WEBVTT - SYSK Selects: How the Scientific Method Works

0:00:00.600 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, Happy Saturday. This is Charles W. Chuck Bryant here.

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I hope you slept well. Hope you're feeling good because

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you're about to listen to How the Scientific Method Works

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is from January of two thousand fifteen, and boy, this

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is a good one. I really loved it because we

0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 1>love science around here and we love the scientific method

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and proving stuff out. So check it out right now.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of My

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radios How Stuff Works. Hey, and welcome to the podcast.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Clark. There's Charles W. Chuck Bryant, there's Jerry

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Stuffy should Know grinning. It's even a while. I know,

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it's funny, like those words come pouring out of my

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>mouth and then it's cool. You wake up in the

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>middle of night saying that, and you mean like slugs

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>you in the face. She's sleep She has to dry

0:00:55.320 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>my brow. Yes, we prerecorded some for December, as we

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>like to do to take a little time off at

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year and not explain things for

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks in our real lives. Like people ask

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>me things like what happened to that stick of butter? Yeah,

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, don't ask. Don't even ask me. I

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>could tell you, but I'm not gonna exactly. That's how

0:01:16.800 --> 0:01:21.039
<v Speaker 1>it goes in my house. Find your own butter. December

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was find your own butter Munthy. That's a good that's

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one. That should be a T shirt

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. You should know. Find your own butter or

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>December is find your own butter mundy. Yeah, that's right.

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a stick of butter and some garland on it. Yeah,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that. So it's good to see you again, man.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Good to be back in here. Yeah, it is nice

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>to be back because as much as the break was great,

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to be explaining things again. Well that's good

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 1>because if we got in here and you're like, I

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>can't do this, I can't do it again, we'll be

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>in trouble. Yeah. Yeah, So I'm glad we're all feeling good. Jerry,

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you're feeling good. Jerry's got two thumbs up in a

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>big goofy smile, two of her three thumbs. She looks

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>like Bob from that male enhancement pill. I had. Oh

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>see the guy, the old man that's like super buff.

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>I would call him old. He was middle aged. He

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>looked like kind of a Bob Dobbs type dude. I

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's kind of who he was modeled. And I

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>see the guy that's super muscle. Now I'm thinking of

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>someone different. I think you're thinking of Jack La Lane. No, no, no, no,

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>just there's some ad. There's some old man that looks

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>like really creepy because from the next super buff looks

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like it year old. No. Remember, there was like a

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>male enhancement pill and I'm making air quotes here for

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>erectile dysfunction. Well, there go the air quotes. But yes,

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and it was like in the early two thousand's, I

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>think maybe late nineties, but I think early two thousands,

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and these ads were everywhere, and there was Bob and

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like all these great things happened to him because he

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 1>started taking this pill. I can't remember the name of

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the pill. But the company like got into a lot

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of trouble because it was basically like a subscription service

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and like you gave him your credit card and you've

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>got this free trial, but then they started sending it

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>to you and it was like next to impossible to

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>cut off service. Interesting They're like, no, we want your

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>mailness to be enhanced. So you you've seen these ads.

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna start asking questions, but why why bother?

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I will? I will YouTube. I will find it on YouTube.

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll be like, oh, Bob, yeah you will. You'll go oh,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I won't have to come back in and record an

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>insert the guy that's on the back of all those

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>pill bottles in my bathroom so chucky. I don't even

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>remember how we got Oh yeah, Jerry did that. That

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>was Jerry's fault. But um, you remember we did the

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Enlightenment episode. Okay, we talked a lot about how there's

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this kind of um tug of war over the human

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>psyche between rationalism and mysticism. I guess you could you

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>could put it well, I feel like we're talking today

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about the scientific method. Yeah, great idea. By the way,

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. It's been a long time coming. Um,

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>because I realized, like I, I don't understand as fully

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>as I don't understand science. I understand the scientific method

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's pretty cut and dry, and it's beautiful and

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>elegant and simple. But then you just take this thing

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and it came out of the birth of rationalism, and

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>when you place it into the world and make it

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>function there's a lot of implications. Is it being used properly?

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it being used responsibly? Like are we putting what

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.840
<v Speaker 1>constitutes faith into that? You know, like it just raises

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>all this other stuff. And it made me realize, like

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand science as much as I want to,

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>So researching this it was awesome. Yeah, and this is

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a cool episode, I think, because not only are we

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:39.279
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about the scientific method, but we're going

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about just science, like what is science in general?

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>And some of the rock stars along the way who really,

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, laid out the path remarkably and like many

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.279
<v Speaker 1>many years ago, like coming up with these amazing discoveries

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that still like hold you know, you can like hold

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:00.719
<v Speaker 1>their feet to the fire for a lot this stuff. Yeah,

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>because if you come upon a universal truth, you know

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is, like you got to be

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:10.279
<v Speaker 1>the person who discovered it because you know, you saw it,

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you realized it a certain way, but ultimately it was

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>there already. Yeah, like Newton, I mean, we'll talk about

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff, but it's not like now we're like, oh, Newton,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>most of what he said was wrong, But that's understandable

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>because it was a long time ago, like his stuff

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>holds up really really well. I was wondering if he

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>on his deathbed was just like, oh man, I contributed

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so much to humanity it's mind boggling, but I couldn't

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>enhance my malehood. Well, Bob hadn't come along yet, So Chuck,

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>let's let's just quit stalling and talk about science. Like,

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>what is science? Well, I hate the old elementary school

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>uh defined as but it's a pretty good place to

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>start here to get a base definition of science. Yeah,

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>old William Harris did a great job with this. Yes,

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>William Harris did a great job. Uh. Science the intellectual

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and practical activity encompassing the structure and behavior of the

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>physical and natural world through observation and experimentation. Boom end

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of podcast. Uh So, the first part of that is

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.040
<v Speaker 1>science is practical and it is you know, they make

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a good he makes. Bill Harris makes a great point

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in here. It's not just stuff you do in a lab,

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just for scientists. It is all about

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>being hands on and active, and it's all about discovery

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and asking questions about I mean, that's how everything is

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>ultimately solved, is by someone looking at something and having

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a question about it exactly. And then the scientific method

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>comes in when you say, and this is how you

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>properly get to that answer exactly. Um. And he makes

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.160
<v Speaker 1>another good point to that the idea that there's a method,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a scientific method, makes it seem like it's it's secreted

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>away among the the fraternity of scientists. And like you said,

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>any anybody can use it. It's just kind of part

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of being a curious human is it's not even anyone

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>can use it. Everyone does use it, you just might

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>not even know that you're using it, like if you

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one of the examples that use later is

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>if like your car overheats, when you figure out why

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and fix it, that's the scientific method, right, playing out

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly based on reasoning. Yeah, okay, in deduction and induction. Man,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there's so much to talk about. Okay, So let's let's

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>talk about that definition that you had. So the first

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>part is that science is it's a practical activity. So

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>science is practical, right, It's it's this, Um. The basis

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of the whole thing is discovery. Right. You see something,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you see birds in flight, and you say, where are

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>those birds going? And if you just went and laid

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>down on the ground and went to sleep. After that,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>then you're not you're not carrying out science. But if

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you went I want to find out where those birds

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are going, and you follow them and you start taking notes,

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that is the basis of science, is discovery. Yeah,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's the observational part as well. Um, sometimes you're

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>using a microscope or a telescope. Sometimes you're using your eyeballs.

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>But no matter what your tool is, uh, you're gonna

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>be watching something and recording what's called data or data,

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>depending on I don't know what kind of person you are. Yeah,

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>what do you say? I think? I say both. I

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>think data. Yeah, I don't think I've I don't think

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I say data data, I say data data. Yeah, all right,

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll go with data. You say both. I feel like

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it just comes out of my mouth one way or

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the other, and I don't really think about it. I

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's like being ambidextrous. Yeah. Yeah, I'm a data

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>data Yeah. Uh. So once you are observing this data, well,

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple of kinds. There's quantitative data, which

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>are numbers, like you know, your body temperature is point six,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>although I think that's changed slightly now, didn't it. Yeah, yeah, there.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>You used to be like, if you were a human being,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>your body temperature is point six and they's like, no,

0:09:00.440 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a little more variation than that. But any kind

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>of just numerical representation is quantitative, whereas qualitative as behavioral,

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 1>like I'm gonna watch that bird um eat and poop

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for the next week, right, or what happens if I

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what will the slug do if I put a bunch

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of salt on it? You know, I don't do that. No,

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you really should not do that. No, that's awful. But

0:09:25.559 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the reaction of the slug is gathering qualitative data, and

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>depending on who you talk to, there isn't qualitative data

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and science that it should all just be quantitative, because yeah,

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>because quantitative data is reproducible. Qualitative data is it's not

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>necessarily reproducible. You can observe the same phenomenon, but you're

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily controlling it. Okay, well, I guess I get that,

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with Bill here and that they are both.

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>They go hand in hand, and neither one is more

0:09:57.960 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>important than the other. You need to have both. Well,

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people do, and we'll talk more about

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it later. Because without the idea that qualitative data is

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.359
<v Speaker 1>acceptable and scientific. You don't have the social social sciences,

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.400
<v Speaker 1>like they don't exist. Yeah, that's a good point, but

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>yes we have quantitative data and qualitative data. I agree

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>with you, they're both useful. Okay. Uh, it is an

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>intellectual pursuit um. So you can make observations on data

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>all day long. But until you bring reason, in this case,

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>inductive reasoning, which is driving a generalization based on your observations,

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>then it's just data sitting there on a piece of

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 1>paper like it's supposed to lead you somewhere right exactly,

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>And so we should talk about inductive and deductive reasoning

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and it depending. Again. It's really weird. One of the

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>things that came across is that there's not a universal

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>agreement on how science is carried out. Like No, I

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>saw some places where there's like there's no place for

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>inductive reasoning in science. Then other places they're saying, well,

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you have to have science using inductive reasoning. Everybody seems

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to agree that deductive reasoning is the basis of science,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but that you also have to have inductive So deductive

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>is basically taking a big broad generalization and saying that

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it applies to something specific more specific. Yes, Uh, inductive

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is the opposite where you say, I've noticed these different

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>data points, and uh, that means that this broad generalization

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is true. So you go from specific, small observations to

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a broad generalization. And the reason that a lot of

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>people say, well, inductive reasoning doesn't have any place in

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>science is because you're saying, those birds over there are

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.679
<v Speaker 1>all brown. Therefore all birds of that type are brown.

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Even though I haven't seen every single bird of that

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>type in the world. I'm saying that all those birds

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.079
<v Speaker 1>are brown, and a lot of people say there's no

0:11:59.120 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>place for that in science. Well, if you want to

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>go out and prove that, then that's your business. You know.

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't just say that and be like and I'm done,

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, I guess you could, but be much of scientists, right,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>But the the you can use it to formulate hey hypotheses. Right,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So you can say, I've generated all these data points,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna put them together and see if this broad

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>generalization is right. Okay, so there is a place for

0:12:24.280 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>inductive reasoning science. But everybody says deductive reasoning is the

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:33.480
<v Speaker 1>basis of science. Well, Bill Harris does. He offers a

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>great example for inductive reasoning with Edwin Hubbell of the

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>Hubble Telescope. Uh. He was looking through the Hooker telescope,

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>which at the time at California's Mount Wilson. Is it

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the one from Rebel Without a Cause? Now that's um

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Griffith Park Observatory, which has been redesigned, and uh is

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>really cool now, Yeah, I mean it was kind of

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>cool before, but it was definitely like, uh, sort of

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>a bass museum that time forgot. Oh really, so they've

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>updated it. I'll bet that was cool though in its

0:13:06.360 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>own way. Yeah, it was neat. I used to live

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:09.840
<v Speaker 1>near there, so it was kind of But that's like

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the famous one, at least in the movies. Yeah, that's

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>where they have the big knife fight and there's this

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.120
<v Speaker 1>James Dean statue there too. Oh I didn't like a

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>bust um. So yes, Edwin Hubble, he's at Mountain Wilson

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.839
<v Speaker 1>and he's looking through the Hooker telescope, which was the

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest one. And at the time everyone said the Milky

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Way Galaxy is it? That's what we've got going on?

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>Did you know this? Uh? Yeah, I knew that because

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>we're talking. Yeah, not that long ago did not realize this.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>And he started looking through this telescope and said, you

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>know what, these nebula that everyone says are part of

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>our galaxy look to me like they're beyond our galaxy.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Not only that, they look like they're moving away from us.

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So he made this, uh, with through inductive reasoning, made

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>this observation that you know what, I think there are

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>many many galaxies out there, and not only that, I

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>think they are expanding. And uh, through technological advancement with

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>telescopes over the years, scientists, you know, it proved to

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>be true. Yeah. Pretty cool. So this is a really

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>good example of him saying, like, I've made some observations

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and now I'm going to say this broad generalization. Right,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>So these these galaxies appear to be moving away from another.

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>So the whole universe is expanding. Right. That's inductive reasoning.

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a pretty brave thing, uh, especially back then, because

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>you're really putting your reputation at steak. It really is,

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you know. So what Hubble was, what Hubble did was

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what we've come to see as science. He made some observations,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>he came up with a hypothesis, um, and then it

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was tested later on. It's not you don't necessarily as

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a scientist. You're a part of a larger collective of scientists, right,

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>and every scientist needs one another. It's why there's journals

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and and um conferences and things like that to share information. Right,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the party into party, and and Hubble came up with

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>his own observations, and rather than just experimenting, experimenting, experimenting himself,

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure he continued to do, he created this

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>basis of work that he probably realized is going to

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>survive him. Right. And then later on scientists came down

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the road and they tested his hypothesis and they found

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>it was correct, and so his hypothesis became a theory.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It eventually became part of the basis of the Big

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Bang theory that the universe started as a huge explosion

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's expanding still because we're because it exploded at

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>one point, right. And they did that by carrying out

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>other tests or experiments exactly. So this is how science works.

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Like some guy back in in n makes some observations

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>in California, he proposes this big broad generally generalization, and

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>over the next like ensuing half a century more and

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>more scientists all around the world start testing his hypothesis

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and find it to be true, so it becomes a theory. Yeah. Well,

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 1>well let's finish up here with science. The last part

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of the definition is that it's systematic, and it's methodical,

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and it requires testing and experiments, and it requires those

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>experiments and tests to be repeated and verified, and it

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is is. It's a system, it's a way of working

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>things out. It's a way of working and that is

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method. Basically. Yeah, you have your idea, you

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>pose a question, you theorize hyper you put a hypothesis

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>out there, and then you go about trying to either

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>prove it or disprove it. Yeah, exactly. And then the

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>way that you go about proving or disproving it, that's

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method. Everything else is just scientific inquiry. The

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>way you go about, the standardized way of going about

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>scientific inquiry is the scientific method. And we, friend, we'll

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 1>talk about the scientific method right after this. All right,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>you brought up a point. I think we should go

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>ahead and just get right to my friend, let's do

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses and theories. One thing to to stay together. One

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:39.639
<v Speaker 1>thing that really chase my hide is, uh, when you

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>hear poop o ers of whatever scientific theory say, well,

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just a theory, and you where was this thing

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:49.479
<v Speaker 1>that you found that poop poo that Do you remember

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>what website that was? No? No, Also, I do want

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 1>to give a shout out now that you mentioned it

0:17:56.000 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>too Explorables. It's like an online university basically of free

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>courses and uh, there is one on scientific reasoning that

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is just amazing. It's like a huge rabbit hole. You

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>go down and you start clicking on the embedded links

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and you end up like understanding all sorts of stuff.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So go check that one out if you like understanding stuff.

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:19.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's one of the things that bug me if

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>someone says it's just a theory, and this does a

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>great job of kind of throwing that out the window, um,

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's basically mixing up the two definitions of theory. Yeah,

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>there's like a colloquial definition that people use every day

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:35.159
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't really have much to do with the

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>scientific use. Like I got a theory that Jerry and

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in one hour bathroom breaks every day is really playing

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>words with friends in the lobby. I think your theory

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is correct. So that's a theory in the colloquial meaning

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>as where science goes. The theory is not just something

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>you postulate. So if this may or may not be true,

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 1>the theory is b on the hypothesis, and it's something

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that is strongly supported in many different ways and all

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there's all kinds of evidence to support something that eventually

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>becomes a theory. Right, So, um, what you your theory

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>about Jerry's bathroom breaks in the scientific world would be

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>a hypothesis. What In fact, yeah, it would be a

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>scientific law, but ultimately would begin as a hypothesis, a

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>hunch based on intuition, based on the data you've collected, observations,

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, where like, you know, you've seen

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that Jerry goes to the bathroom for like an hour

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>to stretch frequently. When she comes back, she's um finishing

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>up a game of words with friends. You've heard that

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>she's been spotted in the lobby during these times. So

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis is that while she is gone for these

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>hour long bathroom breaks, she's actually down the lobby playing

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>words with friends. Right, based on knowledge, observation, and logic. Right,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>So let's say that you decided to set up an experiment,

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and you experimented, and you went and you found Jerry

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.400
<v Speaker 1>playing words with friends five different times, and you told

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>me about it, and I was like, I'm going to

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.720
<v Speaker 1>run that same experiment exactly the way you did, Right,

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>I would test that same hypothesis. If I found the

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>same results to be true, then what you would have

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>come up with, your hypothesis would move to basically a

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>theory that is, this widely accepted thing. This explanation that

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Jerry is not actually in the bathroom, she's downstairs playing

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>with friends, would be the Jerry bathroom break theory. Right.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>And then if it turns out that you find that

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Jerry spending an hour a day pretending to be in

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the bathroom but actually being downstairs playing words with friends,

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>if the universe couldn't exist without her doing that every day,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>you would have a scientific law. That's right. Yeah, I

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>think that was a good example you came up. Well,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>it's a great example, as it turns out. Uh. I

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>guess the point here is when you hear someone say

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in an argument, well that's just a theory, just punch

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>him in the head and then tell him what we

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 1>just said about the bathroom breaks, and they'll say, who's Jerry,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:21.160
<v Speaker 1>or just just queue up that whole bit and stand

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>outside of their window wearing a trench coat and holding

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a boom box over your head with the smug look

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>on your face. Uh all right, So should we go

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>back in in the old way back machine a little

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>bit and just talk a little bit about how the

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>scientific method came to be? Yes? Man, this this thing?

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Where are you running this on these days? Straight? Kerosene?

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>The fumes in here killing me? Sorry about that? Trying

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to go green? You know, kerosene is not cream diesel.

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm choking bio diesel. How about that? Okay, the

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>way back machine will run French free Greece. That would

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>be fine. I'll get to work on that. I could

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>handle this for you. So you you teach us with

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Renaissance, and the reason the Renaissance was so awesome

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and necessary was because of something else we've talked about,

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>which was the Dark Ages. Uh when, which remember that's

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the rationalists disparaging term for this era. That's right, Uh?

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>But I think sort of rightfully so, because right before

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dark Ages until about a century after, there was

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>not much advancement at all in the realm of scientific advancement.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, it's it's true. That's hard to argue with that,

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and and the reason why it is again, science wasn't

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>really born yet and there was a huge struggle between

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 1>rationalism and mysticism, and ultimately we're living in the age

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of rationalism now. Yeah, and we should point out too

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that this was mainly in Europe over in the Islamic world,

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>as I think we had a listener mail point out,

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.399
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of advancements being made. Uh, just

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of flying under the European radar at the time,

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>because some say the Catholic Church kind of kept science

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>under its thumb for a while and it's a pretty

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>big threat and said, you know, you can't do this stuff.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You can't experiment like this, and don't ask these questions

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>because here are your answers. Yeah. But eventually the Renaissance

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 1>came about in the twelfth century and people woke up

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and I saw some of the work in the Islamic

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>world and said, you know what, maybe let's start reading

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 1>up on Aristotle and told the me and euclid it

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>once again. Yeah, they're like, we forgot about these guys. Yeah,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it literally kind of vanished for a while

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it did. From the west. Yes, fortunately it was still around,

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, and in its home places. But yes, in

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the West they were lost. The Roman stuff was almost

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>entirely lost because it was being suppressed by the locals.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Greek knowledge was completely vanished. Yes, somehow,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>somehow they got there was some um. We got another

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.719
<v Speaker 1>listener mail after the Enlightenment when they said that it

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:08.959
<v Speaker 1>was an Islamic scholar who was the one who translated

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Aristotle into Latin or something like that, and that without

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>this guy, like, the West wouldn't have had much to

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>start with. Because that's where that birth of rationalism came

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>from from, was this rediscovery of Greek and Roman classical thought.

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And this was the basis of scientific inquiry of rationalism,

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of saying, like, okay, there's there's set rules to things,

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and we need to discover these rules and how the

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>principles of how the universe works, like there has to

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>be principles, and we need to find this in a rational,

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>methodical way. And right out of the gate, Europe said, okay,

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>well whatever you say is right, then, Aristotle. We're used

0:24:47.600 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to just believing everything without questioning it. And luckily Albert Magnus,

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is who it was. Um was Albertus Magnus

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>or Roger Bacon, who said, no, it is Bacon. Roger Bacon,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>who just has this great name, Roger Bacon, the Bacon brothers. Yeah,

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>he said, Roger. They weren't brothers though, but they were

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>they related at all, you know. I looked that up

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think people know either way. I don't

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>think there's any proof, but a lot of people think,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>because of their names and the way things went back then,

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>that they may very well have been red And I

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.159
<v Speaker 1>mean they were separated by three d or so years.

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Although Roger was a was a monk, so he would

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>not have had children. So if they were, it's an

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>excellent point. It wasn't necessarily through his line, you know. Yeah,

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it could have been a nephew or something. Yeah, or

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>his brother Kevin might have had the line that matched.

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So Roger was the one who said, everybody stopped. Just

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 1>because Aristotle wrote something doesn't mean it's fact, especially when

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we find contradictions to it. Yeah, it doesn't. Our cells

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>not automatically right, and this is a huge advancement. Yeah,

0:25:54.560 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>And Albertus Magnus was the one I believe who said

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you know this and called revealed truth, which is basically

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 1>God says this instead of a truth found by experimenting,

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 1>is maybe we should experiment instead and not take this

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>revealed truth as the truth. Right. And we mentioned in

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the Enlightenment episode as well about scholasticism about using scientific

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>inquiry to explain theology, which was you know, you're still

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>working from a theological standpoint, right, but you're starting to

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>use scientific inquiry and the the idea that you shouldn't

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>just accept things as truth. That was again a huge,

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>huge breakthrough. Uh. Francis Bacon, the other Bacon brother, he's

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the heroes of this story. Yeah, he was

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:47.240
<v Speaker 1>an attorney and philosopher and its possibly Shakespeare. Oh really,

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I never heard that interesting? So what do you mean

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>like wrote those under the pseudonym huh? And there the

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare sister was the other theory too, right. That was

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>a woman. I've heard that, and she couldn't like you know,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.520
<v Speaker 1>women couldn't be the play, right, so's her dumb brother, William.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>That's good? Was it her brother? I think that was

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the theories. This was a good Smith song too. Uh,

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare sister was that the name of it. Wouldn't it

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>a band too? I think it was? What was it? Maybe?

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, anyway, he was a philosopher and a lawyer,

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know what, the Baconian method basically

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 1>became the scientific method. He was the first dude who

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>really said, this is how the steps that you should

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>take to uh investigate science. There has to be a framework.

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And the whole point of this that we take this

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>so for granted now because it's so intuitively and on

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:54.880
<v Speaker 1>its face right, yeah, as far as scienceific inquiry goes.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>But this is an enormous breakthrough to say, you follow

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this step, the up this framework, and if everybody who

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.640
<v Speaker 1>carries out science follows the same framework, then science will

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>be universal and interchangeable and anyone in the world, and

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>not just now, but anytime, we'll be able to carry

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>out the same experiment and we'll be able to verify

0:28:19.600 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>or disprove it. Yea, And that is amazing that that happened.

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>That's why Francis Bacon is one of the heroes of

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the story. And he didn't come up with this entirely

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on his own, but he was the one who said

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.000
<v Speaker 1>this is what we're gonna do. I'm going to give

0:28:34.000 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it a name. I'm going to spell it out, and

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:39.959
<v Speaker 1>from now on you can call me the dad of

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method. Yeah. And that's why Newton was such

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a rock star, because he so rigorously stuck to the

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.760
<v Speaker 1>scientific method that all these centuries later, his uh, you know,

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>his systems of laws are they have stood the test

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of time. And uh, I think it's a good point

0:28:56.040 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to bring up to that the collaboration of sciences is

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>really the hallmark of advancement and moving forward. It's not

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>working in a vacuum. It's sharing your ideas and working

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>with one another. And the whole h little sidebar here

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>on celth here I thought was pretty cool, which was

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>when science quit. We're not quit, but started looking at

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>small things instead of looking at the universe around them

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and at the stars. And uh said, basically, you know,

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>through the advancement of lens grinding, Antonio van Leben Hook,

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>specifically a Dutch tradesman, was pretty good at making simple microscopes,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden, contemporaries like Robert Hook said,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what, let's start looking at tiny things because

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.760
<v Speaker 1>they're in might lie the answer too many many things yeah,

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and they're right. Robert Hook found cork. He discovered cells

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>by looking at cork through an early microscope. So in

0:29:56.240 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this story, science is hastened by technological advance, spent lens

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>grinding to make microscopes, and then this new technology is

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>used to further science, right, Yeah, it's like mutual inspiration

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>between Leavin Hook and Hook. Levin Hook. Yeah, it was

0:30:12.760 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>neat because Hook heard about Leavin Hooks microscopes, got his

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>hands on one or a microscope, looked at him like cork,

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>and said, oh, there's such thing as cells. Levin Hook said, oh,

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty neat. Let me try. And he said, oh,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there's such a thing as quote little animals, which we

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>call protozoan bacteria. And one of the Royal Societies. After

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Leavin Hook presented his findings, turned back to Hook and said, hey, Hook,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we know you're pretty handy with the microscope. You confirmed

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Leavin Hook's findings are their little animals? Hook said, there are, indeed,

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I can see them with my microscope. That's right. And

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that inspired a German botanist name Matthias schleiden Uh to

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>look at a lot of plants, and he was the

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>first guy to say, you know what, plants are composed

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of cells. And he's having dinner one night with his

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>zoologist buddy. Yeah, this is about a hundred years later. Yeah,

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Theodore schran and said, you know what, dude, Uh, order

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the wine and order the steak. Trust me, because this

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>place is fantastic. And uh, also, plants are made of cells.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Don't tell anyone. And he went, you know what, dude,

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I have been investigating animals with microscopes and they're made

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of cells too. And so they figured out at this

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>dinner that everything is made of cells. All living things

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>are made of cells. Boom, Okay, so this is huge.

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>This is a big advancement, right that we're hitting upon

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. Huge, but it laid the further foundation, right,

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So initial scientific inquiry led to further scientific inquiry and

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>further scientific conclusions and generalizations. All living things are made

0:31:54.040 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of cells, and then it was extrapolated elsewhere. Right. Yeah,

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Like twenty years later, Rudolph Virtual said, you know what,

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not only is everything made of living cells, but they

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>all come from pre existing cells, which was a huge

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 1>deal at the time because people believed in spontaneous generation

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>at the time, Like if you left some um wheat

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>seed in a sweaty shirt. It would spawn mice. I

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>think was one of them. There's a lot of weird ones.

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Press basil between some bricks and you'll get a scorpion.

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Was one, like they were really out there? Yeah, well

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the one that is well not true, but the one

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that you could actually see was rotten meat would eventually

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>uh spawn maggots. How did they possibly get there? Yeah,

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>spontaneous generation. But that's the obvious explanation, and if you

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.280
<v Speaker 1>think about it, they're working from Okam's razor and Ockham's razor, says,

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the simplest explanation is usually the right one, all all

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>other things given. Well, the thing is is spontaneous generation

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>has never been shown to be possible. If we've got

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the cell thing over here, let's investigate that. So this

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:06.640
<v Speaker 1>uh what was the guy's name? Virtual? Yes, he's saying, okay,

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>well wait a minute, I get this cell theory I'm

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>working on that's been around for a couple of decades.

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Hypothesis probably the cell hypothesis at the nice catch. Don't

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>feel bad though, because this article that you sent said

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that scientists today like still like confuse those terms just

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and the the house of works. Article makes a good

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>point in saying that science and everything that has to

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do with it is in the scientific method is very

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>fluid and open to interpretation and experimentation. Obviously, but so

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he says, um, okay, this cell hypothesis, this is a

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty good explanation for what we now call spontaneous generation.

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't do anything about it. He just put it

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>out there. Yeah, and then along comes Louis Pastier, who

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>does do something about it. He figures out a great

0:33:54.160 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 1>experiment to try to disprove spontaneous generation. Yeah, it's pretty

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>pool to um. He basically took a broth uh, put

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>equal amounts in two different beakers. One had a straight

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:11.360
<v Speaker 1>neck and one had an S shaped neck. He boiled

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it just to make sure everything and it was killed,

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and then just let it sit there in the same conditions,

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>open to the to the world and are open to

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the room, like it wasn't corked. In other words, he

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>noticed that the one with the straight neck eventually became

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>cloudy and discolored h meaning there was some junk growing

0:34:30.160 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>in there, and the one in the S shaped neck

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 1>did not do anything. It remained the same. So led

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>him to think what well, he thought that germs, that

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:42.839
<v Speaker 1>there were such things as germs which m leaving Hoke

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and Hook had already shown um and that if that

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in the S shaped flask they had gotten trapped in

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the neck, in this the open neck, they had been

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>able to just enter unobstructed and had generated there. The

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 1>reason that the S shaped ask was still sterile was

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>because there is no such thing as spontaneous generation. If

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there were, then no S shaped neck would impede anything

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like that, and boom, there you have it. So he

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>disproved that spontaneous generation is a thing, right, that's right

0:35:17.920 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>through the scientific method. Exactly. Here's the leap that a

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people make, scientists included that really is a

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>great disservice to science. He didn't prove cell theory right.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>What he did was take that cell hypothesis and present

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 1>some really persuasive evidence that it's probably right. Yeah, But

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>like this article you sent points out, disproving something is

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>just as important as proving something. So here's the thing

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the most you can hope for a science is

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:53.320
<v Speaker 1>disproving sure with science, unless you're talking about math. With science,

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.959
<v Speaker 1>there's no such thing as proof a theory, even a law,

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>universal law still has the potential for being undermined by

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>one single experiment, one single observation, and therefore there is

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>no real ultimate proof in science. There's just theories and

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>support for theories, and then ultimately laws aim further and

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>further support for laws, right, but they're not proven. What

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>science does ultimately is disproved things or lend support for

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>existing theories, are existing interpretations of why things happen the

0:36:29.719 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 1>way they do. And that's what past true did. So

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the experiment, he disproved spontaneous generation,

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but he lent support to the cell theory, and probably

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>with his experiment it went from the cell hypothesis to

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the cell theory because it was just so persuasive. And

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what a theory is. It means that a lot

0:36:48.760 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>of people out there who are reasonable say this explanation

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>is probably the right one. Yeah, it's predictive. If you

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>do it over and over, you're probably going to get

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the same result. But that's not to say that past

0:37:01.320 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>year showed that if you do this a million in

0:37:03.920 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>one times that the S shaped flask won't turn cloudy.

0:37:09.239 --> 0:37:11.840
<v Speaker 1>He didn't prove that. You can't prove that, which is

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>again science can disprove and when support can't prove. Very

0:37:16.800 --> 0:37:19.719
<v Speaker 1>good point. So right after this message break, we're going

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to get into the actual steps of the scientific method. Alright, dude,

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess that long last, we're there. Like you mentioned before,

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method is fluid and it's not like when

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.959
<v Speaker 1>you get your science degree they hand you a little

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>laminated card like the Miranda rights that cop scary that

0:37:58.000 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, list out all the different steps you have

0:37:59.920 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to take. Um. But generally maybe yeah, I would we

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>should carry those around, all right. We should make little

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>wallet cards of the scientific method just to carry the stuff.

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:11.719
<v Speaker 1>You should know a logo on it. Oh yeah, I'll

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>make a million bucks a random and sell them. Uh.

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Generally speaking, though it follows these steps. The first thing

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you do, like we mentioned earlier, is you observe something.

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You ask a question. Uh next, Like Darwin was known,

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I think when we did our podcast on him too,

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you would spend like a week on three square feet

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of ground. It was like even longer than that. Remember

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Remember was wasn't it He said that he didn't he

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't gonna MOA's lawn for like three years because he

0:38:40.480 --> 0:38:43.719
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see what what happened? Yeah, so he's the

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 1>ultimate and qualitative data of just observing, writing things down

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and asking questions. And the reason you ask your question

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 1>is so you can narrow something down like that. I

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>think the example they use in here is on galapa

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.759
<v Speaker 1>ghosts like the beaks of what bird? Was it? Finches? Yeah,

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the finch bird. He noticed a bunch of different beaks,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>so he finally posed a question like, um, you know,

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I think these beaks are different for a very specific reason,

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and I aim to find out why. Yes, he said,

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>what caused the diversification of finches on Galapagos? Who should

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have done that with an accent? Well, yeah, he would

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 1>have had a British accent. Huh yeah, unless he was

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be someone else. I think of him as like, um,

0:39:27.480 --> 0:39:31.240
<v Speaker 1>sounding like Hemingway or something. Oh yeah, just drunken, violent

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of. But he wasn't. He was like the opposite

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of that. Yeah. Well I saw that the movie. So

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a picture of his voice as the dude that played

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>him who I can't remember right now, ed Norton. No,

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I finally saw Birdman though. Did you see that? Yeah? Yeah,

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>great movie? Um, I disagree, Oh you didn't like it?

0:39:54.840 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>What Wow, that surprises me. Um, we'll get into that

0:40:01.239 --> 0:40:06.239
<v Speaker 1>off here. So, uh sorry you just threw me with that.

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Make an observation. Yes, he's on galapagost and he's like,

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>what the hex with all these different finches one small island?

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Why would there be different species of finch so asking?

0:40:15.719 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>And and why are they all seeming to survive and

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>coexist so well? What's what makes Yeah, then he leads

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to the question what's making all of these species of

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>finches so diverse? Right? Or Bill Harris uses a pretty

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:34.359
<v Speaker 1>good example that's something everyone can understand, like what car

0:40:34.400 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>body shape is the best for air resistance? Like one

0:40:38.520 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the shape like a box, or one the shape like

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>aerodynamic like a bird. And he carries that out In

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the next step. You formulate your hypothesis based on your

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, for knowledge and maybe observations like so, you

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>know what, I think that a car shaped like a

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:58.520
<v Speaker 1>bird is probably more aerodynamic than one shape like a box. Yeah.

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 1>If you're thinking, if you're the type of per soon

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he's sitting around asking questions about aerodynamics, you probably already

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of sense that a box is less

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 1>aerodynamic than a bird. That's right. Boxes rarely fly unless

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>they're carried by one of those delightful Amazon delivery drones.

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:17.759
<v Speaker 1>They don't have those yet, right, They're not gonna do that,

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>are they. There's like a pizza delivery drone service. Man.

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>I think where you have pizza are grilled cheese in

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.399
<v Speaker 1>New York and you go stand on an X after

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you order and it like comes and drops it. That

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.439
<v Speaker 1>is the dumbest thing of error. And I can't wait

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to do it where they're making a lot of money.

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty funny. Um, Yet we can't get food to

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the homeless somehow exactly. We can drop a grilled cheese

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>on someone's head. They're like, you homeless, gut, get off

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of that x exactly. Um. Alright, So your hypothesis I

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think we ever mentioned is typically represented as an

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if then statement, Yeah, if you're doing good sciences, Yeah,

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>like if the cars profile. Uh, well, the the example

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 1>he uses if the body's profile related to the amount

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of air it produces, which is the more general statement. Yeah,

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that's like based on a theory. Yeah, and it's gonna

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.919
<v Speaker 1>get more specific than the car designed, like the body

0:42:14.920 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of a bird will be more aerodynamic than one like

0:42:18.200 --> 0:42:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a box. So that's inductive reasoning, starting with the broad

0:42:21.480 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 1>statement and going to something narrow, and it's if. Then

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, Yeah, and now you have a test.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.239
<v Speaker 1>You have a question that can be answered, you can

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to answer it. Yeah, and he

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:36.640
<v Speaker 1>points out to this is pretty important that, uh, your hypothesis,

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>if it's formulated correctly, means it is testable and it's falsifiable,

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:44.800
<v Speaker 1>which are often one and the same, you know. Yeah,

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's again we go to the people who say

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're they're soft sciences, aren't real science. There's pseudoscience

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of the data that they come up with,

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the hypotheses they come up with aren't falsifiable,

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not testable. It's a it's a thing. It's an issue,

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a thing. So next up in the steps, you're

0:43:07.520 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna experiment. And when you experiment, you can't just go

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in there willy nilly and do whatever you want. Um,

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to set up specific conditions and they must

0:43:17.120 --> 0:43:20.840
<v Speaker 1>be controlled, and you want to everything that's supposed to

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be identical needs to be identical. So basically you have

0:43:24.320 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>two variables. At least you have an independent variable and

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you have a dependent variable, and if you're talking about

0:43:31.400 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 1>car shape, that is the independent variable in this study,

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the one that's manipulated exactly, it's the one you're controlling.

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 1>The independent variable is the one you, the researcher, is controlling.

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So in this case, you're controlling the shape of the car.

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You have yourself a bird shaped car and you have

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:52.560
<v Speaker 1>yourself a box shaped car. So the shape of the

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>car changed because you made it change. Now when you

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 1>blast a bunch of air over it during your experiment,

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 1>what your measure ring is the dependent variable. So you're

0:44:02.600 --> 0:44:06.959
<v Speaker 1>measuring what happens based on the change that you made.

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right, and you want to you you want to

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>study one single variable at a time, basically, Yeah, don't

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:16.400
<v Speaker 1>get fancy, just just do good science, step by step, methodical.

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:20.359
<v Speaker 1>You also have to have your control group in any experiment. Uh,

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And an experimental group and then controlled group is what's

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna allow you to compare the test results to that

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.880
<v Speaker 1>baseline measurement. Yeah, and you need that baseline measurement, so

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not just like chance. Basically exactly like if Pasture

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:38.760
<v Speaker 1>had just done the S shaped neck and nothing happen.

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:42.799
<v Speaker 1>He wouldn't have necessarily been able to say that he

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was right even though he was right. He needed that control,

0:44:46.400 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>which was the open flask. Right. Or with the cars,

0:44:49.480 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>you need two cars, like you said, one bird shaped

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and one box shaped, right, Or then maybe in this case,

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>since the bird shape and the box shape both show

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:59.879
<v Speaker 1>up in the hypothesis, you need a third like egg

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 1>shaped one or something like that. I bet that would

0:45:02.640 --> 0:45:07.359
<v Speaker 1>be pretty streamline. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But the key though,

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>is all of those variables have to be um. All

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the other variables have to be the same, like you

0:45:12.520 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>have to have them. They have to be the same weight,

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:18.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to be painted the same, the tires, everything,

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the windows. One can't have an antenna on the other not,

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 1>They've all they've got to be identical other than the

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>one variable, right, the independent variable that you're that's the

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>one you want different. Everything else you want the same

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>or else it's possible that, oh, well this one had

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bigger tires, so that actually made it more aerodynamic. Yeah,

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and you're just doing yourself a favor by doing all

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. You know, you want to rule out everything

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>else but that one variable. After that, you want to

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:50.120
<v Speaker 1>analyze your data, so you can draw your conclusion, and

0:45:50.200 --> 0:45:54.360
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's kind of straightforward and easy. Sometimes takes a

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of work and a lot of various tools draw

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>all that out. Let's say you're just asking a car

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and a wind tunnel. You're measuring the wind resistance using

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:08.280
<v Speaker 1>certain awesome instruments and that kind of stuff, and you're

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 1>taking that data, and then afterward you're going to analyze.

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You're going to compare the data that you gathered from

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the bird shaped car the box shaped car, and then

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the control the egg shaped car. You're gonna compare them,

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna say, well, the wind resistance was less

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>for the bird shaped car then the box shaped car,

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:31.880
<v Speaker 1>which means that my hypothesis was correct. And here all

0:46:31.880 --> 0:46:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the data points. Whereas Louis paste or could just say,

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>look at the Beaker's exactly, don't be an idiot, I'm

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:43.839
<v Speaker 1>a scientist. That one's got gross stuff. You can see it, right.

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:47.719
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing about science to chuck ideally is

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:51.280
<v Speaker 1>let's say that egg shaped one turned out the control

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:54.839
<v Speaker 1>group turned out to have better wind resistance than anything. Well,

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:57.920
<v Speaker 1>just by virtue of carrying out this experiment correctly, you

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>would have stumbled upon and even better aerodynamic design, and

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you would have come up with that little egg shaped

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes suv that was so huge, like ten years ago,

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Mercedes egg coming to a store near you. So, um,

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a big, big part of the scientific method is

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:24.200
<v Speaker 1>carrying out a a an experiment, controlling the variables, analyzing

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the data. And then there's a step that he missed

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that is very rarely part of a scientific method list

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that is to share your data. And this is a

0:47:35.480 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 1>huge problem with science right now. Yeah, the article you said,

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it was really eye opening. Uh, scientific research has changed

0:47:41.640 --> 0:47:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the world. Now it needs to change itself. It's an

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>economist article. It's up on the internet. Yeah, it was

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary that it's I mean, here's some of

0:47:50.840 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the data he points out is one rule of thumb

0:47:53.640 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>among biotech venture capitalists is about half of published research

0:47:59.440 --> 0:48:02.839
<v Speaker 1>can't even be replicated. And on the biotech firm am

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Jin found that they could reproduce only six of their

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty three landmark studies in cancer research, So you can't

0:48:09.880 --> 0:48:14.240
<v Speaker 1>repeat these things. It's like everyone's fighting for dollars in fame,

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not fame, but to some our career advancements

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>such that they're kind of not doing that final step

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:25.239
<v Speaker 1>any longer. No, and it's not necessarily just them, it's

0:48:25.360 --> 0:48:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the other scientists aren't going back and saying, well, let

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:32.600
<v Speaker 1>me see if your results are reproducible. People are just

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.960
<v Speaker 1>taking it on faith. We need another Roger Bacon to

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 1>come along and be like, dude, we can't just blindly

0:48:38.480 --> 0:48:41.839
<v Speaker 1>accept that one person carried out this one study and

0:48:41.880 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>then just go do clinical trials on it without anybody

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:49.919
<v Speaker 1>reproducing it to see if the results can be verified independently. Yeah.

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Because uh, and this is a good time to mention bias.

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:56.480
<v Speaker 1>There is such a thing as bias, and it still happens. Um.

0:48:56.640 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>A scientist is usually to prove something or disprove something

0:49:03.000 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>that they want a specific result. Like, even if you're

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:10.919
<v Speaker 1>super open minded, you're probably hoping to disprove or prove

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:14.880
<v Speaker 1>something one way or the other, and your confirmation bias

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>might you know, even if you don't think you're doing it,

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you might nudge out some results that don't support your

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis and so you won't make it into that awesome journal. Um,

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:30.240
<v Speaker 1>which this author points out that journals need to start

0:49:31.080 --> 0:49:36.839
<v Speaker 1>uh putting in what he calls uninteresting results and experiments, right,

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>or like the stuff that's not sexy, right, or studies

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that failed to show that their hypothesis was correct. Yeah,

0:49:43.960 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff is disproved. Those things still need to well not

0:49:47.080 --> 0:49:49.719
<v Speaker 1>even disproved. Well, yeah, I guess it is disproved. But yes,

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like the guy set out to say, like the red

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:57.680
<v Speaker 1>balloon uses less helium than a silver balloon, and it

0:49:57.719 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>turns out that no, they use the same amount if

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:03.239
<v Speaker 1>he lium. Well, if that study gets published and put

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>out there into the scientific literature on helium and balloons,

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:09.719
<v Speaker 1>then it's going to prevent some other scientists down the

0:50:09.800 --> 0:50:13.440
<v Speaker 1>road from wasting time, money, and helium, which, as you remember,

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>is an increasingly needed commodity. Um By carrying out the

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>same experiment, whether whether the results are positive or negative

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.920
<v Speaker 1>or what, the study is meant to be shared. And

0:50:25.960 --> 0:50:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that's the point of the scientific method, is to to

0:50:28.280 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>reduce bias. And if you follow it all the way

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:33.600
<v Speaker 1>through ideally and do all of the steps, including share

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:39.120
<v Speaker 1>your research, whether it's happy or sad, then science benefits.

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>The world benefits, and by not doing that, the world

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.400
<v Speaker 1>does not benefit. Yeah. He points out that these days

0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:50.880
<v Speaker 1>only four of published papers are quote unquote negative results

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and it used to be like or more um And

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:56.799
<v Speaker 1>he says, because it's a lot of it has to

0:50:56.840 --> 0:51:01.600
<v Speaker 1>do with this sort of you know, getting in these

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 1>journals and you're the rock star scientists and this study

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is super sexy. Like if they kind of quit going

0:51:06.719 --> 0:51:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that route and made it what it should be, then

0:51:09.680 --> 0:51:13.680
<v Speaker 1>research dollars would be better spent and people could you know,

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he said, the peer reviewed thing isn't even all it's

0:51:16.040 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 1>cracked up to be. Know that. He mentioned a study

0:51:18.760 --> 0:51:21.480
<v Speaker 1>from a medical journal that gave a bunch of peer

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>reviewers some stuff with deliberate errors inserted into the research,

0:51:26.880 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>into the studies, and even when they were told that

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they were being tested to find this, they still missed

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it. Yeah. So yeah, the science used

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to kind of re evaluate the way it's carrying out science.

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not science. The problem isn't science itself. The problem

0:51:42.440 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't the scientific method. It's the way that it's being

0:51:44.719 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>used or not followed through. And a lot of it

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 1>has to do with academia and the people funding science. Yeah,

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and he said, you know, these days there's up seven

0:51:52.000 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 1>million researchers, and back in the day, even in like

0:51:55.480 --> 0:51:58.799
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen fifties there or like a few thousand maybe, right,

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>So there's just a lot of career competition. He calls

0:52:01.760 --> 0:52:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it careerism. And so you fake a result or two,

0:52:05.640 --> 0:52:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or you just nudge out some results that don't support

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis. You want the bigger paycheck or the fame

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:16.800
<v Speaker 1>or notoriety, and all of a sudden, science is not science. Yeah,

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's pseudoscience exactly. And speaking of pseudoscience, I

0:52:23.120 --> 0:52:25.520
<v Speaker 1>think we've reached the point where, um, we should talk

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:28.640
<v Speaker 1>about the limitations of the scientific method, because it does

0:52:28.719 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>have its limits, right, like the way that the scientific

0:52:32.200 --> 0:52:34.879
<v Speaker 1>method is set up, especially if you go through um,

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:39.360
<v Speaker 1>if you include falsification, which most scientists now say is

0:52:39.400 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a thing like falsifiability of your hypothesis means that you

0:52:43.440 --> 0:52:47.239
<v Speaker 1>have a real scientific hypothesis there if it can be

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:51.080
<v Speaker 1>disproven by some observation or some measurement or whatever, then

0:52:51.120 --> 0:52:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's falsifiable. And if it's not falsifiable, then it's not

0:52:55.000 --> 0:52:59.680
<v Speaker 1>really science. So the thing is force something to be falsifiable,

0:52:59.680 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and it is actually a philosopher that came up with

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the concept of falsification, a guy named Carl Popper in

0:53:04.520 --> 0:53:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen thirties, and he was the one that said, like,

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you're you have to be able to falsify something for

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it to be disproven or supported, and if not, then

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it's pseudoscience. Well, part and parcel of that is that

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:22.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying has to be able to be detected empirically.

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:25.279
<v Speaker 1>There's some way that it has to the presence of

0:53:25.280 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it has to be measured or inferred. And so a

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:32.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, well, then with the scientific method

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:36.279
<v Speaker 1>it reaches it's the limits of its current usefulness when

0:53:36.320 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>it tries to explain the supernatural. When somebody says, like,

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:44.360
<v Speaker 1>ghosts are real, exactly, you can't prove that, well, you

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 1>also can't disprove it either, right, And so if you

0:53:48.880 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 1>are a scientist who says, uh, because the scientific method

0:53:53.760 --> 0:53:57.840
<v Speaker 1>can't prove or disprove the existence of ghosts or God,

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there is no such thing as ghosts or God, you're

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:04.880
<v Speaker 1>making a leap of faith just as much as the

0:54:04.880 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 1>same person who says science can't prove or disprove the

0:54:08.120 --> 0:54:11.439
<v Speaker 1>existence of ghosts or God, therefore God's and ghosts are real.

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:15.240
<v Speaker 1>They're both leaps of faith. And that really the most

0:54:15.280 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific approach to the existence of the supernatural, whether it

0:54:19.200 --> 0:54:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is ghost or god, is that we simply don't know,

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and that we cannot know scientifically. And but that doesn't

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that it does exist or doesn't exist. And that's

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:32.720
<v Speaker 1>saying that science shows that it does or doesn't exist,

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is by by definition, the opposite of what science shows.

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Science shows neither. It's not capable of showing or showing

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 1>that something doesn't exist. That's a good point. Uh. The

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:48.279
<v Speaker 1>other place where science can get corrupted is when it

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:52.279
<v Speaker 1>blurs the lines, or when people blur the lines between uh,

0:54:52.480 --> 0:54:57.800
<v Speaker 1>moral judgments and science value judgments. Like you can study

0:54:57.840 --> 0:55:00.319
<v Speaker 1>global warming, you can study cause and effect, you can

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:05.040
<v Speaker 1>report data, but when you make that secondly to say,

0:55:05.320 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 1>and this is a scientist, I mean someone can come

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:09.840
<v Speaker 1>along and say global warming is bad, shouldn't drive your suv.

0:55:10.239 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 1>That's fine, But a scientist can't do a study and

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:18.319
<v Speaker 1>say that because that's, uh, that's a value judgment. And

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:22.319
<v Speaker 1>that's where science can get corrupted pretty much. Right. You

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>can you can study glow warming and results until the

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 1>cows come home, but you can't assert that if you

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.839
<v Speaker 1>use this lightbulb, you're a bad person, right or um

0:55:31.920 --> 0:55:36.120
<v Speaker 1>ocean acidification is bad. It's not good for humans. But

0:55:36.160 --> 0:55:39.479
<v Speaker 1>if you're a jelly fits, it's awesome, you know. So yes,

0:55:39.760 --> 0:55:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and again you made a great point. It's not science,

0:55:42.880 --> 0:55:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's people using science to make value judgments. Yeah. So, ultimately,

0:55:48.640 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method, although it does have its limitations and

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that it needs empirical data, uh to prove or disprove something,

0:55:57.680 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not that it's not flawed. That's not a flaw.

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a limitation, and it's it's when it's misused then

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>its results become flawed or skewed. And that's the people

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:13.799
<v Speaker 1>doing it, man, not science. That's right. It's pretty interesting stuff. Yeah, man,

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a good one. I thought so too. Man.

0:56:16.320 --> 0:56:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Let it's start out with a bang boom. It's all

0:56:18.840 --> 0:56:21.759
<v Speaker 1>downhill from here. Uh. If you want to know more

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 1>about the scientific method, check out that article on the economists,

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:29.040
<v Speaker 1>check out explorables uh, and then of course check out

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the scientific method in the search bar at how stuff

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. And since I said that it's time

0:56:34.160 --> 0:56:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for listener mail, that's right. But quickly before listener mail, uh,

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:44.399
<v Speaker 1>we get asked by listeners all the time, what can

0:56:44.440 --> 0:56:46.879
<v Speaker 1>we do? Since you have a free podcast, we can't

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:49.560
<v Speaker 1>pay for it. What can we do to help you, guys?

0:56:49.600 --> 0:56:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And one thing you can do that we would appreciate is, uh,

0:56:53.840 --> 0:56:56.360
<v Speaker 1>go to iTunes and leave a rating and a review

0:56:56.480 --> 0:57:00.319
<v Speaker 1>for us. That makes big, big difference and pen us

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>up there in the rankings, which means more people find

0:57:03.000 --> 0:57:06.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. After they listen to Cereal, they'll

0:57:06.280 --> 0:57:08.560
<v Speaker 1>just say, well, jeez, there's other podcasts in the world,

0:57:09.120 --> 0:57:13.399
<v Speaker 1>what is this pod cast? So ratings and reviews really

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:15.440
<v Speaker 1>help us out and it doesn't cost you anything but

0:57:15.480 --> 0:57:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes. Um, be honest, We're not saying go

0:57:18.080 --> 0:57:20.520
<v Speaker 1>leave us some great review, but go leave us a

0:57:20.600 --> 0:57:25.000
<v Speaker 1>great review. You said it, Uh, and tell tell one

0:57:25.000 --> 0:57:27.080
<v Speaker 1>person about stuff you should know. We would appreciate that

0:57:27.120 --> 0:57:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to turn somebody onto the show. And um, that's it.

0:57:30.960 --> 0:57:34.280
<v Speaker 1>That's our version of a pledge drive because they wow,

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:36.960
<v Speaker 1>we do that what once every three years? No? Not

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>not very obnoxious and at last all right, So onto

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:43.040
<v Speaker 1>listener mail. This is from my sister in law. Actually,

0:57:43.680 --> 0:57:47.480
<v Speaker 1>oh yeah, this is some nepotism. Yeah, Jenny Jenny Bryant,

0:57:47.560 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 1>she mentioned in the homeschool episode homeschooled her kids for

0:57:52.240 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a little while, and she sort of corrected me Uh

0:57:55.600 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 1>love the homeschooling episode. Guys. One very big trend these

0:57:58.160 --> 0:58:02.760
<v Speaker 1>days in the home schooling community is what Abbey my

0:58:02.840 --> 0:58:06.760
<v Speaker 1>niece does, which is hybrid homeschooling. So two to three

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>days a week she is at school and then the

0:58:09.720 --> 0:58:13.840
<v Speaker 1>rest of the time she's a plant. She's not a plant. Uh,

0:58:14.000 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the rest of time she's at home. So she says

0:58:15.720 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a great option with curriculum provided and new topics

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:22.040
<v Speaker 1>sought at school and then worked out at home. Many

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of these schools are accredited making getting into college, including

0:58:26.000 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Ivy League schools, Hassle Free and Abbey School has sports teams,

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 1>homecoming Abbey is actually an excellent volleyball player, Beta club,

0:58:34.640 --> 0:58:38.240
<v Speaker 1>newspaper staff, all the good stuff. The flexibility is great

0:58:38.240 --> 0:58:40.560
<v Speaker 1>for families, and we are huge fans of how the

0:58:40.640 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 1>hybrid approach prepare students for college by allowing them time

0:58:44.000 --> 0:58:46.600
<v Speaker 1>outside of class to manage their work and life schedules.

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's from Jenny actually via text first listener mail

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:55.640
<v Speaker 1>via text How did you print that out? Did you

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:59.280
<v Speaker 1>retype it and print it? Oh? Dude, are you serious?

0:58:59.800 --> 0:59:03.360
<v Speaker 1>You can part from texts? No, you just copy pasted

0:59:03.440 --> 0:59:06.320
<v Speaker 1>to an email? Oh yeah, yeah, I forgot about that. Men, then,

0:59:06.480 --> 0:59:09.280
<v Speaker 1>how in the world did you did you do that

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with your thoughts? I have a niece who is excellent

0:59:13.200 --> 0:59:16.680
<v Speaker 1>at volleyball too. Hold, we should get them together. I

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. It's ten eleven, okay or something like that.

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Abby just turned thirteen, so there. Oh, maybe they face

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>off against one another. Yeah, is she in Atlanta? Yes,

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:28.680
<v Speaker 1>she's up in Canton. You never know where's aving. She's

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in Roswell. But they think with volleyball they kind of

0:59:31.240 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>have played all over the state. Bizarre if they play

0:59:34.080 --> 0:59:35.880
<v Speaker 1>each other. Yeah, we'll just see each other at a

0:59:35.880 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 1>match one day on opposite sides of the court with

0:59:38.440 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 1>our arms folded. Yeah. Uh, what else? I got nothing else? Well,

0:59:43.640 --> 0:59:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like Chuck said, go leave us a review. And if

0:59:46.920 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to get in touch with us, you can

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>tweet to us at s y s K podcast. You

0:59:51.160 --> 0:59:53.840
<v Speaker 1>can join us on Facebook, dot com, slash Stuff you

0:59:53.840 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Should Know. You can email us and we still do that. Yeah,

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't text me at uh stuff podcasts at how

1:00:02.280 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com and has always joined us at

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:09.720
<v Speaker 1>our home on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot Com.

1:00:09.800 --> 1:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know is a production of I Heeart

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Radios how stuff works. For more podcasts for my heart Radio,

1:00:14.600 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.