WEBVTT - Chevron Lines Up 11 Ships as Venezuela’s Dark Fleet Vanishes

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Week Daily reporting from the magazine that helps global leaders

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:18.320
<v Speaker 1>stay ahead with insight on the people, companies, and trends

0:00:18.360 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>shaping today's complex economy. Plus global business finance and tech

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with Carol Masser and Tim Stenebeck on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to Peter Cheer. He's head of macro strategy

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>at Academy Securities. He's back with us in our Bloomberg

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Interactive Brokers studio. It is kind of wild, Peter, considering

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>how this year has started and the actions in Venezuela

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 2>and then kind of markets to look past it. I'm

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 2>just curious your view on this, and I'm curious what

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of calls you were getting from either clients at

0:00:54.760 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>your firm.

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 3>So we certainly had a lot of questions about Venezuela

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend and into this week. It's at Academy.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 3>We work with thirty retired generals and admirals, so we've

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 3>been doing it a lot.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 2>On yesterday.

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. Yeah, Master Robinson, he's great. So yeah,

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>I think I think the market who's actually do make sense?

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 4>Though?

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 3>I think this is the start of the year stuff. You know,

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 3>you got cs going on, So there's a lot of

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 3>you know, headlines coming out of Vegas that people seem

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 3>to be like. So I'm not surprised that we're kind

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 3>of rallying away from that. I think on Venezuela it

0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:24.800
<v Speaker 3>was a very impressive military operation, whatever else you want

0:01:24.840 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 3>to think about it, it was very successful, incredibly you

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 3>know fast, you know this very precision. Now, I think

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to see a lot on oil energy prices.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's there's a lot of building out and

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>what I think this is going to really this is

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>a quick fix. None of this is a quick fix.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think what this is really going to boil

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 3>down to is this is our first real confrontation with

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 3>China away from either kind of sphere of influence.

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 3>If you think about all the trade negotiation was mainland

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 3>China versus US. You know, there were some tariffs, but

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>all of a sudden, we're going and saying we're going

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>to take stuff. China's invested a lot of money there.

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 3>China has a lot of loans to companies. How is

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 3>that friction going to play out. China's going to use

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 3>their lawyers to try and stop things. I think this

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 3>is really important too for China because if they kind

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 3>of get pushed out of Venezuela very easily and they

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 3>lose money, the rest of the world where they put

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 3>out their belt and roade initiative starts looking at that

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 3>and it could be a big role on effect. So

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to see friction. I honestly think

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 3>we're going to see China first attack with lawyers, and

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 3>they won't attack anything until they start seeing what we're

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 3>actually doing. So far has just spent a lot of

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 3>talk and noise.

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 5>Venezuela was the story yesterday and it certainly is today,

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 5>But in the last few minutes, Greenland has become more

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 5>of a story. President Trump and his team are discussing

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 5>a range of options for acquiring Greenland. A Reuter's reporter

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 5>says in a post on exciting a White House statement,

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 5>where does that strategy fit in?

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 3>That one's a hard one for us. I think when

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 3>we look at the world, when we kind of view Iran,

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 3>we could see maybe doing something the IRGC. I don't

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 3>think we would do anything with the religious side of

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Iran and any way shape or.

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 5>For what When you say do something, what do you

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 5>mean maybe with.

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 3>Support, you know, to attack some of the irg's facilities

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 3>or something. If the IRGC gets very aggressive against the protesters.

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.239
<v Speaker 3>I could see something around there. Cuba seems a little

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 3>bit more easier to deal with we already had have.

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 3>The uss Ford is in the Caribbean Sea. It's actually

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>not a very efficient place for it to be. It's

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 3>too small of an area for an aircraft carrier group,

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 3>and it's due for some refitting and remodeling. So I

0:03:11.639 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 3>think we will try and use it as much as possible.

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's why we weren't surprised about action in Venezuela.

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:17.959
<v Speaker 3>I think we could see activity in around Panama Canal

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.079
<v Speaker 3>where we try and either buy it or invest in it.

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:23.800
<v Speaker 5>Is that for a China proxy, I.

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Think for a China proxy, And again I think we

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 3>really want to control shipping through central South America and

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>the Panama Canal is a big part of that. And

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 3>don't forget Marco Ruby is the first place he went

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 3>on Greenland. I think we all struggle with why this

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>term annex or take keeps coming up. I think that's

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>a struggle.

0:03:38.800 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 5>So to recap Panama, Venezuela, Cuba, Iran makes sense, Greenland

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 5>not so much.

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 3>I find it very difficult to like play why we

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 3>would just wrap NATO, And again, I think we've been

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 3>less thoughtful on NATO and where it's important is but

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 3>this kind of puts a lot of friction, And even

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 3>from a business standpoint, I think I can believe that

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>in Venezuela there there's a lot of raarers and critical

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 3>minerals that have been underinvested in. I find it hard

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 3>to believe someone hasn't been checking out Greenland and saying

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 3>this is just economically unviable. I do know, and I

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 3>think this is interesting because one of our generals is

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>actually now the Undersecretary of War, and before he became

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Undersecretary of earlier still working with us, he did talk

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 3>about and point out that China has more ice breakers

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 3>than we do, and so China views themselves as an

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 3>arctic nation. Russia clearly views themselves as an arctic nation.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 3>So maybe this has coming something to do with as

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 3>the polar ice caps are melting that it creates different routes,

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 3>so we want some more protection there. So maybe some

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 3>of that makes sense, but again that all feels like

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 3>it could be done within the confines of existing rules

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 3>and regulations rather than having kind of this annex or

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 3>take concept.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I don't know, how are you thinking

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 2>about this year when it comes to the Trump White House,

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and especially with midterms looming. I've heard some folks say that, Listen,

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a lot of pressure on the administration to get

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 2>things done early in the year because as midterms loom,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>there are expectations that there might be pushback against the

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 2>GOP and the Trump administration. But I'm just curious what

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 2>you're telling your clients.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.119
<v Speaker 3>So what we've really liked is what we've been calling

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 3>prosec or production for security, and it's kind of along

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 3>the lines of resilience, and that includes anything from chips, electricity,

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 3>so Intel, for example. I think there's gonna be huge

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 3>pressure on companies to use US chip manufacturers, right, we

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 3>have to break away from Taiwan. I think there's realization

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 3>we're not producing electricity. We will deregulate, we'll get electricity

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.040
<v Speaker 3>in all forms running. I do think President Trump will

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 3>give up on his kind of hatred of solar and

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>adapt solar, but you're gonna see solar nuclear I do.

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 5>I think it's just Wind is a step too far.

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I think Win's a step too far. They really does

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>not like he really does not lie. I think there's

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 3>a visceral hatred to it. Partly, I think it does

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 3>destroy views. I think there's questions about his efficiencies, and

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 3>it does kill birds and stuff, and that seems to

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 3>really bother them. So I'm not going to fight the wind.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 3>I do think on.

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Solar housecats kill a lot of birds too, truly.

0:05:51.600 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 3>That is probably true. We had one that was very

0:05:53.279 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 3>good at that, yeah, true, Yeah. So I think those

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 3>are all the things that we can invest. And we

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 3>just saw yesterday two point seven billion going into your

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 3>ranium companies. So I think you can move away from

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 3>the AI story and into anything that's going to be

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>part of this building out of infrastructure. You know, you've

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 3>got Cat, You've got Deer, Navistar, all the heavy equipment makers.

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 3>I think we're going to see real efforts to become

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>slightly more independent.

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 2>Are all nations doing that?

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 3>So how I see this starting as the US really

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 3>jumpstart of this, right, the US has been all over this.

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I think what we're starting to see now is capital

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 3>is going to follow next, So investors are starting to

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 3>follow this. We talk to private equity companies who are

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 3>starting to scour the universe for Hey, who's got mining

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 3>rights that have been unused, who's got some interesting patents?

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 3>And around these rarest and critical minerals, I think you're

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 3>going to see again these huge buildouts, potentially in electricity production.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.679
<v Speaker 3>So it's capital vitalization dead well. I think other countries

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.280
<v Speaker 3>are going to figure this out eventually, that they have

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 3>to do it. I think at some point Europe's going

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 3>to release like Shell and BP to actually do what

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 3>they're phenomenally good at. And so far there's still constraints,

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 3>but I think everyone's adopting this. I think you have

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 3>to look much closer when you're thinking about supply.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Chains, domestic political risk of this new world order. That's

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 5>something I've been thinking a lot about, especially in an

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 5>election year, because we thought that the Make America Great

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Again movement was really about keeping within the US's borders,

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 5>not getting involved in foreign wars. The President has talked

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 5>about leaving countries outside of the US alone, and that's

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 5>not really what we've gotten in the last few months.

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>No, though I will say, I think if prior to

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, Liberation Day and stuff, I think there was

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 3>a lot of hope that we'd work very closely with

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Canada because Canada has a lot of things that we

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 3>need that would be a big part of this. We

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>work closer with Mexico, and we kind of got away

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 3>from that, So I think this starts. Maybe it's just

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 3>trying to reshape how these relationships work. Ultimately, I think

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 3>we're going to need things like podasts, We're going to

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 3>need to work with Canada. But I do think you know,

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 3>they laid it out of the National Security Strategy and

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 3>it's only thirty nine pages of double space. It's even

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I could read it, So I would recommend reading it

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 3>because I think it does form this way. Yeah, we've

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>been telling corporations for years now, and I think now

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 3>we're getting a lot of incoming calls. Like we've been saying,

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 3>if you are manufacturing in Thailand and Vietnam, you're not

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>really disversified because you're going through the same shipping lane.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 3>So I think you've got to be very careful about shipping.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 3>If you're looking at building a new plant this year,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 3>I think you want to build it in North South

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>America or Central America or the US precisely because that's

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 3>where we have a lot more control. So I think

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>that's where corporations follow into this. And I don't want

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 3>to say it's going to be us by ourselves. What

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 3>I've been trying to say is I think for every

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 3>single commodity or product, every country is going to have

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 3>an X amount that they want to do themselves so

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>they can be sufficient. Why you can do with your

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 3>close neighbors, and then Z or Z you just do

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 3>on the open market. And I think that's going to

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 3>vary by country to country what they can do. But

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>I think Europe's behind on this.

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 5>I think the.

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Sad thing is if I look at what we need

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 3>to do in the US, you have a pretty good

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 3>road wrap. Just look at China's done for the last

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>ten years, right, They've basically done prosec on steroids, and

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 3>we're just starting to do it. But it's exciting and

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 3>I think some of it will last past an election

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 3>cycle because Biden did do the chipsack, right, So why

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 3>doom was not immune to like understanding we.

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Did a lot of President Trump in his first term

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 2>is China strategy, right?

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 3>So I think this is now truly going to replace

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 3>ESG as a major policy tool, as a major way

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 3>corporations think and how investors think. Right, if everything was ESG,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 3>I think where we were really is if you think

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 3>about Masso's hierarchy of needs one probably you know psych

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 3>one on one it proves I took it. But we

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 3>were kind of at this kind of high self actualization period,

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 3>like what would we like sustainability look like. But it

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 3>was all based on the premise that we had the

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 3>basics covered. Well, we really have the basics covered if

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 3>we're dependent on China for those basics. So I think

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 3>this is a pullback to say, to be truly sustainable

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 3>and independent and resilient, you need to do some core

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 3>level of this self yourself. And that's where I think

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 3>we are. It's that evolution.

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.600
<v Speaker 2>What are the implications of that in terms of cost

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 2>to society? In terms of does it make things more

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 2>expensive if we're doing more manufacturing in the United States, Well,

0:09:38.280 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 2>labor isn't cheap here, so I'm just curious what are

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the implications What does it mean for economic growth maybe

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 2>in the United States.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 3>So I think it's going to be potentially a little

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 3>bit higher on some prices. So it's very good that

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:49.719
<v Speaker 3>oil and some of these energy costs are coming down.

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>That will help on this. At the flip side of that, though,

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 3>is if people can go back to working for you know,

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 3>I hate to say the word about say it like

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 3>national champions right where you feel that your industry, your

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.200
<v Speaker 3>job is important to the country, you probably go home

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 3>feeling slightly safe about your job. I think there's a

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of benefits from this we've been talking about. The

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 3>Spider Marks is great. He kind of coined the phrase

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 3>for us by the rough spider Marx General Spider Marks.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 3>He's quite awesome. But he coined the phrase. We're in

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 3>a pre war environment, and we've always been in a

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 3>post war environment until recently. And I think pre war

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 3>sounds a little bit scary, but it's just like deterrens.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 3>If you understand that you're in a pre war and

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 3>you do the preparation properly, you deter the enemy. And

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I think the things that to me are really crucial

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.079
<v Speaker 3>about a pre war is it creates a sense of

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>urgency which we're seeing and self sacrifice.

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 5>We're speaking with Peter Cheer, head of Macro Strategy, at

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Academy Security. So he joins us here in the Bloomberg

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 5>Interactive Broker's studio. Peter, you mentioned a few We went

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 5>through a little bit around the globe and we talked

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:48.359
<v Speaker 5>about Iran, We talked about Venezuela, We talked about Greenland, Cuba, Panama.

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 5>What about Mexico and what about Colombia. Have they been

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 5>put on notice?

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 3>I think Colombia has been put on notice. I've been

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 3>much more focused on Mexico. So one of the things

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 3>that we believe to some degree is we been changing

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 3>the rules of engagement with Venezuela. Right, if you go

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 3>back four months ago, who would have thought we would

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.439
<v Speaker 3>shoot a drug boat we're now doing that. I think

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 3>the world would have gone ballistic if we did that

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 3>in the Gulf of Mexico or Golf of America now

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 3>though it's now standard operating procedure. Right, we've attacked some

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 3>of the drug facilities. I suspect that somewhere in Q one,

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Q two Lake Qan early Q two we approach Mexico

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 3>very serious and tells jion Bo, I'm like, we can

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 3>work with you to get rid of your cartels, or

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 3>we can get rid of the your cartels without you,

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and to me, the one thing we haven't talked to

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I know we've been talking about so much oil. If

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 3>we can solve Venezuela's drug problem and cartel problem and Mexico,

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 3>it makes both of those countries safer, more viable countries,

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Fewer people need to migrate all those countries. So I

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 3>think it fits perfectly.

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 2>But then in terms of drugs, maybe I'm crazy here

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and I know we've only got about forty seconds left here.

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 2>What about China and fentanyl? Like have we covered that?

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>If we're talking about narco terrorists. I think some might say,

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:56.560
<v Speaker 2>wait a minute.

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at this more from the ability to kind

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 3>of make those countries safer where you have some ability

0:12:01.120 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 3>to influence it so that people don't want to leave.

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people who you talk to, people coming

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 3>from Mexico, their choice is letter sob Yeah, you either

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 3>fight the cartel and die or you join.

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 2>The Cartnezuela eight million people or something.

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>So I think if you can do that, and on

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 3>top of that, if you cut the head off the snake,

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 3>maybe the drug cartels and their activities in the US

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 3>do slow down.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So are you're positive about the year. Are you upbeat?

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 3>I am, Actually I'm very positive. I think again, this

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 3>buildout's going to be very interesting. The biggest risk to

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 3>me is China threatening and doing something about rarest and

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 3>critical minerals because we're not there yet where we need

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 3>to be.

0:12:31.480 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>Ten seconds, if President Trump wasn't in the White House

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 2>again for a second term, will we be having this conversation.

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 3>No. I think he actually really kind of planned ahead

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 3>of this though some of it. I think we would

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 3>have finally seen because we've been talking about rarest crtical

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 3>minerals for years and years. We're finally realizing the Chips

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Act realize some of this. This is what progression. How

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 3>we're doing it is just stronger and more aggressive.

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Such a great conversation. Peter Cheer over at Macro Strategy

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 2>and Academy Securities.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Stay with us more from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming

0:12:58.160 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 5>up after this.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to five eastering. Listen

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg spoke with economists, US politicians, and heads of trading

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 5>firms and hedge funds to understand really what's at stake

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 5>in the prediction markets. Boom Tanisa Sikova and Lydia Bayoud

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 5>are part of the team behind the story. Danitza is

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg News cross Asset reporter. Lydia is Bloomberg News Financial

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 5>Regulations reporter Denisa Here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 5>Lydia joins us from Bloomberg's Washington, DC bureau. Lydia, I

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 5>want to start with you in Washington because you cover

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.960
<v Speaker 5>financial regulations prediction markets. Is it fair to call it gambling?

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 6>I think these days people increasingly are seeing a blurredline there.

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 6>To your point about marketing speak, the companies are very

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 6>keen to describe themselves one way, but certainly within Washington,

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 6>I don't think a lot of people are seeing much

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 6>of a difference. And for sure in the sports gaming world,

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:09.439
<v Speaker 6>they see them as direct competitors.

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting gaming gambling. What exactly is this underneath

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.200
<v Speaker 2>the common in for those who maybe have been living

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 2>under a rock, which is kind of fine. I like

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>to kind of hibernate every once in a while. Remind

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 2>us what these prediction markets are all about who are

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 2>the big players.

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, twenty twenty five was a year of prediction markets.

0:14:27.200 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 7>We had two big firms kind of dominate the space

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 7>of cos Kaushi and Poet Market. Their valuation went through

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 7>the roof. They started from like one to two billions

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 7>and both end of the year in the double digits

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 7>off billions, so really really rapid growth. And we're seeing

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 7>not only those tech city convolling names, We're seeing a

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 7>lot of traditional finance names. We're seeing Ceme, We're seeing

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.119
<v Speaker 7>a lot of those traditional finance players getting.

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 8>Involved in the space.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 7>So clearly this is interest more beyond city convul.

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 2>The volumes are crazy. So but tell us how it works,

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>can Tim or I? Can we go out and place

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the bet? Like how who determines who can do what

0:15:04.720 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 2>on the platform?

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 7>Super simple, super easy. So obviously sports betting you have

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 7>to be twenty one for this.

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 8>Eighteen is enough.

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 7>It's very accessible. You go the bet is like as

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 7>cheap as like a few cents or a door and

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 7>you just go and create it. Other thing just very shrimple.

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>You can create the bet.

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 7>No, you cannot create the bet.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 2>You can place that. You can ask it.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 7>Oh, yeah, there is a way to claim a market,

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 7>but of course it's up to the platform to create.

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 7>But as we have seen in recent months, there is

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 7>a lot of variety of bets on things that you know,

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 7>anywhere else you cannot bet from the bet on Nicolas

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 7>Maduro being outed to any type of pop culture thing

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 7>and any top.

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 5>Artists on Spotify this year is on.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, of course that's very popular.

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Any type of mentioned market.

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 7>People are watching like politicians stole on TV and betting

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 7>on every word they say, every twist, like people are

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 7>even making front of this. We famously had the coin

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 7>based CEO knowing that people are watching what he says

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 7>on the learning cloth, so he was he was crashing

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 7>the market.

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 5>So that's where I want to bring in Lydia, because

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 5>when you're in a world Lydia Bayud where there is

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 5>one person in control, like a CEO of a company

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 5>like Elon Musk, if the number of tweets that he

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 5>sends between a certain period of time, that's a bet

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 5>on poly market right now, or prediction on poly market

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 5>that one can make. What is the slippery slope that

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 5>opens when one person is in control of the outcome.

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 6>Here, So that's something that I think regulators and policymakers

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 6>are really grappling with. Particularly, I think the Majuro example

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 6>that we highlight on the story has really made that

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 6>so salient for everyone right now. Generally, federal rules prohibit

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 6>federal employees from trading on non public information for their

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 6>own financial game. I think Representative Richie Torres is planning

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 6>to introduce legislation if he hasn't already this week, that

0:16:56.000 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 6>would like very clearly prohibit that type of trading on

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 6>prediction markets. But really we're kind of facing like a

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 6>different regime compared to how I think a lot of

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 6>people think about insider trading that is regulated in equities

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 6>markets or markets overseen by the securities in exchange competition.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 6>Because you know, if you're in the derivative space and

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 6>you are an energy producer, an agriculture producer, you're expected

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 6>to trade on knowing you know, my crop's really great

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 6>this year, or we're pumping so much oil and gas

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 6>out of out of the ground. You know, I'm able

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:32.399
<v Speaker 6>to hedge my position and sort of let my knowledge

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 6>that I have inform both me and then the market.

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 6>You know, there's kind of a market utility argument that

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 6>is made in those traditional markets, and we're seeing that

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 6>again sort of these blurred lines shift into prediction markets

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 6>and people sort of grappling like okay, well, what's okay

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:51.400
<v Speaker 6>insider information like what benefits everyone to have insiders trading

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 6>and kind of you know, as they like to say,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:58.360
<v Speaker 6>drawing on the wisdom of the crowd and doing price improvement,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 6>but so not.

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Exactly you know machines.

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.280
<v Speaker 6>Right, Well, that is the big debate about how are

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 6>you going to draw that line about you know, if

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 6>you are Elon Musk in your there are mention markets

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 6>and what you might say to your you know, not

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 6>to pick on Elon anyone, any executive, right and you're

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 6>gonna you know, there are mention markets, and what you

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 6>might say in your quarterly call? Do you swing a

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 6>market just for funzies? Do you swing it knowing that

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 6>you know your buddies, buddies, buddy might have some money

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 6>writing on the line. And then how does anyone catch

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 6>that should they be catching it? There's so many open

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 6>policy questions that are being asked, I think around Washington

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 6>right now because of these markets.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, there's an interesting you know, I'm just going through call.

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 5>She you could spend. I know not both of you

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 5>did this, Like you get some hours going through this,

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 5>but like, does it really serve the market? Aniza to

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 5>ask if will Taylor Swift and Travis Kelcey be married

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 5>before January?

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 3>First?

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 2>That's important stuff.

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 7>It is important stuff. We had a lot of Bloomberg

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 7>headlines on this as well, but we did, we do,

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:02.640
<v Speaker 7>but it is important. So what a lot of those

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 7>prediction micro believers says, We're going to bring a lot

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 7>of people through sports. So for example, kou Shei has

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:11.000
<v Speaker 7>ninety percent of their volumes very often coming from sports.

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 7>So it's pretty hard to make the argument that this

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 7>is a truth machine at the moment. But what some

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.400
<v Speaker 7>people hope and believe is that eventually some of those

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 7>casino elements and of those betting elements will bring people

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 7>who want to bet on things like economic data, things

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 7>like maybe people want to hedge, Like the hedging scenario

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 7>is something that has come up a lot talking to people.

0:19:30.800 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 7>It seems like it's not coming anytime soon, but people

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 7>are saying, oh, maybe I want to.

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 8>Hedge the weather in Florida.

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 7>Maybe I have a house and I can't buy insurance.

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 5>Well, I don't understand that I keep going on topic

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 5>and I'm trying to take them off topic. Like here's

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 5>another one. For example, what will Rachel Maddow say during

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Jimmy Kimmel Live.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 2>Right, Okay, that's a classic mentioned.

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 5>Mark Epstein, corrupt slash corruption, Ice, Russia, Ukraine, affordable affordability healthcare?

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, but there's serious stuff like the FED decision

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>in January.

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 5>I say, help for what we do, and we talked

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 5>about this.

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Doing elections in different things.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 7>For sure, elections have proven to be one pretty good time.

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Help me understand though, and well, you know, Lydia come

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 2>on back in here. One of the things I'm curious

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 2>about is like who is checking who is making these trades?

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Is calshi or is polymarket? Are they actually checking, especially

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 2>when it could be potentially insider trading? Do they know

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 2>exactly who's making these trades? Are they doing due diligence?

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 6>So these exchanges are structured as self regulatory organizations, so

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 6>they're supposed to kind of self monitor, monitor trades and

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 6>root out any potential for market manipulation. Again, the sort

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 6>of where you draw the line between what's okay and

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 6>what's not okay on insider trading, that's a judgment call,

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 6>I think, except in all but the most clear cut instances.

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 6>But you know, exchanges can self report information to the CFTC.

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:57.840
<v Speaker 6>The CFTC can look into it. Again, it operates differently

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 6>than the Securities Exchange Commission.

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 2>But what's the bandwidth for regulators to want to take

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 2>this on.

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 6>The CFTC is chronically underfunded. They have I think roughly

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 6>five hundred staff. The SEC has four or five times

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 6>maybe ten times that number are not quite but they

0:21:19.320 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 6>are understaffed for the task at hand, and there are

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 6>more applicants. I think we mentioned in the story that

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 6>there are there's a lot of interest driven heavily by

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 6>sports trading, but also in the economics, also in other spaces,

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 6>and so they are kind of underwater in terms of

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 6>all that there is to do for market demand for

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:43.600
<v Speaker 6>this space. So I think a lot of people are

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 6>wondering what the CFTC will do. But if we look

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 6>at the new chairman, Michael Sellig, when he was an

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 6>attorney in private practice, he wrote a comment letter that

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 6>was pushing back during the Biden administration on any effort

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 6>to reign in sports prediction markets for example, or really

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 6>most prediction markets, So I think you've got someone who's

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 6>very you know, he said he's going to defer to

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.679
<v Speaker 6>the courts on how the courts might eventually rule on

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 6>this topic. But at least when he was an attorney

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 6>representing clients, he was very much in favor of them.

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Before we let you guys go Tanizza. If we think

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 5>about the universe of prediction markets, Robin Hood's getting into it,

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.160
<v Speaker 5>Calsh and Polymarket are the big ones, and they count

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 5>I think a Trump as advisors to both of those.

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 5>Are these all regulated the same way or is one

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 5>regulated differently than the others.

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 7>So also obviously they have the Trump as advisor, and

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 7>Trump Media is looking into launching a prediction American and

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the sports betting companies are looking to

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 7>also getting into prediction market the way so Kaushi so

0:22:45.280 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 7>far is obviously under the CFTC. Pully Market is just

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 7>entering the US. They have this beta test so they're

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:56.639
<v Speaker 7>only onboarding some users. So currently most of the bets

0:22:56.640 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 7>on Polly Market are actually in this weird regulatory space

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 7>where a lot of them are coming from a world

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 7>and isn't necessarily regulated under the CFTC. We've seen very

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 7>different decisions. For example, there was a market connected with

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 7>the United Care CEO killing and CFTC asked how she

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 7>to remove that market, But polling market who is not

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 7>under that jurisdiction, actually kept the market. So you can

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 7>see there are very different outcomes depending on the regulation.

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, a human land on Mars before California starts a

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 2>high speed rail nineteen percent chance costs twenty cents for yes,

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 2>eighty five cents for no.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:33.360
<v Speaker 5>Well, what counts as the high speed rail?

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 4>Is it?

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Like I'm just reading?

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 5>Okay, stay with us more from Bloomberg Business Week Daily

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 5>coming up after this.

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily Podcast. Catch

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.480
<v Speaker 1>us live weekday afternoons from two to fives during it,

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Vid Royal as chief financial and investment Officer over at

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Thrive and the firm has close to two hundred billion

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.280
<v Speaker 5>dollars in AUM, probably more as of now. That's a

0:24:07.359 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 5>number from a little over a year ago. David, what

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.160
<v Speaker 5>did you what did you think of what we heard

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 5>from Mike McLoone just now, I mean, this is this

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 5>what happens in a late stage bull market.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think so, and I was amused absolutely. You know,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 8>I've never gotten more questions about gold and silver from clients,

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 8>and I regularly meet with clients and our and our advisors.

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 8>I think it's fears of currency debasement. So the retail

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 8>clients are really interested in metals right now. And the

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 8>question I always ask in response when I get a

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 8>question about gold, is what problem you're trying.

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 5>To solve gold or silver?

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 8>If you're worried about currency debasement, you could have a

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 8>diversified portfolio of commodity stocks. There are probably better ways

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 8>to deal with inflation or currency risk than just owning

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 8>gold or silver. But you know, silver is behaving like

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 8>high bit of gold right now. I mean, and it's

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 8>us feel very technical.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 2>That currency debasement the dollar mostly or current.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 8>Bold I mean dollar weakness early in the year that'll

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 8>strengthen later in the year. I think it's it's general

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 8>concerns about the deficit and and the federal budget.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 5>That's so interesting. I mean, I go back to this

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.239
<v Speaker 5>idea of you hearing from clients more about metals than

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 5>ever before. Is that indicative of something within the markets

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 5>right now. I mean you set you mentioned the currency

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 5>debasement is a concern of theirs, but is there something

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 5>else happening to you? You think like this is sort

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 5>of a yolo by everything rally or beyond.

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 2>The beyond the concerns about the data deficit.

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 8>I think it's less yolo and more. You know, it's

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 8>a very uh, you know, bifurcated economy.

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 8>You know, a lot of concerns, a political turmoil. People

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.239
<v Speaker 8>are just very concerned right now. Consumer confidence is very

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 8>weak despite the economy being and yet.

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, I've got to tell you how many people

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 2>have come around this table and said, well, wait a minute.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, the stock markets hitting records, the wealthier consumer,

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 2>which is so important in terms of consumer spending doing

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 2>just fine. I agree with you that lower rung of

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 2>the case shape. I'm concerned Tim's concern. You sound concerned,

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 2>and we also be concerned, right because that's a big

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 2>part of certainly America. So I just do wonder, and

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I wonder when when people care more broadly and when

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 2>it does really matter in terms of the overall economic

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 2>health of this country.

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, you know, I certainly get a lot more questions

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.639
<v Speaker 8>about metals than you know, than crypto these days, and

0:26:21.640 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 8>I would say it was the reverse maybe twelve months ago.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 8>There's a lot less interest in crypto, probably because bitcoin's

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 8>been weaker recently and it seems to have shifted. But

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 8>I think there's just sort of a general generalized concern.

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 8>And that's again why I say, what problem are you

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 8>trying to solve? I mean, metals and even crypto have

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 8>probably a place in a diversified portfolio, but again, you know,

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 8>what role does that have in your overall portfolio?

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 5>Talk about the interests or lack there that you're seeing

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 5>in crypto right now. I mean, do you actually that

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 5>thrive in Is it a part of a recommendation that

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 5>you have for clients portfolio?

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:54.919
<v Speaker 8>We don't broadly. I mean, they have access to it

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 8>through brokerage. Clients could buy cryptot it and I'm sure

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.479
<v Speaker 8>some do. It's not part part of our centrally managed

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 8>portfolios that I oversee.

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 5>What more so is like more traditional more traditional? If

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 5>somebody wants alternative exposure, what are the alternatives that you recommend?

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 8>So we you know, would would you know look at

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 8>you know, potentially metals rates and things like that within

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 8>our mixed asset products, our asset allocation funds. We actually

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:25.560
<v Speaker 8>have an allocation of private equity within our daily liquidity

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 8>mutual funds. It's a small allocation, but we actually do

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 8>give retail clients fifty dollars a month. You can get

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 8>access to private equity at thrive. That's a pretty cool thing.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 2>What do Yeah, where are flows going at this point?

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Where are investors either asking you to commit or where

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 2>are you guys recommending? Where's money going into? Money coming out?

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, we're seeing strong flows into our managed accounts.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 8>There's still a lot of interest in equities overall across

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 8>the industry. You're seeing strong fixed income flows as we have.

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:51.359
<v Speaker 5>In recent years.

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 8>Continuing to see that, continuing to see that, yeah.

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 2>Right, because it was it was an interesting year and

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 2>where you saw both stocks and bonds do well, right,

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 2>which is not typical. It always makes me a little

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 2>nervous and cautious.

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 9>You know.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 8>One other observation on flows is, you know, across the industry,

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 8>money market assets have you know, roughly doubled from four

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 8>trillion four years ago to eight trillion. Our own money

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 8>market fund is quadrupled over the last three years.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:13.640
<v Speaker 5>But rates are coming down.

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 8>The rates are coming down, So I keep telling clients,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 8>you've got to be extending duration right now, lock in

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 8>these attractive years.

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay, So where's the right place for a client to

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 5>put money that's been in a money market. They want

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 5>access to it, but they also want yield that's higher

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 5>than four percent. Where can they go?

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 8>You know what I've been recommending lately in taxable accounts

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 8>as munis. You're going to of course through me that No.

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 8>I love munis. Right now, they're not quite as attractively the.

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Right way for an investor, like a retail investor to

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 5>buy munions, especially if they live in a high tax state.

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 8>I buy an actively managed municipal bond fund, and because

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:49.200
<v Speaker 8>you know you do need I think active management in

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 8>that space. You know, we offer two We have a

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 8>core unity bond fund and we have a high yield

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 8>unity fund. So I often recommend clients split their assets

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 8>between a regular union.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 5>A high How high yield are we talking about?

0:28:59.000 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 8>You can get about four and a half, which on

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 8>a taxi billot bases in tax free in about four

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 8>at a little less than four that's that's very attractive because

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 8>you know, if you look at corporate bonds. You know,

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 8>you're going to get about five ish percent of a

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 8>half and you're paying taxes on that, so you know,

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 8>to get a similar tax equivalent yield of you know,

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 8>seven seven and a half, you be you'd be well

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 8>into the high yield space.

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 5>This is what happens, Caroly in a rate environment where

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 5>rates are coming down.

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. We'll see whether it continues. I mean, what

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>are your expectations in terms of rates and how that

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 2>impacts kind of the investment environment.

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 8>So I think I think it's going to be interesting

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 8>this year. You know that we're pricing in, you know,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 8>I think last I looked, of course on my Bloomberg terminal,

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 8>about a sixteen percent chance of a January rate cut.

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 8>Market's not expecting that, but we are seeing some pretty

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 8>significant employment weakness, and January is probably off the table.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 8>But I wouldn't be surprised if we see a couple

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 8>of cuts in the first half of the year. Of course,

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 8>we're going to have a new FED share announce fairly soon,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 8>so that May meeting is starting to look like we'll

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 8>get a cut. But I think, you know, the average

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 8>rolling three month jobs added was twenty thousand and even

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 8>If you back out the one hundred thousand or so

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 8>government jobs that were lost, it's only fifty thousand and

0:30:04.960 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 8>three months over the last three months. Polelan twenty twenty

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 8>four at Jackson Hole said any further weakening in the

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 8>labor market would be unwelcome, and they were averaging one

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 8>hundred and twenty thousand a month back then and actually

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 8>one hundred and seventy before revisions based on the information.

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 5>Yet, But do we have to look at that comment

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 5>in the context of a lower no illegal immigration world like,

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 5>do we have to completely reset what a healthy number

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 5>looks like in an environment to use?

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 8>The reason I think we're seeing some increased weakness is

0:30:34.200 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 8>really other indicators. So over the last three months, we've

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 8>had nine hundred thousand people moved to part time employment

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 8>for economic reasons they would like a full time job.

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 8>That's gone from about four and a half million to

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 8>almost five and a half million the last three months.

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 8>That's the sign of a weakening labor market. And wage

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 8>growth last month was almost zero.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 5>So what does that look like for thou that group

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 5>of individuals you talked about, does that people who want

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 5>a full time job and maybe they're doing gig work instead. Yeah,

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 5>this is what Daniel de Martino Booth talks to us about. Yeah,

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 5>she's concerned about the weakness. She's talked about this over

0:31:04.960 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 5>the summer.

0:31:05.400 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not listening because I've been thinking about this stock.

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 9>Sea.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm really sorry.

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 5>I'm so sorry. Didn't you, Carol? Were you thinking about Well?

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 2>I was looking at the notes and David like, at

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 2>the stocks that you like, Shark Ninja, build a Bear.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these are not names we talk about.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 5>Carl talks a lot about build a Bear.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 8>So I'll give you a boot Bards in there too,

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 8>and we love boot barn. I loo if that was

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 8>on my list. So I'll give you the theme that

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 8>we like within concerned folks, a lot on the consumers.

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I do listen to most things you guys said they're.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 8>But anyway, Yeah, so the theme is, well, you know,

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 8>we talked a little bit about the K shaped economy.

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 8>The upper and consumer is doing better than the lower

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 8>and consumers, and and but the upper and consumer is

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 8>still looking for value. So you know, you get a

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:46.480
<v Speaker 8>trade down like Shark Ninja, compete with other firms like

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 8>a Dyson, but at a little lower price point. The

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 8>other thing we want is companies with product niches or

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 8>innovation that can drive sales and that aren't relying on

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 8>macro tail ones because, as I said, we're seeing some

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 8>economic weakness. So you want companies that drive growth through

0:32:01.120 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 8>product innovation and not just relying on the macro environment.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 2>You prefer small cap mid cap space.

0:32:06.120 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 8>You know, I like small cap I mean small caps

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 8>are relatively inexpensive now. They're also behaving differently over the

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 8>past year. So on days when we've had some economic

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 8>weakness where small caps normally you expect small caps are rally,

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 8>I think second quarter of twenty twenty one, you're coming

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 8>out of a bottom and rip roaring economy. That's when

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 8>you expect small caps to outperform. They've been doing well

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:27.400
<v Speaker 8>on days of economic weakness where rates come down. I

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 8>think small caps are behaving much more rate sensitive than

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 8>they used to. So I think with the FED cutting

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 8>and I think we're going to get a couple of

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 8>cuts this year, I think that could really benefit small caps.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 8>They're more levers in large caps and they tend to

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 8>borrow short.

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 5>David Royle, great to see you.

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 8>Great to see you.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for stopping us, for having me Chief Financial and

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:49.280
<v Speaker 5>investment officer over at Thrive In Stay with us. More

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 5>from Bloomberg Business Week Daily coming up after this.

0:32:56.160 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, which

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is live weekday afternoons from two to five these during

0:33:02.800 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this listen on Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 5>And it's our weekly Women, Money and Power segment. We

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 5>speak with some of the most influential women from across

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 5>the business world. We welcome back Christina Lee, Managing director

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 5>and co portfolio manager for US private debt Strategy at

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 5>oak Tree Capital Management. She joins us here in the studio.

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 5>Happy new year, How are you?

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 4>Thank you well, thank you so much for having me

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 4>back on. I think twenty twenty six is a new year,

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 4>and I think, as you can tell from the public markets,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 4>there's enthusiasm. I think from the private side there's enthusiasm

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 4>as well.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 5>What's the enthusiasm that you're seeing.

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 4>I think it's about M and A demand, you know,

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four. So when we were sitting back and

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four, think about twenty twenty five, everyone said,

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 4>with the new administration coming in, M and A is

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 4>going to have a boom year in twenty twenty five.

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 4>That didn't really happen right the first nine months Emina

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 4>stalled predominantly because there was so much uncertainty, for example,

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:58.040
<v Speaker 4>around tariffs, et cetera. But now I think where we're

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 4>seeing that enthusiasm, as especially on private equity side, is

0:34:01.640 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 4>private equity is held on to their investments for too long.

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Now they need exits. They need to provide distributions back

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 4>to the limited partners. So we're seeing a backlog of

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 4>deals to hit for twenty twenty six, which should help.

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 5>They are they good deals if the backlog is that

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.320
<v Speaker 5>they need to return money to clients, they need to exit,

0:34:19.480 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 5>like having to force sales is never a good thing.

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 4>I think from a credit perspective, they're good deals. And

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 4>why I say that is I think there has been

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 4>a bit of a mismatch between buyers and sellers in

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 4>terms of price. What we've seen is those that will

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.840
<v Speaker 4>sell for twelve times, fifteen times, eighteen times sell. Doesn't

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 4>necessarily mean a business that's going to sell for ten

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 4>to eleven times is a bad business from a credit perspective,

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:46.839
<v Speaker 4>And that's why I think for private credit, seeing that

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.479
<v Speaker 4>increased demand should be a benefit to the industry because

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.879
<v Speaker 4>in Q four what we saw was heightened competition because

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.720
<v Speaker 4>there was a supply demand imbalance, a lot more private

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 4>debt dry powder versus M and A deals. Even if

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 4>you look at pop markets in twenty twenty five, the

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 4>majority of the volume was actually reprising some refinancings. There's

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 4>very little new issues last year, So this is our year.

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 2>So of new issues exactly, big deal. So how much

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:14.919
<v Speaker 2>dry powder though is out there? Like how much needs

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 2>to be worked off?

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 9>Still?

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, if you look at dry powder and private credit

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:21.040
<v Speaker 4>versus private equity, everyone's like, Wow, there's so much dry

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 4>powder and private credit. There's still a lot in private

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 4>equity too, there's multiples, and so that's why we think one,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:29.880
<v Speaker 4>not only is there dry powder for private equity, a

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of that dry powder is aging. They need to

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 4>deploy it. These are closed end fens. They have a

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 4>certain set investment period, right, so they're going to be

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 4>also looking to more deploy as well, and there's going

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 4>to be more companies out there for them to buy.

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 5>Is there a specific type of company that you're seeing

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 5>that's going to be doing this out there?

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I think what we've seen so far is thematically those

0:35:52.400 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 4>that can only get very high purchase price multiples. And

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 4>what do I mean by that?

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 5>For so, it's not necessarily a certain industry, it's not.

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 4>A certain industry. I think certain industries have benefited, for example,

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:04.479
<v Speaker 4>from very high public valuations. For example, everyone talks about AI,

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 4>everyone talks about data center. We saw a good number

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:09.799
<v Speaker 4>of deals come out in the market for M and

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 4>A last year around data centers, around AI. Because they

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 4>were going for such expansive multiples, we saw less what

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 4>I call it kind of notlts and bolts industrial businesses.

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.319
<v Speaker 4>They're not bad businesses, They're just not going to go

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 4>for fifteen to eighteen tumes. So I think people reserved

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 4>and helped onto their deals, maybe to do some add ons,

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 4>build some growth in to then sell it for this year.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 2>So how much of the activity that you think will

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 2>go on is the result of just pent up, couldn't

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 2>do anything for so long, versus Wait, it's a good environment,

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 2>it's indicative of a good business environment, deal environment, economic environment.

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it's a combination. It's probably fifty to fifty.

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 4>And the reason I say that is, if you think

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 4>about it, have we had a normal year in terms

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 4>of M and A what is normal normally year?

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't twenty twenty five.

0:36:55.440 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't twenty twenty five. Really wasn't twenty four normal year?

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like a steady pace where expectations were met.

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Really hasn't in a couple of years we had supplay

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:05.320
<v Speaker 4>chain issues.

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 9>All right, we're just I think we're just done with normal, right, yes, yeah, yeah,

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 9>normal is done in general, right, you know, so we

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 9>haven't had quote unquote that normal M and A year,

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 9>And so if you think about the pent up demand,

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 9>it just wasn't twenty twenty five.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 4>It's been since twenty twenty really twenty twenty two when

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 4>there was a break in the public markets. Remember first

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 4>half of twenty and twenty two you saw the public

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 4>markets break even the private markets started to break. Right,

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:33.919
<v Speaker 4>So it's been multiple years, and I think that's grow,

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 4>having this pent up demand grow. And then second we

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.879
<v Speaker 4>have a falling rain environment. It's better to get debt capital, right,

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 4>that's beneficial for these companies and the economy. Granted there's

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:45.919
<v Speaker 4>cracks in it, but it's still holding up.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 2>So what if that doesn't continue? Though, I think that's

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 2>one of the big questions. I mean, we're seeing investors

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit enthusiastic as we wait a bunch of

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 2>economic data this week and hopefully for some more clues

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 2>about what the Fed's going to do this year. But

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I feel like people keep pulling back their expectations about

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Fed easings because there are inflationary concerns if we don't

0:38:04.680 --> 0:38:06.760
<v Speaker 2>get a lot more in the way of rate cuts.

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what do we need to do to kind

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 2>of keep the market as you describe it now? Yeah,

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 2>I think or the level of activity. Yeah, I think.

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.080
<v Speaker 4>The economy has to hold up. I think one of

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 4>the things that will spook investors and I think we'll

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 4>spook the m and A market is any type of downturn.

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 4>We haven't had a real downturn since two thousand and nine.

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of amazing, right, COVID was too short.

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 4>There's just massive bound to black.

0:38:30.840 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 5>Guy, there was a lot of people got scared then, Yeah,

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 5>a lot of people in the markets got scared, a

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 5>lot of people sold, But that didn't count in your view.

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that counted because I think what was

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 4>happening in twenty twenty was COVID was quote unquote short lived.

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:45.359
<v Speaker 2>I think you.

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 4>Saw kind of March through September really m and A

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 4>dry up. But then as things started to normalize and

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 4>there was so much dry powder again to support that

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.719
<v Speaker 4>M and A market, twenty twenty one was like a

0:38:55.760 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 4>banner year. Back half of twenty twenty. Twenty twenty one's

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:00.480
<v Speaker 4>banner year for M and A credit.

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 5>What's the relationship between your world and equity market performance?

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think part of it is on evaluation side, right,

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.960
<v Speaker 4>and spurring M and A the better the equity markets,

0:39:11.000 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 4>So doing that supports higher purchase price multiples for the

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 4>private markets as well, which spurs therefore M and A

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.520
<v Speaker 4>deal flow, which helps us because that's a big driver

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:22.040
<v Speaker 4>of demand when there's not enough deals in the market.

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 4>What happens with private credit is you have a lot

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 4>more competition. What does that mean, Decrease spreads, increase leverage.

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you need to see like it all kind of

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 2>flow through here. Your new fund that you guys launched

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 2>in October, the oak Tree Direct Lending Evergreen Fund institutional

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 2>clients completed your first Clothes at about two point thirty

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 2>five billion in committed capital. How much of that has

0:39:43.719 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 2>been lent out? Deployed at this point.

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think just thinking about that product in general,

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 4>when you think about an Evergreen fund, it's kind of

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:55.760
<v Speaker 4>a newer product and direct lending and you're raising money

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 4>every quarter.

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 2>It's open end.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:40:00.879
<v Speaker 4>Fund, and so from a deployment stand point, right, you're

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 4>always going to be looking to deploy.

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 2>And one of.

0:40:03.120 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 4>The things that we found is a growth factor in

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.520
<v Speaker 4>private credit. Are these newer types of vehicles. If you

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 4>think about for direct lending, it has been always kind

0:40:11.920 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 4>of closed end funds. Yeah, I think LPs are asking

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 4>for evergreen funds. They want someplace to get income, to

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.080
<v Speaker 4>be diversified and a safe pair of hands and consistently deployed.

0:40:23.120 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 4>And that's what Evergreen and frankly Oaktrey provides.

0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 9>Well.

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Good stuff like we were so looking forward to catching

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 2>up with you. Happy New Year, Good to see you.

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 4>Again, Happy New Year as well. Thanks for having me.

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll see you soon. Christina Lee, Managing director, co portfolio

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 2>manager for US Private debt.

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 8>Over at Oaktree Capital.

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:52.280
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and all ways on the Bloomberg terminal

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 3>MHM