Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. If you're like me
Speaker 1: and suffer from insomnia, you know what, that's not fun.
Speaker 1: You know I tried everything I couldn't get a good
Speaker 1: night's sleep. And this is neither drug nor alcohol induced.
Speaker 1: That's right. It is my pillow. Mike Lindell invented it
Speaker 1: and he fitted me for my first my pillow, and
Speaker 1: it's changed my life. I fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer,
Speaker 1: and the good news you can too, Lea. Go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com promo code Sean and take advantage
Speaker 1: of one of Mike Glendell's best offers, his special four pack.
Speaker 1: You get fifty percent off to my Pillow Premium Pillows
Speaker 1: to go Anywhere Pillows. My Pillows made in the USA,
Speaker 1: has a sixty day unconditional money back guaranteed no risk
Speaker 1: to you, and attend you warranty. You don't want to
Speaker 1: spend more sleepless nights on a pillow tossing interney that's
Speaker 1: not working for you. Just go to my pillow dot
Speaker 1: com right now, use the promo code Sean and you
Speaker 1: get Mike Glendell's special four pack. You get to my
Speaker 1: Pillow Premium Pillows to go Anywhere pillows fifty percent off,
Speaker 1: and you'll start getting the kind of peaceful and RESTful
Speaker 1: and comfortable and deep, peeling and recrupitative sleep. He'd been
Speaker 1: craving and deserved my pillow dot com promo coach Sawn. Alright,
Speaker 1: seventy four days, I've been telling you, and we've been right.
Speaker 1: We've been ahead of the curve where there's no hyperbole,
Speaker 1: no exaggeration, the single most important mid term in our lifetime,
Speaker 1: and it's all coming to fruition. They couldn't stand Trump.
Speaker 1: They mocked, they ridiculed him the minute he and Milania
Speaker 1: came down the escalator in at Trump Tower. They laughed
Speaker 1: at the idea that he was running. They laughed at
Speaker 1: the idea he'd win the nomination. They couldn't They couldn't
Speaker 1: fathom any scenario. Even on even November, they couldn't fathom
Speaker 1: that Hillary would lose. The eggs of Poles showed that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump lost everything. He lost Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina,
Speaker 1: he lost Michigan, he lost Wisconsin, he lost he lost
Speaker 1: it all. It was a wipe out the media. Well,
Speaker 1: we have an uncold authority that the plan that the
Speaker 1: exampos was showing that. Well, it looks very good for
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton today, not even close. He did the impossible.
Speaker 1: He won North Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. And
Speaker 1: guess what we're benefiting as a country. But that doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: It's always been and we had no idea these deep
Speaker 1: state operatives were involved in all the shenanigans they were
Speaker 1: involved in. And now it's become what I've told you
Speaker 1: Now it's become what I've been saying for months. This
Speaker 1: election is about five major things. They want to impeache Trump,
Speaker 1: but they're not telling you what they want to do that.
Speaker 1: It's about Obamacare, how did that work out for you?
Speaker 1: EEP and your doctor your plan and paying less? Good
Speaker 1: luck with that. It's about they want the crumbs back.
Speaker 1: Pelosi said it, Elizabeth Warren has said it that their crumbs,
Speaker 1: nothing but crumbs. If their crumbs, why can't we keep
Speaker 1: the crumbs? You know what, sometimes, if you're hungry, crumbs
Speaker 1: might not be so bad. I mean, there's a reason
Speaker 1: that if you have dogs and love dogs like I do,
Speaker 1: that if the crumbs fall from the table. The dogs
Speaker 1: are loving it. And if that's all you got, crumbs,
Speaker 1: you're gonna take the crumbs. That's the way it's gonna roll.
Speaker 1: And of course we know they want to eliminate Ice,
Speaker 1: they want to open borders. They think there's a lot
Speaker 1: of voters that will come into the country that will
Speaker 1: be Democrats. That's their hope there. And then, last, but
Speaker 1: not least, all their friends that are involved in all
Speaker 1: of this corruption that we have been literally out on
Speaker 1: a limb exposing. They want all their friends protected. Remember
Speaker 1: if Hillary one, you wouldn't know the name struck Page,
Speaker 1: Comy McCabe, Yates, you wouldn't know any of this. None
Speaker 1: of this would be known. And the fact, you know,
Speaker 1: just go through everything that we know, because it's breathtaking,
Speaker 1: it's staggering. You can't even really even believe that it's America,
Speaker 1: that all of this is happening in the United States
Speaker 1: of America. But here it is. Every day we talk
Speaker 1: about it, every day, we tell you about it. Every day.
Speaker 1: There's no information about it. Every day the media ignores it.
Speaker 1: And all they do is they go on whatever the
Speaker 1: whatever the talking point of the day is stormy, stormy, stormy, Russia, Russia, Russia.
Speaker 1: But they are very very specific things that they want
Speaker 1: to do if they are elected, and they one of
Speaker 1: them is to get rid of the deep state. And
Speaker 1: I sent this question, you know, with all the talk.
Speaker 1: All right, we got Manafort. We got him on not
Speaker 1: paying us to five tax fraud charges. It didn't file
Speaker 1: his taxes the right way from two or whatever onwards,
Speaker 1: two thousand and nine onwards. And then of course he
Speaker 1: lied on loan applications. Then we get Michael Cone this week,
Speaker 1: we got taxi medallions and the same issue with taxes
Speaker 1: and the same issue with loan applications. There are lessons
Speaker 1: we can take away from all of this. Don't lie
Speaker 1: to the FBI. Or even if you don't lie to
Speaker 1: the FBI, like General Flynn, and they illegally survey you,
Speaker 1: they're gonna basically make you sign a plea agreement because
Speaker 1: you run out of money and you have to sell
Speaker 1: your house. Maybe that's the way the special counsel. You know,
Speaker 1: thanks people for their service. Thirty years of plus of
Speaker 1: serving the United States of America. You don't get the
Speaker 1: benefit of the doubt. Even though the FBI interviewers and
Speaker 1: James Comey and Peter Struck all thought that General Flynn
Speaker 1: was telling the truth. But we'll make him sign that
Speaker 1: paper otherwise, well, we're gonna have to go after your family,
Speaker 1: and like what father is not gonna dive on the
Speaker 1: sword and say I'll take the hit for my kids
Speaker 1: and my wife and every everybody else. So then you're squeezed.
Speaker 1: Oh excuse me. They put the screws to you and
Speaker 1: the hopes you sing or compose like like Judge Ellis said,
Speaker 1: So then you can prosecute or impeach Trump, which has
Speaker 1: always been their goal. But back to the point. So
Speaker 1: we've got everything out of the way about lying to
Speaker 1: the FBI. Everything out of the way. But you gotta
Speaker 1: pay your taxes. I advise you all to pay your taxes.
Speaker 1: And if you're applying for a loan, don't make up
Speaker 1: bs on the loan application. That's all a bad idea.
Speaker 1: And that's what we learned this week. Did we learn
Speaker 1: anything about Russia Nope? Anything about collusion in two sixteen nope.
Speaker 1: Did we learn anything about campaign irregularities are Donald Trump? Nope? Well,
Speaker 1: Michael Cohen did say that he did it at the
Speaker 1: at the direction of Donald Trump, but he's had said
Speaker 1: just the opposite, which I'm sure was part of the
Speaker 1: plea deal. He got a better deal. But as that
Speaker 1: was in the plea deal, those words probably saved him
Speaker 1: five years in jail. And at that point, who complained,
Speaker 1: Michael Cone, We're gonna get to Lannie Davis's stuff and
Speaker 1: in just a second here, but these are the five
Speaker 1: things that are going to impact this election. That they
Speaker 1: want to impeach the president. They want their crumbs back,
Speaker 1: they want to keep Obamacare, they want open borders, and
Speaker 1: they don't want to be exposed because we know that
Speaker 1: there were people in the highest levels of the FBI
Speaker 1: and d o J that rigged an investigation into Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton and other words, that they literally were writing an
Speaker 1: exoneration in May of sixteen, written by Struck and comey
Speaker 1: Um before they ever interviewed Hillary or seventeen other key witnesses.
Speaker 1: They didn't interview her until July, and come exonerated her
Speaker 1: on on the on the fifth of July, three days
Speaker 1: after li second of July five. You know, and I'm
Speaker 1: asking the Department of Justice this week, you know, with
Speaker 1: all this back and forth with the Attorney General, and
Speaker 1: the President. Does the Attorney General think that Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: violated the law. It's either legal or illegal to have
Speaker 1: a private server with top secret classified information on it,
Speaker 1: or it's not. It's either a crime and a violation
Speaker 1: of the law and a felony. Is the Espionage Act
Speaker 1: says to destroy such information. I don't recommend that if
Speaker 1: any of you are ever subpoenaed by Congress, by a
Speaker 1: quarter or by anybody, that you delete your emails and
Speaker 1: that you wipe your hard drives clean, and that you
Speaker 1: bust up your devices where maybe those emails landed with
Speaker 1: a hammer. I don't advise it. I don't think it's
Speaker 1: gonna end well for you. And that's what I'm asking
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. That's what the President is saying. Well,
Speaker 1: I agree with Jeff Sessions. We don't want to politicize
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice. But these are fair questions. Are
Speaker 1: these crimes are not? You know, is the Attorney General
Speaker 1: concerned about the exoneration before investigation? You know, then we
Speaker 1: can move on to the FISA issue. You know, does
Speaker 1: the Attorney General believe FISA court judges were lied to?
Speaker 1: Now that we know the bulk of information, Grassley Graham
Speaker 1: new Nest memos told us that the bulk of information
Speaker 1: presented to the FISA courts was the steal dossier that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton bought and paid for by funneling money through
Speaker 1: a law firm so it doesn't show up as a
Speaker 1: op research expense, then funnel to Fusion GPS, then the
Speaker 1: hiring of a foreign national. I thought that was bad.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't have foreign nationals influencing our elections. That then
Speaker 1: results in a dossier full of Russian lies that even
Speaker 1: the author of the dossier doesn't stand by when he
Speaker 1: was pressed under the threat of perjury and Great Britain
Speaker 1: in an interrogatory. Oh, I don't know if it's true.
Speaker 1: It's just ray intel maybe fifty fifty you guess, you know.
Speaker 1: Flip a coin. How did that become the basis of
Speaker 1: a Fizer warrant to spy on an American not just
Speaker 1: any American in the middle of a presidential campaign of
Speaker 1: Trump campaign associate American? And is the is the a
Speaker 1: g concerned that these applications to spy on this quote
Speaker 1: American that they never revealed even though they knew that
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton in the d n C paid for those
Speaker 1: lies through the funneled money to the op research firm,
Speaker 1: to the former spy, and the foreign influence in the
Speaker 1: campaign is. As the Attorney General concerned, Nobody involved in
Speaker 1: these fis A warrants ever even bothered to independently verify
Speaker 1: corroborate the salacious contents details in the dossier used to
Speaker 1: obtain the FISER warrants. The people in other words, that
Speaker 1: signed off on it, the people that when they put
Speaker 1: their name on it, as Rod Rosenstein did on the
Speaker 1: last application, the third subsequent application, the third renewal application
Speaker 1: for in total. You know, and he said in May,
Speaker 1: what did he say that, Oh, we have an oblope,
Speaker 1: we put our name to it. We've got to know
Speaker 1: that it's true. Well, there wasn't true, and we know not.
Speaker 1: And even Lannie Davis is saying that the comments about
Speaker 1: Michael Kohn aren't true, you know, being improgue, not true,
Speaker 1: you know, but they all signed their name to it,
Speaker 1: it all signed off on it. Steve Steals to he
Speaker 1: Steel doesn't even believe his own dossier. And you still
Speaker 1: have people in the media still pushing this. We don't
Speaker 1: know that it's thet Yeah, we do know it's debunked.
Speaker 1: You got the guy's passport. It doesn't have PROD stamped
Speaker 1: on it. Lie. There's no evidence of Hooker's peeing in
Speaker 1: a bed in the ritz Carlton in Moscow. Wrong lie debunked.
Speaker 1: Why is that bad? Well, good question, Hannedy. Why is
Speaker 1: it bad? It's bad because is at dossier. Those Russian
Speaker 1: lies were designed to literally lie to everybody, all the
Speaker 1: American people. So when they leaked the contents of the
Speaker 1: dossier and the rumor, the lies, the propaganda, the misinformation,
Speaker 1: the distortion, They're meant to influence your vote with Russian
Speaker 1: lies so you'll vote a certain way. And it didn't
Speaker 1: work out for any of them, and all those people.
Speaker 1: Just to bring a full circle, they're now piste off.
Speaker 1: All their efforts, all they're conspiring, all of these activities
Speaker 1: never gave them the result that they wanted. In the
Speaker 1: words of Peter Struck, we will stop him. They didn't
Speaker 1: stop him. Now we're in the insurance policy point in
Speaker 1: this whole thing. Now I'm gonna tell you how it's
Speaker 1: gonna end. You want to know how this whole thing
Speaker 1: I think is gonna end and when it's gonna end,
Speaker 1: because I think I know the answer, but I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna tell you right now because I gotta take a break. Well,
Speaker 1: I don't. I'm not gonna have to have to do
Speaker 1: the spot lendous screaming over there to the spot by
Speaker 1: the way, Do you have a will? I I redo
Speaker 1: my will once a year. I just you gotta do it.
Speaker 1: It's important now. Maybe twenty years ago or trust, Look,
Speaker 1: maybe it was. Wasn't a shocking statement you didn't have
Speaker 1: a will? You want the government deciding what happens to
Speaker 1: your kids and your stuff? No, But these days there's
Speaker 1: no excuse. Why Because legal Zoom has made it simple
Speaker 1: and easy and inexpensive to create your own. More than
Speaker 1: a million of us now have used legal Zoom for
Speaker 1: our state planning needs. Right now, it's national make a
Speaker 1: Will Month at legal zoom dot com. Now is your
Speaker 1: turn take control of your family, your assets getting a
Speaker 1: state plan. It starts with either a will a living trust.
Speaker 1: Maybe you don't know which one is right for you.
Speaker 1: Let not your heart be trouble, because legal Zoom has
Speaker 1: a network of independent attorneys. They will advise you on
Speaker 1: what is best specifically for you and your family. And
Speaker 1: great news than not a law firm. You don't pay
Speaker 1: those high hourly rates. It's affordable, so make things easier
Speaker 1: on your family of God forbid your gone. Check out
Speaker 1: legal zoom dot com the last will living Trust of
Speaker 1: State plans. Now it's national maker, the national make a
Speaker 1: Will month a legal zoom dot Com Special savings. Put
Speaker 1: my name Hannity in the referral box when you check out. Oh,
Speaker 1: by the way, the President put a hold on talks
Speaker 1: with North Korea. Little Rocketman's back to his old tricks
Speaker 1: and he's not moving fast enough. Quick break right back.
Speaker 1: We'll continue fighting the trumpat liberal media one day at
Speaker 1: a time. Is the Sean Hannity Show. I got, I
Speaker 1: got friends and what you know that really sucks? What
Speaker 1: you just did? I said what you know? I'll tell
Speaker 1: you where it's gonna end right after this message. I'm
Speaker 1: not I didn't do it on purpose. I have a
Speaker 1: clock that I have to follow here or my Cock's
Speaker 1: affiliates go absolutely nuts when I go over. And I
Speaker 1: love all my cock station so much. WSB and Oka
Speaker 1: V and h I O and car MG. They just
Speaker 1: get it. They have a very strict trafficking weather together
Speaker 1: schedule that I can't miss. Um, this is where it's
Speaker 1: gonna end. I know the media is recycling all news
Speaker 1: old news all the time, and I know that you've
Speaker 1: heard a lot in the last couple of days. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh. Uh, this guy David Packer of of the
Speaker 1: National Enquirer and Dylan Howard. Dylan has been on this
Speaker 1: program before. We like Dylan. We gotta along with Dylan
Speaker 1: and the Dylan and they've both got immunity. Did you
Speaker 1: see it, Hannay? You didn't see the news? And then
Speaker 1: we find out that the you know, Trump c CFO
Speaker 1: got immune. Let me let me calm everyone's hearts here.
Speaker 1: It's old news. It was all a part of the
Speaker 1: lead up to the Michael Cohen plea that took place
Speaker 1: this this week. Now, that doesn't answer the question where
Speaker 1: is this gonna end. It's gonna end this way. In
Speaker 1: my opinion, I think the fight is still ongoing. But
Speaker 1: Mueller knows at this point, especially after the the whole
Speaker 1: release that the White House Council Don McGann has spent
Speaker 1: thirty hours with Mueller. Well, that's ostensibly talking to the president. Now,
Speaker 1: in thirty hours, let's say they do get an interview
Speaker 1: with the president and the president is says one or
Speaker 1: two or three things that conflict with Don McGann's recollection. Now,
Speaker 1: this goes back a while that Don McGann testified, and
Speaker 1: they're acting like this is new news. It's not. They
Speaker 1: recycle the old news all the time, big breaking news.
Speaker 1: Look at this like it's not big breaking news. It's
Speaker 1: like they're lying to you because they want to artificially
Speaker 1: pump this up. So the president would be in a
Speaker 1: perjury trap. And what when Rudy said, well, truth is
Speaker 1: in truth. What he's saying there is if the president's
Speaker 1: recollection of something doesn't exactly match, say Don McGann's recollection
Speaker 1: of something, then it will be up to the special
Speaker 1: prosecutor to determine who is telling the truth. Now, let's
Speaker 1: say Don McGann's i'm not making it up, his recollection
Speaker 1: was wrong, and the president's was right. They we already
Speaker 1: know they hate Trump. He can't win. They are the
Speaker 1: deciders in that moment, and in that sense, lying to
Speaker 1: the you know, lying on the oath them becomes a play,
Speaker 1: and that's the perjury trap. How it ends. I'll get
Speaker 1: into more details, but this is the summary. Robert Mueller
Speaker 1: at this point, my guess is he does insubpoena to
Speaker 1: the president, but he might still out there. He writes
Speaker 1: a report. It is going to be an impeachment road
Speaker 1: map should the Democrats win in seventy four days. You
Speaker 1: don't think this is the most important mid term in
Speaker 1: your life, think again, I'll pick it up here when
Speaker 1: we get back immediately thereafter. There's gonna be a Julianni report,
Speaker 1: is my guess, and then it's gonna be okay, the
Speaker 1: American people decide the top of the one Sean is
Speaker 1: our number. You want to be a part of the program. Um. Look,
Speaker 1: that's the way I think it's gonna end. Do I
Speaker 1: know for sure? No? Am I following it closely? Yes?
Speaker 1: Am I worried and concerned. Absolutely. Uh. I'm not one
Speaker 1: that ever takes for granted the vote of the people.
Speaker 1: And if you want to know how I think this end,
Speaker 1: I would argue that based on the team that Mueller
Speaker 1: is put together, the action that he has taken, the
Speaker 1: fanaticism of the people on his team. You know, how
Speaker 1: how do you get away with hiring Genie Ray, once
Speaker 1: an attorney for the Clinton Foundation, to be part of
Speaker 1: your special council team? Now that seems abusively biased to me,
Speaker 1: But what do I know, especially considering, oh, this is
Speaker 1: the guy that beat Hillary Clinton, and the fact that
Speaker 1: we've gotten gone so a far from where we were.
Speaker 1: You know that the mandate has exceeded anything to do
Speaker 1: with Russia, to the point where Judge Ellis says, okay,
Speaker 1: considering a filing of the Mantaphor campaign, that that Mueller
Speaker 1: had exceeded his mandate and jurisdiction by even getting into
Speaker 1: taxes and and real estate loans with money that had
Speaker 1: nothing to do at all with Russia, which preceded any
Speaker 1: relationship with Donald Trump, which had nothing to do with
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen campaign. But then after Judge Ellis views
Speaker 1: the information, he concludes, Yeah, the mand aids that broad
Speaker 1: and that wide. It's basically like take it. Let's say
Speaker 1: you'll live on a bay, and let's say you can
Speaker 1: see the other side of the bay, and that would
Speaker 1: be like taking a net from one side and putting
Speaker 1: it all the way down to the bottom and going
Speaker 1: all the way across. You're gonna catch everything. Anything that's there,
Speaker 1: you're gonna catch. That's a fishing expedition. That's what we've
Speaker 1: we've seen happen here. You know, remember Papadopoulos and General
Speaker 1: Flynn and Paul Manafort and Michael Cone. There's no Robert
Speaker 1: Mueller and there's no Trump collusion ridiculousness. Then we don't
Speaker 1: get here. You know, think of all the people that
Speaker 1: have worked in the White House. You remember whole picks
Speaker 1: worked in the White House. I guarantee, I don't know
Speaker 1: for sure, I'm just guessing, but I guarantee you that
Speaker 1: the legal bills for people that worked with Donald Trump
Speaker 1: this is would include rights previous and Steve ben I
Speaker 1: forget about the personalities. Whether you like this one don't like,
Speaker 1: that doesn't matter. I guarantee you the legal bills alone
Speaker 1: for each one of those individuals probably exceeded whatever they
Speaker 1: were getting paid to work in the White House to
Speaker 1: the point it's not worth working in the White House
Speaker 1: anymore for anybody. And this is person after person after
Speaker 1: person after person. Now I understand the thinking of of
Speaker 1: you know, Ty Cobbs and John Doubt and maybe they're
Speaker 1: gonna be proven to be right in the end, because
Speaker 1: maybe I couldn't understand or wrap my mind around the
Speaker 1: idea that the White House counsel who represents the president
Speaker 1: is there to represent the president would ever talk to
Speaker 1: a special counsel, which makes zero sense to me to
Speaker 1: this day, except that maybe that is the secret sauce,
Speaker 1: along with a one point four million documents they sent
Speaker 1: over in the hopes that this would put things to
Speaker 1: rest pretty easy. You know, maybe that's what ends it.
Speaker 1: But it's gonna end. I think now, I don't know
Speaker 1: about the subpoena issue. I don't think that the special
Speaker 1: counsel of My guess is the following. My guess is
Speaker 1: Robert Mueller wants the subpoena. You don't hire Andrew Weissman
Speaker 1: with his background and track record of what tens of
Speaker 1: thousands of Americans losing their jobs when he was doing
Speaker 1: the in Ron case because and that all ended up,
Speaker 1: you know, a loser in the U. S. Supreme Court
Speaker 1: nine zero, same guy that put maryal executives in jail
Speaker 1: for a year, but that was overturned by the Fifth Circuit.
Speaker 1: I guess people don't really give a rip if it's
Speaker 1: not them. And but those people went to jail for
Speaker 1: a year. I'm sure it was hell. I'm sure it
Speaker 1: sucked for the years leading up to this and the
Speaker 1: defense and the decision of the deal whichever it was
Speaker 1: at the time. I'd have to bring Sydney Powell back on,
Speaker 1: who wrote all about this. But why do you put
Speaker 1: somebody like that on your team if you're trying to
Speaker 1: be fair and balanced? How does Bruce or have a job?
Speaker 1: Random thought? At this point, he's been demoted twice. We
Speaker 1: know seventy contacts that he's had with Christopher Steele before
Speaker 1: and after the election. Uh, we know he's anti Trump,
Speaker 1: we know his wife or a profusion GPS. I mean,
Speaker 1: can you get any more and can this get any
Speaker 1: more insane? Now we've gone from Russia collusion, then we
Speaker 1: go to taxicabs huh, what is what? And and tax
Speaker 1: filings from years before Donald Trump ever really thought he'd
Speaker 1: run for president, And and then what do we got?
Speaker 1: We got taxed, we got tax fraud lying on bank
Speaker 1: loan applications. Good grief. It is just unbelievable. Now, my
Speaker 1: guess is that that the Special Council probably wants to
Speaker 1: subpoena of the President, which could lead to another year
Speaker 1: eighteen month fight, although others say it could be quite
Speaker 1: much faster. They probably could even expedite that. But even
Speaker 1: in an expedited fashion, it's gonna be a constitutional war
Speaker 1: if it happens, And I don't think Trump's attorney has
Speaker 1: ever given nor do I think I think at this point,
Speaker 1: I don't think Trump will talk to them. Why should he?
Speaker 1: It's a perjury trap. Who wants to be in a
Speaker 1: perjury trap. Don McGann talks to the Special Council for
Speaker 1: thirty hours. Okay, he gives his best recollection. I'm not
Speaker 1: questioning his integrity. I'm just questioning why they would ever
Speaker 1: give up that privilege that they have. He didn't have
Speaker 1: to testify, they didn't have to hand over a single document.
Speaker 1: But they're cooperating. They're trying to get this behind us.
Speaker 1: Most exculpatory evidence comes from James Comey himself in this case,
Speaker 1: when he puts in his notes that Donald Trump said
Speaker 1: to him or I didn't have anything to do with
Speaker 1: any collusion, but if anybody around me did, well, we
Speaker 1: need to get to the bottom of that. Anyway, so
Speaker 1: he can't testify, So there could be a fight over that,
Speaker 1: but probably there's got to be some sense of of desire.
Speaker 1: I just I've got to believe that even though people
Speaker 1: have views that's so alien to my own, that there's
Speaker 1: got to be some thought here on the impact of
Speaker 1: the country, what the hell is going on here and
Speaker 1: how divided the country is. I'm just guessing, you know,
Speaker 1: at the end of all of this, it's not gonna
Speaker 1: be whoever works for Mueller's name on this history. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be Mueller's name on this So if he wants
Speaker 1: that's a pedo fight, we'll see what happens. It'll go
Speaker 1: to the Supreme Court at some point. White Democrats are
Speaker 1: trying to use it. We can't confirm Brett Cavanan, Yeah
Speaker 1: you can. Brett Cavanaugh can be yes, he can be objective,
Speaker 1: Yes he can. Um But I think that Mueller is
Speaker 1: going to write a report, and I think that it
Speaker 1: is going to be for the Democrats their roadmap, and
Speaker 1: I think the roadmap is one of how to impeach
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, how to overturn the election. This is the
Speaker 1: insurance policy on steroids unfolding before our eyes, and I
Speaker 1: don't think it's gonna have anything. They'll mention Russia a
Speaker 1: lot in the report, and they're gonna talk about the
Speaker 1: the the the equivalence of the Russian formerly KGB of Russia,
Speaker 1: the Russian intel people that they indicted that will never
Speaker 1: ever come to America and be put on trial. These
Speaker 1: are indictments that are meaningless. They're put in place just
Speaker 1: to say Russia, I believe, and I believe just like
Speaker 1: the Russian bot companies, they're put in place just to
Speaker 1: say Russia, Russia, Russia. I don't think Muller and his
Speaker 1: team ever thought these bot companies, and I believe they're real.
Speaker 1: I but there's no doubt Russia as a hostile regime,
Speaker 1: There's no doubt Putin is a is a corrupt actor
Speaker 1: on the world stage and an antagonist of the United States.
Speaker 1: Is not our friend. Doesn't mean we have to be
Speaker 1: at war with them, doesn't mean we can't have understandings
Speaker 1: with him. You want to defeat Putin and Russia, it's simple.
Speaker 1: Produce more energy and find a way to get it
Speaker 1: to our allies in Western Europe. Check made, game over finished.
Speaker 1: Putin's done, Russia is done. But then you have our
Speaker 1: allies and NATO like Angela Merkel, you know, still putting
Speaker 1: the lifeblood of their economy, some seventy five percent of it,
Speaker 1: in the hands of a hostile regime and a hostile
Speaker 1: actor in Putin. It is the dumbest thing I've ever seen.
Speaker 1: We've got to figure out a way to get oil
Speaker 1: and natural gas, which the President has now opened up
Speaker 1: over to our allies in Western Europe. It's great for
Speaker 1: their security and ultimately our security, and it will create
Speaker 1: millions of high paying jobs for the forgotten men and
Speaker 1: women of this country. It's just basic, simple common sense anyway.
Speaker 1: And then I would guess that after Muller writes his report,
Speaker 1: and I believe again it is a roadmap to impeachment,
Speaker 1: then Julianni and Jay Sekulo and that team would end
Speaker 1: up writing their report. Again, I'm just speculating and just
Speaker 1: watching this all unfold. It also fits the model that
Speaker 1: was set forth in the whole Clinton impeachment. And then
Speaker 1: we'll get to a point where, you know, then if
Speaker 1: the Democrats are in power, if this happens in seventy
Speaker 1: four days, this is what is at stake. And I've
Speaker 1: been saying for now a long time, and Hannity, you
Speaker 1: repeat yourself, Yeah I do, because I never know. There's
Speaker 1: different people listening at different times. This election is about
Speaker 1: the five things I told you. It's about. They want
Speaker 1: to impeach the president, but they don't want to tell
Speaker 1: you what they really want to do, and they're asking
Speaker 1: people like Maxie Waters and other shush, just don't say
Speaker 1: it because we don't want to cont we're gonna act
Speaker 1: like we have to do it, but we're gonna do it.
Speaker 1: They've already decided, and similarly, they'll ignore all these other issues.
Speaker 1: This is issued item to impeach the president, eliminate all
Speaker 1: of as it relates to the abuse of power that
Speaker 1: exonerated Hillary Clinton from what is the most egregious case
Speaker 1: of obstruction I've ever seen in my life, a slam
Speaker 1: dunk if any of you ever did it. And then
Speaker 1: of the Espionage Act, and then it gets into the
Speaker 1: fires of Orange, it all disappears. In other words, those
Speaker 1: people that abuse those top positions that we have exposed.
Speaker 1: Adam Shift shuts it down and then it will be
Speaker 1: followed up by the way with investigation after investigation, and
Speaker 1: the Trump, the Trump campaign, the Trump administration, NonStop investigation,
Speaker 1: in other words, to paralyze what is now proven to
Speaker 1: be a successful agenda that is putting Americans back to work,
Speaker 1: that is making the country safer, that is showing that
Speaker 1: that eliminating burdensome regulation, lower taxes works. So they want
Speaker 1: to impeach the president. They want to end the investigations.
Speaker 1: They want their crumbs back. They're only crumbs, but damn
Speaker 1: they want them back quick. They want every pennyback, and
Speaker 1: maybe even more. They want Obamacare, that's it. And they
Speaker 1: want open borders. Five things. And I've said for the
Speaker 1: longest time there were five forces working against this president.
Speaker 1: And number one is something that probably a lot of
Speaker 1: you had not heard about a couple of years ago.
Speaker 1: It's the deep state. Just like many of you a
Speaker 1: couple of years ago never heard of bleach bit. Who
Speaker 1: ever heard of bleach pit until Hillary Clinton bleach bit.
Speaker 1: If I'm the owner of bleach bit, I'm the happiest
Speaker 1: guy in the world. That wow, leash bit is now
Speaker 1: famous and Hannity gives us a free plug every time
Speaker 1: he mentions it. You know, they're not paying for ads here.
Speaker 1: And then, of course, you know you just you gotta
Speaker 1: see this for what it is. You don't think this
Speaker 1: mid term matters. Well, if you voted for Trump and
Speaker 1: you're happy with the progress, that's what's in play. If
Speaker 1: you're ready for the country to be torn apart, and
Speaker 1: it's gonna be a a knockdown, drag out brawl. Let me,
Speaker 1: politically speaking, it's gonna be they, It's gonna be the
Speaker 1: It's gonna be pretty much a declaration of a political
Speaker 1: war again again political it's gonna be You're gonna have
Speaker 1: the intensity of the left that wants to bring this
Speaker 1: man and take away the power that was given to
Speaker 1: him a duly elected president. They're gonna want to do
Speaker 1: that now. This interesting little sidebars by the way, the
Speaker 1: President put talks with North Korea, little rock Man on
Speaker 1: hold today because a lack of progress. Told Pompeioto canceled
Speaker 1: this thing. Just you know, as the Democratic media is
Speaker 1: two two times on cable TV alone in a single day,
Speaker 1: impeachment assault on the president is backfiring. We got some
Speaker 1: poll numbers and key midterm race is suddenly now moving
Speaker 1: in the GOP's direction. Maybe this won't be a bad thing.
Speaker 1: Washington Examiner points out Scott Walker has been trailing in
Speaker 1: his bid for a third time. I think he's a
Speaker 1: great governor. He won a recall election. This guy's been
Speaker 1: through more elections than anybody. Um. The Marquette pole came
Speaker 1: out this week showing Walker, tide and Senator Tammy Baldwin
Speaker 1: want to tend Democrats running for re election and a
Speaker 1: in Wisconsin, but she hadn't been considered especially vulnerable. She
Speaker 1: led by seven team points um. However, she took uh
Speaker 1: of the vote um and forty seven for her Republican opponent. Oh,
Speaker 1: how did that happen? And we got a New Jersey
Speaker 1: Even Robert Bernendez is leading by only six in New Jersey.
Speaker 1: I mean generic ballot polling is now tightening. Also, here's
Speaker 1: another anecdotal piece of evidence. Political points out that the
Speaker 1: RNC announced this week they notched up a record breaking
Speaker 1: cash hall for July. The impact of Cones guilty ply
Speaker 1: on RNC fundraising will be infinitesimal, according to some GOP
Speaker 1: donors telling Politico, and the numbers bear him out. Four
Speaker 1: team point two million in July, the best take for
Speaker 1: a month in a mid term cycle, and almost twice
Speaker 1: the amount of the Democratic Party and what they took it.
Speaker 1: I hope that some hope that people are getting that
Speaker 1: what I've been telling you forever, these five items is
Speaker 1: what the elections about. Believe me, I'm gonna you're gonna
Speaker 1: hear a lot of this after Labor Day. We're just
Speaker 1: giving you a preview of coming attractions. All right, Sarah
Speaker 1: and Greg, Well, when we come back, we had a
Speaker 1: lot to get to today. Eight one Sean. Also, angel families,
Speaker 1: people that lost loved ones to legal immigrants are gonna
Speaker 1: tell their I mean, these stories break your heart, but
Speaker 1: they're trying to warn us that it can happen to anybody.
Speaker 1: What happendence that does Michael Cohne have that the President
Speaker 1: knew in advance about that controversial Trump Tower meeting that
Speaker 1: his son, his son in law, the campaign chairman at
Speaker 1: the time, Paul Manafort, had with these Russians leading up
Speaker 1: to the election. So again, at this juncture, I can
Speaker 1: only say that he was peasant during a discussion with
Speaker 1: Junior and Dad, and beyond that his testimony to the
Speaker 1: Senate Intelligence and has Intelligence committees was accurate. So can
Speaker 1: you say now whether in fact Michael Cohen has information
Speaker 1: that President Trump was aware either before the Trump Tower
Speaker 1: meeting that Don Jr. Was part of with the Russian
Speaker 1: attorney claiming to be part from the Kremlin with Dornan
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton, either that Michael Cohen has information that the the
Speaker 1: President knew about it in advance or knew about it
Speaker 1: immediately after Senator Burn, Senator Warner read the answer to
Speaker 1: the question about his testimony, which is that he said
Speaker 1: he was not aware ahead of time and did not
Speaker 1: hear um anything to the contrary, and that was the
Speaker 1: testimony before the Senate as well as the House Intelligence committees,
Speaker 1: and he said that that testimony was accurate. So Michael
Speaker 1: Cohen does not have information that President Trump knew about
Speaker 1: the Trump Tower meeting with the Russians beforehand, or you know,
Speaker 1: does not. The presidents in titles of attorney generally has
Speaker 1: faith in somebody that's qualified for the job, and I
Speaker 1: think they will come to time sooner rather than later
Speaker 1: where it will be time to have a new face
Speaker 1: and a fresh force at the Department of Justice. Clearly,
Speaker 1: Attorney General Sessions doesn't have the confidence of the president,
Speaker 1: and all I can say is that I have a
Speaker 1: lot of respect for the Attorney General. But that's that's
Speaker 1: an important office in the country. And there after the election,
Speaker 1: I think they will be some serious discussions about a
Speaker 1: new Attorney general. All right. That was Lindsay Graham yesterday
Speaker 1: and that made big news along with Charles Grassley, uh
Speaker 1: Bob Corker, who's leaving Congress can't stand the President told
Speaker 1: political he feels moves are being made to bring about
Speaker 1: Sessions outstair from the Department of Justice. It's apparent to
Speaker 1: me the President wants to do something to Attorney General Sessions.
Speaker 1: But it's also apparent that in the interim at Sessions
Speaker 1: owns him. Now, I'm not sure why, Why does it
Speaker 1: have to be so personal and as much as could
Speaker 1: it really just be? As the Attorney General clearly doesn't
Speaker 1: like the president at this point. When he said yesterday
Speaker 1: that the actions of the Department of Justice will not
Speaker 1: be improperly influenced by political considerations, nobody's asking for political considerations.
Speaker 1: All people are asking for is did Hillary commit crimes?
Speaker 1: And if she did, why isn't she indicted? Did warp fights?
Speaker 1: A judges lied to? Was false phony Russian propaganda bought
Speaker 1: and paid for by Hillary through funneled money through a
Speaker 1: law firm to hide the expense, and then funnel to
Speaker 1: Fusion GPS to a guy named Christopher Steele, a foreign agent,
Speaker 1: and that he present and propagate Russian lies and where
Speaker 1: the American people lied to so they vote a certain
Speaker 1: way before the election, And was the bulk of that
Speaker 1: information the basis for not one, but four FISA court
Speaker 1: warrants against Carter page a drum campaign associate, That's what
Speaker 1: it is. Does he believe Hillary violated the law top
Speaker 1: secret information on her server that she obstructed when she
Speaker 1: deleted and and hard drives erased and device is destroyed?
Speaker 1: You know? Is are they concerned about the exoneration written
Speaker 1: before the investigation? Does Sessions think the FISA Court judges
Speaker 1: were led to? Was there a fraud on the court?
Speaker 1: Was it wrong not to reveal Hillary paid for that information?
Speaker 1: Was it wrong not to say that even the guy
Speaker 1: himself to put it together, Christopher Steele didn't even stand
Speaker 1: by his own dossier. Is he concerned about the wave
Speaker 1: of firing and resignations and the and the motions at
Speaker 1: his Department of Justice because a rampant bias, abuse of power? Corruption?
Speaker 1: In line? Why is Bruce or still employed there? Is
Speaker 1: he concerned that nobody verified the information in the phony dossier? Anyway?
Speaker 1: Here to join us on all this, Sarah Carter investigated
Speaker 1: reporter Fox News contributor and Greg Jarrett his book YEP
Speaker 1: still number one New York Times bestseller, The Russian Hoax.
Speaker 1: Thank you both for being with us. Sarah, you wrote
Speaker 1: extensively on this session Trump feud yesterday. Yes, and it's
Speaker 1: obvious now that there's a point being reached in Apex
Speaker 1: and Congress sort of speak, both in the Senate and
Speaker 1: the House, where look, this is doing more damage to
Speaker 1: the country than good. The relationship you know, between Jeff
Speaker 1: Sessions and the president is very contentious. Obviously they don't
Speaker 1: trust each other. The president needs somebody there, and it's
Speaker 1: his right to have somebody there that he can count on,
Speaker 1: somebody there that he actually has a working relationship with.
Speaker 1: We know that relationship for now has been really damaged.
Speaker 1: And the point here, Sean, is not about whether or
Speaker 1: not what the President wants to interfere or doesn't want
Speaker 1: to interfere. I think what people in the Senate and
Speaker 1: the House are seeing, those that I've spoken with, are saying, look,
Speaker 1: this is detrimental to the country. The best thing that
Speaker 1: could happen is for Jeff Sessions to either resign or
Speaker 1: to be removed. And uh, you know, and they give
Speaker 1: the president all the authority to do so. The few
Speaker 1: that are supporting him in this, I think the bigger
Speaker 1: question is here is what a Sessions thinking what does
Speaker 1: he want to do. I mean, well, Tommy is he
Speaker 1: expressed himself yesterday he doesn't think much of the president.
Speaker 1: He you know, I called over there, and to be
Speaker 1: fair to the Department of Justice, they actually took my call.
Speaker 1: They answered my questions and the answer was what I
Speaker 1: always get from them, which I understand is what they
Speaker 1: have to say and do. But they can comment on
Speaker 1: any ongoing investigation or potential investigation. So in other words,
Speaker 1: they won't you know, they won't even confirm that anything
Speaker 1: is being looked into. And the public watches all of
Speaker 1: the double standard, and I think most people are pissed.
Speaker 1: They are They're angry. People are angry. Every every person
Speaker 1: that writes to me, that writes to you, I'm sure,
Speaker 1: is frustrated and angry. And this is the regular this
Speaker 1: is America are These are the people that aren't even
Speaker 1: involved in the Washington bubble, who are so frustrated at
Speaker 1: watching the Mueller UH Team Special Council go after everybody
Speaker 1: around Donald Trump offering immunity deals to everyone. And then
Speaker 1: they look at what happened with Hillary Clinton, and they
Speaker 1: look at what's been happening with the FIS abuse scandal,
Speaker 1: and even with Rod Rosenstein and his involvement in ethical
Speaker 1: conflicts that have arisen from him actually asking the president
Speaker 1: to fire James Comey and ainting out very clearly in
Speaker 1: his letter to President Trump that the reasons why Comey
Speaker 1: should have been fired. And now somehow he's in charge
Speaker 1: of overseeing the special Counsel, which is including obstruction chart
Speaker 1: you know, wants to move into obstruction against the president.
Speaker 1: So there's a lot of frustration here. I think the
Speaker 1: biggest question here is what is Jeff Sessions going to do?
Speaker 1: Is he going to force himself to sit there? I mean,
Speaker 1: who the heck wants to work for someone who absolutely
Speaker 1: does not trust them and he doesn't trust the president.
Speaker 1: So this, I think really the ball is in Attorney
Speaker 1: General Jeff Sessions court. I know there's a lot of
Speaker 1: people that like him, even people that want him to
Speaker 1: leave that like him, that are saying, look, you know,
Speaker 1: Attorney General Sessions, you've been there for two years, You've
Speaker 1: done your job, or you haven't done your job, and uh,
Speaker 1: it's time for you to move on. So I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, according to them, the right thing for him
Speaker 1: to do would be to just submit his letter of
Speaker 1: resignation and you know, tell the president you know, I
Speaker 1: think that's going to happen. And let me just bring
Speaker 1: Greg into this discussion because I think in a weird way,
Speaker 1: although it's not true, in a weird way, Quarker is
Speaker 1: right because in a sense, the president is savvy enough,
Speaker 1: the people around him savvy enough to know that if
Speaker 1: the President fired Jeff Sessions, we know how it would
Speaker 1: portray and play out in the media and play out
Speaker 1: among Democrats. And that is a Saturday night massacre. I mean,
Speaker 1: they mentioned two hundred and twenty two times in a day, impeachment.
Speaker 1: This is all the media and Democrats really care about
Speaker 1: at this point. Well, if Jeff Sessions had an ounce
Speaker 1: of integrity and conscience, he would resign should have done
Speaker 1: a long time ago. Every day Jeff Sessions is the
Speaker 1: Attorney General, he's doing more and more damage to the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, to the FBI, to Congress, which is
Speaker 1: seeking lawful documents that the d J refuses to turn over.
Speaker 1: Sessions is doing enormous damage to the treat When you've
Speaker 1: lost the confidence of the president, it is time to resign.
Speaker 1: Any decent person I happen to be one of the
Speaker 1: I am accurately described as Sarah, I'm a guy that
Speaker 1: always liked Jeff Sessions. I still think personally he's a
Speaker 1: good guy. I just don't think he's up for this job.
Speaker 1: But the difference between being nice and likable, which he
Speaker 1: certainly is, and competent, which he has proven he is not.
Speaker 1: He should never have disqualified himself from the Russia case.
Speaker 1: He side of the wrong regulation. When he did it,
Speaker 1: he was duped, which sells me he's gullible and naive.
Speaker 1: You know, it's easy to be one of a hundred U. S.
Speaker 1: Senators that don't frankly, do very much, very hard to
Speaker 1: be the Attorney General of the United States running the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice, and of course underneath that the FBI. UH.
Speaker 1: But for his recusal, there would never have been a
Speaker 1: special counsel. Mueller would not have and allowed to assemble
Speaker 1: a team of partisans determined to damage Trump, undo the election,
Speaker 1: and harm the nation at large. And if you want
Speaker 1: to point the finger of blame at anybody, Jeff Sessions
Speaker 1: is the guy, all right? Let me well, and Sean
Speaker 1: right on right on Gregg's point, and what you said earlier.
Speaker 1: You know about the Dems and and those never trumpers
Speaker 1: who are going to come after President Trump if he
Speaker 1: chooses to replace Attorney General Jeff's Sessions. That what can
Speaker 1: You can't even argue that this is a massacre because
Speaker 1: Jeff Sessions has already refused himself from everything Russia. So
Speaker 1: their argument is false on its face. I mean, if
Speaker 1: he was in charge of the whole Russia investigation and
Speaker 1: he was working against the president, Okay, I can see that,
Speaker 1: But they can't make this argument that this is the
Speaker 1: massacre when Sessions really has already refused himself from everything
Speaker 1: Russia and it appears everything else. So this is a
Speaker 1: problem about having the right people in place in your
Speaker 1: administration to get the job done. And the president needs
Speaker 1: to be able to communicate with his attorney general. That
Speaker 1: is an absolute fact. Look, Eric Holder was, uh, you
Speaker 1: know with President Obama for years. He was very close
Speaker 1: to President Obama. They were they were allies. They stuck to,
Speaker 1: you know, each other like glue. They were always on
Speaker 1: the same page. This president has the right as every
Speaker 1: other president to have somebody that he can work with,
Speaker 1: and it's impossible for the president to work with somebody
Speaker 1: when there's a broken trust. Well, I think that's all.
Speaker 1: That's all legitimate, and and frankly, I don't think sessions
Speaker 1: like the president. That's fine. You know, people at times
Speaker 1: don't get along with each other. I want to get
Speaker 1: into another issue that has come up and been reported.
Speaker 1: It's actually four separate issues. That you have this guy
Speaker 1: David Pecker, uh, Dylan Howard, they both work for a
Speaker 1: m I and and that would be the National Enquirer
Speaker 1: um and they're both very well known. Uh. Then we
Speaker 1: have the report that Trump Organization CFO also has been
Speaker 1: given immunity, that all three of them have been given immunity,
Speaker 1: and that the Manhattan District Attorney is now looking into
Speaker 1: issues involving the Trump Organization's charity, etcetera, etcetera. Well, the
Speaker 1: first point is is that we've known for a long
Speaker 1: time that the Trump Organization CFO testified already, and we
Speaker 1: know that this goes back a number of months as
Speaker 1: it relates to the National Enquirer, and what we're now experiencing,
Speaker 1: Greg Jared is something that I keep calling recycled news,
Speaker 1: as if it's pretty big breaking, earth shattering news every day.
Speaker 1: All of this was factored into the Southern District of
Speaker 1: New York's plead deal with Michael Cone. There's nothing new
Speaker 1: here at all that they are reporting. This is what's
Speaker 1: called piling on and it often happens, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: especially in politics, when they think somebody's down, they pile
Speaker 1: on top. Uh. Let's get to the heart of it
Speaker 1: the Michael Cohen case. It's not a crime for the
Speaker 1: president to contribute to his own campaign. Trump can spend
Speaker 1: an unlimited amount of money on his own campaign. And
Speaker 1: if Cohen made a payment for him with the intent
Speaker 1: of it being reversed, reimbursed, and it was that's an advance.
Speaker 1: You know. At worst, it might be a civil violation,
Speaker 1: the equivalent of jaywalking and a five penalty, which is
Speaker 1: nothing compared to what Obama pay three hundred seventy dollars
Speaker 1: for two million in illegal donations. Beyond that, it's probably
Speaker 1: not even qualifying as a campaign expense. He had another
Speaker 1: purpose to it. He'd done it before, long before he
Speaker 1: was a candidate, for personal and commercial reasons. This was
Speaker 1: explained quite nicely by the former chairman of the Federal
Speaker 1: Election Commission, Bradley Smith, who said, you know, these payments
Speaker 1: are not illegal under campaign laws, but try to tell
Speaker 1: that to prosecutors in the Southern District. It's like saying
Speaker 1: he's an unindicted co conspirator, but they didn't accuse. They
Speaker 1: didn't accuse Michael Cone of a conspiracy. That's right. There
Speaker 1: has to be an underlying climb in any conspiracy in
Speaker 1: their heights. Stay right there, We've got to take a
Speaker 1: quick break. Welcome back more with Sarah and Greg. At
Speaker 1: the bottom of this half hour, John Sale he used
Speaker 1: to work for the Southern District of New York. We'll
Speaker 1: got his take on all of the week's unfoldings, if
Speaker 1: you will, all right, went along. In the last segment,
Speaker 1: we continue with Sarah Carter, Greg Jarrett with us. Sarah
Speaker 1: will give you the final remarks here. I say, this
Speaker 1: airplane lands with a Mueller impeachment roadmap. If you will.
Speaker 1: Should the Democrats win in seventy four days? Yeah, unfortunately, Sean,
Speaker 1: I would tend to agree with you on that, But look,
Speaker 1: we can't predict the future. Uh. It looks like the
Speaker 1: Republicans have a really good chance of keeping the House,
Speaker 1: even if it's bia slim margin. And I think in
Speaker 1: the end, the American people will have their final say
Speaker 1: they're exhausted of this mole or investigation. They want the
Speaker 1: country to move forward. It appears that even those never
Speaker 1: trumpers that were in Congress are now on the President's side,
Speaker 1: some of them at least, and they're fighting to make
Speaker 1: this country better. And I think eventually in the end,
Speaker 1: hopefully that plane lands and it's a different ending than
Speaker 1: what you just said. Hopefully the plane lands in America.
Speaker 1: Can I can't see it. Get back to business, all right,
Speaker 1: Sarah Gregg, thank you both. Eight one sewn Uh formerly
Speaker 1: a prosecutor in the Southern District of New York and
Speaker 1: Watergate assistant prosecutor. We'll talk about all these matters and
Speaker 1: more straight ahead. So can you say now whether in
Speaker 1: fact Michael Cohen has information that President Trump was aware
Speaker 1: either before the Trump Tower meeting that Don Jr. Was
Speaker 1: part of with the Russian attorney climbing to be part
Speaker 1: from the Kremlin with Dirdan Hillary Clinton, either that Michael
Speaker 1: Cohen has information the President knew about it in advance
Speaker 1: or knew about it immediately after. Senator Barron. Senator Warner
Speaker 1: read the answer to the question about his testimony, which
Speaker 1: is that he said he was not aware ahead of
Speaker 1: time and did not hear anything to the contrary. And
Speaker 1: that was the testimony before the Senate as well as
Speaker 1: the House Intelligence committees. And he said that that testimony
Speaker 1: was accurate. So Michael Cohen does not have information that
Speaker 1: President Trump knew about the Trump Tower meeting with the
Speaker 1: Russians beforehand, or you know, does not. Prosecutors have said
Speaker 1: Michael Cohen broke the law, and Michael Cohen says, the
Speaker 1: President told me to do it. You said last night
Speaker 1: as well, that you believe that every president breaks the
Speaker 1: law during an election. I mean, really does that make
Speaker 1: candidate violates election laws when they run. He told you
Speaker 1: what I said, candidates violent election. Just told you I'm
Speaker 1: going back and you can get you can get back
Speaker 1: to make it okay violations. It doesn't. But let me
Speaker 1: be very clear. You're not letting me make my point.
Speaker 1: The president doesn't break the law if as a candidate
Speaker 1: he can meets to his own campaign. So if he
Speaker 1: gave a million dollars to two women his hush money,
Speaker 1: there would be no crime. Oh, forget about the law
Speaker 1: and what it actually says and what it actually means
Speaker 1: and everything else that we keep hearing. You know this,
Speaker 1: this issue is not as small issue as it relates
Speaker 1: to what was said, um, as it relates to you know,
Speaker 1: Lannie Davis professing that, in fact, that that that Michael
Speaker 1: Cohen knowingly knew that Trump knowingly colluded with Russia and
Speaker 1: had knowledge of this meeting ahead of time, and then
Speaker 1: said it, and CNN ran with it, and the Washington
Speaker 1: Post ran with it, and then Lannie says, never mind
Speaker 1: not it's like, you know, not a small detail in
Speaker 1: any respect where please to have back John sale Is
Speaker 1: with us and his background. Of course, he worked at
Speaker 1: the very prestigious, important Southern District of New York, where
Speaker 1: some of the best prosecutors in the country and out
Speaker 1: history of actually spent time and worked there. How many
Speaker 1: years you've been there? Were you there? Rather? I worked
Speaker 1: in the Southern District four or five years. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: you knew, uh, well, I forgot exactly what you said.
Speaker 1: You knew Rudy had worked there, you knew my friend
Speaker 1: Andy McCarthy had worked there, etcetera. Oh, absolutely, uh I worked.
Speaker 1: I didn't work there when Rudy was the U. S Attorney.
Speaker 1: He and I were prosecutors together and we prosecuted a
Speaker 1: lot of cases together. As a matter of fact, you know,
Speaker 1: a lot of people say, well, why is Rudy talking
Speaker 1: so much? Why is Ruddy defending people so much? And
Speaker 1: I was a little surprised once Trey Goudy actually said, well,
Speaker 1: if you're innocent, Darnett, why don't you act like you're innocent?
Speaker 1: And I'm thinking, if I'm innocent, I'm gonna want to
Speaker 1: tell the world I'm innocent. That's how I would act,
Speaker 1: That's my natural reaction. Well, there's a difference as who
Speaker 1: caught the court room, and then there's a quote of
Speaker 1: public opinion, and when you represent the president of the
Speaker 1: United States and naive if you don't realize you're in
Speaker 1: the quote of public opinion. Well, and I I mean
Speaker 1: a big part of this now is going to be
Speaker 1: an really firmly believe that at the end of the
Speaker 1: day how this is gonna end up. And I don't
Speaker 1: think there's gonna be anything about Russia and Russia collusion
Speaker 1: at all, because I don't think it ever happened. And
Speaker 1: I think had it happened, had there been evidence of such,
Speaker 1: we would have heard about it a long time ago now,
Speaker 1: So you can see that this case now has branched
Speaker 1: off until all these different arenas. And it was very
Speaker 1: interesting when Judge Ellis demanded after a filing by Paul
Speaker 1: Manafort's attorneys in this most recent case that we got
Speaker 1: the judgment on you know, eight counts guilty ten on
Speaker 1: a hung jury. But when Ellis said he wanted to
Speaker 1: see what it was in the mandate to Robert Muller
Speaker 1: and whether or not a you know, a ten year
Speaker 1: old tax charge, um, and a bank fraud case of
Speaker 1: Manafort fit under the umbrella of what it is. The
Speaker 1: mandate was for the special counsel. And then that's when
Speaker 1: he made his now infamous comment about putting the screws
Speaker 1: to Manafort. They don't really give rip about his taxes,
Speaker 1: so he will sing or compose so they can prosecutor
Speaker 1: and peach Trump. It seems that we're now often let's
Speaker 1: see taxi medallions, lying on baked applications, paying not filing
Speaker 1: your taxes, and paying the proper amount of tax, which,
Speaker 1: by the way, those are all lessons people should learn
Speaker 1: in life because you shouldn't do those things. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying you should, but um. But it seems to be
Speaker 1: really afar from what Russia collusion started out to be. Well,
Speaker 1: showing then the Manifold case had absolutely nothing to do
Speaker 1: with Russia, had nothing to do with the president. But
Speaker 1: you and I can talk about this with all our
Speaker 1: sincerity while Mr Manafort is going to be facing possibly
Speaker 1: as much as ten years in prison for that. And
Speaker 1: so Joe Ellis was correct in that comment he made.
Speaker 1: Although it may have been a little bit injudicious, it
Speaker 1: certainly was accurate. Uh. You know, this is a man's life,
Speaker 1: a sixty nine year old man's life, and it's clear,
Speaker 1: you know, the only reason he was prosecuted by the
Speaker 1: Special Council was because of what they're doing. He could
Speaker 1: have been prosecuted by another U. S. Attorney's office and
Speaker 1: it would have been judged on its merits. Right, in
Speaker 1: other words, the criminal system, we don't need a special
Speaker 1: Counsel to go after people that didn't pay their taxes
Speaker 1: in or whatever. Now that those are prosecuted if it's
Speaker 1: the cases appropriate by the US Storney's officers every day.
Speaker 1: But it seemed like they were dragging this out of
Speaker 1: mouth balls that a decision had already been made back
Speaker 1: in not to prosecute Well, I mean, the reason is,
Speaker 1: obviously I'm not joining frankly in the characterizations of the
Speaker 1: Mueller's offices being on a witch hunt or the Southern District.
Speaker 1: But the facts are what they are. I mean, the
Speaker 1: Manifolt case had absolutely nothing to do with Russia, so
Speaker 1: called collusion or the president. Yet Manifolt is sitting in
Speaker 1: a jail cell well. And then also there are people
Speaker 1: that commit crimes, which raises a whole question that I
Speaker 1: want to ask you about. But first I want to
Speaker 1: ask you about Alan Dershowitz's comments a president can look
Speaker 1: at the payment or the issue of the payment a
Speaker 1: number one. I think it's atrocious that Lannie Davis. I mean,
Speaker 1: now he's backtracking on what he had said, but it
Speaker 1: became a huge, massive report at the time that you know,
Speaker 1: he's out there telling people that Michael Cohen has information
Speaker 1: that in fact he knew, that Trump knew, and Trump
Speaker 1: was aware of and actually approved of the meeting at
Speaker 1: Trump Tower, etcetera. With this Russian who met with Fusion
Speaker 1: GPS leaders before and after the meeting, who turns out
Speaker 1: also to be a client of Fusion GPS, I mean,
Speaker 1: it becomes one big cluttered mess in my mind. But
Speaker 1: but it turns out Michael Cohen didn't have such information,
Speaker 1: and yet CNN runs with it, the news media runs
Speaker 1: with it, and then he says, oh, never mind, that's
Speaker 1: a big deal in terms of the press for the president. Well, uh,
Speaker 1: Michael Cohen, what's very significant about him is he pled guilty,
Speaker 1: but he does not have a plea agreement. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: I palm say he doesn't have a cooperation agreement, which
Speaker 1: means it's a non cooperative play. In other words, is
Speaker 1: what I think. That's the proper legal legal is to right. Correct,
Speaker 1: But either way you phrase it to me, it means
Speaker 1: that the prosecutors in the Southern District or not sufficiently
Speaker 1: confident that what he's telling was the truth, or to
Speaker 1: put it this way, they don't think he's a viable witness.
Speaker 1: They think that he's told so many stories, so many
Speaker 1: different ways, every which way, but sunday that they would
Speaker 1: not use him if they bring any kind of a case.
Speaker 1: Then why were the words inserted in that play agreement,
Speaker 1: the ones that got all the attention at the direction
Speaker 1: of and you're right, Michael had said something very differently.
Speaker 1: I almost took it and this is just total conjecture
Speaker 1: on my part, interpretation on my part, I took it
Speaker 1: to mean they wanted that in there because that kind
Speaker 1: of sticks it to the president. Maybe that helped Michael
Speaker 1: get a better deal. Is that absolutely off the wall? No,
Speaker 1: well it's not off the wall. Uh. I mean you
Speaker 1: can say it, by the way, even though it's my show,
Speaker 1: you can say Hannity or off the wall. A lot
Speaker 1: of people say it every day. So it's fine. I'm
Speaker 1: I'm showing him gonna say. I look forward to saying it,
Speaker 1: but I can't say but I can't. But I can't
Speaker 1: say it. If I can't say it about what you
Speaker 1: just were saying, it wouldn't be something. In other words, well,
Speaker 1: you know, look, you know we think that that happened,
Speaker 1: and we're believing that happened, and well here's the deal.
Speaker 1: If you say it happened, and here's the deal. If
Speaker 1: you don't say it happened, I would that type of thing.
Speaker 1: Is that? Well, something not possible. You know. I don't
Speaker 1: want to say what's possible. What I want to say
Speaker 1: is that in a case that frankly the whole world
Speaker 1: was watching, I don't think he would have said that
Speaker 1: as a surprise to everybody. So although I have no
Speaker 1: inside information, I presume that the United States Astorney's office
Speaker 1: knew that was going to be said, and uh be,
Speaker 1: but it could have been part of a profer deal.
Speaker 1: What are you gonna tell us if you tell us
Speaker 1: that we might offer this to a sort of thing. Well,
Speaker 1: but now, but you usually don't then say that in
Speaker 1: the plea that's kept let's kept private. Uh it's uh
Speaker 1: it clearly it was said for a purpose. Uh, and
Speaker 1: you know that remains to be seen. You know what
Speaker 1: crossing you just do all of them is they want
Speaker 1: to go so called up the ladder, And what they
Speaker 1: seem to be doing now is they're trying to make
Speaker 1: a case going up the ladder, and up a lot
Speaker 1: of means only one place, you see. I believe that
Speaker 1: Robert Mueller. The way this ends is that Robert Mueller
Speaker 1: writes his report because you can indict a sitting president. Um.
Speaker 1: If I had to guess, I was leaning that he
Speaker 1: would subpoena the president to testify. But I think I
Speaker 1: don't think after knowing that thirty hours of testimony came
Speaker 1: from the White House Council, I can't imagine that that
Speaker 1: Robert Mueller wants that fight. It will become an impeachment
Speaker 1: roadmap should the Democrats win in seventy four days, is
Speaker 1: that far fetched? Uh? Well, Rob, the press has been
Speaker 1: calling the president an unindicted co conspirator based upon what
Speaker 1: Michael Cohen said. That's totally preposterous. First of all, what
Speaker 1: Michael cohone said is only his accusation at the worst
Speaker 1: case scenario, and he's not charged with the conspiracy. So
Speaker 1: where's the conspiracy that the president could be allegedly an
Speaker 1: unindicted copa That is so well said. I'm so that's
Speaker 1: why it was so impressive with you when you were
Speaker 1: on with us the last time. And yeah, I think
Speaker 1: you're right, and you can indict a sitting president. But
Speaker 1: more importantly, every smart lawyer I have talked to believes
Speaker 1: the charges seven and eight in the Cone plea are
Speaker 1: not even a violation of law. I don't know. They
Speaker 1: seem to be throwing or public consumption. But you know,
Speaker 1: I have to say the brilliant words. We have to
Speaker 1: we have to see. Yeah. Oh, by the way, can
Speaker 1: you repeat the part about how impest you are with me?
Speaker 1: Can you repeat the part that you look forward to
Speaker 1: beating the crap out of me like everyone else does?
Speaker 1: I mean, that's fine. I can handle it. Obviously, I'm
Speaker 1: a god. I have a big dartboard on my back.
Speaker 1: No I do. But you still haven't said anything to
Speaker 1: enable me to do that. And so far everything you've
Speaker 1: said has been perfectly sensible. I'm actually fascinated by all
Speaker 1: of it. But it's sad and another sense because of
Speaker 1: in fact I'm right, and that Mueller is going to
Speaker 1: write an impeachment roadmap and in the lead up to
Speaker 1: the election, probably released sometime in October, and then Rudy's
Speaker 1: gonna release his rebuttal to it, probably not long thereafter.
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know. I don't think the country
Speaker 1: is gonna have a clue what to think, except there's
Speaker 1: not going to be anything related to Russia in it.
Speaker 1: And I think in that sense, I wrote an article
Speaker 1: in The Hill in which I argued that the president
Speaker 1: should not talk to the Mueller. I want to ask
Speaker 1: you about that when we get back, and we'll pick
Speaker 1: up right there, stay right there. John Sale is with us.
Speaker 1: He worked in the Southern District of New York as
Speaker 1: a prosecutor at the time. Rudy was there. Right as
Speaker 1: we can continue with, John Sale is with us. Formerly
Speaker 1: of the Southern District of New York, former prosecutor Great Insights.
Speaker 1: You know, we were talking about what what Mueller might
Speaker 1: do and what Rudy might do in response to it.
Speaker 1: I do think this is about impeachment. But I want
Speaker 1: to ask you about this strategy that secutors often used.
Speaker 1: I called the Sammy the Bull strategy. Here's a guy
Speaker 1: commits nineteen murders, but if he's going to testify against
Speaker 1: the big guy, as you were talking about earlier, John Gotti,
Speaker 1: well we're gonna not only give you a get out
Speaker 1: of jail free card, we'll give you a new house
Speaker 1: in Arizona and put you in the witness protection program.
Speaker 1: And we saw this with Rick Gates and the Mantaphor case.
Speaker 1: He got to pretty much a get out of jail
Speaker 1: free card. Why do I feel that's bribery? Why do
Speaker 1: I feel that's like paying a witness to say something
Speaker 1: that there's something of great value they're getting on the
Speaker 1: other side of it, When in fact, if you listen
Speaker 1: to the jurors, the numbers alone were enough to get
Speaker 1: Mantafort in most of their eyes show. There was a
Speaker 1: case about ten years ago in which a federal judge
Speaker 1: held that that is bribery. Now that was reversed by
Speaker 1: the appellate card, but that you're giving a thing of
Speaker 1: value in exchange for something, meaning the testimony that what's
Speaker 1: the thing of value? The way I think about your
Speaker 1: freedom jail card, Yeah, your freedom and and and conceptually
Speaker 1: it is bribery. But there is a statute which uh
Speaker 1: would apply to everybody else other than the government, meaning
Speaker 1: other than the US attorneys. I just don't like the
Speaker 1: tactic to me, to me that that needs to be reformed.
Speaker 1: Am I am I in a minority view here. I'm
Speaker 1: I'm a very conservative individual. I want to live in
Speaker 1: law and order tax You're in a major minority, and
Speaker 1: that tactic has been upheld uh uh by the Supreme Court.
Speaker 1: And think and McCarthy thinks, I'm nuts. Do you think
Speaker 1: I'm nuts too? Ye? That tactic is going to stay
Speaker 1: and it can be abused. We what we need, what
Speaker 1: we really need is to rely on good judgment and
Speaker 1: fairness of prosecutors. Most of the time we see that
Speaker 1: prosecui prosecutorial discretion. Yeah, most of the time it is sad,
Speaker 1: but you know, most of the times is not good enough.
Speaker 1: It ought to be all the time. But it's human
Speaker 1: imperfection and the human temptation to get a big fish.
Speaker 1: Isn't that part of it though, isn't it that you
Speaker 1: know what that there? It's too much, It becomes humanizing
Speaker 1: to some. In fact, I would even argue that they
Speaker 1: don't realize. On the other side of this, You know
Speaker 1: these witnesses for years or longer, their families, their friends,
Speaker 1: their lives, the stress, the money, and you know, Lieutenant
Speaker 1: General Flynn has to sell his home. All right, John Seal,
Speaker 1: thank you so much, and we hope you'll come back again.
Speaker 1: Hight nining for one, Shawn told free telephone number. You
Speaker 1: know how many more people are gonna be killed by
Speaker 1: illegal immigrants before we don't we realize that we can't
Speaker 1: have sanctuary cities and that we've got to obey the
Speaker 1: rule of law and that the wall will help. Straight ahead,
Speaker 1: coming up next our final news round up and information
Speaker 1: overload our They have been so willing to move the
Speaker 1: gold post every single time with this president, no matter
Speaker 1: what he says, no matter what he does. Right the
Speaker 1: fact that he was even sworn in its president after
Speaker 1: the Access Hollywood tape. Let me know for a fact,
Speaker 1: that they're Bublican Party is actually not working on behalf
Speaker 1: of the American people. They're working on behalf of Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: And he's been able to bully them into their silence.
Speaker 1: And I don't think that today change is much. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: I'm sure we'll hear what he has to say about
Speaker 1: this at his his rally. A Fox News is talking about,
Speaker 1: you know, a girl in Iowa and not this a
Speaker 1: person has been charged with that. This person is an
Speaker 1: undocumented immigrant, um Mike Pants. And the President has suggested
Speaker 1: the immigration laws need to be stronger so that people
Speaker 1: like this man who was accused of this murder, we're
Speaker 1: not in the country. Your reaction, my I'm so sorry
Speaker 1: for the family here, and I know this is hard
Speaker 1: not only for the family but for the people in
Speaker 1: her community, the people throughout Iowa. But one of the
Speaker 1: things we have to remember is we need an immigration
Speaker 1: system that is effective, that focuses on where real problems are. UM.
Speaker 1: Last month I went down to the border and I
Speaker 1: saw where children had been taken away from their mothers.
Speaker 1: I met with those mothers who had been lied to,
Speaker 1: who didn't know where their children were, who had had
Speaker 1: a chance to talk to their children, and there was
Speaker 1: no plan for how they would be reunified with their children.
Speaker 1: I was discussed by Senator Elizabeth Warren here and her
Speaker 1: speak today, and what I need, what I want to
Speaker 1: say to her is stop lying to the American people
Speaker 1: because you don't care what is happening to the victims
Speaker 1: of illegal alien crime. Because if you did, you would
Speaker 1: be standing up for us and you would be doing
Speaker 1: something about it. That last comment was maryam Mendoza, a
Speaker 1: longtime friend of this program, and she was taken on
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren stupidity and oh the MSNBC contributed this. This
Speaker 1: girl in Iowa that Fox News is talking about. MARYA
Speaker 1: Mendoza is the mother of Police Argent Brandon Mendoza. He
Speaker 1: was killed on May the twelve and a head on
Speaker 1: collision and the driver was an illegal immigrant. Let's see
Speaker 1: hiah metha and phetamine and his blood alcohol content was
Speaker 1: over three times the legal limit. Also joining us another
Speaker 1: friend of the program, he too lost his son, Steve
Speaker 1: Ronnebeck is with us. His son Grant, was twenty one
Speaker 1: years old working overnight in the convenience store, murdered while
Speaker 1: working there in Mesa, Arizona. The killer was an illegal
Speaker 1: immigrant who was released by ICE in after a conviction
Speaker 1: for burglary and kidnapping involving drug dealing, if I remember correctly,
Speaker 1: in that case, it actually held a woman hostage for
Speaker 1: almost a week. Also joining us, Agnes Gibbey. Her son
Speaker 1: Ronald da Silva, was murdered in two thousand and two
Speaker 1: in California's in An Empire by illegal immigrant gang member
Speaker 1: Louise Gonzalez, according to reports in that case, and it's
Speaker 1: just unbelievable. Welcome all of you to the program. Uh,
Speaker 1: My thoughts and prayers are with all of you always. Marianne.
Speaker 1: I admire your your your courage, your willingness to take
Speaker 1: on the stupidity of some that really just fight basic,
Speaker 1: simple common sense. We can protect people like your son,
Speaker 1: who you was so proud of. And I am amazed
Speaker 1: daily that these politicians um continue to protect illegal alien
Speaker 1: criminals in our country. And like I said on Tucker,
Speaker 1: you know, we have pleaded with them to please look
Speaker 1: at what's happening to American citizens. And it's not just
Speaker 1: the American citizens who are killed, Sean. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: a rape epidemic going on in North Carolina. There's huge
Speaker 1: amounts of identities aft happening right now with our military
Speaker 1: men and women because of the leak with military information
Speaker 1: a year or so ago, and they're being affected immensely,
Speaker 1: and the crimes just go on and on and on
Speaker 1: and on. It's just such a deep seated, um you know,
Speaker 1: awful thing that's happening to us. And to think that
Speaker 1: they would even refer to her as an Iowa girls
Speaker 1: instead of standing up for their fellow American infuriates me.
Speaker 1: The Iowa girl has a name, and her name is
Speaker 1: as Molly Tibbitts. Your son has a name, Steve Ronobak's son,
Speaker 1: Grant has a name. These are real people, real lives,
Speaker 1: real family LEAs, And you know, I've gotten to know
Speaker 1: many of you over time. Steve, you're one of them.
Speaker 1: Like mary Anne, I don't even know how you do
Speaker 1: these interviews, but you're doing it to warn other parents
Speaker 1: that this can happen to them too. Oh absolutely, And
Speaker 1: And you know, I just want to say, and I
Speaker 1: know I can speak for Agnes and Maryanne, that that
Speaker 1: from my family to the Tibbott's family, that our prayers
Speaker 1: and condolences and we're just so sorry that they've had
Speaker 1: to join the club that nobody should be part of,
Speaker 1: especially at the hands of an illegal immigrants. The you know,
Speaker 1: that just hit me like like a sledgehammer in the chest.
Speaker 1: The other day when when they found her and then
Speaker 1: a few hours later they said it was the illegal
Speaker 1: alien that killed her. It just goes to show you
Speaker 1: that are the liberal side of our government is not
Speaker 1: ready to put the American people first. They're not ready
Speaker 1: to fight for American citizens. They have their own agenda.
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren is disgrace. And what she said about the
Speaker 1: Iowa girl your right. So she has a name and
Speaker 1: her name, Yeah, that was the MSNBC contributor that said
Speaker 1: that part. But I gotta tell you something, I found
Speaker 1: it cruel. There's a certain you know, I have this
Speaker 1: uncanny ability, uh Steve, that I wish I almost didn't have.
Speaker 1: And it's called empathy. And I'm listening to you and
Speaker 1: Mary Anne and Agnes is with us today, and I
Speaker 1: have met so many other families, and I just somehow
Speaker 1: I can look into your eyes, hear your stories and
Speaker 1: see the pain that maybe maybe it lessens a little
Speaker 1: bit here and there, but it never leaves. You're never
Speaker 1: gonna get over the fact that you're twenty one year
Speaker 1: old son who's working an overnight shift, he's producing, he's
Speaker 1: he's building, his life is no longer with you. Every day.
Speaker 1: I just I don't know. I listen, I don't know
Speaker 1: if I survived. I don't know how you few people
Speaker 1: do it. I don't know how you make it. And
Speaker 1: we just keep fighting, and we keep fighting to protect
Speaker 1: other American families so that this doesn't happen to that.
Speaker 1: And that's what keeps me going. Yeah, and Agnes, you've
Speaker 1: you've been through this pain too, call us about your son, Ronald. Yes,
Speaker 1: I have, and I lived with it every day. And
Speaker 1: first I wanted to say to Molly's family, my heart
Speaker 1: goes out to them. I was extremely touched and moved.
Speaker 1: It opened a huge scab on my heart. Uh. This
Speaker 1: country should be filled with empathy, respect and concern for
Speaker 1: American citizens and for the victims that have lost your
Speaker 1: lives in this insanity. And uh and I agree with
Speaker 1: with ron and Uh. Mary Anne, Senator Elizabeth One is
Speaker 1: a disgraze and embarrassment to this country. What kind of mother,
Speaker 1: what kind of woman is she to reduce? Uh? Molly
Speaker 1: Tibbets to Iowa girl, that person, that girl had a family.
Speaker 1: She ought to be ashamed of herself in our country
Speaker 1: needs to start focusing on American citizens. As a legal
Speaker 1: immigrant myself, I find find it incredibly offensive that this
Speaker 1: country is not protecting citizens in legal immigrants, but giving
Speaker 1: every protection to illegal aliens. And another thing that really
Speaker 1: really bothers me is how they reduce them to undocumented immigrants.
Speaker 1: They are not immigrants, they are illegal aliens. You know,
Speaker 1: I don't know what when you came into the country.
Speaker 1: I keep saying, just I don't repeat myself, agness, In
Speaker 1: case you've never heard me say it, I don't care
Speaker 1: that people come to the country. My grandparents, all four
Speaker 1: of them came at the turn of the last century,
Speaker 1: poor from Ireland. I mean, nothing in their pockets, you know,
Speaker 1: ten bucks. I only want one thing. Just do it
Speaker 1: like you did it. You did it legally, so we
Speaker 1: can check your background and we don't have drug trafficking,
Speaker 1: human trafficking across our borders. I've been down there twelve times,
Speaker 1: I've in it with my own eyes, and just to
Speaker 1: protect the American people, and that's all we're asking. I
Speaker 1: don't think that that's common sense to me now, and
Speaker 1: there is a process. It took my family twirteen years.
Speaker 1: They applied three times. The first two it lapsed. They
Speaker 1: have to start the process all over. This is why
Speaker 1: it's so important to vet people too. They have to
Speaker 1: go through full background investigation, full medical that you pay.
Speaker 1: You have to pay out a pocket for all these things.
Speaker 1: That's a small price to pay to come to such
Speaker 1: a great country. But people like me, they're legally immigrated
Speaker 1: into into the country. We assimilated, We respect and honor.
Speaker 1: This is my home, this is my country. I didn't
Speaker 1: have a choice where I was born, but this is
Speaker 1: my country of heart, and I will fight to the
Speaker 1: end for my country. And that's why vetting is so important.
Speaker 1: Like this guy that killed Wally Christian, he said or
Speaker 1: he blacked out. Well, obviously if he has an anger issue,
Speaker 1: he blacks out. We don't need people like that in
Speaker 1: our country. Get them out. There's so many countries and
Speaker 1: I'll throw those to marry in and um, you're right,
Speaker 1: but there's that they have merit based immigration. But there's
Speaker 1: also you know, we could have people that come for
Speaker 1: a season. They can work. If you know, look at
Speaker 1: our unemployment rate, it's so low now we actually have
Speaker 1: more jobs available than we have people on unemployment. I mean, okay,
Speaker 1: then maybe that's an opportunity to bring people in and
Speaker 1: give them an opportunity. But as long as we check
Speaker 1: out your background, we don't care where you come from.
Speaker 1: If we build the wall, I'm all in favor of
Speaker 1: the big door in the wall, as long as we
Speaker 1: check people out. Just like people that grow up under Shariah,
Speaker 1: that is the antithesis of our constitutional republic that they
Speaker 1: grew up under. I want to know that they share
Speaker 1: our values before they come here. It's it's hard for
Speaker 1: them to assimilate into this country. And um, you know,
Speaker 1: there are good people who come to our country. I
Speaker 1: agree with that. But the criminal element and the lenient
Speaker 1: leniency shown in our court systems to these illegals who
Speaker 1: are giving less lesser cent sences an American citizen would
Speaker 1: for the exact crime that you know that they have committed,
Speaker 1: and they're an illegal alien president in our country. On
Speaker 1: top of it, this should be holding more of a
Speaker 1: punishment for them. And the fact that a lot of
Speaker 1: times all they do is deport them when we have
Speaker 1: a purse border the way we do, I was just
Speaker 1: down to Glenn Spencer's ranch in southern Arizona. And and
Speaker 1: there's a bob wire fence is all that separating Mexico.
Speaker 1: I climbed through the bobwire fans and climb back in
Speaker 1: two seconds. These are not the protections that America needs.
Speaker 1: And these criminals that are deported after they've committed heinious crimes,
Speaker 1: they're back over in a week. And because Steve and
Speaker 1: Agnes and I are privited a lot of these articles
Speaker 1: that aren't out in mainstream media, they're back fifteen, sixteen, eighteen,
Speaker 1: twenty two times, and they're committing heinous crimes every time
Speaker 1: they're here and every time they're deported. And this isn't
Speaker 1: you know, I'm still getting guss out of it from
Speaker 1: a lot of people. You're a racist. This is not
Speaker 1: a racist problem. And this is not a way that
Speaker 1: liberals are going to deflect from this problem. They have
Speaker 1: to face it head on. These are legal aliens, which
Speaker 1: means they are people unlawfully present in our country. I
Speaker 1: don't care where you've come from and what race you are,
Speaker 1: You are illegally president in our country. And this is
Speaker 1: what all three of us are fighting. This has to stop,
Speaker 1: you know, uh. I want to give Steve another opportunity
Speaker 1: to speak here because I just want people to hear
Speaker 1: your message because you you have lived through this. You
Speaker 1: have you know, we hear about Kate Steinley, we hear
Speaker 1: about you know, this young woman Molly Tibbitts. And I
Speaker 1: know people some have heard your story, but many have not.
Speaker 1: And there's so many others. I bet I don't know
Speaker 1: how many you all know together. I mean, I'm sure
Speaker 1: you've met a lot of these parents. I've met a
Speaker 1: lot of them over the years, myself, Steve. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: you know Marianne and I and Magnes and and Laura
Speaker 1: Wilkerson and I know she's a friend of the show.
Speaker 1: We've got to love her. She's amazing. Yeah. And you know,
Speaker 1: we get to meet these people and we get to
Speaker 1: hear their stories, and I don't think there's any one
Speaker 1: of us that doesn't shed it here with that family
Speaker 1: member because we know their pain. I put out a
Speaker 1: post the other day about you know, can you imagine
Speaker 1: the pain that this family is going through? And at
Speaker 1: the end, I said, I can. And then you know,
Speaker 1: there were several people that I didn't even know we're
Speaker 1: out there. They posted a picture of their loved ones.
Speaker 1: And and I met a woman in Indiana. She doesn't
Speaker 1: want to do media, but it happened to her family,
Speaker 1: you know. And by the way, we talk about separation issues,
Speaker 1: which happened to near Obama and Donald Trump actually fixed
Speaker 1: it through executive order, but it really needs to be
Speaker 1: done by law. I don't think what he did through
Speaker 1: executive order is even constitutional, but he did it um
Speaker 1: and we need to fix the laws. And the only
Speaker 1: thing I will say to you is, you know, there
Speaker 1: are so many people that have literally you know, it
Speaker 1: reminds me of Eric Bowling was on the show the
Speaker 1: other day, Steve, and he said, my son died of
Speaker 1: he bought a Zanex that was laced with Fenton al
Speaker 1: And I want people to know it can happen to them.
Speaker 1: And he's right, and so were you a matter if
Speaker 1: it's going to happen to you, it's a matter of
Speaker 1: when anymore. With the amount of crime that's happening against
Speaker 1: American citizens. And we have formed Angel Families angel Families
Speaker 1: dot com. The website is going to be it's a
Speaker 1: it's a shell right now, but it's being built Sean,
Speaker 1: and we've got I mean, we have got an influx
Speaker 1: of Angel Families that are reaching out to us so
Speaker 1: that we can get their stories out and so that
Speaker 1: people don't think, well, it's just Steve and Agnes and
Speaker 1: Marianne and Laura and a few others who are out
Speaker 1: in the news. We are bringing these people to the light,
Speaker 1: and the American public is going to find out very
Speaker 1: very soon how many of their fellow Americans have been
Speaker 1: affected by illegal alien crime. All right, we'll take a
Speaker 1: quick break. We'll come back more with Angel Families. Will
Speaker 1: tell you more about their web We'll tell you about
Speaker 1: their website when we get back. As we continue with
Speaker 1: Agnes given E, Steve, Ronnebeck, and Marry M. Mendoza. Right,
Speaker 1: as we continue Sean Hannity Show, Angel Families. Now they
Speaker 1: have a website. We'll tell you about in a second.
Speaker 1: Agnes giveven E, Steve, Rona Beck, Marry M. Mendoza all
Speaker 1: lost children. Uh yeah, because of the illegal immigrants in
Speaker 1: this country. Real quick, Steve, I cut you off. I apologize.
Speaker 1: That's all right. You know, it is very inset and
Speaker 1: what I want to I want to instill in the
Speaker 1: public is this is kind of like a rape victim,
Speaker 1: and I hate to use that analogy, but it is
Speaker 1: so many rape victims are afraid to come forward or
Speaker 1: they don't want to come forward. There are so many
Speaker 1: of these families out there that have lost loved ones,
Speaker 1: or they've had loved ones become addicted to heroin, or
Speaker 1: their child may have been a rape victim to illegal
Speaker 1: alien and they they don't want to come forward, they
Speaker 1: don't want to go through the agony of it. But
Speaker 1: you want to get a run that they can't listen.
Speaker 1: You're all amazing people, um frankly, far better than stronger
Speaker 1: than I think I could ever be. I'm so sorry
Speaker 1: and each one of your cases, Agnes, thank you so
Speaker 1: much for being one of those. Steve, thank you, Maryanne.
Speaker 1: It's always a pleasure to talk to you again. And Uh,
Speaker 1: I know you're fighting for other parents and other families,
Speaker 1: and I hope people hear it and we could do
Speaker 1: things that are compassionate but tough and smart and just
Speaker 1: full of common sense. One Shawn toll free number, by
Speaker 1: the way, the Senate candidate running against Elizabeth Warren is
Speaker 1: gonna check in and then we're gonna get to your
Speaker 1: calls next Blinds dot com. You know they're not just
Speaker 1: in the blinds business. They're in the complete home transformation business.
Speaker 1: Because that's what's gonna happen when you get brand new
Speaker 1: custom blind shade, shutters, and drapes, all the big names
Speaker 1: of blinds dot Com. You're gonna look around when they're
Speaker 1: when you're done, and you're gonna say, this looks like
Speaker 1: a remodel without that expensive cost. They're gonna guide you
Speaker 1: through the entire process. You get free samples, free shipping,
Speaker 1: free professional online design consultation. Now there's a reason blinds
Speaker 1: dot Com is the number one online retailer of custom
Speaker 1: window coverings. You get all those brand names, you get
Speaker 1: the lowest price possible, lower than any store can ever
Speaker 1: offer offer. And now through August the twenty nine, you're
Speaker 1: gonna save up to thirty plus take an additional five
Speaker 1: percent off sitewide just by using the promo code Handy.
Speaker 1: That's thirty on top of their already low prices and
Speaker 1: an additional five percent off sitewide Blinds dot Com promo code.
Speaker 1: Hannity Quick Break right back on this Friday and the
Speaker 1: candidate that could beat Elizabeth Warren next. Alright, we're gonna
Speaker 1: get to your calls in a second, first, I want
Speaker 1: to introduce to you Jeff deal Is, with a Senate
Speaker 1: candidate Massachusetts running against Elizabeth Warren Um and well, he
Speaker 1: had some interesting comments to say about Warren's comments about
Speaker 1: the death of Molly Tibbotts and his latest campaign. Had
Speaker 1: My son, Matthew Genis, was twenty three years old. He
Speaker 1: was kind, caring, outgoing, He was more than I could
Speaker 1: ever have hoped for and a son. My son was
Speaker 1: killed by someone who should never have been in the country.
Speaker 1: The only thing that has changed since Matthew's death is
Speaker 1: the death toll. It's estimated that there are twenty people
Speaker 1: a day killed by illegal aliens. That's over seven thousand
Speaker 1: people every year. My son is dead because too many
Speaker 1: politicians and local jurisdictions put illegal aliens ahead of Americans.
Speaker 1: Very four story and the news that has to do
Speaker 1: with Molly tibbots the young woman in Iowa who was murdered.
Speaker 1: A person has been charged with that. This person is
Speaker 1: an undocumented immigrant. We need an immigration system that focuses
Speaker 1: on where real problems are. I went down to the border.
Speaker 1: I met with those mothers who had been lied to,
Speaker 1: and there was no plan for how they would be
Speaker 1: reunified with their children. And that's the latest add of
Speaker 1: Jeff Deal, Senate candidate Massachusetts running against Elizabeth Warren. Uh, Jeff,
Speaker 1: that's a tough ad. What's the reaction in Massachusetts been
Speaker 1: to it? Well, Sean, thanks for having me on, and uh,
Speaker 1: I'll say you people in Massachusetts disappointed once again with
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren. Just two weeks ago, she made that comment
Speaker 1: down in New Orleans that the entire criminal justice system,
Speaker 1: including law enforcement, are racist. I think people were extremely
Speaker 1: upset with that. Then to have that pretty heartless turn
Speaker 1: from talking about the family to which she considered to
Speaker 1: be the real problem, which was families being separated at
Speaker 1: the border, people illegal immigrants over American citizens. That really
Speaker 1: has caused people to get upset. Where where was she
Speaker 1: when Obama did the same thing? And why doesn't she
Speaker 1: applaud it? Was President Trump. I don't even think it's
Speaker 1: constitutional as executive order, but he he passed it anyway,
Speaker 1: he signed it anyway, now I know. And by the way, Sean,
Speaker 1: the other sad thing is two days ago when she
Speaker 1: made this comment, it was the seven year anniversary of
Speaker 1: the loss of Matthew Denise. That's Maureen Maloney's son. That
Speaker 1: was Maureen Maloney's voice in the audio you just played.
Speaker 1: She I asked her if she would introduce me at
Speaker 1: the convention that six months ago when I won the
Speaker 1: Republican nomination to run against Elizabeth Warren. Maureen is an
Speaker 1: angel mom named by Donald Trump um to that group.
Speaker 1: So she speaks nationally about this issue about illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: killing American citizens. Those are the ones that are separated
Speaker 1: from their families permanently. And that's the problem with Elizabeth Warren.
Speaker 1: She doesn't seem to even want to acknowledge or recognize
Speaker 1: the problem. In fact, she's going the other way. She
Speaker 1: wants to eliminate ice, and of course she's villainized law enforcement.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you this. Look, well, I know, Bill, Well,
Speaker 1: there's been a there's been uh Scott Brown as an example,
Speaker 1: Massachusetts every once in a while, kind of surprises of
Speaker 1: the country. Although let's be honest, they're more liberal Republicans.
Speaker 1: I'm not even a member of the Republican Party. I'm
Speaker 1: a registered Conservative in New York. But um, it's not
Speaker 1: unthinkable even in Taxachusetts. And I lived five years on
Speaker 1: the border with c. Konkin Swansea, Massachusetts, and I remember
Speaker 1: it well. I lived in Rhode Island five years. Um,
Speaker 1: but it's an uphill climb. If a Republican wants to
Speaker 1: win in Massachusetts, why do you think you can unseat her?
Speaker 1: Especially with her well our national fame shooting through the roof.
Speaker 1: First of all, Sean, you remember Scott Brown being the
Speaker 1: forty one vote against the Unaffordable Care Act. Massachusetts was
Speaker 1: the blueprint for that plan. And yet we still send
Speaker 1: Scott Brown because he explained how financially it wasn't gonna
Speaker 1: bet any benefit anybody. Of course, nobody's gotten that two
Speaker 1: five dollar annual savings. I lead in two fourteen a
Speaker 1: repeal of the index gas tax here in Massachuset. It's
Speaker 1: putting two billion dollars back in the pockets of people
Speaker 1: and businesses. And uh so that's been one another indicator
Speaker 1: of how fiscally aware voters in Massachusetts are. And I
Speaker 1: will tell you this, Uh, Donald Trump got more votes
Speaker 1: in Massachusetts than our Republican governor Charlie Baker, who is
Speaker 1: one of the more popular governors around the country. So
Speaker 1: on paper, the votes are out there. In this ask
Speaker 1: you this helped your campaign in your opinion, if Donald
Speaker 1: Trump went into campaign for you. Absolutely, he's twenty Democrats
Speaker 1: unenrolled to vote for him in the primary. I was
Speaker 1: the only Republican who actually endorsed Donald Trump. I was
Speaker 1: his co chair for Massachusetts. And he is delivering on
Speaker 1: all the promises. Economically, Massachusetts has country leading low unemployment
Speaker 1: three point five percent. We have over one point two
Speaker 1: billion dollars in new revenue because of the job growth
Speaker 1: and wage increases because of the tax reform bill that,
Speaker 1: by the way, Elizabeth Warren voted against, and she called
Speaker 1: it crumbs, just like Nancy Pelosi Massachusetts. By the way,
Speaker 1: that just crumbs. Why does everybody want their crumbs back
Speaker 1: so badly? If it's only crumbs, let us keep it.
Speaker 1: People in Massachusetts will vote what's in their financial interests,
Speaker 1: and they know with me that I've cut taxes and
Speaker 1: I want to continue to progress that's happening in Washington,
Speaker 1: and Elizabeth one wants to take that country back to
Speaker 1: a socialist agenda of higher taxes as she wants. You know,
Speaker 1: obviously government run healthcare, which doesn't work. We know the
Speaker 1: price tag on that thirty two point six trillion dollars.
Speaker 1: If she wants to implement that, Uh, and Elizabeth one
Speaker 1: again is so out of touch with the reality. She's
Speaker 1: putting the interest of people who are not citizens over
Speaker 1: those of Americans. And I think the Tibbets family they
Speaker 1: deserve an apology in my opinion from her for not
Speaker 1: for being so basically unsensitive to the issue. Uh and
Speaker 1: and really just trying to make political points out of
Speaker 1: this whole thing. Well, so, I can't really even admit this,
Speaker 1: but it's the truth. When I lived in Rhode Island,
Speaker 1: I I could not get enough of watching Larry Bird
Speaker 1: and Parish and and d J, Kevin McHale, Danny, Danny Ainge,
Speaker 1: you know, going up against Magic Johnson and Showtime in
Speaker 1: Los Angeles one of the greatest moment. It's an NBA
Speaker 1: history watching that rivalry is one of the best ever. Um.
Speaker 1: But as a New Yorker, that's the death sentence for me.
Speaker 1: Just so you know what I'm admitting here, it's a
Speaker 1: bad thing. Um. Well, listen, we wish you a lot, Jeff.
Speaker 1: We're gonna follow your race. It sounds like you have
Speaker 1: your pulse on the people of Massachusetts. I do think
Speaker 1: it's a long shop. But if people in the era
Speaker 1: of Trump, people need to believe anything can happen. But
Speaker 1: we have the most important election I think in our lifetime,
Speaker 1: this mid term, which is coming up in just seventy
Speaker 1: four days, and we're going to follow your race closely.
Speaker 1: Thanks for being with us well. I appreciate And people
Speaker 1: go to Deal for Senate dot Com they can be
Speaker 1: involved in helping me out as well. Thanks all right,
Speaker 1: Jeff Deal running in Massachusetts eight nine one, Shawn is
Speaker 1: our toll free telephone number. Let's say how to Kevin
Speaker 1: is in Virginia Beach, Virginia on the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Happy Friday, Kevin, how are you showing? It's a pleasure
Speaker 1: to talk to you. I'm watching our federal government fall apart.
Speaker 1: In essence, then, I'm wondering why we're not looking at
Speaker 1: the fact that Mueller is actually in a way holding
Speaker 1: Uh what's the word I'm looking for? Um, maybe blackmail?
Speaker 1: What are you saying? What are you suggesting? Blackmail? How
Speaker 1: can we not be looking at the fact that we're
Speaker 1: holding over someone's head, uh three hundred years in jail,
Speaker 1: uh to get him to flip? I mean to me,
Speaker 1: that is nothing. Well, I mean it's like Rick Gates
Speaker 1: and the amount of four cases. The big example is
Speaker 1: Sammy the Bull Gravano kills nineteen people, but if he
Speaker 1: testifies against John Gotti, they'll give him a get out
Speaker 1: of jail free card and a witness protection program home
Speaker 1: in Arizona. I mean, there's there's something. And as John
Speaker 1: Sale pointed out, it had once been ruled by a
Speaker 1: corpate since overturned. The overturned that that is a former
Speaker 1: bribery something of great worth, which is somebody's freedom. You
Speaker 1: can't put a price on freedom. Well, what kind of
Speaker 1: an offense can the right mount to go against? It's this,
Speaker 1: It just seems so futile. Uh, it's just that. Guess
Speaker 1: when you go to the voting boots, you get to
Speaker 1: speak your mind and nobody gets to know. But but literally,
Speaker 1: I've had people come at me because I had a
Speaker 1: little one bumper sticker on my truck that's Tromp on it.
Speaker 1: And it's just amazing. Listen, you want you you want
Speaker 1: to guarantee that your life is over, I'll tell you
Speaker 1: what you do. Let's say you get a subpoena. I
Speaker 1: want you to delete the emails. I want you to
Speaker 1: delete the hard drive. I want you to bust up
Speaker 1: your devices. You want to want to know what else
Speaker 1: you get to go before any judge. Don't corroborate the information,
Speaker 1: just kind of make it up as you go along.
Speaker 1: Don't perfect purposely omit key facts to the judge. See
Speaker 1: how well those maneuvers would work out for you. Which
Speaker 1: is the point I made in my monologue on TV
Speaker 1: last night and on radio here yesterday, is we have
Speaker 1: a two tier justice system, and it is The President
Speaker 1: even tweeted a lot about this this morning. If if
Speaker 1: you care about justice and equal justice, and if you
Speaker 1: care about equal application of American laws, you believe in
Speaker 1: our constitutional republic, which is is rooted in a system
Speaker 1: of equality, we better get this right. Because if we
Speaker 1: don't get it right, and we only selectively prosecute people
Speaker 1: that we politically disagree with and criminalize political differences as
Speaker 1: a country, we're done. It's intentity that that's hyperbole. It's
Speaker 1: not hyperbole. And I'm telling you cannot use the justice
Speaker 1: system as a weapon because you don't like somebody's political
Speaker 1: point of view, or in the case of Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: the Great Disruptor, you don't like his style. That's really
Speaker 1: what it comes down. Look, he's like, as I've been saying,
Speaker 1: you take a pool after it's been sitting all winner
Speaker 1: and you know, you know all the algaes growing in
Speaker 1: the spring, and you open up the pool. It's disgusting
Speaker 1: and you gotta kill it. So what do you do?
Speaker 1: You shocked the pool? Well, Donald Trump is a shock
Speaker 1: to the entire poll, political insider, swamp sewer infrastructure, and
Speaker 1: all those people that benefit from the sewer. They kind
Speaker 1: of hate his guts, not kind that they do, and
Speaker 1: they want to destroy him and they want to bring
Speaker 1: him down. And Mueller is going to provide the roadmap
Speaker 1: in his report. That's how this You want to know
Speaker 1: how this story ends, It's gonna end with his report,
Speaker 1: the Julianni report, and then the voters decide. That's how
Speaker 1: I guess it ends. And then you the people. You
Speaker 1: don't think this is an important election, Oh it is one,
Speaker 1: Shawn told free telephone number. You want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. Right. That wraps up what is
Speaker 1: a huge and busy newsweek. But let not your heart
Speaker 1: be troubled, because why you have the weekend. We'll come back.
Speaker 1: We'll be ready for battle political battle on Monday. As always,
Speaker 1: thanks for being with us. Have a great, safe, fun weekend,
Speaker 1: and we will see you back here Monday. And uh
Speaker 1: that's all for this week