WEBVTT - Gary Gensler

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.840
<v Speaker 1>The current chairman of the SEC is Gary Gensler, who

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>headed the CFTC under President Obama. Gary is a former

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>partner at Goldman Sachs, a former professor at M I T,

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and a very well recognized expert on the financial markets.

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I had a chance to sit down with him recently

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some of the key issues facing the SEC,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>including how to regulate cryptocurrencies and how to deal with

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the enormous new technologies affecting our markets. Your main principle

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>though the SEC, as I understand it, is fairness and

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>disclosure and equity. Everybody is treated the same. Everything is fair,

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>everything is disclosed, and do not rate the relative merits

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of investments. That's the principle, right, yeah, I mean we

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about it as a three part mission investor protection,

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>which embodies much of what you just said, facilitating capital

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>formation companies that are raising money entrepreneurs, but also those

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of us who are homeowners and take out a mortgage.

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>We are issuers as well. We're raising money. And then

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>that which is in the middle fair, orderly and efficient

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>markets investors, capital formation, and then the markets in the middle.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So since the Great market recession, the Great Recession of

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight and two thousand nine, at which

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>time you were then the head of the CFTC, which

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>regulates commodities and futures. Since that time, the markets have

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>changed dramatically because of technology developments. Are you thinking that

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the SEC and other regulators have been able to keep

0:01:28.840 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>up with all these technological changes. It's it's a real challenge, David,

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>for across our government to stay up with the remarkable innovations.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>The last time we updated our rules for the stock markets,

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets was in a significant way, was in

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five, and sixteen years later. Those rules

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that may have been fit for purpose, then are they

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>really ready for the twenties? And nearly half of our

0:01:56.520 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>stock market does not trade in the transparent what's called

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>lit exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange or NASTAC,

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're in dark polls or their host salers. So

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I've asked staff, well, what can we do to update

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:13.840
<v Speaker 1>these markets for thees given the rapid change of technology.

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about that particular change. You have said,

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and others have said that the markets are supposed to

0:02:20.080 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be equitable and fair to everybody, but so much on

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets are now controlled. Some people say by limited

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>number of market makers who may not give everybody the

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>fairest price. That's the argument that some people make. How

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:33.400
<v Speaker 1>are you going to deal with that? And is it

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:38.519
<v Speaker 1>a big concern or is it a modest concern? Well, um,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's important I think an agency like ours to

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>constantly bring up today our rule set, So I would

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>say it is a central concern if I can use

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a different word than you did about our regular investors.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen an increase of retail UH participation, but

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>are regular investors as well? Is the big institutions having

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>efficient markets? And are they getting what's called best execution?

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>We wrote a rule years ago about that you're supposed

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to get best execution out of your broker. And is

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that happening when, as you said, a few wholesalers are

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>buying the order flow and and a lot of that's

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>getting concentrated around a few host salers. Let's talk about

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>some other technology changes since you were lasting government. One

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.959
<v Speaker 1>of them is something called us spack um uspac is

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>a new device to enable somebody to go public without

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>going through the normal I P O process. Does that

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>offend you that people are going around the I P

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>O process you have at the SEC or do you

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>say okay as long as some disclosure occurs. But I

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>think that uh we we at the SEC are committed

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to be technology neutral and innovations uh like special purpose

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>acquisition companies, which actually have been around for quite some time.

0:03:56.880 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just they took off in the last two years

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and and there's been hundreds of them, as you know,

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and well over a hundred billion dollars raised through these

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally blank check companies. UM, what we're looking at is

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>how do we guard the public not just in disclosure,

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but also there's very significant fees the sponsors generally take

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>about as a promote. They have two years to invest

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.039
<v Speaker 1>the money. Uh. They're encouraged to invest the money because

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to get that uh. And then what sort

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of conflicts does that set up? What due diligence are

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>they doing when they're buying those target companies. Having said that,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at how we can bring some greater disclosure

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>transparency and deal with some of those inherent conflicts. Now,

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>there's another issue that has arisen, which is called gamification,

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>which is to say people are making a game out

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of trying to buy stocks, and very young people are

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>caught up in it. You have very very on day traders.

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you worried about this phenomenon? So, if I could

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>take just a step back, we live in the ties

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in a new digital age where where applications on our

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>phones can use massifcial amount of data and then predict

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>our behavior. And this is true outside of finance and

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>inside of finance. Outside of finance, the streaming apps figured

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>out a while ago that I'm kind of a romcomp

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>type of guy. Okay, that's figured out now in this space,

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a robo advisor or a brokerage app, if

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>they figure out by giving you David Rubinstein a certain signal,

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a certain color, a certain prompt of behavioral prompt that

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you might trade more or you might buy a higher

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>revenue product for them, there in lies and potential conflict.

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>What do we do when the digital algorithms are maximizing

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>for the company's revenues rather than our return earns. And

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 1>so we're trying to think that through. It's not just gamification,

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit more than that. It's whether there's

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a conflict between the app and our investment returns. CEOs

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>today are more outspoken than they used to be about

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 1>public policy issues. Is that something that the SEC thinks

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is a good thing? Or should CEO is just worry

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 1>about the share price and earnings and things like that,

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>or should they comment on voting rights or climate change things?

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you think CEO should do? We hear from

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>market participants. That helps us be better at what we do.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>We hear from advocates all across the market and all

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>across the political spectrum. That helps the five of us

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in a commission to hear from the public. So, whether

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a chief executive officer or it's somebody who's buying

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the first fifty shares of stock in a company, do

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we benefit from hearing from folks? And and my my

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 1>call list are made public on a monthly basis, you'll

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>see that some CEO is getting get in touch. They

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>want to They want to say something about Maybe it's

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>about equity market structure, maybe it's about climate risk disclosure.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's about what we talked about earlier about spacks

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or crypto. And we don't have to necessarily agree. We

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>try to when we disagree, to disagree agreeably. As my

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>uncle Norman used to say, UM, but but it's helpful

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to hear from UH people in the markets. So today,

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>what would you like Most people who are not knowledgeable

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about the SEC but are watching this interview, they want

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to learn a little bit. What would you like them

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the most know about the SEC? Markets work best when

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we have rules of the road. I think that those

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 1>of us at the SEC are entrusted UH to ensure

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that the markets is the best they can are, free

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of fraud, free of manipulation, that you as investors get

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to decide what risk you take. Now, many companies that

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>are based in China are now traded I think in

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange or NASDAC, but they are

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>not subject, as it turns out, to accounting oversight in

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the same way that American companies are. Are you worried

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>about that? Is there anything you think you can do

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>about that? Was? You and I are both Baltomore boys,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so we both remember fondly Paul Sarbans, who was our

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>senator here in Maryland for well I think thirty years

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and and Paul and Republican Mike Ox that came together

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and two. President UH George W. Bush

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>worked with them when something called the Sarbanes ox The Act,

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and there was another basic bargain. That basic bargain was,

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to raise money from the public, not

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>only did you have to provide financials that were audited,

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>but your auditor had to be subject to inspection. Basic bargain.

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>So to your story is, nearly twenty years later, companies

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>from fifty plus jurisdictions have allowed their books and records

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to be looked at, inspected in essence the auditors to

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>be audited. Two jurisdictions have not, China and Hong Kong.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And so Congress last year said, all right, enough is enough,

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 1>and they set a three year clock in place, a

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>three year clock year one that if we can't work

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this out, if the auditing firms of these China related

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 1>companies don't open up their their work papers, then what

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Congress said, then we have to suspend trading. That these

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>companies should not be able to access US markets through

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>our stock exchanges in the like. So you're too modest

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to point this out, But Senator starbins principal staff person

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>drafting this Starbins Oxley was Gary Gensler. So you know

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>this all pretty well, right, Yeah, there were there were

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>other involved as well, and I learned working for a senator.

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was all there. If it went well,

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it was theirs. But if it went pear shaped, of

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>course it was maybe the staffs um but yes, I

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>do know it. It was. It was after Enron and

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>world Com failed, and so Congress stepped in and said

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 1>they had to change this and up up the game,

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>up the rigor with regard to auditing in the United States. So,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>as you pointed out, both both of us were from Baltimore,

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>though we didn't know each other growing up. I'm a

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten years plus older than you. So you

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I grew up in Baltimore. Were you in a very

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>wealthy family or was it a blue collar family? What

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of family was it? Well, neither of my parents

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>went to college. In fact, my grand folks didn't. Three

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>of them didn't even go to high school. But my

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>dad started a small business out of UH with his

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:56.719
<v Speaker 1>mustering out pay after World War Two. And while I

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>never had more than I think three dozen employees, it

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.319
<v Speaker 1>was a ven in business in the bars of Bottomore

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. It sent all of us UH kids

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to college. It helped pay down the mortgage over the years. Uh,

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>and um, we we lived a good life around this

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>small business and through the community of Pikesville that I

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>grew up in. So you were four other siblings, one

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>of whom is your twin brothers that right? Yeah, I

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>have an identical twin brother. Watch out if he goes

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on TV. So who's smarter? Are you or your twin brother?

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>How Rob is? So you went to uh, Pikesville High School,

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>a very well known high school in that area. I

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>assume you're near the top of your class. And you

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>went to University of Pennsylvania undergrad Is that right? Yeah? Yeah,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Rob went there as well. We both went to Wharton,

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>had a faithful decision. He had gotten in a little

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>earlier than I and I was. I was accepted. We

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>were both kind of math kids, and I was accepted

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to M I T and Uh, my twin brother had

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>gone to Wharton already accepted, and then on a faithful

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 1>day decided to go the same place. It's worked out

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>for me and I ended up at m I team

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>many years later. So, so you graduated after working and

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>then you went right to Goldman Sachs. Yes, I joined

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a group called the Merger and acquisition area. It was

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>about a dozen people headed by Steve Friedman and Jeff

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Blasi at the time, who you might have later known, uh.

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And then it grew. It was throughout thees grew rapidly,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and you became one of the earliest or youngest partners

0:12:24.720 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman. Is that right? I was honored to uh

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>make it into the partnership while I was in the

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>merger and acquisition area. That's right. So you're a partner

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at Goldman. You're making a great deal of money by

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>any normal human standards. Why did you leave Goldman? Sachs.

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I my time there was I spent eighteen years there.

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I did a number of things, not just this merger

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and acquisition area, but I went to the trading side.

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I went and helped run part of the back office.

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>It was really just a remarkable experience and opportunity. But

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt I felt some connection to public service, maybe

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.479
<v Speaker 1>as a as a kid that was a class treasurer

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and lost for senior class president. UM. I always had

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>this connection and I thought public service was uh something

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>if I had the opportunity, I wanted to be part of. Well.

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>One of my mentors, uh, one of my bosses at

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Goldman Sachs. Bob Rubin had been chosen by President Clinton

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>first to be as National Economic Advisor and later as

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Secretary and UH Secretary. Reuben knew I'd be a

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>soft touch for service, and when President Clinton won a

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>second term, UH, an opportunity arose. I I guess I

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>competed for it, but an opportunity arose, and I went

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>down to the Clinton Treasury as an Assistant Secretary for

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Financial Markets. And I haven't looked back. It has been

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It's been a terrific twenty four years. So after you

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>left the Clint administration when it ended, UH, did you

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>decide to go back in the investment world or what

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>did you do? Now? The first The first thing I did,

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 1>along with a colleague from the Treasury Department, is we

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book. UH. We We thought of it as

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.599
<v Speaker 1>a common sense book on investing, which really was promoting

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the use of low cost index funds for people that

0:14:19.600 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have UH just their their retirement savings and saving for

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>their futures. So that was the first thing. And then

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I started working with Plus Sarbanes on that what you

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>said became this accounting law called Sarbanes Oxley and then

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately President Obama is elected and he asked you to

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be the head of the CFTC. Is that right? Yeah?

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I had been working on UH then's UM Senator Clinton's campaign,

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand and eight campaign as a senior advisor.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So I was particularly honored that he that he reached

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>out and his you know, gave me the opportunity to

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.760
<v Speaker 1>serve once again. So when you head of the CFTC,

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, we were going through a recession,

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>so you had to pick up a lot of pieces

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 1>of failed investments and so forth. Was that a more

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>challenging position than the one you have now? Um? At

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the SEC They're they're they're both remarkable organizations. The CFTC

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is of course smaller, and the CFTC is interesting. It

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>was set up to oversee commodity futures or derivatives for

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>corn and wheat, and then in the nineties seventies it

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>was expanded to energy products and yes, interest rate products

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and and even the S and P five hundred stock future.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So so these these these derivative products, but an innovation

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>had come up called swaps and swaps which are very

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>similar to UH futures. Another form of derivative had not

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>been regulated, and in the middle of that crisis, that

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight crisis, credit to fought swaps and

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>swaps lead to some of the the instability in our markets.

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So working with Tim Guitner, working with Mary Shapiro at

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the SEC, working with all the members of Congress actually

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>across the aisle, we cobbled together reforms for this swap market. Now,

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you had a very impressive career, and it's still very impressive,

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>but at one point you had a tragedy. Your wife

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.120
<v Speaker 1>passed away and you had to raise your three daughters

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially by yourself. So how did you do all that

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>while you were doing all these other things. Well, I'm

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>not sure I did it all that well, but I

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was actually off the grid. So we lost Francesca in

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six. She had first had cancer when

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we were Uh, I guess you'd said kids. I mean,

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>she wasn't but thirty when she first had cancer and

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>we were dating. We were blessed to go on and

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>get married have three wonderful daughters. But we did lose

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Francesca to cancer in two thousand and six, and I

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>was kind of off the grid, and uh, for three

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>or four years, pretty much stay at home dad or

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>your daughters, any of them now influence to go in

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:10.959
<v Speaker 1>the financial services world. No one's a remarkable uh artist,

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a political cartoonist and artist, ones a PhD and culture anthropology,

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and one's working in immigration law. So President Biden, he

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>asked you to head up the SEC. Were you interested

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in doing that? At the time you were teaching m

0:17:23.640 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I t UM. You finally got your taste of m

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I t So why did you decide to leave m

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I t and coming and run the SEC? One when

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a president asked you to do something, It's really hard

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 1>to say no. Let me let me just say that.

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's also just an incredible privilege and an honor.

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I've been around capital markets my whole adult life, uh,

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>starting as I said, as a twenty one year old

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>at Coleman Sachs, and here some four decades later, I've

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>asked once again to serve. It's a hard thing to

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>say no to. I will say this though, being a

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>professor UH at m I is an incredible experience, the

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>vibrancy of that student body, the faculty, the stayff so.

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>But even there, I was studying the intersection of finance

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and technology. I was spending a fair amount of time

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>on that intersection and the new innovations around fintech and

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>then more precisely around artificial intelligence and also cryptocurrency sort

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of that it's started with the Setosian Nakamoto white paper

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>thirteen years ago. Well, let's talk about that. You did

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>teach an M I t about things that you don't

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>like to use this word cryptocurrency, I guess, but essentially cryptocurrencies.

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>What is the SEC doing about that? Is? Is it

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>is are cryptocurrencies are security or are they not a security?

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it a currency or is it? What is it?

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>It's clear if if you're using this new technology to

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>raise money from others and those other people that the

0:18:55.960 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>public are anticipating profits based on the efforts that that

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>brings it into this what's called an investment contract. Congress

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>back to back to nineteen thirty three and nineteen thirty four,

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Congress painted with a very broad brush, David. They painted

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>with a broad brush to protect the public from fraud

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>when people were raising money from the public, and the

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>public is in anticipating a profit based on those individuals

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>raising the money. So it look it depends on the

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>facts and circumstances. It depends obviously on each individual uh token,

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But many of these, uh, maybe even the majority of

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>them are tokens raising money from the public, where the

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>public is anticipating profits based on the efforts of the

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>others that promoters. So should we anticipate that you will

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>have regulations clarifying what the sec is going to do

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>on cryptocurrencies and related kinds of things in the near future.

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>I actually think it's it's it's pretty clear. Uh. My predecessor,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Jake Clayton uh said this more than once that he

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>thought it was pretty clear that many of these tokens

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe actually his words where he hadn't really seen many

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that weren't securities. What what we've asked the trading platforms,

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the lending platforms, the other various venues to come in

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to work with us to get registered under the securities laws.

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Because of a platform has fifty or some of them

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>five hundred tokens on their platform, probabilities are they're not

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:40.719
<v Speaker 1>all uh, non securities. How do you get ideas from

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the White House? I mean, you were appointed by the president,

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>you're the head of an independent agency, but of the

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>White House, House policies, do they call you up or

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>you basically once the president the point of view, you

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>don't see him. Again. We work very closely with the U. S.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Department at Treasury, with the other financial regulators, of course

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>they're sibling market regulator, the CFTC and the back regulators

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Federal Reserve. And I'm I'm a member of

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 1>something called the Financial Stability Oversight Councils again, something Congress

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>set up after the o A crisis. And yet we're

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>an independent agency where if we write a role and

0:21:17.400 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly if we do enforcement actions, we we don't. We

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.640
<v Speaker 1>don't check in with the White House. And that's by

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Congress's will. Congress wrote the law that way. And um,

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so there's a certain independence from that. Uh, that daily

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with President Biden. Isn't calling you saying

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 1>good job, Gary, You're really doing a good job there right, Well,

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't, I wouldn't probably uh want to

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 1>disclose any of that. But that's a that's a would

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>be a pretty unusual president sec uh Chair. I mean,

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>I know my predecessor may have played golf or something,

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's not happening here. Speaking of golf, how do

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you stay in shape? You look like you're pretty fit.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, how do you percise or stay in

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>shape when you're chamber of the SEC. Well, you're kind,

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>You're kind to say that. I've been a lifelong uh runner,

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and I learned a little bit of athleticism that decision,

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that faithful decision to go to University of Pennsylvania because

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>my twin brother was there. Because also I ended up

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 1>being at cocks In for crew, and I learned from

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>coach Ted Nash this incredible sense of he was an

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Olympic horseman and Olympic gold medalist, this incredible sense of

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 1>of of that it's important to think about our body

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. So I try. I even to this day,

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I try to still get out and run. I'm not

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>as good a runner as I once was. Um, I've

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>done a fair amount of biking in my life, and

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>mountain climbing and trekking. My eldest daughter and my youngest

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>daughter and I have all sort of trek together. My

0:22:46.680 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>middle daughter, the anthropologist doesn't like that bit, but these

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>are some of the things I try to do. So

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the pleasure of being the Chairman of the SEC is

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>what you've obviously been trained for it. Why do you

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>enjoy doing this? Because it's a twenty four hour day

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of job, you're always gonna have critics. Why do

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy this job? I assume you do enjoy it.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I do enjoy it, David. I think, Look,

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gonna find their passion. I was intrigued and interested

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in finance. I was my twin brother, and I guess

0:23:14.840 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>got you know, gift of math and numbers, and but

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I was also always like felt like that what we

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 1>can do to leave our world a better place? You know,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>when when when when we get to the end of

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.199
<v Speaker 1>our lives and look back, it's our family, it's our

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>loved ones, it's our friends, And to me, can we

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>leave the world a little bit better off? And that's

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that's what motivates me in this job. Can we can

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we do something that's better for working families or people

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>starting out in their life, saving and investing for their

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>future and tip the scales a little bit in their

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>favor away from the folks in the middle. So does

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>your twin brother ever say you did a better job

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and I did, or then he did and your career.

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Does a twin brother say you've got a little lucky

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Or does he ever say I was really smarter than you.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I just didn't want to be the chair of the SEC.

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>What does he say about this? Um? Rob's a terrific

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>friend and a terrific brother, and he says usually just

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>gare go get him. Thanks for listening to hear more

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of my interviews. You can subscribe and download my podcast

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on Spotify, Apple, or wherever you listen.