WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Shutdown Averted, Autumn Statement, Fentanyl Crisis

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the top stories in the coming week from our day

0:00:06.120 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Break anchors all around the world. Straight Ahead on the program,

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the world's most valuable chip maker reports earnings this week.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. We'll tell you what

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to expect from end video.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hedge in London, where we're looking ahead to

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 2>the UK government's autumn statement and it's a gloomy economic

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 2>back job.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Bryan Curtis in Hong Kong. We look at the

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 3>US China agreement on fentanyl. What needs to happen to

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 3>disrupt the supply.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm Kaylee Lines in Washington, where Congress has averted a

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.240
<v Speaker 4>government shutdown for now, with the real spending fight still ahead.

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 5>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, the business

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 5>news you need to wrap up your week in just

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 5>one fifteen minute podcast available on Apple, Spotify, The Bloomberg

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.320
<v Speaker 5>Business Appen everywhere you get your podcasts.

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>today's program with one of the last important third quarter

0:00:56.720 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>earnings reports, and it's a biggie and video reports on Tuesday,

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Fueled by blockbuster demand for its artificial intelligence chips shares

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>up more than two hundred and thirty percent just so

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>far this year. Also in Vidia's latest breakthrough trip and

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the impact of US restrictions on tech sales to China.

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>For all that and more, let's bring in Bloomberg Technology

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>host ed Ludlow in San Francisco and Bloomberg Intelligence senior

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>technology analyst man Deep Singing here in New York. Both

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of you welcome, Ed. Let's start with you. What are

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you expecting to see from Nvidio's earnings and its outlook?

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.279
<v Speaker 6>So they'll just be a big focus on the data

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 6>center business for Nvideo, right and in the context of

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 6>artificial intelligence, in video makes GPUs graphics processing units, and

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 6>those are chips that are basically capable of doing lots

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 6>of parallel data processes at a very high level. It's

0:01:49.480 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 6>kind of what you need in an AI accelerator to

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 6>train the foundation models that POWERAI. And they've just seen

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 6>massive growth in that data center business. You know, last

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.600
<v Speaker 6>quarter it was kind of one hundred and seventy percent

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 6>top line growth year on year, and going into this

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 6>fiscal third quarter, the expectation is that that growth jumps

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.359
<v Speaker 6>to two hundred and thirty percent approximately year on year,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 6>but as you pointed out, the stocks had an incredible

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 6>run in twenty twenty three so far the story is

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:20.959
<v Speaker 6>well known in video. Is still the kind of market

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 6>incumbent for this specialized AI chip, and so expectations will

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 6>be really high. And around the corner they have their

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 6>next generation chip, the GH two hundred, which is due

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 6>to go in production in the second quarter of next year.

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:36.399
<v Speaker 6>So you know that's how earnings always go, right, how

0:02:36.400 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 6>did they do on the things we know they're doing?

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 6>And when's the next big thing actually going to come

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 6>and materialize in their financials? And I'm sure that that

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 6>will be the discussion man do well.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 7>So from my perspective, you know, the last two quarters

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 7>and videos come out not only beat their numbers, but

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 7>raise the guidance by you know, almost thirty forty percent,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 7>And now that you know it's happened two times, I

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 7>think the bar is pretty high. But at the same time,

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.799
<v Speaker 7>we know the market is still supply constrained. I mean,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 7>everyone that we talk to keep saying, you know, they

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 7>can't find the GPUs, whether it's a eight hundred or

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 7>the h hundreds, to train the models to really invest

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 7>in GENAI. And so from that perspective, it still feels

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 7>like the market is supply constrained and that goes in

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 7>in Video's favor. Look, there are announcements from Microsoft yesterday

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 7>and then from AMD saying that their GPU business could

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 7>be two billion dollar und rate in twenty twenty four.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 7>But when you compare to where in Video is we're

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 7>talking about sixty billion in data center revenue next year

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 7>or even higher, it just tells you like they have

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 7>the dominant share and they continue to be the preferred

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 7>accelerator for anyone who is training these a lot of

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 7>language models.

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:55.880
<v Speaker 6>And Mandy, let me jump in and kind of help

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 6>out the audience with some of what you said. So

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 6>supply constrained means that basically there is more demand for

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 6>their AI accelerators or GPUs than they can actually make

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 6>right now. And that's kind of important because the risk

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 6>or the unknown in the background is China, and China

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 6>in the data center context has been like twenty to

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 6>twenty five percent of their business historically, and there are

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 6>technology export curbs, and how originally Nvidia got around that

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 6>was to make a lower spec version of the H

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 6>one hundred called the H eight hundred, or a lower

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 6>spec version of the A one hundred called the A

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 6>eight hundred. Those were GPUs specifically for the China market

0:04:33.839 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 6>that were conforming with the US technology export curbs that

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 6>were put in place. Those curbs were then expanded, and

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:45.119
<v Speaker 6>you probably noticed last week some activity in the share

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 6>price around reports that they're planning three new chips next gen,

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 6>even lower spec to comply with those with those curbs.

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 6>But the reason I make that point, and I'm interesting

0:04:55.360 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 6>you take on this, man deep, is that when your

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 6>supply constrained, if one of your big market, China is

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 6>a warrior or a problem, there's plenty of demand elsewhere.

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 6>You know, from countries and companies all over the world

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 6>who are kind of clamoring to get hold of those

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 6>those specialist GPUs. And I know that on the Bloomberg

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 6>Technology Show and everyone I speak to that's certainly the case, right,

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 6>people would say, I'll take some of those if we

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:18.960
<v Speaker 6>can get them.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And look the way to model the revenue for

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 7>Nvidia or AMD. You know the lift from Jenni is

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 7>look at the hyperscaler CAPEX. I mean, these are still

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 7>the largest customers for these chips, because all these chips

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 7>are being deployed on public cloud. And we know Microsoft

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 7>has phrased their CAPEX expectations Googled not so much, and

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 7>Jensen was there at the Microsoft event. So it just

0:05:45.800 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 7>tells you that, you know, there is an appetite to

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 7>get these chips. However many Nvidia has, and you know,

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 7>if it's a hyperscaler, they're going to buy it, even

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 7>if they're investing in their own chips. And right now,

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 7>the definitely the markets seems like, you know, there is

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 7>a huge appetite for whatever and video is making on

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 7>the Accelerator.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 6>Site exactly, and it's kind of important to think about

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 6>how those chips manifest in the real world. You just

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 6>outlined it. But in the courter Gone, I actually visited

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 6>in Nvidia and I got my hands on the now

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 6>infamous H one hundred. And when we're talking about GPUs

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 6>or literally semiconductors that are the brains behind training AI models,

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 6>it's not like a chip you can just hold in

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 6>your hand. You know, when people say, oh, I secured

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 6>a cluster of ten thousand, h one hundreds, they don't

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 6>just sort of have them in a bag slung over

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 6>their shoulder. As Mandeep explained, these GPUs go in combination

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 6>several GPUs into a box called a server design. That

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 6>server design goes, alongside dozens of others, into the infrastructure

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 6>that forms data centers. We're talking about like massive scale here.

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 6>And what Invidia has done and how it's been able

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 6>to maintain its lead is that right now, the work

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 6>that's being done on AI is training foundation models or

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 6>large language models that have billions and billions of parameters,

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 6>tens of billions, sometimes hundreds of billions of parameters. Only

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 6>the h one hundred can can really handle that right now?

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 6>And what was so interesting manib reference the news from AMD,

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 6>but specifically Microsoft coming out with its own silicon this week,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 6>the Azure MAYA one hundred. You know, from what I

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 6>can tell, that's an AI accelerator that's much lower spec

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 6>right and it will do some of the more the

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 6>smaller models, more basic models. I guess what I'm saying

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 6>is like the market expectations super high because in Vidia

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 6>has a lead, and it looks like it will continue

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 6>to grow and maintain that lead for the time being.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 7>I mean, what I'm interested in is what the software

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 7>strategy is so what people forget with then Vidia is

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 7>not only they have the accelerator, but they also had

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 7>the Kuda software that really makes it easy to train

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.920
<v Speaker 7>your llms. And in this case, you know, if the

0:07:57.000 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 7>hyperscalers are spending five to ten billion dollars every hyperscaler

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 7>is spending on these GPU chips, how does it translate

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 7>into the cloud revenue next year? Because right now, when

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 7>you look at the cloud estimates, whether it's Azure, Amazon AWLS,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 7>or Google GCP, the accelerator revenue is still not reflected

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 7>in the number. So I'm curious to see what is

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 7>the lag when you know the monetization starts to show

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 7>up in the cloud numbers.

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, let's talk then let's pivot to the newest

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>chip that it's going to develop and come out next year.

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You talked at about the Age one hundred, it's going

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to come out with an Age two hundred. Sure, how

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>will that be different and how much more will it

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to handle these large data sets?

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 5>Go ahead.

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 6>So what we're talking about is the Grace Hopper super chip,

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 6>and it is both a GPU that we've just been

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 6>talking about a graphics processing unit, but also it has

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 6>within the design other components a processor, but particularly it

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 6>addresses the issue of memory. One of the challenges in

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 6>artificial intelligence and training large language models, which are basically

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 6>the underpinnings of artificial intelligence, is something called the memory wall. Okay,

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 6>and the memory wall basically is an issue where when

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 6>you have a really big AI workload, large AI models

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 6>have basically poor data reuse. They're drawing on lots of

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 6>data for their training, but when you deploy that AI

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 6>technology as a chatbot or another generative AI tool, it

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 6>basically has a poor success rateed cycling data that's already there,

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 6>and so it's really important to increase the memory capacity.

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 6>So in simple terms, the super chip GH two hundred

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 6>just has a more cutting edge inclusion of high BAM

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 6>with memory, and GH two hundred is going to go

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 6>into production in the second quarter of twenty twenty four,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 6>so it's not going to be out there in the

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 6>real world at volume for some time. But from the

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 6>sheer technology standpoint, this is now the battleground. If you

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:17.199
<v Speaker 6>look at AMD's equivalent, their AI accelerator, they lean very

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:19.959
<v Speaker 6>heavily in this idea that they've addressed the high bandwidth

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 6>memory issue but AMD ain't going to be in production

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 6>at volume for some time as well.

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 5>Well.

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot to look forward to our thanks to Bloomberg

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Television Technology host ed Ludlow in San Francisco and Bloomberg

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence Senior technology analyst man Deep sing here in New York.

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Catch Bloomberg Technology weekdays at noon Wall Street Time and

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>get the B Tech podcast wherever you download. Coming up

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg day Break Weekend, a preview of UK Prime

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Minister Rishi Sunak's spending plans. I'm Tom Busby and this

0:10:50.520 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend, our global look

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>ahead at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>program a look at one of the key agreements reached

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>by the US in China following that presidential meeting in

0:11:14.400 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. But first in the UK, Rishi Sunak's government

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>will unveil its tax and spending plans in the coming days.

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Some positive economic data has given the Prime minister a

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>boost on achieving its economic goals, but the budget may

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.960
<v Speaker 1>not make for such optimistic reading. For more or let's

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak, europe Banker

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Caroline Hepger tom.

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 2>Rischie Sunak has been on a roller coaster in the

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>past week. He met one of his five key pledges

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 2>to votus that inflation should come down below five percent

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 2>by the end of the year, but he suffered a

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 2>major setback on another to reduce illegal migration, when the

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>UK's top court said that his plan to deport asylum

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.800
<v Speaker 2>seekers to Rwanda was illegal. Add to that a controversial

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 2>reshuffle of his top team and it has been a

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 2>busy few days. So in the coming week, the Prime Minister,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 2>along with his Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, will be trying to

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 2>reset the government's economic agenda. All this with one eye

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 2>on a general election that is expected within the next year.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 2>The economic and fiscal situation in the UK is still

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>pretty gloomy, with growth flatlining, inflation is still well above

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 2>the Bank of England's two percent target, and rising borrowing costs.

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>On Blueberg Radio, I've been speaking to Elizabeth Martin's UK

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 2>economist at HSBC for her view about the situation facing

0:12:36.960 --> 0:12:37.679
<v Speaker 2>the chancellor.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 9>What's the UK government borrowing is actually coming in below

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 9>what the OBR had been expecting in the near terms

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 9>it's okay, but you know, the amount of issuance into

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 9>the guilt market is concerning, I think to everyone involved

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 9>in in that market, and I think, look, we're servicing

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 9>a debt level of nearly one hundred percent of GDP

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 9>at rates at fifteen year half. So all of those

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 9>things do worry me. And I think whoever wins the

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 9>election is going to have some difficult choices to make

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 9>unless we can find that holy grail supply side growth

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 9>and you know, grow the pie, as Let's Trust used

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 9>to say.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 2>So that was Elizabeth Martin's UK economists at HSBC for herview.

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 2>As the governing Conservatives continue to trail behind the opposition

0:13:21.600 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party in the polls, the Chancellor will be keen

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 2>to make an impact with his autumn statement. And I've

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 2>been discussing the context with Bloomberg opinion columnist Marcus Ashworth

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 2>asking him what he thinks the context is to the

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>autumn statement.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 8>I actually think that the data out recently has been

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 8>very good for the UK and it's why sterling is

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 8>at one twenty four. So I appreciate that's more dollar

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 8>drive them, but you know, look, the economy is only

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 8>at zero. I mean, that's a great result, and I

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 8>do think interest rates are have Peete and I will

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 8>come lower. The interesting point is he's got a little

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 8>bit of wiggle room because if you look at numbers

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 8>year today, the public finances as ever are completely different

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 8>for what the Ober thought they might be. I'm not

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 8>having a go at them, it's it's the way the

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.439
<v Speaker 8>system works. But we're probably going to be about thirty

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 8>six billion or something like that better by the end

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 8>of this financial year. Were already about twenty billion better.

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 8>And that means that probably we will have to issue

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 8>about twenty twenty six less guilts and t bills. He

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 8>can play around this stuff. He has some headroom that

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 8>could of course go away, and it's more a political

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 8>question whether he wants to spend it now. I think

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 8>he made There's lots of hints already coming in as

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 8>his usual UK politics, and I think inheritance tax is

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 8>something he wants to do something about very soon. He

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 8>may cup the limit from forty percent tax down to say,

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 8>I know, thirty or even twenty percent. That's a sort

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 8>of to keep the background is happy a bit, but

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 8>he wants to keep the dry powder for clearly the

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 8>the budget in March, and I think all they can

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 8>really do this government is at least give the inclination

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 8>that they will cut taxes in the future, wait for

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 8>the Bank of the until possibly have cut rates by

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 8>the time of the next election. But you know, they've

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 8>not got much room, but they have enough room to

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 8>do something. They could of course increase spending, but I

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 8>think all they'll really do is set traps for the

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 8>next labor government.

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>What about any tax books do you think for UK businesses,

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 2>because that's the other big kind of lobby is companies

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 2>who want to be able to invest, to grow businesses,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 2>to get to get well an extension of tax breaks

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 2>that they've enjoyed. Do you think that's possible. Would it

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 2>be well received by market?

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 8>It should be possible, It should be the right thing

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 8>to do. The question is how many votes are actually

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 8>in there, and that's a very horrible situation we're in.

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 8>The right thing to do is to extend these basically

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 8>all investments investment be set up against tax, which they've

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 8>had to because of again these OBR rules, they had

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 8>to limit that to three years. They're playing games of

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 8>their around their own rules. It's a situation we're in. Unfortunately,

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 8>we're boxed in by this this ridiculous fiscal framework, and

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 8>that's why if you're investing, you will need an horizon

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 8>longer than three years. At the moment, the tax breaks

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 8>only out for three years and it's about to expire.

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 8>They will increase that. Will they extend it permanently? I

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 8>hope they do so in essence or business investment can

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.160
<v Speaker 8>be offset against corporation tax. I don't think they'll cut

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 8>corporation tax every roll, but they'll increase analysis. It's the

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 8>right thing to do. I hope they do it. Whether

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 8>they do it or not depends purely on the politics

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 8>sadly here, and I think there is a chance they

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:39.280
<v Speaker 8>may delay that or certainly put that into it in

0:16:39.320 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 8>a situation where it makes it all that pain will

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 8>come in future fiscal years and not this currently.

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>There's also been a drive to try to turn around

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 2>the fortunes of London listings to try to get pension

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 2>funds and we've spoken about this before, to get them

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>to invest into UK businesses. Now today we've been talking

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 2>this money on big Radio about the British ier. I mean,

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 2>is that the answer to the poor performance of UK stocks.

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Would it work. There's a chance they're going to do it.

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 8>It's the answer for UK stockbreakers for sure. I mean

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 8>it's amazing to read some of the commentary on perhaps

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 8>great ideas coming out. Let's make a British ier and

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 8>increase the allowances. I'm very, very nervous when they're talking

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 8>about putting our pensions, for instance, into sort of infrastructure products.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 8>Please leave our sayings alone. That's not where the government

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 8>should be. If you want to give us greater allowances, fine,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 8>but don't alter or steer it in such a way

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 8>that you are making you invest in something which we

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 8>shouldn't necessarily be investing in. And I think it's a

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 8>very dangerous subject. I do think there's a halfway house.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 8>They can increase the allowance if you put it into

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 8>UK things, but I don't think you should be altering

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 8>the current allowances to invest around the world or where

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 8>you want to, because I don't think that's what and

0:18:00.280 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 8>should be steering and picking winners. So yes, they may

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:06.720
<v Speaker 8>play with this. This has been flagged quite hard, so

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 8>I imagine there will be something, whether they leave it

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 8>till the budget or they do it now. They also

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 8>said I don't know, but yeah, we might get something

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 8>on that. To sound all pro British.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>The issue, you know, more broadly is about the kind

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 2>of inflationary pressures and what the Bank of England does.

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, put that into context. How much further does

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the Bank of England have to work to bring down

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 2>inflation in the UK.

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 8>They don't have to do anything. They've overdone it. In fact,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 8>I think the panic hike in Dune and fifty basis

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 8>points two days later they got the CPI number which

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 8>realized the actual fact they didn't need to do anything.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 8>And we've seen the numbers out this week that you know,

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 8>particularly services inflation down to six point six that's already

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 8>well above where the Bank of England expects to be

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 8>a six point nine at the end of this quarter.

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 8>They've overdone it, as has I think the European Central

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 8>Bank as well, which brings us into As I said,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 8>I expect a rate cut before the next election. As

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 8>I think the economy, as I said, flatlining at zero.

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 8>It's a fantastic result. In our economists expect overall drop

0:19:12.440 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 8>a one four percentage point in ghost domestic product over

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 8>the course of the next year. I think that's certainly possible,

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.640
<v Speaker 8>and I think we'll be talking more about the prospect

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 8>of inflation coming down too quickly. And I'm the worries

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 8>again of getting below that target a little and earth

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 8>than they're expected.

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think the cost.

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 8>Of living crisis we're now should we say, reverse earnings

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 8>are now substantially above where inflation is. I think food

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 8>prices can you come down. We've already seen the energy

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 8>stuff watch out, so I personally think we'll get some

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 8>good us on that front.

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 2>That was Bloomberg opinion columnist Marcus Ashworth. My thanks to

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 2>him for joining me. I'm Caroline Hepgar here in London.

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>You can catch us every weekday morning for Bloomberg Daybreak

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 2>eu at beginning at six am in London. That's one

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 2>am on Wall Street.

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Tom our thanks to Bloomberg Daybreak Europe banker Caroline Hepgar

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, the plan

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for a crackdown on fentanyl by both the US and China.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. I'm Tom Busby

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in New York with your global look ahead at the

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>top stories for investors in the coming week. The US

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>government avoids another possible shutdown, at least for now, as

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll look at what's next for Congress. But first, the

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>deal that President Biden reached with Chinese President shi Jinping

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to combat the manufacture and export of fentanyl into the

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>US has been characterized by senior US officials as the

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>most important agreement coming out of that summit. So what's next?

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.679
<v Speaker 1>What steps are needed to disrupt the supply?

0:20:47.960 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 3>For more?

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak Asia anchor Brian Curtis speaks with Michelle Cortes

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Medical Science and Tech reporter.

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Tom We focus on one of the key areas of

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 3>agreement between President Biden and Chinese Leadershijenping, combating the spread

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 3>of fentanyl. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid produced by companies

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 3>in China. China said that it would take actions to

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 3>prevent the raw materials of the drug, known as precursors,

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 3>from being exported without controls. The precursors find their way

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 3>into Mexico and into the hands of primarily two criminal gangs,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:26.439
<v Speaker 3>the Sineloa Cartel and the Cartel Jalisco New Generation. The

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>gang synthesize the chemicals into fentanyl and hire US citizens

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 3>for the most part, to smuggle the drugs into the

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 3>United States. So how does that chain get disrupted? Well,

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 3>joining us now is Michelle Cortez from Bloomberg's Global Business

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Asia team, So in terms of how does he get disrupted,

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 3>I suppose it's at the source. That's what this is

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 3>all about. Can they do it?

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:52.399
<v Speaker 10>Good news, of course that China and the US are

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:55.679
<v Speaker 10>working together on pretty much anything these days. We're a

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 10>fan of that, but particularly when we're talking about something

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 10>like the opioid christ which is killing about one hundred

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 10>and fifty Americans every single day. And Brian, you're exactly right.

0:22:05.600 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 10>What they're doing is they're going after the source material,

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 10>the active pharmaceutical ingredient for the fentanyl. China is the

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 10>manufacturing hub of the entire world. That is certainly true

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 10>for pharmaceutical products, and fentanyl is an improved drug. It

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 10>is used for real medical reasons and a lot of

0:22:24.040 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 10>that production comes out of China. But what is also

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 10>happening is this illegal production that is being also done

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 10>in China, and for a long time was fed directly

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 10>to the US. There was a crackdown on that, and

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 10>what has happened since then is a lot of those

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 10>precursor ingredients are now being sent to Mexico in the

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 10>form of powders and liquids. They're being built into medicines,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 10>pills and drops that are smuggled over the border as

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 10>you pointed to, getting to Americans. And it's that piece.

0:22:56.800 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 10>It's actually nailing down who's making the active ingredients in China,

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 10>making sure that only the legitimate stuff is shipped out

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:06.359
<v Speaker 10>to the right place.

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 3>So do we know much about the way in to

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.439
<v Speaker 3>these companies and the flow out of the chemicals.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 10>Right, So that's exactly the point. We don't know certainly

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 10>as people in general, as users, as reporters, we don't

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 10>know who's making real ventanyl, who's making illicit ventanyl, and

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 10>where it's going. That is going to require the Chinese

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 10>government to really buckle down and to put money, time

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 10>and effort into organizing and they're going to really have

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 10>to put effort into figuring out which companies, which manufacturing plants,

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 10>are making what medicines and where they're sending it. And

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 10>that's the piece that's where the rubber hits the road

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 10>that they're going to have to actually do the investigations.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 10>The bureaucracy, the paperwork, all of that kind of nitty

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 10>gritty stuff. It is not easy. It is not going

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 10>to be fast, but that's the stuff that's going to

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.200
<v Speaker 10>have to happen in order to reduce the trade.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 3>It's always something of a black box in China. It's

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 3>not easy to know exactly what sorts of controls there are.

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Do we know much about the controls that are already

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 3>in place and what needs to be added?

0:24:12.520 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, we certainly know about the controls where the Food

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 10>and Drug Administration comes in and reviews all of the

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 10>manufacturing that's happening to make sure that it's being done

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 10>on the up and up. So anything that is FDA

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 10>approved manufacturers those companies we know. The problem is is

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 10>that that's not where the issue is. That's not the companies

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.199
<v Speaker 10>normally that are sending out the illicit material, and so

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 10>finding those companies people who are doing things on the side,

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 10>perhaps who have the knowledge, maybe they're getting the access

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 10>to these ingredients for things that aren't actually medicines. They're

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 10>used in many other things, painting and automotive uses, stuff

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 10>like that. These chemicals aren't just medicines. So there's a

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 10>lot of different avenues where you can get into that,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 10>and we are going to really be relying on the

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 10>Chinese government to buckle down and dig deep to find them.

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, let me ask you this, If by chance we

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 3>get serious controls put in place, what's to stop the

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Mexican cartels from accessing this material elsewhere? Is it really

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 3>hard to make? Is it really China that specializes in this.

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 10>Well, we have seen since the crackdown on China in

0:25:23.440 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 10>about twenty nineteen that a lot of this effort has

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 10>shifted over to China, I mean, has shifted over to India.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 10>China and India are the two big active pharmaceutical ingredient

0:25:33.280 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 10>producers for the world, and we have seen that shift.

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 10>It is difficult to make medicines. We see that with

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 10>shortages of generic drugs and many other medicines, you know,

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 10>things for cancer, chemotherapy is really important things. It is

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 10>not easy to just crank something up and start generating

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 10>these medicines and rolling it out. So it would be

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 10>difficult for Mexico to actually start producing it. For these

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 10>crime cartels to be doing it on their own, they

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 10>need to get the access to it from where. But

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 10>whether or not they can shift all of the demand,

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 10>all the supply to India or other manufacturing powerhouses.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 7>We'll have to watch.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.239
<v Speaker 3>And Michelle from the medical science standpoint, why is it

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 3>that fentanyl is killing so many people?

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 10>It is all overdose. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid, an

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 10>incredibly powerful medication. It's one hundred times stronger than morphine,

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 10>for example. And the issue is that when you're talking

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 10>about this illegal production of it, there is just not

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 10>the safety guardrails that are put up. And it is

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 10>so powerful, so potent, and so inexpensive that it's easy

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 10>for these crime syndicates to make their pills and their

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 10>other drugs, slip in a little bit of fentanyl to

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 10>kind of give the other ingredients a boost so that

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.119
<v Speaker 10>you're still getting some kind of a some kind of

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 10>a pain relief, some kind of a you know, a

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 10>drug benefit from it in terms terms of illegal drug benefit,

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 10>but it's much less expensive. The thing is that that

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 10>fentanyl is so powerful that if you don't do it

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 10>in in exactly the right amount, then you can easily

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 10>give somebody an overdose. And it varies, it varies for

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 10>every person. It varies based on how much you weigh

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 10>it varies how much you've been using. It varies what

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 10>you've eaten and done that particular day. So you could

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 10>potentially take a ventanyl pill. You can take an opioid

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 10>you don't even know what it is. You could think

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 10>that you're buying LSD or heroin, and in fact you

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 10>get ventanyl slipped into it, and you get it from

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 10>the same person. You think it's the same batch. One

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 10>day you're fine, the next day you've overdosed.

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:46.479
<v Speaker 3>In any case, the spotlight has really been shown now

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 3>on this triangle from China to Mexico to the United States.

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 3>And we can all hope for progress on stopping or

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 3>combating some of the distribution, but will there be other

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 3>benefits as well, more like just on educating the public

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 3>about what's really happening here.

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 10>Well, anytime you can educate the public, that's definitely going

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 10>to be a good thing. And absolutely we know that,

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 10>certainly from the US perspective, there's been a lot of

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 10>excitement and celebration around the fact that they have gotten

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 10>some meeting of the minds with China when it comes

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 10>to this, because in the US there has been effort

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 10>made to reducing the supply, to catching it early and

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 10>to trying to reduce demand.

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 4>But that is just so very very.

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 6>Difficult to do.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.280
<v Speaker 10>And the hope is that by actually hitting some of

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 10>that supply early that you can reduce the demand, you

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 10>can reduce the access, you can reduce the give and

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 10>take on that end. So when we have some positive news,

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 10>that's great, something welcome to tell Americans that something that

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:52.240
<v Speaker 10>is affecting every single community, every single town, all across

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 10>the country. Everyone knows somebody who has either died from this,

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 10>been exposed to it, maybe had to give a life

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 10>saving narcandos to someone. Some of our colleagues actually carried

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 10>around with them just because they live in big cities

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 10>and have had to use it. So anything that's positive

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 10>definitely will take it.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 3>Michelle, Thanks so much for your insights. Michelle Cortes from

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's Global Business Asia team. Michelle is a specialist in

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 3>health technology and medical science. I'm Brian Curtis along with

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 3>Doug Krisner. You can catch us every weekday here for

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg day Break Asia, beginning at seven am in Hong

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 3>Kong and six pm on Wall Street tom Our.

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Bloomberg day Break Asia anchor Brian Curtis and

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>coming up here on Bloomberg day Break weekend, the US

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>once again averting a government shutdown for now. We head

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to Washington next. I'm Tom Busby, and this is Bloomberg.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look ahead

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:01.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Busby in New York. Stop gap two tiered

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>temporary funding bill, finding a lot of support in the

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>House and Senate and helping avert a government shutdown at

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>least for now. But Congress will have to do this

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all over again in just a few short months. Can

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they get a resolution done for more? Let's head to

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg ninety nine one newsroom in Washington and Bloomberg

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Sound On. Co host Kaylee Lines.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Tom, a shutdown has been averted. Congress has saved

0:30:25.560 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 4>the holidays for themselves, and in fact, everyone already left

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.760
<v Speaker 4>town for Thanksgiving this past week. But come the new year,

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 4>there is going to be a reckoning on Capitol Hill.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 4>The real funding battle still lies ahead. This stop gap

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 4>Continuing Resolution only extends funding for some parts of government

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 4>until January nineteenth, and the other parts until February second,

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 4>and meeting those deadlines is probably going to prove pretty

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 4>challenging here with Mara is Mike Dorning, who helps lead

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:55.800
<v Speaker 4>our congressional coverage at Bloomberg. So Mike Speaker Mike Johnson

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 4>has already said he does not intend to pursue another

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 4>continuing resolution, no more st gap measures, and it seems

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 4>like hardline conservatives in the House do intend to hold

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 4>him to that. So I kind of see two options here,

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:10.200
<v Speaker 4>one being do the work finish all the appropriation bills

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 4>in time, the other being shut down. How hard is

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 4>it going to be to go with option one to

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 4>make option one happen and avoid option two.

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, actually, I think at the end of the day,

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 11>it'll probably be something in between the two, although it

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 11>may involve a shutdown. They've sort of teed up what

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 11>the conservatives don't like, the omnibuses, but almost like little

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 11>mini buses where you won't do all the twelve appropriations

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 11>bills because it just looks like there's just divisions in

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 11>the Republican Party that are blocking them from even getting

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 11>some of them out of the House with a Republican

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 11>version of them, let alone, you know, actually compromising with

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 11>Democrats and coming up with something. But it does tee

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 11>up like essentially two trashes of global settlements, one for

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 11>part of the government initially and then someone for the

0:32:04.680 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 11>rest of the government in early February. And I think

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 11>there's a very high risk of a shutdown and at

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 11>least the first instance, and probably maybe both instances, because

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 11>the divisions are just so great well.

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 4>And to your point on division specifically the divisions within

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 4>the Republican Conference. What Mike Johnson just did pass a

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 4>clean continuing resolution with no spending cuts with overwhelming Democratic

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 4>support is exactly what we saw Speaker McCarthy do earlier

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 4>this fall that ultimately led him to be ousted as speaker.

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 4>So I wonder if the question we're dealing with is

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 4>not singularly will the government shut down, but also a

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 4>question of will Mike Johnson keep the speaker's gavel.

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 11>I think that if that becomes a problem, it'll be

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 11>a problem in late January early February, when all of

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 11>this comes to a head and they are teeing it

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 11>up for the sort of grand fight over funding the

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:04.400
<v Speaker 11>government to be Then you know, he does come into

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 11>this with some credibility, and any reasonable person would say, hey,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 11>he was barely in the speaker's job three weeks when

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 11>you know he's facing a shutdown, so you got to

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 11>give him some ability to get give an extension. And

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 11>he is really a sort of a core, very credible,

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 11>very conservative guy. I mean, this is a guy who

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 11>basically came up representing the Christian right in lawsuits before

0:33:32.280 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 11>he ever ran for elective office. So that wasn't some

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.959
<v Speaker 11>opportunistic you know, positioning himself for the Republican primary. This

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 11>appears to be who he is so much like Nancy

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 11>Pelosi was like this incredibly progressive person with this long

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 11>track record, and she was able to have credibility with progressives.

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 11>This is a guy who is a true ultra conservative.

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 11>He called himself an arch conservative and that helps his

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 11>credibility for now until the robber. It's the road the

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 11>end of January, beginning of February.

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 4>So the outlook is murky to see the waste. Mike Dorning,

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 4>one of the leaders of our congressional coverage here at

0:34:08.680 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg in Washington, thank you so much, and Tom the.

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>Fight ain't over yet, thank you. Kaylee. That was Bloomberg's

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>sound on co host Kaylee Lines, reporting from our Bloomberg

0:34:17.880 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine one newsroom in Washington, and you can hear

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>sound on weekdays one to three pm Wall Street Time

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. That does it for this edition of

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning at

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>five am Wall Street Time for the latest on the

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.719
<v Speaker 1>market's overseas and the news you need to start your day.

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tom Buzzby. Stay with us. Top stories and global

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>business headlines are coming up right now.