Speaker 1: Welcome. It is verdict for Ted Cruz. Week in Review.
Speaker 2: Ben Ferguson with you, and these are the major stories
Speaker 2: that we talked about this week that you may have missed.
Speaker 2: First up, the White House takes their hand off of Israel,
Speaker 2: actually threatening Israel that if they go into Rafa, you
Speaker 2: can kiss your support and military aid goodbye. Will this
Speaker 2: backfire on the administration and what does this mean for
Speaker 2: the terrorists in the region. We'll get into that in
Speaker 2: just a moment. Also, is there anything that Congress will
Speaker 2: do after we found out that the anti Israel protesters
Speaker 2: on college campuses are being funded by some of the
Speaker 2: biggest adversaries the United States of America in the world.
Speaker 2: And finally, Hunter Biden, sugar Daddy cuts him off after
Speaker 2: letting him borrow more than six million dollars. Don't worry
Speaker 2: another money has to be paid back apparently until after
Speaker 2: election day. So why did he cut him off just
Speaker 2: weeks before he's going to trial. We'll explain the backstory
Speaker 2: of what that may mean for the present's re election campaign.
Speaker 2: It's the Week in Review and it starts right now.
Speaker 1: Centaer.
Speaker 2: I also want to ask you about a second part
Speaker 2: of what we've learned, and this actually came out in
Speaker 2: the Washington Post. The US apparently offers Israel Israel intelligence
Speaker 2: and supplies an effort to avoid the RAFA invasion. Now
Speaker 2: this is I think maybe a quid pro quo. Is
Speaker 2: that how you would describe it?
Speaker 3: Well, I would say it's even worse than that. So
Speaker 3: this is an article that came out in the Washington Post.
Speaker 3: So that was published a lot of places, and it
Speaker 3: was on May eleventh. The title of the article is
Speaker 3: what you just said, US sites intelligence, offers Israel supplies
Speaker 3: to limit RAFA operation. Let me read to the first
Speaker 3: couple of paragraphs, because it really is stunning news when
Speaker 3: you understand quote, the Biden administration, working urgently to stave
Speaker 3: off full scale Israeli invasion of Rapha, is offering Israel
Speaker 3: valuable assistance in an effort to persuade it to hold back,
Speaker 3: including sensitive intelligence to help the Israeli military pinpoint the
Speaker 3: location of Hamas leaders and find the group's hidden tunnels,
Speaker 3: according to four people familiar with the US offers, Now
Speaker 3: I want you to pause and understand what that means.
Speaker 3: It means the Biden administration is saying that right now
Speaker 3: they know where senior Hamas leaders are, and right now
Speaker 3: they are not telling Israel where the senior Hamas leaders are.
Speaker 3: That also means that Biden is saying, right now, the
Speaker 3: administration knows where Hamas's hidden tunnels are, and right now
Speaker 3: they are not telling Israel where the hidden tunnels are.
Speaker 3: Now I mentioned before that there is a pro Hamas
Speaker 3: wing of the administration. What in the hell Hamas murder
Speaker 3: twelve hundred israelis it is US policy that Hamasa terrorists,
Speaker 3: by the way, they murdered over thirty Americans, and what
Speaker 3: this White House knows where the senior leaders are. And
Speaker 3: it is like, Nope, nope, we're not going to tell you.
Speaker 3: We're not going to tell you, Like how the hell
Speaker 3: is that possible? And now they're saying, well, if you
Speaker 3: don't invade Rafa and go after Hamas, we'll tell you
Speaker 3: where the leadership is. That is truly stunning.
Speaker 2: Isn't that the same thing that they were implying by
Speaker 2: the way that Donald Trump they accused him and impeach
Speaker 2: him like the quid pro quo with Ukraine. Remember, I'll
Speaker 2: go after the Bidens, even though that's not actually what
Speaker 2: it was. It was the real quid pro quo back
Speaker 2: then was Joe Biden withholding a billion dollars from Ukraine
Speaker 2: until they fired the prosecutor that was going after the
Speaker 2: company where his son was getting paid and he was
Speaker 2: getting the other kick to look.
Speaker 3: Look, Ben, I don't care. I don't care about the
Speaker 3: quid pro quo. I don't care even about the analogies
Speaker 3: to the Trump impeachment. Everyone knew at the time that
Speaker 3: was a partisan exercise by Democrats because they hated Trump.
Speaker 3: Had nothing to do with Ukraine, had nothing to do
Speaker 3: with quid pro quo. It just had to do with
Speaker 3: Orange Man bat. It had to do with Trump derangement syndrome.
Speaker 3: We will weaponize impeachment to go after Trump. By the way,
Speaker 3: it's the same thing that has led one, two, three
Speaker 3: four Democrat prosecutions of Trump in the past year. It's
Speaker 3: what led to the ridiculous circus playing out in the
Speaker 3: New York trial court, just like the last ridiculous circus
Speaker 3: that played out in a different New York trial court,
Speaker 3: the one the civil trial that resulted a half billion
Speaker 3: dollar judgment against Trump, the current one where Democrats are
Speaker 3: are living their fantasy. This is fantasy poured and by
Speaker 3: the way, I don't mean in terms of actual a
Speaker 3: porn star discussing salacious details. That's actually the least pornographic
Speaker 3: thing for leftists. They're just loving seeing Trump dragged through
Speaker 3: the mud because they hate his guts. And so I
Speaker 3: am less concerned about the quid pro quot stuff than
Speaker 3: I am about the simple reality. Given a choice between
Speaker 3: Israel and Hamas, Joe Biden and today's Democrats, over and
Speaker 3: over and over again choose Hamas. That is astonishing, It
Speaker 3: is idiotic, It is unprecedented, it is dangerous, it is indefensible,
Speaker 3: and there are no Democrats defending it. Every Democrat ought
Speaker 3: to be asked, why, given the choice between Israel and Hamas,
Speaker 3: do you choose to give money and weapons to Hamas
Speaker 3: and blockade weapons to Israel.
Speaker 2: Well, let's go back quickly to you guys getting notified
Speaker 2: about the President deciding to change this and to basically
Speaker 2: go around the sanctions. So, if I've got the list correct,
Speaker 2: there's these newests. Hey, we're going to allow for these
Speaker 2: weapons to be sold to places that are basically hate Israel.
Speaker 2: We have a ran that we have a little sanctions
Speaker 2: on a ran right now that we're not imposing and
Speaker 2: we have a president. This is coming also from the
Speaker 2: New York Times Peter Baker that Biden privately threatened to
Speaker 2: rethink his support for the war in a private call
Speaker 2: with now Who back in February. That would be two
Speaker 2: months before doing so publicly. So lying to the American
Speaker 2: people are misleading them. The White House didn't put it
Speaker 2: into the readout of the call because they purposely were
Speaker 2: trying to I would argue, cover up or avoid quote
Speaker 2: a public blow up, and the New York Times has
Speaker 2: got this.
Speaker 1: Now.
Speaker 3: Now, look, that's exactly right. This administration from the beginning,
Speaker 3: from January twentieth, twenty twenty one, they have been systematically
Speaker 3: undermining Israel. And by the way, some Democrats will say, well,
Speaker 3: it's not in Yahoo they hate. Look there's a unity
Speaker 3: government Israel. The entire war Cabinet supports going into Rafa.
Speaker 3: Rafa is where the Hamas terrorists are, and Israel is
Speaker 3: committed We're going to destroy Hamas. The Biden administration of
Speaker 3: the Democrats have decided they're going to use the full
Speaker 3: force of the American government to try to protect Tamas
Speaker 3: from Israel.
Speaker 2: Senator, final question I have for you is this, if
Speaker 2: you are Israel right now, in essence, you're being blackmailed
Speaker 2: to not protect yourself. You have a country that's supposed
Speaker 2: to be your ally that they're heavily dependent on for
Speaker 2: military aid and equipment, and the president saying I'm not
Speaker 2: giving it to you if you don't do what I
Speaker 2: tell you to do. And you see this, and then
Speaker 2: you look at our withdrawal from Afghanistan, and then you
Speaker 2: look at what's happening in Russia and Ukraine. If you're
Speaker 2: an ally of America right now, do you feel like
Speaker 2: they're actually a genuine ally Because in the past, if
Speaker 2: you were an ally of America meant big brother America
Speaker 2: is going to protect and defend you, and you don't
Speaker 2: screw with the little brother because they're an ally of
Speaker 2: America and if you do, there will be major consequences
Speaker 2: that seems to be completely gone now in the world.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Look, I think every ally of America is questioning
Speaker 3: how valuable is that with with Joe Biden as president,
Speaker 3: being an ally of America, you can't count on this administration.
Speaker 3: Let's take for example, a country like Saudi Arabia. Listen,
Speaker 3: I think if if Donald Trump had served a second term,
Speaker 3: Saudi Arabia would have joined the Abraham Accords. They were
Speaker 3: very close to they were ready to do so, and
Speaker 3: Biden came in and he immediately began undermining our allies,
Speaker 3: including Saudi Arabia, and Saudi Arabia still has not joined
Speaker 3: the Abraham Accords. And I think explain the Abraham Accords
Speaker 3: here that are it may not understand exactly what that means.
Speaker 3: So the Abraham Accords were historic peace deals that Donald
Speaker 3: Trump and his administration negotiated, and they were peace. They
Speaker 3: were peace accords between Israel and several Arab countries, between
Speaker 3: the United Arab Emirates, between Bahrain and Israel. And I
Speaker 3: was there on the south lawn of the White House
Speaker 3: when they were signed into law, and it was you
Speaker 3: had to go back forty years for the last time
Speaker 3: something like this had happened, had been either with Jordan
Speaker 3: or with Egypt. And it had been forty years since
Speaker 3: we'd seen peace between the Arabs and the Israelis, and
Speaker 3: we were seeing multiple Arab countries signing normalization accords. They
Speaker 3: were called the Abraham Accords with Israel. Now, I will
Speaker 3: say it was very sad when the Abraham Accords were signed.
Speaker 3: Do you know how many Democrat senators showed up with signing.
Speaker 1: I'm going to guess between zero and five zero. There
Speaker 1: you go.
Speaker 3: By the way, when we opened our embassy in Jerusalem
Speaker 3: in Israel, I was there, flew to Israel, I was
Speaker 3: there at Jerusalem The day we opened the embassy happened
Speaker 3: to be the seventieth anniversary of the creation of the
Speaker 3: modern state of Israel. How many Democrats were there, either
Speaker 3: senators or House members the day we opened our embassy
Speaker 3: in Jerusalem.
Speaker 1: I'm going to go with zero zero, not a one.
Speaker 3: Now, Joe Lieberman was there, so you could say he
Speaker 3: was a former Democrat senator. But to be clear, the
Speaker 3: Democrats drove him out of the party and then last
Speaker 3: time he was reelected, he was reelected as an independent
Speaker 3: because they'd beaten him in the Democrat primary. So he
Speaker 3: had been a Democrat, but he didn't lose his mind
Speaker 3: and decide that he hated Israel. And so that was
Speaker 3: the closest we have. And by the way, the defense
Speaker 3: that some Democrats gave as to why they didn't go
Speaker 3: to the opening of the embassy in Jerusalem, which by
Speaker 3: the way, many many Democrats senators had claimed they supported
Speaker 3: for years the defense they gave as well. Trump didn't
Speaker 3: invite us. You know what, Trump didn't invite me either
Speaker 3: when they opened. When they were opening the embassy, I said,
Speaker 3: I'm going. And by the way, let me tell you
Speaker 3: how it works as a senator. If you want to
Speaker 3: go somewhere, you go. You don't have to be invited
Speaker 3: by the White House. They don't just where you travel.
Speaker 3: As a senator. I decided this is an historic moment.
Speaker 3: I will be there, and I flew down there. Mike
Speaker 3: Lee flew down there with me. Lindsey Graham was down there,
Speaker 3: Dean Heller was there, there were several Republican senators. I
Speaker 3: propose to Mike Katie, you want to go to Israel
Speaker 3: for the opening? The embassy said absolutely, let's go, and
Speaker 3: we flew down. The reason no Democrats were there is
Speaker 3: they didn't want to be there. They didn't want to
Speaker 3: be at the signing of the Abraham Accords. And the
Speaker 3: point is the value of being an ally to America
Speaker 3: when Joe Biden and the feckless Democrats are in charge
Speaker 3: is much much less than it used to be. And
Speaker 3: that's tragic. It should be really valuable to be a
Speaker 3: friend and ally of America and listen, if you're the
Speaker 3: government of Taiwan right now, you got to be looking around, going, boy,
Speaker 3: I'm feeling really lonely. And those are some big Chinese
Speaker 3: missiles and big, big Chinese amphibious vehicles that are looming
Speaker 3: on the horizon.
Speaker 2: Now, if you want to hear the rest of this conversation,
Speaker 2: you can go back and listen to the full podcast
Speaker 2: from earlier this week. Now onto story number two.
Speaker 1: So is there.
Speaker 2: Anything that Congress can do? I mean you're hearing this,
Speaker 2: everyone's hearing this now you mentioned it earlier. Can you
Speaker 2: ask the FBI director? Can you call on them to
Speaker 2: take action here and to look into this? Or is
Speaker 2: this just a Hey, they're on our side as the
Speaker 2: Democratic Party, the Socialists and the Marxist and the communists
Speaker 2: within the Democratic Party, we don't care because we want
Speaker 2: their influence and we want their money.
Speaker 3: So yes, I've called on the Biden administration to do this.
Speaker 3: I've called on the IRS, I've called on the FBI.
Speaker 3: Many of these organizations that are pushing these protests or
Speaker 3: five to one C three's which is supposed to be
Speaker 3: tax exempt. They're supposed to be not engaging in political activity,
Speaker 3: So I've called on the IRS to investigate that already.
Speaker 3: Look in a sane world, the FBI would be the
Speaker 3: big examining this closely. We watched during the Trump presidency
Speaker 3: the whole Russia Russia Russia nonsense, which was totally made up.
Speaker 3: It was based on Hillary Clinton campaign OPO research, but
Speaker 3: it became the obsession number one of the deep state
Speaker 3: and number two now of the Biden administration. And yet
Speaker 3: I have no indication that the Department of Justice is
Speaker 3: doing anything to examine this. I have no indication that
Speaker 3: the FBI and by the way, the fbio to announce
Speaker 3: they are investigating this. If they were doing it, they
Speaker 3: shouldn't keep it a secret. They should make absolutely clear
Speaker 3: that what is happening on these campuses is deeply concerning,
Speaker 3: and they're going to get to the bottom of who's
Speaker 3: funding it. But they're not doing that, and I don't
Speaker 3: believe they will because many of the funders, in addition
Speaker 3: to being the Chinese communists and the Cuban communists, many
Speaker 3: of the funders are also the top funders for the
Speaker 3: Democrat Party. And this Department of Justice operates as an
Speaker 3: adjunct to the White House. It is a Democrat Enforcement Bureau,
Speaker 3: which means I don't think they're going to go after
Speaker 3: the top funders of the Democrat Party because you know
Speaker 3: what their objective is to re elect Joe Biden and
Speaker 3: so stopping foreign communist governments from fomenting dissent, protecting Jewish
Speaker 3: students on campus, preventing our universities from being ripped apart,
Speaker 3: preventing airports from being shut down, preventing freeways from being
Speaker 3: shut down. Remember, these are the same people who during
Speaker 3: the quote Summer of Love, the deep state didn't want
Speaker 3: to do anything, and so I don't believe the Biden
Speaker 3: administration is going to do a damn thing.
Speaker 1: You mentioned something that we talked about.
Speaker 2: It jogging my memory from maybe in two or three
Speaker 2: episodes ago where we were talking about it was very
Speaker 2: clear that the same people in this country that are
Speaker 2: funding Joe Biden's reelect for president are the exact same
Speaker 2: people that are funding the campus rioters. And so you
Speaker 2: combine that right with now the foreign money.
Speaker 1: This is a hell of a.
Speaker 2: Lot of influence center over the United States of America
Speaker 2: and young people, and it's is it being orchestrated by
Speaker 2: the foreigners or is this being orchestrated by the Biden
Speaker 2: administration in essence.
Speaker 3: Yes, Look, understand, this is not organic, This is not
Speaker 3: occurring spontaneously. This is highly organized. There's a reason why
Speaker 3: all of these activists have the same damn tents because
Speaker 3: the groups that are pushing this sent out links to
Speaker 3: the same Amazon link to buy the tents, and they
Speaker 3: are being funded. They're being funded, number one, by radical leftists.
Speaker 3: They're being funded by anarchists. They're being funded by communists.
Speaker 3: And I don't use communists as a pejorative, as just
Speaker 3: an insult. I mean people who embrace communism. And as
Speaker 3: we're laying out here, it's not just American communists, of
Speaker 3: which there are sadly far too many. It is Chinese communists,
Speaker 3: the Chinese Communist Party, it is Cuban communists, and they
Speaker 3: see this as a vulnerability in America, a way to
Speaker 3: tear us apart. Look you look at a place we were
Speaker 3: talking about elite institutions. You look at a place like
Speaker 3: Duke University, Ben, how the hell is Jerry Seinfeld now
Speaker 3: too controversial of a speaker for campus leftists. We saw
Speaker 3: a Duke's commencement, oh about fifty anti Semitic leftist storm out.
Speaker 3: And by the way, Seinfeld was not giving a speech
Speaker 3: about Israel. He was not talking. He happens to support Israel.
Speaker 3: They simply said, damn it, I will not listen to
Speaker 3: a Jew. I am such a bigot. If you invited
Speaker 3: Jew to speak to me, I will walk out ostentatiously.
Speaker 3: You look at the recent graduation at Columbia where you
Speaker 3: had these nitwits walking up and ripping their diploma in half,
Speaker 3: and I mean they are angry, they are bigoted on
Speaker 3: the left. Being a bigot. Hating Jews is accepted on
Speaker 3: the left. Now. That is an acceptable bigotry.
Speaker 1: And I don't understand why these universities.
Speaker 2: And maybe it's just because I'm old school, and I
Speaker 2: think you would agree with me. If back when I
Speaker 2: was in school, if you ripped up your diploma when
Speaker 2: you were walking across the stage, they probably would have
Speaker 2: just taken away from me and said you didn't graduate.
Speaker 3: Yeah, so it's an interesting question. Consequences, is what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: Probably I will say I'm not sure you could do that.
Speaker 3: You might actually have a breach of contract claim if
Speaker 3: you have actually paid your tuition and pastor your classes.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure, they could revoke your diploma at that point,
Speaker 3: but you know what they could certainly print on your transcript.
Speaker 3: Ben Ferguson is embarrassed to have graduated from ole Miss
Speaker 3: and tore up his diploma. You should know that if
Speaker 3: you're thinking of hiring it.
Speaker 2: Final question for you on what we just exposed. What
Speaker 2: is it that people need to do with this information?
Speaker 2: And it is this just more of a Hey, if
Speaker 2: you've got a kid or a grandkid that is looking
Speaker 2: at where they're going to be going to college is
Speaker 2: part of this, pay attention to what they're doing to
Speaker 2: your kid's mind. And don't just assume that because your
Speaker 2: kid gets into quote a prestigious university, that's the right
Speaker 2: decision to send them there.
Speaker 3: Look, that's a hard choice. And I will say parents,
Speaker 3: particularly parents with high school and college aged kids, it's
Speaker 3: a really hard choice. My view has long been that
Speaker 3: a kid should go to the best school they can
Speaker 3: get into. And it does open doors, it opens career doors,
Speaker 3: it's beneficial. I will say, the more radicalized these places get,
Speaker 3: the less convinced I am that make sense. I will
Speaker 3: say I saw an article recently talking about how many
Speaker 3: top high school graduates are now looking at schools in
Speaker 3: the South by the way. You know, it's easy, and
Speaker 3: we talked about this in a prior podcast. You know,
Speaker 3: it's easy to say, Oh, all colleges are just crazy
Speaker 3: and this is just a problem across the country. No,
Speaker 3: that's not true. This is a problem in Blue states.
Speaker 3: This is a problem at Columbia, at NYU, at Yale,
Speaker 3: at Harvard. This is a problem at Princeton. This is
Speaker 3: a problem at UCLA. This is a problem at UC Berkeley.
Speaker 3: This is a problem at usc This is a problem
Speaker 3: at the University of Washington. This is a problem in
Speaker 3: blue states. Why is it a problem in blue states?
Speaker 3: Because you have Democrats who will not stand up against it,
Speaker 3: who will not protect you ash students, who will not
Speaker 3: oppose anti Semitism, who will not lock up protesters, who
Speaker 3: will not stop pro Hamas protesters, who will not stop
Speaker 3: threats of violence. These are the same people that were
Speaker 3: utterly powerless in the so called Summer of Love and
Speaker 3: let anarchists take over portions of major cities in America.
Speaker 3: These are the same people who allowed Black Lives Matter
Speaker 3: and Antifa protesters to fire bomb police cars, to loose stores,
Speaker 3: to commit crimes we're not seeing this in red states. Look,
Speaker 3: you and I both live in Texas. At UT there
Speaker 3: were protests. You know what they did. They sent in
Speaker 3: the police, and if you committed threats of violence, you
Speaker 3: got arrested, and miraculously you didn't have the garbage you
Speaker 3: had at these other schools. You look at places, whether
Speaker 3: University of North Carolina or other southern schools, they don't
Speaker 3: have the problems Florida. Look, Florida and Texas. Listen, you
Speaker 3: and I both have a lot of very close Jewish friends.
Speaker 3: They're not living in fear in Texas. They're not living
Speaker 3: in fear in in in Florida. But you know what,
Speaker 3: they are living in fear in New York and New
Speaker 3: Jersey and Connecticut, in California. And ideology has consequences. If
Speaker 3: you have leftists who embrace cultural Marxism, who believe Jews
Speaker 3: or oppressors, you know what, they're not going to oppress
Speaker 3: Jewish students, and that is that is sadly where today's
Speaker 3: radicalized Democrat party is.
Speaker 2: As before, if you want to hear the rest of
Speaker 2: this conversation on this topic, you can go back and
Speaker 2: dow the podcast from earlier this week to hear the
Speaker 2: entire thing. I want to get back to the big
Speaker 2: story number three of the week.
Speaker 1: You may have missed.
Speaker 2: There's another report that has hit the same time that
Speaker 2: Hunter Biden's sugar daddy, Kevin Morris, is quote tamped out
Speaker 2: of cash after funding President Biden's son.
Speaker 1: That would be the famous Hunter Biden.
Speaker 2: He has been funding the president's son's legal battles now
Speaker 2: for almost half a decade. His quote close friend Karen
Speaker 2: Kevin Morris, who said, no, no, no, I'm not getting anything
Speaker 2: out of this guy. I'm just a good guy. He's
Speaker 2: said to have loaned Hunter Biden more than six million
Speaker 2: dollars this as Hunter Biden is facing two criminal trials
Speaker 2: starting in a few weeks, and now the sugar daddy's
Speaker 2: saying I'm out after six grand. My question is the
Speaker 2: timing of this. He's seen the same poll numbers you're seeing.
Speaker 2: He's seeing the same momentum that you and I are
Speaker 2: seeing day in and day out with Donald Trump. He's
Speaker 2: seeing the same economic news it's coming out, and he's
Speaker 2: seeing these trials come up, and it's is he cutting
Speaker 2: basically a bad investment at this point saying okay, I'm
Speaker 2: hedging my bets. Joe Biden's not going to be able
Speaker 2: to do me favors for another four years. Why would
Speaker 2: I keep spending my money?
Speaker 3: Of course he is so. The headline in the Daily
Speaker 3: Mail which broke this story is Hunter Biden's sugar brother,
Speaker 3: Kevin Morris quote tapped out of cash after funding President's
Speaker 3: sons legal battles for almost five years. Here's how it begins.
Speaker 3: Hollywood lawyer and Hunter Biden's sugar brother, Kevin Morris is
Speaker 3: said to be tapped out of cash after financially supporting
Speaker 3: Hunters legal battles over the last four and a half
Speaker 3: years to the tune of six million dollars. Let me
Speaker 3: ask you, do you have any friends that are good
Speaker 3: enough friends that you give them six million dollars?
Speaker 1: No? And not only that.
Speaker 2: I love how the money apparently is supposed to be
Speaker 2: paid back after the election.
Speaker 3: The Daily Mail continues. The withdrawal of financial support for
Speaker 3: the President's son comes at the worst possible time for Hunter,
Speaker 3: with two trials looming which could end up seeing him
Speaker 3: serve jail time. I got to say, this is striking.
Speaker 3: Nobody seemed to care. The US didn't seem to care
Speaker 3: that there was this lawyer in California funding Joe Biden's
Speaker 3: sons legal defense up until this stage. But the fact
Speaker 3: that he is bailing out. I got to tell you
Speaker 3: that there is the old phrase the rats are running
Speaker 3: from the ship, that starts to suggest that's exactly what
Speaker 3: happened here.
Speaker 2: Yeah, quid pro quote, you got to have somebody that
Speaker 2: can hook you up on the end of it. And
Speaker 2: if Joe Biden's out of office, what's the point of
Speaker 2: keeping your money flowing to this? To Hunter Biden, this
Speaker 2: could be major could mean major complications also for Hunter
Speaker 2: Biden's legal defense. Can that be used as a delayed tactic?
Speaker 2: Is my question?
Speaker 3: Oh, they'll try, but I don't think it will succeed.
Speaker 3: Here's what the Daily Mail reported quote the Paramount. In
Speaker 3: twenty nineteen, during Dad President's Biden's campaign for the White House,
Speaker 3: they quickly developed a close friendship. Justice Hunter was trying
Speaker 3: to get his life on track and stay sober. At
Speaker 3: the time, Morris helped him get safe housing. He was
Speaker 3: dubbed Hunter sugar brother. If you're agreed to loan the
Speaker 3: first sun Or reported two point eight million dollars to
Speaker 3: pay off his tax debts and joined his legal team
Speaker 3: amidst criminal and congressional investigations. But now, after four and
Speaker 3: a half years of shouldering the financial burden, having loaned
Speaker 3: him more than six point five million dollars, Morris is
Speaker 3: no longer willing to foot the bill.
Speaker 1: Where does he get the money?
Speaker 2: Now, I'm going to guess it's probably going to be
Speaker 2: some some of his foreign businesses, or hey, maybe it's
Speaker 2: some really nice artwork that will go for more than
Speaker 2: a half a million dollars, because apparently getting a half
Speaker 2: million dollars to do finger painting is pretty impressive. That's
Speaker 2: just the going right now. If you're the president's son,
Speaker 2: let me tell you about Patriot Mobile. If you have
Speaker 2: a cell phone and you have a cell phone with
Speaker 2: Big Mobile, you may not realize that you're actually supporting
Speaker 2: planned parenthood. You may not realize you're supporting democratic causes
Speaker 2: and candidates running at the local, state and national level. Well,
Speaker 2: with Big Mobile, they get big donates to the left.
Speaker 2: And once I found that out, I had to make
Speaker 2: the switch. Now, the number one reason why people don't
Speaker 2: switch cell phone providers is because in the past it's
Speaker 2: been incredibly time consuming. Not anymore with technology in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty four. In fact, switching to Patriot Mobile, you do
Speaker 2: not have to go to a store. You can literally
Speaker 2: do it over the phone. And when you switch to
Speaker 2: Patriot Mobile, with every phone call you make, with every
Speaker 2: text message you send, you're supporting conservative values and causes
Speaker 2: because they take about five percent of your bill each
Speaker 2: and every month and they give it back to conservative
Speaker 2: organizations that support free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity of life,
Speaker 2: the Second Amendment, and they support our military veterans, first responders,
Speaker 2: and are wounded warrior heroes. So when you make a
Speaker 2: call and you pay your bill, you're sustained up for
Speaker 2: what you believe in. So don't wait too long. Make
Speaker 2: the switch. You get the same exact service used to
Speaker 2: right now because you're going to use the same towers
Speaker 2: that you're using right now. You can keep your same
Speaker 2: cell phone number, keep the same phone you have in
Speaker 2: your hand right now, or.
Speaker 1: Upgrade to a new one.
Speaker 2: All you got to do is go to Patriotmobile dot
Speaker 2: com slash verdict that's Patriotmobile dot com slash vertict or
Speaker 2: call them nine to seven to two Patriot. That's nine
Speaker 2: seven to two Patriot, and you're gonna get free activation
Speaker 2: when you use the offer code verdict join me, make
Speaker 2: the switch today and make a difference patriotmobile dot com
Speaker 2: slash verdict or nine seven to two Patriot. Finally, Senator,
Speaker 2: one other thing that has happened, and this is going
Speaker 2: to continue to break and become a bigger story. But
Speaker 2: we are now finding out that the White House is
Speaker 2: refusing a Foyer request. It is a request that was
Speaker 2: filed to find out about the naties of people on
Speaker 2: the terror watch list that have been arrested by border
Speaker 2: patrol in recent years. The CBP now says they will
Speaker 2: not turn over the data, citing privacy and law enforcement
Speaker 2: sensitivity exemptions, saying that yeah, deal with it. We're not
Speaker 2: giving you the inte on how many people have come
Speaker 2: across the southern border that are on the terrorists watch
Speaker 2: list and what nations they're coming from.
Speaker 3: Well, this is the third story we're covering today that
Speaker 3: deals with Biden cover ups. That's the unifying theme behind
Speaker 3: all these stories. In this instance, they're covering up the
Speaker 3: likely terrorist and the criminal threats that are crossing into
Speaker 3: this border illegally through Joe Biden, the Democrats' open borders
Speaker 3: and let me read you a tweet from Bill Malugian.
Speaker 3: Bill Lugan, as you know, is the heroic, the fantastic
Speaker 3: reporter for Fox News, has done more reporting on the
Speaker 3: border than I think any reporter in the whole country.
Speaker 3: So here's what Bill Malujan tweeted, quote new Six plus
Speaker 3: months ago, I filed a foyer requests with CBP seeking
Speaker 3: the nationalities of people on the terror watch list arrested
Speaker 3: by Border Patrol in recent years. CBP now says they
Speaker 3: will not turn over that data, citing privacy and law
Speaker 3: enforcement sensitivity exemptions, telling me, quote, the privacy interests of
Speaker 3: the individuals in the records you have requested outweigh any
Speaker 3: minimum public interest in disclosure of the information. Any private
Speaker 3: interest you may have in the information does not factor
Speaker 3: into the aforementioned balancing tests. Llujin continues, quote, I did
Speaker 3: not ask for any names, IDs, addresses, anything that would
Speaker 3: breach privacy, nor did I ask for any law enforcement
Speaker 3: sensitive information. I simply requested only, and only, as bracketed
Speaker 3: by asterisks on both sides, the nationalities of people arrested
Speaker 3: on the list, so the public can have an understanding
Speaker 3: of where in the world they are coming from. CBP
Speaker 3: acknowledges in the opening paragraphs of their response letter to
Speaker 3: me that all I asked for was the nationalities of
Speaker 3: those arrested on the terror watch list. But they then
Speaker 3: go on to cite exemptions that have nothing to do
Speaker 3: with what I requested, including medical files, phone numbers, email addresses,
Speaker 3: home addresses, dates of birth, etc. None of which I sought.
Speaker 3: And they even excite an exemption regarding quote records which
Speaker 3: could be reasonably expected to endanger the life or physical
Speaker 3: safety of any individual. I disagree with CBPS withholdings of
Speaker 3: this data based on exemptions that have nothing to do
Speaker 3: with my FOIER request, and I will be appealing immediately.
Speaker 3: Let me ask you something, Ben, What is Joe Biden,
Speaker 3: this administration and the Democrats? What are they hiding?
Speaker 1: Yeah?
Speaker 2: And the question is where they hiding and how is
Speaker 2: it affecting? Most importantly, are secured in this country with
Speaker 2: terrors coming across the southern border. They know they're coming across,
Speaker 2: but they don't want us to know what countries. Yeah,
Speaker 2: and why is that? What is your guess?
Speaker 3: Because it's stamming Because the countries are countries where there's
Speaker 3: massive terrorism. They're Jahatis, their people that want to kill Americans.
Speaker 3: And it illustrates I've said repeatedly, we're at a greater
Speaker 3: risk of a major terrorist attack in the United States
Speaker 3: than we have been any time since September eleventh. It
Speaker 3: is tragically going to happen. I don't want it to happen.
Speaker 3: But Joe Biden, the Democrats are inviting terrorists to come
Speaker 3: into this country. Iran has demanded global jahad against America.
Speaker 3: Hamas has demanded global Jahada against America. Hesbel has demanded
Speaker 3: global Jahada against America. And Joe Biden, the Democrats are
Speaker 3: inviting people in. And I assume from their refusal to
Speaker 3: tell us so we know there have been hundreds of
Speaker 3: people on the Terror watchless who've been apprehended. They have
Speaker 3: not released what countries they came from. I assume, based
Speaker 3: on their refusal to do so, that the country list
Speaker 3: is really damning, that they're from countries that are dangerous,
Speaker 3: that have lots of terrorists who want to kill us.
Speaker 3: And this is political. This is all about hiding the politics.
Speaker 3: It reminds me of you remember, and we talked about this.
Speaker 3: We did a whole podcast on this when the data
Speaker 3: broke about about the hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants
Speaker 3: that Joe Biden had flown into America flown into cities
Speaker 3: all of America, and the Biden administration refused to disclose
Speaker 3: which cities and they claimed it it was national security
Speaker 3: information they wouldn't release it. Ultimately we got that information.
Speaker 3: We covered that on this podcast. What cities they were
Speaker 3: overwhelmingly cities in Florida and Texas, which is not surprising
Speaker 3: given this administration is so political. They're trying to do
Speaker 3: everything they can to screw Florida and Texas. But their
Speaker 3: claim that it was a national security risk to release
Speaker 3: those cities was a lie. It was politically embarrassing, and
Speaker 3: that's exactly true here. It's politically embarrassing. I hope through
Speaker 3: litigation and political pressure pressure, we can get the information,
Speaker 3: but Joe Biden the administration accounting on that, they can
Speaker 3: stonewall until at least the election.
Speaker 2: It's all about the election, isn't it. Don't forget. We
Speaker 2: are going to keep you update on this story. I
Speaker 2: have a feeling more will break on this, and we
Speaker 2: do this show Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. We have a
Speaker 2: week in review for what you may have missed on
Speaker 2: Saturdays as well, so make sure you hit that subscriber
Speaker 2: auto download button on those in between days, I'll keep
Speaker 2: you update on the latest breaking news on my podcast,
Speaker 2: the Ben Ferguson Podcast, So grab that hit the subscriber
Speaker 2: auto download button as well, and I'll keep you updated
Speaker 2: there and the Senator and I will see you back
Speaker 2: here on Saturday. As always, thank you for listening to
Speaker 2: Verdict with Center, Ted Cruz Ben Ferguson with you. Don't
Speaker 2: forget to download my podcast and you can listen to
Speaker 2: my podcast every other day you're not listening to Verdict
Speaker 2: or each day when you listen to Verdict. Afterwards, I'd
Speaker 2: love to have you as a listener to again the
Speaker 2: Ben Ferguson Podcasts, and we will see you back here
Speaker 2: on Monday morning.