Speaker 1: George.
Speaker 2: I'm a homegrowl that knows a little bit about everything
Speaker 2: and everybody.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you don't lie about that, right,
Speaker 1: Lauren came in, Hey, y'all was up. It's Laura l.
Speaker 1: Rosa and this is the Latest with Laura L. Rosa.
Speaker 2: Your daily dig your daily breakdown, an easy digestible one
Speaker 2: too at that we love a good snack of all
Speaker 2: things pop culture, entertainment, news and the conversations that shake
Speaker 2: the room. Now, you guys know, I love to keep
Speaker 2: y'all up to date, but more than anything, I love.
Speaker 1: To take y'all a court. To take y'all a court.
Speaker 2: So today, while on air for Breakfast Club, I got
Speaker 2: a text that something was coming. Then there was a
Speaker 2: story that broke via TMC's website of Diddy and a
Speaker 2: filing that was filed on Diddy's behalf.
Speaker 1: Now we had kind of predicted this in the room.
Speaker 2: I know, we talked about this here on the Latest
Speaker 2: with Laura Rosa as well that since former Prosecutor Camy
Speaker 2: was like, I had already had an inkling that if
Speaker 2: I was, you know, Diddy's team, one of the things
Speaker 2: I would do is try for that bond again. You know,
Speaker 2: and try to get him home to await his sentencing,
Speaker 2: which is going to go down on October third. Now,
Speaker 2: the reason why I said then that I thought that
Speaker 2: this would be smart was because even though the final
Speaker 2: decision is up to a judge, the prosecutors are the
Speaker 2: people who've laid out all this information, and if at
Speaker 2: all there is any hiccup with the prosecution, it can
Speaker 2: potentially favor Diddy on his side. Now, I found it
Speaker 2: interesting that in this request for bail, it's a fifty
Speaker 2: million dollar bell package, which is not a crazy number
Speaker 2: or number we haven't heard before. If you guys remember
Speaker 2: months ago, back in September of twenty twenty four, did
Speaker 2: he had actually offered a fifty million dollar bell package,
Speaker 2: and his plan was to put up his mom's home,
Speaker 2: a couple of the Miami properties other collateral. He said,
Speaker 2: you know, he would stay away from any woman, and
Speaker 2: there'd be like a signing sheet of who goes in
Speaker 2: his home, and you know, he wouldn't.
Speaker 1: Fly and all these things.
Speaker 2: So they basically just took that same ball package offer
Speaker 2: because of course, you want to have a good number.
Speaker 1: You want to put up as much as you can.
Speaker 2: Because the point is to make the court believe that
Speaker 2: you have so much on the line, you're not going
Speaker 2: to mess up at all while on that baill, nor
Speaker 2: will you try and flee before a court can sentence
Speaker 2: you to face whatever consequences it is for your crime.
Speaker 1: So that's not new. They altered it a little bit,
Speaker 1: but that is not new.
Speaker 2: So the new bill package that they're proposing is a
Speaker 2: fifty million dollar bond secured by mister Colmbs's home in Miami.
Speaker 1: So now it's only the one home.
Speaker 2: The bond will be co signed by three financially responsible people.
Speaker 2: Colmes will residing his home in Miami. Colmbs' travel will
Speaker 2: be limited to the Southern District of Florida the Southern
Speaker 2: District of New York for attorney meetings, as well as
Speaker 2: airports necessary to travel between the two. Now this is
Speaker 2: a little different because originally, and it's been updated probably
Speaker 2: like I would say, two times since the original one
Speaker 2: that I keep referencing.
Speaker 1: But originally they were mentioning Jersey.
Speaker 2: Being one of the places that Diddy could travel to
Speaker 2: as well and again and there were multiple different assets listen,
Speaker 2: including his mother's home. I do think it's interesting that
Speaker 2: they're offering up the bond for the home, like the
Speaker 2: home is the asset, right, But then at the same
Speaker 2: time they're saying he'll be residing in this home, It's like, Okay,
Speaker 2: we want to put together this is very favorable bond package, right.
Speaker 2: We want to put together it's very favorable bell package. Right.
Speaker 2: We want to put up so much that you believe
Speaker 2: that we know we got too much on the line
Speaker 2: to lose.
Speaker 1: The way that we can do that. We're offering you money,
Speaker 1: we're offering you assets.
Speaker 2: But basically I'm telling you, I'm going this is the
Speaker 2: place where I'm laying my head that I'm giving it
Speaker 2: to you right in your hands. This is important to me.
Speaker 2: I thought that that was, you know, something worth calling
Speaker 2: out as well. They also mentioned that Diddy will be
Speaker 2: placed under express supervision of the US Pre Trial Services
Speaker 2: Agency and that he'll be reporting to the agency as
Speaker 2: directed by the agency.
Speaker 1: Before that mentioned.
Speaker 2: Something like almost kind of like a house arrest type
Speaker 2: of thing where like there was like check in and
Speaker 2: you know, like he would be on lockdown essentially, And
Speaker 2: that's what they're proposing here, is like it'll be very
Speaker 2: heavily supervised, it'll be expedited the minute that he can
Speaker 2: get out of here and we can get them set
Speaker 2: up with that, that is what we're gonna do. And
Speaker 2: then lastly they say that Diddy's passport will be surrendered
Speaker 2: to pre trial services and he won't be allowed to
Speaker 2: apply for another passport in court on the final day
Speaker 2: of court when he was not granted bail right then
Speaker 2: and there, his attorney's made it clear then too, like
Speaker 2: we literally have his passport right now in our physical possession.
Speaker 2: They're just trying to show that he is going to
Speaker 2: abide by the rules this time.
Speaker 1: Now. Backing this up, The reason why.
Speaker 2: Again I mentioned I believe that they're filing for this
Speaker 2: is because there have been some hiccups when it comes
Speaker 2: to the prosecution. We still to this day do not
Speaker 2: know why US Attorney Komi, who was the lead attorney
Speaker 2: for the government on this case against Ditty, she was
Speaker 2: let go. But there has been a conversation of overreach.
Speaker 2: Was this a government overreach the way that they tried
Speaker 2: to frame or angle this case when it came to Diddy. Now,
Speaker 2: I don't know enough, nor does anyone know enough to
Speaker 2: point to that when we look at why did his
Speaker 2: team would think that now would be any different than
Speaker 2: before when a judge said no to bail, because if
Speaker 2: you think about it, everything the judge mentioned as far
Speaker 2: as why they didn't believe that he should be let
Speaker 2: go until sentencing, it's still the same. The judge mentioned
Speaker 2: the video from Cassie and the violence that that showed.
Speaker 2: That video is still there, that video still in the
Speaker 2: judge's mind. The judge talked about did he not having
Speaker 2: regard for the law essentially and just kind of doing
Speaker 2: whatever he wanted to do. That thought based on what
Speaker 2: we heard in the courtroom over these last couple of weeks,
Speaker 2: it's still there. Regardless of what he was found guilty
Speaker 2: of or not. It's still there now. I think DIDNY
Speaker 2: team is doing the right thing. I mean, it's their
Speaker 2: job too, but they're doing the right thing by leaning
Speaker 2: into laws. So throughout this docum, and I want to
Speaker 2: read some episodes from the document, they point out some
Speaker 2: things that, you know, I think they're able to now
Speaker 2: more clearly cite back up information for than within the
Speaker 2: time that.
Speaker 1: They were given to do it.
Speaker 2: Right after they proposed the idea of didn't get in bail,
Speaker 2: it was literally like we had hours that we waited
Speaker 2: versus Now it's been weeks and days for them to
Speaker 2: be able to, you know, provide more case law and
Speaker 2: things to back up their argument. So what they're saying
Speaker 2: is is that first of all, the district Court must
Speaker 2: find by clear and convincing evidence. This is in the
Speaker 2: first opening pages of their submission for a bill request.
Speaker 2: They say, the district Court must find by clear and
Speaker 2: convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee
Speaker 2: or pose a danger to the safety of any other
Speaker 2: person or the community if released. Second, it must be
Speaker 2: clearly shown that there are exceptional reasons why such person's
Speaker 2: detention would not be appropriate. Now they're like, look, this
Speaker 2: is everything we need to show you, and we have
Speaker 2: no problem with doing that. So the first thing that
Speaker 2: they bring up is and you know, this is a
Speaker 2: conversation that they've been having in the world, honestly, has
Speaker 2: been having since did he was convicted of the two
Speaker 2: Man Act counts right that deal with prostitution. So they
Speaker 2: look the history of the Man Act and the way
Speaker 2: that this has always been used. No one has ever
Speaker 2: been jailed presentencing in the document, they say in the
Speaker 2: lifestyle that he and other adults voluntarily chose, mister Combs
Speaker 2: will be called a swinger, but in the vocabulary of
Speaker 2: the man act or of prostitution, generally, he might at
Speaker 2: worst be somewhat recognized as a john, someone who pays
Speaker 2: to have sex with a sex worker, in this case,
Speaker 2: a male sex worker, more particularly a male sex worker
Speaker 2: who works for and is vetted by a well known
Speaker 2: company or agency, which is the agency it was like
Speaker 2: the Cowboys or the Cowgirls agency that they reference a
Speaker 2: lot in Diddy's trial, So they're they're already framing him
Speaker 2: as a john. This is the're framing him as a john.
Speaker 2: And basically they're saying, look, there's no other person in
Speaker 2: these cases, from what we can find, who was considered
Speaker 2: a john the same way he would be considered that
Speaker 2: hasn't been able to go home while they're await sentencing.
Speaker 2: They also then point out that from what they can
Speaker 2: find in the history of this act, there is no
Speaker 2: evidence of someone having to sit in jail while waiting
Speaker 2: to be sitting They're basically like, look, y'all have never
Speaker 2: done this before in this case, and what he's actually
Speaker 2: found guilty of is not exceptional to the point where
Speaker 2: y'all need to do it now, so please help us understand.
Speaker 1: They're leaning on the law heavy.
Speaker 2: The judge and the prosecutors leaned on Diddy's actions. Diddy's
Speaker 2: team is like, we acknowledged those actions, which I think, honestly,
Speaker 2: you're not going to get around them. I don't think
Speaker 2: that Diddy will be granted a bell this time. I
Speaker 2: really don't. But the judge and the prosecutors from the
Speaker 2: beginning said, we're not going to act like this didn't happen.
Speaker 2: And on top of us acting like not acting like
Speaker 2: it didn't happen because we saw on video our testimony
Speaker 2: of it. You guys stood here in court for the
Speaker 2: first week of court and admitted to all of these things.
Speaker 2: There is not enough in front of me as the judge, right,
Speaker 2: I'm speaking hypothetically as a judge where I feel like
Speaker 2: all of those things that you admitted to and that
Speaker 2: I heard of and that we witnessed are counteracted, where
Speaker 2: he's rehabilitated enough right where I can believe that these
Speaker 2: things won't happen. And again we talked about here on
Speaker 2: the Latest with Laura La Rosa. The last time we
Speaker 2: talked about Diddy and him, you know, being in a
Speaker 2: rehabilitation program. We talked about the optics of that and
Speaker 2: the reason why if I'm Diddy, regardless if I really
Speaker 2: want to be really rehabilitated or not, why I would
Speaker 2: do that now. I don't know if at some point
Speaker 2: his team tries to bring that into the conversation here,
Speaker 2: because if we're being honest, it's a bit too early
Speaker 2: to claim, Hey, he's doing better now. He's only been
Speaker 2: in a program, but some weeks if that.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 2: Diddy seem also call out the fact that, you know,
Speaker 2: the man act as a hundre and fifteen years old,
Speaker 2: it's outdated. People think of sex differently, so being a
Speaker 2: swinger living in lifestyle that you know, Diddy and his girlfriends,
Speaker 2: including Cassie Ventora were living. It's not a crime. It's
Speaker 2: just a way of life for some people. But he's
Speaker 2: being treated like it was a crime. We've talked a
Speaker 2: lot about that here, you guys know what I'm referencing.
Speaker 2: But something new that they mentioned. They talked about how
Speaker 2: MDC Brooklyn, which is the location where Diddy is, the
Speaker 2: conditions of the jail and why that based on other
Speaker 2: case law that they cite as a look, y'all did
Speaker 2: that over here should be a sufficient reason for him
Speaker 2: to be released. So they say, number one, the jail
Speaker 2: has continued reports of inordinate periods of lockdown. They say,
Speaker 2: number two, there are claims that the facility provides inadequate
Speaker 2: or substantially delayed necessary medical care, a particular risk in
Speaker 2: this case because Diddy has had, you know, his own
Speaker 2: health things. There was, you know, the reports of him
Speaker 2: going to the hospital and having to be taken out
Speaker 2: of the hospital late in the middle of the night
Speaker 2: because of a health scare of some sort. Number Three,
Speaker 2: they cite general issues about the conditions at the facility.
Speaker 2: These conditions have not abated in mister Colmbs's detention at
Speaker 2: the facility, as the court is aware. During mister combs
Speaker 2: incarceration at the NBC, the facility was subject to an
Speaker 2: interagency SUITEP that was designed to achieve our shared goal
Speaker 2: of maintaining a safe environment for both our employees and
Speaker 2: the incarcerated individual's house at in DC Brooklyn, And that
Speaker 2: was a statement from the jail.
Speaker 1: In other words, Diddy's.
Speaker 2: Offense team says, there's a significant issue at MDC Brooklyn
Speaker 2: that obviously relates to the safety of employees and incarcerated
Speaker 2: individuals that require outside law enforcement to come in and
Speaker 2: take action because MDC as a jail didn't have significant
Speaker 2: law enforcement.
Speaker 1: The presence of law enforcement.
Speaker 2: They mentioned that throughout the walls of the facility he's
Speaker 2: in for twenty four hours of the day. At some
Speaker 2: points there's insufficient safety precaution has been taken place, and
Speaker 2: they point back to but very subtly because I think
Speaker 2: they don't want to lean into heavy year because it
Speaker 2: can kind of look crazy on them because it's like,
Speaker 2: he's a celebrity, but so what he committed a crime?
Speaker 2: But they subtly hints at They say, because Sean Colmes
Speaker 2: is in an exceptional situation as a post verdict pre
Speaker 2: sentence inmate at MDC. Now, there is nothing about someone
Speaker 2: who has found guilty of a crime going to jail
Speaker 2: that is exceptional. I can understand their argument of no
Speaker 2: one else has been jailed for this, and that's a conversation.
Speaker 2: But if you say that, you know, just his post
Speaker 2: verdict and pre sentenced confinement is exceptional. And then you
Speaker 2: point out things like they're not being adequate safety or
Speaker 2: enough resources, or you know, they don't respond to medical
Speaker 2: things all in the right time. I'm not saying that
Speaker 2: this is right, but these are things that we hear
Speaker 2: people complain about and that we see people fighting against
Speaker 2: for their loved ones every single day when it comes
Speaker 2: to these prisons in these jails. So when I read
Speaker 2: this line, I'm like, it would be much better if
Speaker 2: you guys just said what y'all are saying, because for
Speaker 2: everything you allege that the jail is lacking or inadequate of,
Speaker 2: they're gonna come back with an answer of how they
Speaker 2: fix it or how it's not lacking or inadequate because
Speaker 2: they don't want a lawsuits and you.
Speaker 1: Can't just I mean you really.
Speaker 2: If I'm Diddy's team, I wouldn't even lean into the celebrity.
Speaker 1: Of it all.
Speaker 2: And it's more of like and not even like he's
Speaker 2: a celebrity. Oh my god, he shouldn't be living like this.
Speaker 2: It's more of the celebrity of the case. If every
Speaker 2: day inmates are not being kept saved and every day
Speaker 2: employees are not being kept safe, with the celebrity of
Speaker 2: the case, this should be an exceptional reason why we
Speaker 2: should be able to move for him to come home
Speaker 2: and wait until a sentencing. But I think you there's
Speaker 2: a really slippery slope there. Wow, you can't even say
Speaker 2: slippery slope when you talk about this, and then the
Speaker 2: baby will there's a really slippery slope there though, when
Speaker 2: you have a conversation about this, because I get what
Speaker 2: they're saying.
Speaker 1: But at the same time.
Speaker 2: A judge has already had weeks of testimony presented in
Speaker 2: front of him in evidence that he said to watch
Speaker 2: in a jury who's decided on certain things where it's
Speaker 2: kind of like, you know, the narrative has been because
Speaker 2: of this man's money, power and celebrity, he's been able
Speaker 2: to do these things and go about his everyday life
Speaker 2: as if things are fine. And that's kind of what
Speaker 2: the judge you know, talk briefly about when making his
Speaker 2: decision for Bill the last time. It's like, these are
Speaker 2: things that you blatantly ignored the rules of the court on.
Speaker 2: So if you'll do that for whatever circumstance or whatever reason,
Speaker 2: because of who you are, because of the power, because
Speaker 2: of whatever, we can't trust it. And you've shown us
Speaker 2: that you have no regard for authority because of these things.
Speaker 1: So we'll see what happens y'all at this point.
Speaker 2: Now, what normally happens is you know, the prosecution will have,
Speaker 2: you know, some time to respond, so that should probably
Speaker 2: be coming out within the next day. I give it
Speaker 2: twenty four hours before they respond, because it's going to
Speaker 2: be textbook response.
Speaker 1: It's going to be the Cassie video.
Speaker 2: It's going to be allegedly the hotel room being set
Speaker 2: up for a freak golf while Diddy was waiting to
Speaker 2: be brought in by police here in New York on
Speaker 2: these charges. It's going to be the fact that in
Speaker 2: that hotel room they found drugs.
Speaker 1: It's going to.
Speaker 2: Be all the things, all the things like they're going
Speaker 2: to be. They haven't went anywhere since the last time.
Speaker 2: So I predict that Diddy will not receive the bell.
Speaker 2: I said the day that the last bell hearing happened
Speaker 2: at court when he was found not guilty on the
Speaker 2: most serious charges like the conspiracy and all those things,
Speaker 2: that I wouldn't have been surprised if he got a bell.
Speaker 2: I'm honestly not against that happening. I think that at
Speaker 2: this point it would make sense for him to receive one.
Speaker 2: But in me hearing the way that Judge responded to
Speaker 2: Diddy in his team before and the facts of the
Speaker 2: case are still the same because Diddy's team can't. They
Speaker 2: don't even reference the firing of the prosecutor, Like they
Speaker 2: don't even get into those things for real, for real.
Speaker 2: So it's like, what's new here? And to me, that's
Speaker 2: the only thing that's new. But it's like there's a
Speaker 2: tiptoe around it. And I don't know if the tiptoe
Speaker 2: is because you know, that's just internal information of like
Speaker 2: why maybe they don't know why the firing even happened,
Speaker 2: or you know, third, maybe the firing has nothing to
Speaker 2: do with something that they could even use to prove
Speaker 2: that Diddy should be given another shot at bail, whatever
Speaker 2: the case may be. Outside of that firing, nothing else
Speaker 2: is new. So I see the judge leaning in the
Speaker 2: same way. Not the judge doesn't. It's gonna really make
Speaker 2: me want to know what Coomi was fired for, because
Speaker 2: to me, that's the only thing new here that has
Speaker 2: happened since the last time they put this re quest.
Speaker 1: But let me know your thoughts. Take it to the
Speaker 1: streets and outside we.
Speaker 2: Outside, the outside, hit me on I g on X,
Speaker 2: I'm Lauren l Rosa everywhere l O R E N
Speaker 2: l O R O s A.
Speaker 1: I want to hear from y'all.
Speaker 2: At the end of the day, there is always a
Speaker 2: lot to talk about you guys, my Lowriders. I appreciate
Speaker 2: y'all every single time you join me to talk about it.
Speaker 2: I will catch you guys in my next episode.
Speaker 1: Y'all know. Look, we stay in court, don't we. Y'all
Speaker 1: can wait