WEBVTT - Apple Ditches IPhone Production

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanivk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all partnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. We are certainly seeing stocks

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>really across the board trade hired today in a significant way.

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Not participating as much though in that rally is shares

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>of Apple. They were down as much as four point

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>six percent at their lows today, still off those lows,

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>but still down about one point four And this has

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>to do with the Bloomberg exclusive, a story about Apple

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>backing off plans to increase production of its new iPhones

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>UH this year. This is according to folks in the nose.

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to it with our Bloomberg News West

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Coast correspondent Ludlow normally on the West coast, like for us,

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>he's on the East coast and is here in our

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sto here's another one. I don't think we'll let go

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>back your stack, baby, what a treat. So what's going

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on here? What do we know? And it's complicated in nuance,

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know, sources tell us that just before the

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>iPhone four teen was announced, they went to supplies and said,

0:01:19.440 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>let's boost production by around six million units. We were

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking it would be ninety million this year for the iPhone,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>which was in line with last year. They requested the

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>supplies braced for an additional six million, and according to

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>our reporting, overnight they walked that back. And the concern

0:01:34.280 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>is that that great demand for this new handset that

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they thought would be there actually didn't materialize. And we've

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>already had some evidence of that in the pre ordered numbers.

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>Two So when I look at Apple shares, they fell

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as much as four point six percent, but they've been

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>steadily pairing their losses. And this doesn't sound like a

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.480
<v Speaker 1>good story for Apple right, less demand for its highest

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>priced iPhones or for those super expensive high marking phones.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Yet it's not as bad as you might think either.

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So the Cell side in particular is sanguine because most

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of them were modeling for ninety million units anyway, So

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they look at this report and they go, well, it

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really changed anything for us. It's still ninety million.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 1>There there are some specific pieces of reporting that's so

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 1>important that there's evidence that the consumer, particularly in China,

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is going for that higher end model that the fourteen

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>pro Okay, So while there might be concerned about overall volume,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>they are selling the more expensive hand set, and so

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>if they stick to that original ninety million goal, which

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:31.799
<v Speaker 1>was modeled by the Street, then maybe those higher A

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sps can boost the top line, even if just a little,

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're selling more of them are more expensive. What

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought was interesting, and I bet you picked up

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 1>on this our Bloomberg intelligence team, Ana Grana, you know,

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:45.760
<v Speaker 1>reminding us um because this was about, oh, I guess

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the belief that there was, as you said, China demand,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>European demand weak. And he reminded us that those two

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>regions are about Apple's total sales eat. I mean that's massive, right,

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So we need to think about macro stories here, right, Yeah,

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the why do we care about this? And

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>it's the rich people buy iPhones, and even in a recession,

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they still buy iPhones. What we're looking for is the

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of bigger picture effect. We know that the smartphone

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>market is soft, particularly in China. The preorder data report

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>from Jeffreys this Monday showed wasn't great in China, but

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>good for the higher price models. We need some lens

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with We know what the FED is doing, we know

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about the outlook for recessions around the world and inflation.

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 1>What we do is we look to the company movement

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and action to try and get another kind of read

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>on the consumer. And I think a lot of what

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>this story did would say things are pretty bad and

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>key key markets still they're going to sell a lot.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I always feel like, I know when you tempered back

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the Apple numbers, but they still kind of blow me away. Yes,

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>even the expectations. If if it's a lower number, it's

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>still a lot of stuff. I like what Global Equities

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Research said. They called Apple the first casualty of recession

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and said that the collapse demand for these iPhones is

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>just a tip of the iceberg. You could see a

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of layoffs across and through the Apple supply chain.

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>In the months to come yes and take this is

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>one part of a whole. The next piece of evidence

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>we looked to his Micron earnings Thursday. Why biggest maker

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of memory chips d RAM also a huge supply to

0:04:08.760 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple If their earnings are soft, more evidence that the

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>broader market for electronics slowing down. The one thing then

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>also intrigued by two when it comes to Apple is

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that they have the ability to just call it. Their

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>suppliers say we want six million more and then a

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>couple of days or months later say you know what,

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>no scrap that we're not doing that anymore. And the

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>suppliers just have no not going to say, you're not

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>going to say that's fine. Whatever we plan to all

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.440
<v Speaker 1>those people were going to bring in, we're not bring

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>them in now. And the equity pain was felt in Asia,

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>for those suppliers in Europe, for st micro in here

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and they all scrambled. We heard

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>from sources one supply completely shifted production to just the

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>pro the higher end. Well, what if that doesn't stick

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and people end up wanting the cheaper models. Well, as

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>we reach out to Apple and look for some commentary

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 1>or some clarity on this, I mean, what is it,

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, top of mind for you, if you're sitting

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>down with the CEO of Apple, what would you want

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to be asking them right now other than to confirm

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>pla is this true? An Apple spokesperson declined to comment

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>for the story. You know, Apple is a company that's

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>had tremendous growth, and what we're talking about here is

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>flat unit growth ninety million last year this year. That's

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of iPhones. But at the top line, I

0:05:15.000 --> 0:05:18.720
<v Speaker 1>think that the consensus is for two revenue growth. That's

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>not what Apple does. You know, we've been through the

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>pandemic era cycle, we've been through the five G supercycle.

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>What's going to lift them up into that next phase

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>of growth? And there's a lot resting on people buying

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the expensive Pro hand set. And that's why there's a

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of questions about Tim Cook as well, because he's

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>not the visionary that Steve Jobs was. He's an incrementalist, right.

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>He makes the iPhones better and improves the guts, but

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe not the actual aesthetic of the phone that people

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>get excited about. So the iPhone fourteen and the Pro,

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the Pro had fancy camera features, very high speck but

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 1>what was the update. It was satellite enabled capabilities. If

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 1>you're stuck up a mountain or you're in the ocean,

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you can connect via your iPhone. Very rich people. Right,

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 1>there's the thing. Who's that helping? Like? Is that going

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>to hiking up? It doesn't matter whether I will I

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>will say, like I'm looking to upgrade my phone again,

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>but I keep looking for something that's an incremental or

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>bigger boost a change. Um, and that that better camera

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in the satellite capability doesn't do it for you. Camera

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>that does dishes is a laundry like that kind of thing. No,

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's like it's an important stock to watch. But

0:06:19.360 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I do think you guys are right. You pointed out

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it was down four point six percent. It's lows. It's

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>come off of that with the overall rally. But um,

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Redmont gun and stuff. He has all the details very early.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, to see him like a big scoop

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 1>by Bloomberg News, does seem a bit at the company

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>or something like he has lots of friends at Apple.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, alright, folks, we gotta run low. Bloomberg

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.280
<v Speaker 1>News West Coast correspondent. He is here on the East

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Coast for a bit, joining us here in our interactive

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>broker studio. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio. It's a story we covered big time yesterday

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>about what was up with using what's app that led

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.239
<v Speaker 1>to surveillance failures across Wall Street. More than two billion

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in fines already levied to a roster of firms including

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>b of A City, Goldman, Morgan Stanley, eleven Wall Street

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>banks in total prevailing to stop staff from using unauthorized

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>messaging platforms. Scarlett, this is one of our most read

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>stories on the Bloomberg today. I'm just looking at some

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the bank's named. It's hard to find a bank

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that we know that's not included in this list. Hannah

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Lovett has been following this story from the beginning and

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>she joins us. Now, Hannah, there's been more than two

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars and finds levied so far, as Carol was

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>just saying, but the banks are now taking action in

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a different way as well. They just opened the vault

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to let her in and welcome um. What kind of

0:07:37.760 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>compliance steps of regulatory measures? Regulatory solutions are these banks

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>coming up with. Yeah, So beyond the fines that came

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>out in the orders yesterday, they agreed to um hire

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>compliance consultants to make sure that they're you know, monitoring

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and preserving these messages lay, Yeah, to the extent that

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to be. And you know that the these

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.280
<v Speaker 1>firms are required by law to do this. And that

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>was already um you know, becoming an issue just because

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>of the proliferation of these messaging apps UM you know

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>what's up signal you name it UM. So that was

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>already a thing pre COVID. And then if you think about,

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, what happened in early when everyone was working

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>from home and like you know, you you went from

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 1>saying something to your colleague next to you to maybe

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>like tapping out a message. So that wasn't what started this,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 1>but that definitely made it a bigger deal. I do

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's part of our world, right, we were

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>talking before we got going. I mean, how often do

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>I like send myself to my Gmail or something something

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to do for work or just a memory.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of what's fun about We're not fun? What's

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting about the stories? We get more and more details.

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Is we're finding out about the worst offenders. So what

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>do we know about them and what level and what

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of things they were doing? And do we know

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>names totally? Um, well, we don't know names. We don't

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>know names. Why not because they did not name them

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in the orders. Okay. My suspicion is if they start

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to name people, you'd get people the high at the

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>highest level, as you get all kinds of people like

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>who would not be ensnared in this right? I mean,

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, as demonstrated by like you said,

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like virtually every major bank yesterday. And you know,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they said that the investigations on going, so there could

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be more, but like you know, it was everywhere. I

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>think that was a general conclusion, um, And they did

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing. You know, we had a story earlier

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this year about how the US was mandating this look

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this like strategic look across the board into you know,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty thirty five phones at each firm, um, and that

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was mandated to kind of get a sense of the

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of this and how much was happening. And clearly,

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they all ended up getting fined around the

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>same thing, like that's it's like, oh, you're all doing

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it drilled down though, Like there's like tell us about

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>be of A and what we found out for you

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>because because the specifics to me are kind of interesting,

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.839
<v Speaker 1>so we have an idea. Right. Also, they disclosed to

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>most and penalties as well. Right, they definitely the most

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>um they did, but they did by the CFCC, so

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>they their sec fine was the same everyone else and

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the gosh a little more CFCC. But there's so so

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>basically the way that these things were structured was that

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it was in order for each firm and there was

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>an area of like a couple of paragraphs where it

0:10:09.920 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was the specifics for each firm. So be avail I'll

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>just look at it. Um a managing director at the

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>investment bank with the US wide role sent and received

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 1>thousands of messages including the colleagues, clients and personnelity other firms,

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and then the head of an equity's trading desk texted

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with more than fifty colleagues and numerous people outside the

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>firm and like so that was what be eviated. You

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>can go down the list and truly it was like

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, this m D and this part of the

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.680
<v Speaker 1>bank did you know send this many thousand messages to

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>these people and and it really was just every Yeah,

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it was like copy and paste, you know. And you

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:46.079
<v Speaker 1>guys reporting because you say when you're talking about be

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and forgive me for singling it out, because if you

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>could pick a Scarlett said, uh Stanley, no, mora Ubs

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.120
<v Speaker 1>City credit suite, it covers No, She's right, she covers

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>all ahead of a trading desk told brokers at others

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to delete message they messages they had exchanged on personal

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>devices and to switch to signal, which, as we know,

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is encrypted according to the CFTC. So is it just

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a case of we were just kind of talking to

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>each other, we weren't trying to hide anything, or is

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>it something deeper? And that's why it's worries. I think

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the things that TVD about this whole

0:11:17.960 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>investigation is like, you know, at this stage they're not

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>calling out wrongdoing, they're like found within the messages. They're

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>calling out the wrongdoing that is that these messages were

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>happening in the first place. But you know, when the

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 1>JPM order came out in December and again yesterday when

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 1>these came out, like it clearly states that the investigation

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is ongoing, So I think that will be you know,

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>something that I will certainly be paying attention to going

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>forward is is what else might come out of this?

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>So when we say that the investigation is ongoing, do

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we think do we suspect that there will be more

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>fines levied or will it be a case of the

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 1>banks will say yeah, yeah, yeah, we get that there's

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of wrongdoing. Let us figure out what we

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>need to do and come up with our own solutions.

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a good question. You feel like what else? That

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>is a good question. I mean, I wouldn't necessarily rule

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>out any of that. I think that you know, a

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of banks were named yesterday, some weren't, So we could,

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if it's indeed ubiquitous a quad across

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the industry as it as it seems, we might be

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>able to look there um and then beyond that. Yet

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>anything in the underlying messages that they would find, uh,

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that would be a case of wrongdoing. But we haven't

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>gotten there that. I have a quick question, how can

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you communicate with clients or colleagues then if you need

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to use your device and just kind of about twenty seconds, Yeah, um,

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean email. I think they have like an app

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>installed now that does the tracking so they can use that,

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 1>or like a company issued phone. Yes, so much just

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>put in place after the financial crisis. Will people be fired?

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you think after this they were at drap Morgan

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.800
<v Speaker 1>TBD or to come kind of levet you and the

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.560
<v Speaker 1>team and the reporting has been really great on this

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and we really appreciate getting an update. Or Hannah Levit,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>she is financial reporter at Bloomberg News, joining us in

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>our interactive Broker studio. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with Carol mass Her and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Well, on a day where we are

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>focusing so much on Biogen and the very promising results

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>of that company's Alzheimer's drug, we are reminded once again

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>about those big biotech and big farmer names that continue

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to work on better treatments, are new ones to tap

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>some of our major medical ailments. So that brings us

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to a story in the upcoming a new issue of

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. That's story already online at Bloomberg dot

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>com Slash business Week, and of course on the Bloomberg Terminal.

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to it. It's about how big Pharma

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.679
<v Speaker 1>is chasing a fifty five billion dollar prize of safer

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>blood thinners. The story from Bloomberg News healthcare reporter Angelica

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Angelica Peebles. She's on the phone in San Diego. Hey, Angelica,

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you here with Scarlet Food and myself.

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about your story and what you set

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>out to do. Big Pharma is really searching for new

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>treatments for blood clots, and that's because we have some

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>really good treatments right now, namely Eloquence and z Arelto.

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>They are some of the best selling drugs in the world,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>but they also carry some pretty big risks um namely bleeding.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It can take a variety of forms, whether that's just

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>bruising a little bit more easily, or in rare cases,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>turning into brain bleeding, which can of course be lethal.

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's just a really big prize out there for

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>these companies to create something that's just as effective as

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the treatments we have now, but safer. And that's how

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>the companies landed on a different enzyme. It's called factor

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>eleven A, and basically there's this whole chain plotting system

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in your body. We won't have We don't get into

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>all the details. But right now the main drugs target

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>one enzyme and now they're going after another, and it's

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>still relatively early. We just have um more recent data

0:14:48.080 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and the companies still have to do these really big

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>trials to prove that they work. But if they do

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 1>UM it could mean a lot of companies and of

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>course for patients. So when we say big farmah, which

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>companies are doing the chasing hair, Which ones are investing

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time and money into this. There are

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies in this game, but the biggest

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>ones that we're focusing on right now are Bristol Myers,

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>squib Johnson and Johnson and those two of our partners.

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>And then there which is of course the German company

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 1>behind Asprin, and those are the ones that are going

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>into these big trials UM and are. They're both working

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on pills that you can take. There's another company called

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Antos and they are spin out from nov Artists and

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>they are using UM biologic drugs, so it would be

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>infused or injected. I mean some of these names A

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Delica are already bringing in some money for these big

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>farmer names, aren't they yeah, eloquence and are relative or

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>huge money makers, And they will lose their patent exclusivity

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 1>um within the next few years, and that means that

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>generic treatments will be able to come onto the market,

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>presumably undercutting the price, and that poses a big question

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 1>for those companies on how they'll replace that money, and

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>so they see these new drugs as a way to

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>fill that whole. Of course, um they'll have to compete

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 1>against the now the cheaper drugs that are already on

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the market. But that's why it's so important to show

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that these drugs are much safer, because if that's the case,

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>then they can treat far more patients people who right

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>now either can't or don't want to take a drug

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that might um cause them to bleed out. God's a

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>bit if they cut themselves, cut themselves shaving, or something

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, so it could expand the market for them.

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting that big farms chasing this because we know

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that in a lot of ailments UM it's often the

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>smaller biotech companies that are doing a lot of the

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>investing in some kind of new medical solution or some

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of farmers pharmacist pharmacological solution to ems. Yeah, but

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that big farmers in here shows that the

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>potential to make money here is massive. Are there smaller

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>companies that are perhaps making headway doing anything interesting in

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>this space? There are smaller companies, Anthos being one of them.

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Of course they came from a big barma company, but

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they're doing it alone now, and there are more. But

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 1>really this is a perfect um perfect disease, a perfect

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>indication if you will, for big pharma because so many

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>people um experience blood clots. In fact, blood clots are

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>responsible um for an estimated one in four deaths worldwide,

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 1>which I was shocked to hear, And so that really

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>suits itself well for a big company to go after

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>running these trials will take thousands, if not you know,

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 1>many more patients around the world, and it will take

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money to actually prove that these works.

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>That this is a perfect opportunity for big farma to play. Hey, Angelica,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>is this part of kind of where finally reaping the

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>benefits of that huge mapping of the genome and really

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>just getting to understand on a much greater, deeper, smarter

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>level genetics in terms of creating methodologies or pharma or

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>treatments that really can target different individuals who maybe didn't

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>respond so well to a previous treatment. Good question, Thank you.

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>The way that UM scientists decided to factor or focus

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>on factor eleven a, which is that enzyme, is because

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of genetic data, So that is UM. You know, this

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is one example of how genetics are marrying drug development

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and how we're using UM the information that our genetics

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 1>provide to create better drugs. And the scientists found was

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that there were certain people who maybe they've led a

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit more than your average person, say if they

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>were getting their teeth cleaned, but they didn't bleed as

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>much as people with other forms of hemophilia. And at

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the same time, they appeared to be at less risk

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of stroke than the normal population. And so that gave

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>scientists a clue that going after this particular enzyme and

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>actually blocking it could give you the benefit of, you know,

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>preventing blood without this unnecessary this added burden of potentially

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>unwanted bleeding. And so that was really how this all

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>came about, and we're just going to see more and

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>more of this going forward. So Angelica big picture, when

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.919
<v Speaker 1>we talk about treatments for Alzheimer's, for instance, it very

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>much feels like one step for two steps for one

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>step back. What's the trajectory like for a new safer

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>blood than or is it similarly staggered and frustrating? Drug

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>development is never perfect, and companies will remind you oftentimes

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that they fail more than they succeed. And what's interesting

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>about the Phase two data that Bear, as well as

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the Silmyer, squib and Johnson and Johnson presented last month,

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is that the drugs actually failed in their trial, and

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that caused a lot of concern that maybe these don't

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>work as well as these thought they do. The company said, look,

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>these studies weren't powered to show just how well the

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>drugs work. It was more about finding the right dose

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and making sure that they live up to their promise

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of being safer. Um right now, there's a lot more

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>skepticism that they might not be everything that we thought

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>they would be. So if their Phase three trials are

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.640
<v Speaker 1>not guaranteed to succeed by any means, and they could

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 1>very well fail, we'll have to see. Yeah, my brother

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>who worked in the pharmaceuticals for a long time and

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we had debate about the cost of pharmaceuticals and treatments

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>is like, keep in mind that this takes a long

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>time to develop stuff, and a lot of stuff doesn't

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pan out, so we'd always go kind of round and round.

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like a lottery. Yeah. Bloomberg News healthcare reporter Angelica

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Peoples judging us on the phone from San Diego. That

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>story in the upcoming new issue of Bloomberg Business Week

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>on newsstands tomorrow. Already online a Bloomberg dot com slash

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Business weekend, of course, on the Bloomberg terminal brom Journal. Yeah,

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no Ah

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>night please album Bobart Rivals. I want to drive. It's

0:21:04.880 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a good question. This is good ride to the clothes

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>well radio, all right, everybody, just about ten minutes left

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in today's trading session, and man, we are seeing some

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>buying here in the last few minutes of trading, as

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Dug mansioned those equity averages well above two percent, two

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>point three percent higher on the SNP NAZDAC hired by

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>almost two and a half percent. We're pretty much at

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>our best levels of the session. This is we've seen

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.880
<v Speaker 1>yields back off, so Let's get to it. Let's get

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>to the drive to the close with Doug Cioca, CEO

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and partner at Cavar Capital Partners over a billion in

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>assets under management. He joins us on the phone in Leewood, Kansas,

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>uh and joins us on the phone from there. How

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>are you, Doug. I'm doing very well. How are you doing?

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing okay, I'm doing okay. But I gotta ask

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you something really important to happened here in New York City.

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if everybody saw it, but our New

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>York City Mayor Eric Adams actually making some amends about

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>New York versus Kansas. Here's what he had to say.

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>New York has a brand and when people see it,

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it means something. You know when we go there. It's

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>not Kansas doesn't have a brand when you go there. Okay,

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you from Kansas out New York City Mayor Eric Adams

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.520
<v Speaker 1>um having some fun about branding. But come on, Doug,

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>you know you are from Kansas. One of the reasons

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>I love talking to people around the country, especially when

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it comes to markets in the economy, is we get

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a different perspective. So come on in. Yeah, we were

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>shocked to learn that we were the land of no

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 1>brand the last night. Imagine it made its way around

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>our local media circuit, and so it's actually kind of

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>kicked up a lot of sort of spontaneous contributions to

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>define the brand of Kansas. And I don't know if

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to invoke the national basketball champion Kansas Jayhawks

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>from this year, our agricultural contribution in the world, grade schools,

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>low crime, and lest us never forget the birthplace of

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>American treasure had left. So, oh my gosh, Oh that's

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a good point. You know, I got thought of that.

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>You make a good point, good, a really good point. Um.

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say I love the heartland. And like I said,

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I love talking to people, especially when it comes to

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>financial markets and trying to get a grasp of what's

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.119
<v Speaker 1>going on in terms of sentiment across the country. And

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>when we go to you, Doug, we get that. Tell us,

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 1>how does it feel in Kansas right now? Are you

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>guys have freaked out as much as we all are

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>about recession, fed moves, higher rates, what's going on overseas?

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Give us give us some perspective here. Yeah, I think

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>all of that, I mean, and it is we know

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, being in the Midwest is wonderful and we

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>love sort of the set of values in the Midwestern

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.160
<v Speaker 1>mentality and friendliness, but you know that the market is global,

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and we feel as plugged in here is I think

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I probably would if I was sitting in Chicago, New

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>York and London. So I think the way information makes

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>its way around the universe these days, and we don't

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't feel disconnected, and the psyche of certainly our

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>clients is fragile. I think just the crossed asset class

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>correlation that has defined the first nine months of this

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>year has been really pronounced. And I think that unfortunately,

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 1>when when you have to go through some um expectation resetting,

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>when you get these resets and valuations, and you just

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 1>try to frame perspective on what that can mean well

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>into the future, and we're very optimistic, and I think,

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately you have to plow through this um. It sounds

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>silly to be optimistic in the face of perspective recession

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>in a bare market, but we can't help but be

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so you have to plow through this. And I wonder

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>there's this word disorder that comes up a lot these days. Uh,

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Jenny Yellen says there's no disorder in the markets at

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 1>least stateside. Larry Summer says, yes, there was in the

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 1>UK bond market. Uh, but he sees risks of breakdowns

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>to come. How do investors prepare for that possibility of

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>breakdowns to come? Do you just sit in cash? You

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>move to cash? Do you uh sit tighten, not do anything.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Look at my four oh one kid, I kind of

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>wish I had moved to cash. I'm just gonna put

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that out there. Yeah, I think we we could have

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>used an expression for a while and just talking about

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>managing for the short term and investing for the long

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>term and keeping a certain amount of capital out of

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the path. That's insanity, I think is just prudent um

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>asset management. But I think more than anything, And and

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the feed seems to think that um, their

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>experimentation is not live. Right. This is not like a

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 1>randomized control trial or only one group of constituents is

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>impacted by their actions, right, their direct implications and many

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>indirect implications. Where right, no area of a globally intertwined

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>economy is going to be immune from some of the

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 1>things they're doing. And I heard an interview with Lizzianne

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Saunders the other day, and she made a really good

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>point about the SET trying to differentiate between financial market

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:48.639
<v Speaker 1>volatility and financial system instability. And I do think the

0:25:48.640 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>FED seems at best apesthetic to the former, but hopefully

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>you know not to the ladder, and with taking place

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>within the UK is a pretty good example of the ladder. Yeah,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>financial market uh, movement volatility is certainly what we're seeing

0:26:02.040 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. If you were to take a step back,

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is the tail? What is the

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>dog here? What's driving what here? Yeah, it's a great question,

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think what's interesting when you do take

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the step back, right is if you if you are

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of understanding accountability, which for the exercise is beneficial,

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>so you can ask your tave a pathway forward and

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.959
<v Speaker 1>then you understand the accountability. Why we have inflation. We

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>had a lot on the demand side because coming out

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic, we had a bunch of stimulus that

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>justifiably came to the economy the bestically and globally and

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>likely overstayed uh the necessary point of being retained. And

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>then you have some of the externalities, right that have

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>taken place because of supply mind disruptions in Russia, Ukraine

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and over in China, and I think what you try

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to do is then find the combination of steps with

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>extraction of liquidity, being mindful of the things that are

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>out of your control, and then use a term that

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Powell used in his press conference four times but it

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is not actually incorporated into practice, understand that the implementation

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is going to be long and variable, and that would

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:17.360
<v Speaker 1>require a set of patients to understand the direct impact

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of some of these military policy initiatives. If you had

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity, I think you take a little the volatility

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>out of the system, but you restore much more needed

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>stability to this. Hey, Doug, what's a smart metric to

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:31.959
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on for investors? Where I feel like

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the metrics is a lot of volatility in them, and

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not quite sure what we should be focusing on

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>at this point. You know what's been fascinating curls this week?

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Despite the hawkersh tone of the FED meeting, follow through

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>at that FED Lessons event on Friday, and then reinforce

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>through harsh language of Mester Cash Carrian Bullard, the terminal

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.239
<v Speaker 1>rate projection has dropped every day this week and now

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>from the four point four for March and next year

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.879
<v Speaker 1>because the market thinks this said we'll see the fruits

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>of its labor comes through in better cp I PC

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>or job reads or the realization of these global ramifications

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.120
<v Speaker 1>courtesy what took place in the UK, and that may

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>cause the said to pause, right, maybe a little bit

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of at SCP projections, right. I think that would

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be a really good thanks for them to deliberate about doing.

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting, which also I keep thinking about what Charlie

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Evans told CNBC in terms of maybe uh FED rate

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>moves potentially topping out come March. Doug Cioca, we love you,

0:28:29.720 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>We love Kansas, chief executive officer partner at of Our

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Capital Partners, joining us on the phone from Leewood, Kansas.

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>He's got about a billion dollars more than that under

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>management at his firm. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com,

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can also listen to our radio show at

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News