WEBVTT - Silver Supply Expected to Decline While Usage Grows, Krebs Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot Com. In

0:00:32.080 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the past three weeks, silver has plunged almost thirteen percent.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>We have somebody who can give us a sense of

0:00:39.280 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>what the technicals are underpitting, some of the moves, and

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>what we can expect looking forward. Mitchell Crebs joins US now.

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>He is president and chief executive officer of Core Mining UH.

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>He also is the president of the Silver Institute, which

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 1>is based in Chicago, Illinois. He's pumping his fist. I

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>expected you to come here like drenched in silver, you know,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just dripping from everywhere, but but you're not. You're actually

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.280
<v Speaker 1>wearing very little jewelry. Um. So there was a report

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:04.959
<v Speaker 1>that you put out today that was looking at the

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>silver industry, and there was good news and there was

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>bad news. So why don't you start with the good news. Yeah? Sure,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.039
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. The good news for sure is

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that silver supply for the first time in fourteen years,

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>actually declined last year, So that's a big deal. Not

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>by a lot, but it's now declining and it's expected

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>to continue to decline, which you know, basic supply and

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>demand fundamental suggests that that's a positive tail wind for

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>silver going forward. It's the fourth year in a row

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>now where we've been in a structural deficit where demand

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>has outstripped supply, So that's another positive i'd say. On

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the on the demand side, UH, solar panel demand hit

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>an all time high. It was up thirty four percent

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>last year. UH, and that's a market that we think

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.119
<v Speaker 1>will continue to grow. You know, silver is very much

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of a technology, green, clean, renewable energy type of metal.

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people think of silver as

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>your silverware or your jewelry, which definitely that plays a part,

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but silver is used in every everything with a light switch,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>anything with an on and off switch has silver in it.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's a very diverse UH demand base. And you

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>know this is this is an interesting point because silver

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is often thought of as a sister metal to gold,

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>precious metal to kind of buy in times when you're

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for a haven um, and yet it's got a

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>much more prevalent industrial use. Can you give us a

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of how much demand has come from stuff that

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you actually use versus jewelry and how much that has

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>increased over time. Yeah, that's changed a lot. It used

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>to be mostly a precious metals, but as electronics have

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>have grown globally, emerging middle classes in places like China

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and India have have grown in consumption GDP per capita

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>has grown industrial demand electronics demand for silver has grown

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It now makes up the majority of demand

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for silver. Can you give us a sense of where

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.359
<v Speaker 1>that was, say two decades ago or a decade ago,

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>It would have been more like a decade ago. Fifteen

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, thirty five millimeter film was actually the biggest

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.839
<v Speaker 1>source of demand for silver um. Now so that's gone

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.399
<v Speaker 1>from like thirty five percent a year down to four

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>percent as we've all gone to you know, digital and

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that's been all replaced with new uses in the electronics sector,

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>predominantly and solar. So, so give us a sense with

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the shifting landscape. There was some not so great news

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in the report that you put out today. Can you

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>lay that out for us? Yeah, overall demand was down.

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>A lot of that has to do with just slower

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>global economic growth UM which has had an impact and

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>had a negative impact on some of that electronics driven demand.

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Jewelry demand was down a bit. India was probably one

0:03:41.200 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest stories with some of the currency crackdown

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that took place there last year. That had a negative

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>effect on silver demand, uh, coming out of out of India.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But the beauty of beauty of having such a diverse

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>demand bass you know, every year you're gonna have some

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>things that are down and and some markets that are

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that are up. But overall last year it was down

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah. Yeah, Well, I mean as I

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was thinking as you said this, so global demand is

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>down partly because the economy is slowing, and yet typically

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>when things are slowing, they would people would go into

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>precious metals to sort of offset the risk of a

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>potential downturn. So it's sort of trying to square those

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.480
<v Speaker 1>two sides is a little bit hard. And that's the

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>duality of silver. You know, it is highly correlated to gold,

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 1>So everything that moves gold in terms of safe haven

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>investment risk off. You know a lot of people are

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>looking at precious metals these days, more with these higher

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:37.679
<v Speaker 1>valuations in the broader equity markets, UM, expectation of higher

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of inflation. Those types of things that drive gold definitely

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>UM have a big impact on on silver. But I

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>always think of silver as having a good it's it's

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>underpinned by all of this good, solid, diverse industrial demand.

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>But what moves silver higher is the investment demand in

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>in times when typically that's more favorable to things like gold.

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So for something that is so stable and has these

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of competing uh dynamics of affecting its price, why

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>is it down more than twelve percent in the past

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>three weeks. Well, silver is a very volatile metal. It

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 1>makes gold look like, uh, you know, looks boring. It

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:18.840
<v Speaker 1>makes gold look very boring. Silver goes up and down

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It's a small market, it's flashy. So the

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>total demand every year for silver's like a billion ounces.

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's you put today's price on that, that's a

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen billion dollar global annual market. That's chump change, uh,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>compared to gold is you know, ten times that size

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>copper for example, oil you know, much much bigger. So

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>silver gets moved around a lot without you know, a

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of capital and so silver can go up and down.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Last year, the price of silver varied between thirteen dollars

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an ounce and I think twenty one dollars announced, which

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>is huge volatility. So in the last uh last four

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks three weeks, a lot of what we've seen in

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.279
<v Speaker 1>silver's not that unusual. Um Us in the in the

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>industry have pretty strong stomachs, and that's why it's so

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>important to be you know, as a mining company like us.

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's all about costs. It's all about trying to you know,

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have a diverse, uh diverse portfolio of operations that have

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>low costs, conservative balance sheet to try and withstand that

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>inherent volatility, especially in silver. So with silver, you were

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about how supply is expected to be down. Is

0:06:25.040 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>this because companies and mining companies like your yours, Is

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>they're running out of places to go? Or is it

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>something else? Over the last five years, exploration in our

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>industry has absolutely plummeted. So peak prices were back in

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eleven when silver hit nearly fifty dollars announced,

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>so to go from fifth almost fifty dollars announced down

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>to think get hit thirteen dollars announced people slash their

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>exploration budgets, so there's no new discoveries, so there's no

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>new projects being built. And at the same time, a

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of the bigger projects are a lot of the

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>bigger minds the world. They're starting to get to the

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>end of their lives, so those are expected to be

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>mined out and and go away. So you were kind

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of caught in this perfect storm of a lot of

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the older minds going away and and not a lot

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of new minds there to offset that. Where do you

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>think is going to be the biggest new vein discovered? Oh, well,

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the new the next new deposit. I would probably put

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>my money on Mexico, just because Mexico is the world's

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>largest silver producing country. There's a lot of metal there,

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so the odds of finding more usually find more metal

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>where there already is metal found, So I'd bet on Mexico.

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Peru's the second largest silver producing country. Those would be

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>my bets. But you know the places that haven't had

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>as much exploration historically, Africa UM, even in Asia UM,

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there's probably more uh large deposits out there that just

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>have not yet u UM gotten on anybody's radar screen.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Crebs, thank you so much for joining us. Mitchell

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Crabs as president and chief executive officer of Core Mining.

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He's all so the president of the Silver Institute, uh

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and he is based in Chicago. We're gonna we want

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>to dig into some shares it also are thinking into

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the red Surprisingly, because the war is over, Verizon did

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>beat out A T and T to buy a straight

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Path in other words, by five G capabilities for three

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>point one billion dollars. To understand why everyone's just down

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>on this news, John Butler is here to make sense

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of it all. John Butler is senior Telecom Services and

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>Equipment Analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. So John, what do you what? Why?

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Why is everyone down? Including Straight Path, which is down

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>more Well, that all comes down to price. But this

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 1>was interesting in terms of how it all unfolded. I

0:08:55.640 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>think we'll start at the ten thousand foot level, which

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is this is a big win for Verizon because their

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 1>bet on the near future in terms of returning to

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>growth is all on five G. We're mostly on five G,

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I should say, and A T and T S big bet,

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>as you know, is on content. They bought Direct TV

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're buying Time Warner both carriers have their eyes

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>set on five G services, which are to put it

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in perspective, it's the next generation wireless technology, the next evolution.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>As we moved from two G to three G, we're

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>now at four G LT, which people probably recognize. The

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>next step is five G. It promises to be ten

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>times faster than where we are today. But you need

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>new spectrum bands to deploy that service. And so the

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>FCC initially licensed a number of bands, including twenty eight

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and thirty nine Gigga Hurts, and this little unknown company

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>called Straight Path had nation wide licenses for thirty nine

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Giga Hurts and twenty eight Giga Hurts and some big

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:10.880
<v Speaker 1>markets like New York. So suddenly, you know, the carriers

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:12.719
<v Speaker 1>woke up to the fact that we're going to need

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this spectrum potentially down the road, and the bidding war

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>began for Straight Path. So while we're at the twenty

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>foot level, how did straight Path get that spectrum? Well

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that's a long story, but basically the backstory behind it

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>is they really, to their credit, understood they skated to

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>where the puck was going, if you will, you know,

0:10:39.559 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they understood that there would be a need for these

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>high band spectrum frequencies, because high frequencies don't travel very

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>far and so they never had much value. But they

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>carry a lot more data than those lower bands. And

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so the carriers are now building networks a lot closer

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to you and me, the wireless networks, and they don't

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 1>need that long haul distance anymore, but they want that

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>big fat pipe. And so straight Path saw that they

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bought the licenses from the f c C. And where

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they came into violation is they squatted on them, as

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they say, they sat on those licenses and they didn't

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 1>put them to use, and the f c C came

0:11:22.880 --> 0:11:25.080
<v Speaker 1>back at them and they find them a hundred million

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:29.079
<v Speaker 1>dollars the most of what most of those proceeds, by

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>the way, can be paid from the sale of the spectrum.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:36.239
<v Speaker 1>So they're they're forced to sell the spectrum now. Um,

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>which is which is how this whole bidding war began. Well, so,

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so is there going to be a six G? I mean,

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>can you go higher frequency? At this point? Uh? Number one?

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 1>And number two? Is this sort of really bad news

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for a T and T because they are going to

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be behind in the speed wars. Well to the first question, Um,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>with five G, you can put it over any spec

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>from that's allocated for uh use some wireless communications, so

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not like you have to use the up these

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>higher frequencies. But again I go back to their these

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.440
<v Speaker 1>multi lane highways if you will. They're big fat pipes

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>then can carry a lot more data than some of

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the lower frequencies that we use today for four G,

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and so therein lies the value there for a T

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and T. They have options. Actually, you know, Dish owns

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of spectrum in the higher frequencies. They own

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>something called the AWS which is not nearly as higher

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>frequency as straight paths, but it's it's pretty good stuff

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and they could look to Dish to license that potentially.

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And also I think the FCC is going to auction

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>off some of the bands around the twenty eight and

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the thirty nine gig hurts in the future, although no

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>dates are set. And so there in lies the uncertainty

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for a T and T. But they see behind a

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>curtain that you and I don't. I'm sure they've talked

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to the f c C and they have a better

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>grasp on their options than we do. So let's get

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to the price. Because straight path is down more than

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>although to be fair, they are up dramatically on the year,

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>dramatically by four fourth, So it's not you know, this

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is nothing compared to what we've seen. Why, real quick,

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>why didn't A T and T fight this bid again?

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it goes back to what we were just

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I think they have options outside a straight path,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and everything comes at a price. And I think if

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they look down the road and saw another auction coming,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe they wanted to keep dry powder for that because

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>three point one bagan is a lot of dough. You know,

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a lot of dough. That is the

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>technical term. And you've heard it from John Butler. Uh,

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a lot of dough three point one billion

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>dollars that Verizon is paying to buy straight paths. Thank

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much. John Butler is senior Telecom Services and

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Equipment Analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, and he joins us in

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:05.359
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios here in New York.

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 1>We want to take a moment to let you know

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.559
<v Speaker 1>about something new from Bloomberg. Starting right now, you can

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>use our io s app or our new Google Chrome

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>extension to scan any news story on any website instantly.

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Revealing relevant news and market data from Bloomberg and other

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>sources related to companies and people you're reading about. So

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>no matter where you're reading the news, you can bring

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the power of Bloomberg's news and data with you. It's

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing. Download our io s app or search for

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg extension on the Chrome Store to try it out.

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Learn more at Bloomberg dot com slash lens Well. I

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>am honored to bring in Craig Bouchard, who's chairman and

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>chief executive officer of Brady Industries, which is based in Kentucky,

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>not Chicago. Apologize for miss speaking, Craig, Thank you for

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>for coming first. Before we talk about your one point

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollar investment. At first, can you just give

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of what Brady Industries is. Well. Brady

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Industries was created for the purpose of bringing jobs and

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>a great company to the Appellation, to the to the

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>northeast part of Kentucky UM and we're building what will

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>be um the highest quality, lowest cost producer of aluminium

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So, with this one point three

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar investment in uh An Aluminum rolling mill to

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>create more eco friendly and very thin aluminiums that can

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>be used for for example, for making cars. Yes, so

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you would think of Brady as making the sheet the

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:44.480
<v Speaker 1>exterior of automobiles that aluminum, as well as the plate

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>aluminum that would be in the wings of airplanes, in

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the interiors of airplanes. And then with an acquisition that

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll be announcing here in a couple of weeks, making

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>ultra high strength parts, lightweights, high high strength parts for

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the inside of cars and airplanes. So why has there

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>been a plant of this size in the US before? Well, actually,

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say there hasn't been one before. There hasn't

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>been one in at least thirty years. So, UM, the competitors,

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>which are all great companies, Arconic, Nobela, Solaris, Constallium, Kaiser,

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they all have plants, but they're older plants that have

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>had recent new additions to them, but they're they're older facilities. UM,

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say why there hasn't been one because, UM,

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that greenfield is where advanced manufacturing is going.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the it's the only way to create the low

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>cost producer. UM. And I think in the case of

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the metals companies, you know, they haven't had lots of

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>capital to spend because of you know, some tough years

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:49.040
<v Speaker 1>over the last many years, and so this is an

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:53.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to kind of change that change the whole mold. Actually, well,

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, some people would say that the reason why

0:16:55.280 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>companies have created overseas factories because the labor is cheaper,

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>UH and you have to pay people more in the US.

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're finding And how much does that

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>contribute to the issue. Well, that was a real reason.

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, ten years ago people outsourced a lot to China,

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam and other places. But the wage rates in those

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>countries have gone way up in that time period, whereas

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>wage rates in the United States have stagnated and even

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>gone down. Even very skilled labors like exist in the

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Ashland in the in the Northeast Kentucky area, so the

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>wage equation has flip flopped. Um, we're going to the

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>place that has an abundance of very skilled labor that's underutilized.

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the main reasons that we went to

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 1>eastern northeastern Kentucky. And so these laborers and just to

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>be clear that this mill UH would create up to

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a thousand construction jobs and that it would be that

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>these would be more, as you were saying, high skilled

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>jobs that would be better paid. Where where were these

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>workers employed previously? They were very skilled labors in workers

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>in coal mine. Uh. Big layoffs at companies like A

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>K Steel shut up plant down in that area recently.

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Those are highly skilled workers. Ashland Oil was a Fortune

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>five company in that area many years ago and left.

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it's been a it's been a troubled

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty years in the appellations. We're about to change it. So,

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that it's been about twenty years and

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people talk about brain drain from

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>certain areas that you know, have been in trouble for

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a while, do you think that there will be a

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>sufficient stock of of qualified employees. So, Lisa, here's a

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 1>really good answer to this one. When we announced at

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the press conference with Governor Bevan, who's, by the way,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the best governors in the United States, if

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>not the best, um we announced to a crowd of

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>three people under a tent um that um Brady was beginning.

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>We made the whole press release, and we we put

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>our website live at that moment with the press release

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>on it. In a career section, to click on on

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the website where any individual could send us their resume,

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>tell us exactly what kind of a advanced manufacturing job

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for, um, and get in a queue. Um,

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 1>it's been ten days. We've had two thousand, two hundred

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>applications already for those five and fifty jops. Well, it

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>seems like there's plenty of demand. Um. The one point

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars, how are you financing that? Yeah, so

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>or financed in the normal Wall Street way, UM, with

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>banks and investors and strategic investors. UM. Roughly one third

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of that is equity and roughly two thirds will be debt.

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That's priced pretty attractively given given our background. So we're

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>happy with how that's gone. Uh. The equity was done,

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 1>is done in two pieces. One of them has already

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>completed in way over subscribed, the other one coming up shortly.

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>So we're we're headed right down the path to breaking

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>ground in the first quarter. The eco friendly aluminum that

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about, is it typically more expensive than

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the other the other stuff out there. Well, first, aluminum

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>is the only commodity of all of the medals that

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>is one recyclable, so it's eco friendly from from the start,

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course we're not a smelter, we're a rolling mill,

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>so we're using less carbon in general than, for instance,

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the smelting industry, which is heavily heavily energy dependent. Um. Thirdly,

0:20:20.800 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>we're completely brand new, the best machines in the world,

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>coming in from the very best suppliers. Our emissions are

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>almost nothing for having three million square feet under roof

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Ohio River. So it's a really good This

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>isn't the smoke stacks of our of our prior generation.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.600
<v Speaker 1>This is five fifty people walking around with an iPad

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in their hands. Thank you so much for joining us.

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting Craig Bouchard, chairman and chief executive officer of

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Brady Industries, based in Kentucky, talking about the one point

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollar investment that his company is making in

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a new aluminum rolling mill that should create up to

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a thousand construction jobs. Really interesting about the job dynamic.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.919
<v Speaker 1>And I do wonder how many other firms are going

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to follow your your footsteps and really move into some

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of these areas where you have seen companies move out

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and people are unemployed. Well, there's some drama today over

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.359
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit and Keith noton is going to explain it

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:30.199
<v Speaker 1>to us. Keith Noon as the auto editor at large

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News located in Detroit, and Keith, we're talking

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about Ford. Ford shareholders are really angry and they had

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a call not an actual in person meeting or virtual

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>meeting I suppose, I should say, with the leadership of

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the company today and it was it was pretty heated.

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Can you first just lay out what some of the

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>issues were that these shareholders were so upset about. Well, Lisa,

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the big issue is the stock. That's what they vented

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>their spleen on today in the Search annual meeting. It's

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 1>down thirty six percent since Mark Fields became CEO in

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:10.199
<v Speaker 1>the summer of he followed, as you might recall, the

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>rock star CEO, Alan Moalley. And although he has generated,

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, really strong profits, the US auto market is

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>at its peak and starting to head down. So investors

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>are fleeing, uh, the auto stocks for the most part,

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>US auto stocks UM, though Ford has taken it on

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the chin more than others, and the shareholders are are

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:35.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty fed up. So they hit UM executive chairman Bill

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Ford and Mark Fields with a lot of tough questions

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>today in this annual meeting. You know, I just just

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.639
<v Speaker 1>point out in your story you noted that Ford's shares

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>have traded down, traded down by about thirty six percent

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>since Mark Fields took the helm as chief executive officer

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>in July of two fourteen. So what were some of

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the questions that shareholders wanted to know? Where were they focusing? Yeah, well,

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to know essentially what management was going to

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>do about what they called the pathetic performance of the

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of their stock. Bill Ford expressed frustration. He's the executive chairman.

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>He's also the great grandson as the founder Henry Ford,

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and he said, um, people ask him, does the Ford

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>family care about the stock price? And he said the

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>short answer is yes, a lot. Most of our worth

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>is tied up in the company, so you know they

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>want to see the price go up as well. Um Uh.

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>He was faced with these questions, Bill Ford, uh at

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 1>last year's annual meeting too, and he gave it, you know,

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a straight, full throated endorsement of Mark Fields. Um. This

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>time around, he certainly endorsed Mark Fields strategy, but he

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention him by name. As he was defending the

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>strategy was which was a subtle difference. That's important because

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Ford's board this week has been turning up the pressure

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>on the Fields. They scheduled extra time to meet with

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>him to ask him about his strategy for turning things around.

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>So the heat is on Mark Fields at the moment,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and let's talk about what he has done, right. I mean,

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 1>he's diverted quite a bit of money into the self

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>driving and electric technologies and saying that he's going to

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>invest in the road ahead. Um, he also has been uh,

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean overseeing the company at a time of pretty

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>good growth, as you say, But so what what what

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>could he potentially how could he change? Yeah, so he

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.239
<v Speaker 1>talks about trying to keep one foot in today and

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>one foot in tomorrow. You know, the the automotive and

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>transportation industries are going through these really you have huge

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>changes as as driverless cars approach in the next few

0:24:34.480 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>years in robot taxis. So Mark Fields is investing billions

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.880
<v Speaker 1>and those new technologies that won't pay off for many,

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 1>many years. And he really gets no investor credit for

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:47.199
<v Speaker 1>doing that, though he says if he doesn't, you know,

0:24:47.240 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>the company won't survive the changes that are coming. At

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the same time, though he's not making as much money

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on the good old fashioned you know business of selling

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>cars and trucks forwards U you know, adjusted earnings. So

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter, while GM was notching record earnings,

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>GM's making more money off SUVs than Ford. Ford's lineup

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is aging a bit. They don't have UM at the

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>moment competitive big SUVs. They're coming with a redesigned Linket

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Navigator next year. They also aren't present in some key

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.239
<v Speaker 1>segments like small pickups and UM subcompact SUVs, which they

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>are rectifying that as well, but it's going to take

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 1>some time. And meanwhile GM is stealing the march. So

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>can you just put this shareholder meeting into perspective. I

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>know you've covered others and you've been covering the auto

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>industry for a long time. I mean, have you ever

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>heard such vitriol at a meeting during a generally positive

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>time for a company? Well that's the key, Uh, during

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a positive time for the company. This company last year

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>had pretext earnings of ten point four billion dollars, which

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>was the second best in company has to So no, this,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>this kind of ire from shareholders is unusual given you

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>know how the company is actually performing. But then again,

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the stock price is pretty unusual for how the company

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>is performing as well. The stock is acting as if

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the company is going out of business, when in fact

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they're doing pretty well, given fact that the auto market,

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>after seven years of growth, is starting to slow down.

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to get your take on the departure of

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Chantelle Leonard. She was the executive director of US marketing.

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>She had been at the company for twenty five years,

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and was it yesterday? Certainly this week the company announced

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:41.199
<v Speaker 1>that she will be leaving to pursue other interests without

0:26:41.200 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>any more explanation, Um, do you have a better sense

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of why she left and what this means? Yeah, it's

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>very unusual. She was She was sort of public face

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of forward marketing in the US. She was always appearing

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>on TV or doing interviews about what the marketing plans were.

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>A week ago, she was in a video on the

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>advertising age who website talking about Ford's strategy for self

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>driving cars, and then suddenly she up and leaves. I

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's a reflection of how tough things are right

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>now for Ford in its home market. Is it loses

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>market share as a sales decline on a retail basis,

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>sales directly to consumers. Chrysler actually outsold for the last month,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:25.680
<v Speaker 1>which is highly unusual. So you know, it's a time

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of tumult um and Ford's North American operations, and they

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just lost a pretty valuable veteran who Automotive News magazine

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I had identified as a rising star just two years ago. Well,

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure we will be talking more as this unfolds

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>about what Ford does plan to do going forward in

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>order to play kate its shareholders. Keith Noton, thank you

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Keith Noton is editor at

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Large for the Auto Industry for Bloomberg News, coming to

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>us from Detroit. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can sub gribe and listen to

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo wits one. Before the podcast,

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.