems to be

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in better control and you know, um the data coming

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>out of Asia is a bit more solid. So you

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>know that ultimately is the process that I think all

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>investors in emerging markets need to go through. So obviously

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>fed Ter J. Powell will try to stay away from

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:26.559
<v Speaker 1>anything political or partisan. Later on today when he speaks, nevertheless,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll get some questions about what he might be able

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to do if there is no stimulus or delated stimulus

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>or a small stimulus. What can he say to calm

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>markets or not pull the middle tailsmen? Yeah, I mean certainly, certainly, um,

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, continuing to say that the fet is there, um,

0:09:42.800 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>they will use all tools available, UM that they believe

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they still have more tools UM that they can deploy. Uh.

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think that I'm looking for kind of

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>twisting in their asset purchases, particularly with UM UH, with

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Treasury still issuing more long a data paper.

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we had seen some of the steepening

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of the curve, you know, prior to again the election results,

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>because I think that there's been so much coupon issuance

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in the market. So UM, you know, I I think

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that stage one but you know, his toolbox is UM

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>depleted relative to where we were a year, year and

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a half ago. UM, and the Fed's going to continue

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to be pushed UM towards obtaining its new long term

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>goals around inflation and around kind of helping the jobs market.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So uh, you know, for the time being, UM, there's

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 1>still que wei that they could do. There's still some twisting.

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>UM yields remained fairly controlled. Uh, and you know, they'd

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like to see what the economy looks like as we

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>go into next year, with the virus still UM, you know,

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>front and center in terms of their concerns. Hey, Marvin,

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just looking on my Bloomberg screen. Here I see gold

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>up forty two maybe forty three dollars announced. That's two

0:10:56.480 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>point to five percent five dollars announced for gold. What

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>do you think is going on in the gold market?

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you guys? Uh have yourself position? V goal? Um? Yeah,

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>so so, UM, you know, I think that's part of

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the dollar story at this point. Um, there's been uh,

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>a re acceleration of kind of this dollar debasement type story,

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>given that you know, the FED is probably going to

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>buy more bonds um. And and you know, kind of

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 1>relative to what other economy, other countries are able to do.

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I do. I do think gold and

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of that dollar debatement story go hand in hand. Um.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know that that that is a popular trade

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that um uh that even if we don't get as

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>much stimulus, the FED can kind of offset that based

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:43.960
<v Speaker 1>on how it approaches them as it purchases. So, Marvin,

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:45.680
<v Speaker 1>if there was one piece of advice that you would

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>give to a client who calls you up today and said,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 1>oh my gosh, you know then I'm terrified. I'm terrified

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of what's going to happen. What would you tell them? Now?

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I say, holistically, UM, you know, realize that the central

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>banks are still a large part of this discussion, and

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, from a stimulus side of things, Washington will

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>get something done. Um. You know, it's the size that

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we're arguing with, but you know, the economy needs it,

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>and um, I think that they're going to, um uh,

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, get something that's going to provide relief to

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of people who who need it

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. Marvin Low, thank you so much. We appreciate it.

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Low, Global macro strategists at State Street appreciate his

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>perspective on a cross assets where we asked him about

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>just about everything from gold equities to credit two commodities. Uh.

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But it just seems Vanni here that this is a

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>market rallying here, it's looking for risk, it's comfortable taking risk,

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>and the status quo I think for this market, Uh,

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be pretty bullish here, right. And I

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.680
<v Speaker 1>think there was money on the sidelines, particularly for a

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>distress investments, you know, junk bonds and so on, and

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>that's probably rolling in a little bit more as we

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>head throughout the months into the winter, and you know,

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>unsurprisingly as COVID cases start to absolutely go crazy again.

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean We're over hundred thousand a day now in

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the US, and you know, you have to wonder what

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that will do to economies around the country. Obviously, we're

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>getting you know, labor market data and so on showing

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that the labor market was slowly improving, but that's going

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to turn around as well. Pole if if coronavirus keeps

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>popping its head up, well, we're still counting votes, as

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.319
<v Speaker 1>we all know, but it appears that we may be

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>headed towards a government structure where the Democrats control the

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 1>House and potentially the White House Wall. The Republicans retained

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.199
<v Speaker 1>control of the Senate, and business leaders are trying to

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>figure out what it means for their business, and one

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of the big areas is taxation. Kate Barton, Global Fast,

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 1>chair of tax at accounting firm e Y, joins us

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to give us some color here. So, Kate, given what

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.839
<v Speaker 1>we know now about how the government may be structured

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of Republicans and Democrats, what are you telling

0:13:55.120 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>your clients today about how they should be thinking about

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>their tax situation. Well, thank you, I think we're I'm

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely telling our clients to practice patients and uh, that's

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the key and we're all wondering what happened to the

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>polls here, But um, you know, patience is the key.

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think that if it does in

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>fact go um red, you know, blue red, blue, if

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you will, um, you know, it's a different perspective companies

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>before that or before you know, the last two days

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we're modeling out a blue waves to be ready for that. UM.

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that if it is in fact blue red blue,

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it will be less changed but still could be significant. Right,

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We're we're looking at every scenario. Yeah, and in fact

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's even blue red less blue, right, you know,

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 1>blue red, a little more red than than it was

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in Congress. So talk to us about Biden's tax fan

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>because he very much has one. Would he be able

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to get anything through well? I think that, um, Biden

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>has had a record of really going bipartisan and trying

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>to work both sides of the aisle, So you know,

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the his efforts on collaboration, I wouldn't underestimate he does

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>have a headline rate going up from twenty one to

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight percent. He's also contemplating a corporate minimum tax,

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which has a lot of our clients concerned. But you

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>know what happens um in terms of campaign rhetoric and

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>what actually happens. I'm sure there'll be a lot of

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>distance between those. So you know, the other aspect is,

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the indirect taxes that could come president or nominee.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Biden has basically said that he would want carbon taxes

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>or UM. You know, really take a closer look at

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that area. So it could be uh that indirect taxes

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>take on more of the front page news story. And

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I think what we've heard from Canada Biden and generally

0:15:58.840 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>from the Democratic Party is perhaps a reallocation of the

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>tax burden UM, so that perhaps wealthy people pay more,

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>corporations pay more. Is there any appetite for meaningful tax

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>reform here? If in fact we do have somewhat of

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a split government, you know, you really have to wonder

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it will be their first priority. Most leading economists

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 1>say that governments have to be super careful about doing

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that tast dance between stimulus versus revenue raising. Clearly, we

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of deficits. They're going to have to

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 1>be paid at some point, but the timing of that

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>could have a huge impact on the US economy and

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the recovery from the virus. So I think that is

0:16:41.040 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>something that you know, has to be carefully thought through.

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>For sure. I think we're gonna see governments around the world,

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>including the US, um try to tax big business and

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>ultra high network individuals. Uh. Candidate Biden basically had a

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>proposition that he wanted to tax individuals over that make

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>over four hundred thousand dollars a year. And so you know,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see if that actually goes forward in

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a blue red blue, and and what would be the

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>timing you know is going to be the first order

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of business. There was also the idea that he would

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>do something about tax headquarters that are overseas. What are

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you telling clients to do in terms of where they

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>might be headquartered? Listening, companies are all every country around

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the world is looking at where supply chains are and

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>our goods, especially health and consumer products like um asprin

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and and that type of drugs are they made close

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>enough to the consumer. So you know, both candidates, if

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you will, President Trump and and candidate Biden, both of

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>them have made in America aspect to their attack plans

0:17:47.720 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and and more more focused on things should be made

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>closer to the consumer. So what form that takes some

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we're all watching. I mean, at the end of the day,

0:17:56.760 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>our clients need to make goods and services and places

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that make sense for around. Yeah, but I'm not talking

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>about supply chain or where things are made. I mean

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>if you take Apple for example, things made in China,

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's paying its tax, you know, in

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 1>a very complicated way and goes through Ireland in various places.

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>That that's what I mean. Well, companies that are have

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a digital footprint, I mean are around the world. The

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>o e c D. Everybody is looking at that and

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to come up with a multilateral approach to tax

0:18:26.320 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>if every country does their own thing. I mean, companies

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>are looking at double triple tax station which could be

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>really a killer in this type of an environment. And

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>so um, you know that is a big issue in

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>one where you know the U. S. Treasury and its

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the o e c D is an important one, Kate.

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the tax issues that's near and dear to

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the hearts of our listeners in the tri state area

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of New York is a state and local tax. What

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>if anything is Canada. Biden said about that well, Karida

0:18:58.240 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden had a proposal all that he would allow state

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>and local taxes to be deducted, although they would be

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>phased out um if you will, as you earned more

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>money closer to that one hundred dollars I reference. But

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know he would put back in the state and

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>local deduction, so that wasn't important. So well again we're

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>watching that. Well that's critical, all right, Well, thank you

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>for that. That's some fascinating thoughts. Um, you know something

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 1>to too over Kate part and Global Vice share of

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>tax That e, why discussing what the tax landscape might

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>look like. Although there's still a lot of uncertainty out there,

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so a little bit of a delayed reaction, I think

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you could say from kind of a stocks as you

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>might expect or seeing them rally today. Of course, they

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>took a bit of hit, so to speaking, yesterday, even

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>though some valid measures legalizing the use of recreational marijuana

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>did pass yesterday. Let's bring in Ken Shane, senior analysts

0:19:58.359 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for Global Food, Beverages Tobacco at Bloomberg Intelligence, to tell

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.360
<v Speaker 1>us what gives so, Ken, why the delayed reaction? Yeah?

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi money, Um, well, I think a lot of investors

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>may be awaiting the outcome for the presidential election and

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the state of the Senate, you know, two big important

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>components to trying to UM you know, estimate the future

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>sales potential so it can So what happened, Yes, I

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>just are on election date. We had five additional states

0:20:26.960 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>including uh here in New Jersey legalized UM recreational me

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>marijuana is at the bottom line, Yeah, right, Paul, that's

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. UM. You know, the big takeaway from yesterday

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>was the overwhelming nature of the voter approval of all

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>five state US marijuana about initiatives is a big plus

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 1>for the industry on a number fronts. First, it further

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>validates this industry as a legitimate place in society. You know,

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about a nineteen billion dollar industry. Now it's no

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 1>longer some nason upcoming group. It's now you know, almost

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>at the level of bottled water sales. I mean, it's

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>out there yet. You know, yesterday's four states that are

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>proved New Jersey, Arizona, Montana, and South Dakota for recreational

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:20.480
<v Speaker 1>authorization UH for marijuana markets now allows them to push

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead with increasing number dispensaries, locations, licensing activity, can pick

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>up and make contribute over a billion dollars in sales

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>by the year three to an industry, like I said,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is um around nine or so. Yeah, and for context,

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>let's give some of the companies. We're talking about Aurora Cannabis,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about until Ray, We're talking about Afria, some

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of them up double digits today. The thing is, though

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't the cannabis industry want federal change so that

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about state by state change here. We're

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about, you know, an entire country, at which point

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>then you could really scale up operations, invite private equity

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in and so on. Yeah, that's right. Some of the

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>big movers today or the Canadian companies something that you

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned there, and they're really going to be driven mostly

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>by access to the US. Right now, they really don't

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>have access because they're you know, stock listings, don't you know,

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>from the stock exchanges. They don't allow them to compete

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>directly in this federally illegal business. So they really need

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>to have federal you know, federal approval and access to

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the US. But that's not the case for the US

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>operators like cure Leaf and True Leaf and some of

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>these so called multi state operators in the US. The

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>state legalization alone is a big win. UM. It can

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>further benefit them if it's stayed legal because it would

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I mean a federal legal because it could mean, um,

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>if they have banking services, they would have more favorable

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 1>tax treatment. They could perhaps you know, sell across state lines,

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>which they can't do today. Uh. So that's really the

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>bottom line of that. So where are we ken with

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a federal type of law here if we were to

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have your republic at democratic presidents. Do we know the

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 1>position of Mr Biden? We do qual um. You know,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>he's got a record this saying that he would like

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the first decriminalize it, um, remove you know, marijuana from

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the Schedule one from the Controlled Substances Act. That in

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>itself would allows I mentioned some tax benefits um and

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>some other benefits UM. In terms of federal legalization. I

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to take some time. It would, in

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, it would certainly require a Democratic controlled Senate.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh in addition to the president to um, you know,

0:23:33.000 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 1>act on something like that. But you know, even without that,

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>there are considerable benefits to having a Biden presidency again

0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>just by just by rescheduling a schedule. One can I

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>have a curiosity about how we get the Mari Lana

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>to these dates if you still can transport across state lines,

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>so for example, in New Jersey, will it have to

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.359
<v Speaker 1>be grown in New Jersey? And also what about the

0:23:55.640 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>banking laws? Is it still in all cash business? Um? Well,

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>in terms of growing in New Jersey is one of

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the many states. Most of the states require vertical integration

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's really to source tracing, to ensure quality control

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>things like that. They require, um, the sellers to also

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>grow it on their own. Um and that won't change,

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe in the near term. Um. So, uh

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>so that's that's the case with that in terms I'm sorry,

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>what was your second question? Banking or banking? Well, there's

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>something there's you know, the Safe Banking Act was approved

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>by the House. It's been kind of a hold given

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the elections right now, but again, as I as I

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it, if if there's a democratic control of the

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>presidency and or Senate, we think that there's a good

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:46.040
<v Speaker 1>chance that that will allow some banking activity. Right because

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, Paul, it's literally you know, people need to

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 1>have safe safety deposits, safety deposit boxes, in there. Yeah,

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be It's gonna be interesting to see this

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 1>plays out in the great state of New Jersey or

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>ken and I both live. Ken Sha, senior analysts covers

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>global food, beverage, and tobacco for Bloomberg Intelligence, giving us

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the latest Yiravanni on you know, five more states legalizing

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:13.919
<v Speaker 1>uh recreational marijuana, which is good news for the cannabis companies.

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 1>But again Kencha was saying, federal legislation is the holy grail.

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We're not joined by Josh Green, Bloomberg business Week calumnist.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>He has a fascinating story in the Bloomberg Business Week

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>basically saying Trump is um is here to stay, no

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>matter who's in the White House. Josh, thanks so much

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. It is just extraorting here. You

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>look at the absolute numbers here, record turnout for this election,

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>uh President Trump getting north of sixty eight million votes.

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of support obviously out there, even if

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.439
<v Speaker 1>he's not in the White House the next term. Josh,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>you're suggesting that Trump is um is here to stay. Yeah,

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I mean, if you look at the

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>elections also, we've seen so far um Trump has added

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.920
<v Speaker 1>millions and millions of voters, even as he's on track

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>to lose the popular vote by something like seven million votes.

0:26:08.600 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one of the defining features of the

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party in the Trump era is that it's basically

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>become a cult of Trump everything. What what binds Republican

0:26:18.800 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>voters is their strong approval of Trump um. You know,

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>that was always going to make it difficult for the

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 1>party to move on if Trump lost, because it wasn't

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:31.880
<v Speaker 1>clear what else would unite them. There isn't that kind

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of same excitement for a Tom Cotton or a Nicky Haley. Yet.

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>There may be in four years, but there isn't right now.

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>But I think the other thing that we saw on

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night, the broad outpouring and support for Republicans generally

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to help Republicans win back house seats UH and and

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>may leave them ultimately with control of the Senate, shows

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:57.439
<v Speaker 1>that Trump is UM isn't the automatic death sentence for

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Republican candidates. The Democrats going into an election night presumed

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.199
<v Speaker 1>it to be. There wasn't a blue wave, and in

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>some ways there was even a red wave. The way

0:27:06.880 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I described it in the New UH cover story in

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Business week I wrote, is that it's what we see

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>our royaling cross currents of partisanship. I think that's right.

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And given the fact that Trump doesn't seem likely to

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>leave the political stage regardless, I don't think the Trump

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>is um is going away. Whatever the outcome of the

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>election ultimately winds up being. Josh, is this essentially Steve

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Bannon's vision of the future that is coming out now

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and coming to pass? And obviously, you know, you wrote

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the book on Bannon Devil's Bargains, Deve Bannon, Donald Trump,

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and the Nationalist Uprising? Is that what Trump is um is?

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a good question, and I'm gonna I'm

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna give a tricky answer. It isn't It isn't. You know.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, Bannon always believed that it would

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>take a powerful, charismatic politician uh to impose his brand

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of populist nationalist. Trump is certainly that. But I think

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 1>there are two problems. One, Trump, once he was in office,

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>never really followed through on that his tax reform was

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 1>heavily slanted towards the wealthy and corporations. And number two,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, while nothing has been decided yet, the signs

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>seemed to point to Biden as likely to be the

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>next the next US president, and so Trump, you know,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>losing after one term certainly would not be the Bannon vision.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But I think I think maybe a better way to

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>say it is, I don't see anything on the horizon

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>that is likely to replace or displace Bannon's vision for Republicans,

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Trump winds up winning a second term. So, Josh,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what happened to the Republican Party? Where does the conservative

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>movement within the Republican Party? Uh, the George Wills and

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>of the world, where did they go? Um? Canada? Maybe?

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because they certainly don't appear to have

0:28:56.680 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a home in US politics, you know, the Lincoln project. Right.

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe they can you know, incorporate as a as

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a country or established residency somewhere. But they they're they're

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>really a drift. You know, on the one hand, they can,

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 1>they can support Biden, But on the other hand, you know,

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>their argument that that that Conservatives should repudiate the Republican

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Party up and down the ticket. Um, it really wasn't

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>heated on election night when Republicans gained so much strength,

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not just in Congress but in state houses too. It

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>just really wasn't uh, this broad scale repudiation of the

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>party that Lincoln Project types were hoping for. So, you know,

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they're they're they're partisans without a party. Right.

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>So now, you know, you say Trump is um is

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>here to stay. How's that got something to do with

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the blue collar voter for example? Or what do you

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>mean if it is Biden in the White House, you know,

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>where does Trump then go or his his you know antecedents. Well, well,

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll we'll have to see. I mean, you know, we

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't have full election results yet, but it seems

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>all but certain that there really was an outpouring of

0:30:03.120 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>additional working class, white collar blue collars sorry, white blue

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>collar support that came out for Trump. I mean you

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>can see that just in his raw vote totals. I

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>think that will be a big part of it. But

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>part of it also was that there were a segment

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of you know, upscale, suburban, white collar, college educated voters

0:30:21.960 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>who found Trump repulsive. But we're still at heart Republicans,

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're willing to split their ticket, vote Joe Biden,

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>uh and vote for their local member of Congress or

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>senator as a Republican and so uh, you know, I

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:35.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot we don't know about the

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>vote composition, but but certainly if you look below the

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>presidential race, Uh, the evening was a big disappointment for

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Democrat and showed that Republicans still have strength. I think

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>some of the strength. Also worth mentioning is that Trump

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>did extremely well with Hispanic and Latino voters, which was

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 1>something that UH strategists and people on the ground have

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>been warning about for months, if not for years. We

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>saw that come to full fruition on election night in

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>places like Florida and in the Rio Grand Valley in Texas,

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>where report or support for Republicans was much much stronger

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>than Democrats. About it would be hey, Josh, on the

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>flip side, what do the Democrats do here? They again,

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 1>as you Richard, just saying, this was not a great

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>showing for the Democrats. What do they need to do

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to broaden their appeal? Well, the first thing we need

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to do is hold off send off all these court

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>challenges and make sure that fidinancially does become the next president. Um.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's a great question. I don't think

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's an obvious answer. I mean, on the one hand, Uh,

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the voters they lost, uh in

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>congressional races, they tended to be you know, professional, somewhat conservative,

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>college educated. Um. The ones they held onto were the

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>ones around blue metro areas that Democrats won in eighteen.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So think people in the suburbs of Denver, Minneapolis, Uh,

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, northern Virginia and northern New Jersey, those kind

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of place in Atlanta, I should say those kind of

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>places held. The places that didn't were some of the

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>further reaches that they won in North South Carolina's first district. Um. Uh,

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a there was a district Oklahoma five right outside

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City, the suburbs there. They lost those, and they

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>lost all of the red tinged suburban districts that were

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.360
<v Speaker 1>targeting in places like Texas and New Mexico. So I

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>think the answer is that they've got to find a

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>message that uh it's not a radical left message that

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>appeals to those kinds of voters while also activating the

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>excitement of based Democratic voters. They still need to show

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to show up. You know, the one the one thing

0:32:40.840 --> 0:32:43.959
<v Speaker 1>if you split really hard. Um, you know, there is

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a case though for things like the fifteen dollar minimum wage,

0:32:47.160 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know that one in Florida by a large margin

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>even as Democrats lost. Maybe there's a possibility for a

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a fusion left centrist policy that Democrats could

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>run on back again in coming weeks. And everybody go

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>read his Bloomberg Business cover story right now. That's Josh

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Green of Bloomberg Business Week. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews at

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn.

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.880
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio