WEBVTT - TikTok Security and ARK's Latest VC Fund

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>Emily jay I met Ludlow in New York in for

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>next hour. A lack of trust from US lawmakers could

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>completely alter TikTok's operations in its biggest market. The worry

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is parent company Bite Dances relationship to the Chinese government.

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Now we've learned the White Houses working with TikTok on

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a security deal, but negotiations have all but stalled. Plus,

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Kathy Wood's new venture fund targets liquid assets. It's arks

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>first for eight into private investments and essentially gives retail

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>traders venture capital market access. Will ask arcs chief futurist

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>about the strategy, and Bitcoin maximalist Jack Mallars joins me

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to discuss Strike's latest funding round and his push to

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>make bitcoin the currency for cross border transactions. The Biden

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>administration and TikTok are working on an agreement that would

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>let the video sharing site keep operating in the US,

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>but Bloomberg's learned that talks have stalled over concerns the

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>company's Chinese ownership poses a national security threat, according to sources.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 1>If an agreement is reached, it could impose more restrictions

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>on how TikTok stores data from US users. Meanwhile, TikTok

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>has stepped up it's lobbying efforts in d C, but

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>has had little engagement with Republican naysays Bloomberg BusinessWeek reports.

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Joining me now, Bloomberg's Alex Brinker Adam Adam Kovakovitz, Chamber

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of Progress CEO, Alex, I'm going to start with you.

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>What is your latest reporting about talks between the US

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>government and TikTok. That's right. This is to allay concerns

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>around US users data, particularly in regards to Chinese government,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 1>which owns which China is where TikTok's parent company is based.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So far, in these negotiations, TikTok has said that they're

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>going to partner with Oracle throughout all US users data

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>through their servers. They're also going to allow Oracle to

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>audit its algorithms and its content moderation policies. Now the

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>hiccup ed has come in because the deal still needs

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to kind of get over the line. Scythians is the

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>governmental body that's investigating it um it is an inter

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>agency body, and the Justice Department in particular, the individual

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>who is on that panel for the Justice Department is

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>still concerned that this deal does not go far enough

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to keep data out of the hands of the Chinese

0:02:46.880 --> 0:02:49.320
<v Speaker 1>government ed So that seems to be the sticking point

0:02:49.320 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>according to our reporting, that is dragging this process on

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a little bit longer than TikTok would like. Adam,

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you're the CEO of the Chamber of Progress, and one

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of the goals of the Chamber of progresses to make

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry acts fairly and responsibly, particularly towards consumers.

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>So when you hear Alex go through the latest reporting,

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is this good news or bad news. I'm not sure

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>we've ever seen a service like TikTok before that it's

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>become so popular with Americans and yet is owned by

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, and that's a unique problem and challenge for

0:03:24.960 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>government policymakers. Alex talked about the concessions that are on

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the table in terms of the company's negotiations with the

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration. I'm not sure any of those conditions really

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>solve this question of Chinese government access problem. Of access.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>So long as TikTok is owned by a Chinese company,

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are are almost certainly going to have access

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to American user data no matter where it's stored. They

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>don't come in through the front door, they come in

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>through the back door. That's just the reality of how

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>China operates. And as far as the Oracle you know,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>suppose is an audit look Oracles on the verge of

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>having a massive cloud hosting deal with TikTok, right, they're

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>going to have a financial incentive to look the other

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>way regarding China's control, and Oracle is not a branch

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of the US government. It's obligated to do what's best

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>for its business. So I think there's a I think

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that one of the big questions surrounding this, As you said,

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the buy Administrations figure figures involved, I think

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 1>are doubting whether this is tough enough. And frankly, I

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>think there's a concern that if they do a partial

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>compromise on certain aspects of their business that doesn't really

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 1>get the fundamental national security and even propaganda concerns that

0:04:34.680 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that that could be seen as avoiding the deep, bigger,

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>deeper issues that TikTok uh opposes Alex. The talks between

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and US government a kind of the hair and now.

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But you've got a fantastic piece in Bloomberg Business Week

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>magazine about the kind of bigger picture efforts of TikTok

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and I gotta bring up a child on the screen

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>now that kind of shows how TikTok is kind of

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>stepping up and bites onto its parents company, its parent company,

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's low being efforts. But then we're near what Meta,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the parent company of Facebook's doing tolkd us through what

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you've learned, Yeah, they are nowhere near. But TikTok did

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>clock it's biggest quarter in terms of lobbying spend. And

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>my colleague and I wanted to take you guys behind

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the scenes a little bit to see what's going on

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in d C with TikTok's efforts to charm the belt Way.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>What we learned from a mix of sources in DC

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>around the company is that they've taken hundred and thirty

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 1>meetings with congressional offices. Uh, it's TikTok ceo. We heard

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.599
<v Speaker 1>last week was even at a football game of lawmakers

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>versus the Capitol Police, but there's a really important group

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>of folks that they are not meeting with. We heard

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that Um McCarthy and thieves, the leads in the House,

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the key Republicans in the House, Josh Holly and Mark A.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Rubio in the Senate, these senators that all Republicans who

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>have been really large detractors and have approached the company

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of skepticism have been notably left off

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>the formal meeting lists for the company. Now, the company

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.359
<v Speaker 1>told us that they are having productive conversations with lawmakers.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>They said they are not meeting with folks who seemed

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to be unswayed by facts. So ed read into that

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>what you may, but it does seem that TikTok's charm

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>offensive has missed some of the biggest detractors in the

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>belt Way. And I'll tell you, if this Synthius deal

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go through, or if it drags on and these

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>voices continue to get louder, it could cause some problems

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>for them as they're trying to kind of resolve some

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>of these really big concerns and get this deal over

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the line out of what's your reactions what you've just

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>said about so s well, being efforts. Look, I there's

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>no doubt I live here in Washington. I see what

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do. They're trying to highlight the ways

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>people are using TikTok. They're trying to portray themselves as

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>good citizens, and probably do the same affaire with them.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm sympathetic to the U S employees of TikTok who currently,

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>frankly have to spend a lot of time dancing on

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the head of a pin about the Chinese government's role

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>in the app and in their Chinese ownership. I don't

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>think there's any doubt that their jobs as lobbyists and

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as as a company would be much easier, and frankly,

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that our national security concerns would be a lot less

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>if TikTok were sold um to an American owner. But

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of course that's a big you know, that's a big challenge.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think Beijing officials in Beijing know what

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a powerful platform this is. You've got at one point

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>four billion people on TikTok. I think the reason that

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't let Chinese citizens use TikTok, I

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's a recognition of how powerful it is. But

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we know the Chinese government isn't the business of spreading

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>propaganda online, but they did this during the Olympics. They've

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>done this with influencers, and so I think there's a

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond even the question of data access. There is a

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>big question about is TikTok like the next version of

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>urt you know, which we kicked out of this country

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>after Russia invaded Ukraine. Right much to discuss still. Bloomberg's

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex Brinka and Chamber Progress founder and CEO Adam Kobakovitch,

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you both. Twitter is complaining that Elon must legal

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>team hasn't turned over this text with Morgan Stanley CEO

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>James Gorman ahead of next month's trial. Twitter lawyers want

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to sanction Musk and his lawyers for not producing text

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 1>with Gorman, as well as Oracle chairman Larry Ellison. According

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter, Muskers we've held four text with Gorman, including

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>some from April, the day the company announced it was

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>accepting masks offer. Our Investment Management has launched is long

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>awaited our venture fund. They will target in liquid assets,

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>investing in both private and public companies. Along with other

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>VC funds. The fund limits how and when investors can

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>cash out, but a minimum investment of five dollars means

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>potentially any individual US investor can buy in. Here to

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 1>explain the funds goals is ARC chief futurist Brett Winton Brett,

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>what are the goals? Well, we aimed a democratized venture

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>capital and think you just described exactly what we're trying

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. Anybody can right now. You can go into

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>your browser and you can type an ARC dot VC

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can download the tight NAP and you can

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 1>invest five dollars today into venture capital. I think it's

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>if you think about venture as an asset class, it's

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>really been held apart from a lot of individual investors.

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>These are not assets that should require you to be

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 1>rich in order to invest in them, nor should you

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have to, you know, fill out a lot of PDFs

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and um only be able to get into the top

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.559
<v Speaker 1>funds if you're the Yale Endowment. We think that every

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>individual should have access to venture capital, uh if if

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>within their risk tolerance limits, and we think this vehicle

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>provides a mechanism by which they can do so. So

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>we've been waiting on this mechanism, as you called it,

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit of time. All bloom Bag Intelligence

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>et F analyst Eric Baucina, So you guys know Well

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>has a note out in response to your launch titled

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Woods Venture Fund Burdened by tough timing High Phase.

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the timing. It's it's been brutal for

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.719
<v Speaker 1>both public and private markets of late. How do you

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>get around that this is the perfect timing? This isn't

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>tough timing, this is there's never Bill Gurley said it

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the other day there's never been a better moment to

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>start a business. And I think there's never been a

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>better moment to put your risk capital into a venture

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 1>product like this one, and into innovation companies generally. So UM,

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>we think that there's roughly eight trillion dollars in market

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>cap attributable to the innovation platforms that we focus on,

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's going to more than two trillion. So there's

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>incredible technological tail winds in play. And so UM, when

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody's running for the exits, is exactly the time to

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>be putting your capital to work. It's so about phase then.

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I think typically existing ETFs carry a fee of seventy

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>five basis point zero point right, and and in this

0:10:57.120 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>case it's a fee of two point seven and it's

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>expense ratio there for full point that seems high. What

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>why is it set at that level? Well, think about

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the comparable products you could get if you're investing adventure

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>where you're paying two percent management fee plus carry. So

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a much more efficient exposure then you would

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>get if you were in a top quartile venture fund UM,

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>which I've done quite well. Uh. And so the UM

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.559
<v Speaker 1>investment vehicle itself restricts our ability to UM charge carry.

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>That's how we could democratize this, and so we believe

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>we're charging an extremely efficient rate for getting access to

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>top tier companies. This is the likes of Epic Games UM,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the likes of Mosaic mL, which is really UM delivering

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>UM machine learning and advanced AI software to mid market businesses.

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>These are companies that UM a typical investor couldn't get

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>access to. And so by just going to art dot

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>VC right now, you can invest in this fund and

0:12:02.920 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>get access to these kinds of great innovation companies. Redemptions

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>capped right at five percent of net asset value on

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a quarterly basis. And what's so interesting here is that

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:18.479
<v Speaker 1>it the split is seventy percent private public, but Traditionally,

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>capital is locked up in VC funds for a very

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>extended period of time. You guys are also looking at

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>investing in other VC funds. How do you manage that?

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, some redemptions with the need to lock up

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>capital in the private sector, So redemptions are capped at

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>five across the entire fund. But if an individual investor

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>UM wants to UM sell their position and the overall

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.079
<v Speaker 1>request for redemptions or below five percent, they'll get their

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>entire position UM sold out a net asset value. It's

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>only if UM if request to redeem exceed five percent

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>in a given quarter, then redemptions happen on a pro

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 1>rata basis. UM. Another difference between UM our fund and

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 1>typical adventure is that UM the money that inflows into

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the fund can get allocated to innovation assets immediately. In

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the public markets, UM as we're negotiating private market deals

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, at equilibrium, we're seeking to be

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 1>UM like you said, targeting seventy private exposures. But on

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>an individual technology basis, we will play arbitrages between the

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>public and the private markets. And in some technologies, it's

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>very clear to us that the private markets are undervalued

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>relative to the public markets and vice versa, and so

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>UM we think this is a really interesting way to

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>get exposure to innovation tail winds UM that will allow

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>us to invest in these companies early and carry them

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>all the way through I p O into the public market.

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Book of the portanfol we just showed a shot there

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>if the SMP five hundreds out performance relative to our

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>innovation e t F Right, this is a different strategy.

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>But how do you convince investors that this is right

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to use this new mechanic in this new way of

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>getting access to private markets and private companies. I think

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that any innovation exposure should be measured over a business

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 1>cycle length um performance basis. So when we underwrite our

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>positions in the private market and in the public market,

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we look forward five years and say, you know what

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is an in market investor going to pay five years forward?

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Who's not even a technological optimists like us, but just

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>playing paying a market multiple for the cash flow generation

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>capabilities of those businesses? Right? I think that given particularly

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>given what's happened with rates and with innovation assets across

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the board, UH investors are are short innovation today, maybe

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>unintentionally so the disruptive technologies that we think are going

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to penetrate the marketplace are going to totally turn over

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>the business models of incumbents that people have in their

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>pore portfolios. All of the problems that we're seeing in

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>the world today. Innovation solves those problems, and so owning

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a share of the businesses that are going to solve

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>those problems is a way to generate our performance, our invests.

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Chief futurist Brett Winton has been a pleasure to have

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you on. Thank you. Coming up, Netflix has a game plan.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 1>The tech giant is creating its first in house video

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 1>game studio, but when will the company be seen as

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a gaming competitor? We discussed next This is Bloomberg. Netflix

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is creating its first in house video games studio in

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a push to be less reliant on third party creators

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and expand is gaming offerings. The streaming service platform is

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>seeking to increase engagement and differentiate itself with games, but

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence believes there won't be a significant impact, at

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>least in the near term. BI media and list geter

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>anger Nathan joins us now to discuss a gee you

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>actually put research out before the news of his own

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in house studio, Hit the Bloomberg does change anything to you, Well, unfortunately,

0:16:02.880 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>not really, ad and thanks for having me. So, you know,

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has kind of been taking baby steps really in

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>this space of gaming. They now have about thirty games

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or so. It's been on their platform for about ten months,

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>but so far we've seen that, you know, the uptake

0:16:17.800 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>has really been fairly lackluster. We just recently saw a

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>report from Autopia which said that less than one percent

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of their subscriber base has actually engaged with the games

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>um and so, you know, I think it's going to

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>be a case of, you know, too little, too late. Uh.

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>This whole news about them developing their their own studio

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much taking a page out of the same

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>playbook that they followed for their original video content. Right,

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>they created, They've created their own studios. They have their

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>own originals, whether it's you know, A Stranger Things or

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a Witcher. But I think with the video game market,

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the dynamics are totally different. It takes years and

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>years to create a viable slate of good games, and

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Netflix is going to find that out or

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 1>getter to illustrate that point. We've got this chart which

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 1>shows that in the third quarter based on app downloads.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.479
<v Speaker 1>You could just take Candy Crush. We all know, Candy

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Crush more than thirty nine million downloads every single Netflix

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>game that's available, josh a five point five million. And

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I think in your research you point out there are

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>some technological restrictions in so far as you can only

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>get Netflix games through the mobile app, right, what's the

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>problem there? Yeah, absolutely, I think there's you know, so

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>much of the problem with why the uptake has been

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>so slow, it's because of discovery, right, or or the

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>lack of discovery so to speak. So, first of all,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's only available on mobile. Remember of Netflix viewing happens

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>on connected TV, and there's really no option there to

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>even play a game, so you have to be on

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>your mobile device. And then once you're on your mobile

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>device and you do wish to, you know, kind of

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>engage with the Netflix game, you actually have to leave

0:17:57.800 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the app and go and download the the mobile gaming

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>app separately. So there's kind of quite a bit of

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 1>friction there. So it's not exactly the most user friendly

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I think that's been one of the

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>other reasons that has inhibited kind of that uptick, All right,

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>get regn a from of Bloomberg Intelligence. Good to catch up.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us. This is Bloomberg Technology. I'm

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Ed Ludlow in New York. Meta says it has blocked

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands of inauthentic accounts, pages, and groups from Facebook and

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Instagram that originated in Russia and China. Meta says the

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Russia accounts spread propaganda about the war with Ukraine, and

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:45.720
<v Speaker 1>China based accounts were targeting US users in regards to

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>mid term elections. Sarah Fryer leads our big tech coverage

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>here at Bloomberg News. So, Sarah, what do we know

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>about the accounts that were frozen by Meta? Well, the

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 1>thing that was the most interesting to me about this

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>report is that UM Meta made a rare disclosure of

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the amount of advertising that these accounts spent around a

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and five thousand dollars from Russia to spread propaganda

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>about the war in Ukraine. And that's significant because this

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>company has of course come under criticism for receiving advertising

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars from Russia around the US election back in They

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>still don't have a way to to block this from happening.

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Um even though it's against their rules. Even though they've

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>built up this security team, they have said that that

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they will continue to have problems like this, they will

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 1>try to catch them early. But the fact that there

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>was that level of advertising campaign shows that they're still

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>work to do right. Sarah, over the last four years,

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I remember, you know, sitting with you looking at these

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of blog posts from what was then Facebook now

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>met her about the work they were doing and this

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>idea that they're trying to be more transparent. Are they

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>being more transparent with what they're doing. I do think

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that they are being more more open out what they're

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 1>finding and taking down. UM, But I think that that

0:20:03.440 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 1>is still, you know, not the major issue here. The

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>issue is not that you know, this stuff exists. The

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>fact is that they still have a platform where this

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff can go viral, that it can be easily gained. UM.

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>They have groups where they can um, where these kinds

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of foreign governments can build followings around top. But that

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals of how Facebook works has not changed, UM,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and so they're going to continue to play whackable until

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>until that changes. And I think that um, you know,

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the disclosure is is a good thing, but it's only

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 1>one part of the problem that's pivot to TikTok. Your

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>team has been writing about what TikTok and in its

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>parent company Bye Dance, have been doing in Washington, d C.

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>What is the strategy there, what is the latest Well,

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking of transparent, they mean people into in DC have

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about TikTok. There. They are under

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 1>fire from from publicans, democrats, everyone around, UM around their

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>their issues with their algorithm, UM, whether there's a national

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>security risk in the fact that they are owned by

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, by a Chinese based a China based company. UM.

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>The problem is TikTok has not been willing to to

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>speak with some of its loudest critics UM and what

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it has spoken with them and hasn't gone over well.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>So reporters Alex Brink and Emily Burnbaum spoke with multiple

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 1>sources to give the behind the scenes look of of

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>how this is working in d C. They know TikTok

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>knows that they have some trust issues there UM and

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to have to work on their credibility.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>That it's going to be difficult UM. There. There's also

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a decision on Scythius blooming UM. So so it's a

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>little difficult for them to really come out with a

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>strong plan before knowing what that action might be from

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>the federal government. Um and in the meantime, their critics

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>are only growing louder. All right, Bloomberg, Sarah Fryar, thank

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Some other Meta news. Cheryl Samberg got

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>an applause as she exited the Meta headquarters in Menlo Park, California,

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday. This was her last week as CEO, after

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>announcing she'd stepped down back in June. Samberg joined the

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>company then known as Facebook in two thousand and eight.

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>She will remain on the board of directors now. Sam

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Bankman Freed says his m and A spree, including many

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>deals with traditional financial firms, will not hinder f t

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>x is profitability this year. He's also said he's got

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>more cash to burn. Here's some of Bankman Fried's conversation

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>earlier on Bloomberg Crypto. We've tried to be somewhat judicious frankly,

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>with you know, the deals that we've been doing, and

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously that's not going to be perfect, and

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, there we have obviously needs an expenditure through that,

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>like you know, we have not you know, we have

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>not used the majority of the cash that we have

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>on our own balance she you know, that's not necessarily

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to say that there are other things imminently here. Um.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, so much is that we want to be flexible,

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we want to be in a position

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>where we are you know, looking forward at uh you know,

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>what we can be doing, where we can be most helpful, um,

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and where we grow the most. So you know, I

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think how we describe us right now is as exploring.

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I don't know if that's going to

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily read anywhere. It might it might not, um, but

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you know we're going to continue poking around, you know. UM.

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of one of the other cool things

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that Bravo said in the ft. He thinks that a

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people in the industry are disturbing in terms

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of their lack of transparency. You're not one of those people. Obviously,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 1>he is willing to invest in you. Again. How much

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>cash is on your balance sheet? What kind of free

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>cash flower you're generating? How much are you burning through? Yeah,

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a good it's a good question. And you know

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we were you know, we were profitable last night. You

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>know expect that you know, we'll like to be profitable

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>this year as well. UM. And you know, I mean

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you can look, we raised, you know, all things considered

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of billion dollars last year. UM. You know,

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 1>we have done a number of acquisitions, We've generated some

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know pre cash flow GISTs with you with revenue. UM.

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you kind of try and combine all

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of those things together, at the end of the day,

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.919
<v Speaker 1>I think you're left with UM, you know, upwards of

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars UM and UM. You know, there's some

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 1>definitionalsues here which are worth noting around regulatory capital and

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 1>other things which make it not tricky able to define

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly what the right number to talk about is. UM.

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>But uh, you know we still have some uh fairpet

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 1>of drawing power. Well, Sam, you said regulatory. So I

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 1>do want to talk about regulation now, especially as we've

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>had a number of stories just circulating in the last

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 1>forty eight hours or so, including New York Attorney General.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Here in New York, Latitia is accusing NEXTO of falsely

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>claiming that it was a licensed broker dealer. Then in

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>South Korea you have prosecutors freezing sixty seven million dollars

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 1>worth of assets tied to do quon who they are

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:03.640
<v Speaker 1>seeking to arrest. You also have Etherean's latest upgrade, known

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>as the Merge, that could be triggering widespread tax confusion

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. And on top of all of that,

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>we hear from the Chairman of the Federal Reserve earlier

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>today talking about the need for more crypto oversight. Just

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>take a listen to what he said. There's a real

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>need for more appropriate regulation so that as as a

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>DeFi expands and starts to touch more and more retail

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.639
<v Speaker 1>customers and that sort of thing. Uh, so that appropriate

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.359
<v Speaker 1>regulation is in place. So more regulation is needed. But

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of course you already know that, and that's something you've

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>been working on for some time. Now. Do you feel

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like we're getting closer to some kind of real framework

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:44.200
<v Speaker 1>or at least having organized jurisdiction what the CFTC and

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>SEC each control separately too. I do think that there's

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of progress made, and I, you know,

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited for that that that's a keeping you know,

0:25:52.640 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>for the industry going forward. And I do think that

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we've made, you know, a lot of progress. You look

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>at where we were a year ago with very little

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>going on on the regulatory side. You know, you look

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>today where there are you know, proposals in Congress to

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>provide clarity for a spot cryptocurrency assets UM, where the

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>SEC and CFTC are both working on regimes where you

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>have stable point bills going through UM. You know, we

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously have been applying for licensure you know, UM with

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>with the CFTC, and and you're an active discussions with

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the SEC as well. It's it is really a world

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of difference, and I think that's pretty exciting UM. And

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I agree that that, you know, there needs

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to be clear federal overtight here UM to really protect

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers and at the same time to be able to

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>provide clarity for the industry to operate. That was f

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>t X CEO Sam Bankman, Freed and Celsius and f

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>t X the growing list of crypto executives that have resigned.

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Alex Maschinsky stepped down as Celsius CEO two months after

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the crypto lender fault for bankruptcy. Maschinsky lawned Celsius launched

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Celsius in twenty seventeen, pitching it as a safer and

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>better alternative than traditional bank and f t x U

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.639
<v Speaker 1>s S President Brett Harrison has also stepped down to

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 1>transition to an advisory role. We've seen a ton of

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:11.639
<v Speaker 1>turnover in cryptos since the Downtown. Just last week, Cracking

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>CEO Jesse Powell announced his resignation. Coming up, Strike CEO

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Jack Mallers on his fresh funding for the mobile payments platform.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg now. Strike has just struck eighty million

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars in new funding. The mobile payments platform, which uses

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bitcoin Lightning Network, played a big role in El

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Salvador's bitcoin push. Now it wants to use the new

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>cash to grow its partnerships and launch new ones. So

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in Strike CEO Jack Mallers to discuss. Jack,

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>congrats on the round. What does it mean for you?

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna use that parlor cash for? Thank

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you my find Sarah. I appreciate Bloomberg having me back.

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>What am I going to use the money for? To

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to improve payments? We think Lightning network and Bitcoin

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>is some of the biggest and most broadstroke innovation in

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>the history of payments, and there's a lot to do

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:14.840
<v Speaker 1>because it's one of the biggest industries in the world.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's a cool moment. We're very proud of it,

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but we have our work cut out for us, and

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot, a lot, a lot to do to

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 1>solve payments globally. Jack, take me back to basics. What

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is the pitcoin Lightning Network. I think it's like helpful

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for the audience to know what it is that it

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of underlines what your company does. Yeah, so we're

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna kiss keep it simple, stupid. Uh. The Lightning network

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>allows bitcoin to move instantaneously and it relatively no cost.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And to the novice on the couch, you'd probably go like, Wow,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>who's this kid in a hat? Why is that important?

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, Yeah, but you might care because bitcoin

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is a digital instrument, it's actually value, it's globally recognized

0:28:52.480 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>as value. And then the fact that it could move

0:28:54.920 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in real time and settle instantly is something that no

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>payment network has ever been able to do in the

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>history of payments. You have payments that actually take weeks

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to settle, they're very expensive to settle, they involved two

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to ten parties. And the fact that bitcoin could be digital,

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>global recognizable value and move at the speed of light

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and at relatively no cost. You have to put your

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>thinking cap on and be like, huh, I bet we

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>can do a lot of cool stuff with that. And

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>from a very high level, that's why the technology is

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>fascinating and that's why I founded the company, is because

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got to use that technology and make it commercially

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>viable for people in the real world to realize those benefits. Jack,

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we focus a lot on the volatility in bitcoin in

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>recent months. I'm just thinking at a one year chart

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>on my Bloomberg But if you go from sort of

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>June to where we are now, we've traded in a

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>more narrow range of around twenty thousand U S dollars.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>We've called you a bitcoin maximalist, you know, give us

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>your take on what's happening with with bitcoin specifically. Yeah, So,

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I think what's interesting when we think of bitcoin and payments,

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>we actually use it to ask a value and we

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>don't care about the volatility. So the services that my

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>company offers, we allow you to move dollars over it,

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>or euros over it, or any fiat currency over it.

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>So volatility doesn't matter to our customers because our customers

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>are never subjected to holding the actual asset now as

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>a bitcoin holder is someone who holds bitcoin in my portfolio.

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what you want to talk about bitcoin, You

0:30:12.840 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about Netflix stock, if you want to

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about the British pound. I mean, the macro environment

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit of a mess, and I'm happy

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about it. But the real main point, this

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.400
<v Speaker 1>is the one I want to stick. Uh. The reason

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin is an attractive asset, and it's an attractive

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:28.959
<v Speaker 1>money to hold, and it carries the properties that are

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>enticing to someone that wants to store wealth in it

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>have not changed and that's by design. No one can

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>change them. And so the theory and the thesis on

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>why bitcoin is important to the world, and increasingly so

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so is as profound and as sound as it's ever

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>been and it will always remain that way. Uh. And

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 1>so I think Bitcoin's got nothing but time on its side.

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And as the macro environment kind of continues to play

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a game of twist and figure itself out, Bitcoin is

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>going to do its thing. It's very simple, supply demand metrics.

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>When when you know that the supply is fixed and

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>demands the only thing that sets the price. So Jack,

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is going to do its thing. I think you

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 1>know the other consideration. We're always focused on the regulators,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and thankfully fed Chared your own power has been speaking

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>about crypto. Let's have a listen. We think that the

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>central bank is and and will always be the main

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 1>source of trust behind money. Stable Coins essentially borrow that

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>trust from the underlying issuer, and in many cases these

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>are dollar stable coins, so they're really borrowing that trust. Jack.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate he was talking about stable coins and that example,

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but he's essentially saying that trust has to come from

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>central banks. Your system and your thesis is kind of

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of that, right, Yeah, trust has to come

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 1>from central banks. The guy that runs a central bank

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and happened to say that, did he? I mean, come on,

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you some I'm an individual, I'm an American.

0:31:51.680 --> 0:31:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Trust and money comes from whatever I want my money

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to be held in and who I want to trust.

0:31:56.360 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>That's not defined for anyone other than myself. UM's democracy. Uh.

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the comment, Mr Powell, but I'm going to

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>decide like who I trust in what assets I want

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to hold, unless that's all of a sudden illegal or

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>not it is frowned upon. So oh, that's my take. Listen,

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I I like a system that's bounded to the physical

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>realities of the world. Money cannot just be created out

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of thin air. Creating money cannot be free. What do

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I want the cost to create money? I really like

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a natural resources that's bound to the physical world, like energy.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's an awesome way to understand who

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>gets to create money, the expense to which, and create

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it in a programmatic adjustment in a distributed network to

0:32:35.640 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>see how hard it is. So I don't know, I mean,

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>call me crazy. I prefer something like that. All right, Well,

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:43.000
<v Speaker 1>we're grateful to have you on strike. Founder and CEO

0:32:43.320 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Jack Malice, thank you, but you're welcome Southeast Asia. Right

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>sharing and delivery. Giant Grab expects revenue to slow sharply

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>as it targets profitability. In speeding up efforts to reverse

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>years of losses, the company will focus on expanding into

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>new areas such as groceries, banking, and advertising. I caught up.

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>We see Etho peter O e to discuss. We have

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:20.320
<v Speaker 1>this marketplace that we can continue to create efficiency and

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.880
<v Speaker 1>monetization at the same time, and part of this is

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>serving our merchants. We have over four million registered merchants

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on our platform, whether they're the small businesses, medium sized businesses,

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>or even franchise restaurants, buick service conglomerates. That's on our

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>platform today. But how do we serve them better? And

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 1>advertising is one of those elements that we can serve

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>them better. We have a lot of data on our merchants,

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of data on our consumers, so

0:33:48.360 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you put those two together? And we've seen

0:33:51.600 --> 0:33:55.920
<v Speaker 1>very early wins in advertising, will be continuing to expand

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on that. We continue to develop the technology behind that.

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So we feel very strongly that actually advertising as part

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of our future growth will benefit the ecosystem, especially our merchants.

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Today's Southeast Asia, Hey Peter. On the right hailing and

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 1>delivery front, it looks like the competition is coming for you.

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You know in key markets like Singapore, a lot of

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 1>names entering the market. How do you pull off this

0:34:21.080 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>profitability goal and defend market share at the same time.

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Our competition has always been intense in Southeast Asia. Were

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that, but we're very focused in making sure that

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:36.360
<v Speaker 1>our super app, our product and our services continues to

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>be one that our consumer will continue to use and

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we've seen engagement, We've seen continuing interaction with our super

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>app our drivers also at the same time as well

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>as our merchants. So we're going to continue to be

0:34:50.920 --> 0:34:54.640
<v Speaker 1>very heads down and continuing to create this ecosystem because

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it creates stickiness. Also, despite what we see around us,

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>whether it's new competitors or sisting competitors that we have,

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>we also have one of the strongest balance sheet that

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we have here in something is there run for all

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 1>these players? Do you see some consolidation happening in Southeast Asia?

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey what about M and A. Again, your growth is

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>very key for us. We're going to continue to focus

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:23.879
<v Speaker 1>on growing the ecosystem. We've got all those new initiatives

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about, and we're going to continue to

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 1>develop new products and services, and we're going to continue

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to the broaden our tom our TAM is also broadening

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>as we have these new services that we're creating, things

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>like digital banks that we've never had before, advertising that

0:35:38.760 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we've never had before. So we'll continue to focus and

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just execute on organic growth and again part of that

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>is making sure we're up strategy it continues to flourish.

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You in Southeast Asia, you mentioned the balance sheet. There

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was a time where six billion dollars seemed like a

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. It doesn't seem like a lot of

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 1>money anymore. You're gonna need to raise more capital. Capital

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>l castion framework was one of the topics actually that

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.359
<v Speaker 1>we were discussing during our invest today today, and one

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of the first pillar that I alluded was cash preservation.

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And we're very disciplined in making sure that every penny

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:17.279
<v Speaker 1>counts and every cost in our business also is being optimized,

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and we will continue to be very discipline in making

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>sure that cash is preserved. It's at the debt markets.

0:36:23.960 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 1>We actually have a term loan b that we have

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>currently in existence. We have at one point eight term

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 1>loan bit facility and we've that's we've it's been in

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>place now for the last for the last two years,

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's part of our capital allocation framework and different

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:41.480
<v Speaker 1>capital structure works. And we're in a very good spot

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>right now in terms of where we are with our

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet and as with the future growth and also

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.360
<v Speaker 1>with the future free cash flow that we can generate

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.360
<v Speaker 1>as we get to break even in the future, we

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>feel that our balance sheet actually will continue to be

0:36:55.360 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>strengthened in the future years. That was Peter Oe grab CFO. Meanwhile,

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the arcade game Asteroid has come to life, and NASA

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>spacecraft has successfully crashed into an asternoid asteroid about six

0:37:10.600 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>point eight million miles from Earth. It was a test

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to determine if the impact can nudge the space rocks

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 1>slightly off course. The U s. Space Agency is in

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the early stages of a plan to protect the Earth

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.839
<v Speaker 1>from asteroids. If measurements show the asteroid course was even

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>slightly altered, NASA will consider the mission a success. That

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>does it. For this edition of Bloomberg Technology Wednesday, we'll

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>hear from Circle CEO Jeremy Allier about USDC and the

0:37:37.160 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>future of fintech. Don't forget to check out our podcast.

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:37:41.920 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>online on Apple, Spotify, and as always iHeart Radio. This

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg